Slashdot Mirror


Bitcoin Price Crashes

Beardydog writes "Bitcoin trading site MtGox.com has suspended operations for the rest of the day after illicit access to at least one account resulted in a steep drop in the price of Bitcoins on the site. Commenters to the support page for the event are reporting that a list of usernames and associated email addresses and password hashes have been posted online. MtGox are currently planning to roll back all of the day's trading, email notices to all affected users, and require replacement passwords for affected accounts."

38 of 642 comments (clear)

  1. Bitcoin to revolutionise economy by David+Gerard · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bitcoin is a decentralised computer currency designed by self-righteous Ayn Rand-reading nerds who despise looters and parasites like, er, you. It is used to purchase Internet services, illegal drugs and pictures of naked women holding video cards.

    Bitcoin works by an emergent synergy of cryptography, peer-to-peer, anonymity, anarchism, libertarianism, wasting stupendous quantities of electricity, the marketing department at NVidia, the enduring exchange value of tulip bulbs and doing all of this instead of Folding@Home.

    Bitcoin successfully harnesses a hitherto-unexploited Internet resource: the vast reserves of unexamined privilege amongst computer programmers. Coins are "mined" by stealing them from people who are able to comprehend this level of computer science but still keep their Bitcoin wallet in plain text on a Windows machine.

    The Bitcoin system is robustly designed to continue past the collapse of the US dollar and the world economy, as the Internet, fast computers and reliable electricity are all expected to be readily available when barbarian hordes are wandering the burnt-out post-apocalyptic remnants of civilisation.

    It is completely incorrect to describe Bitcoin as a "pyramid scheme." Technically, it's a "pump-and-dump."

    Many common products are still inexplicably not purchasable with Bitcoins. "It's as if they don't understand the revolutionary wonder of Bitcoin," says Debian developer Hiram Nerdboy, 17. "I can't get chicks with Bitcoins either. Even with my slickest Pick-Up Artist techniques! It's as if my knowledge of economics and game theory didn't apply to real life. But that's impossible, of course. They're probably just theists. Hold on, I just gotta post to Slashdot about this."

    Bitcoin was invented by Internet libertarians, in the spirit of freely-chosen individual interpersonal interactions that will bring about the utter collapse of the oppressive taint of the dead hand of government, in order to make money at your expense.

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
    1. Re:Bitcoin to revolutionise economy by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Bitcoin system is robustly designed to continue past the collapse of the US dollar and the world economy, as the Internet, fast computers and reliable electricity are all expected to be readily available when barbarian hordes are wandering the burnt-out post-apocalyptic remnants of civilisation.

      I think that you have missed the Fallout series of historic documentals.

      --
      Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
    2. Re:Bitcoin to revolutionise economy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I absolutely agree. These worthless, abstract encrypted computer bits are WORTHLESS.

      Anybody who knows anything understands that REAL value is in small, green pieces of paper with pictures of dead people on them.

    3. Re:Bitcoin to revolutionise economy by David+Gerard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The pieces of paper are backed by a country of 300 million people who will do work in exchange for them.

      (One good thing about Bitcoin threads on Slashdot: plenty of opportunity to beat Econ 101 into the heads of libertoonians who think they've got the perfect zinger for every situation.)

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    4. Re:Bitcoin to revolutionise economy by Colin+Smith · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The pieces of paper are backed by a country of 300 million people who will do work in exchange for them.

      You realise that most dollars are not paper? They make up only about 6% of money. The rest is debt based.

      There is only about ~900 billion paper and coin dollars.
      There is about ~14 trillion dollars worth of credit supplied by banks.
      There is about ~55 trillion dollars in total debt, again, supplied by banks.

      What backs the dollar is the faith that the 14 trillion dollars will some day pay the 55 trillion dollars off.

      --
      Deleted
    5. Re:Bitcoin to revolutionise economy by Fnord666 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Documental: (n) - A form of elemental that has all of the necessary paperwork.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    6. Re:Bitcoin to revolutionise economy by Binestar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Once again, the conservative, sandwich-heavy portfolio pays off for the hungry investor.

      --
      Do you Gentoo!?
    7. Re:Bitcoin to revolutionise economy by canajin56 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      OK, lets say there is only a single gold coin in town. That's the only currency in existence. OK so far? So, I have that one coin, and I pay somebody that coin for a new window. The glassier takes that coin, and he goes to the pub and he buys a beer for that one coin. Now the bar pays the bartender with that one coin. Now he takes that coin and he buys a sandwich with that coin. Oops, so far our town as a GDP of 4 coins, but there's only one in existence. DO YOU UNDERSTAND YET THAT AN ECONOMY IS NOT A ZERO SUM GAME? I know, you should use the broken window fallacy next! Point out that if you hadn't broken my window in that above example that the GDP of my fictional town would have been 0 instead of 4! ;)

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    8. Re:Bitcoin to revolutionise economy by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 3, Funny

      Pop Quiz: What was the Zimbabwean dollar backed by?

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    9. Re:Bitcoin to revolutionise economy by Jeremi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Pop Quiz: What was the Zimbabwean dollar backed by?

      Ooh! Ooh! I know!

      It was backed by the full faith and credit of the Zimbabwean government!

      (which, unfortunately, didn't have a very good grasp of economics)

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    10. Re:Bitcoin to revolutionise economy by emt377 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      OK, lets say there is only a single gold coin in town. That's the only currency in existence. OK so far? So, I have that one coin, and I pay somebody that coin for a new window. The glassier takes that coin, and he goes to the pub and he buys a beer for that one coin. Now the bar pays the bartender with that one coin. Now he takes that coin and he buys a sandwich with that coin. Oops, so far our town as a GDP of 4 coins, but there's only one in existence. DO YOU UNDERSTAND YET THAT AN ECONOMY IS NOT A ZERO SUM GAME? I know, you should use the broken window fallacy next! Point out that if you hadn't broken my window in that above example that the GDP of my fictional town would have been 0 instead of 4! ;)

      To take this further, assume my company sells your company a piece of paper for $1M. You then sell me a piece of paper for $1M. All that has happened is that two pieces of paper changed hands, but economically we've produced $2M of GDP (= total value of goods and services produced, not total amount). No gold coin needed at all. If there's a 1000 of us buying and selling each others' pieces of paper we will have produced $ billions. No currency involved. It's also why an economy can grow without increasing production - there's simply an increase in demand for what it produces. More specifically, an economy that's more effective at meeting needs instead blanketing producing every conceivable product and service can have the same or bigger GDP while producing significantly less.

    11. Re:Bitcoin to revolutionise economy by Ihmhi · · Score: 5, Funny

      2. Documental: (adj.) - The severely compromised state of mind attained after signing your name for the 422nd time on a mortgage application.

    12. Re:Bitcoin to revolutionise economy by 7-Vodka · · Score: 3, Interesting
      LOL, even a child can figure this exploit out.

      You as a bank lend me $100. I deposit it in my account with you. You now have $100 in deposits and can lend me $1000. I deposit it back into my account and you now have $1000 in deposits and can lend me $10,000. Repeat ad nauseum. In actuality, between us we only have $10 and not $10,000.
      Now I suppose we could reverse the situation If I just paid all my loans back. But that's not possible because you don't want the principal back. You want principal + interest.
      Where does the money come to pay the interest? It doesn't, because it doesn't exist.

      In fact, the same ponzy scheme is played out at the currency level.
      For every $ the FED creates and disperses into the money supply, they charge interest on. Which means, they want that $+interest back. But if they only gave out a $ but they want $+interest back, where does the money come from to pay the interest? It doesn't exist. It can never be paid back.
      The only solution is to create more money. And that's why we're in the shite we're in today and why the $ is worth only 4 cents of what it used to be worth.

      --

      Liberty.

  2. Enough already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Enough with this Bitcoin spam already.
    Bitcoin is stupid, unneccessary and irrelevant, we don't care for your fucking scam.

    1. Re:Enough already by hipp5 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Enough with this Bitcoin spam already. Bitcoin is stupid, unneccessary and irrelevant, we don't care for your fucking scam.

      To be fair, it's nice to hear news that predictions about bitcoins being crappy are indeed true. This story is somewhat of an anti-spam.

    2. Re:Enough already by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You cared so much, you wouldn't risk your precious slashdot karma. Therefore, bitcoins are worth less than slashdot karma.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    3. Re:Enough already by D'Sphitz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Fortunately for the rest of us, this site isn't all about your own personal interests. And if you dislike Bitcoin, one would think this is the kind of story that you would like.

    4. Re:Enough already by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Bah. Bitcoins represent a number of interesting concepts. Currency alone is a rather fascinating thing that touches on psychology, economy, history, and one of the earliest forms of information technology. Toss in some cryptography, peer-to-peer / decentralisation, etc. and there's no end to the facets of this subject.

      That doesn't mean you have to buy in to Bitcoins. Keep in mind that these Bitcoin stories are more than simple "yay Bitcoin - buy buy buy" that you would expect from advertisements / spam. There are negative sides being covered by these stories. But if you have no interest in anything remotely related to Bitcoins, then by all means... don't click on the damn article that says it is, in fact, about Bitcoins.

  3. Re:Is it even possible to roll back a bitcoin trad by Shadyman · · Score: 5, Informative

    These are trades are done on a firm's website, with US$ and BTC balances stored on it. It's totally out of the hands of the bitcoin system except for deposits to (and withdrawls from) accounts on the site.

  4. Re:Is it even possible to roll back a bitcoin trad by superwiz · · Score: 3, Informative

    The only thing I can think of is that they are rolling back transactions which haven't settled yet (settlement=delivery). Because once they bitcoins held in a MtGox account have been transferred out to your bitcoin wallet, they can't get it back. But while they are still held in MtGox account, the actual owner of the coins is MtGox (much like your brokerage is the actual owner of your monkey while you have money deposited with the brokerage).

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  5. Is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is it just me, or does these comments, and everything surrounding this, AND THE FACT THAT THIS OCCURRED ON FATHER'S DAY, sound suspicious to anyone? I hate to sound like a conspiracy theories, but this sounds an aweful lot like a psy-op to me.

    After all, Bitcoin" was not hacked, nor did "Bitcoin" crash (http://bitcoincharts.com/markets/ - they are STILL WORTH MORE than the U.S. dollar). It was a SINGLE WEB SITE that was hacked. If the pirate bay was hacked, would you say that "bittorrent" was hacked? Only if you're an idiot and don't understand how bittorrent works.

  6. It's worse than that. Very flaky players by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Mt. Gox", the main Bitcoin exchange, was originally "Magic the Gathering Online Exchange". Nobody really knows who runs "Mt. Gox"; it appears to be one person in Tokyo who's only reachable via email and IRC. (He must be having a terrible night; this all happened around 3AM in Japan.) It's not like there's some real financial institution, or even a funded start-up, behind this. Most, if not all, of the Bitcoin "exchanges" and "exchangers" are somewhat flaky entities. Bitcoin's ecosystem is financially very weak.

    Understand that Mt. Gox is not just an exchange. It's a depository institution, like a bank. Customers have balances, in Bitcoins and other currencies, with Mt. Gox. But Mt. Gox is not regulated or audited as a bank or a brokerage, even though it holds other people's money. Accounts are uninsured.

    This matters when something goes wrong and somebody gets stuck with losses. Mt. Gox claims they're going to "roll back" transactions to before the theft. But some of the money is already gone, transferred out before Mt. Gox shut down. Mt. Gox is going to have to eat some of those losses if they do a rollback. Do they have the cash? Nobody knows. They're not audited by anybody.

    As for the security breach, not only is the entire file of usernames, email addresses, and encrypted passwords now widely available, so are the unencrypted passwords cracked so far. (One wonders why whomever stole the password file published it, but it may have to do with their needing help from others to crack the passwords.) As a result, TradeHill, another Bitcoin exchange based in Chile, has shut down, to avoid attacks using passwords obtained from Mt. Gox. Right now, there's no way to turn Bitcoins into dollars. (Euros, yes; right now the going rate is EUR11.51/BTC. But that market is very thin.)

    Whether or not BItcoins are a good idea, the market ecosystem behind them is far too flaky.

    1. Re:It's worse than that. Very flaky players by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Do they have the cash? Nobody knows. They're not audited by anybody.

      And there's your problem - no transparency. Same problem as exists on Wall St.

      One wonders why whomever stole the password file published it, but it may have to do with their needing help from others to crack the passwords.

      Perhaps, but de-anonymizing BitCoin is sufficient for the purposes of BitCoin's biggest critics (and those who stand to lose the most from it succeeding).

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  7. Re:Is it even possible to roll back a bitcoin trad by phoenixwade · · Score: 4, Funny

    they can have my monkey - he was throwing shit everywhere.

    --
    A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
  8. Re:buh? by Stellian · · Score: 3, Informative

    Rolling the transactions back is a huger blow to that interesting experiment, and basically undermines the attempt to get bitcoins accepted as a form of currency.

    Trades on the exchange do not impact the Bitcoin blockchain (transaction history) directly, in the exact same way as money is not directly transferred to/from your bank when you trade. Any market event is buffered into the virtual accounts that traders hold with Mt.gox, while the actual bitcoins are in Mt.gox's wallet and the actual dollars are in Mt.gox's bank account. You need to specifically request a transfer to get either money or bitcoins out of the system.
    So the event is in no way relevant for Bitcoin. It's just a bad case of unsanitized inputs.

  9. BitCoins are simply a hobby, not a currency by sirwired · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Usefulness as a currency is inversely proportional to potential as an investment. BitCoin fans, when you boast that your "currency holdings" have shot up in value by several hundred percent in a year, this is NOT A GOOD THING for BitCoins as a currency. You, Joe Merchant, would have to be a complete blithering idiot to set yourself up to accept BitCoins as a form of payment if deflation of several orders of magnitude is REQUIRED in order for your "currency" to be anything but a niche toy. In addition, credit, the lifeblood of any economy is completely impossible under such conditions; it would be the height of insanity to take out a loan if you had the potential of owing the equivalent of several hundred percent interest after a year. (As in, if you took out a loan for a thousand BitCoins a year ago, you'd be praying for an event like this to happen right now...)

    An ideal currency remains relatively stable in value in relation to something you actually want to buy. An illiquid currency that gyrates wildly in value is useless, as it makes proper pricing of goods, services, and credit impossible.

    In the end, BitCoins are no more a "currency" than Beanie Babies were. And at least Beanie Babies are cute. (And tulips were/are pretty flowers.) BitCoins are an interesting experiment in cryptography, nothing more.

    1. Re:BitCoins are simply a hobby, not a currency by RobinEggs · · Score: 5, Insightful

      These are very good points.

      It wasn't until bitcoin that I understood the point of constant inflation: it makes credit feasible. You can only borrow safely if you can be almost certain money won't increase in relative value in the future, and to make a borrower feel truly safe currency value should have a near certainty of decreasing somewhat. With significant deflation a possibility you can't even take out a car loan without simultaneously risking indentured servitude; it would be insane to take home or business loans, and I don't mean figuratively insane, either.

      Inflation also encourages lending and investing. It's like the Red Queen hypothesis: with inflation eating the valuation of your cash you have to put it to work somehow in hopes of earning more than the rate of inflation.

      It seems no one makes loans or investment in bitcoins, and the scam artists - excuse me, properly rewarded early adopters - who minted thousands or millions of coins back when they cost 1/1000th as much processing time to generate still seem to be hoarding and not using them.

      It's technically true that they're not a ponzi scheme, but they're still basically a confidence game that at the current trajectories don't seem like any benefit to people who weren't already in the market by mid-2010. Anyone who adopted after that could use them as money laundering and anonymous payments (like Silk Road), but couldn't efficiently generate or purchase them without wasting more fiat currency than the coins are worth in service fees or electricity.

  10. Re:Growing pangs by traindirector · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Anyone with an iota of common sense could see that.

    I wasn't trying to extol myself as a genius--I was making an observation for those who haven't had much of a look at the history of the market.

    What we need is a digital cash system that is run by banks -- yes, I know, we all like to hate on banks, but the truth is that banking is an important part of the economy and the majority of digital cash protocols call for a bank to issue the digital currency.

    I think bank-issued digital currency would be worse than government-issued currency, because the government has at least some semblance of advancing the good of its people, whereas a single bank issuing a currency could do whatever it pleases to the market, having only profit motive.

    A system like bitcoin where a very large number of users of the currency all have a stake it in with no single user selling all their bitcoins would cause more than a .1% fluctuation in value would be a system that would be very good at holding value for its users (assuming there are no design exploits and no organization with enough computing power to start playing games with the block chain).

    The problem with the current bitcoin system is that I imagine there are hundreds of people who could crash the value of the currency because it's likely too concentrated with a few individuals and the market is not deep enough for them to sell their stakes to those who are willing to invest in it more. At the value of $17 US / bitcoin, there are $112,141,350 US in the bitcoin market. There are probably dozens of bitcoin "millionaires" (in USD) who would end up with probably only somewhere in the thousands of dollars if they sold, with the result being putting the bitcoin value back at something like $.10 - $.20 / bitcoin. The system is extremely intriguing, but the current ownership distribution and market seems like a disaster, either waiting to happen or already starting.

    Maybe if the system were started again, with the current level of interest, the results would be different. I'd get involved in that. The market with the current ownership distribution? No way.

  11. Disconnect by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm supposed to hate electronic voting, but support a wholly electronic currency?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  12. Just sayin'! by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's worth nothing that this 'price crash' was completely artificial, the result of a malicious act, and only really affects the Mt.Gox exchange site. I suppose it probably also affects any sites that set their exchange rate by Mt.Gox, but many don't do that on a real-time basis anyway. I use Bitcoin Market, another trading site, and their prices are unaffected.

    --

    Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
  13. The e-mail from Mt.Gox. by Gendou · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have an Mt.Gox account but have never actually used it for anything. I received the following e-mail earlier today.

    Dear Mt.Gox user,

    Our database has been compromised, including your email. We are working on a
    quick resolution and to begin with, your password has been disabled as a
    security measure (and you will need to reset it to login again on Mt.Gox).

    If you were using the same password on Mt.Gox and other places (email, etc),
    you should change this password as soon as possible.

    For more details, please see this:

    https://support.mtgox.com/entries/20208066-huge-bitcoin-sell-off-due-to-a-compromised-account-rollback

    The informations there will be updated as our investigation progresses.

    Please accept our apologies for the troubles caused, and be certain we will do
    everything we can to keep the funds entrusted with us as secure as possible.

    The leaked data includes the following:

    - Account number
    - Account login
    - Email address
    - Encrypted password

    While the password is encrypted, it is possible to bruteforce most passwords
    with time, and it is likely bad people are working on this right now.

    Any unauthorized access done to any account you own (email, mtgox, etc) should
    be reported to the appropriate authorities in your country.

    Thanks,
    The Mt.Gox team

    Gmail also flagged suspicious failed login attempts on my e-mail account, so I had to go through a password reset process on it. Although I used a unique password at Mt.Gox, the attacker apparently is running automated login attempts using the stolen e-mail addresses and Mt.Gox passwords, so anyone using non-unique passwords is likely in trouble.

    1. Re:The e-mail from Mt.Gox. by Dr.+Sp0ng · · Score: 3, Informative

      Gmail also flagged suspicious failed login attempts on my e-mail account, so I had to go through a password reset process on it. Although I used a unique password at Mt.Gox, the attacker apparently is running automated login attempts using the stolen e-mail addresses and Mt.Gox passwords, so anyone using non-unique passwords is likely in trouble.

      Yep. Same story for me too. Glad I enabled two-factor authentication on my Google account (and SSH to my home server while I was at it).

    2. Re:The e-mail from Mt.Gox. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Gmail also flagged suspicious failed login attempts on my e-mail account...

      That's not an accident; Google is watching out for you.

      See http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=19641.msg245983#msg245983

      Hi guys,

      The reason your Google accounts have been required to change the password is that you appeared in a list of public MtGox accounts. We do understand that you may not have been sharing your passwords, unfortunately as they were leaked in hashed form it is hard to know which ones will be found to be sharing passwords and which won't - this will be found out by brute forcers over the next 24-48 hours.

      Again, apologies for the inconvenience, we know that choosing new passwords is a pain. Requiring password rotations is not a decision we take lightly. However this is standard procedure for credentials leaks. It is to avoid accounts showing up in the black market for hacked passwords, as Gmail account access can be used to obtain access at other sites (PayPal, Facebook, etc).

      thanks,

      Mike
      Google abuse/anti-hijack team

  14. This is not really a bitcoin story by Cyberllama · · Score: 5, Informative

    So much as it is a MTGox story.

    About a week ago the first rumors of MtGox being compromised by a SQL injection exploit began to circulate.
    Here's one of the original claims from someone calling themselves Buttsec from June 14th. Others which I'm too lazy to dig up were more specific and named MtGox explictly:
    http://pastebin.com/4NPemHfz

    On that very same day, MTGox implemented a $1000 dollar withdrawal limit. Suspicious, right? For the past 3 days, there have been offers to sell MTGox's database of usernames and password hashes. Here's an example:

    http://pastebin.com/ui0nusuZ

    Today, there is this:
    http://pastebin.com/hN7PxRhc
    http://pastebin.com/w06pa2mB (there are many of these, the first link gives you the urls if you want to see them all)

    This confirms MTGox was indeed hacked. One of the hackers offering to sell this database that came out today had even specifically mentioned that the hole he had used was CLOSED by MTGox a couple of days ago. Today, FINALLY, MTGox admits they were hacked and has sent out emails to all their users. Here is a copy:
    http://pastebin.com/9Cx94wzs

    In light of all of the evidence (more of which I'm sure you can find on your own), I find it very hard to believe that MtGox was not aware they had been hacked, and yet they've been denying it and operating normally (aside from the newly added withdrawal limit, which they even boast about in the linked press release). In fact, I found one reddit page of many where MtGox users were complaining there accounts had been compromised (There have been many over the past week) and the employee flat out denies that they have ANY reason to suspect they've been compromised:

    Here's one such complaint among many: http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/i17jd/i_just_got_ripped_off_on_mtgox/
    And here's one with an employee denial: http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/i2dkn/mt_gox_has_some_serious_issues/
    Here's all that (purported) employees posts: http://www.reddit.com/user/MtGox_Adam

    Long story short: For the last week (5 days at least), I've been wondering if MtGox had been truly hacked or if someone was just trying to depress the price of bitcoins by spreading rumors. Today I don't have to wonder anymore. What I do have to wonder about is why has MtGox kept silent for the past week when ALL indications were that they KNEW. They fixed the hole, added the withdrawal limit, and yet kept on denying they had an issue when dozens of users complained of account compromises. Rather than admit the issue and try to have it fixed, they apparently tried to keep it a secret. How can we trust any company that handles security issues in this manner?

    1. Re:This is not really a bitcoin story by woolpert · · Score: 3, Interesting

      On that very same day, MTGox implemented a $1000 dollar withdrawal limit. Suspicious, right?

      Not so. The $1000 withdrawal limit has been in place since at least early May 2011 (when I started cashing out my holdings).

  15. There's no Bitcoin market right now. by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative

    other USD exchanges are still running fine.

    From Bitcoin.org's market table:

    Look at those tiny volumes. Total volume for all the little guys is under 0.1% of Mt. Gox, which was trading over 200,000 bitcoins per day. With Mt. Gox and TradeHill off-line, the market is dead. None of those little guys have any significant buyers available.

  16. Re:Let's attempt some critical thinking. by Capsaicin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Imagine this headline: Forex.com hacked, concept of USD put into question. Doesn't that sound a bit ridiculous? This was a bad day for mtgox.com and bitcoin speculators, but it does not demonstrate inherent weaknesses in the system of bitcoin.

    I agree, this does not "demonstrate inherent weaknesses" in the design or Bitcoin, per se, and I would add that an event such as this one could strangle Bitcoin in its cradle. Consider these points:

    i) Unlike the USD, Bitcoin has still to establish legitimacy in the eyes of the serious investor.
    ii) Sites such as Mt Gox, provide the primary (perhaps even exclusive) gateway to Bitcoin. FX dealing sites are very much down the list on how most people gain exposure to USD.
    iii) The USD can be used by US citizens to settle their taxation debt. The USD can be used internationally to purchase oil. Within the US (and not only there), the USD can be used to purchase practically the entire range of goods and services.

    If we apply critical thinking, it will be apparent that the analogy you propose with your headline, while appealing on the surface, cannot do justice to the differences between Bitcoin and the USD.

    --
    Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
  17. Bigoted much? by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Remember, most people are stupid

    This is untrue, if you actually examine the world people, on average are VERY CLEVER. If "people" were stupid our species would have been wiped out long ago.

    Now what people are, is selectively informed. They may not have chosen to be informed about topics you consider important, but it does not mean they are stupid...

    I'm sure your average redneck ain't keeping his ammo dry, and your average gun nut (simply for lack of a better term) can't guarantee their storage spot is impervious to floods or broken water pipes

    How "sure" are you? Because I'm damn sure you are wrong. Almost anyone I've ever seen keeps ammo in something like an ammo box, which is quite dry and mostly impervious to occasional water. The "redneck" that talks so funny probably knows quite a lot more than you about the care of ammo, and humorously would probably call you an idiot for not knowing the details on this better...

    Grow up and realize that people who are different from you are not automatically stupid.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley