Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Spying Devices Installed On Hong Kong Cars

jjp9999 writes "Spying devices disguised as electronic border cards have been secretly installed on thousands of Hong Kong vehicles by Chinese authorities, according to a Hong Kong newspaper. A translation of the story states Chinese authorities have been installing spying devices on all dual-plate Chinese-Hong Kong vehicles for years, enabling a vast network of eavesdropping across the archipelago."

34 of 171 comments (clear)

  1. It's China... by Stormwatch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nothing they do surprises me anymore.

    1. Re:It's China... by countertrolling · · Score: 2

      Yeah really, pretty clumsy effort.. In the 'west' we do it right, we build the device into the car.. inside your rear view mirror is a hidden camera and mic

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    2. Re:It's China... by Mistlefoot · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Isn't this legal for the government to do in the US as well? Not much they do surprises me either though....

    3. Re:It's China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You need to follow the source!

      The original is from Apple Daily, the second highest circulation (300,000 in a city of 7 million) newspaper in Hong Kong. It is not particularly pro-Falun Gong. It has strongly pro-democracy (HK doesn't have much of that), pro-free market, pro working class, with the usual Hong Kong mix of high minded analysis, original poetry and literature, lurid celebrity coverage, and serialized softcore porn!

      The original article seems well researched. The guy who took it apart is an associate professor in electronic engineering in a local university (City University of Hong Kong). He said that there is a sensitive microphone (which seems unnecessary for its stated function) and a transmitter powerful enough to monitor major urban areas in Hong Kong from across the border.

      They went for a second opinion from a PI who said that the transmission range would be a lot lower that the estimated 20 km in built up areas. However, there is no particular reason why China would confine its monitoring to the Chinese mainland outside of Hong Kong. Even apart from the fact that they have taken over the UK/US built monitoring facilities in Hong Kong covering the entire South China sea, Hong Kong is full of Chinese owned companies who could be directed to operate monitoring stations in what is, after all, sovereign Chinese territory.

      The main cause for alarm in the original article is whether this might compromise commercial secrets in negotiations between private Hong Kong businessmen, and Chinese companies with semi-official connection.

  2. Re:How do you not see such a device... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    How does seeing help....

    When it is disguised as a border pass transponder, which you'd pretty much expect to have "taped onto the vehicle’s front window"?

  3. Re:How do you not see such a device... by Dahamma · · Score: 2

    So is my Fastrack. Maybe I'm naive, but I never seriously considered it was being used to spy on me... (though now that I think of it, it's probably more likely than not ;)

  4. Re:How do you not see such a device... by rubycodez · · Score: 2

    do you live in a state with electronic tolling? how do you not see the the device you are required to have fastened to your windshield if you wish to use automatic toll paying? this is similar thing, a "border card" required for vehicles dual licensed in mainland / hong kong

  5. The article is kind of pathetic by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Those who RTFA can read this:

    Apple Daily says they took the device to a university professor and a private investigator, both of whom attested to the espionage potential of the units.

    or this:

    An Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at City University of Hong Kong, Zheng Liming, took apart one of the devices and confirmed that it can listen in on conversations

    and see a photo in which a hole in the plastic shell is marked "cavity for receiving sound" (a microphone would have been more convincing), two quartz crystals (the likes of which can be found in almost every modern electronic devices) marked "generate carrier frequency for radio transmission" and a nondescript chip that "turns voice signals into digital information".

    You know what? I think I'll take a photo of my cellphone's innards, photoshop conveniently spy-sounding labels into the photo, bring my cellphone to a university professor who will testify that my device has a microphone, a crystal, an antenna and a processor that definitely has the potential to turn it into spying device then write an article about it.

    Some journalism...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:The article is kind of pathetic by wvmarle · · Score: 2

      It is taped to the windshield. It does not seem to have any (external) power supply. How could such a device be able to transmit a serious quantity of data, over a distance of 20 km, with mountains in between? Hong Kong may be small but it's hilly, with peaks of almost 1000m tall. From most parts of this 20km radius there is no line of sight to Shenzhen - all mountains in the way, except for the north-western part of Hong Kong which is mostly protected wetland. Such transmission if at all possible takes a significant amount of power, a battery that fit in there would run out in hours or less. On these points alone I'd call this story total nonsense.

      They have been installed since 1997 - that means most are in place for some four years now. The only way to keep it working is if it's a passive device, using external radio sources as their power source, as is typical for devices used for automatic toll payment and similar purposes.

      And by the way, Apple Daily is a tabloid.

    2. Re:The article is kind of pathetic by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 2

      It is taped to the windshield. It does not seem to have any (external) power supply. How could such a device be able to transmit a serious quantity of data, over a distance of 20 km, with mountains in between? Hong Kong may be small but it's hilly, with peaks of almost 1000m tall. From most parts of this 20km radius there is no line of sight to Shenzhen - all mountains in the way, except for the north-western part of Hong Kong which is mostly protected wetland. Such transmission if at all possible takes a significant amount of power, a battery that fit in there would run out in hours or less. On these points alone I'd call this story total nonsense.

      Last time I checked the Chinese had no problems setting up receivers in Hong Kong, well, less than before it became Chinese territory anyway! So I'll have to call nonsense to your nonsense.

      They have been installed since 1997 - that means most are in place for some four years now. The only way to keep it working is if it's a passive device, using external radio sources as their power source, as is typical for devices used for automatic toll payment and similar purposes.

      Please link to the source of your information? And why would a device the size of a mobile phone have to be passive? It's not like they haven't always been an obvious electronic device.

      I was in Hong Kong three years ago and what you are saying was bullshit then. The licenses are good for ten years - but the displayed permits are updated every year. It's possible that these weren't installed in all cars, tricycles (yes), motorcycles, buses, and trucks. There's two main types of cars with a dual license - wealthy people - and not wealthy people. Most foreigners hire drivers - the drivers are not wealthy and the license allows up to three drivers (they tend to run 24/7 back and forth across the border) - they're also the type of vehicles (trucks also) used for smuggling and both instances would be attractive spying targets. As stated earlier I reckon they'd hear the incriminating stuff as the vehicle approaches the checkpoint.

      A cavity microphone would make sense for these devices as it would allow cheap noise cancelling - similar setup to mobile phones.

      In addition to the dual license a two-way permit is required for every occupant - and they only last from a week to a year (depending on circumstance) - so I wouldn't be surprised if the vehicle licences have similar terms. Oh, and the one time we were asked to leave the vehicle to get our papers checked in the office - they took the permit with us. I'm wondering now if they might of replaced the battery at the same time.

      Next time you're in the Guangdong Public Service Bureau applying for your 2-way pass (it's where the vehicle passes come from too) maybe fire up your scanner.

    3. Re:The article is kind of pathetic by wvmarle · · Score: 2

      Active broadcasting a signal takes a lot of power. A typical mobile phone can last maybe 10-12 hours on a charge, when talking. Up to two weeks standby. For these devices well let's be generous, make it double the time, that's 24 hours of broadcasting signals. The rest of the year: no battery. And I didn't see a battery on the photos.

      As I said, and what you handily ignored: no visible power source on any of the photos. An external power source is a necessity for this kind of broadcast if it has to last a whole year - broadcasting over any significant distance takes a lot of power. The devices are small, batteries if any are in place necessarily are small too.

      Next is the practical problem of receiving the individual signals. You would likely need a different frequency for each one, or active frequency scanning by the device to find a free channel, as otherwise they start interfering with each other. There are a few thousand out there. And how come no-one has ever detected such a signal, if it exists, over the last four years? There are plenty of radio amateurs in this world, scanning all bandwidths allocated or not, to see if there are any interesting signals to be heard.

      And about receivers on this side of the border: it's possible. However that's not the claim made in the article, which claims that the receiver is in Shenzhen and that they can listen over a 20-km range into Hong Kong. That's the fact I'm disputing here. I'd be very interested how ANYONE could have a reliable direct radio communication with Shenzhen from the roads in Sha Tin, or worse: Tsuen Wan. The latter has Tai Mo Shan in the way.

      Mind you I'm not saying it can not be done, at all. I'm just saying that it absolutely can not be done (for several independent reasons) the way it's presented in the article.

    4. Re:The article is kind of pathetic by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 4, Informative

      Active broadcasting a signal takes a lot of power. A typical mobile phone can last maybe 10-12 hours on a charge, when talking. Up to two weeks standby. For these devices well let's be generous, make it double the time, that's 24 hours of broadcasting signals. The rest of the year: no battery. And I didn't see a battery on the photos.

      What have you been smoking? There is only one photo in TFA linked article. Look again - see the blue shrink wrapped batteries? Still no? How about now?

      The device will not fit in your shirt pocket - it's a little larger than an iPhone (I and other posters have seen these devices). As for your proof - again, what the fuck have you been smoking? A phone and this device have little in common when it comes to power consumption (see if you can work out why). Hint - I can buy devices on the open market that will transmit an audio signal for more 12 months - and they will fit in my pocket. No nuclear power pack involved. Don't go basing you idea of surveillance technology on what the FBI leaves attached to the bottom of Arab students cars - you can bet the Chinese have access to far more sophisticated devices than I can buy.

      The rest of your screed is pure castles in the air - try getting off the sofa and visiting the world. China == Hong Kong - lip-service is the only difference between one side of the border and the other. The speculated range of the devices is just that. Speculated. As for signal interception - really, are you fucking serious? Do you hear mobile telephone calls on your transistor? (and that's a GHz crystal in the photo you can't see - just under the battery pack that doesn't exist).

      Consider it - every insightful argument you've come up with is wrong - you can't see the obvious, and you can't even count up to two properly. And no, advertisements don't count as pictures. But hey - don't let your ignorance to stop from being an expert in Chinese spying devices, it never stopped you from making laughably clueless statements about the nature of emails or programming.

      A dollar gets me ten you've got some weasely denial.

    5. Re:The article is kind of pathetic by b0bby · · Score: 2

      I don't live in Hong Kong, but those blue batteries look just like the battery packs you use in cordless telephones. I bet you'd get a decent life out of them if you were only waking up the device when you were recording or transmitting.

  6. maybe, maybe not. by mark_elf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We have a couple of experts saying it certainly could be a bug. But nobody said they found the freq it was transmitting on and got feedback from it. Kinda flimsy evidence so far.

  7. Re:Hey, we're learning from the market leaders! by tmach · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, the current suggestion is to put a device on your car to track the mileage so they can tax you based on how much you drive.

    http://money.cnn.com/2011/05/18/news/economy/gas_tax_drivers/?section=money_latest

  8. Re:Hey, we're learning from the market leaders! by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...so they can tax you based on how much you drive.

    Which is blatant BS (on their part, not yours), since if they only cared how much you drive (rather than where and when), then all they'd have to do is check the fucking odometer!

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  9. Technology seems interesting by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 3, Informative

    stick the bug into the license plate!

    I do wonder how they work technically. I mean, there can't be much space for a battery in such a licence plate. You can't use RFID like technology at a distance of more than 10-50 meters, which would make actual eavesdropping a challenge even for a government. If it is to have any semblance of being secret obviously you can't use the car's battery or electrical systems.

    Very weak radio transmitters still need about a watt for reasonable communications (ie. cell phones). So if you wish to use something like this for, say a year (they're valid for a year), you'd need a tiny, tiny 31 MJ (that's megajoule) battery, or 3 KWh, but it can't be much larger than a watch battery.

    So how the hell do you keep that thing powered ?

    For that matter, which radio do you use ? Cell network ? It would require a hell of a lot of people in the loop.

    1. Re:Technology seems interesting by nzac · · Score: 2

      Read the article, the battery is 3 AA(A)s in plastic.

      You don't need a anything close to that to have them on standby. They could activate them when they scan them crossing the border for a period of time with a known bit sequence of arbitrary length.
      The article writer/PI is pretty bad though at least one of the crystals is the clock for the microchip no (need for two carriers). To me is looks like the black one is providing a clock to a high power transistor for the carrier the blue is just too close to the chip to be anything else.

    2. Re:Technology seems interesting by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 3, Informative

      And that's where I get stuck - trying to figure out what is profitable to smuggle into China. Milk products made from milk?

      Religious texts and other restricted or forbidden items or material, drugs.

      That's the problem - pot's kind of hard to get hold of down south, but up north it's not hard to find. Methamphetamines are everywhere Cocaine I wouldn't know about - but I'd be surprised if it wasn't available - there's certainly plenty of heroin moving around. Firearms are dirt cheap. China makes most of the things that are illegal in the West. And there's no money in Bibles - they're not even restricted anymore - it's only fruitcake Americans that bang on about raising money to ship Bibles to China - there's a hell of a lot more Bibles in China than there are people who want to read them. Trust me - after you've spent a couple of days in the industrial and commercial boom-towns you begin to realise that if there's a demand it'll be satisfied in just a couple of days, well maybe not satisfactory, and probably toxic. Whiskey is cheaper in China than Hong Kong. As for western tech - it's all made there in the first place. I agree there's got to be a market for smuggling something into China (apart from smuggling workers without passes back). On the other hand a shitload of stuff gets smuggled into Hong Kong.

  10. Re:Hey, we're learning from the market leaders! by master5o1 · · Score: 2

    Or tax at the fuel stating.

    --
    signature is pants
  11. the source... by mathfeel · · Score: 5, Informative

    I clicked the link and was about to RTFA, then I spotted that it's from "The Epoch Time" referencing an article from "The Apple Daily". I am from HK and those are not two news sources that I trust. The first is a media front for the Fa Lun Gong, which as much as I dislike communism, I have a worse distaste for a money sucking "religious" cult. The latter is a sensationalist tabloid paper. It is famous for its yellow journalism. If you want a report on fact, that's not it.

    --
    The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the 'social sciences' is: some do, some don't
  12. Re:Hey, we're learning from the market leaders! by master5o1 · · Score: 2

    Then get the stonecutters to put a stop to that technology.

    --
    signature is pants
  13. Re:How do you not see such a device... by wvmarle · · Score: 2

    The thing with those devices is that of course they automatically log when-ever you pass a toll gate. So there is a record of the movements of that device (and in effect an individual vehicle). I wouldn't be surprised if law enforcement uses it to track smugglers (they typically cross the border multiple times a day).

  14. Re:Hey, we're learning from the market leaders! by teh+kurisu · · Score: 2

    That depends on whether they want to use variable road pricing, which was an idea mooted in the UK a few years back. The idea being that you get charged more for driving on roads that are more congested. Or something like that.

  15. I'd be weary of the source, it is the Apple Daily by carsonc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd be weary of the source as it is the Apple Daily. They are known for not being that reliable. I was on the cover a number of years ago, and they photoshopped my hair blond to make me look more white and miss quoted me. I was pissed but then everybody told me that everybody knows that's what they do. C'est la vie. I'll wait till I hear it from a different paper.

  16. Re:Hey, we're learning from the market leaders! by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 2

    Hey gamers, help me out with your combo skills!

    When .gov quits pretending to actually be for citizens, they'll just pull up the covers with the nice Corps they're in bed with. Let's pair the last two semi-consecutive stories in a row.

    "Location aware apps from Adobe. Spying from Government."

    Why are we now falling for the spin? Are we that desperate for Minority Report style ads?

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  17. Re:How do you not see such a device... by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2

    You don't have to track prepaid tags that simply transmit tokens until they run out of tokens -- you just keep track which tokens you have heard and only accept new ones. Tokens then may be randomly loaded when payment is made, without any need for association with any particular person or vehicle.

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  18. My 50 cents... by Omniskio · · Score: 2

    . . . is that, no matter the source, no matter the content, no matter its significance, the Wu Mao Dang will spun it round, round, baby, right round. . . You're being harmonized. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/50_Cent_Party

  19. Daughter board is a JZ-871 by kyle5t · · Score: 2

    I was lucky to find this with just a little googling. It is a JZ-871 GFSK transceiver module.

    http://www.sz-wholesaler.com/p/505/545-2/micro-power-data-rf-module-jz871-171649.html

  20. Re:"No charge, Sir" by mrsam · · Score: 3, Informative

    In the US, drivers have to buy their own RFID transponders just for the privilege of being able to pay tolls electronically.

    Not necessarily. I did not pay for my EZ-Pass transponder. At least in New York and New Jersey, two of the states that use the EZ-Pass transponder that I can vouch from personal experience, the transponder is given to you free if you have the tolls billed automatically to your credit card.

    Which is, pretty much, is the only practical approach. If you take the other option of getting a prepaid transponder, they'll charge you for it. But, having to constantly prepay is just not worth the hassle, in my opinion. It's much more convenient to have the agency automatically bill you. With the tolls being as high as they are, you'll be spending all your time adding money to the account. It's just not worth it.

    There are some states in the EZ-Pass system that charge for transponders. But you do not have to buy a transponder from your state's agency. New York will give EZ-Pass to any state's resident. If your state's EZ-Pass gives discounts on some in-state tolls, you won't get them from New York though.

  21. Re:Unsettling by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 2

    Is the US preparing for another conflict or something ?

    In effect yes. Societies do not simply up and go to war one morning. It's generally a process that takes some time to build up. The larger the conflict, the longer the build up.

    A good example is the Libyan conflict, which took several weeks of drumming before allied forces launched air-strikes, and even still the US was quite reluctant to proceed. The Syrian conflict is currently being drummed up as we speak, but whether there's enthusiasm for air-strikes is another matter. However, I stress that no major action will be taken by the US, UK or any other western power without a build up of public interest in a conflict.

    As to who is behind these build ups and ultimately these wars, while there are special interests, ultimately I think these things are emergent phenomena; and I would now be inclined to say that they are beyond a society's conscious control. Which isn't to say that they cannot be halted or indeed advanced prematurely. That is the job of the leaders of states. They are the ones that ultimately decide how these trends evolve and ultimately manifest themselves.

    See also: The Second Iraq War and The Cuban Missile Crisis.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
  22. Re:Hey, we're learning from the market leaders! by operagost · · Score: 2

    In most states in the US, there is a safety inspection once a year when the odometer reading can be taken with absolutely no inconvenience to the owner.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  23. Re:Hey, we're learning from the market leaders! by kilfarsnar · · Score: 2

    I hope you're not serious. Your car must be inspected once a year. Make odometer reading part of the inspection process.

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  24. Re:Hey, we're learning from the market leaders! by mrchaotica · · Score: 2

    If variable road pricing is incompatible with the Bill of Rights, well then they don't get to do the fucking variable road pricing!

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz