Slashdot Mirror


8.8 Earthquake Near Japanese Coast

radioweather writes "USGS is reporting a 8.8 (was estimated first at 7.9) magnitude earthquake off of the east coast of Honshu, Japan. Details from USGS. Tsunami warning issued. Japan's Meteorological agency is saying 20-foot or higher waves are possible from a Tsunami near Miyagi prefecture."

61 of 431 comments (clear)

  1. Look on the bright side by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Funny

    Look on the bright side - if the tsunami washes over Australia at least it'll put the bushfires out.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Look on the bright side by Canazza · · Score: 2

      Look on the bright side. After all the destruction they can rebuild it as Mega Tokyo!

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    2. Re:Look on the bright side by somersault · · Score: 2

      Strangely if you watch videos of the Tsnunami, there is actually burning wreckage being washed along on top of it.. so it actually has the potential to set fire to any trees that it doesn't mow down..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    3. Re:Look on the bright side by MikeDirnt69 · · Score: 2

      With all that japanese tecnology absorbed, the wave can reach your house anytime it want!

      --
      Am I eval()? - http://www.monst3r.com.br
    4. Re:Look on the bright side by bunratty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Earth has had magnitude 9 earthquakes for millions of years. Therefore, obviously, they are nothing to worry about. What's the big deal? Sorry, I can't resist a chance to rib that tired old argument that AGW is not a problem because earth has been warmer in the past.

      --
      What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
  2. USGS continues to upgrade by Kalidor · · Score: 5, Informative

    Quake was upgraded to 8.9 some time ago. Also aftershocks continue.

    http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Maps/region/Asia_eqs.php

    --

    Code softly but carry a big magnet.

    1. Re:USGS continues to upgrade by AnonymousDot · · Score: 2

      Where do I download Quake 8.9? I'm still at version 4...

  3. This is worst than in the movies by Pecisk · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wave moves slowly and silently inland, and carries parts of houses in full flames (!!!). This is insane.

    http://edition.cnn.com/video/#/video/world/2011/03/11/sot.tsunami.hit.japan.cnn?hpt=T1

    Mother Nature shows it's power. For better or worse.

    --
    user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu This server is going down for shutdown NOW!
    1. Re:This is worst than in the movies by osu-neko · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But, damn. That tidal wave footage left me speechless.

      Yeah, I was watching what looked like some water washing across a field carrying some garbage and debris in it, then they zoom in and you see the "garbage" is composed of large buildings, and the "little bits of debris" is a bunch of cars and buses. At which point, the whole sense of scale snaps in and you realize that that water that at first looked to be slowly flowing inland is in fact going far, far faster than you could possibly run if it was coming towards you...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    2. Re:This is worst than in the movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      oh fuck off you pedantic prick

    3. Re:This is worst than in the movies by Blymie · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I can't believe no one has commented on the guy in the car, turning around on the road, and trying to get away! Hope he made it. :(

    4. Re:This is worst than in the movies by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2

      I wonder what would had been the best move in that situation

      I think the best move in a flash flood would be to stay in the car for as long as possible but retain the ability to get out when it starts to sink. Judging by the Mythbusters episode this may not be an easy thing to do. The automatic center punch seems to be the best way to break a car window for quick egress.

      Toyota Hilux after watching everything they can survive on top gear

      I think its the only time they used a toyota in their junk car challenges because they want cars which will break down in amusing ways.

    5. Re:This is worst than in the movies by RogueyWon · · Score: 2

      A tsunami like this is technically a wave, but because of its extremely long wavelength, it neither looks nor acts like a normal oceanic wave. A "normal" wave, even a 15 meter monster (higher than this tsunami, but pretty routine in some parts of the world) will basically splash against the shore but not make it more than a few tens of meters inland at most.

      A tsunami might not be as high as one of these waves, but it contains a far larger mass of water, with far greater momentum. The effects of a significant tsunami making landfall, pretty well demonstrated in the footage of today's, tend to resemble a very fast, very high and very powerful tide.

    6. Re:This is worst than in the movies by Martz · · Score: 2

      The thing is, it's not just 1 truck and the water. As you saw from the footage the sheer amount of debris in the water would be your major problem, not drowning just because you're in the water per se.

      I think the safest thing that driver could do was to put their foot to the floor and drive as aggressively away from the coast line as they could, trying to stick to the roads and make sure that they don't overcook it going round a corner and blow out a tyre.

      It would certainly take some confidence to drive out of a situation like that without panicing and being left a sitting duck in the middle of the road, immobilized by fear.

    7. Re:This is worst than in the movies by aliquis · · Score: 2

      What is an automatic center punch? And yeah, maybe better within than outside but sucks if you get trapped / drown .. Probably not that easy to keep above surface outside either. What's the water temp there?

      In the episode I think of they have put the Hilux on top of a building and let explosions (?) destroy the building and let the Hilux fall with the building. And then put it on fire or something such.

      Still worked after some minor repair/adjusting/refill/whatever.

    8. Re:This is worst than in the movies by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Informative

      To drill a hole in a metal surface you need to start by creating a little depression so that the drill won't slide around. A manual center punch is a short steel rod. The sharp end goes against the metal surface. The blunt end you hit with a hammer. An automatic center punch has a spring between the sharp and blunt ends. You press the blunt end so that energy collects in the spring. When sufficient energy is collected the sharp end snaps out all at once and makes the dimple in the surface. Glass is brittle and fails catastrophically under concentrated load. If your car floods you may not be able to open a window because pressure will stop it sliding. My automatic center punch cost 12 aussie bucks at a hardware store. I keep it in my van, and another in my tool kit where it actually gets used for its intended purpose.

    9. Re:This is worst than in the movies by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      It _IS_ a wave, only with a huge wavelength (usually in the km scale). So it *looks* like a flood, but it's really a series of waves with clear peaks and troughs.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    10. Re:This is worst than in the movies by Remloc · · Score: 4, Informative

      As someone who woke up 35 miles from Northridge that Martin Luther King Day, it is NOT silent. You can hear the rock grinding.

    11. Re:This is worst than in the movies by moortak · · Score: 2

      So that's why my home made fries have tasted wrong.

      --
      Xavier Rabourdin for president 2012
    12. Re:This is worst than in the movies by davidbrit2 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow, you know you've pissed somebody off when burning houses on surfboards are trying to kill you.

    13. Re:This is worst than in the movies by bws111 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You keep posting this same moronic crap on every story about natural disasters. Where is this magical place on Earth that is free from natural disasters (earthquake, tsunami, volcano, flood, drought, extreme cold, extreme heat, hurricane, tornado, blizzard, typhoon, mudslide, avalanche, wild fire, ...)? And yes, you do get to cry when one befalls you. And yes, people will help you out, because most of civilization has compassion and empathy for others.

    14. Re:This is worst than in the movies by Terwin · · Score: 2

      Because it causes less stress to the male nerd psyche to imagine it is a guy in trouble and probably about to be killed than to imagine a female in distress that we have no way of helping and will almost certainty die.

      When analyzing the situation and trying to determine odds and avenues of escape, seeing in your minds eye a guy who was in a hopeless situation die from things beyond his control is not nearly as traumatic as imagining a woman(or school girl depending on how much animae you watch) killed in a variety of ways by the uncaring forces of nature.

      Think of it as a way of maintaining clinical distance from a situation that we have no power to affect.
      (And if you are on this site and do not automatically try to analyze virtually everything you encounter, then how did you get here anyway?)

    15. Re:This is worst than in the movies by MartinSchou · · Score: 2

      Where is this magical place on Earth that is free from natural disasters (earthquake, tsunami, volcano, flood, drought, extreme cold, extreme heat, hurricane, tornado, blizzard, typhoon, mudslide, avalanche, wild fire, ...)?

      Denmark?

      I think the biggest "natural disasters" in Denmark is lots of snow, and even then it's only a disaster in the sense that "it's more than we're used to".

      Extreme temperatures? Lowest recorded temperature: -31.2 C/24.2 F. Highest recorded temperature: 36.4 C/97.5 F

      Most precipitation in a 24 hour period? 168.9 mm / 6.6 inches

      Hurricanes? Since 1891 (120 years of data) - eleven class 4 storms (>28.5 m/s winds for 10 minutes), three classified as hurricanes.

      Tornadoes? A few that classify as maybe an F1.

      Earthquakes? Most topping out at about a 4, as it's sitting on the middle of a plate. A single 5.2 was registered in 1982, originating 40 km under the surface. Only one earthquake recorded that has resulted in any kind of damage to houses, and those were minor damages (think cracks in brick walls).

      Tsunamis? Since we don't get earthquakes, tsunamis need to be caused either by insanely big land slides, like the north face of the Canary Islands dumping into the ocean, or massive earth quakes in the Atlantic. And even then Denmark is shielded quite well by it's location.

      Floods? They happen, but nothing serious. Usually just results in people getting wet living rooms and flooded basements. Most of the newer ones happens because the sewage systems in the cities haven't been updated to keep up with the massive increase in paved surface area that dumps water into them rather than soil absorbing the water.

      Drought? Not really. There are summers where there is barely any rain, but Denmark is a collection of relatively small islands and a single peninsula. It is almost completely surrounded by water, so any kind of serious drought could be fixed with desalination plants very quickly.

      Blizzards? We get those, but moderate temperatures and moderately low amounts of snow means the only reason they cause problems is budget and idiocy. Budget because the local municipalities aren't setting aside enough money for snow clearing and idiocy because people look out at a blizzard and uncleared roads, turn on the radio and hear that the authorities are advising people to stay indoors and then go "what the fuck do they know?" and end up stuck in a ditch.

      Mudslides? No mountains or hills to speak of. Which rules out avalanches as well.

      Wild fires? There are some minor wildfires in the heathland every year, maybe one or two major ones a decade, but nothing life threatening, and definitely not even close to being a natural disaster.

      Volcanoes? Closest volcanoes are in Iceland and southern Europe/Mediterranean.

    16. Re:This is worst than in the movies by IorDMUX · · Score: 2

      Denmark?

      All right, you've covered 0.03 % of the earth's surface, there.

      Assuming we manage to cram some absolutely astounding population density into that country, where should the other 6.75 billion humans live?

      --
      >> Standing on head makes smile of frown, but rest of face also upside down.
  4. 8.9 Now, Tsunamis Ahead by rsmith-mac · · Score: 4, Informative

    Since Slashdot summaries are always a bit dated, it's been bumped up to an 8.9 by the USGS. The good news is that it was off-shore and 15.2mi down, the bad news is that it was off-shore and generated a large tsunami that is still wrecking havoc in Japan and may be heading elsewhere.

    Best of luck to the Japanese; if anyone is prepared it's them, but I don't know how one prepares for something quite like this.

    Meanwhile for the US there are active tsunami warnings in Hawaii, and NOAA has just issued a watch for the US West Coast.

    1. Re:8.9 Now, Tsunamis Ahead by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 2

      To be fair, this is pretty fast by /. standards (though I expect a dupe next week).

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    2. Re:8.9 Now, Tsunamis Ahead by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Funny

      (though I expect a dupe next week)

      It's called an aftershock... :P

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:8.9 Now, Tsunamis Ahead by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2

      Its an 8.8 on the 7 point scale.

    4. Re:8.9 Now, Tsunamis Ahead by JanneM · · Score: 2

      Complementary scales. The Japanese shindo scale describes the effects on a particular point on the surface; this is rather more practically relevant for people in the area than the amount of energy released at the source. So the one and same earthquake is a seven around Sendai, a five near Tokyo and a two in the Osaka area.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  5. Re:Pray by frup · · Score: 5, Funny

    That would require effort.

  6. Local News by ZirconCode · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sitting in Japan, translating from the news here~

    largest earthquake since 300 years
    nuclear power plants affected but nothing leaked
    some factory at the coast started burning, they're showing it over and over again
    8 people so far found dead
    tsunami along almost the entire coast, 3meter to 10meters

    It's very bad,

    They're also warning of another earthquake which is predicted to happen shortly

    1. Re:Local News by ZirconCode · · Score: 5, Informative

      Financial markets went down, Prime Minister already reacted and sent out military and more If you're in Japan: remain calm, move away from coast, keep (clean) water in bathtub & food, DON'T CALL TOKYO

  7. Warnings for entire Pacific area in effect! by muckracer · · Score: 3, Informative

    Japan already got smashed. Further warnings for:

    RUSSIA / MARCUS IS. / N. MARIANAS / GUAM / WAKE IS. /
      TAIWAN / YAP / PHILIPPINES / MARSHALL IS. / BELAU / MIDWAY IS. /
      POHNPEI / CHUUK / KOSRAE / INDONESIA / PAPUA NEW GUINEA /
      NAURU / JOHNSTON IS. / SOLOMON IS. / KIRIBATI / HOWLAND-BAKER /
      HAWAII / TUVALU / PALMYRA IS. / VANUATU / TOKELAU / JARVIS IS. /
      WALLIS-FUTUNA / SAMOA / AMERICAN SAMOA / COOK ISLANDS / NIUE /
      AUSTRALIA / FIJI / NEW CALEDONIA / TONGA / MEXICO /
      KERMADEC IS / FR. POLYNESIA / NEW ZEALAND / PITCAIRN /
      GUATEMALA / EL SALVADOR / COSTA RICA / NICARAGUA / ANTARCTICA /
      PANAMA / HONDURAS / CHILE / ECUADOR / COLOMBIA / PERU

    1. Re:Warnings for entire Pacific area in effect! by sunspot42 · · Score: 5, Informative

      There's a warning out now for the West Cost of the US. Wave expected to hit between 7-7:30 AM PST. Only expected to be 3-4 feet high at this time. Avoid the beach.

      http://wcatwc.arh.noaa.gov/

    2. Re:Warnings for entire Pacific area in effect! by BronsCon · · Score: 2

      correction, northern and mid cali are under warnings. I live on the 3rd floor of my apartment building, work on the 4th floor and park on the roof of my office, i think i'm covered, though i may have to swim home

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    3. Re:Warnings for entire Pacific area in effect! by muckracer · · Score: 3, Informative

      Estimated travel times of tsunami through Pacific (mirrored/relinked from the media, since NOAA and especially the West Coast Center sites are being hammered right now):

      http://www.spiegel.de/panorama/bild-750254-190518.html

  8. Insane! by whoever57 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I am just outside Tokyo and the shaking here was insane. The building shook for about 2 minutes, then it died down, but very shortly later the after-quakes hit. Over three hours after the initial quake and the building is still shaking. Trains are shut down, so people can't get home.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re:Insane! by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2

      Be safe and stay well, man.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  9. Not log10, 10^(11.8 + 1.5M) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hi,

    It's a common misconception that the power of a mag 9 earthquake is 10x more than an 8, or 1,000x that of a 6. It's not. It's more like 31,000x stronger than a 6. If you've ever had the misfortune to experience a 6, you can appreciate that the energy released by these big ones are rather hard to contemplate.

    http://earthquake.usgs.gov/learn/topics/measure.php
            1 J = 1e7 erg
            1 PJ = 1e15 J
          Energy_petajoules = ( 10^(11.8 + 1.5*Ms) ) * 1e-07 * 1e-15

    here's a picture of what this looks like, although ring size scaling has been reduced from the above formula to fit on the screen.

    1. Re:Not log10, 10^(11.8 + 1.5M) by fremsley471 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Richter scale records the amount of energy released and is obviously useful when comparing Mag 4 with Mag 8. But what it doesn't say is how it is released- long and rumbling (4 1/2 mins IIRC for this one) or shorted in a large, powerful, greater displacement.

      Had this driven home in Picton, New Zealand when a Mag 4.5 gave myself and my son a headache, like a punch, but only set the lights swinging, loosening dust, in the library where we were sitting.

  10. West Coast Tsunami warning/watch by dltaylor · · Score: 3, Informative
  11. Tsunami monitoring bouys by DerekLyons · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can see live data from the Tsunami warning bouys here.

  12. Re:Pray by sznupi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or is this just another one of those strange religious things, like where the vengeful, hateful and all powerful being is going to condemn us all to to suffer in fire for ever and ever until the end of time - yet somehow still loves us?

    No, he's a good guy if you give him a chance; he just sometimes can't help hitting me when I deserve it...

    ( http://groups.google.com/group/net.religion/msg/30925fd2c9a20cbd?
    http://groups.google.com/group/net.origins/browse_thread/thread/2511f7a6ccacd6a9/7179db188c826528?lnk=st&q=%22Damager+God%22&rnum=5&pli=1
    also, apart from classic dystheism and gnosticism (too bad the Demiurge preffered to brand gnostics as heretics and to supress them... ;p ): maltheism)

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
  13. Re:Courtesy of the Sun by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Informative

    Meaning what? Neutrinos come from the core of the sun at a constant rate. They have nothing to do with solar flares, and the Earth is mostly transparent to them anyway. If they did dump energy into the rock on a small enough scale to cause something like this, then we would feel it too, in our bodies. We don't. Most of the radiation in the flare is stopped by the magnetosphere, the atmosphere and our bodies, where it damages DNA. I would be surprised if it penetrates 10 cm into rock, let alone 25 km.

  14. Bible Belt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's strange how God always sends tornadoes to the Bible Belt.

  15. Re:Casualties... by siddesu · · Score: 3, Informative

    22 deaths reported so far, but it is still very early to tell. Still, since it happened during daytime, and in a region that is a bit less sparsely populated (http://www.chizuyainoue.jp/j_population/pop_density/1.pdf) than average, the fatalities will probably not be as high as the Awaji/Kobe earthquake of 1995 (when over 6000 people died, most of them in fires).

    But it was a rather scary affair - I was in Tokyo, in the street, and having trouble keeping my balance. Can't imagine what it felt like in a high rise, or closer to the epicenter.

  16. Re:8.9 USGS Computer Generated and not reviewed by osu-neko · · Score: 2

    "This is a computer-generated message -- this event has not yet been reviewed by a seismologist."

    Why is everyone blindly trusting the USGS computer? JMA is still asserting a 7.9.

    No they aren't. JMA upgraded their estimate to 8.8 about an hour ago.

    --
    "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  17. Re:Scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    For any quake that would measure over 3.5 on the Richter scale, the USGS uses the Moment Magnitude Scale instead. The 8.8 (well, 8.9) refers to the latter scale.

  18. Re:Casualties... by reiisi · · Score: 2

    I'd suggest avoiding being drunk this weekend.

    You're going to need your wits about you, whether to escape or whether to help. Although, as I type this, I realize you may not have power to run your computer and read this.

    Be careful.

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
  19. Re:arbitrary? by DrXym · · Score: 2

    Our lack of understanding is not equivalent to God's arbitrariness.

    Also, some people see no difference between causing and permitting, when it is supposed to be the Omnipotent doing either the causing or the permitting.

    Everywhere you could live in a real world is dangerous. Would you rather this Omnipotent God put you in an unreal world so you could try to experience life there?

    Ah I get it, God is just being "mysterious". That's the usual cop out for these kinds of acts isn't it? When someone survives against the odds it's a "miracle" and when they don't it's merely "god's will". So God decides to snuff out a bunch of people or trash their livelihoods it's just part of some "greater plan". A plan which involves carnage, untold suffering, human misery, terror and pain. God really is a complete shit isn't He? Let's all bow down and give worship to our cruel, random, unprovable space tyrant.

  20. Re:suggestions? by outsider007 · · Score: 2

    Yes but before praying, google the appropriate god/offering. In this case it's Poseidon and he's demanding human sacrifice.

    --
    If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
  21. Do your part to help stamp out pseudoscience by dtmos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    when you have massive ejections like yesterdays they can certainly contribute to instability in the Earth's magnetic field, which leads to tectonic shifting.

    Er, no. The way the game of "science" is played, one must first show data establishing a valid statistical correlation between coronal mass ejections and earthquakes, then a plausible model establishing causation. Or, present the plausible model establishing causation, and then predict earthquakes to occur in the future, with a success rate that differs from random chance in a statistically significant manner.

    The reason the relationship between CMEs and earthquakes is not "a more accepted concept than it is", is that no one has done either of the above. It shouldn't be hard: The occurrence of CMEs varies with the sunspot cycle and, therefore, one would expect a cyclic variation in earthquakes if this hypothesis were true. Note that near the solar maximum we expect two or three CMEs per day, so this has to be figured in, too.

    Reviewing your links:

    1. The Mukherjee and Mukherjee paper notes that there was increased solar activity, and then an earthquake occurred (the 2001 Gujarat earthquake). In fact, in the "entire world, a total of 65 earthquakes have been reported on the same day". However, there is no evidence presented that that was an unusually high (or low) number of earthquakes for a day, that other earthquakes occurred on similar days with high solar activity, or that they did not occur on days with low solar activity. In fact, some of that data presented -- in particular, the GOES X-Ray flux data -- is irrelevant to the argument, since X-Rays do not affect the Earth's magnetosphere (the protons arriving two days later, do that) and, in any event, they cannot pass through the Earth's atmosphere and so cannot affect the surface (let alone the rock below). Despite the heading of section 2 of the paper, no "correlation" between CMEs and earthquakes is presented -- just a single coincidence. I went to the dentist on 26 January 2001 -- did that also cause the Gujarat earthquake? The same amount of evidence is presented for both hypotheses.

    2. The de Arcangelis, et al. paper does not even mention a causal relationship between CMEs and earthquakes. Rather, it notes that the statistical properties of the two phenomena are the same: Their distributions are both power-law. This is interesting, but so is the distribution of Internet links, and a million other phenomena. It's nice work, but does not support your hypothesis.

    3. This guy just took a single month's worth of earthquakes and compared it with "solar activity" (without defining the term). Even the author didn't make any conclusions as a result, so why should the reader? Besides, 2010 was one of the quietest years of solar activity in human history -- just wait 'til 2013!

    4. Do you have a link to the entire Jain paper, or are you citing the abstract as the reference? Without the paper it's hard to conclude anything, but even in the abstract the author states, "Our investigation preliminarily shows that each earthquake under study was preceded by a solar flare of GOES importance B to X class by 10-100 hrs. However, each flare was not found followed by earthquake of magnitude >4.0." This situation can occur with unrelated events, simply when one (a flare) is more common than another (an earthquake). Note that B-class flares are incredibly common, and in many years this level of energy represents the standard amount of X-ray flux arriving from the sun, without any flares.

    All of the above does not prove, or even argue, that CMEs do not cause earthquakes. Rather, it says that no significant evidence of such a link has been established. Until it has, one might argue with equal validity that any other random physical phenomenon does, too.

  22. Re:Loss of Coolent Accident? by uncle+slacky · · Score: 3, Informative

    Correction - no leak, and the fire is not in the reactor building:
    http://www.neimagazine.com/story.asp?sectioncode=132&storyCode=2059127

    See also http://www.jaif.or.jp/english/ for updates.

    --
    Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it.
  23. Re:Casualties... by goodmanj · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We're actually pretty good at emergency response to things like hurricanes. Where we fail is at solving vast existential problems with no quick fix solution. Like "a major city is 20 feet below sea level".

    The Katrina disaster occured decades before the levees failed.

  24. Re:Pray by vadim_t · · Score: 2

    Creating a world that has earthquakes and tsunamis and then putting people on it is evil?

    Yes

    You'd suggest, I suppose, that He put the people on a world without earthquakes and tsunamis?

    Yes, if you want to make the claim that your deity is a good one.

  25. Re:A race against time by TheLink · · Score: 2

    8.9 pretty much counts as an epic center. 9.9 would definitely be legendary.

    --
  26. tsunami coming ashore in Hawaii now per cnn by trybywrench · · Score: 2

    CNN is saying the tsunami is coming ashore in Hawaii now, they said they've been evacuating all night so hopefull there will be no deaths. A buddy of mine in Japan said he felt the shaking for "6 or 7 hours" he's checking in regularly on facebook so i know he's safe. thoughts and prayers to all those affected.

    --
    I came to the datacenter drunk with a fake ID, don't you want to be just like me?
  27. Atomic State Of Emergency by assertation · · Score: 2

    The Japanese government just declared an atomic state of emergency. They are denying that any radiation is being leaked, but admitted that one reactor lost its cooling capacity. People are being evacuated.

    In the event of an earthquake, nobody would need to worry about the wind getting lose.

  28. California News Coverage by gearloos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As Usual- I just saw a CBS Weather girl actually say "And it is so surprising that it is sunny on the west coast with all this going on" ! Are media people born with dog shit in their brains or does a small dog have to sit over them while sleeping and make nightly deposits to get it to the level they have in adult life?

    --
    "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
  29. Re:"Supermoon" on Mar 19 by tehcyder · · Score: 3, Funny

    supermoon=syzygy at extreme perigee Coincidence?

    Are you some kind of lunatic?

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  30. Re:arbitrary? by captain_sweatpants · · Score: 2

    No, you don't have the capacity to understand it. Or you have given up trying to understand things as instructed by some arbitrarily designated speaker for the aforementioned cruel, random, unprovable space tyrant. You have chosen ignorance. Forgive us for wanting to understand, because apparently your god won't.