Slashdot Mirror


A Game Played In the URL Bar

Kilrah_il writes "Whether you think it is useful or useless, you can't ignored the sheer cool geekiness of a game played entirely in the URL bar. From the article: '... While getting lost in a three dimensional virtual world amongst increasingly thoughtful plot and character development may be an adequate pastime for some, the only new title the gaming world should be talking about is URL Hunter, an experimental keyboard-character based game played entirely in your browser's URL bar.'"

156 comments

  1. WEEEEEEE !! WE BE HAVIN FUN NOWZ !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lordy lordy we be havin funz nowz !!

  2. Hmm... MOAR! by jackdub · · Score: 1

    Amusing for a few seconds, this uses JS?
    Disappointed that he didn't incorporate a blink tag somehow into the url bar though :(

    1. Re:Hmm... MOAR! by netsharc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That would be easy...

      Since all this does is modify the anchor part of the URL (the part after the #) via Javascript, which is basically what Gawker sites (e.g. Gizmodo) do when you click on a story on their right side navigation bar, and using a JavaScript timer to make the a's move periodically, he could incorporate a period where the whole thing disappears.

      But, fun stuff. I don't look forward to the SEO & advertising monkeys selling "ad space direct on the user's URL BAR!"

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    2. Re:Hmm... MOAR! by Seumas · · Score: 1

      YOU CAN'T IGNORED!

    3. Re:Hmm... MOAR! by ZeRu · · Score: 1

      Amusing for a few seconds

      ...but no more than that.

      --
      If you post as an AC, don't expect me to spend a mod point on you.
    4. Re:Hmm... MOAR! by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      I don't look forward to the SEO & advertising monkeys selling "ad space direct on the user's URL BAR!"

      It would be a waste of money for them. Most non-tech people I know do not ever look at the address bar. And most tech people would probably protest the ad out of principle.

      Heck, most non-technical people type in complete urls into google and bing without even thinking of using the url bar.

    5. Re:Hmm... MOAR! by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

      Amusing for a few seconds. Does this use JS?

      Question marks mark questions.

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  3. I Killed by molnarcs · · Score: 1

    4 animals in 23 seconds. Woohooo!

    1. Re:I Killed by meteficha · · Score: 1

      They are not animals, they are ANTS! And you're an ogre.

    2. Re:I Killed by nomoreunusednickname · · Score: 1

      FcukingGameKilledMySpaceBarIn20Seconds!Aaargh

    3. Re:I Killed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just ascended on my last toolbar run.

    4. Re:I Killed by GNious · · Score: 1

      2 in 30 seconds - not userfriendly for one-handed players :)

    5. Re:I Killed by molecular · · Score: 1

      723 entries in my history in 30 seconds. ffffffffuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu

    6. Re:I Killed by John+Marter · · Score: 1

      That was the coolest part. You have this instant replay that you can view as a two dimensional history of the game.

  4. Better than... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dragon Age 2 by far.

    1. Re:Better than... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dragon Age 2 by far.

      I'd prefer a 2-year-old dragon.

  5. History by DamienRBlack · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well that filled up my history nice and good.

    1. Re:History by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish I saw your post before I started playing...

    2. Re:History by arcctgx · · Score: 2

      If you're using Firefox it's easy to get rid of all history entries from a given domain. Don't know about other browsers out there, but I guess they should have a similar feature.

    3. Re:History by asCii88 · · Score: 1

      Nothing of that sort happened here. Using Chrome 11.0.696.3 dev

    4. Re:History by 517714 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't that make it an inconspicuous means of clearing one's history.

      --
      The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
    5. Re:History by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well that filled up my history nice and good.

      Thank goodness for Clear recent history in FF.

    6. Re:History by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using Linux Google Chrome 11.0.696.1 dev here. History full of crap.

    7. Re:History by galaad2 · · Score: 1

      same thing happened to me, in 30 seconds firefox had recorded a crap load of junk, had to manually delete the site from the history file.

      let's just tag the article with "historybomb" as a warning

      --
      root@127.0.0.1
    8. Re:History by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      12.0.703.0.dev here. History full of crap. And my e-peen is bigger than yours.

    9. Re:History by blai · · Score: 1

      You, as a slashdot user, keep browser history?

      That changes everything.

      --
      In soviet Russia, God creates you!
    10. Re:History by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Internet Explorer 6 here. Whats history?

    11. Re:History by prichardson · · Score: 1

      With Safari 5.0.3 (6533.19.4) I only have 1 piece of history from that site.

      As an aside, a working game in the URL bar is awesome!

      --
      Help I'm a rock.
    12. Re:History by Gamer_2k4 · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's what you're apparently living in.

    13. Re:History by proverbialcow · · Score: 1

      Using the 'current' version (10.0.648.133),and can verify the history is craptastic. Try hitting Ctrl+H.

      --
      The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
    14. Re:History by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perfect, no more need to clear the porn history.

    15. Re:History by frenchbedroom · · Score: 2

      I just typed the first letters of the url in the address bar, pressed down and then held Shift + Del to clear the entries (using Firefox)

    16. Re:History by Mythrix · · Score: 1

      Argh, you're right! After playing this game for not even a minute I had to spend several minutes playing "click every checkbox" to clear the trash from my Google Chrome history.

      It was just like FarmVille all over again!

  6. Just don't try using the back button by nedlohs · · Score: 5, Funny

    to get back to slashdot.

  7. DO NOT CLICK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    it's a goatse mirror

    1. Re:DO NOT CLICK by neumayr · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Why the warning? People need to be educated about clicking shortened urls, and it could be worse than goatse..

      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
    2. Re:DO NOT CLICK by dadelbunts · · Score: 1

      I have seen goatse so many times i am desensitized to it. Hell seeing goatse is comforting at this point.

    3. Re:DO NOT CLICK by Isaac+Remuant · · Score: 1

      Absolutely, they could end up watching a video on how to crack a playstation or even go to Wikileaks!!!

      --
      "Science can amuse and fascinate us all, but it is engineering that changes the world. " - Asimov.
  8. that's goatse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    goo.gl should be a give-away :)

  9. Naysayers by omfgnosis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is it a good game? Not really. The gameplay is pretty awful, and the concept is naturally pretty limited. But it's clever and unusual, and highlights something that is both useful and not widespread enough (the ability to set navigation without leaving a loaded page) as well as something that is of questionable utility but novel (manipulation of an interface element that's currently guaranteed to exist in any desktop user agent to act as a presentation element).

    People can dismiss it, as they have done and surely will do until this article falls below the fold, but it's pretty neat conceptually. It's not earth-shattering. Just neat.

    1. Re:Naysayers by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      "(manipulation of an interface element that's currently guaranteed to exist in any desktop user agent to act as a presentation element)"

      Well, almost. It's not there in full-screen mode browsers, and I know that some of those internet kiosks hide it. Mobile phone and tablet browsers too, to save screenspace. But it's usually there.

    2. Re:Naysayers by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

      Apart from full-screen desktop browsers, none of your list are desktop browsers. Exception noted though.

    3. Re:Naysayers by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      My intended point is that, with the rise of mobile browsing, there is more diversity. A site shouldn't just assume the browser supports flash any more, or that it has a conventional mouse, or even an address bar.

    4. Re:Naysayers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it's clever and unusual, and highlights something that is both useful and not widespread enough (the ability to set navigation without leaving a loaded page) as well as something that is of questionable utility but novel (manipulation of an interface element that's currently guaranteed to exist in any desktop user agent to act as a presentation element).

      Well well, for me that's a HUGE security risk regarding phishing attacks. I create my phishing website and then change the navigation to an official URL. You take a look at that location, think you're on the safe side and I get your credentials.

    5. Re:Naysayers by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

      You *can not* do that. Changing the domain will navigate to the domain you've changed it to.

    6. Re:Naysayers by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

      I specified desktop browsers in anticipation of that point. :)

      And while a conventional site shouldn't assume any of those things, and more (eg. the site in question assumes a keyboard which rules a bunch of mobile devices out), that's not new. A conventional—ie. informational—website should remain functional regardless of the hardware and software interfaces involved, and this has been the accessibility rallying cry since long before there was even such a thing as a "mobile browser".

      That said, this isn't a conventional site we're discussing. It's perfectly reasonable for a specialized application to have certain software and hardware dependencies. It may narrow the audience to impose unnecessary dependencies, but the harm is to the application vendor.

      The problem is that websites and web applications share a platform, and it's easy to get confused about what expectations apply to which.

  10. Re:Thats nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fucking troll.

  11. This is a new game! by Joe+U · · Score: 2

    This is a different game compared to the round of 'get around the filtering software' usually played in the URL bar.

    I usually win more interesting stuff with that game.

  12. If you're using firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you use firefox, clear all the data from the last 1/2 hour and you should be good...

  13. Wow, History explosion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From just being on there, firefox stated 1,611 items of the site in history.
    *mashes delete button*

    Interesting concept, but not executed very well.

    1. Re:Wow, History explosion by Shikaku · · Score: 1

      Sort History by site (& date), right click domain, delete.

  14. Alexa by conscarcdr · · Score: 1

    is the real game being played.

  15. Nice one by HalAtWork · · Score: 2

    I've managed to avoid it for nearly a decade. I can't believe it was the old "color FreeCell bash script" that got me.

  16. Re:Thats nothing by lexman098 · · Score: 0

    What is this digg? Where are the mods?

  17. Evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is pretty evil to your history.

    Also don't accidentally hit ESC multiple times when starting a new game.

  18. Vimperator by seyyah · · Score: 1

    Don't work.

    1. Re:Vimperator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Works "fine" for me in 2.3.1.

      Used ctrl-z to get into pass-through mode. The url with the a:s and o:s were shown at the bottom.

  19. Certainly worth a moment of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just for the chuckle factor.

  20. Re:Thats reminds me of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Goatse Alert ! (got me, dammit!)

  21. parent post links to goatse, downmod plz by emurphy42 · · Score: 1

    (nt)

  22. Shame on you Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...for spreading malware (history crasher).

  23. Re:Well, for one that is really great hack! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After trying the game, that link seems extremely appropriate actually.

  24. Not so great with Vimperator by DataDiddler · · Score: 1

    I don't even have an URL bar. :'(

    --
    Working...
    1. Re:Not so great with Vimperator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what you get for using a dumb vi interface on top of Firefox's.

    2. Re:Not so great with Vimperator by icebraining · · Score: 1

      I did :set guioptions+=T just for this!

  25. O/T: Trusted URL shorteners by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

    Are there any trusted URL shorteners? The link in my sig is shortened because it's too damn long to fit otherwise. I never thought about people avoiding it for fear of a ninja link.

    1. Re:O/T: Trusted URL shorteners by MrWeelson · · Score: 4, Informative

      I use TinyURL, they have a 'Preview' feature that lets you see the actual URL before visiting the destination site - requires cookies.

      Go here - http://tinyurl.com/preview.php - and click the link that says "Click here to enable previews."

    2. Re:O/T: Trusted URL shorteners by supadjg · · Score: 1

      I think people are instinctively wary of web addresses made consisting of random letters and numbers, as they remind them of those received in spam e-mails. I've installed an extension in Safari called Ultimate Status Bar which shows you where shortened urls will redirect ( http://ultimatestatusbar.com/ ), which is very handy.

    3. Re:O/T: Trusted URL shorteners by Kilrah_il · · Score: 1

      I believe you meant "people on slashdot are instinctively wary of web addresess made of random letters and numbers...". The "regular" people don't give a shit about anything, and that's why we have problems with viruses, trojans and plain old Nigarian scams.

      --
      Whenever in an argument, remember this.
    4. Re:O/T: Trusted URL shorteners by mikkelm · · Score: 1

      Very insightful. You should submit this ground-breaking research for publication.

    5. Re:O/T: Trusted URL shorteners by Purity+Of+Essence · · Score: 1

      He has. Here's the link: http://bit.ly/gTJhzk

      --
      +0 Meh
  26. Protip by nethenson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Use history.replaceState to avoid clogging people's browser history and effectively disabling their back buttons.

    1. Re:Protip by Pigeon451 · · Score: 1

      Or simply use private browsing. No history saved.

  27. Great example for non-techs to highlight bad stuff by rcpitt · · Score: 2
    This is a great example to show your non-tech friends what can be done with the URL bar if they visit the "wrong" site.

    Make 'em paranoid - but entertain them at the same time - love it!

    --
    Been there, done that, paid for the T-shirt
    and didn't get it
  28. Re:Well, for one that is really great hack! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More goatse?

  29. Status bar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I admire the creativity, I have to wonder if this type of demonstration might be better placed in the status bar of the browser, rather than the address bar. I think it would give the same result without messing with history/URLs/etc

    1. Re:Status bar? by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Well.. status bar manipulation, they did that on GeoCities sites (pre-cursor to MySpace?) in 1999!

      It's very easy to have marquees, etc, and of course, something like this which also reacts to key press events.

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
  30. Game on IE9 vs. FF4? by hduff · · Score: 3, Funny

    Can we get the IE9 and FF4 benchmarks for this? It's important.

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
    1. Re:Game on IE9 vs. FF4? by Kilrah_il · · Score: 1

      +5 Funny

      --
      Whenever in an argument, remember this.
    2. Re:Game on IE9 vs. FF4? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1 Redundant

  31. Does Not Work by hduff · · Score: 4, Funny

    in lynx.

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
    1. Re:Does Not Work by vaporland · · Score: 1

      I can tell ya, playing this is a bitch on my iPhone 4...

      --
      Ask Me About... The 80's!
  32. Re:Well, for one that is really great hack! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes

  33. Old news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the Xoom days (Webhost not tablet) most pokemon fansites would have javascript that would animate the status bar or have a raise a pokemon with an ascii pokemon in a textbox. I even wrote a javascript pokedex. I browsed hundreds of javascripts back at places like javascript source and dhtml drive back when IE6 wasn't even out for a over a year.

    Get off my lawn and I'm only in my 20s.

  34. Reminds me of Defender of the Favicon by wondershit · · Score: 5, Interesting
  35. Incognito by suomynonAyletamitlU · · Score: 1

    Seriously, everyone, open the link in an incognito window or similar if you have one, it eats into your history as soon as it starts.

  36. (A) Clever. (B) Boring. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 0

    Also, at risk of being called a punctuation Nazi, I am not very impressed with a website that describes itself using an apostrophe to indicate plural ("a's").

    This is one of the simplest rules in English, as such things go, and I simply have doubts about people who get it so wrong.

    1. Re:(A) Clever. (B) Boring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Nope, that is in fact the standard convention for the plurals of lowercase letters:

      http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/621/01/

      I won't call you a punctuation nazi, because Nazis at least made an effort to know their own rules.

    2. Re:(A) Clever. (B) Boring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at the risk of being called a troll, you just herped so hard that you derped there.

      why aren't you in the kitchen?

    3. Re:(A) Clever. (B) Boring. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1, Troll

      "I won't call you a punctuation nazi, because Nazis at least made an effort to know their own rules."

      I have. You are wrong, and Purdue has its head up its ass. Here are just a few other references:

      Grammar Book

      Your Dictionary

      Davis School District K-12 usage guide

      Georgia Southern University Writing Center

      In Wikipedia's entry on it, the mentions of using it for plurals lack citations. But the refutations of those usages do have citations.

      The vast majority of evidence and authority is on my side. You lose. Try again.

    4. Re:(A) Clever. (B) Boring. by Lucidus · · Score: 2

      Rule 6 from your Grammar Book explicitly uses the apostrophe to show the plural of a lower case letter (i's). Your own references refute you.

    5. Re:(A) Clever. (B) Boring. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 0, Troll

      I was being facetious when I wrote "try again", but even though you did, you are wrong again. Rule 6 deals with possession, not plural.

    6. Re:(A) Clever. (B) Boring. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 0, Troll

      And by the way, Rule 6 also deals with compound nouns. Lowercase letters are not compound nouns.

    7. Re:(A) Clever. (B) Boring. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 0, Troll

      However, looking again, I see that Rule 11 does give an example using a lower case "i", even though the rule mentions only that you do not use them with capital letters, and does not mention lowercase at all.

      Even so, that is only one person. All other authorities I have found except Purdue disagree with you.

    8. Re:(A) Clever. (B) Boring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, Rule 11 of your own reference explicitly contradicts you. The Wikipedia article does also: "It is generally acceptable to use apostrophes to show plurals of single lower-case letters, such as be sure to dot your i's and cross your t's." The other references simply don't deal with the issue. I would say that you are clearly wrong here, and you should, as they say, stop digging. If you continue to disagree, please write a sentence using the plural forms of the following letters: a, i, and u. Do you see what hapened there? Congratulations, now not only do you know that you were wrong, now you know why.

    9. Re:(A) Clever. (B) Boring. by Lucidus · · Score: 2

      Oops, I did intend to refer to Rule 11, not Rule 6. So Grammar Book, Purdue, Wikipedia, and the books Eats, Shoots & Leaves and The Well-Tempered Sentence (currently on my desk) all agree with using the apostrophe with lower-case letters to indicate plurals. For upper-case letters, and numerals, usage is currently mixed: formerly, the apostrophe was considered correct; now, it is usually omitted except when this would cause confusion. However, the New York Times, for one example, still uses the apostrophe when pluralizing upper-case letters.

    10. Re:(A) Clever. (B) Boring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All your sources either disagree with you or don't cover the particular topic.

      Here's a couple more sources that agree with me (I'm the original anonymous coward):

      English-Test.net, citing the University of Sussex and the University of Delaware as well as Purdue.
      eHow.com

      And if you google "plural of lowercase letters" you'll find lots more. But you shouldn't have to do that, and this should never even have been an argument. This is (1) a very common convention of English orthography and (2) kind of obvious if you think about it, since otherwise "as" and "is" and "us" would cause confusion.

    11. Re:(A) Clever. (B) Boring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not very impressed with a website that describes itself using an apostrophe to indicate plural ("a's"). This is one of the simplest rules in English, *as* such things go,

      How many?

    12. Re:(A) Clever. (B) Boring. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 0

      "Yeah, Rule 11 of your own reference explicitly contradicts you. The Wikipedia article does also..."

      If you would bother to read the whole post, you will see that I already addressed the Wikipedia issue. The statement that it is "generally acceptable" is not supported by citations, but the statement that authorities disagree with that does have references.

      Like I told the first guy: sorry, try again.

    13. Re:(A) Clever. (B) Boring. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "So Grammar Book, Purdue, Wikipedia, and the books Eats, Shoots & Leaves and The Well-Tempered Sentence (currently on my desk) all agree..."

      You seem to have had the same trouble actually reading what I wrote that the other respondent above had.

      Despite outward appearances, Wikipedia does not agree. The statements that agree are all marked citation needed. The statements that authorities disagree with that position actually have references.

      So -- if you bother to read carefully -- Wikipedia actually agrees with me.

      Eats, Shoots, & Leaves was written by a journalist, not an English professor, school, any other organization with some claim to authoritative knowledge.

      Karen Gordon, author of The Well-Tempered Sentence, may actually have some legitimate claim to knowledge.

      But that still puts the "authorities" who claim that is acceptable at just Purdue, and two individuals. Believe me, I have checked, and references I have found that say an apostrophe is never to be used for plurals easily outnumber those that say it is acceptable, by more than 10 to 1.

    14. Re:(A) Clever. (B) Boring. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "All your sources either disagree with you or don't cover the particular topic."

      Simply wrong. I have already explained why Wikipedia actually agrees with me, twice. The other sources (with the exception of a rather ambiguous entry in Grammar Book), state specifically that apostrophes are not to be used to form plurals. Honestly, I think you may need reading lessons.

      "This is (1) a very common convention of English orthography..."

      An error made frequently is no less an error. I know of a lot of other common mistakes, too. And they aren't in the rule books, either.

      "and (2) kind of obvious if you think about it, since otherwise 'as' and 'is' and 'us' would cause confusion."

      Not at all, since instead of how many a's are there in this sentence?, it is ridiculously easy to write the letter "a" occurs how many times in this sentence? No ambiguity whatsoever. If anything, it is using an apostrophe there that could cause confusion, because in other cases it is used only to show possession.

      A number of references that are considered very authoritative, like The Elements of Style by Strunk & White, mention apostrophes only in relation to possessives, never plurals.

      Of all the sources I found that mention the subject at all, those that say it is unacceptable to use apostrophes to form plurals outnumber those that say it is by 10 to 1 or more. That is good enough for me.

    15. Re:(A) Clever. (B) Boring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you haven't addressed it, you've just made assertions with no evidence whatsoever. And you still haven't provided those sentences with the plurals of i, a, and u. You're wrong and you can't admit it, and it's frankly getting sad.
      You made the assertion, you need to provide the evidence, and you simply haven't. Provide actual evidence of your case or STOP DIGGING!

    16. Re:(A) Clever. (B) Boring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Simply wrong. I have already explained why Wikipedia actually agrees with me, twice. "

      I saw where you said it, I just don't believe you. Provide actual evidence or GTFO. And by actual evidence I don't mean a creative reading of Wikipedia citations, which based on your track record don't say what you claim they say, but an actual authoritative cite saying that you shouldn't use apostrophes to form the plurals of lowercase letters.

      You won't be able to do it because you're wrong. You just don't know you're wrong because your understanding of grammar ended with the authoritative -sounding pronouncements that your grade school teachers made.

      "Of all the sources I found that mention the subject at all, those that say it is unacceptable to use apostrophes to form plurals outnumber those that say it is by 10 to 1 or more. That is good enough for me."

      Yet you've provided none of those sources, and the sources you have provided disagree with you.

    17. Re:(A) Clever. (B) Boring. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "I saw where you said it, I just don't believe you. Provide actual evidence or GTFO."

      With statements like GTFO, you are lucky I'm answering you at all. You sure as hell don't deserve it.

      How can you "not believe" me? I didn't ask you to believe me. It's right there in Wikipedia. I explained right where it was, and gave all the details you need to understand. If you still can't find it, you are hopeless.

      I have nothing further to say.

    18. Re:(A) Clever. (B) Boring. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      I see that somebody who disagrees pulled out their "troll" wand and cast a spell.

      Whoever you are, "troll" is not an acceptable substitute for "I disagree."

    19. Re:(A) Clever. (B) Boring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "With statements like GTFO, you are lucky I'm answering you at all. You sure as hell don't deserve it."

      I should be honored? Someone who invents cites, pretends that sources say things that they simply don't say, shucks and jives when asks to provide evidence, refuses to admit when wrong, has deigned to respond to me?

      "How can you "not believe" me? I didn't ask you to believe me. It's right there in Wikipedia"

      No it isn't. You're lying about what your cites say again. I notice that you aren't actually providing any quotations of your Wikipedia "sources," I take that as evidence that you know you're lying.

      "I have nothing further to say."

      That's a clear admission that you've finally figured out that your cites don't support you.

    20. Re:(A) Clever. (B) Boring. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "I notice that you aren't actually providing any quotations of your Wikipedia "sources,"

      That and other comments merely prove that you're a moron. Everything else has already been said, and I repeat: if you still can't find what I was referring to, after I explained exactly what I was talking about and linked directly to it, then there is nothing further to say.

    21. Re:(A) Clever. (B) Boring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "there is nothing further to say"

      Let's hope that this time you're telling the truth when you say that.

      By the way, here's some actual cites showing that you're wrong. Notice how you don't have to read every second letter of a Wikipedia cite on a Tuesday to understand what they're trying to say:

      http://www.english-test.net/forum/ftopic14784.html - "To form the plural of a lowercase letter, place 's after the letter."

      http://www.hunter.cuny.edu/communications/style-guide/editorial - "A's and B's: When referring to grades, use apostrophes"

      http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/marks/apostrophe.htm - "An apostrophe is also used to form some plurals, especially the plural of letters and digits"

      But let me guess, these cites are worse than your numerological reading of the citations to a Wikipedia article that explicitly contradicts you. Question: Is your inability to admit that you're wrong evidence of some sort of psychological issue?

    22. Re:(A) Clever. (B) Boring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't mark you a troll because they disagree with you. They marked you a troll because it's obvious that you're wrong but you won't shut up about it. It's perfectly OK to go through life being wilfully ignorant, so long as you're willing to STFU about it so it doesn't annoy everyone else.

    23. Re:(A) Clever. (B) Boring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Despite outward appearances, Wikipedia does not agree. The statements that agree are all marked citation needed. The statements that authorities disagree with that position actually have references."

      Present an actual link to "The statements that authorities disagree with that position," because to be perfectly honest, based on your track record of being unable to understand what your cites are actually saying, those authorities aren't saying anything of the kind.

      I actually wasted my time and went to Wikipedia, and to my profound surprise (sarcasm) didn't see a single link to any authority disagreeing with the proposal that you must use an apostrophe to pluralize lower case letters.

      P.s., claiming that Wikipedia cites say something that they clearly don't say is just one of many reasons that you got marked troll.

    24. Re:(A) Clever. (B) Boring. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Have you ever heard the phrase, "The pot calling the kettle black?"

    25. Re:(A) Clever. (B) Boring. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "... your numerological reading of the citations to a Wikipedia article that explicitly contradicts you... "

      I repeat: the statements in Wikipedia that say it is acceptable are ALL marked with "citation needed". That means they are unsupported statements that anybody can make. Like you, for instance. But the parts where it says that authorities disagree, all have actual references. Imagine that.

      The fact is that just about anybody can post just about anything on Wikipedia. But what matters -- even the folks at Wikipedia will tell you this -- are the references. So if you really want to keep making the same losing argument, go ahead. I think it's pretty funny.

      And I will repeat this, too: I, too (as I mentioned a long way back in this thread) have already seen sources that say it is okay to use apostrophes that way. But the sources I've seen that say you can't have outnumbered them by 10 to 1.

      That's good enough for me. If it's not good enough for you, fine. But arguing about it here won't get you anywhere.

    26. Re:(A) Clever. (B) Boring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "That means they are unsupported statements that anybody can make" you mean, like when you say that "the sources I've seen that say you can't have outnumbered them by 10 to 1" and then completely and utterly and hysterically fail to provide a single one? And then you provide cites that you obviously haven't read that directly contradict you? And then you bluster and whine, and make a fool of yourself, when it's obvious to everyone that if there was a single cite out there that supported you, you would post it in an instant and gloat about it? But there isn't a single cite out there that supports you, so you lie about Wikipedia cites?

      "But the parts where it says that authorities disagree, all have actual references." No they don't. I checked. You're a liar. There is not a single cite in that article that disagrees with pluralizing a lowercase letter with 's. Unlike you, you borderline retard, I actually read the cites, so I know what they say.

    27. Re:(A) Clever. (B) Boring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the relevant difference: I'm not wrong.

  37. Re:Hmm... MOAR! -- OK (Warning: Huge JS blob) by VortexCortex · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Amusing for a few seconds, this uses JS?

    Yep.

    Here, I wrote a JavaScript: URL that creates a Tetris game at the top of whatever page you're on.

    URL Tetris

    Protip: Create a Bookmark, set the Location of the bookmark to the tetris code... Click the bookmark and play tetris on any web page.

  38. For some reason by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

    Not totally sure why, but that reminds me of a very old Star Trek game we used to play on PDP 11 computers.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:For some reason by arsemonkey · · Score: 1

      It was the map,, I think the Klingons were 0's. loved that game; I think it was on the 8088. Damn I am old.

    2. Re:For some reason by ldephil · · Score: 1
    3. Re:For some reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes!
      I had a port of the same game on a Wang 2200 MVP!

    4. Re:For some reason by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      There were a couple variations. There was the first one that was more strictly turn-based - after each turn you'd get a new printout of your current grid, and boy did it churn through a lot of paper. But later they adapted it for those new-fangled VT-52 (or whatnot) terminals, and the enemy ships could move within the grid (or come in or leave) as you attempted to fire.

      Wow, I wasted a lot of time on those games...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  39. URL Tetris Source Code by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

    (please excuse the self-reply)
    In case anyone wanted to see the source code:
    Here's the unencoded version of the URL Tetris.

    1. Re:URL Tetris Source Code by Isaac+Remuant · · Score: 1

      Nice work! Thanks for posting the code.

      --
      "Science can amuse and fascinate us all, but it is engineering that changes the world. " - Asimov.
    2. Re:URL Tetris Source Code by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

      Nice work! Thanks for posting the code.

      Thanks for playing.

      P.S. I didn't hard code the game size... At the start of the source you can change the variables to create whatever size game you want:
      w=10;h=20;s=18;ds=2
      w = Number of cell wide.
      h = Number of cells tall.
      s = Size of each cell in pixels. ds = Drop Slide (Number of drop cycles to wait after the piece has touched down before locking the piece in place).

      Just edit those before you press Enter. If you make the game too big and can't close it, hit the [Esc] (Boss Key).

      P.P.S. The pieces aren't completely hard coded either. The block array "B" contains a 4x4 bitmap (32bit integer) to define the shape, and a CSS color code for each piece. You can add/remove pieces by adding/removing [int, col_str] elements.

      // The relevant code to modify begins @ char column 725 (aprox 1/4th into the code): B=[[0x4460,'#f80'],[0x2260,'#229'],[0x262,'#93d'],[0x462,'#a11'],[0x264,'#091'],[0x660,'#ee3'],[0x2222,'#2ad']];

      As you can see the B[0] (the first piece) is [0x4460, '#f80']
      The integer is given in Hex... Each hex digit is one row of the piece's block bitmap:
      // Least significant bit is in the first row (from top to bottom).
      4 = 0100 = .X..
      4 = 0100 = .X..
      6 = 0110 = .XX.
      0 = 0000 = ....
      As you can see the 1's make up the L piece, and '#f80' is CSS color shorthand for #ff8800 ( #RrGgBb )
      Red=255, Green=136, Blue=0 ( Orange ).

      You can make a big gray hollow wedge piece via:
      F = 1111 = XXXX
      A = 1010 = X.X.
      C = 1100 = XX..
      8 = 1000 = X...

      // The element would be:
      [0xFAC8, '#888']
      (However, I find just adding one block to any of the standard pieces provides more interesting / lest "FFFFFUUUUUUU--" game play; Big solid pieces and a larger grid is fun too.)

  40. Re:Hmm... MOAR! -- OK (Warning: Huge JS blob) by Rizimar · · Score: 1

    That was a lot of fun. This version of Tetris was not stingy on the line pieces :)

  41. Re:Hmm... MOAR! -- OK (Warning: Huge JS blob) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Come on, do you really expect the intelligent people of slashdot to paste a highly-obfuscated blob of javascript from an untrusted party into their url bar?

  42. Ancient technology by gr8_phk · · Score: 1

    I did a "stateless" CGI othello game back in like '94 that stored the game state in the URL. The difference is that I also displayed a board on the screen via HTML generated on the fly. Automatic reload in X seconds was used to have to computer make its response move. The back button worked too. Of course tons of people on /. did similar things back then too.

  43. You can selectivly delete history in firefox.. by nzac · · Score: 1

    Ctl+shift+H to open history window
    Type in the common keyword or url: "points" or "url hunter"
    C-a all the selection and press delete

    This also works well for other sites

    1. Re:You can selectivly delete history in firefox.. by DavidRawling · · Score: 3, Informative

      Or just right-click on one of the URLs and choose "Forget about site".

  44. Re:Hmm... MOAR! -- OK (Warning: Huge JS blob) by tepples · · Score: 1

    do you really expect the intelligent people of slashdot to paste a highly-obfuscated blob of javascript from an untrusted party into their url bar?

    Yes, because JS in a browser is sandboxed. It's not like running a shell/Perl/Python script with full user privileges.

  45. That's nothing new. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://notpron.org/notpron/ is also played in the URL bar. Most of the time.

  46. Re:Hmm... MOAR! -- OK (Warning: Huge JS blob) by cvtan · · Score: 1

    What, no music? This plays well and I can't believe I pasted something unknown into my browser. If you can do this, certainly you can fix the gray text on gray background on Slashdot...

    --
    Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
  47. Re:Hmm... MOAR! -- OK (Warning: Huge JS blob) by monkyyy · · Score: 1

    i did :D

    --
    warning pointless sig
  48. Scrollbar? by dragonhunter21 · · Score: 1

    I could see a really cool use of this on news sites- a scrolling ticker at the top of the page.

    --
    Sent from my CR-48
  49. I've been playing a game in the URL bar for years by sootman · · Score: 2

    It's called "change the numbers to find more porn."

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  50. Re:You can selectively delete history in firefox.. by Rhodri+Mawr · · Score: 1

    Thank you for that snippet. Nice feature. Mod parent up - informative.

  51. Re:Hmm... MOAR! -- OK (Warning: Huge JS blob) by mr_mischief · · Score: 2

    It's now been tested in Chromium.

    The q(') key moves the piece to the right. The enter key drops the piece. The space bar will also drop the piece if there's nowhere to scroll down on the page behind it. The arrow keys do nothing unless there's somewhere to scroll the page left or right, in which case they do.

    It's currently unplayable on Chromium due to these issues, but it's still a pretty impressive demo.

    Chromium version is 11.0.696.3 (dev) Mandriva 2010.2 for the record. I get the same results from Google Chrome 7.0.517.41 on the same system.

    It works well in Opera.

    Version information
    Version: 11.01 Build: 1190
    Platform: Linux System: x86_64, 2.6.36.2-desktop-2mnb
    Browser identification: Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux x86_64; U; en) Presto/2.7.62 Version/11.01

    Some of the lesser-known browsers:

    • Konqueror says it doesn't support the URL scheme javascript: and is explicitly clear about that.
    • Arora 0.5.2 (WebKit version: 532.4) plays as Chrome/Chromium do. It's one of those many lightweight WebKit browsers.
    • Midori 0.2.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1, WebKitGTK+ 1.2.0) is a lightweight web browser that also plays as Chromium/Chrome do. I see a pattern.
    • Epiphany (Web Browser 2.30.5) is another WebKit browser. This one fairs worse than the other WebKit browsers because any single-quote key hit works once for the JavaScript and the next is captured by the browser to open its search feature or type into it. This requires putting focus back on Tetris with the mouse.
    • Hv3 oddly enough supports JavaScript but refuses to recognize a javascript: scheme. It doesn't clearly state its distaste for it like Konqueror. It just puts 'http://' in front of it automatically.
    • Fennec 1.0.0 (The mobile thing from Mozilla) did run the Tetris interface but not take any input from the keyboard at all. That's probably a bug in the early version of their mobile browser ported to the desktop. The mouse clicks for reset and quit worked fine.
    • NetSurf (ported to Linux from RiscOS, this particular one being on a Pentium M laptop with Mandriva 2010.0 as I haven't put it on the desktop yet) doesn't like the URL in the location bar. It also wouldn't load the script properly from a link. The browser has some JavaScript support, but it just doesn't go this far. It officially has only partial support, and this outstrips that. It's no big deal for those of us who use it once in a while alongside bigger, slower browsers that handle much more JavaScript.

    So, I think there you have it. You support Firefox and Opera well right now. If you can figure out WebKit compatibility you should be able to waste everyone's time, as everyone should have at least one of Firefox, Opera, Chrome, Chromium, or Safari. If not, WebKit should also get those freaks with none of the mainstream browsers who happen to have Arora, Midori, or some other minor WebKit browser.

    My Galeon installation is currently broken and not worth fixing with all these other browsers around, but I'm guessing it should work the same as a really old Firefox since it uses Gecko. I was unable to find a version of it newer than 2006 anyway, and that's ancient when talking about JavaScript in a browser. I read that the project was completely discontinued in 2008.

    So, there's a testing report and a brief survey of the randomness installed on my systems for cross-browser testing purposes. HTH. HAND.

  52. What I Think: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sucks.

  53. Re:I've been playing a game in the URL bar for yea by bruno.fatia · · Score: 1

    Looks Way Better than "change the numbers to get MS points"

  54. Re:Hmm... MOAR! -- OK (Warning: Huge JS blob) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cross site scripting?

  55. Re:Hmm... MOAR! -- OK (Warning: Huge JS blob) by tepples · · Score: 1

    Please be more specific about what kind of cross-site scripting vulnerability you're thinking of, other than say some PHP page that forgot to htmlspecialchars() a field.

  56. Re:Hmm... MOAR! -- OK (Warning: Huge JS blob) by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    Impressive. Hat tipped in your direction, Sir.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  57. Re:I've been playing a game in the URL bar for yea by cyxxon · · Score: 1

    The fun thing about that game is, you never even know how many levels there are! Also, you don't have to beat a level to proceed to the next one...

  58. Re:Hmm... MOAR! -- OK (Warning: Huge JS blob) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  59. Hackers by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of a game I played in uni where there was a clue as to the next URL on each page. A quick google didn't find it, but I'm pretty sure the name had something to do with being a hacker (coz who else knows how to use an address bar?)

  60. Re:Hmm... MOAR! -- OK (Warning: Huge JS blob) by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    Come on, do you really expect the intelligent people of slashdot to paste a highly-obfuscated blob of javascript from an untrusted party into their url bar?

    Luckily, the code didn't work in Opera at work on Windows. Phew!

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  61. did something similar in 2002 by kisrael · · Score: 1

    I made a similar thing in 2002, but even more limited because it used the one line of a grey pushbutton as both the input and the output of the game!
    http://kirkjerk.com/features/gb.html

    --
    SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
  62. Re:Hmm... MOAR! -- OK (Warning: Huge JS blob) by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    Could you explain what risk these intelligent people would be avoiding that they are not subjecting themselves to every time the click on link to an unknown site on Google?

    To the point, what risk does Javascript in the URL bar pose that Javascript in the page not pose?

  63. A real URL game was invented a long time ago by ianalis · · Score: 1

    notpron.com

  64. NEED MOAR by Fluzzarn · · Score: 1

    this is awesome, but needs more levels

  65. 3n3rgy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lately I've been staying up late playing. I take this energy shot DynaPep, It keeps me going all night. Amazing stuff, I even found this coupon code 10MAR11 that you can use at http://www.evolutionnutritionproducts.com

  66. Re:Hmm... MOAR! -- OK (Warning: Huge JS blob) by EnglishDude · · Score: 1

    Brilliant! I like it! :-D Doesn't work 100% perfectly in Opera[1] though as pressing the right arrow makes the page scroll to the right, covering up the playing field.

    [1](Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; en-GB) Presto/2.7.62 Version/11.01