Slashdot Mirror


Pot Grower's Privacy Challenged

damaged_sectors writes "A map marking what are supposed to be secret locations of 60 warehouses and other buildings where medical marijuana is grown in Boulder has accidentally been made public by the city. Officials say an 'oversight' led them to publish the map on the city's Web site. Kathy Haddock, Boulder's senior assistant city attorney who advises the council on medical marijuana issues, said Thursday that the map would be removed from the city's Web site. No conspiracy here folks. In other news the council will decide at its Jan. 18 meeting whether Boulder should circumvent the open records act exemption for cultivation centers by requiring applicants for medical marijuana business licenses to waive their right to privacy. The council could force all growing centers to sign such a waiver as a condition of receiving a city-issued business license. While the risk this would make it easier for Federal authorities to raid grow-ops might not concern council members and others opposed to medical marijuana — I have to wonder what sort of mentality thinks exposing growers to the very real risk of armed robbery by criminals is justifiable."

28 of 477 comments (clear)

  1. Let's put it up on Wikileaks by lseltzer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Governments should't be keeping secrets

    1. Re:Let's put it up on Wikileaks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nor should their citizens need a license to grow a plant.

    2. Re:Let's put it up on Wikileaks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      srsly, mods - a 0? a plant is a plant.

      the government should be protecting citizens rights, not eliminating them.

      regardless of the speculation about negative longterm effects (which are not founded in scientific research), the plant can grow almost fucking anywhere. someone can toss a seed in your yard and it will grow. would you want to be arrested for that?

    3. Re:Let's put it up on Wikileaks by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nor should their citizens need a license to grow a plant.

      They absolutely should if it's prescription medicine.

      I think you need a prescription for some high-grade woooosh!

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    4. Re:Let's put it up on Wikileaks by uncqual · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Absolutely. However, don't ask a public or private ER to treat you at their or taxpayer's expense when you snort crystal drain cleaner. Don't expect food stamps or welfare from taxpayers when you make stupid choices that make you un/underemployed. Don't expect even medicare to take care of ailments that are likely traceable to such stupid decisions.

      I agree completely with you, but there are two sides to the coin. On one there is personal freedom, on the other is personal responsibility and accountability. Pick both or neither.

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    5. Re:Let's put it up on Wikileaks by mweather · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Absolutely. However, don't ask a public or private ER to treat you at their or taxpayer's expense when you snort crystal drain cleaner.

      So long as they also refuse to treat the obese, or those engaging in contact sports and other dangerous lifestyle choices.

    6. Re:Let's put it up on Wikileaks by 2.7182 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly. Just as to be an organ recipient, you should be listed as an organ donor.

    7. Re:Let's put it up on Wikileaks by fishexe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nor should their citizens need a license to grow a plant.

      They absolutely should if it's prescription medicine.

      Growing a plant that can be used to produce prescription medicine doesn't require a license.

      If pot were legalized then I would agree with you, but medicinal marijuana != legalized marijuana.

      It's not, but it's technically not a prescription drug either. It's still against federal law and federal law provides for prosecution of medicinal marijuana as well as recreational marijuana. Given that, your argument basically boils down to "It absolutely should be illegal because it is illegal. If it were legal I would agree with you that it should be legal."

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    8. Re:Let's put it up on Wikileaks by VortexCortex · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Absolutely. However, don't ask a public or private ER to treat you at their or taxpayer's expense when you snort crystal drain cleaner. Don't expect food stamps or welfare from taxpayers when you make stupid choices that make you un/underemployed. Don't expect even medicare to take care of ailments that are likely traceable to such stupid decisions.

      OK, wait... four words: Lung Cancer and Alcoholics.

      In addition: Don't try learning to ice skate! Everyone falls a few times while doing so -- It's stupid to think you'll be the only one not to fall down! Insurance & Medicare should be denied to people who are stupid enough to strap blades to their feet and travel unnaturally fast on slippery surfaces. (IMHO, Hockey is safer than Figure Skating -- The latter should wear protective gear.)

      I agree completely with you, but there are two sides to the coin.

      Likewise!

      On one there is personal freedom, on the other is personal responsibility and accountability. Pick both or neither.

      This is a false dichotomy! One can be both personally responsible, and a fool. One can be both free and restricted by laws.

      Not all drugs are created equal. I would place marijuana somewhere between Tobacco and Alcohol -- Both of which are already legal.

      Let us not forget that prohibition allowed the mobsters to use illegal alcohol profits to fuel their wars. Remember this when you consider the drug cartel wars that Mexico is experiencing.

      The answer is simple -- Tax it and regulate recreational drugs, prohibition only funds the terrorists while draining our resources via a futile fight to preserve the ban.

    9. Re:Let's put it up on Wikileaks by Jerry · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The answer is simple -- Tax it and regulate...
      Exactly!

      Thousands are being murdered annually because of the demand for Marijuana in the US. In one fell swoop we could clean out our prisons of people who shouldn't have been sent there, shut down the Mexican and American drug lords, and find a new source of taxes. We could also renew research on medical uses of Marijuana, especially Rick Simpson's discovery that it may be a cure for Cancer (see YouTube). Medical Marijuana is not a myth. The US Gov patented almost two dozen medical uses for it. See patent # 6630507.

      --

      Running with Linux for over 20 years!

    10. Re:Let's put it up on Wikileaks by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Given that, your argument basically boils down to "It absolutely should be illegal because it is illegal. If it were legal I would agree with you that it should be legal."

      I've come to understand that for a, surprisingly large, portion of the population, that is exactly the way they think. It's like they have no concept that it is the duty of the citizenry to judge the law.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    11. Re:Let's put it up on Wikileaks by Yvanhoe · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, depending on the metrics used, alcohol may be considered like the most harmful drug on the streets or just below heroin and cocain. Cannabis is lower than tobacco and LSD even lower than that.

      http://www.mapinc.org/lib/LancetFigure1.gif

      http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/2010/nov/02/alcohol_more_harmful_heroin_or_c

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    12. Re:Let's put it up on Wikileaks by shiftless · · Score: 4, Insightful

      All bullshit. For every one of those studies I can show you why it's flawed or why it can't be trusted because it is a GOVERNMENT FUNDED STUDY. The government doesn't fund ANYONE to study pot unless they intend to show it causes harmful effects.

      Physical dependence is bullshit. Nobody (except quite possibly a TINY PERCENTAGE of users) develops physical dependence to marijuana.

      In regards to psychosis, a study in a British journal recently found that is a flawed assertion.

      In regards to emphysema, Dr. Donald Tashkin of UCLA studied marijuana and tobacco smokers for over 20 years, and found that smoking marijuana slightly REDUCED chances of developing lung cancer or emphysema.

      Got any more pearls of wisdom you'd like to share with us ignorant pot smokers?

  2. Re:OK, so I don't know the whole story... by Fluffeh · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh you.... Bringing all that common sense and logic to slashdot. Have you yourself been smoking some of this medicine perhaps?

    *sips coffee*

    --
    Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
  3. Re:OK, so I don't know the whole story... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm fairly sure that banks choose to advertise their places of business, rather than having them helpfully outed by the local government...

    Further, while retail establishments, banking and otherwise, are made as public as possible for obvious reasons, it is quite common for actors in a wide variety of legitimate industries to be somewhat cagey about the locations and precise purposes of their various "back office" facilities. Keeps security costs lower, provides less information to competitors, and so forth. Most of this stuff isn't truly "secret"(in the sense that it is nothing a PI or decent reporter couldn't dig up with a bit of work); but there are tens, probably hundreds, of thousands of industrial parks and office complexes around the country, often gated and typically deliberately understated, quietly doing assorted stuff, under the (small) placards of various corporations that may or may not be under some other umbrella entirely. In addition to static facilities, things like shipments of cash, high-value consumer or industrial goods, hazardous chemicals, and pharmaceuticals are quite commonly done quietly. Again, not secret; but the local government sure doesn't "accidentally" reveal the time and route that the next shipment of medical opiates is going to be taking into the local oncology hospice...

    Obviously, this isn't the end of the world; but conflating retail and backend operations is pretty misleading.

  4. Re:"Medical marijuana" is such a scam by countertrolling · · Score: 5, Insightful

    An even bigger scam is the pretext they use to prop up prohibition.

    Count deMonet

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
  5. Let's be clear - this is a business license by vinn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let's be clear - this is a business license. The city is well within their right to place requirements on a business as part of a business license application. Now, the term used here was waive their "right to privacy", but this is almost certainly not what the city ordinance will say. The ordinance will likely say that inspections can be done to ensure compliance with state law as well as for public safety reasons to make sure that there isn't a fire danger.

    I'm not sure what the intentions of Boulder are, but we just got done crafting our own city ordinances for our small town in Montana. I think we did a fantastic job and one of the key objectives of writing it was to set up the guidelines under which the business license could be issued. The other major concern was zoning. At no time did any of us think, "Oh, we gotta collect all this information so we can do a raid." We collected it because a) it's the same information we collect for other businesses and b) there are some special concerns related to public safety and it would be completely irresponsible to to ignore those. For example, we require a security system and an inspection to make sure one was installed.

    --
    ----- obSig
  6. Re:OK, so I don't know the whole story... by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 5, Informative

    They - OH MY GOD - list their addresses publically!

    ...not the addresses of their currency distribution facilities or data centres they don't. I live near the processing centre of a large bank. The place doesn't have a sign, front door, receptionist, anything - Just armoured cars coming and going.

  7. Disabled man gets a visit to an Amsterdam prostitu by Cwix · · Score: 5, Informative

    The danish can:
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/denmark/1499735/Taxpayers-foot-bill-for-disabled-Danes-visits-to-prostitutes.html

    In a move that has provoked angry protests but has delighted the country's legalised sex industry, the Danish government has launched an information campaign advising the disabled how best to go about obtaining erotic services.

    ...

    In Aarhus, the second-largest city, disabled residents have been told that they may visit a brothel or call a male or female prostitute to their home once a month and pass the bill - which can be up to £300 - on to the state.

    --
    You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
  8. Re:"Medical marijuana" is such a scam by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 5, Informative

    How is the parent post flamebait? It's true. The only reason we have prohibition is because it helps certain people (like DEA and their goons) remain in power and profit. Under our current laws, dangerous radicals like George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and John Adams would be thrown in a federal prison. The whole medical marijuana thing might have whatever problems, but much worse than anything associated with it is the fact that lives are being ruined because a someone scumbag likes sucking up taxpayers dollars to screw over honest law abiding citizens.

  9. Re:OK, so I don't know the whole story... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Informative

    How do you feel about The Drug Companies? Should *they* be able to hide the locations of their pharmaceutical plants from the public?

    Look, if these folks want to be in the *BUSINESS* of manufacturing marijuana, they need to take the same types of precautions as the plan that makes Oxycodone.

    And, according to one guy quoted in the story (yes, I RTFA, did you?), that's exactly his attitude: He doesn't care because he's got security.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  10. Re:OK, so I don't know the whole story... by stonewallred · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I do work for a business in my town. It has a emergency generator, a secondary generator for HVAC/R and lights, and a tertiary generator for the -30F freezer. The stuff in the walk-in cooler (36F), the walk-in freezer (0F) and the other walk-in freezer(-30) (reachable only by going through the cooler and 0F freezer) are all small boxes and insulated containers marked with bio-hazard symbols. They keep a rotating temp chart that if it varies by more than 3F in an hour period, they call me for immediate service and inspection. And when I asked them what was in the boxes, they said "stuff". When I asked abut the temp requirements, they said the "stuff" gets unstable above 40F. The company name is very generic. The staff, about 30 or so, don't wear name tags. There checks are drawn on a local bank. And when I google them, there is no information other than their phone number and address. That's the "I don't know the whole frickin story" I am interested in. Oh, and they have never questioned any of my bills, or prices. I show up, verify the equipment is functioning within parameters (Amp draw, operating pressures, etc) and give them a bill. They write me a check then and there, no matter if it is 2pm on a Monday, or 3am on Christmas Eve (yeah, called me three years ago because the temp varied by 4 degrees F at approximately 11pm.)

  11. what, are you high? by alienzed · · Score: 5, Informative

    Classic propaganda from someone who obviously has no direct contact with anyone who actually consumes the stuff. The people I know who do consume it are more caring and intelligent than those I see constantly opposing it's existence. but.... haters gonna hate.

    --
    Never say never. Ah!! I did it again!
  12. Decriminalize it by crumbz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And this becomes a non-issue. After all liquor stores publicize their locations. After all liquor is a more addictive, more harmful drug by orders of magnitude yet it is regulated and legal.

  13. Re:"Medical marijuana" is such a scam by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Eh, at least it keeps you from any job more technically challenging than filling a fry bag...or emptying a Doritos bag.

    My father, who has smoked pot for 50+ years, is a retired math professor.

    Now me? I work for the Feds, mostly sitting on my ass doing nothing. I don't use marijuana.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  14. Re:"Medical marijuana" is such a scam by fishexe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Medical marijuana" is just a scam. 60 "grow facilities" in Boulder, Colorado? Four times as many "dispensaries" in San Jose as 7-11s?.

    Maybe four times as many people need pot as need slurpees. It's an effective treatment for a vast array of common conditions such as chronic anxiety, ADHD, nausea, or just everyday aches and pains. It's not just for the terminally ill. While most states with medical marijuana laws restrict it to only the most severe cases, California allows it for any condition a doctor feels justified in prescribing it for.

    If it's to be treated as a medical treatment, it should be moved to Schedule II or III, prescribed by doctors, and distributed through pharmacies.

    You're right, it should. The only thing standing in the way is the federal government.

    --
    "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
  15. Re:"Medical marijuana" is such a scam by BarefootClown · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now me? I work for the Feds, mostly sitting on my ass doing nothing.

    Ladies and gentlemen, your tax dollars at work.

    --

    "Make it ten--I am only a poor corrupt official."
    --Captain Louis Renault (Claude Rains), Casablanca

  16. Re:"Medical marijuana" is such a scam by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now me? I work for the Feds, mostly sitting on my ass doing nothing.

    Ladies and gentlemen, your tax dollars at work.

    Ah, but the parts of the day I actually *am* doing something are very productive. And, as a former Fire Fighter, I can tell you that *most* of my day usually did not involve anything more strenuous than wiping down the truck.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.