Bin Laden's Death Causes Twitter Record
gabbo529 writes "Twitter has been a source of breaking news since its inception five years ago, and the social network was used at a high rate last night with the death of Osama Bin Laden. [Sunday night] saw the highest sustained rate of Tweets ever. From 10:45 p.m. to 2:20 a.m. ET, there was an average of 3,000 Tweets per second."
Second plaice!
A joke only UK readers will get:
Who says you can't take a Bin out on a bank holiday.
Brum tish!
I was going to go for a joke about how dastardly Bin Laden must have been, to provoke a massive DoS attack against western communications infrastructure just by getting shot.
Then I realized that we were talking about Twitter.
Can you even measure that?
So the question I have now is, was Michael Jackson less significant or did the Jackson craze lead to more people knowing about Twitter and thus more people available to tweet about Bid Laden? The world may never know.
Well, Bin Laden had taken over Hitler's spot of "Evilest Guy Alive" for quite a few years. It's no wonder his death is much discussed.
As someone whose persona was so large, and whose death was always going to be controversial, I guess that means he joins Hitler, Elvis, and Michael Jackson on the island of dead people who are regularly sighted.
if you think the source is reliable and expert enough to really give you news. Given that there was an article on the front page about how people find the news they want, I don't know if Twitter gets around that same problem.
"To stop the terrorists."
It took the death of the most hated man alive to finally put an end to the supremacy of Justin Beiber tweets.
As of Monday CNN was reporting over 5000 tweets/sec at it's peak. Today is Tuesday. Why is information from Sunday being used? Why can't up to date articles be used around here?
There were an amazing amount of comments here in the first thread about Bin Laden's death... ~2000? What's the record at /.?
No, no sig. Really.
ThePromenader
Third bass!
According to CNET it was 4K/s and not even close to being the record
"Twitter traffic spiked to more than 4,000 tweets per second at the beginning and end of President Obama's speech tonight announcing the death of Osama Bin Laden,"
"it's well short of the 6,939 tweets per second ushering in the new year in Japan"
Osama Bin Laden may be dead, but without Ewoks & a John Williams music score to celebrate this mighty victory with, it feels kind of empty.
There was also a Canadian federal election yesterday, with many surprising results which were all reported in this exact time slot. I know that's not as exciting as a bunch of commandos shooting a guy, but if we're going to talk facts, let's get them straight.
So you don't know what the word "sustained" means. Congrats.
the last thing they wanted was him being taken alive and blabbing some real truths in front of people not cleared for the deep sh1t
Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
Does anyone really use Twitter? I hear a lot about it in the media, and attention whore celebrity types seem to love it, but no-one I know, and I know quite a few people, use it. Not one. Are there really that many users, or is is just a very loud minority?
Because the guy who files the TPS reports didn't use the new cover sheet.
I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?
.. for the same piece of news, feels like a measure of the redundancy of the network's data traffic.
Forth flounder!
Who cares.
Perfect fifth!
(get it - it's a musical term - because bass has a double meaning - ah, screw it, I'm trying way too hard.)
Counter-Terrorists Win!
How does it feel to be a liar with pants constantly on fire?
OBL's death generates 27 tangential Slashdot stories.
Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
Is that it? 3000 per second? And Twitter was/is having performance issues all the time. LOL
My services can do 20000 transactions per second, per server, per core. I guess I have gone a bit overboard when tweaking for performance if a "popular" site like Twitter has record numbers of only 3000 transactions per second.
Most web developers and web admins must be idiots.
My services can do 20000 transactions per second, per server, per core. - by Anonymous Coward
That's nothing - I can ignore all ten billion people in the world simultaneously in no time at all.
Go ahead, test me - there's a "Reply to This" button beneath my post.
Shouldn't they be called twits?
Sixth sturgeon!
Then it is a good thing that Twitter has 3,000 servers so they could each handle the 1 tweet/sec load!
I'm not saying that Ruby is slow, but ...
we are only talking about 140 characters and a single TCP packet is 1500 characters.
The article says 5000 per second by the time Obama finished his speech
And the death of bin Laden is no exception. Those 3000 tweets/second are not carrying "breaking news" of any kind; they are people making jokes, political talking-points or simply repeating rumours and hearsay. Even the article states that most of the tweets came after the news appeared on TV.
Fact is, the overwhelming majority of people on twitter have no first-hand experience of the event, and those that do have first-hand experience are not about to leak any details of it. All the good information is collected on websites like the BBC, not on Twitter, so if I want news, I'll stick with a proper news source.
"A week in the lab saves an hour in the library"
Millions of wanna-be reality stars tweeting every banality. Hell, even the so-called live-tweeting was just a resident complaining about chopper noise.
I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
Hihi, I'm Bin Laden. I was able getting a AOL internet connection. As expected, they work better here than on earth.
http://boards.4chan.org/b/res/326248972 Complete with music.....
To be more precise, they want to kill everyone who does not believe as fervently as they do in the same interpretation of their religion.
Citation needed.
OK, here it is.
Sometimes you need to read a bit more than the huffpost in order to broaden your point of view. That "western support for the dictators who run governments in the middle east" line is a bit tired, don't you think? Could you ([citation needed], of course) point out which "western" governments support the dictatorships of Syria, Iran, and Gaza?
It's truly ironic how someone can talk about "gross oversimplification" in the same sentence they talk about "western support" for dictatorships.
"Twitter has been a source of breaking news since its inception five years ago"
Don't say that word or I'll retweet the tweet my neighbor retweeted after his boss retweeted the tweet he retweeted...
They wouldn't have liked the idea of him being alive, because the chance of him saying something to raise any kind of doubts or portray himself as a non-monster would have presented itself.
America, FUCK YEAH!
Coming again, to save the mother fucking day yeah,
America, FUCK YEAH!
Freedom is the only way yeah,
Terrorist your game is through cause now you have to answer to,
America, FUCK YEAH!
So lick my butt, and suck on my balls,
America, FUCK YEAH!
What you going to do when we come for you now,
it's the dream that we all share; it's the hope for tomorrow
FUCK YEAH!
McDonalds, FUCK YEAH!
Wal-Mart, FUCK YEAH!
The Gap, FUCK YEAH!
Baseball, FUCK YEAH!
NFL, FUCK, YEAH!
Rock and roll, FUCK YEAH!
The Internet, FUCK YEAH!
Twitter, FUCK YEAH!
FUCK YEAH!
Starbucks, FUCK YEAH!
Disney world, FUCK YEAH!
Porno, FUCK YEAH!
Valium, FUCK YEAH!
Reeboks, FUCK YEAH!
Fake Tits, FUCK YEAH!
Sushi, FUCK YEAH!
Taco Bell, FUCK YEAH!
Rodeos, FUCK YEAH!
Bed bath and beyond (Fuck yeah, Fuck yeah)
Liberty, FUCK YEAH!
White Slips, FUCK YEAH!
The Alamo, FUCK YEAH!
Band-aids, FUCK YEAH!
Las Vegas, FUCK YEAH!
Christmas, FUCK YEAH!
Immigrants, FUCK YEAH!
Popeye, FUCK YEAH!
Democrats, FUCK YEAH!
Republicans (republicans)
(fuck yeah, fuck yeah)
Sportsmanship
Books
Q:You know what the first thing they found on Bin Laden's computer was?
A:His brains!
Please tip your waiters and try the fish.
Seventh your mom.
AMERICA! FUCK YEAH!
I saw this retracted on World News Now this morning. They mentioned another event getting around 5500 tweets/minute. I think it was the Japan quake.
I am a walrus!
When does the movie come out?
When I first heard about the death of Bin Laden, I thought of this quote from the darkknight:
The Joker: Don't talk like you're one of them! You're not... even if you'd like to be. To them you're just a freak, like me. They need you right now, but when they don't, they'll cast you out. Like a leper. See, their morals, their "code"... it's a bad joke, dropped at the first sign of trouble. They're only as good as the world allows them to be. I'll show you. When the chips are down, these uh, these "civilized people", they'll eat each other. See, I'm not a monster. I'm just ahead of the curve.
I see it relating to the way that the standard American moralistic mantra of "everyone deserves a fair trial" is thrown out the window when the choice has been made to rationalise a murder.
All the good information is collected on websites like the BBC, not on Twitter, so if I want news, I'll stick with a proper news source.
A lot of people would have first heard about it from twitter (or another social network), and then gone to a proper news source for conformation and actual details. I guess thats the point of this story (if there is a point to it, apart from how much the network can handle at once)
http://www.infowars.com/top-us-government-insider-bin-laden-died-in-2001-911-a-false-flag/
http://www.prisonplanet.com/inside-sources-bin-ladens-corpse-has-been-on-ice-for-nearly-a-decade.html
If you do a little research, it quickly becomes apparent that the US government has proclaimed Osama to be dead no less than 9 times. Witnesses are now appearing that indicate that Osama has been dead for almost 10 years. This announcement is just a stunt to get Obama's tanking popularity back up in preparation for 2012.
So 3,000 tweets per second, 215 minutes, that's 645,000 tweets total. So even if you didn't have tons of people tweeting over and over and over and over you would have had 0.1% of the world population (roughly) tweeting. And that is when the whole hive that is earth has been kicked and we're all buzzing about.
Is twitter really only topping out at 3000 updates per second? How on earth can they have such bad reliability and performance issues if they are only dealing with this tiny amount of info?
With the financial data I deal with there can be hundreds of thousands of updates per second.