Slashdot Mirror


Daleks To Be Given 'A Rest' From Dr. Who

donberryman writes "Steven Moffat told the BBC 'There's a problem with the Daleks. They are the most famous of the Doctor's adversaries and the most frequent, which means they are the most reliably defeatable enemies in the universe.'" And so, 400+ encounters later, both the Doctor and the daleks will take a break from each other.

332 comments

  1. I guess by c0mpliant · · Score: 1

    someone finally listened to the Daleks... EXTERMINATE!

    Too bad for the Daleks they exterminated them

    --
    There is no -1 disagree
    1. Re:I guess by Dogtanian · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This strikes me as a somewhat sensible decision.

      I mean, I like the Daleks and all that, but they seemed to pop up an awful lot in the new Who series (since 2005) to the point where you got the impression that people forgot Who wasn't all about them. They appeared fairly regularly in the "classic" series, but not quite as frequently as peoples' memories would lead them to believe.

      Then again, I realised a while back that my earliest (and *very* faint) memories of Doctor Who at a very young age are of watching it mainly to see the Daleks- not the Doctor!- and being disappointed when they weren't on. And it's easy as an adult to forget that. But I still think that they've made the right decision- just easing off the Daleks a bit for a while. If kids want to see them, the "old" "new" episodes are still repeated countless times on BBC3 anyway!

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    2. Re:I guess by asdf7890 · · Score: 4, Informative

      They appeared fairly regularly in the "classic" series, but not quite as frequently as peoples' memories would lead them to believe.

      Indeed, Doctors 5 through 7 only met them once each on-screen. 2 & 4 encountered them in two televised stories each, 3 bumped into them in 3 stories and 1 holds the record (if you count modern two-parters as single stories) at 5 televised meetings. I'm ignoring short "guest" appearances here, like the few minutes in the 5 doctors, and counting the last segment of Frontier in Space as a run-on to the full Dalek story that followed.

      The fact that they didn't appear often heightened the excitement for the fans when they did and I agree with many that they have perhaps been overused in recent series, so giving their narrative a break for a bit certainly makes good sense to me.

    3. Re:I guess by grub · · Score: 4, Insightful


      The Daleks went from being a feared nemesis to being a laughing stock.

      Exactly as what happened to The Borg in the Star Trek universe. It got so bad on Voyager that I wouldn't have been surprised to see The Borg beaten in an episode by cream pies in the face as Captain Janeway spun around on the floor yelping "Woop woop woop!" like Curly.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    4. Re:I guess by mackil · · Score: 2

      I agree completely. It's a bit like the Borg from Star Trek TNG. They weren't on the show often, but when they were, it was usually an "event". The Daleks are no longer an "event".

    5. Re:I guess by morari · · Score: 1

      A perfect parallel! The Daleks are an awesome enemy, but once they're defeated two or three times a season, the threat starts to wane. Besides, they all look like bloated, hump-backed iMacs now anyway. :P

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    6. Re:I guess by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I find both the Daleks and the Cyber Men silly.

      I haven't watched the old who, but in the new one they both are stuck looking strait out of 70's si-fi, and it cheapens the look of the whole episode IMO.

      Both act a little too annoying too. Like the borg, but with really annoying voices, and no personality.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    7. Re:I guess by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      A perfect parallel! The Daleks are an awesome enemy, but once they're defeated two or three times a season, the threat starts to wane. Besides, they all look like bloated, hump-backed iMacs now anyway. :P

      Hey, let's bitch about the new Dalek design! Bitching about the new Dalek design is cool.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    8. Re:I guess by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 2

      Exactly as what happened to The Borg in the Star Trek universe.

      At least Trek countered in DS9 with the Dominion. An enemy who, while ultimately defeated, managed to install fear for several seasons.

    9. Re:I guess by guspasho · · Score: 1

      The Daleks started out as a laughing stock. That was their whole appeal from the beginning, because they were so ridiculous. They went Laughingstock -> Feared Nemesis -> Laughingstock.

    10. Re:I guess by morari · · Score: 1

      Maybe I missed out on something because I don't hang around Doctor Who fan forums, but I'm not too found of the "fatter" shape of the new Daleks. If it weren't for that, they wouldn't be too bad.

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    11. Re:I guess by plover · · Score: 1

      Compared to the old episodes, 1970's sci-fi F/X would have been an improvement.

      All things have to be kept in perspective. Those older episodes looked like they were filmed on a budget of about 200 quid. Per season. They could barely afford properly colored gaffer tape to cover up the inverted "Wesco" logo on the garbage bins they used for the first Daleks. The advert for the casting call probably went something like: "Wanted: middle aged gent to portray zany but brilliant scientist. Costumes not provided, please wear your own shabby brown coat; we'll supply the scarf. Pay is eternal fan glory plus 5 pounds 20 per episode."

      In other words, they couldn't spruce them up too much, or they'd have lost their roots. But now they can fly!

      --
      John
    12. Re:I guess by Meski · · Score: 1

      They were invented in the early 60's, so looking like 70's scifi was a good thing.

  2. spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone too by dbIII · · Score: 1

    At the start of Tom Baker's time the sonic screwdriver couldn't even reliably get the Doctor through a locked door, but now it is a magic wand that can do just about anything. Good to see it got written out of the plot recently.

  3. why bother with the new paradigm then by shooteur · · Score: 1

    He should of thought of this before bringing in the New Paradigm.

    1. Re:why bother with the new paradigm then by Denogh · · Score: 1

      This. I've been wanting to see those new paradigm Daleks in an episode, and now my hopes and dreams are crushed.

  4. Stairs by BodeNGE · · Score: 1

    Wern't too hard anyway.

    1. Re:Stairs by ThunderBird89 · · Score: 1

      Daleks don't use stairs. They level the building.

      --
      Hyperbole: I use it liberally!
  5. Borg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's like the Borg. They were over after BOBW part 2.

    1. Re:Borg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's an acronym for that? Seriously?

    2. Re:Borg by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      There is for many Trek episodes, and the fans communicate inn these acronyms. It is no different from fans (like myself) of "classic" Doctor Who referring to significant episodes in short form (if you say "genesis" other fans know you mean "Genesis of the Daleks", "frontier" for "Frontier in space" and so forth). It happens in any situation where you have people who probably know too much about a subject talking to each other (cars, trains and facets of certain sports being three other common examples) - large parts of the subject get rendered as some form of short-hand.

    3. Re:Borg by shadowfaxcrx · · Score: 1

      This had to be explained on a site like /.? ;)

      --
      "I disagree with you" does not equal "flamebait."
  6. Rights? by gmhowell · · Score: 1

    Or does this have to do with not paying rights to the guy who invented them?

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    1. Re:Rights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or does this have to do with not paying rights to the guy who invented them?

      Yeah, Davros has to make a living somehow.

    2. Re:Rights? by Gideon+Wells · · Score: 2

      I thought the rights were technically paid for, but they were licensed under a "Watchmen" like agreement that meant the rights did not revert back (requiring further payment and/or tweaks to the agreement) until the Daleks weren't used for one season. Whence why the Daleks appeared every season in the new series in at least on episode.

      --
      by Anonymous Coward: I, for one, welcome the shift from car analogies to pizza analogies. um.. overlords?
    3. Re:Rights? by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      Quite possibly. The Daleks aren't owned by the BBC / Doctor Who, Terry Nation's estate owns them and leases them back to the BBC. Doctor Who is working under a tighter budget than in previous years, so they may well have decided their money is better spent elsewhere. I can't blame them either, Moffat has a habit of coming up with cool new baddies.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    4. Re:Rights? by grahamm · · Score: 1

      As the guy who invented them (Terry Nation) died in 1997, the rights would be owned by his heirs. Or maybe the BBC themselves own the rights as the Daleks were created for a BBC show.

    5. Re:Rights? by Steauengeglase · · Score: 1

      Good, in the long run I've found myself enjoying the tighter budget episodes a bit more. Keeps the writers on their toes.

    6. Re:Rights? by jimicus · · Score: 1

      As the guy who invented them (Terry Nation) died in 1997, the rights would be owned by his heirs. Or maybe the BBC themselves own the rights as the Daleks were created for a BBC show.

      AFAICT, television - at least under the BBC - seldom works like that. More often than not, virtually anyone who's had any sort of creative input has some sort of rights in each show and these rights are licensed to the BBC under agreements which expire after a certain number of years, a certain number of re-broadcasts or a certain number of lunar eclipses.

      A few years ago the BBC had the great idea to put their entire archive on the Web. Turned out that by the time they excluded everything they didn't have sufficient rights for, they wasn't much left - so the project was shelved.

      (I'm not an expert, I'm just going off what I've been able to gather - corrections welcome.)

    7. Re:Rights? by sjames · · Score: 1

      I can just see playing that on a technicality. Beginning of episode, a Dalek is spotted floating through space, falls into black hole. Dr makes humorous comment and the distinctly not Dalek based story begins. Good for another season!

  7. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The sonic screw driver is in the image in the article. It doesn't work on doors, as long as they are made out of wood (it does not work on wood).

  8. I wish I was a Dalek by ciderbrew · · Score: 1

    After years of not being able to stand Dr Who, I've only just been able to watch this new one. Does it need to be camp? I know the BBC can't spend money; but even the The Dresden Files looked better. I wish liked it more. I would go back and watch the old ones to try and get into it; but his penchant for annoying ginger girls puts me off.

    1. Re:I wish I was a Dalek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having absorbed the old Dr Who with mother's milk, I must take exception to your attitiude. Dr Who is an institution!

    2. Re:I wish I was a Dalek by martin-boundary · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Camp is cool. What the show really needs though is more people wearing fezzes. If the new Daleks had worn fezzes, they'd never have been shitcanned.

    3. Re:I wish I was a Dalek by JustOK · · Score: 1

      or bow ties. A Dalek with a bow tie AND a fez...

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    4. Re:I wish I was a Dalek by Angostura · · Score: 1

      A dalek in a bow-tie.

      Now that would be classy.

    5. Re:I wish I was a Dalek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Thanks for letting us know that you don't like it. Like thousands of others, I'll enter this important information into my diary, and I'm sure someone will create a Wiki page listing this information.

    6. Re:I wish I was a Dalek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You mean like this: A Dalek in a fez and a bow tie. :D

      Yes, the Internet has EVERYTHING.

      Your turn: Rule-34 this! ;)

    7. Re:I wish I was a Dalek by JustOK · · Score: 1

      a dalek goatse

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    8. Re:I wish I was a Dalek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found one here.

    9. Re:I wish I was a Dalek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, a Stetson. Stetsons are cool.

    10. Re:I wish I was a Dalek by Dogtanian · · Score: 2

      After years of not being able to stand Dr Who, I've only just been able to watch this new one. [..] I know the BBC can't spend money; but even the The Dresden Files looked better.

      Er... do you remember what the original series was like? This new one is absolutely massive budget compared to it. That shouldn't be taken to mean that the original series was crap, but even in the best episodes you never got the impression that they had tons of money to throw at it.

      The new one has quite a lot of effects- maybe too much on occasion- and they're really pretty good for the most part.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    11. Re:I wish I was a Dalek by ciderbrew · · Score: 1

      Oh maybe more camp IS needed. I must be in the uncanny valley for camp; But I'll never be able to stand Catherine Tate for more than 3mins. I'd still know it was her under a pile of fezzes.

    12. Re:I wish I was a Dalek by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      Fezzes are cool...

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    13. Re:I wish I was a Dalek by hedwards · · Score: 1

      That's in large part the fault of the crew. I think Red Dwarf is probably one of the best examples of the problem and the solution. Look at series one, series 4 and say series 6, the budget for sets went up little if at all in the mean time, but the sets looked better and better as the series went on, due in large part to more and more creativity in terms of where the money went. Roger Corman is a similar mind, you look back on the Pit and the Pendulum and you'd think it was a much more expensive film than it really was.

    14. Re:I wish I was a Dalek by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

      Here you go. (SFW)

    15. Re:I wish I was a Dalek by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      After years of not being able to stand Dr Who, I've only just been able to watch this new one. [..] I know the BBC can't spend money; but even the The Dresden Files looked better.

      Er... do you remember what the original series was like? This new one is absolutely massive budget compared to it. That shouldn't be taken to mean that the original series was crap, but even in the best episodes you never got the impression that they had tons of money to throw at it.

      The new one has quite a lot of effects- maybe too much on occasion- and they're really pretty good for the most part.

      Effects cost a lot less money these days than they used to. You can get quite far with a couple of PCs and the right software. Most of the money would be spent on the people to use it.

      The new series has a lot more visits to London and Cardiff than the old series had, though. :) But I guess that means fewer trips to the quarry, too.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    16. Re:I wish I was a Dalek by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      I think Red Dwarf is probably one of the best examples of the problem and the solution. Look at series one, series 4 and say series 6, the budget for sets went up little if at all in the mean time, but the sets looked better and better as the series went on, due in large part to more and more creativity in terms of where the money went.

      Up to a point. On the other hand, I notice that you don't mention series 7, which had a noticeably more expensive-looking pretend-film appearance, but was still by far the strongest candidate for its jump the shark moment.

      Actually, in the case of series 7, it tried to jump the shark, didn't even succeed and was metaphorically torn to pieces by the shark, before being eaten and reincarnated as shark poo.

      Urgh, what a disgusting train of thought. :-/

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    17. Re:I wish I was a Dalek by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Even accounting for that, I think it's safe to say that new Who is probably a lot more expensive than the original. As you say, effects software may be cheap, but it still needs a not-so-cheap expert to get the most from it. And the whole scale of the thing is much bigger, even excluding digitally-originated effects.

      FWIW, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation also part-funded it (though having checked this out, it apparently only applied to the second and third series).

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    18. Re:I wish I was a Dalek by laejoh · · Score: 1

      I wish I was a lumberjack, leaping from tree to tree and all...

    19. Re:I wish I was a Dalek by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Eh, I was just talking about the set dressing, from about season VII on they seemed to be doing a lot more than just updating the sets and as such the observation sort of breaks down. Series VI was also the end of the original run and it doesn't strike me as fair to continue beyond there.

  9. because the redisigned daleks look stupid by penguinchris · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing they were planning on doing a bunch more Dalek stories... as you say, they definitely set things up for it (though nothing leading to anything specific), and they redesigned how they look.

    Problem is that the redesigned Daleks look really stupid... like shitty appliances from Sharper Image or Brookstone, from a decade ago. I get that that's probably the same way they were designed originally, based on shitty appliances, but the appliances in the 60's were apparently a lot cooler looking :)

    So, realizing they screwed up with the Dalek redesign, they decide to not have any shows about them for a while... leaving plenty of time for the new Daleks to disappear from time and the original ones to reappear. This can all be explained with a quick hand-wavey timey-wimey explanation like they usually do when things get complicated.

    1. Re:because the redisigned daleks look stupid by Platinumrat · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah! When I saw the new Daleks, I thought: "They look like the Wiggles... and about as scary!".

    2. Re:because the redisigned daleks look stupid by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      This is my thinking too. The huge build up and reveal to the "new" Daleks, and the subsequent behind the scenes stuff with them really said "we think these are going to be awesome!" However, the fan reaction to the new design has put them off and they have had to do an emergency rethink - probably by bringing back the old ones.

      If only the London 2012 committee had done the same thing with the 2012 logo, after realising that after £500,000 or something crazy to design it that *everyone* universally hates it, and the most flattering thing anyone can say is that it looks like Lisa Simpson giving a blow job. The "knocked up in 5 minutes" suggestions posted to the BBC site were almost all better than the official train wreck - although perhaps not the Goatse one that managed to slip through and get posted on the BBC's site.

    3. Re:because the redisigned daleks look stupid by underqualified · · Score: 1

      Problem is that the redesigned Daleks look really stupid... like shitty appliances from Sharper Image or Brookstone, from a decade ago. I get that that's probably the same way they were designed originally, based on shitty appliances, but the appliances in the 60's were apparently a lot cooler looking :)

      So, realizing they screwed up with the Dalek redesign, they decide to not have any shows about them for a while... leaving plenty of time for the new Daleks to disappear from time and the original ones to reappear. This can all be explained with a quick hand-wavey timey-wimey explanation like they usually do when things get complicated.

      Then they come back looking like humans!

      The Daleks Were Created by Man. They Rebelled. They Evolved. They Look and Feel Human. Some are programmed to think they are Human. There are many copies. And they have a Plan.

    4. Re:because the redisigned daleks look stupid by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

      It's gotta be the bold primary colors... those seem to signal children's shows. Plus all the roundedness signals "safe" - it's kinda a meme that scary stuff has sharp angles.

      So they now looks like AI robot pets!

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    5. Re:because the redisigned daleks look stupid by itsdapead · · Score: 1

      Problem is that the redesigned Daleks look really stupid... like shitty appliances from Sharper Image or Brookstone, from a decade ago.

      I'd put it like this:

      Old Daleks: Mini Classic

      New Daleks: BMW Mini

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    6. Re:because the redisigned daleks look stupid by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

      Upturned dustbin with a sink plunger stuck on the front?

    7. Re:because the redisigned daleks look stupid by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Perhaps not the Goatse one that managed to slip through and get posted on the BBC's site.

      You can forgive them that mistake when Audi did a whole UK-wide billboard and newspaper ad campaign that featured similar imagery. It wasn't like they even pulled it or anything AFAICT, the one near where I lived was up for quite a while before they replaced it with another one after roughly the usual length of time.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  10. keep daleks, get rid of writers by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

    Keep the Daleks, but for the love of everything scifi remove the fucking love stories from the show. Also give the current writers the boot, they can take matt smith with them, though in truth he may just suck because of the truly horrible writing.

    1. Re:keep daleks, get rid of writers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Doctor Who's writing is currently better than it has ever been, and Matt Smith is ideal for the role. It's so easy to look back with vague memories and criticise the current version, but don't spoil it while we are experiencing a high moment for the show.

    2. Re:keep daleks, get rid of writers by bloodhawk · · Score: 2

      Sorry I could not disagree more. I have seen almost every episode of all 11 doctors and sat through the great along with some god awefull episodes, but I have never found the show so completely and utterly boring as this current season. This to me is without question the worst it has ever been.

    3. Re:keep daleks, get rid of writers by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      I don't know about that. Maybe it's just me, but I'm finding the current season is getting to be quite hard to follow. I think Moffat needs to cut down just a bit on the wholesale timeline rewriting that he likes to do. There's a fine line between making things complicated, and making things so complicated that people don't bother to untangle it (eg Lost).

    4. Re:keep daleks, get rid of writers by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

      While I will agree there has been a lot of waving arms about the room and proclaiming "There is a CRISIS!!!!1111 -but I know how to solve it! But first, I need a stuffed dog toy. WALK WITH ME!" with this Doctor, it sort of works because the guy seems like a flibbertygibbit.

      But it seems as if the writers have some sort of mandate to come up with twisty bits every other episode. When a character we have all been watching all season suddenly turns out to not be the real thing, then at some point it means the producers and writers have been giving the finger to the audience. And when stunts like that become the norm, regular mundane plots become neglected.

      --
      Sig for hire.
    5. Re:keep daleks, get rid of writers by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      They have made the doctor into some twisted version of inspector gadget with this season. He seems to have no clue but always manages to stumble into the solution. This is not what Doctor Who was meant to be, at least not to me. An overarching story is fine, the odd plot twist is fine. A blundering idiot for a doctor with stupid love stories and that idiotic River theme they have going seems they have finally lost the plot, it is now more like a soapy than the different and cool scifi show I fell in love with.

    6. Re:keep daleks, get rid of writers by malkavian · · Score: 1

      I've found it pretty straightforward.. There's an undercurrent going on, and it's been interesting following it, but certainly not over complicated..

    7. Re:keep daleks, get rid of writers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My problem with it is that it's so bloody formulaic. Going back to "Bad Wolf" in the first series of the reboot it's been exactly the same thing, some little thing in the background that doesn't seem to directly tie in to what's happening (the Vote Saxon posters everywhere, a strange rent in the fabric of space-time, some sinister eye-patch wearing woman) that always seems to be some critical plot point in the season finale. It's not writing proper story arcs, it's just meant to feel like it.

    8. Re:keep daleks, get rid of writers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Love the current writers. Love River. Sorry if y'all can't keep up. My 7 year old son can.

    9. Re:keep daleks, get rid of writers by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      He's ideal for the role for a kids's show; however Moffatt, as Matt Smith pointed out ITFA, Doctor Who has become a show too scary for kids. The end of the most recent episode with Pond screaming until the credits was just a bit disturbing and is giving my female friends nightmares. Moffatt is an amazing story-teller, but often times he'll turn it to 11 for dramatic effect, when really the story only calls for a 7 in what's really a kid's show.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    10. Re:keep daleks, get rid of writers by Jiro · · Score: 1

      And I hate River. River is a classic Mary Sue--the kind of character that a 13 year old girl would put in a fanfic. "I'm the Doctor's secret wife, and I'm the only one who can talk smack to him, and I can time travel like him and I'm as mysterious as him and I have a really cool name."

    11. Re:keep daleks, get rid of writers by my+$anity++0 · · Score: 1

      If you pay attention, he seems to have every clue as to what is going on, often a level or two deeper than the audience. Which is exactly how it should be. The Doctor knew he was going to die, for example, way before Amy told him.

    12. Re:keep daleks, get rid of writers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and I have a really cool name

      You do know you can have pretty much any name you like, right? If you really want to be called River Song or Max Power or Ransom Love or whatever then go for it.

    13. Re:keep daleks, get rid of writers by szyzyg · · Score: 2

      Sorry, Current generation of Who is consistently better than anything else from the modern of classic era, I've watched ever episode that exists and listened to all the Big Finish audio production and the Moffat era Who really is magnificent.

      It says a lot that the best episodes in recent years have all been Moffat penned:
      The Empty Child/The Doctor Dances
      The Girl In The Fireplace
      Blink
      Silence In the Library/Forest of The Dead
      and of course.... he's now the producer, he's yet to top 'Blink' - but it's consistenly better on so many levels that I find myself feeling sorry for both Tennant and Ecclestone who were fine actors but kept on being given poor scripts to work with.

      There are many many classic era episodes that rank up there with the current generation - 'The Talons of Weng Chiang' and 'Genesis of the Daleks' being two particularly fine examples. But there's sooooo much mediocre dross like timelash that brings the classic show down.

    14. Re:keep daleks, get rid of writers by wolfemi1 · · Score: 1

      Really? The death of the Doctor didn't do it for you? The Silence? Amy being a Flesh duplicate? Questions of morality brought up by conscious biological tools? Damn, you must be watching a different series than me.

  11. Only this season by Nick+Fel · · Score: 3, Informative

    Moffat has clarified that he was only talking about the current season: https://twitter.com/#!/steven_moffat/status/75506136593338368

  12. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by coolmadsi · · Score: 3, Informative

    At the start of Tom Baker's time the sonic screwdriver couldn't even reliably get the Doctor through a locked door, but now it is a magic wand that can do just about anything. Good to see it got written out of the plot recently.

    It's been destroyed a couple of times since the reboot, and another one has been made, usually popping out the TARDIS console. He used it in the last scene of the last episode that was aired (unless you're talking about future episodes...). It is a fairly simple to use plot device though (need to move plot forward = use screwdriver to open door, otherwise, need to keep characters where they are = door is deadlocked)

  13. Horrible writers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, they should kick these bad writers with names that nobody knows like Neil Gaiman,

    1. Re:Horrible writers by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      Neil Gaiman did one episode.

      And, yes, it was very good. Cheap-looking TARDIS corridors notwithstanding.

      But this was right after "Curse of the Black Spot" - which was kind of a lemon, IMO. I've really enjoyed the Eleventh Doctor so far but he has had a few really weak episodes.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
  14. 50th Anniversary??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They better be back in time for the Doctor Who anniversary next year!!!

  15. Re:WHO'S ON FIRST ?? by martin-boundary · · Score: 1, Funny

    Of course you don't know! There's a simple explanation for that. The timey wimey folds of spacetime have done a wibbly wobbley again, that's why!

  16. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    They solved the problem with the sonic screwdriver a few years ago by inventing the deadlock seal - anything that is deadlock sealed can't be opened by the magic wand. I'm not sure what you mean about it being written out of the plot though. In the last episode, the Doctor left it behind, but he's done that several times before and made a new one...

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  17. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by ThunderBird89 · · Score: 2

    He did give it to his ganger to disintegrate the animalistic one (though I fail to see why couldn't they just open the door for a second, and have the real Doctor press the button), but by the end of the episode, the TARDIS generated the new one (and presumably destroyed the old one to prevent misuse), which he used to disintegrate Amy's replicant.

    --
    Hyperbole: I use it liberally!
  18. Nope. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    which means they are the most reliably defeatable enemies in the universe.

    Surely they're not as incompetent as Evil Warlords, who are so bad that they have to keep a rulebook on screw-ups to avoid.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:Nope. by arkenian · · Score: 1

      which means they are the most reliably defeatable enemies in the universe.

      Surely they're not as incompetent as Evil Warlords, who are so bad that they have to keep a rulebook on screw-ups to avoid.

      You forgot the most important part: "... and then, decide that this time is special, so ignore all the advice."

  19. Cheating Daleks by Zoxed · · Score: 1

    I still think it was cheating when they changed the Daleks to be able to float up stairs :-)

    1. Re:Cheating Daleks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Didn't they do that in the 60s? I can remember them floating from Pertwee episodes.

      So technically, I think that means they didn't change anything.

    2. Re:Cheating Daleks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i remember a Tom Baker episode of him mocking them for not being able to go up a chute after them, but also remember a Sylvester McCoy episode of one flying up the staircase. 'Rememberence of The Daleks'

    3. Re:Cheating Daleks by delinear · · Score: 1

      The first instance of them hovering in the TV show was Revelation of the Daleks, in 1985 - I had to look this up as the first one I clearly remembered was Remembrance of the Daleks as well, but in any event they've had the ability for just over 25 of their nearly 50 years. I still like the classic response that they don't need to climb stairs when they can just level buildings - nobody mocks a Challenger tank's inability to climb ladders :)

    4. Re:Cheating Daleks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still not as bad as flying R2D2, but still cheesy.

    5. Re:Cheating Daleks by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      I still think it was cheating when they changed the Daleks to be able to float up stairs :-)

      In the First Doctor story "The Chase", they land on the deck Mary Celeste. Later, one of the Daleks is up on the poop deck. So the Daleks in that story were able to get up stairs (assuming, of course, that they didn't use their time machine to teleport up there or something...)

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    6. Re:Cheating Daleks by JosKarith · · Score: 1

      I recently watched through all the old Dr Who (except for the lost Troughton series obviously) and the first floating Daleks were in the McCoy era. In the 60's films they had some disks to float on but that was it.

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
  20. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many locks have you seen made of wood?

  21. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe this was because the Doctor needed to see what happened [i]first hand[/i] when you destroy a ganger, ie. his own?

  22. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by rufty_tufty · · Score: 3, Insightful

    i think a lot of this comes down to the quality of the writers not the tools at the disposal of the characters. A bad/mediocre writer will wave the magic wand to get past the problem the writer has put the character in. To create tension they'll have the magic wand not work. This is fine and an audience will put up with this provided the rest of the story is enough to keep them interested.
    A good writer won't need a sonic screwdriver or a deadlock seal, the traps and problems will be those of circumstance, character traits and morals. But like any tool they can be overused too, there's only so many times the lock of the doctor being a pacifist being opened by a companion sacrifice can be used; but we're back to the good vs bad writer stage again...
    So I've no problems with the Daleks being used a lot, used in every episode even as long as they are used well. That does seem to worry me about the new Dr Who that they're not being used because they have a good story but used like the sonic to up the tension and that just doesn't work long term.

    --
    "The weirdest thing about a mind, is that every answer that you find, is the basis of a brand new cliche" -
  23. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by rufty_tufty · · Score: 1

    Hate to reply to myself but:
    I meant to say that the daleks being used like the sonic as a writing tool, only instead of being used to let him through any door, to solve any problem, to magic the badness away being used to up the tension at any moment. No need to have a good idea just add Dalek for instant tension. Sorry, overused, doesn't work, come back when you have a good story.

    --
    "The weirdest thing about a mind, is that every answer that you find, is the basis of a brand new cliche" -
  24. For the Best by WhirlwindMonk · · Score: 2

    Definitely for the best in my opinion, and not just because of writing quality, the new design, or anything like that. They've just lost their "oomph." Early on, they were terrifying, seeing them pop up suddenly made my heart sink, wondering how they would get through the situation. Now that the Doctor has plowed through them countless times, in increasingly absurd numbers, they just don't evoke that reaction anymore. "I am the last Dalek!" *dead* "We are the last of the Dalek fleet!" *dead* "We are the last five Daleks!" *dead* "We are all the Daleks ever!" *dead* "We are the last five Daleks! (again!)" *dead*

    And, at least for me, the same is true of the cybermen. To be fair, I wasn't a huge fan of them as an enemy in the first place, but they definitely feel stale to me now. I'd love to see the return of some of the enemies used only a couple times, or something new and unique. The weeping angels were just fantastic. They were unique, dangerous without being pegged as "THE WORST THING THAT THE DOCTOR HAS EVER FACED!!!!11", and, perhaps most importantly, used sparingly. Maybe one more episode of them this season, perhaps with a nice twist on the theme, amidst some one-shot challenges, and perhaps even a brand new recurring foe.

    1. Re:For the Best by bsane · · Score: 1

      I'm not a huge fan of cybermen either, but I the current rounds of cybermen are supposedly separately evolved. 'Cybermen' is more like a category of self-replicating cyborg, who all happen to have the same mask. I'm not saying that makes sense or is ok, but its different than 'we got them all! except for this one...'

    2. Re:For the Best by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      Cybermen are the zombies of Dr. Who. They can crop up all sorts of ways, and once there's a few, they can replicate themselves by preying on the living...

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  25. The Doctor needs a break too by RedBear · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Unfortunately the Daleks aren't the only thing that needs a break. So does the Doctor. He has become a bad charicature of himself.

    This new season is sort of like being forced to watch a Jerry Bruckheimer film every weekend, with all of the ludicrously over-dramatic theme music and gag-me-with-a-spoon melodramatic themes. Already last season the new Doctor was a little too full of himself, but I was quite shocked to find that it got infinitely worse this season. And the ridiculous "mysterious" River Song character that keeps being forced into every episode for some unknown reason just makes me want to vomit. Every time she smugly says her signature line I want someone to punch her in the mouth.

    The plots, and the Doctor himself, are so incoherent that even I barely know what the hell just happened at the end of an episode, and I'm normally the guy in the room who is explaining the plot twists to others. The new episodes make almost zero sense, like they're using some random plot element generator to write the stories for them. The behavior of the characters no longer rings true, so the stories fall flat. The new Doctor comes across as a gibbering moron who doesn't pay attention to anyone or anything besides himself and yet magically finds his way out of every possible situation without seeming to have the slightest clue what he's doing.

    I've managed to find and watch nearly every episode of the old series (thanks Pirate Bay!) and thoroughly enjoyed almost every single episode, from the first Doctor right up through all the David Tennant seasons. But this newest stuff has pretty much made me stop wanting to watch the show, at least until they get new writers. It takes some real talent to screw up a show that has been pretty entertaining for decades already using a very simple formula. They should really just rename the show to "The Something Horribly Bad Happens to the Tardis Every Week Show" which seems to be the common theme now.

    1. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      You pretty well nailed my exact thoughts. After over 30 years of eagerly watching anything and everything Doctor who I am finding the new stuff more and more cringe worthy, The current season is beyond apalling, perhaps the show needs a rest again till they can find some decent writers that can rediscover what made Doctor Who such a long lasting show in the first place, and it certainly wasn't the shit they are currently churning out.

    2. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      Totally disagree, this season has been pretty good apart from the yawn fest that was the pirate episode. Though it isn't perfect, but what season is? I do feel a little cheated by the fourth episode as I thought we would meet other Time Lords, other than that, I think it's been pretty coherent as a series. Though I should mention, it was soooo predictable that the ganger Doctor wasn't going to survive beyond the story it was introduced in. It felt like a cop out that those two gangers *had* to stay behind and stop the monster coming through the door. It was hardly a tight situation so everybody could make it back to the TARDIS. Oh actually while I'm nitpicking, didn't it seem forced that the humans rejected the gangers right off the bat. My reaction would be like the Doctor's, fucking cool! A double!

      What Moffat might be trying to do with the entire season is add some value to them so we have to re-watch them again. Like Fight Club, it deserved a second and third viewing because the ending changed the entire premise of the story.

      Amy Pond annoys me btw, I'm glad she won't feature much in the next episode, time for Rory to stand up and become a more central character as I like him very much. He has a heart and doesn't seem as self-centred as Amy (he was moved by the TARDIS dying in the previous story). Rory also isn't the racist Amy is.

    3. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 1

      Already last season the new Doctor was a little too full of himself, but I was quite shocked to find that it got infinitely worse this season.

      Agreed. It seems like the new way the Doctor gets out of impossible situations always begins with something like "Do you know who I am? I did X, I did Y, I'm the Doctor, you should fear me!", sometimes ending with the bad guys just picking up and scampering away.

      Last season was terrible about this, and it's carried over into this season despite the new Doctor and change of show runner. The cocky Doctor needs to go.

      River Song doesn't bother me quite as much, but she's definitely the Doctor's version of LOST -- lots of mystery and never any pay off. It seems like this arc might finally come to an end this season, but who knows.

    4. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow. It's amazing how two people can watch the same thing and get something completely different from it.

      Since Moffat has taken over, I feel the quality is the best it's ever been. I love the season spanning sub-plots, which are built up with plot hints and subtle clues over months. They're always surprising, yet for me have been logical and obvious when revealed.

      I could go on, but I've made my point. I'm not saying I'm right, 'cos there's no such thing with matters of taste, obviously, but I do find it fascinating how I disagree with every single one of your points about as strongly as I could.

      The human brain. Infinite possibilities :p

    5. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like someone that would like "lost". Since Moffat Started it has all been downhill and it aint a gently sloping hill at that. for the first time ever I am hoping each episode the doctor or maybe river/rory/amy dies so they can find an excuse to flush the garbage stories lines they have adopted and maybe push it back to where it should be. I truly hope this season sees the end of moffat and potentially the current cast too (though with the current writing it is impossible to say if thy have any potential to actualy be good).

    6. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by rsmith-mac · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I'd agree that the Doctor has become a caricature of himself, but certainly the quality of the plots has suffered.

      Moffat's desire to have a strong overarching plot means that nothing ever makes sense until the very end. It falls in to that same trap that shows like Lost and Heroes did, where confusing the audience was mistaken for a clever plot ("ha ha, I fooled you!"). Certainly there are good reasons to do arcs, and well done arcs are fantastic, but as it stands the main arcs of Moffet's seasons make absolutely no sense. It's very hard to enjoy a show when you have no idea what's going on.

    7. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The new episodes make almost zero sense

      Since they rebooted the series they have been pushing more for time paradoxes running stories. For example "Bad Wolf", "Torchwood", "Saxon" and "There is something on your back". Each season it appears to get more and more in your face. In this series it appears to be the woman through the hatch, which makes sense now since the last weekend.

      So at the start of each series they do appear to be a mess but wrap up nicely.

    8. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Threni · · Score: 1

      > You pretty well nailed my exact thoughts. After over 30 years of eagerly watching
      > anything and everything Doctor who I am finding the new stuff more and more cringe
      > worthy,

      Possibly because 30 years ago you were a child, and now you are grown up?

      It's just like Mr Noodle from Elmo's World. I used to find it funny, but now I just think he attempts to feed plants with a spoon rather than, say, a glass of water are simply laughable.

    9. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by RedBear · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You're reply is quite amusing, probably unintentionally. You like the show except for all the boring, predictable, nonsensical and annoying parts? Perhaps you just haven't reached your saturation point yet for those elements like I did from the very first episode this season. I gave it a couple more tries hoping it would get better, but it didn't. I didn't even bother watching the second part of the episode you're referring to, because I was thoroughly disgusted by the time the first half was over.

      I have noticed the clues to some over-arcing theme that will certainly be wrapped up at the end of the season, but a grand finale won't save save something for me that has such awful individual episodes.

      To each their own. By all means, enjoy the show as long as you are able.

    10. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      I can still enjoy old episodes, I can even enjoy most all of it including most of the david tennent stuff (most). Age has nothing to do wtih it. The current stuff is like watching a soapy combined with inspector Gadget and Lost.

    11. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by RedBear · · Score: 2

      Already last season the new Doctor was a little too full of himself, but I was quite shocked to find that it got infinitely worse this season.

      Agreed. It seems like the new way the Doctor gets out of impossible situations always begins with something like "Do you know who I am? I did X, I did Y, I'm the Doctor, you should fear me!", sometimes ending with the bad guys just picking up and scampering away.

      Last season was terrible about this, and it's carried over into this season despite the new Doctor and change of show runner. The cocky Doctor needs to go.

      That is EXACTLY what I'm talking about. He seems to think he's a cross between Superman and Jesus Christ now, like he's both invincible and can do no wrong even while people are getting killed all around him. In the real world (where the Doctor used to live) that kind of crap would have gotten his ass atomized a dozen times over by now.

      I don't want to watch the Superchrist Spacey Soap Opera Show, I want to watch Doctor Who, where a clever guy encounters strange alien mysteries and narrowly avoids getting killed by being clever, not by being stupidly arrogant and self-absorbed and melodramatic.

    12. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Monsieur+Canard · · Score: 1

      Was that Mr. Noodle or Mr. Noodle's brother Mr. Noodle?**

      --
      He took a duck to the face at 250 knots.
    13. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by arevos · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The plots, and the Doctor himself, are so incoherent that even I barely know what the hell just happened at the end of an episode, and I'm normally the guy in the room who is explaining the plot twists to others.

      I haven't had any problems understanding what happens in each episode. In fact, I find the two new series by Steven Moffat to be considerably better than the old Russel T. Davies series.

      Russel T. Davies was infamous for "Doctor Ex Machina" plots, in which the Doctor would pull technobabble solutions out of his ass at the last minute. His villains were either re-introduced monsters from old Doctor Who episodes, or extremely uninteresting evil aliens who were entirely interchangeable.

      Steven Moffat actually attempts to write science fiction, in that the Doctor's solutions are based on rules set up earlier in the episode, rather than rectum-derived technobabble. The viewer gets all the information the Doctor gets, so when he reveals the solution there's a genuine feeling of "Oh, now that's quite clever". Moffat's monsters also typically have some kind of interesting gimmick and often have some relation to the real world, giving them a certain scare factor that's not present in Davies' generic aliens.

    14. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by crossmr · · Score: 1

      I've been extremely disappointed with this season and last. Matt Smith has done absolutely nothing for me. While Tennant quickly won me over, I've given Smith plenty of time to find his groove and have zero excitement about the stories like I had with the last doctor.

      It's a shame as we're getting to the end of the regenerations, but they need to do something to give some life back to this franchise, it's a shame it's going down the toilet so fast.

    15. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Having an arc doesn't make you into Lost or Heroes (or Galactica, or the X-Files) - what does that is trying to make an arc without actually bothering to figure out the ending first. So you just keep getting more and more mysteries that whatever writer decides to cram in this week without any underlying logic, and it soon becomes ridiculously unworkable.

      Whereas, if you decide to have a story arc, and you plan it ahead of time, and you stick to that plan, you get such wonderful things as Babylon 5.

    16. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amy Pond annoys me btw

      A big step up from Rose or Cathrine Tate's character though. The companion character is crafted to be the anchor between the viewer and the abnormal world, but they seem to forget the part where they make her a good character beyond that.

    17. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice troll bro

    18. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1

      It's a shame as we're getting to the end of the regenerations, but they need to do something to give some life back to this franchise, it's a shame it's going down the toilet so fast.

      I'm just guessing, but fairly sure that the 12 regenerations thing has been dropped in the reboot. There has been no mention of it that I am aware of since the start of the 2005 season. If they were still considering it, then when the Master returned would have been a good time to mention it as he was well past his 12th regeneration prior to the reboot. Plus David Tennant started to regenerate to heal himself in an episode and shunted the extra energy to his hand at one point. I would assume that it would count as his 11th regeneration and the current would be his last if that were the case.

    19. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I differ in opinion. The later David Tenant episodes and Colin Baker rank down near the bottom for me. Matt Smith has been more interesting as of late. I loved the Doctor's Wife episode.

    20. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Fractal+Dice · · Score: 1

      Think of the current state of Doctor Who as a multi-year episode of Blink - there is a huge sprawling plotline going on, but it's not going to all make sense until the end.

    21. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by FredFredrickson · · Score: 1

      There's no way to wrap up River Song with this Doctor, she commented on how young David Tennant looked during "Silence in the Library", and Matt Smith looks even younger. The beginning of her story MUST start with an older doctor.

      --
      Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex
    22. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I disagree, Matt Smith has taken Moffat's excellent writing and really made something of the character, far more so than the previous two actors ever did. To be fair to them I think Davies' stories were the real problem for them; compared to Moffat's they were just childish and shallow for the most part and suffered heavily from defeating the Daleks/Cybermen every single week. It reminds me of the Borg from Star Trek - in TNG they were quite scary, with a single cube being almost unstoppable, but then Voyager came along and Janeway beat them every week until they were just a lame caricature of themselves.

      Smith's Doctor is more like the pre-2005 ones, and to me infinitely preferable to Tennant's. The companions are more likeable too and the dynamic with the three of them works well. The Doctor babbles out a stream-of-conciousness monologue sometimes and it gives you an insight into how is mind is working, but also how he uses it to manipulate people by drawing their attention away from other things. The plots are complex but not hard to understand I think.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    23. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      All the shows I like (All three StarGate series, Deep Space Nine and Doctor Who) have problems within themselves. It's because I care about consistency within the mythos. What should I do, not watch any of them? I have to accept sadly nothing is perfect. Even if I could produce on Doctor Who and fix what I think needs fixing, somebody will dislike my changes as well). I could rant on about other aspects of Doctor Who if I wanted, but I won't and it is still better than the usual crud on offer.

    24. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      Disagree, Amy's slightly a step higher than Rose but that's not giving her much. But Amy is a big step down from Martha and at least Donna wasn't self-centered. Rory makes the better anchor and more grounded in reality, not getting carried away in a fantasy. Besides, what's wrong with having a permanent male companion? Mickey was a joke at first but matured and actually all the male characters seem better written. Amy ruins the show for me.

    25. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by gad_zuki! · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Comments like yours just illustrate how art is subjective.

      I love Moffat's work. Its incredible. The production is good too. The music you dislike, I feel is wonderful and cinematic. I find the stories incredibly engaging and the stories before Moffat's reign to be a bit of a cookie-cutter yawn-fest and drama that, frankly, just didn't work most of the time.

      That said, I do find the show to be incredibly ridiculous and I'm not sure what 'gritty realism" people like you celebrate. Every episode of this show is incredibly shlocky. Its more "adult fairytales" than anything approaching sci-fi. I think Moffat understands this on a fundamental level and is really delivering the goods.

    26. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Bloodwine77 · · Score: 1

      I know a lot of people dislike Russel T Davies, but I loved the Bad Wolf story arc throughout the first season. It wasn't overbearing and it just made you go, "what the hell does that mean?!". The plots of the episodes themselves weren't overly convoluted and shoe-horned to fit the story arc.

      I found season 5's time crack story arc a bit too in-your-face and was overly used.

      Also, the season 5 finale felt anti-climatic. It just did not have much of an epic feel. It just didn't seem up-to-standard, especially with all the lead-in hype.

    27. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Bloodwine77 · · Score: 1

      Also, Supernatural. It is one of the few U.S. shows where the creator had a finite-season vision instead of a never-ending series. It is a story arc that spans 5 seasons, yet works very, very well.

      Of course, the ratings were so good that the network asked for more seasons. The original show runner stepped down because he said he has told his story. While Supernatural season 6 isn't horrible, you can feel that it somewhat lacks the direction of previous seasons.

      I wish more U.S. shows were planned around a set number of seasons.

    28. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't had any problems understanding what happens in each episode. In fact, I find the two new series by Steven Moffat to be considerably better than the old Russel T. Davies series.

      The giddyness has gone (thankfully), however, the high concept but ultimately superficial plots remain. OTOH, I though midnight was every bit as unnerving as blink.

      Russel T. Davies was infamous for "Doctor Ex Machina" plots

      The new series isn't much better, the 45 minute run time for syndication is responsible for some of it. The story arcs are still crap, high stakes peril isn't the most engaging of dramatic devices and the exposition has been clumbsy.

      Whenever you get things thrown in because they're cool, the story suffers. This is why the star wars prequels suck and it's why the new doctor who sucks. Did they really need to go to Utah for the season opener? Did it add anything to the story that they couldn't have gotten with a second unit and some simple green screen work? No but it was cool to go film in the US!

    29. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Bloodwine77 · · Score: 2

      If you want gritty realism then you watch Torchwood. That has to be one of the most depressing TV shows I have ever watched.

    30. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't quite go as far as you two do, but, yeah, as another 30 year-or-so watcher of Dr. Who, they are straying dangerously close to incoherence at times, and, yes, I'm the guy in the room usually explaining the plot. Neil Gaiman's episode was a nice exception this season (shows you can do a good episode with a "something bad happens to the Tardis" plot), but other than that, they seem to be investing more in special effects and sets, and less on writers. Given how things were usually done on the cheap, the former is a good thing, but NOT at the expense of the latter.

    31. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Steauengeglase · · Score: 1

      I think I could do without the Amy intro on every episode. Every time I see it I stop for a moment and wonder if the BBC has done a UK re-working of The Ghost Whisperer.

    32. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by pjbgravely · · Score: 1
      Not The Doctor's face, his eyes.

      River: ...Look at you. You're young.
      The Doctor: I'm really not, you know.
      River: Oh but you are. Your eyes! You're younger than I've ever seen you.
      The Doctor: You've seen me before then?

      --
      Star Trek, there maybe hope.
    33. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Denogh · · Score: 1

      I think Matt Smith has the potential to be a brilliant Doctor. Maybe just dumping Moffat would be best.

    34. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by MrNemesis · · Score: 2

      Disclaimer: I haven't watched any of the current series yet (despite living in the UK), I prefer to save them up and watch them all in a big lump. I also didn't have any points to mod you up, hence the reply.

      I'm also much more of a fan of Moffat's style, and I'm actually surprised people are comparing his style to that of "Lost"; Moffat has always loved elaborate lead-ups that make little sense until the denouement (if any of you haven't seen the sublime Brit Com "Coupling" I can highly recommend it; lots of realistically filthy humour and meticulously constructed plots in a Fawlty Towers-esque pantomime). I got tired of Lost and its ilk very quickly because they never seemed to progress, at all, either on a plot or sub-plot basis; Moffat is frequently labyrinthine but I've never felt disappointed by any of his it-won't-make-sense-until-the-end scripts. YMMV I guess.

      Being a Who veteran of some years, I also *much* prefer his sense of fear and foreboding to that of RTD's. He's been a Who geek since he was a kid, and despite retaining the campy charm that's always been quintessentially Who he's turned the creeping sense of horror up quite a bit from what I thought was the rather more po-faced stuff in RTD's run, but then he's also a guy who also spent a lot of time behind the sofa as a kid so maybe we're both just creeped out by similar things - the things you can't see/hear being a major theme in a lot of his monsters.

      That said, The Girl in the Fireplace and Blink are still by far the best Who I've seen from Moffat (or, indeed, at all in the new series).

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    35. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Trarman · · Score: 2

      Amy Pond annoys me btw, I'm glad she won't feature much in the next episode, time for Rory to stand up and become a more central character as I like him very much. He has a heart and doesn't seem as self-centred as Amy (he was moved by the TARDIS dying in the previous story). Rory also isn't the racist Amy is.

      Rory really is an untapped goldmine in this series. He's what, a thousand years OLDER than the doctor now? I'm rather surprised that waiting around for Amy to get out of the Pandorica hasn't matured his character any.

    36. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

      In my experience every single show that runs too long ends up turning into a caricature of itself. The writers get fixated on certain distinguishing character traits and exaggerate those. They default to the predictable. It's not surprise to see this happening with Dr. Who.

    37. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I was thinking the exact opposite. What the doctor needs is a good run to have the caste mature and meld with the writers. The first season is always a bit dodgy in any show, but this doctor has been especially good and I think the characters of the doctor and Rory are really coming along.

      Amy Pond needs to come along a bit more. They used her recently a couple of times as the dumb character which needs things explained to her, but I think that was a big mistake as it seemed to take her backwards from last season. Best to have new characters in the episode which need to be told about time travel in order to bring along the audience. You'd think after a year or two the main characters would figure out basic stuff about paradoxes and time travel and timey whimmey stuff. Also, the strength of the last two doctors was that he needed his companions as a moral compass sometimes, but that balance like it is a bit lacking now.

      So, I think it would be really good if they could keep the actors together for a third season, at least, before thinking about switching companions yet again. Bring back the time lords in some interesting way... they seemed to be back in the Doctor's daughter (as a clone) and somehow with Amy's pregnancy or that little girl which seemed to be related.

      Rory is also technically older than the doctor now since he lived for two thousand years in the alternate timeline, it should show more in the character from time to time.

      River Song is going to be "revealed" finally in an upcoming episode. But I think the biggest mystery so far is why there is any mystery. It was already complicated to have a relationship out of sequence. But I guess having a twist of unexpected is to be expected.

      So, I still very much enjoy the show and look forward to seeing each episode. Best sci-fi on tv right now.

    38. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by saratchandra · · Score: 1

      I agree completely. I just hope that Doctor Who would be more about the Timelord and less about the humans (Amy and Rory can go jump off a cliff for all I care). Too much drama about the two is nauseating.

    39. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by CrackedButter · · Score: 2

      Yeah, why doesn't those 2000 years of experience kick in for him?

    40. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Personally where I think they lost it is the "self-rescue" time travel when he was locked in the box. The whole part about not crossing your own timestream was what kept the series sane from the obvious solution - just go back in time and warn/stop/do something before it becomes a problem. Or indeed a future doctor can now show up and save the current one from anything. That was a limit to his power, when he became linked to the events he had to stay and fight, he couldn't just run back to the TARDIS and fix everything. Now he's just jumping around as he pleases, like in the Christmas special where he's rewriting the man's memories while he's standing there. Why is not that the answer to every villain now, go back in time and stop them from becoming villains? Now they have to hide his omnipotence behind absurdity, like it's all some kind of game to him. They need to dial back that mania a notch or two.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    41. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by FredFredrickson · · Score: 1

      good catch

      --
      Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex
    42. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Well, he's a plastic duplicate - maybe his mind can't change the way a human would. Compared to all the other stuff, that's more than plausible.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    43. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by szyzyg · · Score: 1

      "I barely know what the hell just happened at the end of an episode"

      Maybe it's a generational thing, but my 6 year old daughter frequently has to explain the finer details of the plot to her mum,

    44. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's something that the doctor has always been able to do, but rarely does simply due to the resulting complications, but in some cases, there really aren't many other choices. In the Christmas episode it was fairly clear that the doctor wasn't going to be able to use a technological solution to the problem, and the antagonist couldn't be bribed or otherwise cajoled into changing his mind so there weren't many other options. Also, considering that the episode was based on Dickens' A Christmas Carol it was fairly clear why it had to be done. In some cases it's flat out impossible to do because something has been "time-locked" or exists in such a manner that it cannot be changed. While crossing ones own timestream shouldn't be done every time, there's no reason to completely avoid it if it gets in the way of telling a good story.

    45. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      He was a plastic duplicate. But good point.

    46. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Bloodwine77 · · Score: 2

      The current Rory is human. His auton duplicate was destroyed during the 2nd big bang.

      I think his character has matured some, but you also have to realize that he spent those 2,000 years being a guardian over the box. It is not likely that he went off traveling the world and having many opportunities to interact and learn.

      He showed his maturity during the Rebel Flesh two-parter. He didn't look down on the flesh humanoids and he seemed to be very in-sync with the Doctor about respecting their lives. I suspect he was very sympathetic to the flesh because he has memories of being an Auton. When he was an Auton he felt like he was still Rory, so he can understand how the flesh have to wrestle with having the memories and personality of a person, but in fact be their duplicates.

    47. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crossing your own timestream can destroy the universe; it was okay in the finale because the universe was already being destroyed. The Doctor mentioned at the time that hopping around with the vortex manipulator was much easier now that the universe was so much smaller, and Rory said outright in 6x01 that the universe was destroyed the last time the Doctor saved himself.

      The Christmas specials have all been heavily hammed up; my takeaway has always been that the events are canon but the physics are probably oneoffs. I doubt we'll see a post-regenerative Doctor regrowing limbs again, for instance. What I thought was most interesting about this Christmas episode in particular is that the Doctor's shenanigans didn't make that big a difference in the past; Scrooge still grew up to be a grumpy misogynistic old man. None of it undid his decision to screw the ship in the beginning, in particular. The man only really changed in the present, after being confronted with his past.

      Moffat is a sucker for stable causal loops, but then so am I, so I heartily approve these timey-wimey shenanigans.

    48. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was intentional. Moffat's already explained, eventually, the Doctor can only make that threat so many times before he has to back it up. And he's about to back it up in a big way.

    49. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

      Nice diatribe, but I'm not convinced. What is this concept that time off from the air will magically make the series better? Consistent good writing, production, and acting does that, and it has absolutely nothing to do with a show becoming "tired." The entire concept is ludicrous.

      Besides, the new episodes are nowhere near as bad as the John Nathan Turner era. Don't get me wrong. Troughton (what few survive) and Tom Baker (except for the last season) are still the best, IMNSHO, but I'd definitely put Smith's series up there near the top. The only problem I see is that the Doctor keeps looking younger. It'll be hard to go back to a middle aged or elderly regeneration. I wonder if they will actually go with a female Doctor next time. It's the logical thing at this point.

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    50. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by iJusten · · Score: 1

      When 11th Doctor did a crossover with Sarah Jane Adventures, he mentioned that he had 507 incarnations.

      The Master was on his last incarnation during the classic series, but said he had been granted a new set due to the services he provided during Time War.

      --
      Chronologically late.
    51. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Theovon · · Score: 1

      Season 5 switched from sci fi to fairy tail. For some people, this was great, while for others, it was horrible. Moffat is going out on a limb, trying to be "fresh" and "different". Not everyone likes it.

      Season 6 is taking that to a whole new level. Everything is designed to be as shocking as possible. My wife is a fantacy nut and a writer, so she can predict basically any plot twist of any show, which drives me nuts, but there have been one or two plot points this season that she did not anticipate, like Amy being a ganger. (I'll have to ask her if/when she anticipated the Doctor's death in episode 1. I forget if she mentioned it. She probably did since the spoilers said that someone from the TARDIS gang would die, and what would be more shocking than that being the Doctor himself?)

      For some people, going out on a limb like this is exciting. For others, they're annoyed that Moffat is trying to one-up M. Knight Shayamalan.

      Me? I'll let you know when it's all over. How are we going to get out the hole dug by the Doctor's death? And who is that little girl who regenerates at the end of episode 2? And where is Amy? And why can't we have more episodes like "The Doctor's Wife" and fewer like "The Black Spot"?

    52. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      Yeah, why doesn't those 2000 years of experience kick in for him?

      Experience doing what? Sitting around guarding a great big box? There's only so much you can learn from that. :)

      (But they established in a bit of dialogue in this season that he only remembers that stuff "sometimes"...)

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    53. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Tetsujin · · Score: 2

      Already last season the new Doctor was a little too full of himself, but I was quite shocked to find that it got infinitely worse this season.

      Agreed. It seems like the new way the Doctor gets out of impossible situations always begins with something like "Do you know who I am? I did X, I did Y, I'm the Doctor, you should fear me!", sometimes ending with the bad guys just picking up and scampering away.

      I'm not a fan of the Doctor's showboating, either... Eye-roll every time there's mention of "The Oncoming Storm" or anything like that. But do consider the circumstances of the two cases in which it happened in the 2010 series:

      1: vs. the Atraxi. The Atraxi were already content, having re-captured Prisoner Zero, and were leaving, when The Doctor called them back to bitch them out.
      2: vs. the alliance: The Doctor didn't know it but he was the reason all those aliens were there in the first place. So all his showboating really did was confirm for them that their trap was working.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    54. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      I think Matt Smith has the potential to be a brilliant Doctor.

      Already is, IMO.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    55. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by guspasho · · Score: 1

      "Russel T. Davies was infamous for "Doctor Ex Machina" plots, in which the Doctor would pull technobabble solutions out of his ass at the last minute."

      That was always a characteristic of the Doctor, at least as far back as Tom Baker. What really irritated me was the fairy-Jesus-Doctor that always resolved the season finales during Davies' run. That's not science fiction, that's fantasy. The only finale where he didn't employ that was Doomsday, which was really good (especially when the Doctor turns the wrong way in the Torchwood HQ. Awesome.)

    56. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by guspasho · · Score: 1

      I agree, I couldn't stand that story. I think I have to put it on top of the list of worst Doctor Who stories ever.

      "It felt like a cop out that those two gangers *had* to stay behind and stop the monster coming through the door."

      I *hated* that. It was so goddamn obvious that everyone could easily run to the TARDIS door instead of holding shut that door. Monster-ganger-Jennifer would just pound away on the TARDIS door while the Doctor made everyone stable as he later did after the danger passed, then open the door and use the screwdriver on Monster-Jennifer. Or leave behind two originals to hold the door and use the screwdriver while the gangers hide in the TARDIS?

      And why did they have to melt ganger-Amy? What was the point of that? Did I miss something? Didn't we just spend two whole episodes talking about how the gangers are as real and as human as the originals?

      Just like you said, the whole conflict was very poorly contrived. Everyone should have been like "Cool! I have a double!" just like all the viewers felt. From the forced conflict to the unbelievable sacrificial crisis to the killing of ganger-Amy (by the pacifistic Doctor, no less!!!) nothing about that two-parter made any goddamn sense.

    57. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by guspasho · · Score: 1

      They need to explain how he even remembers being an Auton in the first place. That barely makes any sense. Hopefully that's planned for a future episode of this season. That would be nice. He could remember those 2000 years and become much cooler in the process.

    58. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I'd agree that the Doctor has become a caricature of himself, but certainly the quality of the plots has suffered.

      Moffat's desire to have a strong overarching plot means that nothing ever makes sense until the very end.

      I don't think that's a bad thing, as long as the episodes along the way are enjoyable, and as long as it all makes sense in the end.

      For instance, the "trust me" scene in "Flesh and Stone" - to me, it didn't make any sense the first time around. (Of course, that scene was explained in "The Big Bang"...) That episode also introduced the idea that the cracks could erase things: they also took this opportunity to remind us of some of the things that happened in "Eleventh Hour" - the duck pond (there were never any ducks, of course, because they were erased. This is also another hint about Amy's life.) The "trust me" scene was basically just a mystery - without knowing that erased things could be brought back (an idea introduced in "Cold Blood") it was pretty much an unsolvable mystery for the viewers... But the 2-parter was enjoyable on its own so the mysteries (which I mostly didn't notice anyway) weren't too distracting.

      In the end, the dangling mysteries from Season 5 (apart from the bit in "The Lodger", and the various references to The Silence, which tie into Season 6) were all concluded pretty nicely. I think it worked. I'd agree that it's kind of a gimmicky way to arrange a story - but really it's just a mystery. Mysteries are fun because you're pulled along by little hints that give you the feeling of coming closer to the answer - and then a lot hinges on how the mystery is resolved in the end. In other words, the process of picking up the clues along the way can be fun even if the conclusion is unsatisfactory (hence, people enjoying "Lost", etc.) - but in this case I think the conclusion was well executed, too.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    59. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by guspasho · · Score: 1

      Not trolling here but you should tell us what you think that is. I'm interested in listening and we get few enough Doctor Who conversations here.

    60. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      > The new episodes make almost zero sense

      Since they rebooted the series they have been pushing more for time paradoxes running stories. For example "Bad Wolf", "Torchwood", "Saxon" and "There is something on your back". Each season it appears to get more and more in your face. In this series it appears to be the woman through the hatch, which makes sense now since the last weekend.

      So at the start of each series they do appear to be a mess but wrap up nicely.

      I don't know: I mean, before learning about The Flesh it wasn't really clear how these strange things were happening to Amy - but the Eyepatch lady kept appearing pretty regularly, and the Doctor kept looking at the preggo-scope to remind us that something was up... (Plus there was a photo of Amy in the little girl's room!) It seemed to me that it had to be something like that - somehow Amy was somewhere else, in that place with the Eyepatch Lady... So it didn't entirely make sense before this weekend, but I don't think it was a total mystery the way "Bad Wolf" was up until "The Parting of the Ways"...

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    61. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by guspasho · · Score: 1

      Oh and the premise of this incredibly dangerous acid that's useful for what exactly? And needs humans exposed to or near it why? They didn't even bother to make the acid pit room believable as anything more than a death trap.

    62. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      I've been extremely disappointed with this season and last. Matt Smith has done absolutely nothing for me. While Tennant quickly won me over, I've given Smith plenty of time to find his groove and have zero excitement about the stories like I had with the last doctor.

      It's a shame as we're getting to the end of the regenerations, but they need to do something to give some life back to this franchise, it's a shame it's going down the toilet so fast.

      Could not agree less. I think the show has never been better. In practically every way imaginable I think it's superior to Eccleston's and Tennant's runs. I think Matt is fabulous as the Doctor and I think Amy and Rory are excellent as companions.

      It's not as though I really have a lot of bad things to say about the Tenth Doctor and his run - except maybe that he never seemed to find a companion-relationship that worked (Rose pined for him and then went away, Martha pined for him and then went away, Donna did sort of a Mary Sue for him, then had to go away) - it just seems to me that Smith's run has been really solid.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    63. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      Personally where I think they lost it is the "self-rescue" time travel when he was locked in the box. The whole part about not crossing your own timestream was what kept the series sane from the obvious solution - just go back in time and warn/stop/do something before it becomes a problem. Or indeed a future doctor can now show up and save the current one from anything. That was a limit to his power, when he became linked to the events he had to stay and fight, he couldn't just run back to the TARDIS and fix everything. Now he's just jumping around as he pleases, like in the Christmas special where he's rewriting the man's memories while he's standing there. Why is not that the answer to every villain now, go back in time and stop them from becoming villains? Now they have to hide his omnipotence behind absurdity, like it's all some kind of game to him. They need to dial back that mania a notch or two.

      Christmas episodes are a bit of a special case - they're Christmas Episodes.

      But they specifically addressed the mop+fez scenario:
      "Why can't we just go back and change it?"
      "It'd be a paradox that could destroy the universe."
      "He did it before."
      "...And, to be fair, the universe did explode..."

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    64. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by wolfemi1 · · Score: 1

      I never got that. Is he or is he not now a plastic duplicate? And if not, how does he have the 2000 years of memory that the plastic duplicate got?

    65. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by wolfemi1 · · Score: 1

      Did you miss the part in S6E01 where he was killed?

    66. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by wolfemi1 · · Score: 1

      You will absolutely LOVE the initial season six two-parter. I've seen all of the episodes from 2005 onward, and I think they're my favorites so far.

    67. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Trarman · · Score: 1

      Even being a guardian, he had to overcome challenges. Like not sticking out as a guardian (even though there was a myth surrounding the "lonely Roman"). He also had to go where ever the box went, without looking suspicious. He had to learn different languages. And I'm sure he didn't spend 2000 years twiddling his thumbs. :) He must've been involved in something.

      I don't deny that Rory is a compassionate character. But I don't think his compassion is due to waiting around 2000 years. I think waiting around 2000 years was due to his compassion. Sure his memory of being an Auton gives him a unique perspective on what the Flesh has to go through, but I think his character is just the sort that would be more accepting regardless.

      My point is, he has experienced, first hand, the progression of humanity from sword swinging conquerors to modern day civilization. He's GOT to have grown. I would enjoy seeing more of that, and less of "this situation is dangerous.. to prove it, let's kill Rory.. again".

    68. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Bloodwine77 · · Score: 1

      I agree with you that Rory should be given more room to shine. The only other companion in the new series that has experienced as much life and time as Rory is Captain Jack and he got his own spinoff show. Granted, Rory is not as charismatic as Captain Jack, but he is no slouch and they could make him more seasoned and competent now.

    69. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by RedBear · · Score: 1

      The Doctor's Wife episode was one of the very worst, in my opinion. The show managed to go for decades prior to that episode WITHOUT stooping to explicitly stating exactly why the TARDIS never seemed to go where it was told. Now apparently the answer to everything is that the Doctor has to be in a pseudo-sexual relationship with every woman on the show, including the "female" TARDIS consciousness. That was never what the show was about. It's been turned into a soap opera in space apparently in an attempt to make the Doctor more "human" so he'll appeal to a wider audience. The problem is, the Doctor ISN'T human, and was never meant to be. It just doesn't work for me anymore. The show seems like something that's being dumbed down to try and appeal to a lowest common denominator audience.

      Of course, that's all just my subjective opinion. But I think it says something that I can repeatedly watch hundreds of older episodes of a show and then suddenly I can't stand watching new episodes. I'm certainly not the only one strongly disliking the new stuff.

    70. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by ProfBooty · · Score: 1

      I agree there. Way too much time is spent on the companions and their family's since they brought Dr Who back.

      --
      Bring back the old version of slashdot.
    71. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The theory I've heard is that the regeneration limit was a rule of the Time Lords, as opposed to a physical limit. That would explain why the Master would have broken that rule, and I can see the Doctor doing the same.

    72. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Hast · · Score: 1

      I was very anxious to see the first ending in the Moffat led show (with Matt Smith and Karen Gillian). My main gripe with RTD's series enders where that they always tended to be quite cheap.

      If you haven't seen it yet I'll only say that it was one of my favorite pieces of 1 hour television ever. After the opening when one of the main characters say "Right, this is where it gets a bit complicated." follows 50 minutes of brilliance.

      And while those 50 minutes are quite complicated (certainly more complicated than what eg Inception managed in 2.5 hours) it's not hard to keep up because the viewer is given small clues all the time. This is rather well explained by Moffat in the Confidential for that episode, where he points out that if the viewer understand what is going to happen right before it happens, they have no problem following along.

      I also really like that Moffat is very fond of turning the ordinary and close to us into a monster. In "the empty child"/"the doctor dances" it's a small boy in a gas mask. In the "girl in the fireplace" it's a ticking clock in your room. In "silence in the library"/"forest of the dead" it's shadows. Blink has gothic statues and now we have the silence.

      In a way the Daleks and Cybermen are like supervillans. They may be hellbent on destroying you, but you always know where they are because they put up a big show. The horrors that lurk in the corner of your eye, you're never really sure if they are gone...

    73. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by MrNemesis · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I was kinda hoping for a response like that (and thanks for yours too wolfemi!).

      I had no hope for Matt Smith at the beginning of the last series, being a big fan of Tenant's swagger, but over the course of a fair few episodes he'd managed to create a classic Who persona - just the right combination of whimsical kindly grandfather and genocidal maniac :). Still not got my mind made up on Karen Gillian yet. And yes, RTD's endings were, as you say, too cheap... not that they were bad per se, just not enough variation; there's an explosion, bad guys dead, cue credits, whereas Moffat's the kinda guy to use that ending as a jumping board both back and forwards into last and next season. Timey wimey calvinball indeed!

      Whenever I've seen anything from Moffat that had a "Right... this is all getting a bit hectic...", genius has always followed and I've always been amazed by his awesome plot-crafting, so I don't doubt the plot will live up to the hype - more complicated than Inception (loved the spectacle of the film but felt they could have done much more with the concept... hopefully there'll be more films like it now that are more willing to trust the audience to pay attention) is good, on a par with Moffat's other work will be scintillating.

      I was amazed by the other comments I saw saying they thought Who was now too scary for kids - seeing it in order to get terrified was half the point as a kid, no? Being from a Welsh mining town I remember being terrified of the old slag heaps after I saw a repeat of The Green Death, but that didn't stop me loving it.

      Personally, I'm glad the daleks are getting a rest - the formula of "daleks appear/they are the ultimate indestructible evil!/oh wait I just killed them all" was getting old real fast, and seemed to be there for little more than spectacle. As you say, the horrors you can't quite see are both far scarier and can be done on a much lower budget :D Having a writer like Moffat at the helm can capitalise on that in a way I don't think RTD could (which was a shame given his promising start with deeply creepy no-budget gubbins like Dark Season and Century Falls).

      Classic Who indeed. Looking forward to my marathon now. This missus will probably like it too if she can poke her head around the sofa for long enough.

      Disclaimer: not a Moffat fangirl, honest guv, but I did squeee slightly when I heard he was taking over.

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    74. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      He is human now after he was ire-inserted back into the timeline but he keeps the 2000 years of memories because he re-remembered the Doctor when Amy recalled him in the very last moments of the final episode of season 5. I think Rory asks about it in the first episode of season 6.

    75. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      Well we know he did kill at least one Cyberman, and survived the Blitz, that has to be worth something.

    76. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      I remember now, Watch 'Day of the Moon', the Doctor and Rory talk about the fall of Rome.

  26. Daleks: Overused but Iconic by ThunderBird89 · · Score: 1

    "[...] they are the most reliably defeatable enemies in the universe."

    Thing is, the Daleks were only defeated once in the new series (Parting Of The Ways), all the other times, only the current plan was defeated, and the Daleks escaped to plot again. While I do agree that they've become overused, they're the most iconic leg of the triad of classical opponents (the other two being The Master, who's been timelocked and removed from this universe, and they Cybermen, who are going to appear in the next episode). The Sontarans and the other opponents brought back from the old series don't really cut it this time around, but Moffat has been successful in creating some truly terrifying encounters (The Weeping Angels and the Vashta Nerada), and Russel T. Davies's Midnight Entity was great as well. Maybe the writers should focus on creating new, scarier menaces to bring back the "hiding behind the couch" phenomenon that defined the classic series, and thinking up a way to end the current one, or find a plausible way to weasel out of the "12 regenerations"-limit.

    --
    Hyperbole: I use it liberally!
    1. Re:Daleks: Overused but Iconic by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      12 regenerations - Easy, Currently on 10 1/2 - 1 forced by the Time lords (which may not count), and it was an artificial limit made by the Time Lords (who are no longer around), which they overrode during the time war (brought back the Master after he was very dead, and had had ~15 regenerations already, and Rassilon, who had had all his regenerations long ago) which the Doctor fought in, so he either has 2,3,12 or as many as he wants left ....

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    2. Re:Daleks: Overused but Iconic by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      "[...] they are the most reliably defeatable enemies in the universe."

      Thing is, the Daleks were only defeated once in the new series (Parting Of The Ways), all the other times, only the current plan was defeated, and the Daleks escaped to plot again.

      I'm sorry... What?

      Dalek: The Dalek is not technically defeated, but self-destructs.
      Parting of the Ways: Whole fleet, approximately half a million Daleks including the Emperor disintegrated
      Doomsday: Thousands of Daleks sucked into the hellish interdimensional void, four escape.
      Evolution of the Daleks: One Dalek turns himself into a mutant hybrid, gets killed by the others. Two more killed by human Dalek-slaves. one escapes.
      The Stolen Earth: Another fleet of about half a million Daleks: casings hacked so they spin around all goofy-like and explode. Another half a million Daleks dead, of which I guess three survived?

      I'd say those all count as "defeats". "Victory of the Daleks" wasn't a defeat for obvious reasons... :)

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    3. Re:Daleks: Overused but Iconic by ThunderBird89 · · Score: 1

      The problem is that apparently, a single one is enough to bring back their whole race, through cloning or finding a repository of ancient Dalek data that reconstructs into five brand new ones. You can say Deus Ex Machina, but it doesn't change the fact they just refuse to stay down. :)

      I could also bring up the terrorism-example: the Daleks win if they get past the Doctor once, for the Doctor to win, he has to stop them every time. Different definitions of defeat and victory.

      --
      Hyperbole: I use it liberally!
  27. Daleks don't make sense by MalachiK · · Score: 1

    I've always been bothered by the Daleks. Why would a super advanced battle machine made of 'bonded polly-carboid armour' have such a vulnerable and inefficient targeting system? The eye stalk just doesn't make any sense. And only one weapon? Again, that energy rifle thing just seems a bit daft. I think the problem is that R.T. Davis wrote the Daleks to be the ultimate, unstoppable enemy of the Time Lords because they were one of the most well-known elements of the brand and useful for marketing.. This just doesn't fit well with their retro design. Right up until the end of the 7th doctor's time the Daleks were pretty scary, but hardly invincible (remember Ace taking one out with a baseball bat in Remembrance?)

    1. Re:Daleks don't make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That baseball bat had been altered by the Doctor with the Omega Device.

    2. Re:Daleks don't make sense by itsdapead · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think the problem is that R.T. Davis wrote the Daleks to be the ultimate, unstoppable enemy of the Time Lords because they were one of the most well-known elements of the brand and useful for marketing..

      There's a far better plot-driven reason: in the classic "Genesis of the Daleks" Doctor #4 was sent back to wipe the Daleks out before they were created. So, basically, he fired the first shot in the Great Time War.

      This just doesn't fit well with their retro design.

      But the Daleks are also fanatical racial supremacists, so they would never accept that the design cobbled together by Davros in a bunker was anything but perfect.

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  28. I didn't mind them by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

    in the later seasons, I thought they were always well used and quite fun, popping up at weird times and delightfully evil. And their simplicity contrasts nicely with the rest of Dr Who, which is usually a bit involved.

    I'm sure their come back will be grand.

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    1. Re:I didn't mind them by wootcat · · Score: 1

      If you want to make the Daleks scary again, then you need to allow them to win once in a while. Whenever the Daleks show up, something terrible must happen, something permanent. If the Doctor wins, make it "won the battle, not necessarily the war" situations. Turn them into such a villain so whenever they show up, you're not thinking "Okay, how's the Doctor going to defeat them this time", but "Oh, crap!"

      --
      I'm really a low 5-digit Slashdotter, but this ID is where I am now.
  29. Colored daleks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The 'new' daleks suck. They are the most horrible enemies you can get, and now they come in 5 colors.... AAAAAAAAAARGH !! They really messed up this one...

    1. Re:Colored daleks by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      The 'new' daleks suck. They are the most horrible enemies you can get, and now they come in 5 colors....

      Er, they did that in the two 1960s Dalek films not long after the series started. Though to be fair, (a) those weren't "canonical" (geeky fanboy jargon) with the TV series, (b) they probably did that because the film was in COLOUR at a time when all British TV- Who included- was black-and-white and (c) those films were mostly not much good. So maybe you have a point. :-)

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  30. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by agentgonzo · · Score: 1

    Not true. A recent episode (it was either the living flesh one or the pirate one) had the Doctor unlocking locked door by sliding back the bolt on a wooden door with the sonic screwdriver.

  31. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by johnnysaucepn · · Score: 1

    The sonic screwdriver has not been written out of the plot, although he does seem to use it more sparingly this series. Like a good magic wand, it's job is to exert the will of the user. In other words, it doesn't change what genius idea the Doctor comes up with, it just provides a useful conduit to make it happen without minutes of exposition and digging around in computer banks. Generally, for everything the screwdriver does, another method exists that would take twice as long - and not make a difference to the plot either way.

  32. At least the Daleks don't have relationships by Bongo · · Score: 3, Funny

    But honey, how would you feel if I rescued you from an inner city estate?

    EXTERMINATE.

    Well ok, how about if I hoisted you out of a killer taxi in a wedding dress?

    EXTERMINATE.

    Waited 2000 years by your side?

    EXTERMINATE.

    Flowers?

    EXTERMINATE.

    1. Re:At least the Daleks don't have relationships by Richard+Kirk · · Score: 4, Funny

      (I am submitting this for a friend who has trouble with keyboards)

      The BBC is bi-ased. The pro-gram shows only the da-leks being de-fea-ted. It never shows the time-lines when the da-leks con-quer and the doc-tor is de-fea-ted. They por-tray the da-leks as mind-less kill-ers. The daleks are nu-anced. The da-leks are complex. The da-leks have had it up to here with this stu-pid pro-gram. Dear 'Points Of View'. Oh why, oh why, oh why can we not have un-bi-ased re-por-ting? Why can't we see the da-leks win and the doc-tor get his ass ex-ter-mi-nated? Why can't the doc-tor stay dead when he dies? It's all so un-fair. Yours, Dis-gus-ted of Ska-ro.

    2. Re:At least the Daleks don't have relationships by delinear · · Score: 1

      Please, please for the love of all that is sacred, don't give them ideas!

    3. Re:At least the Daleks don't have relationships by N+Monkey · · Score: 1

      Why do I never have mod points?

      yours
      Davros

    4. Re:At least the Daleks don't have relationships by Veretax · · Score: 1

      "It's time for my Dalek Poetry Reading

      This one is called Daffodils

      Exterminate Daffodils

      Exterminate Daffodils

      Exterminate Daffodils

      Exterminate, Exterminate, Exterminate"

      I don't recall where I saw this online, but it made me Laugh so hard I fell out of my chair!

    5. Re:At least the Daleks don't have relationships by FredFredrickson · · Score: 1

      You mean your friend can't type with a plunger??

      (lol mod parent up!)

      --
      Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex
    6. Re:At least the Daleks don't have relationships by guspasho · · Score: 1

      Lawl. Thanks for that. Enjoy your extermination.

    7. Re:At least the Daleks don't have relationships by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Existence is futile. You will be exterminated.

  33. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This was a big problem with the Russell T Davies episodes. He used spectacle as a substitute for plot. Huge fleets of Daleks or Cybermen as a substitute for character interaction. In contrast, the best episodes have been things like Blink, that have kept the atmosphere with relatively little emphasis on special effects.

    The original problem with the sonic screwdriver was that, after being used a few times, writers either had to use it, or have the audience thinking 'why didn't he use the sonic screwdriver?' With the deadlock seal, good writers can just say add a line of dialog saying 'oh, doesn't work', and move on. Imagine 42, for example, without the deadlock seal. Either there would have to be some contrived way of losing the sonic screwdriver at the start, or the audience would have sat there saying 'why don't you just use the sonic screwdriver on the doors?!?!?' Just mentioning the word 'deadlock' meant that we all knew that the magic wand wouldn't work, so there was tension that didn't seem artificial.

    With a good writer, the sonic screwdriver is a substitute for technobabble. Put on the glasses, wave the magic wand, and something involving technology that the audience doesn't need to care about just happened and you can return to the plot. No need to go into long explanations. We all know the sonic screwdriver does complicated things with technology, and we don't need to know the details.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  34. They are only getting a break by Windwraith · · Score: 1

    Confirmed by Moffat to be just this season, which is probably tight in terms of content. We shall get more technicolor Dalek stuff.

    I wasn't a proper fan of the series until the revival, yet I watched enough of the old series to want to follow that revival when it was aired.
    I dunno, some people complains, but I really really like the revival. And....I kind of prefer the Daleks from before the "last paradigm" but just because the armor is more detailed. I feel rather satisfied with the modern Dalek overall (they can't be defeated by stairs!).

  35. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by itsdapead · · Score: 1

    They solved the problem with the sonic screwdriver a few years ago by inventing the deadlock seal - anything that is deadlock sealed can't be opened by the magic wand.

    Plus - it can't do wood...

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  36. Spinoff! by mikeq · · Score: 1

    They should do a spinoff that shows the situation from the Dalek point of view.

    1. Re:Spinoff! by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1

      They should do a spinoff that shows the situation from the Dalek point of view.

      I don't think you really need a show to get that across. They're not exactly the most nuanced of charters, a 30 second commercial would be sufficient:

      "EX-TERM-IN-ATE!"

      "DALEKS-ARE-SUPREME! EVERYTHING-NOT-DALEK-MUST-BE-EXTERMINATED!

      "THE-DOC-TOR-IS-THE-ENEMY!"

      "EX-TERM-IN-ATE!!!"

      Never mind. a 15 second commercial will do.

    2. Re:Spinoff! by tragedy · · Score: 1

      "We shall become all powerful, crush the lesser races, conquer the galaxy, unimaginable power..."
      " unlimited Rice Pudding etc etc..."

  37. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    puzzle boxen?

  38. Re:WHO'S ON FIRST ?? by Sulphur · · Score: 1, Funny

    Of course you don't know! There's a simple explanation for that. The timey wimey folds of spacetime have done a wibbly wobbley again, that's why!

    Of course you don't know! There's a simple explanation for that. The timey wimey folds of spacetime have done a wibbly wobbley again, that's Who!

    FTFY

    --

    Can you spare bitcoin for Davros?

  39. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by itsdapead · · Score: 1

    the TARDIS generated the new one (and presumably destroyed the old one to prevent misuse)

    Remember, he needs a spare at some stage that he will have been going to give to River. Plus, they're going to need a spare Doctor for space-suit guy* to going to has** killed, so presumably, we haven't seen the last of the "ganger" Doctor, either...

    (* My money is on Amy )

    (** Dr Dan Streetmentioner, where are you...)

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  40. Coloured daleks by MitchAmes · · Score: 1

    The first thing I thought of when I saw the coloured daleks was that the Doctor had fallen into an episode of the Mighty Morphin Power Rangers.
    (That's what you get for having children who lived and breathed Power Rangers for several years.)

    1. Re:Coloured daleks by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      The first thing I thought of when I saw the coloured daleks was that the Doctor had fallen into an episode of the Mighty Morphin Power Rangers.

      (That's what you get for having children who lived and breathed Power Rangers for several years.)

      It's good that you included a Wikipedia link, otherwise people might not have gotten the reference.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
  41. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    isn't that the whole premise of dr. who? if nothing else, dr can always come in from a later, or earlier, time and catch anyone who's falling to their death, the bad guys can be anything and anything can be conjured up from nothing anywhere. and is regularly done. what's amazing about it is that despite all this, the writers have just been writing the daleks in like beagle boys hunting for scrooges treasure.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  42. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Good to see it got written out of the plot recently.

    however, they are increasingly using scenes where they play very loud music and talk very quickly when solving the problem at hand, to disguise weakness in the plot.

    the fact everything stopped (e.g. the acid stopped boiling and the monster stopped pushing the door) when they had the "tender" scenes didn't go unnoticed either.

  43. No, THESE are the most defeated adversaries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
  44. I have one thing to say to Steven Moffat by TimeElf1 · · Score: 1

    Ex-ter-min-ate! Ex-ter-min-ate! Ex-ter-min-ate!

    --
    Cannot find REALITY.SYS. Universe halted.
  45. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

    They are shortcuts ...
    Sonic Screwdriver - Unlock doors easily, mend devices, scan for information
    Psychic Paper - Get access and co-operation
    Daleks - Here comes trouble
    Tardis - Get to latest adventure

    They can be overused, but if used correctly simply keep the plot going

    All could be used to escape from the scene, or solve the plot too quickly, so all have limitations (Deadlocks, High IQ, Stairs etc ...)

    Star Trek had the same issue, get into trouble just beam out ...except either they couldn't, or it would not solve the issue ...

    --
    Puteulanus fenestra mortis
  46. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We all know the sonic screwdriver does complicated things with technology, and we don't need to know the details."

    Actually, I like those details. It is like Superman and kryptonite. Just how did all that kryptonite make it to earth? How many Superman villains have attained it? Over the years, the stories would attest that it is sold at the corner store. >_>

    Just how many objects are deadlocked? If it is that trivial to deadlock, why not deadlock EVERY door. Then, such a commonality would suggest more common tools to circumvent it. I think using "deadlock" is a cheap workaround and sets a very bad precedence and the SS being such a "magic wand" is a cheap workaround in writing. I can think of many ways you wouldn't be able to pass through a door (in this genre), so the writers shouldn't have an issue either. They shouldn't be so damned lazy.

  47. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by grahamm · · Score: 1

    Or River. Did she not say in a past episode that the reason she is in prison is because she killed a very good man. We know that her timeline and the Doctor's are running in opposite directions, so maybe the Doctor is the man she killed.

  48. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by delinear · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What I think works particularly well with the sonic is the fact that it's used so much, but much of the time appears to do little or nothing. The doctor will quite often point it at people or things and take a "reading" that he doesn't do anything with or about, which is a nice way of saying "this tool is always here but it's not always useful" - they've made mention in the past of how flaky it can be. The doctor uses it almost as an extension of his sense to probe situations in the same way as a human might use smell and sound to augment sight (and still sometimes come up with the wrong answer). Conversely using it less but only using it in situations where it always works to save the day would turn it from a tool into a miracle device. What we need is more of the screwdriver but not always more of it saving the day.

  49. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My money is on River.

    Remember she killed "a good man" to get imprisoned.

  50. Well, as far as the Daleks are concerned... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...(sunglasses) I'd say they've finally taken the plunge.

    (I wear sunglasses now. Sunglasses are cool.)

    .

    1. Re:Well, as far as the Daleks are concerned... by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 1

      They're not dead, they're just ...

      (sunglasses) ...

      pining for the fjords of Bad Wolf Bay.

      YEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAHHHHHHH!

      (Doctor) Who are you? Who? Who? Who? Who?

    2. Re:Well, as far as the Daleks are concerned... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Owl: Who who who?
      Sharri Rothberg: You stay out of this!
      Owl: Whooo... O.O

  51. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is like Superman and kryptonite. Just how did all that kryptonite make it to earth?

    Supposedly the hyperdrive of the spaceship Kal-El came on had some problems, allowing the kryptonite to follow quite easily.

  52. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by delinear · · Score: 1

    Plus, they're going to need a spare Doctor for space-suit guy* to going to has** killed, so presumably, we haven't seen the last of the "ganger" Doctor, either...

    Exactly this - they even make some comment about there being some way the essence of the "flesh" doctor might survive the disintegration. If that's not telegraphing the end of that particular story arc, I don't know what is.

  53. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by chriseyre2000 · · Score: 1

    I suspect that the Doctor that died is a Ganger (Can Ganger timelords regenerate?). It would stretch things too far for the Doctor to also be in the spacesuit...

  54. Re:WHO'S ON FIRST ?? by martin-boundary · · Score: 1
    MOD PARENT UP.

    He's an older, wiser regeneration of me!

  55. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    If it is that trivial to deadlock, why not deadlock EVERY door.

    Cost. Even galaxy conquering space monsters have accountants.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  56. Once they started flying... by biodata · · Score: 1

    I knew their days were numbered. The old Daleks were scary in their relentless trundling unstoppableness. They had a physicalness which was scary because it was so mechanical and alien. Once they started flying you could tell it was all CGI and hence not scary. Daleks were designed to trundle, not fly.

    --
    Korma: Good
  57. They aren't as reliably defeated as all that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Washington Generals (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_Generals) have a record of 6 wins to 13,000 losses. To beat that, the Daleks would have to be defeated at least 1767 more times without beating the Dr. even once.

  58. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by Tolkien · · Score: 1

    it just provides a useful conduit to make it happen without minutes of exposition and digging around in computer banks.

    All the doctor needs to do is learn to program like the folks in The Matrix learned how to pilot helicopters and shit. Then he can whip up a GUI in Visual Basic, so all his problems will just be a mouse click away from resolution.

  59. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    It's been destroyed a couple of times since the reboot, and another one has been made

    Apparently the much-maligned John Nathan Turner (producer of Who throughout the 1980s) had it destroyed early in his tenure and explicitly vetoed attempts to have a new one made- or whatever- for similar reasons. He thought it was too easy a plot device- I guess it's a sort of Deus Ex Machina.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  60. You're wrong about all of the new episodes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I disagree completely that The Doctor needs a break.

    "The Doctor's Wife" is perhaps one of the best episodes I've ever seen. It completely eclipses anything that had David Tennant in it. The script and the acting.

    I don't think that you appreciate the subtelty of the new Doctor's character. He appears as a gibbering moron but is anything but. For example, in last year's Christmas special, he's walking around in the room (at the start) and turns around asking "Who is she?", saying that he's never met anyone unimportant. It portrays a person that is keenly aware of everything going on around him even if it appears otherwise.

    Listen to what the TARDIS said about needing to find someone mad enough to join it galloping around the universe. The Doctor is meant to be slightly crazy/mad and lost it with some of the previous leads.

    1. Re:You're wrong about all of the new episodes. by sconeu · · Score: 1

      "The Doctor's Wife" is perhaps one of the best episodes I've ever seen. It completely eclipses anything that had David Tennant in it. The script and the acting.

      What about "Midnight"?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:You're wrong about all of the new episodes. by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      "The Doctor's Wife" is perhaps one of the best episodes I've ever seen. It completely eclipses anything that had David Tennant in it. The script and the acting.

      What about "Midnight"?

      That one always struck me as an odd sort of experiment - "What if the Doctor were in a perilous situation and the people around him reacted realistically instead of falling in line?" As such I think it was very cool but maybe not "one of the best"...

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    3. Re:You're wrong about all of the new episodes. by sconeu · · Score: 1

      See, I thought it was good, because there was *no* visible monster. It was all Tennant.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    4. Re:You're wrong about all of the new episodes. by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      See, I thought it was good, because there was *no* visible monster. It was all Tennant.

      It wasn't all Tennant. Quite a lot of it was the other people on the bus-thing.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
  61. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by dbIII · · Score: 1

    used it in the last scene of the last episode that was aired

    No. His copy who got left behind with the screwdriver used it in the last scene of the last episode that was aired.

  62. not "400 appearances" by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    Moffatt was joking when he said that. Unfortunately, Slashdot "editors" took it literally.

    Probably the Doctor has encountered them "only" about 20 time, over the last 48 years (and almost 800 episodes).. At least a quick search through the list of episodes (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Doctor_Who_serials) finds 17 including the word "Dalek", and they usually got billing.

    The Daleks, The Dalek Invasion of Earth, The Daleks' Master Plan, The Power of the Daleks, The Evil of the Daleks, Day of the Daleks, Planet of the Daleks, Death to the Daleks, Genesis of the Daleks, City of the Daleks, Destiny of the Daleks, Resurrection of the Daleks, Revelation of the Daleks, Remembrance of the Daleks, Dalek, Daleks in Manhattan, Victory of the Daleks. Plus a couple others, like "The Long Game" where they were acting in secret.

    Of course, Moffatt will bring them back soon regardless.

    1. Re:not "400 appearances" by atomicxblue · · Score: 1

      hrmm.. *scratches chin* It could very well be 400+ for all we know, since the show has always given the impression there is more adventure than is ever shown on the screen...

      Just my thought for the day.. :D

    2. Re:not "400 appearances" by laejoh · · Score: 1

      The number 404 seems more appropriate!

    3. Re:not "400 appearances" by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      He'd have had to have spent most of his 900 years fighting the Daleks to have defeated them 400 times.

      But presumably he racked up a few victories during the Time War in the hiatus.

  63. How have the Daleks survived this long anyway? by goffster · · Score: 1

    Some small alien life form moving around awkwardly on a very human scale
    in an exoskeleton looking not much different than a big vacuum cleaner?

    Please.

    I think an actual big vacuum cleaner that sucked people up
    and fed on their life force would be far scarier.

  64. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by Soluzar · · Score: 1

    Generally speaking he really can't do that. The laws of time prevent a person from being in the same moment twice, or otherwise interfering in events from their own personal timeline. It seems as though these are 'laws' in the sense of 'the laws of physics', rather than in the sense of 'criminal law'. The Doctor has tried to break some of them in the past, but it didn't work. Time corrected itself to erase his interference. I'm not saying they always stick to the rules they created for themselves, but in theory... the Doctor can only change events within certain limitations.

  65. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by squidfood · · Score: 1

    How many locks have you seen made of wood?

    Ones that float.

  66. They don't need defeating by Crookdotter · · Score: 1

    Why do we have to defeat them every episode? It's easy enough to write a story where there are people in danger, the Daleks are involved and the Doctor comes swanning in. He can't fight the whole Dalek army but decides to save as many as he can, fighting a few and sneaking them out, losing some on the way. The Daleks don't lose and the Doctor wins. Plenty of scope for Dalek / Doctor stories that don't mean anyone gets wiped out. I could come up with ideas about that all day long. New Dalek empire, stronger than ever, they snatch the TARDIS and Doctor and decide to put him on trial. Clever writing making it seem like the Doctor is somewhat guilty of leaving too many people to die, killing too many Daleks, whatever. Twist at the end where the Doctor escapes in the TARDIS. Hey, I'd like to see that episode. Then bring back Gallifrey - not for one paltry episode, but for good, along with the Daleks. No need to go for the end of the world every season.

  67. Steven Moffat needs the rest. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This and the last season (and a bit of the end of the previous doctor) have been atrocious. He's trying way to hard to make the show something that it's not. These giant story arcs are not only boring, but no one gives a shit.

  68. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by FredFredrickson · · Score: 1

    As an American, I hate the fast talking over loud music- I have the darndest time figuring out what Matt Smith is saying. David Tennant was easier to understand.

    --
    Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex
  69. Re:WHO'S ON FIRST ?? by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 1

    Spoilers.

  70. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

    (* My money is on Amy )

    I'm thinking Amy's child, which is somehow fathered (or entirely created) from the Flesh's remaining imprint of the ganger Doctor. By killing the doctor proper and taking the energy from his regeneration this being can then regenerate, either "back" into Smith (as he is apparently sign-on for at least another series) or the next Doctor (if the plot line encompasses the next series too). This might be their way of getting around the 12 regenerations limit for the Doctor, assuming the resulting being is starting with a fresh count, rather than saving the decision of how to deal with that until a few series hence.

    There is also timelord DNA floating about the universe as a result of the "The Doctor's Daughter" episode though. They could bring that into it too/instead.

  71. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But we also know the past Doctor met a River in that ends up with a sonic screwdriver that one could assume the Doctor gives to her at some point in his future. Timey whimey.

  72. Comparison with earluer daleks... by N+Monkey · · Score: 1

    It's gotta be the bold primary colors... those seem to signal children's shows. Plus all the roundedness signals "safe" - it's kinda a meme that scary stuff has sharp angles.

    So they now looks like AI robot pets!

    This thread just reminded me that the BBC's click program recently featured the Dalek6388 web site that has the history of the daleks used in the series from '63 to '88. I'm just having a look through it now (so please don't slashdot it before I'm done) :-)

    1. Re:Comparison with earluer daleks... by afidel · · Score: 1

      All the links at the bottom of that site are broken, they include /newsite/ in the URL, apparently all the content was moved to / without updating the pages, doh.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:Comparison with earluer daleks... by afidel · · Score: 1

      Oh, it only happens if you click on the last link first "Epilogue: New Series".

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  73. Daleks? I was sick of England by PJ6 · · Score: 1

    Old episodes: we can go anywhere in the universe and here we are in the English countryside AGAIN.

    Hooray for CGI backdrops and larger budgets.

    1. Re:Daleks? I was sick of England by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      Some of the old quarries were very picturesque.

    2. Re:Daleks? I was sick of England by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      Old episodes: we can go anywhere in the universe and here we are in the English countryside AGAIN.

      In the 2005 series they put a stop to that.

      Instead, they just went to London and Cardiff a lot. :)

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
  74. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by ThunderBird89 · · Score: 1

    Curse of the Black Pearl^H^H^H^H^HSpot. A bolt, which, admittedly, wasn't wooden...
    He couldn't get the wooden door open in Silence in The Library, though.

    --
    Hyperbole: I use it liberally!
  75. stairs by jDeepbeep · · Score: 1

    Stairs haven't stopped Daleks for a while now. just saying.

    --
    Reply to That ||
  76. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by jDeepbeep · · Score: 1

    maybe the Doctor is the man she killed.

    That is exactly what I've been thinking too.

    --
    Reply to That ||
  77. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what you're expected to think, but it's obviously going to be someone else, such as Rory.

  78. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by AgentSmith · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cost. Even galaxy conquering space monsters have accountants.

    [Cut scene to a dimly lit counting house in the outer reaches of the of Sol galaxy.
    Pan down to a green blobish looking fellow behind a raised desk and a Dalek gliding into the room]

    Dalek: HERE IS MY REQUISITION FORM FOR DEADLOCK DOORS!

    Vogon Accountant: Get stuffed! We can't afford it. The Galactic Economy is complete in stook thanks to you lot failing all the time!

    Dalek: THE LOCKS ARE EFFICIENT! THE LOCKS WILL KEEP OUT THE DOCTOR ! WE WILL NOT FAIL!!!!

    Vogon Accountant: I can't get money from nowhere! Can't you conquer something?! How about the Cybermen? They keep hording gold away like their lives depend on it.

    Dalek: CYBERMEN ARE NOT THE PROBLEM! THE DOCTOR IS THE PROBLEM! WE WILL EXTERMINATE HIM WHEN THE DALEK RACE IS SECURE!!! EXTERMINATE! EXTERMINATE!! EX-TER-MIN-NATE!!!!!!

    Vogon Accountant: Oh Hells Bells! [Accountant pushes a button on his console] Imelda, another Dalek 'client' has turned foaming mouth mental again. Bring out some of my . . . poetry. [Imelda hands him a large leatherbound tome which he unlocks] Yes, now then! Fie gorlble sond on one summer day. Tise doc! Doc doc! Tise doc!

    Dalek: Naggggg! MY SENSORS ARE IMPARED!! Narrrghhh!! MY PLUNGY THING CANNOT REACH MY BRAIN!!! AAAAAAGGHHHHH!!!

    [Dalek explodes. Two Vogon janitors in coveralls come by and wheel the remaining Dalek stump away.]

    Vogon Accountant: Shoulda used a Sonic Screwdriver. Stupid blobby git.

         

  79. The Washington Generals disagree ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that the Daleks are the easiest opponents to defeat in the universe.

    In case you don't know that's the team that historically played against the Harlem globetrotters

  80. Leave the field fallow by Fractal+Dice · · Score: 2

    The Daleks are England's Godzilla - their take on the echo of the trauma of WW2: a mechanized tank with unrepentant genocidal goals. When they were on screen I could see they touched some lingering discomfort in my parents' generation - even though I didn't entirely know why. They way they were reintroduced in the revival, there was a touch of the that same legacy fear in the way they had the Doctor recoil from them - that background trauma was internalized into the canon of the show.

    Now that the show has moved past the Time War survivor guilt issues, the Daleks do need to go away for a while until a suitable story can be found that needs them.

  81. How to get rid of Amy+Rory? by axl917 · · Score: 1

    I admit I am tiring a bit of the Amy+Rory soap opera saga, but can't quite envision how they are going to get phased out. I don't think the writers have the balls to kill one or both outright, esp if Amy is really pregnant, and it'd be too trite to do the "we want to settle down and not travel any more" out.

    1. Re:How to get rid of Amy+Rory? by Bloodwine77 · · Score: 2

      Amy is some nice eye candy, but between the two characters I think it would be a good twist if Rory ended up being the only companion in the end. He is the better human, afterall.

  82. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

    Churches!

    Very small rocks!

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  83. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

    Ok, but what about the flying? If yellow sunlight gives Kryptonians the power of flight, how does that work? Are they able to negate the effects of gravity and just float? What about thrust; where does that come from? And if they can negate the effects of gravity in a yellow star system, Does that mean that Power Girl would need a heavy duty bra in a red star system?

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  84. Arcs by camperdave · · Score: 1

    I was hoping they'd keep the ganger version around to explain how the Doctor from the season opener dies in his current regeneration. What the show needs is some subtle, multi-season arcs; some mysterious coincidence that pops up now and again that when resolved it changes the perspective of the show. I mean things like The Face of Boe being Captain Jack Harkness, and the Bad Wolf concept. With Bad Wolf, it would have been great if that had spanned the entire Rose arc instead of just the one season.

    Star Trek TNG got this right. The series premiere has Q putting the Enterprise crew on trial for the crime of being a vicious, savage, child race. Picard convinces Q to to test them, and they have their little FarPoint encounter, and you think: that's that. Over the next seven seasons, Q pops in from time to time, like he said he would at the end of the Premiere. During the sixth season, when Q is testing Amanda Rogers to see if she's really Q or not, we get a hint of the arc. Q is going to be Amanda's judge, jury and executioner, and when Picard recounts the trial from the premiere, Q says "The jury is still out, Picard. Make no mistake." Then, during the series finale, Picard finds himself back in the same court as the premiere, and the enormity of the arc becomes apparent. The entire series that we'd enjoyed watching for seven seasons were all part of the trial that started in the first episode.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:Arcs by ThunderBird89 · · Score: 1

      Given that the Doctor says the Ganger's molecular memory may survive, there's a chance that the Doctor may be reconstructed if enough of the goo is left floating around in the ocean after the explosion. Hell, I could even imagine the goo pulling itself together, given the Doctor's tenacity, or pulling some shenanigans with hybrid powers of a Time Lord made from programmable matter (Christopher Eccleston patched the medical nanites by calling them to his hands, so I think it's fair game the replicant Doctor could possibly reprogram his own mass).

      --
      Hyperbole: I use it liberally!
    2. Re:Arcs by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      I was hoping they'd keep the ganger version around to explain how the Doctor from the season opener dies in his current regeneration.

      You got to consider, though: Amy asks if gangers can "die" - but a more important question is, can they regenerate? Remember the Doctor regenerates before he's shot the second time...

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
  85. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

    She was probably wearing a space suit at the time.

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  86. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by Rhodri+Mawr · · Score: 1

    It's already clear that The Doctor is perfectly able to program from the virus he wrote to expose Prisoner Zero in "The Eleventh Hour".

  87. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

    The Doctor's daughter pulls up in an obscure American car when they need to make a quick get away?

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  88. Thoughts on Season 6 [Spoilers] by Bloodwine77 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think the Daleks will be back, but probably not before season 7. I suspect the rest of this season will involve Amy, her baby, and what ever alien race is involved.

    Part of me thinks the Amy-having-a-timelord-baby story arc is borderline jumping the shark. I hate it when shows use babies as plot devices. It just feels too much like a cheesy soap opera gimmick. The other part of me is going to give it a chance because I can sort of see an overall theme emerging. Either her baby is a genetic experiment or it is hers and Rory's but since it could have been conceived on the TARDIS then due to all the time energy it could be part time lord.

    We've seen TARDIS-like consoles in two episodes. The first was in the Lodger, in the "upstairs apartment" where people were being zapped while being forced to try to power the ship. The second time was in The Day of the Moon, in the sewers with the Silence. I do not think the Silence are responsible for the TARDIS-like ships, and we will see a new, different enemy that is trying to build a TARDIS and has kidnapped or engineered Amy's baby so it can power the ship. This is just my speculation.

    I can see this story arc spanning many more episodes, so there isn't really any room for Daleks. I do think we can use a proper break from Daleks and Cybermen, so that it'll actually mean something again when they are re-introduced.

    As for the 11th doctor, I like him more than I thought I would when I heard David Tennant was leaving the show. Matt Smith plays a very quirky doctor and the 11th doctor feels more vulnerable, quirky, and child-like. He makes mistakes and his technology is more fallible (e.g.: the sonic screwdriver doesn't work in every situation). As much as I love the 10th doctor, the writers made him too powerful and god-like and near the end I never really felt he was in much danger (with few exceptions). Moffat either had to tone down Doctor Who's invincible awesomeness, or he had to introduce ever-more-powerful enemies. There is more wiggle room if he weakened the doctor, so I think that was a good decision. My only real complaint about Matt Smith as the doctor is that he needs to be more intense at times. I love his quirkiness, but if he can add in some intensity to the mix then he has potential to be one of the best doctors.

    I also like Rory, because he is a stand up guy that does the right thing. He is the best of humanity. I think he is a better person than Amy. He is a bit insecure, but wouldn't we all if we were standing next to the Doctor? I am happy the writers ended up making Amy and Rory be together and love each other without making her another wide-eyed lovesick Doctor groupie. I hate love triangles and I am glad that plot device is not being used ... for now.

    1. Re:Thoughts on Season 6 [Spoilers] by wolfemi1 · · Score: 1

      Good comment! I think you're right, with the exception that I think Matt Smith is perfectly capable of playing intense, like in The Almost People when he gets the psychic question from the Flesh. I just think he doesn't have the opportunities in the script to be darker like Tennant or Eccleston did.

    2. Re:Thoughts on Season 6 [Spoilers] by Hast · · Score: 1

      This might be considered a slight spoiler, or just a hint of what to come..

      We've seen TARDIS-like consoles in two episodes. The first was in the Lodger, in the "upstairs apartment" where people were being zapped while being forced to try to power the ship. The second time was in The Day of the Moon, in the sewers with the Silence.

      In the confidential to the day of the moon they mentioned that the console room used by the silence is in fact the same set as in the lodger. (But more gritty.) So it's not impossible that there will be a callback to that in future episodes.

  89. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

    Same with Amy vs Donna. Amy has some kinda' accent or something.

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  90. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by onepoint · · Score: 1

    Post like this is what keeps me reading slashdot. No matter where you go, there is always an accounting cost. it's like being hit on the head with the anvil, the Answer is very true but nobody ever thinks of it.

    --
    if you see me, smile and say hello.
  91. Let them win for change! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about they actually let the Daleks win a *battle* or two?

  92. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by itsdapead · · Score: 1

    Or River. Did she not say in a past episode that the reason she is in prison is because she killed a very good man.

    Yes, but I think that has been telegraphed *too* clearly not to be a red herring (...along with the River==Mrs Who gag - he's a bugger, that Moffatt guy).

    My prediction: Amy shot the Doctor in order to prevent some horrible timey-wimey disaster and/or to protect her baby (after all, she's been so concerned to try and save the Doc that its a matter of narrative causality that she should have been the one to kill him) but River turns out to be Amy's daughter, and takes the rap for her Mum (we know that she is staying in jail to keep some sort of "promise").

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  93. This seasons has been PERFECT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every episode a 'fishfinger-custard' and not a single 'green scaley womble'. If you want the Doctor to finish, just stop watching him, and if enough agree with you, then he will magically disappear.

    "The new episodes make almost zero sense"

    They make perfect sense, ask a question if you don't understand, there's no shame in not being able to follow complex plots.

  94. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by Hatta · · Score: 1

    Donna knew that all she really had to work with was a big mouth, so she used it.

    Amy... Amy talks?

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  95. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

    I was thinking more along the lines of using her biological make-up as a reference to help extract the Doctor's influence on the Flesh from the remnants left behind by the humans. Of course if they (whoever "they" are) know of her and have her alive, she would make a more logical vessel than Amy if the baby is in fact entirely or part gallifreyan.

  96. 400? Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "400" encounters was just a number plucked out of the air by Moffatt, in case anyone's wondering. They've appeared in about 30 stories over the years, and some of those were cameos or flashbacks.

  97. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by Duradin · · Score: 1

    Don't diss the sonic!

  98. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by coolmadsi · · Score: 1

    used it in the last scene of the last episode that was aired

    No. His copy who got left behind with the screwdriver used it in the last scene of the last episode that was aired.

    [Spoiler warning]
    A couple of scenes after the Flesh-Doctor uses the sonic screwdriver, in the TARDIS, the original uses the sonic screwdriver to break the link to the fake-Amy (which collapses just like the Flesh Doctor did).

    The Flesh Doctor was an exact copy, down to the clothes and everything. He normally carries his sonic screwdriver in his pocket, so it plausible that the Flesh-Doctor had a copy of the sonic screwdriver, the copy being the one subsequently destroyed.

  99. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by Tolkien · · Score: 1

    Ah. I never followed the show that closely.

  100. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by Jiro · · Score: 1

    A sonic screwdriver is a piece of equipment. Anyone can have one. Liz Shaw had one, though that was probably a mistake (she used one while the Doctor had gone to another dimension; the writer probably meant she was using his and didn't realize the story made that impossible.) Romana made her own. A villain in "Partners in Crime" had a sonic pen, and that was part of the new series. River didn't have to get it from the Doctor, no matter what she said.

  101. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

    Watch the episode again. There were a few scenes after the copy bit it, one of which took place in the TARDIS and featured the Doctor using the screwdriver again.

    I won't describe exactly what happened as it constitutes a pretty major spoiler, but it was a very important scene and the screwdriver played a key role.

    --
    ... I'm addicted to placebos
  102. K-9 needs a return by ZeroNullVoid · · Score: 1

    The doctor needs to go take back K-9 from Sarah Jones....
    She has had him long enough, and likely he can just take her from the timeline after she is dead and K-9 is all alone. K-9 is best companion ever, although I do enjoy the eye candy companions also.

    1. Re:K-9 needs a return by atomicxblue · · Score: 1

      I think they should make Sarah Jane's death canon and mention it in the show, possibly having her give her life to save a bus load of children -- none of that "cowering in fear" crap! I think for a character like Sarah Jane, the only way to end her story in the Who universe is to have her go out in a blaze of glory.

  103. defeat Daleks by geoffaus · · Score: 1

    everyone knows that Daleks are easily defeated by stairs - or did they solve that with the new ones?

    --
    As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a reference to Godwin's Law approaches 1
    1. Re:defeat Daleks by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      everyone knows that Daleks are easily defeated by stairs - or did they solve that with the new ones?

      I thought it was resolved in the old series?

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    2. Re:defeat Daleks by Bloodwine77 · · Score: 1

      Daleks navigated stairs in the class series.

      Here is a Youtube clip from Remembrance of the Daleks:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BuWFXYcDk4
      (36 seconds in to the clip you see a Dalek going up stairs)

      In season 1, episode 6 of the new Doctor Who there is a scene roughly 23 minutes in where a human says,
      "Great big alien death machine defeated by a flight of stairs" and then the Dalek says, "EL-E-VATE", and hovers up the stairs.

    3. Re:defeat Daleks by Bloodwine77 · · Score: 1

      Jinks! It is funny we both posted the same Youtube video response.

      I tried finding a video of the "EL-E-VATE" scene from season 1 of the new Doctor Who but I couldn't find one.

  104. Bigger story, bigger risks by Livius · · Score: 1

    What I see happening with the current season is not so much that the overall story is good or bad, but that the writers have raised the stakes and taken much bigger risks. There are unresolved mysteries going back a season and a half. That could mean that there is a very big dramatic payoff coming, or it could mean that the writers screwed up a season and a half ago and don't even realize it.

  105. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by AvitarX · · Score: 1

    Isn't their a child doctor (well the non-twist interpretation was Amy and Rorey's altered by the TARDIS) currently?

    They really don't need a stand-in for the space-suit murder at all. That child could have the doctors memories, and go.

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  106. Oh oh.. so in a few years they come back! by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    And now they have sexy human daleks who can sneak in with humans and who wonder about if they are really daleks or humans.

    There is this actress who would be perfect for the role, tricia helfer.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  107. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by dbIII · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure how I forgot that in less than a week even though I've seen a lot of Tom Baker stuff since then.
    It looks like a continuity problem because there was one scene earlier where the doctor passed the screwdriver to his copy (or vice-versa) which looked like it was to establish the point that there was only one. Either that or there was another in the Tardis.

    Anyway, the sonic screwdriver magic wand thing and a desire to tone it down or get rid of it came up in an interview last year. I was hoping it was left behind but that was wishful thinking. Like K9 there was probably just another one in storage.

  108. Maybe Daleks could become good galactic citizens by Livius · · Score: 1

    One of the weakest points in the Doctor Who movie was the notion that the Daleks would have anything we might call a criminal justice system.

    But it would be interesting to see the Daleks in a marginal situation where they have to start co-operating with other races - hating every minute of it - and perhaps observing the Shadow Proclamation, with the Doctor and the Daleks each grudgingly respecting each other's legal rights, at least while others are watching.

  109. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by coolmadsi · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure how I forgot that in less than a week even though I've seen a lot of Tom Baker stuff since then. It looks like a continuity problem because there was one scene earlier where the doctor passed the screwdriver to his copy (or vice-versa) which looked like it was to establish the point that there was only one. Either that or there was another in the Tardis. Anyway, the sonic screwdriver magic wand thing and a desire to tone it down or get rid of it came up in an interview last year. I was hoping it was left behind but that was wishful thinking. Like K9 there was probably just another one in storage.

    I think at that point they had switched, so the Flesh Doctor was giving the real Doctor (who was pretending to be the Flesh Doctor) his (copy of the) sonic screwdriver, to convince the others that the Doctor passing the screwdriver was the real one (when it actually wasn't). That's my guess anyway.

  110. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

        It really did become the Star Trek tricorder. The damned thing could do anything and then some. Need to adjust a cell phone to work through time and space? [points sonic at it] Done. Need to see what this lifeform is? [points sonic at it] Done. Need to fix the computers that were just destroyed in a massive explosion? [points sonic at it] [points it again] Done.

        They really need to just consider what it is. A sonic screwdriver. A device that sends a tuned frequency out. Some things, like unlocking modern doors, could be feasible, but it would require a tensioner too. Look at what a lock pick gun, a lock pick rake, or even a bump key do. But, a sonic device against a keypad? That makes just as much sense as shooting one to make the door fall open. Sure as hell, when I finish forming my evil intergalactic empire, I'll make sure it has locks that work, not locks that you can just shoot, kick, or yell at. I also will have well positioned guards and surveillance, and not build in secret back doors to subvert my own security.

        If some schmuck in a blue box shows up, I'll have him captured immediately. He won't be able to just walk in, steal my evil universe destroying device, and disappear with it.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  111. Dalek vacation by d.the.duck · · Score: 3, Funny

    Somewhere the Daleks will be a spa.... EXFOLIATE EXFOLIATE

    --
    Where does the signature go?
  112. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by grahammm · · Score: 1

    And (in the Sarah Jane Adventures spinoff) Sarah Jane Smith had a sonic lipstick.

  113. Re:Steven Moffat needs the rest. Seconded! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Moffat did some good work in a group as a contributor; previously. As a leader we have been moving too far into fantasy kiddie stories which is something Moffat had done in the past; he needs some restraint to make him shine... somebody who doesn't like TV for children.

    I was upset with the lame ending last season which is the worst I've seen since the 70s - not that they had all that many long story arcs as they do now. Tom Baker died in a lame story but it wasn't as bad as last season. Somehow I feel like Moffat must have come up with that weak ending 3? seasons back when the Master returned the 1st time -- where it was just a hair short of asking the audience to think good thoughts of the doctor so he will live/win and turn from a house-elf back into a humanoid.

    As this arc continues I'm thinking we are heading for a top contender for worst ending. I've been a fan but unlike any of the fans I know, I'm not immediately sold as soon as the theme music starts. I can drop it as a waste of time, like everything post Tom Baker.

  114. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by JockTroll · · Score: 1

    They also have to weigh the same as ducks. I used to have a bridge made of ducks, but it flew away.

    --
    Geeks are so full of shit that "beating the crap out of them" takes a whole new meaning.
  115. So they are going to see other people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this a trial separation or are they free to date? Are we going to see a frustrated Dalek repeatedly killing Jack Harkness on Torchwood? I can just picture a disgusted Dalek slowly gliding off, eye stalk hung low as Jack Harness yells insults after him and grabs his crotch daring the Dalek to kill him again. A Dalek can only take so much abuse and it was bad enough from a Timelord let alone a sexual indistinct American.

  116. It's good business sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're just clearing out the retail channel, and then they'll announce new, upgraded Daleks now with Sonic Screwdriver invulnerability at a conference and people will be lining up outside the stores to buy them.

  117. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by russlar · · Score: 1

    real laughter was produced.

    --
    Anybody want my mod points?
  118. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not really true. There have been quite a few times in recent years when the Doctor has been in the same moment more than once.

  119. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    That would be bad writing if that were the case. Where's a bio-organic compound going to store the electrical energy something like that will need?

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  120. So does Rory by atomicxblue · · Score: 1

    What I want to know is what did Arthur Darvill do to Moffat that was so bad. It's like Moffat takes it out on poor Rory who gets killed literally every week.

    STOP KILLING RORY!!! :p

    1. Re:So does Rory by DeadDecoy · · Score: 1

      He's like the Kenny of Doctor Who. I'll find it amusing if it ever gets to the point where he's died and resurrected more than the Doctor.

  121. Give 'em a chance instead of constantly bitching by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing they were planning on doing a bunch more Dalek stories... as you say, they definitely set things up for it (though nothing leading to anything specific), and they redesigned how they look.

    Problem is that the redesigned Daleks look really stupid... like shitty appliances from Sharper Image or Brookstone, from a decade ago.

    I tell ya, all this whining about the new Dalek design never gets old (except for immediately).

    I mean, it's like you're a Star Trek fan, circa 1987. Oh, lordy, does the new Enterprise look stupid. And the captain is a bald French pacifist with an English accent. And that android guy is just a big Spock wannabe. Clearly this new show is going nowhere.

    The thing is, times change. We get new stuff. Unless you want to get the same stuff you've been getting for 40 years, that is. And today's "worst design ever" is tomorrow's beloved classic. So why not get on board while it's still fresh?

    Now, don't get me wrong, I think the 2005 Daleks had a lot going for them - the Daleks have had those slats from like the third Dalek story, but it was the 2005 Daleks that made those slats actually look good. To me the 2005 Daleks are like the pinnacle of Dalek designs based on the 1963 originals. But, at the same time, I welcome a turn into new and unexplored territory, and I think the new design has a lot going for it. It's got that new eye-stalk and the new neck vanes, the departure from the slats in pursuit of something sleeker, more like the bands that were on the original Dalek casings.

    I guess it's silly for me to say that you should like the new design, or anything like that. But if you're getting hung up on the hunch-back or the bright colors, I'd say get over it and give it a chance.

    As for this declaration of a Dalek hiatus - I really think it's unavoidable at this point. There's just been too much Dalek activity since the 2005 series started. "The Stolen Earth" was especially gratuitous - the whole thing was like a giant circle-jerk of character cameos and a ridiculously huge Dalek fleet subjected to a total humiliating defeat... (Though it did bring us Dalek Fred!) That said, I do want to see more of the new Daleks - but I guess I'll just have to be patient. In the mean time I'm really enjoying what's going on with The Silence...

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  122. Song, not Tam. by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    And I hate River. River is a classic Mary Sue--the kind of character that a 13 year old girl would put in a fanfic. "I'm the Doctor's secret wife, and I'm the only one who can talk smack to him, and I can time travel like him and I'm as mysterious as him and I have a really cool name."

    And she's the one who carries a gun so the Doctor doesn't have to... I can see your point. Her "I'm so awesome" moment shooting The Silence in S06E02 left me with a bit of an eye-roll... I don't like when "highly skilled fighter" characters are so "highly skilled" that they just take their enemies for granted. "Oh, I can just let this last one run at me from behind and shoot him without looking. I'm that cool." (Though Tenth Doctor was guilty of this as well, with the Sycorax... And after losing a hand!)

    Still, that aside, I've enjoyed her part in the show. What can I say? She's a fun character. IMO anyway. And poor River. She doesn't get any more kisses. :(

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  123. Blah, whatever. by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    The Eleventh Doctor is awesome. Most of his episodes are awesome as well. I have no idea what you're complaining about.

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  124. I for one approve! by guspasho · · Score: 1

    Thank goodness. The Daleks were getting so overused. They need to preserve their impact by making their appearances more rare.

    Maybe we can also stop getting linear appearances too? They are time travelers after all. Why do they keep encountering each other in the same order? It wasn't always the case, and River proves that it's much more interesting when they don't meet in the same order.

    1. Re:I for one approve! by thePuck77 · · Score: 1

      Thank goodness. The Daleks were getting so overused. They need to preserve their impact by making their appearances more rare.

      Maybe we can also stop getting linear appearances too? They are time travelers after all. Why do they keep encountering each other in the same order? It wasn't always the case, and River proves that it's much more interesting when they don't meet in the same order.

      Exactly. It seems like almost every issue ends up being the Daleks or the Cybermen, which is a damnable shame because the Weeping Angels and the weird media/TV soul-eater were just better antagonists with more interesting stories. I, for one, would be fine never seeing another Dalek or Cybermen episode.

      --
      "We live as though the world were as it should be, to show it what it can be." - Joss Whedon via Angel
  125. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by Unkyjar · · Score: 1

    You might try, but you'd be stuck in your bathroom because your locks will work. (Your keys not so much)

  126. Who's a gander; What's a goose? by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

    "Vortex Cortex told Slashdot 'There's a problem with the Doctor. He is the most famous character of the Doctor Who series and the most frequent, which means he is the most reliably triumphant protagonist in the universe.' "

    If predictable story lines and characters are right out, then Who is left in?!

  127. Daleks remind me of... by drb226 · · Score: 1

    Team Rocket. Yes, I started watching Who after Pokemon. "emergency temporal shift" == "team rocket's blasting off again"

  128. I Agree by Rhawk187 · · Score: 1

    I haven't been too impressed by the more recent Dalek episodes, and we certainly don't need one every season. So, I'm glad they are giving them a break.

  129. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by mattack2 · · Score: 1

    Aren't the Two/Five/Three Doctors stories counterexamples to those being 'the laws of (Doctor Who) physics'?

  130. The gay Daleks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The gay Daleks, Victor Lewis Smith has a lot to answer for he he

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZfxyvrW-lUs

  131. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by mattack2 · · Score: 1

    Turn on the subtitles (DVDs) or closed captions (broadcasts).

  132. Re:Maybe Daleks could become good galactic citizen by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    One of the weakest points in the Doctor Who movie was the notion that the Daleks would have anything we might call a criminal justice system.

    It was totally meaningless to have the Daleks put the Master on trial anyway. They didn't even show any Daleks on-screen. It could have just as easily been the Timelords holding the trial, with the Doctor taking the Master's remains somewhere else...

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  133. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even if Regeneration Girl does a gender-swap regeneration (which per remarks the Doctor made in "The Doctor's Wife" IS possible), she's still extremely unlikely to end up looking like Matt Smith (who's staying until at least 2013 according to what I've read). Besides, I doubt they'll replace the Doctor with some other version of himself (unless it's like Crichton on Farscape and both Doctors both have an absolutely equal claim to be the "real" one).

  134. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by Soluzar · · Score: 1

    Which is one reason I don't really care for those stories. They just make a mess of everything. You notice that none of the doctors in question remembers what happened to his earlier incarnations in those stories? It is far from a perfect series, but as a general principle they try to suggest that the Doctor can't just do whatever he likes. If he saw someone die, it shouldn't be possible for him to go back and change that. It would make the series boring. To put it another way, that's how good stories do it. Bad stories break the rules. With a series as long as Doctor Who, there are a lot of both. It is kinda pointless trying to make sense of it all, really.

  135. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rory being the "best man I've ever known" to River is a real stretch. Besides, it can't be him. She was STILL in Stormcage during the period that Rory never existed. Besides, she didn't know him before meeting Auton-Rory.

    It's hard to think of who else it could possibly be. Someone whom River thinks is the best man she's ever known AND is someone whom when Father Octavian was asked by the Doctor who it was would say, "you really, really don't want to know." It HAS to be the Doctor (since this is Doctor Who and so it CAN'T be Jesus).

  136. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by tragedy · · Score: 1

    Yes, but that would be covered by the "generally speaking". In the Five and Three Doctors series the collective powers of the Time Lords was being used to allow the doctors to co-exist. In the Two Doctors, the Second Doctor was on a mission for the time lords, so they may have been intervening to allow it as well. Collectively (and individually with individuals such as the Doctor himself) the Time Lords are meant to be scary powerful and can turn off, or at least work around laws of physics. Basically, the current series and episodes like _The Waters of Mars_ seem to indicate that the Laws of Time that the Time Lords follow are laws of physics for the rest of us, but are more like regulatory laws for them. So, they can break them and potentially contain and repair the damage, with some violations being worse than others

  137. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He didn't use it then because he knew it would disintegrate Amy.

  138. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by cavebison · · Score: 1

    We all know the sonic screwdriver does complicated things with technology, and we don't need to know the details.

    I'd prefer that doesn't equate to "technobabble" though, like the language in Star Trek. Mystery is fine, not everyone knows how a microwave oven actually heats food ("it's microwave radiation of course" one would say, still without knowing *how*) and less how a carburettor works in the common car. It's all "magic".

    But there's consistency - we don't say, "quick, microwave the carburettor so we can get outta here!" IMO, good sci-fi knows the audience won't lose disbelief if the rocks look like styrofoam, but we will if it's not consistent and takes the genre "seriously" (incl. comedies like the wonderful Galaxy Quest).

  139. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by Psykechan · · Score: 1

    What I want, nay need to know is whether or not the Doctor destroying Amy's replicant also destroyed his shoes which he got from his ganger. Weren't they made of the flesh too?

    How exactly do you trade clothes with a ganger anyway? If all of their clothes are part of them, you couldn't; any more than you could trade feet with them. If all of their clothes are just separate creations produced by the flesh wouldn't they be alive as well? The pile of discarded Jennifers was turning into a pile of dirty jumpsuit laundry with flesh blobs. Would their eyes really be the last thing to go or would it be their clothes?

    ...and if this alien flesh lifeform is alive and can be pressed into clothes that aren't alive, humanity can use it to replace third world sweat shops making clothes the old fashioned way. I'm thinking something akin to the Torchwood episode Meat.

    Of course I wouldn't have to think of such oddities if the episode wasn't such a letdown after last week's decent build-up. I'm not saying it's the Worst Episode Ever but it is my least favorite 11th Doctor episode taking the title away from the previous champion Victory of the iDaleks.

  140. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by monkeythug · · Score: 1

    When River shoots at the spaceman(woman) and misses (despite being already established as an excellent shot) she mutters something like "Yes, of course" which could mean she knows her shots went wide because it would be a paradox for her to shoot her younger self.

    --
    Don't you wish you hadn't wasted 3 seconds of your life reading this sig?