Slashdot Mirror


Amazon To Offer Ad-Supported Kindle

awyeah writes "Amazon will soon be offering a discounted, ad-supported Wi-Fi Kindle called 'Kindle with Special Offers.' The price will be $114, a $25 discount from the $139 wifi-only device. Note that the advertisements will not appear during reading, only on the screen saver and home page. Will that be enough of a discount to get readers to purchase an ad-supported device?"

210 comments

  1. not enough of a discount by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    An ad supported kindle should be free, or at least under $40. I would gladly pay the extra $25 to not see ads. In fact, I have.

    1. Re:not enough of a discount by PrescriptionWarning · · Score: 1

      yeah $25 off is clearly not enough, it needs to be no more than half the price to make it worth actually considering the ad supported version

    2. Re:not enough of a discount by mikejuk · · Score: 1

      It's not just the reduction in the price you also get special offers and the inital offers include $10 off a gift card and $10 ebook credit and so on... http://www.i-programmer.info/news/152-epub/2279-kindle-with-ads-is-that-a-good-bargain.html Its more like Kindle with coupons!

    3. Re:not enough of a discount by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then it would really have to display ads during reading. No way they're going to get it so low priced otherwise. And this would mean something like on screen video ads and underlining the text you're reading with ad links.

    4. Re:not enough of a discount by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2

      Yeah I wouldn't mind buying the device with ads for 2 years, where if I stop connecting to Amazon they start charging me monthly or something, to pay it off. Device sold by 2 years of served ads, and lucre on purchased ebooks. The trick would be getting a free one and never touching it, which is costly to Amazon; so of course if I'm not connecting to Amazon to get their ads, I should be billed.

    5. Re:not enough of a discount by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It will never happen because the devices can be freed from Amazon and you just got the device for free or cost and Amazon got nothing.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:not enough of a discount by heathen_01 · · Score: 1

      If the ads are not absurdly obnoxious then how many would really do it? Do you realise that there are people who watch broadcast TV with advertisments when they have the DVD of the same film sitting right next to the TV?

    7. Re:not enough of a discount by metrometro · · Score: 2

      > Its more like Kindle with coupons!

      KroupOn!

    8. Re:not enough of a discount by e3m4n · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They totally missed their opportunity here.. ad support is a good start but they should have worked with periodicals to create a subsidy for a steeper discount. Perhaps they could create a $40 version that required you to subscribe to the NYTimes publication for a period of 12 months that also had the ads on there. The NYT completely saves on printing cost, they expand their reading base, and amazon.com gets more devices out there. Its the cell phone concept that has proven to work very well.

    9. Re:not enough of a discount by vlm · · Score: 1

      If the ads are not absurdly obnoxious then how many would really do it? Do you realise that there are people who watch broadcast TV with advertisments when they have the DVD of the same film sitting right next to the TV?

      Can you buy a legal DVD of a film that doesn't have 15 minutes of commercials at the start? The "illegal" copies are much better than the original.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    10. Re:not enough of a discount by vlm · · Score: 1

      they should have worked with periodicals to create a subsidy for a steeper discount.

      A discount? I'd be happy (a happy subscriber) if "The Economist" cost less on Kindle than in print.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    11. Re:not enough of a discount by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1

      An ad supported kindle should be free, or at least under $40. I would gladly pay the extra $25 to not see ads. In fact, I have.

      Agreed, the $25 discount for a lifetime of adverts doesn't seem to be a particularly good deal. In addition, if you have the disposable income to drop $114 on a reading device, there is a good chance you can afford the extra to get one without ads.

      Personally I think the discount should have been $40. Only because then it would then make that version of the Kindle cost $99 which, I believe, is considered the sweet spot for many consumers.

      Given Amazon's vast retail knowledge, I'm surprised they didn't do this. Or maybe they are just testing the water in preparation for a $99 Kindle for Christmas?

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    12. Re:not enough of a discount by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      If the ads are not absurdly obnoxious then how many would really do it?

      It took me some time to figure out what you meant. Try complete sentences. Anyway, offering a substantially discounted Kindle would only create a market for unlocked Kindles with alternative software. Amazon most especially does not want to do this.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:not enough of a discount by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that the Kindle is basically a portable shopping cart for nothing but Amazon reading material, it should be under $40 already.

    14. Re:not enough of a discount by N1AK · · Score: 1

      An ad supported kindle should be free

      And why exactly 'should' it? What if Amazon have estimated the average ad revenue per device to be $25, should they drop the price by an additional $114 dollars because they enjoy losing money. Would it be better if they offered a free version that constantly spews audio ads, and shows text ads inserted in books (to earn that $139 discount) instead of this version with 'unobtrusive' ads? Personally, the discount probably isn't enough to make me take it. Perhaps enough people will to make it worth Amazon doing.

      Saying Amazon 'should' make it free doesn't mean anything, without some further information. If I thought Google should host all my files securely for free, it doesn't tell you anything unless I explain why it would be of benefit to them to do so, or what I think they could do to make it happen. Anything less is the adult equivalent of a child who wants a pony, and can't appreciate that buying it would mean selling the family house.

    15. Re:not enough of a discount by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      $25 is actually insulting. In fact, I think I'm going to punch Jeff Bezos right in his smug face when I see him again.

      And if this turns out to be a precursor to models that *require* ad viewing (the way movies and DVD's have gone now), I'm going to kick him in the balls too.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    16. Re:not enough of a discount by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An ad supported TV should be free, or at least under $(made up number with no justification). I would gladyl pay and extra $25 to not see ads. In fact, I have.

      It amazes me that people flip out over these ads that only happen when A) you're not using the device and B) when you're already seeing ads from Amazon anyway, even though they do not look like a traditional ad. I wish the same people crying about this would apply the same logic to television. You pay thousands of dollars for a set and up to a few hundred dollars a month and (tada!) you still have to look at friggin ads!!! I guess it shows where people really value their money. Have fun paying for and watching SyFy and it's 12 minutes of commericals for every 18 minutes of non-commercial content suckers. You'd probably never see 12 minutes worth of Kindle ads in the lifetime of the device even if you were a heavy user.

    17. Re:not enough of a discount by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Can you buy a legal DVD of a film that doesn't have 15 minutes of commercials at the start? The "illegal" copies are much better than the original.

      Legal DVDs I've watched (bought in GB/IE/FR/DE/BE/LU) don't seem to have this any more.

    18. Re:not enough of a discount by rainmouse · · Score: 2

      yeah $25 off is clearly not enough, it needs to be no more than half the price to make it worth actually considering the ad supported version

      I disagree. There are plenty people who buy a kindle that would happily accept a small discount in exchange for some shitty screen-savers. Personally I would get one just for the challenge of killing the ads and turning it into a regular kindle.

    19. Re:not enough of a discount by tophermeyer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Prescription, do you own/have you used a Kindle?

      The way these ads are delivered is just about the least intrusive advertising vector I can think of. The ads will be displayed on the hibernation screen that appears when the Kindle is off. On current Kindles what is displayed is a rotating selection of portraits of authors or literary illustrations. Replacing those images with ads will literally cost the user absolutely nothing in terms of cost, time, or attention.

      Quite the opposite, because Amazon's recommendation system is so robust, as a current Kindle owner I would be interested in getting this on my current Kindle. Amazon does a great job of offering recommendations for e-book purchases based on what I've read in the past. We're supposed to be living in the future, it would be nice if my e-book reader is smart enough to make intelligent recommendations on what I might like to read next.

    20. Re:not enough of a discount by contrapunctus · · Score: 1

      isn't there a rumor flying around about free kindles for prime members?
      here is an example: http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-20040764-1.html

    21. Re:not enough of a discount by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Yep, I've noticed a drop in the trend, though they're not completely gone. That said, almost all of them that still do it don't mess with the fastforward button anymore, so you can skip them.

      It always puzzled me why they'd put ads that were really only viable for 6 months on a medium that will last decades. I put in an old VHS a few weeks back (can't even remember which film it was now) and it was advertising the "Upcoming Film" "Earth Girls Are Easy" staring Gina Davis and Jeff Goldblum . . . (for those that don't know, that film came out in 1988, and it sucked). What kind of idiocy creates a situation where I'm watching ads for a 23 year old movie?

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    22. Re:not enough of a discount by e3m4n · · Score: 1

      don't get me started on that :-) .. those fucking assholes only have to pay editors, journalists, accounting, marketing, sales, and IT staff to produce electronic publications.. to produce bound printed material you have all those costs plus the huge printing cost to run all that equipment, materials, staff, shipping etc. They keep trying to charge full price to cover the expenses of all the bound printed material employees. The reality is electronic periodicals have a future and printed material really doesn't. This sort of overcharging to cover the reality that they have way more employees than really needed is the same problem the post office is facing. Weve had more rate increases in the last 10 years than the 200 years preceding. The reason is fewer items are being mailed but the cost of all the infrastructure and employees isnt changing.

    23. Re:not enough of a discount by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Really? If it's only the screensaver that has the ads, then how do people 'click to buy' what's in the ads? User input is disabled in the screensaver.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    24. Re:not enough of a discount by Gramie2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just because advertising is currently unobtrusive doesn't mean that it always will be. When some manager realizes that his bonus is being threatened, it's amazing how obtrusive they are willing to get.

      Of course, you could say that if it changes you would switch, and after a couple of years you might be looking for a new e-book reader anyway. Still, if Amazon is successful with an ad-supported Kindle you know that other manufacturers will follow suit and there will be few alternatives.

      Remember when cable TV had no ads? I do.

    25. Re:not enough of a discount by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      What you say is true, but it doesn't matter.

      It's not a matter of how much it costs the user, it's how much revenue it generates for Amazon. I would guess that they're going to make an additional $200 per user per ad-driven Kindle, so giving me a $25 discount is NOT enough!

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    26. Re:not enough of a discount by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would gladly pay the extra $25 to not see ads. In fact, I have.

      But only because you had no other choice at the time of your purchase. You may have gone with the ad supported Kindle if it were available to you, so your statement is not only pretentious (far too common on /.) but also a poor argument.

    27. Re:not enough of a discount by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would gladly pay the extra $25 to not see ads. In fact, I have.

      I can't believe you actually got a contract with Amazon saying that they won't show you ads.

    28. Re:not enough of a discount by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sucker. By the sounds of it, this advertising will end up costing you a fortune !

      A turkey voting for thanksgiving !

    29. Re:not enough of a discount by rbollinger · · Score: 2

      Amazon Link

      The ads are actually pretty unobtrusive. You can see them at the link above, about half way down the page.
      They do have the ads on the hibernation screen (which are most likely 'un-clickable'), as well as ads on your homepage (which are probably clickable). I agree that $25 does seem a bit slim for the discount, but still worth it, after all how long will it be until a few clever people will probably figure out how to re-write the memory so that you have the full version.

    30. Re:not enough of a discount by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      What kind of idiocy creates a situation where I'm watching ads for a 23 year old movie?

      It's not idiocy at all. Most sales fall in a certain period and it costs only infinitesimally more per tape to include those ads. If there is idiocy it lies in buying the product which advertises to you in a way you find offensive. Any more I prefer to rip anything before watching it and XBMC and vlc both typically allow me to skip FBI warnings and such (vlc more than XBMC, actually.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    31. Re:not enough of a discount by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Amazon can enable ads to go in there but not my personal library of images. Yes I know I can HACK it to do that but why should I? Also I agree $25 off to add Adverts to my Kindle. No thanks.

      Seeing that I paid the highest price you can pay for a Kindle 2 I hope Amazon allows me to swap out the images (or at least get rid of some of freaky looking ones.)

    32. Re:not enough of a discount by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      It's not a matter of how much it costs the user, it's how much revenue it generates for Amazon.

      Why should I care about Amazon's revenue? When I buy a product, I make a decision based upon its value to me. As described, the ads would detract very little from my enjoyment of the product. Indeed, if they advertise products that I'm actually interested in, they may even add value from my standpoint. Besides, I'm already bored with the standard "sleep" displays. Some variety would be welcome, even if it's ads.

    33. Re:not enough of a discount by melikamp · · Score: 1

      They can get a lot more than $25 from you if they can program you to buy useless crap. You cannot purchase your way out of ads, you just have to block them or boycott advertisers.

    34. Re:not enough of a discount by rbollinger · · Score: 1

      How in the world did you come up with an additional $200 per user per ad-driven kindle?

      I'm using Facebook as a metric, since their advertising bidding process is readily accessible. Now for this type of advertising I would assume more of a Cost Per Metric than a Cost Per Click bid. On Facebook, their Cost Per Metric bids for around $0.44-0.77 USD per 1000 Impressions. Its a bit harder to measure impressions with a Kindle, because it is not always connected to the network, and its an item that you are going to have over a long period of time. That being said let's assume that you read your Kindle 5 times a day, and each time you read it you get 2 impressions: the impression on the home screen and the impression on screensaver. That would be 10 impressions per day or 3650 impressions per year if you were an avid reader. In which case the revenue from your impressions for Amazon would be less than $3. At this rate it would take more than 8 years for amazon to make up for your $25 discount. Now I'm not trying to say that these are the actual advertising rates for the Kindle, just trying to point out that $200 seems a bit unrealistic.

    35. Re:not enough of a discount by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      Just because advertising is currently unobtrusive doesn't mean that it always will be. When some manager realizes that his bonus is being threatened, it's amazing how obtrusive they are willing to get.

      When that happens (and it is a possibility after all), it will most likely be another product with a different discount. But as it is, as a current Kindle user, I'd take the $25 discount on the deal that exists now, and simply ignore the ads on the hibernation mode screen saver. Or more likely, I won't ignore the ads. Demonize marketing as much as you want (and a lot of it is warranted), but if we are objective, we have to admit Amazon has always done very good targeted advertisement. When I sign in my account, I rarely see any out-of-the-tangent advertisement. Most of it is tailored to my interests (based on my purchase history). If I can get that unobtrusively while getting a $25 discount, why not. OTH, I can always take an acid-trip into hyperbole la-la land and argue that a possibility (advertisements running amok) is actually a certainty, demonizing the deal/product/discount right of the bat.

      Of course, you could say that if it changes you would switch, and after a couple of years you might be looking for a new e-book reader anyway.

      Which is a very good argument, no? Still, if Amazon is successful with an ad-supported Kindle you know that other manufacturers will follow suit and there will be few alternatives.

      Remember when cable TV had no ads? I do.

      So a legitimate business should not pursue a legitimate product/market development venue, and a buyer should not use his discretion in getting something he wants (or needs/thinks he needs) now, because of a possible what-if?

      Are you suggesting that they (both Amazon and customer) don't exercise their rights (as product developers and customers)? What exactly do you propose? Is the potential (yes, potential) cable-related scenario that you are suggesting so evil, so nefarious that we should simply fall into paralysis by analysis over something so trivial as a product developer making a product with advertisements to be sold to willing customers (who probably don't give a shit, and which is their right not to)?

    36. Re:not enough of a discount by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 2

      What you say is true, but it doesn't matter.

      It's not a matter of how much it costs the user, it's how much revenue it generates for Amazon. I would guess that they're going to make an additional $200 per user per ad-driven Kindle, so giving me a $25 discount is NOT enough!

      They don't buy one, and simply pay the extra for the no-advertisements variety. I for one don't give a shit if Amazon makes $1 or $200 per user-ad. I still get my $25 discount, and, considering Amazon's history, I will also get non-obtrusive advertisements on things I'm interested in. My satisfaction is not tied to their profit margin, nor I will wish them not to increase their profit simply because I'm not getting a share of that pie (something I'm not entitled to since I'm neither involved nor invest in their product development.)

    37. Re:not enough of a discount by PrescriptionWarning · · Score: 1

      No I don't currently have a Kindle, though I plan to get one once I finish reading several of the physical books I need to read. But my main point is that $25 off from $140 is chump change to me and doesn't justify going for the ad supported version even if its not that obtrusive. So a significantly lower price would be needed for me to consider that, otherwise I'd rather just go ahead and pay the $140 once I'm ready to get one.

    38. Re:not enough of a discount by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      Yep, I've noticed a drop in the trend, though they're not completely gone. That said, almost all of them that still do it don't mess with the fastforward button anymore, so you can skip them.

      It always puzzled me why they'd put ads that were really only viable for 6 months on a medium that will last decades. I put in an old VHS a few weeks back (can't even remember which film it was now) and it was advertising the "Upcoming Film" "Earth Girls Are Easy" staring Gina Davis and Jeff Goldblum . . . (for those that don't know, that film came out in 1988, and it sucked). What kind of idiocy creates a situation where I'm watching ads for a 23 year old movie?

      Rub a pair of neurons (just saying') and think of the probable chance you'll see an advertisement of an old movie that you haven't seen and that might peek your curiosity. Then, voila, you go rent it. Voila again, profit for the media company.

      Mildly annoying (to the point of being just an afterthought for any normal person)? Yep. Capable of producing profit for the media company? Yep.

      It is not idiocy at all. Whoever came up with this (no matter how much the fanboys would want to demonize him), that person knew how to think ahead in terms of profits. Only a fool (or someone whose job is not about making profits) would fail to appreciate the intelligence behind it.

    39. Re:not enough of a discount by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      I agree that $25 does seem a bit slim for the discount, but still worth it, after all how long will it be until a few clever people will probably figure out how to re-write the memory so that you have the full version.

      I guess Ayn Rand won after all. I wonder when, exactly, it became socially acceptable for people to just turn their ethics off on a whim? You're getting a discount for purchasing a Kindle by agreeing to view these ads - if you don't want the ads, pay the extra 25 bucks. It's simple.

      It's not like you can't get a Kindle without the ads.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    40. Re:not enough of a discount by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      Considering that the Kindle is basically a portable shopping cart for nothing but Amazon reading material, it should be under $40 already.

      Wishful thinking. Why should they do that? Amazon is free to maximize profits. Perhaps in the future, when the market is sufficiently vast (and with enough indication that the Kindle is the primary shopping experience), then Amazon might be able to do that and recoup the cost of product development. The market is still not there (I think) to justify the subsidizing of a product being sold at such low cost.

      It is still possible within 2 years (an eternity in tech), but not right at this moment. Not yet.

    41. Re:not enough of a discount by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      This sort of overcharging to cover the reality that they have way more employees than really needed is the same problem the post office is facing. Weve had more rate increases in the last 10 years than the 200 years preceding. The reason is fewer items are being mailed but the cost of all the infrastructure and employees isnt changing.

      I take issue with your last sentence. I think the US Post Office is handling MORE mail than it ever has. Unfortunately for us, most of it is junk ads the USPS is being paid to deliver to every mailbox.

      We're only a few years away from that all ending, though. I know I've only got a handful of bills (doctor's office, health insurance) that aren't yet available online, and all of my family and friends (even the elderly) switched to email long ago. When the last holdouts switch over, I'm just going to stop visiting my mailbox. Is it overfull? Then it's the Post Office's problem, not mind.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    42. Re:not enough of a discount by e3m4n · · Score: 1

      well you may feel this way but the excuse for all these ridiculous rate increases over the last 10 years has always been claimed that their volume is decreasing while their costs are are the same. Their budget shows them hemorrhaging cash year after year. I think they're losing a lot on bulk packages which is why they comissioned the 'if it fits it ships' campaign. But lets face it, their tracking sucks and things like ebay are driving non-commercial package delivery, whithout the good tracking system ups and fedex offer your left exposed to getting scammed. I still remember when a first class letter cost 15cents and was so for many years.

    43. Re:not enough of a discount by awyeah · · Score: 1

      When some manager realizes that his bonus is being threatened, it's amazing how obtrusive they are willing to get.

      My main concern with this is that there's always the possibility that ads could be added to my existing, non-ad-supported Kindle 3. I think this is very highly unlikely, but after all, it's just software...

      --
      Why, no, I haven't meta-moderated lately. Thanks for asking!
    44. Re:not enough of a discount by dufachi · · Score: 1

      For only a paltry 25 bucks, I'll just get the ad-free one. At that price reduction, it's not worth having to deal with the advertising.

      --
      -Kinsey
    45. Re:not enough of a discount by rbollinger · · Score: 1

      At this point you are going into the territory of who exactly owns your device.

      You didn't agree to view the ads when you purchased it, you just agreed to purchase a product that had advertisements on it. Personally I think its fair for you to modify something you own. The same way I think its fair for someone to hack their PS3 to enable OtherOS. Once you buy it you own it, and are free to modify your property. On the flip side I also believe it's fair for the service provider to deny access to their services (e.g. Sony denying hacked PS3's from connecting to their network).

    46. Re:not enough of a discount by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      How are they turning off their ethics?

      As you yourself pointed out, you'll be able to get the ads (by buying the new cheaper version) or not (by buying the existing higher priced version).

      Obviously they pointed out the most attractive offers, but the $20 gift card for $10 or MP3 album for $1 (presuming I had a choice of an album I wanted anyways), are ones I wish I could get on my existing Kindle.

    47. Re:not enough of a discount by Xeranar · · Score: 1

      I'm going to have to say that the metric you used for Facebook is just unrealistic. With about 4 million kindles sold collectively ad-based Kindle 3's are probably going to make up about 100,000 once the program is in full swing. So we're more inclined to see that metric be applied by the 100 or 500 or have the bid increased substantially. Even just halving it has Amazon turning a profit on their ad-kindles in a little over a year not including the fact that their main goal is to sell you books through their store. The reality is that to justify forcing me to view ads I should receive a steeper discount. $20 is minimal on the overall price, it is barely a 7% discount. I think if I used a credit card to buy it with the right perk I could get that off. If Amazon wants to entice new buyers to get a kindle handing them out for $50 a pop would get people. As is stands now I suspect few will bite at that low a price. PS: I suspect a vast majority will have their ad-based software stripped and replaced with normal kindle OS and use 3rd party bookstores to read from.

    48. Re:not enough of a discount by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Kindle is pretty thoroughly hacked, anyway (it running Linux), so I'm pretty sure that there will be ad removers before long.

    49. Re:not enough of a discount by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      That's plainly false. For one, you can load books from any sources onto Kindle, and, so long as they are in a supported format (plain text, PDF or MobiPocket), it will display them the same as any book from Kindle Store. And it's easy to covert ePub to MobiPocket with Calibre.

      For another, Kindle has a web browser, and if you open a supported book file using that browser, it will be downloaded and added to book collection on the device. Thus, any book store offering supporting formats and compatible with WebKit browsers (IIRC, that's what their browser is built on) can be used to purchase books directly from Kindle. I do just that with a Russian online book store that I use heavily - I think they know about that scenario, in fact, because they specifically offer MobiPocket versions for their books.

    50. Re:not enough of a discount by ynp7 · · Score: 1

      Those screensaver images do get boring REALLY fast. Sadly, that feature was almost as much of a selling point when I pre-ordered this thing as the $25 price difference.

    51. Re:not enough of a discount by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      The problem is what I really want is a cell phone that changes it IMEA in a random manner so it is free to place calls with all the time. Also, I want a 25 watt output so I can always make calls with it.

      If I own the phone, I should be able to do these things.

      Unfortunately, the FCC got a decision around 1976 that makes it clear manufacturers can make things but to modify the device in any way immediately revokes your authorization to use the device. This originally applied to CB radios but has been extended to practically everything.

  2. Buyers Remorse by geekmux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "...Will that be enough of a discount to get readers to purchase an ad-supported device?"

    Probably, but chances are most users, no matter how unobtrusive the ads may be, will likely regret not forking over the "extra" $25 to try and have at least ONE electronic experience that is ad-free, as one can hardly get away from advertising these days, no matter where you are.

    1. Re:Buyers Remorse by Grygus · · Score: 1

      Probably, but chances are most users, no matter how unobtrusive the ads may be, will likely regret not forking over the "extra" $25 to try and have at least ONE electronic experience that is ad-free, as one can hardly get away from advertising these days, no matter where you are.

      This post brought to you by Coca-Cola. Coke is it!

    2. Re:Buyers Remorse by just_another_sean · · Score: 2

      Ads. Coming soon to your dreams!

      Didn't you have ads in the 21st century?"
      Well sure, but not in our dreams. Only on TV and radio, and in magazines, and movies, and at ball games... and on buses and milk cartons and t-shirts, and bananas and written on the sky. But not in dreams, no siree.

      Damn near prescient I would say!

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    3. Re:Buyers Remorse by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      Probably, but chances are most users, no matter how unobtrusive the ads may be, will likely regret not forking over the "extra" $25 to try and have at least ONE electronic experience that is ad-free, as one can hardly get away from advertising these days, no matter where you are.

      With electronics becomming so much smaller every year, expect ads to be added to things that are currently non electronic. Imagine one of those greeting card circuits installed in every condom sold, advertising aspirin when you open the package.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  3. Limited Time by Gutboy · · Score: 2

    For $25 do I only get ads for a week or two? Or for the rest of the devices lifetime? It's not worth the discount if the latter.

    1. Re:Limited Time by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      For $25 do I only get ads for a week or two? Or for the rest of the devices lifetime? It's not worth the discount if the latter.

      Do you mean "the former" or are you being sarcastic?

    2. Re:Limited Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For $25 do I only get ads for a week or two? Or for the rest of the devices lifetime? It's not worth the discount if the latter.

      Do you mean "the former" or are you being sarcastic?

      Did you have a brain fart?

    3. Re:Limited Time by somersault · · Score: 2

      No, he means the latter. I'd take the $25 discount if it was only 2 weeks of ads.

      Seriously though, if the ads aren't there while reading the book, I don't see the big deal even if it's for the lifetime of the device. The only time I look at my Kindle is when I'm actually reading a book. Now, I don't want ads myself, but I know some people who would take that kind of discount. Some people even seem to like ads..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    4. Re:Limited Time by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      For $25 do I only get ads for a week or two? Or for the rest of the devices lifetime? It's not worth the discount if the latter.

      Do you mean "the former" or are you being sarcastic?

      Did you have a brain fart?

      Whoops yes!

    5. Re:Limited Time by geekmux · · Score: 1

      ...Seriously though, if the ads aren't there while reading the book, I don't see the big deal even if it's for the lifetime of the device.

      So, I would assume that when you DVR your favorite TV show, you do NOT fast-forward past the commercials? I mean, technically they aren't there when you're watching your TV show...

    6. Re:Limited Time by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      As long as what you're trying to do is read the book, there won't be any commercials. This is more like a DVD player that switches to a (silent) ad whenever it's been in pause mode for more than five minutes, but otherwise never shows one.

    7. Re:Limited Time by somersault · · Score: 1

      Ads on a DVD require active intervention to bypass though, ads on a website or application tend to require passive intervention. I used to pretty much not even see ads on websites even before I installed an adblocker.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    8. Re:Limited Time by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      No, he means the latter. I'd take the $25 discount if it was only 2 weeks of ads.

      Seriously though, if the ads aren't there while reading the book, I don't see the big deal even if it's for the lifetime of the device. The only time I look at my Kindle is when I'm actually reading a book. Now, I don't want ads myself, but I know some people who would take that kind of discount. Some people even seem to like ads..

      Slashdot moderations increase people's ambient principles.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    9. Re:Limited Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only time I look at my Kindle is when I'm actually reading a book.

      That is what I would assume a normal person would expect. But as mentioned before, someone will have the bright idea that the "ad" will take several seconds (longer than needed) to go away before you can start reading / go back to using the device.

      Just like the unskipable videos before playing a DVD.

      $25 is looking very very cheap if that is the case.

  4. only $25 off on a long-lived device? by turtledawn · · Score: 2

    Nope. Not nearly enough.

    --
    Uh, "if it looks roughly mouse-shaped according to my infra-red sensitive pit, eat it"? --Chris Burke 09-08-10
    1. Re:only $25 off on a long-lived device? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seeing as they're only on the screen when the screen isn't used, it makes zero different to what the device does now. You obviously haven't got one, so have no clue about what you're saying. Just like the story submitter, there is no screensaver mode, the screen isn't a CRT or LCD, it's e-ink and has no concept of screen burn.

    2. Re:only $25 off on a long-lived device? by woolpert · · Score: 1

      Is this your entry in "how many incorrect statements can be made in one post"?

    3. Re:only $25 off on a long-lived device? by somersault · · Score: 2

      There is a "screensaver", though of course it doesn't really act as a screensaver, it's more of a notification that the device is now on standby.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    4. Re:only $25 off on a long-lived device? by turtledawn · · Score: 2

      I do actually have one - it was an unwanted gift from my mother in law. She's very nice. The only use I've had for it is using it to demo the accessibility features for a radio show I do for vision impaired people. I rather like the author portraits it displays in standby mode and would be sad to lose those to ads, esp. if only for a $25 discount.

      --
      Uh, "if it looks roughly mouse-shaped according to my infra-red sensitive pit, eat it"? --Chris Burke 09-08-10
  5. Inevitable End Result by Sonny+Yatsen · · Score: 2

    I think the inevitable end result of ad-supported e-Books is subtle (or not so subtle) product placements inserted into books. I can't wait until "It was the best of times, it was the worst of times" becomes a product placement for Timex, and Tom Sawyer takes a refreshing sip of Coca-cola as he rafts down the Mississippi.

    --
    My postings are informational and does not constitute legal advice. Act on it at your risk.
    1. Re:Inevitable End Result by slyrat · · Score: 1

      I think the inevitable end result of ad-supported e-Books is subtle (or not so subtle) product placements inserted into books. I can't wait until "It was the best of times, it was the worst of times" becomes a product placement for Timex, and Tom Sawyer takes a refreshing sip of Coca-cola as he rafts down the Mississippi.

      Well it is already being done. The site wowio offers some of its books for free with ads placed in the books. They also have comic books with the same formula. I'm sure it will expand a bit and it often can work well if it is the first in a series. Baen has done similar, though no ads in theirs. In that case the Author chose for particular books to be free and Baen was fine with it. I'm sure that publishers will come up with other interesting ideas to get more people reading.

    2. Re:Inevitable End Result by captainpanic · · Score: 1

      Easier to leave the text unedited, and just place banners and fullpage ads.
      The text might be scanned though, and topic-relevant ads might be placed.

    3. Re:Inevitable End Result by proslack · · Score: 1

      Nothing new under the sun. Check out any old pulp magazine from the 20s or 30s, or a modern Reader's Digest or Analog. Ad-supported, just like your local newspaper. Most paperbacks have adverts in the back for other books from that publishing house.

      --


      Floating in the black seas of infinity without a paddle.
    4. Re:Inevitable End Result by boristdog · · Score: 1

      Tom Sawyer takes a refreshing sip of Coca-cola as he rafts down the Mississippi.

      You may want to check up on your Twain, amigo. Huck Finn rafted down the Mississippi.

      -damn, I'm a literature nazi

    5. Re:Inevitable End Result by Sonny+Yatsen · · Score: 1

      Tom Sawyer also rafted down the Mississippi. See Chapter 13 of the Adventures of Tom Sawyer (or flip to page 116 of the Google Books link here: http://books.google.com/books?id=yBYmAAAAMAAJ&dq=Tom%20sawyer&pg=PA117#v=onepage&q=raft&f=false).

      He rafted down the river with Joe Harper and Huck Finn. I never said he rafted by himself.

      --
      My postings are informational and does not constitute legal advice. Act on it at your risk.
    6. Re:Inevitable End Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, like product placement in books is just a new idea and hasn't been done before....

    7. Re:Inevitable End Result by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      Maybe they should follow the model of "Pride and prejiduce and zombies". Take an existing book, and mark it up.

      For example, take "Harry Potter", and insert numerous Viagra and Insurance references, then sell that version for 10% off. "Voldamart streached out his crooked hand toward Harry Potter, and croaked 'Have you considered Mrs Reeds Home Style Peanut Butter? It's made with 30% real peanuts. 9 out of 10 mothers prefer it over other brands!'"

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  6. An important detail by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Will the device refuse to run if it's not able to connect to the ad server?

    1. Re:An important detail by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      A bigger question: Will it still be hackable? I could see some that planned on hacking the thing anyway saving $25, the same as I've known Linux guys that would take the cheapest trialware ridden laptop because they knew they'd never even boot into the mess anyway, so it saved them money.

      So the bigger question is what is stopping the hackers from doing this now? Anything? And how long before this is mandatory? I bet Amazon isn't making huge profits on the thing to start with (and all corps seem to believe they are entitled to huge profits nowadays) and force feeding ads would probably make them a mint. So how long with you be able to buy the "Non TiVo'd" Kindle, vs one that protects their ad revenue with eFuses or code signing?

      I'm all for choice, and if they offered this thing for $40 or less with ads I'd probably get one just to play with, but I worry about the future of ads on mobile devices. We can hardly escape ads now as it is, with even schools renting out spaces on lockers and tables to ad companies, so how long until you can't escape the crap?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    2. Re:An important detail by vlm · · Score: 1

      Will the device refuse to run if it's not able to connect to the ad server?

      Blocking an ad server over your own wifi would be trivial.

      Blocking an ad server over someone elses wifi, tough, but theoretically possible if you trespass inside someone elses wifi-router.

      Blocking the 3G data connection to the ad server... probably not easy at all.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    3. Re:An important detail by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Blocking an ad server over your own wifi would be trivial.

      Not if the ad server is the Kindle sync server.

  7. $25 for reduced battery life?!? by RingDev · · Score: 2

    Sign me up!

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    1. Re:$25 for reduced battery life?!? by metrometro · · Score: 4, Informative

      Other than pinging the radio once in a while (which it could do while charging, if you wanted to be nice about it), putting ads on the e-ink screens do not draw extra power. The Kindle already flashes the screen once to show a "screen saver" image.

    2. Re:$25 for reduced battery life?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well.. Actually the only extra battery use would be from the retrieval of ads from their servers. I assume it will only do this when in wifi or 3g is on, then cache the ads until connectivity is on again. The amount of power used to download these ads will probably be trivially small so I doubt it will lower you battery life much if any.

  8. Coffee Table Real Estate by metrometro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At a hardware level, the e-ink screen is begging for this kind of treatment. When powered off, it's basically a coffee-table billboard waiting to happen, married to all the radios and spyware you need to profile the house its sitting in and deliver the ads.

    I'm totally grossed out by this. For now it's opt in, but it won't be in the future. Expect this to show up on all kinds of crap as e-ink screen prices drop. Lunch boxes, refrigerators, etc.

    Just another reason the $75 Kobo is the best e-reader on the market (I've owned a Nook, Kindle and Kobo).

    1. Re:Coffee Table Real Estate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not on my coffee table!

    2. Re:Coffee Table Real Estate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $75 for a Kobo? Where? The lowest retail price I can find is $100 from Borders...

    3. Re:Coffee Table Real Estate by metrometro · · Score: 1

      ebay. People are clearing out Borders locations and/or cashing in soon-to-be-void gift cards, then flipping the Kobo for a loss.

    4. Re:Coffee Table Real Estate by Lehk228 · · Score: 2

      it's too bad RCA doesn't get back into the eReader business

      i had an REB 1100 which included a resistive touch screen indiglo backlit LCD and integrated modem to dial in and buy books.

      it still had the best UI i have seen for an e reader

      the the page foreward and back buttons were large flipper-ish buttons on the side that could be hit with a palm squeeze, and one of the functions was a direction button where any of the 4 sides could be designated as the top, since it was not physically symmetrical this was very useful, you could turn it landscape with the fat part as top and place the book on a table or desk, with the thin side as top when holding landscapr, or either end as top depending if you were holding it left or right handed (iirc flipping which was top also switched which of the page flippers was forward and back, but i'm not sure on that one)

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    5. Re:Coffee Table Real Estate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you all ready get suggestions for other books once you get to the end of the book you are reading as well as get asked to rate the book. I just hope they dont advertise books, it doesn't need to be easier for me to buy books, thirty some are siting in my to read list. It is the only draw back I can really find with the kindle.

    6. Re:Coffee Table Real Estate by turtledawn · · Score: 2

      Kindle offers orientation changing (though not automatically like the iPad and not with a single button press). The page buttons aren't as nice as what you're describing, though.

      --
      Uh, "if it looks roughly mouse-shaped according to my infra-red sensitive pit, eat it"? --Chris Burke 09-08-10
    7. Re:Coffee Table Real Estate by boristdog · · Score: 1

      The most popular e-readers in Europe:

      http://www.pocketbook-usa.com/products/

      A little pricier, but a good selection of products.

    8. Re:Coffee Table Real Estate by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      Kindle offers orientation changing (though not automatically like the iPad and not with a single button press). The page buttons aren't as nice as what you're describing, though.

      The last two generations of Kindle had automatic orientation changing, though of the five people I know with Kindles, none have left the feature enabled because it's annoying when reading while lying on one's side.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    9. Re:Coffee Table Real Estate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " (I've owned a Nook, Kindle and Kobo)."

      You do know that you could have bought a lot of actual books for what you spent on these gadgets, right...?

    10. Re:Coffee Table Real Estate by BlackCreek · · Score: 1

      Just another reason the $75 Kobo is the best e-reader on the market (I've owned a Nook, Kindle and Kobo).

      Did you ever handle a Pearl e-ink screen? I have a Kindle DX -Graphite and a Kindle3 but I owned a Hanlin, and handled a bunch of e-ink devices in shops. The difference in screen quality from this Pearl to the older vizplex(?) is huge.

    11. Re:Coffee Table Real Estate by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Kindle offers orientation changing (though not automatically like the iPad and not with a single button press).

      There is an option to do automatic changing on DX, actually. Haven't checked on Kindle 3.

  9. I think I'll wait... by mattgoldey · · Score: 0

    until the hackers figure out how to disable the ads on the cheaper model and then I'll get one. ;)

  10. Not even close by Brooklynoid · · Score: 1

    Considering their closed business model (you can't read an eBook from any vendor other than Amazon on a Kindle), the device itself, even without ads, should be very close to free. Amazon should be looking at the Gilette business model; charge next to nothing for your razors and make your money on the blades. I might pay $25 for a device that locks me into Amazon as my exclusive eBook vendor, but not a penny more.

    1. Re:Not even close by Sechr+Nibw · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that you were able to do this, as long as the eBook doesn't have DRM. I don't recall what formats it supports, but, if there's no DRM, then you can convert it to a format that is supported. I know the Kindle app for iPhone supports .mobi formatted files now. The downside is that you have to sync them with iTunes, and your bookmarks and "last page read" aren't synced to Amazon and back to other devices.

      As for an actual Kindle, I know you can at least email "Word and picture files" to it, for a small fee. Alternatively, I believe you're able to copy things to it over USB.

    2. Re:Not even close by HelioWalton · · Score: 4, Informative

      (you can't read an eBook from any vendor other than Amazon on a Kindle),

      And where exactly did you come up with this? The main problem is that it can't read ePubs, but you can load anything in a format it supports (txt, mobi, html, pdf if you are masochistic, etc....) via USB, and with some (txt, mobi I think are the only two), you can even download them using the experimental web browser from any store or website.

    3. Re:Not even close by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding. How much does a second or third generation kindle cost to manufacture? Lock-in is annoying and reduces it's value. Ad-servers are going to slow down the experience, connecting, updating,"verifying". The dead tree book is harder to get and store but, it will work every time you open it. Won't need updates, affect your other devices or change it's mind about a business model.

    4. Re:Not even close by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      You can read any Mobipocket book on a Kindle via USB sideload, download from a website, or the Kindle wireless file transfer (over the 3G connection, it's $0.15/MB, free over WiFi, and any conversions Amazon would do can be done for free via the @free.kindle.com address and USB). A non-DRM'ed book (or one whose DRM has been removed) can easily be converted into Mobipocket by using Calibre.

    5. Re:Not even close by EdgeyEdgey · · Score: 1

      pdf if you are masochistic

      What is bad about PDFs? Does it not display them well? I have lots of documents in PDF that I would like to read on a Kindle.

      --
      [Intentionally left blank]
    6. Re:Not even close by HelioWalton · · Score: 1

      The PDF reading is ok, it just really depends on the pdf. For something like a PDF formatted to be 8.5x11 sheets, just text, it isn't too great, you have to be zoomed in and scrolling around is a little slow. I found the PDF viewer was great for converted to PDF powerpoint slides though. They usually have big text anyway, so once shrunk to kindle size, it was about normal readable size.

    7. Re:Not even close by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

      If you're looking at a PDF that's at all image-intensive I really can't recommend the Kindle for it, despite otherwise thinking it's a great device.

    8. Re:Not even close by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      (you can't read an eBook from any vendor other than Amazon on a Kindle),

      And where exactly did you come up with this? The main problem is that it can't read ePubs, but you can load anything in a format it supports (txt, mobi, html, pdf if you are masochistic, etc....) via USB, and with some (txt, mobi I think are the only two), you can even download them using the experimental web browser from any store or website.

      Calibre converts every format, including pdf and ePub, to mobi. It's a must-have (and free) program for any Kindle owner.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    9. Re:Not even close by HelioWalton · · Score: 1

      Exactly, I missed that crucial point above. PDF conversion isn't always great, but typically ePubs go just fine.

    10. Re:Not even close by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Kindle has screen resolution of 600x800, so if you read the PDF in fit-page-to-screen mode, normal text is pretty hard to read because of too few pixels per character.

      If you read in landscape it's better, but then you have to scroll up and down - and it's rather annoying on eInk screen, because it takes a second or so to redraw it.

      Kindle DX is 864x1200, so it's a decent PDF reading device. But it's rather more expensive.

    11. Re:Not even close by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      ePub and MobiPocket are both ultimately HTML subsets, so it's no surprise. MobiPocket is more constrained, which is probably why Amazon has picked it initially for their books (AZW is really just DRM'd MobiPocket), but both formats are well-understood regardless, and transformation is not hard.

    12. Re:Not even close by BlackCreek · · Score: 1

      In my experience the best format for reading (black & white) comics in the Kindle DX is PDF. If you convert to mobi (with images) there will be a margin around the images, with PDF you get a nice proper full-screen view.

  11. I predict by rainmayun · · Score: 1

    Amazon will eventually drop the price to $99 or less, and at that price point buyers will be willing to accept a cheaper, ad-subsidized device.

    1. Re:I predict by icebraining · · Score: 1

      That's redundant. If $99 is a price point, then by definition it'll be accepted by buyers. I think you mean "price," not price point.

    2. Re:I predict by tophermeyer · · Score: 1

      I think you are right on. That $100 mark is a weirdly magic number for a lot of electronic devices. If Amazon can get a Kindle in for $99 or less, that thing could kick babies and people would still think they're getting a good deal on it.

  12. What about book prices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd much rather see this model apply to eBook prices rather than the readers themselves. I took the plunge a week ago and got me a fancy-pants new eReader, only to find that the prices for the eBooks are actually higher than the prices for the mass-market paperbacks in a lot of cases.

  13. That is the best they could do? by grapeape · · Score: 1

    Who in their right mind would subject themselves to advertising for the life of a product to save a measly $25. One would think that after the success of the Kindle and its proprietary nature they would be able to approach advertisers and offer a rather large captive audience that is fully trackable and work out a deal to basically give kindles away....that would have impressive and could have worked to make kindles as ubiquitous as television.

    1. Re:That is the best they could do? by tophermeyer · · Score: 1

      It's not that dissimilar from the ads you see in the back pages of the trashy sci-fi paperbacks. The ads are there, most people ignore them (most don't even realize they're there) but occasionally someone spots a title they might be interested in.

      The Kindle ad isn't like a TV ad that you have to sit through to continue watching your show. The ad is displayed on the screen when you're not using it and disappears as soon as you turn the device on. As a current Kindle user I would be interested in getting this so Amazon can offer me their recommendations. I'm not required to buy anything they advertise.

    2. Re:That is the best they could do? by grapeape · · Score: 1

      Except they aren't just on screen saver, they are also on the menu's and they aren't ads for other books, in fact their first client is Buick.

    3. Re:That is the best they could do? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      99% of time one spends using Kindle is spent reading a book. Main menu is used for a few seconds between the books to switch to the next one to read. I imagine that they will get much more use from "screen saver" ads than they would from ads in the menu.

  14. How lame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a deal -- if you are an advertising firm. $25 for directed adverts for years.

    Not only is the $25 not enough of a discount, but it is enough to make me spend lots more on a different device.

  15. Advertising strikes me as a bizarre idea by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    Basically the Kindle's primary purpose is as a promotional tool for eBooks. Amazon wants people to buy eBooks and they want them to buy from Amazon.

    So the device is an advertisment.

  16. It would probably display cached ads by tepples · · Score: 1

    Will the device refuse to run if it's not able to connect to the ad server?

    Between connections to the Internet, the device would probably display cached ads, and then it would update them when the user buys a new book.

    1. Re:It would probably display cached ads by tophermeyer · · Score: 1

      A question that your post just raised for me is if Amazon will require periodic connections in order to push those ads. For the 3G users that's not so much of a problem, they can just turn on the 3G radio for a minute until the notification goes away. But as a Wi-Fi only Kindle user I might be a little peeved to find out that Amazon expects me to find a wireless network every 2-3 weeks to check in.

  17. Might Be Better Than It Sounds by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

    The Kindle is based on e-ink, which consumes a negligible amount of electricity when displaying a page. The ads will only be displayed on the lock screen page, and the bottom of the home page. There will not be any ads on the bottom of the books themselves. This might work if Amazon regularly includes really great offers to owners of the ad-Kindle such as half-priced Amazon gift cards and books, as the article suggests.

    Personally, I'd rather pay the extra $25 to get an ad-free version. However, if this works out and advertisers are plenty, Amazon might start giving bigger discounts to get a larger audience.

    --
    A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
  18. The result? by Lunaritian · · Score: 1

    Save $25, spend hundreds of dollars buying advertised stuff.

  19. Nope by Ferretman · · Score: 1

    Sorry, if it's going to subject me to ads then it needs to be free, or so cheap that I'll *feel* like I'm actually getting a deal. Ferretman

    --
    Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc
  20. It should be free! by SirAstral · · Score: 1

    If you want to disturb me in any way with an Ad, the service I am using better be free.

    1. Re:It should be free! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to disturb me in any way with an Ad, the service I am using better be free.

      Do you subscribe to cable or satellite TV?

  21. Oh, the horror... by Diddlbiker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...of having an ad on the cover of a device when it is turned off. Thank god your tablet, smartphone or laptop does not have a big logo on the cover, advertising its manufacturer.

    I wouldn't mind getting a $25 discount for that. The two problems that I have with it are:
    * Are the ads related to what I bought on Amazon? If I buy, say, a dozen dildos, do I have advertisments for sex toys on the cover of my kindle for the next two weeks (or until I buy something else)
    * Is Amazon going to pull a bezos on me? After two months reverting and saying "you know what, we are going to insert advertisements inside your e-book on second thought. You know, a bit like "an e-book on the kindle is just like a real book. Except that we can yank it from your shelf if we decide that's a good idea".

    1. Re:Oh, the horror... by Loosifur · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up.

      I sincerely hope that all of the people who recoil in horror at the idea of ad-bearing products don't own clothes, shoes, cars, or any other products that bear their manufacturer's logo prominently.

      --
      This unbiased moderation brought to you by the Porcine Aviation Group!
    2. Re:Oh, the horror... by dlgeek · · Score: 1

      You realize Amazon lets you control whether products you've purchased or viewed in the past are used for recommendations, right? There's a "Don't recommend products based on this item" button and you can even remove items you've viewed from your history....

    3. Re:Oh, the horror... by jfengel · · Score: 1

      If I buy, say, a dozen dildos

      Sounds like you throw one hell of a party.

    4. Re:Oh, the horror... by parens · · Score: 1
      Sure, my clothes and cars bear the manufacturers logo. As does my Kindle - right across the top, Amazon Kindle - and again on the obverse.

      What my clothes and car do NOT do is update their ad cache via a wireless connection every x days/weeks.

      Static advertising is one thing, auto-updating ads are something else completely. Putting a logo on a product is not nearly the same as selling ad space.

    5. Re:Oh, the horror... by Insightfill · · Score: 1

      If I buy, say, a dozen dildos,

      This message, brought to you by someone named "DiddlBiker".

    6. Re:Oh, the horror... by anyaristow · · Score: 1

      Two differences:

      1. The screen on my Kindle is perhaps 50 times the size of the logo on it.

      2. I get to see the logo "ad" before I decide if I'm willing to put up with it. If I accept dynamic ads then I don't know what kind of cheesy, crass stuff I'm going to have to put up with.

      It's a matter of class. $25 just isn't enough money to give a marketer a permanent piece of my personal space.

    7. Re:Oh, the horror... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      tatic advertising is one thing, auto-updating ads are something else completely

      Why? What's the difference?

    8. Re:Oh, the horror... by parens · · Score: 1
      Well, to start with, one is static, while the other is dynamic.

      If you meant, "besides obvious semantic differences", the former is a non-changing logo that's always in the same spot on a non-user-interface area, i.e. the top bezel, or the rear panel.

      Compare and contrast to a updating ad placed inside the user interface, namely, the e-ink screen.

      I don't generally stare at the rear panel or top bezel when using my Kindle, but I am fond of looking at the screen while using the device. Hence, it's intrusive, and a sea change compared to a static manufacturer's logo.

    9. Re:Oh, the horror... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I don't generally stare at the rear panel or top bezel when using my Kindle, but I am fond of looking at the screen while using the device.

      Given that the ad is for their lock screen, you wouldn't actually be looking at it while using the device.

      Okay, so there's another ad on the main menu (bookshelf). Unlike the lock screen one, which is full-size, this one takes the place of the two bottommost lines in the list. Considering that 99% of the time you'll be reading the actual book rather than picking the one to read, and there are no ads in the books, I don't really see the problem.

    10. Re:Oh, the horror... by parens · · Score: 1
      You asked me to elaborate on the difference between a static logo and dynamic ads, not delve into personal preferences, which are completely subjective.

      There's also the "slippery slope" argument, i.e., if this goes over like I'm sure it will, ads will become more obtrusive. No, they are not currently overly obtrusive.

      If it doesn't bother you, that's good. It does me.

    11. Re:Oh, the horror... by markjhood2003 · · Score: 1

      Oh, the horror ...of having an ad on the cover of a device when it is turned off.

      That's exactly what the horror is: the device is turned off and it is still displaying advertisements, like some undead zombie. This isn't the same as a static discrete logo on the corner or the bevel of some device (and no, I would not buy a device or an article of clothing that prominently featured a logo). The situation here is that you turn off a device and it's sitting on your coffee table still auto-updating advertising at you. *shudder*

  22. Discount is on the wrong version by today · · Score: 1

    This discount is on the version that you have to hook to your computer in order to update. A single $25 discount seems inappropriate for this devices.

    I would rather see a discount on the free-3G/wifi version of the unit. In this product, you get free 3G for life. An ad-supported model makes more sense because you continue to receive a service in exchange for continuing to receive ads. It would also allow them to update those ads more often.

    The best solution would be to discount the reader a bit *and* discount each kindle book you buy, say maybe by 10%.

    1. Re:Discount is on the wrong version by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Are you quite sure you can't download updates over the 802.11?

      Also, wrong. The idea is to get people the cheapest e-reader possible to encourage uptake.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    2. Re:Discount is on the wrong version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best solution would be to discount the reader a bit *and* discount each kindle book you buy, say maybe by 10%.

      Except they can't. The publishers have completely hamstrung the sellers' abilities to adjust the price of eBooks.

    3. Re:Discount is on the wrong version by parens · · Score: 1
      I already get free 3G for the life of the device - why on earth should they start charging for that now? Making something that used to be free, now be ad-supported, is a sure way to piss off your customer base.

      Now, if they were to give it away free - the 3G version, not the silly crippled version - that would change things. I'd still want the option to buy a "real one", of course, and that's the problem I see. This is a trial balloon, and if uptake goes well, it stands to reason that this model will be extended across the Kindle line.

    4. Re:Discount is on the wrong version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ad-supported version has wifi, you don't need to hook it up to your computer.

    5. Re:Discount is on the wrong version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be a bit confused about Kindle options. None of them require being "hooked to your computer". There's a version that comes with both wi-fi and 3G ("free" for a one-time payment of $50), and a version that comes with wi-fi only.

  23. Kindle Owner Speaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fantastic thing about the Kindle is it just works and does nothing except display books... which is great if you read, read and don't care about anything else on the device. The idea that anyone spending over 100 on this device anyway for the sole purpose of reading (therefore someone who enjoys reading a *lot) will want to save $25 for the benefit of having their reading interrupted is ridiculous. I wouldn't even want my beloved Kindle for free if it was harassing me.

    Reminds me of those stupid offers 10 years ago, free computer with ads forever... thankfully those companies went bankrupt. FAIL.

    1. Re:Kindle Owner Speaking by Nimey · · Score: 2

      If you'd RTFA, it's not supposed to interrupt your reading. It'll show ads when the screensaver kicks in, and on the home screen.

      I'd still not buy one of these - $25 isn't enough of a discount, even with the other stuff, and I've got a 3G K3 already - but it's not quite so bad as you'd like to pretend it is.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
  24. I wonder... by Haedrian · · Score: 1

    What would be interesting is determining how much advertisments cost to put on a kindle - how much Amazon takes from each 'click' (do people still pay for impressions?) and work out just how many times a user needs to react to an ad for Amazon to get its money worth.

  25. It will be very popular by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

    I'd have bought one... given that I rooted mine 20min after taking it out of the box. This discount version would have saved me $25 I could have spend on a case. Oh wait, i hacked up an old pocket organizer and velcro'd the kindle in... I guess amazon just can't win with me.

    1. Re:It will be very popular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh wait, i hacked up an old pocket organizer and velcro'd the kindle in...

      Classy. Did you use duct tape, too?

  26. how poor must you be? by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    Seriously a $25 savings for a life of ads? Fuck that shit.

    1. Re:how poor must you be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because you would never purchase cable or satellite service for more than that much money a MONTH and subject yourself to content that is now fully 25% advertisements?

  27. Screensaver Replacement by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this process would eliminate the screensaver ads that amazon wants to load?

    --
    'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
  28. Only Kindle's First Step by Seumas · · Score: 1

    After they acquire enough significant sponsorship, I wouldn't be surprised to see it become free. Most of us may not desire that, because if you can afford $114 for an e-reader, you can probably afford $139. On the other hand, if you can't afford anything near that price, then ad consumption in return for a device could mean the difference between having and not having one at all. It would make it available to an entire range of people who may otherwise not be able to benefit from a device so many of us take for granted (whether or not we own or use them).

    Of course, the real appeal for this will be that when it becomes free, it'll surely be given to every student in every public school and they'll receive a special stream of advertisements not only as currently described in the press release by Amazon, but on a more granular basis. I can just see students opening their textbook and hearing/seeing "Remember, this Earth Sciences textbook is brought to you by Monsanto Growth for a Better World! or a five and ten second pre-rolls for every test question.

    1. Re:Only Kindle's First Step by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      I can just see students opening their textbook and hearing/seeing "Remember, this Earth Sciences textbook is brought to you by Monsanto Growth for a Better World! or a five and ten second pre-rolls for every test question.

      Why on earth would they make the device intentionally annoying? They would much rather sell you books by staying out of your way and throwing in an ad every time you turn it off - so that when you pick it up again, you see several books that Amazon thinks you might like.

    2. Re:Only Kindle's First Step by larwe · · Score: 1

      Who says the ads will be for books? "I see you're reading Lady Chatterley's Lover - here's an ad for 10% off Horny Goat Weed".

    3. Re:Only Kindle's First Step by parens · · Score: 1

      That line in Amazon's press release about the special launch deals, is just a red herring. Amazon Recommendations are already built into the Kindle, this is actual ads. As in for Buick.

    4. Re:Only Kindle's First Step by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Amazon can't sell you a Buick (yet). They'd rather advertise their own stuff and get you to buy it. And you only see Amazon Recommendations if you decide to Shop the Kindle Store - which I do from time to time, but only when I want to buy a book. This is putting those recommendations out there on the hibernate page where you'll see them. Frankly, I tired of the Kindle hibernate screens pretty quickly, and added my own instead, but I can definitely see why someone might choose to take $25 in return for seeing recommendations every time they turn the device off.

  29. Unnews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soon? They had this on sale since sunday.

  30. Can you root it? by Halifax+Samuels · · Score: 1

    If you can root the Kindle and remove the Ads then this may be worth it. If not, or if you don't want to, it'll have to go more than $25 off...

    Really, Amazon will be making much more than $25 per Kindle over the life of the devices showing ads, so they should make the devices cheaper than that. It's not like they're going to be losing money.

    1. Re:Can you root it? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Yes, you can root Kindle. Heck, in 3.0 they actually had a root shell out of the box! (by accident, but still). For 3.1, there's this.

      Once rooted, well - it's Linux...

  31. The nature of advertising by mariafernandez · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately ads have a tendency to multiply as time goes by. How many ads will readers have to endure in, say, a year's time before they can turn the page?

  32. No. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Sorry, ad supported for $25.00? get bent.

    Free for add supported? then they will generate interest. Whoever though that a pittance discount = the value of the invasive advertising is nuts.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  33. Can't be any worse than the standard screensvers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of the current screensavers are ugly. I imagine ads would look better than the current screenssavers do, and get you it cheaper. Not much different from having ads in magazines on your coffee table at teh end of the day.

  34. Does this make sense for advertisers? by pilich · · Score: 1

    So basically, If you're the one buying these ads, you're targeting the people who were too cheap to pay the extra $25. Is this the best use of your advertising dollars, getting the demographic that doesn't like spending?

  35. Still people will complain by pvera · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When the original Kindle came out, people complained it was horribly expensive. Whenever Amazon released a new model and/or chopped the MSRP, people complained it was horribly expensive. When it went under $200 people bitched that there was no reason for it to sell for more than $150. When the Wifi model came out for $139 people complained that there was no reason for it to cost more than $100. Now the Wifi can be purchased for $114 and people are going to come up with any excuse to complain about the price, ads or both.

    I am 100% convinced that even if Amazon gives it away just for the cost of shipping (free if you are on Prime), people will still bitch and moan about the stupid ads.

    I have owned two Kindles (awesome, cludgy), two Kindle 2s (awesome, period) and currently two Kindle 3 Wifi (awesome, keyboard sucks). All of our previous Kindle devices were sold to friends for a reasonable price, and all of them are (that I know) still up and running today, and each and everyone loves them.

    Both my wife and myself adore this device, for people like us that read a book or more per week these devices are extremely practical. The Wifi model uses so little power that it freaks me out whenever I realize that I actually need to charge it.

    --
    Pedro
    ----
    The Insomniac Coder
    1. Re:Still people will complain by geek · · Score: 1

      I agree. I bought one a few years ago, the old 2nd gen with 3g. I've always been an avid reader but my girlfriend not so much. I got her the new wifi version when it first came out and she's done nothing but read on it since. We don't even watch movies anymore, a lot of nights we "go to bed early" just so we can read. It's truly a great device in every way. I just can't grasp all the whining about it. I think it simply has to be people who've never used or owned one.

    2. Re:Still people will complain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You buy more book reading gadgets than most people buy books. You've owned SIX book reading devices? These things have only been out a few years. Why do you spend so much money buying and re-buying gadgets? It sounds horribly wasteful.

    3. Re:Still people will complain by pvera · · Score: 1

      I have a wall 6 bookcases wide, 6 shelves each, crammed with books. Once we got the first two Kindles we realized that in just a few months we had replaced the contents of one full bookcase. Out of the 6 full bookcases, less than one full bookcase can be considered must-keep books, either because they are unique, they have maybe a dedication, etc. The other 5 bookcases are hundreds of pounds worth of novels with a paper value of close to zero, and they take space, and they need to be kept clean, and they need to be protected against insects, humidity, etc.

      And to answer your question on why spend so much money buying and re-buying gadgets? Because I can. I am willing to spend money to gain convenience. I really like not having to chase down for books anymore. All my favorite authors are selling on the Amazon Kindle market, and 99% of the time their prices are reasonable. Usually when somebody gets greedy and overcharges there's a gaggle of people on Amazon that will immediately start complaining and making noise until the prices are lowered.

      Is this for everyone? Of course not. But if you are addicted to reading general fiction and you don't care about reselling your old books, a Kindle wifi is practical and very cost effective. The $114 (or what the hell, the $139 I paid for mine) is less than the cost of books and the bookshelves to hold them for even one year of my kind of reading.

      --
      Pedro
      ----
      The Insomniac Coder
    4. Re:Still people will complain by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that most people buy less than 6 books in the course of several years?

      I don't know if that's true - would be interesting to see the stats - but if so, it is a sad statistic for our society.

    5. Re:Still people will complain by pvera · · Score: 1

      They won't even borrow them at their local library for free.

      --
      Pedro
      ----
      The Insomniac Coder
    6. Re:Still people will complain by jarlsberg71 · · Score: 1

      I've had my 2Gen kindle now for just over 2 years. I have 4 more friends on my account, so we can buy a book "Once" and then all 5 of us get to read it concurrently. My friends and I have read over 200 books in 26 months. I like charging it once a month roughly, (about the time I load a few more books on it as well)

      --
      E8B8B
  36. Free. Free is a good price. by RealGene · · Score: 1

    If you'd like to give me a portable, sunlight-readable billboard for free, that's just fine.

    --
    Mission: To provide products that consume time and energy as entertainingly as permitted by the laws of thermodynamics.
  37. $25? I want free like CueCat! by Kamiza+Ikioi · · Score: 1

    I spend more than that a month for Audible audiobooks (Amazon) and Kindle books. And I use it all through my Android DroidX. After a year, I should be getting a FREE Kindle. I'd be willing to put up with ads ONLY if it were completely free. If they add in a stipulation that you've purchased at least $250 worth of content, I'm fine with that too, because I have. I've bought the Kindle as a gift for someone else, and really liked the readability. Reading on a DroidX kinda sucks, but I love books. Why should they give me a free Kindle? Because if I purchase a really large book (500+ pages), I go to a Barnes & Noble and pick up the paperback for $10. If Kindle wants to capture my sales as a higher volume customer, Kindle should be free.

    Of course, should they give them away like freaking CueCats? That's a great question. I know RadioShack would jump on board, haha. Maybe that's a genius marketing strategy to beat Apple. Maybe make it "free" with a newspaper subscription. But once someone crosses a certain purchase threshold, they should get a 100% off coupon code.

    --
    I8-D
    1. Re:$25? I want free like CueCat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The public library is the place for audio books. Pick them up during the winter, rip to iTunes, listen to them when I'm driving or weeding, then dump them.

      Similarly I find that using Stanza on my iPhone makes an acceptable reader. The downside is the power usage. But I don't want to be locked into Amazon, and won't buy a Kindle until
      A: Most titles are available from at least two suppliers.
      B: Amazon updates firmware so that they cannot take back a book.
      C: Ebook prices start making sense. Given the costs of type setting, printing, collating, binding, trimming, and shipping books, as well as the long lead time, an ebook should cost 1/5 to 1/3 of the price of a pbook.

  38. the better question by sorak · · Score: 1

    "...Will that be enough of a discount to get readers to purchase an ad-supported device?"

    The better question is:

    How long before the ad-free version stops being offered?

  39. Awesome. When do I get it on my current kindle? by Frozen-Solid · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome this. As long as the ads being displayed are even remotely as interesting as the artwork the screensavers show currently I'm all for it. Only having the dozen or so screensavers we have right now on the kindle is boring. I'd be willing to voluntarily turn this on if it means I get some more variety.

    --
    Frozen Insanity
    http://frozen-solid.net
    1. Re:Awesome. When do I get it on my current kindle? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It would actually be interesting if they offered it as a firmware update for existing Kindles, in exchange for an Amazon store voucher.

  40. Depends on the quality of the ads by brainzach · · Score: 1

    If the ads are unobtrusive and artistically done, I don't think it will bother a lot of people. Unlike most other forms of advertising, I don't really mind the ads in magazines. They don't get in the way of reading, are higher quality and some are actually enjoyable to look at.

    There is a difference of a nice picture of nice scenery and a polar bear drinking a coke with a logo in the corner compared to big block letters that say DRINK COKE.

    If you think about it, the Amazon logo on the device is its own form of advertising. People would put pictures of cars on their PC's desktop, which is also a form of advertising. As a kid, I would cut some advertisements out of a magazine and hang it on my wall.

    If done unobtrusively and tastefully, I don't think most people will be turned off that much. I personally would pay the $25 premium for an ad free versions, but there will still be a significant segment of the population who wouldn't mind the ad supported version.

  41. Sadly by dmomo · · Score: 1

    "Will that be enough of a discount to get readers to purchase an ad-supported device"

    Yes. Because I'm sure that Amazon has done the market research. They didn't just make up a magical amount. I'm sure they did a cost / revenue analysis and also researched what discount would encourage customers to buy the device.

    I hate advertisements, but I thought it interesting to see Amazon take a different approach. They are allowing customers to give feedback on the ads. I am curious if it is easy to upgrade the Special-Offer Kindle to a non-ad supported one.

  42. A prelude to cable-fication if we do not stop it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is clearly an experiment in market tolerance. Everyone needs to stay away from this and encourage other to do so as well. This makes more money for amazon, so if they do not detect market revulsion, they WILL phase out the add free version ASAP in order to increase their bottom line. Then we will basically have the cable model, where we are paying them so they can hit us with ads for their profit. And I guarantee you that if people are shown to be amenable to this, then all of the other readers will follow suit and the only way to get ad free books will be to go back to the paper variety.

  43. Margins, not units sold by Software+Geek · · Score: 1

    How many more kindles will this pricing option sell?
    Are there really that many people out there that would walk away from a $139 kindle, but are willing to buy a $114 kindle with ads?
    The discount would have to be much steeper in order to result in a measurable increase in sales.

    I suspect that this is really about improving margins, not selling units. People who were already going to buy a kindle will opt for the cheaper one. The ad revenue it brings in will more than offset the purchase discount.

  44. Holding out for the free Amazon Prime Kindle by Rotag_FU · · Score: 1

    There is speculation that Amazon Prime members may get free Kindles (http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-20040764-1.html). I would definitely take them up on that and would likely buy books on it. Even if this isn't true, it was a shrewd move by Amazon since I was considering getting a Color Nook and rooting it to put stock Android on it. I'm now holding out until after the holidays to see if this rumor comes to fruition. I wonder how many others that were on the fence about buying a competitors device are now waiting to see if they will get a free Kindle instead.

  45. You don't think they did the math? by larwe · · Score: 1

    Rely on it that Amazon has usage data for the existing Kindles out there. They have without a doubt priced the "ad-supported" Kindle such that their estimated number of impressions for the estimated lifespan of the device will pay for the $25. To lower the price further would probably require that they insert ads into the actual reading experience, and nobody in their right mind would want that device.

  46. Reasons not to get a kindle by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    1) Kindle will not work with epub, or many other formats. Libraries typically use epub format.

    2) B&N nook color will be a complete android platform soon. Read any format. Or just use your phone and/or computer to read any ebook format.

    3) Ten days without a recharge is, typically, not needed.

    4) No color.

    5) The "LED eye strain" claims are a hoax. I read an LED all day without eye strain. I'm 52 and I have never had great vision.

    6) Kindle does not work well in dim light.

    7) Kindle is a unitasker. Why carry around a kindle and a notebook, when a notebook will do everything you need? Why have a kindle and an android tablet, or a kindle and an iPad?

    8) No touch screen.

    1. Re:Reasons not to get a kindle by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      1) Virtually any unprotected ebook format can be converted to Kindle format. A good free converter is Calibre. Of course, DRM-protected ebooks typically can only be read by the manufacturer's reader.

      2) Nook color is more like an underpowered iPad competitor than a Kindle competitor--it can't match Kindle's key features: e-paper and battery life of many days.

      3) But it sure is a convenience not to have to worry about a recharge, particularly on a long trip.

      4) No, a Kindle is not the device of choice for reading comic books. But it's great for text-based literature.

      5) I've got both. Neither gives me eye strain, but the Kindle display is more pleasant to read.

      6) In dim light, I'll pull out my iPhone. I don't do so much reading in dim light that the small size of the screen is much of a handicap. But when the light is adequate, I'll put it away and pull out my Kindle. And in full daylight, I'd much rather have the Kindle.

      7) I don't carry around a notebook--too heavy. If I'm carrying my iPad for other uses, I might decide to leave my Kindle at home, but I'll miss it--the iPad is simply not as comfortable for straight reading--heavier, thicker, and (as noted below) for straight reading, the touch-screen tends to get in the way. Yes, I'd love a device that was as fast as an iPad, with the vibrant color of an LCD screen plus the clear text and bright light visibility of epaper, with touch screen capability plus physical page-flip buttons, and as thin and as light as a Kindle. Let me know when I will buy one. In the meantime, I will tend to use the best device for the task at hand whenever possible.

      8) I don't need a touch screen to read a book. Mostly, I just use the page forward and back buttons. With a Kindle, I can hold it in either hand and access both the page forward and back buttons with my thumb. I can't do this with my iPad (even if it were not uncomfortably heavy), and I find the touch screen often gets in the way, because an accidental brush of my thumb against the edge of the screen can cause an unwanted page flip.

    2. Re:Reasons not to get a kindle by bastion_xx · · Score: 1

      1) Kindle will not work with epub, or many other formats. Libraries typically use epub format.

      If it's non-DRM epub, it can be converted to mobi (non-DRM).

      2) B&N nook color will be a complete android platform soon. Read any format. Or just use your phone and/or computer to read any ebook format.

      Again, if the content I want is available via Amazon or via a semi-easy process to convert or upload, format is not an issue. Design and use of my preferred reading device is key -- the Kindle.

      3) Ten days without a recharge is, typically, not needed.

      Unless you don't have a charger with you. More important when you read on a device that doesn't have e-ink. iPad ain't going to last long enough, even on a short trip.

      4) No color.

      The books I read are still in black text on white background.

      5) The "LED eye strain" claims are a hoax. I read an LED all day without eye strain. I'm 52 and I have never had great vision.

      I assume you mean LCD. I concur when you talk about regular lit environs such as a home or office. I mean we use LCD's day-in and day-out via our computers. Outside though in direct sun, nothing beats e-ink.

      6) Kindle does not work well in dim light.

      Get the new cover wit integrated light. Runs off the Kindle's battery and is one of the best designed solutions I've used so far.

      7) Kindle is a unitasker. Why carry around a kindle and a notebook, when a notebook will do everything you need? Why have a kindle and an android tablet, or a kindle and an iPad?

      Sometimes, a purpose-built device overcomes the unitasker shadow. My phone, iPad and laptop provide 20-80% of the experience I look for when reading a book. The K1 provided 80-90% of that experience, and the K3 is 99% of the way there. Heck, even Alton Brown has unitaskers in his kitchen when they provide a much better function than a general use tool.

      8) No touch screen.

      For a book, it's not something I need. On the K3, the only time I wish I had touch capabilty is when navigating a page to look up a word.

    3. Re:Reasons not to get a kindle by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

      1) Virtually any unprotected ebook format can be converted to Kindle format. A good free converter is Calibre [calibre-ebook.com]. Of course, DRM-protected ebooks typically can only be read by the manufacturer's reader.

      Most ebooks are not unprotected. Calibre is a time consuming PITA.

      2) Nook color is more like an underpowered iPad competitor than a Kindle competitor--it can't match Kindle's key features: e-paper and battery life of many days.

      Better to read any book format, and have color, and thousands of apps, than kindle's key features which are nearly useless.

      3) But it sure is a convenience not to have to worry about a recharge, particularly on a long trip.

      True, but nearly insignificant.

      4) No, a Kindle is not the device of choice for reading comic books. But it's great for text-based literature.

      Anything can read text. I already have several devices and don't need another.

      5) I've got both. Neither gives me eye strain, but the Kindle display is more pleasant to read.

      Maybe in bright sunlight, not anywhere else.

      6) In dim light, I'll pull out my iPhone. I don't do so much reading in dim light that the small size of the screen is much of a handicap. But when the light is adequate, I'll put it away and pull out my Kindle. And in full daylight, I'd much rather have the Kindle.

      I don't want to have to juggle several devices. Who reads in full daylight? I guess the kindle is targeted to the idle rich who read on the beach, or yacht, or whatever.

      7) I don't carry around a notebook--too heavy. If I'm carrying my iPad for other uses, I might decide to leave my Kindle at home, but I'll miss it--the iPad is simply not as comfortable for straight reading--heavier, thicker, and (as noted below) for straight reading, the touch-screen tends to get in the way. Yes, I'd love a device that was as fast as an iPad, with the vibrant color of an LCD screen plus the clear text and bright light visibility of epaper, with touch screen capability plus physical page-flip buttons, and as thin and as light as a Kindle. Let me know when I will buy one. In the meantime, I will tend to use the best device for the task at hand whenever possible.

      I have android smart phone for carrying around. I don't need to carry around several other devices all the time.

      8) I don't need a touch screen to read a book. Mostly, I just use the page forward and back buttons. With a Kindle, I can hold it in either hand and access both the page forward and back buttons with my thumb. I can't do this with my iPad (even if it were not uncomfortably heavy), and I find the touch screen often gets in the way, because an accidental brush of my thumb against the edge of the screen can cause an unwanted page flip.

      Having an android tablet, instead of a unitasking ebook reader, means you have far more functional device. You can still read books, but you can also browse the web effectively, and do many other things.

    4. Re:Reasons not to get a kindle by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      No book reader will read all protected formats. But as the best established of e-book dealers, Amazon is probably the least likely to go out of the business and take your DRM-protected comment with them. I've found Calibre fast and convenient for converting nonprotected formats, and these days, many vendors of non-DRM books, such as Webscriptions, offer Kindle format, anyway.

      I find it a major convenience not to have to worry about whether I remembered to recharge my Kindle. Or about running down my phone reading books on a long flight and being unable to make a call at the other end.

      I find the Kindle screen more comfortable to read than my iPhone or iPad under any normal illumination. I use my iPhone exclusively to read outside at night. I avoid reading on my iPad (too heavy).

      I could do all of my reading on my phone, but I do find that the comfort of a larger screen, the more pleasant to read epaper display, and physical page forward/back buttons on both sides justifies carrying a book reader in addition to a phone. I do agree that there's no point in carrying a second LCD-based device around for reading.

      I can browse the web pretty well on my iPhone when I'm on the go, so I don't feel the need for a tablet. At home, I like to use a tablet. But at home, there is no reason not to use the best device for the purpose. When I want to read a book, I pick up my Kindle. To browse or watch video, I use my iPad. To type, I use a laptop. To make phone calls or to set a wake-up alarm, I use my iPhone.

  47. A one time discount of $25 is not enough... by TavisJohn · · Score: 1

    If the device COST $25, AND if I got credit toward free e-books based on how many adverts it displayed/I was forced to see, then MAYBE it would be worth it.

    But a one time discount of $25 for adverts to be displayed is not enough. Over a few years Amazon will make far more in advert revenue than $25.

  48. Content? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will the content be free?

  49. targeted ads by reasterling · · Score: 1

    I have a kindle and I can see that it would be nice (even a benefit) if the device would automatically show me the next book in the series I am reading. However if there just throwing random ads then I will not have any thing to do with it.

    On a side note: I wish amazon would offer the a books package ie. buy real book at regular price get kindle book for $2. I have a constant concern that I am going to loose or break my kindle and then not have access to any of the books I own until I pay another $130.

    --
    "For I desired mercy, and not sacrifice" -- God
    1. Re:targeted ads by BlackCreek · · Score: 1

      I am at a point that I am trying to get rid of most paper books I own, and I try to only buy (i.e. license) digital books. They take too much space and accumulate dust. I may also move (again) in the next few years and boxes full of books are a PITA. Storing paper at home also has a cost even if it is not immediately clear how to estimate it.

      You should think that if your Kindle is lost or breaks right now, you'll need to shelve $130, pretty much like if you lost or broke your cellphone. The good news is that (unlike phones) the price of e-readers has been going down, so replacing a broken e-reader is only been getting cheaper.

  50. Get it under $100 and we'll talk by gravis777 · · Score: 1

    Only Ads on the homepage? I can deal with that. Doesn't sound like much of an annoyance. Give me ads while I am reading and a huge discount on ebooks, and then we will really talk. I buy the majority of my books used, and rarely pay more than a couple of bucks for a book. When I see the kindle prices of $10 a book, I laugh.

    1. Re:Get it under $100 and we'll talk by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      You don't need to buy books from Amazon to read them on Kindle. Buy from any other store, convert to .mobi (thank you, Calibre authors!), and that's it.

      That said, I think they'll drop the price below $100 for the next big holiday sale, whenever that might be.

  51. One time $25 break not worth it by mysidia · · Score: 1

    If they want uptake of the Ad-Supported kindle; they should instead charge 3G WhisperNet users a $25 monthly fee, and offer to waive it if they will convert to an Ad-Supported kindle.

    I suspect they will do that, eventually.

    Maybe offer a "Kindle price" and an "Kindle Special Offers" price for every book... display a little dialog "Convert to a Kindle with Special offers, and receive a $25 rebate, $5 off this book, and 10% off future kindle editions."

  52. Another Kindle Owner Speaking by anyaristow · · Score: 1

    The home screen is already pretty small for the task of listing all your books, so "on the home screen" probably means the ad will be full-screen until you press a button to see your home screen. That's something you'll have to put up with every time you switch from one book to another.

    That, and the screensaver shows every time you are distracted long enough that it decides you aren't reading anymore. A popular request is the ability to turn the damned thing off. Imagine how much fun it will be to see another ad every time your reading is interrupted.

    1. Re:Another Kindle Owner Speaking by Nimey · · Score: 1

      No. It has a one-line (maybe 2-line) ad ad the bottom of the home screen.

      You probably have no idea how retarded people who jump to conclusions sound.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    2. Re:Another Kindle Owner Speaking by anyaristow · · Score: 1

      Oh, so close to being useful (pats you on the back for RTFA)...and then you had to be a dweeb.

  53. Ad sponsored Opera and Eudora by Xian97 · · Score: 1

    I ran both Opera and Eudora for a while in ad sponsored mode. The ads were small and not intrusive, much less than a banner takes up on many sites. I found it a reasonable trade off to have a way to support the developers while still getting the full version of the programs for free. I am glad that Amazon is providing this option for those that would want to take advantage of it. From what I read, I don't think I would see them that often. I see the screensaver long enough to turn mine on and I am only on the home page long enough to switch books when I finish what I am reading.

    I do think that the discount should be more, a $99 Kindle would be the sweet spot for an ad supported version, especially since for the most part you are locked into buying your ebooks from Amazon so they are going to making money from you with those purchases. There are some smaller publishers that you can get mobi format, Baen for one, but most of the time you would be making your purchases from Amazon.

  54. Ver cheap ad space by anyaristow · · Score: 1

    The screensaver shows every time I am interrupted long enough that it decides I've stopped reading. I probably see that damned thing 10 times per day. That'd be incredibly cheap ad space at $25. Give me the device for free and the books at half price and we'll talk.

    A popular request is to be able to disable the screensaver. I can't imagine how annoying it'd be if it was displaying ads.

  55. Hey by StripedCow · · Score: 1

    Hey, I paid $1000 for my computer, and I still have ads... something doesn't add up here.

    --
    If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
  56. Pfht. by pubwvj · · Score: 0

    The discount is too little.

  57. But will they sell your data to advertisers? by Polo · · Score: 1

    Well, they might have ads, but also... will they provide your information to the advertisers?