Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Removes Yaoi Manga Titles From Kindle Store

Repossessed writes "Amazon is now cracking down on Yaoi manga, with several titles that have been available on the Kindle since 2009 being delisted and others now being rejected, according to Digital Manga Publisher. DMP has also stated that Amazon has not given any rationale for the rejections and removals, and Amazon has not been answering emails or phone calls from journalists asking about the subject."

23 of 450 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Couldn't you define it in the summary? by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 5, Funny

    And remove the joy of discovery when you google the term? Why for...

    --
    - These characters were randomly selected.
  2. Don't let One Distributor Control eBooks! by rolfwind · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This was always the paradox of ebooks. By every measure, ebooks should have the first thing that easily came to the computer. Files sizes were small and text was one of the first things reasonably conquered by computers. In the early days, sound cards were necessary to play music, video files were just goddamned intensive.... and yet as a medium, books came last after everything else.

    Now, we're stuck with Amazon/Apple being the central distributors, they're start going to decide more and more on content for whatever reason. At least music players, you can load it up as an mp3 file and there are several music stores online to choose from. Even Apple managed to talk RIAA out of DRM. But publishers are going to be signing their own death warrant, building up their masters for the immediate (and false) security of DRM.

    I love things in a digital format. But I really, really hate how the distribution model is playing out. This is the eBay model. One central place, it's convenient in some ways, but you play by their rules or you don't play at all, and if they decide to fuck you, they really fuck you.

    We need to get away from the eBay model from these greedy ass companies, or it's going to be a damned bleak and bland future. We need to move over to the google shopping model, decentralized and seperate stores/vendor offering their wares connected by an neutraol aggregator (which lets people review service) and a whitelist for the cautious type.

    I'm getting really sick of the direction these gadgets are heading.

    1. Re:Don't let One Distributor Control eBooks! by MimeticLie · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's really only an issue for the Kindle folks right now. Other readers (Nook, Kobo, ect) can use EPUB files, available from many different sources. If Amazon starts driving smaller stores out of business or the other stores start censoring as well, then it might be cause for concern. As it is, you can still find Yaoi from Barnes and Noble:

      http://search.barnesandnoble.com/King-of-Debt/Sanae-Rokuya/e/2940012508836/?itm=1&USRI=king+of+debt

    2. Re:Don't let One Distributor Control eBooks! by gmhowell · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What we see now is a less tech-savvy public that would rather pull all their media from central distributors anyway, because they are ignorant of the alternatives. This is why DRM is being thrust upon us without a mass uproar.

      Why do nerds always seem to not understand that people might not be ignorant: they might be apathetic. The theoretical losses due to DRM are outweighed by the perceived benefits. Here's a hint: indifference curve. Yours is not mine.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    3. Re:Don't let One Distributor Control eBooks! by RonTheHurler · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is clearly a form of censorship, but it's not an illegal one. Amazon has a right to choose what they carry in their stores, just as any other store does.

      There is a worse form of censorship happening in our schools that very few people seem to be aware of. I discovered this when my daughters collaborated to write a book. They are in first and third grade, and when the box of newly printed books arrived, they proudly tried to donate several copies to the school library. The school rejected them.

      It was not because of content. The librarian and some teachers all read the book and thought it was fine, and a great example of accomplishment for the other kids. It was not because of price -- we were donating the books. The problem is, the school district only allows books from a specific set of publishers, and since this book was self-published, it could not be allowed in the school. I inquired about the publishers, and there were only three on the list (Scholastic being one, and I'm sorry don't recall the other two.)

      Essentially, the schools don't have to censor anymore, they have outsourced that function to a few trusted publishers. In our case, this is a district-wide policy, other districts might be different.

      I have a busy life and didn't have the time to become an activist for open libraries in the schools (but I truly wish I could). Instead, I managed to get the kids' book on Amazon and B&N (although not in an e-book format -- It's a picture book that doesn't migrate well to those devices.)

      Regarding Kindles, distributors and censorship - the device is not totally dependent on the e-store. I have versions of my daughters' book on my own kindle and in Ibooks too. The formats for publishing on those devices is pretty well known (epub. mobi, pdf, etc.) Distribution is the problem, but only for the technically challenged who can't be bothered to manually transfer the title onto their device - even when it's as simple as sending an email (a service Amazon provides for their Kindles -- it's a slightly bigger challenge for iBooks, but only slightly. I don't have a Nook...)

      But I can't hack into my kids' library so easily -- other than to provide books at home for them too. Is there a better solution to this problem? Ultimately, I don't think so. Does anyone have a different opinion?

    4. Re:Don't let One Distributor Control eBooks! by Ephemeriis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's really only an issue for the Kindle folks right now. Other readers (Nook, Kobo, ect) can use EPUB files, available from many different sources. If Amazon starts driving smaller stores out of business or the other stores start censoring as well, then it might be cause for concern. As it is, you can still find Yaoi from Barnes and Noble:

      http://search.barnesandnoble.com/King-of-Debt/Sanae-Rokuya/e/2940012508836/?itm=1&USRI=king+of+debt

      This is why I purchased a nook, instead of a Kindle.

      Well, not this specifically... I'm not a big fan of yaoi...

      But, thus far, B&N has not been pulling the same kind of crap that Amazon has. They haven't been pulling questionable titles and deleting books off of ereaders. And even if they did, I can buy my books somewhere else as an EPUB or a PDF.

      Part of that I attribute to the fact that B&N is an actual bookstore, while Amazon is just a generic online retailer. You won't be buying a new computer from B&N. And, while they do stock music and movies... The selection of books absolutely dwarfs the selection of music and movies. Real bookstores are generally opposed to censorship. They're generally opposed to banning and burning books.

      Amazon, on the other hand, is the on-line equivalent of Wal-Mart.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
  3. Meanwhile still availible: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Meanwhile still availible:

    "Titles currently available on Kindle include Christmas Creampie, a graphic novel in which “horny Whoreville hussies show a frustrated dildo shop owner the true meaning of Christmas,” and Little Lorna in Resort Sports (I’m not even going to link to this one), in which Little Lorna, who is spunky, sexy, but “not too bright,” goes on vacation to Mexico with her Uncle Bob; “nudity, spanking, and sexy humor” result.
    So apparently a sweet love story between two men is unacceptable, but an orgy in a dildo shop is OK."

    http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/2011/05/too-hot-for-kindle-amazon-pulls-yaoi-from-kindle-store/

  4. Not that I'm interested in the following... okay? by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 5, Informative

    Bullshit, yaoi is just gay hentai, (where as yuri is lesbian hentai). Shotacon is, usually gay, hentai with little boys, (and lolicon is hentai with little girls, if you were just dying to know).

  5. dongs galore by eltardo · · Score: 5, Funny

    As long as I can still buy 12" double sided dildos on Amazon, I'm good.

    --
    plop
  6. Re:alternatives to Amazon by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Where do people go when they give up Amazon?

    Back to paper books? I can think of half a dozen independent book stores within walking distance of my home, and I am in a medium sized town.

    --
    Palm trees and 8
  7. Amazon was offended, end of story by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Amazon's content requirements are very clear. Even if the material is not pornographic, it can still offend-- and Amazon is not obligated to explain why it has chosen to take offense.

  8. Can this discussion actually be constructive? by Art+Popp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd be curious as to whether someone has a better model in mind on how this should be done.

    Given:

    The Amazon Kindle Terms and Conditions: “We are entitled to determine what content we accept and distribute through the Program in our sole discretion.”

    The anime.net definition of Yaoi:
              An acronym standing for YAma nashi, Ochi nashi, Imi nashi – No Climax, no point, no meaning. It’s used
              to describe manga/anime focusing on male relationships, not avoiding strong, graphically portrayed homosexual
              themes. Very often, yaoi story focuses only on the sex, ignoring elements like true plot, emotions or characters development.

    There really is zero doubt as to why Amazon didn't want this on the Kindle. I don't know why there are any “phone calls from journalists asking about the subject.” If you live in the US, clearly the Kindle's primary market, then you know that there are a large number of people here who would spontaneously combust if the they found their tweenager reading this stuff as a “Lend Me” book on their Kindle.

    Given that this content is available online (and in color) it would seem a difficult niche to make money on, which would be required to re-engineer your whole e-book system to have age-sections/age-bars. Simply rating 900,000 ebooks so you could decide their category would be a serious expense.

    So my questions are:

            Would such ratings be more valuable than they would be a tool for greater censorship?

            What scale would you use?

            Is this is project we should Open/Crowd-Source?

            Where would you rate: The Canterbury Tales, Sons and Lovers, 1984?

            The above are available on the Kindle store now. Would an rating system that we implemented make them available to more or fewer total humans?

    1. Re:Can this discussion actually be constructive? by Rakishi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not all subjects are fine at all ages. Reading some topics, or viewing some materials at too young an age really can harm a child psychologically, introduce them to concepts their mind isn't mature enough to handle yet and the results can be quite harmful.

      Which subjects? Please cite studies.

      Europe and many other countries around the world seem perfectly fine despite being very open about nudity. In fact, they'd probably claim the US is a degenerate bunch of Neanderthals for how much violence we allow our children to see.

      So which standard are you using? Is nudity okay for your children as many Europeans would claim or is violence okay as many Americans would claim? Which one is based on science and which one is based on arbitrary cultural views? Well?

      In reality, a rating system compresses a very complex multi-dimensional set of movie descriptors into a single axis. No matter how much you may delude yourself into thinking there is science behind how it's done, there isn't. It's an arbitrary choice based on culture. Not your culture, btw, but that of whomever makes the decision on the rating.

  9. Amazon Deleting 1984 Was a Warning... by Ron+Bennett · · Score: 5, Insightful

    After Amazon remotely deleted 1984 (ironic to say the least), this is no surprise. It would be akin to a book seller breaking into one's home to take back a book one had already bought; "licensed" is the loophole Amazon and other on-line book sellers uses to get around the 1st sale doctrine to restrict, or even often forbid, resale, sharing, etc.

    More to the point, the 1984 incident illustrated well that Kindles, much like many mobile devices, are designed with remote deletion in mind - there was an article on here the other day about Google remotely deleting apps.

    While Amazon supposedly agreed they will refrain from utilizing remote deletion in the future, the feature still exists. On a related note, even if the device out of the box doesn't support remote deletion, any device that accepts software updates with little (ie. Bluray players; inserting a disc) to no user intervention (mobile phones) can easily be programmed to remotely restrict / delete / self-destruct.

    Among the best defenses against remote deletion / restrictions are widely used, non-DRM formats that can be easily copied and widely distributed, as well as, easily compared / verified to ensure the contents haven't changed...

    To digress a tad, it's only a matter of time, assuming it's not already happened, before some company, such as Amazon, doesn't remotely delete a book, but rather silently modifies some of the content *after* purchase without telling the customer.

    Ron

    1. Re:Amazon Deleting 1984 Was a Warning... by DaScribbler · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You left out the point that when Amazon removed 1984 (and Animal Farm too) from Kindle devices, it was because it was discovered that the books were added to the Kindle store by a publisher that didn't have the rights to sell the books. And that the books were subsequently re-added to the Kindle store by the publisher that DID have the rights to them. The customers were refunded and credited for their troubles.

      The analogy that it's akin to breaking into one's home is a bit of a stretch.

    2. Re:Amazon Deleting 1984 Was a Warning... by Ephemeriis · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You left out the point that when Amazon removed 1984 (and Animal Farm too) from Kindle devices, it was because it was discovered that the books were added to the Kindle store by a publisher that didn't have the rights to sell the books. And that the books were subsequently re-added to the Kindle store by the publisher that DID have the rights to them. The customers were refunded and credited for their troubles.

      The analogy that it's akin to breaking into one's home is a bit of a stretch.

      Granted, the publisher did not have the rights to those books. That is true.

      But it wasn't really those books being pulled from the store that surprised me. What surprised me was those books being deleted from Kindles.

      If I go buy a paper copy of 1984 and it turns out that the publisher doesn't have the right to it, that book will be pulled from store shelves, but I'll still have my book sitting at home.

      Amazon did the digital equivalent of sending someone to your house to forcibly collect the offending book. Sure, you were refunded... But that doesn't make me feel much better.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
  10. Re:Couldn't you define it in the summary? by Kenja · · Score: 4, Funny

    Has to be linked at some point I guess.

    http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2005/4/11/

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  11. Re:alternatives to Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Then your medium-sized town is an exception.

  12. Re:alternatives to Amazon by SuricouRaven · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Can't say I'll miss porn written for schoolgirls,"

    Maybe they'll ban Twilight next.

  13. 118 comments, and not said yet, so: by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If a fictional book is created, sold and read, illustrated or not, about a bank heist, no one is stealing; nothing has been stolen; it is fiction. A work of imagination. For entertainment purposes.

    The same applies to interactions such as those found in Lolita, Yaoi titles, the Story of O, Exit to Eden, Belinda, and so on for quite a long list written over an impressive span of time (erotica is hardly unique to the 20th and 21st centuries.)

    That said, there is no question that as a venue for selling products, the seller has the right to choose what products they will sell; all that remains is for the customers to decide if those choices make them more or less likely to shop there.

    Finally, an interesting reality of our society is summed up by the phrase "the squeaky wheel gets the grease." If you wish to apply legitimate pressure encouraging Amazon to carry all titles without making content-based cullings, simply contact them, tell them so, and indicate that your future purchasing plans will vary depending on Amazon's behavior here. And then follow through.

    I would suggest that this is worth doing; today, it's something you probably don't care if you ever see. Tomorrow, it may be something you do care about. Ideally, a venue for buying e-books would, as Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos has claimed is their goal, carry every book, no matter what content.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  14. Re:alternatives to Amazon by tverbeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Can't say I'll miss porn written for schoolgirls..."

    But that's just where it starts.* I don't want to misapply Martin Niemöller's "first they came for the Jews...." quote here, because he was talking about something even worse than censorship, but the principle is the same. If you wait until they get around to affecting you directly, that's way too late. Regardless of what one thinks of these graphic novels (which are the male/male equivalent of disposable paperback romance novels), it should be alarming that the world's largest book seller is removing them from the world's largest e-bookstore. If you have any "guilty pleasures" at all in your entertainment choices (gross-out movies, violent action films, slasher videos, "edgy" comedians, any variety of porn), keep in mind that there are people who want to suppress those too. So it should be important to you – personally – to stop them long before they get there.

    *Actually it started (as far as I've heard) with erotic novels that contained the word "rape" in the title. Amazon's been quietly disappearing books from the Kindle store for a while now.

    "Where do people go when they give up Amazon?"

    Barnes and Noble would be the closest equivalent, both in terms of online dead-tree retailing and a good ebook/reader system. I haven't heard of them pulling books from that system based on someone disapproving of the content. At least not yet.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  15. Re:alternatives to Amazon by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

    Was that necessary? Now I'm torn between hope and my firm belief in free speech.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  16. Re:alternatives to Amazon by Ephemeriis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Where do people go when they give up Amazon?

    Back to paper books? I can think of half a dozen independent book stores within walking distance of my home, and I am in a medium sized town.

    You've either got a different definition of "medium sized town" than I do... Or you've very lucky.

    I also live in what I'd call a "medium sized town"... Biggish for a town, but absolutely nothing you could call a city. We have a Borders, and a used bookstore downtown.

    Borders is becoming less and less of a book store every day. They've got more movies and music and calendars and coffee in there than books already. And the books they do have are a lousy selection. I don't remember the last time I went in there looking for a book that wasn't on a current best seller list and actually found it.

    Yes, if the stars align just right, you can find some awesome stuff at the used bookstore... But more often than not they've just got used copies of the same stuff that Borders is carrying. Cheaper, sure, but I don't want to read it anyway.

    There's a library of course... And they're terrific for some of the older/classic stuff... And reference materials... But they don't generally have newer stuff available. Either they don't have a copy, or the one copy is perpetually loaned out to someone.

    All of which means that I do most of my book shopping on-line.

    I bought a nook largely because I am impatient. I can buy a book on-line and have it download to my nook within a minute or two. And I can even make purchases through the nook itself, so I don't need to be sitting in front of a computer. Makes it much easier to get my hands on decent reading material. Almost makes it seem like I'm not living in the ass-end of nowhere.

    Now, I went with a nook at least in part because of the crap that Amazon has been doing with their Kindle. So I am unaffected by Amazon's decisions right now. But there are a lot of folks out there with Kindles who are affected by these decisions. Who were using Amazon and the Kindle to gain access to reading material that just isn't available in their local area. Especially if we're talking about erotica and/or pornography. It's virtually impossible to find a good selection of erotica/pornography outside of a large city.

    Alright... So you're going to go back to paper books purchased from any one of a half-dozen independant book stores within walking distance of your home in a medium sized town...

    So, where do the rest of us go?

    --
    "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde