Slashdot Mirror


What's Killing Your Wi-Fi?

Barence writes "PC Pro has taken an in-depth look at Wi-Fi and the factors that can cause connections to crumble. It dispels some common myths about Wi-Fi problems — such as that neighboring Wi-Fi hotspots are the most common cause of problems, instead of other RF interference from devices such as analogue video senders, microwave ovens and even fish tanks. The feature also highlights free and paid-for tools that can diagnose Wi-Fi issues, such as inSSIDer and Heatmapper, the latter of which maps provides a heatmap of Wi-Fi hotspots in your home or office."

248 comments

  1. Badgers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Badgers

    1. Re:Badgers by bennomatic · · Score: 2

      It's true. And what's more, honey badger don't give a sh*t!

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    2. Re:Badgers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, already played out

    3. Re:Badgers by refactored · · Score: 0
      Damn, why don't I have mod points to mod you up!

      BADGER BADGER BADGER! mushrooom!

    4. Re:Badgers by BatGnat · · Score: 1

      SNAKE!!!

    5. Re:Badgers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We doan nee no stinkin' badgers!

    6. Re:Badgers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I need... gopher chucks.

  2. Horrible link... by Azmodan · · Score: 4, Informative

    Billions of ads + need to check 15 pages to RTFA... and the article is actually a little shallow...

    1. Re:Horrible link... by Threni · · Score: 2

      Pc pro is a shit mag; what would you expect? I grew up on mags like pcw - they had assembly columns and maths sections etc. Now it's all recycled press releases and mp3 player reviews. No wonder they're dying.

    2. Re:Horrible link... by easyTree · · Score: 1

      It took me a while to realise that PCW had died :-(

    3. Re:Horrible link... by Jezza · · Score: 1

      But worse, the "web IT press" is actually worse... I miss PCW and Byte. Mind you, I miss the Amiga as well.

      Anyway - I'm a "desktop" person, so I tend to just use an ethernet cable... I know, but I'm not carrying these monitors into the lounge, so why does it matter?

    4. Re:Horrible link... by easyTree · · Score: 1

      If the magazine's title described the level of article, the magazine would be entitled 'PCN00b'. Presumably, they believe that their reader aspires to be a PC-Pro and should be gradually helped out of the primordial swamp of n00bdom.

      Disclaimer: I say this as a long-time reader of the print version of PCN00b :-(

    5. Re:Horrible link... by Stumbles · · Score: 1

      Worse than shallow; it was a scam article just to push a couple of apps.

      --
      My karma is not a Chameleon.
    6. Re:Horrible link... by AVryhof · · Score: 1

      I second the vote for old PCW and Byte. I miss the codes you could type into debug on DOS, and things like Byte's CD full of compilers.... the stuff that inspired you to try some new programming language because you want to do something neat. Some of these old mags also developed some cool tools like notepad alternatives, disk format utilities, and things you might not always care about, but are useful.

    7. Re:Horrible link... by Idbar · · Score: 1

      On the bright side, you now know what's killing your network... if you're on a wireless, that solves the mistery :)

    8. Re:Horrible link... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's really killing WiFi is usually bugs in the drivers on either end. In general no device follows the specs and there are always strange bugs. And they get away with it because they claim "interference".

    9. Re:Horrible link... by VoltageX · · Score: 1
      --
      "Anonymous could not immediately be reached for further comment." - International Business Times
    10. Re:Horrible link... by Meski · · Score: 1

      Even when Byte was more ads than articles, dammit, they were interesting ads.

    11. Re:Horrible link... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No Ads straight to the article one click what you running windBlows or apple slapintosh one of them

  3. Analog Video Senders make great jammers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Three on sale for 15 dollars each, 1 for each section of the spectrum. (essentially channels 1-5, 5-9,9-X.) When I setup my in home surveillance system everyone in about a 200 foot radius was jammed on 2.4ghz. It took a while to figure out, but even a sniffer was pretty much useless, kismet was getting next to nothing.

    1. Re:Analog Video Senders make great jammers by semi-extrinsic · · Score: 1

      I've had pretty much the same experience with cheap analog A/V senders. It was kinda cool turning it on and off - "now you have internets - now you don't."

      Microwaves, on the other hand, I've never had any trouble with. I can stand next to it cooking something and troll facebook at the same time.

      --
      for i in `facebook friends "=bday" 2>/dev/null | cut -d " " -f 3-`; do facebook wallpost $i "Happy birthday!"; done
    2. Re:Analog Video Senders make great jammers by icebike · · Score: 2

      What is the actual use of Analog Video Senders anyway?
      Is this what is being advertised for start watching in one room and finish in another from various cable providers?

      I note that back in 2009 when a dimilar story was posted it was baby monitors that were taking the blame, even tho video senders were mentioned back then as well.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    3. Re:Analog Video Senders make great jammers by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm not sure about how it works in the standard US setup, but here in the UK if you want more than basic OTA broadcast reception you'll have a set-top-box - either cable decoder, or sat decoder. That's fine for watching in one room, but how do you watch those channels in another? One way is to rent a second STB, which means lots of money plus pulling new cable through the walls. The other is a TV sender. Takes the STB output, transmits it, reciever in another room gets them and outputs to TV. Only drawback is you can't change the channel remotely, and some will even do that by transmitting the IR signal the other way over radio.

      They used to work by just transmitting an analog TV signal that any TV in range could pick up with a loop antenna, but those were banned years ago due to interference issues (And, according to rumor, a few incidents of pornography ending up on the neighbour's TV). The new ones operate up in 2.4GHz band, killing wireless networks.

    4. Re:Analog Video Senders make great jammers by semi-extrinsic · · Score: 2

      Well, I used mine to connect the computer at one end of the (large) living room to the TV at the other end. The device I'm talking about does nothing more advanced than transmit a composite video signal from one point to another, wirelessly.

      --
      for i in `facebook friends "=bday" 2>/dev/null | cut -d " " -f 3-`; do facebook wallpost $i "Happy birthday!"; done
    5. Re:Analog Video Senders make great jammers by rrossman2 · · Score: 1

      I have.. I can't watch Hulu or anything in the kitchen while I'm waiting for something to microwave. The signal just craps out (stays connected, but there's just too much noise over the signal). That's even with the router less than 25' away down stairs, though the microwave would be about 10' away.

    6. Re:Analog Video Senders make great jammers by Bert64 · · Score: 2

      Your microwave should not leak any signals/radiation... The inside of a microwave is basically a faraday cage (look at the metal mesh which runs through the glass on a typical microwave door).
      If it does leak radiation, then its faulty and you really should get it repaired or replaced ASAP as it can be quite dangerous (wifi cards are typically under 1 watt of power, a microwave could be up to 1300 watts and the full force of one will cook you quite quickly).

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    7. Re:Analog Video Senders make great jammers by Bert64 · · Score: 2

      Get an STB which supports streaming over IP such as a dreambox or a custom built linux box...
      Then you have a choice, ethernet, powerline adapters, wifi (still using 2.4ghz but in a cleaner way) etc. You can change the channel remotely on them too.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    8. Re:Analog Video Senders make great jammers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you really want to have fun, get your ham radio license -- hams can run up to 1.5 Kilowatts on the lower part of the 2.4 GHz band!

    9. Re:Analog Video Senders make great jammers by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      Sadly there are plenty of crummy microwaves that will cause trouble with your wifi, at least if your access point is near the microwave. I saw this pretty frequently while working tech support a bunch of years back (right around the time when everyone wanted wireless even if their computer was next to their NAT router).

      Now, I didn't ever see it be the only source of signal loss but for those who already had a fairly weak signal placing the AP near the microwave did occasionally result in their connection dropping every time they used the microwave.

      So I suspect it's more a matter of crappier microwaves interfering just a little, but just a little is enough when you already have a bad signal (and what really bothered me was how few users were able to figure out the correlation between "turn microwave on" and "wifi stops working").

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    10. Re:Analog Video Senders make great jammers by adolf · · Score: 1

      What is the actual use of Analog Video Senders anyway?

      They're used a lot for half-assed CCTV systems, with applications ranging from video baby monitors, to security video, to hidden pedobear spy cams. The cheap ones are generally pretty ugly unless the planets align just-so, and tend to shit all over whatever band they're using.

      There are a few companies that produce more professional versions of such devices, which include very directional, polarized antennas. These play a little nicer with the RF spectrum, but are still bandwidth hogs. They only reason they play nice at all is to avoid interference with other devices of the same type -- not to be nice to Wi-Fi signals. (I've got a few such devices in a parking lot affixed to light poles in a light industrial area, and in this fixed installation they work great. But if that customer wanted WiFi and analog security cameras, there'd be some potential issues...)

      Is this what is being advertised for start watching in one room and finish in another from various cable providers?

      No. Such installations as that use either Ethernet (802.3 or 802.11), or HPNA (over existing coax or telephone wires), or something proprietary (DirecTV's SWIM system). They're not analog at all (in any conventional sense), and are almost always wired. Installers tend to avoid using wireless for these applications whenever possible (it's expensive, and it's error-prone, resulting in service calls, which make it more expensive yet...).

    11. Re:Analog Video Senders make great jammers by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      A faraday cage attenuates RF. It doesn't eliminate it completely. You'd need perfect conductors for that.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    12. Re:Analog Video Senders make great jammers by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Your microwave should not leak any signals/radiation...

      This is not at all true. There shouldn't be substantial RF leakage, but it would be an impressive accomplishment to not leak ANY RF energy, especially given the high power involved. Even tempest-hardened environments leak plenty. There as here, the main culprit tends to be the power lines... They make good antennas, carrying RF signals from inside the metal box, to the outside world.

      And as for danger, sure, it could be dangerous, but we're talking about "touching an electric hot plate" kind of danger, here, and that only in an extreme case, and only if you're very close by... nothing too exotic.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    13. Re:Analog Video Senders make great jammers by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Why don't you just buy another STB for the other room? Since you're likely to be plugging it into a relatively small TV then cheap crappy SD STB will work just fine. You can pick up an el-cheapo DVB-S STB for about (can't type a pound sign, since slashcode has a horrible regression)10 these days.

      ATTENTION SLASHDOT JANITORS: YOUR SITE HAS A REGRESSION. I filed a bug months ago. Fix non-ASCII characters, or at least put them back the way they were.

    14. Re:Analog Video Senders make great jammers by compro01 · · Score: 1

      That only works if you don't need magical decryption (e.g. digicipher 2, like my satellite provider uses) crap in the STB.

      also, try £ to get a £

      same works for euro and yen signs.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    15. Re:Analog Video Senders make great jammers by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      a microwave could be up to 1300 watts and the full force of one will cook you quite quickly).

      Oh come on. Even in open air, with no shielding, the power density of a 1.3kW magnetron falls below that of normal sunlight at somewhere under two feet.

    16. Re:Analog Video Senders make great jammers by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      My parent's microwave interferes with their video sender but not their wireless, though the video sender *does* interfere with the wireless network (no matter what channel the AP is using), pushing it down from 5Mbit+ in the chair nearest to the sender to ~1Mbit.

      I suspect that most people who have trouble with microwaves are people who have very bad reception anyway - their laptop or other machine being in a position (either due to distance, materials between them and the router, other sources of interference, bad kit, or some combination of the above) where the wireless connection barely works. That last tiny bit of interference lifts the noise level above the useful signal level, but until that point the users don't notice the bad signal reception as they are only checking email and facebook (or performing other tasks that generally work fine despite low bandwidth and high latency) or are blaming slow responses on the sites or the ISP rather than the local network leg.

    17. Re:Analog Video Senders make great jammers by tgibbs · · Score: 2

      The shielding of a microwave is designed to prevent it from cooking you, not to block the tiny bit of leakage that interferes with wifi

    18. Re:Analog Video Senders make great jammers by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      I had the same problem with a customer that turned out had one of those 'wireless security camera' setups set up in his workroom so he could watch his property. I checked for a microwave oven, cell phone interference, finally I walked around the property looking for anything that could cause trouble and spotted the cam. Sure enough I had him turn it off and bingo! WinXP detected and hooked up to his wireless network. Now once it hooks up it works fine, but if the camera is running on first setup you're boned.

      Personally I'll be glad when they start selling those whitespace devices. For really short runs like giving a home Internet access there shouldn't be any reason why they can't just use the whitespace, especially if the device is low power. As it is there is simply too much crap running at the 2.4GHz frequency, hell just sitting in my apt I probably have a dozen routers I can hook up to and I am living in a small town. I can't even imagine what a nightmare keeping devices working in say an apt in DC or LA must be like. The interference must be insane!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    19. Re:Analog Video Senders make great jammers by lazybeam · · Score: 1

      Buy a new microwave oven: sounds like it is leaking badly!

      --
      --
      no sig for you. come back one year.
    20. Re:Analog Video Senders make great jammers by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Because you don't *buy* them. You *rent* them. Those boxes are propritary. The only box that'll work on a cable network is the one by the cable company, which is available only for rent, not sale. Things are a little better with sat - the non-branded box will get you the unencrypted channels only, which really means the shopping channel and not much else. If you want channels you can actually watch and that arn't on freeview anyway, you still need to rent the box.

    21. Re:Analog Video Senders make great jammers by Surt · · Score: 1

      It certainly isn't likely to cook you any faster than the food inside. You wouldn't, for example, fall over dead from cooking on your way to turn it off.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    22. Re:Analog Video Senders make great jammers by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      What annoys me is why these devices don't just use the network that is available. I spent a lot of time looking for a baby monitor (something without a camera) that could just send over my existing wireless network but came up empty.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    23. Re:Analog Video Senders make great jammers by Brewmeister_Z · · Score: 2

      It really depends on the age and quality of the microwave oven. I have a client that has a really old beast of a microwave that is pre-1980's old. I have a tool on my laptop to analyze the 2.4Ghz band and I could see that some channels would be obliterated with noise when the microwave was on. This just meant assigning the access points to channels least effected by the noise. In newer and/or higher grade routers, the auto-select feature should pick out a good channel so this would be a non-issue anyway.

      --
      I Cater to the Needs of Stupid People. - from a coffee mug Christmas gift
    24. Re:Analog Video Senders make great jammers by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      The way my house is set up, the kitchen is between the router and the conservatory. There's a bit of a distance issue, but the router is quite usable when the microwave is turned off... but because the kitchen has a hanging ceiling, and the microwave is a little on the old side, the wireless becomes completely unusable in the conservatory and dining room when the microwave is on.

      The solution was to use powerline networking to extend a wired connection to the other side of the kitchen, and set up a second wireless access point there, which worked out well, because it also meant I could move the main router to a position that better covered the bedroom end of the house.

      Ahh, the joys of living in a 2800sqft bungalow....

    25. Re:Analog Video Senders make great jammers by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      The routers with auto-select on the channel select based on the interference where the router itself is, not based on the interference between your router and where you want to use wifi. I find it often chooses really bad channels for full coverage, and prefer to set it manually after walking around with a wifi analyser (which is a free app on any android phone). It won't protect against RF interference from microwaves, senders, or anything like that, but at least it'll help pick a channel that doesn't have other networks to fight with.

    26. Re:Analog Video Senders make great jammers by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Yes and no. If you cancel your contract within the first year (X years?) then they'll want the box back. However when I cancelled my contract with Sky after about 7 years I was left with the box to do with as I pleased. (Which in this case was dispose of the useless, failing piece of crap)

      However you are correct in that getting another box to watch in another room means paying an additional monthly fee; as far as I know there's no option to just buy the box outright and pay no extra for the service. That is simply out and out greed, and is why I will never do it.

    27. Re:Analog Video Senders make great jammers by Brewmeister_Z · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info. That just reinforces the need to do a survey with a wifi analyzer. I have an Android phone now after the Alltel to AT&T switch (so far, it is not too bad of a service for me but others in the area have dumped their service for Verizon which is the only other choice). I will have to get that app so I don't have to lug the laptop around as much for that purpose.

      --
      I Cater to the Needs of Stupid People. - from a coffee mug Christmas gift
    28. Re:Analog Video Senders make great jammers by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      You buy your satellite STB. I don't know why anyone would put up with overpriced cable crap.

      The FTA satellites have got all the same channels as FTA terrestrial, except you stand a chance of receiving it more than 50 miles from a city. For a lot of people in remote areas it's the only way of getting off-air TV.

    29. Re:Analog Video Senders make great jammers by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Probably because if the box is seven years old, it's already obsolete and they are distributing the successor model now.

  4. microwave by __aazsst3756 · · Score: 1

    microwave knocks ours out. Router 200-300 feet away, and microwave much closer to the computer endpoint.

    1. Re:microwave by elsurexiste · · Score: 1

      Weird, mine doesn't. Are you sure it's safe?

      --
      I rarely respond to comments. Also, don't ask for clarifications: a brain and Google are faster, believe me!
    2. Re:microwave by Duradin · · Score: 1

      Watch a spectrum analyzer when there's a microwave running. Entire channels just annihilated by the noise from it.

      Crappy portable phones are fun to watch too. Not the full scale nuclear armageddon of the microwave but I'd say noisy enough to be tac-nukes.

    3. Re:microwave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      ditto. take a fluorescent bulb to microwave and shut off light sources. If the bulb starts to glow replace the microwave.

    4. Re:microwave by icebike · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'd have that microwave looked at, because I have no problem streaming video right next to my microwave to a wifi tablet.
      Maybe you have a leak? Any appliance store has detectors, most will rent them to you.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    5. Re:microwave by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Do you mean your microwave oven? Contact the manufacturer and make them send someone out to run a microwave leakage test. The service center is required to have a properly calibrated one. The test may not be free but they should not charge more than a service call but see if the manufacturer will cover this test.

      Switching power supplies used in these microwaves can cause trouble regardless of the FCC warning on them. You can get noise from the supply and noise on the power line even though it's not otherwise failing.

      An older version of Tripp Lite's surge suppressor could filter this crap off the power line. It sold for around $70 in the '90s. Without the testing I could do back then I won't recommend them now.

      From Crisco
      http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/wireless/ps9391/ps9393/ps9394/prod_white_paper0900aecd807395a9_ns736_Networking_Solutions_White_Paper.html
      "Jupiter Research reports 67 percent of all residential Wi-Fi problems are linked to interfering devices, such as cordless phones, baby monitors, and microwave ovens."

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    6. Re:microwave by rrossman2 · · Score: 1

      I don't have to worry about the baby monitor part.. ours are in the 434MHz range, and I know that because I can hear the remote start signal every time I remote start or lock/unlock the doors lol

    7. Re:microwave by Shikaku · · Score: 2

      Mod parent up interesting. I knew that light bulbs light up in the microwave, but I never put it together so you could test leaking microwaves with it.

      Also if the microwave is leaking hard, the light bulb may explode (as if you put it in the microwave), but this takes a lot of energy or time, so turn it off immediately when a positive leak test result is found.

    8. Re:microwave by Jezza · · Score: 2

      Ahh, but what frequency is your Wi-Fi? (Is it 802.11A, 802.11G or 802.11N?) Makes a HUGE difference.

    9. Re:microwave by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Have you ever taken a flourescent tube and held it under high power transmission lines? Something like this.

          Depending on the current load and the height of the lines, you can get it to light up pretty close to the ground. I've done it while standing on the ground (tube at 3 to 5 feet AGL). Sometimes it required standing on the car and holding it straight up (tube at about 8 to 10 feet AGL). You'd be surprised to find out what's there, that you can't see.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    10. Re:microwave by semi-extrinsic · · Score: 1

      Yes. This is part of the goodness of the new N standard - it works on both 2.4 GHz (like normal WiFi) and at 5 GHz. If your microwave is anywhere near 5 GHz, I'd make a run for it.

      --
      for i in `facebook friends "=bday" 2>/dev/null | cut -d " " -f 3-`; do facebook wallpost $i "Happy birthday!"; done
    11. Re:microwave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine doesn't. I live in a very small apartment, I'm usually 25~30 ft away from the oven when my girlfriend turn it on to make some popcorn, never noticed anything.
      Even if I place my notebook right beside the microwave oven, whatever inferference it's emitting isn't enogh to make a noticeable difference. Actually tried this downloading something from the internet on 10Mbps cable through WiFi, not a single hiccup. Haven't actually tried to move files to another computer on the same WLAN though.

    12. Re:microwave by adolf · · Score: 2

      Have you ever taken a flourescent tube and held it under high power transmission lines? Something like this.

      You mean something like this?

      I have a friend who works at a large bakery. They use big microwave ovens to make cookies. One of his favorite tricks, before all glass was banned from the floor, was carry a fluorescent tube around near the ovens to scare the new guy. I guess they light up pretty brilliantly. :)

    13. Re:microwave by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      Several years ago, I had two pairs of cordless phones (house line and business line), and my wireless network. The house itself was very quiet as far as RF went. We were fairly isolated, with only one house adjoining us, and they didn't have anything wireless.

            The house line and cordless line ran perfectly happily together at 2.4Ghz. Then I bought the new phones for the business line. It too was 2.4Ghz. As soon as I plugged it in, it killed the network and house phone. It was like a big kill light switch, and it didn't matter what channel I switched the wifi to. I had to return it to the store, and picked up a 5.8Ghz phone instead.

          All of the equipment were good brand name items. They were all digital, frequenting hopping, so there should have been no interference. Some just don't play well with others.

          I've helped people identify wifi problems. I have seen some troublesome microwave ovens. I've seen a lot more problems where an appliance is in the "line of sight" (through the wall) between the AP and the client. It's usually the refrigerator. They're amazed when I can move the AP a little to the side, or raise it up, to reduce their interference. I try to explain, when you have the AP, shoved behind the computer, with their UPS on one side, and a steel file cabinet on the other side, you've blocked the signal. Once I've moved it, they complain that the AP is ugly and they don't want it on their desk or on top of the file cabinet. {sigh}

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    14. Re:microwave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i work with microwave ion sources for ion beam experiments, and whenever we turn ours on, the wireless in the whole shop goes out. we have leaks, but they are undetectable unless you get the sniffer right up next to them. even then, theyre not anything that would damage a person. we use the b/g spectrum, and a 2.4 ghz microwave generator. apparently ultra small amounts of leaked microwaves will screw with a wireless network.

    15. Re:microwave by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Nice pictures. :) Obviously the lines are too low, or under a heavy load.

          For reference, in case anyone wonders, it's not necessary to put them to ground (neither electrically and physically). When I did it, I held it in my hand, holding it by the glass part of the tube. The only reason for doing that was that the metal part isn't really all that big. :) Standing on the car, I was insulated from the ground by the tires, but since the metal ends weren't touching anything at all, it didn't matter.

          That must have really taken some dedication to get them all arranged like that. I followed the link to the creators site, and he has more pictures. You can see that the tubes are all perfectly vertical, and perfectly spaced. He used 1,301 tubes in 3,600 square meters (38,750 square feet or 0.89 acres)

         

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    16. Re:microwave by russotto · · Score: 1

      Watch a spectrum analyzer when there's a microwave running. Entire channels just annihilated by the noise from it.

      What I've seen is a high but narrow spike wandering back and forth across the spectrum. That's with a conventional magnetron. It probably just overwhelms the front end of the receiver rendering all the fancy spread-spectrum stuff moot.

      I'd expect an "inverter" microwave to be more like you've described, but I've never seen one.

    17. Re:microwave by smash · · Score: 1

      unfortunately, 5ghz doesn't go through walls or floors very well.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    18. Re:microwave by EricX2 · · Score: 1

      We bought a new panasonic microwave that would kill my wi-fi when it was running. The magnetron was faulty, so I returned it.

      After that I decided to never buy appliances from newegg. Not their fault, but 20 dollars shipping to get it, then 40 to send it back... paying sales tax would have been cheaper by far.

    19. Re:microwave by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      you probably were not insulated from the ground by the tyres as most tyres these days conduct electricity

      google it for more

    20. Re:microwave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those aren't frequencies, they are technologies...

    21. Re:microwave by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Ya, I know. I was reading a study on increased lightning strikes on motor vehicles due to it. They're using more carbon in performance tires, to assist with traction.

          But.. This wasn't recent, it was about 20 years ago, and still, I wasn't touching the metal surface of the bulb, and I was wearing sneakers (pretty much all I wore back then), so I was insulated from the car by my shoes. The contacts on the bulb were isolated from me by an air gap.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    22. Re:microwave by swalve · · Score: 1

      I've got a light timer that will kill gigabit ethernet. When that fucker is plugged in, random connection drops. Not plugged in, perfectly fine.

  5. Linux by MPAB · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    In every PC I've had with WiFi, getting it to work under linux has been a complete disaster. Broadcom and Realtek alike.
    Nowadays it's not anymore a work-not work issue, but a work-at-full-speed-and-suddenly-drop-to-a-few-bps-range issue. I've given up.

    1. Re:Linux by semi-extrinsic · · Score: 1

      1.) You must have had some bad luck there, which sucks for you, but Linux actually has pretty good WiFi chipset support.

      2.) Have you tried using the manufacturer supplied drivers (which you may have to compile yourself), instead of the open source ones? I have seen this fix things on some Broadcom models. Also note, if you have installed these, I have experienced Ubuntu writing over these with the old drivers when it "updates". You can probably blacklist this.

      --
      for i in `facebook friends "=bday" 2>/dev/null | cut -d " " -f 3-`; do facebook wallpost $i "Happy birthday!"; done
    2. Re:Linux by itamihn · · Score: 2

      Have you tried using NDISwrapper? I haven't tried it myself, but if you are able to use the same driver as in Windows, everything *should* work the same way.

    3. Re:Linux by icebike · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nothing in this story talks about Linux.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    4. Re:Linux by WillKemp · · Score: 1

      Have you tried using NDISwrapper? I haven't tried it myself, but if you are able to use the same driver as in Windows, everything *should* work the same way.

      It does work the same way - badly!

    5. Re:Linux by Ogi_UnixNut · · Score: 1

      Which is why I only use Atheros chipsets. Rock solid Linux support since the 2000's using madwifi drivers. Such a same that Broadcom is cheaper, so most integrated chipsets/cheap hardware use it. Intel's wireless is ok on Linux. Not as good as Atheros (prone to firmware resets on my Thinkpad, but with no noticable loss of connection, as it resets immediately) but perfectly usable.

      This doesn't help you now, but for future reference (and for other readers), stay the hell away from Broadcom for Linux. Useless wireless drivers (their hardware is kinda useless as well, especially their gigabit ethernet hardware).

    6. Re:Linux by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      You've had unlucky experiences, or your trolling...

      On all of the machines i've tried in the last couple of years (atheros, broadcom, realtek and ralink chipsets), wireless has worked out of the box under Ubuntu (and in some cases i have used gentoo successfully with wifi), whereas Windows hasn't always supported the wireless card out of the box (which makes downloading the drivers a pain), and other weird problems like the drivers supporting wep but not wpa (i thought it was up to the os rather than the drivers to dictate encryption support).

      The performance has generally been better on the linux drivers too, not to mention that most linux drivers support rfmon mode while i'm not aware of any windows drivers that do.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    7. Re:Linux by green1 · · Score: 1

      I find that wireless works fine out of the box on kubuntu. as long as you aren't trying to connect to a hidden network with a space in it's name... I have yet to find any way to do that under kubuntu except manually on the command line, and even that's hit and miss. This goes for the past 3 major releases.

    8. Re:Linux by smash · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but non-working wifi and Linux have gone hand in hand for a long time. Its a lot better now, but...

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    9. Re:Linux by icebike · · Score: 2

      Oh, I don't know, I've never had a wifi based machine that would not work under linux.
      Occasionally I've had to load ndiswrapper, but in the end every one of them worked.

      Lately most distros figure this out by themselves, and load what ever is necessary, fetch the firmware and do the whole
      nine yards.
      Still, windows-centric drivers are manufacturer problem, not just a linux problem, and one that even they are starting to realize
      is not going to cut it going forward.

      On the other hand, I've actually been forced to swap out mini-pci cards in windows machines to
      get to one that would handle WPA2.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    10. Re:Linux by atomicbutterfly · · Score: 2

      Oh, I don't know, I've never had a wifi based machine that would not work under linux.

      A friend was having a problem trying to get wireless working on his Linux laptop. Turns out the ssb module had to be blacklisted as it would interfere with the wireless system. He could do it (manually messing around with the necessary .conf file), but it's still a joke and completely demolishes the argument that Linux is ready for the desktop.

    11. Re:Linux by icebike · · Score: 2

      One swallow does not a summer make.

      I've had similar odd driver related problems problems with windows machines.

      Does that "complete demolish" the argument that windows is ready for the desktop?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    12. Re:Linux by GORby_ · · Score: 1

      How does something that doesn't work on a laptop make Linux not ready for the desktop?

    13. Re:Linux by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      If you have the option, use Intel wireless. The last time I had to install drivers for my Intel wifi cards was years ago, and I have not had any problems using wifi with Intel cards on Linux ever (once the drivers were installed). No slowdowns, no sudden drops from the network, no stability issues at all. And in most laptops, it is really easy to specify an Intel wireless card... if they didn't give you a choice at the manufacturer, it's also trivially easy to replace the card with one you can get from sites like http://www.logicsupply.com/. The Intel cards tend to be more expensive, but they are worth every penny, especially if you plan on installing Linux.

    14. Re:Linux by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Just avoid Broadcom at all costs, they're a total crapshoot (I didn't even know Realtek made wifi adapters though). Even on my sister's Dell Mini 10v that CAME WITH LINUX ON IT, the Broadcom drivers have been broken through various distro upgrades. I managed to get some backported drivers to work on Lucid. I could not get a valid download of Maverick at the time, but that's another story (the torrent they gave out was bad, the hash of the .iso as specified in the .torrent didn't match!)

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    15. Re:Linux by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      NDISwrapper is a crapshoot too. It's worth a shot but it's not a sure thing. With many Broadcom adapters, NDISwrapper drivers can't connect to WPA-secured APs.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    16. Re:Linux by smash · · Score: 1

      Trolling the internet (with broken wifi) to figure out ndiswrapper and hack it into life does not qualify as "working" for most people. The alternatives (windows, mac), "just work".

      Yes, I've made wireless work under linux (and FreeBSD too, this isn't a linux exclusive) when i had to as well, but it shouldn't have to be fucking around with that shit.

      And yes I'm aware of the reasons. End users don't care, they just know their shit doesn't work.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    17. Re:Linux by icebike · · Score: 1

      Apples and Oranges.

      Your typical End users just buy a box and expect it to all work. Less than 1/1000th of one percent ever install an OS of any kind. Ever! If it breaks, they take it somewhere.

      If you ever purchased a linux machine (Dell and HP sell them or have sold them in the past) they worked out of the box. 100%.

      So lets keep the comparison on a level playing field, and not handicap one OS by requiring it be installed on bare metal by a novice while the other OS goes home from BestBuy pre-installed.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    18. Re:Linux by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Have you filed a bug report? That's probably a rare enough setup that few people have tried to do it.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    19. Re:Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (i thought it was up to the os rather than the drivers to dictate encryption support)

      Is encryption offloaded to the WiFi chipset? I presume so, which is why it's up to the drivers or even the firmware.

    20. Re:Linux by green1 · · Score: 1

      I have found many bug reports that match what I would file, they have been in there for years, but are never deemed important enough to action. Unfortunately I'm not enough of a programmer to help though.

  6. Access Points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't people talk more about using a wire to an access point to get the wireless where you want it ?

    1. Re:Access Points by icebike · · Score: 2

      Why don't people talk more about using a wire to an access point to get the wireless where you want it ?

      Because of the difficulty of stringing wires thru finished construction, especially when you rent.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    2. Re:Access Points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "stringing wires through finished construction" might cost a bit, but it is not difficult at all. If you want to do it yourself, any of the electrical books at Lowes or Homedepot will show you the steps involved.

      You can also go the cable-company route, leave the wires exposed, and staple them to the wall.

    3. Re:Access Points by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833122318&cm_re=powerline_networking-_-33-122-318-_-Product

      There are many other options out there, but that's the one I am using, for exactly the purpose that the GP has suggested. No stringing wires needed at all, and throughput is plenty adequate for wifi.

    4. Re:Access Points by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      "stringing wires through finished construction" might cost a bit, but it is not difficult at all

      Depends on what your walls are made of; here in the UK most of them are brick. Straightforward yes, but "not difficult" it most certainly is not.

  7. Tools for OS X and Linux by cerberusss · · Score: 3, Informative

    Both InSIDDer and Heatmapper are Windows-only, AFAIK. For Linux, there's the awesome Kismet and its cousin for OS X, KisMAC.

    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    1. Re:Tools for OS X and Linux by Cwix · · Score: 2

      There is an InSSIDer for linux in alpha.

      It does seem to work in Linux at least for me, it is alpha so YMMV.

      http://www.metageek.net/products/inssider/linux/

      --
      You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
    2. Re:Tools for OS X and Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's an alpha version of inSSIDer for Linux here

    3. Re:Tools for OS X and Linux by mfraz74 · · Score: 2

      Yes it works in Linux, but it is one of those awful mono apps.

    4. Re:Tools for OS X and Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      # iw phy phy0 interface add moni0 type monitor
      # ip link set moni0 up

      Then use wireshark on moni0. Statistics -> WLAN Traffic.

    5. Re:Tools for OS X and Linux by Rigrig · · Score: 1

      There's inSSIDer for Linux, although Kismet is nice, it doesn't output pretty pictures :p (Seriously though, the graphical overview of networks is a nice addition to just a textual list of networks and their strengths for each channel, especially for seeing the overlap if they're using something besides the three standard channels)

      --
      **TODO** [X] Steal someone elses sig.
    6. Re:Tools for OS X and Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I refuse to ignore an app because of the language it was written in. If it installs, and works as expected I don't care if its written in a pig latin dialect of cobol.

    7. Re:Tools for OS X and Linux by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      If all you need to do is see the available networks and their signal strength/noise level on OSX you can just use the Airport command line utility, if you want to sniff there's always tcpdump.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
  8. The one killing your Wifi is ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ethernet.

  9. Heatmapper got slashdoted by Picardo85 · · Score: 2
    1. Re:Heatmapper got slashdoted by HForN · · Score: 1

      Here's a link to the file without having to go through the whole email authentication thing, though the speed is still horrible.

      http://www.ekahau.com/download/client/Ekahau%20Heatmapper-Setup.exe/

    2. Re:Heatmapper got slashdoted by galaad2 · · Score: 1

      the direct link is also useful because the download is only shown after you provide them with an email address.

      When you do that they subscribe you to their mandatory mailing list BUT YOU ONLY FIND ABOUT THIS after you "confirm the download" by clicking the download link in your email at which point you are told you have been subscribed automatically. They do not tell you about this AT ANY POINT before you download.
      fortunately I used a mailinator address to get the link without the mail spam in my real inbox.

      proof:
      when you fill in the download form the message they display is:

      ====
      Thank you!
      Please check your e-mail for a message from us. It contains the download link for HeatMapper.
      If you don't find it, check your spam / trash folder also.
      ====

      and the email i received only says:

      ========
      Hi, tester from test,

      Without further ado, here's your download link for Ekahau HeatMapper:

      hxxp://www.ekahau.com/download/hmdlreq/accept.php?email=M8R-gouv9e%40mailinator.com&sessionid=FA0B695315482

      Thank you for choosing HeatMapper!

      Cheers,
      The HeatMapper Team
      ============
      (changed http to hxxp so the link is not made active by /. )

      there's NOTHING there about agreeing to be subscribed to their mailing list. After clicking the link the page shown says
      ========
      Download Ekahau HeatMapper
      You have been added to Ekahau Mailing List

      Read the license agreement, and click on "Accept and Download" at the bottom of the page to download.
      [...snip...]
      =========

      so.. at this point basically you have not even agreed to their license agreement yet (which doesn't say anything about agreeing to receive mail anyway) but they have already went ahead and added your mail address to the marketing/spam database

      --
      root@127.0.0.1
    3. Re:Heatmapper got slashdoted by ekahau · · Score: 2

      You're right, we didn't inform the user early enough about the implications of filling out the form. We've now changed this by adding a fine-print disclaimer (we all love those, right). We'll change this to be more user-friendly in the coming weeks. We're also doing our best to up the capacity of our web server for the coming days... Thanks, Jussi / Ekahau

  10. Yup by hackertourist · · Score: 1

    I've got some Wifi problems in my apartment. In the room with the AP, everything is fine. In the next room, transfer speeds are in the toilet. I used 'WLAN AP Grapher', which gives a graph of signal and noise over time, but that indicated no change in the S/N ratio between rooms. This rather surprised me. If there's interference, there should be noise in the frequency range used by the WLAN.

    And on that note: anyone know of a tool for OS X that shows WLAN speeds in a graph ?

    1. Re:Yup by bedouin · · Score: 1

      I live in an apartment building constructed with concrete and steel beams. Although it's not a huge place, the signal would die outside of the AP's room. A cheap, probably $30 repeater fixed everything,

      Look into the nitty gritty technical specs before you buy one though. The box may say, for example, that it supports WPA2 -- and it does, but only when acting as an access point. If repeating you may be stuck with WEP; that means your entire network must be downgraded to WEP. Read the manual on-line before buying if possible.

    2. Re:Yup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple has not yet deemed you worthy of having such a tool.

    3. Re:Yup by karnal · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind too that you're only seeing one end of the conversation. S/N ratio can be good for the downstream (AP --> Laptop/client radio) but crapola for the other direction (client --> AP) and you won't ever see it unless you're monitoring the AP side of the conversation.

      Run into that one every now and again. User has good signal, but the laptop just isn't getting to the AP.

      --
      Karnal
  11. Its their fault by Master+Moose · · Score: 5, Funny

    My wifi was going great... until the neighbours decided to secure their network

    --
    . . .gone when the morning comes
    1. Re:Its their fault by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 5, Funny

      You have the Really Long Cable option if they haven't secured their door.

    2. Re:Its their fault by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Links is still the best wifi isp.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    3. Re:Its their fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somewarez I've seen a software fix for that...

    4. Re:Its their fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife was doing great ... until she decided to go with the neighbor!

    5. Re:Its their fault by Confusador · · Score: 1

      Forget XKCD, this calls for an oblig Sheldon.

  12. Weak signals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stations in the same channel with lots of retransmissions at 1 Mbps will kill your WiFi.

  13. ...and even fishtanks... by John+Bresnahan · · Score: 2

    and even fishtanks

    I knew that goldfish was up to something!

    1. Re:...and even fishtanks... by munozdj · · Score: 0

      I knew that goldfish was up to something!

      I think you're watching way too much of American Dad

      --
      Democracy: Crowdsourcing a country near you
    2. Re:...and even fishtanks... by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      Fish are always.... streaming!

  14. Microwave at 50m by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Research from the Farpoint Group suggests that data throughput can fall by 64% within 25ft of a microwave, and Farpoint analyst Craig Mathias said the firm had even “seen problems at 50m”.

    I'm sorry but if this is the case you have far bigger problems with your microwave then simply WiFi interference.

    RUN!

    1. Re:Microwave at 50m by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I guess it depends on how old the microwave is. Some really old microwaves really kicked out EM fields.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Microwave at 50m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't it be the microwave shielding causing the absorption (as opposed to reflection) of the radio waves that's causing the problem rather than escaping radiation?

    3. Re:Microwave at 50m by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Not really. WiFi signals are very weak so it doesn't take much interference to degrade throughput.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Microwave at 50m by JonySuede · · Score: 1

      My parents have a working microwave from the early 80. It will kill any kind of transmission in the house but my parent wont replace it as any replacement they had was not as fast as this 2500W monster.... My current 1100W microwave kill the signal only if my laptop is resting at about 6 inch of it....

      --
      Jehovah be praised, Oracle was not selected
    5. Re:Microwave at 50m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Access Point power: 100mW (max)
      Microwave power: 1000W

      That is 5 orders of magnitude. If the microwave leaks only 0.1% it is still 10 times as strong a transmitter than the wifi signal.

      1 watt won't kill you. it may warm up your nuts a bit if you are sitting on top of the leak of the microwave in question but that's about it.

    6. Re:Microwave at 50m by the_raptor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I thought most Slashdotters had a basic understanding of science? Non-ionising radiation is basically all the same. It doesn't matter if it comes from the magnetron in a microwave oven or your Wi-Fi AP. The only issue as to whether it will cook you is the power you absorb. Microwave ovens tend to run in the range of 500-1000+ watts of power, your AP probably puts out below 5 watts. It doesn't take much to figure out that minor and completely safe levels of leakage from the microwave will heavily interfere with Wi-Fi.

      Of course I have actually had RF burns from playing with radios so I am not terrified of non-ionising radiation like luddites are.

      --

      ========
      CINC, 4th Penguin Legion
    7. Re:Microwave at 50m by zippthorne · · Score: 0

      2500 W? Where do they plug it in?

      I suspect the reason they can't find another one is that most people want to put their microwave oven in the kitchen rather than the laundry room...

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    8. Re:Microwave at 50m by SmilingBoy · · Score: 1

      2500 W? Where do they plug it in?

      In any normal socket? My kettle even has 3.0 kW

    9. Re:Microwave at 50m by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          It should be, and usually is. The obvious sign of that is, the signal is blocked all the time, when the metal box (microwave) is between the AP and the client. If it isn't in the "line of sight", a leaky microwave will still cause interference.

          I had a friend with an old microwave. We'd talk for about an hour at a time, various times in our conversation, he may throw a cup of water in the microwave to make coffee. As soon as he hit the start button, all I'd hear was interference. He's walk away from the microwave and it would be fine. When he went back (after it had finished), we'd carry on the conversation with no problems. He wasn't moving to put the handset on the wrong side of the microwave or any other signal blocking object.

          More often than not, interference is caused by some RF blocking material (like the refrigerator or the steel plate in your head), not the cravings of the stoner next door making cheese nachos.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    10. Re:Microwave at 50m by barrkel · · Score: 1

      2500W / 240V is well under 13A; those are the relevant figures for the UK, Ireland etc. Rest of Europe you might assume 220V, but still under 13A, much less 16A for normal earthed sockets on the continent. But such high power is far from unusual; for example, ordinary kitchen kettles are plugged straight into a normal socket and generally draw 2200 watts.

    11. Re:Microwave at 50m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't microwave ovens typically shielded?
      I think that's what the GP was referring to.

      Farpoint analyst Craig Mathias said the firm had even “seen problems at 50m”.
      If your microwave is 50meters away and not in the line-of-sight (between you and the AP) and it is still causing "problems", then it's time for a new microwave.

    12. Re:Microwave at 50m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      John Connor is that you?

    13. Re:Microwave at 50m by JWSmythe · · Score: 2

          Well, that 100mW depends on the AP.

          A lot of them are only running at 80mw or less. I just did a quick search. The Linksys WAP54G puts out 16.5dBm for 802.11b, or approx 44.67mW. The WRT54G puts out 42mW, but you can crank that up past 100mW through some simple hacks. I use the Tomato firmware, which lets me set it from 1mW to 250mW. For the best signal to my relay AP, I leave it set to 200mW. That's enough to push through the walls, without causing signal distortion.

        I had an Orinoco PCCard that put out 200mW. I had a 24dBi antenna attached, so my signal was about 47dBm, so I was well over 1W, but nowhere near 1000W. That wasn't for an in-building purpose though. It was specifically for a dedicated long range directional link over 1/2 mile, showing 100% signal strength at both ends.

          Despite what anyone might claim, it didn't cook my hand when I was adjusting it. I put my hand in front of it, just to say I did. No heating, no burns, nothing other than interfering with the signal. That was a point to point, between the low end at about 25' AGL, and the high end about 90' AGL. The only signal problem I ever had was when some damned bamboo trees grew up into the line of sight. At first, the signal degraded when the wind blew. (the wind blew the tree in to block the signal). As they grew, it eventually became enough of a problem where I cut down the offending trees from the cluster.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    14. Re:Microwave at 50m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not at all. Microwave ovens are usually blasting out 800 to 1000 Watts or even more. A typical radio receiver is sensitive down in the FemtoWatt range (x 10E-15). It doesn't take much at all to interfere with WIFI receivers.

    15. Re:Microwave at 50m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I'm sorry but if this is the case you have far bigger problems with your microwave then simply WiFi interference.

      A wireless card or access point puts out around 20 milliwatts, or .02 watts. A microwave oven puts out 1000 watts. If a microwave oven leaks only 1/50,000 of it's energy, it's matching the output of your wireless card.

    16. Re:Microwave at 50m by JonySuede · · Score: 1

      in a plug near the oven

      --
      Jehovah be praised, Oracle was not selected
    17. Re:Microwave at 50m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microwave ovens draw a lot more power than their rated output due to efficiency losses. A good modern microwave might be only 70% efficient. An old clunker from the 80s might get 50% if you are lucky. That's 5000 W from the wall for 2500W of output. That is over what standard outlets in the UK or Europe can provide.

    18. Re:Microwave at 50m by Solandri · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm surprised this hasn't been modded up. The FCC limit on omnidirectional broadcasts in the 2.4 GHz band is 1 Watt. Most wireless routers I've seen are 500-750 mW max. They actually self-regulate their power output to use the weakest possible signal and still maintain good throughput. Most microwaves are actually around 1500 Watts. So even if the shielding is 99.9% effective, it's still putting out at least 2-3x more "signal" than your router, probably a lot more. It's simple enough to demonstrate. Start copying a large file over wireless with something like Teracopy (which gives instantaneous MB/sec). Then turn on your microwave. Throughput will plummet.

    19. Re:Microwave at 50m by galaad2 · · Score: 1

      most of europe uses 230V since quite a few years now and 220V is a thing of the past:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mains_electricity#Standardization

      equipment designed for 220V still works on 230V because of built-in voltage tolerances but new equipment should really be designed for 230V not 220V
      i still see brand new chinese crap being labeled with 220V though and in those devices the circuits inside REALLY expect 220v with very little tolerance for overvoltage.

      --
      root@127.0.0.1
    20. Re:Microwave at 50m by jamesh · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry but if this is the case you have far bigger problems with your microwave then simply WiFi interference.

      Does the interference really need to be of eyeball boiling strength to interfere with WiFi? If so then I think the WiFi signal is what you need to worry about.

    21. Re:Microwave at 50m by Swiper · · Score: 1

      Those efficiency losses go the other way though...

      --
      ~We demand rigidly defined areas of uncertainty~
    22. Re:Microwave at 50m by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      That's all good and fine, but a microwave from 50m away would not represent an omnidirectional source if leaking. I'm not worried about cancer, but at the same point I don't make it a habit to microwave with the door open either.

      If you want to be pedantic we don't know anything about the study, or how close the access points were, the layout, etc. If the access point next to the laptop, and the microwave was 50m on the opposite side of the house.... I'd be worried.

      Heck I'd be worried either way. It's leaking RF, maybe the strongest point wasn't pointing in the direction of wireless gear. Personally I would replace it if it were leaking like that.

      Yes I've had an RF burn. It was deep. Finger hurt for about 5 months. Mine was from switching HV. Yours was from radio? Jeesh I'm more afraid of you now than the microwave :-)

    23. Re:Microwave at 50m by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Maybe if your router is sitting above your microwave but what if the router is sitting next to your laptop, and the microwave is on the other side of the house. If your speeds plummet then, it would be wise to replace the microwave.

    24. Re:Microwave at 50m by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      From 50m away it could very well be eyeball boiling strength. The article never said the access point sat on the microwave. Just that the microwave interfered. If the access point was next to your laptop and your microwave was 50m away .... put on some metal safety glasses.

    25. Re:Microwave at 50m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 5 Watt RF Burn HURTS!

      My Finger knows this ... big pain, and a small black pin hole burn in the middle of my index finger pad that was there for months.

      Note to self: Remember to reattach antenna back on to hand held 2 meter transceiver before pushing the transmit button.

  15. Early 20th Century by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 1

    affinity for lathe and plaster.

  16. What is killing my wifi by hackus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Crap firmware and products.

    That is what is killing my wifi.

    I would also like to add:

    1) Wall Street fascist pig CEO types who need that 5th mansion and stupid Board directors and shareholders who let him get away with it while the companies network infrastructure rots to hell.

    That doesn't help my wifi either.

    2) Closed proprietary crap hardware primarily by CISCO that makes it impossible to produce decent firmware via a 3rd party even after you bought the damn thing.

    Apparently in a fascist system you really don't get to own anything you buy and can go to jail if you try and figure out how it works or make your own improvements.

    Poor WRT guys, how they must suffer. Even though they work really hard, their firmware still sucks because the binary blobs they get with the radios suck it and my Wireless N router (WRT600N) still, has to auto reboot every 24 hours or it just plain stops working.

    3) Finally I would like to thank all of the fascist members in Congress for creating laws that pretty much guarantees our wifi will suck.on a country wide basis, insuring intellectual property nonsense will continue to make wifi blow.

    -Hack

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
    1. Re:What is killing my wifi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Consumer-grade wireless is shit. We use Cisco 1130 AGs and they are the shit. No problems, ever. They are light-weight access pionts that you can use indpendantly or have many of them with a controller. I have on in it covers all 4000 sqft of my house (3 floors). Can watch Netflix in HD over it, have a laptop, two iPhones, an iPod, the Wii, microwave, and a bunch of other stuff running w/o a single issue. We've deployed maybe 100 of these and they are fucking rock solid. However, they cost like $600.

    2. Re:What is killing my wifi by labnet · · Score: 1

      While I agree with your ranting, I have a more productive solution.

      For years I put up with crap box all in one WiFi/Routers that would fall over almost daily (in multiple locations as we had moved house) (the reboot walk).
      My solution:
      Cable Modem -> Crap Box AllInOne (But only for the NAT function) -> Dedicated Cheap Gigabit Ethernet Switch -> POE Ubiquti UniFi AP
      My printer (Ethernet) and NAS (Synology DS211J) plug direct into the Ethernet Switch.

      Finally a setup that is cheap and doesn't crash. Been going strong for about 2 months without a reboot.
       

      --
      46137
    3. Re:What is killing my wifi by VortexCortex · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Consumer-grade wireless is shit. We use Cisco 1130 AGs and they are the shit.
      [...]
      they are fucking rock solid. However, they cost like $600.

      1. Cosumer = shit. Commercial = the shit. o_O Same "shit" much?

      2. So what you're saying is that Cisco distances itself from the intentionally crippled consumer hardware via slapping the name Linksys on it, so that when someone buys the slightly better non-crippled hardware they can charge $600 for it -- do you really think that it's 10,000% (Ten Thousand Percent!?) better than the consumer grade device? -- or, would you agree that it's arbitrary price inflation based on pretty much the same design?

      3. Why don't they just make good routers across the board, it would lower their cost to manufacture esp. in volume -- Oh, right, profit margins, never mind.

      I think we've Identified the culprits. WiFi sucks because the manufacturers want it to suck. Guess what? A dime bag of cocaine, or a pirated copy of Windows is cheap too -- It's when you become a Pro at snorting lines or using Windows or running a network that the price becomes prohibitively expensive... At least with the drugs, when you "go pro" the price may get cheaper the more you use.

      Make no mistake, consumer grade WiFi is marginally adequate expressly because it can be. People get used to the convenience of WiFi at home, but when they want to take it to work: Business can not afford to have flaky WiFi. Ergo the ten thousand percent price hike per unit -- You're already hooked -- if you want the clean stuff not cut with rat poison, baking soda, faulty capacitors, overheating chips, and weak antenna coils (so that you can use more like a pro and get a pure, reliable WiFi-high without O.D.ing) you'll have to pay big time.

    4. Re:What is killing my wifi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calm down, Francis...
      I've had a WRT610N for a few years now, never needed a reboot. EVER. Like the Energizer bunny, just keeps going.
      Perhaps your ROUTER just sucks donkeys. Perhaps you were an "early adopter". in which case it just sucks to be you.
      Refold your tin-foil hat and go back in mom's basement, your objections have been duely noted...

    5. Re:What is killing my wifi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's OK, the rest of the world will pick up the slack. Humanity will continue to progress, even though the US is determined to regress. This cycle has been repeated many times throughout our history - the US has chosen, as a nation, to end.

    6. Re:What is killing my wifi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "Wall Street CEO's" and "members in Congress" that you refer to are laughing all the way to the (Swiss) bank.

      Do you honestly think:

      1. they are aware of your scathing comments?
      2. if they were aware of your comments that they'd give a flying fuck?

      They're rich. Their kids will be richer than you and all your siblings added together. You don't rate on their radar.

    7. Re:What is killing my wifi by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Poor WRT guys, how they must suffer. Even though they work really hard, their firmware still sucks because the binary blobs they get with the radios suck it and my Wireless N router (WRT600N) still, has to auto reboot every 24 hours or it just plain stops working.

      I have used OpenWRT and was impressed but not happy.
      Then I used DD-WRT and I was happy but not ecstatic.
      Since my hardware happens to be compatible I was able to switch to Tomato, and now I am at least very happy, if not... well you get the idea. WDS is finally working for me, for example. So this might not help you, but some might be pleased. I try to wire any bandwidth hog...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:What is killing my wifi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to mention FCC frequency propagation limitations.

    9. Re:What is killing my wifi by maxume · · Score: 1

      Where can I get a Linksys for $6?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    10. Re:What is killing my wifi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After I upgraded my neighbors wifi firmware I haven't had any problems.

    11. Re:What is killing my wifi by antdude · · Score: 1

      How are we suposed to know which wireless electronics are good and that don't cause interferences? In my area, there are so many WAPs even on different channels. Disconnections occur randomly and rarely, but annoying like on SSH2, gaming, streaming medias, IMs, etc. I had to go back to old fashion network cables for reliable connections.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    12. Re:What is killing my wifi by alexo · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, Tomato's support for 802.11n is very limited.

  17. Really great link. NOT! by pro151 · · Score: 1

    PC Wiper Mag. Crashed Google Chrome browser. One of very few websites able to do this. No stars, I give this post 10 toilets.

  18. What's killing your Wi-Fi by cerberusss · · Score: 3, Funny

    What's killing your Wi-Fi? Or rather, who? *maniacal laughter*

    Mini Portable Signal Jammer (Wi-Fi/GPS)

    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
  19. Obligatory XKCD by lobiusmoop · · Score: 3, Funny
    --
    "I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
    1. Re:Obligatory XKCD by Zaatxe · · Score: 1

      My cat is named Nacho. And he once tipped my wi-fi router. Does it count as a Nacho-dropped wi-fi?

      --
      So say we all
  20. Absolutely agree about Microwave Oven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We were running a trial with Axis wireless cameras. Nice cameras, but the link was unreliable, mostly around lunch time. Nobody believed me until I set up tcpdump, walked over to the microwave, hit the 30 second button, and down it went, never to return.

  21. 5GHz, or wired by sillivalley · · Score: 3, Informative

    Go 5GHz with WPA2 and 802.11n -- you'll have great performance until all your neighbours do the same.

    Go wired (gigabit) when you can -- that's faster and more secure.

    If you're forced to run on 2.4, don't expect great things in crowded (spectrum) areas. Do spectrum scans, and if you can't work with one of the non-overlapping 2.4GHz channels (1,6,11), and can't use a directional antenna (you can build your own corner reflector or parabolic reflector for under $1) try 3 or 8 and don't worry about HT (high throughput) datarates.

    Take up arc welding as a hobby.

    1. Re:5GHz, or wired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah bad advice,

      Because the bands are only regulated by POWER and not WHAT you put over them, modulation wise.

      Just swap your router and wifi card to Middle Eastern channel spacing, (different regions of the world have different channel spacing) then set it to max throughput.

      All interference problems solved (modulation wise). But. nobody within 200 meters of your router or laptop will be able to get a signal anywhere :)

      No laws broken, you are still pumping out the below or on the legal power limit.

      I did that to my neighbour cuz he was pissing me off with his loud music. Set my laptop to ME channels and adhoc peer. My networked fine. He was kicking and yelling and screaming about his internet, I even saw a wardriver go past with netstumbler on his laptop on the passenger seat :)

    2. Re:5GHz, or wired by cbeaudry · · Score: 2

      5ghz wont do you any good if you have lots of walls, as it just bounces off them.

      I tried, it doesnt work unless you are trying to saturate a large open area.

    3. Re:5GHz, or wired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if all your neighbors move to 5 GHz, there are 23 non-overlapping channels (to 2.4 GHz's 3). 5 GHz doesn't pass through solid objects (walls) as well as 2.4 GHz, but interference from competing 5 GHz networks is not really a practical problem.

    4. Re:5GHz, or wired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On 5MHz you'll still get interference from some of the things mentioned in the article - microwaves, metal in walls etc.

  22. CRT interference? by Baloo+Uriza · · Score: 1

    The CRT part was interesting; curious to see further documentation on that.

    --
    Furries make the internet go.
  23. popeye the sailor man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do fish eat semen?

  24. Er... by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    My 8 year old Airport base station dying, that's what killed it.

  25. Bad/cheap routers is another problem by theurge14 · · Score: 1

    Not mentioned in this article was the problem of people operating poor quality routers. Ironically enough that they quoted a rep from Belkin in the article, cheap $30 routers from the likes of Belkin, D-Link and such from the local Wal-Mart electronic section tend to have a bad habit of "dropping out", or freezing traffic to the point to where the only solution is to power off and power on the router. On some bad quality routers this happens nearly 100% of the time under heavy traffic loads (2 or more computers watching Netflix, for example).

    The solution to this is to invest more than $30 into a home router.

    1. Re:Bad/cheap routers is another problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      likes of Belkin, D-Link and such from the local Wal-Mart electronic section tend to have a bad habit of "dropping out"

      The problem is actually caused by the chip manufacturing process.

      When a batch of chips comes off the line, they are of varying quality. Some of the chips are below the minimum tolerance levels needed to operate normally in a normal environment. These chips are either underclocked and sold as a lower-end model, or else they are slapped into the same case with the same model and version number and sold at a discount rate to large discount retailers like Wal-Mart. So you can't tell by just looking at the case (and often not even by looking at the chips).

      What this means is that you can buy a specific model (and revision) from a place like Wal-Mart, and have it shit on you any time you put it under load. And you can buy an identical unit from a smaller store who gets theirs through normal distribution channels, and have it operate with no trouble at all.

      The solution to this is to invest more than $30 into a home router.

      Well, not necessarily. The solution is (to start with) to avoid large discount retailers.
      But just spending more isn't the answer- that $120 "gaming router" is almost identical to the $30 router, it just has a different case, maybe a little extra RAM (but not always) and a slightly different firmware revision, but it's using the same exact chipset.
      And this is not a manufacturer-specific thing, either. ALL of them do it: Netgear, Belkin, Linksys, D-Link are all guilty of this.

      What I recommend is to go look at what is being marketed to the SOHO crowd (small office/home office). It's also a very good idea to look through actual hardware reviews from places that do thorough testing, as you will see drastic differences in the performance across models and version. Out of the "big four" home router manufacturers, there really isn't one that is 'best' or 'worst'; they all have models that suck and ones that kick ass. The trick is finding the good models for a decent price, so shop around a little bit and it'll be well worth your time.

    2. Re:Bad/cheap routers is another problem by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Custom firmware can turn many cheap shitty routers into rock solid workhorses.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  26. I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    @sillivalley: I agree. 5GHz with WPA2 is my preferred choice. I always run better when I'm using that setup. Then again, my closest neighbor is 40 miles away from me. iphone 6

  27. Cell phone by mrops · · Score: 2

    put the cell phone in the microwave, close the door, if you call and it rings, u have a leak

    another trick on smartphone is to install some kind of wifi analyzer and put it in microwave, close the door and watch signal strength

    1. Re:Cell phone by mrops · · Score: 2

      Forgot the disclaimer, Do not turn on the microwave while the phone is in.

    2. Re:Cell phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that was a pretty neat trick. 4 bars out of 4 just outside the microwave door. Placing the phone in a glass (to hold it upright) in the microwave and closing the door dropped the signal quickly to 0 bars. For some reason I had always thought microwaves used waveguides and weren't really a faraday cage - but I guess the waveguides are actually used just to route the microwaves from the magnetron to the cooking area and the faraday cage type structure is used to keep external leakage low. Very nice demo.

    3. Re:Cell phone by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      That's not entirely correct, there are many reasons why you might still get a good cell signal on your phone while it is inside a microwave oven. The oven is only designed to attenuate the (usually 2.4GHz) signal to levels that wont harm humans, it doesn't need to be perfect, only good enough to conform with the regulations. If you're living near enough to a cell site your phone will still work.

      I'm using 5GHz WiFi (you insensitive clod) :-)

  28. I would like to know too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because otherwise the only conclusion is that resonably priced consumer Wi-Fi hardware, routers, dongles, and built in chips are cheap crap that doesn't ever work as fast as claimed. A lot of enterprise-grade stuff's no good either.

    For example, with various affordably priced domestic WiFi routers I have tried the internal LAN switching is usually garbage or the throughput between the built in wireless AP is bottlenecked to the wired switch, or the AP is flakey crap or a combination. Many seriously underperform, even if the signal performance turns out to be good. Even with excellent signal and all 54mbps+ wifi, the best I may get is ~10mbps. Connect two WiFi devices and the internal LAN transfers between them will total 10mbps, even if one is on wired. Change the router, change the devices and not much may improved. Borrowed a high-spec corporate grade AP from work, got much more speed, although the thing still flaked out. Unplugging interference sources and hoping channels has always made little difference. Flashing to DD-WRT got no benefit either, it was garbage hardware.

    I resisted switching from ethernet until I had no choice (renting can't exactly wire cat-6 through the walls). So maybe if I spent twice as much on a router I'd have a chance of respectable performance.

    1. Re:I would like to know too. by Larryish · · Score: 1

      1) Don't run ethernet through the walls, run it through at the bottom of the baseboard. drill through as low as you can get the drill to go, and push your runs under the base, around to the hole, then through.

      2) Paint the visible parts of the cable (about 1.5 inches near each hole) the same color as your baseboard.

      3) ???

      4) Profit.

  29. Baby monitor kills mine by TAZ6416 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Once my daughter goes to sleep and my wife turns this bad boy on, my wireless network totally falls apart.

    http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=110693416818&clk_rvr_id=236365054762

    Seems quite common, I work in IT and now and again I get asked do you know why my wiresless network is so crap and a lot of the times they've just had a baby.

    1. Re:Baby monitor kills mine by green1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I work as a service tech for a local telco, I frequently go out to fix people's wireless when they can't figure out what's wrong, baby monitors and other people's wifi do kill the signal, but usually not badly enough to be a major problem, simply changing the channel on the AP or moving the equipment a few feet usually solves it.
      Microwave ovens are a big deal, but usually only in close proximity to them, or if it is directly between the computer and the AP.

      What has always amazed me more is how badly various other household appliances can affect networks, and I'm not just talking wireless either, I've had cases where a hand mixer in the next room was able to make streaming video unwatchable on an ethernet cabled computer. And a customer who watched streaming video while on the treadmill required a lot of creative work to get a signal through even on ethernet. (turns out the problem was actually interference on the power line side of things, a UPS on the computer and moving the treadmill to a circuit on the other half of the electrical panel eventually solved it)

      Basically, consumer gear is garbage, everything from hand mixers and treadmills to computers and routers. sometimes you can work around it, sometimes you just can't.

    2. Re:Baby monitor kills mine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had cases where a hand mixer in the next room was able to make streaming video unwatchable on an ethernet cabled computer.

      Which also sounds a lot like "both things are on the same circuit" (just like your treadmill issue). The hand mixer might be trashing the AC line quality, resulting in problems with the computer from having garbage power input.

      A *good* UPS would have solved both issues, even without rewiring. Something that does actual voltage regulation (like a Smart-UPS unit).

    3. Re:Baby monitor kills mine by green1 · · Score: 1

      Consumers can't afford "good" UPS units, so they're stuck with consumer grade garbage, which was my whole point to start with, consumer grade equipment, whether it be a hand mixer, a treadmill, a computer, or a UPS is garbage.

      When dealing with consumer devices all you can do most of the time is work around the issues. In the case of the treadmill we put the computer on a UPS and that wasn't enough, moving the treadmill's power cord to an outlet wired to the other side of the circuit breaker panel wasn't enough either, but the combination of the two solved it. In the case of the hand mixer it was decided that they would simply not try to use it while watching streaming video (moving to an outlet on the other side of the panel wasn't enough, and the customer wasn't willing to pay for a UPS (especially being that there was no guarantee it would solve the problem)). In the case of most microwave ovens we often move routers or again, try not to use it while making dinner.

      Should people have to compromise like this? No, but it's the price we pay for affordable devices with noisy motors and poor shielding and filtering.

    4. Re:Baby monitor kills mine by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Sometimes, it's the infrastructure that's bad. I've had poor or improperly installed wiring take out entire computers when an appliance being used suddenly causes a localized brownout.

      Electrical wiring is supposed to be properly shielded (especially the wire that runs from your socket to your appliance), but I've found it to be the worst from experience. They typically aren't so bad as to affect wifi unless the wire is running vertically between base and computer, but they usually interfere with any ethernet cables laying nearby.

      For wifi, anything that operates on the same spectrum will interfere with the connection. Baby monitors, cordless phones, cordless peripherals, even the cell phone can be problematic. For this, it is either due in part to the router's antenna design being poor and prone to interference, or the .design of the wireless chip inside the computer itself.

      I don't know if these things are limited to the consumer-grade status of the products. It's more likely that businesses already know either via an employee or a consultant what to do and what not to do with the products they bought.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    5. Re:Baby monitor kills mine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2.4ghz wireless camera's, not the 802.11b/g/n stuff. Just the cheap 25 - 30 dollar connect to a TV. You see them in small businesses.

    6. Re:Baby monitor kills mine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once my daughter goes to sleep and my wife turns this bad boy on...

      Thought Ebay had started selling sex toys for a minute there.

    7. Re:Baby monitor kills mine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was so surprised to _not_ find a vibrator ad at that link...

    8. Re:Baby monitor kills mine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I clicked on that link half-expecting to see some sort of super-power wireless dildo capable of billions of revolutions per minute in the vibration motor that's so rad it literally gives off interference. Then was a little disappointed when I realized that my fantasy about your wife wouldn't hold up so we against the reality of the post-baby tenderness, weight, and sag. Then I remembered that it's my imagination and so your wife can be natalie portman, olivia wilde, angelina jolie, or any one of the three at any given time and I was happy again.

      TLDR: I have the strangest boner.

    9. Re:Baby monitor kills mine by green1 · · Score: 1

      Electrical wiring is supposed to be properly shielded (especially the wire that runs from your socket to your appliance), but I've found it to be the worst from experience.

      In residential wiring in Canada, I have NEVER seen shielded electrical wiring used inside walls or on appliance power cords, even the wire running from the power utility to the house, and the stuff running down the back lanes isn't shielded.
      The only shielded electrical wiring I have seen is only really shielded to protect from physical damage, the RF shielding is just a byproduct of the metal sheath used to protect it.
      Appliances are often (though not always) shielded, but never the wiring.

    10. Re:Baby monitor kills mine by green1 · · Score: 1

      My comment about changing channels was in regard to the router, not the camera. even the cheap 25-30 dollar cameras don't pollute the entire spectrum evenly, you can usually find a wifi channel that still works.

  30. Netcraft confirms it: wi-fi is dying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A eulogy and service will be held tomorrow at Cisco Cemetery.

  31. Gold Dust! by failedlogic · · Score: 4, Funny

    In my carefully controlled laboratory (the basement of my parent's house), I decided to try things that would enhance the wireless connectivity. "Scientists" tend to only focus on the negative. Who wants to read something that very craftily calls us idiots? Summary of article the article I didn't read: "Want better wireless? Get rid of the microwave, dumb ass!"

    I'm going to write a paper. But my parents want me to clean up the basement first. I don't feel like it ...... so its going to take a while. :)

    In writing this more positive paper, I felt gold dust would be the best stuff to sprinkle in the air to enhance wireless signals. After all, this stuff works *MIRACLES* for stereo cables and computer cables. Why not wireless signals?

    So I installed some fans in the basement to blow the gold dust around while testing my wireless network. I tried 3 different gold samples. 1) Gold bought from Dollar Store. 2) Gold bought from Pawn Shop. 3) Gold extracted from Monster Cables.

    Total cost of materials (gold): $2000*. Acquiring gold from the first two sources was much cheaper than the 3rd (see Marketing Materials as reference).

    I'm not going to bore you with the methodology. "What was the purity of the samples?", you might ask. I trust I'm getting 100% Gold from all my sources. They told me it is.

    Suffice it to say, my paper will conclude (I'm not done looking at most if of the results just yet and don't think I need to) that sprinkling gold dust in the air boosted wireless signals up to 2 x 10 ^ 3 % (this is a scientific study so I must use scientific notation!). I'll leave the reader to conclude which of the 3 sources resulted in the best results. Frankly, I lost track.

    1. Re:Gold Dust! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gold dust? You're killing Cybermen? The dastards...figures they'd interfere with WiFi next.

    2. Re:Gold Dust! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're just being silly now. Here's something more realistic though. Usually the worst with consumer-grade routers is that they overheat on two or three major chips, and then they tend to degrade or drop signal after that starts happening. It's because the router manufacturers are too damn cheap to spend an extra $0.15 or so per unit.

      Best you can do is drill a few holes in some strategic places on the plastic casing, spend about $0.15 or so on some small heat-sinks to mount on the overheating chips, and then mount a small computer case or CPU cooler fan to the router case and tap voltage from a 5v part of the router circuit. (On some models it's easy to go right to the power connector, most hacks just do it that way and throw on a resistor or two if the wall-wart powering the router provides more than 5V.)

      It's actually surprising how many routers with intermittent problems can be fixed and have significantly improved uptime by simply doing something about the thermal issues which the manufacturers have failed to bother with. (In worse cases, some older routers may have those old flaky-assed electrolytic K-caps. Unless you're good at soldering, might be easier to just buy a newer router and keep the thermal fix in mind since it's a less-skilled hack to perform.)

    3. Re:Gold Dust! by coofercat · · Score: 2

      Did you compare your gold solution with wifi spray? http://j-walk.com/other/wifispray/

    4. Re:Gold Dust! by dmmiller2k · · Score: 1

      Pixie dust is odorless and colorless (so it won't aggravate your parents), and has the added advantage of not requiring fans (it disperses itself and stays suspending in the air). Finally, a tiny bit goes a long, long way, (so it's way cheaper). One thing that takes getting used to, though, is everyone being in a great mood. And finding a source is fairly difficult -- but worth it. :)

      --

      "No matter how cynical you get, it is impossible to keep up." -- Lily Tomlin

  32. Bufferbloat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One issue that continually makes wireless far worse than wired connections on home routers is bufferbloat. See http://gettys.wordpress.com/2011/01/03/aggregate-bufferbloat-802-11-and-3g-networks/ and http://linuxwireless.org/en/developers/bufferbloat and http://tech.slashdot.org/story/11/01/07/0533226/Bufferbloat-mdash-the-Submarine-Thats-Sinking-the-Net and https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat/2011-February/000068.html and ...

  33. here's some things that jam wifi by DragonTHC · · Score: 2

    xbox 360 controllers.
    ps3 controllers.
    bluetooth.
    electrical motors for ceiling fans.
    cordless phones in the 2.4Ghz range.
    cheap RC cars/planes/helicopters.
    Your paper shredder, while it's running.
    your 5 neighbors' wifis all on channel 6.
    CFL bulbs. (They tend to absorb radio signals.)

    All of these will interfere with wifi. Perhaps you should switch to 5Ghz 802.11N

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
    1. Re:here's some things that jam wifi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything on your list can be summed up by simply saying:

      Unshielded electric motors.
      Devices which use radio frequencies in the unlicensed spectrum.

      CFL's, however, do not "absorb radio signals". You should leave about 2 foot clearance between a flourescent fixture and your broadcast/receive antennae, but that's due to EMI issues not "radio absorption".

  34. Nothing anymore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...replaced my 802.11b/g/n access point with a 802.11a/n access point and now all my troubles seems so far away...
    5 GHz is empty in residential areas.

  35. Buffalo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Old, early generation Buffalo 802.11g router, purchased from Worst Buy for $39 when they were being cleared out of inventory during the patent lawsuit several years ago... I've got it plugged into a UPS battery backup now and it's been running non-stop for over two years without a reboot.

  36. bloody download barrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    heres the download link for Heatmapper

    http://www.ekahau.com/download/client/Ekahau%20Heatmapper-Setup.exe

  37. Unlicensed use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just remember that WiFi is an 'unlicensed' use, and that you have to accept interference from licensed uses, and in turn, not interfere with them. If a licensed user of the WiFi spectrum comes over and says "I'm sorry, you have to turn off your WiFi", you'll have to

  38. Marine RADAR ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in sight of the San Francisco Bay. When large cargo ships and ferries pass nearby by they interfere with my WiFi signal. These BUF's put out serious microwave Watts (4 - 25 KW)! How do I know? When it's foggy you can hear their fog horns and that correlates nicely with a WiFi fainting spell.

    Also, I find it impossible to make a new WiFi connection when the kitchen microwave is Magentonizing the mornings oatmeal. An established WiFi sessions survives across a quick Microwave oven zapping. But no new connections are possible. So I have mostly gone to hardwired connections.

  39. Network Down by rmccoy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Back in the day...

    When WiFi was just starting to get rolled out in most businesses, I had set up a multi access-point wireless network that had worked really well for about five months. Then, with no known changes, it started dying across the entire building almost every afternoon about the same time.

    I worked with the building maintenance staff to try to find any electrical gear that might be starting up about that time with no luck. Finally, because the executives loved their wireless, I had to buy a spectrum analyser to try to track down the problem. I kept it on my desk until the next time we had an outage and started following the high amplitude broadband noise that had suddenly appeared.

    The directional antenna led me straight to the kid that worked in the mailroom who had his feed up on the desk talking into a wireless phone. I pulled the plug on it and the noise stopped, the network reappeared. He'd brought in a consumer wireless phone so he could talk to his girlfriend while he moved around the mailroom sorting mail. I'm surprised his hair wasn't smoking with the signal the thing was emitting.

    I took it away from him and everyone, except maybe his girlfriend, was happy. :)

    1. Re:Network Down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you missed a great chance to draft a free thinker into your department and train him properly, because he sure wasn't a droid.

      Way to go kid, I'd have done the same!

  40. Impatience by sjbe · · Score: 1

    It will kill any kind of transmission in the house but my parent wont replace it as any replacement they had was not as fast as this 2500W monster....

    Because heaven forbid they wait an extra 20 seconds...

    1. Re:Impatience by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Moe: I got this deep fryer on loan from the US Army. It can flash fry a buffalo in 40 seconds

      Homer: 40 secoonnds... but i want it nooow

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  41. The Point by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Because heaven forbid they wait an extra 20 seconds...

    It's a microwave man; the whole point is speed. If you're going to suffer eating nuked food, you better damn well at least get a speed advantage out of it.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:The Point by JonySuede · · Score: 1

      you got it !

      --
      Jehovah be praised, Oracle was not selected
  42. what i learned from wifi by FudRucker · · Score: 2

    even people can block wifi, my router is next to a desktop in the office at the front of the house, normally i get about 75% signal strength, when someone is sitting at that desk it drops down to about 55% to 60% and i notice the slowdown...

    this router has a rubber ducky antenna so while searching for a way to improve my signal quality i found this and it really does work, now when someone is sitting at the office desk near the router it does not weaken the signal and the overall signal averages about 85% solid without problems

    build one of these out of heavy paper like card stock or similar (cereal box cardboard) and aluminum foil http://www.freeantennas.com/projects/template2/

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:what i learned from wifi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait. People are objects too?!?!

  43. Reactor by TemperedAlchemist · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing the nuclear powerplant I built in my backyard isn't helping... That and the invasion of sentient bloodthirsty mutant animals.

  44. Heatmap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the latter of which maps provides a heatmap of Wi-Fi hotspots in your home or office.

    If your equipment is sending microwave transmissions so strong that they can cook your body, it's time to get out of the kitchen ...

  45. Ubuntu! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No bloody way on earth I can get it to connect to my android access point!
    stupid stupid ubuntu.

  46. Wavedeploy too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  47. Electric Smart Meter by gmby · · Score: 1

    I've had no wifi in my living room since they installed the new power meters on the outside wall. What i found in that the meters are on 2.4GHz and use up to 4watts output. They are some kind of mesh network to each other. I had to take down my wifi on that outside wall to my brothers house. It quit working and the input amp was destroyed do to proximity to the meter. 5feet away. Lost two wrt54's before I figured it out. I'm tempted to wrap the meters in tinfoil as a message to the power co. But I like my freedom too much. Can't afford to take on a 500lb gorilla.

    Singed;
    Living on the wire now...

    --
    I don't want a pickle; I just want a Motor-Cycle! A four foot cop arrived with a five foot gun!
  48. The Orville Redenbacher Test by wsanders · · Score: 1

    Some urban legend is circulating that this will work for radiation, but it will definitely work for WiFi interference: Set a bag of microwave popcorn out on the counter. If it starts popping, you've probably got WiFi interference problems.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  49. Standard sockets by DragonHawk · · Score: 1

    Parent post wrongly assumes a standard US household socket, which is max 120 volt, 15 amp, 1800 watt.

    Other replies to parent port appear to wrongly assume various European outlets. European household power is generally 220-240 volt, but max amperages are all over the map -- literally. They range from 15 amp / 3750 watt to as low as 5 amp / 1250 watt, depending on country, IIRC.

    We don't appear to know the country of the grandparent post's parents' microwave. We can't even say "European" for sure; some early US models were hardwired, and so might have had a higher than usual power draw.

    Power sockets exemplify the "I love standards -- there are so many to choose from!" concept.

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
  50. You jest, but.. by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

    My parents couldn't understand why connecting to their Wi-Fi was intermittent. Though once connected, it all worked fine.

    Then I looked into it and found that both they and some neighbour used the same network name: "wireless" (obviously the factory setting), but with different passwords. And this was setup by some IT guy (not me). <facepalm>

    I changed the network name, and all is well now. :)

    I wonder how common it is for people to unwittingly use each others' Wi-Fi because they use factory settings...

  51. WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "CFL bulbs. (They tend to absorb radio signals.)"

    Uh, water absorbs RF too. Are you going to blame your WiFi problems on your morning coffee?? Holy crap on a cracker...

  52. Written by technical dimwit by thsths · · Score: 1

    The article is not even getting the technical facts right, much less the grammar. Shouldn't we expect better from PCPro? No, I guess not.

  53. samsung hometheater by nazsco · · Score: 2

    have one with 2 wireless speakers for the back channels.... I loved it while i was oblivious to the fact that it kill wifi in a 3ft radius!
     
    ...until i tried to play online on the wii.

    Now i have to choose if I want 5.1 audio or multiplayer.

  54. Number 1 Cause... by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 2

    ... mismatched devices!

    You would not believe how many people "upgrade" their broadband to 20+ Mbit/sec service and then complain that their computer is still only getting 1-3Mbit/sec speeds. A lot of them don't realize that the older 802.11 devices can significant reduce the performance of a modern wireless network.

    Most 802.11b devices (which are still in use today) usually top out at around 10-11Mbit/sec, and that's under perfect conditions. If you start adding multiple users, competing networks and outside interference, things get out of hand pretty quick.

    Here's a list of things to look for in examining your wireless network for performance issues:

    - Replace the router.

    If you're router is over 3 years old, it might be time to replace it. Especially if it's an older 802.11a/b model. The really old 802.11 devices, like Apple's original AirPort base station, have a lot of problems working correctly when they encounter other networks within their own service range. This can result in dropped or spotty connections and overall losses in bandwidth. Many of these first generation wireless network devices barely worked, but they worked well enough for the few people that could afford them. Most of these devices have since been trashed for more recent models either because they started failing under the weight of other networks or simply died from various flaws or age.

    - Update the firmware.

    Many wireless devices have firmware chips on them that can be upgraded through software. This can help weed out networking issues that might be caused by buggy firmware, or may add enhanced features that can help your device work better under heavier loads from competing networks, interference, multiple users and various security issues.

    - upgrade all client-end networking hardware at the same time.

    When putting a wireless network together, or upgrading an existing one, make sure your client devices use similar configurations. (Or identical, if possible...) A single, poorly configured client device can significantly impact your wireless network's performance. By making the network devices functionally similar to each other, the simpler it will be to put together an efficient network setup. For example, if you have a network consisting of only 802.11g devices and set up a router to only accept 802.11g connections, it'll run at around 54Mbit/sec. But, if you have a network consisting of random 802.11 devices and a router that will support several protocols going back to 802.11b, the network will default to using the slowest, most common protocol available (802.11b) and will force all connected clients to run at that speed (11Mbit/sec), regardless of each client's individual configuration. That bandwidth is then divided by every connection, making then network seem much slower than it is. By keeping the client and router hardware similarly configured, the network speeds are less likely to suffer. Your maximum network performance is limited only by the hardware you use to build it.

    - Secure your network.

    Make sure your network hardware is secure on both the router and client end. Set up your router to use the most powerful encryption protocols it supports and utilize MAC address detection to identify each piece of hardware on the network, so you can ensure no one outside of your client list can access your network. Also, don't use DHCP to assign IP addresses. Manually configure each client, so they have a static IP. Finally, disable SSID broadcasting. This will reduce the likelihood of a war-driver finding your network and tagging it for others to find.

    - Use the latest available network protocols.

    Using protocols like 802.11g or 802.11n may help to significantly improve your network speeds over older ones, but may also offer some added flexibility. Unlike the older 802.11b/a protocols, some of the newer protocols aren't limited to one broadcast frequency (2.4GHz). While the broadcast frequency of your wireless hardware has relatively little to do with your netw

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
    1. Re:Number 1 Cause... by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      If you're router is over 3 years old

      That's an over-generalization, and with the current state of consumer end routers, probably even bad advice. I've been using my Linksys WAP54G for years, and an identical model at my parents (I checked my slashdot journal: May 2005). They support up to WPA2-AES since the latest firmware I put on them (might be a better one by now.... It's been ages, but if it works don't touch it). Sure, it's a access point and not a router, because it was bought in a time where routers didn't have wireless by default.

      The only, but really only issue I have with it is that it's range isn't great. I guess, better antennas could alleviate that problem, but as it reaches my wifes iMac (furthest away) with full signal it's fine. (My laptop, usally doesn't get full signal, I guess it's an internal antenna problem)

      Modern routers? Oh, boy... From my experience the firmware is so crappy that something you need on it will not work, or not work correctly. For example, I had a nice 2003 ADSL modem (yes, modem, not router). I do my routing with a Soekris net5501-70 and OpenBSD. One day it stopped working. I tried it on my dad ADSL line and it worked there. Apparently the telco company had upgraded something in my area and that made my old venerable modem stop working. I had to buy a new router, and got the greatest and latest from my ISP (still, spending money for no reason in my humble opinion). You know what, this thing couldn't even operate in bridge mode! Impossible to use. The firmware had the option, but just did a complete factory reset if you selected it. I realize this is not wireless related, but frankly, if firmware craps on that, I have no confidence in it's quality.

      My sister recently got her own ADSL line, and she got exactly that model. The guy coming to her place to install it told her it was the greatest model they had. I told her to expect problems.

      I've been thinking that if I want to upgrade my wireless network (which at this moment is not high on my priority list), I'll go with professional Cisco gear. It may cost an arm and a leg, but there is no way I'll suffer with todays consume grade stuff.

      Ah, just for the record. My current wireless, has no problem using 802.11b alongside 802.11g. I have a PSP, and that's 802.11b only. Works find, with no significant impact on the other wireless devices.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    2. Re:Number 1 Cause... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wanted to point out that 802.11a is superior in a lot of ways to 802.11g. 802.11a is at 5ghz and 54Mbit/s with a higher throughput than g in most real world scenarios. Its a rather obscure option found mostly in the better dual-band 802.11n devices or in older business class products.

    3. Re:Number 1 Cause... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Secure your network.

      Make sure your network hardware is secure on both the router and client end. Set up your router to use the most powerful encryption protocols it supports and utilize MAC address detection to identify each piece of hardware on the network, so you can ensure no one outside of your client list can access your network. Also, don't use DHCP to assign IP addresses. Manually configure each client, so they have a static IP. Finally, disable SSID broadcasting. This will reduce the likelihood of a war-driver finding your network and tagging it for others to find.

      While I'd agree with most of what you've said, this bit about securing your network is probably a little off. MAC filtering, disabling DHCP and hiding the SSID does nothing to increase the security against anyone who can defeat the WEP or WPA crypto of the network. All it does it make using the network a nightmare and encourage the end user to just turn all the security off as soon as you leave and they want to add a new device.

      WPA1 or WPA2 with a nice long key, ideally taped to the under side of the router gives all the security any home user needs and is fairly easy for them to maintain.

      (I would disable the SSID broadcast on business LANs, but not as a security measure. Only to reduce the number of SSIDs guest see when trying to hit the guest LAN, to make there's and supports life easier.)

    4. Re:Number 1 Cause... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My router is over 7 years old and still going strong, WRT54G FTW, running the Tomato firmware it is nice and stable, the only real problem was the power supply dying, but cheaper to replace that than get a new router, and until I need a router that support n then it'll keep doing its job.

    5. Re:Number 1 Cause... by zevans · · Score: 1

      Replace your router

      Or if you do have a clunky client that drags everything else down - keep your old router and use it as an AP for that specific device. I did this for a while, had the Windows Mobile (yeah yeah I know) on the old 11b and ran everything else on shiny new 11n.

      --
      "... and more and more now there are all kinds of electronic goodies available" -- Pink Floyd 1972
  55. Microwave ovens by thepacketmaster · · Score: 1

    Every time the wife turns on our Panasonic Genius microwave the Wifi signal tanks, not to mention the cordless phone is useless. Needless to say, we stand back from the microwave when it's on.

    --

    --

    Luck is just skill you didn't know you had.

  56. Easiest way to bork a WiFi connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lighter with a piezoelectric crystal (generating an electric arc). Press it a few times in rapid succession near a laptop and your WiFi is out. It also kills wireless DTV on my laptop.

  57. Power line networking by Archtech · · Score: 1

    I had terrible trouble with wireless, although my house is quite small and the distances involved were usually less than 30-40 feet. Did some research and found out that most mass-market wireless won't go through a decent brick or concrete wall, is stopped pretty much dead by metal, and doesn't even like double glazing much. So you need to consider what materials your house is made of before you go shopping. If it's wood or some other lightweight material, fine. But if it's built with lots of brick and concrete and steel - maybe not.

    Power line networking to the rescue! I happened to choose Devolo because it looked good quality (although relatively expensive). My problems evaporated within 24 hours, and network speeds have actually increased. I hardly ever use even Ethernet cable any more. Every mains socket is also an Ethernet socket, so I sit down with my laptop, plug in the mains cable, and plug a short length of Ethernet cable into the same socket - and I'm wired.

    Of course, you can do this with a wireless acces point instead of a laptop - so pick the power point that is most convenient for where you want reception, and plug in your access point there - that lets you use your equipment in the garden.

    --
    I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    1. Re:Power line networking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so the solution to wireless interference is eliminating the wireless part? good work, you are a genius

    2. Re:Power line networking by Archtech · · Score: 1

      Thank you!

      But actually, it's fairly obvious that if one approach isn't working you should look for an alternative approach - not keep banging your head against the wall. (Unless you enjoy that...)

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
  58. WTF? by dhaines · · Score: 1

    That was "in-depth?"

  59. metal discs by Bobtree · · Score: 1

    I moved a couple boxes worth of DVDs and CDs away from my router and it has significantly improved the signal strength and reliability (it used to reboot itself fairly regularly). If I put one of those boxes on the floor in a certain place, I can completely block WiFi to the "shadowed" part of the house. Moving the router just a few inches in one direction will effectively kill the signal to my game consoles. Sometimes these little details matter.

  60. Pulse Audio was Killing my WiFi by carrier+lost · · Score: 1

    After weeks of switching locations and settings and trying new routers, I found that Pulse Audio (on a wired computer on the network) was starting twice. Whenever an audio file was played on the offending machine, the dual PA servers would suck bandwidth from the router. It wasn't noticeable on the only other wired machine in the house, but the effect on the wireless machines was complete and utter loss of bandwidth, even though the signal-strength indicators remained high.

  61. Browser based Stumbler and WiFi Mapper by DJ+DeFi · · Score: 1

    Pretty cool for not requiring any software installation. http://meraki.com/tools/

    --
    You cannot warp because you are warp scrambled.