Slashdot Mirror


Toshiba Develops 3-D Monocle

For years, adoption of 3-D display moneygrubbing headache porn technology has been hampered by the cumbersome viewing glasses needed to properly perceive the video movie spacetimes porn , not to mention the loss in market share of people who have suffered the injury or loss of one of their eyes legs minds porns . Now, Toshiba has laid those concerns to rest with the creation of the world's first 3-D monocle, dubbed the "Spectacle." "Two triangular polarizing lenses were melded in parallel and encased in black-plated tungsten carbide for a lightweight and durable enbuildification construction balsa porn ." The elegant, minimalist design leaves your second eye free for other tasks rolls REM porn .

69 comments

  1. Spectacular by nschubach · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now when I poke my eye out I can still enjoy 3D!

    --
    Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    1. Re:Spectacular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Now when I poke my eye out I can still enjoy 3D porns!"

      There, fixed that for ya...

    2. Re:Spectacular by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Now when I poke my eye out I can still enjoy 3D!

      Go ahead, Raphie, get that Red Ryder BB Gun with a compass in the stock!

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Spectacular by obergfellja · · Score: 1

      Now when I poke my eye out I can still enjoy 3D!

      Now, Pirates can even enjoy 3D. Only if Nintendo can adopt this technology.

  2. Enough is enough by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Its fun to look for one slightly plausible "april fool" among genuine articles. A whole stream of them just gets boring.

    1. Re:Enough is enough by Anrego · · Score: 0

      Indeed. This falls flat big time.

      They really need to intersperse real stories in with the lame April fools ones, and make at least some of the April fools ones plausible.

      It would draw in the crowd of people who mostly ignore Slashdot once the April fools stuff starts up and might add a bit more humour to the April fools stories as people wouldn’t immediately assume they were jokes.

      People might have to think about whether the articles are plausible. You’d need to have an extra line that _clearly_ makes it an obvious joke in the actual comments page or something, to prevent the inevitable fake story that everyone believes.

    2. Re:Enough is enough by Anrego · · Score: 1

      Id also add that google's "internet through the sewer thing" back in "the day" actually got me. This is the kind of good April fools joke. On the surface it seemed plausible. I actually started going: "hey, that kinda makes sense.. " before I caught on.

      The "zomg Microsoft is using the linux kernel in the next release of windows and is decomissioning internet explorer in favour of google chrome" type stories have no humor value to me. Even less so when, as you said, they just come as a constant stream.

    3. Re:Enough is enough by boristdog · · Score: 1

      Whiner.

      We need a whole day where we can just say "fuck it" and not worry about the oh-so important world of technology.

    4. Re:Enough is enough by Riceballsan · · Score: 1

      Well I think the main reason is simple, google themselves declared the gmail anouncement date a bad marketing decision. The problem is everyone has taken the jokes too far and now it is a waste of time for anyone to anounce anything on april fools day because nobody will believe it.

    5. Re:Enough is enough by eln · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Every year Slashdot does something for April Fool's, and every year people bitch about it. Personally, I like that Slashdot is linking to the various geek april fools jokes out there so I don't have to go hunting for them myself, and I think the Mad Libs in the article summaries are clever too.

      April Fool's is the one day of the year this sort of thing happens. If it bothers you that much, just take a day off from the Internet and spend the day chasing kids off your lawn or something.

    6. Re:Enough is enough by TheCycoONE · · Score: 1

      Interestingly OpenTTD 1.1.0 was actually released today (www.openttd.org)

      In this case the date did help me notice it, as I was scanning open source project sites to see what they were doing for April Fools.

    7. Re:Enough is enough by mfnickster · · Score: 1

      If you want the plausible ones, try this:

      http://slashdot.org/tags/april1already

      --
      "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
    8. Re:Enough is enough by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Its fun to look for one slightly plausible "april fool" among genuine articles. A whole stream of them just gets boring.

      So does a whole stream of 'this is boring' comments every... fucking... year.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  3. Seriously? by CowardWithAName · · Score: 0

    Is there going to be any real news posted today? Or just all "jokes"? Kinda ruins /. for those who actually enjoy reading real news...

    1. Re:Seriously? by piripiri · · Score: 1

      Same stuff on almost every news sites today... If you want real news you'd better wait until tomorrow.

    2. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The vadican porn one is real

    3. Re:Seriously? by nschubach · · Score: 2

      Even "die hard" news readers have to take a day off every now and then.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    4. Re:Seriously? by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      Kinda ruins /. for those who actually enjoy reading real news...

      In other words, just like every other day.

    5. Re:Seriously? by CowardWithAName · · Score: 1

      Real geek news.

  4. Now get two! by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

    And enjoy the whole world in SIX DEE! For the price of TWO!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Now get two! by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 1

      In America conmerce controls the government.

    2. Re:Now get two! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, great, extra time dimensions.

      "Hey, the movie's playing backwards in my frame of reference! I want my money back!"

      "Also, there's a guy in the third row who tried to watch the movie twice by moving sideways in the fifth dimension and now he's stuck in a time loop. He says he's seen Jackass 3D 15,288,329 times and was wondering if you could do something about that."

  5. Finally! by spudnic · · Score: 1

    I'm getting a kick out of this because I have use of only one eye.

    S

    --
    load "linux",8,1
    1. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have strabismus, and wish this was a real product.

      Alas.

  6. It's true.. by Dynamoo · · Score: 1

    It's true.. with the monocle, you can watch a 2D movie while travelling forward in time. Given that time is regarded by some as a dimension, then it is indeed three dimensional. I'll get me coat.

    --
    Never email donotemail@WeAreSpammers.com
  7. Several non-binocular depth cues by tepples · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This one is slightly plausible. The monocle could selectively change focus of parts of the image, or apply any of several other non-binocular depth cues.

  8. Put on your 3-D monocle now by Candid88 · · Score: 1

    No! NOOOOO! But possibly, yes.

  9. Bout time by Klept88 · · Score: 1

    Now I can finally have the Sir Patrick Moore look I've always wanted while still enjoying epic 3d TV, I hope they release "The Sky at Night" back catalogue that is 3d-monacle supported!

    --
    Bi-Winning
  10. All I immediately thought of by plopez · · Score: 1

    was "Hogan!"

    Sad, isn't it?

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    1. Re:All I immediately thought of by Nameisyoung007 · · Score: 1

      I was going to say the exact same thing. Good show, excellent use of the monocle.

    2. Re:All I immediately thought of by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      I see NOTHINK!

      (perhaps I should get myself a 3-d monocle).

    3. Re:All I immediately thought of by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      I see NOTHINK!

      That would be Shultz, not Klink.
      Oh, in case anyone (other than me) cares, Hogan's Heroes is available on DVD. And it is just as funny as I remember it being back in the day.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    4. Re:All I immediately thought of by WalksOnDirt · · Score: 1

      I was surprised to see it listed as one of the worst TV series of all time. It took me a while to realize that people were objecting to Jews making fun of Germans, like that was devaluing the holocaust or something. Odd.

      --
      a,e,i,o,u and sometimes w and y (at be if of up cwm by)
    5. Re:All I immediately thought of by plopez · · Score: 1

      Yeah, weird. Werner Klemperer was 1/2 Jewish, the guy who played LeBeua (Robert Clary) was in a concentration camp, John Banner was Jewish, etc.

      A large chunk of the cast was Jewish, and agreed that the way the situation was handled was OK. The producers, directors and writers were very careful about, from what I heard. The Germans were shown as real twits.

      Though Schultz was the most sympathetic, more "the Kraut who rather be drinking beer and eating bratwurst" type.

      The other thought that occurred to me was that the camp seemed to be in Germany. If that was the case then when they went to meet the resistance at the "Hauserhof" it probably would have been the *German* resistance.

      What an odd comedy series....

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  11. Indubitably! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now all I need is a 3D tuxedo!

  12. There's never been an escape from Stalag 13! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hogan!!!

    1. Re:There's never been an escape from Stalag 13! by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Now if only he had been running Stalag 17...

  13. Caution: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do not look into videos that show lasers with remaining eye. Double without the monocle.

    -gz612

  14. Porn everywhere! by Addict7 · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one editing each world with "porn"?

    1. Re:Porn everywhere! by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 1

      yes.

      --
      "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
    2. Re:Porn everywhere! by Ironhandx · · Score: 1

      My first was moneygrubbing, then porn for every one thereafter. Since it hasn't gone outside the bounds and I didn't get the error on any of them, I imagine we're not alone :D

  15. Some one dropped acid in my Wheaties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I woke up and Slashdot is covered in drop down menus. I'm going back to bed until April 2nd.

  16. Someone at Toshiba is watching too much Futurama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone at Toshiba is watching too much Futurama and must have fallen in love with imaginary being called Turanga Leela.

  17. 3D squint of pain! by Tragedy4u · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or do all the photo's of the people wearing that thing look like they're squinting in massive pain. That or they're in the process of evacuating in their trousers due to immense 3D excitement!

    1. Re:3D squint of pain! by maxume · · Score: 1

      That one guy looks like he is enjoying it.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  18. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Aren't April Fools jokes supposed to be funny and, you know, fool you?

    1. Re:So... by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Aren't April Fools jokes supposed to be funny and, you know, fool you?

      Yeah, right. Next you're gonna say Easter is about some guy getting executed instead of cute bunnies hiding candy or something...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  19. Your Sig by mdielmann · · Score: 1

    Yet another endorsement for Netflix.

    --
    Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    1. Re:Your Sig by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

      No kidding. The only sporting events I'll watch are live, and even then only when my kids are the ones playing. If that makes Netflix a back door way of getting the benefit of a la carte pricing, I'm all for it.

      (And I'm willing to risk being modded off topic, since this whole fucking day is off topic on /.)

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
  20. I have more respect for Toshiba now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any company with that kind of humor is worth paying money to. (puts in monocle) I say, Well done, sir, well done!

    And for you April Fool's haters: get a sense of humor! :-P

  21. Agreeded by hAckz0r · · Score: 2
    Two big give-aways in this one for me.

    First, two polarizing filters in series will filter out all the light.

    .
    Second, tungsten carbide is not lightweight! Tungsten carbide is very heavy, dense, and extremely hard material. It is often used for cutting hardened steel. Its not easy /cheap to manufacture because of its hardness and would be far heavy enough to be uncomfortable to wear given that you have to squint to keep it in place. Titanium would have been a much better choice!

    Besides that. what would be the point of having 3D for just one eye?

  22. Good bye for good slashdot. This has always been a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good bye for good slashdot. This has always been a pretty lame place. But 4/1 just sets it over the edge.

  23. ZOUNDS! by squidflakes · · Score: 1

    A monocle for viewing of digital-ized images created by a difference engine and projected for the enjoyment of fine gentlemen? BRILLIANT!

  24. Arrr! by snspdaarf · · Score: 1

    Besides that. what would be the point of having 3D for just one eye?

    Just ya wait 'till the 19th o' September, galley rat! You'll understand!

    --
    Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
  25. And the inverse of the 3d monocle by OberonBob · · Score: 1
  26. What really sucks by milbournosphere · · Score: 1

    is that I was given mod points and now I have no decent stories on which to actually use them :( Stupid April Fools.

  27. OMG! 3D Ponies!!!!! by Uncle+Warthog · · Score: 1

    OMG!!! I can't wait!!! OMG!!!

  28. Jokes on them, it actually works (Pulfrich effect) by AC-x · · Score: 1

    You can get a 3D effect by darkening one eye using the Pulfrich effect. Back in 1993 the BBC had a special 3D week where using 3D glasses with one clear eye and one darkened eye. Shows shot in a specific way would look 3D with the glasses but appear normal to users without the glasses.

    They even did a 3D Dr Who Special.

  29. Sign me up by donny77 · · Score: 1

    Where can I preorder?

  30. Timely & Perfect by Freymour · · Score: 1

    You just gotta love April Fools Day!

  31. best 3d April Fool's story by queequeg1 · · Score: 1

    at least I hope it's a joke:

    Surgery

  32. ObSimpsons by base_chakra · · Score: 1

    [While watching Jersey Shore and Big Brother]

    "That's my third monocle this week; I simply must stop being so horrified."

  33. Excellent by kyrio · · Score: 1

    Now more people can ruin their eyes!

  34. Re:Good bye for good slashdot. This has always bee by osu-neko · · Score: 1

    Can I have your stuff?

    --
    "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  35. Will we see Hogan's Heroes reruns in 3D? by twoears · · Score: 1

    Where's Colonel Klink when you need him? I can hear General Burkhalter yelling, "Kleeenk!!!"

    1. Re:Will we see Hogan's Heroes reruns in 3D? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Where's Colonel Klink when you need him? I can hear General Burkhalter yelling, "Kleeenk!!!"

      Except Klink's monocle got smashed on a semi-regular basis - this could add up for him. He'd probably resort to stealing even more from the prisoner's Red Cross packages.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  36. Wear two! by GooberToo · · Score: 1

    If you wear two of them, you see in six dimensions* instead of just three.

    * LSD not included.

  37. But... But... My brother only has one eye... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was so excited to send my brother a link to this article... but luckily had the good sense to look in to it first. Now I'm just sad. He will never get to revel in 3D.

  38. Surprise: 3D monocles are real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The joke is on you and Toshiba's writers. You can, indeed, have a 3D monocle -- that is, a device that makes a 2D display appear 3D by only affecting one eye.

    There were a number of 3D television experiences in the mid-80's that worked with a pair of glasses, where one eye was covered with a semi-transparent dark film of plastic and the other eye was covered in either clear plastic or nothing at all. You might expect that this would lead to both eyes seeing the same thing at the same time, but you'd be wrong... It turns out that dimmer images travel slightly slower to the brain than bright images, so the device effectively introduces a slight time delay between the two eyes. So if you have an image moving horizontally across a 2D display, the eyes will perceive the image at an offset proportional to its horizontal speed, making it appear to be on a plane in front of or behind the background (depending on which eye is dimmed and whether the object is moving left or right).

    Thus, if you view a 2D animated image with horizontal parallax scrolling using these glasses, it will appear 3D. This is known as the Pulfrich effect. There are a number of YouTube videos where you can try it out yourself (use a lens of a pair of sunglasses to cover one eye -- works best in a darkened room).

    Because the effect only works with scenes with horizontal motion, you don't see it used very frequently. But, yes, you can have a 3D monocle.