Slashdot Mirror


Facebook Linked To One In Five Divorces In US

An anonymous reader writes "yes, in theory if you're single, Facebook can help you meet that special someone. But for those in even the healthiest of marriages, improper use can quickly devolve into a marital disaster. A recent survey by the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers found that Facebook is cited in one in five divorces in the United States. Also, more than 80 percent of divorce lawyers reported a rising number of people are using social media to engage in extramarital affairs."

46 of 292 comments (clear)

  1. What percentage use FB again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Saying that divorces are linked to Facebook is like saying car purchases are linked to internet usage.

    1. Re:What percentage use FB again? by croddy · · Score: 5, Informative

      The methodology is worse than that; I ran across this statistic a couple of weeks ago and tracked it down through some hellish chain of blog posts and it turns out that the way this was determined was searching a list of divorce court documents for the word "Facebook" and about 20% matched the string. Any divorce filing containing the string "Facebook" was coded as a divorce linked to Facebook.

      The most encouraging thing about this is that it sort of indicates that Facebook has only infiltrated about 20% of marriages.

    2. Re:What percentage use FB again? by sorak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A better analogy is that divorces are linked to facebook in the same way divorces are linked to the telephone, or to strip clubs.

    3. Re:What percentage use FB again? by gknoy · · Score: 2

      On the bright side, very few of the divorces were of gay couples! :)

    4. Re:What percentage use FB again? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Have to blow my mods on this one.

      Turns out Lesbians have a much higher divorce rate than gay males.

      So Females are involved in over 50% of divorces. (- hehe, it's a fact!)

      I speculate that Females are much more likely to "pull the trigger" when unhappy than men are. This may be because of their emotional state or it could be the divorce laws favor them. In any case, Females also initiate the majority of straight marriages too.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    5. Re:What percentage use FB again? by realityimpaired · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There's a joke in the community that seems rather apt....

      Q: What does a lesbian bring on the second date?
      A: A moving van.

      Sad, but true. At least in my experience... relationships do move pretty fast. Not going to turn this into a men vs. women like you seem to be trying to do, but in my experience, women do tend to be a lot less restrained emotionally than men are. Perhaps that's the reason... but I would shy away from using the word "volatile" if you know what's good for you. :)

    6. Re:What percentage use FB again? by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 2

      Or it could be because females know full well they won't have a problem finding other strong, attractive partners. Men, on the other hand, have to work their asses off to attract a woman that is worth paying attention to.

    7. Re:What percentage use FB again? by PhilipTheHermit · · Score: 2

      Actually, I append "TheHermit" to my name across the board, because I'm basically a crazy techo-hermit. In my apartment, it's just me and my gear! And where other hermits used to focus their energies on religious study, all I care about is programming and art.

      It kinda works for me though, I think. Plus, it's in my email, so women know INSTANTLY I'm basically antisocial and dislike groups. It's like product labeling.

      --
      Thus spake the master programmer:
      "When the program is being tested, it is too late to make design changes." (Tao)
    8. Re:What percentage use FB again? by Vintermann · · Score: 2

      It's not that men are from nature any more emotionally restrained than women. It's just that men who are aggressive and impulsive get a bloody hard time from kindergarten on - not entirely unreasonable - and so they are taught to restrain those traits. Whereas young girl's aggression stays under the radar for most adults, isn't challenged. If you've seen case stories of female bullying, you'll know how bad it can get.

      Adult culture enforces the distinction, too. Women's aggression simply isn't viewed as negatively as men's.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
  2. It's just a part of peoples lives by dmomo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a common way for people to communicate. Facebook is going to be "linked to" everything as long as this is a fact.

    In other news:
    Facebook is linked to 50% of parties. Facebook is linked to 80% of weddings. Facebook is linked to 100% of political. Facebook is linked to 65% of friendships. Facebook is linked to 90% of people liking stuff.

    1. Re:It's just a part of peoples lives by Toe,+The · · Score: 3, Informative

      In other news:
      Facebook is linked to 50% of parties. Facebook is linked to 80% of weddings. Facebook is linked to 100% of political. Facebook is linked to 65% of friendships. Facebook is linked to 90% of people liking stuff.

      Parties, weddings, politics, friendships, and people liking stuff are... all linked to divorce.

    2. Re:It's just a part of peoples lives by Nadaka · · Score: 5, Insightful

      One thing is more linked with divorce than anything else, marriage. 100% of divorces are caused by marriage.

    3. Re:It's just a part of peoples lives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Amen. 50% of marriages end in divorce, the other 50% end in death. Your odds are not good - for God's sake, don't get married!

    4. Re:It's just a part of peoples lives by ThatMegathronDude · · Score: 3, Insightful

      death is cheaper :)

    5. Re:It's just a part of peoples lives by mldi · · Score: 2

      You forgot about CmdrTaco!

      --
      If you aren't suspicious of your government's actions, you aren't doing your job as a responsible citizen.
    6. Re:It's just a part of peoples lives by Dusty101 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Once again, kiddies: Correlation does not imply causation!

      Actually, at the risk of being identified as pedantic, correlation does not *automatically* imply causation. It might, however, still suggest it.

      I still agree with the gist of the parent & grandparent posts' point regarding this particular story, though.

    7. Re:It's just a part of peoples lives by treeves · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Marriage is a necessary, but not a sufficient condition for divorce. Many (even a majority of) people who get married do not divorce.

      If the statistic is thrown around that 50% of marriages end in divorce, consider the many serial divorces, and realize that many people get married once and stay that way, to balance the numbers.
      Take a sample of three people: Joe, John and James.
      If Joe gets married and divorced three times, and John gets married once, and James gets married once, then five marriages have occurred, but three divorces. 60% divorce rate. But only 33% of that group got divorced.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  3. And this is news? by timholman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd be willing to bet that the use of the telephone (one of the greatest social inventions of all time) is linked to just about 100% of all divorces, as well.

    What is it with everyone trying to blame Facebook and Craigslist for all the ills of the world? They are tools, and nothing more. But they are new, and so I guess that makes them suspicious, doesn't it?

    1. Re:And this is news? by SpryGuy · · Score: 2

      Modern telephones, with text messaging and call history (frequently available on the web as well, or via an app) don't have quite the same privacy as the old POTS dial-up corded phones of the past.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    2. Re:And this is news? by DerekLyons · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What is it with everyone trying to blame Facebook and Craigslist for all the ills of the world? They are tools, and nothing more. But they are new, and so I guess that makes them suspicious, doesn't it?

      I'd have thought people interested in technology would be interested in examining how that technology interacts in the real world. I mean, you don't find it interesting that social media is so widely implicated and in what that implies for it's impact on society and the changes as the wired generation reaches adulthood? The positive effects of social media on the current Jasmine Revolution(s) are widely examined and praised here on Slashdot, one would think that the negative effects would be equally interesting.

    3. Re:And this is news? by SpecBear · · Score: 2

      Do they really think they have to spell this stuff out to people? The only way relationships can get "dangerous" to your marriage is if you let them, whether online or not.

      Yes, and no. Yes, in that there are a whole lot of people out there that who really believe that such things "just happen". No, in that the people who need to be told that there's a broad danger zone that you have to travel through before you cross the line into cheating are also the people who are least likely to listen.

      You're absolutely correct in that relationships can only get dangerous if you let them. I've seen this far too many times. I tried to counsel a friend who was able to rationalize all kinds of behavior as long as he wasn't actually cheating. He walked right up to the line and when he took that last step, he claimed it "just happened".

  4. So this would be like email, fifteen years ago? by KublaiKhan · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm fairly sure there were stories like this going around when email became popular, and people started using it to, y'know, communicate with each other.

    Before that, cellphones--telephones--hell, I bet even the telegraph was implicated in adultery.

    (WHAT.ARE.YOU.WEARING.STOP
    SIX.SKIRTS.HOOPS.CRINOLINE.BUSTLE.CHEMISE.HAT.STOP
    NO.GLOVES.YOU.NAUGHTY.WENCH.STOP)

    And back before that, it was letters.

    Anything people have ever used to communicate has been implicated in adultery, because that's sort of how to set up a liason, ain't it?

    --
    In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
    A stately pleasure dome decree
    1. Re:So this would be like email, fifteen years ago? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2

      It's little known that many of the walls of hieroglyphs in Egyptian ruins are just smutty notes people left one another. They were pretty much the Craigslist "adult services" section of their day.

      This, for example: http://humanpast.net/images/hieroglyphics.jpg

      Translates to "For a hot time contact Lusty Isis in the main market square, next to jewelry vendor. 300 papyrus scrolls for complete experience. 50 scrolls extra for Anubis costume."

    2. Re:So this would be like email, fifteen years ago? by corbettw · · Score: 2

      You've got your translations mixed up. That's an ad for a new work-at-home business plan, and it only takes 300 scrolls to start.

      It actually looks promising, I'm gonna go see if it's still available.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  5. 320 Lawyers Like This by dmomo · · Score: 5, Funny

    [thumbs up icon]

  6. It's not facebook's fault you're a jerk by adonoman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you're in one of the "healthiest of marriages", you're not going to be doing anything on facebook or elsewhere that's going to jeopardize your marriage. I'm not going to be an asshole in person, or online. If you think that something is OK online, but not in real life, then you've got problems.

    1. Re:It's not facebook's fault you're a jerk by Anonymous+Monkey · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's not quite that simple. Adults tend to become attached to the person of the opposite sex that they spend the most time with. Before facebook and e-mail it was fairly obvious to see who you were spending time with. Now we have tools that make it unnecessary to be physically with some one to feel like you are with them. This can be deceptive for everyone involved. It starts with "I'm not cheating on my wife, I'm must checking an old girlfriends facebook page." But ends up with more personal conversations being had over facebook than in real life with your wife. And it's more deceptive than letters, because if you are writing letters you must get out paper, a pen, an envelope and a stamp, sit down and write, making it obvious how much time you are investing. However, for many people facebook is only as far away as alt-tab, so the amount of time you spend on it isn't as obvious.

      --
      We are the Borg...
    2. Re:It's not facebook's fault you're a jerk by maxume · · Score: 2

      It still seems fairly simple, the Facebook just happens to make the infidelity a little easier.

      (You seem to be saying that the Facebook activity seems harmless at first and then the person doing it ends up somewhere they didn't see themselves going; that's probably true, but I think the fact that they let it happen probably says more about how ready they were to get married than it says about Facebook)

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:It's not facebook's fault you're a jerk by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2

      Aaaaannnnd...I'm calling bullshit.

      It's dead simple. There is a huge leap between looking at a facebook page of old girlfriends and moving on versus opening your heart up to someone behind your wife's back. A good rule of thumb is that if you can't admit something to your spouse, you're probably doing something that isn't healthy for your relationship. It's not the length of time you spend writing or chatting, it's the context and the circumstances.

    4. Re:It's not facebook's fault you're a jerk by LWATCDR · · Score: 2

      I don't know if you are correct about being attracted to people you are around or not. You are correct about communications with ex's. On of my ex's contacted me when my mother died. My mother helped her out a lot with financial stuff when her father died 10 years ago. She sent me a very heart felt message and then told me about all the issues she was having in her life.
      I really felt bad for her. But knowing her I also knew that she could get the wrong idea if I spent too much time consoling her. Part of becoming and adult is finding that balance in relationships. Being too close to someone can sometimes do more harm than good. That and even then you must always think about how your spouse feels. Your first responsibility is always to your family.
      But what it comes down to is Facebook is a tool for communications and what is communicated is the problem not the tool.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:It's not facebook's fault you're a jerk by phoenix321 · · Score: 2

      The very meaning of the word "Civilization" is repressing basic biological urges.

      One single day of work cannot be had unless you repress basic biological urges. Don't urinate in the hallway, don't defecate in the staff meeting, don't fart in the restaurant, don't masturbate in the cinema and don't have sex with that sickingly cute coworker if she says "no".

      And it goes on: don't kill those who stole your food, don't kill for food, don't take other people's stuff.

      People not repressing their basic biological urges when appropriate *are* assholes, usually. No one would ever get out of bed to work.

  7. And how many are linked to cars? by perpenso · · Score: 3, Informative

    Facebook Linked To One In Five Divorces In US

    And how many are linked to cars (*), another tool used by those who have decided to be unfaithful?

    Yet another time for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_causation.

    (*) Hey, dumb stories demand a car analogy. :-)

    1. Re:And how many are linked to cars? by vux984 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My wife signed up to facebook breifly, "friended" a few friends and family, and within a day or two had old boyfriends and male acquaintances trying to get in touch with her to chat etc... it was vaguely unsettling really. I'm sure some were happily adjusted in their own lives and were just interested in catching up... but it was pretty clear some of them were looking to hook up.

      Its pretty easy to see how that can get out of hand.

      It even seems to be a likely outcome of joining facebook from what I've seen.

      And to rebutt your car analogy -- nothing like that happens you buy a new car. I'll concede that cars are also tools that are used by the unfaithful, but the car doesn't have all your exboyfriends in the backseat when you buy it.

  8. UNPOSSIBLE! Doesn't fit the narrative. by NevarMore · · Score: 4, Funny

    I thought it was the homosexuals that were a threat to my marriage? You can't possibly get me to accept that now its the Internet and the Facebook that are the real barrier to matrimonial bliss.

    Lets be honest, the usual cause of most divorces is the two people in the marriage.

  9. Outside influences by morcego · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Shouldn't people at some point stop blaming outside influences for their own failings ?

    I'm happily married. I'm a hardcore gamer, who spend a lot of time online. My wife hates computer games. We make it work fine.
    My daughter owns a notebook, spends a lot of time online. I don't have any kind of "network nanny" on her computer. So far, she hasn't committed mass murder in her school.

    Go be a husband/wife and a parent. Stop blaming outside influences, computers, games, TV etc for your own failings. Own up to it.

    Facebook don't force people to commit adultery. Videogames don't brainwash kids to murder other people. Deal with it.

    --
    morcego
    1. Re:Outside influences by SpecBear · · Score: 2

      A man is only as faithful as his options. - Chris Rock

      I don't believe Rock is correct for all men, but it's certainly true for bucket number 3. Basically, the difference between buckets #2 and #3 is the amount of effort one is willing to put into cheating, and the level of plausible deniability one needs to rationalize it. Type 2s will make opportunities to cheat, while type 3s will just take advantage of opportunities that arise. Thus the Type 3s are only as faithful as their options. Which, in my book, isn't really being faithful.

    2. Re:Outside influences by Eth1csGrad1ent · · Score: 2

      ahhh.... no..

      Group 3.1) those who might cheat, but don't - are not cheaters....
      and group 3.2) those who might cheat, and do. are DEFINITELY cheaters.


      Stop trying to give people outs... you either respect the person you're with enough not to treat them like shit, or you don't.

  10. Re:The real take away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    is that there are no divorce lawyers in Arkansas. according to the AAML website. Is divorce not legal there?

    Divorce requires a marriage. Marriage requires a license. A license requires the pair to be unrelated.

    Sorry, I feel ashamed and guilty for the above but I'm going to press submit anyway.

  11. Your High School Sweetheart V1.0 is now available by RevWaldo · · Score: 2

    Do you wish to install?
    [Yes] [No]

    .

  12. Re:Your High School Sweetheart V1.0 is now availab by Nadaka · · Score: 5, Funny

    Warning: Virus Detected

  13. misinterpreted the statistic by e3m4n · · Score: 2

    At first I thought it was basically saying that 20% of all facebook users get a divorce and facebook was the culprit. Now I realize its saying that out of all the divorces, 20% of them claim its due to a connection they made with someone on facebook. I would like to know what percentage these 20% contribute to the entire demographic of married couples on facebook (if both spouses on facebook count as 1). That would give a better perspective on how much an impact facebook has IMO. Whatever the results, I would consider the same impact substantially higher for non-married committed relationships where separation consists of no legal paperwork or drawn out procedures. I'm so old and jaded these days I know the grass is never greener on the other side. Everyone has a list of flaws, marriage is all about finding the person with the flaws you are willing to live with. Leaving a known quantity for an unknown quantity is not really the smartest choice. After 11 yrs of marriage I know that if I leave a mess somewhere I wont get judged over it. Likewise if my wife does something that gets on my nerves I'm over it in 10 minutes anyway. None of that exists in a new relationship. Sure its shiny and new, but eventually that wears off and suddenly you realize there's flaws you might NOT be willing to live with. Acceptance is the most important ingredient for making a relationship survive the long haul. Going with shiny and new, you never know if the other person wont bolt as soon as they find out you fart in bed, or like to work late on projects. Just because you two get along great as pen pals is hardly a basis to completely up-heave ones life.

  14. Re:Bogus by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 2

    Is this the Peer Reviewed research that our academic publishers are claiming deserves high fees for? What happened to outrage at bad methodology?

    P.S. Bill and Ted like this.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  15. Marriage Problems in General by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 2

    My Grandma got married a few months back (yes, you read that right). I was talking to one of the ministers at the service, and he was commenting on how he does fewer weddings these days than he used to. I asked him if he thought it might be because people are having more odd-ball weddings, rather than typical church related services. He said he had worried about that at first, but after doing some digging, it just seemed like fewer people were actually interested in marriage. This trend seemed particularly true in younger adults like myself.

    That kind of discussion, plus this kind of news, plus my own personal experiences talking to folks makes me wonder if the institution is simply being questioned on a more fundamental level. It always seemed a bit odd to me (though not completely unreasonable) to commit oneself to the company of another single person for the entirety of one's remaining life. I think a lot of younger folks are starting to question that paradigm as well. As such, I think this particular 'study' might just be revealing a symptom of a deeper topic. I think the traditional institution of marriage is on the verge of slipping from being the formal definition. I don't think as many people in the free (kinda) world today are as interested or intrigued by the idea of spending the rest of their lives with one person. One of the great things the internet has done is that it has opened many people to new perspectives and new ideas. There is a lot to learn out there, and there are millions of beautiful people to meet and get to know on whatever level one may desire. I think, in light of these revelations, folks are starting to see that binding oneself to a single mate for the rest of their lives seems a bit, well, boring. If you marry someone when you are, say 22, and after ten years or so, you two have had a good run, and some good times, but things have stagnated, why not let good memories remain good memories, quit while you're ahead, and go meet someone new (if that's what you both want)?

    Of course, these are just the musings of my own mind, but it's something to think about. I'd wager that over the next few decades, we are going to see the traditional institution of marriage start to fall from its place as the accepted standard.

  16. Facebook a facilitator, not to blame by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 2

    There was a story a few months ago about a preacher warning his congregation about Facebook infidelity. While the his comments were of course hyperbolic, there's some truth at the core. It's not blaming Facebook, but it facilitates people looking up old relationships which could lead to problems.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  17. Farmville by DarthVain · · Score: 2

    Of those involving Facebook, 100% involved Farmville.

  18. Mod parent up by turing_m · · Score: 2

    The bottom line is you get married to have (and raise) children. Getting married for any other reason is idiotic. If you aren't going to commit to marriage, don't have children. There are enough children in the world now.

    Strange, but encouraging to see this sort of wisdom on slashdot. This is the original reason for marriage, (vastly) predating preferential tax treatment etc. Children are an essential part of every civilization, which is why if there is an exception to every culture having a marriage ceremony, it would be the exception that proves the rule.

    And if people are going to bring about the end of a marriage which has borne children, through action or inaction, then let it be said that they are selfish dicks for doing so.

    --
    If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.