Slashdot Mirror


Univ. of Illinois Goes War-of-the-Worlds On Students

theodp writes "'Strange beings who landed in New Jersey tonight are the vanguard of an invading army from Mars.' (Orson Welles, 1938). 'Active shooter at BUILDING NAME/INTERSECTION. Escape area if safe to do so or shield/secure your location.' (Univ. of Illinois, 2011). An alert message sent out Thursday to 87,000 emails and cell phones warning recipients to escape from an 'active shooter' at the University of Illinois was an error, the Office of the Chief of Police confirmed. 'The alert sent today was caused by a person making a mistake,' explained an email. 'Rather than pushing the SAVE button to update the pre-scripted message, the person pushed the SUBMIT button. We are working with the provider of the Illini-Alert service to implement additional security features in the program to prevent this type of error.'"

38 of 168 comments (clear)

  1. Just a typo by GPLDAN · · Score: 2

    It meant to say "Reactive HOOTERS at State & Main."


    It's part of a new network detection system for big, non-artificial breasts detected by a camera system. The roll out is initially for Los Angeles and Beverly Hills, the AI is being perfected by the NCSA guys.

  2. Umm, 'scuse me? by Guspaz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    But Schroyer said some students were shaken by the initial alert and criticized the university for taking about 12 minutes to send an email confirming it was false.

    "That was unacceptable in my opinion," he said.

    Really? 12 minutes is too slow? The thing sent out 87,000 e-mails (which takes a while no matter how big and distributed your mail system is), and the person who made the error probably didn't notice until either they got the e-mail or somebody who did told them.

    I think 12 minute response time for something like this is pretty impressive.

    1. Re:Umm, 'scuse me? by halfEvilTech · · Score: 2

      apparently those same students thought that the sender had their email open as well and recieved it right away. Of course you need to the proper people that this happened and compose the confirmation. At this point said person is really wanting to make sure they get it correct which takes a few minutes.

      But I guess that is not good enough for the TGIF (twitter, google, ipad, facebook) generation and their I want it now mentality

    2. Re:Umm, 'scuse me? by DisKurzion · · Score: 3, Informative

      At the school I work for, there was a major outcry when we implemented a universal SSO for the ever-increasing amount of online tools put out by our school.

      There were numerous articles in the school paper decrying the change.

      5 years later, and we could only imagine the outcry if we got rid of it: "WHAT DO YOU MEAN I'D HAVE TO MAINTAIN A SEPARATE PASSWORD FOR EVERY SYSTEM!!!???"

      Students complain for the sake of complaining.

    3. Re:Umm, 'scuse me? by McKing · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Two things I've learned working at a University:

      1) Students will complain about anything.
      2) Faculty will complain more than students.

      --
      If only "common" sense was actually that common...
  3. Implemented! by kanweg · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do you want to cancel the alarm?
    [Cancel] [Cancel]

    Bert

  4. Easy solution by pak9rabid · · Score: 2

    How about prompting for a CONFIRMATION before spamming thousands of text messages/emails out?

    1. Re:Easy solution by dkleinsc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Anyone who does usability studies can assure you that people won't read confirmations, they'll just blindly click OK. And it's worth noting here that this was entirely an ID10T error, not a computer glitch, although I'm sure a fair number of folks will try to blame it on the computer.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    2. Re:Easy solution by pak9rabid · · Score: 2

      Yes, but seeing *something* pop-up when the action you're taking doesn't usually produce a pop-up should be indication enough that something isn't right, even if the user doesn't take the time to read it.

    3. Re:Easy solution by Rary · · Score: 2

      Anyone who does usability studies can assure you that people won't read confirmations, they'll just blindly click OK.

      This is true if you're discussing confirmations that come up for frequent actions. However, if your normal action (save) just happens without any confirmation, and your non-normal action (submit— how often do they actually need to use this system?) pops up a confirmation, it tends to catch you off guard and make you take notice that something unexpected is happening. This would be precisely the correct use of a confirmation dialog.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    4. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Anyone who does usability studies can assure you that it's a bad idea to have a button labeled "submit" close to one labeled "save".

      I am pretty sure this was some kind of web app. A lot of web apps use the standard "submit" button for saving form entries.

      This was neither an ID-ten-T, nor a system glitch, but a badly thought through design.

    5. Re:Easy solution by blacklint · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, yes. Most of the time people think "Of course I want to do !" when they see a dialog, because they actually did intend to press that button at the time. But they do solve the problem of "Oh no, I didn't mean to click that!" (I've accidentally sent uncompleted emails an embarrassing number of times), and really are useful for things that cannot be undone. Such as, oh, I don't know, sending mass text messages.

      This most certainly was an interface problem. If someone is intending to update a template, if they can accidentally send an uncompleted message to thousands of people, the interface designer horribly screwed up. Those options should be no where near each other. Humans routinely make small mistakes, and blaming the user for interface problems only makes things worse.

    6. Re:Easy solution by Chuckstar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This was not an ID10T error. This was bad human interface design.

      The user had two choices: "Save" and "Submit". My first reaction to seeing that was "what's the hell is the difference between Save and Submit?"

      Apparently:
      "Save" = update the template
      "Submit" = send out the alert

      IMHO, that's a terrible choice of verbs. You could almost reverse the two and still have them make just as much sense. How about "Update" and "Send"? Or this might even be one of those rare times when you want to use longer button names -- "Update Template" and "Send Out Alert". Much less likely for a mix-up like this if those were the button titles.

    7. Re:Easy solution by aix+tom · · Score: 2

      Yep. I would probably have labelled the buttons "Save Text" ( normal grey ) and "SEND ALERT" ( Red, and in a completely different location, with a big ALERT Icon on it. )

      ( And, of course, the "SEND ALERT" shouldn't be the default action of the form that gets triggered when you hit enter. Just saying. ;-P )

    8. Re:Easy solution by pak9rabid · · Score: 3, Funny

      Better idea: A modal dialog pops up, with a big red countdown from thirty seconds before the 'ok' and 'cancel' buttons become enabled, to make sure the user reads it. It also plays an audio clip at full volume to tell everyone else in the office to check it.

      Michael Bolton: That is the worst idea I've ever heard in my life.
      Samir: Yes, this is horrible, this idea.

    9. Re:Easy solution by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 2

      Easier yet would be separating the "I want to set an alarm" path from the "I want to change the scripts" path. Having both functions in the same dialog is simply asking for trouble.

      And hey, they were using custom software. It doesn't have to precisely follow the methods for creating an email template, does it?

      And... why are people fixated on just the words? Why not make the "send alarm" button have Big Red Friendly Letters, a different button shape, or perhaps have the button slide away from the mouse, requiring the user stalk and corner it in order to click on it?

    10. Re:Easy solution by Belial6 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In our system the button that resets all of the application's configuration data requires that the user type in "Break this application". We have yet to have someone claim that they accidentally type the letters to spell out "Break this application".

  5. Irony by ncttrnl · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sounds like UI needs a better UI on their emergency notification system.

  6. Don't they have a test system? by mcmonkey · · Score: 2

    It sounds like they have no way to test the message other than it sending it out to every address in the alert list.

    Let's say in this case after updating the message templates, the person hit 'save' rather than 'submit'. On the bright side, then no message would have been sent. On the not-so-bright side, no message would have been sent!

    Don't you want to know before there's an actual emergency that your emergency message is working? Not that this incident was an intentional test, but shouldn't they have a test after updating the message template?

    1. Re:Don't they have a test system? by aztektum · · Score: 2

      It sounds like they were adding some campus specific default messages into the system to use in a hurry.

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
  7. Re:Scary by Reapman · · Score: 2

    No, we live in a society that THINKS they have to pre-prepare texts and emails to warn students of this. To be honest considering the time it takes to fire off an email saying "get the hell away from here" having prepared messages for this is kinda dumb in my not so humble opinion.

    I wonder what the odds are in fact of getting shot at school...

  8. Re:Scary by VolciMaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The really scary part is that we live in a society where the police have to pre-prepare texts and emails to warn students that someone is shooting up their school.

    "pre-prepare"?!?

  9. Re:scary, but.. by LighterShadeOfBlack · · Score: 2

    Clicking one wrong button lead to 87,000 emails being sent out saying there was a gunman on the campus and you're asking if the system is broken? What would it take for you to be sure the system was broken, if pressing the wrong button actually unleashed a gunman onto the campus?

    --
    Spelling mistakes, grammatical errors, and stupid comments are intentional.
  10. Re:Scary by Anrego · · Score: 2

    Now I have to watch some George Carlin when I get home :(

  11. Re:Scary by causality · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, we live in a society that THINKS they have to pre-prepare texts and emails to warn students of this. To be honest considering the time it takes to fire off an email saying "get the hell away from here" having prepared messages for this is kinda dumb in my not so humble opinion.

    I wonder what the odds are in fact of getting shot at school...

    But schools are gun-free zones. No murderer would ever carry a gun into a gun-free zone and start shooting! It's not allowed.

    --
    It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
  12. Re:It Takes TWO controllers by ackthpt · · Score: 2

    To turn keys that initiate the Minute Man launch sequence...

    But this system can be triggered by someone with poor hand-eye coordination. This is why developing your FPS skills are more important than ever!

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  13. INterface guidlines by hoggoth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And this is why "[SAVE MESSAGE TEMPLATE FOR LATER USE] [SEND MESSAGE IMMEDIATELY]"

    is better than "[OK] [CANCEL] [ABORT] [ERROR] [RETRY]"

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    1. Re:INterface guidlines by Mr+44 · · Score: 2

      This is actually one of the improvements in Windows Vista:

      The TaskDialog is the OS functionality for easily showing a dialog with descriptive button labels instead of just old school MessageBox with OK/Cancel/etc.

  14. Re:Scary by Chuckstar · · Score: 2

    You don't think it makes sense to sit down ahead of time and think of appropriate wording for an emergency email before an actual emergency occurs? Quick... where should we tell them to go? or should we tell them to stay put? What's the best way to word this to get their attention, but without creating too much panic?

    In an actual emergency, you wouldn't want to take even 5 seconds to think of those answers.

  15. Re:Scary by UBfusion · · Score: 2

    The really scary part is that both the authorities think they are properly protecting citizens by sending electronic messages and the the citizens think they are properly protected by receiving said warnings. To the point that if authorities don't send any they are considered accountable or accomplices and if citizens don't receive any they are feeling safe.

  16. Re:It Takes TWO controllers by 517714 · · Score: 3, Funny

    In this case FPS skills apply whether the warning is mistaken or not.

    --
    The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
  17. Re:For the love of... by BBTaeKwonDo · · Score: 2

    >a user could have typed the message in themselves

    They set up a template so that, in the stress of the moment, the person sending the message wouldn't forget to include some important detail (e.g., location of the emergency, what to do, etc.)

  18. To the rescue... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 3, Informative

    We are working with the provider of the Illini-Alert service to implement additional security features in the program to prevent this type of error.

    Clippy:

    "It looks like you're about to panic thousands of people. Would you like help?

    • Get help panicking people.
    • Just panic people without help.
    • Don't show this tip again.
    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  19. Notification System by dlapine · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm an alumni of the U of I, and I work here as well. I get these notifications. I thought I'd bring up 2 points:

    1. Fortunately, given the spring break, the actual number of people on campus able to read this was was quite low.
    2. Unfortunately, we just had a fire on Green street 2 days ago, and we got an alert from the same system informing us about it. So this warning was probably taken very seriously for those 12 minutes.

    Overall, I'm satisfied with the system and I was impressed by the very explicit letter from the chief both explaining the error and accepting the blame for the mistake. She also detailed the upcoming efforts to address the error. I'd like to see the same level of accountability from my ISP or phone company.

    --
    The Internet has no garbage collection
  20. Re:Scary by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

    I suspect the chances of getting shot on the way to or from school are higher - and the chances of getting hit by a car on the same journey a lot higher still.

  21. Awful summary by Darinbob · · Score: 2

    This has nothing to do with War-of-the-Worlds, except that there was false panic. The Orson Welles broadcast was done as a fictional story, this incident was an accidental broadcast of an alert.

    Next up, a headline saying "Oncologist Pretends to be Orson Welles with Wrong Diagnosis!"

  22. "active shooter" by wsanders · · Score: 2

    "Active shooter" is police jargon for a Columbine-type situation.

    The opposite isn't "passive shooter", but the term signifies (at least in some jurisdictions) a situation in which immediate action needs to be taken, rather than, say, waiting to call out the SWAT team.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  23. Re:Poor UI design? by Belial6 · · Score: 2

    By having the same form used to generate templates as used for sending real messages, the developers had already made a mistake in their application's workflow.