Slashdot Mirror


Gov App Detects Potholes As Your Drive Over Them

An anonymous reader writes "The City of Boston has released an app that uses the accelerometer in your smartphone to automatically report bumps in the road as you drive over them. From the article: 'The application relies on two components embedded in iPhones, Android phones, and many other mobile devices: the accelerometer and the Global Positioning System receiver. The accelerometer, which determines the direction and acceleration of a phone’s movement, can be harnessed to identify when a phone resting on a dashboard or in a cupholder in a moving car has hit a bump; the GPS receiver can determine by satellite just where that bump is located.' I am certain that this will not be used to track your movements, unless they are vertical."

181 comments

  1. They don't have to put the app in your phone by symbolset · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are plenty of city workers with city-issued phones to find all the potholes. Take off the tinfoil hat.

    Of course the purpose of this is to find all the potholes to the city workers can avoid them on the way home - and maybe make a nice graphical pothole zonemap for the city website. Actual road crews probably won't have access to the information.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:They don't have to put the app in your phone by intellitech · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not even necessary! Most people in my town report potholes to the municipality, all they need to do is LISTEN and FIX THEM.

      --
      vos nescitis quicquam, nec cogitatis quia expedit nobis ut unus moriatur homo pro populo et non tota gens pereat.
    2. Re:They don't have to put the app in your phone by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

      If my grandaddy doesn't do anything about his car's suspension, they're going to be repaving every road he drives on.

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
    3. Re:They don't have to put the app in your phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If my grandaddy doesn't do anything about his car's suspension, they're going to be repaving every road he drives on.

      Only if he's black.

    4. Re:They don't have to put the app in your phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fugged aboud it... unless yer gonna cough up a liddle xtra

    5. Re:They don't have to put the app in your phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the UK potholes are a major nuisance and the local authorities have a legal responsibility to fix them. The local council can also be held financially accountable to damage to cars/bikes that are damaged as a result of hitting potholes... although the process is lengthy and cumbersome.

      It also springs to mind that you'll not get any motorbikes or scooters using this app as hitting a pothole (to activate the app) at even medium speed is likely to dismount you and injure or as has happened numerous times kill the rider. NB: bikes & scooters are used extensively for commuting in major towns and cities.

      Lastly, doesn't this just encourage people to drive over potholes and in the process make them worse by further eroding the road surface?

    6. Re:They don't have to put the app in your phone by Yvanhoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I always thought every municipality should have something like a bug tracking system that citizens could use. Does anyone know if some administrations ever tried that ?

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    7. Re:They don't have to put the app in your phone by jonbryce · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes. www.fixmystreet.com in the UK.

    8. Re:They don't have to put the app in your phone by Paua+Fritter · · Score: 1

      Check out this Aussie service "It's Buggered, Mate": http://its-buggered-mate.apps.lpmodules.com/
      It's only a demo, though; you can report things that are buggered, but no-one gives a bugger

    9. Re:They don't have to put the app in your phone by bl8n8r · · Score: 1

      > There are plenty of city workers with city-issued phones to find all the potholes. Take off the tinfoil hat.

      True, however we could argue the point that there are also plenty of city workers *driving* over the same potholes as everyone else, yet we still have potholes.

      This is Just Another Database of information containing people's whereabouts which has potential to be hacked, lost on a laptop or smartphone, or used for something other than what it was originally intended.

      If you could care less, then argue for opt-in/opt-out.

      --
      boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
    10. Re:They don't have to put the app in your phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Most people in my town report potholes to the municipality"

      Now if they'd just report all their income to the IRS, they would even be fixed.

    11. Re:They don't have to put the app in your phone by oneiros27 · · Score: 4, Informative

      As a municipal elected official ...

      We fix our streets. The problem is, we have a state highway running through the town (Main Street), and we have a number of county roads, too.

      About 90% of the complaints are about the county roads, as there's a stretch of road that was supposed to have been resurfaced 2-3 years ago, and they still haven't done it; they replaced a section out last year (during rush hour), and they're supposed to replace out another section or two this year where the potholes are particularly bad. ... but they're not maintaining their roads, and when we report potholes to them, they take anywhere from a week to a month to do something; in some cases, they keep calling for an address of where "the" pothole is, and we have to explain it's not just one pothole, there's a dozen in less than a block, and when they finally come out, they patch *one* of the holes, so we have to keep calling and pestering them for them to fix one at a time.

      And also, if they're in Maryland -- the state last year cut the state funding to municipalities for road maintenance by 90%, but they didn't make the cuts until after the municipalities were required to have passed their budget. (and state police aid was also cut significantly), so it's possible that they just don't have the money to do it.

      --
      Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    12. Re:They don't have to put the app in your phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live on a corner, sharing a city and township line. There are technically no city houses on the approach to my driveway. Given my street address, the city cannot find the pothole in the middle of the city owned section of road at the end of my driveway.

    13. Re:They don't have to put the app in your phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all they need to do is LISTEN and FIX THEM

      Two things governments all over the world do well.

    14. Re:They don't have to put the app in your phone by cooperaaaron · · Score: 0

      Huh.... Truly, that's all you had to post ? What does black have anything to do with potholes ?

    15. Re:They don't have to put the app in your phone by maxume · · Score: 1

      It seems highly unlikely that they are crazy enough to mandate that drivers install the software, so arguing for opt in is sort of like yelling at the sun to rise in the morning.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    16. Re:They don't have to put the app in your phone by sglewis100 · · Score: 1

      Not even necessary! Most people in my town report potholes to the municipality, all they need to do is LISTEN and FIX THEM.

      You must live in a small town. I don't know if most people in my town report potholes or not. I would suspect not, but with tens of thousands of people, it wasn't really practical for me to find out. My gut tells me, that the great, vast majority of people do NOT report potholes. I sure don't.

    17. Re:They don't have to put the app in your phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few ideas. The first is that you can correllate the data to sift out false positives if you have enouogh of these. The second is that the source should be available by FOIA, so you can see exactly what they're reporting. Third is that if you log all of the potholes, you now have solid data when you start begging for a larger budget. This is not all bad.

    18. Re:They don't have to put the app in your phone by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

      Portland, Oregonhas a better idea.

      Snap a photo of the problem and the app sends it, with GPS info, etc, to the appropriate city department. Good for potholes, dead street lights, trash in the bike lane, etc.

      But I am thinking that all taxi cabs, delivery trucks, and city vehicles maybe should be required to have a GPS with accelerometer constantly reporting to a central database. This would be a great way to monitor traffic conditions, useful in dispatching emergency vehicles, planning improvements, and finding out which donut shops the police prefer. Do it so John Q Public could opt in if he wanted to, but no need to require that.

      --
      Will
    19. Re:They don't have to put the app in your phone by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Check out this Aussie service "It's Buggered, Mate": http://its-buggered-mate.apps.lpmodules.com/ It's only a demo, though; you can report things that are buggered, but no-one gives a bugger

      Like the weather, caused by man-made climate change?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    20. Re:They don't have to put the app in your phone by wbean · · Score: 1

      There's a Web site for that! http://www.seeclickfix.com/citizens. Boston aleady uses it: http://m.seeclickfix.com/boston/recent

    21. Re:They don't have to put the app in your phone by atisss · · Score: 1

      In soviet russia there is no need for such app.

      Everyobody knows that potholes are everywhere

    22. Re:They don't have to put the app in your phone by Chapter80 · · Score: 1

      I always thought every municipality should have something like a bug tracking system that citizens could use. Does anyone know if some administrations ever tried that ?

      Yes, Citizen Request Management systems (another "CRM" acronym) are available, and widely implemented.

      The leader in the market place is E-Gov Link. You can see it in action at Lowell, a suburb of Boston (who was featured in TFA).

      Sure enough, potholes are on the Lowell CRM, as are a number of other types of citizen requests, like sidewalk repair, Graffiti issues, tree issues, etc.

    23. Re:They don't have to put the app in your phone by nblender · · Score: 1

      So put up signs at the entrance to the county and state roads that says "End of Springfield road maintenance zone".

    24. Re:They don't have to put the app in your phone by mcsqueak · · Score: 1

      Portland, Oregon has an iPhone (and maybe Android? Not sure.) app that lets you report things like pot holes, graffiti, etc. It's actually pretty slick. It''s called "PDX Reporter" or something like that.

      You can take a picture and attach it to the report, pinpoint the location on a map screen, and write a comment in a comment box. Once you submit a report, you can track them through fulfillment. I've only reported potholes, but all the ones I've reported have been fixed within a week of reporting.

    25. Re:They don't have to put the app in your phone by pclminion · · Score: 1

      And the point of that would be what?

    26. Re:They don't have to put the app in your phone by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > And the point of that would be what?

      To encourage citizens to direct their complaints to the responsible agency. Most people won't be aware that the city is not responsible for the maintenance of all the roads in the city.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    27. Re:They don't have to put the app in your phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think what you mean to say is that in soviet russia, the potholes report YOU.

    28. Re:They don't have to put the app in your phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, we did it in 2009. Dublin was not interested in hearing about how bad their road are.

      http://www.odcsss.ie/content/sensetile-city-road-w%C3%A6r

  2. swerves? by mug+funky · · Score: 4, Insightful

    does it log when you very slightly swerve to avoid a big pothole?

    like most people do?

    i guess if it's REALLY big you couldn't avoid hitting it.

    1. Re:swerves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      and how does it differentiate between potholes and, say, old people?

    2. Re:swerves? by mysidia · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes... this is probably really about detecting people texting while driving.

      If you have the app on your phone, and you pick your phone up while moving to start typing your text message, the phone will detect you have lifted it while driving; and immediately use satellite/GPS to determine your position, transmit the alert to the local authorities together with your phone's front-facing camera output.

      As police are homing in on your position, the facial recognition software will match your face and alert them to the make and model of your car, and they'll bust the driver for texting

    3. Re:swerves? by commlinx · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree this smells of a developer that thinks they've come up with a great innovation that won't work in practice. I've used accelerometers in vehicle / equipment monitoring applications and unless the mechanical bonding is solid and/or known the results are practically useless. Especially with a phone where having it in your pocket while you adjust sitting position and any other number of things will possibly have a similar acceleration profile to hitting a pot hole.

      They'd probably be better having a way to report things from a menu, then you could cover things like traffic lights out and other general traffic hazzards. Anyone that cared enough to run the app probably wouldn't mind pulling over in a safe spot, adjusting back the position from their current position and submitting a report. You could assign a "karma" to each user account to help prioritize and sift out asshats, and it would also remove any privacy concerns.

    4. Re:swerves? by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, this is for detecting potholes in Boston. Most of the swerves will be for other reasons, or no reason at all.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    5. Re:swerves? by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 1

      The acceleration profile for a pot hole being hit would easily be compared to both current speed and position, and shifting of a phone in a pocket would easily be detected and ruled out. (As you're supposed to have it on your dash board)

      Not to mention they can require several reports before marking a pothole... You know... These are all things done for other fuzzy inputs.

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
    6. Re:swerves? by c0lo · · Score: 2

      and how does it differentiate between potholes and, say, old people?

      How to put it in layman terms? The potholes are... well... holes. The old people are... more like speed-bumps.
      The accelerometers will show if the car went down-up or up-down... If the car stops immediately after, in the first case they'll send the towing truck, in the later they'll send an ambulance.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    7. Re:swerves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They won't be on the dash because it would be a blind spot plus the batteries won't recharge if hot under the glass. There won't be multiple reports because once the first person hits the hole and bumps up and down all the rest behind will see and swerve as well. If you had it on the dash they would be stolen as well and you'd probably be carjacked for your phone so i doubt the city will want there employees at risk.

    8. Re:swerves? by sumdumass · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh noess.. the phone was upside down.. Now the government thinks I ran over old people.

      Think about that.. seriously.

    9. Re:swerves? by c0lo · · Score: 1

      Think about that.. seriously.

      Think. What a preposterous suggestion... would I be able to do it at this hour, I'd be doing the job I'm paid for instead of posting on /.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    10. Re:swerves? by bronney · · Score: 2

      and if the car went left right left right A B start, you has 1up!

    11. Re:swerves? by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The acceleration profile for a pot hole being hit would easily be compared to both current speed and position

      Let me tell you there is absolutely NOTHING easy about characterizing a system mass, spring, damper, damper (yes 2), with not only unknown but variable mass spring dampers even when you know a very rough approximation of what the impact velocity is, and I say rough because GPS doesn't give you an instant speed and people have a tendency to swerve, slowdown and do other strange reactions when there's obstructions on the road.

      Just of the top of my head the things that will mask your signal:
      Unknown speed,
      Unknown mass of the car,
      Unknown rim size and unknown tire pressure giving you an unknown dampening reaction to the bump,
      Unknown shock absorber stiffness, and
      Unknown coupling between the dashboard and the phone (how soft or hard is your dashboard), as well as angle of the phone on the dash.

      With so many unknowns it is impossible to characterise a bump of a pothole from any of the other things that may happen. Was that a minor pothole or did the guy just drive over the lane reflector?

    12. Re:swerves? by scrib · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's late, so pardon me taking you TOO seriously, but the phone, in any orientation, knows which way "down" is. See, there's this force called "gravity" which acts exactly like accelerating away from the center of the earth. It's how phones know which way you have 'em oriented. If the measured acceleration sharply lessens then increases then you are dipping into a pothole. If the acceleration is the other way around, you've run over a... speed bump.

      If the app's voice recognition software catches you saying "oh shit, do you think anyone saw that" they know to send the police.

      --
      Help! Help! I'm being repressed!
    13. Re:swerves? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      I've used accelerometers in vehicle / equipment monitoring applications and unless the mechanical bonding is solid and/or known the results are practically useless. Especially with a phone where having it in your pocket while you adjust sitting position and any other number of things will possibly have a similar acceleration profile to hitting a pot hole.

      All that changes when you're getting input data from a variety of vehicles over a span of time. With that kind of data, you can analyze it statistically to sort out the noise from the signal.

    14. Re:swerves? by MORB · · Score: 1

      They can filter out false positives by considering only multiple reports at the same locations.

    15. Re:swerves? by somersault · · Score: 2

      See, there's this force called "gravity" which acts exactly like accelerating away from the center of the earth.

      Really? I was under the impression that gravity was accelerating me towards the center of the earth. At least, when I jump, I seem to come back down again. Maybe I'm standing upside down.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    16. Re:swerves? by somersault · · Score: 1

      There won't be multiple reports because once the first person hits the hole and bumps up and down all the rest behind will see and swerve as well

      Troll much, or just stupid? Are there only 10 drivers on the road each day, all in the same convoy? Also, they'll bump down and then up if they hit a hole, and no people don't really watch out for that kind of thing in my experience. If I hit a pot hole, so does the person behind me. Even if I swerve they often still just plough over it.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    17. Re:swerves? by takev · · Score: 1

      It's just you.

    18. Re:swerves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can assure you that it is possible, even while writing comments on my iPhone, to avoid any po

    19. Re:swerves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? I was under the impression that gravity was accelerating me towards the center of the earth.

      You need to think about it some more. It is the act of "not falling" that is being detected. If you accelerated to your left the accelerometer would be "pulled" to the right. Now which way is the accelerometer being pulled by gravity?

    20. Re:swerves? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      I agree this smells of a developer that thinks they've come up with a great innovation that won't work in practice.

      I think it's clever and will work quite well. If you've got a few dozen "bumps" in the same location it's probably a good idea to send out a crew to inspect it, as obviously something is going on.

    21. Re:swerves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it wrong to pray for this to happen, while fearing the unintended.

    22. Re:swerves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think about that.. seriously.

      Think. What a preposterous suggestion... would I be able to do it at this hour, I'd be doing the job I'm paid for instead of posting on /.

      ... at this hour ...

      You know, there some novelty lately. Since in some parts of the world it is dark at this hour, where as in others it is light, some weird kids came up with the idea to divide the world in time zones ... you know, like it's 00:00 here and on the other end of the world it's 12:00.
      I mean , come on.. drive too far an you'd have to reset your watch ...
      Kids these days ...

    23. Re:swerves? by Interoperable · · Score: 1

      I'll bet that the results from any given vehicle would be useless, but integrated over thousands of separate trips over the same road space it may build up a decent map of the road surface. I image that a vast oversampling would be required to average out the noise inherent to any one vehicle. I suspect that it will be useless simply because adoption will be too low to provide the necessary data smoothing.

      Still, it's worth a try. All it costs is someone else's battery life.

      --
      So if this is the future...where's my jet pack?
    24. Re:swerves? by somersault · · Score: 1

      Oh, I see how he was wording it now. Sounded like he was saying gravity acts by accelerating you away from the center of the earth.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    25. Re:swerves? by witherstaff · · Score: 1

      and if the car went left right left right A B start, you has 1up!

      I'd prefer the invincibility mode to make rush hour driving way faster. Or at least to survive hitting potholes.

    26. Re:swerves? by nwmann · · Score: 0

      or instead of taking 1 or 2 minutes out of their time while screwing with traffic patterns to get over should it happen to be busy some developer out there could develop an app for your phone... where you can sit it oh idk on your dashboard or cupholder as the SUMMARY states... and if enough people running the app have a bump at the same spot then it could be bumped up to priority or if the accelerometer registers a larger than normal bump it could be indicative of a more serious problem. don't knock someones innovative way of solving a city wide problem just because you think you've got a better idea.

    27. Re:swerves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I agree this smells of a developer"

      Maybe if you bathed your phone more often you wouldn't have this problem.

    28. Re:swerves? by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 1

      Just of the top of my head the things that will mask your signal: Unknown speed,

      The iPhone has GPS, accelerometer and a compass... If you can't figure out when the car is going more than 30 km/h and when it stops, perhaps you should leave programming to someone with a brain?

      Even if it's not accurate, you will still know when you are moving at speeds that will cause potholes to be noticeable.

      Unknown mass of the car, Unknown rim size and unknown tire pressure giving you an unknown dampening reaction to the bump, Unknown shock absorber stiffness, and Unknown coupling between the dashboard and the phone (how soft or hard is your dashboard), as well as angle of the phone on the dash.

      What are you trying to do... Calculate the size and shape of the potholes down to the centimeter?

      To figure out if the data contains any potholes you need to look at the data for the whole trip and use that to figure out how to find the bumps. Your car isn't going to change it's mass, rim size or shock absorber stiffness from one second to another producing fake positives. Sure there might be cars if fluffy dashboards and super-shock absorbers... Yet who cares, that car just isn't going to produce any signals.

      And if the car drives over a lane reflector, it will not be registered as a pothole unless more people happen to do it the same place. And if so, it can be eliminated in the future. These are all problems software engineers should have no problem dealing with...

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
    29. Re:swerves? by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "The iPhone has GPS, accelerometer and a compass... If you can't figure out when the car is going more than 30 km/h and when it stops, perhaps you should leave programming to someone with a brain?"

      And if the car does 50 in a 30 zone, you even get money to fix the hole, just bill the ticket to the phone account.

    30. Re:swerves? by elsurexiste · · Score: 1

      The fact that the person who texted was seated on the back was inscrutable to them.

      --
      I rarely respond to comments. Also, don't ask for clarifications: a brain and Google are faster, believe me!
    31. Re:swerves? by AJH16 · · Score: 1

      Like the 3 foot wide pothole on my way home from work every day on a single lane road that hasn't been fixed for 2 weeks.

      --
      AJ Henderson
    32. Re:swerves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would assume that a single hit isn't really enough to trigger this, I would assume they take more of a average of all cars in X days.

      I would also assume that the old person would eventually be removed from the street, thus negating their effect.

    33. Re:swerves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See, there's this force called "gravity" which acts exactly like accelerating away from the center of the earth.

      Really? I was under the impression that gravity was accelerating me towards the center of the earth.

      I hope you have something soft to land on. Gravity is pulling you to the centre of the earth. The action on you is the same as if you were accelerating away from the earth (you feel pulled back). When you get in a car and hit the gas, you feel pushed into the back of your seat, but you're actually accelerating forwards with the car (the seat is pushing you forwards, which is why you feel like you're pushing backwards).

      Note: Unless you are in an actual falling situation you're probably not accelerating towards the centre of the earth. Acceleration is a change in velocity, so unless you're speeding up or slowing down (up/down/sideways/revolving/rotating), you're not accelerating.

      NB2: yeah the car could be in reverse, the earth could have been impacted, Hitler, etc...

    34. Re:swerves? by chromatix · · Score: 1

      Easy. They need to come and look at the hole to determine how to repair it anyway. So if they find a squashed mess at the site instead of a hole in the road, they know it was an old person instead of a pothole.

      --
      --- The key to knowledge is not to rely on people to teach you it ---
    35. Re:swerves? by Kilrah_il · · Score: 1

      You stop after running over old people?

      --
      Whenever in an argument, remember this.
    36. Re:swerves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've used accelerometers in vehicle / equipment monitoring applications and unless the mechanical bonding is solid and/or known the results are practically useless. Especially with a phone where having it in your pocket while you adjust sitting position and any other number of things will possibly have a similar acceleration profile to hitting a pot hole.

      I guess your experience is with data from one car. If you get many such signals, you have a much better chance of finding the right signal in the noise.

      First you can filter on fast horizontal movement as indication of a car really been driven. Then if you have plenty of those recordings, you can overlay them all and so filter out all the incidental movements, like your passenger dropping the phone or djusting your "seat belt."

      And no, you don't get anybody to pull over and make a report. That is a rather unrealistic dream. I'd guess 90% of people on the road are in a rush to get to their destination. Hey, people barely stop for pedestrians or cyclists, even when they have to by law!

    37. Re:swerves? by pclminion · · Score: 1

      Really? I was under the impression that gravity was accelerating me towards the center of the earth. At least, when I jump, I seem to come back down again. Maybe I'm standing upside down.

      No, he's right. The force of gravity is indistinguishable from what you'd feel if you were in an elevator accelerating upwards at 1 g. Come on, this goes back almost 100 years to Einstein's thought experiment which led to the general theory of relativity.

      When you're standing on solid ground, what do you feel? A force pushing UPWARDS on the soles of your feet. The sensation you have of gravity is that of a force pushing your body UPWARDS. Think carefully about it. Sit in a chair. What parts of your body experience force, and in what direction? Do you feel a downward pressing on your shoulders, or an upward pressing on the backs of your legs and your butt?

      This is a matter of perception. The force is actually a downward force. But in all respects, the effects due to that force are the same as if you were in an accelerating reference frame with the acceleration directed upwards.

    38. Re:swerves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy. They need to come and look at the hole to determine how to repair it anyway. So if they find a squashed mess at the site instead of a hole in the road, they know it was an old person instead of a pothole.

      And if there's a pothole nearby, hey, save a few bucks on asphalt :)

    39. Re:swerves? by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2

      I agree a single-point pothole detector, using an iphone in someone's pocket, is useless. However, consider that if you were getting a stream of data from thousands, you could correlate their position/sensor readings, and then you might get *some* signal out of all the noise. I'm still dubious it's going to work well, but with enough sensors and enough time it is at least possible.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    40. Re:swerves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You bring up good arguments for measuring exactly how deep and wide this a particular pothole is.

      However just to determine where it is and to do a rough categorization of shallow, medium, deep, you don't need all that exact information.

      Consider a feedback loop for this:
      You make some educated guesses based on the data you get. Then you drive out and give an assessment of the pothole you find before you fill it (NON, shallow, medium, deep, ...). Now you correlate that back to the data that you got. You have learned which users have predicted the pothole the best, so you can weight their info a bi thigher in the future.

      Lets assume that most people ride the same car most of the days, so mass of the car, rim size, tire pressure, shock upsorber stiffness, even coupling between the phone and car, will be still unknown, but for a given source they are aproximately constant. So it does not matter that much that they are unknown.

      While you don't have an exact current speed with GPS measurement (or positon for that matter its only ~10 feet in wide open space). Based on other info you can actually calculate a pretty good approximation of the speed. For example you don't only know the speed of the phone/car you get the report from, but also from cars before and behind (given enough cars having the system). So you can calculate flow speed not to badly.

      And yes the idea of measuring bunps in connection with swerving behavior should be even better. If some phoen sverves where others have a bump, that is a good indication of a pothole being the cause. But if you have only swerves or only bumps, then that might be the random action you see.

    41. Re:swerves? by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Just of the top of my head the things that will mask your signal: Unknown speed,

      The iPhone has GPS, accelerometer and a compass... If you can't figure out when the car is going more than 30 km/h and when it stops, perhaps you should leave programming to someone with a brain?

      By that standard, it appears that none of the makers of GPS gadgets have been willing or able to hire any programmers with brains. ;-)

      My wife and I have at least 5 GPS-enabled gadgets: Her iPhone, my G1 phone, two cars with GPS (a Garmin and the crappy one sold by Honda), plus an older Garmin. All of them show strong signs of being programmed by people without brains.

      Thus, a few months ago, while my wife was driving her car and I was a passenger, I passed the time by comparing the car's (Garmin) GPS with google maps on both phones. There were several times when one phone or the other showed us wandering off the highway and driving a mile or so into the countryside. At one point, the phones showed us on opposite sides of the highway, and the iPhone showed us driving across a large lake. The car's GPS kept us on a road, but sometimes it was a local street a block away.

      The fun part was when the iPhone showed us suddenly jumping about 100 miles to the southeast, a few miles east of Cape Cod, driving along in the ocean parallel to the shore. This wasn't a fluke; it showed us there for nearly 10 minutes. Then it showed us jumping back to our actual location (on a highway west of Boston).

      The cars' GPS gadgets have "trip record" features which we usually leave running. I occasionally check its information, and usually it shows our top speed at over 200 mph, sometimes over 300 mph. We usually do drive in the fastest lane, but I don't think either car has ever been anywhere near 200 mph.

      On my G1 phone, when I start up google maps at home, it regularly shows my position about 1/2 mile to the south-southwest, in the middle of a patch of woods next to a reservoir. For a while, sometime a minute or more, it'll show its position wandering in an irregular path across the neighborhood, going through yards and houses, and finally reaching our house. It will sometimes show us back in those woods at random other times.

      This seems to be a standard sort of story from people who watch what their GPS toys are saying. It appears that the makers don't know how to fix such things. So where can they hire programmers who have the brains to Get It Right? It does seem a bit odd that an established industry like this should continue to fail so humorously, and nobody can figure out how to program them correctly.

      Either that, or the GPS system just can't achieve the level of accuracy and reliability that you assume anyone with a brain could easily produce.

      (And yes, I've seen some of the math that goes into GPS programming. I have a couple of math degrees, and I'm impressed that they've made pocket-sized GPS computers that work as well as they do. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    42. Re:swerves? by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Let me tell you there is absolutely NOTHING easy about characterizing a system mass, spring, damper, damper (yes 2), with not only unknown but variable mass spring dampers even when you know a very rough approximation of what the impact velocity is [,,,]

      With so many unknowns it is impossible to characterise a bump of a pothole from any of the other things that may happen. Was that a minor pothole or did the guy just drive over the lane reflector?

      I actually know how to do those things, but I don't think they're very relevant to this idea. The key to this idea isn't for your phone to perfectly detect whenever you run over a pothole. The key is combining data from multiple sources and finding locations where they correlate. I'm imagining Google Maps with a bunch of dots which show every location where a phone experienced more than x g's of vertical acceleration rapidly in opposite directions. A slider bar on the side would let you adjust x. You simply slide it up and down until most of the "noise" dots disappear and all you're left with are tight concentrations of dots which would correlate to potholes. If you wanted to get fancy, you could have each phone track its vertical accelerations and assign some mitigating value to its data (e.g. "Hmm, low vertical accelerations, my car must have a super-cushy suspension. My average acceleration is y so make sure you scale my reported values by 1/y.").

      Of course, for this to work, the city has to actually fix potholes when they're found. Most cities don't seem to fix them even when you call in to tell them there's a pothole at such-and-such location.

    43. Re:swerves? by jc42 · · Score: 1

      image that a vast oversampling would be required to average out the noise inherent to any one vehicle. I suspect that it will be useless simply because adoption will be too low to provide the necessary data smoothing.

      My wife and I use google maps with traffic reports turned on, and we've found that it's generally fairly reliable. It does tend to be up to half an hour out of date around here (Boston), but it's definitely useful enough to be worth the battery power. I've avoided a lot of major traffic problems by checking with it.

      Google's traffic scheme is pretty well documented. Basically, your phone's GPS position and velocity are sent to the mother ship every so often, where the server software does the obvious sort of averaging. It presumably discards numbers outside a range; you'd want it to not include things like a car stopped at the side of the road or in a gas station, or a GPS position that's suddenly wildly different than the previous position.

      It can be fun to point out to users of google maps that google clearly has the ability to track your phone's position any time google maps is running. What's even more fun is, when they open their phone and turn google maps off, you ask them if they know that it has stopped running, or has just stopped showing its window. Few people know how to ask their phone which apps are actually running.

      (I have a G1 phone, with a Terminal app installed, and there's a "top" command that works. Somehow, this mystifies most iPhone users that I've shown it to. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    44. Re:swerves? by somersault · · Score: 1

      He was right, I argued because I read it wrong. I do feel my body being pulled downwards by the way, otherwise I wouldn't ever have to slouch :p

      --
      which is totally what she said
    45. Re:swerves? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > The force is actually a downward force.

      Nope. The only force on you is the upward one exerted on your body by the chair.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    46. Re:swerves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It won't be necessary to use facial recognition software or cameras, the app will just cross reference the big government databases of vehicle registrations and cell phone customers.

    47. Re:swerves? by pclminion · · Score: 1

      If the only force you experienced was an upward force, you'd accelerate upward. You do not, because the upward force of the chair is the same magnitude as the downward force of gravity.

      In terms of general relativity, the force of gravity isn't really a force, and the only true force on you is that of the chair, which serves to keep your body moving along a geodesic of spacetime, but seriously, general relativity is unnecessary to explain the operation of an iPhone accelerometer.

    48. Re:swerves? by Peeteriz · · Score: 1

      Simple statistics will differentiate. If the average ten-feet stretch of road gets a dozen detections of bumps that may be somewhat like potholes and one stretch in the middle gets a hundred - then you have a nice X on the map to go and check out.

    49. Re:swerves? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The point is not trying to define the shape of the pothole, the point is trying to figure out what is a pothole from the thousands of tiny little bumps you feel while driving down the road, that people make when they pick up or bump their phone, the ones people make who don't leave their phone on their dash but on the seat and you shift your weight or reach back and move your bag while driving.

      You're over simplifying a huge problem. So the car isn't going to change it's mass etc, you're right which means you will have data to characterize the ride. What you going to do? Record the entire trip worth of data continuously at a resolution of 1ms and then do some very fancy maths on a huge dataset on an iPhone? How about program some continuous learning into an iPhone app, that'll be good. I wonder what happens when the phone gets answered and the phone ends up in a slightly different position than before, or if a pothole moves said phone.

      As for the lane reflector issue this is exactly the kind of situation you will get on multi-lane roads right before a turnoff. Go find such a road and you'll typically see the reflectors on the side of the road dark black from the thousands of tires which have hit it every day as people attempt to merge in the last minute because they either can't plan ahead or are trying to do a sneaky around the traffic.

      Also have you ever programmed a moving robot? Doing so should give you an appreciation for the size of the problem.

    50. Re:swerves? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Roadside reflectors and the like will typically generate false positives with very high correlation at a turn-off. Go look at a multi-lane road and see how dark the usual reflectors are from the thousands of cars that run-over them every day doing funky steering maneuvers to get to work a bit earlier.

      It is probably doable in theory, but in practice you'll end up with so many false positives, so many differences such as one phone reporting actual potholes which another is reporting a signal 10 times stronger that is noise, that ultimately the overhead of actually identifying the data will be in your typical government fashion far more expensive than a simple link on a website saying "report potholes". ... Which we do anyway. I highly doubt there's a council out there which doesn't know where dangerous potholes are. People are whingey bastards at best, especially when they can see their tax dollars aren't working.

      Of course the government may have some fantastic software engineers who are working on this problem, but even this notion makes me laugh seeing their typical tax return programs and web applets. It's an overly complicated technical solution to a very simple problem. Personally I think they'd do far better if they gave people a one click solution. On a website put up the google map, and say "click on the pothole location". No noise, no effort, just quick, and depending on the submitter - accurate information.

    51. Re:swerves? by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      i love these posts.

      the Postergeist hits the "preview" and "submit" buttons for you after you've stopped typing suddenly.

      reminds me of 4chan and that Candlejack meme where the same thi

    52. Re:swerves? by Mana+Mana · · Score: 1

      > and people have a tendency to swerve, slowdown and do other
      > strange reactions when there's obstructions

      Do they have the tendency to defy gravity, perhaps by hitting the ole Jetson anti-gravity drive? Get realz.

  3. Great will it then get car-sick too? by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    1) Distribute pothole detection app to citizens.
    2) Observe network overload when they all drive down Wilshire Blvd. at rush hour.
    3) ???
    4) Profit!

    1. Re:Great will it then get car-sick too? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      That was my first thought. I live in East Dunbartonshire. Even considering how much cheaper 3G is in the UK, I don't think I could cope with the bandwidth bill.

    2. Re:Great will it then get car-sick too? by Canazza · · Score: 1

      Wow, you get a 3G signal out there? My Mum lives in Helensburgh and I can't get a signal there above 2 bars. Just shows you what a difference of 40 miles can do in the UK :P

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
  4. How exactly does it work? by citoxE · · Score: 1

    I can't help but sound stupid, but how exactly can it detect when you've driven over a pot hole or are just shaking your phone up and down? Isn't this what road surveyors are for in the first place?

    1. Re:How exactly does it work? by flatulus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I can't help but sound stupid, but how exactly can it detect when you've driven over a pot hole or are just shaking your phone up and down? Isn't this what road surveyors are for in the first place?

      Correlation. Any single "bump" - not interesting. A dozen or so "bumps" with the same lat/long: Send an inspector to that location. Good chance you'll find a pothole (or a dead body) in the road....

    2. Re:How exactly does it work? by Ynot_82 · · Score: 2

      Exactly,
      and how do they know you're driving?

      Local jogging club causes 10 miles of road to be dug up

    3. Re:How exactly does it work? by blackest_k · · Score: 2

      not seen many people jogging at 20-30 mph +

    4. Re:How exactly does it work? by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      I guess that's due to all the potholes.

  5. Headline of the future by mentil · · Score: 2

    Government program undermined by Lowriders.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  6. Is this how low the bar has dropped? by flatulus · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can see hundreds (nay, thousands) of people signing up to participate in this, thinking "how cool!" All the time the city builds gigabytes of records of where the subscribers were (in the latitude/longitude sense) and who knows, maybe the next step in the plan is to issue speeding tickets based on the GPS telemetry.

    Cellphones are the work of SATAN, I tell you!

    1. Re:Is this how low the bar has dropped? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SATAN?
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SATAN

    2. Re:Is this how low the bar has dropped? by Zouden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're suggesting they will encourage people to use their phones to report potholes, and then issue speeding fines using the collected data? I'm sure that'll really encourage participation in the program.

      The government has more efficient ways of oppressing you than asking you to opt-in to a pothole-reporting system. Put down the tinfoil hat.

      --
      "A week in the lab saves an hour in the library"
    3. Re:Is this how low the bar has dropped? by yeshuawatso · · Score: 2

      Speeding is the same conclusion I came up with. I could see the next headline "Gov uses app to catch speeders reporting pot holes." Of course, this could be a good thing too. The app data may be able to capture where people speed the most and setup speed traps, especially if people are speeding in dangerous areas such as school zones. Other possible good uses include identifying street congestion that hasn't been reported, most commonly used routes for road improvements, and most common reroutes and side streets to keep an eye out on areas that will need expansion soon. Really a mixed bag of good and evil.

    4. Re:Is this how low the bar has dropped? by bieber · · Score: 1

      Aside from the fact that no one would use the app if it were being used to issue speeding tickets, attempting to gauge someone's speed remotely with periodic GPS readings would be laughably inaccurate. "Sir, the readings here show that you accelerated from 10 to 180 mph in the course of five seconds...in a school zone. I'm afraid we're going to have to take your license..."

    5. Re:Is this how low the bar has dropped? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What is more efficient than a fully automated speeding ticket generator with no officer required?

      "I'm sure that'll really encourage participation in the program."

      Which is why they will wait until they have a lot of participation before they even begin the ticketing phase.

    6. Re:Is this how low the bar has dropped? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Samsung Android's GPS actually tracks speed fairly well up to ~180 MPH - I haven't been faster, so can't say how well it does above that.

      I had to install a GPS utility to get all the good info our of the GPS.

      My guess: They'll use it as advertised until they realize how much ticket revenue they are missing out on. Then a rash of tickets will be mailed out. The coffers will swell... and the roads will STILL have potholes.

    7. Re:Is this how low the bar has dropped? by Nikker · · Score: 1

      It's a whoosh moment. No one can accelerate from 10-180MPH in 5 sec, unless you're driving a F-18.

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    8. Re:Is this how low the bar has dropped? by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      The "efficiency" is kind of reduced by the potential for a massive suit for monitoring and logging of data for purposes not stipulated in the contract. And the fact that after the first fine hits the news, everyone would uninstall the app.....

      HAL.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    9. Re:Is this how low the bar has dropped? by espiesp · · Score: 1

      Actually sure an F-18 could do it either.

      But a top fuel drag car can easily do it without breaking a sweat.

      Not that it changes your comments merit much.

    10. Re:Is this how low the bar has dropped? by WillDraven · · Score: 1

      I don't understand the school zone thing. It may be different elsewhere but around here NOBODY lets their kids walk to school, if they did they would probably have social services called on them for child endangerment (since we all know the streets are just filled with people who want to steal our children...). I have seen, literally, a school bus pull out of a school, drive 1 block, and then drop off a couple kids. If they're never going to be crossing the street unattended, why the heck does everybody have to slow down to 20 mph in a 3 block radius around the school?

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    11. Re:Is this how low the bar has dropped? by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

      If you speed on the streets with the potholes, your mechanic will be collecting more revenue than the local cops soon enough.

    12. Re:Is this how low the bar has dropped? by nzap · · Score: 1

      a massive suit for monitoring and logging of data for purposes not stipulated in the contract

      Which contract? You mean the one nobody reads?

  7. Ha, AGPS fail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If past performance is any indication of future results, about 1/10th of the time, my potholes will show as being on the front lawn of the persons house on that street... Assuming it actually gets the street right at all, and doesn't mark me as being in the lake like it does time to time.

  8. Okay.. so you know where a pothole is within 500 m by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    The most accurate I've seen is 47 meters but often my phone is 1500 meters off.
    At times, when using google maps, I'm driving somewhere a half a mile off the road until it snaps back on.

    I wish it were more accurate.

    Oh and get this...

    It reports my location like (this is not my actual location hackers)

    21.7324
    -92.7823

    within 450 meters.

    LOL. 4 digit precision... within 450 meters..

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  9. Interpretation of phone movement by Ynot_82 · · Score: 0

    How on earth do you determine what caused a phone to move?
    If you knock your phone into the passenger footwell reaching for your cigarrettes, are the council going to come next day and tear your road up?

    1. Re:Interpretation of phone movement by ottawanker · · Score: 1

      Simple, the city just waits until 500 people have hit the same pothole, and only then sends someone out to check.

    2. Re:Interpretation of phone movement by T+Murphy · · Score: 1

      Simple, the city just waits until 500 people have hit the same pothole, and only then sends someone out to check.

      1. Put large hose or similar across road (in the middle of nowhere)
      2. Wait for 500 cars to run over said hose
      3. Remove hose
      4. Watch confused road crew respond to "pothole"
      5. Repeat

    3. Re:Interpretation of phone movement by DeathFromSomewhere · · Score: 1

      Oh noes, they would have wasted 10 minutes of their time before moving on to the pothole down the road. Sonovabitch.

      --
      -1 overrated isn't the same thing as "I disagree".
  10. tracked movements... by Odinlake · · Score: 1

    I am certain that this will not be used to track your movements, unless they are vertical.

    So it doesn't log which potholes you run over? Sorry, I'm not particularly afraid of having my movements tracked, but I'm trying to make sense of the quoted sentence...

    1. Re:tracked movements... by bieber · · Score: 1

      I believe the point the summary is trying to make is that they won't be tracking your location all the time, but simply recording it when you go over a pothole. Hopefully even then they'll just store the location in a database without any identifying data, but if you're really worried about someone extrapolating your route from the locations of potholes you've driven over, then this app isn't for you.

    2. Re:tracked movements... by Odinlake · · Score: 1

      "someone" wouldn't need to do much extrapolation at all to drag me down, if they notice regular bumps over the pothole on the road to the town whore house [or whatever]. I wonder why the author I quoted above can be, as he writes, certain the app will not be used to track my movements. Not that anyone would care about my movements per ce, but let's imagine I'm a celebrity, politician, or something.

    3. Re:tracked movements... by arose · · Score: 1

      You have a road that leads to nothing but the local whore house? Putting a guy with the camera in front of it might actually get you some evidence, potholes somewhere nearby don't prove shit.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  11. Trailer trash Friday evenings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trailer trash better turn them off Friday evenings

  12. Here comes automated speeding tickets... by ibsteve2u · · Score: 2

    They just intentionally place two "minor" speed bumps (literally) in the road, and when your GPS tells 'em you're on the road, the timing between the bumps tells 'em you're speeding, and they send you a ticket. A failure to pay same then results in the app telling the nearest police car that you're passing by. Nifty.

    --
    Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
    1. Re:Here comes automated speeding tickets... by bieber · · Score: 1

      I know courts in the US aren't always the most astute when it comes to judging the scientific validity of instruments used to measure our compliance with the law, but I like to think that they would recognize how completely, wildly inaccurate such a measurement would be and not allow the issuance of tickets based on it. Putting aside the obvious privacy laws they'd be breaking in the first place, of course.

    2. Re:Here comes automated speeding tickets... by Ribbons+Almark · · Score: 1

      Totally agree with this statement of here comes automated speeding ticket. what I would find funny is if you took this app and got on a subway train. OMG!! THIS GUYS IS MOVING WAY TOO FAST! CALL SWAT!

    3. Re:Here comes automated speeding tickets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would the speed bumps even be needed? Just use the GPS to tell where the phone is at the beginning and end of the elapsed time.

  13. Cooool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is so cool, unlike here it takes days, weeks, and sometimes months before the government decide to close a small potholes. Sometimes they just pour in some white cement and it only last 2 or 3 days before start cracking up, where this only happen after the hole is out on the local newspaper.

  14. Easy to develop because it doesn't do anything by makubesu · · Score: 2

    Why bother actually collecting the data if you never intend to fix the pot holes?

  15. In the monitoring station... by abednegoyulo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Guy1: Hey WTF is going on here? We are detecting a lot of bumps in a very secluded area.
    Guy2: So?
    Guy1: The vehicles seems to be not moving.
    Guy2: Ah! Valentines day!

  16. Re:Okay.. so you know where a pothole is within 50 by bieber · · Score: 2

    Presumably, a single report would never be used to identify a pothole, as that could easily be a fluke (maybe the user dropped their phone while driving through the area). Rather, you would want to wait until you'd gotten a reasonable number of reports from the same area to ensure that there actually is a pothole in the road; a convenient consequence of this would be that you could average the responses from that area, which should go a long way towards correcting for GPS inaccuracy. At very least it should be good enough that a city worker could find the pothole in the course of a couple minutes driving around...

  17. Gotta rethink my driving habits... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Oh, shoot! If I participate with this program, won't be able to fornicate while I drive. Else Big Brother is gonna think the city is more pockmarked than the moon!!

    1. Re:Gotta rethink my driving habits... by c0lo · · Score: 1

      Oh, shoot! If I participate with this program, won't be able to fornicate while I drive. Else Big Brother is gonna think the city is more pockmarked than the moon!!

      No, they'll just send someone to plug that hole you are hitting so often... after all, that's the very end purpose of the application.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  18. Re:Okay.. so you know where a pothole is within 50 by commlinx · · Score: 1

    LOL. 4 digit precision... within 450 meters..

    You might want to double-check your calculation. A minute of longitude at the equator is equal to 1 nautical mile or 1852 meters. For a rought calc if you assumed there were 100 minutes in a degree instead of 60 you'd still have two decimals left making it around 18 meters of precisions. Rule of thumb is 4 decimals equates to around 10 meters.

  19. And in other news... by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    For the last several weeks, city workers have been attempting to fill an unexplained rash of apparently-invisible pot holes on Lovers' Lane.

    "I don't get it," said Area Supervisor Ed Jamacated. "From the readings we've been getting, it should look like the Grand Canyon around here."

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  20. Get out of my phone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds to me like just another way for the government to track the movements of average citizens. Go fuck yourself, government.

    1. Re:Get out of my phone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      commodore_64love is that you?

  21. what's the point? by noahm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I lived in metro-Boston for a long time (I moved away about a year ago), and my only question about this whole project is, "why?" The Mass DCR (Dept of Conservation & Resources) is legally free of any liability for damage to cars due to road disrepair, and it is clearly evident. Potholes deep enough to cause severe damage are common, and unless the DCR staff goes out of its way to avoid ever driving, there's no way they could be unaware of these. (That's hard to imagine, since the only organization more poorly run in the entire Boston area is the MBTA, operator of the public transit system.) You don't need a GPS to find the potholes, you just get in your car and drive, they'll find you. Just watch out when they do!

    I suppose, in fairness, that this article is only referring to Boston proper, not the greater Boston area. Problem is, nobody lives in Boston. Most people live in Cambridge, Somerville, Newton, Brighton, etc, etc. Maybe the roads in Boston will be great because of this, but everybody's car will be so trashed by the time they get there that it won't matter.

    Gah. The SF Bay Area is fucked, but this really makes me not miss Boston!

    1. Re:what's the point? by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2

      Problem is, nobody lives in Boston. Most people live in Cambridge, Somerville, Newton, Brighton, etc, etc.

      While most of the people in the Metro Boston area don't live in Boston itself, Boston is nevertheless the most populous city in New England. The next-most-populous city in the metro area is Cambridge, and it's only about 1/5th the population of Boston.

      Also, Brighton has been part of Boston since the 1870s.

      The Mass DCR (Dept of Conservation & Resources) is legally free of any liability for damage to cars due to road disrepair, and it is clearly evident.

      DCR mainly only runs the parkways, which admittedly are some pretty major roads. But most of the roads in the city don't fall under DCR; the city's own Department of Public Works maintains them. Or that's the hope, at least.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    2. Re:what's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I've never heard 645,000 people referred to as "nobody". That's about 6 times the population of Cambridge and almost 10 times the population of Somerville. Oh, and by the way ... Brighton is a neighborhood of Boston.

    3. Re:what's the point? by Idarubicin · · Score: 1

      You don't need a GPS to find the potholes, you just get in your car and drive, they'll find you. Just watch out when they do!

      On the other hand, if you don't want to have to rely on city workers driving every mile of road in the city looking for potholes -- and have to wait until spring 2013 before they're finished their survey -- then I can see the benefits of a distributed system.

      This app potentially provides information that would be difficult and time-consuming to acquire in any other way. It tells you how many drivers are actually going over a given pothole, which is a more direct measure of the harmfulness of a given hole than a simple look at the average traffic on a given street. (Some holes are easier to avoid than others; there's a reasonable argument that the holes causing the most discomfort should be fixed sooner.) It also may be able to provide information about the 'severity' of each hole; the ones producing the most acute acceleration are probably going to be subjectively 'worse' than the others.

      Given finite and insufficient road repair resources, it makes sense to develop methods to allocate those limited resources in a way which maximizes the improvement in comfort for the most drivers. I will note at least one caveat, however -- the 'fairness' of the system could be distorted by a non-uniform distribution of accelerometer-equipped smartphones running this app. Lower-income residential neighborhoods, for instance, might be penalized by such a scheme.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    4. Re:what's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, i bought a jeep when i move from a rural area into boston.. cause the roads are so bad you need one.

  22. Amusing... by thestudio_bob · · Score: 1

    At first I thought that said Potheads and was like, do we really need an App for that? They're not that difficult to pick out.

    --
    The real Sig captains the Northwestern. This one captains /.
  23. lollll...I would agree - to date... by ibsteve2u · · Score: 0

    Technology evolves, and as the reality of "flood-up/trickle-down" economics - the reality that the only thing that trickles down is pain - becomes ever more evident in ever more desperate state and local governments...

    For instance, triangulation and transmission delays from cell phone towers in combination with GPS data could be used immediately to narrow down location, and privacy concerns? Heck, they just stick that label of the system is necessary to apprehend fleeing terrorists, and then soon enough it will bleed into the privacy of the individual American..coerced, perhaps, by communities desperate to fund their police forces with traffic offenses.

    I wouldn't rule anything out...like, I never thought my government would lie my country into invading another nation, and then lie about the "Six days, six weeks, I doubt six months..." duration to protect some tax cuts from the application of basic math, and then lie about the need for more troops and so delay a surge until a critical Presidential election had passed, and then lie about stuffing key government departments with people chosen on the basis of their ideology, and then lie...

    --
    Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
  24. Re:Okay.. so you know where a pothole is within 50 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that that is the GPs point - that the device reports more digits than can be remotely accurate.

  25. umm by Mcavity · · Score: 1

    why do I see reports coming in from the local "make out point"?

  26. Re:Okay.. so you know where a pothole is within 50 by zero0ne · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sounds like your phone is using the cell tower for location instead of the GPS chip.

    Civilian GPS should provide a worst case accuracy of ~8 meters at a 95% confidence level.

  27. ..unless they are vertical. by dmomo · · Score: 1

    Then the City's gonna be looking for a lot of potholes at yo momma's house.

  28. I've lived in or around Boston my entire life by dmomo · · Score: 1

    And there are potholes. But not as bad as you make it seem. At least compared other Cities that get a good amount of snow. New York and Pittsburgh are two that come to mind. I'm not saying it isn't a problem, but I just want to make it clear to people who are not familiar with the area. I've never once gotten damage from a pothole severe or otherwise. It happens, but I've only heard of it once or twice second hand.

    An app for that? I'll whole-heartedly agree with you there. I don't see a reason for that.

  29. Just monitor police cars by Animats · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Just monitor police cars and garbage trucks. They tend to cover most streets every few days.

    1. Re:Just monitor police cars by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      ...Then all the streets around donut shops will be in perfect conditions

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
  30. Thinking more about it.. by dmomo · · Score: 1

    I'd actually WELCOME more potholes in Boston. Maybe it would slow some of those crazies down!

    1. Re:Thinking more about it.. by noahm · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about that. It's pretty apparent to me that the crazies don't have much concern about the condition there car is in once they reach their destination. As long as they get there first! Damage is a secondary consideration.

      Ok, I'm probably exaggerating, but man, there are some crazy drivers there! As far as I can tell traffic laws are viewed merely as suggestions, and there's no enforcement at all. For all the crazy driving I witnessed in the time I lived around there, I probably saw no more than 2 or 3 instances of police involvement.

    2. Re:Thinking more about it.. by Interoperable · · Score: 1

      No, it would just make their steering more erratic.

      Actually, from the short time that I spent driving in downtown Boston, the drivers seemed pretty much much on par with most big cities.

      --
      So if this is the future...where's my jet pack?
    3. Re:Thinking more about it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The police are busy setting up speed traps elsewhere... usually in places where going 10-20mph of the limit is perfectly reasonable (one should alway take road conditions into account though).

  31. Encouraging driving into potholes? by flimflammer · · Score: 1

    So are they encouraging people to actually drive into potholes and potentially damage their vehicle? I've never met someone who, when seeing a pothole, didn't move slightly in either direction to avoid it.

    Interesting idea, but practicality says it's not going to work very well.

    1. Re:Encouraging driving into potholes? by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      If the pothole is bad enough, they're encouraging people to drive into the pothole so that the car itself fills it.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  32. Re:swerves?: Multiple data Points... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that what you are missing is that they would not react to single data points but groupings of data points. For example, the road crew won't roll until there have been more than, lets say, 50 hits in the same position or area. As you have pointed out, a single data point could be anything. A large number of data points forms a pattern.

    David

  33. bumpy ride? by SlashV · · Score: 1

    "I wanna boom boom boom with your body yo" "It's gonna be a bumpy ride"
    Wonder what the government will think about those potholes ;)

  34. What's the real reason??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey as if the services don't know where they have potholes! They have workers, cameras, etc. And what if it is not a pothole? Absurd! And another quetion arises - what is the real reason for the app?
    Katerina from ipad application design
     

  35. Misread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read that as Gov App Detects Potatoes As Your Drive Over Them

  36. Y'all are overcomplicating this... by Loopy · · Score: 1

    Think about it. The results would obviously be rather useless if it was in your shirt pocket, but if it's in the console or on the seat, you don't need to do any fancy up-then-down-then-blah characterization. Just have the software monitor the vibrations from normal road noise and isolate spikes in the pattern. You don't have to know the pattern ahead of time. Let the software decide what the noise floor is based on the aggregate data it's seeing over X seconds, then watch for the abnormals. Even if you get the occasional person bumping it or picking it up or running over the bumps in the middle of the road, when the "home office" processing software does the mass data analysis, it will weed out the flyers and only identify the spikes that show up consistently. They don't have to know what kind of bump it is, just that there is a bump in the road that is bad enough to show up at a consistent rate and that would trigger an inspection to find out if it's expected (train tracks) or unexpected (pothole/buckling/etc.).

    It doesn't have to be perfect: just good enough to identify the bad areas. Even if it was horrendously inaccurate, an automated system that was nearly free and got 30% right would be better than waiting on people to call in reports with erroneous or hard-to-understand data.

    1. Re:Y'all are overcomplicating this... by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      That's great. But considering GPS is only accurate to about 100m, and mine frequently puts me several hundred meters to a few miles away, how would you match up the pothole logs to actual locations?

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    2. Re:Y'all are overcomplicating this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might want to actually turn your GPS on instead of using the cell tower tracking.

  37. Re:Okay.. so you know where a pothole is within 50 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are obviously not using a GPS so why is this relevant? The figures you cite sound like cell tower positioning.

    Actual GPS results will easily be in the usable accuracy range -- the odd outliers won't matter as the data will be used in statistical analysis anway: only massive clusters of pothole locations will actually trigger an action.

  38. Re:Okay.. so you know where a pothole is within 50 by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

    That doesn't hold true once you get into the urban jungle, or essentially any location where you do not have a clear view of a large portion of the sky.

    This, incidentally, is the case in quite a lot of metros in the US.

  39. Technology problem by hellfire · · Score: 1

    First, this app has to be running in the background. iOS apps stay in the background for some time but iOS will eventually quit the application to free up resources for other apps. No one is going to voluntarily open this app before they leave for work just to check for potholes. It also has to use data on a limited data plan. Finally a background app has to reduce some battery life to report back home. I don't see this being all that ingenious as it sounds just because of iOS limitations and limitations in general of smartphones.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

  40. Of course you know the result by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    Suddenly the red-light district of any city is going to have the nicest streets, because of so much 'sudden vertical movement' being reported there day after day.

    I can't imagine the street workers (on either side) are going to mind.

    --
    -Styopa
  41. Mining and Holes go Together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. The pothole database will make it possible to track the user crossing his "pothole history" with the known "pothole geography" database, and extracting a correlation. Peasy.

    2. Cessation of signal means the impact broke the phone. Or the car fell in the "pothole".

    3. This will enable them to prosecute "pothole vigilantes", who fill up potholes on their own, when the state is passive.

    Why not have robotic pothole-fillers ? Could be ... "interesting" :)

    "Pothole-Minators" ?

  42. Never been to Medford eh? by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

    There are many streets in Medford that are "unplowable" due to the deplorable condition of the asphalt. Tough luck to you if you live on one of those streets.

  43. You don't get it by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

    The potholes don't slow them down at all. Ever wonder why so many boston cars have dents? Its because they are swerving to avoid potholes.

  44. Average and count by spectrokid · · Score: 1

    If enough people have it, you can focus on areas where 10 people "bumped" at exactly the same place and throw out everything else. Running over grandma in peace you will do...

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

  45. Re:Okay.. so you know where a pothole is within 50 by JTsyo · · Score: 1

    Not to mention this is on a road. So it's basically 10 meters in a linear direction not a radius. An inspector can easily find the pothole within a 10 meter stretch of road.

  46. Re:damages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about logging your trip to the dealer/garage immediately afterward to fix the damages when you don't swerve in time? (Yes, I just had a $500 pothole event yesterday).

  47. Don't do this in New York by Brannoncyll · · Score: 1

    .... or your servers will be a heap of smouldering slag after the first morning rush over the Triborough bridge!

  48. Re:Okay.. so you know where a pothole is within 50 by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    I think you missed my point.

    The reported accuracy (4 digits) is less than the actual accuracy (within 450 meters).

    So it gives two highly accurate numbers... which are only accurate to within 450 meters. It might as well say, "you are at 21.23, -92.71"

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  49. Re:Okay.. so you know where a pothole is within 50 by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    Does the iphone 3g have an actual GPS?

    Does the iphone 4g have an actual GPS?

    I'm using mine with the default settings. Is there a way to turn on the real GPS vs the cell phone tower GPS?

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  50. Re:Okay.. so you know where a pothole is within 50 by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    Well this is an app for a cell phone right (presumably the iphone).

    iPhone GPS (even aGPS) accuracy varies wildly. In the city it can get confused.

    Perhaps I don't have it turned on and it is only using cell phone towers but I read that getting confused in the city is common because of reflections off buildings. I don't see any settings to "turn on real GPS".

    95% is not 100%... but what I see isn't 95%. The best it's ever reported was 17 meters and that is rare. 45 meters is much more common. 450 meters is common and 1500 meters occurs at least a few times a day.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  51. Simplest solution by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    Drive your car over a pothole, break the suspension and sue the relevant local authority.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  52. You've got to be kidding !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're going to let the government know everywhere you were and how fast you were speeding on your way there ? The least obnoxious result is that the speeding fine notifications will probably just pop automatically into your inbox. No need for a judge, you just convicted yourself out of you own mouth so to speak.

  53. Other Uses by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Investigator: "Then tell me, Mr. Jones, why does that bump profile resemble your mother-in-law's face? Twice even; one forward and one backward."

  54. Bullshit walks and talks, I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Catch! Here is my smartphone.

    Oops! New China Syndrome Hole at 24th and Southwest.

  55. My thesis from 2008! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey!
    That was my thesis project back in 2008!
    http://bachear.sourceforge.net/
    Gimme credit!

  56. My thesis from 2008 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the same thing as my Thesis from 2008.
    Look for bachear project at sourceforge:

    About this project:

    This is the Bachear project ("bachear")

    This project was registered on SourceForge.net on Aug 28, 2008, and is described by the project team as follows:

    Analyzing the signal from an accelerometer combined with GPS data is possible to automatically create a map showing the street defects.

  57. Smart Phone Accelerometer Orientation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the smartphone can report only vertical acceleration because it knows its 3 dimensional orientation?

  58. It can track my vertical movements? by Meski · · Score: 1

    So all it needs to do is to correlate position of two[1] GPS that are extremely close, and one (or more) is doing up and down movements? [1] ok, more, if you want to locate an orgy. Software patent for new application, anyone?

  59. You drive, she was driven, you're driving... by incubbus13 · · Score: 1

    How about an app that puts 'You' in the right place when someone typos 'your'?

    K.

  60. Re:Okay.. so you know where a pothole is within 50 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was his point... sarcastic laughter at over-precise numerical specification when a 450m range of error was present.

  61. Pothole Alert App by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have proposed this idea to Boston and I am awaiting their response. Maybe everyone here can request Boston to participate if they like what I am proposing. The reports would be emailed to Boston every time someone sends in a report. Also, the system can even email different contacts in different cities or different counties. So it actually works nationwide anywhere.

    Pothole Alert App

    Use your iPhone or Android phone to report potholes using GPS.

    iPhone :
    http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/pothole-alert/id404126454?mt=8

    Android:
    https://market.android.com/details?id=com.shake

    -----