Dead People Scientists Won't Let Rest
An anonymous reader writes "Some historical figures are just too interesting to leave alone, even when they're supposed to be moldering in the grave. That's why medical researchers dug up Tycho Brahe, bombarded Napoleon's hair with neutrons in a nuclear reactor, and did everything they could think of to King Tut. Discover Magazine has 8 stories of delayed diagnoses and extreme postmortems."
Anyone else get dyslexia over this one? What I thought I saw before doing a double-take:
Zombies invade university laboratories, scientists assaulted
Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
Some people have too much time on their hands.
In the picture, did that one guy wear a sweater that his mom made him?
Hey, what's the licensing on the picture? Attribution? Did you guys just swipe it from some place and put it up? For a bunch of people who get up in arms over licenses, it sure does seem like you don't care to pay attention to other people's.
I didn't know "Tycho Brahe" was a real person who is not Jerry Holkins.
Gauß' brain is still somewhere in the university of Göttingen while the rest of his body has been buried.
What good is there in spending millions of dollars to find out that Professor Plum killed King Tut in the library with the candlestick? What are you going to do about it? Arrest someone who dies thousands of years ago? Have the current Pharoh make a law banning candlesticks? The information might be somewhat interesting, but how much should we spend to find out? The library, the candlestick, Professor Plum (and his descendents) are probably all just dust in the wind by now.
Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
which was found in a shoebox in someone's closet.
If you don't want people messing with your corpse for centuries to come, get cremated.
"Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
I have to say, when they identified and reburied Copernicus, they gave him the coolest tombstone I've ever seen. Very nice...
"Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
Maybe i am just cold hearted but i have a hard time see napoleon rise from his grave in anger or haunt the scientist from "other side" the grave just because his hair got bombarded in a nuclear reactor.
The whole ghost story part of vengeful spirits and poltergeists are just something a ignorant/scared/happy thinking part of the society raised us to believe in, heck not to far back we were raised with the belief that the ground we walk on was flat, the only "rest" dead people get is what people put in their own mind that the dead person think. Heck if this vengeful spirit thing were real i would have a farm of angry animals haunting me for all the beef/bird/fish i have been eating in my life.
Dead people are dead, end of story. There is no happy place or burning hell for your spirit to go. Heaven and hell is here on earth and its what we create for ourself.
Its a good thing the scientists have a go at those corpses, maybe they can learn something of use from em, if not to bad.
All respect to their memory, but a carcase is not a memory.
The first immortal cell line ever grown was that of Henrietta Lacks in 1951, who had cancer, and her cells are still living in many labs throughout the world--about 20 tons worth (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henrietta_Lacks)! Scientists, literally, won't let her die.
There is this book called Testing Testing or something like that (in 1990s I heard of the book from someone who trains others to administer professional engineering license tests), it is not about taking tests but about society's pervasiveness of tests. There are tests for people before they are born, many tests in school years, driver's licenses, job related tests, and tests after people die.
An elementary school teacher calls "timed tests" (i.e. 10 minutes for students to complete a arithmetic exam) "drill and kill" tests.
mfwright@batnet.com
... is definitely Jeremy Bentham, in my book (if you're not in the know, go straight to the "auto-icon" section of the article).
Good lord people, I'm so tired of being grouped in with the "scientists" at large when it comes to stories like this. The general population (the generally more tech-savvy /. crowd notwithstanding) seems to think that anyone with a business card that says scientist somewhere on it is responsible for all the good and bad technological developments in the common news media. I am a molecular biologist with an engineering background, and I am so bloody tired of being assaulted on a daily basis because the BBC or the Guardian or the NYT or the Washington Post says "science says N; world is going to end. It's not how fucking science works. I'm sorry to rant to all of you (who presumably "get it") but there are so many scientific disciplines out there, we cannot all be grouped together. Is this story about MD Ph.Ds? Forensics specialists? Epigeneticists? Forensic chemists? Protein chemists? Archaeologists? My grad school adviser used to state that all a Ph.D means is that have a huge in-depth knowledge base concerning a tiny bit of any given subject- any decent scientist will know what I'm talking about. I work in an R&D group with 10-odd scientists, with degree levels ranging from B.S. with 2 years experience to Ph.D with 40 years experience (one of whom is literally a rock star of the mobio world) and we all have our specialties, and we rely on each other on a daily basis to complete our development goals. Please stop grouping all scientists in together; it does nothing but make the story submitter/editor look ignorant. /rant
That scared me. I thought it was said "Dead people scientists". That turned out to be thankfully less eventful than I expected.