I was just going to comment on that. By connecting wikileaks to a rogue's gallery of villains, the article makes it's political leanings pretty clear. It's also woefully brief and simplistic. But this article seemed more designed to get lots of hits, by using every buzzword it could think of that'd make it come up high on Google than useful or informative. I guess if you were teaching a 5th grade class an introduction to malicious software hackers it'd be a place to start. This is like a nursing home-time news broadcast designed to scare seniors and technophobes. Kids are licking toad's butts to get high! News at 11! Fluff piece. Maybe it'll be on L&O next season.
Screw it, I'm willing to take the hit to the overall healthiness of our democracy if we can have one internet for stupid people and one for the rest of us.
I will pay an extra $20 a month to subsidize a separate internet for Glen Beck and the rest of the conservative neo-Luddites.
That was my favorite homepage. If it's changed I'm done with the internet. I quit. I hope they didn't update it and fruck up the navigation and look like other sites have done recently...
It's ugly, it's awkward, it has a floating top "banner" that blocks me being able to see the top half of the article I'm reading. It sucks. Change is bad. Go back.
I hear if you put tin foil over the top of your monitor, they can't spy on you any more...the intertoobs come through there and the spy satelites can't see through the tin foil.
This frustrates me. If you go by the Jewish calender, or any of the other pre-Gregorian ones, the date doesn't match.
Time, as we measure it, at least, is entirely a human construct. The idea that a second is a fundamental unit of the universe contains tenuous scientific assumptions.
Numerology is bunk. Worse, trying to find metaphysical (or even non-metaphysical) content in a system that is completely made up and has no foundation in any kind of science is nuts.
In the calender of my life, today is the 13th day, of the 13th son, of the 13th/. comment I've ever made. The world will come to an end tomorrow. Guaranteed. All the omens say so.
Any time I see a scientist (or any other 'pundit') predicting the future, I automatically assume the opposite of what they say will be true. The only guaranteed way to be wrong in life is to specify something about the future. Bill Gates saying 64k is all anyone will ever need in RAM or whatever, for instance.
Worse, and akin to what some people are arguing above...this sounds old and tired, to me. Someone giving up on a lifelong dream. Hawking has done a lot of great things in his life, but, to me, one of the greatest has always been inspiring other people with his love of science and his passion for knowledge. To say that humanity will never do something, given the practical infinity of time seems defeatist and...sad to me.
I think the theory of everything is one of the most important pursuits in science. Whether or not it is possible, rational, logical or what...it's already spurred massive amounts of research (LHC, etc) that has/will pay dividends in commercial, medical, or merely cool ways. It's the same argument I always have about the space program. Yes, it'll never be cool as Star Trek, at least not for a couple thousand years, but our need to explore, to climb, to name, to learn might be the thing that keeps us alive as a species. When we lose that...then I would expect extinction to be a natural outcome.
I think your god spends way too much time paying attention to what consenting adults are doing in bed. It's a little creepy, frankly. My mom taught me that it wasn't polite to eavesdrop. My ex-girlfriend taught me it sometimes was, if you were invited. But the invitation seems to be a crucial part of human social interactions.
I ran an apache webserver +clam av + spamassassin + qmail/squirrelmail on a pentium 233mhz box with 32 mb ram and about 5gig of HD space. That was Sarge, I think. But it ran beautiful for 2-3 years, every day, as a webserver for work. Then the drive seized solid. But? When did they last make 233's? 1995 or so? Pretty good run for it.
My thinking is, there are a ton of experiments we could do, that you can't do on a human. Anything that harms their development, etc, is outlawed for ethical reasons. With this, you could do that. It doesn't actually have to be that close to a human being to give us more knowledge. Just closer than a rat is. That's all it takes to give us valuable insight.
We could find out what kind of nurture makes people addicts, or sex offenders, or killers, or wife beaters, or whatever else. You could craft a person who was any of those things. And then simply erase the damage any time you wanted.
Whether the video is a fake or not, this kind of constructed persona offers some pretty cool opportunities to study human development.
Imagine if you could raise him to be a sociopath? The insights that would lend us to prevent that happening to real people would be awesome.
All of the experiments that need to be done, or would be helpful to do, that we can't do because of human testing ethics could be done.
Whether it works or not, right now, it is definitely a step toward nurtured personality growth. That's just cool no matter if it works yet or not.
It doesn't even have to be any kind of 'true' AI. As long as it is more similar to the way a human subject reacts than a lab rat or monkey. And in 20 years (probably more like 5) once the momentum of investment and invention in the field gets established it could open whole new vistas for humanity. That's pretty awesome.
Actually, I wrote a report about this for an Anthro class once. The advantage of "modern" humans, over homo erectus was "organization". Homo Erectus had a (20%) bigger brain (for whatever that means), massed ~20kg more than the average modern human, and was generally better established in the area.
Cro-Magnon man gathered resources and brought them to a central location, while Neanderthal went to the resources and used them there. Whether Erectus was wiped out, assimilated, or whatever, obviously organization requires communication, and it provided enough of an evolutionary advantage that Neanderthal lost.
The American government has a long and dishonorable history of rule-by-fear. This isn't politics, per se. It is governance.
Like the 'hide under your desk' nuclear drills of the 60s-70s. Or the 'we might have to draft', about the 100 hour long 1991 Gulf War.
As long as I tell you that the guy over there in that room will shoot you, you'll do anything I want, accept any irrational rule or condition I put in place, in order to get 'here'. Even if you told people that guy over there has 123,000 people in the room with him and he's only going to shoot one a year, and our 'safe haven' causes 10 people a year to be crushed by overcrowding, they'd still jump through hoops and accept ridiculous restrictions for the illusion of safety.
The anti-terrorism security in place is the moral (and practical) equivalent of telling a nervous father-to-be to go boil water and get towels. It's an old trick in first aid/crisis situations too. You give the people who are freaking out direction, rules, boundaries...and they're okay and can act competently within those boundaries. It doesn't matter if the orders even make sense. As long as they have direction and feel like someone is doing something, they feel safe.
Isn't that what all airport "security" is now? Come on, seriously, checking your ID? Because there's no way a terrorist could make a fake ID. 14 year old 8th grade drop out urban poor can manage it, but obviously it's beyond the technological capability of terrorists. What else do they do. Oh, yeah, scan your bags. Which is really efficient. Because in the 4000 years that humans have been smuggling things through security/border checkpoints, nobody expects to have their bags searched. Taking off your shoes. That's the best one. The new one. I feel much safer knowing I had to wait an extra 5 minutes to get on the plane, so that Bob in front of me could figure out how to untie his thigh-high lace-up hiking boots because he's been living in a cave for the last 15 years and/or can't read the 10,000 signs posted all over the place and is deaf to the cyclically repeated PA messages. That way, if a terrorist had a bomb in line behind me, it might go off 5 minutes early. Which I think you will concede is the most effective aspect of the entire charade.
When you use a bad logical process, your conclusion usually isn't right. That's just how things go. The scientific method, logical principles, and so on aren't random. It is the stuff that works reliably for separating truth from fiction. So when you fail to use it, well your results are probably incorrect.
Wow. You've obviously never had an argument with my girlfriend before. And lost.
Dear IBM, I have a Greddy Turbo Timer in my car. If you turn the car off, it takes 30 seconds to power down. What if the light changes first? What if you turn my car off when I've been racing around irresponsibly and seize up my $6000.00 turbo because you didn't give my car enough time to cool down before you turned it off?
Slashdot Mirror
Note to self: change password from potrzebie
At this rate, they should have an app out by next year to make my girlfriend bi...
K.
Oh My God (OMG). That Is So Cool. (TISC) unmanned vehicle (UAV)/drone (drone) software(SW) for the win! (FTW!)
K.
I was just going to comment on that. By connecting wikileaks to a rogue's gallery of villains, the article makes it's political leanings pretty clear. It's also woefully brief and simplistic. But this article seemed more designed to get lots of hits, by using every buzzword it could think of that'd make it come up high on Google than useful or informative. I guess if you were teaching a 5th grade class an introduction to malicious software hackers it'd be a place to start. This is like a nursing home-time news broadcast designed to scare seniors and technophobes. Kids are licking toad's butts to get high! News at 11! Fluff piece. Maybe it'll be on L&O next season.
K.
Screw it, I'm willing to take the hit to the overall healthiness of our democracy if we can have one internet for stupid people and one for the rest of us.
I will pay an extra $20 a month to subsidize a separate internet for Glen Beck and the rest of the conservative neo-Luddites.
K.
How about an app that puts 'You' in the right place when someone typos 'your'?
K.
That was my favorite homepage. If it's changed I'm done with the internet. I quit. I hope they didn't update it and fruck up the navigation and look like other sites have done recently...
K.
It's ugly, it's awkward, it has a floating top "banner" that blocks me being able to see the top half of the article I'm reading. It sucks. Change is bad. Go back.
K.
I hear if you put tin foil over the top of your monitor, they can't spy on you any more...the intertoobs come through there and the spy satelites can't see through the tin foil.
K.
The computers are beating Communists at chess now, next thing you know they'll be beating humans.
K.
This frustrates me. If you go by the Jewish calender, or any of the other pre-Gregorian ones, the date doesn't match.
Time, as we measure it, at least, is entirely a human construct. The idea that a second is a fundamental unit of the universe contains tenuous scientific assumptions.
Numerology is bunk. Worse, trying to find metaphysical (or even non-metaphysical) content in a system that is completely made up and has no foundation in any kind of science is nuts.
In the calender of my life, today is the 13th day, of the 13th son, of the 13th /. comment I've ever made. The world will come to an end tomorrow. Guaranteed. All the omens say so.
K.
Any time I see a scientist (or any other 'pundit') predicting the future, I automatically assume the opposite of what they say will be true. The only guaranteed way to be wrong in life is to specify something about the future. Bill Gates saying 64k is all anyone will ever need in RAM or whatever, for instance.
Worse, and akin to what some people are arguing above...this sounds old and tired, to me. Someone giving up on a lifelong dream. Hawking has done a lot of great things in his life, but, to me, one of the greatest has always been inspiring other people with his love of science and his passion for knowledge. To say that humanity will never do something, given the practical infinity of time seems defeatist and...sad to me.
I think the theory of everything is one of the most important pursuits in science. Whether or not it is possible, rational, logical or what...it's already spurred massive amounts of research (LHC, etc) that has/will pay dividends in commercial, medical, or merely cool ways. It's the same argument I always have about the space program. Yes, it'll never be cool as Star Trek, at least not for a couple thousand years, but our need to explore, to climb, to name, to learn might be the thing that keeps us alive as a species. When we lose that...then I would expect extinction to be a natural outcome.
K.
I couldn't figure out how a sandworm was going to use this thing. It's not ergonomically designed for 100' long, limbless users at all.
K.
recognize basic costumer information
Costumers? Prolly is consumers. But, if it only works on costumers, that is a way cooler invention...
K.
I think your god spends way too much time paying attention to what consenting adults are doing in bed. It's a little creepy, frankly. My mom taught me that it wasn't polite to eavesdrop. My ex-girlfriend taught me it sometimes was, if you were invited. But the invitation seems to be a crucial part of human social interactions.
K.
I ran an apache webserver +clam av + spamassassin + qmail/squirrelmail on a pentium 233mhz box with 32 mb ram and about 5gig of HD space. That was Sarge, I think. But it ran beautiful for 2-3 years, every day, as a webserver for work. Then the drive seized solid. But? When did they last make 233's? 1995 or so? Pretty good run for it.
K.
My thinking is, there are a ton of experiments we could do, that you can't do on a human. Anything that harms their development, etc, is outlawed for ethical reasons. With this, you could do that. It doesn't actually have to be that close to a human being to give us more knowledge. Just closer than a rat is. That's all it takes to give us valuable insight.
We could find out what kind of nurture makes people addicts, or sex offenders, or killers, or wife beaters, or whatever else. You could craft a person who was any of those things. And then simply erase the damage any time you wanted.
K.
Whether the video is a fake or not, this kind of constructed persona offers some pretty cool opportunities to study human development.
Imagine if you could raise him to be a sociopath? The insights that would lend us to prevent that happening to real people would be awesome.
All of the experiments that need to be done, or would be helpful to do, that we can't do because of human testing ethics could be done.
Whether it works or not, right now, it is definitely a step toward nurtured personality growth. That's just cool no matter if it works yet or not.
It doesn't even have to be any kind of 'true' AI. As long as it is more similar to the way a human subject reacts than a lab rat or monkey. And in 20 years (probably more like 5) once the momentum of investment and invention in the field gets established it could open whole new vistas for humanity. That's pretty awesome.
K.
Crap, that shoulda gone under the post for communication, not evolution.
K.
Actually, I wrote a report about this for an Anthro class once. The advantage of "modern" humans, over homo erectus was "organization". Homo Erectus had a (20%) bigger brain (for whatever that means), massed ~20kg more than the average modern human, and was generally better established in the area.
Cro-Magnon man gathered resources and brought them to a central location, while Neanderthal went to the resources and used them there. Whether Erectus was wiped out, assimilated, or whatever, obviously organization requires communication, and it provided enough of an evolutionary advantage that Neanderthal lost.
K.
The American government has a long and dishonorable history of rule-by-fear. This isn't politics, per se. It is governance.
Like the 'hide under your desk' nuclear drills of the 60s-70s. Or the 'we might have to draft', about the 100 hour long 1991 Gulf War.
As long as I tell you that the guy over there in that room will shoot you, you'll do anything I want, accept any irrational rule or condition I put in place, in order to get 'here'. Even if you told people that guy over there has 123,000 people in the room with him and he's only going to shoot one a year, and our 'safe haven' causes 10 people a year to be crushed by overcrowding, they'd still jump through hoops and accept ridiculous restrictions for the illusion of safety.
The anti-terrorism security in place is the moral (and practical) equivalent of telling a nervous father-to-be to go boil water and get towels. It's an old trick in first aid/crisis situations too. You give the people who are freaking out direction, rules, boundaries...and they're okay and can act competently within those boundaries. It doesn't matter if the orders even make sense. As long as they have direction and feel like someone is doing something, they feel safe.
Sorta like a sheep...
K.
Isn't that what all airport "security" is now? Come on, seriously, checking your ID? Because there's no way a terrorist could make a fake ID. 14 year old 8th grade drop out urban poor can manage it, but obviously it's beyond the technological capability of terrorists. What else do they do. Oh, yeah, scan your bags. Which is really efficient. Because in the 4000 years that humans have been smuggling things through security/border checkpoints, nobody expects to have their bags searched. Taking off your shoes. That's the best one. The new one. I feel much safer knowing I had to wait an extra 5 minutes to get on the plane, so that Bob in front of me could figure out how to untie his thigh-high lace-up hiking boots because he's been living in a cave for the last 15 years and/or can't read the 10,000 signs posted all over the place and is deaf to the cyclically repeated PA messages. That way, if a terrorist had a bomb in line behind me, it might go off 5 minutes early. Which I think you will concede is the most effective aspect of the entire charade.
K.
I bet nobody in that country notices the coup. Damn paywalls.
K.
When you use a bad logical process, your conclusion usually isn't right. That's just how things go. The scientific method, logical principles, and so on aren't random. It is the stuff that works reliably for separating truth from fiction. So when you fail to use it, well your results are probably incorrect.
Wow. You've obviously never had an argument with my girlfriend before. And lost.
K.
Dear IBM,
I have a Greddy Turbo Timer in my car. If you turn the car off, it takes 30 seconds to power down. What if the light changes first? What if you turn my car off when I've been racing around irresponsibly and seize up my $6000.00 turbo because you didn't give my car enough time to cool down before you turned it off?
K.
PS. This is a stupid idea.