Slashdot Mirror


Watch Out Netflix, Amazon Streaming Video to Prime Users

ageoffri writes "Amazon has announced that they will include streaming with a subscription to Amazon Prime. The free 2 day shipping on a huge selection of products either sold directly by Amazon or fulfilled by Amazon is already worth the Prime cost. Now add in streaming that works out to just under $7/month and it gets better. Sure the selection isn't that great yet but this has the ability to really change the streaming market!"

40 of 218 comments (clear)

  1. We're Amazon! by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 2

    We're Amazon and we want to be everything to everybody!

    1. Re:We're Amazon! by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2

      I wish they would get the Prime 2-day shipping back in order. I used that service a *lot* until last October they switched to Ensenda as the carrier in my area. Suddenly the few 2-day Prime packages that got delivered at all were coming in 1-2 weeks. The story is the same with the other obscure carriers A1, On-Trac, Lasership, etc. After a while I gave up and canceled my Prime membership. Why pay extra for 2-day shipping that comes in 1 to 2 weeks or not at all?

      Amazon needs to restore their Prime shipping program to a usable level of service before they start with unrelated freebies like streaming video.

    2. Re:We're Amazon! by MoonBuggy · · Score: 2

      My only complaint would be the Kindle. Technically it's perfect but I wish they'd treat books like MP3s and give us DRM free PDFs like O'Reilly.

      PDF is good for retaining formatting, but often at the expense of semantic information - the end result is that while you can be fairly sure that your text will end up 1.7 cm from the edge of the page, the software (text to speech, or reflowing for a different font size, for example) might have trouble distinguishing paragraph order in a multi-column layout. For novels and the like, where it's just text, ePub is unquestionably far superior; for textbooks and other instances where formatting matters more you can make an argument either way.

    3. Re:We're Amazon! by pyite · · Score: 2

      I used that service a *lot* until last October they switched to Ensenda as the carrier in my area.

      They did the same thing with me. Overall, Ensenda was fine for some packages and a disaster for others. Makes sense if you read up on them. Your packages are basically delivered by a "man with a van." Unmarked vehicles show up and drop packages off. So, it's basically hit or miss. Especially if you get a driver who does't know your building (living in an apartment) and decides that not finding the building translates to "delivery attempted." So, whenever Ensenda screwed up, I was very vocal, as I never have a problem with either FedEx or UPS. After about a month of almost exclusively Ensenda, I haven't had it in 3+ months.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    4. Re:We're Amazon! by Omestes · · Score: 4, Interesting

      fast and cheap books

      More expensive than a paperback isn't my definition of cheap.

      Their 3rd parties are a mixed blessing, as well. 90% of the time they aren't cheaper than driving down to a used bookstore and grabbing it, once you factor in the very silly shipping prices. I had a $0.99 book shipped to my house, it had $3.99 shipping. Upon getting it I noticed it shipped from less than five miles away, about a 10 minute drive, and for that I waited a week. Last time I went to the used bookstore I cross-referenced Amazon prices, the used bookstore won every single time once shipping was accounted for.

      On rarer books (more uncommon than anything) their prices can get ridiculous. I've found a couple books listed for +$100, for a ten year old trade paperback that most bookstores can still probably order for you.

      Their shipping... oh lord. I just ordered some stuff from Amazon after using Newegg for most of my needs, I now realize that I am spoiled. I order some random bit of hardware from Newegg with free to $0.99 shipping and it comes to my door within three days, no matter what. I order the same thing from Amazon (not even a third party), with $4.00 shipping and it comes to my door in a week, if not more (and spends around 4 days in a warehouse for no reason), and generally in a beaten up box 18 sizes too large with nothing but an airbag for protection.

      I do use Amazon, I'm even fond of them, but they aren't the greatest thing in the world, and they haven't done everything right. They actually are quite mediocre on several areas. They win because they are big, ubiquitous, and convenient.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  2. Sorry students... by domulys · · Score: 2

    ... this doesn't apply to your free Prime membership.

  3. "Sure, the selection isn't great yet..." by eln · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So it's basically Netflix, with the exact same shortcomings of Netflix. I'd gladly pay at least twice what Netflix currently charges for streaming if I could get their entire collection that way. Unfortunately, the content providers haven't yet pulled their heads out of their asses and figured out that digital distribution is the future, so we're still stuck waiting for DVDs in the mail for most reasonably modern and/or highly rated content.

    As digital distribution becomes more ubiquitous, more and more people will turn to piracy unless the content providers start allowing more of their stuff to be streamed legally. Hopefully they'll figure that out instead of fighting streaming every step of the way.

    1. Re:"Sure, the selection isn't great yet..." by afidel · · Score: 2

      Exact same, ha. Of the 460 SciFi TV seasons they have available only 60 are available through prime right now and most of those (42) are from the BBC. Big content really is shooting itself in the foot. As you point out if I want to watch a current tv series it's MUCH easier to go grab it off TPB or some other download site than it is for me to watch it electronically.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:"Sure, the selection isn't great yet..." by need4mospd · · Score: 2

      I'd gladly pay at least twice what Netflix currently charges for streaming if I could get their entire collection that way.

      Given that my current cable bill is over $50, I'd pay well over twice Netflix's regular rates if I could get their full catalog completely ad free and on demand. And I'd tell the cable company to keep their overpriced ad-supported content.

    3. Re:"Sure, the selection isn't great yet..." by Seumas · · Score: 2

      It's nice that Amazon is offering it with the accounts, even though I'll never use it. Netflix has four times the streaming selection (which is still only about 5% of what it SHOULD be) and it's in higher quality on more devices for only $8/mo.

      Of course, Netflix has plenty of downfalls, too. Their selection is only about 20,000 (and for all I know, they count an entire season of a TV show as 26 items or something). Worse, half of their selection is that fucking poor quality Starz stuff (which usually expires and is no longer available by the time you actually get around to watching it).

      You could cut a huge portion of people's *ahem* alternative methods for acquiring content if you just made all movies and television shows ever made available via an affordable on-demand service like Netflix on as many platforms and devices as possible with no limited number of hours you could watch in a month. And if you could make even new content available within 24hrs of airing on TV via the same service, you would curtail about 99% of alternative content acquisition methods.

      If Netflix streaming was pretty much every TV show ever made plus about 150,000 or 200,000 movies, I'd probably pay $50/mo for it (as long as I wasn't limited to streaming to ONE device at a time -- since you can watch cable on as many televisions in the house as you want, as long as you have the cheap-ish box connected to each television).

      I can tell you - when I search for a movie or show that is on Netflix, but only available via DVD (place order, wait for availability, have it mailed to you, check the mail, put it in the player, watch it, put it back in the envelope, mail it back, hope it doesn't get lost or pilfered in the USPS, etc) . . . the last option I'm considering is "yeah, I think I'll just go ahead and get the DVD from netflix". . .

  4. works in linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Not only works in Linux, but it works *well* in Linux.

    Netflix can eat it.

    1. Re:works in linux by s0litaire · · Score: 4, Informative

      I was pleasantly surprised it works on my Linux laptop ^_^

      --
      Laters Sol "Have you found the secrets of the universe? Asked Zebade "I'm sure I left them here somewhere"
    2. Re:works in linux by deathguppie · · Score: 2

      Use chrome with an nvidia 9000 series or better card and you get some nice vdpau exceleration as well.

      --
      once more into the breach
  5. Works in the UK Just fine... by s0litaire · · Score: 2

    I've a US Amazon.com Prime account. (currently a free trial!)

    Just finished watching the "Millennium trilogy" (Girl with..) series of movies
    Now starting on Farscape Series...

    Think I'd pay the fee for unlimited streaming (Works out at just over £4 a month...) ^_^

    --
    Laters Sol "Have you found the secrets of the universe? Asked Zebade "I'm sure I left them here somewhere"
    1. Re:Works in the UK Just fine... by Mojofreem · · Score: 2

      Based on the books by Steig Larsen (http://www.amazon.com/Girl-Dragon-Tattoo-Millennium-Trilogy/dp/0307473473/ref=tmm_mmp_title_0?ie=UTF8&qid=1298415990&sr=8-4/).

      • Girl with the Dragon Tatoo
      • The girl who played with fire
      • The girl who kicked the hornets nest

      It's actually a rather good set of movies (haven't finished the third one yet), though it does have some disturbing content. It's in Swedish, with English subtitles. All three are currently available on Netflix streaming.

      I heard that they're planning an Americanized Hollywood adaptation. I can only expect it to end up as awful and vile as "Point of No Return" was compared to "La Femme Nikita".

  6. Re:Why Amazon Prime? by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why bundle this with Amazon Prime? Why not just make it a separate subscription service? It feels like the equivalent of bundling a haircut with a tech support service subscription for a Linux distro.

    While the library is small they give it away. Once they get a respectable library of titles they'll have a bunch of people who are using it to start charging while they claim "We never said it would be free for ever. You can't complain about something you were getting for free." Base on the amount of users they'll be able to measure what their monthly fee will be (the more popular it is the more they'll charge - up to the amount Nerflix charges - with a discount to Prime users).

  7. Limited market by PARENA · · Score: 2

    but this has the ability to really change the streaming market!

    ...in the USA (and perhaps Canada?) There still isn't anything close to Netflix or this new Amazon service in Europe. Or at least not that I know of. There wasn't anything like it in Holland a few years back and there isn't now over here in Finland. :/

    --
    Here's the secret to immortality: ...oh dang, I forgot.
    1. Re:Limited market by s7uar7 · · Score: 2

      Amazon recently bought Lovefilm, the UK's equivalent of Netflix, and they have (very limited) streaming. With a bit of luck amazon.co.uk at least will introduce it.

    2. Re:Limited market by s0litaire · · Score: 2

      opps! i forgot i had the "Modify Headers" plugin on firefox turned on... (with a US IP address)
      That seems to keep the site happy ^_^

      --
      Laters Sol "Have you found the secrets of the universe? Asked Zebade "I'm sure I left them here somewhere"
  8. Works on Linux! by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Informative

    As a prime member this is great news. If they expand the available titles I plan on canceling netflix. I will make sure I tell them too. I also just streamed a show on my android phone.

  9. Re:Netflix and Android by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

    It already works on android. Amazon streaming uses flash. I just streamed some top gear on my Droid(overclocked, only to 800mhz). There was a little bit of stuttering but it was watchable. Go try it!

    I will also probably test it at 1.2Ghz to see if that gets rid of stuttering.

  10. Content is the most important piece by ExileOnHoth · · Score: 2

    "Sure the selection isn't that great yet but this has the ability to really change the streaming market"

    Really? That sentence right there sums up why engineering types consistently fail to take on the big players in this market.

    I think you have it backwards: the "selection" is EVERYTHING. Until a company shows it can make the kind of content deals Apple can with the big content creators, it will fail to gain market share.

    The content is critical.

  11. Sorry students, Family Members *AND* "Amazon Moms" by evw · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nor to anyone who currently get free Amazon shipping via a family member who is a member of Amazon Prime. The free video only applies to the single Amazon Prime member account:

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeId=200572880

    "Prime instant videos require an Amazon Prime membership and are not included with the free shipping benefits provided by Amazon Mom, Amazon Student, or if you are a guest of an Amazon Prime member. To watch Prime instant videos, sign up for a $79 Amazon Prime membership at http://www.amazon.com/primevideos. If you are a member of Amazon Mom and sign up for a $79 Amazon Prime membership, you will lose any additional months of Amazon Prime shipping benefits you may have earned."

    Amazon video on demand:
    http://www.amazon.com/Video-On-Demand/b/ref=&node=16261631

    Subset of "Prime Eligible" movies that Amazon will stream free to Prime members today (2153 results):
    http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=s9_al_bw_srch?rh=n%3A16261631%2Cp_85%3A1&page=1&rw_html_to_wsrp=1&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_s=center-3&pf_rd_r=1G4XGFTBQHGKXW5S6ZP3&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_p=1288998822&pf_rd_i=16261631

  12. Competes more directly with iTMS by Azureflare · · Score: 2

    It appears that Amazon has a collection of movies/tv shows that are free to stream, and a much larger collection that you must pay $3 to rent or $10 to buy (much like iTMS).

    The selection for free instant play seems rather small. In all honesty, this seems to be more a competitor for iTMS than Netflix. I don't pay anything extra to get dvds or stream from Netflix.

  13. Re:No PS3 support :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I paid $95 for my AppleTV and it just works. I am not sad.

  14. The Amazon Prime myth by dbc · · Score: 3, Informative

    Amazon's distribution center in Reno can hit 90% of the population of Northern California overnight with *regular* UPS shipping. If you order for regular 5-7 day delivery, they pick, pack and label your parcel, and then let it age on a warehouse shelf for a few days. If you pay for overnight or Prime, they don't age it. Amazon Prime is a racket, a profit center, not free shipping.

    1. Re:The Amazon Prime myth by farnsworth · · Score: 4, Informative

      Amazon's distribution center in Reno can hit 90% of the population of Northern California overnight with *regular* UPS shipping. If you order for regular 5-7 day delivery, they pick, pack and label your parcel, and then let it age on a warehouse shelf for a few days. If you pay for overnight or Prime, they don't age it. Amazon Prime is a racket, a profit center, not free shipping.

      It's not like there is a continuous flow of infinite-capacity trucks rolling by the warehouse 24/7. Both Amazon and the shipping company have to maximize shipment density and at the same time minimize delivery time. One way to do this is to create artificial segments of shipping via pricing. The customers who pay less get a less certain delivery window. The customers who pay more get priority on that night's truck (or however they work it). It's not like the trucks drive faster if you pay more. You are paying more for priority in the logistics chain, which is well worth it for some people.

      --

      There aint no pancake so thin it doesn't have two sides.

  15. Downside to Prime by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Informative

    There are a couple of non-obvious downsides to paying for Amazon Prime.

    The first is that it can be a false economy - the expedited shipping is not free, you pay for it up front a year at a time. But since the extra cost is not accounted for in the price of each transaction it makes it harder to comparison shop - it becomes mentally easier to pay a higher price for an item at Amazon rather than purchase it elsewhere because the "total cost" appears to be lower.

    The second downside is more insidious - since you've paid up front, Amazon can hold your money hostage. I saw one case a few years ago where Amazon had a dispute with a bunch of fatwallet types - Amazon shipped out 20-30 different products to a couple of hundred customers at a very low price and then changed their mind about the price after the orders were delivered. They told the buyers that they could either return the products for a refund or pay the difference in a second charge to their credit cards. Amazon even went so far as to process those second charges without getting permission.

    The people who disputed the charge with their credit cards got the charges cancelled as they were never authorised in the first place. BUT Amazon then "froze" their accounts on their website. The people who had paid for Prime were SOL - sure they had the privilege of expedited shipping on any order for another ~10 months, they just couldn't place any orders. As far as I know, none of those people ever saw a penny of that Prime fee refunded.

    While I wasn't financially affected by the incident, seeing how Amazon handled it, I was convinced to never pay Amazon for their Prime service. It isn't a stretch to see Amazon pulling the same stunt with the video streaming - you can stream any video you pay for, but they won't actually let you pay for anything.

    FWIW, it also made me think twice about "deals" at Amazon - if they won't stand behind their own system's pricing info, how am I supposed to tell the difference between a promotional discount and a computer error?

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    1. Re:Downside to Prime by CastrTroy · · Score: 2

      I live in Canada, so maybe things work different for Amazon here, but basically it's always been 2 day shipping here. Even if you get the free super saver shipping on orders over $39 it still only takes 2 days for the item to be delivered. It's not guaranteed 2 days, but it's effectively 2 days. Many times it's even 1 day. As long as they have the item in stock, and you live in a major city, you are going to get the item within maximum 3 days, Usually 2 days, and often 1 day. You could pay extra if you really want guaranteed 2 day shipping, but most of the time you are just paying for something you would get anyway.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:Downside to Prime by Anthony+Mouse · · Score: 2

      But since the extra cost is not accounted for in the price of each transaction it makes it harder to comparison shop - it becomes mentally easier to pay a higher price for an item at Amazon rather than purchase it elsewhere because the "total cost" appears to be lower.

      That's because you're doing it wrong. If you're already paying for Amazon Prime then the total cost actually is lower. The cost of Prime is a sunk cost. You don't get it back just because you bought less stuff from Amazon, so you don't use it when comparing prices.

      What makes it annoying (especially to competitors) is that it allows Amazon to scoop up all the high volume purchasers. If you buy enough stuff that a Prime subscription is cost effective then what Amazon is essentially doing is giving you a (shipping) discount on everything to keep you buying from them, because they know you buy a lot of stuff and they also know that their competitors try to undercut their prices. So as long as competitors are only undercutting the price for plebeians rather than the price-after-shipping for Prime subscribers, Amazon can capture the high volume customers by offering them this stealth discount. It's basically price discrimination in favor of high volume purchasers.

    3. Re:Downside to Prime by kramerd · · Score: 2

      Well, when you put it that badly;

      the buyers were in the wrong.

      The promotion was for buy one dvd, get one dvd of equal or lesser value free. Fatwallet allowed users to purchase one dvd at 3.97 (the cheapest in the promotion) and receive a free dvd of any price. This was clearly not the correct pricing (unless the 2nd dvd was also priced at 3.97). Since this was a sale of goods, the UCC applies, even for non-merchants, so this action is a counteroffer, which Amazon is not required to accept.

      Amazon did not accept, but instead allowed people who improperly took advantage of a flawed checkout system to either return for a full refund (including return shipping) or pay the actual listed price, with a full month in which to do so. The only people who could possibly have been adversely affected by this were international orders (by definition not prime users, but still people who were legally only giving a counteroffer).

      People who disputed the charges (rather than sending the product back or paying the difference) had their accounts frozen because they were in breach of contract, as outlined in the terms of service for all amazon users (not just prime accounts). Amazon did not hold money hostage, nor did they deprive Prime users of prime benefits, they simply demanded payment for contracts entered into by purchasers.

      Keep in mind that I am not backtracking; amazon never changed their price, amazon had permission to make the charges because purchasers had accepted a contract and then breached (giving anyone who had a unilateral mistake access to a refund), and there is absolutely no basis for claiming that amazon prime isn't worth the money based on anything in gp post.

    4. Re:Downside to Prime by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2

      I'd like to see a link to this because it sounds to me like the OP made it up out of his ass.

      Here you go:
      http://forum.dvdtalk.com/store-forum/491638-amazon-pricing-error-anyone-charged-yet-those-sick-attacks-arguing-5.html#112

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    5. Re:Downside to Prime by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2

      Keep in mind that I am not backtracking;

      AC called it, you are quacking like a duck.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    6. Re:Downside to Prime by KingSkippus · · Score: 4, Informative

      The second downside is more insidious - since you've paid up front, Amazon can hold your money hostage. I saw one case a few years ago where Amazon had a dispute with a bunch of fatwallet types - Amazon shipped out 20-30 different products to a couple of hundred customers at a very low price and then changed their mind about the price after the orders were delivered. They told the buyers that they could either return the products for a refund or pay the difference in a second charge to their credit cards. Amazon even went so far as to process those second charges without getting permission.

      The people who disputed the charge with their credit cards got the charges cancelled as they were never authorised in the first place. BUT Amazon then "froze" their accounts on their website. The people who had paid for Prime were SOL - sure they had the privilege of expedited shipping on any order for another ~10 months, they just couldn't place any orders. As far as I know, none of those people ever saw a penny of that Prime fee refunded.

      I read the link you provided in your reply and then some. The "deal" the OP is referring to was a "buy one, get one of equal or lesser value free" offer, and was presented as such by Amazon. However, due to a glitch in their order processing system, it gave you credit multiple times for the lesser-priced of the items. The glitch was posted on a forum, and some people thought it would be clever to exploit the glitch. Reading the thread, apparently one guy ordered over $1,600 of DVDs for something like $25.

      Amazon didn't "change their mind about the price." The terms were posted on the site, and any reasonable person would have known that the deal did not entail getting $1,600's worth of DVDs for $25 because of a billing glitch. Amazon simply corrected a billing error after giving people who exploited the error a very reasonable time to return the DVDs (with shipping pre-paid) if they didn't want to be charged. Some of the exploiters chose not to, Amazon billed them per the text of the offer, and a bunch of them complained that they weren't able to bilk Amazon out of thousands of dollars.

      Those people were effectively trying to steal those DVDs as surely as if you knew a credit card processor at you local Best Buy is on the glitch and you thought you could get a new flat screen television for free. Personally, I'm glad Amazon didn't let them get away with it.

    7. Re:Downside to Prime by Anthony+Mouse · · Score: 2

      By attempting to recall whether one bought enough things in the previous 12 months, I would think.

  16. Re:Compared to Netflix? by Darth_brooks · · Score: 2

    Probably not, since they're at the whims of the content providers. Given that exclusivity == $$$, even when the content is shite, don't expect the current situation to improve any time soon. Same situation as music. If an artist, label, or studip doesn't want digital downloads, checking different endpoint providers won't change the selection.

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  17. Re:Netflix and Android by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Informative

    I watched for 5-10 minutes, battery still at 90%.

  18. Re:No PS3 support :( by Nerdfest · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think he means "It just works ... just barely".

  19. Re:Why Amazon Prime? by uncmathguy · · Score: 2

    From the Terms and Conditions: "However, if we remove access to Prime instant videos as a Prime benefit and you cancel your Prime membership before you or your invitees have made any eligible purchases, we will give you a prorated refund of your membership fee (even if you have accessed a Prime instant video)."

  20. free? by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 2

    Only in the fairyland world of marketing is something claimed to be "free" when you are actually paying for it. Please don't fall for it. I'm paying $80/year for 2 day shipping on my orders. Adding the word "free" in there is absurd.

    Yes. I also round up prices ending in 9. ;)