Slashdot Mirror


English City Council "Not Ready" for Zombie Attack

Unlike the CDC, a freedom of information request submitted to the Leicester City Council has revealed that the council is not prepared for an unexpected zombie invasion. From the article: "'We've had a few wacky ones before but this one did make us laugh,' said Lynn Wyeth, head of information governance. The Freedom of Information Act allows a right of access to recorded information held by public authorities. Ms Wyeth said she was unaware of any specific reference to a zombie attack in the council's emergency plan, however some elements of it could be applied if the situation arose."

121 comments

  1. You're Laughing Now by guyminuslife · · Score: 4, Funny

    Will you be laughing when the apocalypse comes, and you look back and say, "We weren't prepared, oh god, we weren't prepared...."

    No! You'll be wandering the streets of Leicester, all dripping blood and rotting flesh, hungering for brains. BE PREPARED!

    --
    I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    1. Re:You're Laughing Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's okay. They don't have any brains for the zombies to munch on anyways.

    2. Re:You're Laughing Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      no we do what we have allways done - promote them to the House of Lords.

    3. Re:You're Laughing Now by eln · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is much ado about nothing. If history is any guide, the Doctor will come to the rescue of our British cousins in the event of any shenanigans.

    4. Re:You're Laughing Now by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Fine. I prepared some brains to see how they taste.

      They really need ketchup. Lots of it.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    5. Re:You're Laughing Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Theory: The Doctor is actually Arthur.

    6. Re:You're Laughing Now by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. Black pepper.

    7. Re:You're Laughing Now by martin-boundary · · Score: 0

      BE PREPARED!

      Sorry, can't be prepared. NOBODY (*) expects the ZOMBIE APOCALYPSE!

      (*) Ziiiing!

    8. Re:You're Laughing Now by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      Or maybe not, and he'll just reboot the Universe after they all perish, except one :)

    9. Re:You're Laughing Now by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      And chillie pepper and Maggi - have you never been to Haiti?

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    10. Re:You're Laughing Now by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      No, I've only ever had brains from English supermarkets.

    11. Re:You're Laughing Now by jumpinjax · · Score: 1

      normal Saturday night in Leicester then.

  2. Re:First Plop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Uh. Love you too?

  3. Re:First Plop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Relax yo, nobody's attacking you.

    However you sound like you could benefit from a professional psychiatrist. Get some help, anger isn't good for you.

  4. Duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you're prepared for it, it's not unexpected.

    1. Re:Duh. by qubezz · · Score: 1

      If it is expected, you're not prepared...

    2. Re:Duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      expect the expected.

  5. You Know... by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Funny

    Even if the zombies never come, it's never really a bad idea to install steel storm shutters or stockpile AR50s and ammo. Just sayin'

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:You Know... by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      A stockpile of AR15's would be a much better choice for the zombie invasion. Just sayin'

    2. Re:You Know... by Lehk228 · · Score: 2

      AR 15 is a horrible gun for fighting zombies.

      relatively sensitive to rough treatment and inadequate servicing, the direct impingement gas system tends to foul faster and under sustained firing can build up enough heat to melt lacquer coatings from coated ammo, leading to jams that are very fun to clear with the parts so hot.

      if you want to use a semi-auto or assault rifle for zombie protection there are two families of rifle to look at, AK47 and SKS, both are tolerant of rough treatment. my personal preference would be for the SKS the more streamlined 10 round internal box magazine will be less likely to snag while sprinting through woods or close quarters, and the hinged bayonet is long enough to take heads off if it comes to that, though once they are that close it's more a matter of how many guests you bring with you to hell

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    3. Re:You Know... by crankyspice · · Score: 1

      Six of one... You get a lot more stopping power out of a 50cal than a .223 Remington, but the (except in California; stupid "bullet button" requirement) detachable magazine and (semi)automatic operation of the AR15 would certainly have advantages. Still, with proper training, from 250' away, even firing at a moving target, a shooter can get off 3 shots with a bolt-action rifle in only six seconds, and score two hits -- including a head shot.

      --
      geek. lawyer.
    4. Re:You Know... by Gerzel · · Score: 2

      What about something in an easy to handle shotgun? For the person who doesn't shoot much but still wants to be ready for the zombies. Also squirrels. Automatic is a plus for the squirrels.

    5. Re:You Know... by Lehk228 · · Score: 2

      shotguns are great to exceptional. a little $400 Mossberg pump gun is easy to handle in close quarters and very reliable. 12Ga shotgun shells are also probably the easiest ammo te get your hands on as it is carried literally everywhere that sells ammo, it is restricted by law pretty much nowhere, and it's cheap to practice with target loads

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    6. Re:You Know... by lul_wat · · Score: 1

      But Jacky Kennedy was right next to him, and wasn't using a bolt action rifle so I guess you wern't referring to that

      --
      Divide a cake by zero. Is it still a cake?
    7. Re:You Know... by Roachie · · Score: 2

      Yea the pump is useful in room-to-room exchanges and out to some yardage, But I would want the stopping power at range that An AK/SKS provides. The AR is a true death trap for one who relies on it, unless you can get your target to stand still and wait for you to disassemble the weapon to clear the frequent jams.

      My biggest problem with the AR isn't the fouling, its the locking lugs on the bolt- they bite into misfed cartridges and fubar the weapon. I have jammed ARs simply by hitting the bolt release too hard. You cant always call for a time out.

      --
      This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
    8. Re:You Know... by tibman · · Score: 1

      Not that i agree with your assessment of the AR15, i've only used the M16A2/4 and M4. But I would say you should only choose a gun that the local army and police stockpile ammo for. You would have to stockpile a vast amount of ammo to make sitting in one place worth it. All that shooting will do nothing but attract more zombie targets and expend more ammo. Being mobile (light!) seems more preferable, imo.

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    9. Re:You Know... by modecx · · Score: 1

      Hey now, don't be so quick to dismiss the too heavy-caliber to be practical zombie-slaying options. You could install some of those red velvet-rope waiting lines, and also put up a big sign reading "FREE BRAIIIINS" on a kiosk... Surely the zombies would patiently queue up (I mean, it's not like they have anywhere else to go), and when you've got a few dozen deep...kablammo!

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    10. Re:You Know... by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      it is restricted by law pretty much nowhere

      Are we still talking about Leicester? Because I seem to recall that blanks for starting pistols are restricted by law in England.

    11. Re:You Know... by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      The AR15 is far better than an AR50, for a whole host of reasons, from semi auto operation to fairly wide availability of the ammo. I'm pretty sure the OP just mixed it up with the AR15, to be honest, which is why I posted at all.

    12. Re:You Know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      though once they are that close it's more a matter of how many guests you bring with you to hell

      "When Hell is full the dead will walk the Earth."

      Sorry, but hell is not where you are going.

    13. Re:You Know... by IrquiM · · Score: 1

      You need to explain AR50s to us Europeans - we don't use guns you see...

      --
      This is blinging
    14. Re:You Know... by plopez · · Score: 1
      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    15. Re:You Know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys need to take your ARs to a gunsmith if you're having that much trouble with them, or get one from a better manufacturer if you're using a cheap one. A decent AR will run all day and never jam if it isn't outright abused. I have a Bushmaster that will happily go through several hundred rounds at a stretch without jamming, ever. Fouling isn't going to be an issue unless you're going through a truly ridiculous amount of ammunition (like >1000 rounds), provided you clean it properly in the first place. I know some internet commandos like to dump on the AR for reliability, but based on my own experience I have no problem entrusting my life to mine. Oh yeah, DON'T use lacquer coated ammunition.

    16. Re:You Know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem is, in a zombie invasion you can't rely on all those conditions being met. What do you do if you can only get your hands on lacquer coated ammo and you don't have a cleaning kit / somewhere appropriate to clean the gun?

      Disclaimer: I know nothing about guns, just trying to point out some obvious flaws.

    17. Re:You Know... by Roachie · · Score: 1

      Na, it really is a design flaw. All weapons jam. When my AR( Bushmaster ) jams it has a tendency to stay that way. When my AK jams its not hard to clear.

      Fouling was a big deal back in the 60s. But now I confirm that its not an issue unless, as the coward said, you burn a ridiculous amount of ammo.

      Good advise on the lacquer.

      --
      This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
    18. Re:You Know... by Phoghat · · Score: 1
      Silly man. The AR 50 is a single shot rifle. After you kill a zombie, you'll have to re-load. What you need is what's known as a "Ma Deuce" or the Browning M2 50 caliber machine gun. Kind of hard to carry around however.

      Personally, I'd prefer a Mossberg short barrel shotgun with a magazine extension. Just saying.

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    19. Re:You Know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you manage to get to the police ammo stockpile, the chances are you'll find guns there as well, or maybe you'll pass some dead cops whose gun you can take.

    20. Re:You Know... by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      the AK will run all month even if it is abused, that's the point. at the range, or even in a war there is time for proper maintenance or at least a quick approximation thereof. when the dead are rising to eat your brains, taking your rifle apart when everything seems safe will likely be your death.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    21. Re:You Know... by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      i'm not knocking the AR-15, in fact i want one.

      just not for a SHTF and especially a zombie SHTF there is plenty of 7.62x39 around and more of it is in robust packaging, like russian "spam" cans twin packed in wooden crates, instead of cardboard boxes in cardboard cases and maybe wrapped in plastic

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    22. Re:You Know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good choice.

      Now, let's review a few points - for those who have watched too many movies.

      A successful zombie outbreak survivor will make use of basic military / enforcement strategies.

      Contrary to responses - the AR15 is indeed a fine weapon.
      We are talking head shot stopping power, not how much impact overall in general. While high caliber weapons are nice, they are not practical in a fast fire - accurate handling situation.
      An AR with a 30 round clip, or 100 round drum, can come in handy when needing to clear out an area quick. Also, the rifle can double as a semi long range cover weapon. With a good bi-pod - and laser aligned scope, the rifle is deadly.
      Also, for those who know, you can get hollow point rounds. These, with the correct burn ration, deliver a nice wound. Deer hunting backs this up.
      Or you could go full FMJ so that the rounds keep going through multiple targets.
        -- (All this is backed by first hand experience.)

      Side note: An automatic weapon is not practical. The rounds can be used up too fast. Semi auto lets you place shots a bit better. Remember, for the dead, it is about shot placement - not volume.
      Even a .22 mag is effective at medium range - the rounds have a tenancy to penetrate, and then bounce around in the target. Good for brain destruction. Even though these have been used to put livestock down, I would prefer something with a bit more "umph".

      A shotgun is a good choice for closer range as a backup. However, even a good combat shotgun holds - generally - 8 rounds. This is not good in an overrun situation. You can try to get a drum, but the wait list on these are ridiculous - as only a few are made at a time. A Mossberg 500 combat is a good gun.
      Now you could try to get an AA-12 automatic shotgun, (not likely), with a 20 round drum. This is a military weapon. Good luck getting it.
      The major downfall - reload time.

      Lastly, a side arm is required.
      I would not recommended going with a overly high powered caliber. They kick too much, and are not good for a first time shooter.
      A 9mm is fine, and bridges the .40 and .45. Again, you can go FMJ or Hollow. A balanced handgun will have lower kick.

      Finally, a blunt or long sharp weapon is advised . Bullets will run out, and you may not have backup clips or time to reload. your last hope if a weapon that does not need ammo. The downfall - you better have some power in your arms, and have stamina.

      The weak will die first....

      Hope this helps.

    23. Re:You Know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SKS bayonet is really only good for stabbing, not chopping.

    24. Re:You Know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if the zombies never come, it's never really a bad idea to install steel storm shutters or stockpile AR50s and ammo. Just sayin'

      ---------
      Good choice advising to get an AR-15.

      Now, let's review a few points - for those who have watched too many movies.

      A successful zombie outbreak survivor will make use of basic military / enforcement strategies.

      Contrary to responses - the AR15 is indeed a fine weapon. The 5.56 NATO is not the biggest round, but is effective.
      We are talking head shot stopping power, not how much impact overall in general. While high caliber weapons are nice, they are not practical in a fast fire - accurate handling situation.
      An AR with a 30 round clip, or 100 round drum, can come in handy when needing to clear out an area quick. Also, the rifle can double as a semi long range cover weapon. With a good bi-pod - and laser aligned scope, the rifle is deadly.
      Also, for those who know, you can get hollow point rounds. These, with the correct burn ration, deliver a nice wound. Deer hunting backs this up.
      Or you could go full FMJ so that the rounds keep going through multiple targets.
      -- (All this is backed by first hand experience.)

      Side note: An automatic weapon is not practical. The rounds can be used up too fast. Semi auto lets you place shots a bit better. Remember, for the dead, it is about shot placement - not volume.
      Even a .22 mag is effective at medium range - the rounds have a tenancy to penetrate, and then bounce around in the target. Good for brain destruction. Even though these have been used to put livestock down, I would prefer something with a bit more "umph".

      A shotgun is a good choice for closer range as a backup. However, even a good combat shotgun holds - generally - 8 rounds. This is not good in an overrun situation. You can try to get a drum, but the wait list on these are ridiculous - as only a few are made at a time. A Mossberg 500 combat is a good gun.
      Now you could try to get an AA-12 automatic shotgun, (not likely), with a 20 round drum. This is a military weapon. Good luck getting it.
      The major downfall - reload time.

      Lastly, a side arm is required.
      I would not recommended going with a overly high powered caliber. They kick too much, and are not good for a first time shooter.
      A 9mm is fine, and bridges the .40 and .45. Again, you can go FMJ or Hollow. A balanced handgun will have lower kick.

      Finally, a blunt or long sharp weapon is advised . Bullets will run out, and you may not have backup clips or time to reload. your last hope if a weapon that does not need ammo. The downfall - you better have some power in your arms, and have stamina.

      The weak will die first....

      Hope this helps.

  6. Unexpected? by Manos_Of_Fate · · Score: 2

    is not prepared for an unexpected zombie invasion.

    As opposed to all of those expected zombie attacks?

    --
    Isn't enough that I ruined a pony, making a gift for you?
    1. Re:Unexpected? by HellYeahAutomaton · · Score: 4, Funny

      No one expects the zombie inquisition!

    2. Re:Unexpected? by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      is not prepared for an unexpected zombie invasion.

      As opposed to all of those expected zombie attacks?

      You telling me you arent expecting a zombie attack at some point?

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    3. Re:Unexpected? by Gerzel · · Score: 1

      Don't you think for one second that they don't want to eat our tasty brains.

    4. Re:Unexpected? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Yes, we already made a list of all the unexpected things that might happen.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  7. It's not the zombies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not the zombies I'm worried about! It's the fucking emo vampires and the swooning tween girls!

    God! I'd just fucking OFF MYSELF if that ever came to be!!!

    1. Re:It's not the zombies! by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Coward.

      Be a man. Off them and do the world a service.

    2. Re:It's not the zombies! by webmistressrachel · · Score: 1

      Just emo vampires, as opposed to other kinds? You, my friend, are a trad goth with a chip on your shoulder, aren't you? The swooning tween girls remark gives it away: jealousy, the oldest emotion.

      --
      This tagline was transcoded to result in at least one smirk. If you experience failure to smirk, please consult your Gen
  8. Shawn of the dead by Windwraith · · Score: 1

    It's happening! Get your cricket things and go smack some zombies!

    1. Re:Shawn of the dead by Ricochet · · Score: 1

      Shawn of the dead? Nut up or shut up! - Zombieland

    2. Re:Shawn of the dead by Windwraith · · Score: 1

      Haven't had time to check that one out. Do you recommend it?

  9. Simple and obvious solution... by Scutter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...for any zombie invasion of the English countryside: Barricade yourself in the Winchester.

    --

    "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    1. Re:Simple and obvious solution... by teslar · · Score: 1

      for any zombie invasion of the English countryside

      Just nitpicking - the movie was set (and shot) in London. Getting to the Winchester may not be the smartest move if you're in the countryside :)

      Of course I suppose it is up to debate whether it's smarter to be in a big city or in the country side during a zombie invasion - I'd go with remote countryside locations in the hope that Zombies just pass you by en route to the next major food source/city.

    2. Re:Simple and obvious solution... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      Zombies don't travel much. If you're in a city, you'll be surrounded by millions of them. If you're in the country, you'll just have to deal with a few wanderers and the neighbours. Zombies just don't have the forward-planning ability to set off for a distant food source, and even if they did they don't have the coordination to drive so they'll be traveling very slowly.

    3. Re:Simple and obvious solution... by Nuskrad · · Score: 1

      Plus, in the English countryside everyone and their mum has a gun. Like farmers... and farmer's mums

    4. Re:Simple and obvious solution... by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Being out in the country didn't help the people holed up in that farmhouse at the beginning of 28 Weeks Later. Of course, you just have to have the willingness to not open the barricade for anyone, even a child.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    5. Re:Simple and obvious solution... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      But those were 28 Days zombies: They have no established rules, so they can do anything the writers want. The classic zombie is much better established: A reanimated corpse, slow and uncoordinated in movement but of immense durability. Individually they may be simply walked away from, but with their ability to quickly spread the zombification they will easily form a horde of tens of thousands. The threat is in their numbers.

  10. Uhh... by Lanteran · · Score: 1

    Besides the fact that zombies... don't exist, this oatmeal should help ye prepare:http://theoatmeal.com/comics/zombie_how

    --
    "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
    1. Re:Uhh... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Did a zombie eat the part of your brain that does hyperlinks, or has it always been missing?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Uhh... by Lanteran · · Score: 1

      Slashdot usually automatically hyperlinks urls. Sorry for the site's malfunction. If the zombies ate the copy/paste center, though, this should help you: Linky for the copy/paste impaired.

      --
      "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
    3. Re:Uhh... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Slashdot usually automatically hyperlinks urls.

      This was a bug even before the great redesign.

      Copy/paste impaired, am I? At least I know how to use the preview. Now get off my lawn!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  11. Won't the invasion be in America by high_rolla · · Score: 1

    I reckon they've done their research and after watching a whole heap of zombie movies, realised that if there is an outbreak it will most likely start in America. This will give them plenty of time to formulate a plan before it spreads to England.

    --
    Ryans Tutorials - A collection of technology tutorials.
    1. Re:Won't the invasion be in America by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 1

      Well, it's a reasonable assumption. A lot of Bad Things start in the American Colonies, then move to the UK after they've proven themselves here. Marijuana prohibition... infinite extension of copyright terms... reality TV...

    2. Re:Won't the invasion be in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What do you mean "start"?
      Did I miss something? I didn't notice FOX and the Neocons* ever stopping... ^^

      * OK, let's not insult conservatives. Neocons don't conserve anything. They destroy. Things like the constitution. A better name would be "fascists". (Also: Not saying they are limited to the Republican party, or the USA.)

    3. Re:Won't the invasion be in America by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      Everyone knows the zombie apocalypse is already hapenning: it started in Germany, and authorities are lying that it's E coli infection.

    4. Re:Won't the invasion be in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean "start"? Did I miss something? I didn't notice FOX and the Neocons* ever stopping... ^^

      * OK, let's not insult conservatives. Neocons don't conserve anything. They destroy. Things like the constitution. A better name would be "fascists". (Also: Not saying they are limited to the Republican party, or the USA.)

      Yes, apparently you've missed quite a lot of your brain -yet another loser who has to exploit the opportunity of any topic to slam their "favorite" political faction, even if it's wildly off topic and unrelated. Sounds like OCD is setting in.
      But I suppose Rachel Maddow suggesting that the 2nd Amendment is outdated and should be done away with is okay with you. Now which side is trying to destroy the basic statutes (Bill of Rights in this case) the US was founded on?

      Besides, if she and the rest of the extreme left wingnuts had their way, we'd all be sitting ducks for the zombies with few good options to protect ourselves! (See? At least I found a way to tie this into the subject, even if it is tongue-in-cheek)

  12. Too late by Lexx+Greatrex · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have been on the tube... the zombies are already there

  13. Stupid Question by jdpars · · Score: 0

    About FOIA... I thought it was American legislation, but this is definitely a UK city. Is it called the same thing across the pond?

    1. Re:Stupid Question by MurukeshM · · Score: 2

      Similar legislation exists elsewhere too. In UK its FOIA, namesake to the American law. In India its called the Right to Information Act.

    2. Re:Stupid Question by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 3, Informative

      About FOIA... I thought it was American legislation, but this is definitely a UK city. Is it called the same thing across the pond?

      It is not a stupid question. In fact it is the most serious post here that I have read. The UK has the Freedom of Information Act 2000. In my own country of Australia we have the Freedom of Information act 1982. There are plenty of other countries that have something similar.

      And this has been an entirely frivolous and annoying use the act.

    3. Re:Stupid Question by beuges · · Score: 2

      And here in South Africa, the ANC government is desperately trying to force the Protection of Information Bill into law, essentially criminalizing whistle-blowing rather than protecting it. So much for SA being a democracy, or a progressive African country. It's just another dictatorship with the figurehead rotating every few years.

    4. Re:Stupid Question by Nuskrad · · Score: 1

      And this has been an entirely frivolous and annoying use the act.

      The information officer at the council obviously disagrees, he could have denied the request if he had though it was 'lacking any serious purpose or value'. If nothing else it has brought knowledge of citizen's rights under the act to a wider audience

    5. Re:Stupid Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was probably trying to make sure he looks very, very, busy, with all the job cuts going on in local councils at the moment...

  14. Zombie invasions are already happening in Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are large, compact settlements people-like organisms in all major cities, except that the bodies therein are completely alien, controlled by different social mechanisms, brainwashed with a different set of "values" and armed - at the least with the readiness to strike at the "infidels". While it is not yet openly acknowledged by the bleeding heart liberals in Europe often (although recently even a president of a European country did), it is a truth that is evident to anyone with a working brain and open eyes who lives here.

    Therefore, the question is neither funny, nor whacky, and preparations must be made, or the invasion will be very, very successful for the zombie masters.

    Look at Switzerland, where the preparations have been going on full force since long time ago. Have they suffered when invasions of alien, brainless or brainwashed races marched through Europe?

  15. Triffids by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    They've had 50 years to prepare for a triffid attack, but I bet they're not ready for that, either.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    1. Re:Triffids by ktappe · · Score: 1

      They've had 50 years to prepare for a triffid attack, but I bet they're not ready for that, either.

      Darn it...I was blissfully unaware of triffids until I read your post and went a-googling. Now I'll not sleep a wink tonight. Thanks a lot!

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
  16. More pop culture humor. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 0, Troll

    Blah blah blah Chuck Norris! Ha ha ha.

    Blah blah blah bacon! Ha ha ha.

    Blah blah blah I can has? Ha ha ha.

    Blah blah blah Weiner! Ha ha ha.

    Blah blah blah Zombies. Ha ha ha.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    1. Re:More pop culture humor. by Warwick+Allison · · Score: 1

      Do you know Kevin Bacon?

    2. Re:More pop culture humor. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      I think I am only two hops from him.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  17. Egg firmly on faces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Basically if the Zombiepocalpyse happens the UK is screwed due to poor planning where as the US is prepared? After getting blown off for all the help in WW II don't expect much from the US when the zombies come a callin'. In the US every house is armed to the teeth where as in the UK you'll be fighting them off with Cricket bats and blood sausages. Draconian gun laws won't be much comfort while your neighbors are eating your brains. Please do send us the rest of the current season of Doctor Who before the zombies take over the BBC. Then again replacing the staff of the BBC with flesh eating zombies may be an improvement. It certainly couldn't hurt Radio One. Zombie Stig may not be as quick as he was when he was alive but the rest of the Top Gear cast may be more entertaining as the other two hosts chase Richard Hammond around screaming "Brains!!!" as he tries to outrun them in a Morris Marina held together with Duck tape. Then again zombies running the BBC has got to be better than American "Idle" and Gossip Girl. Root Channel is better than those two shows.

    1. Re:Egg firmly on faces by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 2

      After getting blown off for all the help in WW II don't expect much from the US when the zombies come a callin'.

      Where the hell did that come from? Who blew off whom?

    2. Re:Egg firmly on faces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's Scottish and jealous.

    3. Re:Egg firmly on faces by Dr+Fro · · Score: 1

      "You'd all be speaking German and eating brains if it wasn't for the US" ?

      --
      ********************
      I object to Intellect without Discipline.
  18. What about an *expected* zombie invasion? by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

    ... has revealed that the council is not prepared for an unexpected zombie invasion.

    Does that mean the council is prepared for zombie invasions in general, but just doesn't know how to deal with unexpected ones?

  19. The Leicester City Council wouldn't know, but... by Artifakt · · Score: 2

    The British have a perfectly cromulent plan to deal with zombie invasion, involving possibly activating the 'white elephants' of squadron 666, and definitely loading the SCORPION STARE software in all enabled CCTV surveillance systems in zombie plagued areas. Playing an electric violin arrangement of Wagner's 'Ride of the Valkyries' at them may also be needed in a few cases, but really we're saving that for the plague's masters.
            Oh, you're not cleared CASE NIGHTMARE GREEN? Nevermind - I seem to have misspoken. The British have absolutely no plans to deal with zombie invasions.
     

    --
    Who is John Cabal?
  20. Re:The Leicester City Council wouldn't know, but.. by dougisfunny · · Score: 1

    I don't think the white elephants would be ideal for dealing with a zombie invasion SCORPION STARE sure, but not the white elephants.

    --
    This is not the funny you're looking for.
  21. Silly? by naota-kun · · Score: 1

    Sure, it is a fun and games until your slow shuffling, pasty-faced neighbor chomps down on your skull.

    --
    dull-eyed footstool-temporary octopus
  22. Re:The Leicester City Council wouldn't know, but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yay! Another Charlie Stross fan, thought it was just me :) Bob Howard will save the day

  23. Oh, hilarious by Lincolnshire+Poacher · · Score: 2

    FOIA exists for a reason and that reason is not to make flippant and pointless enquiries.

    There are already plenty of threats to rescind or curtail FOIA inthe UK and nonsense like this, which wastes time and money, will only lend credence to those calls.

    In other words: wise up.

    1. Re:Oh, hilarious by JSG · · Score: 1

      At the moment this is the MoTD in the /. footer :

      "Mix a little foolishness with your serious plans; it's lovely to be silly at the right moment. -- Horace"

      Cheers
      Jon

    2. Re:Oh, hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does your comment have to do with the linked article, which explains how the government is broadening the scope of the FOIA?

    3. Re:Oh, hilarious by u38cg · · Score: 1
      One man's flippant and pointless inquiry is another's raison d'etre. More to the point, if you're on the receiving end, they are *all* flippant and pointless. I have made a couple of enquiries under the act and while they were important to me, a public interest test would probably have knocked them out.

      If freedom of information means anything, it means that the zombie invaders must be answered along with everyone else. Set your information systems up properly, and it should be perfectly easy to manage the daft as well as the important.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    4. Re:Oh, hilarious by doccus · · Score: 1

      If it's the same in your country as ours, you have to be rather specific about any FOI request, such as 'all the minutes of the council meeting at so and so date, regarding zombie attacks'. which would lead me to believe that the council were set up, to appear as fools, by *someone*, ahead of time, i.e. during the meeting by directly or indirectly introducing the motion, who then later tipped off someone to request FOI... Just a hunch....

  24. Not prepared?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not preparing for a Zombie attack is just brainless.... in which case you're probably safe.

  25. Leicester, use Olympic plan for US Tea Baggers. by leftie · · Score: 1

    Leicester can just use the plans they came up for the coming Olympics for dealing with visiting American Tea Party dignitaries.

    Not enough difference between zombies to tea baggers to bother with the extra expense. Close enough for government work, anyway.

    1. Re:Leicester, use Olympic plan for US Tea Baggers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know England is a small country compared to the US, but the Olympics are in London and Leicester isn't that close to London.

  26. you need a shotgun licence, not so easy to get by fantomas · · Score: 4, Funny

    In the UK you'll need a shotgun licence to own a shotgun. Not so easy to get. You'll have to persuade the police (they do a home visit for each application) that you have a good reason for needing one, and "being prepared for the zombie invasion" probably won't be the winning answer....

    1. Re:you need a shotgun licence, not so easy to get by EdZ · · Score: 2

      "I would like to own a shotgun" is a sufficient reason to apply for a shotgun permit. It's the FAC that covers other firearms (.22 rimfire semi-automatics and bolt-action of larger calibre) that's somewhat more onerous in it's requirements; mainly that you need to be a member in good standing of a firearms club.

    2. Re:you need a shotgun licence, not so easy to get by u38cg · · Score: 1

      It's actually not too bad. They're essentially checking that you're not batshit insane, not likely to kill yourself with it, and not likely to give or sell it to criminals. As long as you don't appear to be the kind of person that attempts to clear stoppages by banging the butt on the ground and staring down the barrel, you're generally OK.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    3. Re:you need a shotgun licence, not so easy to get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about farmers? And farmer's mums?

  27. Re:Stupid Fat Person by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right, I mean what's the probability that two countries that speak more or less the same language would name similar laws the same way?

  28. On the other hand.. by cheros · · Score: 1

    .. you ought to admire the typically British sense of humour shining through here. I mean, poking a bit of fun at officials is not actually a bad thing in a world that is becoming increasingly obsessed with boring rules and regulations.

    Yes, I know this takes "valuable" time, but let's face it - to BUY entertainment and job enjoyment like that would cost more - after such a stunt the rest of the day goes so much easier.

    It's not always about money..

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  29. Good grief! by pro151 · · Score: 1

    I can't believe I wasted 30 seconds reading this! Whats worse than that is I can't believe the number of idiots that waste even more time commenting on it. Oh crap, I just commented on it! Oh well, I will just have to add myself to the idiot list. :o()

  30. Francis, Buddy! by Warwick+Allison · · Score: 1

    You are prepared! When I first-post they're all over me, tearing at my brain lining and giving such perfect proof of my infantophagia that I mod them up before I've even realised it's me they're talking about!

  31. Weaponry by plopez · · Score: 1

    Here are my thoughts on weaponry:

    Guns are ok but you need the right one. Shotguns have high recoil and the ammo is bulky and slow on reloads. Semi-autos can also have a reload problem since you can burn through ammo fast, and you also have to deal with muzzle rise as well. Large caliber pistols take a bit of practice to get good at, the large ones such as the .357 mag. or .45 have a bit of recoil to deal with. Pistols are really only good in the 7 m range. It takes a lot practice to get accurate at longer ranges.

    So for longer ranges I would use a decent varmit gun like a .270 or a .243. Light on the recoil with a flat trajectory, good for sniping, and the ammo is lighter. Don't discount a .22 long rifle for closer in. The .22 has no real recoil and easy to carry so you can run fast if needed. If all you need is a head shot a .22 LR can penetrate then bounce around the skull scrambling the brains like eggs. Like wise with a good .22 shooting range pistol for closer in, or a .32 pistol. If all it is is a head shot all you have to do is penetrate the bone, leave the macho pocket cannons for the Rambo wannabes and the movies.

    Guns have the disadvantage of a report wine fired. A crossbow or hunting bow might be useful for stealth operations. At close range both can penetrate well and don't forget the eye sockets.

    Same with "wrist rockets" :
    http://www.google.com/search?q=wrist+rockets&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a#q=wrist+rockets&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=6ik&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&prmd=ivns&source=univ&tbm=shop&tbo=u&sa=X&ei=FHvzTartCsnegQfx4unCCw&ved=0CDoQrQQ&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=607e1640359d683b&biw=1202&bih=559

    You can punch through plywood and hence bone with them, they are silent, and you can use rocks or metal bolts as ammo if needed.
    Are you prepared?

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  32. What do they mean, unlikely? by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

    Just issue SIGSTOP to the parent processes that don't ignore SIGCHLD, and once child processes exit, you have zombies!

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  33. Marketing Gold! by plopez · · Score: 1

    Anybody want to meet me at Zombie-paloozo 2012 in Leicester next year?

    If their smart the town council will organize that, they just had a gift dropped on their lap. :)

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  34. Zombies just jumped the shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, I think we can all see now that zombies have jumped the shark. Way too much exposure, it's oversaturated every medium. Now when I see zombies, I run the other way. Because they're boring.

  35. Re:The Leicester City Council wouldn't know, but.. by loimprevisto · · Score: 1

    How many times do I have to say it- Dammit, watch your OPSEC!

    You are in violation of Section Three of the Official Secrets Act. Slashdot does not have GAME ANDES REDSHIFT clearance. You'll be answering to the auditors for this one...

    --
    Much Madness is divinest Sense --
    To a discerning Eye --
    Much Sense -- the starkest Madness
  36. Re:First Plop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is confusing to me. I was told you ate babies, that you *are* female, and that you do in fact ingest your own fecal matter.

    If what the world says about Frosty Piss isn't entirely true, then... well I just don't know what to believe anymore. Maybe flammable water *IS* safe, maybe Elvis *is* alive.

    This is all too much to handle, so instead I'll go back to thinking of Frosty Piss and a pissed off female baby eating shit eater. And with a name like that it won't be hard to remember. /you nailed me on the SICK part though...

  37. Can we stop with the 'zombie apocalypse' bullshit, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not funny anymore. Every time someone says they're worried about the 'zombie apocalypse', all I hear is 'I know I'm worthless in a survival setting, so I'm going to make nervous jokes about it.'

  38. no laughing matter... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    I think you can replace zombie invasion with virus contamination, or swarm infestation, etc....
    the idea is that something is able to spread at an abnormal rate, will you be able to contain it.....someone coughs and spreads a virus, the next one gets it, and so on, whether a zombie bites you, and then you bite someone else, or someone coughs on you, it is the same, disease containment is the point of the story, and the fact they actually could not see the real issue, is pretty sad. Zombie movies just add a laughable factor into it, or entertainment without feeling bad for all those dying, but those people are dying as well from those zombie bites, yet we don't feel bad, we instead laugh....

    the world we live in, ....!

  39. Re:The Leicester City Council wouldn't know, but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OPSEC? clearance? PAX terminal? You sound like Military Intel.

  40. How many rounds does a zombie need? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most zombies seem to require quite a few shots. If you're comparing Assault-weapon sized ammo and the spare clips, you're not that far behind in bulk yet you can get away with a single shot from the shotgun, so chamber one round and you're good.

    Of course, a big-ass broadsword is much better, since it doesn't need ammo. Leave the shotgun for clearing a roomful and then use the sword to take out the singletons/pairs.

    Bows are pointless with zombies because the flesh isn't all that solid and the bolt goes through and is really hard to find. If you want to go old-school, a few javelins or spears thrown will work better.

  41. Re:The Leicester City Council wouldn't know, but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  42. exactly! by fantomas · · Score: 1

    indeed. claiming fighting zombie invasions as your reason for wanting one might get you into the "batshit insane" category pretty quickly though....