CIA Declassifies Pages From Their Cookbook

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

CIA Declassifies Pages From Their Cookbook

Posted by CmdrTaco on Wednesday April 20, 2011 @03:49AM from the my-spell-checker-exploded dept.

AngryNick writes "The Washington Post reports today on the declassification of some of the CIA's oldest secrets: Do you want to open sealed envelopes without getting caught? According to one of the six oldest classified documents in possession of the Central Intelligence Agency: 'Mix 5 drams copper acetol arsenate. 3 ounces acetone and add 1 pint amyl alcohol (fusil-oil). Heat in water bath — steam rising will dissolve the sealing material of its mucilage, wax or oil.... Do not inhale fumes.'"

85 of 119 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

But...but... by LordStormes · 2011-04-20 03:52 · Score: 2

what if I've got nasal congestion? This stuff ought to eat through that lickety-split if I inhale the fumes, right?
Useful for something by antifoidulus · 2011-04-20 03:54 · Score: 2

While hardly anyone sends info via letters anymore, I bet a bunch of teenage amateur meth manufacturers are getting ideas for new drugs.

--
Monstar L
1. Re:Useful for something by dmbasso · 2011-04-20 04:14 · Score: 3, Informative
  
  Just yesterday I became aware that people drink (or inhale the vapor of) a infusion made of VHS videotapes to get high. It's been a long time since I laughed so much... with ideas like that we can confirm that there are no bounds on human stupidity.
  [Warning: VHS tea may cause cancer or metal poisoning, take it only if you are completely retarded and want to kill that lonely neuron of yours.]
  
  --
  `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
2. Re:Useful for something by Lumpy · 2011-04-20 05:33 · Score: 1, Troll
  
  I love how Darwinism is wiping out all the idiot teenagers.
  Keep doing stupid shit to get high kids... It makes the world better for the ones that are not so stupid.
  
  --
  Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
3. Re:Useful for something by Anonymous Coward · 2011-04-20 06:00 · Score: 5, Insightful
  
  All teenagers are idiots. Most adults are, too. The ones who survive into adulthood are merely the lucky ones, and it's hit and miss as to which ones grow out of their stupidity.
  Ideas of social Darwinism are for morons.
4. Re:Useful for something by Cheech+Wizard · 2011-04-20 09:24 · Score: 1
  
  I agree. Evidence: Politicians... ;)
5. Re:Useful for something by Lobachevsky · 2011-04-20 17:34 · Score: 1
  
  All of evolution is luck. Consistent luck is just another term for skill.
6. Re:Useful for something by Internetuser1248 · 2011-04-20 22:47 · Score: 1
  
  and also used as a first aid remedy for some poisons like cyanide
wow by Charliemopps · 2011-04-20 03:55 · Score: 2

Wow, 6 documents from 100 years ago. We'll find out about Kennedy any day now!
1. Re:wow by Spritzer · 2011-04-20 03:57 · Score: 2
  
  Why? The CIA knew nothing about that.
2. Re:wow by creat3d · 2011-04-20 04:04 · Score: 5, Funny
  
  That's right, son. That's right.
  
  --
  Grammar nazis are to this community what excrements are to gold.
3. Re:wow by GodfatherofSoul · 2011-04-20 04:48 · Score: 1
  
  More likely they don't want to give a heads up to other fledgling or small-scale intelligence operations.
  
  --
  I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
4. Re:wow by Kamiza+Ikioi · 2011-04-20 05:33 · Score: 1
  
  Hey, MI-6 recently released the fact that semen was used as a secret invisible ink. I just wanna see the CIA show them up. How about breast milk booby trap bombs? Cause I know "booby trap" is somehow related. The truth is out there!
  
  --
  I8-D
5. Re:wow by jbeaupre · 2011-04-20 05:40 · Score: 1
  
  We'll find out about Kennedy any day now!
  Rumor is he's dead. Uh, which Kennedy are we talking about? Never mind. He's dead too.
  
  --
  The world is made by those who show up for the job.
6. Re:wow by ACE209 · 2011-04-20 06:52 · Score: 1
  
  Unless its about cartoon mice.
  Then you probably would have to wait forever (minus a day).
  
  --
  "we are all atheists about most of the gods that societies have ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further."
7. Re:wow by JWSmythe · 2011-04-20 07:13 · Score: 1
  
  Yup, openness and transparency. That's the CIA's motto. "No, we don't know anything about that". If you can't trust them to tell everyone the whole truth, who can you trust?
  
  --
  Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
8. Re:wow by JWSmythe · 2011-04-20 07:17 · Score: 1
  
  I'm pretty sure the duration of that one is "When hell freezes over" +100 years.
  
  --
  Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
9. Re:wow by Teunis · 2011-04-20 07:34 · Score: 1
  
  if I remember rightly, that secret's in the documents the FSB declassified a few years back ;)
10. Re:wow by Bing+Tsher+E · 2011-04-20 08:31 · Score: 2
  
  The only one who has figured it all out is Oliver Stone. Yep.
11. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · 2011-04-20 12:46 · Score: 1
  
  We have top men working on it now.
Invisible ink by mangu · 2011-04-20 03:55 · Score: 2

That one I learned as a kid: either orange juice or sugar dissolved in water makes invisible ink. Heat the paper with a clothes iron to develop.
1. Re:Invisible ink by vgerclover · 2011-04-20 04:39 · Score: 2
  
  Real Agents use Semen.
2. Re:Invisible ink by tsalmark · 2011-04-20 04:58 · Score: 1
  
  Ewww. I didn't want to know that.
3. Re:Invisible ink by Farmer+Tim · 2011-04-20 05:11 · Score: 5, Funny
  
  Ah, so that's why people say "come again" when they didn't get the message the first time.
  
  --
  Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
4. Re:Invisible ink by Ogive17 · 2011-04-20 05:16 · Score: 1
  
  Orange juice or lemon juice? I always saw lemon juice being used, I would think orange juice might leave behind some color.
  
  --
  "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
5. Re:Invisible ink by mangu · 2011-04-20 05:44 · Score: 1
  
  Then perhaps Mata Hari was not a spy after all. The secret ink found in her room which was used as evidence against her could have been left by one of her lovers.
6. Re:Invisible ink by hellop2 · 2011-04-20 06:37 · Score: 1
  
  urine works too
  
  --
  How many more years will slashdot have an off-by-one error on your Score in your profile?
7. Re:Invisible ink by geoffaus · 2011-04-20 09:23 · Score: 1
  
  "In June 1915, Walter Kirke, deputy head of military intelligence at GHQ France, wrote in his diary that Mansfield Cumming, the first chief (or C) of the SIS was making enquiries for invisible inks at the London University" And he had a rather appropriate name too!
  
  --
  As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a reference to Godwin's Law approaches 1
WWI documents are not CIA by Anonymous Coward · 2011-04-20 03:56 · Score: 2, Informative

These documents predate the CIA. Therefore the recipes aren't CIA recipes.
1. Re:WWI documents are not CIA by morgan_greywolf · 2011-04-20 04:24 · Score: 1
  
  But they were classified and kept by the CIA. The documents themselves (1 2 3 4 5 6) carry stamps keeping them exempt from declassification for dates as late at 1978 and 1989.
  Some of the recipes in there, however, are as old as Julius Caesar.
  
  --
  My blog
Anarchist cookbook? by vlm · 2011-04-20 03:56 · Score: 2

Mix 5 drams copper acetol arsenate. 3 ounces acetone and add 1 pint amyl alcohol (fusil-oil).
This is sounding like the "anarchist cookbook" which had made up recipes intended to blow up potential bombers rather than cooking up the real thing.
Right up there with "get high from banana peels"
You want a solvent for mucilage, try ethanol fumes. I have no idea how to test it because envelope manufacturers have not used biological mucilage for longer than I've been alive... Maybe a museum or an old relative has an envelope they'd let you mess with?

--
"Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
1. Re:Anarchist cookbook? by TheCarp · 2011-04-20 04:08 · Score: 2
  
  I dunno, I think you give the guy who put the cookbook together a bit too much credit. If anything it was a collection that was put together from book learning and inexperience. Sure, anybody can look up the reaction and figure out how to make nitroglycerin. Doing it safely on the other hand isn't something that a lot of people (even some who did it) can speak to.
  Getting high from banana peels is a perfect example. It wasn't new in the cookbook. It was a hoax printed in a Princeton newspaper. The author of the book got ahold of it and included it in his book. Hardly some grand conspiracy, just, ignorance, inexperience, and lack of source checking.
  
  --
  "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
2. Re:Anarchist cookbook? by bmo · 2011-04-20 04:13 · Score: 2
  
  The Anarchists' Cookbook had real recipes.
  It's just that some stuff was left out, like... safety.
  This was discussed here on Slashdot and if you read the packet of declassified docs relating to it, it was pretty well stated that sure, these are actual things you can do, but they might not quite work out as you plan.
  "they" - meaning law enforcement, preferred you blow yourself up and draw attention to yourself instead of having to hunt down every PFY that downloaded the book off the local BBS at 1200 (or 300!) bps.
  --
  BMO
3. Re:Anarchist cookbook? by hoggoth · 2011-04-20 04:16 · Score: 2
  
  But huffing cat urine is real, right?
  
  --
  - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
4. Re:Anarchist cookbook? by geekoid · 2011-04-20 04:16 · Score: 1
  
  Have you read it? it goes into exactly what you need to do to maintain temperature and stability.
  Bear in mind the idea was for someone in a house to do it, not a lab.
  It's also a great book to read on the insight of the time.
  People have forgotten, but we where right on the brink of a large violent revolution. Thanks to the FBI, it became a much calmer event.
  
  --
  The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
5. Re:Anarchist cookbook? by TheCarp · 2011-04-20 04:23 · Score: 1
  
  Actually I have only read some of the online versions, and some bits of the US Army Improvised Munitions Manual (1969) which probably provided a fair amount of source material.
  I wish I had read the real book, always meant to check it out. Maybe that wasn't a good example but, I have heard many times this theory that it was intended to kill the people who tried it, and I just never bought it. It always seemed plausible enough that errors or bad procedures were more the result of lack of QA than actual malicious intent. (and no,,I don't consider revolution to be malicious)
  
  --
  "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
6. Re:Anarchist cookbook? by Omestes · 2011-04-20 04:45 · Score: 4, Interesting
  
  "they" - meaning law enforcement, preferred you blow yourself up and draw attention to yourself instead of having to hunt down every PFY that downloaded the book off the local BBS at 1200 (or 300!) bps.
  Many of the books called by the name "Anarchist's Cookbook" on old BBSs weren't the same as the print edition. Actually in the early-mid 90's I don't think I ever actually found a text version of the print edition on any local BBS (or Fido, or, later, telnet BBSs). If anything, most of the BBS versions were more dubious than the original. I remember reading how to make a "contact explosive" from iodine and ammonia, and pondering how the hell someone would do that without blowing themselves up or inhaling particularly nasty fumes. Some of them devoted tens of pages on stuffing match heads into tennis balls and calling it a "grenade"...
  The 90's were a much simpler time. I supported myself through high school by selling print, and disk, copies of the BBS versions of the Anarchist Cookbook, and other "counterculture" literature to my fellow students. I think I charged like $10 for a print copy, and $5 for a floppy. These days I would have been expelled, arrested, and probably permanently black marked from ever having a successful life.
  I also sold compilations of ways to extract drugs from ethnographic plants for awhile (most of which were probably completely innacurate and potentially harmful, in retrospect)...
  I feel sorry for kids there days... Half the stuff I did in my youth would get someone into very deep water now.
  
  --
  A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
7. Re:Anarchist cookbook? by Lumpy · 2011-04-20 05:30 · Score: 1
  
  Ive made nitroglycerine and its not that dangerous until you get to the unstable levels of concentration.
  Low grade nitro that can take out a house by putting it in a nice sealed pressure cooker left on a fire in the basement? Easy as hell to do. I was 13 when I mixed my first batch of it. I made a small mason jar full of low grade stuff. a campfire in the wood to detonate it, 1 hour later it left a nice 6 foot crater where the campfire used to be. we spent the next 6 hours putting out small fires in a 60 foot radius.
  
  --
  Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
8. Re:Anarchist cookbook? by bernywork · 2011-04-20 07:59 · Score: 2
  
  > I remember reading how to make a "contact explosive" from iodine and ammonia,
  Made it, it worked. Had to play with the ratio a bit though to get the desired effect (I wanted throw downs, not sneeze and blow up...)
  
  --
  Curiosity was framed; ignorance killed the cat. -- Author unknown
9. Re:Anarchist cookbook? by J053 · 2011-04-20 12:49 · Score: 1
  
  I actually made some nitrogen tri-iodide at around age 15. I had gone to a summer camp for "gifted" students at a local college, and we had pretty free access to the chem lab. So, I and a buddy were able to get pure iodine crystals and concentrated ammonium hydroxide, which made it easy. You just dissolve the iodine in the NH4OH, filter the residue, and do whatever you want with it while it's wet. Once it dries, it's a very effective contact explosive. Great for painting on stair treads and doorknobs, or stuffing into capsules for little throwable bombs.
  Good times...
10. Re:Anarchist cookbook? by dbIII · 2011-04-20 15:43 · Score: 1
  
  Go back a bit more and my uncle was making touch powder (picric acid version I think) and simple gunpowder and when that was not enough for his little cannon he ducked under the fence to the army dump and came back with cordite. It turns out there was also mustard gas there but it wasn't found until decades later.
  He was the smart one. Another younger relative blew off four fingers playing with less powerful home made explosives some time in the 1960s. Some of the old chemistry textbooks were a lot more informative on explosives than the anarchists cookbooks ever were. I'm lucky that by the time I knew enough to play with explosives I was busy making sure nasty stuff wouldn't go off. Sitting sixty metres up on scaffolding with a picric acid solution in a machine on your lap which is running an electrical current through it is a good time to muse about how explosive things are or are not. It's also amusing seeing what's left of a vehicle after a lit cigarette, detonator and charge all occupy the same space in the back of it - a wheel knocked a hole in a fence right next to the head of the idiot that was walking away from it who didn't think that throwing his butt out the window would end up in the back where he'd put the gear in a heap.
11. Re:Anarchist cookbook? by Omestes · 2011-04-20 18:55 · Score: 1
  
  I remember being very happy to be out of high school when Columbine happened. I was also very happy that our school had a very high nerd ratio, so we were never really bullied much or ostracized to the point where the less balanced of us were tempted to act out. Hell, in a certain sense we were even respected... which is very odd from all I've heard from other peoples experience of high school
  Most of our tastes were pretty benign, we were more likely messing with computers than messing with potential explosives (there was some of that, obviously).
  Sorry for being nostalgic, its the tail end of a birthday, after a fair bit of beer.
  
  What are some of the rest of you guys (and gals) opinions?
  I think most of the West is trending towards being overly protective of our children, while being overly fearful of them at the same time. Your best bet is in more rural areas, I'd think.
  
  --
  A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
Please do inhale... by Super+Dave+Osbourne · 2011-04-20 03:57 · Score: 2

If someone is opening my mail, by all means inhale drop dead.
CIA Cookbook? by errxn · 2011-04-20 03:58 · Score: 5, Funny

Mix 5 drams copper acetol arsenate. 3 ounces acetone and add 1 pint amyl alcohol (fusil-oil). Heat in water bath — steam rising will dissolve the sealing material of its mucilage, wax or oil.... Do not inhale fumes.
This recipe is terrible, and tastes like shit. Conclusion: The CIA's cooking sucks.

--
In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
1. Re:CIA Cookbook? by mangu · 2011-04-20 04:01 · Score: 2
  
  Mix 5 drams copper acetol arsenate. 3 ounces acetone and add 1 pint amyl alcohol (fusil-oil). Heat in water bath â" steam rising will dissolve the sealing material of its mucilage, wax or oil.... Do not inhale fumes.
  This recipe is terrible, and tastes like shit.
  I knew it tasted bad, but had no idea that this is how shit tastes.
2. Re:CIA Cookbook? by errxn · 2011-04-20 04:06 · Score: 1
  
  Actually, you're right. Adding a couple of teaspoons of shit to this makes it taste better.
  
  --
  In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
3. Re:CIA Cookbook? by LordStormes · 2011-04-20 04:18 · Score: 2
  
  Serve with the C4 recipe on the next page, and BAM! Kick it up a notch!
4. Re:CIA Cookbook? by errxn · 2011-04-20 04:48 · Score: 1
  
  Ehh, that recipe blows.
  
  --
  In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
Culinary secrets? by Anonymous Coward · 2011-04-20 03:59 · Score: 1

CIA + Cookbook makes me think Culinary Institute of America. I was all ready for culinary secrets...
1. Re:Culinary secrets? by muridae · 2011-04-20 06:23 · Score: 1
  
  sodium alginate and calcium chloride
  transglutaminase
  agar agar
  lecithin
  
  Those are the current high tech kitchen secrets. The 100 year old secret is "don't overcook anything".
2. Re:Culinary secrets? by toleraen · 2011-04-20 07:09 · Score: 1
  
  The magic ingredient is water. Yes, ordinary water. Laced with nothing more than a few spoonfuls of LSD.
Pfft. by ackthpt · 2011-04-20 04:03 · Score: 1

Geocaching technology is YEARS ahead of any of this stuff.
Why, I bet you can't even find the camoed ammo can hidden in this post!

--

A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
1. Re:Pfft. by Mitchell314 · 2011-04-20 04:18 · Score: 1
  
  Geocaching technology is YEARS ahead of any of this stuff.
  Why, I bet you can't even find the camoed ammo can hidden in this post!
  Found it. Cleverly masked the 2x4 club as a thread post.
  
  --
  I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
If it's been declassified, it's not useful anymore by PolygamousRanchKid+ · 2011-04-20 04:03 · Score: 1

A general rule of spooks . . . we'll tell you how we spied 100 years ago . . . but not how we do it today . . .

--
Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
CIA's Cooking by wiredog · 2011-04-20 04:05 · Score: 4, Funny

Is awesome!

--

Best Slashdot Co
1. Re:CIA's Cooking by biobogonics · 2011-04-20 10:01 · Score: 1
  
  This CIA (Culinary Institute of America) used to be in New Haven. Maybe this explains why so many Bulldogs became spooks.
Re:If it's been declassified, it's not useful anym by Nidi62 · 2011-04-20 04:08 · Score: 2

A general rule of spooks . . . we'll tell you how we spied 100 years ago . . . but not how we do it today . . .
Except the principles of modern espionage go back hundreds if not thousands of years. Do you think brush-passes or dead drops were modern inventions? How about encryption and codes? While today's technology includes stuff spies could have only dreamed of 100 years ago, the fundamentals and basics are exactly the same.

--
The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
Re:If it's been declassified, it's not useful anym by Gnavpot · 2011-04-20 04:10 · Score: 4, Insightful

A general rule of spooks . . . we'll tell you how we spied 100 years ago . . . but not how we do it today . . .
The joke is not that this is public today - but that it was still considered worth keeping secret yesterday.
Re:Wax Seal by TheCarp · 2011-04-20 04:13 · Score: 1

My god just use pgp already.

--
"I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
Chili? by j00r0m4nc3r · 2011-04-20 04:14 · Score: 1

Do they have a good chili recipe?
1. Re:Chili? by UncHellMatt · 2011-04-20 04:17 · Score: 1
  
  Well they could tell you, but then they'd have to kill you.
2. Re:Chili? by PPH · 2011-04-20 04:40 · Score: 1
  
  I think you misspelled Chile. They can bring the gov't to a boil and add a pinch of Pinochet. But it makes a mess in the kitchen.
  
  --
  Have gnu, will travel.
3. Re:Chili? by GodfatherofSoul · 2011-04-20 04:51 · Score: 2
  
  Mix a democracy with a dash of pro-US dissenters
  Bring to a boil
  Remove president when flavor suited to taste
  Add one whole dictator
  Simmer for 30 years
  
  --
  I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
4. Re:Chili? by HornWumpus · 2011-04-20 13:10 · Score: 1
  
  Lose the oil and start with some bacon instead.
  Use 1/2 or more venison if available.
  Marjoram, Oregano and nutmeg? Out.
  Lose water, add beer.
  You need many more chili peppers. One? Beef stew.
  Add a chunk (or more) of baking chocolate when done cooking.
  It is debatable, I like some beans in my chili. Black beans
  
  --
  John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
5. Re:Chili? by HornWumpus · 2011-04-25 13:43 · Score: 1
  
  Chili pepper is a broad category that includes many mild peppers.
  
  --
  John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
Now this is a major disappointment by phrackwulf · 2011-04-20 04:14 · Score: 1

I thought we were finally going to get the cookbook the blind folks who work at the CIA snack stand in Langley use. Total gyp.

--
What would Richard Feynman do, if he were here right now? He'd do some math and he'd follow through!
To serve U.S. ? by Thud457 · 2011-04-20 04:20 · Score: 1

The Kanamits are not amused.

--
the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
Re:Wax Seal by Vectronic · 2011-04-20 04:21 · Score: 1

It seems he does, Pidgeon Get Parcel... Pidgeon Give Parcel.
Re:Wax Seal by An+ominous+Cow+art · 2011-04-20 04:22 · Score: 1

He said 'trusty', so I assume it's a pretty good pigeon.
LOL at our stupid government by argStyopa · 2011-04-20 04:33 · Score: 1

All of them are re: the recipe for the GERMANSâ(TM) invisible ink in WWI (samples, methods for detecting, etc.). What ârecent advancement in techâ(TM) suddenly made this no longer secret?
Notice that theyâ(TM)re stamped âoeExempt from automatic declassificationâ in 1978. In 1999, the agency rejected a Freedom of Information Act request to release the six documents, asserting that doing so âoecould be expected to damage the national security.â Really?
I recognize as well as anyone the need for secret documents staying secret, but someone needs to be bitch-slapped for keeping âoelemon juice/vinegar secret inkâ recipe almost perpetually secret (yes, one of them the primary ingredient is acetic acid). Thatâ(TM)s just silly.

--
-Styopa
1. Re:LOL at our stupid government by Antisyzygy · 2011-04-20 04:44 · Score: 1
  
  Your typing is all weird.
  
  --
  That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
2. Re:LOL at our stupid government by JWSmythe · 2011-04-20 07:31 · Score: 1
  
  Lets see...
  apostrophe â(TM) '
  dash â', â", â", â
  ellipsis â¦, ...
  guillemets Â Â
  quotation marks ( â â(TM), âoe â )
  slash/stroke ( / )
  And of course, I have to add enough text here to avoid the lameness filter, which said "Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
  Filter error: Please use fewer 'junk' characters. " So if I were to write a few lines about the wonders of how Slashdot does not yet support UTF-8 (still), except on slashdot.jp, it should let me post this without problems. Of course, it will take a lot of text to that.
  In the famous words of my high school french teacher, "repetez s'il vous plait" (without all the "special" characters)
  And of course, I have to add enough text here to avoid the lameness filter, which said "Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
  Filter error: Please use fewer 'junk' characters. " So if I were to write a few lines about the wonders of how Slashdot does not yet support UTF-8 (still), except on slashdot.jp, it should let me post this without problems. Of course, it will take a lot of text to that.
  
  --
  Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
Re:i tastes like shit to you? by 517714 · 2011-04-20 04:38 · Score: 1

I believe an anorexic chip fabricator would deliver the requested flavor combination.

--
The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
Re:Wax Seal by ThatMegathronDude · 2011-04-20 04:52 · Score: 1

Pretty Good Pun
cia and cookbook? think poughkeepsie: by circletimessquare · 2011-04-20 05:31 · Score: 1

http://www.ciachef.edu/admissions/newyork/

--
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
Shouldn't have declassified that by Arancaytar · 2011-04-20 05:51 · Score: 1

It works on RSA too.
jCola by spaceyhackerlady · 2011-04-20 06:10 · Score: 1

You don't make bombs with breast milk. Everybody knows it's the secret sweetener of jCola!
...laura
1. Re:jCola by RockDoctor · 2011-04-20 22:52 · Score: 1
  
  You don't make bombs with breast milk.
  ... you make ice cream.
  It must be true ; I saw it on Slashdot a couple of months ago.
  
  --
  Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
Re:Wax Seal by Captain+Splendid · 2011-04-20 07:07 · Score: 1

The pigeon was best man at his wedding, IIRC.

--
Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
Paging Michael Weston... by mariox19 · 2011-04-20 07:19 · Score: 2

Oh, come on! I'm a regular viewer of Burn Notice. What's the CIA going to tell me that I don't already know?

--
quiquid id est, timeo puellas et oscula dantes.
No, the real joke is by Chicken_Kickers · 2011-04-20 12:27 · Score: 1

No, the real joke is on you. Why? Because the CIA and all other government and private (RIAA) acronyms can do today in plain sight and most importantly, legally what they had to do behind your back 50 years ago.
The English are notorious wankers. by HornWumpus · 2011-04-20 12:56 · Score: 2

Give them credit for turning lemons into lemonade.
At least they weren't 'colonized by wankers'.

--
John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
1. Re:The English are notorious wankers. by Vorghagen · 2011-04-20 16:44 · Score: 1
  
  What about us Australians? Colonised by the people that weren't good enough for the 'Notorious wankers'
Make a better use of the search function by feranick · 2011-04-20 14:26 · Score: 1

http://www.foia.cia.gov/search.asp
I wonder? by slick7 · 2011-04-21 04:29 · Score: 1

Does it say anything about selling drugs to the Crips and Bloods to finance their black ops projects?

--
The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.