Slashdot Mirror


Celebrating 20 Years of Linux

dmbkiwi writes "2011 is the 20th anniversary of the first release of the Linux kernel by Linus Torvalds. Since that time, the Linux kernel, together with the GNU tools and a whole host of software has been developed by enthusiasts and professional programmers into an operating system that runs on tiny embedded systems right up to the world's fastest supercomputers." The Linux Foundation is hosting a celebratory gala at this year's LinuxCon.

193 comments

  1. Happy Birthday by Hatta · · Score: 5, Funny

    What do you get for the kernel that has everything?

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:Happy Birthday by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 3, Funny

      What do you get for the kernel that has everything?

      A larger desktop market share and acceptance by the general population?

    2. Re:Happy Birthday by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      a popper, of course. :-o

    3. Re:Happy Birthday by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      What do you get for the kernel that has everything?

      42...

    4. Re:Happy Birthday by manpeach · · Score: 3, Funny

      Give Him a twenty dollar gift certificate at Pizza Jo's!

    5. Re:Happy Birthday by _0rm_ · · Score: 2

      Sounds like Canonical has that covered.

      --
      Boredom is bliss.
    6. Re:Happy Birthday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Obligatory XKCDs:

      http://xkcd.com/456/

    7. Re:Happy Birthday by npsimons · · Score: 2

      What do you get for the kernel that has everything?

      You joke, but I was just looking at a comparison of open source OSes, and Linux really DOES seem to have everything. I keep getting reminded of The "Last" OS comment. Truly insightful.

    8. Re:Happy Birthday by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Stable API?

      Calm down. I'm joking. It has gotten better. Just the occasional, changing of the name of constants.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    9. Re:Happy Birthday by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Maybe a working link in the Slashdot article? The #1 link is not an HREF.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    10. Re:Happy Birthday by similar_name · · Score: 1

      A larger desktop market share and acceptance by the general population?

      Larger desktop share would be nice, but technically I would say Linux (especially the kernel) is accepted by the general population even if they don't know it's Linux running their phone, gps, web page, etc.

    11. Re:Happy Birthday by 0racle · · Score: 2

      Multiscreen 3d acceleration?

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    12. Re:Happy Birthday by npsimons · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Stable API?

      Oh please don't tell me you're another one of those going on about stable kernel API nonsense.

      Calm down. I'm joking. It has gotten better. Just the occasional, changing of the name of constants.

      Oh good. Well, you could just always go the route of getting your driver into the mainline kernel. Or hell, if that's too much trouble, ask them to write it for you. What's that you say? You want a binary interface so you can write closed source drivers? Well in that case, fuck off. It's called "open source" for a reason.

    13. Re:Happy Birthday by lennier1 · · Score: 1

      If that's the question those mice should really demand their money back.

    14. Re:Happy Birthday by Jeek+Elemental · · Score: 3, Insightful

      decent competition?

    15. Re:Happy Birthday by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      drivers
      documentation
      ease of use

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    16. Re:Happy Birthday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A fully working audio-stack which replaces the current mess of various layers?

    17. Re:Happy Birthday by jd · · Score: 2

      There's a lot of networking protocols (especially dealing with real-time TCP, networking over slow connections - eg DTP, QoS functions) that are missing and why the hell aren't things like Web100 and KTAU integrated with mainstream yet?!

      Documentation (eg: LARTC) is horribly out-of-date and usually sucks.

      The VAX port is missing.

      A number of newer filesystems (eg: btrfs, nilfs) still need work and there's a few good filesystems (eg: Polyserve's fs) that we don't have clean-room implementations of.

      More of the hooks that will be needed to provide a standard baseline for computer clustering (eg: MOSIX, Kerrighd, bproc) still need to be written out and implemented.

      QA. Variants of the kernel are FAA-approved, other variants are Carrier-Grade. It's doubtful the mainstream kernel can be either - at least for very long - but narrowing the gap will increase the number of people interested in high-end usage.

      More drivers. Not just for home stuff, but also for special-purpose stuff. I don't recall seeing any specific SCADA support, for example. There's way more crypto boards out there than there's drivers, and don't give me that nonsense that crypto should be in userspace - you can't drive a hardware accelerator at decent speed if you're context switching all the time. As for what a userspace driver does to security... *shudder* No, some things HAVE to be in the kernel even if it's not some people's preferences on policy grounds.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    18. Re:Happy Birthday by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The Last OS? Isn't that what they said about Multics?

    19. Re:Happy Birthday by mordred99 · · Score: 1

      popcorn .. for something to aspire to when it grows up.

    20. Re:Happy Birthday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ubuntu? Debian? A jedi knows not these things. A jedi only knows slackware!

    21. Re:Happy Birthday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahaha that's a good one!

    22. Re:Happy Birthday by judeancodersfront · · Score: 0

      How about something more realistic like world peace?

    23. Re:Happy Birthday by npsimons · · Score: 2

      The Last OS? Isn't that what they said about Multics?

      Unfortunately, that was before my time. I have heard of Multics though; I think I may still have a scan of my first vi reference card that had MULTICS(or was that ULTRIX?) printed on it. But wasn't Multics written in PL/1? Perhaps that was the cause of it's downfall, whereas I don't see C going anywhere (especially for OS implementation) anytime soon.

      The key to Linux survivability, I think is that lots of people are working on it and using it; in other words, invested. To see the number of changes and technologies that have been integrated into Linux over the years is truly astounding; to imagine something that could replace it (something that would have all the benefits of Linux, and either improve upon its failings, or add something Linux could not), is not something easy to imagine.

    24. Re:Happy Birthday by judeancodersfront · · Score: 0

      You're like the PETA fanatic that shows up at a bbq knowing there would be meat and still chooses to annoy everyone.

    25. Re:Happy Birthday by Nikker · · Score: 1

      Drivers ya I can see that, although there really isn't that much that is missing any more. Documentation though? Common there is so much documentation and so many forums on basically every error code in existence that documentation is just stupid to bring up. Finally "ease of use" most of the time when I hear this it is just about installing drivers but aside from all of that most distros similar to Ubuntu are pretty much just like windows. See icon -> double click, see another icon -> double click. Most of the time FOSS software tries to mimic the popular stuff anyway like OpenOffice vs MS Office. As it develops it gets better but the only real issue would likely be drivers.

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    26. Re:Happy Birthday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ubuntu is not a real Linux; it's too mainstream now so it sucks.

      FTFY :P

    27. Re:Happy Birthday by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      I await - after 15 years - my MIPS R4000 support with framebuffer devices for the SGI Indigo Elan and the unique TTY on this architecture.

      "A better Iriix than Irix".

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    28. Re:Happy Birthday by node+3 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sounds like Canonical has that covered.

      That gift must have got lost in the mail...

    29. Re:Happy Birthday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh for real! The sound on ubuntu/mint is crap! I get one little hiccup over the network streaming in something and pow sound is out. Just liek that and have to restart the application so the sound engine will register the freakin thing. Soon will be leaving for another flavor and leave Ubuntu/Mint to its own poop pile to play in.

    30. Re:Happy Birthday by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      Oh please don't tell me you're another one of those going on about stable kernel API nonsense. [kroah.com]

      Good lord. All the reasons cited on that page are presented as good things rather than as problems that need to be solved, as most of them are.

      Or hell, if that's too much trouble, ask them to write it for you [kroah.com].

      Yeah, because that's worked so well so far. Plus the next time someone changes the kernel API you get to redo all the drivers again. Awesome!

    31. Re:Happy Birthday by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually I'd say these two fit the situation better. That said Happy BDay, may you manage to keep the corps from TiVo tricking your code, and keep making it so any CPU in recorded history can have a Bash term and be hacked. Many happy returns and here's to another 20 years.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    32. Re:Happy Birthday by obarthelemy · · Score: 2

      I'm really having a hard time finding beginner-level doc, especially finding documentation that is relevant to my distro, and its precise version.

      1st, there are so many possible places to scavenge for doc, that google is pretty much the only solution.
      2nd, most doc is outdated
      3rd, most doc assumes more linux knowledge than I have. Or a different distro. or a different version of the same distro.
      4th, honestly, forum support is rarely very friendly or efficient, especially for badly-phrased newb questions.

      Examples:
      I never could get the Remote Desktop (as in, MS's remoting protocol) client/server to run on my Ubuntu... 8.04 I think, at the time.
      I currently cannot access my Win7 PC's HD, unless I enable Everyone and disable the new sharing scheme Win7 offers (can't remember the name)
      I could never get rsynch to reliably synch my (NTFS) main drive to my (NTFS) backup drive, synching only the "changed since last time" files. an "xxcopy d: l: /clone" equivalent.

      I can read docs. I can apply them. I *can't* guess that since the version has changed, such-and-such need to be changed into so-and-so.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    33. Re:Happy Birthday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A girlfriend?

    34. Re:Happy Birthday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After 20 years how about a little down time.

    35. Re:Happy Birthday by mldi · · Score: 1

      A larger desktop market share and acceptance by the general population?

      Larger desktop share would be nice, but technically I would say Linux (especially the kernel) is accepted by the general population even if they don't know it's Linux running their phone, gps, web page, etc.

      True, but that doesn't necessarily mean contributions back to the kernel for the general public and so the kernel doesn't really benefit from that.

      --
      If you aren't suspicious of your government's actions, you aren't doing your job as a responsible citizen.
    36. Re:Happy Birthday by phrostie · · Score: 1

      oh come on, that was funny.

      +1

    37. Re:Happy Birthday by crashandburn66 · · Score: 1

      WiFi drivers that actually work?

    38. Re:Happy Birthday by npsimons · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because that's worked so well so far. Plus the next time someone changes the kernel API you get to redo all the drivers again. Awesome!

      Sigh . . .

      Other people will update the driver for you when external interface changes require it.

      I figured I would post the relevant part of the linked document, since you obviously didn't read it.

    39. Re:Happy Birthday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Common there is so much documentation and so many forums on basically every error code in existence that documentation is just stupid to bring up. "

      Ok, decent documentation.

    40. Re:Happy Birthday by icebraining · · Score: 1

      It is in the Classic Discussion System.

    41. Re:Happy Birthday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you get for the kernel that has everything?

      ZFS and Dtrace.

    42. Re:Happy Birthday by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      What do you get for the kernel that has everything?

      Another filesystem, optimized for whatever pattern of use is happening at some particular mountpoint, like Reiser did for maildirs. You can't ever have too many filesystems. Screw the generalists; there will never be one best filesystem, and this is one way Linux shines and beats everything else out there.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    43. Re:Happy Birthday by butalearner · · Score: 1

      A larger desktop market share and acceptance by the general population?

      Larger desktop share would be nice, but technically I would say Linux (especially the kernel) is accepted by the general population even if they don't know it's Linux running their phone, gps, web page, etc.

      Meh, I'm fine with the current desktop Linux marketshare. If 90% of the population want to perform the computing equivalent of diving in front of bullets for me, who am I to stop them?

    44. Re:Happy Birthday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm actually quite curious how WebOS and Meego are handled in this respect. In respect to my like of Linux and the Linux community, I kind of feel stabbed in the back with Android, but I haven't heard how WebOS and Meego fair in that respect. I suspect that Meego is a lot more friendly, and I don't even know what to expect from Palm/HP with WebOS.

      Unfortunately, your point still wins, even if the WebOS and Meego lot do contribute back to the kernel very well.

      Now, if only Android stayed sane and actually could contribute back on a good level. They've got their whole own thing going on that's a little too far separated at this point...

    45. Re:Happy Birthday by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      MeeGo is just a minimalist Linux distro with a lightweight desktop manager designed for smaller screens. Too bad there's no hardware being made to run it. You can run it on a regular x86 PC, or hack it onto an N900 and a few other devices though. I think my next phone might actually be an Android device hacked to run MeeGo.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    46. Re:Happy Birthday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... I'm using multiple screens with 3D acceleration on my Linux laptop right now...

      There's problems with it under certain conditions, yes. But to say that it's not there all together is a lie. It is possible right now, whether that's in the particular way you want it or not (and honestly, the graphics cards manufacturers deserve a certain amount of the blame on this, and there's not much Linux is going to do until we overcome their asshole problems somehow).

      And Slashdot... you fixed some of the stupid pieces of your interface recently. Good job. But... some of this new stuff is kind of annoying...

    47. Re:Happy Birthday by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Nah... I would settle with a sound system that really works FINE in all cases.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    48. Re:Happy Birthday by Vectormatic · · Score: 1

      I never could get the Remote Desktop (as in, MS's remoting protocol) client/server to run on my Ubuntu... 8.04 I think, at the time.

      why would you want to? Ubuntu supports remote desktop out of the box with VNC, for which there are numerous clients on all OSes

      --
      People, what a bunch of bastards
    49. Re:Happy Birthday by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      RD client is pre-installed on all Windows PC, which is handy, especially when I'm not an Admin. Also, RD looks and feels better than all VNC implementations I've seen.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    50. Re:Happy Birthday by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      I kind of feel stabbed in the back with Android

      Why?

      http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2010/02/they-took-our-codes.html

      Hello? Did someone not realize that Google is basically all about stealing Linux and "forking" it? Do you think that google server that you're hitting is really running bleeding edge Linux 2.6.35RC62? No, they're probably running some 2 year old kernel with their own patches, because they want to insulate themselves from upstream idiocy. They're not going to give you those patches, and even if they did, they probably couldn't because of upstream churn.

      When it comes to Android, Google has done what the license asks. Make all the modifications public. If you and your rag-tag bunch of kernel developers want _their_ HOT new shit, the suck it up and bring the code in. It looks like they've even produced patches and sent you reviews. Don't like what they got? well, they're already doing more than what's required, so stop complaining.

      You see, they've got this product to ship. And they've also got this competitor called Apple. You may have heard of them. So, yea, they _could_ sit their rearchitecting their interfaces so that some kernel dev which they don't pay and don't give shit about can feel like he's important... and watch Apple eat their lunch.

      Or they could say fuck you guys. We're the one that's actually building something here. We'll get around to it, maybe, after we win.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    51. Re:Happy Birthday by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "... whereas I don't see C going anywhere (especially for OS implementation) anytime soon."

      Uh... can you say "Windows"??? Sure. I knew you could.

      Fine, so we can argue over whether Windows "will" go anywhere in the near future, but you can't deny that it DID. Written in C.

    52. Re:Happy Birthday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seeing as Apple uses the Linux Kernel, I would say running on -everything- not Windoze is acceptable market share... Oh wait Apple fanbois tend to not like it when we mention that their precious iCrap wouldn't exsist without linux.... sorry my bad....

    53. Re:Happy Birthday by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

      drivers

      Let's correct that to good drivers for modern hardware. The Linux kernel has a lot more drivers than Win7 does.

      --
      I am not devoid of humor.
    54. Re:Happy Birthday by mldi · · Score: 1

      While I understand that a little bit, they're perfectly within their legal rights to do what they want with it. Unless they're using GPL'd code, they don't have to contribute anything. In a perfect world everybody would contribute everything they do, but if you want that then choose a difference license. Linux is built with only the restriction that anything that uses GPL'd code (using API's does NOT count!!!) then you are legally required to open that up. If you aren't, then you aren't facing that requirement. If Google really is patching the kernel and recompiling, I don't see how you couldn't obtain that patch legally. This argument just doesn't make sense.

      --
      If you aren't suspicious of your government's actions, you aren't doing your job as a responsible citizen.
    55. Re:Happy Birthday by overlordofmu · · Score: 1

      I have zero sound problems with Linux. I have no less than 4 Linux desktops (4 separate computers) that I use and I have never had a sound problem with any of them, ever. But, I also do not use Ubuntu.

    56. Re:Happy Birthday by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Then I don't get your point. It seemed you were saying that C is useless for writing an OS, but apparently you mean it isn't good for making a better OS? I really don't know; I don't believe you made yourself clear.

    57. Re:Happy Birthday by npsimons · · Score: 1

      Then I don't get your point. It seemed you were saying that C is useless for writing an OS, but apparently you mean it isn't good for making a better OS? I really don't know; I don't believe you made yourself clear.

      That's a bad habit of mine (not making myself clear); you can blame it on having my head in code all day ;)

      The point I was attempting to make is that C has some quality that endears it to people, or at least makes it ideal for implementing operating systems. Many still prefer it over higher level languages for even application level programming. Multics was supposed to be "the last OS"; I hypothesized that perhaps it wasn't because it was written in PL/1, and when PL/1 went out of fashion, so did Multics. This is perhaps overbroad and I wasn't even alive at the time PL/1 and Multics were around. But I have a feeling that Linux and C succeed where other languages and OSes fail because of a critical factor: the developers are the users of Linux and C. From what I've heard, PL/1 and Multics were more like Windows and C#: designed by corporate overloads, implemented by wage slaves. Not something thought about after working hours, or even looked forward to working with the next day.

      This is of course, all opinion.

    58. Re:Happy Birthday by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      I read it. It was wrong.

    59. Re:Happy Birthday by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "... designed by corporate overloads, implemented by wage slaves."

      I am pretty sure you meant "overlords", but I like "overloads" much better! :o)

    60. Re:Happy Birthday by Nikker · · Score: 1

      You do realize that aside from sounding like a dumb ass that remote desktop has been offered as a default Ubuntu install for quite some time, you never get any docs with most windows software period and just for the fun of it take a random piece of software for windows and search for it on google and see the ratio of happy comments to frustrated comments cause it's not working.

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    61. Re:Happy Birthday by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      you do realize
      1- windows' remote desktop works out of the box, is actually in the basic install. I never needed to do anything, it's there and just works. not so the linux version.
      2- ditto network sharing
      3- ditto volume synching via either xxcopy or ms's synctoy, which is all kinds of ugly and slow, but actually works.

      so, in the end, on the ms side i got the tools, and they work, i never really needed any doc. on linux's side, the tools are not in the basic install, don't work intuitively, mostly don't work not intuitively either, and the location of the right doc, if it exists, is hidden in a riddle wrapped in a mystery behind posts calling out "stupid noob" such as yours ?

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    62. Re:Happy Birthday by _0rm_ · · Score: 1

      Perhaps. But without Ubuntu I don't think that College Humor would have ever given Linux a nod in any of their videos (Look up The Matrix on Windows). /irrelevance

      --
      Boredom is bliss.
    63. Re:Happy Birthday by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      The GPL says you only have to distribute source code to people you distribute binaries to. So for Google servers they don't distribute binaries outside Google at all - they are all internal. That means they keep the source internal too.

      On Android phones they distribute the binaries to pretty much everyone. The maintain their own tree and provide patch files to the Linux kernel guys. The Linux kernel guys have rejected those patches - Android depends on waitlocks and the kernel guys have don't want them in mainstream Linux.

      So the Android kernel is effectively a fork of the Linux one with little chance of a merger. The source is however open. Android userland is not GPL based and not open.

      Google obviously planned this rather carefully.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  2. This would be quite interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If slashdot stops being broken so that I can click the link. Can't right click->open in tab in ff4, or left click either.... Great.

    1. Re:This would be quite interesting... by sconeu · · Score: 2

      It's not Slashdot. It's a bogus link in the text, once again the editors fail.

      dmbkiwi writes <i>"2011 is the <a>20th anniversary of the first release of the Linux kernel</a> by Linus Torvalds.

      Note the lack of an HREF on the <a> tag.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:This would be quite interesting... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      The parent post is right. In FF4, links don't activate properly here on Slashdot. I don't know enough to figure it out, but it is only FF4 and Slashdot that I've seen this problem.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re:This would be quite interesting... by sconeu · · Score: 1

      I know this is the standard response to a bug report, but...

      "Works for me in FF4".

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    4. Re:This would be quite interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you need to supply more info. I am using adblock, flashblock and noscript and all the links work fine for me in firefox 4.

      Oh I am using the old discussion system though. Could that be a factor? its set to D1, always show link domains.

    5. Re:This would be quite interesting... by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1

      The parent post is right. In FF4, links don't activate properly here on Slashdot. I don't know enough to figure it out, but it is only FF4 and Slashdot that I've seen this problem.

      I've found the solution to be to double-right click, which brings up a context menu so you can open in new tab. Clearly there is some bug somewhere, but I don't know where or what.

      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
  3. Re:damnit guys by MrEricSir · · Score: 2

    I didn't know Stallman had a Slashdot account...

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
  4. The link is broken. by scharkalvin · · Score: 2

    Click on the underlined "20th anniversary of the first release of the Linux kernel " and you go nowhere.

    1. Re:The link is broken. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WELCOME TO SLASHDOT

    2. Re:The link is broken. by Jonner · · Score: 1

      Yep, it's an a element with no href attribute, something I've never seen before.

    3. Re:The link is broken. by butalearner · · Score: 1

      Yep, it's an a element with no href attribute, something I've never seen before.

      Really? I thought that was the old way to make hyperlinks to different parts of the same HTML document (i.e. <a name="foo">. I'm not sure when the "normal" way switched to using the id tag inside any element.

    4. Re:The link is broken. by Jonner · · Score: 1

      It probably changed with HTML 4. I didn't really do much with HTML before that.

  5. Holy crap ... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    Holy crap, 20 years? I'm pretty sure I first installed it in '92 or '93, that really makes me feel old now.

    I know it was a Slackware install with a 0.99a Kernel or something like that. I know there were an immense amount of floppy disks involved.

    Wow, 20 years goes by fast.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Holy crap ... by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      I installed one of the first Slackware distros around 1993 or so on my old 486SX-25 with a whopping 70mb hard drive and 8mb of RAM, to run my BBS. I showed off running X and having folks dial in on one of my two phone lines, really flew once I had proper UART serial ports.

      Now I'm running Linux servers every bloody where; custom routers, SAMBA servers, LAMP servers, Postfix mail gateway.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Holy crap ... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I installed one of the first Slackware distros around 1993 or so on my old 486SX-25 with a whopping 70mb hard drive and 8mb of RAM

      I put it on my brand new 486DX-33, with a 325MB HD, and 8MB of RAM, with a video card with 1MB so I could do 1024x768. Two years or so later I upgraded to have a total of 20MB of RAM (and a princely sum that cost in the fall of 1994, $600 if I recall).

      At the time, my Linux machine was bigger than some of the Sun machines at my school.

      Ahh ... good times.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:Holy crap ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here...I recall ftp'ing it down off of sunsite.unc.edu and making tons of floppy disks to install with! A1,A2,A3,B1,B2,etc,etc...

    4. Re:Holy crap ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember that when Linux came out, I decided it was time to get my own computer. I started working on getting linux installed, Made the file system , and Low and BeHold, Slackware came out! I didn't have to compile everything from scratch! I think the first slackware was something like a .32 kernel. I remember the first kernel I compiled was a .32. I didn't have the system completely working at the time, but with slackware out, I dropped all that and just installed the distro. It beat compiling everything myself.

    5. Re:Holy crap ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I first used Linux on the 'sfi.survivor.org' BBS in St. Louis, in 1993. I first installed Linux in 1995, from a Slackware CD-ROM included with the Linux Unleashed book; it was Kernel 1.2.13, so ... Slackware 3.0? (I remember when Patrick bumped it to Slackware 7, to remove the impression that it was lagging behind RedHat etc. I gave him grief for that at the Linux Business Expo in Las Vegas that year.)

      I think the smallest machine I ever installed Linux on was a 2MB 386sx-25 with a 40MB hard drive. I also have an old Compaq 486/25 with an 80MB drive and an ISA 10Base2 NIC that I got it running on. Memories.

    6. Re:Holy crap ... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I had an SLS version first. I think there may have been a Slackware version at the time. I wanted to limit the headaches of installing it, so I chose a distribution with a relatively small number of floppy disks, and optional floppy sets. The BSD I looked at required too many floppies for a "base" system. I was downloading at work and taking them home (no ISP access until this millenia :-). I certainly had no access to an expensive CD writer. Later it turned out I used Linux more at work than home, but I still wanted distributions that didn't cause the IT staff to wonder why the network was being tied up several hours.

      I remember Linux earlier than this, but I had no compatible computer for it at home so I mentally glossed over it.

    7. Re:Holy crap ... by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Yep I remember installing it on a 486DX-50 with 6 mb of RAM, and it still was able to run multiple desktops with animated backgrounds. Too bad that the linux kernel and the general desktop distributions have become so bloated, used to be a small, fast OS.

    8. Re:Holy crap ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd argue with you and say blah blah Puppy blah blah embedded Linux blah blah... but I agree regardless. The system requirements even for something like Puppy are quite extreme compared to the computer I was running even in 2000/2001 (AMD K6/2, with 512meg RAM I think). I'm hardly a kernel programmer but sometimes from what little I understand I can't help thinking that Linux might have been a bit more flexible going for a microkernel.

    9. Re:Holy crap ... by IrquiM · · Score: 1

      And still using Slackware, we hope?

      --
      This is blinging
    10. Re:Holy crap ... by phrostie · · Score: 1

      it was 96 for me, but still,,,,i feel so old.

    11. Re:Holy crap ... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      For some stuff. I confess that I'm using Debian more and more.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    12. Re:Holy crap ... by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing. "That can't be right because I played with some very early versions and that was only...Damnit!" I still remember my bundles of B, N, D, etc. floppies. (Base, Networking, Development, etc.)

    13. Re:Holy crap ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Gentoo, you insensitive clod!

    14. Re:Holy crap ... by lennier · · Score: 1

      97 for me... and 98 before I switched my Windows desktop for it... but yes.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    15. Re:Holy crap ... by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      I had an SLS version first. I think there may have been a Slackware version at the time. I wanted to limit the headaches of installing it, so I chose a distribution with a relatively small number of floppy disks, and optional floppy sets.

      Another advantage SLS had over Slackware was that it could be installed from 5.25" floppies. Since I didn't yet have a 3.5" floppy drive for my machine (at the time, a 386SX-25 with 4 MB of RAM and 120 MB of disk), I downloaded the 5.25" floppy images (think there were about 20-30 of them in all) and installed from that.

      After upgrading the graphics from Hercules monochrome to VGA (though still monochrome as a color monitor would've been a bit spendy), I got X running on it. I figured out an 800x600 50Hz modeline that worked with my 640x480-only mono VGA monitor if I tweaked the vertical hold knob a bit. Good times.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    16. Re:Holy crap ... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Holy crap, 20 years? I'm pretty sure I first installed it in '92 or '93, that really makes me feel old now.

      I remember being contemplating buying (yes, "buying"!) a copy of ... a 386-based Unix ... Coherent (?) at about the time that I saw a note of the initial releases of Linux in print media (of course, I did not have a phone line at the time. Let alone a telephone). So I decided to hang on a few months ...

      I know it was a Slackware install with a 0.99a Kernel or something like that. I know there were an immense amount of floppy disks involved

      ... and I came back from a month or two in the deserts of Arabia with money burning a hole in my pocket and brought an MFM drive and an RLL controller for it, which gave me space to play with. And yes, Slackware.

      I think I had to get a CD drive to do it.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  6. Re:damnit guys by Hatta · · Score: 4, Informative

    GNU dates from 1983. This is just the Linux kernel's anniversary.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  7. Dead link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How come the first link doesn't do anything?

  8. Re:damnit guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    But it's hardly GNU - it's 20 years old

  9. Re:damnit guys by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

    Correct or not, it's accepted convention, and more publicly recognizable if people just hear Linux. Yes, most of us know its origins ... this is Gnews for Gnerds.

  10. Re:damnit guys by ae1294 · · Score: 0

    Correct or not, it's accepted convention, and more publicly recognizable if people just hear Linux. Yes, most of us know its origins ... this is Gnews for Gnerds.

    Slashdot is a place for overly critical aspies to get together and complain about things that don't really mater. Don't belittle my people damnit.

  11. Re:damnit guys by PhilHibbs · · Score: 5, Informative

    Linux is a kernel, and it's called Linux, and it's not part of the GNU project. A distribution that includes the GNU tool set and the Linux kernel is a GNU/Linux distribution. This is not a story about a GNU/Linux distribution, it's a story about the kernel. If you're going to be pedantic, get it right.

  12. Yay for SLS by Colin+Smith · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    What a totally awesome system that was... Multi tasking and multi user. Window *still* can't get it right 20 years later.
     

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Yay for SLS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a totally awesome system that was... Multi tasking and multi user. Window *still* can't get it right 20 years later.

      Which Window is that? New Finder Window?

  13. Re:damnit guys by ACS+Solver · · Score: 1

    Though judging by your nickname, you might be Eric Raymond ;)

  14. Re:damnit guys by ae1294 · · Score: 1

    Linux is a kernel, and it's called Linux, and it's not part of the GNU project. A distribution that includes the GNU tool set and the Linux kernel is a GNU/Linux distribution. This is not a story about a GNU/Linux distribution, it's a story about the kernel. If you're going to be pedantic, get it right.

    This proves my point... thank you kindly.

  15. Link by similar_name · · Score: 1

    If I had to guess, it should have probably linked to this.

  16. Linux is obsolete by atari2600a · · Score: 1

    It's all about the MINIX microkernel & Prince of Persia!

  17. Re:damnit guys by Jonner · · Score: 4, Informative

    I realize this is probably an attempt at humor, but it's not funny and a lot people still seem to be confused about the issue. Linux is 20 years old, but GNU is 27 years old. There are complete operating systems based on GNU (and not Linux) as well as those based on Linux with very little or no GNU components. The term GNU/Linux only makes sense when one is talking about an operating system based on both of them, which is by far the most common way to use either one of them.

  18. Re:damnit guys by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Free Software Foundation didn't create Linux. Linus Torvalds created Linux and decided to license his code with the GPL. This little fact is the main reason that I call Linux by "Linux" and not "GNU/Linux".

    The OS kernel that should be tagged with "GNU" is Hurd since it is actually being created by the FSF therefore it should be called "GNU Hurd".

    Before the flaming commences, I'd like to defend myself by saying that I promote GNU software in the workplace and support their hard work. I do have some minor ideological differences with RMS, but that doesn't stop me from using GNU software or supporting the FSF.

    --
    These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
  19. Corrected link by sconeu · · Score: 2

    Since the one in TFS is bogus -- I got this from the firehose:

    Corrected Link

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  20. Re:damnit guys by ae1294 · · Score: 1

    I didn't know Stallman had a Slashdot account...

    There is no where on earth infidels can hide from the powerful musky hand of Stallmen.

  21. Happy Birthday by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

    It's already been 20 years?!?

    Damn we're getting old.

    --
    These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
  22. Re:damnit guys by Duradin · · Score: 1

    He just borrows one when he needs it.

  23. Re:damnit guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sad. It means that GNU will not live to see its 30 anniversary. #2012feelings.

    (whops! this is not twittter!)

  24. Slashdot *is* broken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Click on "Log in" :

    Error 503 Service Unavailable

    Service Unavailable
    Guru Meditation:

    XID: 736098075
    Varnish cache server

    1. Re:Slashdot *is* broken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Me too" post

  25. These things happen all too frequently by e9th · · Score: 4, Informative

    And in just 6 months, we'll all be celebrating the 15th anniversary of the first official release of OpenBSD.

    1. Re:These things happen all too frequently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 November 1993 was FreeBSD's official release. I never realized how much Apple sucked until today.

    2. Re:These things happen all too frequently by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Not on/. We won't. Don't forget your audience. It's nearly all linux extremists.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:These things happen all too frequently by e9th · · Score: 1

      I meant to say, "And on October 18th, Netcraft will confirm that OpenBSD has been dying for exactly 15 years."

  26. Re:damnit guys by Jonner · · Score: 2

    Even if RMS has a Slashdot account, I doubt he'd find any fault with this story, which correctly describes the role both Linux and GNU have played.

  27. August 26, 1991 by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Informative

    That was the date of the birth announcement.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:August 26, 1991 by zigmeister · · Score: 1

      Aug 26 is my birthday... seriously, i did not know that little tidbit. I think you just made my day. (Posting from windows.... oops.)

      --
      Failure formatting five FAQs of financial facts.
    2. Re:August 26, 1991 by fotoguzzi · · Score: 1

      I think it's cool that Torvalds was born a few days before the UNIX epoch.

      --
      Their they're doing there hair.
  28. SOLARIS RULES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Linux is a lame operating system and only losers and posers use it.

    SOLARIS RULES!

  29. Re:20 years of Linux on the desktop. by 3vi1 · · Score: 1

    5.1% according to w3schools. http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_os.asp

    Statcounter's statistics are skewed because they include virus information and AV update sites, which the average Windows user has to access about four times a day.

  30. 1 year to download by borcharc · · Score: 1

    20 years back linux came out, 19 years ago i started downloading it from bbs's, 18 years ago I installed it.... thanks to SLS and 2400 bps modems!

  31. Re:damnit guys by Panaflex · · Score: 2

    No, that's ESR(3702).... He used to post here a while back...

    --
    I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
  32. torvalds, stallman to help establish truth.gov by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they seem like square guys? if members of the genuine public could get a look at the mess from the prospective of former unchosens, that could be very helpful to all of us, which these guys have already been a lot. thanks.

    combined with the genuine native american elders rising bird of prey leadership initiative (teepeeleaks etchings), we've just about enough kode base to last out the never ending (until now) chosen ones eugenatical exterminitorial holycost.

  33. Re:damnit guys by ZankerH · · Score: 1

    No one insists on calling the Linux kernel "GNU/Linux". That's the name of a POSIX-compliant OS that uses a combination of Linux kernel and GNU userland utilities.

  34. Linux fangirl since 1997 by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

    I bought a used 486 computer in 1997, booted it, saw that it had Windows for Workgroups on it, marvelled that people actually paid money for it, bought a Linux book at the local technical bookstore, loaded Slackware 3.3, and was off and running.

    I've always liked the way Slackware doesn't try to hide the fact that it's a Unix clone. I also like the way you can build any sort of system you like with it, desktop, server, whatever.

    ...laura

    1. Re:Linux fangirl since 1997 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      You have a computer in the kitchen?

    2. Re:Linux fangirl since 1997 by justmike2000 · · Score: 1

      What was wrong with Windows for Workgroups? I mean how did you know there was something better out there?

    3. Re:Linux fangirl since 1997 by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

      What was wrong with Windows for Workgroups? I mean how did you know there was something better out there?

      Being a Mac programmer might have had something to do with it... :-)

      This was the time Apple was moving their product line from 68k to PowerPC. Our first PowerPC compiler didn't generate fat binaries, but I figured out how to make my own with ResEdit and the 68k compiler.

      ...laura

    4. Re:Linux fangirl since 1997 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:Linux fangirl since 1997 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That actually makes me horny...

    6. Re:Linux fangirl since 1997 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ahahaha FAIL

    7. Re:Linux fangirl since 1997 by justmike2000 · · Score: 1

      Wow, hardcore...

  35. I 3 Linux. by w0mprat · · Score: 1

    Linux has come along way, it's now stable mature reliable and available in a million flavours from some slick looking desktops through to supercomputers. It's a testament to the millions of people who've writen and re-writen it over and over and never run out of fun broken-by-design things to fix, through countless millions of labour hours over a couple of decades to produce an OS almost as good as what a proprietary outfit can do with merely a few orders of magnitude less labour in a few years.
    (If Linux every worked properly I'd have nothing to do and would probably quit IT and take up mosaic tiling or producing hand-copied phone directories).
    Now all it needs is some users.

    --
    After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    1. Re:I 3 Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your signature should warrant your immediate execution.

    2. Re:I 3 Linux. by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 1

      I'm trying to figure out if you're trolling or truly insightful.

      --
      I call it 'The Aristocrats'
    3. Re:I 3 Linux. by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Is that, like, a step up from <3'ing Linux. (The whole three rather than less than three.)

    4. Re:I 3 Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      06:27:05 up 214 days, 14:49, 6 users, load average: 0.89, 0.81, 0.63

    5. Re:I 3 Linux. by bobs666 · · Score: 1


      09:46:03 up 691 days, 21:05, 1 user, load average: 0.62, 0.19, 0.06
      That was not that long for an uptime. I also have this one:
      9:41am up 2167 day(s), 16:31, 1 user, load average: 0.02, 0.01, 0.01
      But then I realized it was a Sun. I saved the line the day we decommission it.

    6. Re:I 3 Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Now all it needs is some users

      When the desktop applications that are as good as their Windows and OSX counterparts arrive then the users will come. Until then its outstanding for running servers, myth isn;t half bad (when you can get it to work)... but sadly not much else.

      And I speak as a totally frustrated part time Linux user who loves the OS but hates the fact that developers would rather keep farking around with the desktop GUIs (hello KDE, hello Gnome) rather than writing some useful applications.

      I mean just look at the utter turd that is Gnome 3.0 Way to go guys, you just lost a shed load of users right there.

  36. An iPad by judeancodersfront · · Score: 1

    They seem to be a popular gift.

  37. Re:damnit guys by jmac_the_man · · Score: 1

    GP just insisted on that. It's the 20th Anniversary of the Kernel, not of its combination with the GNU userspace tools. Hatta is normally obnoxious about everything other than Slashdot being unusable if you leave Javascript enabled, but he's absolutely right about this.

  38. Re:damnit guys by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    The Free Software Foundation didn't create Linux. Linus Torvalds created Linux and decided to license his code with the GPL. This little fact is the main reason that I call Linux by "Linux" and not "GNU/Linux".

    The OS kernel that should be tagged with "GNU" is Hurd since it is actually being created by the FSF therefore it should be called "GNU Hurd".

    Before the flaming commences, I'd like to defend myself by saying that I promote GNU software in the workplace and support their hard work. I do have some minor ideological differences with RMS, but that doesn't stop me from using GNU software or supporting the FSF.

    Google didn't create Linux either, but everybody uses the name Android. Your anti Free Software Foundation sentiment is dated. I use GNU+Linux+X+Gnome+Firefox daily The reality is I can swap out any of those components with very little change to my daily life. GNU/Linux is a more accurate poorer name for what I use on the desktop, but in reality The HURDS of developers include thousands of individuals, all of which will never get created with there name as Part of an OS. Seriously though I have some major ideological differences with Linus, but that doesn't stop me using the Linux Kernel, because what he and others have achieved is incredible.

  39. Re:20 years of Linux on the desktop. by judeancodersfront · · Score: 1

    W3Schools is the one that is skewed.

    W3Schools is a website for people with an interest for web technologies. These people are more interested in using alternative browsers than the average user. The average user tends to the browser that comes preinstalled with their computer, and do not seek out other browser aternatives.
    http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp
    Enough propaganda already, Linux is around 1% and has been for years. Admitting this isn't going to change anything.

  40. Re:20 years of Linux on the desktop. by Airline_Sickness_Bag · · Score: 1

    Popularity doesn't matter to me so much - as long as enough people use it so that there is software developed for it. I use Linux because it does what I want better than the alternatives.

  41. Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the year of Linux (not on the desktop, tho).

  42. Ahhh, the memories. Also DO NOT THROW AWAY... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...any of your old Linux distro CDROMs from the 1990's. They might come in handy as evidence of any prior art.

    Anyway, back to the topic of SLS... my very first distro ever was SLS downloaded as floppy images from a BBS dialup connection, way back in 1993. Never could get it to install and run, but shortly afterwards, the first InfoMagic CDs came out and of the distros on the disk, I got Slackware installed and running on my i386 machine!

  43. does android count as linux on samrtphones? by peter303 · · Score: 1

    It is a superset of Linux 2.6. Its more open than most smartphone OSes, but not as open as Linux.

    1. Re:does android count as linux on samrtphones? by Spykk · · Score: 1

      Does Red Hat count as Linux? SLES? If patching your kernel means you aren't Linux anymore then most distros aren't Linux.

  44. Re:damnit guys by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

    Google didn't create Linux either, but everybody uses the name Android.

    That's a horse of a different color. The Linux kernel is being used mostly as a bootstrap and a hardware layer for Dalvik. For all intents and purposes Android is an OS provided by Dalvik, I haven't seen any push for Gnu/Android.

    Your anti Free Software Foundation sentiment is dated.

    What anti-FSF sentiment?

    --
    These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
  45. Easy: software we actually use. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So far there are only two apps that actually have Linux versions: Guitar Pro 6, Firefox and Abiword. This may not be popular with the Linux crowd, but everything else that might be of interest to me is quite frankly NOT GOOD ENOUGH.

    Sure there are plenty of server administration apps and tools, but I'm not interested in becoming an IT guy. Most of us aren't.

    1. Re:Easy: software we actually use. by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Right! So far there are only two apps that actually have Linux versions: Guitar Pro 6, Firefox, and Abiword! Er... So far there are only THREE apps that actually have Linux versions: Guitar Pro 6, Firefox, Abiword, and VLC! ... Amongst the apps that actually have Linux versions, we have: Guitar Pro 6, Firefox, Abiword, VLC, Skype, and NICE RED UNIFORMS -- Oh, damn!

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    2. Re:Easy: software we actually use. by Vectormatic · · Score: 1

      So far there are only two apps that actually have Linux versions: Guitar Pro 6, Firefox and Abiword. This may not be popular with the Linux crowd, but everything else that might be of interest to me is quite frankly NOT GOOD ENOUGH.

      Sure there are plenty of server administration apps and tools, but I'm not interested in becoming an IT guy. Most of us aren't.

      i'm guessing you dont think the calculator is good enough either?

      --
      People, what a bunch of bastards
  46. I don't believe it by HtR · · Score: 1

    Sure, they want you to believe that it's 20 years old and born in Finland, but if that's true, why won't they make the birth certificate public?

    Now, I'm not saying that it was necessarily created in the Soviet Union in the 60s as a communist plot, but you never know.

    --
    Have you tried turning it off and on again?
  47. Re:damnit guys by npsimons · · Score: 1

    Before the flaming commences, I'd like to defend myself by saying that I promote GNU software in the workplace and support their hard work.

    You sir, are one of my heroes. I'm sorry I was so harsh to you earlier over the stable abi stuff. But I still stand by my opinion that standard kernel abis are neither necessary nor good.

  48. Not so popular anymore? by tsa · · Score: 0

    The fact that this article has only 120 comments 3.5 hours after it was posted suggests to me that Linux is not as popular anymore as it was 10 or 15 years ago. Every Linux-related article on /. would be flooded with comments back then. Am I right or is that a perception by me, and if so, why?

    --

    -- Cheers!

    1. Re:Not so popular anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope.. Just your insecure fantasy. The rest of us are at the birthday party..

      And this is a script.

  49. Re:20 years of Linux on the desktop. by zill · · Score: 1

    When I buy a car, I look at how good the car is. I don't look at the road to see whether it's the most popular car or not.

    In fact, I would avoid the most popular models because they are more frequently targeted by carjackers.

  50. Linus, If you ever read this, you saved my life! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it wasn't for Linux, I wouldn't be here. I started of with Linux at 0.97 retrieve from comp.sys.linux. from floppy on a 16Mhz 386sx with 8Mb of ram! I didn't really get to use it until the network stack was ported to it. When X windows was running on my trident peacock card, I never looked back. Then it was slackware, with it's 10-1.44Mb floppies to install a functional system on a 20Mb Shutgard HD. Thank you Linus! Thank you thank you thank you. While all my other friends were chocking on DOS and Windows, I could actually compile and run stuff! Thank you Linux (and all of the heavy weight programmers and gurus) You made Linux cool, but Linus, thank you for bringing us innovation. Oh the days of comp.sys.linux.

  51. And in one year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll be able to take you all out for a free beer! Wait, no, I mean gratis! Hold on, that doesn't make sense. Let me think about this some more.

    Signed,
    Lin-, erm GN-, erm, GNU-Linux

    P.S. We won't bother with WINE. I've so outgrown that.

  52. Ahem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Android phone users are not users ?

  53. Kids these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep, it's an a element with no href attribute, something I've never seen before.

    (old man voice) Back before we had id attributes, we sometimes used a elements with a name attribute and no href.

  54. Roasted by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    To celebrate, we need some food tied to this. I suggest a nice flamed penguin.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  55. And I didn't start using LInux until.... by SwedishChef · · Score: 1

    1993. I wonder if I have anything left of all those distributions I tried back in the day.

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
  56. The Ultimate Tribute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  57. Re:Grrrrr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was mildly interesting the first 6 or 7 times you posted that link, but no longer.

    Since I've already posted in this discussion, please accept a heartfelt "FUCK OFF ALREADY" in lieu of being downmodded.

  58. 1 year to see the full install menu by ami.one · · Score: 1

    I spent a full year trying to install redhat but never being able to see the full text menu as my monitor would only show the top left quadrant ! Finally the newer versions fixed themselves after a year and i got it to run. Next was being afraid of getting my monitors burning by editing x configuration files & setting wrong frequencies ! (at least that used to be the warning those days)

  59. With the right cards it was there before 2000 by dbIII · · Score: 1

    That's not linux, that's X, and if it's not already built in most of the time it's just a driver download away.
    I'm pretty sure I saw that before 2000 with some Matrox cards.

    Nice of you to join in but unfortunately this article is about something totally different to what you are writing about and you are wrong anyway. I hope the rest of your day goes better.

  60. Re:damnit guys by dbIII · · Score: 1

    He doesn't like the whole password authentication thing so even if he was here he would be an AC.
    Funny that we still had the silly LiGnuX or gnu/linux storm in a teacup even when the heading above was obviously written very carefully to avoid bringing that up. I'm not sure if the above was a very bad reading comprehension failure or just being obnoxious.
    If half as much effort was put into gnu as has been put into the gnu/linux flames then hurd would be good enough that it would be irrelevant to claim ownership of linux with a silly prefix in the first place.

  61. And! by crhylove · · Score: 1

    It's also the year of Linux on the Desktop! Have you tried Linux Mint 10?

    --
    I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
  62. Happy Birthday. by Elliot.exe · · Score: 1

    I have used a lot of Linux distributions over the past few years. I recently download Ubuntu 4.10 (Warty Warthog), it really shows how far Linux has come...I think my VM was letting off vomit as I ran 4.10 in it. Linux will have something Windows and Mac OS X never will, a community that is ready to support software and be helpful. Since it's inception Linux has had software made for it...something you will never be short of in Linux is software. I love the idea that people make software then upload it for free, they enjoyed programming it and they are giving something back to the community and I think that is very healthy.

  63. A video would be nice by trickyD1ck · · Score: 1

    It would be nice if someone made a video of the Linux upgrade path as we've seen recently with Windows. Install Linux 1.0 -> ... -> Ubuntu 11.04 and show how applications continue working.

    1. Re:A video would be nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ....... are you retarded?

  64. Hey, wait a minute! by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    It just occurred to me! Isn't Linux, spelled backward (xuniL), suspiciously similar to the name "Xenu" that is important to the Church if Scientology?

    I think this must be a conspiracy to subliminally "prepare" innocent people for indoctrination into a "xunil"-worship group. Who knows where it will go from there?

    Oh, the humanity!

  65. Damn you! by bursch-X · · Score: 1

    You bastards just reminded me that I'll be 40 this month! You insensitive clods!

    --
    There are two rules for success:
    1. Never tell everything you know.
  66. HairyFeet's "GREATEST HITS", PART DEUX ("NOT!") by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject-line above, & these "prime examples" below via links to the originals of WHY hairyfeet shouldn't have gone to "ITT Tech", in his TECHNICAL BLUNDERS, & more (regarding HOSTS files):

    ---

    Static vs. Dynamic Adbanner addressing (lol, "according to hairyfeet"):

    (Which even BestBuy Techs know!)

    http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2061048&cid=35681060

    ---

    DNS Client Cache turn off for HOSTS, a TECHNICAL Blunder by Hairyfeet:

    (Which even BestBuy Techs know also (just like the one above!))

    http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2061048&cid=35686054

    ---

    Hairyfeet's single solutions SECURITY FAILURES? See inside:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2064694&cid=35690260

    ---

    Your sources on "security" vs. mine (actual security people) (AND myself, a source on it):

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2064694&cid=35690328

    ---

    Lastly, as to your LIBEL of myself (w/ arstech):

    http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2061048&cid=35668740

    ---

    The defeat of hairyfeet by APK (video analogy - hilarious, BUT, apt):

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2064694&cid=35690536

    ---

    They say it all, & usually vs. hairyfeet's own words quoted! I wouldn't pay him too much heed, especially after you read the above b.s., lies, changing figures, & even LIBEL of others that hairyfeet likes to do. After all - he's from "ITT Tech" (student)...

    Worst part of ALL, here?

    Hairyfeet just clearly doesn't even understand how HOSTS files benefit you for:

    ---

    1.) ADDED Reliability (vs. DNS going down, or being 'poisoned', & even DNSBL (DNS Block Lists))

    2.) ADDED "layered" Security online (vs. known bad sites &/or servers (botnet C&C) + maliciously scripted adbannners by BLOCKING them out)

    3.) ADDED Speed (not loading adbanners, and hardcoding your fav. sites into it)

    4.) Even more ADDED 'anonymity' online (vs. DNS request logs)

    (Even server admins might NOT mind having the load on their DNS servers lightened up also, bonus!)

    ---

    APK

    P.S.=> Personally though - because hairyfeet is only a "techie"? I suspect he doesn't want people to know about HOSTS files' added LAYERED SECURITY benefits to the end-user: Why?? Because if users stop getting so much "malware-in-general" which layered security (and HOSTS) give you added layered protection against, he's out money...apk

  67. Minux by bobs666 · · Score: 1

    Andrew Tanenbaum did not know any better, but made a horrid error. He Let Prentice-Hall own the copyright to Minux. This made improvements impractical, the patches got bigger then the original. Linux wins with the copyleft. This allowed sending out the new version. With Minux giving a copy to your friend was stealing.

    I might add that Andrew was a Professor. His ambition was/is to teach, not maintain an OS.

    Seems in in April 2000 Minux became Open Source, but that was 10 years to late for Minux.

    As for the Minux Micro kernel vs the Linux monolithic kernel. Minux was for Teaching. But the message passing was slow. Linux ran much faster, for the rest us us.

  68. Re:20 years of Linux on the desktop. by 3vi1 · · Score: 1

    So, you're absolutely sure the W3 number is more skewed than all the statcounter statistics coming from Windows-only download/software sites (whereas 99%+ of Linux downloads are handled via repos and source control systems)?

    1% of all the PCs in the world doesn't even equal the install base of Ubuntu - just one of the available Linux distros. Stop with your own propaganda.

  69. You throw the banana seed, the monkeys start growing palm trees...

  70. Hb by N1x · · Score: 1

    Happy birthday : )