Slashdot Mirror


Phishers Hone Skills, Craft More Impressive Attacks

CWmike writes "Recent break-ins at high-profile targets like the International Monetary Fund demonstrate just how proficient hackers have become at so-called spear phishing, researchers said on Tuesday. 'Today's spear phishing is not only more prevalent but also much more technically proficient,' said Dave Jevans, chairman of the Anti-Phishing Working Group. 'They're not going for a password, anymore; they're getting people to install crimeware on their computers.' The trend highlights the need for defenses against such targeted threats, requiring companies to look beyond security strategies focused purely on dealing with traditional network threats, analysts said. Increasingly, companies also need to focus on approaches such as continuous monitoring of networks, databases, applications and users, outbound traffic filtering and whitelisting."

63 comments

  1. What about turning the tables on them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have had the Indian MS helpdesk ring a few times about the viruses of my Windows PC, surely there has to be a way of "honey potting" them to shut them down?

    1. Re:What about turning the tables on them? by Billlagr · · Score: 2

      Really??? So have I!! And friends and relatives. All you need to do is provide some credit card details, and bam! your machine is instantly remotely cleaned up. It's good to see MS taking such a proactive stance.

    2. Re:What about turning the tables on them? by syousef · · Score: 2

      I have had the Indian MS helpdesk ring a few times about the viruses of my Windows PC, surely there has to be a way of "honey potting" them to shut them down?

      If I have time, I like to play with them. i use to put the phone down while they were talking and walk away but I worry they'll take silence as consent to switch my phone or do something else. So you egg them on. Keep saying "Sorry I don't understand" and "Could you explain a bit more?". Then agree to nothing. If you don't have time you just hang up.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    3. Re:What about turning the tables on them? by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      Absolutely, I tell al the people I support to keep them on the phone as long as possible, when they ask, tell them your computer is on (But DONT switch it on) then give them false answers to thier questions. Some of the users have kept them on the phone for more than 1/2 hour (Getting right into the spirit of it). Whilst their time is wasted they cant rip off some other poor sucker.

    4. Re:What about turning the tables on them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      These scammers have been calling me weekly for about a year so a couple of months ago I fired up a freshly installed Windows 2000 VM and played along.

      I installed logmein at their request and they took control. The "engineer" showed me event viewer ("look, infections!"), opened a command-prompt, typed a few irrelevant commands (ping, nslookup and tree) and then typed the word "expired". The salesman assured me that this meant my "core security system" had expired.

      The engineer then took me to their website where they clicked a button to initiate a £40 paypal payment "to renew my core security system". Happily the ancient version of IE in Windows 2000 didn't understand paypal's https so it wouldn't connect. After half an hour of pointless tinkering they installed firefox and got me connected. And, of course, I refused to enter my details.

      Anyway, this isn't a sophisticated scam. There's no malware. They are just trying to convince you to give them £40.

      I reported the scam to paypal, but they weren't interested because I hadn't parted with any money.

    5. Re:What about turning the tables on them? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Whilst their time is wasted they cant rip off some other poor sucker.

      As long as you don't mind wasting your own time too. Although presumably most people would do this on work time rather than their own.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    6. Re:What about turning the tables on them? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Con men are con men. All the stuff people talk about elite hacking skills is irrelevant compared to the age-old techniques of social engineering..

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  2. The Art of Deception by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Art of Deception. By Kevin D. Mitnick. It's worth reading.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:The Art of Deception by DeusExMach · · Score: 3, Funny

      It takes a thief...

    2. Re:The Art of Deception by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      The phrase “Set a thief to catch a thief had by this time (after strong representations from the Thieves’ Guild) replaced a much older and quintessentially Ankh-Morporkian proverb, which was “Set a deep hole with spring-loaded sides, tripwires, whirling knife blades driven by water power, broken glass and scorpions, to catch a thief.”

    3. Re:The Art of Deception by repapetilto · · Score: 1

      I wonder if thatd be legal to have. Like in your own home.

    4. Re:The Art of Deception by trum4n · · Score: 1

      Nope. No Deadly Scorpions without a license where i live. And you'd need a permit for the hydro power setup. And the water source. And the hole.

    5. Re:The Art of Deception by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I wonder if thatd be legal to have. Like in your own home.

      Yes, because obviously that would just be using reasonable force to protect yourself. You fucking moron.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    6. Re:The Art of Deception by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      I wonder if thatd be legal to have. Like in your own home.

      Yes, because obviously that would just be using reasonable force to protect yourself. You fucking moron.

      Should it also be large enough to handle the entire SWAT team that might attempt to break into his home on a warrantless raid? Reasonable force for protecting yourself, it would seem, but perhaps not a reason a court might accept.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    7. Re:The Art of Deception by repapetilto · · Score: 1

      You could say its a work of art

  3. Re:This begs the question: by Hotweed+Music · · Score: 0

    Class act.

  4. Re:This begs the question: by JavaBear · · Score: 1

    Well, someone have been reading too many bad "cyber" novels, with a bit of Karl Marx in the mix, while on crack.

  5. Maybe it's time... by __Paul__ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...to stop employing people who are so clueless when it comes to IT. Personal computers have been commonplace for more than twenty years now, it's time people started learning how to use them correctly.

    I'm still coming across businessmen of a certain vintage (typically 50+) for whom it's a matter of pride that they "don't know anything about computers". FFS, it's 2011. Get a grip or retire.

    --
    worldmobilenet.com -- World Prepaid Wireless Internet plans
    1. Re:Maybe it's time... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      In my organization, it's not the old dinosaurs that create security problems, it's the idiot 20 something that bypasses Sonic Firewall (the dipshit product that it is) to get to Facebook by using HTTPS and then proceeds to play Farmville for hours. Unless you can employ security experts in every slot in your organization you have these problems. Remember this is about SOCIAL engineering, not technical issues.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Maybe it's time... by scream+at+the+sky · · Score: 1

      it sounds like you work for my old employer...

      the had an SonicWall in every location (~300 stores) that they relied on for everything security related, and as soon as some of the younger kids realized they could just https to whatever they wanted, it was game over and the PC's stopped working.

      what was even better, was when the kiddies figured out they could unplug the ethernet cable from the laptops we had as our POS systems, and plug in their iPhone and tether that way, completely bypassing everything.

      --
      I wish I was a neutron bomb, for once I could go off...
    3. Re:Maybe it's time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Serves you idiots right for not setting the damn thing up properly.

      Install company created self-signed certificates in all company PCs and then MITM all outgoing encrypted connections, voila, full monitoring.

      If sonic firewall doesn't support that then you (r management probably) are idiots for using it.

    4. Re:Maybe it's time... by badzilla · · Score: 2

      It originates from a time when anyone with aspirations to status in an organisation also had a secretary to perform manual tasks involving keyboards and typing. Admitting to doing one's own typing was a bit of a career depressant. These days I can't believe that anyone of whatever age in business can make serious claim to non-use of computers.

      --
      "Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace." V.Stone, Microsoft Corporation
    5. Re:Maybe it's time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still coming across businessmen of a certain vintage (typically 50+) for whom it's a matter of pride that they "don't know anything about computers". FFS, it's 2011. Get a grip or retire.

      And those are the ones that get you fired when you try to get them to comply with sane security policies. Try to restrict web browsing and email to one of those.

    6. Re:Maybe it's time... by flappinbooger · · Score: 2

      ...to stop employing people who are so clueless when it comes to IT. Personal computers have been commonplace for more than twenty years now, it's time people started learning how to use them correctly.

      I'm still coming across businessmen of a certain vintage (typically 50+) for whom it's a matter of pride that they "don't know anything about computers". FFS, it's 2011. Get a grip or retire.

      No, for most people they have not developed any more technical competence for the computer than they have for the toaster. Once you could buy a computer from Wal-Mart at the same time as getting a loaf of bread and a gallon of milk, while having your oil changed, computers have become commodities. Why would you expect people to develop such deep understanding of using and securing their toasters?

      Who is to blame? Start with Apple, then Dell. Gateway. The early "computer in a box, use color coded wires and a pictograph to hook it up" people made it stupid easy to own a computer. Once the stupid is in, hard to get stupid out.

      It's not a bad thing over all, but from a security aspect it is.

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    7. Re:Maybe it's time... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      To be fair to some of these guys I think people of older generations were not taught to solve problems like we were, instead they learned by committing a series of steps to memory. There was a great XKCD about this, but basically they are stuck if the sequence they learnt doesn't work for some reason. Even something as simple as their USB flash drive being drive X instead of drive Y is enough if your brain works that way.

      You can see this effect at work in IQ tests. Since the 50s they have been getting steadily harder, to the point where someone who scored 100 in 1950 would only get about 80 now - technically mentally deficient. Obviously people in the 50s were not idiots, they were just not taught problem solving at school, and even are pre-school level they didn't have all the educational toys that promote that kind of thinking like we did.

      I'm not saying older people should not make an effort, just that the amount of effort is orders of magnitude more than we require to master something new.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:Maybe it's time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take that you old fogies.

      Yea all you geezers get off my lawn :-D

    9. Re:Maybe it's time... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'm still coming across businessmen of a certain vintage (typically 50+) for whom it's a matter of pride that they "don't know anything about computers". FFS, it's 2011. Get a grip or retire.

      What makes me grumpy is that there are qualified applicants for many of these jobs who DO have computer skills, but they hire based on something other than the ability to actually do the job. Pretty much every college job requires familiarity with Office. Pretty much nobody knows WTF they are doing. Then they have to hire additional IT staff to destink their computers because they're always trying to find ways to screw them up by doing something both unauthorized and stupid.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Maybe it's time... by Kittenman · · Score: 1

      I'm still coming across businessmen of a certain vintage (typically 50+) for whom it's a matter of pride that they "don't know anything about computers". FFS, it's 2011. Get a grip or retire.

      Hey, I'm a businessman in my 50s, you insensitive clod!

      --
      "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
    11. Re:Maybe it's time... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I'm still coming across businessmen of a certain vintage (typically 50+) for whom it's a matter of pride that they "don't know anything about computers". FFS, it's 2011. Get a grip or retire.

      Well, if you can't produce compelling arguments to these businessmen for why they should know about computers, why would they bother?.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    12. Re:Maybe it's time... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      It originates from a time when anyone with aspirations to status in an organisation also had a secretary to perform manual tasks involving keyboards and typing. Admitting to doing one's own typing was a bit of a career depressant. These days I can't believe that anyone of whatever age in business can make serious claim to non-use of computers.

      Meanwhile, in the real world, there are still plenty of secretaries, admin assistants and directors' PAs. If you're a successful business person, time spent reading non-essential emails or typing letters is still wasted time.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    13. Re:Maybe it's time... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      To be fair to some of these guys I think people of older generations were not taught to solve problems like we were, instead they learned by committing a series of steps to memory.

      As someone of an "older generation" can I just say please fuck off you patronising, ignorant little shit?
      Hopefully with your 1337 problem solving skills you can find an amusing way to kill yourself for our amusement.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    14. Re:Maybe it's time... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      As someone who is just trying to be helpful and promote a bit of understanding can I just say please try not to be a twat and take it personally. Obviously my statement does not apply to everyone, I am just making a general point about school level education back then.

      It is also the reason arse holes like you like to make out the youth of today are all dumb as shit and couldn't pass the exams you did. Yeah, they couldn't, because these days they don't teach the same way. I wish someone would do it the other way around - get people of that generation to take modern GCSEs and A Levels, see how badly they do.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:Maybe it's time... by nobodie · · Score: 1

      typically 50+
      Hmmmm, I am 56 and work in an office full of clueless keyboard bangers who I scare away by threatening them with the "Linux Virus"
      There is no age band for clueless people, maybe you might oughta' try that age thing on a few others, like RMS say, or Steve Wozniak, both of whom have more creds than you will probably get in a life of tech work.

      Last week I was chief invigilator for an exam that included a listening component. I created a set of USB pendrives with portable apps and VLC player loaded on together with the sound file to be played over the speakers in the class rooms. The only person who couldn't figure out how to drag and drop the sound file onto the player was the 28 year old Stanford grad who talks up his tech ability. You are officially refuted by anecdote, hang your head.

      HAHAHAHAHAHA

      Of course, when I got the drives back the only one that didn't have a virus on it (mostly the "recycler" virus) was the one from my tech illiterate office mate, so go figure.

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
  6. English is our only hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Ass a security measure we hat to temporarily suspend your account. To restore your account Please download the form and fallow the instructions on your screen."

    I don't think we have to worry too much until they learn English.

  7. Special sandbox for 'em by Mathinker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No, I think the best is to provide super-special sandboxing for them. One could even periodically send "test probes" to random people on one's network to better judge their level of acumen vs. current phishing techniques. Those who fail (or originally admit to being clueless) get:

    • all email which isn't a direct reply to something they originated "held up for review" by some luckless soul in IT
    • extra lockdown of their computer, perhaps including physically disabling USB ports and DVD drives
    • extra automatic monitoring of their computer for unusual behavior
    • segregating them into a special segment of the LAN which is only connected to the rest of the company via a special filtering/monitoring gateway
    1. Re:Special sandbox for 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God says (puppet-net), "deeper promise stumbling God_is_not_mocked displeaseth lusts later melody speaking".

    2. Re:Special sandbox for 'em by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      I think the best is to provide super-special sandboxing for them.

      Etch-a-Sketch

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Special sandbox for 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've been studying phishing attacks and spear-phishing attacks for the past few years. And to be blunt, if you don't think that you are vulnerable, then you are truly the clueless one. You really don't understand the level of sophistication that these attackers have, in using the right kinds of email formatting, the right kind of language, the right kinds of events, and the right kinds of names of people in your organization.

      Are you good enough to avoid PDF exploits? What if you got an email in your inbox about a conference in your field, would you be smart enough to avoid that? How about one that talks about a retirement party for a real person in your organization? Or one that used a stolen account from someone in your org? Read this article in Business Week to see some sophisticated phish.

      Being arrogant about it and blaming users may make you feel good about yourself, but it won't solve the problem. So get off your high horse, be an engineer, and devise real solutions that can really work with people, instead of being an ass about it.

    4. Re:Special sandbox for 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except these people are really really dumb. By the way, the answer to every single one of your questions is "yes, I can deal with that".

    5. Re:Special sandbox for 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, what do you do when that special someone is the ceo? Technically clueless, but needs access to sensitive data.

    6. Re:Special sandbox for 'em by kmoser · · Score: 1

      But how do we know that article you pointed us to isn't itself a spear phishing attack?

    7. Re:Special sandbox for 'em by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The thing is, this policy would probably have to be applied to 90% of users.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  8. Not phishing by lavagolemking · · Score: 3, Informative

    Phishing means tricking users into divulging sensitive data, usually a password. It is just one type of social engineering. What is being described here is another form of social engineering, where users are told instead to install malware or something like that. It is not phishing, or even spear phishing. When you get a lot of information together to plan out an effective attack on human psyche, it's called pretexting.

    1. Re:Not phishing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rate up

      there's a reason why we have all the terms we have

  9. Re:Government, Businesses must now become police s by Alex+Belits · · Score: 0

    network security so closely resembles societal security

    No, and you are dumb for posting this, and you made everyone who read this, a little bit dumber.

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  10. Re:Government, Businesses must now become police s by Jawnn · · Score: 1

    Is it any wonder, that network security so closely resembles societal security. And when religion finally dies, the only security we will have is an all pervasive police state. It is a paradox unimaginable.

    WTF? What security has religion ever provided?

  11. Locked down computers by Danathar · · Score: 2

    Fact of the matter is, the less companies, governments, organizations, etc trust their employees the less control they will give them. Every time a phisher is successful more control over the PC is taken away by security (in general).

    I've seen this happen in my organization. The flexibility of having a computer you can install software that helps you do your job without permission is vanishing very quickly. Before long I expect that you will not be able to download any executable (even archived in zip) or run them. Of course this not saying they will not

    Basically people's desktops at work are going to become less "personal computer" and more "web/document processing workstation".

    1. Re:Locked down computers by The+O+Rly+Factor · · Score: 1

      That's the way it should be, and that's definitely the way it is at my job. Every good sysadmin knows that the biggest idiot in the whole system is the user.

      If you are allowing common users to install their own software, you are doing it wrong.

    2. Re:Locked down computers by firewrought · · Score: 2

      That's the way it should be, and that's definitely the way it is at my job.... If you are allowing common users to install their own software, you are doing it wrong.

      Security groups tend to define "the way it should be" by whatever makes life most convenient for them. In their ideal environment, no software can run, no hardware can be introduced, no websites can be visited, and no emails can be received. Or at least, they'd like to get as close as possible to that environment as they can without management figuring out that they're responsible for organizational deadlock. Many of the promises of computing are lost to this mindset, and the bureaucratic "no" takes significant time, energy, and political influence to overturn or circumvent.

      Ideally, however, "the way it should be" is defined by whatever makes the organization most capable for the least amount of risk. There's a balance to be struck, and we haven't figured out how to organize IT departments so that security policymakers have an intrinsic interest in finding that balance.

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
  12. For the first time I've seen in years . . . by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

    Someone used the word hone correctly, and without appending "in" to it. I am going to go weep for joy.

  13. A major contributor by portwojc · · Score: 1

    And the malware that they're installing continues to evade antivirus software

    Support: Hello this is anti-virus/malware company XYZ how can I help you.
    Caller: Yes I have this software called Anti-something 2010 that just popped up on my screen. I have your software installed and it still came up.
    Support: You can call our 1-900-BLAH number and they can assist you for $39.95 a minute to remove the software.
    Caller: So why did I buy your software in the first place?

  14. You're going to LOVE THIS then, lol! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:You're going to LOVE THIS then, lol! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only because it shows what an idiot APK is.

  15. Some easy email fixes inside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are simple, easy-to-implement measures vs. malware attack in email (which IS how phishing &/or spamming works anyhow):

    ---

    1.) Set email readers (like Outlook variants & others external to webbrowsers) to do TEXT ONLY message displays.

    2.) Use a custom HOSTS file (filled with malware sites &/or phishing/spamming site data - yes, there are places like SpamHaus for instance (or there used to be) that have THAT type of data that's regularly updated) since HOSTS files do what things for browsers in addons like AdBlock can't - cover email readers!

    3.) Use a decent email reader that already has blocks of known malwares (Windows LIVE has such features for example).

    4.) If/when possible - don't allow scripting in browsers OR email readers

    ---

    * Those SIMPLE MEASURES can stall hack/crack attempts in emails easily... for starters!

    APK

    P.S.=> Is there MORE you can do? Yes, sure, & at the firewall perimeter level, as well as local DNS servers using DNSBL lists too (if not browser level TPL's like for IE, NoScript in FireFox, Opera's urlfilter.ini too etc.), but those measures above? A decent enough start!

    ... apk

  16. FalconDUMMY, you're the illiterate idiot (lol) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or, is your not answering a simple question not enough to evidence that much, here:

    http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2198230&cid=36418054

    Hmmm?

    OIC - It's "ok for falconhell to troll others, but not for him getting 're-trolled'", right?? Wrong - what's "good for the goose, is good for the gander" - learn to take what you dish out! OR, just stop trolling others, pretty simple!

    (Additionally?? Learn to SPELL and WRITE... lol, please! We're not here to decipher your 'hieroglyphics' falconhell...)

    Lastly - your replies as "AC" to try to 'defend yourself', especially when you have a registered 'LUSER' account here??? Pitiful... lol!

  17. Re:Government, Businesses must now become police s by bstender · · Score: 1

    "WTF? What security has religion ever provided?"

    WTF you say? Considerable social cohesion for starters. But more specifically, the way individuals manage the chaos. That is, the framework for a brain to function in the world. You may say "that is simply opiate for _lame persons_", but the amazing Zizek can certainly help disabuse you of that naivety. I dish off to him bc to attempt to describe it is beyond the scope of a few paragraphs, (plus I'm never going to come close to doing it adequately anyway). But I will hint at the notion that 'religion' isn't the core of it, that is, the 'brands' you recognize, but rather the innate human faculty which creates religion(s) and which belief creates. It might even be fair to say that there is no security without "religion". You're soaking in it!

    --
    look sig is kool
  18. Re:This begs the question: by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    you are a goat fucking goat fucker, obviusl youy are also illiterate and obese and fat.

    Wow, the ghost of Oscar Wilde is posting on slashdot.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  19. falconhell is a waste of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trying to read falconhell's hieroglyphics style attempts at the english language alone is hours of translation from badly spelled manglings of the english language. I am judging that from the other replies here that actually had many a quoted proof of it. Utterly hilarious proofs in fact. I've never seen anyone write that poorly in only 1 day's time in fact.