Slashdot Mirror


MPAA Threatens To Disconnect Google From Internet

An anonymous reader writes "Over the last few months, Google has received more than 100 copyright infringement warnings from MPAA-affiliated movies studios. Most are directed at users of Google's public Wi-Fi service, but others are meant for Google employees. The MPAA is thus warning the search giant that it might get disconnected from the Internet. Although the copyright holders use strong language, these notices are simply warnings, and typically do not lead to legal action."

12 of 468 comments (clear)

  1. I will be very honest by kthreadd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I won't be sad the day the movie industry goes out of business. I've found other ways to find entertainment which does not involve them. Everything does not have to last forever.

    1. Re:I will be very honest by poetmatt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      a complete collapse of the movie industry wouldn't even be devastating to the music industry itself, it would only be devastating to the MPAA.

      where do you come up with this crap?

      The MPAA and hopeuflly, IFPI is the only part that will fail. The rest of movie industry, music industry, etc are doing just dandy and well with filesharing the entire time. The overall market has expanded greatly.

  2. They're serious? They can't be serious. by rockman_x_2002 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So what you're saying here is that there's someone even better capable than Sony in spewing out nuclear-grade stupid? How exactly do they propose to remove Google from the Internet? That's like removing oxygen from the air in an instant. Actually, I have a suggestion for a better course of action for the MPAA: How about just going back to the business of just making decent movies and quit harassing folks entirely? That way, you get products out there people actually care about, and people don't cringe in anger every time they hear mention of your organization in the news. Just a thought.

  3. Bring it on by Xian97 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I would like to see them try to take Google to court with their vaults of money instead of single mothers and college kids that can't afford to fight back.

  4. Re:I think it's time by nametaken · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can't happen. Google can't delist swaths of multi-billion dollar entertainment companies responsible for generating the bulk of popular culture. They'd sink their own battleship.

    Google is strong because their search engine is strong. Take that away and they're not the Google we know today.

    That's not to say it wouldn't be awesome to see, though. :)

  5. Re:I think it's time by blair1q · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Google is several times larger than Hollywood.

    Remember, Hollywood is the land of hype. It makes itself look more profitable and important than it is, because that helps it sell itself and its products.

    The entire annual gross revenue of movies from the MPAA member studios (about $10 billion) is only a little bigger than Google's annual profit (about $7 billion).

    I'll say that again: Google's PROFIT is almost as big as Hollywood's REVENUE.

    Now, that doesn't include TV, home-video, and merchandising. But it should indicate that Google has a lot more say in how a head-to-head fight would go.

    Think of it this way. If Hollywood decided to start a software company and search engine and ad reseller and hire away Google's talent to do it, how would it do? And if Google decided to start a movie studio and hire away Hollywood's talent to do it, how would it do? Google's people are all salaried and sinecured. Hollywood's are a ravenous band of nomadic, mercenary contractors who go to the highest bidder without any concern for loyalty or decorum. And, once you've got the talent in place, good movies make themselves better without corporate involvement, since they make money by pulling in small but distinct segments of the overall market. But a Google-alike has to be able to please the entire planet all at once, something no Hollywood suit has ever accomplished and never will.

    Google would win, and end up owning both industries.

  6. By what authority? by fredjh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    By what authority does the MPAA have the power to disconnect ANYONE from the internet?

    --
    Stupid, sexy Flanders.
    1. Re:By what authority? by Bratmon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Bribe money, the highest authority in the land.

  7. Re:Next week: DHS siezes Google domain name by oracleguy01 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If, all of the sudden, Americans woke up one day and found Google (mind you, Amazon, Facebook, and a few other web presences would have a similar effect) gone, they would go into a frothing mad rage. As soon as one person pointed a finger at Hollywood or the DHS, you'd have a God damned holy war on your hands. We Americans are certainly passive little government lap dogs as long as we have a steady soma dose of useless crap pumped into our veins via T.V. and the internet. But if you cut off that IV, you will learn really quick like just how much rage a bunch of pissed off house wives that can no longer access their lolcats pictures can generate.

    "Let me tell you something about Hew-mons, nephew. They're a wonderful, friendly people – as long as their bellies are full and their holosuites are working. But take away their creature comforts... deprive them of food, sleep, sonic showers... put their lives in jeopardy over an extended period of time... and those same friendly, intelligent, wonderful people will become as nasty and violent as the most bloodthirsty Klingon. You don't believe me? Look at those faces, look at their eyes..." - Quark

  8. Re:Don't make me laugh! by ivoras · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Unfortunately... probably not. As much as I'd like to see Google launch an "the end justifies the means" campaign and crush MPAA, after some thought I got pessimistic about the prospect. Though theoretically Google could maybe buy all MPAA members one by one, Google is "new money" compared to it and the battle would be far, far from easy and predictable. After some amount of $$ it matters who you know, not how much you have.

    --
    -- Sig down
  9. Re:I think it's time by kthejoker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I love how you blithely limit the MPAA-members' financial clout to just their movie revnenue.

    We're talking about Sony, Disney, GE, NBC Universal, Viacom, NewsCorp, and Time Warner here. They've got a lot more money than just the movie business, if they are so inclined to throw it around.

  10. Re:Don't make me laugh! by Americano · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And while the MPAA collapses, Microsoft and Yahoo form a partnership and launche an aggressive "We don't censor your search results!" campaign, and lots of people just start using Bing and Yahoo, rather than get embroiled in a pissing contest between two big drunks who are both upwind. Meanwhile, MPAA and their lackeys all stop using and dealing with people who advertise via Google (the movie & recording industries generally have pretty big marketing budgets, in case you didn't notice). Ad revenues plummet just as Google has to begin spending lots of money on developing automated methods to scrub search results of any "MPAA-backed" materials. Net result: Google has also committed "suicide by Google!"

    The government steps in, declares the movie studios AND Google to both be "too big to fail," and bails them out at taxpayer expense.

    Yeah, that would be an awesome scenario. Seriously, I can't wait to see them come to blows, rather than work out their issues like fucking adults.