Slashdot Mirror


Golden Gate Bridge To Eliminate Tollbooths

Hugh Pickens writes writes "The San Francisco Chronicle reports that tollbooths and toll collectors, a fixture at the Golden Gate Bridge since it opened in 1937, will be eliminated starting in 2012 as the bridge moves to an all-electronic system, cutting 34 jobs and saving $19.2 million over the first eight years. The bridge will move to a toll collection strategy that combines the existing FasTrak system with one that photographs the license plates of cars going through the toll plaza and mails a bill to the registered owners. Other structures and bridges have successfully gone to all-electronic tolls, including the Sydney Harbor Bridge in Australia and the Leeville Bridge in Louisiana, but not everyone is happy with the change. 'This is a world-famous bridge, and you need a human face,' says Philip Hynes. 'You need people in those toll booths to greet people.'"

22 of 349 comments (clear)

  1. Electronic tolls way faster by Loomismeister · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd much rather cruise through tolls without having to stop, and I really have no desire to see these human toll booth operators.

  2. "You need a human face" by commodore64_love · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No you don't.

    You need to eliminate the 5-minute backup at the toll booth, and thereby save yourself ~2000 hours over a lifetime. You don't need the human face, just as you don't need an operator asking, "Number please?" on the telephone.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  3. When will they and the other us systems go ezpass? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When will they and all the other us systems link up with ez-pass?

  4. Clean air anyone? Traffic jams? by name_already_taken · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Further, what these idiots fail to realize is that all those cars idling at and then accelerating away from the tollbooths add up to a huge emissions source - something which California says they're always concerned about.

    In the last decade they added "Open-road tolling" on the tollways around Chicago - the air quality was measurably improved in the areas near the toll-collection sites.

    The bridges in the bay area are also major commuter routes - eliminating the requirement for every car to stop at a toll booth can only improve traffic flow.

    For everyone who loves the toll collectors, I bet there are hundreds who hate them. I remember a story in one of the Chicago papers about all the bad things people would do to the toll collectors - like heating up coins using the car's cigarette lighter before giving them to the collector. The exhaust gasses those folks have to breathe all day can't be good for them either.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
  5. Re:Saving $19.2M over the first eight years...how? by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, $19.2 million, divided by 8 years, divided by 34 people equals...

    The toll-collectors get paid $70K per year?

    That cost probably includes their medical insurance, the employer's portion of SS and other taxes, vacation time, etc.

  6. Just get rid of tolls completely. by Zaphod-AVA · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Tolls waste a lot of time and money in an attempt to spread the cost of the road to the people that 'use' it, but this doesn't work. Everyone benefits from the road system. Even if you don't own a car, the goods and services you use rely on them. Adding tolls just increases the cost of those goods and services, so the entire toll industry is a waste of time. Just tax people evenly for the roads we all rely on and skip the wasteful toll booths and electronics.

    1. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by clarkkent09 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Everyone benefits from the road system.

       
      And extending the same idea, everyone benefits from the existence of the Internet, therefore people who don't have access to it should also pay a share of your ISP bill, right? Not everyone benefits from the road system equally. People who drive more benefit more personally and also cause more damage to the roads and they should pay more for the maintenance. The gas tax that we have now is one way to do it but its imperfect. The most fair way to finance roads is to pay by the mile traveled with the weight of the vehicle factored in, which is pretty much what the tolls do. The only problem with tolls is the practicality, the delays they cause etc but it seems like technology can fix that.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    2. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 5, Informative

      You misunderstand the reason for toll booths on the golden gate bridge. It's about reducing demand.

      By having a toll on the bridge, a certain percentage of the population is going to decide that it's not worth it to cross the bridge, and will plan their trip using an alternate route. This reduces the number of cars crossing and reduces congestion. By implementing a toll, you help insure that there is at least one non-congested (or relatively quick) path by car into the city, so that those who need to get there in a hurry can. If you need to get into the city 15 to 20 minutes faster, the toll is worth it.

      With the toll, the bridge is useful to some people (or all people some of the time). Without the toll, the bridge becomes just as congested as any other road, because people choosing between the bridge and the alternative will favor the bridge until congestion makes them indifferent between the two.

      You misunderstand the reason for toll booths on the Golden Gate Bridge. It's about revenue.

      There ARE no alternate toll-free paths into San Francisco unless you want to add nearly three hours to your drive. They also strategically planned the toll booths so that most people cannot avoid paying a toll by picking and choosing different paths to take and running the toll-free side of a bridge in the morning and the toll-free side of another bridge on their way home. You must not be from the Bay Area, so I'll forgive you, but there simply is no feasible way to bypass the Golden Gate Bridge to get into the city.

    3. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Reziac · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Whilst reading TFA (I know, it's embarrassing, but I still do it) I noted the bridge "operates with a $89M deficit" ... um, how the hell does it manage THAT? The bridge itself must be long since paid for, and maintenance can't be all THAT high -- surely they don't do a total resurfacing every year? So how much of the deficit is a direct cost of running the toll system itself? Or is it just more of the vaunted California gov't economy's ability to spend at a rate 3x its means?

      Also:

      "A toll-taker's base pay starts at $48,672 a year and tops out at $54,080."

      Holy shit, where do WE sign up to make that kind of money for sitting in a booth?? (Yeah, I know that's barely getting by in San Francisco, but still...) Plus benefits and retirement, no doubt.

      BTW, we already do get taxed evenly, based on usage -- that's what the gasoline tax does. You're taxed in direct proportion to miles driven and weight on the road surface (which translates into wear and tear) because that's the reality of a given driving distance and a given vehicle's weight-to-MPG ratio. Yeah, it gets harsh if you're forced to commute long distances, but I've yet to see a fairer system.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    4. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And extending the same idea, everyone benefits from the existence of the Internet, therefore people who don't have access to it should also pay a share of your ISP bill, right?

      No, but everyone should pay to get internet (and road) access to everyone. If we can count on everyone having internet access we can scrap older less efficient ways to do things. This benefits everyone.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  7. Re:rental car? by magarity · · Score: 5, Informative

    Oh, it's tremendous fun to go through an automated toll with a rental car. First the toll authority sends a bill for $1 to the rental company. Then the rental company charges your card (that's still in their system) for $15 based on the fine print in the rental agreement. A run through a lengthy toll road with five or six toll monitors results in individual bills for each one and can get you a bill from the rental company for a hundred or more.

  8. Re:Saving $19.2M over the first eight years...how? by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 4, Informative

    Salaries aren't the only cost. Don't forget health insurance and pension plan. Plus the cost of maintaining the actual booths. Plus the armored trucks that have to carry a few tons of quarters every day.

  9. Switzerland has a nice system by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Informative

    You buy a sticker to put on the inside of your windshield. It costs ~32€ and is good for a year. With that, you can drive anywhere, without any further tolls. Switzerland has butt-loads of tunnels and bridges that they have to maintain, and their autobahns are some of the best I have ever driven on. They are probably cleaner than most surgical operating room in the world.

    In Italy, they have some kind of electronic subscription sticker system that lets you get through the toll booths fast. Or you can just shove in your EC bank card or credit card at unmanned booths. They do have folks at a few toll booths. On my last trip there, I saw that a lot of tourists would hold up maps, and ask the toll collector for advice. So maybe tossing the human element out is not such a great idea.

    In Germany there are no tolls, and on a lot of the autobahns, no speed limit. Their autobahn motto is: "Drive fast, die young, leave a beautiful, mangled corpse."

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:Switzerland has a nice system by mapkinase · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wish I had mod points to mod you up.

      They also pay special attention to tailgating. I have heard stories about automatic tracking of car-car distance on bridges in Germany.

      Tailgating and lame-ass changing lanes is the main reason for accidents, not the absence of the speed limit.

      Instead of putting emphasis on driver education (stricter driving tests, for example) they toll the economy with their stupid speed limits, increasing amount of time people spend in traffic unproportionally to the speed limit reduction. /rant

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  10. Re:Saving $19.2M over the first eight years...how? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The cost of an employee is usually around double that employee's salary (benefits, substitute cover when they are off, equipment, and so on). They're also going to be saving a lot if they're not handling cash anymore.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  11. Out of state plates & non-US plates. by CrAlt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And how about all the people who don't update their registration when they move? Rental cars?

    And what do you do if the bill isn't paid? Suspend the registration? Cali can't do that to out of state plates or plates from Canada/Mexico.

    I wonder if the added bureaucracy and paperwork for collections is going to nullify the gains they make by not collecting at the bridge.

    --
    I have to return some videotapes...
  12. Tourists vs residents by FooAtWFU · · Score: 5, Interesting
    It's a question of tourists versus residents, one of the long-standing San Francisco tug-of-wars that's only been escalating of late since the city's budget fell apart. San Francisco is very much a place of "soak the tourists for all they're worth". A one-way cable-car ride is $5. (Residents can get a monthly transit pass that lets them ride at no additional cost.) In Golden Gate Park, they just fenced in the Conservatory of Flowers last year so they could start charging money to people without a driver's license which says they live in the city... i.e. soak the tourists. There's complaints that the planned streetcar/subway expansion for the T-Third light rail line is all for the tourists.

    Take a look at Locans and Tourists #3: San Francisco, a map of geotagged photos of San Francisco based on a 'tourist' vs 'resident' heuristic (tourists take photos all at once; residents take them over a period of months). San Francisco is a divided city.

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  13. Re:Clean air anyone? Traffic jams? by houghi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For everyone who loves the toll collectors, I bet there are hundreds who hate them.

    Why? What have they done. Or is it because they are the minions of the people who put the rules in place? In that case, is it OK to hate the military people for doing the same?

    Because then I am confused, because I admire what they do but hat why they do it.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  14. Re:Saving $19.2M over the first eight years...how? by peragrin · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you get paid $50k a year your employer is paying close to $70k to keep you as an employee.

    or do you think that health insurance, workers comp, 401k, etc are all magically free?

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  15. FastTrac by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Tracking your every move, inside our coast-to-coast prison.

    Your papers, please!

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  16. Re:Clean air anyone? Traffic jams? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Funny

    What's wrong with hatting the military?

    Nothing really. A bit redundant in all, they already have hats. But if you insist....

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  17. Re:Clean air anyone? Traffic jams? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not everyone grows up to be an astronaut.

    Not everyone wants to.

    There is nothing soul crushing about doing the job to which are best suited.

    We are currently overcompensating some segments of our society because the wealthy have (temporarily) built a ring around certain jobs and then are passing them on to their children. It won't hold. There just is no value to paying a CEO 100 million dollars when the similar CEO in china or india is doing just as good a job for 1 million dollars a year.

    Overcompensating them makes people envy them even tho they would be unhappy in those jobs.

    There are lots of people of low to average IQ who are happy with a relatively mindless job surrounded by pleasant work buddies.

    But you are right- those jobs can be automated. (and are being automated). The end result will not be that those people suddenly become smarter, talented, and capable of doing jobs that require high intelligence or talent.

    So what happens to them when their jobs are automated away and there are no other jobs to go to?

    They can vote or swing a club or shoot a gun perfectly well. They'll get unhappy when they have nothing to do- no money to spend- and folks act like it's their fault.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.