Slashdot Mirror


Samsung Keylogger Stories a False Alarm

Trailrunner7 writes "The panic that arose yesterday about Samsung allegedly shipping laptops that contained a pre-installed keylogger turns out to have been a complete mistake after further investigation by security researchers and the company itself. In fact, the controversy was the result of a false positive from one commercial antimalware suite and nothing else. Several outlets reported on Wednesday that Samsung laptops had been found to contain a keylogger known as StarLogger right out of the box from the factory. However, upon closer inspection by security companies, the folder on the laptops that supposedly contained the malware was actually a directory that is part of Windows' multi-language support."

183 comments

  1. epic FAIL by pasv · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We believed someone who used a 3rd rate antivirus and didnt verify with a kernel debugger? FAIL on all our parts especially the "security researcher" who so thoroughly researched this one

    1. Re:epic FAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We believed someone who used a 3rd rate antivirus and didnt verify with a kernel debugger? FAIL on all our parts especially the "security researcher" who so thoroughly researched this one

      You wouldn't even need a kernel debugger. I think just a basic examination of the binary itself, and maybe some network traffic capturing would have ruled this "malware" detection out as a false positive.

    2. Re:epic FAIL by Whalou · · Score: 1

      If you consider this an epic fail on the part of security experts, the HBGary incident must be a legen...

      wait for it

      ...dary fail.

      --
      English is not this .sig mother tongue...
    3. Re:epic FAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There was no security researcher who thoroughly researched it. It was some random stupid ass blogger. And someone posted it to Slashdot and it got promoted to the front page because it was inflammatory and would get lots of hits.

      This is the future of news; random dilhole bloggers will post the news because nobody is willing to pay for "real" (although maybe biased) reporting.

    4. Re:epic FAIL by Mascot · · Score: 1

      From what I read, it wasn't even question of a binary. The mere presence of a _folder_ with the offending name triggered the AV. That AV's gotto be the new benchmark as far as being crappy goes.

    5. Re:epic FAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We believed someone who used a 3rd rate antivirus and didnt verify with a kernel debugger? FAIL on all our parts especially the "security researcher" who so thoroughly researched this one

      There was no "security researcher" - the guy who reported it is a "security consultant." If that doesn't give you pause, nothing will.

    6. Re:epic FAIL by cf18 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Indeed.

      - an antivirus software that rise alarm base on a two letter directory name inside \Windows , even when it is empty.

      - a "security researcher" that take the alarm at face value and never check if is actually there, check if the process run, what kind of content it was logging and where it is sending them.

      - a low level support manager confirm the software's existence, probably thinking about the fan speed and temperature monitoring software.

    7. Re:epic FAIL by pasv · · Score: 2

      Sure you could do binary analysis and network traffic capturing but both of these things can be veiled in obscurity. Binary analysis is often extremely time consuming (especially if the author of said (spy|mal)ware is using anti-debugging tricks and self encryption which prevents normal strings from being extracted). As for the network monitoring it's possible to use stenography to pipe out information in things as obscure as DNS requests and outgoing TCP headers. But there is nothing that says keylogger quite like a hook seen from a kernel debugger. Gotta go to the source. Can't say this StarKeylogger would employ any of these techniques tho. I'm feeling just as lazy as the person who pointed said keylogger out in the first place.

    8. Re:epic FAIL by maxume · · Score: 1

      All of us? What about the people independent of Samsung that researched it further and provided some evidence that it wasn't true?

      My initial reaction was more along the lines of "That sounds unlikely" than "Burn them!".

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    9. Re:epic FAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you consider this an epic fail on the part of security experts, the HBGary incident must be a legen...

      wait for it ...dary fail.

      My coffee is black. That's my second dairy fail of the day.

    10. Re:epic FAIL by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 2

      Heh I remember reading the line where he said that it definitely wasn't a false positive because it had never had one before, and going .... "what? Well, the part where he captures the network information or at the very least sees the log files on his disk somewhere must be coming soon." Nope! Just another credulous fool. By the end I was wondering how the hell he could claim that Samsung was logging every keystroke, when even if it was installed, in all likelihood Starlogger can be configured to do a number of different things.

      The part about it being "completely undetectable" gave me a chuckle too. That's not something you should say without some sort of qualifier, but he just kept on going about how bad-ass his investigation was.

      The main thing is though, no real evidence has been given either way (although given the ease of verifying his claim, the fact that it's an accusation, and its extraordinary nature, the burden of proof should clearly go on the accuser's shoulders) so either vilifying or exonerating Samsung is silly at this point. Besides, what did they think they were admitting to? Apparently there is some sort of information-gathering going on, and any at all without clear prior notice to the user and the user's acceptance is ... unacceptable.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    11. Re:epic FAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm feeling just as lazy as the person who pointed said keylogger out in the first place.

      Primary differences being:
      A) This asshat claims to be a security expert
      B) Reported his "findings" to the press

    12. Re:epic FAIL by John+Saffran · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not to blow my own horn, but there were some of us who were sceptical of the story until it was proven by independent sources (http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2061772&cid=35673170).

      Basically the qualifications of the author aren't technical and he's commenting on a technical topic and the story was lacking on details so such a big claim couldn't (and shouldn't) be taken at face value without independent validation.

      In this case the independent validation seems to very strongly refute the claim, which is unfortunate for the author's reputation .. I hope he's learned a lesson from this, nobody needs security people talking about things they don't understand.

    13. Re:epic FAIL by BlueKitties · · Score: 2

      It's not an EPIC FAIL, it's marketing at its finest. I've never heard of VIPRE until this morning when I saw the news. Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if they made it all up just to get attention. If not, that's probably the most profitable false positive in history (save me the medical diagnosis puns...)

      --
      "Sorrow is better than laughter, for by sadness of face the heart is made glad." [Ecclesiastes 7:3]
    14. Re:epic FAIL by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      FAIL on the part of everyone who blindly believes some slashdot story that doesnt name the supervisor, or any details of methodology, or any details beyond the finders name.

      I mean seriously, do people really take all slashdot stories at face value?

    15. Re:epic FAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sad thing is that the previous info against samsung will remain indexed on the internet for evermore with fiction becoming fact over time.

    16. Re:epic FAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I mean seriously, do people really take all slashdot stories at face value?

      I don't know. I've never read TFAs.

    17. Re:epic FAIL by omnichad · · Score: 1

      The folder being empty could simply mean rootkit, though it would be a terrible fail of a rootkit not to hide the folder itself. The fact that the folder is actually a standard part of Windows is the worst fact.

    18. Re:epic FAIL by recoiledsnake · · Score: 3, Informative

      First line of the article:

      Mohamed Hassan, MSIA, CISSP, CISA is the founder of NetSec Consulting Corp, a firm that specializes in information security consulting services. He is a senior IT Security consultant and an adjunct professor of Information Systems in the School of Business at the University of Phoenix

      Then a whole lot of fluff about the Sony root kit fiasco.

      The money quote:

      The findings are false-positive proof since I have used the tool that discovered it for six years now and I am yet to see it misidentify an item throughout the years.

      That seems to be some very concrete proof.

      Then some ramblings about how a class action lawsuit will come out of this. I too smell a lawsuit but not against Samsung.

      --
      This space for rent.
    19. Re:epic FAIL by jdgeorge · · Score: 1

      Apparently there is some sort of information-gathering going on, and any at all without clear prior notice to the user and the user's acceptance is ... unacceptable.

      That's copmletely unsubstantiated.

    20. Re:epic FAIL by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      How does a kernel debugger(de-bugger, interesting concept) detect hardware keyloggers on a chip?

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    21. Re:epic FAIL by molnarcs · · Score: 1

      We believed someone who used a 3rd rate antivirus and didnt verify with a kernel debugger? FAIL on all our parts especially the "security researcher" who so thoroughly researched this one

      Agreed, though I'm quite happy with the results of this FAIL - it showed what would happen if indeed, Samsung installed a keylogger. Sooner or later a company would have decided this to be a good idea. So it's kind of nice to have this small shitstorm without actual damage. The linked article uses such strong wordings as "the panic that arose yesterday" ... good! Companies should be reminded from time to time how sensitive this issue is...

    22. Re:epic FAIL by ifrag · · Score: 4, Funny

      It could have been worse, they could have scanned it with McAfee and rendered the machine unable to boot.

      --
      Fear is the mind killer.
    23. Re:epic FAIL by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that wasn't worded great, it sounds like too strong of a suspicion. By "apparently" I meant "it appears that", which is not the same as "it is certain". The admission was from a Samsung tech, according to the person who posted the unsubstantiated accusation in the first place. That part of his claim I don't doubt, but who knows what the tech thought he was referring to. It is odd enough that I think it bears looking into though, especially if you are or plan on being one of their customers. They wouldn't be the first to accidentally admit to something when they were being accused of something else.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    24. Re:epic FAIL by deapbluesea · · Score: 1

      Basically the qualifications of the author aren't technical and he's commenting on a technical topic and the story was lacking on details so such a big claim couldn't (and shouldn't) be taken at face value without independent validation.

      Congratulations, you've just described 99% of /. posters

      --
      Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.
    25. Re:epic FAIL by Nevo · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't. But neither would an antivirus program.

    26. Re:epic FAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..which is unfortunate for the author's reputation.

      Mohamed Hassan, MSIA, CISSP, CISA, founder of NetSec Consulting Corp is now viewed by the whole world as the script kiddie of security consulting, and that is entirely appropriate.

      He really needs to look into that truck driving school. NetSec Consulting isn't going to be paying the bills much longer.

    27. Re:epic FAIL by Zenaku · · Score: 1

      Of course. Especially the ones posted tomorrow.

      --
      If fate makes you a motorcycle, you become a motorcycle.
    28. Re:epic FAIL by InlawBiker · · Score: 1

      Yet it did not stop every Blog and media outlet on the planet, including Slashdot, from picking up the story. Welcome to the blogs-as-news era.

    29. Re:epic FAIL by mysidia · · Score: 1

      We believed someone who used a 3rd rate antivirus and didnt verify with a kernel debugger? FAIL on all our parts especially the "security researcher" who so thoroughly researched this one

      This is so big a fail... I declare April fools came early this year.... and fooled even the security researcher this time.

      Or maybe it's part of a 3-day countdown type event.

    30. Re:epic FAIL by JCCyC · · Score: 1

      No, wait, let me guess: the folder name was system32 and the AV recommended to delete it!

    31. Re:epic FAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've used VIPRE for years now. It actually is a quality product.

    32. Re:epic FAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not to blow my own horn but TOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOT

    33. Re:epic FAIL by jimicus · · Score: 1

      I've used VIPRE for years now. It actually is a quality product.

      Except for when it false-positives over the presence of an empty folder which is actually a part of a correct Windows installation in certain circumstances.

      (Having said that, if I were to blacklist a piece of software every time I found one stupid bug, I'd very soon run out of software I could run)

    34. Re:epic FAIL by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      The mere presence of a _folder_ with the offending name triggered the AV. That AV's gotto be the new benchmark as far as being crappy goes.

      Sort of like writing an anti-virus program which checks for files called "virus.exe" and calling it secure. Reminds me of mod_security for Apache, and how it blocks things called "shell.php" (and possibly other extensions) from executing just based on the same. Pretty retarded view of "security". It took me forever to figure out why the PHP files that were hosting our Flash courseware shells weren't running when everything else was. Turns out it was a "security" measure, thanks to mod_security. It really helps to instill a lot of confidence that mod_security is competent in any way.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    35. Re:epic FAIL by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      I too was sceptical of the story, but unfortunately I have no such proof of my scepticism. Instead of posting about my scepticism, I just passively accepted that it was part of slashdot's long slide into uselessness, and into its current position as the Fox News for nerds.

      Mod me flamebait if you like, but at least I'm on topic.

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    36. Re:epic FAIL by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      Then we should all know where a keylogger will go if one is desired. It will only be uncovered by accident.

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    37. Re:epic FAIL by Fractal+Dice · · Score: 1

      Just to sure ... we are certain that today's version of the truth is more reliable than yesterdays? We aren't just setting ourselves up for more egg on our faces?

    38. Re:epic FAIL by jordan314 · · Score: 1

      I had the same problem with not being able to blog about the command rm -rf /. Thanks, mod_security.

    39. Re:epic FAIL by darth+dickinson · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of my days as a NetWare admin. For those that might not know, NetWare servers use DOS to bootstrap, then run a program called "server.exe" to launch the server OS.

      I was applying a service pack to a NW6 server, and part of that SP was an updated "server.exe". Well, MacAfee decided that "server.exe" was a virus and just silently deleted it after it was extracted, without even telling me. Killed two servers before I figured out what was going on.

      And yes, I know that MacAfee AV is TRWTF...but it was what the school system had standardized on at the time.

    40. Re:epic FAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      University of Phoenix? Imbecilic professor? Who would have thought!

    41. Re:epic FAIL by Vegemeister · · Score: 1

      +4 Sad but true.

    42. Re:epic FAIL by jc42 · · Score: 1

      The mere presence of a _folder_ with the offending name triggered the AV. That AV's gotto be the new benchmark as far as being crappy goes.

      It's hardly anything new. There was this notorious case from 8 years ago, when the RIAA sent threatening C&D letters to Professor Peter Usher at Penn State, because his web site contained files with "Usher" in their name, including several .mp3 files. So the RIAA concluded that he was illegally distributing songs by the band Usher. As in this case, they looked only at the file names, and couldn't be bothered to check the files' contents. You can read lots about this case by googling "Professor Usher copyright" (without the quotes).

      The problem has long existed outside the computer industry. The TSA has blocked people from flying simply because their surname was the same as (or sometimes just similar to) a name on their do-not-fly list. Security agencies have done this for ages, and every year we read of a number of arrests of people with names similar to a name on an arrest warrant.

      This sort of thing has probably happened to a number of people reading this forum. Maybe they'll speak up ...

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    43. Re:epic FAIL by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Or maybe it's part of a 3-day countdown type event.

      So tomorrow we'll probably have a story about a real keylogger that was discovered somewhere else in a Samsung (or maybe another company's) product. But nobody will believe it because of the date, so the password harvest will proceed until a few million people are victims of identity theft.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    44. Re:epic FAIL by exomondo · · Score: 1

      - a "security researcher" that take the alarm at face value and never check if is actually there, check if the process run, what kind of content it was logging and where it is sending them.

      He didn't take it at face value, he did an 'in-depth analysis' and concluded that the malware was 'undetectable', you insensitive clod!

    45. Re:epic FAIL by mysidia · · Score: 1

      But nobody will believe it because of the date, so the password harvest will proceed until a few million people are victims of identity theft.

      Par for the course on Slashdot.

      But why do you say until a few million people are victims?

      Why would it stop at a few million?

    46. Re:epic FAIL by Riceballsan · · Score: 1

      indeed, an unexpected empty folder it is reasonable enough to send a flag assuming the conditions of the antivirus are set reasonably high, removing an unnecessary and easily replaceable part of a windows install isn't really a huge deal, well giving it a name is kinda silly though, you'd think the AV would just give a heuristic "suspicious" warning instead of pretending it knows what it is. I have seen vipre at a few companies I've worked for and can't say much bad about it. I've never seen or heard of a major virus issue on its watch in any of the companies and I've never seen critical components killed, and that's more then I can say for most AV's with central management capability.

    47. Re:epic FAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First line of the article:

      Mohamed Hassan, MSIA, CISSP, CISA is the founder of NetSec Consulting Corp, a firm that specializes in information security consulting services. He is a senior IT Security consultant and an adjunct professor of Information Systems in the School of Business at the University of Phoenix

      I think this part says enough right here....

  2. How close an examination? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because SRAT likes to live in the IME folder ... and that's definitely a keylogger.

  3. So much for being a CISA CISSP MSIA ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But the original writer and now famous Security researcher is MSIA, CISSP, CISA ... That must say something no ?
    what do you mean Security Certification are worthless ?

    1. Re:So much for being a CISA CISSP MSIA ... by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 2

      But the original writer and now famous Security researcher is MSIA, CISSP, CISA ... That must say something no ? what do you mean Security Certification are worthless ?

      I believe you forgot LOL, SOL and GTFO.

    2. Re:So much for being a CISA CISSP MSIA ... by John+Saffran · · Score: 1

      No it doesn't mean that they're worthless .. they're just not technical certifications so in this case we should've been sceptical (like I said in the original story, http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2061772&cid=35673170) because the certifications aren't relevant to the abilities required to make an informed comment.

    3. Re:So much for being a CISA CISSP MSIA ... by Stenchwarrior · · Score: 1

      Those are not technical certs. Anyone with the ability to understand the auditing process, computers or otherwise, will pass the exam.

      --
      Loading...
    4. Re:So much for being a CISA CISSP MSIA ... by sglane81 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not to mention these gems:

      I installed ... security software ... The scan found two instances of a commercial keylogger called StarLogger ... This key logger is completely undetectable ...

      So, this program found something which couldn't be found. Check.

      After an in-depth analysis of the laptop, my conclusion was that this software was installed by the manufacturer, Samsung. I removed the keylogger software, cleaned up the laptop

      Removed the keylogger by removing the folder? Check.

      I found the same StarLogger software in the c:\windows\SL folder of the new laptop. The findings are false-positive proof since I have used the tool that discovered it for six years now and I am yet to see it misidentify an item throughout the years.

      So, "false-positive proof." Good to know that your extensive experience running an anti-virus program has yielded perfect results. Don't worry about the fact that you don't actually know what you're talking about.

      ... logged incident 2101163379 with Samsung Support (SS). First, as Sony BMG did six years ago, the SS personnel denied ... SS changed its story ... SS personnel relented and escalated the incident ...

      Can we claim Godwin here? I have a feeling Samsung Support doesn't refer to itself as the SS.

      You obviously have some kind of agenda, Mohamed Hassan, MSIA, CISSP, CISA. I know now to never trust anything NetSec Consulting Corp does. Also, congrats on being an "adjunct professor of Information Systems in the School of Business at the University of Phoenix."

      --
      This is the Internet. You can say "fuck" here. - AC
    5. Re:So much for being a CISA CISSP MSIA ... by RoverDaddy · · Score: 2

      Removed the keylogger by removing the folder? Check

      I'm guessing that by 'removing the keylogger', he meant 'let the anti-virus' software do its default recommended action'.

      --
      RETURN without GOSUB in line 1050
    6. Re:So much for being a CISA CISSP MSIA ... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Can we claim Godwin here? I have a feeling Samsung Support doesn't refer to itself as the SS.

      No. The National Socialists don't own the registered trademark on "SS".

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  4. A likely story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SURE it's just for multilanguage support. SURE it is. :)

  5. Whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    infoworld / networkworld got their click throughs, some people will never publish a retraction, spreading fud earns support from sponsors and readers can get their outrage glands working. Everyone wins, everyone loses.

    Unless people want to stop taking unconfirmed near-zero evidence postings seriously?

  6. Then why the adminision of guilt? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Samsung did knowingly put this software on the laptop to, as he put it, "monitor the performance of the machine and to find out how it is being used."

    1. Re:Then why the adminision of guilt? by TheCRAIGGERS · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but wasn't the admission of guilt quoted from an email of the original finder? It's not like we saw a Samsung press release on this.

    2. Re:Then why the adminision of guilt? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clueless low tier customer service drone spouting crap and gets reported as news? Sounds like that to me.

    3. Re:Then why the adminision of guilt? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because some clueless lower support guy had to answer a question like "HEY YOU FILTHY SPYING HACKER BASTARD!!! Why the hell do you put a fucking keylogger on my fucking computer you piece of shit?!?!?! There is no imaginable reason for this shit except that you are the biggest asshole in the world who wants to destroy my computer and STEAL MY FACEBOOK!!!"

    4. Re:Then why the adminision of guilt? by LordLimecat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is why they didnt give you a supervisors name, or any further details on the phone call. There was nothing resembling evidence; it was all rumor and assertion.

    5. Re:Then why the adminision of guilt? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And such a complaint would be perfectly legitimate. If they didn't want to deal with that, then they shouldn't have installed spyware on their computers.

    6. Re:Then why the adminision of guilt? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Samsung did knowingly put this software on the laptop to, as he put it, "monitor the performance of the machine and to find out how it is being used."

      I see no admission of guilt. Instead I see an answer to a question that probably didn't use the word 'keylogger'.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    7. Re:Then why the adminision of guilt? by X.25 · · Score: 1

      Samsung did knowingly put this software on the laptop to, as he put it, "monitor the performance of the machine and to find out how it is being used."

      Do you think this was official Samsung statement, or customer's interpretation of some random answer he received from a random person (that probably had no idea what he was talking about, but wanted to get rid of annoying customer asap) in a random call center?

      I actually can't believe this story was taken seriously for even a split second, considering complete lack of any research or evidence.

      Oh well, anything is news these days.

    8. Re:Then why the adminision of guilt? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, even if someone at Samsung said something to that effect, it's a low-level customer support rep who was trying to get this persistent schmuck off the phone, and who probably misunderstood the question from said schmuck:

      "So, does Samsung install monitoring software, like a keylogger?"

      "Hmm, yes, we have some diagnostic software on the machine."

      "Aha!"

    9. Re:Then why the adminision of guilt? by Scott+Scott · · Score: 1

      Because it isn't at all possible that they managed to reach a support person using the standard "whatever it is, it's a feature that somehow helps you" misdirect to try to end the phone conversation in record time. Sure, the article was poorly researched to begin with, but that part wasn't necessarily bogus. It's fallacious to assume that because some of the story was factually inaccurate, the entirety of the story is factually inaccurate. Not that I put any kind of stock in such a citation; however, it is increasingly common even among more reputable news outlets to make generic citations rather than relaying more useful details.

    10. Re:Then why the adminision of guilt? by yuhong · · Score: 1

      Of course, it would be better to say "I will report it and we may investigate why it happened.", which is just as short.

    11. Re:Then why the adminision of guilt? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He called samsung tech support to get their take on this. He was probably berating them. They were throwing every FAQ answer they could at him until one stuck. Nobody there understood his problem as his problem was a false positive to begin with.

      What kind of security researcher calls tech support anyways?

  7. Appropriate quote by _merlin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The following fortune quote accompanied this story for me:

    It is not good for a man to be without knowledge, and he who makes haste with his feet misses his way. -- Proverbs 19:2

    Disturbingly appropriate, considering the story is about people jumping all over a false assumption. But I'm constantly surprised at the number of times a Windows installation with full multilingual support trips anti-malware or anti-virus software. Don't these guys even use their MSDN subscriptions to get a full set of Windows installs to test against?

    1. Re:Appropriate quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When was the last time you've actually legitimately found a virus with anti virus software. It's pretty obvious that these applications are mostly "for show" at this point.

    2. Re:Appropriate quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or apply the Sagan standard "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence". If you're going to claim something extraordinary, you better double-check every step of your chain of argument. In this case, verifying the conclusion of the antimalware suite, since observing a bug in antimalware is less extraordinary than the conclusion you're deriving from it.

    3. Re:Appropriate quote by Stenchwarrior · · Score: 1

      Fuck to the yes! I only put AV on computers now a days to make end users feel warm and cozy. Then when they bring it back in 6 months later I install the ones that actually work. Too bad they don't prevent.

      --
      Loading...
    4. Re:Appropriate quote by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      Or alternatively: "Before pointing fingers, properly research first", which is terser, less pretentious, and made in 20 seconds by yours truly. Also it has the advantage that it doesn't come from a book with lots of false information.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    5. Re:Appropriate quote by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Antivirus are a useful second line of defense, the first line being "keep your crap up to date". I mean, otherwise you cant protect yourself from that 0-day that the vendor wont have a patch for for 2 weeks, even though all the AV firms have a definition out tomorrow.

      And if a virus attempts to spread through network share (by replacing folders with EXEs with folder icons), having an AV that detects it is really useful.

    6. Re:Appropriate quote by mlts · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have found that AdBlock does far more to keep malware off a system than any antivirus program out there. Couple that with a decent firewall/NAT box/router, common sense about not running downloaded stuff, and a solid backup system, and that will pretty much make for malware-free computer usage. Using sandboxie doesn't hurt either.

    7. Re:Appropriate quote by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Problem is, in the ever-changing world, one of the thing is to accuse first and ask questoins later, in order to get those website hits and oh-so-sweet advertiser revenue.

      The first ones to break the stories gets the hits and eyeballs. The ones to do the research get left by the wayside, mostly unread while everyone else spreads mistruths because they never saw the followup, read beyond the headline, etc. Hell, it happens on /. too.

    8. Re:Appropriate quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't speak for all security folks, and that's not even my primary gig. But in my practice; I typically install a VERY minimal set of Windows when I'm building a system with an eye towards security. (including stripping out any unnecessary language support, unnecessary services, unnecessary drivers.). We look at the requirements the customer has, and we install the absolute minimal components necessary to meet those requirements. (This has become very troublesome now, under Windows Genuine Advantage, given the Activation requirements.)
      We test against that. Everything else is a wild card. Nothing else EVER gets installed on the system, no settings EVER get changed, without a FULL test suite being run, and all deltas documented.

      Even then - we well know that doesn't mean a god damned thing. :)

      We generally like to trust our linux-based systems, with the external USB and removable media ports physically disabled, boxes sealed and locked.

      Everything else - if you connect it to the public network, come on, you've been playing this game. You know it's an arms-race, and the bad-guys are always ahead, and the vendors are always playing catch-up, and you never really know what they're installing. Then; we can always question the source of our hardware, right? We know for a fact that some vendors DO ship compromised hardware. There is no such thing as a "known-good-state" in the consumer-space anymore. It's hard enough to achieve that in the Intelligence/DoD space.

    9. Re:Appropriate quote by Ja'Achan · · Score: 2

      Or apply the Sagan standard "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence".

      Unfortunately, "Company puts spyware on their products" is no longer an extraordinary claim

    10. Re:Appropriate quote by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      Windows 7 installs its Slovenian information in C:\Windows\sl-SI... so no, a Windows installation with full multilingual support would not trip up this anti-malware/anti-virus scanner (apparently VIPRE)

      Don't these guys even use their MSDN subscriptions to get a full set of Windows installs to test against?

      Your suggestion actually fails to fix the problem at all.

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
  8. Re:Samsung Keylogger Stories a False Alarm by neo12 · · Score: 1

    At least Samsung is not a Chinese company.

  9. Oh noes by Haedrian · · Score: 1

    Quick! Call the worldwide boycott off before the entire company loses its 13.5Billion revenue.

    On a related note, could Samsung sue the journalists for libel?

    1. Re:Oh noes by Sonny+Yatsen · · Score: 2

      Even if they could, which I doubt, why would they want to bring extra attention to this when it'll just go away tomorrow?

      --
      My postings are informational and does not constitute legal advice. Act on it at your risk.
    2. Re:Oh noes by MarkGriz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Could? More like should.

      The title of the article was not "Did Samsung install keylogger on its laptop computers?"

      No, the title was "Samsung installs keylogger on its laptop computers", though it looks like they've updated it now to
      "UPDATE: Samsung keylogger could be false alarm"

      Great journalism there. Leap out of the gate screaming "keylogger!!!!" with zero fact checking, but later back off and say "oops we could be wrong"

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    3. Re:Oh noes by Stenchwarrior · · Score: 1

      mod this guy up

      --
      Loading...
    4. Re:Oh noes by LordLimecat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Everyone who left a comment decrying Samsung in the last article is just as much to blame. You give approval to such antics by your reaction.

    5. Re:Oh noes by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Because apparently only Slashdot users know about the Streissand effect. Governments and every business on the planet seem not to have heard of it.

    6. Re:Oh noes by jimicus · · Score: 2

      The Streisand effect is generally associated with people doing something silly, realising their mistake and then trying to shut the door after the proverbial horse has bolted.

      In this case, I think the thing most likely to invoke the Streisand effect would be if the blogger tried to cover up the whole sorry episode by trying to bully sites mentioning either the original article or the subsequent debunking. I reckon Samsung, OTOH, could sue the blogger with relatively little fear of Streisanding. As long as they didn't try to sue everyone else for reporting the story.

  10. Good for Slashdot for following up by HawkinsD · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At least Slashdot has the journalistic ethics to post the follow-up. Good for them. I note that Network World is doing the same.

    Yes, I said "journalistic" in the same sentence as "Slashdot." It's important.

    --
    Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by mere idiocy.
    1. Re:Good for Slashdot for following up by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      Yet the original story still has not been updated to correct the error.
      So much for journalistic ethics.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    2. Re:Good for Slashdot for following up by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      True.

    3. Re:Good for Slashdot for following up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a newspaper makes a mistake they post a correction in the next edition. They don't go out and take back every newspaper and tipex out the mistake.

      That is no different to what Slashdot has done.

    4. Re:Good for Slashdot for following up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They sure as hell do in their online editions. They'll update the actual story, or at least link directly to the retraction/correction.

    5. Re:Good for Slashdot for following up by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wouldn't it be better if they updated the *original* story with the correction, instead of posting a new one?

      Anybody linking to this story on Slashdot is still linking to an uncorrected version. It's not enough to correct the article; you have to correct the article at the same URL.

    6. Re:Good for Slashdot for following up by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      At least Slashdot has the journalistic ethics to post the follow-up. Good for them.

      They're not posting this as penance, they haven't apologised or retracted the original story; they're doing it to gain hits. Same reason they posted the first story without confirmation.

      Slashdot has no claim to being described as "journalism", or has any demonstrable professional ethics.

    7. Re:Good for Slashdot for following up by wygit · · Score: 1

      the "Part two" on the story has been updated. http://bit.ly/ib5R38

      UPDATE 3/31/11: Samsung has issued a statement saying that the finding is false. The statement says the software used to detect the keylogger, VIPRE, can be fooled by Microsoft's Live Application multi-language support folder. This has been confirmed at F-Secure and two other publications, here and here. Still no explanation for why Samsung originally confirmed the keylogger's existence to Hassan, as seen below.

      UPDATE 3/31/11: GFI Labs, the maker of VIPRE, has issued an explanation and apology for generating the false positives that led to these articles: "We apologize to the author Mohamed Hassan, to Samsung, as well as any users who may have been affected by this false positive."

    8. Re:Good for Slashdot for following up by idontgno · · Score: 1

      The appropriate journalistic response is, apparently, a feeble Emily-Litella-esqe "...never mind" after the end of a long-winded, spittle-flinging, completely off-topic rant.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    9. Re:Good for Slashdot for following up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of us using RSS wouldn't hear about a correction if all they did was update the original.

    10. Re:Good for Slashdot for following up by oldhack · · Score: 1

      That's no journalistic ethics. Slashdot has no standard, and puts up anything, especially dupes. Taco probably put it up thinking it was a dupe.

      Right, taco?

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    11. Re:Good for Slashdot for following up by hellop2 · · Score: 1

      You said, "Still no explanation for why Samsung originally confirmed the keylogger's existence to Hassan, as seen below."

      Then you say, "GFI Labs, the maker of VIPRE, has issued an explanation and apology"

      So why do you think Samsung confirmed the existence of a Samsung installed keylogger?

      --
      How many more years will slashdot have an off-by-one error on your Score in your profile?
  11. Makes no sense by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The earlier article quoted Samsung as admitting to placing the software on their computers to gather information. Either that part of the earlier story is false or the current one is. This is not good journalism.

    1. Re:Makes no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, this. Clearly there is a huge gap in the facts. In the previous story Slashdot stated that "Samsung has admitted they did this" and in the same story again "Three PR officers from Samsung have so far refused comment", so if it wasn't PR that admitted to it who did? Where is that person now?

    2. Re:Makes no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      It was confirmed by a low level support person who may or may not have understood what was going on.

      All the PR and Legal depts had "No Comment" till it was more thoroughly researched.

    3. Re:Makes no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The earlier article quoted Samsung as admitting to placing the software on their computers to gather information. Either that part of the earlier story is false or the current one is. This is not good journalism.

      Yes, it's great "journalism". As far as reporting facts goes, it sucks. But "journalists" don't care about mundane things like facts. Ever notice how nobody's a "reporter" any more?

      We now have "journalists" to do so much more than just report mundane facts. That's not good enough anymore.

    4. Re:Makes no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where is that person now?

      Hanging from a lamppost near Samsung headquarters.

    5. Re:Makes no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In one of the original articles he says he contacted support. So this statement is likely from some support drone who had no idea what the customer was talking about. He probably jumped to conclusions because he has to handle support tickets in 30 seconds or less.

      What I've learned from support contacts is to NEVER explain anything. They won't bother understanding what you wrote. State in a single sentence what you want to have done. They'll ignore everything else. Seriously, one sentence only. If you write two or three they will either be ignored altogether or trigger completely unrelated keywords that result in nonsensical preformulated responses.

      Support doesn't have the attention span to handle complex issues like this.

    6. Re:Makes no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was confirmed by a low level support person who may or may not have understood what was going on.

      All the PR and Legal depts had "No Comment" till it was more thoroughly researched.

      Not even that. It was only claimed that tech support confirmed it by the same clueless "security consultant" that completely misunderstood everything about this. We have no evidence that even this part is true.

    7. Re:Makes no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No the article quoted what Hassan claims to have heard back from Samsung. Do you really trust Hassan after learning all this?

    8. Re:Makes no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean random articles on the Internet can be wrong. How can one believe in anything?

    9. Re:Makes no sense by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Escalate me to tier 3. Thank you for doing the needful.

    10. Re:Makes no sense by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

      That's what they want you to believe. This is obviously a smear campaign to cover up their keylogger.

  12. support request by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was certainly one way to get moved up in the queue and get a real answer out of samsung.

  13. I don't care about facts. by mevets · · Score: 4, Funny

    I still hate the keylogging bastards that they are, and I want to see the whole company in jail...

  14. Sorry Samsung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Urgh. This seems such a stupid mistake, so much panic was created simply by the existence of a folder. I'm annoyed at myself for believing the hype and swearing off Samsung products yesterday. Sorry Samsung, forgive and forget?

  15. So the keylogger by Grand+Facade · · Score: 1

    is a Microsoft product?????

    --
    Rick B.
  16. Foot in mouth awards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the 2010 Foot in Mouth award goes to...

    The writer AND the "security researcher" both of whom put the credibility of their school, degree, and certifications at risk.

    I sense two egos deflated for the better.

    1. Re:Foot in mouth awards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And the 2010 Foot in Mouth award goes to...

      The writer AND the "security researcher" both of whom put the credibility of their school, degree, and certifications at risk.

      I sense two egos deflated for the better.

      You should really included Slashdot community there as well, as we jumped on crucifying them based on no evidence whatsoever, just the word of a random blogger.

      "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence"
      -- Carl Sagan

  17. What about their use of Carrier IQ on Android? by Bill+Dimm · · Score: 2
    1. Re:What about their use of Carrier IQ on Android? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 to Parent. The Carrier IQ issue is on par with the false laptop keylogger story.

  18. Hold on a second. by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Where did this quote come from, then?

    monitor the performance of the machine and to find out how it is being used

    1. Re:Hold on a second. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where did this quote come from, then?

      monitor the performance of the machine and to find out how it is being used

      It's technically hearsay - the original "security expert" stated that this is what he was told by someone at Samsung support.

    2. Re:Hold on a second. by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Could have been the poor tech in India had no idea what the question was to begin with...

      That quote could have been attributed to system monitoring software used to conserve battery usage for instance.

    3. Re:Hold on a second. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could have been the poor tech in India had no idea what the question was to begin with...

      Then maybe Samsung should hire tech support employees who know English.

    4. Re:Hold on a second. by jeek · · Score: 1

      Do we even have confirmation that Samsung's tech support is India-based, or is this more FUD/speculation?

      --
      If you want to be seen, stand up. If you want to be heard, speak up. If you want to be respected, sit down and shut up.
    5. Re:Hold on a second. by pclminion · · Score: 2

      Where did the quote come from? It came from an idiot, apparently. If it was true, only an idiot would admit to it. If it was not true, only an idiot would say it was. I tend to discount what idiots say, as should you.

      All those who knew that this was obviously false when it was posted yesterday, raise your hands and link to your comments:

      "This is not believable." Oh, and let me reiterate. Anyone who actually believed a company would do something like this, is a god damned moron. I mean seriously, what the fuck people?

    6. Re:Hold on a second. by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like no music company would ever put rootkits on their CDs either.

    7. Re:Hold on a second. by pclminion · · Score: 1

      1) The purpose of Sony's rootkit, while unethical, at least made sense. A catch-all keylogger makes no fucking sense. There's "evil with a purpose" and then theres "fucking insano poking at the dragon cuz I'm coked up." What Sony did was the former. What Samsung was alleged to have done is clearly the latter.

      2) Sony got smacked down for it. They had to recall their CDs, they were sued in various class actions and various countries. They admitted it was a fuckup and they got slammed for it.

      Critical thinking, try it sometime.

    8. Re:Hold on a second. by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

      The purpose of Sony's rootkit, while unethical, at least made sense.

      And what if the purpose was "pushing the envelope on how much they can get away with on gathering information on their users"?

      Sony got smacked down for it.

      And if this had been true, Samsung would have been smacked down for it.

      Critical thinking, try it sometime.

      Are you always this much of a worthless, piece-of-shit, asshole?

    9. Re:Hold on a second. by pclminion · · Score: 1

      Are you always this much of a worthless, piece-of-shit, asshole?

      If my expectation of some minimal level of brain activity in people who make potentially defamatory claims counts as that, then yes.

    10. Re:Hold on a second. by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

      No, your expectation is that everyone else should come to the same conclusion as you from the very instant that a new subject enters their field of view.

  19. Notes to self: by Stenchwarrior · · Score: 1

    Pick up milk and eggs

    Pick up dry-cleaning

    Don't use VIPRE.

    --
    Loading...
  20. Wife's Laptop by Cytlid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My wife has a Samsung R580 which is almost a year newer than the laptops the guy mentioned in the article. I was going to scan it with some decent rootkit programs (like f-secure blacklight or rootkit revealer) only to find out some of my favorites don't work with 64bit Win7. I wrote to the guy who wrote the article, asking about the name of the "commercial security scanner" he installed. He never replied back. I booted my wife's laptop into Linux last night using a Live CD, and performed some find commands for supporting files of the StarLogger program (which showed up in a google search). Nothing. I was thinking if this was true, hers was exempt because it was almost a year older. Turns out, I find out today, I did more research than this supposedly "phd security expert" had.

    --
    FLR
    1. Re:Wife's Laptop by Cytlid · · Score: 1

      That should read that her laptop is a year _older_ not newer... oops. We all make mistakes.

      --
      FLR
    2. Re:Wife's Laptop by ISurfTooMuch · · Score: 1

      You did more research, but this idiot got all the press. He thought he had something, so he ran to the media with it, and they ate it up. Of course, he looks really stupid now, but that's only because others were more thorough.

  21. Inb4... by supersloshy · · Score: 2

    Inb4 all of the commenters from the previous Samsung article come in here and act like they didn't assume that the keylogger was real, didn't yell about how Samsung should/will be persecuted for this, and didn't ask for people to boytt Samsung ;)...

    I always hear Slashdotters complaining about "moral panic" and complaining about the "idiots" who don't do their research before making claims... How is this any different? Really, it's no different. Is the level of "corporate hate" on Slashdot really that high as to exclude any common sense (apparently not so common) when dealing with a subject like this where it's impossible to tell whether he was right? He said he was right in the previous article, but why did you blindly trust him? All it takes for a simple, non-assuming comment is to add "If this is true," to the beginning of your comments. It isn't very hard and it doesn't make you look like an idiot when the entire reason you said those things turned out to be bullcrap.

    --
    "Our country is not nearly so overrun with the bigoted as it is overrun with the broadminded." -Archbishop Fulton Sheen
  22. Unexpected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And this is a surprise?

  23. where is the outrage? by pablo_max · · Score: 2

    Turn on the TV. Go to any "News" site. Everything is designed to make you react in some way. They especially like to find the most "outraged" person and interview them.
    It is a bit sad. People will freak out about stuff like this and demand action, yet your government erodes your rights and destroys your country a little bit more each day and the same people are quite.
    Tell me /., where is the outrage for things that matter?

    1. Re:where is the outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a bit sad. People will freak out about stuff like this and demand action, yet your government erodes your rights and destroys your country a little bit more each day and the same people are quite [quiet?].

      What the hell planet are you living on?

  24. Won't slow down your PC! by evilgrug · · Score: 2

    The tagline for VIPRE AntiVirus is 'Finally Antivirus Software That Won't Slow Down Your PC!'.

    I guess we know why. Who wants to spend all those CPU cycles searching through binaries both in RAM and on disk, comparing them against a database of virus patterns, and performing advanced heuristics checks when it's so much easier to match directory names and call it a day?

  25. Anyone tried this vipre on other laptops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suppose this slovene language is not specific to samsung. Do we have any slovene speaking people here to run vipre on their machines (laptop/desktop/server)?

  26. A security researcher? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, [weaselwords] "Security Researchers" [/weaselwords] and the company who supposedly put it there in the first place (and admitted it was there) say it's not really there even though the new evidence is bullshit?
    That sounds legitimate. It must be a false alarm.

    Oh, the bank robber who robbed the bank and his "Legitimate businessmen" gangster buddies say he didn't rob the bank even though he confessed and the new evidence is circumstantial?
    That sounds legitimate. Bank robber is free to go.

  27. Slovenian StarLogger by BitterKraut · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From Samsung's comment at http://www.samsungtomorrow.com/1071 it seems that the security program used identified the folder as StarLogger based solely on the fact that the folder's name is SL for Slovene. Incredible.

    1. Re:Slovenian StarLogger by LordStormes · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that folder be in nearly every Windows install? Or is that something that's only installed when you turn that language on in the Windows setup? Otherwise, it should have been pretty easy for VIPRE to test that condition. Do we know if Mr. Security Expert had the Slovenian language installed?

    2. Re:Slovenian StarLogger by jcla · · Score: 4, Informative

      I checked my newly purchased Samsung laptop last night after I saw the article and it had the /sl folder on it, but it took about half a second and an ounce of brainpower to notice that there was a large number of similar directories that all looked like language/country codes. And they all had the same kind of non-executable file in them. I'm not Slovenian. J

    3. Re:Slovenian StarLogger by ElusiveJah · · Score: 1

      Hey people, don't you notice that all these "false-positive, fail!" posts and links chain cite single post on this resource as Samsung's official statement. Now look at whois and see Samsung is not it's owner.
      First "keylogger!!!" hype with weak background, then another "false-positive!!!" hype with even weaker one, then ?...
      That's the nature of today's online media.

      P.S. Excuse my English plz

    4. Re:Slovenian StarLogger by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      I checked my newly purchased Samsung laptop last night after I saw the article and it had the /sl folder on it, but it took about half a second and an ounce of brainpower to notice that there was a large number of similar directories that all looked like language/country codes. And they all had the same kind of non-executable file in them.

      I'm not Slovenian.

      J

      What kind of files? Were they all "*.mui"? Windows 7 (and Windows Vista) use c:\Windows\sl-SI for the Slovenian localizatons...

      IANS either, but I have just installed the Slovenian Windows 7 language pack, and Slovenian Windows Live Essentials.

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    5. Re:Slovenian StarLogger by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      Correction: Windows Live Photo Gallery installs a screensaver to the root Windows directory, which produces a C:\Windows\SL directory if you have the Slovenian language pack installed. However, this shouldn't be exactly hard to check if this is the case, since it's a single MUI file...

      77c443b0c85b67a89bb57edcca491d66 *WLXPGSS.SCR.mui

      Anything else in there is not from Windows or Windows Live Essentials.

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
  28. IT World standard practice by PhreakOfTime · · Score: 2

    My initial reaction was more along the lines of "That sounds unlikely" than "Burn them!".

    My initial response was;
    It's a Network World/IT World article, so its probably made up garbage that will be debunked within hours.

    And look at that... it was. Shocking.

    I have a friend who likes to sent me IT World articles. It's become a running joke how bad their articles are written. Well, a joke to me at least, he still thinks they are some sort of reputable news source for all things IT and that I am just 'picking on them'.

  29. One word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    University of Phoenix.

    1. Re:One word: by jeek · · Score: 2

      Is "One" the slovenian translation of the English word "Three"?

      --
      If you want to be seen, stand up. If you want to be heard, speak up. If you want to be respected, sit down and shut up.
  30. FUD Campaign by Xest · · Score: 1

    I've seen a few people mention it already in previous articles but I'm actually beginning to wonder myself if this is an orchestrated FUD campaign against Samsung. The actors story was, well, a complete fucking non-story too.

    Rogue Apple fanboy, or Apple PR getting a bit twitchy about Android and Samsung's Galaxy phones and tablet perhaps?

    Will be interesting to see if this anti-Samsung FUD continues or if it's mere coincidence that two FUD stories have been posted about Samsung in such a short period.

    1. Re:FUD Campaign by John+Saffran · · Score: 1

      I was a little leery of the actors story too even though I don't consider Samsung (or any other large corporation for that matter) as being the paragons of ethics, but in this case I'm guessing that it was just a case of an id10t shooting off at the mouth rather than someone paid to spread propaganda.

      If he was paid to write that I hope for his sake it was enough to retire on because now his credibility in the field is effectively negative (ie. people will avoid him). For me the worst thing he's done is that he might have damaged the credibility of real security researchers through this stunt.

  31. Expert?!? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Seriously?
    "Mohamed Hassan, MSIA, CISSP, CISA is the founder of NetSec Consulting Corp, a firm that specializes in information security consulting services. He is a senior IT security consultant and an adjunct professor of Information Systems in the School of Business at the University of Phoenix. "
    Goes to show you all that credentials do mean a thing.

    And according to Register "Hassan investigated the matter before working on a story for NetWork World that compared the incident to the infamous Sony BMG rootkit fiasco of 2005."
    LOL that's some amazing investigation skill for a security consultant. Turns out he was using a 3rd rate antivirus software, didn't bother to verify the result is correct (finding actual evidence of the keylogger program or use another antivirus to verify), and it was Microsoft software and not Samsung related at all.

    He needs to hang up his jacket as a security "expert"

  32. Auto-immune diseases. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I'm constantly surprised at the number of times a Windows installation with full multilingual support trips anti-malware or anti-virus software.

    Right on spot, but I think we are witnessing the precursors of auto-immune diseases. The point at which the relations between attacker and defendant become too complex for an immune system to keep it straight all the time.

    Interesting times indeed.

    (captcha was: security, btw)

  33. Their phones still ship with one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They ship CarrierIQ on their Android phones on Sprint. It's hooked in to read all sms messages, button presses, etc.
    http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=11763089

  34. This reporter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    promises to be more trusting and less vigilant in the future.

  35. Liars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This line

  36. Security Expert? by stinkbomb · · Score: 2

    "Mohamed Hassan, MSIA, CISSP, CISA is the founder of NetSec Consulting Corp, a firm that specializes in information security consulting services. He is a senior IT Security consultant and an adjunct professor of Information Systems in the School of Business at the University of Phoenix."

    And is now the laughing-stock of the IT security world.

    Nice job moron!

  37. antimal-ware by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    I don't think it will ever be appropriate to remove the hyphen from "anti-malware". "Antivirus", sure, but "antimal" will always be too close to "animal" for easy parsing as a compound word.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  38. Knee-jerk response is awesome by ashidosan · · Score: 5, Informative

    John Graham-Cumming has an excellent, level-headed response to Mohamed Assan's entire "research."

    Also confirmed at F-Secure.

  39. Who will apologize for the pitchforks and torches? by ChaoticCoyote · · Score: 1

    Good work, Slashdot. Maybe you'll be a tad more cautious before reported bogus news, eh?

    As for individual posters: How many of the people who screamed vitriol at Samsung will now apologize? How many of those who vowed to boycott Samsung in yesterday's thread will admit they were wrong?

    I'll bet very few.

    We live in a society where people treat indignation like a drug, always ready to believe the negative, always looking to be a victim. Sad times for the species indeed. Will people learn from this, and stop believing everything they read? One can only hope (a fool's hope, but hope nonetheless.)

  40. Samsung "Admitted" To The Keylogger by mastershake82 · · Score: 1

    I think the part that gave the most merit to the original claim is that Samsung "admitted" to it. However, in retrospect, it's easy to see what may have happened... here is the quote about Samsung admitting to the problem:

    "The supervisor who spoke with me was not sure how this software ended up in the new laptop thus put me on hold. He confirmed that yes, Samsung did knowingly put this software on the laptop to, as he put it, "monitor the performance of the machine and to find out how it is being used.""

    What seems to have happened is the person called technical suppport at Samsung... people trained to help you with your computer not booting, overheating, optical drive malfunctions, dead pixels on the LCD, etc, etc, etc and asked something that they would have of course known nothing about. I'm going to go out on a limb and make some assumptions... I may be completely wrong, but I've seen this played out in the phone support industry when I worked there more times than I can count. I'm sure, like every other phone based support line, they are trained that when they don't know the answer to something, to make a ticket and someone more knowledgeable will call them back. I assume that because the person was escalated to a supervisor, he did not find that option satisfactory and wanted an answer to his odd request RIGHT THAT MOMENT. Enter the supervisor. At this point, the supervisor will say whatever it takes to appease the upset customer... I'm sure something in the Samsung support database about their performance monitoring software lined up in the tiniest way with the customers finding, so the supervisor gave him that info, and there we go... an "admission" by Samsung.

    If you hate corporations, I'm sure that's enough for you... and someone paid by Samsung saying something about a Samsung product is the be all end all of any situation... but realistically... if they want to provide you with affordable devices with reasonable support, they can't afford to put a "lawyer technician IT superman" on the receiving end of every call...

    tl;dr if you try and whine hard enough, you can get a phone support tech to say anything you want

  41. Someone some where needs to get sued. by GigG · · Score: 1

    The post from yesterday had this line in it. "After initial denials, Samsung has admitted they did this, saying it was to 'monitor the performance of the machine and to find out how it is being used."

    --
    Is buying a Harley Davidson as your first motorcycle since you were 16 at age 49 a midlife crisis issue?
  42. Re:Who will apologize for the pitchforks and torch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh shut up. There was a quote in the original article saying that Samsung confirmed it. So there was at least some reason to believe it was real.

    Get off your soapbox.

  43. A Simple Mistake? by hduff · · Score: 1

    That's what they'd like you to believe . . .

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
  44. The phone call means nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Several commenters have suggested that there still might be something to this story because someone at tech support allegedly admitted that there was monitoring software on the computer. To this I say: get real. Have *you* ever worked in an entry-level call center? We're talking about people earning $8.00 an hour and reading off of scripts. If the call center is located overseas, English may not be their first language. And these people probably don't get their paycheck from Samsung, but from an outsourcer, and they certainly are not privy to Samsung's innermost secrets.

    The fact that the call was ostensibly handled by a "supervisor" means *nothing*. At almost all call centers, any sufficiently skilled employee (and that's a pretty low bar) is allowed to take a "Sup Call." Handling of these calls emphasizes getting the customer off the line, NOT resolving technical issues. They may have just been telling the customer what they wanted to hear. Or they may have been referring to more innocuous monitoring software, like "Samsung Magic Doctor" (which one review site says "promises to fix any PC problems and then recover your system should anything go wrong").

  45. It is tellingly sad by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    that corporations have become so powerful and governments so blase about the rule of law that a goodly chunk of even this crowd accepted this story as quite possibly true.

  46. sue them.... by SuperDre · · Score: 0

    If I were Samsung I would sue the hell out of them, that'll teach those loosers for putting information out on the internet without actually verifying their conclusions, this is one of a good example what's wrong with internet, too many other sites actually just copy the news without verifying it, in the end it could hurt your business enormously..

  47. So you mean all those love letters by makubesu · · Score: 1

    I'd been typing on my Samsung machine will never get to the beautiful key log reader? I'm so alone Slashdot!

  48. Monte Python comes to mind by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1

    "What makes you think she is a witch?"

    "She turned me into a newt!.........Well I got better."

  49. Code of Ethics Violation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  50. OIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, I see, so Microsoft international language support is the keylogger!

  51. Windows... Malware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Windows in Malware, what else is new?

  52. False story? FALSE STORY?!! by Lou57 · · Score: 1

    Dammit, I so wanted to hate another company.

    --
    Lou
  53. Stupid Researcher. Stupid Windows Live, though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Calling him a 'researcher' might be a bit much for that matter. But that's neither here nor now - may he lose his position swiftly.

    What I'm wondering, though.. WTF is Windows Live doing!?

    The directory that caused the confusion was C:\WINDOWS\SL, Eckelberry said. While that is the Slovenian language directory for Windows Live, it is also the directory path used by the Starlogger keylogger, he said.

    Installing into the Windows folder?? The very thing that Microsoft have been discouraging since Windows 95? That they've gone to some lengths to prevent (Admin privilege elevation prompts) from happening in Vista+?

    Even when something does install into the Windows directory, for whatever reason. WHY on EARTH would you put language-specific directories into the Windows root directory?

    Somebody else here already noted that they saw a lot of other two-letters directories that they recognized as language things. Ugh.

    I realize that this behavior is not the direct cause of either the false positive (pretty stupid scanner if it yells fire just 'cos of a folder name) or its wide reporting (stupid researcher who should lose his position and similarly stupid media for leaping on it), but it's still flabberghastingly idiotic that Windows Live would create its folders there.

    I hope Samsung's image has not been damaged too badly. I'm sure their swift response has helped mitigate things (great job, PR department!), but there will always be media who will simply not report on this debunking, won't update their older articles, etc. and those who will be sceptical of Samsung based on this false report despite its debunking.

    Did I mention yet that this 'researcher' needs to lose his position?

  54. False positives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    False positives are killing us, not only email and malware but also terrorists.

  55. Re:Stupid Researcher. Stupid Windows Live, though? by snowgirl · · Score: 1

    Because it doesn't install there. I just installed the Slovenian Windows Live Essentials, and there is no C:\Windows\SL directory, there is a C:\Windows\sl-SI directory though from installing the Slovenian language pack.

    Modern Windows versions use languagecode-COUNTRYCODE for all of its localizations. There would never be a reason why a modern version of Windows would put localization data in C:\Windows\SL...

    --
    WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
  56. Re:Stupid Researcher. Stupid Windows Live, though? by snowgirl · · Score: 1

    Corrections: Windows Live Photo Gallery installs a Screensaver (which all have to be in C:\Windows, or Windows can't find them... retarded, right?) and that for some godforsaken reason uses a bare languagecode directory for its MUI files. (Even though the rest of Windows has moved on from that, since you know, pt-PT and pt-BR are actually both equally supported... I think they're tier three.)

    --
    WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
  57. Re:Who will apologize for the pitchforks and torch by hellop2 · · Score: 1

    I agree!

    All you sinners repent now! I'm talking to you Anonymous Coward!! Also:

    matt_gaia (228110) "Samsung, and hopefully one they'll be sued to hell over."
    amicusNYCL (1538833) "Welcome to my shitlist, Samsung."
    noc007 (633443) "Damn you Samsung"
    Quinn_Inuit (760445) "I don't think either of us would take a Samsung computer of any sort for free at this point"
    metrometro (1092237) "The answer is criminal charges for wiretapping. Throw the CEO and their corporate council in jail,"
    echucker (570962) "Samsung's tech support guy already admitted to it."
    Lead Butthead (321013) "Don't buy their product, and let everyone you know why"

    pclminion (145572) "I mean, literally, unbelievable. I do not believe it. And anyone else who believes it without some proof apart from what this dude says, is a god damned moron. Apparently that's most of the people in this thread."

    --
    How many more years will slashdot have an off-by-one error on your Score in your profile?
  58. Monkey Balls by Mana+Mana · · Score: 1

    "falsepositive" WTF? Anyone who read yesterday's article read that dumbass nigga say, `and it can't be a false positive, 'cause, like, you know, I've been using this application whom I bought legally and licensed well like 6 years ago and it's been always reliable. And like, you know, further and shit, moreover I have an MSIA. You know.'

    Well color me a dumb nigga too cauz, likez, I thought he was referring to his/a lil ole MS cert. But I redz all the wayz to the endz and found out 'twas a Master.

    1. Re:Monkey Balls by Mana+Mana · · Score: 1

      I meant to add the keyword du jour should've been: falsefalsepositive

  59. Re:Who will apologize for the pitchforks and torch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh shut up. There was a quote in the original article saying that Samsung confirmed it. So there was at least some reason to believe it was real.

    Get off your soapbox.

    Are you serious? You are making OPs point for him. That "quote" was, as the rest of the story, completely unsubstantiated. The "security consultant", who completely misunderstood everything about this, claimed that tech support (really!!??) had confirmed it to him. Even the original story had the official Samsung response as 'no comment' while they were investigating. Our willingness to believe an extraordinary claim like this based on no evidence whatsoever, and bring out our pitchforks and nerdrage, is quite interesting. People easily believe what they want to believe I guess.