Slashdot Mirror


SpaceX Sues Valador For Defamation

An anonymous reader writes "Looks like aerospace consulting firm Valador tried to bite off more than it can chew. After already having bagged lucrative 'safety review' contracts with SpaceX' competitors, it tried to sell its services to SpaceX as well. However, according to SpaceX' claims in a recent court filing, Valador tried to juice up their sales pitch by first spreading rumors at key NASA offices that SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket is 'unsafe', and then generously offering its services to SpaceX to aid them with addressing any undeserved bias against them among NASA officials. In true California fashion (being the most litigious state of the nation), SpaceX is having none of that and is taking Valador to court for defamation, seeking damages identical to the value of the consulting contract Valador tried to sell to them." CT: It appears that the link in this story has disappeared. If you can find something better, post it.

111 comments

  1. First post - article is already dead by seifried · · Score: 1

    Not Found The URL you requested could not be found.

    1. Re:First post - article is already dead by thej1nx · · Score: 3, Informative
    2. Re:First post - article is already dead by Mashiki · · Score: 0

      Well tumblr isn't exactly a place of journalistic excellence.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    3. Re:First post - article is already dead by kyle5t · · Score: 0

      I heard a rumor that it actually exploded.

    4. Re:First post - article is already dead by Rei · · Score: 0

      I heard a rumor that the Falcon 9 hires illegal immigrants to choke it in the shower.

      --
      Seen on a Japanese food processor: "Not to be used for the other use."
    5. Re:First post - article is already dead by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure you're thinking of Falcon 7.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    6. Re:First post - article is already dead by macraig · · Score: 2
    7. Re:First post - article is already dead by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      Not Found

      The URL you requested could not be found.

      That's what they want you to think. Conspiricy is everywhere!

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    8. Re:First post - article is already dead by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      I heard a rumor that the Falcon 9 hires illegal immigrants to choke it in the shower.

      I thought it was a chicken that gets choked in the shower...

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    9. Re:First post - article is already dead by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      Is that with or without a tangarine up the arsehole?

      (I suspect that the OP has a sexual joke in there, but even my pretty perverse imagination doesn't quite see what the joke is. Is it not in English?)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. Why the anti-litigation jab? by artor3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This seems like a clear cut cases of defamation. Intentionally spreading malicious rumors, and then offering to clean up those same rumors for a price is pretty low, and if Valador is guilty, they absolutely should be sued.

    1. Re:Why the anti-litigation jab? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Extortion, no?

    2. Re:Why the anti-litigation jab? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and it's particularly delicious that they chose the amount of damages themselves.

    3. Re:Why the anti-litigation jab? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intentionally spreading malicious rumors, and then offering to clean up those same rumors for a price is pretty low

      That's not "low". The term you're looking for is "protection racket".

    4. Re:Why the anti-litigation jab? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 3, Funny

      Only if all the Californians who have left must return to California within 90 days.

    5. Re:Why the anti-litigation jab? by artor3 · · Score: 1

      No, a protection racket would be threatening to spread the rumors if they didn't pay. If anything, this is more akin to a ransom.

    6. Re:Why the anti-litigation jab? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sometimes have to beat up someone to show them you're serious.

    7. Re:Why the anti-litigation jab? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This seems like a clear cut cases of defamation. Intentionally spreading malicious rumors, and then offering to clean up those same rumors for a price is pretty low, and if Valador is guilty, they absolutely should be sued.

      "That's a nice launch vehicle you've got there. It'd be a real pity if NASA were to believe that it tends to catch fire..."

    8. Re:Why the anti-litigation jab? by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Low is a good word for it. This isn't business, it's like an ambulance running down people to make hospitals more profitable.

    9. Re:Why the anti-litigation jab? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then how about this: These are the future rules for residing in California: ... [right wing fantasy]

      It was Ayn Rand who proved that there was a profitable book market for right wing fantasy, such themes have been flourishing in fiction ever since.

    10. Re:Why the anti-litigation jab? by black+soap · · Score: 1

      Go for triple damages, and then ask th

    11. Re:Why the anti-litigation jab? by black+soap · · Score: 1

      Go for triple damages, then ask them if they would like to work for you - at regular price.

    12. Re:Why the anti-litigation jab? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot about allowing any illegal Latin American the right to go there as well.

    13. Re:Why the anti-litigation jab? by Nimey · · Score: 2

      The submitter's political slant, of course.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    14. Re:Why the anti-litigation jab? by Wolvenhaven · · Score: 0

      ...the State of California.

      I think you mean the People's Republic of California. And as a Georgian, I have no issues with not being allowed in California, I really don't have any desire to visit or live there. Reciprocally, I don't want any Californians in Georgia, so you need to add a few laws restricting them from ever leaving the state.

      --
      Orwell was an optimist.
    15. Re:Why the anti-litigation jab? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you should have gone for triple damaged posts :).

    16. Re:Why the anti-litigation jab? by Surt · · Score: 1

      Having lived in both states:

      Georgia: Better weather, unless you're into winter sports. People are really racist, but otherwise friendlier.
      California: More crowded in the living areas, but more empty in the open spaces, and a better variety of them. People are more creative, but there are a much higher number of mentally ill.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  3. Everyone believes your product is crap... by AlienIntelligence · · Score: 2

    Everyone believes your product is crap...
    ... because we told them that.

    You need better PR and management.
    We can suggest a company.

    lol

    -AI

    --
    For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion
    1. Re:Everyone believes your product is crap... by Arancaytar · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Nice reputation you got there.

      Be a shame if something were to happen to it..."

    2. Re:Everyone believes your product is crap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at the CEO - he does look like he had/is bacon

      http://www.valador.com/message_from_kevin_mabie

      add: captcha word: bacunt
      wth?

    3. Re:Everyone believes your product is crap... by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've got a few negative mod points left.
      I'd hate to award them to you so... can you give me a "reason" not to?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    4. Re:Everyone believes your product is crap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you give him negative modpoints? (nevermind the fact that you've already posted and can't in fact do as you proposed). His post was short and funny, something that makes slashdot slashdot

      Wooooshhh... You so failed to get it.

    5. Re:Everyone believes your product is crap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what if it actually is crap?

    6. Re:Everyone believes your product is crap... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Wooooshhh... You so failed to get it.

      Add 'woosh' to 'wrong' mods for the next version of Slashdot - the GP so deserves it.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  4. Original Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    SpaceX vs. Valador: The Price of Success

    When I arrived at work this morning, I found this gem of news in my inbox. I have no personal knowledge of what happened and nothing to add to the article - but I think it pretty much speaks for itself:

    Quote 1:

    Early in June 2011, on behalf of Valador, Fragola attempted to obtain a consulting contract from SpaceX worth as much as $1 million. He claimed that SpaceX needed an ‘independent’ analysis of its rocket to bolster its reputation with NASA based on what he called an unfair ‘perception’ about SpaceX. SpaceX did not respond favorably to Fragola’s offer.

    Quote 2:

    Fragola sent this email to a NASA official on June 8: “I have just heard a rumor [] that the Falcon 9 experienced a double engine failure in the first stage and that the entire stage blew up just after the first stage separated.”

    Quote 3:

    “Fragola’s statements are blatantly false [] there was not ‘double-engine’ failure, nor even a single engine failure. The launch was broadcast by a camera on the Dragon spacecraft, which vividly showed the separation of the first stage - and no explosion occurred.”

    Some of us are in this because we want to see humanity making children in space as soon as possible; others are because they want to line their pockets as much as possible. I’ll leave it up to you to decide who falls into which category.

    Posted on Friday, June 17 2011. Tagged with: spaceSpaceX

    1. Re:Original Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Some of us are in this because we want to see humanity making children in space

      So... how much did the porn industry invest in SpaceX?

    2. Re:Original Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Apparently not enough to get the SpaceX to change the fourth letter in its name.

    3. Re:Original Article Text by c0lo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Some of us are in this because we want to see humanity making children in space

      So... how much did the porn industry invest in SpaceX?

      Only 1/3 of the necessary.. still 2 x-es to go.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    4. Re:Original Article Text by macraig · · Score: 1

      TFA didn't actually say that: the children phrase was apparently added by the GP poster... for some reason.

    5. Re:Original Article Text by gmack · · Score: 1

      Not true, the children phrase is in the google cached version as you can see for yourself here.

    6. Re:Original Article Text by macraig · · Score: 1

      Did you even check your own link? IT'S NOT THERE!

    7. Re:Original Article Text by MaDeR · · Score: 1

      "Falcon 9 experienced a double engine failure in the first stage and that the entire stage blew up just after the first stage separated.”
      Funny that I did not seen that in live feed of any F9 launch. And I watched them multiple times. Must be this SpaceX kool aid.
      I will not even mention little details like telemetry, feedback and that NASA can indepedently detect when something blows up, thankyouverymuch...

      --
      What modern Obelix would say today? Of course, "Those crazy Americans!".
  5. The question that springs to mind is by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2

    Who the heck is Valador, and why do they think they have so much experience in space technologies that they can sell advices to other players in the field?

    NASA doing that I could understand (I mean you know, they have nothing else to do these days, and if anybody knows about blowing space vehicles, it's them), but "Valador"?

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:The question that springs to mind is by Spy+Handler · · Score: 5, Funny

      Valador must be the aerospace consulting arm of Tropicanti & Gotti, LLC.

    2. Re:The question that springs to mind is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the heck is Valador, and why do they think they have so much experience in space technologies that they can sell advices to other players in the field?

      Their CEO probably watched too much TV and thought you could tag an "expert" label on a random bloke off the street and get away with it.

      Or he thought: hey, we're not going to run a legitimate business, but a local Mafia office, so we won't be doing any real work anyway, capice?

    3. Re:The question that springs to mind is by uofitorn · · Score: 1

      I can't believe your comment was modded +3 solely on the basis that you find the name Valador funny. It's really not that funny. And "blowing space vehicles" ? What does that even mean?

      --
      "What kind of music do pirates listen to?" -Paul Maud'dib
      "Yeeeaaarrrrr n' Bee!!" -Stilgar, Leader of Sietch Tabr
    4. Re:The question that springs to mind is by baegucb · · Score: 2

      Here's a better link. http://www.spacenews.com/launch/110617-spacex-sues-expert-questioned-falcon.html
      Valador's VP who allegedly did this, has his background about halfway down.

    5. Re:The question that springs to mind is by Whalou · · Score: 1

      Darth Valador.

      --
      English is not this .sig mother tongue...
    6. Re:The question that springs to mind is by WCMI92 · · Score: 0

      Simple. Follow the money. Look for people with George Soros ties or other ties to the current thugocracy in Washington.

      They wouldn't be so blatant about it if they didn't think they could pull it off: pay us off or you won't get government work because we have "friends".

      Ex government employees should be barred from lobbying for at least 10 years.

      --
      Corporatism != Free Market
    7. Re:The question that springs to mind is by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      Rockets perform better when their frames are low in stress. Having someone blow the vehicle before launch reduces the chance the rocket will go off prematurely, or fail completely.

    8. Re:The question that springs to mind is by torgis · · Score: 2

      Rockets perform better when their frames are low in stress. Having someone blow the vehicle before launch reduces the chance the rocket will go off prematurely, or fail completely.

      You, sir, are in more dire need of a BJ than any other suborbital spacecraft in history.

    9. Re:The question that springs to mind is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He may be right. I had my first stage blown last night, and my frame is significantly less stressed than usual today. I highly recommend.

    10. Re:The question that springs to mind is by idontgno · · Score: 1

      "I have altered your reputation. Pay so that I do not alter it again."

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    11. Re:The question that springs to mind is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are the guys who investigated Challenger after the fact.

  6. California? Virginia. by crankyspice · · Score: 3, Informative

    The lawsuit was brought in Virginia. http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/06/16/Space.pdf...

    --
    geek. lawyer.
    1. Re:California? Virginia. by kamapuaa · · Score: 2

      And the most litigious state in the nation is New Jersey.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    2. Re:California? Virginia. by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      Will that have an effect on the legislative landscape?

  7. Very fast lawyers by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 3, Informative

    First, note that all we have so far is an allegation. Although we tend to like SpaceX around here, Valador are currently only accused scum, not confirmed scum.

    Second, the alleged defamation occurred on June 8 2011. courthousenews.com reports on the suit on June 16. So that is offence to suit in about a week!

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    1. Re:Very fast lawyers by MurukeshM · · Score: 2

      So what? You think SpaceX should wait till the next moon landing?

    2. Re:Very fast lawyers by mwvdlee · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If SpaceX is convinced Valador was using something akin to extortion tactics on them, they should act immediately in order to stop the lies from spreading any further. And why would they wait anyway?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    3. Re:Very fast lawyers by torgis · · Score: 1

      First, note that all we have so far is an allegation. Although we tend to like SpaceX around here, Valador are currently only accused scum, not confirmed scum.

      Second, the alleged defamation occurred on June 8 2011. courthousenews.com reports on the suit on June 16. So that is offence to suit in about a week!

      Civil system seems to move fast and the whole process is greased with money. A criminal case wouldn't see the courts for a year or more.

    4. Re:Very fast lawyers by Serpents · · Score: 1

      I suppose getting their lawyers to sit together, see if they can make a case of available evidence and put the documents for the court together can take some time. A week perhaps?

    5. Re:Very fast lawyers by edumacator · · Score: 1

      Civil system seems to move fast and the whole process is greased with money. A criminal case wouldn't see the courts for a year or more.

      Isn't filing suit more of a parallel to arrest in the criminal courts? That generally happens as soon as incriminating evidence is found.

    6. Re:Very fast lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. It's really weird to see the name of the tiny company you've worked for featured on Slashdot, ESPECIALLY for an article like this!

      Let me say this, at least. I really doubt they'd do anything this blatantly stupid. I mean, yes, they're a contractor, sometimes they appear a little shady. Goes along with being a small business contractor, from what I've seen. And I've only worked with their other business, the infosec side. That said, if the CEO knew something like this was going on, he'd kick the ass of anyone involved. He's got a huge temper, is an in-your-face kinda guy, and has a strong sense of what's right.

      In short, if SpaceX is right, and they very well might be, take it out on the guy who did wrong. They treated me well, I'd hate to see them lose out because of an idiot middle manager.

  8. California being the "most litigious state" by 0WaitState · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Um, last time I looked California is the most populous state in the nation. This submitter claim is as bogus as those who try to claim the 9th district court is somehow biased because it decides more cases of X (fill in bias here), while ignoring that it represents most states west of the rockies.

    Full quote from interestingly slanted summary:

    In true California fashion (being the most litigious state of the nation)

    --

    Remain calm! All is well!
  9. Sicilian connection by macraig · · Score: 1

    So is Valador run by Sicilians or people from New Jersey? Sounds like they got the protectionism racket nicely transformed for tech subcontracting work.

  10. Testing their mettel? by mhajicek · · Score: 3, Funny
    "The Falcon 9 tank walls and domes are made from aluminum lithium alloy."

    "What's an Aluminum falcon"?

    1. Re:Testing their mettel? by Rei · · Score: 2

      Bravo. Bravo. :) Right after the also excellent, "What do you mean, 'They blew it up'? Who's "They"?!"

      --
      Seen on a Japanese food processor: "Not to be used for the other use."
  11. Yay - Space Whores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... investing in lawyers, the only growth industry in the US. The MIC is, of course, a destruction industry.

    1. Re:Yay - Space Whores by torgis · · Score: 1

      ... investing in lawyers, the only growth industry in the US. The MIC is, of course, a destruction industry.

      Not the only growth industry in the US. Figure out a way to grow medical marijuana in space and you'd have a triple whammy of profit.

    2. Re:Yay - Space Whores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Figure out a way to profitably grow medical marijuana in space and you'd have a triple whammy of profit.

      Growing hemp in space is the easy part. Growing it so you can make more than $20k/kg to do something that can't be done on the Earth..... that would give you a real reason to go up.

  12. Off with their heads by JadedIdealist · · Score: 2

    If the other companies using valador have any sense they will fire them immediately and have nothing more to do with them.

    1. Re:Off with their heads by torgis · · Score: 1

      If the other companies using valador have any sense they will fire them immediately and have nothing more to do with them.

      This is a very good point. After being caught up in a racket like this, what do you think their seal of recommendation is worth now?

  13. Mafioso? No, a veteran! by goodmanj · · Score: 3, Informative

    Many of the comments here question the ethics of Valador. Here's an interesting tidbit: the CEO, Kevin Mabie, is a U.S. military veteran, disabled in the line of duty. Check this out.. Which raises two questions:

    1) How dare you people dishonor a distinguished military veteran, who lost his ... something ... defending your freedoms? Don't you realize that the moment he was discharged from active duty, he instantly became a paragon of virtue, unable to lie, cheat, or defraud, and thus this accusation by SpaceX is not only baseless, but treasonous?

    2) How difficult is it to fake this sort of thing? And does anyone in the Slashdot community care enough to go the extra mile to check his credentials, and possibly make some *real* news?

  14. Re:Mafioso? No, a veteran! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
  15. Re:Mafioso? No, a veteran! by lennier1 · · Score: 1

    Makes sense.
    Because he was a backseat driver in an aircraft and fell out of his bunk once too often he's free to employ as many defamatory, even criminal business practices as he wants...

  16. Sounds like an MS-SUN-SCO style operation by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Informative

    In fact, I wonder if there is any tie from that guy back to L-Mart? These days L-Mart is working hard on hit jobs on SpaceX. They have done loads of lobbying jobs on SpaceX, trying to prevent them from even getting a CHANCE at a job, and now has started an astroturfing 'journalists' similar to MS's use of Rob Enderle against Linux and Android. Sadly, it means that SpaceX has had to waste time and money fighting not just Valador, but L-Mart's lobbyists and hitmen.

    There are now many companies that are fighting against all that Musk attempts to do. He really is shaking up the Global industries as he decides to go into them.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Sounds like an MS-SUN-SCO style operation by gknoy · · Score: 1

      For those who have never heard that abbreviation (and I hadn't), "L-Mart" is apparently short for Lockheed Martin.

    2. Re:Sounds like an MS-SUN-SCO style operation by sconeu · · Score: 1

      I'd never hear L-Mart. My company subbed to them for a while, and I always heard it as "Lock-Mart"

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    3. Re:Sounds like an MS-SUN-SCO style operation by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Sorry. I have loads of friends that work for various L-Mart divisions. As they told me, it is 'L-Mart, one step above K-Mart'.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  17. Re:MLB Jersey by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Would somebody be so kind as to crack these spammers? Perhaps steal some money, or simply put in large fake orders so as to tie this idiot up?

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  18. What fucking moron wrote the intro paragraph? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "In true California fashion (being the most litigious state of the nation)"
    WTF does that mean? That if you are defamed you wouldn't actually sue unless your company was based in California, because we all know that suing liars is a 'California' thing?

  19. re:mafiodo retardo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a military veteran and I say the guy is a dirt bag. Would you dare to contradict me? Because by your own admission that would be tantamount to treason.

  20. Re:Mafioso? No, a veteran! by Chaugnar · · Score: 2
    I'm a veteran and my opinion is that Kevin Mabie is behaving criminally. Being that I'm a veteran that must mean I cannot be contradicted because by your own admission that would be treason.

    Many of the comments here question the ethics of Valador. Here's an interesting tidbit: the CEO, Kevin Mabie, is a U.S. military veteran, disabled in the line of duty.

  21. I disagree by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 0

    I challenge anyone to say that a tiny little compartment sitting on top of a gigantic tube of high combustible fuel which is intentionally ignited is actually safe!

    Let's not forget additional issues such as the fact such as it being basically a cylinder with tiny little fits on its ass end being shot up at insane speeds into the extremely unfriendly atmosphere of the earth, later to then reenter at even more insane speeds that damn near engulfing the returning capsule with flames caused by drag against... AIR!!!

    Oh... and if there's the slightest little leak while it's outside of the earth's atmosphere, pretty much everyone inside the capsule will be suffocating to death or being ripped into the vacuum of space.

    Let's be blunt about this... the fucking thing is a death trap!

    If they can figure out a way to launch the rocket using a non-combustible propellant, make it go a hell of a lot slower, put big enough fins on it to allow it to correct course at all times, and find a way of slowing it down so much that by the time it enters the atmosphere on return, there isn't a huge amount of drag produced. That would probably make it safer.... now let's work on how to get it from the atmosphere back to earth without it falling the entire way... that sounds dangerous too.

    To suggest that this thing is anything other than unsafe would be lying.

    To suggest that your company has the expertise to make something like this safe is false advertising on a criminal scale.

    1. Re:I disagree by mandark1967 · · Score: 1

      I challenge anyone to say that a tiny little compartment sitting on top of a gigantic tube of high combustible fuel which is intentionally ignited is actually safe!

      It's safe.

      --
      Sig Follows: "Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." -- Mark Twain
    2. Re:I disagree by danlip · · Score: 1

      "Safe" is a relative term. Yes, going into space is dangerous. Yes there will be fatal accidents. Cars and airplanes have fatal accidents too. Space travel will always be more dangerous than cars or airplanes. But you can certainly be safer than the space shuttle - which is a very low bar to pass. And you can certainly be more or less safe than your competitors.

    3. Re:I disagree by MaDeR · · Score: 1

      Launching rockets is not very safe in general. But some rockets can be safer than other rockets.

      --
      What modern Obelix would say today? Of course, "Those crazy Americans!".
  22. Irony? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Was TFS trying to be ironically defamatory towards California?

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  23. But Valador is correct. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    The Falcon 9 isn't safe. But then again I doubt that any rocket will ever be "safe". It will be a long time before you strap a human into any thing that then goes from 0 to 18,000+ MPH and well over 100 miles up in anything that a reasonable person calls safe. Space travel is not safe or fool proof. Heck the only reason that we can strap people in to aluminum tubes and fly them around at 500+mph and 7 plus miles up and make it reasonable safe is around 100 years of mistakes and many many flights.
    Of course Valador is using the oldest trick in the book. The best lie starts with a truth. I doubt that SpaceX would take unnecessary risks. If they need a test pilot I am willing to go. But as Q said in Star Trek
    "If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you oughtta go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wondrous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross; but it's not for the timid."
    The Falcon 9 isn't safe, being safe is for children. Adults make a trade off between the risks and the befits and then takes those risks.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    1. Re:But Valador is correct. by gknoy · · Score: 1

      I thought the Falcon 9 was intended for heavy lift, not for human transport?

    2. Re:But Valador is correct. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Yes and no. Yes it is intended for medium and heavy lift but it is also man rated like the Titan III was and the Saturn V.
      You know they flew the Dragon Capsule on it didn't you? They Titan III was supposed to be used for the X-20 and the MOLE as well as other projects. It was supposed to replace the Saturn Ib for a lot of manned leo missions. It could have been used to resupply are even expand Skylab had it been funded.
      The Saturn V flew a few times unmanned and was used to launch Skylab.
      I still wonder what would have happened if we had kept improving that Saturn line like the Russians did with their Soyuz launchers.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:But Valador is correct. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still wonder what would have happened if we had kept improving that Saturn line like the Russians did with their Soyuz launchers.

      Very likely the Saturn rockets would have cost less and have delivered both more tonnage and more astronauts into space than the entire Shuttle program. There was an Apollo II capsule design thrown around that would have delivered seven astronauts into space at once, and even the standard Apollo capsule was refit with two extra seats for a "cozy" capsule layout for use in the Skylab rescue mission (that never flew).

      My own guess is that the Apollo Guidance Computer would have been updated several times (with all of the original functionality eventually moving into a single milspec radiation-hardened chip) and that lunar missions would never have really ended even if they would have been less frequent than the couple per year during the height of Apollo. That by itself would have been an amazing side benefit to keeping the program going.

      Ironically, the test stand built to put the F1 engine into high production (Von Braun was hoping for about 100+ Saturn V rockets to be built) was decommissioned, sold to Beal Aerospace where they tried to get something going but never really succeeded, and then finally purchased by SpaceX. All of the Merlin engines have been tested on the same piece of hardware originally built for the Saturn series of rockets. In a sense, the Falcon series of rockets is essentially taking at least a small portion of the heritage left behind by Von Braun and the Saturn rockets. The workflow of that test facility is still pretty much what Von Braun envisioned back in the 1960's when he wanted to have an armada of American spacecraft going into the solar system.

  24. Re:Mafioso? No, a veteran! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't a defense of Valador, just trying to get people a fair-minded picture of how this stuff works.

    People starting a business in this area generally have some cool idea and genuinely want to make something real and useful. They then get bogged down in trying to convince someone in the government with the authority to take action that they aren't yet another business with a cool sounding idea that can't actually deliver. If you aren't, at least on paper, woman owned, minority owned or veteran owned, forget about it, you simply won't get any contracts.

    Many of the comments here question the ethics of Valador. Here's an interesting tidbit: the CEO, Kevin Mabie, is a U.S. military veteran, disabled in the line of duty. Check this out.. Which raises two questions:

    1) How dare you people dishonor a distinguished military veteran, who lost his ... something ... defending your freedoms? Don't you realize that the moment he was discharged from active duty, he instantly became a paragon of virtue, unable to lie, cheat, or defraud, and thus this accusation by SpaceX is not only baseless, but treasonous?

    2) How difficult is it to fake this sort of thing? And does anyone in the Slashdot community care enough to go the extra mile to check his credentials, and possibly make some *real* news?

    Speaking as a veteran myself, though not disabled in any way:

    1) Do keep in mind that most of that attitude is a reaction to the disgraceful treatment Veitnam vets got. People basically took their frustrations with US policy out on veterans who had, overwhelmingly, served honorably.

    And, generally, you can question a veteran's honor as much as you like; you just haven't actually earned the right to be taken seriously.

    2) VA doctors do physical exams to ensure that you have a legitimate disability. The biggest disconnect is that people assume that their common sense idea of disability is even remotely close to the medical definition of disability. I know a guy out on Crohn's, but people tend to think, "how is having to go the bathroom a lot a disability?!"

    There's no good excuse for a fishing expedition, nor would justice be well served by such. My recommendation: let the lawsuit be settled on the merits and don't demean yourself in this way.

  25. Yelp? by roa_runner2 · · Score: 1

    Sounds like Yelp's business model...

  26. Re:Mafioso? No, a veteran! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure LulzSec could fake that page if you asked them nicely

  27. Let's see the issues. by sconeu · · Score: 1

    Titan III was never man-rated. Gemini-Titan was a Titan II derivative.
    I don't believe that Falcon9 has been man-rated yet.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:Let's see the issues. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I am pretty sure that TitanIIIc was actually man rated or was in the process to be. http://www.airliners.net/uf/44100/phpX0sCIF.jpeg
      Is a picture of it flying the one and only Gemini/MOLE test fight. Since it was supposed to be manned I would say it was manned rated or well on the way to be.
      The Falcon9 was built to be man rated from the start has it passed yet? I am not sure about that but that is the intention.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:Let's see the issues. by Coz · · Score: 1

      Correct. Falcon 9 was designed to be man-rated, but SpaceX isn't spending the money to jump through NASA's hoops until they have more of a hope of a contract for human launch services. Man rating is a high enough hurdle that LM and Boeing have refrained from man rating the Delta IV or Atlas V on their own nickels.

      --
      I love vegetarians - some of my favorite foods are vegetarians.
    3. Re:Let's see the issues. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please define "man-rated" or "crew-rated" to be anything other than "according to the whims of the manned spaceflight directorate at Johnson Space Center" and the current favored spacecraft design, of course not giving any sort of chance to somebody not associated directly with NASA.

      There are no realistic standards for man-rating that have ever been met by NASA for that matter, as the Space Shuttle itself failed any of the standards brought forward and those standards really didn't even exist for Apollo, Gemini, or Mercury. About the only standard used was that the rocket had to go up into the sky at least once before somebody was allowed to risk their lives in it, something that again didn't apply to the Space Shuttle as it was crewed on its very first flight.

      Man-rating is all a relative thing anyway. At best it means you have a capsule that contains enough life support equipment so that somebody can survive in the environment where the vehicle finally ends up.

      If you can say that "crew rating" implies some margins of safety in its design and that from its inception that eventually crews were going to be placed on the rocket in some fashion, that is indeed a slightly smaller list of potential vehicle. Then again, why do you claim that the Falcon 9 isn't "man-rated" yet when clearly crews were intended from its inception (based upon numerous quotes by Elon Musk himself)?

      Crew-rating standards are currently a moving target and something that I open proclaim is just a political red herring. Perhaps if spaceflight is a whole lot more commonplace and realistic standards can be established that are also commonly met by most participants (including NASA) then I might accept those standards as something to strive for and meet before flight. Until then, even the suggestion that crew-rating standards have or have not been met is a meaningless point that has no basis in reality.

      I certainly don't trust NASA to establish those standards, as they certainly have a stake in the game to make the standards impossible to meet for anybody including themselves (as they don't even have to follow their own standards).

  28. Re:Mafioso? No, a veteran! by goodmanj · · Score: 1

    I'm not arguing that among veterans, fraud is common. I'm arguing that among fraudsters, false claims of military service are quite common.

    http://www.justice.gov/usao/waw/press/2007/sep/operationstolenvalor.html

    If Mabie really has engaged in fraud and extortion in his business practices, wouldn't it be interesting if he was also lying about his military service, dishonoring veterans like yourself? It's a long shot, but you never know.