Slashdot Mirror


FreeBSD Running On PS3

An anonymous reader writes "One week after Sony's PlayStation 3 private cryptography key was obtained, FreeBSD is up and running on the PS3. Nathan Whitehorn writes: 'Yesterday, I imported support for the Sony Playstation 3 into our 64-bit PowerPC port, expanding our game console support into the current generation. There are still a few rough edges due to missing hardware support, but the machine boots and runs FreeBSD stably. These rough edges should be smoothed out in time for the 9.0 release.'" Update: 01/10 15:04 GMT by KD : As several commenters have pointed out, the submission was misleading in that BSD runs in OtherOS, making no use of the cracked keys.

127 comments

  1. I only have one word to say about this by present_arms · · Score: 1, Insightful

    SWEET

    --
    http://chimpbox.us
    1. Re:I only have one word to say about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      BSD people are notoriously dishonest. Do not EVER accept an open drink from someone who claims to use BSD.

    2. Re:I only have one word to say about this by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Well quite, for one thing they claim their OS is alive, which Netcraft confirms, isn't true...

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    3. Re:I only have one word to say about this by present_arms · · Score: 0

      BSD people are notoriously dishonest. Do not EVER accept an open drink from someone who claims to use BSD.

      don't suppose you can cite a reference to this huh?

      --
      http://chimpbox.us
    4. Re:I only have one word to say about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, with the BSD crowd, you take the open drink and suffer the consequences. With the PS3 execs, you purchase the drink from them and then take it back when someone else in the room has had too much.

    5. Re:I only have one word to say about this by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well to be fair the Linux guy would want to "spice up" your drink with all these 'free" ingredients that were made for a dozen different drinks that didn't go together, so what you ended up with smelled suspiciously like RMS's feet and tasted just as bad. The Windows guy would just pour you some stale shit from a can while swearing it is completely fresh and flavorful, while the Apple guy would offer you an "iSmoothy" that cost three times what it was worth and when you told him you didn't like Pineapple he would say "Liar! Everyone LOVES Pineapple! You just aren't cultured enough to appreciate the experience!"

      So I guess the moral of the story is to pour your own drinks and OS guys typically have bad taste in booze.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  2. Firmware 3.21 by project-nova · · Score: 4, Informative

    From TFA:

    Supported hardware:
    - Sony Playstation 3 Fat, firmware version 3.21
    - Netbooting only
    - 480i/480p only

    !News

  3. They had me at "Free" by Fibe-Piper · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...wait, I have to buy a PS3?

    --
    I went to battle M.C. Escher, but drew a blank.
    1. Re:They had me at "Free" by the_humeister · · Score: 3, Funny

      You don't have to, but if you get caught taking one without paying for it, you might go to jail.

      Also, since the source code is open for all to see, you can just read the code and allocate all resources using pen and paper. It's much better than D&D, trust me.

  4. Misleading Article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does this have to do with the root-key? Nothing as far as I can see. It requires a FAT PS3 with OtherOS support.

  5. Re:Firmware 3.21 by nschubach · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure this has anything to do with the released key. It's netbooting... There's not really enough info in the post to suggest that it does (or does not) have anything to do with the recent hack.

    --
    Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  6. Running in OtherOS, not natively by ard · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is no relation to the cracked keys, as it runs in the OtherOS mode. I.e. instead of Linux, you can run FreeBSD in OtherOS.

    1. Re:Running in OtherOS, not natively by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no relation to the cracked keys, as it runs in the OtherOS mode. I.e. instead of Linux, you can run FreeBSD in OtherOS.

      Was that a poor attempt at being funny, or are you really not aware?

    2. Re:Running in OtherOS, not natively by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no relation to the cracked keys, as it runs in the OtherOS mode. I.e. instead of Linux, you can run FreeBSD in OtherOS.

      No, OtherOS was removed in firmware version 3.21, according to wikipedia:

      The original PlayStation 3 also included the ability to install other operating systems, such as Linux. This was not included in the newer slim models and was removed from all older PlayStation 3 consoles with the release of firmware update 3.21 in April 2010. The functionality is now only available to users of original consoles who choose not to update their system software beyond version 3.15.

    3. Re:Running in OtherOS, not natively by wvmarle · · Score: 0

      RTFA. It only runs on PS3 with firmware version 3.21. Your quote confirms why.

    4. Re:Running in OtherOS, not natively by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it runs on PS3 with firmware version less than 3.21 (see the symbol?). His quote confirms why.

    5. Re:Running in OtherOS, not natively by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      HTML zaps < symbol. Everyone is in violent agreement.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    6. Re:Running in OtherOS, not natively by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Yes you're right. I didn't proofread well, lost a < sign there. Probably I simply didn't proofread at all.
      All those < and > and & characters that are zapped... oh well thinking about it, it makes sense when typing in html.

  7. Re:Firmware 3.21 by smash · · Score: 2

    For now. Given the root key is compromised expect more varied hardware/firmware support in due course.

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  8. *NOT* related to the recent crypto break by fgrieu · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is *NOT* related to the recent crypto break, as demonstrated by the release note stating

    Supported hardware:Sony Playstation 3 Fat, firmware version 3.21

    Francois Grieu

    1. Re:*NOT* related to the recent crypto break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is *NOT* related to the recent crypto break, as demonstrated by the release note stating

      Supported hardware:Sony Playstation 3 Fat, firmware version 3.21

      According to wikipedia:

      The original PlayStation 3 also included the ability to install other operating systems, such as Linux. This was not included in the newer slim models and was removed from all older PlayStation 3 consoles with the release of firmware update 3.21 in April 2010. The functionality is now only available to users of original consoles who choose not to update their system software beyond version 3.15.

    2. Re:*NOT* related to the recent crypto break by index0 · · Score: 1

      Wasn't the OtherOS feature removed from all ps3 systems after 3.15 firmware versions?

    3. Re:*NOT* related to the recent crypto break by MichaelKristopeit400 · · Score: 0
      use < to add the < symbol.

      Supported hardware:Sony Playstation 3 Fat, firmware version < 3.21

      FTFY

      the otherOS feature was removed with firmware version 3.21, so that version is definitely NOT supported.

    4. Re:*NOT* related to the recent crypto break by butalearner · · Score: 1

      Wasn't the OtherOS feature removed from all ps3 systems after 3.15 firmware versions?

      This is a common belief (I've seen it many places besides your post) and I'm not sure why. Possibly because 3.20 and 3.21 were released shortly after 3.15, I guess? All I know is that I'm sitting on 3.20 and I can run OtherOS just fine.

  9. Re:Firmware 3.21 by present_arms · · Score: 2

    hey it's a start, he did say that some hardware is yet to be done, and what can I say, from little acorns, this is news, means we get our PS3's back for what we (OK, OK I) originally wanted one for. Today BSD, soon, Linux then who knows, this is excellent news for us robbed by Sony.

    --
    http://chimpbox.us
  10. Re:Firmware 3.21 by Moryath · · Score: 0

    Yeah.

    Now when there's a dual-boot with full hardware support so that, say, I can load it with XBMC and use it as a media center frontend... THAT will be something.

    The idea of retiring my current XBMC PC is intriguing to me. One less thing hooked to the TV.

    Yes, I know I could do similar with a number of upnp media servers - but those are lousy with fast-forwarding and 30-second jump, only work with certain encoding types (in particularly they barf on FLV's), and anything where I need to turn on subtitles/captioning or want to switch to an alternate audio stream, forget it.

  11. Cool hack... but really what's the use? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

    The hack impresses me, very very cool. Though I thought it's NetBSD that's the one that always tries to run on everything from your digital watch to your toaster.

    Anyway, the real question: is there any use to this? It's not like FreeBSD is known for having many games to play with.

    1. Re:Cool hack... but really what's the use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you could run an http server on it and then tell netcraft...

    2. Re:Cool hack... but really what's the use? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Tell Netcraft what? Tell them "BSD is dying"? They know that already!

  12. Imagine a Beowulf cluster of those.. by eyegor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Our company was setting up a small cluster of PS3's but the whole project died when Sony locked down the firmware. This should breath new life into the effort.

    I was secretly hoping they'd give the "useless" PS3's to the employees though. Sigh.

    --

    Don't anthropomorphize computers, they don't like it.
    1. Re:Imagine a Beowulf cluster of those.. by wvmarle · · Score: 2

      Seriously: what do you want to do with such a cluster, and why is a PS3 more interesting than general PC hardware?

    2. Re:Imagine a Beowulf cluster of those.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Below cost parts?

    3. Re:Imagine a Beowulf cluster of those.. by eyegor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We do a lot of High Performance computing where I work. I currently run a 1472 core ROCKS cluster and the price/core of a PS3 cluster is pretty good compared with an HP blade.

      Because of management issues, I can't see running a huge cluster of PS3's, but it's an angle we're pursuing to see how well it works. Tesla-based clusters are also something being considered, but they type of work you can do on them is a bit more limited than a general purpose cluster based on conventional blades.

      --

      Don't anthropomorphize computers, they don't like it.
    4. Re:Imagine a Beowulf cluster of those.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Cell processor makes it extremely fast for embarrassingly parallel workloads, if written to take advantage of them. The PS3's consumer orientation means they're available for cheap.

    5. Re:Imagine a Beowulf cluster of those.. by Quince+alPillan · · Score: 3, Informative
      The Navy says that they're cheaper than equivalent boards from IBM.

      Though a single 3.2 GHz cell processor can deliver over 200 GFLOPS, whereas the Sony PS3 configuration delivers approximately 150 GFLOPS, the approximately tenfold cost difference per GFLOP makes the Sony PS3 the only viable technology for HPC applications.

      http://scitech.blogs.cnn.com/2009/12/09/military-purchases-2200-ps3s/

    6. Re:Imagine a Beowulf cluster of those.. by feepness · · Score: 1

      Because of management issues, I can't see running a huge cluster of PS3's, but it's an angle we're pursuing to see how well it works. Tesla-based clusters are also something being considered, but they type of work you can do on them is a bit more limited than a general purpose cluster based on conventional blades.

      So what's wrong with leaving it at 3.21. Did you want to play games in off hours?

    7. Re:Imagine a Beowulf cluster of those.. by eyegor · · Score: 1

      The initial cluster was only 10 systems and was in the proof of concept phase. To do meaningful work, we'd want many more systems and the project seemed to be at a dead-end when they changed the firmware.

      --

      Don't anthropomorphize computers, they don't like it.
    8. Re:Imagine a Beowulf cluster of those.. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Only if they are embarrassingly parallel workloads with a tiny working set (under 256KB per SPU, including the code) and a small amount of total data (the PS/3 only has 256MB of RAM). This is quite a small number of HPC workloads.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  13. who needs scooby-doo? by alen · · Score: 3, Funny

    this is so fuckin' cool. next time my 3 year old wants to watch a scooby DVD, Cars or play the Rub a Dub Rub demo i'll just boot up the PS3 to the command line and excite him with /home/var

    1. Re:who needs scooby-doo? by present_arms · · Score: 2

      your username is var?

      --
      http://chimpbox.us
    2. Re:who needs scooby-doo? by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe that's his child's username...or worse, it's his childs name!

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    3. Re:who needs scooby-doo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your username is var?

      His son is named var. Var Alen. He wants to make it sound like Van Halen.

    4. Re:who needs scooby-doo? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      That would probably get Child Protective Services interested in many states.

    5. Re:who needs scooby-doo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Valter Richard you incensitive clod!

    6. Re:who needs scooby-doo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes. Little Billy Var. Not to be confused with Bobby Spool.

    7. Re:who needs scooby-doo? by kj_kabaje · · Score: 1

      Yes--corrupting the youth with black and white and/or text based operating system. Just pure malice.

  14. Cool - no hardware hack required by Algorithmnast · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was worried at first that I'd have to burn a chip or something equally prone to destroying an expensive toy... but after I actually researched it... here, I find that you don't have to mod the PS3 at all - you just have to create a disk that looks like a game disk to the PS3.

    And if you want to go back to PS3 behavior, you just reset the PS3 box.

    Now that is a cool hack.

    1. Re:Cool - no hardware hack required by ElberethZone · · Score: 2

      Well you also need a PS3 which stills have OtherOS functionality (fat model AND firmware 3.21 maximum).
      If you do have a fat PS3 with later firmwares (current is 3.55) then you will need to downgrade with usb dongle (or equivalent like psfServiceMod for some HTC phones).
      You can also wait for the promised AsBestOS hack that should bring back OtherOS style support to the current firmwares.

      So it was a cool hack until Sony decided to remove OtherOS support to avoid hacks (and this did not worked as expected for them...).

  15. Re:Firmware 3.21 by Moryath · · Score: 1

    No it's not. At least until there's a port-able, AsbestOS dual-boot loader.

    This only works if you never updated your PS3 past 3.21 firmware and you have to set up another box on your network to netboot it.

  16. Crucify me... by chomsky68 · · Score: 0

    but I still don't get why anyone wants to run FreeBSD on a PS3?

    --
    I'm Not Antisocial, I'm Just Not User Friendly
    1. Re:Crucify me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      imagine a cluster of FreeBSD virtual machines on your PS3 with FreeBSD!

    2. Re:Crucify me... by chomsky68 · · Score: 1

      I tried. I still don't get it. What for?

      --
      I'm Not Antisocial, I'm Just Not User Friendly
    3. Re:Crucify me... by alen · · Score: 1

      because it makes you feel smarter than the smart people who actually created the jailbreak. some people think they are so cool and smart because they can download a file and follow some simple instructions that the smart person spent months making up

    4. Re:Crucify me... by arivanov · · Score: 2

      For the same reason anyone would like to use BSD on a platform instead of linux.

      There are multiple possible reasons:

      1. Licensing.
      2. BSD has a number of interesting concepts like netgraph which allow for efficient (and controlled) movement of data from kernel to userspace applications and back. While you can do some of that in Linux, it is considerably easier to do that in BSD. So if you have a couple of BSD geeks to code it, your time to market for a high performance scalable system may be considerably less than in Linux.
      3. The code in a lot of systems is considerably more clean and understandable than in Linux. If you have to modify the core OS it may be considerably easier to do so in a maintainable manner. This is doubly so today as we live in the days when Linus changes ABIs at the speed one changes nappies on a toddler with diarrhea. I would never even consider maintaining a linux kernel patch in the long term. With BSD - different story, any day, any time.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    5. Re:Crucify me... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Because you're making a movie?

    6. Re:Crucify me... by chomsky68 · · Score: 1

      I do understand why someone wants to use FreeBSD instead of Linux. My question is, why use FreeBSD (or Linux for that matter) on a gameconsole?

      --
      I'm Not Antisocial, I'm Just Not User Friendly
    7. Re:Crucify me... by chomsky68 · · Score: 1

      so you go out and buy 32 gameconsoles to render a movie? does not make any sense...

      --
      I'm Not Antisocial, I'm Just Not User Friendly
    8. Re:Crucify me... by The+Moof · · Score: 1

      For the same reason anyone wants to run Linux on a PS3 - it's simply their preference.

    9. Re:Crucify me... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      It's cheap for the spec, and already hooked up to a huge screen and good audio equipment, and wireless controllers. That makes it potentially a very good media player.

    10. Re:Crucify me... by chomsky68 · · Score: 1

      Thanks! Finally I do understand. Had I mod points I'd give ya a handful.

      --
      I'm Not Antisocial, I'm Just Not User Friendly
  17. Re:Firmware 3.21 by Algorithmnast · · Score: 1

    Netbooting?

    While TFA may state that the guest OS must be net-booted, TFA says to use Petitboot as the bootloader.

    But Petitboot's installations directions don't mention require loading an image from the network, but do state that Petitboot can only load images that are directly connected to the PS3.

    The Petitboot page also mentions other things about the PS3, so it's not as if you have to boot-strap from petiteboot into TFA's OS...

    IOW - it seems that TFA is stressing "you have to" when it should merely claim "here's how to use netbooting". There's a world of difference there.

  18. Remember when gaming consoles... by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    ...were used to actually play games?

    Neither do I.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:Remember when gaming consoles... by dintech · · Score: 1

      I also remember when a phone was just a phone. I think it's better this way.

    2. Re:Remember when gaming consoles... by tepples · · Score: 1

      There are several games, many of them free software, that are ported to FreeBSD but not to PS3 GameOS. I'd elaborate, but it's been said before, and CronoCloud doesn't want me to repeat it.

    3. Re:Remember when gaming consoles... by froggymana · · Score: 1

      Remember when rocks were just rocks?

      --
      "To prevent this day from getting any worse, I'll just read ERROR as GOOD THING" 1GJU8xLuDKDxEs4KLf8fAGyptoDsqvEsBT
  19. Re:Firmware 3.21 by CODiNE · · Score: 2

    Perhaps no large distribution is willing to touch those keys and risk a court battle with Sony over it. It's all well and good for people to sign their own firmwares and install them, but a larger release brings risks.

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
  20. Re:Firmware 3.21 by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

    That's just a matter of what the developer(s) had handy at the time. If you have a homebrew-capable PS3 (3.41 or older) you don't upgrade it for now, so a lot of homebrew initially shows up for some specific firmware version and then gets ported to others. Soon enough we'll have proper homebrew-capable custom 3.55 firmwares thanks to the key release, so give it time.

    --
    I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
  21. Re:Firmware 3.21 by ciderbrew · · Score: 2

    I wonder what sony would say. Is the use of a key illegal? Its not illegal to find it on webpage and use it is it?

    Maybe someone could write a rootkit with it. I'm sure sony wouldn't mind that.

  22. Re:Firmware 3.21 by somersault · · Score: 1

    The important part of what he said was:

    Sony Playstation 3 Fat, firmware version 3.21

    ie, you can only get this through the "Other OS" function, which has been able to run Linux all along. The summary was updated to include this fact.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  23. Re:Firmware 3.21 by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

    From my experience, retiring XBMC would do you more good than such a hack ;).

    Ye gods, did I hate XBMC.

    On topic: As many others have noted, this has nothing to do with the released keys. I for one admit that I don't care to run any other OS on my PS3 than the original. What I would appreciate, though, is being able to download 'pirated' software.

    Me pirating, and then buying stuff I liked is a tried and true way to make not only the vendors of said stuff happy, but myself as well. And quite frankly, my happiness > happiness of vendors selling crappy software.

  24. Re:Firmware 3.21 by Moryath · · Score: 1

    The current port of XBMC (Linux/Windows) is actually very pleasant. My current living room frontend is a winxp box (slightly old tv tuner that has absolutely shit Linux support, sadly) and I use XBMC quite happily with it.

    If I could get the PS3 running XBMC, I'd likely move the PC out of the room. The PC does take a bit of space, and is a little loud, especially having to run it 24/7 to keep schedule for recording. But like I said, I need to record CC streams along with TV (there are times when other ambient noise, and the presence of friends with hearing issues, makes subtitling/closed captioning a godsend) and being able to switch it on and off would be great.

    UPnP servers also don't let you define the language and subtitle track on the fly, which is a pain when you're a foreign film geek and have been slowly ripping your library of DVD's to your network so as not to wear down on the discs.

  25. What's the point? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    Can't you get a quad core x86 box with far more RAM/disk for about the same money?

    I'm pretty sure one would run rings around the PS3 for most computing tasks.

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:What's the point? by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      If they were even considering using a cluster of PS3s, it's unlikely they were doing fungible "computing tasks" where getting a quick desktop would be a suitable replacement. They're odd systems, but often such systems are odd in a way that's really useful.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:What's the point? by eyegor · · Score: 2

      Power/Cooling and physical footprint are also considerations one needs to worry about. Price/CPU is very good on a PS3 too. For certain types of tasks, the CEL processor is ideal. We don't need a lot of RAM or hard drive either. We just need to crunch through a lot of numbers quickly.

      --

      Don't anthropomorphize computers, they don't like it.
    3. Re:What's the point? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked Visual C++ produces WAY BETTER floating point code than GCC does (easily twice as fast) so unless you're programming in assembly language a single quad-core PC could replace quite a few PS3s. PCs can be had in very small boxes too, with less RAM/disk to save money.

      The thing that worries me most about PS3 farms is that you're stuck with the same technology for the next 'N' years. It was worth doing when it was new but the PC world is busy following Moore's law so it soon overtakes it. eg. Six-core chips are now in the price range where the quad-cores were a year ago. With hyperthreading that's nearly as good as a 12-core machine.

      If the job fits you can also stick in a cheap-ish graphics card and get massively parallel floating point processing.

      PS: I'm just giving you arguments to use on your boss so he'll scrap the PS3s and you get to take one home.

      --
      No sig today...
    4. Re:What's the point? by eyegor · · Score: 1

      Using Visual C++ would require windows. The disadvantage of using windows over *nix are many: Licensing, Manageability, ad infinitum.

      Our main cluster is CentOS-based using ROCKS cluster software and is running on 208 blades using several different generations of HP BL46[05] G[1-6] blades that get refreshed periodically. We have a mixture of CPUs in production currently, dual dual-core Xeon, dual quad-core Xeon and Opteron and some dual quad-core Nehalem. We're replacing the dual dual-core blades with dual-hex shortly to gain processing power without a power/cool/weight penalty.

      We usually disable hyperthreading since we prefer each processor core be used for one job and only one job. Time-slicing between two jobs means that time's wasted flipping back and forth and resources will be used up needlessly. We also size system RAM so there is at least 3GB/core available for each job submitted. Using those strategies, we avoid swap as much as possible and get the maximum CPU utilization. Typically, each core is running at 100% for days on end.

      A PS3 cluster would be similar in use, but limited to jobs that didn't need a lot of RAM or disk I/O. Since a PS3 cluster is pretty much a roll-it-yourself endeavor, I don't expect it to get used nearly as much as the production general purpose cluster. As time passes, it begins to look more and more like a toy compared to the newest advances in HPC.

      When the PS3 cluster project started, it was one of the "sexiest" ways to get your hands on a lot of power for not a lot of money. Recent developments in GPU-based computing is beginning to attract attention, but not every system is a viable host for a production grade GPU board. System form factor and power requirements are significant issues to overcome. CUDA/Tesla boards show promise, but are only suited for certain applications, they would never be intended to replace general-purpose cluster computing. Typically, we'd want something that can run 24/7/365 with a very high MTBF.

      --

      Don't anthropomorphize computers, they don't like it.
    5. Re:What's the point? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      When the PS3 cluster project started, it was one of the "sexiest" ways to get your hands on a lot of power for not a lot of money.

      Sure, a few years ago the cell processor was way ahead of what PCs were offering and PS3s made a lot of sense.

      --
      No sig today...
  26. Re:Firmware 3.21 by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Presumably if a hack restores the function (which I believe was simply disabled, not removed) then it might work on later firmwares also.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  27. not sure what the point is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1 ps3 are about $299 a piece

    2 They have the processing power of 7 android G1 phones

    3 NewEgg can get you a Xenon, 1TB hard drive, and 16GB of ram for under $1000

    4. It can with one core outperform the underpowered cell processors 10 to 1

    Again big names don't equate to big returns.

    1. Re:not sure what the point is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently you've never programmed an application that had more than a single thread before. Retard.

    2. Re:not sure what the point is by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      It's partly residual reputation. When the PS3 came out, it's chip was one of the fastest you could get in raw flops - and better than anything else for the price. It was very impressive. Since then PC processors have continued to improve, while the PS3 has stayed just the same.

  28. In store PS3s? by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

    Call me when they finally get it working on the new PS3s you can buy in stores. Those are generally referred to as "Slim" and have never had OtherOS support.

    --
    GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    1. Re:In store PS3s? by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      I think it's unlikely that an OS that runs on OtherOS will ever run on a system that doesn't support OtherOS. You could crack the PS3 and put a patched firmware that supports OtherOS on there, but at that point you might as well cut the shit and just have it boot FreeBSD directly.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:In store PS3s? by Talderas · · Score: 1

      However, with access to the signing keys for software, is it not conceivable that one could produce and distribute an entirely valid piece of software that tacks on a new Other OS feature?

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    3. Re:In store PS3s? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Someone is. It's called AsbestOS. The last I heard it was partially functional, with development ongoing.

  29. Re:Firmware 3.21 by somersault · · Score: 1

    Hopefully. I heard that Linux was getting pretty usable on PS3 compared to when I first tried it, so it would be worth my while trying it again.

    Turns out that 3.21 was in fact the first version which had Other OS removed, so I'm not entirely sure what's going on here. I CBA RTFA though. If they ever come out with it for the latest firmware then I'll have a look, but in the meantime I like being on PSN too much. And my netbook and phone already run Linux..

    --
    which is totally what she said
  30. Re:Firmware 3.21 by rikkards · · Score: 2

    For me I would buy a PS3 in a heartbeat if XBMC was running on it. My old Xbox based XBMC is nice but I need a blu-ray player

  31. Maybe.. by rrossman2 · · Score: 1

    with a BSD running on it, someone would find a way to get the Mach kernel working and get OS X up and running (granted it would need to be an older version with PPC support)

    1. Re:Maybe.. by froggymana · · Score: 1

      You realize that the PS3 uses a special Cell processor that would not be compatible with a PPC binary? I think you may be thinking of the Xbox360 which uses a PPC processor.

      --
      "To prevent this day from getting any worse, I'll just read ERROR as GOOD THING" 1GJU8xLuDKDxEs4KLf8fAGyptoDsqvEsBT
    2. Re:Maybe.. by Bruce+Cran · · Score: 1

      It's only the SPEs in the PS3 that are specialized: the main CPU, the PPE, is similar to a PowerPC 970.

    3. Re:Maybe.. by chrysrobyn · · Score: 1

      It's only the SPEs in the PS3 that are specialized: the main CPU, the PPE, is similar to a PowerPC 970.

      For the sake of argument, I think we can agree that the SPEs (aka SPUs aka APUs aka SPCs) are the specialized part of Cell and barring the PowerPC 620, that Cell and Xenon derivatives (featuring the more or less common PPE) are the only other 64 bit processors in the same timeframe as the PowerPC 970. The 970 could retire up to 5 instructions per cycle wheras the PPE could complete 8 single precision (or 4 double precision) instructions per cycle. FAR more importantly, the PPE was limited to in-order execution, wheras the PPC970 could handle out-of-order. The PPE's pipeline depth was horrendously long, allowing for 3.5GHz execution at the 90nm technology node, while the PPC970 was restricted to 1-2GHz operation. By any meaningful benchmark the 970 was a far faster core.

      The PPE's sole purpose for existing was to feed SPEs data to crunch. Microsoft had a barely managable deadline for which the PPE was repurposed and Xenon was created.

      If you're interested in the creation of Cell and Xenon, read The Race for a New Game Machine. A lot of people I know are in there, some by different names.

  32. Someone had to say it... by vondiggity · · Score: 1

    News flash, now the PS3 is dying!

  33. Hardware by boxxa · · Score: 1

    Yes, you could run BSD in the OtherOS feature but the benefit to this method is that there is access to the direct hardware such as the GPU which wasn't available before. This is booting a true OS now instead of a OS inside the PlayStation OS.

    --
    Bryan
  34. Re:This is why FreeBSD is not 'enterprise' by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    Unsurprisingly the fanbois have modden your down but I agree. I gave up on FreeBSD when I got fed up with reporting the bug that would crash the whole OS if someone accidently unplugged a mounted filesystem which was being used - eg floppy disk, USB stick. If they can't get basic stuff like that right what chance is there for the more complicated subsystems? I'll stick with Linux.

  35. Re:This is why FreeBSD is not 'enterprise' by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    Unsurprisingly the fanbois have modden your down but I agree. I gave up on FreeBSD when I got fed up with reporting the bug that would crash the whole OS if someone accidently unplugged a mounted filesystem which was being used - eg floppy disk, USB stick. If they can't get basic stuff like that right what chance is there for the more complicated subsystems? I'll stick with Linux.

    What version of FreeBSD are you running? I am a Free/OpenBSD Fanboy. I am running OpenBSD 4.8 FreeBSD 8.1. On my FreeBSD box, I cannot make my system crash in the way you suggest.

  36. Re:This is why FreeBSD is not 'enterprise' by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    This was years ago , the last version I used was 6.0. Thats the point at which I gave up. Perhaps they have fixed it now but I simply can't be bothered to check anymore.

  37. Exciting Times! by bedwards · · Score: 1

    I'd imagine there will be a very large quantity of new PS3 OSs and OS distributions! but its good to see freeBSD ported! My biggest congratulations are for the next PS3 cluster super-computer! Just out of idle curisoty though: I remember Sony reading they are making a loss on PS3 hardware - offset by the sale of games. so id love to know if they can calculate a their losses from puchases of PS3's for other purposes (or if they can estimate their losses any more accuratly than losses to pirated games) Also, The cell archietcture is pretty advanced - what do slashdotters reckon will be running the PS4 that would make it a worthwhile upgrade?

  38. Re:This is why FreeBSD is not 'enterprise' by Bruce+Cran · · Score: 2

    It was fixed via a FreeBSD Foundation project in 8.0 and merged back to 7.x.

  39. More News: by socz · · Score: 1

    GhettoBSD is to be ported to PS3. A new era of free/cheap games on high-end hardware is here!

    Update: Porting failed.

    --
    My abilities are only limited by my imagination
    1. Re:More News: by esquece_lembrar · · Score: 1

      Graphic drivers need to be built with OpenGL and Mesa for the ppc64 architecture before such games can be developed. Will Blender work on the machine and at what rate of rendering? What rendering engine is used by PS3 game developers? Has it been ported to FreeBSD?

  40. Re:Firmware 3.21 by shentino · · Score: 1

    DMCA

  41. Re:This is why FreeBSD is not 'enterprise' by present_arms · · Score: 1

    Yahoo! and a lot of web facing sites want a word with you :D

    --
    http://chimpbox.us
  42. Re:Firmware 3.21 by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

    Have you tried Mediaportal? It is free, has a ton of plug ins and skins to make it into anything you want, has a nice UI, really stable, for HTPCs I'd say Mediaportal is better than XBMC as far as experience IMHO.

    As for TFA, it doesn't really matter whether they use the keys or not, the secret is out. From watching the videos from the hacker conference once they got the keys it was game over thanks to flaws in the core design of the PS3. As we have seen the "smart cow" analogy is all too true, once one figures out the trick it quickly will be picked up by others who will run with it.

    Personally I don't get why the console makers trip over themselves trying to block other usage. I thought the PS3 original idea was the smart one, give them a way to play with the hardware but not get to the parts required to run games. Hell I'd have gone one further and allowed access to ALL the hardware via a sandbox except the crypto required to run games, so that anybody could add any media center style front end they wanted. It would have kept the hackers happy by giving them most of the hardware to play with AND could have sold more units by giving people media options, it may have even caused a cottage industry to pop up with VARs selling different front end enabled consoles to the masses.

    I guess the industry will never learn. They continue to shoot themselves in the foot, all for the sake of DRM that just screws the customers while painting a "fuck with me!" sign on it for the hackers. Stupid is as stupid does I suppose.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  43. Re:This is why FreeBSD is not 'enterprise' by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    Don't worry: there are other, similarly destructive bugs out there. My current favorite is the Intel Ethernet driver bug which causes the machine to hang, sometimes unable to POST directly after a reboot. Second on the list is the new USB stack, which has some severe issues making USB storage all but unusable as a boot medium (since 8.0 and 7.3), and imposes other mass storage unreliabilities. And of course, there's ports itself...

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  44. Re:This is why FreeBSD is not 'enterprise' by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    Yet that means nothing. Enterprises use some really ass-backwards shit. When you've got the staff to maintain your own branches independently, track down obscure bugs, and avoid/circumvent/fix the worst of them, that's one thing.

    If "enterprise grade storage" had half the problems that FreeBSD has, we'd all be attacking each other with pointy sticks right now due to data loss catapulting us back to the dark ages.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  45. Compilers by eyegor · · Score: 1

    We also don't use GCC. We typically use the Intel or PGI compilers and applications like IDL or Matlab.

    --

    Don't anthropomorphize computers, they don't like it.
  46. Re:Firmware 3.21 by tepples · · Score: 1

    The DMCA doesn't always apply. Chamberlain v. Skylink; Lexmark v. Static Control Components.

  47. HTML by tepples · · Score: 1

    Turns out that 3.21 was in fact the first version which had Other OS removed, so I'm not entirely sure what's going on here.

    It could be that a < got stripped.

  48. Re:Firmware 3.21 by Moryath · · Score: 1

    Looked at Mediaportal a while back. It lacked the built-in routines to handle overscan correction (my TV has a VGA input that only handles "surrounded by 1 inch of black" or "zoomed in way too far" modes).

    The overscan correction of XBMC, now that it's become stable, makes it my playback option of choice for the HTPC for now.

  49. I can tell you why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They sell this console at a loss, and expect to make a profit on people buying games..every sale to a geek who just wanted some cheap access to a relatively exotic piece of kit-cell processor you know, not real common-means more or less giving it away for less than the cost of manufacture.

      Ain't nothing in it for them to sell one unlocked today unless you might be willing to pay double (what the fuck ever, an increase, substantial) normal retail for it. Still interested? And even then they would have the marketing headache of trying to justify an identical unit with two different prices, people who wanted it unlocked would be bitching nonstop about the price difference, taking them to court, etc..

    I don't like sony much either, but I think this explains their reasoning, it *does* make some sense looking at it from their POV.

    1. Re:I can tell you why by Nikker · · Score: 1

      If I make something and you buy it from me how can I tell you after the purchase how to use it? If you bought a game system from me and you knew I wouldn't make any money unless you bought 3 games from me are you in some way obligated to make those additional purchases?

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
  50. Re:Firmware 3.21 by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

    From my experience, retiring XBMC would do you more good than such a hack ;).

    Ye gods, did I hate XBMC.

    You are literally the only person I've ever seen say anything close to that. Unless your only experience has been with the early PC builds where hardware video decoding and the like weren't yet working I really don't see any reason to hate, or even dislike, XBMC.

    It provides a great 10 foot UI for accessing your media on a TV, plays everything known to man, and runs on all three major OSes plus two "appliance" type devices (three if you count the XBMC-derived Boxee Box). Sigma Designs is even porting it to their SoCs.

    Show me another home media platform with nearly the flexibility and ease of use. The closest competition is Boxee, which sacrifices local media features for internet media capabilities.

    --
    I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
  51. Re:This is why FreeBSD is not 'enterprise' by pseudonomous · · Score: 1

    How can an OS level bug cause firmware/BIOS level problems? And or tell me what hardware I can reproduce this bug on.

  52. Re:Firmware 3.21 by kriston · · Score: 1

    Fat?
    How about PS3 Slim? Isn't that what we all want, anyway?

    --

    Kriston

  53. Re:This is why FreeBSD is not 'enterprise' by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    The USB issue (7.3, 8.0, 8.1, probably CURRENT, etc.) can be reproduced on the following hardware with a variety of USB flash and rotational media:

    * Supermicro boards (Intel controllers)
    * Old hardware with Intel boards (eg. Celeron P4s)
    * AMD Athlon 64 boards with Nvidia controllers
    * AMD Phenom II boards with ATI controllers
    * Possibly a couple others

    The Intel Ethernet issue is present in FreeBSD, not the hardware - as evidenced by other hardware not having the issue, and other systems playing fine with the same hardware (for very extended periods of time), including earlier FreeBSD releases.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  54. Performance increase by esquece_lembrar · · Score: 1

    Consider the performance of FreeBSD to Linux on other machines and architectures. Now, such a device could be used as a console/thin client when connected to another machine running FreeBSD. One can set up a router, using the PS3 to SSH into other local machines.

  55. Re:Firmware 3.21 by man_the_king · · Score: 1

    Too many people are eager to blame Sony over this - while forgetting that it was the initial potential threat of hacking (the first one by Geohot which depended upon OtherOD) that galvanised them into removing that functionality from the older models. I can't really find a reason to blame Sony for THAT.