Slashdot Mirror
Twitter Fights US Court For WikiLeaks Details
An anonymous reader writes "Micro-blogging site Twitter is opposing an order from a US court to reveal the account details of supporters of WikiLeaks. Twitter has called on Facebook and Google to reveal whether they also received similar court orders. As part of the US government's investigation into WikiLeaks, a court ordered Twitter, in mid-December, to give details of accounts owned by supporters of the whistle-blower site. Twitter has protested against the subpoena and informed the individuals whose account information has been requested, while raising the possibility that other social networking players have received similar orders."
Well, if you're a teabagging Palinista, unless you're pounding down Assange's door with a torch and pitchfork ready to behead him, you're a "supporter".
The only country at war over the cables will be the USA — and it will not over the leaked cables, but over how they have dealt with the whole matter. The US government are starting to embarrass themselves in front of an international crowd.
TFA says nothing about how Twitter is supposedly "opposing" the court order, other than "protesting" and asking for permission from the court to notify the affected parties.
I see nothing in there to indicate that Twitter is forming any kind of legal opposition to the order. I, for one, would be happy to see that they had. Government overreach should be resisted every time.
Yes, I believe this is "overreach", considering that nobody in the list except Bradley Manning has been accused of any crimes, and Manning himself hasn't even been charged.
That makes absolutely no fucking sense, whatsoever.
Reread what AC said, I think you hit it too quickly.
Well, if you're a teabagging Palinista, unless you're pounding down Assange's door with a torch and pitchfork ready to behead him, you're a "supporter".
AC was saying that "if you are Palin", inherently saying that if you are of the "palinite" mindset, an individual would be by default a WL supporter if said individuals are not donning torch and pitchfork (which is actually in alignment with your link you posted as a counter point), per the "palinite" mindset of "If you are not 100% choking the red-white-and-blue dick, then you are a terrorist."
'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
I know we are all quick to jump to the conclusion that 'oh noez teh gubment wants internet ppls infos'
Well, they do, but I see what you're trying to say. However, you also just said, emphasis mine,
They aren't immediately just going after random Joe for saying "I like what those guys do".
Aren't immediately going after them? So you do know, then. The effect is to make the public at large believe that their info may be one day be subpoena'd for posting pro-Wikileaks(or any other kind of "subversive" speech) words online. There's nothing the feds can find on Twitter that they don't already know about those key players.
Also, for the first time in my life, I think I'm kinda respecting Twitter.
Yeah, that's great. It's just the 'bad people' that they're after: including an Icelandic MP. Considering this whole 'grand jury' process is going on in secret, why should we be confident that there's a due process behind deciding whose IP addresses are being fished out of Twitter?
I mean, call me an ass when I'm proved wrong, but the whole point of Wikileaks is that you have a drop-box to leak documents, but it's clean hands from the other side. They don't 'conspire,' they just receive the stuff and publish it. It's pretty open what they do and how. They're just desperate to pin a crime to pin a crime on Julian and his buddies, because that Espionage Act law is looking like weak beer.
'This writing business. Pencils and what-not. Over-rated if you ask me. Silly stuff. Nothing in it' - Eeyore
Man what is happening over there in the US? Didn't you guys start off as the good guys? When did it all start to go so horribly wrong?
I'm a wanker.... and loving it!
It when down hill after President Eisenhower left office.
The slide down hill hit the after burners when Ronald Regan got into office.
We went ballistic with W.
What makes you a "supporter" ?
Only a dirty Commie would ask a question like that. Who are your friends?
- Joe McCarthy
No, it IS the war. It just isn't about militaries fighting it out on a battlefield; it is about governments and free citizens fighting over the rights of man.
I have new found respect for Twitter.
^^vv<><>BA
How else are you supposed to silence dissenting voices, if you can't identify them?
So, they certainly must be going after the NYT and the WSJ, eh?
The US government are starting to embarrass themselves in front of an international crowd.
Starting?
The US government has been disgracing itself for decades.
-jcr
The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
Yes, that's how they set things up, but the thing that's being investigated here is that this was such a huge dump (250,000+ files) that some special accommodation needed to be given. And that this was worked out in advance. And that makes a big, difference. So, we'll see.
Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
That's a very interesting read of the subpoena. I would even suggest it was a sensationalist interpretation.
And you also believe that those 637,000 people will not be on some sort of gov't interest list? I know that speculation on my part is also "sensationalist", but really, do you think it wont happen? And do you think people should want to NOT be put on that list?
StarTrekPhase2 - The Five Year Mission Continues!
Hey cold_fjord,
Are you white? Born and raised in the USA? Is there no chance whatsoever that you're involved with this:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jan/09/giffords-shooting-political-violence-polarised
Jared Loughner, the suspect in Saturday's shooting spree in Arizona, was not working alone. True, the rampage apparently emerged from his confused, unstable and troubled mind.
Officials think he was not working alone - who knows, you could be that missing conspirator. Maybe just in case, you should be jailed and tortured until you admit to it. And even though they may find that he *was* working alone, better safe than sorry, right?
I mean, why not? It's not like you're being a citizen should afford you any special rights. It's for the safety of our children, after all.