Slashdot Mirror


Engineer Designs His Own Heart Valve Implant

nametaken writes "In 2000, Tal Golesworthy, a British engineer, was told that he suffers from Marfan syndrome, a disorder of the connective tissue that often causes rupturing of the aorta. The only solution then available was the pairing of a mechanical valve and a highly risky blood thinner. To an engineer like Golesworthy, that just wasn't good enough. So he constructed his own implant that does the job better than the existing solution--and became the first patient to try it."

151 comments

  1. 404 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the is gone ... 404

    1. Re:404 by norpy · · Score: 2

      Does popsci redirect to a regional version of the site? If so that would cause the 404, I can't load the article because of this.

  2. Karma Beating.. by nanospook · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It's good to be born for a purpose..

    --
    Have you fscked your local propeller head today?
    1. Re:Karma Beating.. by yoblin · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, it's nice when you can really put your heart into something.

    2. Re:Karma Beating.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the wuss didn't install it himself.

    3. Re:Karma Beating.. by Mitchell314 · · Score: 2

      Yeah, it pumps me up to do something great too.

      --
      I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
    4. Re:Karma Beating.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's nice when you can really put something into your heart .

      There, fixed that for you.

    5. Re:Karma Beating.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of fighting to figure out the exact dimensions all by himself, he could have just flown to the "Land of the Brave and Home of the Free" (intentional switch there) and asked TSA for his own backscatter image in an ''xcruciatingly nice way.

    6. Re:Karma Beating.. by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      Then he should have been doing his work in Soviet Russia, as he's actually putting something into his heart.

    7. Re:Karma Beating.. by nanospook · · Score: 1

      There you went and fixed that for me :)

      --
      Have you fscked your local propeller head today?
  3. Inventor CV by Saija · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    Slashdot ya no es que lo era! ;)
    1. Re:Inventor CV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Deer stalking!

    2. Re:Inventor CV by Saija · · Score: 1

      yeah i also saw that and think: wtf? searchig that i've found it to be some kind of requirement to hunt legally in the uk

      --
      Slashdot ya no es que lo era! ;)
    3. Re:Inventor CV by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      It's more of a legal requirement for taking other people out hunting in the UK. If you get yourself into trouble, tough shit. If you get other people into trouble then there are certain repercussions.

  4. Link to Original Article by PatPending · · Score: 4, Informative

    Fuck POPSCI, here's the link to the original article (Warning: graphic photographs)

    --
    What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
    1. Re:Link to Original Article by noidentity · · Score: 3, Informative
      Highlights:

      'It seemed to me to be pretty obvious that you could scan the heart structure, model it with a CAD routine, then use RP [rapid prototyping] to create a former on which to manufacture a device,' explained Golesworthy. 'In a sense, conceptually, it was very simple to do. Actually engineering that was significantly more complex.'

      Golesworthy believes that projects such as this demonstrate that the interface between engineers and the rest of the world isn't functioning in the way it should. 'When it does function, huge advances can be made in a very short time period, on very little money,' he said. 'We have changed the world for people with aortic dilation and we have done it on a fraction of the cost.'

      In May 2004, Golesworthy became the first recipient of his own invention after undergoing surgery at the Royal Brompton Hospital. Since then, 23 patients have successfully had the implant fitted and another seven are hoping to undergo the procedure. According to Golesworthy, the technique will soon replace the Bentall procedure and could be used to treat other heart conditions.

      Wrapping the aorta with artificial material isn't a new idea. More than 20 years ago, US surgeon Francis Robicsek attempted to fashion an external, hand-tailored support for the aorta. The proposal was made before the widespread use of CAD, MRI and RP. Materials such as polypropylene, nylon and knitted Dacron were proposed, with Dacron being the most popular. However, attempting to accurately recreate the shape of the aorta using material cut during surgery proved extremely difficult and the technique never caught on. Instead, off-the-shelf composite valve conduits were offered as a more realistic solution. 'Technology has allowed us to revisit the idea,' said Golesworthy. 'The aorta is such an extraordinary shape that you can't possibly do it by a "taking a yoghurt pot I prepared earlier'. The only way was to bring scanning, CAD and RP together.'

    2. Re:Link to Original Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      (Warning: graphic photographs)

      I sure hope so; all these ascii photographs around the webs have been driving me nuts.

    3. Re:Link to Original Article by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      That's not a graphic photo. Try looking up Fournier's gangrene. THAT is graphic. (No link, it's up to you. Googling the images is NSFW, but mainly because it's disgusting.)

    4. Re:Link to Original Article by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2

      I hate you.

      Thanks,
      MyLongNickName

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    5. Re:Link to Original Article by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Don't stop with the first page. You need the pre-op AND the post-op.

    6. Re:Link to Original Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thanks for the link. Wish /. did more 'informative' linking when it calls for it, as it does here.

      As for the story, this guy is BADASS, and I applaud the medical community in this case for keeping an open mind. Using MRI, CAD, RP (rapid prototyping) would probably seem pretty obvious for a lot of possible medical solutions, especially after diagnosis.

      Onto the gripes.... Is there REALLY that much of a disconnect between the medical industry, bio-engineering, if this falls within that scope, and giving patients better options than mechanical implementations and blood thinners? As was the motivation here. Is the medical industry, not healthcare, really become this myopic with regard to the use of technology, and implementing new procedures and solutions? Guess it's hard to push your field into the unknown when the pharmaceutical industry is knocking on your door with the latest re-patent that's twice the price, and a medical mal-practice suit just a phone call away.

      There's a reason the call it practicing medicine. There is a difference between a mistake while under the knfe, and a forced 18 hour surgical rotation to keep up the 'standard' of innitiation. I just wish more people would remember that, with any field that deals with personal matters, communication is key. This story illustrates what should be standard form in our current technologica era.

    7. Re:Link to Original Article by sycodon · · Score: 2

      "...interface between engineers and the rest of the world..."

      What interface?

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    8. Re:Link to Original Article by guruevi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Communications. The people that design your meds and implants are doctors and PhD's. They actually have very little understanding of solving problems in the real world. I work in the field as a support staff but actually graduated in industrial electronics. I recently had to explain 3 PhD's from the EE department how to interface a 10MHz optical signal with a coax cable - they were going to rework the whole link, I recommended they buy a media converter.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    9. Re:Link to Original Article by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      You missed this quote

      'My aorta was dilating all through that period,' said Golesworthy. 'When you've got the scalpel of Damocles hanging over your sternum, it motivates you into making things happen and so they do...to me it seemed like a ridiculously obvious solution. The only way to do this was with CAD and RP. It shouldn't have taken an engineer to realise that, but it did.'

      Read more: http://www.theengineer.co.uk/in-depth/analysis/uk-engineer-develops-own-life-saving-implant/1006877.article#ixzz1CE3SD5am

      That's really putting your life on the line, you don't see bravery like that very often.

      I also quite like the code which took the quote and links back to the original article with a standard copy and paste

    10. Re:Link to Original Article by Thelasko · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Golesworthy believes that projects such as this demonstrate that the interface between engineers and the rest of the world isn't functioning in the way it should.

      On the contrary, I feel that the interface between doctors and the rest of the world isn't functioning in the way it should. Much of engineering is focused on customer needs, where as doctor's tend to have an attitude of superiority that breaks down communication. The field of biomedical engineering aims to fix that.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    11. Re:Link to Original Article by slackergod · · Score: 2

      It seems to me that our general body of knowledge is growing so large, and economic competition is so fierce, that people are being forced to specialize on particular areas, to the point that they lack even introductory knowledge about other fields of study. Case in point: this paper, where a doctor basically rediscovered calculus.

    12. Re:Link to Original Article by crovira · · Score: 1

      A hardware hacker extraordinaire.

      My hat is off to him

      --
      MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    13. Re:Link to Original Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh?

    14. Re:Link to Original Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you have a shitty doctor and should look into getting one you like.

  5. Obligatory...Oh, physician?... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...heal thyself!

    1. Re:Obligatory...Oh, physician?... by plover · · Score: 2

      ...heal thyself!

      Engineer - repair thyself!

      --
      John
  6. Anyone can do it by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 5, Funny

    I knew a conceptual artist who tried the same thing.

    I miss him.

    1. Re:Anyone can do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I laughed too hard at this

    2. Re:Anyone can do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once had a friend that tried a penis enlargement procedure using a firecracker. Fortunately the explosion wasn't large and she's doing find now.

    3. Re:Anyone can do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She still hasn't found it??!

  7. Hardcore... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    Harder-core still, of course, would be designing and implanting it yourself. While quite rare, DIY abdominal surgery is possible and documented....

    1. Re:Hardcore... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Implanting a heart valve of your own design into your own chest would only be made sweeter if it had been fabricated on your own 3D printer.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Hardcore... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      But the insurance would never cover that..

      And if something goes wrong with your DIY surgery, your family can't sue your corpse for malpractice/wrongful death

  8. yay for engineers! by prakslash · · Score: 5, Funny

    As an engineer by training, I find this to be very cool.

    I myself suffer from a physical... ahem.. shortcoming.
    So, just like this engineer, I designed and constructed a solution using a banana and some duct tape.
    My wife loves it!
    After reading this article, I am thinking I will go ahead and publicize my invention.
    Another yay for engineers!

    1. Re:yay for engineers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As a biomedical engineer and cardiac surgeon in training, this makes me ridiculously excited!

    2. Re:yay for engineers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I myself suffer from a physical... ahem.. shortcoming.
      So, just like this engineer, I designed and constructed a solution using a banana and some duct tape.
      My wife loves it!

      Do you ever get to join in?

    3. Re:yay for engineers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your wife needs to peel it before using it, there's another kind of surgery for that!

  9. More medical engineers by Mahonrimoriancumer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Stories like this make me proud of my alma mater, Colorado School of Mines, for having a bio-medical engineering minor for mechanical engineers. We need more engineers working in medicine.

    --
    So climate's changing. So what? It has always changed. The big news would be if it wasn't changing. - Dr. Philip Stone
    1. Re:More medical engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They should have a full Biomedical Engineering major program of study. Then you can be proud.

    2. Re:More medical engineers by Lord+of+Hyphens · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my university has a biomedical engineering master's degree program. They're getting popular now.

      --
      "I've spent my whole life figuring out crazy ways to do things. It'll work." -- Montgomery Scott, "Relics"
    3. Re:More medical engineers by theantipop · · Score: 1

      Moreover, I think increased cross-disciplinary study for engineering majors would be beneficial all around. At least at the engineering school I attended, it seemed common for most engineering students to have tunnel vision in their area of study. Part of this was due to the rigor of the curriculum not leaving much time for unrelated coursework, but I think it would make for a more well-rounded and effective engineer to allow for and encourage technical electives to be taken in many engineering disciplines.

  10. By any chance was this guys actual name... by Coraon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Tony Stark? Because if so I want to talk to him now about building a few other upgrades for me.

    --
    -Ours is the wisdom of Solomon, the magic of Merlyn, the fall of Icaris.
    1. Re:By any chance was this guys actual name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Came in here to say this. Leaving, satisfied.

    2. Re:By any chance was this guys actual name... by nerdonamotorcycle · · Score: 1

      You might want to avoid the "In a cave, with a box of scraps" part.

  11. Like God said by elashish14 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Do it yourself ;-)

    --
    I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
  12. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can only hope to become an engineer with such a great and benificial impact.

    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're on that path then so do I! :)

  13. Not really the whole story... by demonlapin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There's no need - and hasn't been for a long time, at least 15-20 years - to put in a mechanical valve just for aortic valve disease. There are cadaveric (organ-donor) valves and porcine (pig-heart) valves available. They don't last as long as the mechanical ones, but they don't need anticoagulation. Given that he had Marfan syndrome, however, it's quite likely that the problem was a valve-and-aortic-root problem, just like the Bentall procedure I did the anesthesia for today, which does better with a mechanical valve. His solution is impressive: no quibbles on that here. Imaging a heart to get dimensions is hideously difficult. Getting a 3D model of the aorta is some fine engineering in itself.

    However, he has mostly transferred the problem downstream - the root of the aorta is the most elastic part of a very elastic vessel, and transmitting the higher pressure downstream (which his aorta-corset will do) will lead to increased ballooning of the segment closest to the heart. The hard part is to make sure that that segment can handle it for the remainder of his expected lifespan.

    1. Re:Not really the whole story... by noidentity · · Score: 2

      The hard part is to make sure that that segment can handle it for the remainder of his expected lifespan.

      As long as it handles it without fail for the rest of his life, isn't that long enough? Oh, wait...

    2. Re:Not really the whole story... by Graff · · Score: 2

      There are cadaveric (organ-donor) valves and porcine (pig-heart) valves available. They don't last as long as the mechanical ones, but they don't need anticoagulation.

      But they do need immunosuppressants. That's still a heck of a trade-off!

      I guess that anticoagulants might be worse than immunosuppressants but they both introduce plenty of complications.

    3. Re:Not really the whole story... by demonlapin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Reminds me of the greatest Pratchett quote ever:

      "Give a man a fire and he's warm for the day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life."

    4. Re:Not really the whole story... by demonlapin · · Score: 2

      But they do need immunosuppressants

      Organs, yes. Cadaveric valves, no. Porcine, yes. That's why the cadaveric valves have become more popular. Sorry, I should have made that more clear.

    5. Re:Not really the whole story... by noidentity · · Score: 1
      Yes, exactly. I like this wording, as it hides the punch line better:

      Build a man a fire and he's warm for the day;

      set a man afire and he's warm for the rest of his life.

    6. Re:Not really the whole story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Whow. . . no wonder your gas-passer. . . no bedside manner--at all!

    7. Re:Not really the whole story... by MrQuacker · · Score: 2

      I thought GE had scanners for sale that can do just that? Take a 3D MRI of a heart beating and display/record it in real-time. At 80 beats a minute, and 30 frames a second, not that much would be needed to collect still images of the heart in the same position of every beat. Recording it in 3D also makes a CAD scan of the heart easy to create.

    8. Re:Not really the whole story... by guruevi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, they have really nice sales representations when a lot of data is collected, processed and interpolated (which can be done almost on the fly these days). In the field it doesn't work that well, there are still quite some artifacts and issues where doctors will miss things because they weren't visible. It works good enough to see big things like growths or major defects but I wouldn't trust it to make a precise valve replacement.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    9. Re:Not really the whole story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, so now you have a video of all those wonderful 3D slices of the heart in motion. Now, how do you tell the computer which bits of the video are heart and which bits are not? Keep in mind that you are dealing with a object doing complex motion through three dimensions as interpreted by 2D slices in a greyscale format. As far as image recognition problems go, this one is HARD. There is a reason that MRI techs are really highly trained to read the images and get anything useful out of them. If you were to do it purely by software recognition my guess is that we are shading into AI-hard territory.

      Turning that information into usable data probably represented a significant portion of the total effort involved.

    10. Re:Not really the whole story... by Graff · · Score: 2

      Organs, yes. Cadaveric valves, no. Porcine, yes.

      Ahh, I wasn't aware that the cadaveric valves didn't require immunosuppressants. How do they achieve that? I imagine they can somehow strip off the markers which would trigger an immune response.

      That definitely makes a great case for using a cadaveric valve, I wonder why they didn't go that route.

    11. Re:Not really the whole story... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Well, the issue isn't so much that there's more pressure than normal - it's that the existing part couldn't cope with the pressure. Reinforcing it shouldn't pose any issues as long as the pressure level was normal to begin with.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    12. Re:Not really the whole story... by Kilrah_il · · Score: 3, Informative

      When you transplant an organ, it is connected to blood vessels and thus is exposed to the immune system. When you put in biologic valves, no blood vessels are connected and there is no immune rejection. We do not understand completely why they are not rejected, because obviously they do get some blood, since they aren't ischemic, but I believe it has to do with the lack of good blood supply.
      BTW, as far as I know Porcine valves also do not need immunosuppresion, same as corneal implants.

      --
      Whenever in an argument, remember this.
    13. Re:Not really the whole story... by Kilrah_il · · Score: 2

      A cadaveric valve lasts for about 8 years, give or take. I didn't see anywhere the engineer's age, but I can assume he is somewhere in his 40's or 50's. That means he will have to replace the valve about 4-5 times, assuming he reaches 80. I myself wouldn't like the idea of another 4-5 open heart surgeries in my lifetime. OTOH, at an older age, the valve may last longer (10-15y), and thus there might not be a need to replace it.
      Today a biological valve is usually reserved for older patients, while younger ones get a mechanical valve.

      --
      Whenever in an argument, remember this.
    14. Re:Not really the whole story... by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      House would, and that's good enough for me.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    15. Re:Not really the whole story... by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      A Marfan aorta can't handle normal pressures; that's why he got in trouble.

    16. Re:Not really the whole story... by demonlapin · · Score: 2

      I am not a gas passer. I am a drug pusher. Get it right.

    17. Re:Not really the whole story... by maroberts · · Score: 1

      I am not a gas passer. I am a drug pusher. Get it right.

      +1 Informative/Funny (if I had mod points)

      --

      Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
      Karma: Chameleon

    18. Re:Not really the whole story... by kabloom · · Score: 3, Informative

      The life expectancy of someone with Marfan syndrome was 32 +/- 16 years in 1972, and is now 41 +/- 18 years (all you need to see from that link is the abstract). If I could guess that the increase has to do with improved treatment technology (rather than improved management strategies), then someone getting surgery for Marfan syndrome is probably in their 20s or 30s, because they're unlikely to live too much longer than their late 30's or early 40's without surgery.

    19. Re:Not really the whole story... by Kilrah_il · · Score: 1

      As Walter Sobchak said to The Dude: "I did not know that".
      Thanks.

      --
      Whenever in an argument, remember this.
    20. Re:Not really the whole story... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Not true.

      I've been on fire (literally), and I'm bitterly cold during the winters. The assumption is that one cannot be "on fire" and survive. I'm proof that is not true.

      BTW, Stop Drop n Roll doesn't always work. Sometimes it just lights the ground on fire.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    21. Re:Not really the whole story... by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Terry Pratchett. He writes humor. Humor infused with a lot of fantasy elements, much in the same way that Douglas Adams wrote humor with some sci-fi elements. His statements may not be literally true in all cases. Work with me here.

    22. Re:Not really the whole story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife has Marfan syndrome, and recently (this year) underwent heart surgery for this very condition. She received a pig valve. The doctors have told her that it should last a minimum of 20 years, most likely longer.

      In her case, they recommended the pig valve precisely because of her relatively young age (early 40s). She is active, and the side effects of Coumadin were seen as possibly affecting her quality of life.

      As an aside, in many cases, the aortic aneurysm can be dealt with without having to replace the valve. It didn't work out in my wife's case mainly because she also had a quadricuspid valve (four leaflets instead of the usual three), and was even weaker than it otherwise would have been. As cool as this article's tech sounds (esp. the story of its design), it probably would not have helped her specific case.

  14. Well, how does it work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I assume it is a valve replacement but nowhere in any article did I see a description of how it works or if it even any different from the existing artificial heart valve designs.

    1. Re:Well, how does it work? by robbak · · Score: 3, Informative

      From reading the theengineer.co.uk article, it seems that it is a precisely created wrapping around the outside of the bulging aorta, supporting it. The 'breakthrough' is using medical imaging and 3D printing to make a model of his aorta, so the wrapping can be made accurately before the operation. Previous attempts where the aorta had to be measured and the support created during the operation had been tried unsuccessfully.

      --
      Prediction for end of Universe #42: Fencepost error in Quantum_bogosort.cpp
  15. Engineering seems slow in this area by lseltzer · · Score: 1

    About 20 years ago my father had his aortic valve replaced (due to plaque buildup). He got a mechanical valve. While they were in there they did a bunch of bypasses for which they had to take venus grafts from his legs. I asked his cardiologist why there weren't any synthetic grafts. Harvesting the veins just seems like an opportunity for infection to me. He just said that there weren't any and seemed uninterested in the question. BTW, Mehmet Oz, Dr. Oz from TV, did the surgery. He had just done Frank Torre's heart transplant the year before.

    1. Re:Engineering seems slow in this area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Developing synthetic grafts isn't a very interesting question because it's unlikely that you'll be able to develop something better than the patient's own tissue. Whether it's blood, hair, skin, or veins, using the patient's own tissue is always better. The risk of infection is minimal, while eliminating any chance of rejection and having no additional cost. The only reason you would want an artificial vein is if for some reason you couldn't use the patient's.

      It's like baby formula -- in reality, the only reason you need formula is when the mother can't create the milk herself (deceased, on medication, not lactating enough, can't pump, etc.).

      dom

    2. Re:Engineering seems slow in this area by demonlapin · · Score: 4, Informative

      Living tissue (like a vein) is the most infection-resistant substrate. Infection is a major worry when using artificial graft material, because there isn't and won't be any blood supply to the graft. Synthetic grafts would be grossly inferior to venous grafts, which themselves are poor substitutes for arterial grafts (but there are remarkably few redundant arteries, so the question is generally moot).

    3. Re:Engineering seems slow in this area by lseltzer · · Score: 1

      So then the implant discussed here would be a major infection concern too?

    4. Re:Engineering seems slow in this area by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Yes. Even worse, really, since it's outside the bloodstream (and therefore will have minimal exposure to immune cells).

    5. Re:Engineering seems slow in this area by lseltzer · · Score: 1

      Now that I think about it, my father went on antibiotics at the least little thing because they were worried about an infection (is it "seating"or "seeding"?) in the metal valve. I've never heard this as a concern for artificial joints. My mother's got a knee, an elbow and both shoulders.

    6. Re:Engineering seems slow in this area by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      "Seeding"; the concern is that an infection will land on the valve, set up shop, and spit off little blobs of bacteria throughout his system - the seeds. Bone infections are quite serious, and very difficult to eradicate, but because the entire blood volume of a human being doesn't pass through every bone, people generally don't get an infection there if it doesn't set in immediately post-op. Joint replacements are done in rooms that have laminar flow systems to make sure that the only air hitting the surgical field has been filtered - i.e., there's no way for lint to float in.

  16. I understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that Portal 2 may be the most anticipated game of the year, but showing your compassion for Valve in this way is just ridiculous.

  17. What BS by Jack9 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have had 3 aortic valves implanted throughout my lifetime. Starting at the age of 2. I've also survived a Konno procedure and aortic stem reformation the last time around.

    First of all, Warfarin is pretty fucking safe. If I take an extra 5mg pill once a week, nothing happens. Out of all the thinners, it's not exactly aspirin mild, but it's not horrendously dangerous. Like all drugs, bodies react differently and while I'm ridiculously allergic to tetracycline, I'm middle of the road for reactions to warfarin (over 30 years of it). It's always shock and awe so a news story can give infotainment. Within my lifetime thinners have gained a lot of traction (due to aging boomers). Look up replacements for warfarin. It's big money and the idea that I'll be on warfarin for the rest of my life is unrealistic. Yes I'll be on something, but that's par for a mechanical valve.

    The prosthetic design he came up with, is for his specific problem, weak aortic tissue which involves the stem. As mentioned in the article, a prosthetic aorta isn't a new idea. I'm not exactly sure it's any better an idea than it used to be, nor is anyone else, with a sample size of 30ish. The meat of the story is how the prosthetic is customized. Scan, 3d model, manufacture, affordably. That is pretty radical, from the perspective of current internal medicine. This whole thing sounds like a medical device ad. What I'm more interested in, aortic valves and thinners, they demonize or don't talk about at all. Pity.

    --

    Often wrong but never in doubt.
    I am Jack9.
    Everyone knows me.
    1. Re:What BS by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      First of all, Warfarin is pretty fucking safe. If I take an extra 5mg pill once a week, nothing happens. Out of all the thinners, it's not exactly aspirin mild, but it's not horrendously dangerous.

      I agree. I've been on it for 25 years without incident. The most I've ever taken extra was 2.5mg, but I have forgotten to take my 10mg dose 2 days in a row, and had no problems as a result. Perhaps other people react differently, but from my experience, I have a hard time thinking of it as risky or dangerous.

    2. Re:What BS by Interoperable · · Score: 1

      I don't believe that the implant is a prosthetic aorta at all; rather, it is wrapped around the aorta to prevent further dilation. In that light, it seems like a huge advance for people facing this problem because they will no longer need a replacement of any kind. Warfarin may not be as bad as the article makes it out to be, but I'm sure that it would be better to not be taking any thinners if you didn't have to.

      The new method may not address the same problem that you have but it's certainly a worthwhile innovation. It seems very likely that other related and unrelated internal prosthetics stand to benefit from improved imaging and prototyping.

      --
      So if this is the future...where's my jet pack?
  18. Future Clot? by DigitalPig · · Score: 1

    Well. This is amazing, though PET is well known for its possible thrombosis within 10 years post-surgery. Maybe he would need a materials scientist when designed for this.

    1. Re:Future Clot? by robbak · · Score: 1

      As it is an external stent, around the outside of the arota, not inside it like a endovascular stent, I wouldn't think that thrombosis would be an issue.

      In related news, Firefox's spell-check doesn't know much about things medical.

      --
      Prediction for end of Universe #42: Fencepost error in Quantum_bogosort.cpp
  19. engineer 1 medical science 0 by bakamorgan · · Score: 1

    Someone should get him a plague that says Putting Your Heart into Design and an award... just amazing.

    1. Re:engineer 1 medical science 0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because there's no reward like a talking plague?

    2. Re:engineer 1 medical science 0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "plague" But that would probably kill him.

    3. Re:engineer 1 medical science 0 by ocdscouter · · Score: 1

      Because there's no reward like a talking plague?

      I once knew a guy that had diarrhea of the mouth...

  20. Lucky he wasn't a by Compaqt · · Score: 3, Funny

    software engineer!

    --
    I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    1. Re:Lucky he wasn't a by Geminii · · Score: 1

      Then his Valve would have been a Portal. :)

  21. A new heart valve and a set of 12" brass balls! by Chas · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Okay, I'm a big fan of good engineering and all, but you gotta have some SERIOUSLY heavy-metal nards to be the first guy on the table for your own device for something like this!

    Talk about putting your money where your mouth is!

    Kudos and major man points!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:A new heart valve and a set of 12" brass balls! by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Do note this was back in 2004. Since then, at least 23 other patients have benefit from his pioneering!

      Not only is his pair cast iron, but they've helped others live as well! Shit!

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:A new heart valve and a set of 12" brass balls! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention the surgeon which actually implanted it.
      Oh right, this was outside the lawsuit-crazy US.

  22. Should be tagged DIY Mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DITYS Mods

  23. Re:Quick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm on it.

  24. Physics by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 4, Interesting

    the root of the aorta is the most elastic part of a very elastic vessel, and transmitting the higher pressure downstream (which his aorta-corset will do)

    I'm not a medic but I am a physicist and what you say does not make sense from a physics point of view. If you take a bulge in a pipe containing a flowing liquid and squeeze it back down to the diameter of the rest of the pipe you do not increase the pressure lower down. In fact, if anything, you will reduce it because the narrower pipe will have a larger pressure drop along it due to viscous flow.

    This is not the same as squeezing a closed, static system, like a balloon where squeezing it at one point reduces the volume considerable which does increase the pressure causing the unrestricted part to bulge. Yes, technically there is a volume change by restricting the aorta but surely this is only a small fraction of the total circulatory system and even then wouldn't this just cause the body to eventually reduce the amount of blood in circulation by that amount?

    So unless, I have over simplified something (not taking account of the pulsed flow for example), I don't see from a purely physics perspective how it would make the pressure lower down any higher and so make the situation worse. There may be medical reasons for for increased concern but not the pressure reason you state above.

    1. Re:Physics by lightbox32 · · Score: 1

      I'm not a doctor but my understanding is that during systole (cardiac compression) blood leaves the heart at high pressure (120mm Hg). By expanding, the aorta helps buffer this rise in pressure, and helps gets blood flowing at a constant rate and pressure in the arteoles. If the aorta can't expand due to the corset this high pressure burst will continue further down the circulatory system.

      --
      A camel is a horse created by a committee
    2. Re:Physics by deek · · Score: 1

      I'm not a doctor nor a physicist. That won't stop me from using my intuition, though. By preventing aorta expansion, this should actually increase back pressure on the aorta. The heart will not be able to squeeze down as much, due to the increased back pressure, leading to less liquid escaping. The reduced volume of liquid going through the aorta will decrease pressure further on in the system.

    3. Re:Physics by Kilrah_il · · Score: 2

      I'm not a doctor, not a physicist and not an engineer, but... Wait, I am a doctor... and I like physics, although I'm not a physicists. And what does an engineer do?
      What was I saying?
      damn

      --
      Whenever in an argument, remember this.
    4. Re:Physics by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      The pulsed flow is indeed exactly what you needed to take into account. The heart pumps out some amount of blood when it contracts, and the elasticity of the aorta makes this pressure change less abrupt downstream. If you keep the aorta from expanding, the pressure peaks downstream will be higher. Average pressure should remain about the same.

    5. Re:Physics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any time in the body there is a narrowing in a vessel (stenosis) there will be a post-stenotic dilatation.

      I am not an engineer.

      I do not know the physics underlying this.

      The dynamics are more complex than simple pipes though - I think more akin to your balloon model.

      This is from years of observation (not mine, I've only been practising for 10 years) and I don't know what expections there are.

    6. Re:Physics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Like putting too much air in a balloon."

    7. Re:Physics by maroberts · · Score: 1

      Yes but is his aorta corset simply preventing excessive expansion, and thus performing a degree of normalisation on the blood flow?

      Since the aorta won't be able to expand as much, surely it won't be able to act as a reservoir and push more downstream either.

      --

      Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
      Karma: Chameleon

    8. Re:Physics by demonlapin · · Score: 3, Informative

      The aorta is more like a balloon, less like a pipe. The graft is not very large, maybe 5-6 cm in length. In effect, you have moved the beginning of the aorta downstream a few cm. The aorta is supposed to expand with each beat and absorb the blood squeezed out by the heart, then shrink back down to size during diastole. This graft means that the first part of the aorta can't do that, and so the next part will have to. Soon, it too may need a jacket...

    9. Re:Physics by registrar · · Score: 1

      Given that his heart needs to maintain the same blood flow, it will need to generate higher pressures to get the blood through the less elastic aorta. That will increase the strain on his heart (W = PV, V is constant, P is increased), though presumably it will return it towards normal from a low level, rather than increase it to a dangerously high level. I am not a doctor either (whimsical account name!)...

    10. Re:Physics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps he meant the peek pressure. Peak pressure increases downstream, because an expanding, pulsing aorta will flatten the pressure peaks.

    11. Re:Physics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just skimmed TFA, but I interpret this as meaning that the aorta is just the first failure point. I suspect all parts of the heart are weak and reinforcing the first point just means the failure point is just moved downstream. If the aorta is the most elastic, it may have the most capacity (40+ years?) to deal with high pressures. Other points may fail much faster.

    12. Re:Physics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue for some is not the main section of the aorta, but the brief "ascending" section of the aorta that connects to the top of the heart. If that section expands due to Marfan or some other ailment, then the upper valve cannot close completely which causes high blood pressure (NOT due to being overweight) which can cause other issues INCLUDING further expansion of the affected area and eventually catastrophic failure of the aorta (death). The external mesh around the ascending section of the aorta would serve to bring the vessel back to the original shape and thereby allow the valve to properly close AND bring the patient's blood pressure back to 'normal' without the need for a life-long drug therapy program.

      Why is this such great news? Because this exact condition affects a larger number of adults including some that do not have Marfan syndrome, but due to an illness have experienced an enlargement of the ascending aorta and are now stuck on a high blood pressure drug therapy program AND monitoring by medical professionals for the rest of their life.

      I am one of those people.
      Very healthy and in good shape for most of my life. The only time I ever visited the doctor was when I injured myself or with a sinus infection. Then about 5 years ago during a routine physical the doctor and I wondered why my blood pressure was so high (140/90) when my 'normal' blood pressure was usually around 120/70. An MRI scan showed that the ascending aorta had expanded slightly and the associated heart valve was not closing completely, thereby causing the high blood pressure. Fortunately for me, medication has maintained a normal blood pressure, but there is always the risk that should I get sick again (flu, bronchitis, etc) that it could expand again thereby endangering my life.

      As a person with an engineering degree, my first thought was to wonder if something like this would be possible, but I thought "surely if it was possible someone has already come up with it." Little did I know that someone had, just not in the USA. I will be bringing this information with me to my doctor the next time I visit him.

    13. Re:Physics by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Unless you're really loaded, forget it. Your insurance company won't pay for your experimental surgery, nor for the 3D high-speed CT and ultrasound you'll need to identify the precise dimensions of your aorta, nor for the prototyping. You might try to gin up some interest at Texas Heart. And it still won't get you away from frequent monitoring. I've seen too many people die of these when they rupture. (In fact, we just had a guy die this week of a ruptured aneurysm right in that spot.)

      Having said that, however, a pressure of 140/90 when your baseline is 120/70 sounds more like a new onset of high blood pressure that has caused the dilation. If your primary issue was aortic insufficiency (a leaky valve between ventricle and aorta), your pressure should have been more like 150/50 - the diastolic falls because blood is leaking back into the heart, and the body increases the systolic pressure in order to maintain the same mean arterial pressure.

  25. Nothing to see here... move^W read along by vlueboy · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's a perineum gangrene (pubic area) acording to the internet. Grangrenes are painful rotting of living tissue and require amputation lest you get infected from the necrotic tissue; I suppose its picture has lots of black tissue where you expect skin colors, pus, gore, lots of rotting and hanging skin, and unkempt pubic hairs, and badly decayed sexual organs; male and female.

    We see tons of hearts on TV, and they're beating --not rotting-- while being operating on, unhealthy as they may be at the moment. No, there's no need to see a picture of your proposed comparison to sober up. But thanks for letting us inspect how bad things can get.

    1. Re:Nothing to see here... move^W read along by Kilrah_il · · Score: 1

      Hey, it could be worse.

      --
      Whenever in an argument, remember this.
  26. damn. by milkmage · · Score: 1

    talk about packing your own parachute...

  27. Liar by sycodon · · Score: 0

    Engineers don't have wives.

    But the Sheep will love it I bet.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  28. Wow... by Maxhrk · · Score: 1

    I looks on to this story with stern face.. momentarily later, i cries freely. I salutes you, Tal Golesworthy. You should win Nobel Prize for this kind of stuff! Also, you made me consider my major by looking more into engineering in university!

  29. The attitude here saddens me by 2Bits · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just a few comments, and all the negative comments already: big deal, there is nothing new here.

    You know what, when I hear news like that, it really gives me more confidence in technical people (engineers, scientists, geeks, etc). The guy got a heart problem, he got the skills (with the help of doctors and others, probably) to design the best solution for himself, and in the meantime, for other people too. And guess what, he even got the ball to install it on himself first. And it seems to work just fine. What can be more cool, more geeky, more nerdy than that? Sure, it's only "a small sample of 30ish", as someone said here. So what? Even if this solution only applies to one person, it is still a fucking cool solution.

    For me, I'd like to hear news like that everyday, that's news for nerds, stuff that matters. If I had kids, I would tell them this, and other similar stories, as bed-time stories everyday.

    1. Re:The attitude here saddens me by pbhj · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Roald Dahl apparently co-invented a shunt that was fitted to his daughter to drain a fluid build up.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wade-Dahl-Till_valve

      Perhaps that can be bedtime story for tonight. (I heard about it on a BBC Radio4 programme during the recent Roald Dahl season).

    2. Re:The attitude here saddens me by pbhj · · Score: 1

      s/daughter/son

    3. Re:The attitude here saddens me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, according to the Wikipedia article you reference, it was his son, not his daughter, for whom the device was designed. And by then he had recovered enough to not need it.

  30. rock it roman style by adavies42 · · Score: 1

    they say the romans made aquaduct engineers stand under the arches they'd built when the sluices were first opened. would that more life-critical work could be made fully salient to the people doing it....

    --
    Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
    -kfg
    1. Re:rock it roman style by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      My supervisor used to work for Boeing and apparently they had a rule that if you designed something for civilian aircraft you had to be on the flight when it was tested. Presumabbly for this reason.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  31. Obligatory Simpsons by antifoidulus · · Score: 2

    Homer: What if instead of donating one of my old worn out kidneys, I gave grandpa that artificial kidney I invented...
    Marge: Oh Homer, that was just a beer can with a whistle glued to it...

  32. we need more engineers in more places by hyperion2010 · · Score: 1

    This is the take home message of this whole article:
    Golesworthy believes that projects such as this demonstrate that the interface between engineers and the rest of the world isn’t functioning in the way it should. ’When it does function, huge advances can be made in a very short time period, on very little money,’ he said. ’We have changed the world for people with aortic dilation and we have done it on a fraction of the cost.’

  33. Um... by camperdave · · Score: 1

    In May 2004, Golesworthy became the first recipient of his own invention after undergoing surgery at the Royal Brompton Hospital.

    In May 2004...? Kudos to the guy and all, but this "news" is older than Youtube. Bush was still in his first term of office, and Slashdot had a usable interface.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:Um... by Another,+completely · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But in 2004, they couldn't have had this bit:

      Since then, 23 patients have successfully had the implant fitted and another seven are hoping to undergo the procedure.

      and without that it's just lucky.

    2. Re:Um... by realityimpaired · · Score: 3, Informative

      In May 2004, we wouldn't have known if the procedure was actually successful. The fact that they tried a new technique isn't news. That he's still alive 7 years later is news.

  34. doctors protect doctors by stimpleton · · Score: 1

    This is an anomaly. The medical community(doctors in particular) doesn't cotton to these sorts of antics from outsiders. Just wait to this becomes more widely known amongst the Doctor fraternity. It will become like mid-wifery - a fringe practice prone to potentially costing your baby its life.

    --

    In post Patriot Act America, the library books scan you.
    1. Re:doctors protect doctors by dasqua · · Score: 1

      This is an anomaly. The medical community(doctors in particular) doesn't cotton to these sorts of antics from outsiders. Just wait to this becomes more widely known amongst the Doctor fraternity. It will become like mid-wifery - a fringe practice prone to potentially costing your baby its life.

      Seriously, on everything in your post, WTF?!

      --
      tihs isg mead fmro rcecydle tpyos
    2. Re:doctors protect doctors by jsvendsen · · Score: 1

      Uhm, yeah. There's clearly some ax grinding going on here, but in the guys defense I don't think he really thinks that modern day midwifery kills babies. It might be more along the lines of "The evil doctor patriarchate will pounce on this guy for taking an active part in his own treatment, just as they once pounced on midwives." Now, that's still pretty far out, but not nearly as bad as believing both those things and approving, which is what it looked like to me at first :)

    3. Re:doctors protect doctors by malloc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is an anomaly. The medical community(doctors in particular) doesn't cotton to these sorts of antics from outsiders. Just wait to this becomes more widely known amongst the Doctor fraternity. It will become like mid-wifery - a fringe practice prone to potentially costing your baby its life.

      To clarify, you mean how many Obstetricians consider mid-wifery "a fringe practice prone to potentially costing your baby its life", despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary?[1]

      [1] See Google, really

      --
      ___________________ I want to be free()!
    4. Re:doctors protect doctors by heathen_01 · · Score: 1

      This may be the reference the op was refering to.

      The amazing part of this news story was the level of access he was able to get from the medical profession.

    5. Re:doctors protect doctors by Rutulian · · Score: 1

      Well, doctors tend to be a conservative bunch for a number of very good reasons. New ideas take time before they get traction, and there is enough experience to make them confident recommending it to their patients. Some doctors are more comfortable recommending experimental techniques...I'm not sure if that makes them better doctors. I would prefer established practices unless there was a compelling reason to try something different (as in the article's case).

      As for the OB comment, I just had a baby daughter born yesterday. Throughout the whole process, I never heard anybody from the medical profession refer to mid-wifery as "potentially costing my baby her life." However, from a personal viewpoint, I am much more comfortable having had the delivery in a hospital. There were no complications, but if there had been, an emergency c-section would have been available. The epidural for my wife was also available, which is very good considering the amount of pain she was in after her 12th hour of labor.

    6. Re:doctors protect doctors by malloc · · Score: 1

      You'll note I said "many" OBs, not all. But if you are around much you will find in some circles an incredibly arrogant and ignorant attitude among some OBs.

      I suggest if you have another child you (well, your wife and kid) would benefit from looking at the real situation with mid-wifery, and the real outcome statistics since in the end that's all anyone (should) care about. Many types of complication can be dealt with by midwives, others are just as easy to take care of when they co-ordinate with the hospital and you're not far away. And yes, there are some emergencies that you could only deal with immediately in a hospital, but you're balancing those against the very real fatality rates of increased risk of infection in the hospital. (And of course, just because you have a midwife doesn't mean you can't give birth in the hospital, unless your hospital is of the previously mentioned ignorant attitude.) Anyway, for uncomplicated pregnancies the stats don't point in the traditional OB/hospital's favour.

      --
      ___________________ I want to be free()!
  35. Warfarin by codeButcher · · Score: 1
    I was put on Warfarin (blood anti-coagulant, also used in some rat poisons, for the non-chem/pharm nerds) for half of last year after a bilateral pulmonary embolism (blood clots in both lungs, for the non-med nerds), following surgery.

    Warfarin is a cheap drug and does not seem to affect one's health, even long-term (comparing notes with a friend who is on a lifelong prescription due to heart valve replacement). It however IS quite a b*tch for someone who loves to tinker in the workshop or garden. The slightest cut or scrape tends to bleed and bleed and bleed and .... When dressing in the morning, apart from the phone, keys, wallet, and handkerchief, I also made sure I packed a box of bandages.

    I'm not sure I would go to the lengths of inventing my own medical device just to get around that nuisance.

    --
    Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
  36. Red Cross? by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

    With all the stories we've had on here about the Red Cross suing game makers for use of their logo, has Slashdot really just put a Red Cross logo on all its health articles?

  37. I knew all that time... by ketilf · · Score: 1

    ...spent playing with my RepRap might get useful at some point! ;)

  38. CV by Hugundous · · Score: 1

    This man has a level 1 deer stalking certificate on his CV. He knows what he's doing.

  39. It's gonna suck by nedlohs · · Score: 1

    when he gets a cease and desist order from some submarine patent holder that vaguely mentions something similar.

  40. goes to show by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    So many losers or old technology still in medicine, that someone having no real knowledge of the body, uses his skill from another trade, to figure something out, better then what is there now....thinking outside the box (and the local peninsula I see).
    Amazing, good for him, and now he will be rich, and can relax, as he starts to figure out how to create a synthetic heart.

  41. Warfarin by MrBippers · · Score: 2

    One of the problems with warfarin is that there is a lot of variability between patients. The main clearance enzyme for warfarin, CYP2C9, has reduced function in around roughly 25% of patients due to genetic polymorphisms. The target for warfarin, VKORC1, is highly variable due to genetics and the substrate concentrations, vitamin K, can vary greatly with dietary intake. Warfarin also has a narrow therapeutic window. If concentrations are too high there can be bleeding problems and at concentrations too low it's ineffective.

    The end result is that the initial warfarin dosing can be extremely variable and requires close therapeutic monitoring when starting a new patient on the treatment. It's a far cry from something like aspirin where there is a pretty good idea of what dose a patient will need. A drug company producing something similar to warfarin that wasn't subject to such high genetic variability would be clinically preferred due to lower health care costs in starting treatment on new patients. That said, when you're properly dosed warfarin is pretty damn effective.

  42. Indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Talk about eating your own dogfood.

    I'm not only the inventor of this implant, but I'm also a client.

  43. The State of Medical Practice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently my way of thinking is a little different. What the hell is wrong with the British medical system if this engineer with no medical background has to develop his own medical treatment?

  44. FDA regulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to hear about the legalities of doing this. Medical implants are regulated by the FDA in the US and it seems quite likely any doctor going along with a homebuilt implant would end up fined and losing his license. Did this guy have to jump through any regulatory hoops?