Slashdot Mirror


Tech-Unfriendly Cafes Say No Kindles Allowed

theodp writes "At the risk of pulling-a-Groupon, I have a dream that one day my children will not be judged by their e-readers, but by the content of their character. The NY Times' Virginia Heffernan complains that many indie New York City cafes now heavily restrict, or ban outright, the use of Kindles, Nooks and iPads. Evidently, she says, too many coffee shops have had their ambience wrecked when itinerant word processors with laptops turn the tables into office space. Full-dress computers are one thing, says Heffernan, but banning devices the size of books is going too far, and it's anathema to the character and history of cafes. By contrast, Starbucks offers free, one-click, unlimited wireless service to their patrons, making it in Heffernan's eyes 'a flawed franchise that is squarely in the public good.'"

375 comments

  1. It's a free country by Relyx · · Score: 4, Informative

    Those cafes are quite free to ban eReaders, iPads and the like. Whether it will actually be enforced is another question entirely. Even if the management comes down hard, there is nothing stopping their customers going elsewhere.

    1. Re:It's a free country by confused+one · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You've hit the nail on the head. If Cafe X bans the tablets then they'll see their customers walk down the street to Cafe Y, which welcomes them. There's nothing that says you have to do business with the cafe that bans the devices.

    2. Re:It's a free country by Joe+U · · Score: 2

      So, I can read a book, but not a Kindle?

      Kindle goes in book jacket cover, problem solved.

    3. Re:It's a free country by thomasdz · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, you can read a book, but at MY cafe, only books that have been handwritten on velum are allowed... I don't allow any of them high-falootin' printing press -produced monstrosities. I demand my customers use the written word as God meant it to be used... produced by monks.
       

      --
      Karma: Excellent. 15 moderator points expire sometime.
    4. Re:It's a free country by nomoreunusednickname · · Score: 1

      I would like to see them try to enforce that. Say, i walk in, buy a coffee, sit down... take out my kindle. Then what are they gonna do? Kick me out, while the guy next to me has 3 square meters of newspaper spread out?

    5. Re:It's a free country by morari · · Score: 2

      Who really cares though? I go to cafes to eat and drink, not play with my Nook or check my e-mail.

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    6. Re:It's a free country by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 2

      Absolutely.

      I think this has more to do with economics than ambiance. People with multifunction devices are more likely to plant themselves to a seat than a customer with a paperback. I'm sure there are people with traditional books that spend all day at a cafe, but they are outnumbered by the people with the electronic devices. More new customers equate to more revenue.

      I also think that as soon as more customers go to a competitor in sufficient numbers that generates empty seats, the cafe owner would reconsider their stance against customers with e-readers.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    7. Re:It's a free country by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 2

      Or cafe X will see an uptick in business as their tables turn quicker. Either way, it's the free market economy at its best.

      (Side note: this only works because in a place like NYC, there is a lot of competition. If you lived in a small town with only one coffeeshop, then this would be a completely different deal. (I'm looking at you Time Warner Cable.))

    8. Re:It's a free country by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Their practical ability to do so is, naturally, bounded by customer sentiment and their continued desire to have customers; but there is absolutely nothing requiring them to satisfy anybody's notions of logical consistency in expelling people. They ask you to leave. You leave or are trespassing.

      If their customer base is alienated by that, the establishment may encounter solvency issues. If they approve, they've got a selling point.

    9. Re:It's a free country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say, i walk in, buy a coffee, sit down... take out my kindle.

      They ask you to leave. You leave or are trespassing.

      Do they have to pay back my coffee when they ask me to leave?

    10. Re:It's a free country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! thank you, you hit it right on the head!

    11. Re:It's a free country by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Or cafe X will see an uptick in business as their tables turn quicker. Either way, it's the free market economy at its best.

      (Side note: this only works because in a place like NYC, there is a lot of competition. If you lived in a small town with only one coffeeshop, then this would be a completely different deal. (I'm looking at you Time Warner Cable.))

      But even in a small town, the store owner would be in their right to not allow kindles and other devices. A small town, probably has a smaller coffee shop, which probably has fewer seats that need to be turned over just as quickly as in NYC to be profitable. I've lived in a town of 30,000 that had a Panera's coffee shop. It was next to impossible to eat their during normal lunch hours because of their free wifi and all of the college kids sitting around on their laptops with a cup of coffee for hours on end. $2 for a cup of coffee for 3 or 4 hours of internet wasn't a bad deal for the kids, but it sure impacted business for the store.

      Their solution? During the lunch hours 11:00 - 1:30, you could only use laptops in one relatively small section of the place. They even had free internet terminals at some of the tables if you wanted. It turns out that the same amount of people were using the internet, but instead of one per table or booth, they all shared the tables and booths in that area. In that way, the store could still serve it's paying customers.

      The whole point of the above story is that it impacts even small towns.

    12. Re:It's a free country by jonsmirl · · Score: 1

      I've walked out of Starbucks dozens of times since there are no seats to enjoy my coffee. I don't want to use my electronics, I'm trying to drink a cup of coffee. A couple of Starbucks near me are always occupied with long-term seat sitters and I won't visit them any more. I've come back two hours later and the same people are still in the seats.

    13. Re:It's a free country by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      They will ask you to leave, and if it escalates, I imagine they call the manager, who may in turn call whatever kind of security they have / the police if you continue to resist. Its not complicated, and probably not much different than if you made a scene.

      This is much like if a restaurant wants to enforce a dress code; they are perfectly free to kick you out if you do not conform to it. I dont get why this is a story.

    14. Re:It's a free country by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I don't know if that has been settled. I assume that the management would just sidestep any potential legal complications by having the most grating asshole currently on shift dump it into a paper cup for you. All the alienation, if not more, and very cheap in bulk.

    15. Re:It's a free country by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      I'm quite familiar with small towns and the sole restaurants that serve them. Some serve better food than others - some have better service than others - and some actually reserve a table or group of tables for the general riff-raff. (Old men playing checkers, loggers off work due to weather, whatever, the riff-raff) There are some restaurants that will WELCOME a guy coming in, sitting in the community area, ordering a cup of coffee, then checking his email, maybe browsing a bit, checking in at the office - as long as it's not overdone. They may not welcome the guy 6 days a week, if he holds that spot down right through meal times, and only spends 6 dollars all week long. Other places, they'll tell you REAL QUICK that this isn't the library or a school, and you better order or leave. Such places, I don't return to, even if I'm hungry, LOL

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    16. Re:It's a free country by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Vellum? You're a progressive, right? What is wrong with good old papyrus?

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    17. Re:It's a free country by OnlyJedi · · Score: 1

      The other point is that there is a happy medium between a shop being overrun by customers buying one coffee and staying for 3-4 hours, and the same shop banning all electronic devices, books, newspapers, and anything else that might keep customers in the store for longer. Your local Panera's seems to have found one such happy medium.

    18. Re:It's a free country by thomasdz · · Score: 1

      Papyrus? If I used that for writing, what would I use for toilet paper???

      --
      Karma: Excellent. 15 moderator points expire sometime.
    19. Re:It's a free country by thomasdz · · Score: 1

      yeah, when I was younger... I misunderstood that "no shoes, no shirts, no service" police
      one day I sat down with no pants on... what the hell, they called the cops on me.
      I boycott their milkshake

      --
      Karma: Excellent. 15 moderator points expire sometime.
    20. Re:It's a free country by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Well, I heard that those Egyptians use their left hand to wipe, then wipe their hand in the sand. That's one reason they generally only eat with their right hand. Of course, you can't believe everything that you hear, either, LOL

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    21. Re:It's a free country by Patch86 · · Score: 2

      Not to criticise you (I'm sure plenty of people think similarly) but it's sad that that's the way people view these sorts of places these days.

      I visited the island Jersey a few years back, which has a sort of 60s-Britain-meets-modern-France vibe. I remember a cafe where there were school kids playing chess, and old guys playing cards, and people reading books, and a guy doing paperwork with a laptop. I'm sure they were only buying as many drinks as they wanted, but they all seemed pretty settled in. A lot of continental Europe is similar. Britain has (or possibly "had") a similar sort of thing going on with its pub culture; it wasn't so long ago that pubs were a place to meet, play games, sing, generally socialise (and where incidentally drinks were served). I still happily spend an afternoon or evening in a pub with a book or complimentary newspaper or my smartphone, making a couple of drinks last, occasionally chatting with the locals. Unfortunately more people seem to have your attitude now- pubs are for eating, drinking, and leaving. More's the shame.

      Just another symptom of commoditising all aspects of life, I suppose.

    22. Re:It's a free country by itsenrique · · Score: 2

      Maybe they just ask you to put the kindle away. I can sort of see it now, a place run by some serious hippies. You: *takes out Kindle. begin reading* Owner/Employee: Hey man we really appreciate your patronage but we have a no electronics policy at Wackadoo Cafe. Its for the ambiance. Sorry man. At that point you may continue to use the thing for a while without attracting further conversation, but are you really even going to GO there again? Unless of course you put the kindle away and had a good time..

    23. Re:It's a free country by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2

      Bar cultures are different all over the world. Heck its different across the United States, but in general the bar or pub in the United States and from what I've seen in western Canada is about drinking first, socializing second.

      There are specialized bars for dating (the meat market), singing (karaoke bars), music performance, bar games, dressing up/clubbing, etc. But by in large "bar" in North America means a place to drink, alone or with friends, often until the middle of the night.

    24. Re:It's a free country by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      But if the problem are people who take seats for a long time, wouldn't the right thing be to make a policy against sitting there a long time? After all, the person sitting there for two hours looking out of the window is taking away the seat for a long time as well, while the person who just quickly checks his email on his iPad while drinking his coffee doesn't take the seat for long.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    25. Re:It's a free country by hedwards · · Score: 1

      This is somehow different than dead tree books? I get the logic, around here it's not likely to be much of a problem during most of the day, but I do understand that it could be a problem in more dense areas. But, at the end of the day, there's really very little reason to bar people from reading their Nook or Kindle when books are allowed. I can sort of see barring the iPad as it is more computer than book.

    26. Re:It's a free country by jonsmirl · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Give the manager control of the hot spot. If he is running out seats, set the wifi to kick MAC addresses off after 15min and not allow them back on for 2hrs (earlier if he turns the enforcement off). You can defeat this by switching MAC addresses but the people who set up office during rush hours should get the message.

      FIve or six people setting up office can ruin a Starbucks. They spread things all over the tables forcing you to ask them to clear off a spot for you to use. Then they make comments about not spilling anything on their precious work. Some of them are pretty rude about it. It completely ruins the experience by putting you in the spot of invading their office or you have to drink standing. I've learned which coffee shops have this problem and I'll walk farther to get to ones that are more coffee friendly. Of course that's not much fun in three feet of snow.

    27. Re:It's a free country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a tech who recently worked on a project disabling time limits at StarBucks in Canada, I think this is a much better idea. Let the limits be long in non-peak times, but tighten them up when space is short. Problem is this runs afoul of their contract with Bell Canada, and would put Bell in violation with their contract with their smartphone customers, who are guaranteed unlimited free wireless at all starbucks locations in Canada.

      A franchise chain on this island offers free unlimited wireless at all locations and I've seldom seen people setting up office in peak times. I frequent this chain since the coffee is much better (They do not burn the espresso roast beans). They do not even have a click-through agreement and it seems to work well for them. The only location it does not work well is the one where the wireless never works (because the owner is a jerk and does not want it to).

    28. Re:It's a free country by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      and cafe x will make money while cafe y isn't making enough during rushes due to seats filled up with people not buying.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    29. Re:It's a free country by linzeal · · Score: 1

      They tried this at a bar I go to in the early 2000's all laptops were banned, it worked until about 2005 when Blackberries started coming out and now 80% of the bar is on their iPhones but you will still be asked to leave if you use a laptop.

    30. Re:It's a free country by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      This is much like if a restaurant wants to enforce a dress code; they are perfectly free to kick you out if you do not conform to it. I dont get why this is a story.

      Sure, but there are some kinds of "dress codes" restaurants are not allowed to enforce. You can't kick me out because I'm black, for example, or because I'm in a wheelchair or because I have an oxygen tank.

      And then there are restrictions that are just silly and unreasonable. A Kindle is not distracting in any way. Put it in a cover and it looks like any other book. The screen does not glow; you won't see it from across the room. And suppose the reason you have a Kindle in the first place is because you're elderly or otherwise have poor vision, and you like reading books on the Kindle because it allows you to bump up the font size?

      That's why I probably wouldn't frequent any café that had restrictions like this. The restriction isn't for any kind of logical reason. It's a kind of hipsterism, where they assume that everybody who goes to the café is going to be a young person who doesn't have any vision issues, and so they are free to pick and choose who is wearing hip shoes and who is a square.

      It's an idiotic attitude. It's just like the people who used to mock you, back in the 90s, for having a cell phone. Forget that it's useful; you must be a yuppie. Then it was having a Palm Pilot that made you uncool. Now people like to mock iPhones. Hey, whatever.

      But to me, a Kindle is even different than all of those. It has pretty much one purpose and one purpose only: reading books. If you're sitting there staring at one, it's safe to say you're reading a book. A café that's hostile to reading books is probably not one that I'd be interested in visiting.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    31. Re:It's a free country by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      I go to cafes to eat and drink, not play with my Nook or check my e-mail.

      And by "play with my Nook," you mean read, right? God forbid.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    32. Re:It's a free country by yahwotqa · · Score: 1

      "LOL" is not a punctuation mark. /offtopic

    33. Re:It's a free country by Duradin · · Score: 1

      Probably the same coffee beside them as well.

    34. Re:It's a free country by tixxit · · Score: 1

      My average experience w/ coffee shops in downtown Toronto. It's cold and snowing; my wife and I want to get a coffee and sit down for 20 minutes while we wait for a movie to start or for our reservation at a restaurant. We go to a nearby coffee shop. It is full of people that look like they've set up an office (books, laptop (yes, both), notepad, etc) and have no intention of leaving anytime soon. No seating means we're leaving, trying the next place. Frankly, I'd love it if a few coffee shops discouraged people from sitting around for hours, milking a coffee + refills.

    35. Re:It's a free country by jonsmirl · · Score: 1

      You could do something like kick them off, and then let them log back in again. The login page would contain a nice message about peak traffic times and being courteous to other customers that might want a seat.

    36. Re:It's a free country by morari · · Score: 1

      Socializing is one thing. Meals are practically made for socializing, whether it be a full Italian spread or a simple cup of coffee. I guess I simply fail to even see the appeal in trying to read in such an atmosphere. Cafes can be quite distracting... they're no libraries after all. Furthermore, they don't tend to be very comfortable places to lounge around and read.

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    37. Re:It's a free country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pedantism is not constructive. /also offtopic

    38. Re:It's a free country by Jezza · · Score: 1

      No, that isn't the point at all. Cafe X cannot have a policy which is discriminatory then turn around and say "no, the people I'm discriminating are welcome somewhere else". That argument doesn't follow at all. If you want to argue this you have to say that the policy isn't discriminatory - and if other customers are allowed to read (books, newspapers etc.) then I honestly think it is.

    39. Re:It's a free country by Jezza · · Score: 1

      But this is reading a book... not checking email (though why's that a problem... never mind, I don't even care).

    40. Re:It's a free country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy enough to fix. Just split your cafe into two sections.

      The first section is just over half of the public area available filled with tables and chairs. Might be wise to pick some chairs that aren't exactly comfy, to encourage people to move on after about a half hour or so. Also this is the no lounging section. No computers in this area. Just have your coffee and/or meal and go.

      Then you can have another area with somewhat more comfy chairs or couches. May as well throw in some bookshelves and half-decent reading material. This area where people can hang out at and have their laptops out all day if they want.

      If the lounging area fills up and people can't get in, well they should have considered that before picking that cafe as the source of their wireless internet connectivity. Anyhow, the point is the people on the computers wont be interfering with the main business of the cafe which is having somewhat decent coffee and food. Also it satisfies the need to have a business look busy, even if that aspect caters to the customers which aren't the most profitable ones.

    41. Re:It's a free country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say, i walk in, buy a coffee, sit down... take out my kindle.

      They ask you to leave. You leave or are trespassing.

      Do they have to pay back my coffee when they ask me to leave?

      Not likely. If they have posted a sign saying No Kindles Allowed, or whatever the device is, you've deliberately chosen to break their publicly stated rules. You will get escorted out by a policeman and have the privilege of having paid for something you don't get to consume. Unless of course it was served in a disposable cup you can take with you.

      To tell the truth, I can't believe the sense of entitlement you show yourself to have.

    42. Re:It's a free country by captjc · · Score: 1

      It is not discriminatory in that they are not banning people from their establishment. They are only setting up a few ground rules which customers must agree to in order to do business with them. If people do not agree to said rules, they are free to go elsewhere. Just as many places have a "no shirt, no shoes, no service" policy, if you bring an electronic device they reserve the right to refuse you service. If you go out and put the stuff in your car (or just keep it in your bag) they will happily do business with you.

      I am not saying whether or not I agree with said policy or speculating if it will be good or bad for business. I am only saying that it isn't exactly discrimination.

      --
      Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
    43. Re:It's a free country by melikamp · · Score: 1

      Papyrus? Lucky you. My neighborhood cafe won't allow anything but runes on clay.

    44. Re:It's a free country by farmanb · · Score: 1

      I think you folks may have missed the point entirely; I may be mistaken, but I don't think economics has anything to do with the ban. It appears the proprietors in question are actively attempting to dissuade from coming in those people incapable/unwilling to detach themselves for a little while from their electronic devices. As the article mentions, cafes have long been places with a social atmosphere, but electronics make it far too easy to seclude yourself in a public setting. As the author says,

      Now headphones facilitate that practice — both symbolizing and enforcing public solitude.

      My guess here is those coffee shops instituting such a policy are attempting to avoid turning into the abomination that is Starbucks. Sure, you can go in there and purchase a burnt cup of coffee with an unreasonable amount of sugar/corn syrup and get internet access, but those chains are almost entirely silent save the tapping of keys or whine of earbuds. The indie shops would like to keep their social atmosphere, and banning these devices seems to be what works for them.

    45. Re:It's a free country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may not, but then again as you probably know...you are not everyone.
      Most people (myself included) go out to cafes/coffeeshops to have a drink/etc and a spot that is comfy to surf the net, code, read articles, etc.

      I know if I was told I wasn't allowed to have a kindle/iPad/etc I'd laugh my ass off as I pointed out they've lost a repeating revenue base... As I walk out to the next place.

    46. Re:It's a free country by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 2

      Who takes a laptop to a bar?

      It's the one environment where you DON'T need access to porn.

    47. Re:It's a free country by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 0

      So if I bring in a non-standard quantity of melanin, can they refuse to serve me?

    48. Re:It's a free country by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      It is when GGP is retarded. /ontopic

    49. Re:It's a free country by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      It's a story because of the inconsistency: Books are OK, Kindles are not. There is no sensible (non-Luddite) reason for this. Other commenters have mentioned loiterers (irrelevant because there is no difference between loitering w/ a book vs kindle) and bandwidth usage (bandwidth overuse, on a kindle, are you fucking kidding me?). Both are irrelevant. What possible, sensible reason could there be for banning Kindles and NOT books?

      Sure, they CAN do this. What I haven't heard yet is how it isn't utterly retarded to do so. The sheer stupidity makes it noteworthy.

    50. Re:It's a free country by williambbertram · · Score: 1

      Customers are also "quite free" to go drink overpriced coffee somewhere else. Personally, the ONLY reason I ever go pay $4 for coffee is so I can sit and read a book, or read news feeds on my phone. Before I had a phone capable of reading news feeds, I took a laptop. Maybe I'm missing the point completely here, but reading and web surfing, in my experience, has become a permanent part of American cafe culture. Maybe even more so than non-electronic socializing.

      I'd say these cafe's took the stupid, reactionary way out rather than sitting down and thinking about the problem. "They're sitting here too long, NO MORE READERS / LAPTOPS!!". Instead of ruling with an iron fist and pissing people off, why not figure a way to make money and keep people happy? One thing that comes to mind are "booth meters". When you sit down at the booth, the first hour or so is on the house, if you're going to park there all afternoon they charge you x amount of money per hour. Sounds reasonable to me. The cafe's can't be expected to let everyone take up their booths all afternoon, and some people really like doing that (myself included). I'd pay ten bucks for three hours of booth and a grande latte.

    51. Re:It's a free country by Deefburger · · Score: 1

      Let's see...opportunity knocks and shows a whole new direction for the cafe.....NAH! let's kick em' out instead! Riff Raff! go someplace else! Business falls off to competition from "cheap internet whore coffee houses". At least they go bankrupt with their heads held high, right?

      --
      Most people are mostly good most of the time.
    52. Re:It's a free country by SniperJoe · · Score: 1

      I have a better solution. No public outlets. Sure, they can have all the free wi-fi they want, but they don't get free power. That would eliminate those people who monopolize chairs and tables through working there all day. An hour or two is a little much, but I like to think that it's a much more elegant solution than playing with Wi-Fi settings and having people complain.

    53. Re:It's a free country by bobzaguy · · Score: 0

      In your small town with one coffee shop, what are the odds that the place has wifi, free or otherwise? Being a bit dim on this wifi usage subject, is there a charge that must be paid by the shop after installing wifi? And if the charge is based on usage, how is the usage calculated? If kindles are high-end users of this signal, then is that the reason to ban them? Need to know.

    54. Re:It's a free country by Lunzo · · Score: 1

      Starbucks. There's your first problem! /coffeesnobbery

    55. Re:It's a free country by lupinstel · · Score: 1

      Runes on clay? Luxury!!. My local cafe will only allow text in Egyptian heirogylph or Egyptian demotic script; and the use of the Rosetta
      Stone is specifically banned so I can't translate anything to a more reader friendly ancient Greek.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Cthulhu.
  2. I know this is difficult... by flogger · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I know this is difficult, but if you don't like it, don't patronize the place there.

    --
    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
    "First things first -- but not necessarily in that order"
    -- The Doctor, "Doctor
    1. Re:I know this is difficult... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I know this is even more difficult, but just because you are free to patronize a different establishment doesn't mean you can't complaint about the former establishment.

    2. Re:I know this is difficult... by Travelsonic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know this is difficult, but ability to patronize another facility =/= no right to remark about the perceived stupidity of such a decision.

      --
      If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
    3. Re:I know this is difficult... by Duradin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But, in the name of Freedom, we must force every business to adapt to every customer's wants, whether it is profitable for the business or not!

      If you don't force Ford dealerships to sell new Chevys you must hate freedom.

      Not conforming to every customer's wants is censorship!

      </parody>

    4. Re:I know this is difficult... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just because you are free to patronize a different establishment doesn't mean you can't complaint

      Actually you can't complaint, because it's impossible to noun.

    5. Re:I know this is difficult... by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      For fuck's sake, give the man his typo.

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
  3. No one's saying it isn't by guyminuslife · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's not the point.

    --
    I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    1. Re:No one's saying it isn't by commodore6502 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, it is.
      - In a free country the Citizen owning the shop can ban any damn thing he wants to ban, just as I can invite your into my home, but ban you from wearing shoes.

      --
      Information wants to be expensive AND wants to be free. So you have Value vs. Cheap distribution fighting each other.
    2. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's a cop-out and intellectual laziness to just say the cafe/shop owners can do whatever they want--we already know that. The discussion of weighing the benefits versus the disadvantages is nonetheless an interesting one. And, perhaps such discussions will give cafe owners food for thought in making their business decisions.

    3. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not to start a flame war, but -

      Maybe they should be. I mean, if we are TRULY free, than we should be free to discriminate if we wish. There's usually backlash, but still ...

    4. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What about disabled people with their large clumsy wheelchairs? Or non-white people? Or Women? What about Muslims? What they have one down the street?

      I know the Nazis burned the books, so modern fascists burn Kindles?

      Still feel like a free country?

      That's a stupid argument. For one, disabled people in wheelchars, non-blacks, woment, Muslims, etc, have rights that are enforced under law. Nobody has the right to read a kindle or use a laptop or cell phone wherever they want to.

      Second, the coffee shop, being privately owned is perfectly within its right to say if you don't wear shoes or shirt we will not serve you. If you smoke, we will not serve you and yes, if you use a kindle, we will not serve you.

      The said coffee shops in the articles are doing this for very good business reasons. They have found that when people camp out at a table or booth for hours working on their laptop or reading a kindle, they don't get much revenue. They way the potential for lost revenue by kindle customers getting upset and going elsewhere with the actual loss they were experiencing.

      If you don't like it, you are free to frequent other coffee shops or even start your own that caters to kindle users. That's what it means to live in a free country.

    5. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 0

      Still feel like a free country?

      Yes!

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    6. Re:No one's saying it isn't by meerling · · Score: 1

      What about banning people that can afford your offerings, but they can't afford designer clothes?
      How about banning people that aren't wearing your gang colors?
      People with digital wristwatches?
      People who smoke? (Actually that one actually affects other people, so it's not really in the same category.)

      Of course, they aren't refusing service, they are telling customers what they can and can't do (outside of legal restrictions) in the cafe. Unfortunately what they are banning is one of the 3 things cafes are known for, a light culinary experience, casual conversation, and reading. Or perhaps you can say they are trying to control how you do that exact activity, even though it has no effect on anyone else. Next thing you know, they'll be demanding you wear proper 18th century English or Parisian attire while in their establishment to ensure the correct atmosphere.

      Do you think that is acceptable? Will that kind of attitude cause you to reduce/avoid or increase your patronage of those cafes? If so, why? If not, again, why?

    7. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Alright, I won't cop out. Cafe owners are in business for the same reason most other people are in business: to make a living, or money. Having been a truck driver for years, I spent MANY an hour in truck stop diners, reading the news, reading a book, or just killing time in some other manner. Uncountable hours. But - I wouldn't DREAM of sitting in the diner during their lunch rush hour, taking up space, while I read another chapter or six of Asimov's Foundation. As friendly and chummy as most truck stop waitresses, managers, and owners are toward truck driver's needs - THEY NEED THAT SPACE at rush hour! The average cafe desperately needs all the space available during meal times. And, between meals, many cafes are frantically busy with cleaning up, and preparing for the next onslaught. That is to say, unless the owner makes a policy of welcoming the idle into his establishment, his business space is BUSINESS space. Of course, I know how valuable it is to court those idle people with time to kill, reading a book. Make them welcome today, let them slurp coffee as long as they want, and they'll come back when they are hungry. Some places, anyway. All the same - if you want them to welcome your little distractions, you should take the time to educate them about how your distraction might benefit them in some way. I mean - do you stop at that cafe 3 or more times a week? Are the waitresses familiar with you? Have you ever TALKED to the manager? No, no, and no? Well - this seems to to indicate that you have little, if any value to the store owner. Hey, I'll bet that if you eat at the same restaurant every week, at least twice, the manager WILL remember you before long. Then, ban or no ban, if you pull your reader out for thirty minutes during non-rush hours, he ain't gonna say a WORD to you about it. In short - stop expecting a free ride. You gotta give a little to get a little in this world.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    8. Re:No one's saying it isn't by gilleain · · Score: 2

      They have found that when people camp out at a table or booth for hours working on their laptop or reading a kindle, they don't get much revenue.

      Exactly. This is why many coffee shops that start out with friendly living room furnishings - like low comfy sofas - end up with tall hard stools at a counter. I go to a lot of coffee shops where students sit for hours with their one drink. I think its rude, frankly - it's a business, not your house.

      However, I often use a laptop in these places, and I don't think its unreasonable so long as I only stay for the time it takes to eat my food and drink. Of course, with more people imagining they are 'digital nomads' or some such nonsense, there will be some who sit there all day.

    9. Re:No one's saying it isn't by cyn1c77 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The said coffee shops in the articles are doing this for very good business reasons. They have found that when people camp out at a table or booth for hours working on their laptop or reading a kindle, they don't get much revenue. They way the potential for lost revenue by kindle customers getting upset and going elsewhere with the actual loss they were experiencing.

      If you don't like it, you are free to frequent other coffee shops or even start your own that caters to kindle users. That's what it means to live in a free country.

      I support this as a customer too. It is annoying as hell when you buy a coffee and there are no seats... purely because 15 people have setup their mobile offices on all of the tables.

      If you want to work (or read for an hour), go to your office or the library. There will be less distractions and you will work faster.

    10. Re:No one's saying it isn't by khallow · · Score: 1

      Do you think that is acceptable?

      What do you mean acceptable? I won't interfere with their business. Nor in most of those cases you mention, would I eat there. But would I accept their right to decide who does or doesn't eat there with the bounds of the law? Yes.

    11. Re:No one's saying it isn't by kdemetter · · Score: 1

      Freedom is typically limited to the extend where it interferes with someone else's freedom.

      At one side , there's the freedom of the owner , on the other side , there's the freedom of the customer.

      The freedom the bar keeper has to establish the rules of his establishment , do not weigh up against the limitation to freedom a person receives from not being allowed entrance to the place.

      In this case however, the person is not being disallowed access . He's just not allowed to use his kindle .

    12. Re:No one's saying it isn't by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      They probably should be now. The problem is when most cafes ban blacks / gays / whatever, then these people have no cafes that they can go to. When discrimination is very common, then you need some legislation to prevent it. Now, I'd imagine most cafes wouldn't, and the ones that did would see a lot fewer customers. If anything, the legislation is working against its original intent, because it's making it harder for racist idiots to go out of business by being racist idiots.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    13. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a free country, a business is public and you can't deny service to people unless you have very good reasons. If you have a problem with that, don't make money off the public by opening a business.
      That's because in a free country, you should be able to buy stuff and get service just like anyone else regardless of your race, age, gender, clothing style, political opinions, job, marital status, the brand of your computer, musical preferences, amount of money you spend at the business (imagine a convenience store denying you entry because you only buy $10 worth of food every week or because you shop more often at the store on the other side of the street). etc.

    14. Re:No one's saying it isn't by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's a difficult balance. No one wants to go into an empty cafe, but no one wants to go into a completely full one either. There have been some psychological studies on this, and I forget the exact number but I vaguely remember somewhere about 60% full being optimal for encouraging people in. This means that when you're less than half full, it's a good idea to encourage people to stay - give free refills to regular customers or don't complain if they stay and read without ordering anymore. On the other hand, once you're more than about three quarters full, you want to start encouraging people to leave (although not in a way that discourages them from coming back).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    15. Re:No one's saying it isn't by RulerOf · · Score: 2

      However, I often use a laptop in these places, and I don't think its unreasonable so long as I only stay for the time it takes to eat my food and drink. Of course, with more people imagining they are 'digital nomads' or some such nonsense, there will be some who sit there all day.

      Indeed. I can only imagine that just about every Slashdotter in his twenties can think of a place full of those "digital nomads." It's particularly obnoxious when one of them decides that downloading some torrents is a good idea.

      The place that I used to frequent, and now visit occasionally with friends to sit down and play some DotA (admittedly, the last time was to have fun with Firesheep :P) while drinking some decent coffee is a place on the west side of Cleveland called "Common Grounds." It's all but literally a hole in the wall, but their clientele make for an interesting place to sit and watch what my own life might be like if I hadn't moved to the suburbs and had been more into drugs and sex when I was younger instead of being a suburbanite wrapped up in Diablo 2 and girls that weren't single. [/reminisce]

      Either way, while the shop has a fairly strictly enforced "no loitering" policy, I agree that it's rude to buy one drink and goof off on your laptop for an entire shift. I usually make it a point to, while I'm at the place, buy at least one drink every 90 minutes or so and, of course, to tip the barman.

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    16. Re:No one's saying it isn't by RulerOf · · Score: 1

      People who smoke? (Actually that one actually affects other people, so it's not really in the same category.)

      Definitely a different category. Especially since, at least in Ohio and plenty of other states, it's illegal to start a coffee shop or restaurant that specifically caters to people who would like to smoke while they enjoy that cup of joe.

      Makes me feel bad for all the hookah bars: they made their money on liquor, not tobacco.

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    17. Re:No one's saying it isn't by an+unsound+mind · · Score: 1

      Undoing bad mod.

    18. Re:No one's saying it isn't by t2t10 · · Score: 2

      They have found that when people camp out at a table or booth for hours working on their laptop or reading a kindle, they don't get much revenue.

      And they get more revenue when people camp out for hours reading a paperback???

    19. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Simple - apply a rule that if you haven't bought anything in the last hour (or whatever - you could even vary it by time of day) a new customer has priority for seating.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    20. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The said coffee shops in the articles are doing this for very good business reasons. They have found that when people camp out at a table or booth for hours working on their laptop or reading a kindle, they don't get much revenue.

      I bet they haven't found anything out. The only difference between coffee shop employees and burger flippers is that the former tend to way[sic] less, be more attractive, and wear slightly less horrid clothes.

      I would also suggest that, during quiet periods, having a few people in is better than being empty. Even if they aren't buying anything, they might attract passing trade due to the herd instinct. No scholarly studies, but I've walked past pubs with nobody in on the assumption that if it's empty there must be something wrong.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    21. Re:No one's saying it isn't by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I can see your points if we were talking about places like Denny's and most Truck-Stop restaurants that have free refills on your coffee, but most cafès charge per cup. One in our town not only charges per cup, but has free WiFi on the premises, book shelves full of used books to read and trade, and has open mic nights for folk-music and poetry readings. Their sweets pot customer-wise is middle-aged college students knocking out some homework over a good cup of coffee after school while unmolested by the family.
      Seems to me that these Cafès banning e-readers are trying to take a very contrarian and anti-establishment orientated clientèle and force them into some stereotypical behaviors and it would be easier to be herding cats.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    22. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Jasonjk74 · · Score: 1

      I used to hang out in Common Grounds back in '97. Nostalgia++.

    23. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      The said coffee shops in the articles are doing this for very good business reasons. They have found that when people camp out at a table or booth for hours working on their laptop or reading a kindle, they don't get much revenue.

      I bet they haven't found anything out. The only difference between coffee shop employees and burger flippers is that the former tend to way[sic] less, be more attractive, and wear slightly less horrid clothes.

      I would also suggest that, during quiet periods, having a few people in is better than being empty. Even if they aren't buying anything, they might attract passing trade due to the herd instinct. No scholarly studies, but I've walked past pubs with nobody in on the assumption that if it's empty there must be something wrong.

      And if it is your store, you are welcome to do that. However, in this case, it being their store, they are welcome to run it the way they want. They might not make the best decision. They might not make the most efficient decision. They might not make a decision you or I or anybody else agrees with. But, ultimately it is their decision to make.

    24. Re:No one's saying it isn't by icebraining · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But - I wouldn't DREAM of sitting in the diner during their lunch rush hour, taking up space, while I read another chapter or six of Asimov's Foundation.

      Except you can still do that if you have a paper book. This has nothing to do with table space, your rant is completely offtopic.

    25. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      The freedom the bar keeper has to establish the rules of his establishment , do not weigh up against the limitation to freedom a person receives from not being allowed entrance to the place.

      I'm sorry, I guess I missed the part in the Constitution where we were granted the right to enter private property against the owners wishes.

      Do I think someone saying no blacks / hispanics / gays / asians / muslims is a moron? Yes, but if they own the business, then they have the right to decide that because it's their property. Just as you can't force me to let anyone into my home against my will, you have no right to force me to let anyone into the business I own against my will.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    26. Re:No one's saying it isn't by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2

      My wife works as an architect and we visited a cafe which she had worked on. We met the owner and she complemented him on his uncomfortable seats. Apparently he went through several iterations before he got the formula right. Too comfortable and people say to chat and stop buying. Not comfortable enough and people don't stay long enough to buy enough food. He doesn't want people sitting for hours with a laptop. The space they are using should be earning good money.

    27. Re:No one's saying it isn't by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

      When discrimination is very common, then you need some legislation to prevent it.
       
      How does that legislation come about? If the discrimination against some group is so widespread that they do not even have a cafe they can go to, then who will vote in politicians that want to pass laws against it?

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    28. Re:No one's saying it isn't by sortius_nod · · Score: 1

      This is exactly the problem with the US.

      I was going to post some insightful information, but I realise it would be lost on a moron like yourself.

    29. Re:No one's saying it isn't by MBaldelli · · Score: 1

      Seems to me that these Cafès banning e-readers are trying to take a very contrarian and anti-establishment orientated clientèle and force them into some stereotypical behaviors and it would be easier to be herding cats.

      There's something that doesn't seem to be covered in this article that perhaps should be mentioned/considered. What isn't mentioned it the bandwidth that this coffeehouses purchase for their establishments. We're not talking top-tier/top of the line DSL/Broadband from their local provider. We're talking minimum bandwidth/tier service just to process credit cards by Internet (instead of by DUN/Analog). And we're also not talking top of the line routers for this sort of work either. We're talking SoHo (at best) to home routers that don't always provide the bandwidth for the services paid. These are usually Mom & Pop businesses, not Starbucks, or Dunkin' Donuts or Caribou Coffee. And even then, my experience with such chains is that their connections are often middle-tiered at best. And some, I will even add from my experience with tech supporting their businesses actually throttle connection speeds on the wireless parts of their router for slower connections.

      Now, it's one thing for laptop users to loiter, my experience is often even at the chain coffeehouses, it's usually 1 - 5 laptop users at best at any given time. And more often times than naught those laptop users know they are running on depreciative bandwidth connections (as most have some level of experience with this though YMMV naturally applies). Add 10... 20... even perhaps 30 more users with WiFi enabled eReaders to that mix who aren't there to read a newspaper or the books they have stored on their eReaders and are instead updating/reading their status messages, playing Facebook Games like Farmville or Bejeweled Blitz... who're happily trying to surf the web and watch YouTube Videos and working on the assumption they have the blindingly fast speeds they have at work, home, and school.

      And when they find out they're not getting those speeds, who do you think they're going to bitch at first? Yep. You guessed it -- who's providing the Wireless Service in the coffeehouse. Experience has shown from my experience in Las Vegas Hotel Hospitality that when it comes to iPads and iPhones connecting to wireless out of the 100 or so calls I got a night, the 30 or so calls from iPad and iPhone users had less of a clue about their equipment, the difference in speeds between wireless vs. wired connections and couldn't imagine bandwidth capacity when you're dealing with a hotel at capacity with guests in rooms in the 5,000 - 10,000 range. Hell, it didn't compute to them the thought that bandwidth can be at capacity -- they seem to work on the assumption it's unlimited and comes down from the techno bandwidth viking or some such bullshit and not that the hotel could possibly be on a T1 or T3 line

      And this was almost a year ago that I was dealing with this sort of thing.

      Put that into a smaller venue -- like a coffeehouse for example -- and you can possibly see how quickly Managers would be to wanting to stop this. Particularly given the figures on sales of Kindles, Nooks and iPads hitting the news and even seeing it in their businesses before that article was written.

      --
      "The truth points to itself." - Kosh, Babylon5
    30. Re:No one's saying it isn't by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I support this as a customer too. It is annoying as hell when you buy a coffee and there are no seats... purely because 15 people have setup their mobile offices on all of the tables.

      If you want to work (or read for an hour), go to your office or the library. There will be less distractions and you will work faster.

      If you think it's rude and annoying that people camp out at a table for hours during a standing-room only rush, then simply reciprocate and be rude and annoying in return and sit down with them and ask if anyone was sitting in the vacant seat!

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    31. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thankfully, the courts disagree with your racism-friendly interpretation of the constitution.

    32. Re:No one's saying it isn't by bluemonq · · Score: 1

      You cannot play Farmville on a Kindle. You cannot watch YouTube on a Kindle. You cannot, in fact, do anything bandwidth-related besides basic web-browsing on a Kindle, and even then the first two generations of the Kindle didn't have WiFi adapters. And have you ever tried to browse the web with a Kindle? The screen-refresh on those limits it to mostly dire situations (ie, phone is dead and need to get in contact with someone so I'll try emailing them). If they were banning laptops, that's one thing. But here they are (admittedly allegedly since I don't live in NYC and the writer didn't name names), banning Kindles. The "loitering" defense makes no sense when they're not banning books or newspapers. If I had the money and the time, I'd stake out a spot in front of these cafes that were claiming to ban ereaders because of loitering and hand out free NYT bestsellers to their patrons. If there was a cafe that banned books and newspapers as well, then fine (and it'd be all over the web I'd think), they're being consistent. But banning ereaders seems like a real Luddite move here.

    33. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey guys! I said NIGGER, am I funny yet!?!

      I feel the usage in the GP's case is appropriate. Inflammatory language draws attention to the question and elicits a sense of outrage at the idea. the GGP was overly broad in saying that shops can "ban any damn thing." This is obviously not the case, and the GP highlights that.

    34. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Joe+U · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, I guess I missed the part in the Constitution where we were granted the right to enter private property against the owners wishes.

      I'm sorry, I missed the part where the Constitution granted rights. Can you point out to me where that is?

        (To save time, it's not in the first 10 amendments)

    35. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Jezza · · Score: 1

      But this isn't a "reading ban", the conduct of these customers din't different to others. If someone reading a newspaper or a paperback is OK, why not a Kindle? If you banned reading, that would be weird, but not discriminatory, but to ban someone because they are reading something different?

      It is the thin edge of the wedge (okay, very thin I grant you). If you want to ban customers for some kind of conduct, that's one thing, but this isn't that... Am I really missing something?

    36. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Jezza · · Score: 1

      I can agree with that, you might well ask a customer who's been sat there for an excessive time to either buy something else or leave... Especially at busy times. But someone reading while drinking a coffee, just because they happen to be reading a Kindle?!

    37. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      If they banned the Kindle but not the Nook, then that might be problematic (probably still legal). A Kindle is not the same as a paperback or a newspaper or magazine. It can hold hundreds of books and articles and can download more on the fly. They didn't actually just band the Kindle, but laptops, too. In effect, they are banning the conduct of using electronic devices while in their store that they want to be a place that people congregate and actually talk/discuss.. Now if only restaurants would ban cell phones.

    38. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Jezza · · Score: 1

      But your banning someone based on something other than their conduct! If I can read a book, why not a Kindle? I am doing anything different? Am I really any different to the guy with the paperback or newspaper? Look you want to ban someone because of unacceptable conduct, that's your right. You want to just ban someone because you feel like it? That's wrong. What's next? Seriously, can I ban someone because they are reading a particular newspaper?! Or because of something they are wearing (especially something with religious significance)?

      If someone is actually DOING something wrong, fine. If they are reading the Kindle for hours taking the seat - fine eject them for hogging the seat.

    39. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Jezza · · Score: 0

      Exactly! Someone can disbar themselves by their conduct, not some arbitrary nonsense. You want to make the coffee shop a "no reading zone" then fine (good luck with that by the way) but otherwise? I can't see that's right.

    40. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Jezza · · Score: 0

      Your home is a totally different thing... If you want to ban anyone for any reason (or indeed no reason at all) you're free to do so. Business doesn't work like your home. The same rules don't apply.

    41. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Jezza · · Score: 1

      But you can't. You are not allowed to discriminate against a group, imagine if someone banned you from reading a Bible, but reading the Koran was acceptable (or vice-versa). You cannot do this, it is discrimination.

    42. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Fiduciary · · Score: 1

      When discrimination is very common, then you need some legislation to prevent it.

      How does that legislation come about? If the discrimination against some group is so widespread that they do not even have a cafe they can go to, then who will vote in politicians that want to pass laws against it?

      I don't know! How did the slaves get free?! Must have been a majority of people in the US who favored civil rights and equal treatment under the law back in the 1700s because now we have all this legislation.

      Its very simple. People vote for those who represent them in a representative democracy. If you are the one who gives someone the right to vote then they will vote for you. There is some incentive for politicians to have more people willing to vote for them than the other guy. If a group of people you represent if discriminated against and passing anti-discrimination laws will not alienate your base then you have everything to gain by better representing the people.

      Its somewhat cynical but that's how it is sometimes. The good thing is that when a group becomes better represented they become better integrated into society. We have decided that skin color is superfluous to the good of society because we see the truth of it every day. Society has a memory, and not all of the old ideals of society have left us, but it is unlikely to reemerge because the new way is more beneficial to the people in power.

      You wonder why nobody supports the views of the slashdot crowd? IP reform, broadband, net neutrality! There would be no huge outcries from most people over these issues. No politician's base would be alienated enough to vote for someone else over these issues, but they are avoided. Of course, the first one to try for serious IP reform would see his opponent outspending him three fold. The plight of the reformer in politics today is campaign finance, not lack of will. If the issue isn't sufficiently polarizing votes are are easy to change with a few ad dollars. If a politician bets their career on a boring issue, no matter how important we know it to be, then they risk seeing someone even more in the pocket of corporate interests bought into office.

      It seems the only safe issues to come out for are the moral issues. Gays and abortion don't mean a lot either way to business. Gays will get their way eventually because nobody really loses, gays win, and there is a reduction in strife. Its only taken so long because the upsides in terms of votes and profit are so minor and the downside of opposing gay rights is also minor that for the time being the sentiment of "Boys kissing. ICKY" is still winning.

      Kind of sad that we're so juvenile that we still debate issues like these..

    43. Re:No one's saying it isn't by khallow · · Score: 1

      But your banning someone based on something other than their conduct!

      So what? That's their right (at least in the US). You're free to avoid such a place.

    44. Re:No one's saying it isn't by bigsteve@dstc · · Score: 2

      In a free country, a business is public and you can't deny service to people unless you have very good reasons.

      Actually, I think you'll find that is incorrect. As I understand it, a business in the US can decide who they can do business with / offer service to provided that they don't discriminate on the basis of specifically legislated criteria; e.g. race, religion, (dis-)ability, etc. Even then there are limits. For instance you won't be able to hire a car if you are blind, or get life insurance if you have AIDs.

      Coffee shops are not legally or morally obliged to let you use Kindles, any more than they are obliged to let you eat Big Macs, or dance on the table with your underpants on your head. Or a nightclub or restaurant can legally refuse to let you in because they disagree with your choice of clothing. Ultimately, it is a business decision.

    45. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Jezza · · Score: 1

      Is it? I'm sure the US Constitution prevents one group (business owners) oppressing or discriminating against another. This isn't the coffee shop owners house, there he can admit or not anyone he chooses. I mean, could I seriously open a shop in the US then choose not to serve blacks? (I know it isn't the same thing)

      If that's right, then I really don't understand your freedom at all.

    46. Re:No one's saying it isn't by khallow · · Score: 1

      (I know it isn't the same thing)

      Exactly. It's not the same thing as banning someone based on ethnicity, hence, legal.

    47. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      Telling people they cannot use an electronic device in your store is not discrimination. No one is banning anybody from reading anything in these coffee shops. They are banning the use of electronic devices. You are still free to bring your bible or koran and sit and read. You are not free to come in and turn on your ipad, kindle, nook, laptop. Just like you are not free to where your roller skates or use your skateboard while in the store. Nobody is discriminating against any person.

    48. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Jezza · · Score: 1

      What about religion? Or sexual orientation? What about someone from a different city? What if I banned anyone who'd served in the US military? Or wearing a US military uniform? (Remember we're talking about a coffee shop - though I think a solder in his own country should never is turned out for wearing his/her uniform, but that's probably just me)

      I see this as the thin edge of the wedge, if this stands then what else can stand - where is "too far"?

    49. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Jezza · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the middle ages. I see no possible justification, if the electronic device emits no sound, and no light - well I'm at a loss. Sounds like pointless discrimination to me. And I don't see why In can't ban reading the Bible, but banning a Kindle is fine.

    50. Re:No one's saying it isn't by khallow · · Score: 1

      What about religion? Or sexual orientation? What about someone from a different city? What if I banned anyone who'd served in the US military? Or wearing a US military uniform? (Remember we're talking about a coffee shop - though I think a solder in his own country should never is turned out for wearing his/her uniform, but that's probably just me)

      Most of those are illegal.

      I see this as the thin edge of the wedge,

      I don't. The laws are well established.

    51. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trying to take a very contrarian and anti-establishment oriented clientele and force them into some other behavior?

      Are you kidding me? A business trying to force their views on someone else isn't going to to stay in business. Businesses exist to make money, make a profit. They don't make money or profits by alienating customers, or potential customers, by trying to force them to accept the business owner's political point of view.

      The customer always holds the ultimate power in that relationship. They don't have to do business--eat, drink coffee, etc...--with someone who is out to irritate them. All the customers have to do is leave, and the business goes out of business as it is dependent on customers. So, no business like that has the power to force their viewpoint on someone else. Trying to allege that they do is ridiculous, and ignores reality.

      However, if customer behavior is costing a business so much money that they can't afford to stay in business while that behavior is practiced by their customers the business has no choice. They can, and will, post that behavior and say it isn't allowed. It's not something they want to do, it's something they are forced to do, and hope it won't cost them most of their customers. They just can't afford to not disallow that specific behavior. It's like the No shirt, No shoes, No service signs in many cafes. They disallow that behavior on the part of some people to keep the majority of their customers. Sure it costs them some customers, but they lose fewer customers by banning that behavior than if they didn't ban it.

      Decisions like this one are done lightly, and are most definitely not done just to make someone change their political views/behavior. They are done for economic reasons for businesses exist for economic reasons.

    52. Re:No one's saying it isn't by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's the fact that hotels are charging upwards of $5 per hour or $10 per day that guides users expectations of the bandwidth they will receive. Cafes less so but for those that charge, user complaints about the service may be justified.

    53. Re:No one's saying it isn't by captjc · · Score: 1

      The difference is that it is not discrimination if it is applied broad enough. If I ban Kindles it is discrimination. If I ban all ebook readers it is a policy. Just as I can't ban you from reading the Bible or Koran but I can ban you from reading books in general.

      I agree that it is a pretty stupid policy, but it is their business and they will have to live with the consequences, good or bad.

      --
      Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
    54. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      Yes, me thinking that people have the right to decide who they want to do business with makes me a moron. Jesus Christ, people like you are why the government is constantly taking away more and more freedoms.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    55. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      Thankfully, the courts disagree with your freedom-friendly interpretation of the constitution.

      FTFY.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    56. Re:No one's saying it isn't by modecx · · Score: 1

      If you think it's rude and annoying that people camp out at a table for hours during a standing-room only rush, then simply reciprocate and be rude and annoying in return and sit down with them and ask if anyone was sitting in the vacant seat!

      This also makes a great time to practice your small talk skills. Talk about *everything*. Bonus points for pretending to be a former schoolmate, even when they keep insisting they've never seen you before in their life. They'll be packing up inside two minutes, or maybe you'll meet someone interesting.

      One could actually make this into a sort of sport.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    57. Re:No one's saying it isn't by halowolf · · Score: 1

      I don't sit around much in cafes reading books and the like, I usually get a coffee and such eat and drink with a few friends then be on our way, that is until I am out travelling to different cities for work or something. Then cafes become a nice escape from the hotel rooms when you don't have much else to look at or do in whatever place your in.

      On one skiing trip the local Starbucks was just simply amazing. Great friendly people open fireplace and they didn't mind people sitting around reading and whatever for as long as they wanted. I'm not the sort of person that want's to be stuck in the hotel room all night nor out drinking every night in the party towns so a cafe can make a nice difference in burning away some time if its welcoming and friendly to peoples different needs.

      As for that Starbucks, everyone just kept on coming back since it did a great job of keeping people happy in a relatively small tourist town without many options.

    58. Re:No one's saying it isn't by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      You do realize that your entire post is irrelevant to the issue at hand--they banned eReaders, not reading. The policy is Books: Yes, eReaders: No. That is ridiculous.

      I don't actually disagree with your post, it's just not relevant.

    59. Re:No one's saying it isn't by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      What does this have to do with banning eReaders, but not banning books?

    60. Re:No one's saying it isn't by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Some percentage of your customers will want to stick around and read a book. Some will want to stick around and read an e-reader. They may not be the same group, so getting rid of just one may make you more profitable. It's also quite possible that people are more inclined to go into a cafe where customers are reading books than one where customers are playing with electronic gadgets (you can't easily tell whether it's an eReader, or some game device when you glance in through the window).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    61. Re:No one's saying it isn't by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      So, where'd you get your MBA?

      Alright, I'll grant you that's a semi-sensible argument (for an MBA), but it makes you sound like Darth Vader and it makes me throw up a little in my mouth (but that could just be the whisky).

    62. Re:No one's saying it isn't by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Why? A coffee shop is a business and it depends on getting enough paying customers in to cover its costs. I've seen several fail by getting this balance wrong. One of my friends opened one which closed about six months ago because she was going too far in the other direction - I went there to read quite often during the summer (it was right by the sea). When she opened, everything was quite cheap, so we'd go for coffee, and then decide we were too lazy to cook and stay for some food as well, then another coffee. She put the prices up because she didn't have enough customers to cover overheads, which meant that we'd just stay for one coffee then leave.

      When I was there last summer, quite often I'd be the only customer there - people would look in, see it was empty, and go to the cafe next door. This one was smaller and served less nice coffee, but because it was busy people went in.

      One thing that a lot of businesses seem to miss these days is that the unprofitable customers often generate the profitable ones. The guy with the bootlegged copy of your song may play it to other people who then go and buy the album. The guy in your coffee shop spending an hour drinking a coffee makes it look busy and encourages the family to go in and eat lunch. The small business with the cheapest possible support contract is training the admin who later goes on to make the purchasing decisions at a Fortune 500.

      MBAs call this 'mindshare' or 'goodwill', but that doesn't mean it's not a real phenomenon.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    63. Re:No one's saying it isn't by icebraining · · Score: 1

      No, his "rant" was about manners and common courtesy.

      Which is offtopic in this story.

      Which nicely explains why it eluded you so completely.

      It didn't, but thanks.

    64. Re:No one's saying it isn't by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

      No, the point was never to ask, "do coffee shops have a legal right to ban Kindles from their businesses?", but rather, "should they?"

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    65. Re:No one's saying it isn't by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      The discussion of weighing the benefits versus the disadvantages is nonetheless an interesting one.

      It may have been the first time that it was held. Does someone have a link to the cuneiform language version of Slashdot, where the subject of the economics of caravanserai space was beaten to death just after that monotheistic heretic Abraham passed through into exile? He was a coffee-hogger and no mistake! And the way he treated those kids of his!

      And, perhaps such discussions will give cafe owners food for thought in making their business decisions.

      The number of cafe owners likely to read this blog is, I hope, near zero. Read the strapline : "news for nerds ; stuff that matters".

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    66. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Thiez · · Score: 1

      > Or wearing a US military uniform?

      If the coffee shop has a dress code, they may very well refuse entry to a person wearing such a uniform.

      > Remember we're talking about a coffee shop - though I think a solder in his own country should never is turned out for wearing his/her uniform, but that's probably just me

      Yeah it's just you.

    67. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's ironic how you mention sexual orientation and the US military in this context.

    68. Re:No one's saying it isn't by budgenator · · Score: 1

      There's a website that I tried once and can't remember where your thrown into one on one chat with random strangers.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    69. Re:No one's saying it isn't by modecx · · Score: 1

      I remember that site too, but I wouldn't recommend it, unless you're fond of staring down random strangers' penises.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    70. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife works as an architect and we visited a cafe which she had worked on. We met the owner and she complemented him on his uncomfortable seats.

      "Complemented". I do not think that means what you think it means.

    71. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Jezza · · Score: 1

      Are you sure? You say banning the Kindle but not the Nook would be problematic. I see banning the Kindle and not the paperback as problematic. Are our views quite as far apart as they seem? I just see books. If the electronic book made noise, or was larger than a paperback - I could see a clear difference. As others have suggested, you put it in a binder and from a few feet away it's hard to tell them apart. If you accept that, why is one customer banned and the other is not - isn't that prejudice?

      That's why I see this as "the thin end of the wedge", can we really allow minor prejudice, won't that lead to escalation? What happens when someone want to ban customers for some other BS reason? Like "no tattoos",

      Let's not forget companies has (tried) some pretty reprehensible prejudices. Abercrombie & Fitch who told a worker with one arm that she's have to work in the back room because her physical disability "wasn't consistent with our brand". Or BA who told a worker she couldn't wear a crucifix. Now sure these are far worse, but you start banning stuff for random BS reasons and someone will use this precedent to do something that actually matters. So you ban a kind of clothing (say no "GAP hoodies" and someone will use that to suggest they can ban people with Christian themed garments "because it might upset some other religion". If you've allowed the "no GAP" to stand, then how do you say the other ban is wrong? You've set a dangerous precedent.

      Thin edge of the wedge...

    72. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Meski · · Score: 1

      Within limits. For instance, if they banned citizens by race, or religion, I suspect they'd get into trouble. If they decided they wanted to ban soy latte caffeine free drinking pretentionists, they'd probably get away with it. I like reading ebooks in cafes, but I could live without doing it, provided they banned cell-phones, children and loud people as well. :) (aim for a noise level slightly above a library)

    73. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Meski · · Score: 1

      If I keep ordering coffee/food whilst reading, the taking up space argument shouldn't count.

    74. Re:No one's saying it isn't by hab136 · · Score: 1

      That's Chatroulette. Omegle is simply chat, no pictures, so you won't see any body parts unless they're ASCII drawings.

    75. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posted as AC because my Karma can't stand any more buillshit punish-modding...

      No, his "rant" was about manners and common courtesy.

      Which is offtopic in this story.

      Which nicely explains why it eluded you so completely.

      It didn't, but thanks.

      Then why is his comment rated +5 Insightful? Seems some mods disagree with your assessment regarding the off-topic-ness of Runaway's comment. (And yet, my comment defending his comment STILL gets moderated -1. Grrrr!).

      Speaking of something (somewhat) offtopic, /. REALLY needs to reign in all the ridiculous, childish "punish-modding" that goes on here. It's getting to be like IRC; with all the kiddies and their ban/kick/nuke scripts (why I gave up on IRC in about 30 days). Or, they need to do away with the entire concept of "Karma", because it is FAR too easy to lose, and FAR too difficult to regain. There certainly needs to be some way to keep the constant drone of trolls at bay; but there also needs to be some way to keep immature punish-modding from being so rampant, when most of the time, it's really just a way of expressing "-1 disagree".

      Maybe /. needs a way to easily dispute punish-modding; but I know that, since it is so rampant on /., that any "arbitration" system would be instantly overwhelmed.

      In short, I guess the only possibility is for the /. community to grow the fuck up. But from what I have seen since I joined 8 years ago, it has been seriously and sadly been going in the other direction.

      Now THAT's a (somewhat) Offtopic rant!

    76. Re:No one's saying it isn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There were complete sentences in there, and even an argument of sorts related to the topic. Admittedly, there were no citations or deeper reasoning to back up the basic ideas, but there was some development of the basic idea with reference to the topic at hand. Therefore this cannot be an MBA - both the level of writing and flow of argument were a little too high. I'd guess at law school, despite the lack of pseudo-latin.

  4. Starbucks advert? by fantomas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To summarise the article: indie cafes bad, but on the First of Some Month Starbucks will give you free internet for as long as you want. Not "a major chain of coffee houses" but STARBUCKS.

    How much was this person being paid to plug a company's offerings?

    1. Re:Starbucks advert? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would also like to point out that the article offers no real examples or evidence of these bans. As a Manhattan resident who frequents a number of coffee shops, I see Kindles, iPads and laptops in all of them. There might be a few avant garde, anti tech coffee shops here and there, but they are by far the exception. Meanwhile the article makes every attempt to imply it's standard practice, which is complete and utter bullshit.

    2. Re:Starbucks advert? by SteveFoerster · · Score: 2

      To summarise the article: indie cafes bad, but on the First of Some Month Starbucks will give you free internet for as long as you want. Not "a major chain of coffee houses" but STARBUCKS.

      How much was this person being paid to plug a company's offerings?

      I feel the opposite way. When an article obfuscatorily refers to "a major player in the [whatever] industry" I think it sounds weirder than when they just say which particular business they mean.

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    3. Re:Starbucks advert? by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 1

      To summarise the article: indie cafes bad, but on the First of Some Month Starbucks will give you free internet for as long as you want. Not "a major chain of coffee houses" but STARBUCKS.

      How much was this person being paid to plug a company's offerings?

      Let's just stop putting the name of ANY corporation in Slashdot comments. We can talk about a fruit distributor's smartphone offering and how it is now available on a CDMA network. Hell, we might as well go all the way and stop using names altogether... like how a large North American country's national law enforcement bureau is requesting telephone records of its citizens, and how the aforementioned country has proposed budgetary cuts to their space program, weather programs, nuclear energy research, and their disease monitoring agency.

      stfu

    4. Re:Starbucks advert? by dosius · · Score: 1

      >avant garde
      >anti tech
      what is this i dont even

      -uso.

      --
      What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
    5. Re:Starbucks advert? by fermion · · Score: 0
      This is why people drink corporate coffee and imbibe corporate jam. Corporate products are all about the masses, what they want, with as little controversy and variation as possible. This can be very good as it allows people to focus on other things

      Indie Jam, OTOH, is often about creating a tension. This is good as it differentiates the bussiness from corporate, as well as provide places for people o go who don't want corporate.

      What irritates me is when an indie place complains that hey are being overrun by corporate overlords when differentiation becomes dogma and hey no longer serve a profitable purpose. We have enough churches leeching off he public good will, we don't need coffe shops. What is also irritating is corporate shops pretending to be indie shops. Powell's comes to mind, as does Whole Foods, though they are becoming more honest.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    6. Re:Starbucks advert? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Still too easy to guess. To really hide all the players involved I think you should summarise as

      "Some businesses are bad, but sometimes, another business will give you something."

    7. Re:Starbucks advert? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but does the article name any of these offending coffee shops that are supposedly banning e-readers? I can't find it. Why name *$ clearly but not name any of these shops that are supposedly banning e-readers? Starbucks was named three times in the article, twice in what looks like a veiled ad at the end of the article.

      Also, the models of several ereaders are mentioned too. The generic term "e-reader" was used twice, but six times, specific brands of ereaders were named, Kindle three times, iPad twice and nook once. iPod music player was mentioned once.

      It's not proof of anything, but I think it's really odd. It just has the feel of brand whoring, and looking out for a major advertiser while possibly smearing an industry of smaller players which might have a subtle impact on which establishment a reader might enter.

    8. Re:Starbucks advert? by russotto · · Score: 1

      To summarise the article: indie cafes bad, but on the First of Some Month Starbucks will give you free internet for as long as you want. Not "a major chain of coffee houses" but STARBUCKS.

      Furthermore, not one indy cafe is named and shamed. Is this phenomenon real or is it just something to fill the ad-hole? I work in NYC with a bunch of other geeks, and if any significant number of cafes had a policy like this, I'd expect to have heard about it. Now, NYC is a big place and it's possible the offending cafes are concentrated where the geeks I know aren't, but I'm still suspicious.

    9. Re:Starbucks advert? by martin-boundary · · Score: 1
      "Some businesses are bad, but sometimes, another business will give you something, or maybe somebody else."

      FTFY, don't refer to the reader as "you", he might be able to identify himself.

    10. Re:Starbucks advert? by Shoten · · Score: 1

      He wouldn't catch flak for promoting one company (except by people with no understanding of business and the pressures on the press...) but would catch flak for naming names in the derogatory sense (especially if they're populated by overcaffeinated people with no understanding of business who are so touchy about the "S" word...).

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    11. Re:Starbucks advert? by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      What on earth are you talking about, you paranoid git? No one is saying that you have to use Starbuck's incredibly fast and free wireless access while enjoying a delicious and sweet blended coffee drink with your choice of flavors such as caramel, hazenut, mocha, and vanilla for a new low, low price.

    12. Re:Starbucks advert? by imahawki · · Score: 1

      This is why people drink corporate coffee and imbibe corporate jam. Corporate products are all about the masses, what they want, with as little controversy and variation as possible. This can be very good as it allows people to focus on other things

      Indie Jam, OTOH, is often about creating a tension. This is good as it differentiates the bussiness from corporate, as well as provide places for people o go who don't want corporate.

      What irritates me is when an indie place complains that hey are being overrun by corporate overlords when differentiation becomes dogma and hey no longer serve a profitable purpose. We have enough churches leeching off he public good will, we don't need coffe shops. What is also irritating is corporate shops pretending to be indie shops. Powell's comes to mind, as does Whole Foods, though they are becoming more honest.

      This is a great comment. Sometimes indie = irrelevant. Then they bitch. I equate it to the company/corporate version of my liberal arts major friends who bitch about not making enough money. You pick your poison...

    13. Re:Starbucks advert? by Beefpatrol · · Score: 1

      I have become aware over the last couple years that some companies have become so good at astroturfing that their efforts are almost undetectable as such. Microsoft is one such company. Starbucks is probably another. Companies like Starbucks probably do benefit from it simply because all they really need to do most of the time is remind people that they exist.

      Amazon has been plugging the Kindle pretty hard...

    14. Re:Starbucks advert? by hab136 · · Score: 1

      This is why people [...] imbibe corporate jam. [...] Indie Jam, OTOH, is often about creating a tension

      I can't think of a definition of jam that makes sense in this context. Are you talking about sugared fruit preserves in a jar? How does a jar of jam create tension?

    15. Re:Starbucks advert? by tekshogun · · Score: 1

      To summarise the article: indie cafes bad, but on the First of Some Month Starbucks will give you free internet for as long as you want. Not "a major chain of coffee houses" but STARBUCKS.

      How much was this person being paid to plug a company's offerings?

      first of some month? we get free wifi here at all the Starbucks all the time

    16. Re:Starbucks advert? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a generic term to mean anything corporate made. Yes, one context is fruit preserve bought from a large corp which very well might be worse, though more consistant, than local sources. It has also been used in terms of much in which people prefer packaged products to local jam sessions. So corporate jam, for instance, makes teens feel they are one against the world, while indie jam flow in and out of particular groups. It is a bit unfair to Starbucks, as the original management is moving away from consistant products in the store, allowing local management to source coffee even if it isn't available everywhere.

  5. I, for one... by FuckingNickName · · Score: 1, Troll

    ...am far more likely to go somewhere which bans all this junk. It's like passive smoking, except being surrounded by pretentious jack-offs with unnecessary toys is painful to my mental health.

    1. Re:I, for one... by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree to an extent - I don't think the dedicated e-readers should be a concern as they are equivalent to bringing a book to read - no typing, sound or other flashiness. Of course, real or electronic, book reading takes up space and if you aren't buying multiple cups of coffee you're a loss.

    2. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Good, stay the fuck away from the rest of us you pseudo chic pretentious motherfucker.

    3. Re:I, for one... by Rossman · · Score: 1

      Amen to that!

    4. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...am far more likely to go somewhere which bans all this junk. It's like passive smoking, except being surrounded by pretentious jack-offs with unnecessary toys is painful to my mental health.

      Yea, having access to my whole library anywhere is STUPID. Being able to buy a book and have it instantly is STUPID. Spending money on things that make your life easier is STUPID. ...lol. Judging people for an item is just as stupid as judging yourself because you HAVE an item. Stupid.

    5. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's one of the times I wish a post gets modded to +5 Flamebait so that the sheer ridiculousness of it is up there for everyone to see, so I can point at it and say what constitutes an awful way of thinking.

      Smoking? I understand - It's unpleasant and it stinks. People talking on the phone? I understand - it's annoying.

      But someone reading a book or an article, or doing something unknown on his gadget, without affecting you in any possible way? You'll agree for something to be banned just because you don't like it? This is the kind of thinking that can only lead to more ridiculous bans that hurt us all. Didn't we have enough already? You know, while one slashdotter thinks it's cool to ban a popular fad that annoys him, the society might decide to ban his hobbies. I guess there won't be enough people to care if someone banned tinkering. What would you say?

      From a disturbance perspective, there's more reason to ban talking than to ban gadgets.

    6. Re:I, for one... by PPH · · Score: 1

      If it keeps me away from all those a*holes posting witty remarks on Slashdot [pause to take sip of coffee], I'm for it as well.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    7. Re:I, for one... by FuckingNickName · · Score: 3, Funny

      Smoking? I understand - It's unpleasant and it stinks. People talking on the phone? I understand - it's annoying.

      So you only agree with someone else's private establishment banning what you find annoying.

    8. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are people with asthma, people with smoke allergies, and cancer patients who are negatively affected in a physical, quantifiable way by the presence of smokers.

    9. Re:I, for one... by krotkruton · · Score: 1

      This is a perfect example of free market, though. The market should create cafes where people can 'set up shop' and others where no electronics are allowed. There's no "they should do THIS because THAT is wrong" because it's a matter of opinion and both options can be available.

    10. Re:I, for one... by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      Of course, real or electronic, book reading takes up space and if you aren't buying multiple cups of coffee you're a loss.

      At $5 per coffee serving it can't be that big of a loss.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    11. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice straw man. Where did I say that I agree? I don't, I merely *understand*. I can tolerate both just fine, and I'm against smoke bans, even though I'm not a smoker. But smoking creates an actual inconvenience for everyone else. This doesn't. You just don't like it.

    12. Re:I, for one... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      "negatively affected in a physical, quantifiable way" Alright, quantify and qualify for me. I'm dense. I know asthmatics who smoke. I know people who are allergic to everything from their mother's milk to eggs and peanuts and beef and seafood - who smoke. You're talking out your ass, because you've been brainwashed by the media.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    13. Re:I, for one... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Somebody mod this guy funny. He's earned at least a chuckle, alright?

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    14. Re:I, for one... by nstlgc · · Score: 1

      That was not pretentious at all, you jack-off.

      --
      I'm Rocco. I'm the +5 Funny man.
    15. Re:I, for one... by imthesponge · · Score: 2

      Smokers suck because they leave their trash everywhere. God help you if you work with one; they'll be taking a break every 20 minutes.

    16. Re:I, for one... by FuckingNickName · · Score: 1

      This is the kind of thinking that can only lead to more ridiculous bans that hurt us all. Didn't we have enough already? You know, while one slashdotter thinks it's cool to ban a popular fad that annoys him, the society might decide to ban his hobbies. I guess there won't be enough people to care if someone banned tinkering. What would you say?

      Nice straw man.

    17. Re:I, for one... by FuckingNickName · · Score: 0

      A bad worker who may also be an addict leaves his trash everywhere and takes a break every 20 minutes.

      FTFY.

      My fat self-labelled socialist uncle, who at family get-togethers would sit back after the meal and light a fatter cigar like a tropical dictator, neither smoked at work nor found other excuses to shirk.

      While we're doing your thing, I once worked with one black guy who was a bit clueless. So:

      Blacks suck because they mumble and don't really know what they're doing. God help you if you work with one; they'll produce unmaintainable code and take far too long to do it.

    18. Re:I, for one... by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2

      Smokers are the laziest do nothing workers there are.

      If I find out a job applicant is a smoker I will argue against hiring them because of the extra breaks they will be taking.

    19. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The German railway operator banned smoking on the trains many years before there was a government mandated ban on smoking in restaurants. Their reason: The cars for smokers needed to be refurbished much more frequently than the other cars. Even so, they were still in a condition such that smokers tended to avoid them, only used them to smoke and then got the hell back to the non-smoking cars.

      BTW, to call a non-smoker brainwashed is a bit of a laugh. Smokers are the ones with the chemically addicted brains who keep making up excuses to avoid the dissonance of realizing that they're paying to harm themselves and can't stop.

    20. Re:I, for one... by FuckingNickName · · Score: 2

      You would be turning down Einstein, Edison, Bell, Oppenheimer, Hubble, Freud, Churchill, Roosevelt, Kennedy and, until recently, Obama. Hope that's OK with you.

    21. Re:I, for one... by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 3, Funny

      Since none of them have any IT skills, their resumes wouldn't have got them an interview, so yea its not a problem.

    22. Re:I, for one... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 0

      Fanatics don't care about anything except those few things which they are fanatical about. Ask people like Pol Pot. ;^)

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    23. Re:I, for one... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      "to call a non-smoker brainwashed" Whatever. I spoke with a young woman, whose grandmother died at age 93. Old woman died of cancer. NOT lung cancer, mind you, but cancer. The brain washed young woman insisted that the old woman would have lived years longer, if her FIRST husband hadn't been a smoker. The second hand smoke killed her grandma. Oddly, that FIRST husband, who was a smoker, was only the husband for about a year, about 75 years previously. Again - the anti-smokers have indeed brainwashed this newest generation.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    24. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I'm sorry for wrongly assuming that you had positive characteristics. I feel glad that i had the opportunity to exchange intelligent posts with a person who not only doesn't do thing that other people want to ban, but also can tell the difference between an illustrative example and an argument, and can correctly underline a straw man when he sees one.

    25. Re:I, for one... by zippthorne · · Score: 2

      No he wouldn't. Those guys didn't take "smoke breaks." They would've just smoked in your face.

      In today's era, they'd probably never have started smoking.

      Plus.. that's a helluva list. I think there's like three guys on there I'd actually want to work with. None of whom were heads of state or giants of industry...

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    26. Re:I, for one... by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      Taking frequent breaks is has been proven to be healthy, and even though the reason those breaks are taken isn't exactly healthy, those breaks might save someone from heart disease, sciatica, improve their circulation, posture, eye sight, etc (assuming we're talking about predominantly computer-based work), and in the long run, they'll be more effective workers.

    27. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I notice that none of the people you mentioned smoke anymore.

    28. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did Freud smoke cigars? I thought he just argued that they were stand-ins for what the smoker really wanted to suck on --- a penis!

    29. Re:I, for one... by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Your single anecdote proves nothing. Yes, she was an idiot. That doesn't disprove the effects of tobacco nor does it prove that this generation has been brainwashed.

      NOT lung cancer, mind you, but cancer.

      Medical studies link smoking with an increased risk for many more cancers than lung, particularly kidney, larynx, breast, bladder cancer, esophagus, pancreas and stomach cancer.

    30. Re:I, for one... by DeathElk · · Score: 1

      Thank goodness for that.

    31. Re:I, for one... by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      He said the exact opposite. And yes, he died of (very likely anyway) cigar-related cancer (definitely the cancer, very likely from the cigars).

    32. Re:I, for one... by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      You assume that people on the cig breaks don't work anymore.
      When I smoked and took cigarette breaks with my co-worker, we talked about problems we were trying to solve and often during those breaks we came up with the answer. It probably was the change of environment from the busy office to the relaxed atmosphere of the smoking lounge that gave us a new look at the problems to be able to think up solutions.
      Often those breaks helped us when we were stumped after which we solved problems and saved our company lots of money and got our users back to work earlier.
      But hey, you can have your opinion, even if it is wrong.

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    33. Re:I, for one... by wondafucka · · Score: 1

      ...am far more likely to go somewhere which bans all this junk. It's like passive smoking, except being surrounded by pretentious jack-offs with unnecessary toys is painful to my mental health.

      Oh, do you mean the entire country of America?

  6. No Loitering, We are trying to make money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a reason why the chairs in a lot of restaurants are uncomfortable.
    They want you to eat and leave. Thank you for your business, please come again.

    1. Re:No Loitering, We are trying to make money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They want you to eat and leave."

      It's funny - I lived in Argentina in the 1960s, and it took us a long time to get used to the fact that when you went out to dinner at a fancy restaurant, your dinner would take 3 to 4 hours. You COULD NOT eat in less than an hour. They would not bring your food that fast. Several courses, and each one would take almost an hour. Once we figured out they WANTED you to sit, relax, and enjoy your company, we really got into it. Wish it was that way here in the States.

    2. Re:No Loitering, We are trying to make money by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      If you go to a fancy restaurant in the states, that is how they operate. They don't expect to get more than two seatings in during an evening, say one at 6PM and another at 8:30-9PM. You're also paying several hundred dollars for a quality of food and service that makes it worthwhile to tie up a table for so long. If you go for your $5.95 buffet at the Golden Food Trough, it's in their best interest to shuffle you through as quickly as possible.

      Put in another way, if you're at a restaurant whose menu has any prices other than whole dollar amounts, eat up, get out, and let the wait[er|ress] have another round of tipping customers.

    3. Re:No Loitering, We are trying to make money by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      The other major cue is light levels: intensity is fairly close to being inversely proportional to preferred patron loiter time. "2km from ground zero" level strip-lighting means GTFO. Candles means "our patrons are welcome to make a leisurely recovery from their sticker shock".

    4. Re:No Loitering, We are trying to make money by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Hundreds of dollars? And people tell me living in the USA is cheap...

      On this side of the pond, that's pretty much the experience anywhere other than the ultra-cheap fast food places. You can spend under £20 (about $30) per person on a meal (food and wine) and have a relaxed experience over a few hours. Even a pub lunch (about £10 including a pint of beer) can easily take an hour or so.

      A restaurant where they were trying to get rid of you as quickly as possible is a restaurant I wouldn't return to.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:No Loitering, We are trying to make money by Yosho · · Score: 1

      I have no idea where the original poster is eating at. I know plenty of restaurants where you can get a nice dinner for between $10 and $15 per person; lunch is usually $7 or $8.

      The fanciest place that I personally know of is around $50 per person, and honestly, there you're mostly paying for the decor and ambience -- you can get food that's just as good at less upscale restaurants for $20.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
  7. Do they ban books? by hawguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As long as they ban books, magazines and other reading materials that's a good policy - I hate going to my local coffee shop for a quick drink and snack only to find that half of the tables are taken over by 3 person study groups who pushed 4 tiny tables together to make room for their books and papers, or rows of people on their laptops (some working, some just idling browsing the 'net, and that guy in the corner browsing porn).

    But to ban a Kindle or Nook just because it's electronic seems like a stretch -- browsing is not a joy on either of those platforms, so it's not like someone is going to be spending hours answering his work email. Though he may spend hours reading an eBook, just like he would do with a paper book if he didn't have a Kindle.

    1. Re:Do they ban books? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We ban those things because in a few years it's gonna be Farenheit 451 on those machines... Except they won't need platoons of arsonist firemen but just one guy in an office pushing a button and, voila! Non-approved books will disappear... Or worse, be rewritten on the fly (ala 1984).

      Geeks, you love technology, it's all right to love technology. But please, for once, think of the consequences. E-Book readers are a platform of choice for global censorship. What future do you want to live in?

    2. Re:Do they ban books? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate going to my local coffee shop for a quick drink and snack only to find that half of the tables are taken over by 3 person study groups who pushed 4 tiny tables together to make room for their books and papers, or rows of people on their laptops .

      Why??

    3. Re:Do they ban books? by Renraku · · Score: 1

      They do this because there's not places FOR that kind of thing. If there were even a mediocre coffee shop open all night with overpriced coffee style drinks and overpriced snacks I would totally go there for late night cram sessions providing they had plug in and free wifi. But there isn't. You can go to a Waffle House or similar 24/7 restaurant, but they typically don't have plugs and keep their restaurants at a balmy 45F.

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    4. Re:Do they ban books? by macshit · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it seems a silly policy.

      There's a starbucks near my house that gets extremely crowded sometimes (often with students studying "traditional" materials), and they address this problem in what seems a much more sensible way: At "likely to be crowded" times, they write in big letters on the menu chalkboard something like "When the cafe is crowded, please do not sit and study for long periods." I presume they back this up with some polite nudging when somebody is obviously ignoring the request.

      Importantly, I think, they also aren't anal about it -- when it isn't crowded, they really have no problem with you sitting there for a long time.

      (As it happens, they also don't offer free wifi, but that isn't the source of the problem)

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    5. Re:Do they ban books? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because having to stand up to eat really really sucks.

      And thanks to a half restaurants worth of people utilizing all of the tables, standing up to eat or leaving are your only options.

    6. Re:Do they ban books? by randomforumposter178 · · Score: 1

      it's a good thing they can't get pirated books then. Also paranoia.

    7. Re:Do they ban books? by hawguy · · Score: 1

      I've seen no evidence that Amazon can identify and remove books from my device that I've installed independently of the Amazon store -- I have dozens of e-books installed that Amazon has no idea about. And even if they did delete them from my device, since they have no DRM, I can read them on any device - Kindle, phone, computer, I could even print it out if I wanted to.

      It seems that the digital age makes it easier rather than harder for unpopular books to become published and distributed. In the old days, you'd have to procure a printing press and then you'd have a big warehouse of books to distribute. Now you can publish to a few eBook formats (or even plain text) and put it up on a few bittorrent sites and you've got worldwide distribution that's nearly impossible for the government to shut down.

    8. Re:Do they ban books? by willynate · · Score: 1

      Couple that with the fact that you can turn off the Wi-Fi/3G on the Kindle and make it undetectable anyways.

      I am curious if Amazon can "read" a Kindle's inventory list and notice which titles aren't from them.

      --
      PS . . . What the alphabet would look like if Q and R were eliminated --- Mitch Hedberg
    9. Re:Do they ban books? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as they ban books, magazines and other reading materials that's a good policy - I hate going to my local coffee shop for a quick drink and snack only to find that half of the tables are taken over by 3 person study groups who pushed 4 tiny tables together to make room for their books and papers, or rows of people on their laptops (some working, some just idling browsing the 'net, and that guy in the corner browsing porn).

      But to ban a Kindle or Nook just because it's electronic seems like a stretch -- browsing is not a joy on either of those platforms, so it's not like someone is going to be spending hours answering his work email. Though he may spend hours reading an eBook, just like he would do with a paper book if he didn't have a Kindle.

      Why does this bother you? Do you really need more than half of the tables for yourself? Just take 1 or 2...

    10. Re:Do they ban books? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have not heard anything about this before. I have sold many coffee shops and cafes ice machines and refrigerator equipment etc and I haven't heard a complaint from an owner. New to me

  8. [citation needed] by StDoodle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now, I'm not saying I doubt that there are cafes banning such devices. But cafes -- especially indie establishments -- have a long history of having their individual, quirky policies. Is this one or two cafes that have banned said devices, and only said devices? Have the cafes in question banned all extended table-takeover "loitering" (for whatever that means in such a place)? I just find it rather difficult to get worked up over a post with so little information behind it. (Ok, a small amount of info on cafe history... but without the present situation clarified, what good is that?)

    1. Re:[citation needed] by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Please, sir, be reasonable: requiring "facts", "citations", or (perish the thought) "evidence" of the sort that would earn a passing grade in Stats101 would be the absolute death of the sort of op-ed "journalism" that pads out newspapers across the land. How could you be so cruel?

      Were it not for allowing their scribbling hacks to inflate personal grudges and tiny-value-of-N anecdotes into "trends", the NYT would probably have to do something comparatively expensive, like actual investigative reporting, to fill the space. Won't somebody please think of the Lifestyle section?

    2. Re:[citation needed] by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      They also tend to go out of business in droves, then blame it on the corporate shops and their homogenous atmosphere(s).

      Quirky? How cute.... and essentially droll. I understand the need for turning tables, yet the thought of some over-caffienated jerk hovering over me as I try to finish a chapter is just a little too much. You remember Seinfeld's Soup Nazi? Welcome to NYC. Have a nice fucking day, and take your little Kindle with you.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    3. Re:[citation needed] by PCM2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One of the things San Francisco is doing now is that, when developers want to put up big new office buildings, they have to include a certain amount of "public space" in their designs. I know a couple of buildings that do this, and the result is a really nice, large, open space in the lobby, surrounded by glass, with lots of tables and chairs and some plants, where anybody can go in and sit for free. So if the local coffee shop really wants me to buy my coffee and get the fuck out, then by all means... I'll take it up the road.

      Ah, but that's just the thing. Most coffee shops don't just want you to buy your coffee and get the fuck out, because a coffee shop with no people in it seems cold and uninviting, and it makes you wonder whether there's something wrong with the coffee. The traditional coffee shop atmosphere is one where people sip, read, quietly talk, study, and maybe do a little work. So they need a certain number of people doing just that.

      When I hear about coffee shops making up rules to kick those people out, though, I can only assume that it must be because times are flush. Lucky you -- enjoy it while you can. Cuz you opened a coffee shop in NYC, pal. Hipster trends come and go -- by definition -- and I guarantee you, your coffee won't taste as good as the next guy's in a couple years' time, no matter what you do. You might start wishing you still had some of those customers you alienated, back when it was still cool to pretend people didn't want Nooks and Kindles.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    4. Re:[citation needed] by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      The next problem to think about: who's using their phones to read a book. Or, how long is that dude going to be on the notebook on Facebook.

      The model where you get a portion of buyers hanging around (each with a mix of buys and margins), and some of them grabbing some joe and leaving (hopefully with a sack full of expensive scones) based on a small square footage/high traffic flow lease, is one of those great strange gambles.

      Part of the problem, however, really is caffeine. These guys are around it so much, that they're buzzing and humming under their pointy heads. The machine is going at full-tilt, noodling: how can I make more revenue? Look at that idiot over there, he's been there for two hours while those three Indian chicks were looking for a fucking table! Ohmygawd! Ohmygawd! Ohmygawd!

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    5. Re:[citation needed] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't be at all surprised if the piece was written on a iMafag by some pony-tailed twat sitting in a Starbucks.

    6. Re:[citation needed] by randomforumposter178 · · Score: 1

      this, there was an article a while back about a rash of small cafes ripping out their wall outlets so people could only use their laptops so long. I doubt it was widespread though.

  9. I wish there was a cafe... by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 4, Funny

    where I could use my soldering iron and dremel. Also, the walls would be lined with component and fastener bins.

    1. Re:I wish there was a cafe... by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1

      I am interested in your idea and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

      No seriously - a combination cafe/hackerspace would be awesome.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    2. Re:I wish there was a cafe... by wertarbyte · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There is a location here in the city of Essen, germany that resembles your idea: http://www.unperfekthaus.de/e/ It's a building housing an interesting combination of a restauraunt, art studio, electronic laboratory, stage etc. You can use most of the equipment for free, provided that you do it openly and thus allow spectators, each paying an entry fee of 5,5 EUR which includes an unlimited supply of coffee and soft drinks. Quite nice for hanging out, learning for an exam or soldering together some new devices. Of course, WLAN connectivity is available as well :-)

      --
      Life is just nature's way of keeping meat fresh.
    3. Re:I wish there was a cafe... by davidbrit2 · · Score: 1

      where I could use my soldering iron and dremel. Also, the walls would be lined with component and fastener bins.

      And we shall call it Radio Snack.

    4. Re:I wish there was a cafe... by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 1

      "Okay that will be one dielectric latte' ... would you like batteries with that? no... okay, can I have your ZIP code please?"

    5. Re:I wish there was a cafe... by tangelogee · · Score: 1

      And we shall call it Radio Snack.

      ...or maybe Star-bits? (Yes, I know the technical term would be torx)

    6. Re:I wish there was a cafe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look up "hackerspace". That should be what you want. You may have to bring your own coffee. Or maybe not.

    7. Re:I wish there was a cafe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I've turned the counter in front of the plate-glass window facing the street into a workbench before at Common Grounds in Lexington, KY—soldering iron, yes; dremel, no. I didn't want to make noise that would distract people.

    8. Re:I wish there was a cafe... by Sensiblemonkey · · Score: 1

      Never before was there a need for a '+1, Made Me Swoon' mod score ...

    9. Re:I wish there was a cafe... by pablo_max · · Score: 1

      I did not know about that place. I live in Kettwig! Small world.

    10. Re:I wish there was a cafe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Radio Shack Cafe would be awesome

    11. Re:I wish there was a cafe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are looking for a hackerspace: hackerspaces.org

    12. Re:I wish there was a cafe... by aylons · · Score: 1

      You are looking for a hackerspace: hackerspaces.org

      --
      This comment may contain speech figures. Reader discretion is advised.
    13. Re:I wish there was a cafe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See if there's a Dorkbot chapter in your vicinity. Odds are, wherever they meet won't have free parts for you, but might not mind you discreetly using your butane soldering iron.

    14. Re:I wish there was a cafe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you obviously haven't been to "The Shack" in years.

      "Radio Shack. You've got questions? We've got blank stares."

    15. Re:I wish there was a cafe... by kaizokuace · · Score: 1
      --
      Balderdash!
    16. Re:I wish there was a cafe... by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

      The Geek Group* recently moved to Grand Rapids, MI and is planning on putting a coffee shop in its new, super-hacker-space lab when it opens to the public. There would definitely be no problem with soldering in the cafe, though you might have to take the Dremel out into one of the other rooms due to flying metal bits. I'm not sure what the rules will be about Tesla coils in the shop, though.

      *Disclosure: Yes, I am a member. Forgive me for promoting something cool in which I believe.

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    17. Re:I wish there was a cafe... by identity0 · · Score: 1

      That sounds like a Hackerspace. The one I go to does not have coffee, but it does have a soldering iron and a pinball machine they fixed. And we are in the process of trying to get a 3D printer.

      If you're seriously interested in that kind of stuff, I suggest you check them out.

      There just might be one near you!

    18. Re:I wish there was a cafe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can there be hookers and blackjack?

    19. Re:I wish there was a cafe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want a hackerspace with a cafe, not a cafe with the stuff you mentioned.

    20. Re:I wish there was a cafe... by john_uy · · Score: 1

      Slashdot should have a like button. I like your post. But alas, I don't think we will have it where I live.

      --
      Live your life each day as if it was your last.
    21. Re:I wish there was a cafe... by Lord_Byron · · Score: 1

      I..I might never leave.

      Aside from time spent seeking treatment for lead poisoning, that it.

    22. Re:I wish there was a cafe... by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Ouch, why does this awesomeness have to be in one of only two DE cities connected to my ancestry, and on the footsteps of another, the only DE one where I've spent some time (well, excluding barely remembered DDR stays) ... different times which are no more ;(

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  10. There is something nice about a tech-less cafe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Imagine, people just maybe reading paper books, having good conversations with friends, being on dates, or just soaking up the smell of roasted coffee and the light perfume of the pleasant woman in the sweater next to you. No clickety-clack, no heads down and eyes glued to a screen, no thumbs frenetically moving over a tiny unearthly rectange, more people over 60 feeling at ease and not alienated, etc.

    Nothing wrong with full-on hardcore technology style cafes, either. It's just a choice.

    1. Re:There is something nice about a tech-less cafe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yup, I love the loud shuffle and crinkle of newspapers, the thuds and annoyed mutterings of people dropping books trying to turn book pages while still holding a cup of coffee, those are great. So much better that the absolutely silent, one-handed operation of an e-reader. But nope, none of your high tech gadgets that are improvements in nearly ever way.

      Note: I do have a distinct fondness for physical books, and that's part of the reason I don't own an e-reader myself (the other being the DRM issues with a number of them). But while your argument is fine for something like a laptop (even though I don't completely agree with it), it holds no water against kindles and the like.

    2. Re:There is something nice about a tech-less cafe by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      What's the difference between a paper book and a Kindle, as far as those around are concerned, anyway? The screen doesn't shine, attracting attention, and page turn buttons are very soft, so that click is hardly louder than a page turn.

    3. Re:There is something nice about a tech-less cafe by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      The screen doesn't shine, attracting attention, and page turn buttons are very soft, so that click is hardly louder than a page turn.

      On the Nook, you can optionally swipe the little touchscreen at the bottom to turn pages, which makes no sound at all. (The touchscreen doesn't have to be lit up to swipe it.)

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  11. Indie = Pretentious now? by newcastlejon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can understand people wanting to avoid the sound of spiders scratching behind earbuds, or bright flashing colours in the corner of one's eye but why ban silent, monochromatic book replacements? This sort of café sounds to me like a gathering place of pompous poseurs (possibly goateed) sat there with tattered - by their previous owners - copies of Milne spouting neo-luddite claptrap.

    Here endeth the rant. If these places want to alienate paying customers then that's their right; it's just a shame there probably won't be another article on their inevitable going out of business. Of course, collecting all this sort just makes it that much easier to avoid them, so I'm at best ambivalent about the whole thing.

    P.S. I figure if the only source is a paywalled opinion piece then it shouldn't count as news...

    --
    If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    1. Re:Indie = Pretentious now? by Hatta · · Score: 1, Insightful

      When has "indie" not connoted "pretentious"?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:Indie = Pretentious now? by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention the elbow patched tweed jacket with the pipestem protruding from the chest pocket.
      And perhaps a pair of Lennon-esq granny glasses.

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    3. Re:Indie = Pretentious now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When someone with poor spelling skills is talking about open-wheel racing?

    4. Re:Indie = Pretentious now? by FatSean · · Score: 1

      When people who consume traditional/mass-market offerings hadn't heard about "indie" and didn't know that there were people whowanted to do things differently.

      People who think "indie" connotes "pretentious" are generally people upset someone else has dared to do something in a different way. In other words, those people want the damn kids off their lawn.

      --
      Blar.
    5. Re:Indie = Pretentious now? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      When people who consume traditional/mass-market offerings hadn't heard about "indie" and didn't know that there were people who wanted to do things differently.

      To me, by the time it's called "indie" it's already so watered down it's indistinguishable from mainstream. Look around the city sometime -- if you've got a lot of tattoos, you are definitely not "doing things differently."

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    6. Re:Indie = Pretentious now? by FatSean · · Score: 1

      The untattooed people still out number the tattooed by an order of magnitude. But I know what you mean, when a reality TV show centers around something, it's official mainstream. Shades of gray and all that. Hating on indie or hipster is generally just a way to say "I don't like their fashion" without having to admit to yourself that you care about fashion :D

      --
      Blar.
    7. Re:Indie = Pretentious now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of pretentious, Virginia Heffernan is an incredibly pretentious writer. She specializes in unnatural, choppy prose that tries way too hard to be hip and artsy, so as to imply that there's deep insight there (which there isn't). The result is just that it's slightly hard to read and somewhat vacuous.

    8. Re:Indie = Pretentious now? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Aren't all cafes intended to be gathering places for pompous poseurs?

  12. Turn off the wi-fi by qwerty+shrdlu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If they don't want these people hanging out, why go to the trouble of luring them in?

    1. Re:Turn off the wi-fi by TheABomb · · Score: 1

      Because if they don't offer it, the customers will go to Starbucks, where the 700% markup on a cup of coffee makes up for the lost business the seatwarmers bring in?

      --
      MSIE: The world's most standards-complaint web browser.
    2. Re:Turn off the wi-fi by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

      Q: If they don't want [gadget users] hanging out, why [offer/advertise wireless for] luring them in?

      A: Because if they don't offer [wireless], the [gadget users] will go to Starbucks, where the 700% markup on a cup of coffee makes up for the lost business the seatwarmers bring in?

      So they want their customers, but they don't want them? Brilliant. It seems like a better solution would be to remove wifi, and lower prices accordingly. Some will want wifi with high prices, others will want no wifi and the 700% lower price.

    3. Re:Turn off the wi-fi by hedwards · · Score: 1

      It's not a 700% markup, that's the general cost for that sort of coffee around here. Sure it's a lot more expensive than when people order black coffee elsewhere, but there's a lot more work involved. If it's not your thing you're entitled to your opinion, but it's asinine to suggest that something that takes 5 minutes tops to prepare at the beginning of the day is going to cost as much as something which requires several minutes per cup to produce.

    4. Re:Turn off the wi-fi by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because the draw of the indie cafés is their low prices compared to the national chain coffee shops....

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    5. Re:Turn off the wi-fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because the draw of the indie cafés is their low prices compared to the national chain coffee shops....

      Yeah, I'm not sure where that delusion came from, either. I'm at one this very minute - love it for the people watching, good coffee, friendly staff, and convenient location near home... But he has cupcakes for sale @ $2.75 that are no bigger than what I'd make at home, and a latté & pannini was $11. And this is a small suburb of Philly, not NYC. I'm not anti-Starbucks - I go there when it's the conevient option - so I know how the prices compare. I still come here for the reasons above - and to support a local business - but lower prices don't factor into it. He does offer free WiFi, and though there are people who use it for hours, I think most of the people using it tend to be considerate and pack up when it gets crowded.

    6. Re:Turn off the wi-fi by adisakp · · Score: 1

      If they don't want these people hanging out, why go to the trouble of luring them in?

      You can read and waste cafe space for hours on an eReader without a Wifi Connection. Of course you can do the same thing with a book as well. WiFi is not part of the "lure" and turning it off will do nothing to keep readers out of your cafe.

    7. Re:Turn off the wi-fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said these cafes have wifi? I don't know about the Nook, but the Kindle and iPad both have 3G options, and you don't have to be online to use them anyway.

    8. Re:Turn off the wi-fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because a paying customer who wants to check his email for 15 minutes while sipping a latte isn't a problem.

      It's the customer that's writing his graduate thesis and taking up an entire table for 4 hours (after paying for a $2 coffee) that is hurting business.

      Basically, the freeloaders have ruined it for everyone else, once again.

  13. Their cafe, their choice... by Neil_Brown · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If it's made clear before I parted with money for a drink that something non-obvious is prohibited, then I've no problem at all - I can simply take my patronage elsewhere.

    If it's only after I've bought a drink and sat down to read that I'm told, then I'm likely to be less impressed, but, at the end of the day, it's not really something I'm going to worry too much about - at worst, if I really do need to read something, I can walk out.

    Since I tend to get a bottle of water, and maybe something to eat, I probably haven't lost much either, since I'll take them with me, but I could understand why someone who's not using a takeaway cup might be loathe to leave their (often expensive) coffee behind, but, I do try not to get riled over a few pounds if I can avoid it. Life is too short.

  14. I wish Starbucks would ban freeloaders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I wish Starbucks would do this to some extent. I had to quit frequenting a local Starbucks, when a group of 4 friends and I would always meet on a couple of times of week to drink coffee and eat pastries, and the last 5 times we were unable to find any seating. All the tables had been taken over by assholes who thought it was their right to setup their home offices there. To make matters worse I never saw 1 Starbucks cup or plate on any of the tables, so those assholes were nothing more than freeloaders showing no respect to the business or anyone else around them.

    I told the manager that I know there is nothing she can do about it, but it has become quite clear that her store has been hijacked by low-life freeloaders who probably will have their UPS packages addressed to that place at some point.

    I have never been back there.

  15. Look past the device... by iceT · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd wager it's not the device... or the table space that a laptop takes up... It's way more physical than that...

    It's about CHAIRS and WIFI.

    No one wants to go sit in a coffee shop and when you get there, there are no seats because people have 'set up shop' and are there for the long haul. They want you to enjoy your coffee, and LEAVE. Same goes for WIFI. What once was a sales feature to get you INTO the store: Free WiFi, is now something that KEEPS you in the store, but doesn't make any more money for the shops. How many people drink cup after cup of coffee the entire 2-3 hours they're sitting there? nope. they got one $2 cup of coffee, and then tie up the seats and the wifi for hours. And their WiFi is probably over taxed because of it...

    Books don't consume WiFi, and most people don't read a book for hours.

    --
    -- You can't idiot-proof anything, because they're always coming out with better idiots.
    1. Re:Look past the device... by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'd wager it's not the device... or the table space that a laptop takes up... It's way more physical than that...

      It's about CHAIRS and WIFI.

      No one wants to go sit in a coffee shop and when you get there, there are no seats because people have 'set up shop' and are there for the long haul. They want you to enjoy your coffee, and LEAVE. Same goes for WIFI. What once was a sales feature to get you INTO the store: Free WiFi, is now something that KEEPS you in the store, but doesn't make any more money for the shops. How many people drink cup after cup of coffee the entire 2-3 hours they're sitting there? nope. they got one $2 cup of coffee, and then tie up the seats and the wifi for hours. And their WiFi is probably over taxed because of it...

      Books don't consume WiFi, and most people don't read a book for hours.

      Your entire argument assumes that the largest coffee chain in the US can't do simple math. *$ offers free, unlimited wifi for a reason. What do you think that reason is?

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    2. Re:Look past the device... by artor3 · · Score: 1

      Kindles don't "consume WiFi" either, unless you're using it to browse the web, in which case you really ought to get a more appropriate tool for the job.

      Basically, Kindles are interchangeable with books and newspapers. If the cafe's okay with books, there's no reason to ban Kindles (or Nooks or any other dedicated e-reader).

    3. Re:Look past the device... by OnlyJedi · · Score: 2

      e-readers don't normally consume WiFi either. Most have built-in 3G, and even the ones that don't only use WiFi when purchasing new books and the occasional web browsing. And here's a tip: most people don't buy e-readers for web browsing.

    4. Re:Look past the device... by Zakabog · · Score: 1

      Starbucks are generally much larger than an indie coffee shop, plus not offering free wifi would hurt their business a lot more than it would help.

    5. Re:Look past the device... by drooling-dog · · Score: 1

      It's not that much of a problem until customers are being turned away because there's nowhere to sit. Maybe you can use the "simple math" to figure out how to cover expenses (with a little left over) when your tables are returning $2-3 per hour at peak times. Note too that they tend to be located in high-traffic locations where rents are high.

      It's a bit like airline pricing. The airline may be better off selling you a cheap ticket for a seat that would otherwise be empty, but you're not going to get that fare on flights they expect to fill up. Of course, it would be awkward for a cafe to operate that way.

    6. Re:Look past the device... by OnlyJedi · · Score: 1

      Perhaps that reason is that Starbucks has economies of scale in place that small independent coffee shops don't. I'm sure Starbucks got a great deal from AT&T to provide the WiFi service, and is paying far less per month per store than any cafe would from their local ISP.

    7. Re:Look past the device... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If people don't read books for hours, then why ban Kindles and Nooks? Those are books they are reading on there after all....

      I'm not buying the argument that this is about chairs and wifi. If that's the case, then they would be banning more stuff like textbooks or notebooks, or instituting a maximum time you can sit at a table after a purchase.

    8. Re:Look past the device... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in Santa Cruz there are some coffee shops that have taken a hard look at the numbers and decided to not offer WiFi. I don't know what they are doing with ebook readers, but maybe it's too soon to tell. Lulu Carpenter's

    9. Re:Look past the device... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're on a nook or a kindle, you're probably not sucking up the bandwidth either. Besides the fact that they come with free 3G, 99% of what you do on an ereader is READ BOOKS. In fact, some low-end ereaders don't even have wifi. You connect them to your laptop to download books.

      While they're at it, why don't they ban smartphones, since they can access wifi and easily do anything an iPad or ereader can do. Wait, that would upset a much larger percentage of their customers. WAY TO BULLY THE MINORITY!

    10. Re:Look past the device... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      There is a simple solution; don't be afraid to be an asshole. This will endear you to a whole suite of regular customers you'd like to have. I have been hanging out at Caffe Pergolesi in Santa Cruz since I was a teenager, and now I visit and hang out for a while every time I am in town. I am all but guaranteed to meet up with someone I know and who would like to talk to me there. When they're short on space someone walks around and kicks out anyone who doesn't look like they're producing revenue. Problem solved!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:Look past the device... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      And, that explains why ebooks are barred as well? I can see that as an argument against laptops, but ebooks? They're books in a more convenient format. I can cruise the web on mine, but it's a frustrating enough proposition that I don't do it ever.

    12. Re:Look past the device... by Howitzer86 · · Score: 2

      I imagine a coffee shop with timers on each chair. Put in a quarter to sit in a chair for 10 minutes. Two quarters for 15 minutes. Three for 22.5. Four for 33.75, etc. The more quarters you put in, the less you get out of it.

      At the end of the time, the chair emits a soft ding and raises a flag. Put in more quarters for more time. Want to stay 30 minutes? No problem. Want to stay an hour? Reconsider your options.

    13. Re:Look past the device... by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      Sure, if a shop wants to ban books and newspapers, and thinks that the increased turnover will make up for the customers who choose to patronize a more reading-friendly venue, that is perfectly reasonable. But banning some kinds of reading media and not others comes across as sheer technophobia (perhaps the proprietor's dad works for a printer).

    14. Re:Look past the device... by jroysdon · · Score: 1

      Low-tech solution would be to write the time on their coffee cup when they make their purchase. That's an easy way to ask them to leave after 30 minutes, or get them to make another purchase.

    15. Re:Look past the device... by theNAM666 · · Score: 1

      >most people don't read a book for hours.

      Of course not. Idiot.

    16. Re:Look past the device... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Chairs? I was thinking ejector seats.

      I'd go there just to watch.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    17. Re:Look past the device... by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1
      I think you may have missed the point of coffee shops, at least those that existed before WiFi.

      No one wants to go sit in a coffee shop and when you get there, there are no seats because people have 'set up shop' and are there for the long haul.

      I'm with you so far -- if I want to go to a coffee shop and sit down, I'd actually like to be able to sit in a seat.

      They want you to enjoy your coffee, and LEAVE

      Who are "they"? Coffee shops have historically been about being social or sitting and watching the world go by. In days gone by, even before the dreaded wireless, people didn't go to coffee shops to chug their coffee and leave. They went to hang out -- have a conversation with friends (or even strangers), read a newspaper or a book, or simply look out the window at the weather or the people in the street... and often (back in the day or still in many parts of Europe) smoke a cigarette or three with your coffee.

      The next thing you're going to be saying is we should kick people out of the neighborhood bar after 30 minutes if they don't buy another drink.

      Some coffee shops are busy and often full. But a traditional coffee shop is supposed to be different from a Dunkin Donuts or a fast-food restaurant. You're supposed to linger.

      On the other hand, I do agree with you to some extent -- it's one thing to spend an hour or two sipping down a couple lattes while reading a book or chatting with a friend. It's a different thing to nurse your small coffee for four or five hours while working and typing furiously on your laptop. And to that extent, WiFi probably isn't the best thing for a coffee shop, in my opinion (though I have no problem if someone wants to go to such a coffee shop).

      But please don't pretend that coffee shops were ever places where people went to efficiently consume beverages. Loitering a bit is part of culture.

    18. Re:Look past the device... by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      Put in more quarters for more time. Want to stay 30 minutes? No problem. Want to stay an hour? Reconsider your options.

      While I too get annoyed at those who would spend four hours typing away at a laptop after buying a small coffee, your suggestion seems rather extreme to me.

      I never go to a coffee shop to stay less than 30 minutes, except if I have a random block of time between two other scheduled events. I rarely go by myself for any length of time, and I would NEVER work on my laptop for more than a minute or two. Most of the time, I go with other people and plan to have a conversation lasting anywhere from about 45 minutes to 2 hours or so, over which time I may purchase two, sometimes three drinks.

      Most of the people I know use coffee shops in similar ways. They are for social gatherings or lingering for an hour or so while reading or watching the world go by. They aren't simply a seating area for efficiently consuming beverages in the minimum amount of time.

    19. Re:Look past the device... by hey! · · Score: 1

      What do you think that reason is?

      They've discovered that EMR in the 2.4 GHz band triggers the brain to crave stimulants?

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    20. Re:Look past the device... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Pergolesi still uses glass glasses so that's a no-go. They could give you a receipt with the time but then you have to save receipts and that WOULD alienate regulars who don't want to have to think about a stupid scrap of paper. I reject any concept that comes with more waste built-in.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    21. Re:Look past the device... by cool_arrow · · Score: 1

      I'd much rather sit in my car to drink the coffee and use the wifi. But some coffee places have the wifi set a low power level to prevent that I think. I'm allergic to people who hang out in coffee shops.

  16. Tempest in a teapot by starfishsystems · · Score: 0

    An editorial complains about some coffee shops in New York which have taken to restricting the use of devices which the management feels might bother patrons. The editorial suggests that it would be better to return to 16th century conventions wherein coffee houses became forums for loudly expressing disaffection and dissent.

    In other news, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak has resigned and handed over power to the military, ousted by a historic 18-day wave of pro-democracy demonstrations by hundreds of thousands of Egyptians who demanded his removal.

    --
    Parity: What to do when the weekend comes.
    1. Re:Tempest in a teapot by Hatta · · Score: 2

      Maybe this would be better characterized as a "monsoon in a mug"?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:Tempest in a teapot by russotto · · Score: 1

      In other news, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak has resigned and handed over power to the military, ousted by a historic 18-day wave of pro-democracy demonstrations by hundreds of thousands of Egyptians who demanded his removal.

      Were the demonstrations planned in coffeeshops?

    3. Re:Tempest in a teapot by grcumb · · Score: 1

      In other news, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak has resigned and handed over power to the military, ousted by a historic 18-day wave of pro-democracy demonstrations by hundreds of thousands of Egyptians who demanded his removal.

      Were the demonstrations planned in coffeeshops?

      No, but tellingly, they were organised largely using hand-held electronic devices.

      So, in my best Soup Nazi voice, allow to to say, "NO REVOLUTION FOR YOU, NEW YORK!"

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
  17. There really is a problem... by grahamlord86 · · Score: 1

    I've done the whole Sit In Costa Writing My Book On My MacBook thing, not out of pretense, but just because I write well in that environment.

    And then one sunday, I walked into the same costa, and every- EVERY single table had at least 3 laptops on it, with school kids on MyFace and trailing charger leads to wall sockets.

    I turned around and walked out, not wanted to be part of that horrific sight.

    I think it's okay to have one or two laptops in a coffee shop, but it really can get excessive, and then it makes the shop a place to avoid.

    Personally though, so long as they're not making noises, I don't see the harm in portable devices (iPad, Kindle, etc...) -they're not nearly so invasive as laptops are.

    1. Re:There really is a problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      hypocrite: When I do it it is okay but when other do it, it is unnaceptable

    2. Re:There really is a problem... by tsalmark · · Score: 1

      Where oh where are my mod points?

    3. Re:There really is a problem... by Skreems · · Score: 1

      It sounded more like "when a couple people do it (sometimes me, sometimes not) it's okay, when everyone does it at once it's unacceptable" to me.

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
  18. could they name one cafe? by boguslinks · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Would it have been too much trouble for the author of the Times piece to actually name a place that is prohibiting Kindles? She managed to get in her Charbucks plug without naming any of the villains.

    1. Re:could they name one cafe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She managed to get in her Charbucks plug without naming any of the villains.

      It's called guerilla marketing. Starbucks does quite a lot of it, so do other corporations. It's pretty common to pay bloggers and the likes to write a piece that looks like it's their independant opinion. It's basically an ad, not a journalistic article. Web2.0-marketing is about deception.

    2. Re:could they name one cafe? by Sensiblemonkey · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly. Reading TFA had me vaguely wondering if Virginia Heffernan wasn't a professional shill and exactly how much it might've cost Starbucks to pay for the article.

      At least that was the case until I hit her "Points of Entry: This Week’s Recommendations" article conclusion. The last one of which reads:

      VENTI EVERYTHING Starbucks’s Web site and apps are studded with free content, like a video interview with Colin Meloy of the Decemberists at starbucks.com/coffeehouse.

      Yet another journalist to put on ignore.

    3. Re:could they name one cafe? by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Web2.0-marketing is about deception.

      That almost sounds like it were something new / limited to "Web2.0-marketing"...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  19. Tabloid Fiction? by Manip · · Score: 2

    This story sounds so tabloid I'm a little embarrassed that it is appearing on /. I'd read the story, except I can't. So I have to assume she cited no actual examples and basically could just as easily be making the entire thing up. You read these stories ALL THE TIME, it is like the cancer story every other week or the "shock action by authority figure" story you see every day.

    I bet you'd struggle to find more than half a dozen such places in all of New York STATE. Which, frankly, makes for an entirely non-event. I'm sure you can find just as many private clubs that don't let a certain gender or sexual orientation in at all...

    1. Re:Tabloid Fiction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This story sounds so tabloid I'm a little embarrassed that it is appearing on /.

      Yeah, you'd hope the /. editors, the true Walter Cronkites of new media, would stick to stories that can only be printed on larger paper sizes. More words make it more truthful!

    2. Re:Tabloid Fiction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In case you haven't noticed, slashdot is a tech-themed tabloid.

  20. Why is this bad? by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

    It used to be that people would hang out in diners and Perkins to read the paper, drink coffee, etc... Then kids started coming in with their fancy laptops and their wifi. What they hell do they think they're doing with their new fangled computer thingys!! So the coffee shops saw a niche, took advantage of it and dinners lost a lot of patrons... Now those kids have gotten older, and they themselves don't want kids coming in and annoying them... what are they doing bringing in those new fangeled tablets? Where's the keyboard?!? It's just not right! Get those kids outa here! These sorts of coffee shops will be on the way out the door as soon as the new "Hang out and show off my techno gadget" shop opens.

  21. I hope they do walk down the street by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    Coffee shops used to be about going to meet people, sitting down with a good cup of coffee or tea. Now, if my local Starbucks is any example, its a computer room. You can't get a table in my local Starbucks a few hours after they open because they are all hogged by laptop wielding customers. It really ruins the idea behind what these places used to (granted Starbucks ain't all that great for many people). Instead of hearing people talking, that background sound which shows life of the establishment, all you here is the click clack of keyboards.

    Its not what these places were supposed to be about and those that forget it are quickly forgotten. Let someone else have the boring tech crowd - it is silly how they just congregate to not talk.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:I hope they do walk down the street by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You can't get a table in my local Starbucks a few hours after they open because they are all hogged by laptop wielding customers. It really ruins the idea behind what these places used to

      The idea behind Starbucks is to make profit by selling mediocre $0.50 coffee for $3.00
      Nothing has been ruined

    2. Re:I hope they do walk down the street by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Coffee shops used to be about going to meet people, sitting down with a good cup of coffee or tea.

      And some people just went to grab some coffee and study or read a book. Maybe they found all your yakkety-yakk distracting.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    3. Re:I hope they do walk down the street by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Study at home or in a library, not a cafe or pub.

  22. Wiener Kaffeehaus by zanian · · Score: 1

    I sort of understand the ambience argument regarding laptops. I live in Montreal and we have a lot of these want-to-be New York style cafes. Some of them are nice and I would understand a ban on such things. However, the kindle/e-book thing is simply an economic manoeuvre as many have said above.

    I'm going to be living in Vienna for a year and I was reading up on their coffeehouse culture. I was surprised to find out that, while the drinks are way over priced, it is expected that you only buy one and stay as long as you want. The waiter even comes around periodically and fills/refills a glass of water for you. Even if the place is full, you are never made to feel like you have to leave. The mentality behind this is that you are a guest, and therefore, deserve to be treated as such. It could be true that this is also only a economic manoeuvre (if people are respected they will come back, word of mouth, etc.). However, it seems to just be an old tradition that hasn't changed.

    1. Re:Wiener Kaffeehaus by adnonsense · · Score: 1

      You may also find they don't offer free wifi.

      On the other hand, last time I was in Vienna (2006 IIRC) my hosts were quite proud of the fact that the city had staved off a Starbucks invasion, and the place was quite (but not entirely) free of that and clone establishments. Mind you, similar goes for Berlin, where I was living at the time - the major attraction of Starbucks there was that it was one of the few places to offer a totally smoke-free environment. No wifi though.

  23. Bah... i understand them.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was a time you went into a cafe and talked to the person next to you... today there is starsucks and immitations, where you pay 3 times the price, have your coffee in a stupid plastic can instead of a real cup. There is no service.. no you have to stand in the line to get your coffee.. and well everyone who is in there has his earphones on his head and talks on facebook with the guy who is 300 miles away from you.. instead with the guy who is just around. I'm with the artilce. I'm from Vienna, we enjoy centuries of coffee culture.. and I'm against those people with there electronic devices... cutting them selfs of with those plugs in there ears... beleaving being at starsucks is cool....

  24. Here's One That Apparently Unplugged by theodp · · Score: 1

    Iris Cafe (Facebook): First, the good news! Fall has brought everyone back to the neighborhood and the cafe is bustling with customers old and new! Sadly, this means we are no longer able to offer wifi/computer use at tables. We understand that means some of you will have to go elsewhere, but we hope you'll come by for a coffee or a meal when possible!

    1. Re:Here's One That Apparently Unplugged by cob666 · · Score: 1

      Not offering wifi/computer use at tables is a FAR CRY from not allowing patrons to use eReaders. If its of for me to read a real book then its ok for me to use my eReader.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law - Aleister Crowley
  25. Solution: Turn off WiFi when cafe is full by UNIX*DR · · Score: 1

    My favorite haunt turns off their WiFi feed when the place is packed. This seems like a reasonable compromise. They post this policy for all to see.

    1. Re:Solution: Turn off WiFi when cafe is full by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds good to me! Quickly download/spider all you need when the place starts filling up, then work mostly offline and wait for the less-savvy to pack up and go. Or tether your smart phone for a while when you really need on-line access and the WiFi is down (like posting comments).

    2. Re:Solution: Turn off WiFi when cafe is full by EnglishDude · · Score: 1

      Problem is that e-books don't use wi-fi - only when downloading books, which is a very small proportion of the use of e-books.

  26. E-books Should Be Exempt by UNIX*DR · · Score: 1

    Of course any cafe has the right to put up whatever gizmo restrictions they want, and to hope they still get enough business. What surprises me is that this establishment chose to ban books. People have been reading books in such places for generations.

    Oh. Just e-books.

    Yes. Well, clearly, that makes sense.

  27. So what? by techoi · · Score: 3, Funny

    Their business, their rules. And hardly anything new. Victoria's Secret loves it if I bring in my wife...not so much if I bring my video camera...

    1. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When phones first starting having built in cameras, you think Victoria Secret only banned phones with cameras and not other phones? It's all the same, in this case the E-reader is the paper book's camera phone.

  28. Starbucks, really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who would go to Starbucks for the coffee? That wouldn't make any sense.

    It's all about having an easy to find meeting place, the free wifi, and getting a sugary sweet cream based drink in a to-go cup. Was Starbucks ever about the coffee?

  29. Indie coffee shops.. by Octopuscabbage · · Score: 1

    The only people i know that own e-readers are the kids that go to those indie coffee shops (and a few nerds). That is like banning scarves. Or pants that are to tight. Your pants must be this loose to enter...

  30. Maybe people reading history should be allowed ... by perpenso · · Score: 2

    Our forebears, men like John Quincy Adams, worked tirelessly until slavery was extinguished. - Michelle Bachmann

    Maybe people reading history textbooks should get a pass and be allowed to read. There seems to be some need. I get the attempt at humor and any and all politicians are fair game. But perhaps Bachmann did something few expected and actually made an accurate historical reference.

    FYI. I am pro historical literacy not pro Bachmann.

    "Adams was elected a U.S. Representative from Massachusetts after leaving office, the only president ever to do so, serving for the last 17 years of his life with far greater success than he had achieved in the presidency. Animated by his growing revulsion against slavery, Adams became a leading opponent of the Slave Power and argued that if a civil war ever broke out the president could abolish slavery by using his war powers, a correct prediction of Abraham Lincoln's use of the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863. Adams predicted the dissolution of the Union on the slavery issue, though he mistakenly predicted that if the South became independent there would be a series of bloody slave insurrections.["
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Quincy_Adams

  31. The Kindle argument is ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can see how an Ipod could irritate other patrons or how people blabbering into cell phones can annoy those around you, using public transport on buses in London for example can really be annoying when people have their ipos on full blast for everyone in the bus to hear (I've actually seen people playing music off the cell phones without any headphones and everybody was rather irritated righly so)

    However what harm does a kindle do to other patrons ? Its no different from a physical book. If the coffee shop owners dont like
    kindles they may as well ban traditional books too, I dont see any difference. Often thats WHY i go to a coffee shop - To rea

    1. Re:The Kindle argument is ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've actually seen people playing music off the cell phones without any headphones

      By people, you mean niggers?

  32. Re:Radio Snack by Announcer · · Score: 1

    I love this idea! If I was a millionaire, I'd be looking for a good storefront in a nice area right now, have my lawyer doing the paperwork, sign shop making the signs... what a great idea! :)

    Sadly, I don't think there are enough tinkerers around anymore to make such a store profitable. We are relatively few and far between, much too scattered to make such a place viable... people would have to travel too far to get there.

    What I envision would be more like a combo of Panera Bread, Starbucks and Radio Shack like it USED TO BE in the 1970's (but with today's tech!) and instead of regular tables and chairs, feature workbenches with a small pull-out extension for the coffee & food. :) (We don't want the coffee spilling onto the workbench!) You'd have a food counter, and a parts counter. Basic stuff, like resistors, would be free. Other parts like 2N3904's, small caps, PICs, etc. would be only pennies above the bulk cost of DigiKey or Mouser.

    Now, to add to the appeal of the place, a rapid-fabrication PC board shop in the back, with reasonable prices. Upload your CAD specs, and then pay with a credit card... your PC board will be ready by the time you order that 2'nd cup of Joe. :)

    --
    Willie...
  33. I wish more coffee shops would do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have gone out for coffee several times with co-workers and friends and have wanted to grab a cup of coffee and socialize. You go into the coffee shop and you notice immediately laptops everywhere and people with piles of paperwork taking up entire tables with cords running to electrical outlets. In addition to the mess and the space they are taking up these people have LOUD rude phone conversations so that everyone in the entire store can hear them. These people are completely oblivious that they have turned a place where people come to unwind and relax into a stressful office type situation. I have had to leave many coffee shops empty handed or go find somewhere else to sit with my friends on countless occasions.

    These people are not making the establishment money and are just taking up space and driving away customers. Throw their asses out on the street. When wifi connected laptops were first on the market free wifi made sense because they were cool and there was a fun factor to it. Now that every corporate jerk in the world has a wifi card on their laptop and decides to setup an office in a coffee shop its really time to cut these services to protect other patrons. It has gone from a cute curiosity to an addiction for many people who are simply obsessed with being connected all the time. Force these idiots to pull the plug.

    Personally I would do MORE business with a coffee shop that banned kindles, laptops and ipads. If I saw a sign like that I would open my wallet in support of them taking a stand for sanity.

  34. Only if they are stupid by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

    You might notice that Starbucks, which is a wildly successful corporation, offers free WiFi and welcomes people to sit and play on the computer. Why is that? Well because the drinks and snacks are tempting to people. If they buy a drink and have nothing to do, they'll leave when their drink is done. Fine, and that result works for Starbucks, but it would be better if the bought MORE drinks. If they stay, there's a good chance they will do so.

    Will they all do it? No, but then that is true of anyone who comes in. Some people will sit and talk, or read, or whatever and only purchase a single item. They are in the minority though. People like snacks and treats and when there's a ready supply, they'll usually partake.

    It also isn't a problem really. The only time people using WiFi (or doing other things) and not leaving is a problem is if the dining area is completely full and there are customers that want drinks/food but only if they can enjoy it in the store. Otherwise, it is no problem. People in the store don't stop to-go orders (which are major business) and they also don't cause a problem when the place is less than capacity.

    I guarantee you Starbucks can do the math and they've determined free WiFi makes them more money.

    I know more than a few people who like to work in coffee shops when they get the opportunity. WiFi is a requirement since it is computer work. They don't go and refuse to buy anything, if they were just after WiFi they'd stay home. They buy coffee, soda, snacks, and so on. The whole reason they go to the coffee shop (other than just a change of scenery) is that they can get drinks and snacks.

  35. barking up the wrong tree by t2t10 · · Score: 1

    What are you blabbing on about? They didn't ban "reading at rush hour", they banned Kindles.

    1. Re:barking up the wrong tree by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      He's a fucking Libertarian, and he needs no excuse to get all Ayn Rand on your ass. Careful now, or he'll invoke St. Ron Paul.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  36. They may be empty, but they have their ambience by grapeape · · Score: 1

    Oh please, having a digital device like an ebook reader or ipad is no different than brining a newspaper, magazine or paperback book which has been done far longer than I have even been alive. It is by all means the owners right to ban whatever they want as long as they are willing to accept the consequences of their actions and not whine about it. I have a feeling this has far less to do with "ambience" than it does with not wanting to pay bandwidth bills and not wanting seats occupied for longer periods of time. Im just curious if pushing your business to "order and get out" will actually increase sales...I would bet not.

    1. Re:They may be empty, but they have their ambience by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      And iPad is closer to a laptop than a Kindle, so if they banned laptops, I could see it extending to the iPad. But the Kindle? You can't burn an hour watching youtube on it, or check your email. Browsing even the most basic html sites is painful too. It really is a digital book.

  37. They are not just a coffee shop. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your entire argument assumes that the largest coffee chain in the US can't do simple math. *$ offers free, unlimited wifi for a reason. What do you think that reason is?

    Good question. But then, what's the reason they can blanket an entire city with dozens of shops, whereas a typical indie shop probably struggles with the overhead on one shop?

    Maybe its massive economies of scale?
    Maybe it is having a marketing budget that allows them to convince people to pay increasingly more for a lesser product?
    Maybe selling their branded product in every major grocery chain brings n revenue that indies can't get?
    Maybe it is the numerous deals they can cut with restaurants, hotels, airports etc.

    If you really think that there is some simple math that shows that someone nursing $5 worth of coffee for several hours is a money maker, why not just tell us about it?

    I'm more inclined to believe that wi-fi is a loss leader that is manageable as part a broader business strategy that does not apply to a local shop.

  38. whaaa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kindle ban? Does the general public even know what the sign is talking about when they see "No Kindles"? I feel like a weirdo reading mine in line, never saw anyone else with one except on TV.

  39. So computers aren't computers now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Full-dress computers are one thing"

    iPad, Kindle and Nook are all computers. Even my wristwatch is a computer. I don't know what "full-dress" computers are but I am pretty sure the author doesn't know the meaning of the word "computer".

    1. Re:So computers aren't computers now? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It's an odd expression, but it's pretty clear to me that it means something that a layman would recognize as a computer - a laptop (or a desktop?!?!).

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  40. kindle disguised as book? by VeryLargeNumber · · Score: 2

    How about a kindle sleeve disguising it as a (non e) book?:)

    1. Re:kindle disguised as book? by coolmadsi · · Score: 1

      Or get a large newspaper, open it up and put it inside there. I think I saw Bart Simpson doing that with a comic and an excercise book on the Simpsons once.

  41. Sounds like a perfect opportuninty for a tech fix by jroysdon · · Score: 1

    Here's a thought:
    What if the coffee shop had on the receipt a one-time code that a user could use to surf with. So long as there were at least X free seats, let folks site around and surf. If a crowd shows up, push the Expired button for anything older than 15 minutes. Additionally, just prior to popular rush times, expire those codes. For all expired codes, replace their next click with a "Thank you for visiting, please come again! We need to make room for more customers." The codes that would be supplied during the rush times could be limited to 15 minutes.

    Naturally this won't work with electronic book readers that store the book locally and don't need live Internet, and for those customers you could just politely ask them to leave after a reasonable amount of time. It's really no different than places with a no-cell phone policy. The sign only does so much, sometimes you have to ask the customer to hang up their phone or please leave.

    Guess what, this might even bring in more sales, as someone would be required to make a purchase every 15 minutes during busy times to get more Internet access - or they might just leave and open up room for more customers - but either way it would be customers who had paid in the past 15 minutes who you'd give Internet access to.

  42. The best place for wifi in DC by Presto+Vivace · · Score: 2

    is the Luce Center, where, in addition to free wifi, they have a special table set up for laptops. From Wednesday - Sunday they have FREE coffee and tea from 12 - 4 PM. Slightly off topic, but good to know if you are in DC.

  43. I don't know by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    When it's an unorganized community of innovative and prescient people either compelled by their own ideas or motivated out of necessity from predicament, not some calculated aloof me-toos who are presumptuously deriving contrivances from something they actually recognize (which may be their only truly valuable contribution) as brilliance. Sometimes people who can briefly awe you with hollow hyperbole can actually draw your attention to the truly worthwhile. Don't confuse that with marketing however, which strives to provoke desire combined with (manufactured or otherwise) mania into extreme stupidity.

  44. Starbucks sucks more in Hong Kong and China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > By contrast, Starbucks offers free, one-click, unlimited wireless service to their patrons

    Not in Hong Kong, they offer just 20 minutes free, and then you have to pay or change your MAC address.

    And in mainland China, Starbucks requires you to use your mobile phone to receive a SMS with a temporary password, effectively being accomplice of the surveillance apparatus (which associates your mobile phone with your IM identities and your online activities).

  45. public office space by webserf256 · · Score: 1

    Maybe someone should open a "public office space" that has nice chairs and desks and serves lattes.

  46. [[WP:WEASEL]] {{citeneeded}} by Animats · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Many indie New York City cafes now heavily restrict, or ban outright, the use of Kindles, Nooks and iPads."

    That sentence should have been followed by the names of some cafes, and an interview with an owner. But no. So it's just blithering.

    The Times is slipping.

    1. Re:[[WP:WEASEL]] {{citeneeded}} by farnsworth · · Score: 1

      The Times is slipping.

      Note that this is an article from The New York Times Magazine, not the daily paper. They do confuse the brands on their site, but they are separate things. One is a journalistic daily broadsheet (that, true, has its own problems) the other is, well, a magazine. The magazine is about art and culture and general goings ons. It is not journalism, it is just people writing about stuff that they notice or feel is worthy of writing about.

      --

      There aint no pancake so thin it doesn't have two sides.

    2. Re:[[WP:WEASEL]] {{citeneeded}} by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      I note you don't say anything about your own credibility. Let's see some accomplishments before we go questioning serious, accredited journalists, eh? Times articles are thoroughly fact-checked before going into print. Freaking right-wing nutbags.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:[[WP:WEASEL]] {{citeneeded}} by MrCrassic · · Score: 1

      Of course he won't mention names: his argument is false. I've been to *many* small, "indie" coffee shops around the city and only *one* discouraged the use of laptops because of their size (I used my laptop there anyway and nobody seemed to care). I worked on a significant part of my senior design project at a far-removed coffee bar in Brooklyn that shared space with a music studio, and they offered free wi-fi and tons of outlets!

      This is a good personal piece...too bad it's wrong.

  47. breaking the silence by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

    peace. . .

    Ka-click!

    Ka-click!

    Why is the Kindle's button so loud? Isn't it for "readers?"

  48. Starbucks Doesn't Know Jack by QuincyDurant · · Score: 3, Funny

    These fools have somehow stumbled their way into ~$11 billion in annual revenue by letting people hang out and use computers. But, any day now, one of those Indies that knows more about running coffeehouses is going to blow them away. Caribou Coffee, with 451 stores, offers much better coffee than that unpopular junk sold in Starbucks' 11,000 locations.

    It's really hard to know why anyone would think of emulating a business model as clearly as unsuccessful as Starbucks:

    http://www.wikinvest.com/stock/Starbucks_(SBUX)

    So take your Kindle and shove it where the sun don't shine, partner. We don't need your kind around here.

  49. RTFA - it's bullshit by RevWaldo · · Score: 2

    It makes no mention of which coffee shops are making such bans, and offers no other citations on the "issue". It's mostly a wiki-dump of the history of coffee shops going back to the 16th century. This is about the only article I could find noting this "trend" - from August 2010, a lifetime ago tech-wise. The main issue being that some shops banned "computers", either outright or during certain hours, with no differentiation between laptops, tablets, or e-readers (or smartphones for that matter).

    It's a non-issue, a bump in the road. These shops, what few there are, will eventually adjust their policies. Nothing to see here, move along.

    .

  50. Easy solution... by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

    Do like any other business that serves food & drink -- hound the loitering ones for "would you like another [xyz]?" every ten minutes. After a couple failed passes, politely inform them that paying customers would like to use the space. On the next pass, if they are still lingering, give them the choice: buy something now, or leave immediately. Not everyone taking up space for hours is a loss. Some are actually buying just as much as the short-termers. Just filter them out so you eject the bad customers without alienating the good ones.

  51. Re:Radio Snack by srmalloy · · Score: 2

    Sadly, I don't think there are enough tinkerers around anymore to make such a store profitable. We are relatively few and far between, much too scattered to make such a place viable... people would have to travel too far to get there.

    Integrated circuits were the death of the electronics tinkerer, and smart projects using Arduinos and other low-powered processors haven't brought them back in anywhere the same numbers, likely because of the perceived learning cliff of becoming a 'computer programmer'.

  52. 11K = unpopular? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe I'm not as good at the maths as you are, but I have a hunch any business that has 11,000 locations might be a tiny bit more popular than one that has 451 places.

    If my math is off. please let me know.

    1. Re:11K = unpopular? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess the sarcasm went over your head?

    2. Re:11K = unpopular? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      How's the weather over there in Germany?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  53. just so you know.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Café ends with an acute accent on the terminal 'e' (traced from top right to down left like a slash "/" ), not with a grave accent like the one you typed (going from top left to down right; like an anti-slash "\" ). If you want to be pedantic about foreign words received spelling, please do it right.

  54. Embrace WIFI by Enonu · · Score: 2

    I've YET to come across a coffee shop that embraces having WIFI at their establishment. It's like they just add it like decoration, and then whine and complain when there's a side-effect on how customers interact with the business. Here's some ideas:

    • Let's me order a drink or snack from my device w/o having to stand at the counter for 10 minutes listening to the espresso grinder and steamer.
    • Had some type of minimums for time spent. I'm totally fine with $5/hr if I'm taking up table space.
    • For that $5/hr, there should be a retractable Ethernet cord and power plug on the table itself. Awesome, nobody is going to trip over my power brick.
    • Hell, how about the ability to change the music like juke-boxes in 50s style-cafes?
    • Add that quarter to change the song to my tab, and let me checkout using paypal or whatever.

    That's just off the top of my head. Come on "indie" coffee shop owners, this is easy. Have your establishment embrace WIFI and the customers who want to use it! Please!

    1. Re:Embrace WIFI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've YET to come across a coffee shop that embraces having WIFI at their establishment.

      Where I live, every decent sized restaurant/coffee shop has wifi. For those rare times that wifi isn't available, I can turn my phones wifi hotspot on. Maybe you live in a different culture than those with wifi?

    2. Re:Embrace WIFI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard of places with coffee, and desks, and ethernet hookups. They're called offices. Go sit in one.

  55. He doesn't understand their business model by Eskarel · · Score: 1

    These are not "coffee" shops, they're "indie" coffee shops. Like "indie" everything they're not about the product they sell they're about the product they don't sell. If they tell people they can't do things there, their preferred customer base will want to come more.

    That's not to say that starbucks coffee isn't crap, but most coffee in the US is crap, and I've been to more than a few of those sorts of places. They're selling ambiance and exclusivity with a side of coffee.

    1. Re:He doesn't understand their business model by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      Which in my humble opinion is a terrible idea.

      I mean, think about it: the only time you need WiFi access on your Kindle is to download new books, the daily paper or a new issue of a magazine. Most of the time with a Kindle you're not connected to the Internet, and unlike a laptop, you rarely need to use a keyboard, too. And unlike the iPad, since it uses e-ink display there's no distracting backlit displays to deal with, either.

      Look, as ESPN Radio's Colin Cowherd is wont to say, "live through the windshield, not through the rear-view mirror." If you cater to an increasingly smaller audience you're going to end up losing money--NOT a good idea!

    2. Re:He doesn't understand their business model by Eskarel · · Score: 1

      Think is though it's not an increasingly smaller audience. Yes more and more people have kindles and iPads and whatnot, but the number of people who want to feel superior to others or who want to experience a college lifestyle they never had(and which for the most part doesn't exist) is, if anything, increasing.

      Tell me truthfully that you've never watched one of those cheesy college movies where everyone is running around getting drunk and laid every few minutes and not had a small moment wishing your college experience had been like that even though you know that no one's college experience is like that. That's what they're selling, the coffee only has to be drinkable.

  56. So spill something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the dickwad complains about you trying to sit down, tell him that if he answers his cell phone you'll punch him in the face.

    Do it quietly so that if he complains, you can look bewildered and ask the police to take the crazy man into custody.

    I recommend against actually hitting him in the face, unless he then takes a swing at you, and which time if you are properly trained, you can break his elbow and then steal his cell phone, throwing it in the garbage as you leave the premises.

    Dickwads get no respect, only a beating if they continue to be obnoxious.

  57. Making money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shops exist for one purpose... to sell stuff and make money. Managers consider supplying guests with tables, bathrooms etc a cost of doing business. The goal for most managers is to get people in and out quickly. I could see how managers would consider sitting and reading a direct conflict with their goals. They certainly have the right to do this if enforced in a fair and consistent manner.

  58. Re:Radio Snack by Announcer · · Score: 1

    There is definitely a learning curve (cliff) to these newfangled toys. I learned machine language on the 6502 and the Z80 family of processors, and haven't messed with it since. Heck, I even did hand-assembly of some simple routines with pencil and graph paper in the early/mid 1980's!

    I recently acquired two different PIC dev kits, and have barely done more than break the shrink wrap and start reading the manuals that come with them. It's a different world, for sure!

    There is a Hackerspace here in CT, but it's a good 30 miles away. Sigh. Still, I am considering that I should plan to make a trip up there sometime, specifically when they are doing a presentation on programming/developing for PICs, so that I can learn something from someone who has been there/done that. I'm sure that there are vids on Youtube I could watch, but I would much rather have someone there that I can ask questions, AND have my hands on the gear.

    Wow... I just noticed that this text editor is about as slow as Commodore 64 BASIC! Yeesh! :P

    --
    Willie...
  59. I wholeheartedly support this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go work at a fucking desk. Honestly. Actually, first go fuck yourself, then go work at a fucking desk.

    I despise the Apple-wielding coffee-infused hordes of pricks on corners around Seattle.

  60. can somebody explain, please. by MadMaverick9 · · Score: 1

    Wtf is an "indie" coffee shop?
    I doubt it has something to do with Indiana Jones, which is what I thought initially.
    Why can't coffee shops just be coffee shops like they used to be? A place to get some coffee and meet your friends or just chill - period.
    For crying out loud.

  61. Hang out and show off my techno gadget shop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have a great one in my town. We call it the public library. Come in for as long as you want. Free wifi, comfy chairs, and good coffee.

  62. Computers in the Cafe. by xmundt · · Score: 1

    Greetings and Salutations.
              I have a nearby Panera's where I will go, with my laptop, and, hang out at a table. The fact of the matter is that I will end up buying more of their pastries, etc, than I would have if I had just walked in and had a lunch or a snack, because I am there for a longer period. Granted, Knoxville is much smaller than cities like LA/Frisco/NY, so, perhaps it is a worse problem there. However, I have observed that folks who use their computers are, generally, fairly polite about it. For example, I have seen several examples where folks that have been working at a table have packed up their computer and paperwork and such and headed out when the lunchtime crowd starts to show up.
              As for the Wireless access, Panera's deals with that problem by limiting access to the Net to half an hour per computer between the hours of 11:00 and 14:00.
              so, as long as folks are polite, I do not see this as a problem.

    --
    YAB - http://blog.beemandave.com/
  63. Starbucks charges for WiFi in the Philippines by salm · · Score: 1

    Here in the Philippines, Starbucks either doesn't have WiFi or charges significantly for WiFi on top of the cost of the coffee. Mind you, the Starbucks here are run under a monopolistic license held by Rustan's. Personally, I go over the road to Seattle's Best Coffee, also owned by Starbucks that does offer free WiFi, or at least one hour's WiFi included in the cost of your coffee.
    In summary, the comment in the article regarding Starbucks only necessarily refers to the US, though it may be true in other regions.
    Despite emailing Starbucks Philippines, they have not deigned to explain why they choose to lose my coffee purchases rather than offer me WiFi, though the Starbucks here seem always busy regardless, so maybe they have no need to offer the incentive of free WiFi.
    I can believe the Philippines demands a different business model than the States.

    --
    no time, no sig
  64. it's called the power of choice.. by houbou · · Score: 1

    People have a problem with the word "NO".. if a business such as a cafe bistro/restaurant has a no IPOD/IPAD/Kindle, etc.. policy, then fine by me. I won't go..

    But I respect their policy.. I don't agree, so, I will go elsewhere.

    It's the power of choice. It's an important one and ironically, we forget that.

    While I'm not going, they don't get my money.

    Now, if they have more than enough patrons to follow their rules and go anyways, good for them.

    If not, well, they will lose business and market share to other "high-tech" friendlier cafes and life goes on.

  65. Fine, I shall feed the troll by captjc · · Score: 2

    Oh, please. You can't equate skin color (something you can't control) to choosing to take an electronic device with you.

    No one is forcing you to bring in electronic devices. You can leave it in the car or in your bag or at home. No one is forcing you to patronize their establishment either.

    --
    Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
  66. Re:Radio Snack by cool_arrow · · Score: 1

    I think you'd have a tough time with health code regulations in most cities as mfg pc boards is likely considered toxic stuff.

  67. Re:Radio Snack by Announcer · · Score: 1

    It would obviously have to be a separate facility, with just a common hallway to connect them. It could be done with a non-chemical process, such as a CNC machine, which mills away the copper. (Thus making recycling thereof much easier, since it would be virtually pure copper shavings.)

    Boards would be washed in a non-toxic solution and placed into a "ziploc" bag for the customer to open. Perhaps they would have to agree to some kind of "disclaimer" in order to have a board made on-site? Let the lawyers figure that out! ;)

    Why do they always have to spoil things, anyway?

    --
    Willie...
  68. Re:Sounds like a perfect opportuninty for a tech f by coolmadsi · · Score: 1

    Guess what, this might even bring in more sales, as someone would be required to make a purchase every 15 minutes during busy times to get more Internet access - or they might just leave and open up room for more customers - but either way it would be customers who had paid in the past 15 minutes who you'd give Internet access to.

    I would predict that a large portion of 'new' sales becuase of this would be a single item of the cheapest thing avaliable to buy. Still, better than nothing I guess.

  69. Really, this matters? by ShadoeKnight · · Score: 1

    So? New York City is one of the hardest places in the world to keep a business open. Just don't go there if you care about the bans. Trust me, either they'll lift the ban or their customers will keep coming and they'll keep it up. Find another cafe. Simple. There's probably another one a block down. If you can't find a cafe in New York that caters to your personality then you're lazy and not trying.

  70. It'll Never Catch On... by Sir+Realist · · Score: 1

    "By contrast, Starbucks offers free, one-click, unlimited wireless service to their patrons, making it in Heffernan's eyes 'a flawed franchise that is squarely in the public good."

    Yeah. Pity about the coffee though.