Australia Bans New Mortal Kombat

They've been busy by shibashaba · 2011-02-24 23:33 · Score: 1

Australia seems to be pretty busy here lately.

--
---------- Open Source is capitalism applied to IP.

Re:They've been busy by Lord+Byron+II · 2011-02-25 01:04 · Score: 4, Insightful

Both of the Australia stories on the front page today are both reasons I turned down a job offer to work in Sydney. As an American, the idea that the government would get a say in which video games I play seemed ridiculous, as did the idea that Internet access would be handled by a closed monopoly.
I'm not saying that the USA is whole lot better, but I do have the option of playing the original Manhunt and downloading the latest Ubuntu image without any bandwidth cap.
I wish that countries would keep in mind that there are competitive advantages to keeping their systems more open and that it's not just about protecting the children. In my case, an Australian employer lost out on an employee they wanted because their government was busy playing censor.
Re:They've been busy by shibashaba · 2011-02-25 01:28 · Score: 1

Thats a really good point, something any country wishing to remain technologically competitive should understand. The best minds know they can go anywhere in the world and work, and they're gonna pick the most hospitable places. A lot of researches threatened to leave the US over the DMCA, although I don't know how many actually followed through. Look at Russia, they have an excellent school system but the US surpassed them long ago. China is making some gains, but it's still nothing compared to the US at the turn of the 20th century if you ask me.
I can't imagine why any highly skilled worker would choose to work under restrictive conditions when there is a choice.

--
---------- Open Source is capitalism applied to IP.
Re:They've been busy by thegarbz · 2011-02-25 03:22 · Score: 1

Somehow I doubt that an Ubuntu image affecting the 500GB download cap/month you can subscribe to for a pittance was NOT the reason you turned down a job offer in Sydney. Sorry but compared to Australia, the land formerly known as the land of opportunity's government makes ours look like it's run by saints.

The topic of an 18+ rating is back on the table now that the infamous attorney general blocking it has resigned and has little to no opposition, the government is proposing a national broadband network which will make the US look like they live in the dark ages, and the sun shines 364 days a year. One day we get floods / cyclones of biblical proportions, but that only happens 1/365th of the year :-)
Re:They've been busy by stealth_finger · 2011-02-25 05:00 · Score: 1

One day we get floods / cyclones of biblical proportions, but that only happens 1/365th of the year :-)
And then it's back to business as usual the next day?

--
Wanna buy a shirt?
https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
Re:They've been busy by davester666 · 2011-02-25 05:13 · Score: 1

Well, there's also the fact that you live in the middle of millions of degenerate, hardcore criminals.

--
Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
Re:They've been busy by severoon · 2011-02-25 05:48 · Score: 1

Who could be against banning this???
They also need to get on the books thing...there's lots of bad words in those. Sometimes you just have to step back and smile when governments finally start recognizing their proper role in society...the people aren't going to protect themselves from the outside world!

--
but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
Re:They've been busy by dadelbunts · 2011-02-25 06:43 · Score: 1

Posted by an angry racist australian?
Re:They've been busy by Dexter+Herbivore · 2011-02-25 06:44 · Score: 1

So you refused a job on the basis of false assumptions? There is no closed monopoly on net access, and you can still download or import games which are only banned for SALE in Australia. Possession isn't banned, only the sale by Australian distributors.
Re:They've been busy by Dexter+Herbivore · 2011-02-25 06:46 · Score: 1

Even though the tone of the parent comment is troll-like, his points are valid. Please mods, mod him back up.
Re:They've been busy by dadelbunts · 2011-02-25 06:46 · Score: 1

Oh almost forgot. Since you mention "all those slave descendants" what would you classify australians as? All those criminal descendants? Oh they joy of ignorant bigoted comments.
Re:They've been busy by Nick+Ives · 2011-02-25 08:34 · Score: 1

Somehow I doubt that an Ubuntu image affecting the 500GB download cap/month you can subscribe to for a pittance was NOT the reason you turned down a job offer in Sydney. Sorry but compared to Australia, the land formerly known as the land of opportunity's government makes ours look like it's run by saints.

I honestly have no idea what you're trying to say here.

--
Nick
Re:They've been busy by anomaly256 · 2011-02-25 11:15 · Score: 1

Appearances can be deceiving. Having lived and studied in both places for extensive lengths of time, I can honestly say they're not at all very different in the regards you mentioned. *South* Australia does have some pretty recent draconian laws in place regarding speech (unsurprisingly, they were instigated by the same attorney general who was blocking the r18+ rating and who is no longer in the picture so much) but this nothing when you're comparing to America's unfettered pursuit of Assange for bringing heinous acts committed by government and military into the public spotlight. Something ALL journalists used to do as a matter of course but now they're all gimped, brainwashed, or forcefully restrained from doing so. The packagings might be different but the end-product inside is the same in both countries really.
Re:They've been busy by biovoid · 2011-02-28 18:21 · Score: 1

Well, there's also the fact that you live in the middle of millions of degenerate, hardcore criminals.
They're all dead now. Just like that joke.

Australians invent first time machine! by Onuma · 2011-02-24 23:34 · Score: 1

Apparently they're back in 1992? Haven't there been far gorier games released in Australia in the last 2 decades?

I'm glad they have a society which supports openness, freedom, and tolerance...in the same way the middle east does.

--
What else can happen when an unstoppable force collides with an immovable object?

Re:Australians invent first time machine! by Sockatume · 2011-02-24 23:39 · Score: 5, Informative

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_banned_video_games#Australia

--
No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
Re:Australians invent first time machine! by XLazarusX · 2011-02-25 00:17 · Score: 1

That easy access via NZ is probably why this Saudi-Arabia-style policy stays in place.
If they actually blocked gamers from getting the games, things would change.
Re:Australians invent first time machine! by adeft · 2011-02-25 03:02 · Score: 1

That list reads like a list of games I want to be playing!

Shit by TheSeeker11 · 2011-02-24 23:38 · Score: 1

Shit like this makes me glad I moved to the UK.

Re:Shit by The+Fanta+Menace · 2011-02-25 06:50 · Score: 1

You don't have to pay to enter the city centre. I've walking into there many times.

--
-- Even if a god did exist, why the fsck should I worship it?
Re:Shit by Nick+Ives · 2011-02-25 09:01 · Score: 1

The mass surveillance isn't as oppressive as you might imagine. That might sound a bit like I've got Stockholm syndrome, but hear me out.
First off, the CCTV is mostly ignored both by the general public and the police. For most crimes, the police fails to check CCTV "because it's hard work". Secondly, as a member of the general public you just get used to seeing cameras, they become part of the scenery and you carry on as normal.
Even though the police rarely bother to check CCTV footage, CCTV cameras still act as a deterrent. Muggers will avoid streets with cameras and instead go for people walking down unmonitored side streets. Whilst it's not a 100% guarantee, I do think they improve the situation.
In any case, the response from the public to oppressive surveillance, like the much more sinister Forward Intelligence Teams used to monitor political activists, has been sousveillance. The police don't take kindly to being photographed though.

--
Nick

Wolf Creek by Seumas · 2011-02-24 23:39 · Score: 5, Interesting

And yet, they didn't ban Wolf Creek. A horror film that purports to be based on a true story, but is really the fictionalized telling of a number of true stories and news reports formed into one brutal, disgusting, almost torture-porn film.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolf_Creek_(film)

I understand that it's because of problems with the rating system that differentiate the two, but come the fuck on.

Also, this is why you don't want the ESRB, MPAA, or other ratings becoming some sort of absurd first-amendment violating law in America (remember, ESRB/MPAA are private organizations that serve a voluntary industry . . . even if the unwillingness of stores to sell non rated content makes it a nearly de-facto one).

Re:Wolf Creek by Cimexus · 2011-02-25 00:13 · Score: 5, Interesting

They didn't 'ban' Mortal Kombat either. It was refused classification, meaning that Australian retailers can't ~sell~ it. Merely possessing a copy isn't an issue.
Anyway, as you rightly allude to, the problem in Australia is not that is that content is treated inconsistently. It's that games are 'missing' the R18 rating that exists for film, literature and other media. When they designed the video games rating system way back in the early 90s, they basically assumed that, since games were for kids, no rating higher than MA15+ was needed. Whereas for film, literature and other media, the ratings include an R18 rating. So films like Wolf Creek are still OK. But video games that are deemed unsuitable for 15-17 year olds must unfortunately be refused classification.
Note that the classification board itself is as irritated about this state of affairs as the public is. It's not their fault: they can only operate with the rating criteria they have been given to work with. They aren't on a moral crusade to ban things for the hell of it - they simply couldn't validly fit it into the MA15+ rating. The wheels are in motion to get a R18 classification for games happening (to bring them into line with film etc.), but like anything in politics, it takes a long time :(
In the meantime I'll just import this game like everyone else. No big deal. Usually cheaper to buy games from overseas anyway.
Re:Wolf Creek by black3d · 2011-02-25 00:17 · Score: 1

Oh, that's because we have an R18 rating for movies, just not for games. For some reason parts of the government see R18 rated games as a special kind of evil, that they need to protect us from. Its just like there's no X-rating in the majority of the country - oh, except for the Australian Capital Territory (think, Australia's version of DC) so the government officials themselves are allowed X-rated material - just not the rest of us.

--
"The true measure of a person is how they act when they know they won't get caught." - DSRilk
Re:Wolf Creek by Seumas · 2011-02-25 00:37 · Score: 3, Interesting

And that's exactly the same problem faced here, in America (without the criminality aspect of it being a law, of course). Retailers can carry anything they damn well please. Technically, they can even sell to anyone they damn well please. The whole first amendment thing, and such. Granted, there's an exception for pornographic content (which is itself a very convoluted issue with enormous first amendment thorns). There's no law that says a retailer can't sell an M-rated game to a ten year old and there's no law that says your game has to even be rated or labeled. It is all voluntary, across the board.
Of course, the problem with that is that if the government censors content or distribution of content, that's censorship. If private industry does it, it's just business. But isn't it censorship, if the industry's self-governance is only the result of a threat by politicians to come in and take things over? In a very real sense, there is no practical difference between "we will take over your industry and make sure 16 year old kids don't get a copy of Call of Duty" and "we will voluntarily make sure 16 year old kids don't get a copy of Call of Duty, because we don't want you to step in and make sure 16 year old kids don't get a copy of call of duty". It's censorship by coercion and, in my mind, even dirtier than outright censorship.
And, because of that, you also have problems like AO (adult only) games nearly not existing, because no retailer will carry or sell them. So, we're stuck with M-rated games that label-wise should be on-par with rated R movies. That is, enormous amounts of violence and torture and drugs and language and tense situations, but only mild nudity and no sex (and, no games containing sex or significant nudity, because again that'd get an AO rating). So the impact of this entirely voluntary system is that even games which by definition are only available to people who are also old enough to see R-rated movies are tamed down to nothing more than your GTA and your Deadspace. You and I as grown adults have our content watered to the point that it's drinkable children (who, of course, aren't supposed to be drinking it per the voluntary, but not exactly voluntary nudge nudge rating system).
Not to mention, the MPAA and ESRB boards are basically a couple of corrupt money-grabbing organizations. Most indie developers and certainly no garage developers could even afford to submit their games to the ESRB for rating, because the cost would easily be more than their entire development fund.
Re:Wolf Creek by norpy · 2011-02-25 00:41 · Score: 2

They didn't 'ban' Mortal Kombat either. It was refused classification, meaning that Australian retailers can't ~sell~ it. Merely possessing a copy isn't an issue.
Depends on what state you live in.
WA and i think QLD have laws on their books that *criminalises* possession of RC material.
Re:Wolf Creek by SharpFang · 2011-02-25 00:53 · Score: 1

. The wheels are in motion to get a R18 classification for games happening (to bring them into line with film etc.), but like anything in politics, it takes a long time :(
Especially if a person with definite veto power over the decision is adamantly against it. Then it may take long enough so that they first die of old age before the project can move ahead.

--
45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
Re:Wolf Creek by DrXym · 2011-02-25 02:40 · Score: 1

The BBFC is more strict when rating games vs movies but they still see fit to offer an 18 rating. Their premise is a game is more likely to be played by a minor so they err on the side of caution. In some cases such as Manhunt 2 this will erupt into a minor controversy but it's usually a functioning ratings system. I'm not sure why Australia can't adopt something akin BBFC's 18 rating for games.
The funny part is that an outsider I would naively consider Australia to be a fairly liberal country but it is things like this and firewalls that make me wonder what the hell is going on in that country.
Re:Wolf Creek by bloodhawk · 2011-02-25 04:39 · Score: 1

As you point on they didn't ban wolf creek because they can give wolf creek an R18+ rating, they can't do that with Mortal Kombat. This is all the fault of the Australian State Governer Generals who all have to agree to there rating coming into existence, unfortunately there is always at least one ludite/religious fanatic amongst them that feels they must protect Australia from themselves by imposing his beliefs on us regardless of what public opinion is.
Re:Wolf Creek by black3d · 2011-02-25 10:58 · Score: 1

It's all about "think of the children!". The government considers gaming here to be largely a domain of children (despite their own researching showing the majority of gamers are in the 18-25 demographic, followed by the 26-35 demographic, with children a somewhat distant third) and thus as any game is going to be played by children, "there should be no R18 category - as it's not appropriate for children".
They seem to ignore the fact that introducing an R18 category would actually allow them to classify more of the "borderline" stuff into R18 that they don't really think children should be playing, yet isn't necessarily bad enough to be banned outright. (Under the current system, as there is no R18 rating, games that would fit into that category are refused classification, thus banned - hence why I use that word). Under the current system, shop owners aren't legally allowed to prevent children buying M (MA15+) rated games, as the content is legally allowed to be viewed under parental supervision. This isn't the shop owners jurisdiction. The reality here is that children actually have MORE access to violent material than they would if an R18 rating was in place.
Likewise with the firewall, apparently parents can't stop their children visiting online porn sites so the government wants to block it for you. And since they can't be sure whether or not a parent will be responsible enough to opt-into a filter system, better just to firewall everybody. Technically everywhere in the country X-rated material isn't allowed to be imported. Oh - except Canberra - so the polititians are allowed their porn. Just nobody else. Luckily - this aspect of it isn't in place yet, and instead they're doing selective ISP-level address filtering to block out child-porn, bomb-making sites, and such things. The issue is, they can take it further and block any seditious material they want to and theres no checks in place to ensure this isn't being done inappropriately.
At present, the "firewall" isn't a great issue, as the government is treading very carefully on the issue. It could be one day, though. And seriously they're going the wrong way about it. If you want to combat child porn, you don't BLOCK the honey-pot child porn credit-card-requiring pay-walls. You leave them wide open and collect credit card details. The member of parliament in charge of IT believes that if you oppose filtering, you support child-porn. It's simply a case of incompetent people in positions of power. It's not really a serious threat to the constitution of the nation, and the kind of thing that can be changed easily when the next government gets into power.

--
"The true measure of a person is how they act when they know they won't get caught." - DSRilk
Re:Wolf Creek by CoderJoe · 2011-03-02 00:28 · Score: 1

The member of parliament in charge of IT believes that if you oppose filtering, you support child-porn. It's simply a case of incompetent people in positions of power.
I'm not so sure... That seems like the perfect way to get your desired filtering agenda passed: link opposition to support for child porn, so that nobody would sabotage their political career opposing it.

Do they also... by Jarnin · 2011-02-24 23:42 · Score: 1

Do they also ban R rated movies with bloodspray and limb dismemberment? No? I guess they don't understand that, like art, books, music, television and movies, video game companies cater to different demographics.

Not really surprising though: The more I hear about Australia the more it reminds me of rural Kansas.

Re:Do they also... by Cimexus · 2011-02-25 00:19 · Score: 1

Er no they don't ban movies like that, ~because an R rating exists in Australia for film~. So there is no problem.
The problem is that, for games, the highest valid rating is MA15+. So something that would be happily classified as R and released without issue, if it were a film, must be refused classification if it's a game but can't fit into the MA15+ category. Note that I say 'refused classification', rather than 'banned'. I can buy it from an importer if I want. But to be sold in an Australian retail store, it must carry a valid Australian classification.
Yeah it's a stupid inconsistency between the rating scheme for film and for games. It is in the process of being changed but is taking a while. I firmly believe we'll get an R rating for games in the next few years (in fact, we almost got one earlier this year ... but they deferred the decision to a later meeting). Just gotta grin and bear it until then.

Australian version by Lord+Lode · 2011-02-24 23:45 · Score: 4, Funny

Maybe they should release an Australian version of the game, where you just slap each other instead of fighting.

Re:Australian version by auLucifer · 2011-02-24 23:50 · Score: 1

We already have that game. Its called "Saturday in town"

--
If I was witty I'd put something funny here but, as it stands, I am not and have just wasted seconds of your life
Re:Australian version by EnsilZah · 2011-02-25 00:25 · Score: 1

They did, it's called Mortal Kombat vs. DC Universe.
Re:Australian version by FrostDust · 2011-02-25 00:28 · Score: 5, Funny

Wouldn't be that much different from Germany's version of Counter-Strike: Source, where characters decide to lie down and peacefully surrender after being shot, even when it's a head shot.
Re:Australian version by Hillgiant · 2011-02-25 06:07 · Score: 1

I love that one.
The competitive binge drinking mini-game is the best.

--
-
Re:Australian version by hurfy · 2011-02-25 09:30 · Score: 1

lol, Counter-Strike: A-Team !
Always thought that was the most dangerous show ever....Shoot machine guns wildly in the street and flip a car every week and get a couple scraped elbows on a bad day :O

Typical Reaction by kinkelson · 2011-02-24 23:46 · Score: 1

Mortal Kombat has always had this legacy. Its not a new occurrence.

Re:Duh by cheekyjohnson · 2011-02-24 23:51 · Score: 1

so that parents can make an informed decision

The sad fact of the matter is that most of them probably won't, anyway. "It'll turn them into murderers, so I'm not going to buy this!"

--
Filthy, filthy copyrapists!

Banned! by freman · 2011-02-24 23:58 · Score: 1

Seriously?
Duke Nukem forever is ok, but this isn't?

I remember Duke Nukem and I wouldn't let my kids play it (but just try and stop me from playing it!)

Oh well, I've never been a fan of Mortal Kombat - but now I must import the game as an act of civil disobedience

Re:Banned! by acehole · 2011-02-25 00:02 · Score: 1

Actually, Duke Nukem 3D was censored when it originally came out. When the Atomic edition came out, it was uncensored. See the logic?

--
Be you Admins? nay, we are but lusers!

Really? by Osgeld · 2011-02-25 00:09 · Score: 1

"Mortal Kombat is one of the oldest video game franchises around"

I was on my 3rd gaming console half way though its lifespan when mortal kombat came out

Re:Really? by Gaygirlie · 2011-02-25 00:14 · Score: 2

I was on my 3rd gaming console half way though its lifespan when mortal kombat came out
And your point was? Sure, there are indeed fighting games even older than that, but the franchises are all gone already years ago. Mortal Kombat however is still going and there are new releases even after 19 years. So yes, it is indeed one of the oldest video game franchises still around.
Re:Really? by freman · 2011-02-25 00:15 · Score: 1

Mortal Kombat title was released for Arcade during October 1992 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mortal_kombat#Fighting_games
We did play games before you young whipper snappers got your dang fangled consoles - now get off my lawn
Re:Really? by maxume · 2011-02-25 00:34 · Score: 1

Sega Genesis was released in 1988/1989 and could easily have been his third console (after an NES and some other).

--
Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
Re:Really? by Osgeld · 2011-02-25 03:23 · Score: 1

colecovision, master system, genesis
Re:Really? by Osgeld · 2011-02-25 03:29 · Score: 1

yea your right, no one makes street fighter, king of fighters, capcom vs marvel or any other old fighting games anymore
Mortal Kombat was released as a me too game, they just upped it one with bad blood and digitized actors, now its Oh !! me too, again after everyone has released theirs, its not one of the oldest, at best its middle age, and its not the only one, its just a quick cash in just like the first game
Re:Really? by stealth_finger · 2011-02-25 04:56 · Score: 1

yea your right, no one makes street fighter, king of fighters, capcom vs marvel or any other old fighting games anymore
That's why they said 'one of' instead of the oldest or something more definitive. Regardless of yours or anyone else's opinion on the game or it's competition, the original statement remains technically correct.

--
Wanna buy a shirt?
https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
Re:Really? by Osgeld · 2011-02-25 05:07 · Score: 1

sorry but 2 years before playstation is not an old franchise in ALL OF GAMING (cause technically they did not say fighting games) by any means
its like lumping final fantasy X in the same age group as bards tale cause some dink thinks anything older than 10 years ago is all the same time period
Re:Really? by Gaygirlie · 2011-02-25 05:43 · Score: 1

its not one of the oldest, at best its middle age, and its not the only one, its just a quick cash in just like the first game
The first King of Fighters was released 1994, the first Capcom VS Marvel was release 1998, the first Mortal Kombat was released in 1992. By your argument then those are also "me too" games. Only Street Fighter is an older surviving franchise than Mortal Kombat of all those examples you mentioned. As for your argument.. well, there were PLENTY of fighting games even before Street Fighter came around, so again, even Street Fighter is a "me too" game by your logic.
Besides, you clearly have trouble understanding the "one of" - structure in a sentence: no one is saying Mortal Kombat is the oldest surviving one, only that it is one among several ones. The fact remains that the first Mortal Kombat game is now 19 years old and the franchise is still going strong and thus quite renders your whole argument pointless. Even if we take completely different genres along and in the discussion there still ain't many that are older ones. Even Civilization was released only a year before Mortal Kombat, rendering it 20 years old as of today.
Re:Really? by Osgeld · 2011-02-25 06:40 · Score: 1

cause its not fucking one of the oldest any thing what is hard to understand about that? and why are you trolling me? its a 1990's game that happens to be still made, but so what, that is a list of hundreds (no matter what you want to think) so its a retarded statement clear?
Re:Really? by stealth_finger · 2011-02-25 15:44 · Score: 1

sorry but 2 years before playstation is not an old franchise in ALL OF GAMING (cause technically they did not say fighting games) by any means
I'd say anything that started in the snes era (first arcade release was '92 snes was '93), thats nigh on 20 years now, and is still going qualifies. Sure gaming has been going alot longer but how many names are still going? Not too many, which I think has unstated importance, and yes kids today consider the psx old, but this is alot of nitpicking over a relatively minor quote that is largely irrelevant to the main point of the story.

--
Wanna buy a shirt?
https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
Re:Really? by glittalogik · 2011-02-27 12:39 · Score: 1

C64, ZX Spectrum

18+ rating does NOT help by Anonymous Coward · 2011-02-25 00:13 · Score: 1

In Germany we have an 18+ rating but that doesn't mean adult games are available to adults.

Our official rating monopoly can deny a rating and effectively ban a game alltogether. As a result of that (and the desire to achieve lower age ratings, which are notoriously higher than PEGI or ESRB) almost all remotely violent games are cut. As a rule of thumb, if a game is 18+, you can safely assume it has been censored for the German market.

Even 18+ rated games are harder to get as online retailers have to comply with strict, ill-defined and ever-changing age-verification requirements. Major sites like eBay ban them outright.

Don't put any faith in an 18+ rating. It very likely will not allow adults to buy adult games. Just find foreign download stores (and maybe learn how to use a VPN) and ignore local regulations.

Re:18+ rating does NOT help by mcvos · 2011-02-25 01:10 · Score: 1

In Netherland the problem seems just the opposite. 18+ games are easily available to kids. Bioshock and similar games are sold in toy stores, right next to Lego and Playmobil. And it doesn't look like most toy stores check the age of their customers.
Re:18+ rating does NOT help by Hatta · 2011-02-25 02:10 · Score: 1

Why is that a problem? What demonstrable harm comes from children playing these games?

--
Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
Re:18+ rating does NOT help by mcvos · 2011-02-25 02:31 · Score: 1

It defeats the purpose of the rating system, and can result in people (at least those in politics) supporting much more restrictive measures. Despite our pretty liberal attitude here, some people are suggesting that if the retailers don't reduce the sale of 18+ games to minors, the government should.
Re:18+ rating does NOT help by Hatta · 2011-02-25 03:19 · Score: 1

It defeats the purpose of the rating system
Defeating censorship is a good thing.
and can result in people (at least those in politics) supporting much more restrictive measures
Ah, so the problem isn't a lack of enforcement of the rating system, but an ignorant and bigoted populace.

--
Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
Re:18+ rating does NOT help by mcvos · 2011-02-25 03:38 · Score: 1

It defeats the purpose of the rating system
Defeating censorship is a good thing.
Yeah, but that's not the case here. Read what I wrote: It's not censorship. Yet.

Banned? by louic · 2011-02-25 00:19 · Score: 1

Does anyone know what exactly "banned" means in Australia?

Will the game simply not be for sale? I think most people were planning to download it anyway

Will people get sued for playing it? That seems unlikely, as it will be impossible to check.

Re:Banned? by Frogbert · 2011-02-25 01:20 · Score: 1

Does anyone know what exactly "banned" means in Australia?
Widely Pirated

UK next..? by bhunachchicken · 2011-02-25 00:33 · Score: 1

Just wait until the Daily Mail gets a load of this..

Kung Lao Buzzsaw fatality

--
THE HONOUR OF THE KNIGHTS - CC Licensed Sci-Fi Novel

Re:world+dog vote to ban manufactured weaponry... by delinear · 2011-02-25 00:33 · Score: 1

That's exactly what Kang and Kodos are waiting for. On that day, our superior intellect won't be a match for their puny weapons.

Here's an idea by Israfels · 2011-02-25 01:05 · Score: 1

Why not label it as a movie with "bonus features". All you need is a few quicktime events or a cutscene and you're good. Most bluerays have minigames in them now days.

New by The+Aethereal · 2011-02-25 01:17 · Score: 1

I didn't know there was a new MK coming out. Thanks Australia for the heads up! You can always count on censorship to raise awareness of things I'm interested in.

Re:New by game+kid · 2011-02-25 01:50 · Score: 1

Hell, for at least the last few weeks I seriously forgot there even were games called Mortal Kombat, and I've played (to wildly varying extents) the original, II, like several versions of 3, and 4.

--
You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.

I went to sleep last night and woke up in 1995! by xxMSAxx · 2011-02-25 01:19 · Score: 1

Hopefully they don't make a separate title without the blood which contains new sucky fatalities. I don't think my mom could handle another round of begging for a Sega Genesis.......esp now that I'm 30

--
Work for Pay and Pay for Freedom

Called it! by Drakkenmensch · 2011-02-25 01:22 · Score: 1

Australia wants to ban zombie games, where the targets are already dead. Seriously, what were the odds they'd allow dismemberment of still living ones?!?

Re:world+dog vote to ban manufactured weaponry... by SilentStaid · 2011-02-25 01:34 · Score: 1

Yeah, that's true, but I've got my board and nail at the ready.

Re:China by TaoPhoenix · 2011-02-25 01:58 · Score: 1

Ya'know,

I feel China is catching up faster than your post may think. For a while it's hidden because they have a huge country, but give them another 20 years and they'll turn into a big Chinese Dragon Engine.

--
My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine

wtf by h0dg3s · 2011-02-25 02:04 · Score: 1

"Mortal Kombat is one of the oldest video game franchises around" Um....no it isn't.

Re:China by Lord+Byron+II · 2011-02-25 02:13 · Score: 1

Except that Chinese university students tend to (and I know I'm over-generalizing here) want to come to the USA for their post-graduate education. China can grow and educate, but as long as they have a repressive, over-controlling government, the brains are going to be leaving, not entering.

they also cheat and copy others work by Joe+The+Dragon · 2011-02-25 02:22 · Score: 1

they also cheat and copy others work.

A lot of China is based on copying others IP.

Dingo! by Kagato · 2011-02-25 03:36 · Score: 2

A dingo ate my video game!

The problem is not the ratings system by guyminuslife · 2011-02-25 04:39 · Score: 1

The problem is that the ratings system is a legal institution. In the US, we have industry ratings systems that businesses use voluntarily. There's no law that says you can't sell "Duke Nukem" to a 6-year-old. It's just that the retailers have a policy not to.

It works pretty well. There are probably some ways in which it could work better, but it's a hell of a lot better than what Australia and Germany are doing. When it comes to ratings, our corporate overlords know their markets and, in this narrow case, seem to be perfectly capable of voluntary self-regulation.

--
I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.

Re:Which others? by Ambiguous+Puzuma · 2011-02-25 04:58 · Score: 1

This list may be biased toward Nintendo franchises, since that's what I have the most experience with. Or maybe Nintendo is just well known for having sequels/spinoffs to their Famicom/NES games.

Pac-Man: 1980 Pac-Man (arcade), 2010 Pac-Man Party (Wii)/Pac-Man Champion Edition DX (XBLA/PSN)
Donkey Kong: 1981 Donkey Kong (arcade), 2010 Donkey Kong Country Returns (Wii)
Mario: 1983 Mario Bros. (arcade)--origin in Donkey Kong series, 2010 Super Mario Galaxy 2 (Wii)
Bomberman: 1985 Bomberman (Famicom), 2010 Bomberman Live: Battlefest (PSN/XBLA/WiiWare)
Castlevania: 1986 Castlevania (Famicom), 2010 Castlevania: Lords of Shadow (PS3/XBox 360)
Dragon Quest: 1986 Dragon Quest (Famicom), 2009 Dragon Quest IX (DS)
Metroid: 1986 Metroid (Famicom), 2010 Metroid: Other M (Wii)
Zelda: 1986 Legend of Zelda (Famicom), 2009 Legend of Zelda: Spirit Tracks (DS)
Final Fantasy: 1987 Final Fantasy (Famicom), 2010 Final Fantasy XIV (PS3)
Mega Man: 1987 Mega Man (Famicom), 2010 Mega Man 10 (PSN/XBLA/WiiWare)
Street Fighter: 1987 Street Fighter (arcade), 2010 Super Street Fighter IV (PS3/XBox 360/arcade)
Ninja Gaiden: 1988 Ninja Gaiden (Famicom), 2009 Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2 (PS3)

Mortal Kombat was released in 1992.

Its the lack of ratings by bussdriver · 2011-02-25 06:28 · Score: 2

Private ratings systems are not that reliable and fail to address a great many issues; the movie ratings are an example of how bad the game ratings will become.

We forced food makers to print nutrition information with a huge battle opposing it by the industry with the usual propaganda that today gets significantly more traction with large segments of the population. Its as stupid now as it was then, there are just more suckers today.

Rather than a poor completely arbitrary ratings system setup by private parties; we should have a LIST of controversial elements similar to ingredient labels on food. These are legally specified down to the formatting which is why food labels are so similar. Again, the industry hated this-- even today corn syrup people want to lie and rename themselves corn sugar which is a different ingredient that already exists! THAT is why you must have a regulated definition list, otherwise the lawyers and marketers will have free reign.

We NEED a government system for movies, tv, and video games but not for a similar RATINGS system (which is just an appointed board of people either way) but an INGREDIENT list with definitions/rules that anybody would have to apply.

It may sound like a joke, but it makes perfect sense.... think about it:

Implied sex acts ..... 5min
visible deaths ........... 1min
auditory deaths......... 10 sec
foul language ............1,654

violence: dismemberment, shooting, stabbing, etc... could probably get this list from the police definitions
crimes: prostitution, rape, assassination, child abuse
language: words listed

SURE, this could characterize movies differently but its NOT a review, just a factual listing-- Junk food information is really bad but that doesn't stop it from being popular and that information ignored.... except by parents and dieters...

One excuse for prohibition to adults is the influential nature-- which is honestly undeniable (fyi: advertising works) but if you had these listings your nanny state could ban bad "ingredients" or require an ID or whatever like they do already-- that is a separate issue; but a better system makes encroachments on liberty less broad! Such as this ban on games above a rating, if they had to be more specific, the Australian version of the game could disable dismemberment or whatever specifics are required. Well, Australia loves to give power to oversight committees...they won't list specifics because they like the power a black box review/ratings system affords.)

--
Democracy Now! - uncensored, anti-establishment news

Re:Its the lack of ratings by Homburg · 2011-02-25 09:18 · Score: 1

The British ratings body, the BBFC, doesn't quite take the quantitative approach you suggest here, but it does provide quite detailed breakdowns of the elements that led to a particular classification for a given work. I'm surprised the MPAA doesn't do something similar.
Re:Its the lack of ratings by Geminii · 2011-02-28 17:48 · Score: 1

I like it. Parents who brainlessly buy X-rated stuff for their kids would have less of a leg to stand on complaint-wise if all the ingredients were listed right there on the product.
"Don't tell me what to buy! Cartoons are for kids! Come on little Jimmy, get your copy of La Blue Girl and let's go."

Sheer Stupidity by skegg · 2011-02-25 10:18 · Score: 1

As an 18+ yo Australian male, I could join the army and be given a fully-automatic machine gun.

In 12 months (?) I'd find myself in Afghanistan where, under some circumstances, I would be required to shoot another human being.

But the law forbids me from playing a fantasy game ...

Blood or boobs? by Cameleopard · 2011-02-25 10:56 · Score: 1

I thought a little of the old ultraviolence was awwwwwwwwwwright given the films that pass unmolested by Australian censors. What, does the new Mortal Kombat have a character with A-cup breasts?

Re:China by tmosley · 2011-03-02 04:31 · Score: 1

They come here for post graduate education because it is prestigious. They then go right back to China to get jobs. The bad part is that they also get jobs at their own universities, so eventually, they will consider their own universities to be as good as or better than ours, at which point the US loses its last strain of relevance on the world stage.

Slashdot Mirror

Australia Bans New Mortal Kombat

84 of 119 comments (clear)