Slashdot Mirror


Egypt Cuts the Net, Net Fights Back

GMGruman writes "Egypt's cutoff of the Net enrages the Netizenry, who are finding a bunch of ways — high tech and low tech — to fight back, from dial-up to ham radio, from mesh networks to Twitter. Robert X. Cringely shows how the Net war is being waged, and asks, Could it happen at home, too?" Sure, it could. On the same topic, reader dermiste writes "In reaction to the Egyptian government crackdown on the Internet, the French non-profit ISP French Data Network set up a dial-up Internet access. This way, anyone in Egypt who has access to a analog phone line and can call France is able to connect to the network using the following number: +33 1 72 89 01 50 (login: toto, password: toto)."

48 of 232 comments (clear)

  1. Re:France has a non-profit ISP? by McTickles · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yeah it is an association where members split the overall cost of the network.

    I'll possibly go with them eventually because other ISPs in france insist on making you pay for services you do not want, like TV...

  2. For how long by cdp0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This way, anyone in Egypt who has access to a analog phone line and can call France is able to connect to the network [...]

    I'm wondering for how long will the international phone lines work. The gvt. is most likely able to cut those too. Remaining options will then be HAM radio, GSM roaming, if you are close enough to a border and you are lucky to be in the range of a GSM base station from across (but I have no idea about the situation in Egypt), and satellite phone.

    1. Re:For how long by Pascal+Sartoretti · · Score: 2

      I'm wondering for how long will the international phone lines work. The gvt. is most likely able to cut those too.

      They can't do it too long : the egyptian economy relies too heavily on tourism (see here).

      The same happened in Tunisia a few weeks ago. Ben Ali (the former dictator) quickly understood that he could not cut his country from the rest of the world, because it was too dependent from outside (tourism & call centers). He then left to Saudi Arabia, which might be a good elderly home for Mubarak too.

  3. Better get started on backup numbers... by Goose+In+Orbit · · Score: 2

    I'll wager the exchanges are being told to block it right about now

  4. Re:What's the Catch? by McTickles · · Score: 3, Informative

    They ARE offfering it for free, it is an association, there is nothing in it for them. They are fierce defenders of net neutrality, they have been around for quite a while now.

  5. Re:What's the Catch? by Aldrikh · · Score: 2

    The number to call is a normal landline, so the person in egypt would still have to pay the communication itself, but appart from that, it is free.

  6. Toto...?! by Ghoser777 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Would that be a homage to the group Toto, "famous" for the song "Africa"?

    It's gonna take a lot to take me away from you
    There's nothing that a hundred men or more could ever do
    I bless the rains down in Africa
    Gonna take some time to do the things we never have

    --
    James Tiberius Kirk: "Spock, the women on your planet are logical. No other planet in the galaxy can make that claim."
    1. Re:Toto...?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, it's just the French equivalent of "foo". The sequence "foo bar biz baz" is "toto titi tata tutu".

      If you want to bless the reigns, you should worry more about what's happening in Jordan, rather than Egypt.

    2. Re:Toto...?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes "toto" is common fill-in for passwords and first names. It's more like "joe" than "foobar".

    3. Re:Toto...?! by McTickles · · Score: 2

      toto comes from a lame french kindergarten thing...

      0 + 0
        =

      la tete a toto

      dont ask...

    4. Re:Toto...?! by hotkey · · Score: 2

      'Toto' in French is the equivalent of 'Foo' or 'Bar' in English - it's often used as a placeholder or temporary variable name.

    5. Re:Toto...?! by the_cosmocat · · Score: 2

      Yeah! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T%C3%AAte_%C3%A0_Toto Because toto in french is a small boys not very intelligent so there is nothing (or 0 ) in his head. That's why 0+0= 0 = "tête à toto" = "head of toto"

    6. Re:Toto...?! by doomsday_device · · Score: 3, Funny

      Where do I sign up?

      Here, I guess.

  7. The Cringley article is crap. I want to know MORE by sllim · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yesterday when I read that Egypt had pulled the plug on the internet the first thing that went through my mind was, 'the people will find a way.'. The second thing was, 'I can't wait to see how they do it. This is going to be fascinating.'. Since then I have been contemplating ad-hoc wireless networks and dialing into 56k modems thousands of miles away.
    I have been chewing at the bit (haha! I made a pun!) for any information as to how this little project is proceeding.

    The best Cringley's article can muster is a French company offering 56k access for free and the words, 'Wireless mesh network'. That is all fine and dandy.
    I am happy and impressed that the French company is offering there resources to the Egyptian people. Big round of appluase for those guys. But the geek in me is not impressed. Dialing out of country to a 56k connection is just so bloody obvious. I want to know the bloody details of the wireless mesh. I want to know about the sap that has hacked his satelite dish to give internet access to his town.

    I want more. It has to be out there.

  8. Cairo residents opening home WiFi to protestors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.nowpublic.com/world/egypt-protests-residents-open-wifi-networks-protestors-2751360.html

    I submitted a seperate story on this - before seeing this story.
    Any ways - I think this gives greater significance to the WiFi p2p protocols - couple of links I can find in a rush:

    http://netsukuku.freaknet.org/
    http://sourceforge.net/p/widi/home/

  9. this is important by phmadore · · Score: 2

    I think it's extremely important that we all take notes here. Dial-up may be getting phased out, but keeping one kicking around might not be the worst idea. Probably learning how to set up an actual dial-in connection with ease would be good. Because it can and will happen here when the shit hits the fan, and, being a veteran of war, I can tell you that the best way to demobilize and weaken your enemy is to fuck his communications as hard as you possibly can. Indymedia, while relegated largely to the role of aging dinosaur, has still been on the cutting edge of this sort of thing for several years now. It wouldn't be hard for someone to set up a Twitter-like service akin to Identi.ca and use it as a way to disseminate information on streets to avoid and where certain types of aide are needed and what not, in the event of a national crisis like we're seeing in Egypt.

  10. effect of the 'net overstated? by petes_PoV · · Score: 4, Insightful
    People like to think of the internet as the answer to "the man" and that it has a grass-roots connection to people that allows them to multiply their effectiveness at bringing "people power" to bear. Is there really any truth in that? Although it's a popular meme among advocates, it does sound unlikely.

    For a start, the greater the technological advancement, the more dependent it is on a larger number of underlying functions. That makes it vulnerable not only to someone hitting the kill switch, but to government agents (of whom we can safely assume there are many infiltrated amongst any overthrow plot) sending out false information under the guise of "the people" Whether that's reports saying things are different from what they really are, or sabotaging rallies by sending people tot he wrong place - the problem with believing an anonymous source (on twitter, say) is that they're anonymous: you can never be sure they truly represent who they say they do.

    So, while there is/was obviously some use of the internet by some people in Egypt, I would think that its main effect has been to deliver part of the story to outsiders (whether news organisations or just people) rather than to get things going within the country itself. As such, if the only way we have of getting information is through the internet we naturally (and mistakenly) presume that is also how people inside are getting information, too. There appears to already have been quite enough groundswell without the need for smartphones or websites.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    1. Re:effect of the 'net overstated? by bogjobber · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would disagree with you that the main effect of the internet in Egypt has been to deliver news to outsiders. While internet access is blocked now, the use of social media has been instrumental in informing the population and organizing protests for quite a while. See the April 6 Youth Movement. (Sorry, my work blocks most sites so I can't give a more informative reference than that wikipedia article).

      This is a movement that has been years in the making. I imagine a large number of the people involved in the protests (who are largely young, educated people who would have internet access) became interested and involved well before the protests of the last few days.

    2. Re:effect of the 'net overstated? by mad+flyer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you are in denial or full of shit...

      Just look at what's happening, how it started and how it's being conducted... The net was not shutdown in egypt without reason... Denying it's usefulness as an insurectional tool or saying it lack reliability is just stupidity or attention whoring "HEY look at me ! i'm going against the flow!!!"

      One thing for a start, multiple report from multiple source have more chance to give a good picture than any official newsgroup. It's chaos, propaganda and truth have the same 'timeslot' on the net... it's usually not difficult in these case to see that something is going on, maybe not precisely, but enough to get some part of the big picture...

      I'm getting really tired of smartasses like you, you have nothing of any value to add, just bucket loads of improbable "what if" that you try to pass as reasonable analysis...

    3. Re:effect of the 'net overstated? by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are 2 reasons Mubarak tried to block Internet access:
      1. It was being used by protesters to coordinate - reporting on where police were concentrated, where people were gathering, etc.
      2. It had this video of a civilian getting shot by police while he was backing away. Mubarak probably thought that by blocking access to the video the Egyptian people wouldn't figure out that the cops had crossed that line.

      It hasn't worked. As a longtime /. sig once put it: The Internet treats censorship as damage and routes around it.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    4. Re:effect of the 'net overstated? by RCL · · Score: 3, Funny

      (Sorry, my work blocks most sites so I can't give a more informative reference than that wikipedia article).

      Are calls to France cheap at yours?

    5. Re:effect of the 'net overstated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      That "longtime /. sig" is a quote by John Gilmore, co-founder of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, creator or the alt.* Usenet hierarchy, major contributor to the GNU project, fifth employee of Sun Microsystems, co-author of the predecessor to DHCP, beard wearer. The correct quote is "The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it."

  11. Re:The Cringley article is crap. I want to know MO by bogjobber · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can't imagine that somebody who set up a wireless mesh network or hacked his satellite TV is going to be very focused on reporting the technical details of what he's doing to the foreign press. There's a revolution happening and the Egyptian government is cracking down hard on protesters.

  12. Re:What's the Catch? by ryzvonusef · · Score: 4, Informative

    Also, the number is probably already blocked.

    If you read their comments there are links to other alternatives, including this interesting link that some how uses cellphones[1], and more people are pitching in.

    Also, they have offered some statistics:

    Some figures:

    The first calls arriving from Egypt (code +20) are seen around 19:30. One every 2 or 3 minutes.

    Rarely more than one simultaneous connection. Most are short-term (probably related to the costs of communications).

    Also saw some other sources (Iraq, Algeria, UAE, among others)

    [1]: http://manalaa.net/dialup

    --
    I am an ACCA student. Got a query on Accountancy/Finance? Maybe I can help!
  13. Message from Cairo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    These are exciting times to be living in Egypt. I'm not an Egyptian myself having moved here a few years ago and the locals are usually wary of me but I have past experience of setting up ad-hoc internet connections and that has proven invaluable in the current crisis. I never travel anywhere without my trusty Commodore 64 and, combined with some string and sticky tape, I have set this up as an internet hub giving access to the rest of the world. Like people everywhere, the Egyptians just want to download Hollywood movies and Linux ISOs and to troll foreign journalists. Now I ahve restored that to them it is like a new age of peace and propserity. Best wishes - Junis.

  14. Re:What's the Catch? by rtfa-troll · · Score: 2

    I guess you have noticed this thing called a "phone bill" that you pay. This is made from billing records and traditionally was directly related to the calls you made (nowaday's, with flat rate, it's more complex than that). Every telephone exchange in existence automatically records the outgoing calls you make. Even 99% of PBXs (with the exception of a few where the users deliberately throw away the information).

    I wonder if volunteers messing around in this area are not generally doing lots of harm. At the very least try to give your users plausible deniability by offering your lines for use by both gamers and professionals or please warn them to try from somewhere they won't be traced to. E.g. warn your users to use a public connection or try to tap into the line of someone else who isn't willing to join the protests (best of all a security official's line - getting the suspicion spread around will help other people to get off by denying they knew about the calls). The same goes for all the stuff like ESR was doing in Iran. If it doesn't look like commercial HTTPS you shouldn't be using it without at least basic identity hiding measures. These measures are very difficult for non techical people, so just rushing in and providing support at the last moment is a disaster. Instead the safer way has to be to provide locals with training in advance.

    I'm a bit loath to criticise here since I think it's very important that people do something and don't just sit on the sidelines, but I wish the people trying to organise communications were just a little more careful.

    --
    =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
  15. Lots of backup numbers by mangu · · Score: 2

    Try googling it

    If Google is too hard, try these

  16. It's all shades of gray by mangu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    doesn't anyone want to talk about about the fact that the good old US of A is supporting a brutal regime that murders and tortures its own people?

    If the USA didn't support any regime that murders and tortures its own people it would have very few relations to other countries. It's all a matter of proportion. Egypt is less brutal than other countries in that region, they have a relatively moderate stance regarding international relations, they try not to let Muslim radicals do too much harm.

    Don't get me wrong, I think Mubarak should step down, but Obama is right in taking a cautious approach to that crisis.

    1. Re:It's all shades of gray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ok, so what you're saying is that all we have to do is trust your judgment on what is the lesser of two evils? I'm not sure that's good enough.

      Especially not for those people that are tortured and murdered daily by the countless regimes that the U.S. keeps in power.

      You see your argument can justify involvement with any level of evil, and it suggests that your moral compass is not just flexible, but broken.

      And has anyone noticed that the first place that America's "friends" are heading to when they're ejected by their own people; yes its Saudi Arabia - surely the most brutal and unpleasant regime in the middle east. I mean you got public beheadings, execution of women for witchcraft & adultery, routine use of torture, this place has it all!

      And once again, guess who keeps this evil and murderous regime in place? You guessed it - it's the US of A.

      In God we trust - now pass the pliers.

    2. Re:It's all shades of gray by dachshund · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Egypt is less brutal than other countries in that region, they have a relatively moderate stance regarding international relations, they try not to let Muslim radicals do too much harm.

      This is one way of looking at things. The other is that the local population's views aren't (or at one point, weren't) deemed compatible with the U.S.'s strategic and economic interests in the reason. As a result, it became convenient to ally with a totalitarian regime that overrode those interests.

      In this view, which I believe is pretty well supported by history, Muslim extremists are more of a symptom than a cause of U.S. policy (i.e., if a regime crushes all of its non-violent, secular opponents, sooner or later you'll be left with fanatics who are willing to die for their cause). For a great view on this, look up the history of the U.S. in Iran, and in particular how our Operation Ajax eventually replaced a secular prime minister with a radical Islamic government.

      The one thing I'll offer in "our" defense is that these things are highly path dependent. In other words, our mistakes beget a dictator, which leads to radicalism, which leads to our offering more support to the dictator in order to hold down the radicals --- basically the situation you described in your post. It can be very difficult to untangle yourself from bad decisions made by your predecessors.

      Doesn't mean we shouldn't try --- even as a practical matter (rather than a moral one) these dictatorships in the middle east aren't going to last forever, and the longer we support them the worse it'll be for us when the shit hits.

    3. Re:It's all shades of gray by MrL0G1C · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If the USA didn't support any regime that murders and tortures its own people.......

      It doesn't just support them politically it actually trains their police how to do this: Leaked U.S. Military Manual:

      How to Train Death Squads and Quash Revolutions from San Salvador to Iraq.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    4. Re:It's all shades of gray by couchslug · · Score: 2

      Protecting Israel from Egypt takes second place to protecting Egyptians from each other. Do not forget Mubarak, like Hafez Assad in Syria and Saddam Hussein in Iraq, imposed stability on people who would not otherwise have it. It takes a strong, forceful leader to rule primitive societies.

      Mubarak was useful to the US. He fought Al Qaeda, which his successors won't bother to do.

      When there are no "good guys", playing some of the bad guys against each other is necessary. Taking the moral high road never conferred any advantage, which is why the most successful Empires in history did not (as opposed to "pretend to") do that.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    5. Re:It's all shades of gray by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      Imposing stability rarely in the long run guarantees it. I'll concede that in certain societies at certain times your argument may in fact hold weight, that not every society is instantly ready for democracy. Hell, even Merrie Olde England went through a considerable number of contortions between the Magna Carta, the Model Parliament, the English Civil War, the Glorious Revolution, and ultimately the great Reform Bills of the 19th century. But even in the case of England, at least there was movement, not always straightforward, but at least movement towards a democratic and liberal society. In Egypt, like a good many of the authoritarian North African and Arab regimes, there was no such liberalization. The Mubarak's and Ben Ali's did indeed keep a cap on the fanatics, but they also squashed the dreams of a few generations of ordinary citizens in the process, with little liberalization or sign that the government was doing anything but watching its own ass and enriching its own leadership. That's not a route to stability, that's a route to revolution. The Shah in Iran almost figured it out, but much too late.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:It's all shades of gray by Nick+Ives · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It takes a strong, forceful leader to rule primitive societies.

      With this, you clearly show your prejudice.

      --
      Nick
    7. Re:It's all shades of gray by rainmouse · · Score: 2

      Egypt is less brutal than other countries in that region

      Though Egypt without the internet should perhaps be renamed Gypt?

    8. Re:It's all shades of gray by Nick+Ives · · Score: 2

      But the law regarding stoning was put in place in '77 and Sharia was put in place via a referendum in '80. You could say the people voted for it, but the idea of a free vote in a dictatorship is kind of ridiculous.

      Now there is a revolutionary situation in Egypt. There are both secular and Islamic forces at work and, at this stage, it's impossible to say who will be successful. It's incorrect to say that Egypt is a primitive society though, they have an industrial base, a developing economy and control of one of the major world shipping routes.

      Hunter-gatherer tribes living in rainforests are primitive; Egypt is a brutal, repressive regime that the people are rising up against.

      --
      Nick
  17. Re:What's the Catch? by eric_herm · · Score: 2

    Yeah, they have nothing better to do that finding who call a number in France. The riots are not more urgent, nor are the medias, the economy, and likely organizing the escape of Mubarack. Nor is more urgent to have a new governement...

  18. Re:GSM Roaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not much likelihood of GSM roaming. Take a look at a photo of Egypt at night from space.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/28634332@N05/5146231463/

    Egypt *is* the Nile. And not much near the borders...

  19. Re:What's the Catch? by commodore6502 · · Score: 2

    Ooops. Me not perfekt. ;-) (shrug) I hear the exact same thing from europeans all the time: "New Jersey... Virginia... eh, what's the difference? It's over there somewhere."

    BTW there was no reason to mod -1 Troll on BOTH my messages, especially the second one about Dialup internet costing virtually nothing to provide.

    --
    Information wants to be expensive AND wants to be free. So you have Value vs. Cheap distribution fighting each other.
  20. Does this mean... by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does this mean we can get their IPV4 addresses back?

    Just 'sayin

  21. Re:What's the Catch? by commodore6502 · · Score: 5, Informative

    >>>are they charging an arm and a leg? I mean, I know they're Not for Profit, but that doesn't always meant they offer all services free. If they ARE offering it for free... I can't help but wonder what their angle is.
    >>>

    I don't know why you're surprised. DIALUP internet only costs me $7/month. Netzero and Juno offer it for free (see links below). It's not that much of a burden for the Non-profit ISP to offer free access to egyptians.

    And the datarate is only ~30 kbit/s via analog lines, so you could carry over 300 users in the space of one DSL or cable customer.

    http://www.juno.com/start/landing.do?page=www/free/index
    http://isp.netscape.com/

    --
    Information wants to be expensive AND wants to be free. So you have Value vs. Cheap distribution fighting each other.
  22. Re:What's the Catch? by Daimanta · · Score: 2

    The government is bounded to doing one single thing at a time. They have, if they are skilled at it, the ability to multi-task like no other because they command a large army of civil servants.

    When analysing a revolution there is rarely one single thing that determines the success or failure of overthrowing the seated power. A (current) government therefore has the interest in controlling the flow of information in the broadest sense of the word. If Muburak and his cohorts have paid attention to the role of internet in the flow of information to a new generation(with new predominantly people under 30 years), they will make damn sure that they restrict access to unfavourable information, in this case the french dial-in ISP. In fact, if I was an employee of the digital division of the government of Mubarak(and loyal), I would immediatly place a phonecall to the person who has the ability to monitor/block this address.

    This factor might be one of them that determines whether this revolution will become like the one in Tunesia or the one in Iran.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
  23. Re:Phy disconnect or DNS? by jimicus · · Score: 2

    IIRC it's already been figured out - their top-tier ISPs (presumably under orders from the government) have stopped advertising the addresses they provide routes to at the border routers.

  24. Re:What's the Catch? by GCsoftware · · Score: 2

    Being that the Czechoslovakian revolution was peaceful and led to a prosperous modern state, and the Romanian one was bloody and messy and led to a clusterfuck that persists to this day, I'd say you were flat-out wrong. I don't think pushing the Egyptians into a civil war is a great idea to be honest...

  25. Re:The Cringley article is crap. I want to know MO by Xyrus · · Score: 5, Funny

    I propose a new protocol: Internet Delivers Information Over Twitter, or I.D.I.O.T for short.

    --
    ~X~
  26. Not the "real" Robert X. Cringely by Simon80 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Mark Stephens and InfoWorld parted ways acrimoniously, and one of the results of that is that they both still use the Robert X. Cringely name. The InfoWorld Cringely is NOT the same author as this one.

  27. Killing DNS by amplusquem · · Score: 2

    Egypt turned off the internet by shutting down the DNS servers. It is extremely useful to have public DNS servers memorized. Google: 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4

  28. Kill Switch by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2

    You have now seen an Internet Kill Switch in action. Anyone at all still think that it's a good idea to give this president one too?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."