Slashdot Mirror


'Zodiac Island' Makers Say ISP Worker Wiped an Entire Season

itwbennett writes "The creators of 'Zodiac Island' say they lost an entire season of their syndicated children's television show after a former employee at their Internet service provider wiped out more than 300GB of video files. eR1 World Network, the show's creator, is suing the ISP, CyberLynk of Franklin, Wisconsin, and its former employee, Michael Jewson, for damages, saying CyberLynk should have done a better job of protecting its data."

228 comments

  1. Backups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is why you need them.

    1. Re:Backups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just finished backin up. My daddy taught me good.

    2. Re:Backups by bmo · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Only wimps use tape backup: real men just upload their important stuff on ftp, and let the rest of the world mirror it ;)" - Torvalds, Linus (1996-07-20)

      --
      BMO

    3. Re:Backups by White+Flame · · Score: 3, Funny

      Good thing Torvalds never used CyberLynk's FTP hosting.

    4. Re:Backups by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

      You mean like the backups that a company might pay an ISP to make?
      As was the case in this story, according to TFA.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    5. Re:Backups by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      When the data is worth something, you don't rely on only one backup. Especially if it's done by another company.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    6. Re:Backups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But 300gigs of data? In a world where 1TB hard drives are under $50, who can spare $17 word of hard drive space on a backup?

    7. Re:Backups by malkavian · · Score: 1

      If you're a small company, with highly distributed work, and a single repository for all these to check in, and very little in the way of hard tech, why not?
      Would you trust your car repair to just one garage when you get a service? Yes? Well, that's because you trust them to do what you pay for..
      Not everyone has the money to get multiple offsite backups for each site, or even the resource to perform more than one backup (from the sounds of TFA, a lot of this work of contribution has been ad-hoc by highly distributed, and not particularly technical people, so their onsite backups are going to be flakey).

    8. Re:Backups by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Good idea: I bet they can download their show back from a torrent :p

      (yeah, lossy compression...)

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    9. Re:Backups by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I don't put my entire business inside one car without lots and lots of insurance. Could get in a collision, get stolen, or a disgruntled employee could light it on fire.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    10. Re:Backups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Though true men don't do backups .. for a tv show , they are idiots not having their masters safely locked away.
      Noone , i mean noone , should trust a third party with ALL their data.Just plain stupid.Id dismiss any actions taken
      by the company on the grounds they did not secure their data properly and good industry practices.

    11. Re:Backups by Kentari · · Score: 1

      That'll teach them to wait until 'Backup Day' to make them...

    12. Re:Backups by PacMan · · Score: 2

      "multiple offsite backups" aren't the problem. A single "onsite" copy would have served in this case. A pocket-sized USB drive would apparently have held all the data, recent home PC drives could have held multiple copies, for very little cost.

    13. Re:Backups by mr_mischief · · Score: 2

      It's the mirroring part that provides the safety net. In fact, if you're using an ISP that doesn't state explicitly in their ToS that backups are your responsibility and that any backups they provide are a best-effort courtesy service then find yourself an ISP that'll still be in business in six months to move to. Yes, I've worked in the ISP and hosting biz. I have for over a decade, and I now work for one of the big boys.

    14. Re:Backups by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      He shut up about that pretty quickly after he lost linux kernel 3.0 years back.

    15. Re:Backups by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The sad part is if you read TFA (I know, but I got bored) then you'll see they paid for backups as part of their service agreement but the ISP lied and hadn't actually bothered to back up shit.

      Now considering how we have a "fuck everything but the quarterly earnings report!" attitude going on in businesses right now I have to wonder: How widespread is this? After all backup and the tapes or HDDs to put them on cost a pretty penny, so not actually spending that money makes your bottom line look good, at the same time saying you have a backup solution (which you charge extra for) is equally good for your bottom line.

      Now considering the fact that if these clowns would have followed best practices and changed the passwords when they fired this guy they probably STILL be getting away with charging for a service they don't actually have to incur the expense of actually providing I have to wonder, how many others are doing the same right now? I mean how many are actually gonna set up a test to see if their hosting company has the backups they say?

      It sounds to me like backup services are just one more way to cut expenses while making extra money, and sounds like it is ripe for abuse like in TFA.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    16. Re:Backups by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Doesn't ast have a copy?

    17. Re:Backups by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      Only if done correctly (and your mirrors have backups). But really, how often do you back up that which you're mirroring? Pretty much never, if you're most people. And if the source deletes a file, generally all the mirrors do as well... Backups are still needed to help protect you against yourself.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    18. Re:Backups by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

      Goes to prove the point that if you don't have two backups you may as well have none...

    19. Re:Backups by dmacleod808 · · Score: 1

      and i said"OH my god, Oh My god" +1 Internetwebtubulars to you.

      --
      There Can Be Only One...
    20. Re:Backups by camperdave · · Score: 2

      Goes to prove the point that if you don't have two backups you may as well have none...

      Fry: What happened?
      Dr. Zoidberg: All six thousand hulls have been breached.
      Fry: Oh, the fools! Why didn't they build it with six thousand and one hulls? When will they learn?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    21. Re:Backups by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Linus Torvalds - Riding on everyone else's work since 1996.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    22. Re:Backups by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

      eggs, one basket.,...

    23. Re:Backups by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      When you have N copies, you really have N-1 copies.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    24. Re:Backups by Amouth · · Score: 1

      local mirror - daily remote sync - weekly snaps - quarterly archives saved for min 18 months..

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    25. Re:Backups by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      " I mean how many are actually gonna set up a test to see if their hosting company has the backups they say?"

      Quite simply. Its not backed up until you do a FULL RESTORE FROM BACKUP. THATS HOW YOU KNOW IF ITS BACKED UP OR NOT.

      --
      Good-bye
    26. Re:Backups by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 2

      Right. But with how many insurance companies do you insure the same car, in case the first turns out to be criminally incompetent? And do you keep a ship-shape spare copy of your original car in the garage, just in case?

      This was a distributed, collaborative effort, with the copy of record constantly changing in small ways. It was perfectly reasonable to ask a professional to take care of the back up, and expect to never lose more than a week's worth of work in the worst case scenario.

      This will never see the inside of a court, because the ISP would simply lose. They were paid for a critical service that they chose not to perform.

    27. Re:Backups by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      I would be hard pressed today to come up with the exact distribution I used for 1.09
      I just noticed that it would be harder than I expected to reproduce Slackware 1.0 or so, even without Volkerdink's April Fool's joke.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    28. Re:Backups by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >The sad part is if you read TFA (I know, but I got bored) then you'll see they paid for backups as part of their service agreement but the ISP lied and hadn't
      >actually bothered to back up shit.

      When you're on the storage provider's side of this it's easy to understand why they get into the situation they are in. How do you comply with a SLA that requires daily backups? In my relatively small shop, it means we have an expensive HP Storageworks tape drive, expensive SAS cards, an expensive contract with a tape storage place, a continuous supply of expensive tapes, an expensive and labor intensive management protocol to ensure that tapes get loaded, backups get scheduled, get successfully written, can be recovered in disaster drills, and this is for an *automated* backup system, and even so we cannot manage more than getting about 8 terabytes of data saved and sent offsite in a week's time.

      ISPs that offer a backup SLA tend to rely on D2D solutions, or worse, they haven't yet been bitten by failure modes of Netapp or EMC or whatever that aren't supposed to happen. (As a sysadmin, I saw simultaneous failures of *three* drives in a Netapp, *twice*, which is something that Netapp claimed never happened before.)

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    29. Re:Backups by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Five flaky backups are still better than nothing. I'm sure the Zodiac Island makers would be glad if, after the offsite backup failed, they could at least reassemble some of the episodes from flaky backups, even if some of them would not reflect the latest version.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    30. Re:Backups by greed · · Score: 1

      It's a good time to test your full DR plan: see what it takes to bring up your entire production needs from backups.

      Obviously, environments with lots of load-balancing servers would want to just bring up one or two, not the full capacity.

      And yes, I've sat with the tape drives, the DR plan, and a red pen going through the procedure and re-writing it until it actually worked.

      From then on, any time a disk failed, it was a 5 minute service call. "You've got backups?" "Yup." "Great. These aren't supposed to be hot-swapped, so please turn around while I do something here..."

    31. Re:Backups by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      This is why I tell customers having a backup they can hold in their hands is always of the good. The data lost in TFA was less than 300Gb total, that would have been trivial to back up to a nice cheap WD Essentials while they were uploading it "just in case". this of course wouldn't let the ISP off the hook, but they wouldn't have lost an entire seasons worth of work either.

      In this day and age where you can often pick up 2Tb externals for just $80 having no on premises backups to me just seems like begging for trouble. I've found most small businesses can easily back up the entire data of the business in 1Tb with space left over, and a pair of them is less than $180. Why do they even take the risk? For me these WD drives have been an easy sell, as nobody wants to think about having to try to deal with major data loss. Better safe than sorry, especially when the costs are so trivial to be safe.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    32. Re:Backups by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      the contents of my car is covered by both the car insurance and my home owner's insurance. I know this for a fact because my laptop and PC were replaced by the home owner's insurance (because they were willing to cover the whole thing with a lower deductible)

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  2. Phew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can just see the relief on their faces when they learn that the whole series is still available at yourmegasupertorrentdownload.com

  3. Torrents by White+Flame · · Score: 5, Funny

    They preserve culture.

    1. Re:Torrents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Stealing" does not mean same thing as "preserving".
      (Neither does P2P mean same thing as stealing, but in this case, it is about RAW videos and not about lousy HDTV/DVD rips)

    2. Re:Torrents by White+Flame · · Score: 1

      Correct, but preservation is an interesting and real side-effect, especially as those who are interested in particular content are generally the ones to keep that content alive & hosted.

    3. Re:Torrents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      300GB is not a lot of raw video.

    4. Re:Torrents by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A good point though. Businesses go out of business. Some television of the past has even been deliberatly destroyed for legal reasons, or because it is embarassing to the company today. Still more can no longer be shown for the same reason, and remains locked up in a vault somewhere. VHS tapes degrade quickly, but now the pirates have digital technology, they do serve to preserve - thousands of people with their own stores, independant, backups for each other. They can't be legally compelled to destroy anything, because they just don't care. Companies come and go, but so long as someone is willing to replace the occasional failed hard drive, a pirate collection is forever.

    5. Re:Torrents by dadelbunts · · Score: 2

      Kind of like abandonware. Most abandonware titles are impossible to find in a hard copy. In many cases the companies that own the rights arent around anymore. Kind of seems like digital media is harder to preserve than physical media to me sometimes as we take it for granted how easy it is to backup, then no one backs it up.

    6. Re:Torrents by Cederic · · Score: 2

      Some television of the past has even been deliberatly destroyed for legal reasons, or because it is embarassing to the company today.

      Or because it cost too much to retain it.

      There's a distressing amount of BBC material that's gone forever, very intentionally, primarily due to cost reasons.

    7. Re:Torrents by evanism · · Score: 1

      if they did, there would be 6897 copies on BT right now!

      Maybe the fact their stuff wasnt, indicates the value more! (i.e ZERO)

      --
      Just bought a new quantum computer, but I'm uncertain how it works.
    8. Re:Torrents by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Arrr - pirates be saving it all.
      What do you call anime fans that only pirate shows with an English soundtrack?
      Dubloons!

    9. Re:Torrents by lennier1 · · Score: 1

      True, even a huge chunk of the classic Doctor Who episodes would have been lost, had it not been for archives abroad.

    10. Re:Torrents by cffrost · · Score: 2

      "Stealing" does not mean same thing as "preserving".

      "Copying" doesn't mean the same thing as "stealing."

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    11. Re:Torrents by erroneus · · Score: 1

      But the "cloud" is your backup! Store it on the cloud! It's safe because no one still knows what that means! (We all just nod like we know what they are talking about) No way things will get lost on the cloud after all.

      You know, before this whole cloud computing thing, the previous commercial connections with "cloud" were with toilet paper. I kinda think it still is.

      "If we can convince them to store their data with us, they are guaranteed to keep paying us for doing nothing!"

    12. Re:Torrents by cffrost · · Score: 1

      Or one could just decide not to be a stupid moron and make at least just one fucking backup, for fuck's sake. Instead of infringing the copyright by spreading it without license.

      Go ahead and trust copyright holders not to let human culture rot under lock and key; I don't. Copyright is an arrangement between copyright holders and society, and the former have been reneging on their part of that arrangement. As far as I'm concerned, due respect for copyright law in its current form has been forfeited.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    13. Re:Torrents by jonwil · · Score: 1

      A good example of content that is likely locked in a vault never to be seen again is the Aussie sitcom Hey Dad...!
      It is a classic sitcom that was much loved in its time. Some small parts of it were released on DVD (I have a disk titled "Best of Hey Dad...!" myself).

      But one of the characters made allegations that the lead character of the show molested her and because of that, the show is likely to be buried, never to be seen again.

      There is also the story of Andy Muirhead who's show "Collectors" got yanked (and later relaunched in a different format without Andy) the moment the Australian Broadcasting Corporation bosses got word that he was alleged to be involved with child porn, even though it was just an allegation. (it seems like even the tiniest hint that you have done something wrong involving kids is enough to cause you to be tainted for life even if you are cleared of all charges and the real bad guy is locked in jail)

      There are no doubt other cases where actors have gotten in some form of trouble and become blacklisted or had their shows pulled off air.
      I just wish Hollywood would do the same to Charlie Sheen and stop airing 2&1/2 men (maybe then we can get some GOOD TV on for once :)

    14. Re:Torrents by petermgreen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      True, even a huge chunk of the classic Doctor Who episodes would have been lost, had it not been for archives abroad.

      Even with the foreign "archives" (which afaict were often just rolls of film forgotten somewhere) some are still missing and many were recovered in poor condition requiring heavy restoration.

      And IIRC we only still have the famous silent film "metropolis" because people who were contractually obliged to destroy their copies didn't actually do so.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    15. Re:Torrents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, really. I mean my personal computer at home has a total of 6TB of storage space connected to it. If I can have that, you'd think that a company that is producing videos could afford the same.

    16. Re:Torrents by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Torrents may end up being the only way to preserve media...
      If the only non torrent versions of the media available are DRM encumbered and the keys are lost, you may find that the only remaining usable copies are the torrented versions.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    17. Re:Torrents by Jon_S · · Score: 2

      And according to MS what we need is a "hybrid cloud" model. Just keep nodding.

    18. Re:Torrents by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      "Stealing" does not mean same thing as "preserving".

      In terms of culture, it certainly does. There is no surer way of preserving, enlivening, spreading culture than "stealing".

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    19. Re:Torrents by Gramie2 · · Score: 1

      As I recall, the BBC was going to wipe the tapes for the Monty Python TV show, so that they could be reused, but Terry Gilliam bought them.

    20. Re:Torrents by lysdexia · · Score: 1

      /me kowtows to dbill.

    21. Re:Torrents by Duradin · · Score: 1

      For a time it was thought that the safest/best place for the treasures of Egypt was England, whether the Egyptians liked it or not.

      In the days of proto-archaeology it was about profit and there was a fair bit of destruction of "unimportant" stuff but unlike old style tomb robbers stuff did get documented and preserved.

      While stealing does not mean preserving outright, it can lead to preserving if the thief (or who he fences it to) places more (non-monetary) value in the object than the owner.

    22. Re:Torrents by Alascom · · Score: 1

      Your local ISP's FTP server is not "the cloud".

      A google service that replicates your data to multiple datacenters and dozens of servers, provides tape backup, and gives you easy and secure accessibility from anywhere... that is "the cloud".

    23. Re:Torrents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Destroying media increases the value of having seen it, for those who did.
      A lot of early films and early television broadcasts, and pretty much all radio shows were meant to be ephemeral. The experience of consuming the material was the end result, and the works were not meant to be some kind of enduring artifact. Notice that the directors and producers didn't see to it that they retained their own personal copies.

    24. Re:Torrents by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Well, this is April 1st...maybe it is an april fool's story?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    25. Re:Torrents by the_hellspawn · · Score: 0

      It is when it is a child's show. With 5 or 6 little pompous kids whining their diapers are full and manager mommy, daddy, or both whining about how their brats are not getting enough time in front of the camera. Yes, 300GB is not a lot for you and I, but image that situation and 300GB is a gawd-awful amount to loose.

      --
      "The laws of science be a harsh mistress." --Bender
    26. Re:Torrents by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      There's also one of the deliberatly vaulted in there. The Happiness Patrol features a minion of the villain that, apparently by pure coincidence, resembles very closely Bertie Basset the mascot of the liquorish allsorts brand. The BBC promised that they would never allow the episode to air again, in return for an agreement from Bassets and Co not to take any legal action.

    27. Re:Torrents by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Disney confined some of it's classics to vault for a long time. Song of the South for some casual racism - completly unremarkable at the time of production, but an embarassment just the same. Fantasia for the same reason. Even Streamboat Willie, for Micky Mouse performing some cartoon violence not in fitting with the image Disney wants for the character today. They do still show these things, for they are valuable brands and have historical significence, but not in the original form. They are edited to some extent to hide whatever it is that Disney doesn't want to show. They excised a whole character from Fantasia by zooming-and-cropping any frames they appear in.

    28. Re:Torrents by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      And according to MS what we need is a "hybrid cloud" model.

      Sounds dicey to me, a pilot would refer to a "hybrid cloud" as a "Cloud filed with rocks".

      You're generally supposed to avoid them.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    29. Re:Torrents by DJRumpy · · Score: 1

      Exactly. It's still the data creators responsibility to ensure they have proper backups. The ISP is definitely negligent for not removing access of a former employee (changing passwords, revoking account access, etc), as well as not ensuring proper backups were in place. That's assuming these folks had a proper legal agreement with said ISP to retain backups.

      That said the creators should have at least a disaster recovery run or a simple audit to ensure their data was properly secured.

      From TFA:

      The problems started in February 2009 when CyberLynk terminated Jewson's employment for an undisclosed reason. One month later, on March 26, Jewson allegedly logged back into his former employer's systems and went on a data-wiping rampage.

      The lost data included an entire season of "Zodiac Island" -- 6,480 files -- that was stored on a CyberLynk FTP server. The show's producers had been using the server for nearly a year as a drop box where contributors from the U.S., Manila, Beijing and Hong Kong could collaborate on episodes.

      CyberLynk was supposed to have backed up the data, but CEO Adam Hobach told WeR1 that his company's backup procedure "had failed and/or was not properly instituted," WeR1 said in a lawsuit filed last week in U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii.

      About 65GB of the data was permanently lost, leaving the production company with only snippets of its 14-episode season. "Because this destroyed data includes fragments from each of the 14 episodes, it is now impossible to re-assemble any of the episodes in its entirety," WeR1 said.

    30. Re:Torrents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just metropolis. The "restoration" video on my DVD copy of "Lost Horizon" mentions that the only reason that they have so much of the film is that the UK distributor failed to destroy the film once the release period was over. They are still missing about 2 minutes of footage (but have the audio) - in the DVD this is replaced by still publicity shots of the appropriate actors.

      The answer (IMO) is for the same obligations as on book producers to be laid on film and software producers: 5 or 6 copies must be supplied to the copyright libraries.

    31. Re:Torrents by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      For a time it was thought that the safest/best place for the treasures of Egypt was England, whether the Egyptians liked it or not.

      The great thing about torrents (or filesharing generally) is that it leaves the original "treasure" in the hands of the owner. It allows more people to enjoy it than would be possible. Only a certain number of people can visit the pyramids or the artifacts of the pharaohs. Everybody can enjoy the torrent-copy of Keith Jarrett and Charlie Haden's Jasmine or the latest mix from Burial or the Hilliard Ensembles recording of the Bach motets. Or the latest from the great Die Antwoord.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  4. World Backup Day by erice · · Score: 2

    I guess they didn't hear that it was World Backup Day

    1. Re:World Backup Day by toastar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Who's fucking idea was it to make April fools day World Backup day?

    2. Re:World Backup Day by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Actually March 31st was world backup day.
      Ironically, in my time zone the Slashdot article about it appeared less than an hour before the day ended ...

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    3. Re:World Backup Day by RenHoek · · Score: 1

      It's not.. it's on March 31st, i.e. yesterday

    4. Re:World Backup Day by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      TFA is very clear about this: the ISP was responsible for making backups, and failed to do so.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    5. Re:World Backup Day by erice · · Score: 2

      TFA is very clear about this: the ISP was responsible for making backups, and failed to do so.

      Yes, but anyone who relies on ISP backups for important data, on an ftp site, no less, is an idiot. The only way this story makes any sense is if all they managed to trash all their local copies, including backups (if any), and then looked to the ftp site as a backup of last resort. The ftp site files were almost certainly not in condition to broadcast. Their loss means that the creators can blame someone else for the screwup and not have to redo all their work.

    6. Re:World Backup Day by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, timed so when your coworker pulls a so-called prank on you by deleting all your files, you'll have just completed your backup...making it trivial to recover your data.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    7. Re:World Backup Day by cgenman · · Score: 2

      If you're relying upon the ISP to have backups, you don't have backups. What if that ISP goes under? Gets hit with a flood? Servers locked up by an FBI investigation? Or, as in this case, an employee goes on a deleting rampage?

      Don't just backup your data. Backup your providers. Backups are about redundancy.

      And never personally verifying that the ISP had backups? They might as well have used prayer as a data-protection methodology.

    8. Re:World Backup Day by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 2

      Yes, but anyone who relies on ISP backups for important data, on an ftp site, no less, is an idiot.

      The only way this story makes any sense is if all they managed to trash all their local copies, including backups (if any), and then looked to the ftp site as a backup of last resort. The ftp site files were almost certainly not in condition to broadcast. Their loss means that the creators can blame someone else for the screwup and not have to redo all their work.

      A cheap idiot at that. We're talking about 300Gb of data. I'm guessing a production company can cough up 50 bucks for an external 500Gb hard drive. They might have even have had enough left over to splash out on a second one.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    9. Re:World Backup Day by theygoto11 · · Score: 0

      Maybe they did hear about WBD, but not WRD (World Restore Day). Damn that write only media!

    10. Re:World Backup Day by Kilrah_il · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Re: April fools.
      I am now announcing that for the next 24h I will not believe any story not originating from Fox News. Since all the major (i.e. serious) papers print fake/prank stories today, I guess it's Fox's time to pull the major prank - print out a real, accurate, fact-filled news item, for once.

      --
      Whenever in an argument, remember this.
    11. Re:World Backup Day by Kilrah_il · · Score: 1

      You meant coincidentally, right? Not ironically.

      --
      Whenever in an argument, remember this.
    12. Re:World Backup Day by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      I think you're being a little judgmental there. We don't know what kind of contract terms they had with the ISP; from TFA it sounds like CyberLynk was providing a full data-hosting solution, and that's why there weren't good local copies: they expected the ISP to provide that. This was a collaboration server, remember, so no one group necessarily ever had a full copy of all the source materials. I agree that, given the size of the materials, it should have been trivial for each group to keep a full copy, but perhaps they were avoiding this practice to try and keep everything synchronized (i.e. one master copy) or were in the middle of a major resynch. We simply don't know whether or not they deserve (much) blame. I don't think it's unreasonable to expect to be able to subcontract data protection.

      On top of that, the employee responsible for the data loss was on a post-firing rampage. Those tend to be pretty good at overcoming mechanisms meant to protect against natural disasters.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    13. Re:World Backup Day by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      To be honest, when I read that part of the article, it sounds more like CyberLynk is trying to cover up more problematic employees.

      But let's not kid ourselves. We need to backup the backups! Backup the providers' backups! Backup the providers' backups' providers! Let the madness never end!

      To be honest, I somewhat doubt they had the money to carry it that far, though.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    14. Re:World Backup Day by bjourne · · Score: 1

      They had to rely on someone. If you want to renovate your bathroom and you don't know how, then you have to rely on a craftsman to do a proper job. If you are an ISP which provides backup services and you don't do any, you're not doing your job. The whole point of a specialized economy is that you shouldn't have to be an expert on everything to get any job done. Most people are not, and should not have to be, experts on all the technical and procedural problems which you need to understand to run a proper backup scheme (of which there are many).

    15. Re:World Backup Day by Nermal6693 · · Score: 1

      In my time zone it appeared 10 hours after the day ended. So my first thought was also about "why on April Fools' day?"

    16. Re:World Backup Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More than that:

      "The problems started in February 2009 when CyberLynk terminated Jewson's employment for an undisclosed reason. One month later, on March 26, Jewson allegedly logged back into his former employer's systems and went on a data-wiping rampage."

      Why the hell did they not revoke the user accounts of the guy they'd just fired?

    17. Re:World Backup Day by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      No, I didn't mean coincidentally. Coincidentally it appeared on March 31 in my time zone (it was a coincidence because (a) it was about March 31, and appeared on March 31, abd (b) due to the time zones, it wasn't a given that it appeared on the right day). However that it appeared less than one hour before that day ended was not a coincidence (what would it have coincided with?). Also "coincidentally" doesn't include a valuation. The irony (or whatever; if you don't like "irony" in that context, provide a suitable replacement) in the situation is that due to the the time when it appeared, it was quite unlikely to be read in time to actually make a backup at that day in response to seeing that article (indeed, when I saw the article, the day was almost over, so making a backup in the remaining time of the day was basically impossible).

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    18. Re:World Backup Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      epic correction fail, grammar nazi - you should be banned from posting

    19. Re:World Backup Day by evanism · · Score: 1

      come on, even my blessed 93 year old grandmother knows how to back up her work off the computer - and she certainly doesnt trust a company to do what you pay for!

      Right about the post-firing rampage, as a multitime CTO, it was my worst nightmare after letting people go. Security is good to have, but trust is mandatory.

      btw, love the regex :)

      --
      Just bought a new quantum computer, but I'm uncertain how it works.
    20. Re:World Backup Day by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      The article its not very clear on that at all. It says they were supposed to back up the server. It doesn't say they were statutorily required to do so. It does not say they were contractually required to do so. It does not say they were required to successfully store the backup copies. It does not say they were required to perform a flawless recovery. It doesn't say what penalties for nonperformance or guarantee of service there would be.

      I just read the ToS on the company's web site. It is suspicious that it says it's current as of April 1st... like maybe they changed it after the fact. But it does specifically say this ( lc()'ed to get past /. yelling filter, as this was all caps):

      you expressly agree that use of the cyberlynk network site is at your sole risk. you expressly agree that neither cyberlynk network, nor its affiliated or related entities, nor any of their respective employees, or agents, nor any person or entity involved in the creation, production, and distribution of cyberlynk network's web site are responsible or liable to any person or entity whatsoever for any loss, damage (whether actual, consequential, punitive or otherwise), injury, claim, liability or other cause of any kind or character whatsoever based upon or resulting from the use or misuse of this site or any other cyberlynk network web site. by way of example, and without limiting the generality of the foregoing, cyberlynk network and related persons and entities shall not be responsible or liable for any claim or damage arising from failure of performance, error, omission, interruption, deletion, defect, delay in operation, computer virus, theft, destruction, unauthorized access to or alteration of personal records, or the reliance upon or use of data, information, opinions or other materials appearing on this site. you (and not cyberlynk network) assume the entire cost of, and responsibility for any and all necessary servicing, repair or correction resulting from your use of this site. in addition, you expressly acknowledge and agree that cyberlynk network is not liable or responsible for any defamatory, offensive or illegal conduct of other subscribers or third parties.

      So even if they were responsible yesterday, they won't be in the future. It's a good faith effort, and you're still in charge of your own data in the end.

    21. Re:World Backup Day by mr_mischief · · Score: 2

      I believe you should be able to pay for that, too. But suing someone because they say "we backup our servers" and you think that means they guarantee 100% data retention is just the worst kind of careless oversight. If you find the ISP's website as I did and read the description of services and the ToS, there's no way an informed consumer would believe they are getting 100% guaranteed data backup. The company disclaims even being fit for use for any particular purpose.

    22. Re:World Backup Day by monkeythug · · Score: 2

      I can see you get you're concept of irony from Alanis Morrisette.

      It's not ironic, it's just unfortunate.

      --
      Don't you wish you hadn't wasted 3 seconds of your life reading this sig?
    23. Re:World Backup Day by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      Backup Day should come once a week.

      And even that might be too little.

    24. Re:World Backup Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because they lost 300Gb of data, doesn't mean that's all their data. They might have many terrabytes of data in total. If you have an SLA with a company to back that data up for you, I don't think it's unreasonable (maybe imprudent but not unreasonable) to rely on that actually happening.

    25. Re:World Backup Day by maxume · · Score: 2

      The thing about that song is that it is ironic.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    26. Re:World Backup Day by maxume · · Score: 1

      If she doesn't trust companies to give her what she paid for, what does she trust for backups?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    27. Re:World Backup Day by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      No. It would have been unfortunate if I had experienced any negative consequences due to this. However, it's just the whateverony (you still didn't give an appropriate replacement word!) that the post which is intended to tell me about the backup day just comes so late that it is pointless.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    28. Re:World Backup Day by shoemakc · · Score: 1

      With that in mind, some thoughts about backing up Gmail data:

      http://howto.wired.com/wiki/Make_a_Local_Backup_Of_Your_Gmail_Account

      -Chris

      --
      --an unbreakable toy is useful for breaking other toys--
    29. Re:World Backup Day by Entrope · · Score: 2

      Standard form disclaimers like the one you quote are typically superseded by the agreements that are specific to the relationship in question. If a customer pays extra for backups, judges tend to be unsympathetic if the vendor tries to weasel out by the kind of argument you suggested ("we never promised we could RESTORE backups! and we told them it was at their own risk!"). Otherwise the additional agreement and charge for the backups gets the customer nothing but a bill of goods.

      The show's creators really should have spent the hundred dollars or whatever to have an on-site backup of the data, though.

    30. Re:World Backup Day by Kosi · · Score: 1

      This sound like buying service for your car from a road construction company. Not a wise thing, as you can see here.

    31. Re:World Backup Day by Kosi · · Score: 1

      She posts all the stuff as "Justin Bieber f*cks Britney Spears.rar" to some torrent sites.

    32. Re:World Backup Day by geekoid · · Score: 1

      No, it's unfortunate.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    33. Re:World Backup Day by evanism · · Score: 1

      Kosi, dude, fuck. Keep it civil, its my goddam grandma. Its more like "Fred Astair croons Eleanor Powell".rar.

      None of your late 90's trash talk young man!

      --
      Just bought a new quantum computer, but I'm uncertain how it works.
    34. Re:World Backup Day by maxume · · Score: 1

      The events described are unfortunate, but a song called "Ironic" that doesn't contain any actual irony does end up being ironic. I suppose it could simultaneously be unfortunate.

      Of course, the reason these discussions never work very well is that people assume that a person with enough vocal skill and charisma to be somewhat compelling would never approach popular music as a job.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    35. Re:World Backup Day by hedwards · · Score: 1

      That's what I like about crashplan, I can easily backup my data locally and online with the same program. Unless my house burns down, somebody steals my backup disk or the drive fails, I'll be using that for pretty much any restores I need to do, but I've still got the option to download from their site or have them ship me a disk.

    36. Re:World Backup Day by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Ooh. "Not for use for any particular purpose." That's pretty damning.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    37. Re:World Backup Day by Kosi · · Score: 1

      Sorry for believing your granny was smart enough to create torrents with names that actually get downloaded by more people than the few perverts looking for "even older than mature" or zombie pron.

      And why should I keep it civil, does she read /.?

    38. Re:World Backup Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, great idea to backup BEFORE any fool gets to have his or her day!

    39. Re:World Backup Day by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      My point is the "were supposed to" is very vague. You could say they "were supposed to" back things up because they had a policy of backing up customer data on web and FTP sites as a courtesy. You could also say they "were supposed to" back things up if they were under contractual obligation to this specific client to have a certain percentage of data recovered, up to and including 100%.

      The article doesn't specify, the summary doesn't specify, and unless I see an actual contract I sure as hell can't specify.

    40. Re:World Backup Day by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      It is actually a pretty standard disclaimer. You buy the services you think you need. The vendor supplies what they say they provide. Unless the vendor is also acting as a consultant, there's generally no claim to understanding the needs of the customer better than the customer does. Unless you understand the customer's situation almost as fully as the customer, you can't really guarantee your product or service will fit their needs.

    41. Re:World Backup Day by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Who's fucking idea was it to make April fools day World Backup day?

      I don't know. But I wish it had been me. It would have made the whole point of April Fools Day bearable.

      (And yes, I did RTFCs about it actually being March 31 ; the point still stands.)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  5. Sorry, but by fivevoltforest · · Score: 1

    there is no scenario AT ALL in which this should be possible. You shoot, makes backups the same day. Edit the show on your own computers, hopefully backing up to a remote location daily, or more realistically, weekly. (Sneakernet, I'd assume.) When you're done editing your show, you want to have backups all over. Why the fuck did the ISP have control of the only copy of their show?

    1. Re:Sorry, but by fivevoltforest · · Score: 1

      And sorry, I keep forgetting that I have to manually add in line breaks.

    2. Re:Sorry, but by Nursie · · Score: 1

      'ISP' seems to be a bit of a misnomer here, they were hosting a collaboration server that contained the data so I'd call them a hosting company.

      And it looks like the production company relied on the hosting company to keep backups, which they neglected to do.

      Otherwise I agree with you - you should have backups of the raw footage and the animation separately, you should have the finished product on the collab server, sure, but also on tape or HDD in secure storage somewhere. And if it was me I'd have it stored on a machine in our office, and I'd have my very own private set of blurays in my desk draw or even at home, 'just in case'

    3. Re:Sorry, but by White+Flame · · Score: 2

      They used the ISP's FTP hosting as a collaboration point between the different companies spread across the planet (animation studios, live action studios, editing, etc), and it was part of the deal that backups be done at the ISP itself. Yes, it's a non-redundant setup as opposed to having replication across all sites, but they did have a paid-for backup service that unfortunately didn't do their job.

    4. Re:Sorry, but by jjohnson · · Score: 2

      If I'm paying the hosting company to maintain backups, then that's my backup plan, and it's not unreasonable for a small business to rely on it if IT isn't a major part of their business. If they had 300GBs of storage in use, then they had a serious account that almost certainly included guarantees of regular backups. The ISPs admission that their backup system failed says as much.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    5. Re:Sorry, but by Eivind · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's unreasonable to "rely" on ANY backup-plan whatsoever, without actually regularily testing RESTOREs.

      If you buy backup - which is fine - make sure to actually test a restore, and do so REGULARILY.

    6. Re:Sorry, but by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      If I'm paying the hosting company to maintain backups, then that's my backup plan, and it's not unreasonable for a small business to rely on it if IT isn't a major part of their business. If they had 300GBs of storage in use, then they had a serious account that almost certainly included guarantees of regular backups. The ISPs admission that their backup system failed says as much.

      It'd be a backup plan if they'd still had the originals. This was more like a data storage plan where they paid for backups. While it's not unreasonable to assume that you're actually getting what you pay for there is some risk involved as this clearly shows. Further more the risk is unknown because companies are often stunningly incompetent behind the scenes. In the end the consideration they should've made is "if everything is lost will we be content with whatever damages we get from suing ?" Only if the answer to that question is yes then they made the right decision by not keeping a local copy.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    7. Re:Sorry, but by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      No you don't.
      Go to the top, click account.
      A rectangular screen will pop up.
      Click posting in the top bar on the rectangular screen.
      Set the "Comment Post Mode" to "Plain Old Text".
      For each return in your post a br will be included automatically.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    8. Re:Sorry, but by martin-boundary · · Score: 1
      So what? Are they better off now with no movies and trying to sue the hosting company for damages, or would they have been better off with movie backups and optionally sueing the hosting company?

      Some decisions are just boneheaded, no matter how many pages a contract is long.

  6. Today is World Backup Day by cbope · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Today is World Backup Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is not ironic. That is coincidental.

      What would have been ironic would have been if the back-ups were deleted whilst participating in World Backup Day.

    2. Re:Today is World Backup Day by 517714 · · Score: 1

      This makes your comment ironic.

      --
      The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
    3. Re:Today is World Backup Day by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I forget who said it, but it's totally true. There Are Two Kinds of People in the World, Those Who Have Lost Data and Those Who Will. Which is unfortunate because unlike when I started using computers in prehistoric times, the opportunities and the equipment for doing backups has really come a long way.

    4. Re:Today is World Backup Day by Torodung · · Score: 1

      Amazing. I had no idea, and yesterday I bought a 1TB external drive for backups. I'm looking at the Staples receipt as I type this.

      What an astonishing coincidence.

      As an April Fool's joke, I guess, Windows 7 backup decided to make a 500GB backup, with system image, of a computer that has only 358GB of actual used HD space. Can anyone recommend me a backup program that isn't complete skite? Or maybe just some real documentation for Windows Backup, so it doesn't make a backup that's 40% larger than my total data?

  7. Am I missing something here? by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    Did these video just magically appear on the server or where they uploaded to the server after they were created somewhere else?

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:Am I missing something here? by White+Flame · · Score: 1

      From TFA:

      The lost data included an entire season of "Zodiac Island" -- 6,480 files -- that was stored on a CyberLynk FTP server. The show's producers had been using the server for nearly a year as a drop box where contributors from the U.S., Manila, Beijing and Hong Kong could collaborate on episodes.

      CyberLynk was supposed to have backed up the data, but CEO Adam Hobach told WeR1 that his company's backup procedure "had failed and/or was not properly instituted," WeR1 said in a lawsuit filed last week in U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii.

    2. Re:Am I missing something here? by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      We need a mantra to inextricably link restoration testing with "backing up".

    3. Re:Am I missing something here? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2

      Probably the worker saw the FTP server full of copyrighted movies, and thought "better wipe them before we get any legal trouble; to be sure, better also delete the backups." :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    4. Re:Am I missing something here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No the article is also quite clear on this:
      " The problems started in February 2009 when CyberLynk terminated Jewson's employment for an undisclosed reason. One month later, on March 26, Jewson allegedly logged back into his former employer's systems and went on a data-wiping rampage."

    5. Re:Am I missing something here? by sandytaru · · Score: 1

      So very very very true. Nothing like going about your business thinking your backups are cool, then discovering your initial base image on your BDR was corrupted and you have no valid chain - i.e your backups won't load. And its better to find this out during a regularly scheduled test, once a month, than to learn about it when your main server died!

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    6. Re:Am I missing something here? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      If you haven't restored, you haven't backed up.

  8. This is not news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... its a 1st April prank to get free publicity

    1. Re:This is not news... by JorDan+Clock · · Score: 1

      Except it was first reported yesterday morning.

  9. This is by Konster · · Score: 1

    This is the 21st century and some people still haven't wrapped their heads around proper safeguarding of data.

    It sucks to be them, but it's their own responsibility to make sure their data is replicated on as many devices in as many places as is convenient and affordable to do so.

    1. Re:This is by Per+Wigren · · Score: 1

      That depends. It really should be possible to outsource that to another company, like this "ISP" for example, and then leave it up to them to keep your data safe. After all that's what you pay for. I don't know the details of the service they offered though, maybe it was a cheap "Here is a network drive. Use it however you want but don't expect anything." kind of service. In that case you're correct. However, if it was a premium "Trust us, we take care of your data!" kind of service then it's another thing.

      --
      My other account has a 3-digit UID.
    2. Re:This is by martin-boundary · · Score: 3, Informative
      That's easy to say, but the trend is the other way. How many people here on slashdot even use gmail as their primary email provider and don't ever back up the messages?

      You might say it's not the same thing, but it's not so different for a company to keep some of their most valuable assets in the cloud in one place, and for a person to keep some of their most valuable communications and contacts in the cloud in one place.

      If something is valuable, never trust it wholly to the cloud.

    3. Re:This is by LordNacho · · Score: 1

      This is the 21st century and some people still haven't wrapped their heads around proper safeguarding of data.

      It sucks to be them, but it's their own responsibility to make sure their data is replicated on as many devices in as many places as is convenient and affordable to do so.

      This is the 21st century and some people still haven't wrapped their heads around proper safeguarding of data.

      It sucks to be them, but it's their own responsibility to make sure their data is replicated on as many devices in as many places as is convenient and affordable to do so.

      Agreed. At the end of the day, you're responsible for your own property. Particularly when it's something irreplaceable like your own work, you can't rely on someone else, even if that's the whole point of their business. People screw up things all the time, and even if you can sue them, you're still screwed out of your work.

      I wonder how much was really lost. Surely they don't just make the video, upload it, and then delete all the stuff they used produce it?

    4. Re:This is by TFAFalcon · · Score: 1

      It depends on how good your lawyer is.

      If he/she can convince the jury that your work is worth millions of dollars, then it might be worth having it destroyed so you can sue the storage company.

    5. Re:This is by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Which is particularly embarrassing. Personally, I don't use the gmail site, I just use Thunderbird which downloads all of the messages that I get. The bigger issue are those assholes that insist on not including the entire message when they email. Those messages may as well get chucked in the trash right now, because they're not going to be readable in the future. Fortunately, it's mostly just marketing materials, but still.

    6. Re:This is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's easy to say, but the trend is the other way. How many people here on slashdot even use gmail as their primary email provider and don't ever back up the messages?

      You might say it's not the same thing, but it's not so different for a company to keep some of their most valuable assets in the cloud in one place, and for a person to keep some of their most valuable communications and contacts in the cloud in one place.

      If something is valuable, never trust it wholly to the cloud.

      I don't need my e-mail backed up.... why would you keep something important there?

  10. I'll check by RenHoek · · Score: 1

    If the show is any good, I might have a copy on my harddisk..

    Hmmm? You mean it's not about the new My Little Pony show?

    Well try this then: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=%22zodiac+island%22+torrent

  11. Where's the April Fool's post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would have loved to see "Canonical bought by Apple Inc." or "Linus Torvalds dies in skydiving incident".

    1. Re:Where's the April Fool's post? by Nursie · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Where's the April Fool's post? by arashi+no+garou · · Score: 1

      You sick fuck.

      And then there's the Linus dying thing, I mean come on!

      *ducks*

    3. Re:Where's the April Fool's post? by evanism · · Score: 1

      Thats not an AFJ! Thats a blasphemy straight from the anus of Satan!

      --
      Just bought a new quantum computer, but I'm uncertain how it works.
  12. Haven't you the master copy or just any copy? by VincenzoRomano · · Score: 2

    Backup is a very big word, guys.
    I mean, haven't you any other copy?
    Who designed your production processes, Pinocchio?
    Information technology is not just a bulb light that just works by plugging it in. It's (just a little bit) more complicated and yet (much) more powerful.
    Shame on you, then!

    --
    Maybe Computers will never be as intelligent as Humans.
    For sure they won't ever become so stupid. [VR-1988]
  13. Welcome to /. hell day!!!! by Dutchmaan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Story post time is officially Apr. 1.... it's /. hell day...

    1. Re:Welcome to /. hell day!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://wcca.wicourts.gov/simpleCaseSearch.xsl

    2. Re:Welcome to /. hell day!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It links to a story posted March 31. I don't know if you are just to lazy to RTFA or just wasn't too lucky with your April 1. joke, either way your post officially sucks

    3. Re:Welcome to /. hell day!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for reminding me to disable my RSS for ti.

    4. Re:Welcome to /. hell day!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the article itself is dated March 31st. It just happened to hit Slashdot a little late. I'm pretty sure it's real.

    5. Re:Welcome to /. hell day!!!! by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

      It links to a story posted March 31. I don't know if you are just to lazy to RTFA or just wasn't too lucky with your April 1. joke, either way your post officially sucks

      too* lazy...

  14. And nothing of value was lost. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least not if this is this is a clip of the show:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dJfpH7K1_Qc

  15. If the data is that critical... by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 1

    ... don't leave it in a place where a random disaster (or random disgruntled third-party employee) can wipe it from the face of the Earth. Terabyte-size drives are cheap nowadays. Buy them. Buy many of them. Back up elements to them on a regular basis. Don't destroy raw material until the editing is done and the master has been copied at least twice purely for long-term storage, never mind how many copies need to be made available for distribution. Don't even rely on just hard disks - dump masters to tape if you can afford it. HDCAM's not completely overpriced; hell, even standard-definition Digital Betacam is better than, quite literally, nothing.

    If they're lucky, the animated contributions and sound elements may be retrievable should the individuals responsible for those be more scrupulous about their material retention than the studio (the story didn't quite make clear what, if anything, they've been able to recover), but any location shooting lost is going to be a pain to redo.

    This should be a very expensive lesson for their technically-inclined production crew and, if they have any, actual IT staff.

    --

    Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
  16. Welcome to the future of cloud computing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can not wait to see the kind of complaints that arise after some twat somewhere wipes your entire life in the clouds.

  17. No offline copy? by webdog314 · · Score: 1

    Sure, 300GB is a lot of data, but it's not *that* much data. We're talking about TWO FREAKING YEARS worth of work from multiple companies and NOBODY had enough sense to back the whole thing up offline?? $50 at Fry's would easily buy you a terabyte drive. Forget the ISP, it's a total FAIL on the part of all involved I'd say.

    1. Re:No offline copy? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Maybe someone made a "backup" but is afraid to admit it ...

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:No offline copy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again this comes down to, "if you're paying for a service (the ISP was supposed to provide backup to the digital dropbox they were using), you should reasonably feel that you're getting what you paid for."

    3. Re:No offline copy? by Barryke · · Score: 1

      To be fair, it was used as a dropbox to collaborate on new material.

      I expect that material changes every day, so doing this in situ seems like a wise thing to do. They paid that company to take care of that.
      This is a fair deal.

      Now for recoverability; i expect each of those collaborators didn't lose their most recent product, and as such that the entire contents is not lost. Perhaps some temporary files/videoedits that nobody really needs anymore.

      And seriously, since when is 300GB enough to do video collaboration? Do they edit/distribute compressed SD quality video or something?

      --
      Hivemind harvest in progress..
    4. Re:No offline copy? by mad_minstrel · · Score: 1

      I can't imagine how they managed to squeeze (and lose) a season's worth of data into 300GB. Sintel, which is just 15 minutes long, has 650GB of raw frames, excluding any work files.

      --
      May the source be with you.
    5. Re:No offline copy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Stop shifting the blame to the user. For once a user did the right thing and relied on the IT company, they didn't make stupid or unreasonable requests that led to their downfall and then try and blame the IT guys. In this case the IT company was wholly at fault and royally shafted them. A user shouldn't have to understand about backups if they're paying supposed professionals to do it for them any more than I need to know how to strip and rebuild a car engine from scratch when I'm paying a professional mechanic to do my servicing.

    6. Re:No offline copy? by afidel · · Score: 1

      Sounds more like BD quality, 300GB/20(episodes in a typical season)=15GB/episode or roughly BD quality. Now, since these were post production and just intended for final edit that's pretty normal.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  18. Backup and Not Restore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You notice they always call it backup software, not restore software.

    1. Re:Backup and Not Restore... by Vekseid · · Score: 1

      A company a family member worked at got hit by that one.

      They bought backup software for some insane amount of money.

      Time came they had a crash and needed to restore from backup.

      There was no restore software.

  19. In their defense by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

    It sounds like their ISP was supposed to do that. I've nothing wrong with paying other companies to do something for you. Not every company has the resources to do everything. You outsource things to experts. However that means you presume they do it right, and do what they say. The ISP said "Ya no problem we back this up." And then it turned out they didn't.

    1. Re:In their defense by Cylix · · Score: 2

      It's fairly common practice to keep the raw video in case you need to do something with it. It's generally higher quality, free from effects and can be remixed as needed. In the event the finished product is wiped out then the show can be reproduced at some cost.

      With one of the previous companies I was with we spent so little on technology that it wasn't uncommon to lose the primary file server. Eventually, after the third or fourth reload plus reproducing they eventually opted to invest in some backup technologies and secondary file servers.

      While it is April fools day I have seen this scenario too many times. I believe there is some rule to humor that indicates a situation is humorous when it is on the unbelievable side. This doesn't strike me as terribly unbelievable.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    2. Re:In their defense by yeshuawatso · · Score: 2

      Mod parent up; someone read the article. This is exactly on point to why this will be settled out of court with a couple million exchanging hands, and A LOT of the ISP staff will be terminated for not doing their jobs. Plus, there's the PR stuff to reassure customers, dealing with those that lost non-essential data, and of course, the loss of customers who will simply exit and go somewhere else. The worse thing this could have done was make it to a lawsuit.

    3. Re:In their defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's fairly common practice to keep the raw video in case you need to do something with it. It's generally higher quality, free from effects and can be remixed as needed. In the event the finished product is wiped out then the show can be reproduced at some cost.

      RTFA. This was not yet a finished product. They were files that had been passed back and forth between artist/animators/etc for the last 2 years while developing the show. It was a remote, collaborative effort that was still ongoing. So these were essentially the unfinished source files that got lost. The article says that while 300GB were wiped, they only permanently lost 65GB of data. I'm assuming the other 235GB were files that the various contributors still had their own local copies of.

  20. Yeesh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I totally feel for the production company, but I have to make one point...

    Why wasn't any of this stuff being copied locally? You can buy a 2TB drive for 160$. Yes it may take a goddamn month to download all of it with todays shitty american and canadian ISP's throttling, but you wouldn't lose years of work. Better yet, have someone physically go down to the ISP with a portable drive and have them copy it for you, so the most you may ever lose is whatever your time is worth.

    If backup was in the contract, why wasn't the backups being tested. I know between two machines I have at one colo, it takes about 21 hours to backup 500GB of data over the GigE interface when the machine is in full use.

  21. Backup Awareness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This means that, officially, World Backup Day has ended.

  22. RTFA and it does not make much sense by Ecuador · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It was an off-site FTP server for collaboration, are they telling us none of the collaborators had the full set of data? It was "just" 300GB, meaning it could fit easily on an average hard drive.
    Furthermore, they say they require all the data to reconstitute the episodes, so every time they needed the episodes, they would download all those 300GB of 6000+ files from FTP and rebuild their episodes? What kind of idiocy is this.
    And lastly, did that employee secure erase everything? It was more than a simple rm -rf ?

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    1. Re:RTFA and it does not make much sense by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, they say they require all the data to reconstitute the episodes, so every time they needed the episodes, they would download all those 300GB of 6000+ files from FTP and rebuild their episodes? What kind of idiocy is this.

      If it is the work of a company doing effects that is missing, it's not unreasonable that there are scenes missing from all episodes. If this is a work in production, the other companies could have simple placeholders or simply worked on their own scenes. I don't know how they split the work, but it's not unreasonable that nobody has the latest work of everyone as they work in parallel.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:RTFA and it does not make much sense by arth1 · · Score: 1

      And lastly, did that employee secure erase everything? It was more than a simple rm -rf ?

      Depending on the file system used, rm can be quite secure. It is meant to be irrecoverable, and even though some file systems are badly enough implemented that there are "undelete" programs, this is far from the case everywhere.

      A working undelete program is one that restores from backup.
      Daily incremental backups is a given. And, as this company learned the hard way, no backup is complete until you have tested a restore.

      But most of all, don't give a janitor the keys to the crown jewels before he's earned your trust, and you his. And if you have to terminate someone with copies of all the keys, change all the locks and audit for hidden ones. No exceptions.
      It can still be cheaper not to fire them completely, but give them a retainer fee for the next ten years. Then they have a reason not to exact revenge too.

  23. I heard Nokia is switching to Windows Phone 7! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    April fool!!!! Bwa, ha, ha, sucker, ha, hee, ho, ho, ho...

  24. The only people I feel pity for is the ISP by bedouin · · Score: 1

    I have been in a situation like this, though definitely not of the same magnitude. I lost an entire year's worth of work on a non-profit site I was working on. I was under the impression that backups were being made.

    I had written a simple shell script to connect to the server and backup my SQL data and other files. The problem was I hadn't run it since I started the site. Who do I blame? Me.

    The funny thing is that I tend to backup religiously, but for some reason didn't backup the site's database. You can have 20 year old backups survive, even if on shoddy media, but the one time you decide not backup you're screwed.

    More pertinent to the story -- I shot and edited a documentary with hours worth of footage. After every interview I would go home, plug in my DV cam, and import the video to Final Cut Express. The tape was then put away for safe keeping. Next I would backup all the capture and project files to an external hard drive. So, if I have a HD crash then the backup exists. If both hard drives die I have the original tapes. My only flaw would be keeping them all in the same building.

    When the entire project was finished I backed it up in its entirety again. I can still go back to that project if I'd like. I also burnt it to a DVD, exported it back to my DV cam, and even made a Digital 8 copy. Still not satisfied I made a VHS copy, and two more 'master' copies of the DVD.

    That was nearly 2 years of work, and there was no way in hell I was going to lose it. I made no money for this and had nothing material at stake. The Zodiac Island people have big money and a reputation at stake, but were not professional enough to backup? I just don't feel much pity for them; if they want to sue someone, sue the disgruntled former employee -- not the ISP.

  25. How fitting to also be on the front page today! by AbRASiON · · Score: 1
  26. Anyone actually looked up this show? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    From the show website: "The stories of the twelve Kids of Zodiac Island share family values of loving, respect, and ethical behavior while learning to enjoy Nature. The loving, joyful Zodiac Kids are role models for children across the globe, and help everyone realize we are all peaceful, loving, happy beings."

    So... nothing of value was lost? Sounds anvilicious to me.

    http://www.zodiacisland.com/characters/index.html -- IT BURNSES ME! Really, children deserve better than that.

    1. Re:Anyone actually looked up this show? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair though, it looks better (and saner) than Teletubbies. Still makes me want to punch the wall but not quite as hard.

      Plus, it's not those stupid My Little Ponies. You've got to give them that. No matter how bad something is, at least if it's not about those wretched Ponies, it has its redeemable qualities.

    2. Re:Anyone actually looked up this show? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > IT BURNSES ME

      it burnses US.

      Fixed that for you.

      Please: if you're goin to use LOTR references, get them right. Otherwise you look foolish and will lose your geek card...

  27. I think they all should be out of a job. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Definitely smells like incompetence on everyone's part, especially Cyberlinks. But to not keep a copy of your own data, but trust it entirely to a cheapo ftp site? Whoever made that decision also deserves the boot.

  28. Q: because it breaks the flow of a message by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Funny

    A: Why is starting a comment in the Subject: line incredibly irritating?

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  29. They probably fired him for bitching about backups by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

    .. that weren't being done ; a lot of management just don't want to hear that they have to actually spend money on hardware and staff to run it. Instead, squash the problem by removing that squeaky cog.

    And then he made his point rather more obvious.

    Just speculatin'

  30. Cloudy data by pmontra · · Score: 1

    Obligatory pun: This is what happens when you store data into the cloud. It evaporates!

  31. The rules by sjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Rule 1, if you upload it to your ISP, keep a backup.

    Rule 2, if they say they keep backups, keep a backup, theirs may not be very good.

    Rule number 3, if they agree contracturally to make full backups, keep one of your own. They don't care as much about your stuff as you do and they probably have a get out of jail free clause buried somewhere in the fine print.

  32. duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you care about any of your data, you always have a backup offline in your own physical possession. You definitely can't trust service providers who claim they backup, often those backups are never tested and they do not function. Even if they do, what if their facility is hit by a natural disaster? Most aren't going to have an off-site backup. Moral of the story is you cannot trust anyone else to keep your data safe.

  33. 300 GB is not a lot of data by wesw02 · · Score: 1

    The makers of this show should have done their own backups. You can buy a 2TB drive for ~$100, fill it up and put it away for safe keep. Simple as that.

  34. National back up by markass530 · · Score: 1

    isn't today or yesterday or whatever national back up day? Ironic, Dontcha think?

  35. Nice setup by medoc · · Score: 1

    Precious archival data stored in a single location on a machine that they don't control. It's not the ISP employee who should be fired...

  36. Good luck seeking your claim. by SpzToid · · Score: 1

    The company is "seeking restoration and restitution for all damages and destruction of our proprietary materials," WeR1 CEO Ingrid Wang said Thursday in an e-mail message.

    Good luck with that. Backups are sort of like buying fire insurance aren't they? They seem like a separate service to purchase, aside from ftp hosting. Like in case something inane occurs, like for when the ftp-hosting ISP's cheap labor (allegedly) effects disks with circumstances of disgruntlement.

    --
    You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
  37. Enoough already! by drumstik · · Score: 0

    Ok, we get it - it's best practice to have a backup solution. They DID - they paid for it. Blaming the victim (and they were victims - they paid for a service and did not receive it) only gets you so far.

  38. Why didn't the ISP delete/disable the fired ... by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

    ... employee's accounts immediately upon termination? Kind of a moronic oversight.

    --
    'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
    1. Re:Why didn't the ISP delete/disable the fired ... by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Afaict that is easy enough to do with "regular" users but much harder with sysdmins (and at a hosting provider a large proportion of the employees are probablly sysadmins of some sort). They tend to know passwords that are poorly documented and/or shared. A disgruntled admin may even go as far as creating extra accounts specifically for the purpose of maintaining access after they are fired.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    2. Re:Why didn't the ISP delete/disable the fired ... by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

      I agree completely, and it seems this is a smaller ISP without the policies and procedures of a national ISP. Still, they can act more professionally and not run the business like a bunch of high-school kids.

      --
      'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
  39. Re:Cost too much to retain it by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 2

    Nope.

    That's the beautiful trap. Companies love to moan about how long tail materials are "too expensive to retain", meaning they're willing for it to vanish forever, but skies alive if you create a college club around it! Copyright terrorists! Sue them!

    If some super-lawyer for EFF wants another angle to chip away at the copyright insanity, that might be an angle: get a statement under oath that something is "too costly to maintain", aka the retention value is negative, and then it becomes one of the CC licenses, perhaps Attribution-Only with commercial use allowed. (I don't think anyone wants to pretend that Da Mouse is their invention, they just want to make mashup derivatives.)

    To my vague recall that's what started the paper shredder industry - something labeled trash is no longer fully protected property.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  40. Back It Up!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BACKUP,BACKUP,BACKUP!!! Redundancy!!!! It would take an idiot to leave all their files to an ISP without having physical copies stored as well.

  41. People still don;t back their stuff up. by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    Amazing.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  42. Missing something important by davev2.0 · · Score: 0

    132 on this article and not one about Michael Jewson and his criminal behavior. No, ever single one is about how the company was stupid to trust their ISP to have backups.

    This shouldn't surprise me as most Slashdotters seem to approve of the kind of act Jewson committed. I have no doubt many are envious that he was able to do it while they themselves are incapable of striking back at their former employers.

  43. 321 rule by TRRosen · · Score: 2

    3 copies
    2 mediums
    1 offsite

    PS stop talking about 'the cloud" like it exists. It's only an abstract concept. Everything is on a real piece of hardware that will fail and controlled by a human that will f*ck up.

    1. Re:321 rule by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

      the "cloud" has just become a euphemism for the interwebs.

      --
      from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
      to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
  44. nobody cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nobody cares about backups, but people get fired over restores.

  45. Unions by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    This is why you need them.

    Also, if your 320gig worth of invaluable childrens' TV show only exists on your ISPs servers, you should jump out of a high window right now because you are too stupid to live. A 320gig portable hard drive can be had at newegg for about fifty bucks. Less if you keep an eye on woot. How stupid can you be? When you edited those shows, did you wipe all your hard drives afterward? How in the hell can your only copies be on your ISP's servers?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Unions by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Also, if your 320gig worth of invaluable childrens' TV show only exists on your ISPs servers, you should jump out of a high window right now because you are too stupid to live.

      That rule ought to be expanded to include people who buy into the "cloud computing" idea - which is what these people were doing in an ad-hoc manner.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    2. Re:Unions by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      which is what these people were doing in an ad-hoc manner.

      Ad hoc cloud computing. Boy does that sound like a bad idea.

      Well, maybe. Under the right circumstances. Note the preservative quality of recordings that have been committed to torrent-space. As long as the trackers can stay one step ahead of the RIAA/MPAA, those works will be a vital part of the culture forever (or until that huge solar flare does an EMP-wipe of Earth).

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  46. money for nothing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they have a backup but saying they dont allows them to get money from the ISP?

    After all 300 GB is just $50 for an external hard drive

  47. Re:Cost too much to retain it by Cederic · · Score: 1

    I'd love abandonware (whether computer programs, TV programmes, films, music or books) to fall out of copyright. Proving something is abandonware is tricky. Better to significantly reduce copyright terms.

    I don't think however that the BBC destroying old tapes/films because they either saved money be re-using the physical media or because they saved money by not having to store it was at any point intended to become a trap.

    I suspect the BBC would admit themselves that it's a shame they can't produce a DVD with the original Doctor Who on it, or add it to iPlayer (free for UK TV licence holders).

  48. Re:They probably fired him for bitching about back by sandytaru · · Score: 1

    The sad thing is, I can honestly believe this.

    --
    Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
  49. Great security and backup practices by grapeape · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And people wonder why fired IT workers are escorted to the door without being allowed to go back to their desks. All it takes is one idiot to make the rest of the company completely paranoid from that point forward. First rule of IT Staffing: When someone leaves...make sure their access leaves with them. The lack of backups however is inexcusable.

    1. Re:Great security and backup practices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like we can't leave a trojan horse or four behind keyed to our login remaining active? Or other nastiness, if one were disposed to that sort of mischief.

  50. Jesus and Satan by aprentic · · Score: 1

    Jesus and Satan are arguing about who is the better programmer so they decide to have a competition. For the sake of argument let's say they're supposed to write a log(log(n)) sorting program.
    They both type furiously for a few minutes and then Jesus leans back and smiles. Satan continues typing when suddenly the power goes out.
    Both computers shut down and Satan starts cursing like a sailor.
    When he notices that Jesus seems undisturbed he asks, "What the hell are you smiling about?"
    He replies, "Jesus saves."

  51. CyberLynk FTP server by doperative · · Score: 1

    What was in the terms regarding storage of the data and CyberLynk and World Network, the show's creator?

  52. Qualified people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is why you need them. Stop hiring people with basket weaving degrees and hire some real people. Its your own fault.

  53. Re:Hairyfeet Y do U insist on making all /. laugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh look, it's the April Fool.

    If only you'd go away for the rest of the year, I think I could stand you.

  54. Back-up COPY by KiwiCanuck · · Score: 1

    Not too long ago one of my friends brought me his dead back-up drive. He was really upset that the drive failed. I told him that drives fails, and that is why you are supposed to keep a back up copy of you data on a separate drive. To which he replied, but I only have the one copy. It's on my back-up drive.

  55. FAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With Jewson, you lose some.

  56. Rule 4 & 5 by swb · · Score: 1

    Rule 4: Make sure you know the sales person's personal information -- home phone number, home address, name of wife and kids, car make, model & tag.

    Rule 5: Make sure you know same about owner.

    When they screw up on this scale, have your "consultants" make unannounced solo visits to places they park their car to discuss how their company will make up for your loss.

    Be sure your consultants are unknown to company officials but address them on a friendly, first-name basis, and let them know that the "recent data loss is totally unacceptable." Assure them you know that they will "make sure they have the first cash payment of $50,000 ready by Friday" and that to keep things convenient, you're willing to "pick it up at their cute house on Elm Lane with the patio in the back yard or perhaps at the daycare or school little Johnny attends."

    This lets them know you care about them and have all of their most important interests at heart and that while you understand this might require some short-term sacrifices on their part, by making you whole again, you're willing to help keep them safe.

  57. TO THE CLOUD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...

  58. This doesn't make sense by kyrio · · Score: 1

    The fault lies on the idiots who didn't back their shit up before putting it on another person's server.

    1. Re:This doesn't make sense by vandamme · · Score: 1

      OK, boys & girls, we learned "teamwork, sharing and how to be part of a loving community."

      And April 1 was Backup day, and Clean Out the Internet Day, and...

      All I know about The Cloud I learned from the weatherman; if you want different weather, wait 5 minutes cuz those clouds could evaporate.

  59. missing tag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    andnothingofvaluewaslost

  60. Re:Cost too much to retain it by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    I suspect the BBC would admit themselves that it's a shame they can't produce a DVD with the original Doctor Who on it

    The very first Doctor Who story is complete in the archives (as is the original unaired pilot) and has been released on DVD, as have several other First Doctor stories. AFAIK if anything it's the Second Doctor's stories that suffered the most from this phenomenon- some exist complete, but a very high percentage are partially or completely wiped.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  61. To the cloud! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nuff said...

  62. Game companys resell cracked exes from torrents by Nick+Ives · · Score: 1

    Actually, the interesting thing about piracy is how it enables easier preservation. Storing widely shared rips of films in open formats is a very redundant way to ensure old films don't get lost.

    I recall that Max Payne 2 on Steam uses the Myth cracked exe; You used to be able to see the Myth logo inside the actual exe but they patched it out. I'm fairly certain I've heard of other instances where cracked exes have been used in digital releases of old DRMed games.

    --
    Nick
  63. Re:Cost too much to retain it by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Oh - I wasn't thinking of the BBC - that incident dates from an earlier time. I am thinking of much more recent examples.

    If I recall, on the Baen Library one of the editorials remarked that "it was too much work to fix up out of print novels to bring them back into print vs the expected sales". Also see the music industry (!) - why should anything be out of print in that field ever?

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine