Slashdot Mirror


Rep. Bill Posey Introduces 'Back To the Moon' Bill

MarkWhittington writes "In an attempt to rationalize and give focus to NASA's human space flight program, Rep. Bill Posey, Republican of Florida, has introduced a bill that will direct the space agency to send astronauts back to the Moon with a goal of permanent habitation of Earth's nearest neighbor."

10 of 562 comments (clear)

  1. On Spending by Warbane · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While I'm firmly of the stance that we need to drastically reduce spending (almost) across the board, this is the type of project I wish money would go to if it's going to be spent.

    Trying to be ambiguous as to not divert the discussions focus, but spending on an endeavor that will ultimately benefit the entire nation as well as be a boon to science seems like a better use of funds than programs heavily favoring a specific subset of the nation. (Take that how you will, I have no particular program in mind.)

  2. Re:A better idea by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How about paying the government deficit that is about to default in a month so humans can habitat Earth first

    Because if man is to survive as a species, we must leave this planet. To leave this planet, we must advance the state of the art. To advance the state of the art, we must spend money on human space exploration/colonization.

    Deficits will never go away, and neither will the fact that the sun will eventually incinerate the earth.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  3. Re:Umm... by ildon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is local politics. Need to keep the money flowing into NASA to keep the constituency happy, regardless of your party affiliation. Plus NASA's budget vs. the entire budget is close to nothing. Just like that recent budget "cut" the republicans were bragging about was like less than 1% savings on the entire budget. I guess you could say the victory is that it didn't go up, but whatever. Still seems pretty crappy.

  4. Re:A better idea by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because if man is to survive as a species, we must leave this planet. To leave this planet, we must advance the state of the art. To advance the state of the art, we must spend money on human space exploration/colonization.

    Deficits will never go away, and neither will the fact that the sun will eventually incinerate the earth.

    If your worried about the sun going nova, then take a couple of deep breaths and relax. We've got time. Although I strongly support the space program, we would do better as a species if we realized that we're NOT getting off this rock anytime soon and we'd best spend some energy keeping what we've got habitable.

    Supporting the space program could be done without materially increasing the deficit (NASA takes up some tiny fraction of the US budget at present). But it really bugs me when congresscritters put up stupid bills like this one. You get all sorts of earmarks and pork embedded in it, you get NASA (or whatever organization) pulled in all sorts of usually contradictory ways. You get things changing from year to year. If someone came up with a bill that funded NASA with x% of the Federal Budget for 50 years, maybe I could go for that but the current bill is just grandstanding and appeasing his constituents.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  5. Re:A better idea by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You mean an event that will not happen for millions of years as in 2029 and 2036? Just because the likelihood is low doesn't mean it won't happen tomorrow. Frankly, humans themselves are a *lot* more likely to make Earth uninhabitable and a lot faster than a million years.

    --
    People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  6. Re:A better idea by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Earth is a lot tougher than we are, and will be here for a long long time, so "man is destroying Earth" isn't a reason.

    If you mean that the pile of crushed metal is still 'technically' a car sure we aren't destroying the earth. We are destroying the environment we absolutely need to survive. That's pretty much what people mean when "we're destroying the earth".

    --
    People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  7. You are an idiot by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Kennedy was more conservative then reagan, poppa bush, or W. Back then they could balance budgets. Now, we have uneducated masses voting in neo-cons who speak of balancing budgets, stopping illegals,and getting to the moon, but do the exact opposite. Sadly, these followers ignore results and simply listen to rhetoric. Neo-cons have fucked up education in America. Hell, reagan and W grew gov more than all other president EXCEPT for lincoln and FDR who were dealing with real issues.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  8. Or, as Rep. Bill Posey likes to think of it... by matunos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...the "Federal stimulus for Florida's 15th congressional district to get Bill Posey re-elected" bill.

  9. Re:Great! by BeanThere · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unlike the Democrats, right, who are totally busy solving that deficit problem? US seems to be screwed either which way.

  10. Re:A better idea by Surt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Recent evidence would seem to suggest that said greedy people do not wind up contributing in a meaningful way, but instead wind up finding every edge case they can to try to skim off the productivity of others.

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking