Slashdot Mirror


Why People Who Make Things Should Learn Chinese

ptorrone writes "MAKE Magazine is making that case that any 'maker' who builds, buys or creates electronics should learn (Mandarin) Chinese. MAKE outlines the resources for anyone wishing to learn the language of the soon-to-be largest economy and source of just about everything we buy in the USA."

59 of 588 comments (clear)

  1. Or Not by Aranykai · · Score: 5, Insightful

    China is poised to become the worlds largest non-native English speaking population in the world. They are learning English at a much faster rate than any Americans can learn Chinese.

    --
    If sharing a song makes you a pirate, what do I have to share to be a ninja?
    1. Re:Or Not by Swampash · · Score: 5, Funny

      They are learning English at a much faster rate than any Americans can learn Chinese.

      Hell, they're learning English faster than any American can learn English.

    2. Re:Or Not by Dahamma · · Score: 2

      Reminds me of a Dutch exchange student in middle school. The usual moron was making fun of his accent until a couple of us pointed out that said exchange student was getting an A in English while he was getting a C, even though English was his second language (of about 4).

      American students really need to start learning a language much earlier than high school. Even the "gifted" kids who get to start in ~7th grade would be better served by starting a few years earlier...

    3. Re:Or Not by Nemo's+Night+Sky · · Score: 2

      China is poised to become the worlds largest non-native English speaking population in the world. They are learning English at a much faster rate than any Americans can learn Chinese.

      This is true, however, they are learning English faster than they can learn Chinese. This is because almost anybody can learn English faster than Chinese. This is the reason why children begin communicating at an earlier age in the west than their equivalent Chinese counterparts.

    4. Re:Or Not by ShakaUVM · · Score: 2

      >>Probably because they have schools that actually teach the subject well.

      No. They don't.

      I've actually sat in on English classes in China, a few years back, and they're pretty horrible. Here's a sample class:
      1) Copy down sentences on the blackboard 10 times each
      2) Show them to your teacher
      3) Ok, you can go.

      The real kicker is that the sentences on the blackboard were all horrible, mangled, English (the result of graduates of the system), such as "The person go went up store bought coke." Not just "kinda" wrong, but brutally wrong.

      The only way to learn a foreign language is from people actually fluent in the language, and demand vastly exceeds supply in this case in China. Hell, the guy at the school tried to offer me a job there to teach his students, and would even throw in free Chinese lessons for me in the bargain. I'd have been tempted if I was a single guy with no commitments back home. White guys are treated like rock stars in China, and it would certainly be easier to learn Mandarin with classes in China than from my local community college.

    5. Re:Or Not by Njovich · · Score: 2

      American kids can take classes like art, drama, debating, literature etc. and play in the school band. Do you think kids who are forced to study three foreign languages have time for this?

      Living in Holland, I can absolutely confirm that students here do have time for that yes. The way you learn languages here is devoid of rote memorization and not the time sink you seem to think it is.

    6. Re:Or Not by ks9208661 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Three of those 4 languages are of very little use unless you don't mind being confined to western Europe.

      French is useful outside of Western Europe too.

      While Dutch kids spend those 12+ hours a week learning geographically confined languages like Dutch, French and German, native English speaking kids have 12+ extra hours a week to learn more useful things, and still be able to communicate more effectively and with more people than someone who is fluent in Dutch and speaks some French, German and English. American kids can take classes like art, drama, debating, literature etc. and play in the school band. Do you think kids who are forced to study three foreign languages have time for this?

      In the last PISA ranking, Dutch kids outscored American kids in all categories, despite being disadvantaged with 12+ hours a week of "learning less useful things" (i.e. languages). To be fair, PISA checked only reading, maths, and science, which, like language learning, are typical "left brain" subjects.

      Worse still, try to find an adult who still knows those foreign languages (other than the same basic English half the world speaks) a few years after their graduation.

      I work with Dutch adults who are equally fluent in English, German|French, and Dutch. They're in their 40s and 50s, and have graduated from school for more than a few years. I didn't even have to try to find them.

    7. Re:Or Not by TheTyrannyOfForcedRe · · Score: 2

      White guys are treated like rock stars in China,

      Not exactly, but they get all the pussy they can handle and then some. Age doesn't seem to matter much either. 45 and wanting a 20 year old? No problem!

      Forgot to mention that this only applies if you're a professional, have a job and money.

      --
      "Liechtenstein is the world's largest producer of sausage casings, potassium storage units, and false teeth."
  2. And I'm learning Chinese, said Werner Von Braun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    That Was The Week That Was

    1. Re:And I'm learning Chinese, said Werner Von Braun by woboyle · · Score: 2

      Actually, that was Tom Lehrer's "That Was The Year That Was" album! A favorite of mine since it came out in 1965. I think some of the other topical songs included the classics "So Long Mom (I'm Off to Drop the Bomb)", "Pollution", and "The Vatican Rag".

      --
      Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real-time.
  3. Largest economy? by the+linux+geek · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What remote evidence is there that the PRC will ever be the world's largest economy? They're displaying symptoms characteristic with a bubble, and their GDP is only roughly half of that of the US. Or is massive growth going to continue forever, just like it was going to for Japan and South Korea?

    1. Re:Largest economy? by Mashiki · · Score: 5, Informative

      None. 10-15 years and China will be experiencing what Europe and the US are. Slowing economy, high local debt and foreign debt. China is the hot shit right now, but most if it's GDP is coming from local manufacturing where the party is throwing money hand over fist for them to spend on things like...ghost cities, and all that.

      And there's no real shortage of news stories about the number of cities with no one to next to no one in them. Here's a good one by SBS. The real problem is china is still operating on a 3 tier structure for economics, and the poor bastards at the bottom are still at the very bottom eeking out life as dirt farmers.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Largest economy? by Maniacal · · Score: 2

      Exactly. Everything I'm reading says they are dangerously close to bursting. I'm not an economics guy so I have to rely on the "experts" but it doesn't sound good. Plus, their GDP is artificially inflated with these building projects they're doing. Google "Chinese ghost cities" and take a look. Strange stuff going on over there.

      --
      MG
    3. Re:Largest economy? by Dynedain · · Score: 2

      Japan and South Korea have populations substantially smaller than the US.

      China on the other hand, has a population roughly 1.5 times the US. The US has 9 cities larger than 1 million people, China has 160.

      China's population is waking up and rapidly transitioning from the mostly rural poor to modern "western" lifestyles. Even as China starts dropping in competitiveness on the world market, their domestic market is rapidly grown and still has a lot of room to spare.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    4. Re:Largest economy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wikipedia says Chinese population is about 1,35 billion and USA has 311 million.

    5. Re:Largest economy? by Relic+of+the+Future · · Score: 2
      "China on the other hand, has a population roughly 1.5 times the US."

      Not even close. Try "more than 4 times".

      --
      Those who fail to understand communication protocols, are doomed to repeat them over port 80.
    6. Re:Largest economy? by hawguy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Exactly. Everything I'm reading says they are dangerously close to bursting. I'm not an economics guy so I have to rely on the "experts" but it doesn't sound good. Plus, their GDP is artificially inflated with these building projects they're doing. Google "Chinese ghost cities" and take a look. Strange stuff going on over there.

      Here's a few articles predicting trouble in the Chinese economy:

      http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/175179/20110706/china-economic-bubble-housing-bubble-job-growth-asia-bubble-china-interest-rates-recession-inflation.htm
      http://www.businessinsider.com/china-economy-hard-landing-bumpy-landing-soft-landing-and-what-landing-2011-7
      http://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Opinion/2010/0316/China-the-coming-costs-of-a-superbubble

      But we shouldn't be too happy to see their economy stumble -- a major failing in China will have serious economic impacts throughout the world.

    7. Re:Largest economy? by PhreakOfTime · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not that you don't bring up some good points but consider this slightly re-worded sentence you wrote;

      Everything I'm reading in English says they are dangerously close to bursting

      Some of their other infrastructure is coming in the form of high speed rail, with many parts of it functioning already. Rail links to the rest of Europe are already planned and being built. While there may be ghost cities right now, the 'plan' is to have the infrastructure in place for the hordes coming in from the rural areas, to avoid such nasty things like 'tin shack villages' and overcrowding becoming commonplace, like many other countries have experienced when population growth far exceeded the ability of local infrastructure to be built.

      I think it is hard for many westerners to really understand what is going on in many parts of China. The growth that was once limited to coastal cities, is spreading into more central locations of the country, to take advantage of the population distribution. Human rights, and pollution controls aside(and those really are BIG things to us, and rightfully so), they are absolutely doing almost a perfect job of bringing their country into a more-than-modern era.

      As far as them 'busting'. The likelihood of that happening is much smaller than it was here, or in any of the problem EU countries like greece, portugal, iceland, and italy. Why? They actually have rather sane lending policies when it comes to housing. I have been hearing the line that there is a bubble in China for just about a decade now, mainly from westerners who think that their lending practices closely match ours(they don't), and just by looking at the growth similarities, a parallel is able to be drawn to our meteoric rise, and subsequent fall(it isn't) in real estate.

      It has been about 5 years since I looked when I last heard this same 'rumor' of a bubble going around since I really looked at the financial requirements and legal framework, and I do imagine some of that has changed(possibly the restriction on second homes was lifted in that time, Im not sure), but there are a LOT of reasons why what appears to be a bubble in China, is only a buibble when looked at through the experience of western eyes. I won't say something stupid like 'it's different this time', but there are serious structural and behavioral differences that make a comparison between our two economies incredibly hard to do without spending a large portion of your waking hours immersing yourself in the differences between the frameworks of the two systems.

      End result, learn Chinese. Worst case, you expand your knowledge. Best case, you(more likely your children) don't become a slave.

    8. Re:Largest economy? by the+linux+geek · · Score: 2

      The US is the largest manufacturer in the world.

    9. Re:Largest economy? by PhreakOfTime · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In a way, the US is. China has the ability to artificially peg is currency in a way that is more beneficial to them, than it is to the people lending them money. No other major world economy enjoys this benefit, and they are taking full advantage of it.

      As to the problem of empty buildings, many of the empty buildings are nothing more than concrete shells waiting to have the final build out done. The manpower needed to clean any needed upkeep greatly dwarfs the manpower needed to build it. It is far better to have the infrastructure already in place and clean it, than not to have it in place and then have to deal with things like ghettos, and unbalanced infrastructure needs. Once you fall behind in that respect, the cost to bring an area 'back' to where you want it to be is many orders of magnitude greater than the initial outlay.

      Want to see some large vacant areas right here in the US? Visit the large 'Manhattan West' development in Las Vegas. It is almost completely empty. That is just one of many developments. Who pays for it? Well, the bank writes it off against their loan-loss reserves, and then gets to spread that loss out to offset any profits over the next x number of years.

      banking is a little strange when you fully bury your nose in it, and many, MANY things are almost counter-intuitive if its not your usual line of work. Even when it was involved in my normal line of work, there were still some areas that defied my understanding..Either way, Im not anywhere near that field anymore, and couldn't be happier about that.

      As I said, I am not an expert nor am I silly enough to say this will al just somehow work out great for China. But if I had to put money on them, I would be leaning more to it working out for them as a whole. Mainly because they will do whatever is needed to accomplish that. And that involves some rather ugly things that would never be allowed to happen in a western-style democracy without heads literally rolling. Our banking system shenanigans would have ended with state sponsored beheadings in public, and China is also able to very specifically adjust its currency peg in a way that will soften the blow to them more than any other economy would be able to. This has some downsides, and I think one of the major risks is that they get too accustomed to this setup, and push it right to the edge-conditions, leaving them just as vulnerable as their western counterparts. However, they are not near that point... yet.

    10. Re:Largest economy? by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm assuming it's as described in 1984:

      Inner party
      Outer party
      Proles

      You have the inner party—the upper crust, the rich, the members of the party in power. Then you have the people who work for them—the factory workers, and so on. Finally, you have the people outside the cities.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    11. Re:Largest economy? by artor3 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      End result, learn Chinese. Worst case, you expand your knowledge. Best case, you(more likely your children) don't become a slave.

      More accurately: Worst case, you waste countless hours of your all-too-short life learning a skill you never use. Best case, you can communicate with people that you'd be able to communicate with anyway -- every single Chinese student who wants a college degree has to become fluent in English to pass the CET (College English Test) and high scores are necessary for many top jobs.

      English has become the world's language. There's no reason to learn another language, except as a hobby. A better use of your time is to learn to understand thick accents. There are classes you can take on that, and they will likely be far more useful. Also useful would be studying Eastern cultures, as cultural context is very important in communication.

      And as an aside, it's extremely hyperbolic to suggest that people who don't speak Chinese will become slaves. That's like saying Frenchmen who didn't learn English are slaves.

    12. Re:Largest economy? by Dynedain · · Score: 2

      Sorry, meant to say roughly 5 times, with the US at around 300 million and China at about 1.5 billion.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    13. Re:Largest economy? by artor3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It ties back to the same fallacy that people always seem to fall for. The first half of an S curve looks a lot like an exponential curve, so we just assume it is one. Computers get faster? The singularity draws near! The Dow Jones Industrial going up? It'll be at 36,000 in no time! Travel gets faster? Where's my warp drive?! I grew from 1 foot to 6 feet in my first 16 years? I'll be two miles high by the time I die!

      Whenever anything is advancing rapidly, we assume it will be that way forever, when in reality it inevitably slows down.

    14. Re:Largest economy? by PhreakOfTime · · Score: 2
      > Through where? Russia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India? And that's just the first layer of countries on the Chinese side of a China-to-Europe rail.

      Three networks are planned, with the Britain to China route to be extended to Singapore, and built within a decade.

      Passengers on a second route would travel to the north of China and through Russia and on to Germany, where the network would join the European railway system.

      A third network would extend south through Vietnam, Thailand, Burma and Malaysia

      You can read about it http://www.smh.com.au/travel/travel-news/china-to-build-highspeed-rail-link-to-europe-20100309-pvuf.html there, among any other place that has a financial interest in keeping a close eye on these things

      Watch the videos others are posting about the ghost cities.

      Slashdot is not usually the place I gather my financial information from, especially when 90% of them are links to the same series of videos from one source, who just happens to be selling its own financial advice.

      Frankly, if your only evidence is youtube links from other people whos only exposure to this economy is from stories they have read fed out through 'other' investment houses with their own book to sell, your opinion is less than worthless. I never said there weren't ghost cities, I never said they were only on the interior of the country, and I never said they had sane lending policies. I said they have RELATIVELY saner lending practices. There is a reason I use the words I do, and it is because I am trying to point out the difference between the two economies. To give you a car analogy, it is the difference between someone saying that "cars are relatively the same when comparing a Ferrarri to a Kia, and you returning with the counter that it is stupid to claim that a ferrarri is the same as a Kia, when that was explicitly not what was said.

      To be blunt, I don't think you have the background to understand what the differences are between China and the US, mainly because your sourcing things like youtube videos and not an analysis of your spreadsheets comparing negative interest rates, and internal lending requirements. If you are seriously interested, you need to understand why the western media has been running stories about 'the bubble' in China for the better part of this century. The point is to try to influence decision makers by introducing a sense of uncertainty and risk, by trying to compare apples to oranges, to influence the decision making process of those who make the important decisions within companies.

      Here's a link from 2006 saying the same thing;
      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/2943687/China-grows-by-11pc-as-fears-of-bubble-deepen.html

      The previous year, 2005;
      http://www.globegazette.com/news/opinion/article_1e59656c-273e-5889-abf9-62e64c19b88b.html

      How about 2003;
      http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=LXc0AAAAIBAJ&sjid=rI4EAAAAIBAJ&pg=6557,627471&dq=china+bubble&hl=en

      I have been involved with some financial entities, and this was part of my research for many years, going back further than a decade. It is quite clear to me that there is a bias, and honestly this is to be understood easily when you understand the way that money flows. Money doesn't give a shit what youtube videos you post, all it cares about is where it is easiest to move to, and more importantly to move OUT. Like I said, I have been hearing this story for a decade, and when you can pull your nationalistic ego out of the equation, you will find it easy to understand

    15. Re:Largest economy? by Swampash · · Score: 2

      The US is the largest manufacturer in the world.

      Failure in translation. What was actually said was "American manufacturers are the fattest in the world".

    16. Re:Largest economy? by PhreakOfTime · · Score: 2

      That is an incredibly shallow point of view.

      In 10 years, your business deals with a major Chinese manufacturer. You and your competitor are up bidding on the same major project. You didn't bother to learn Chinese because you thought it was worthless, but your competitor did because he understands not only the language, but the culture.

      Your competitor is able to talk to the internal departments in their native tongue, and you are not. If you have been in the three-letter business world longer than a few minutes, you know that form and tact are VERY important aspects of your success in a global market.

      You don't get the contract, but you don't care because you are accustomed to the life you have grown up living, and would rather stick with what you know to your grave, then change with the world around you. Not everyone is going to succeed, and the old phrase in the last century was 'the world still needs ditch-diggers', to which the new equivalent will be, well the world still needs mono-lingustic people.

    17. Re:Largest economy? by korean.ian · · Score: 2

      Some of their other infrastructure is coming in the form of high speed rail

      Oh, that classic Government Big Dick project? High speed rail doesn't pay off. There's like one high speed rail line in the world that makes more than it cost, in the densest part of Japan. That's an example of terrible government mismanagement and GDP inflation, not forward thinking.

      /quote>

      That's not true. Korea's high speed rail has been profitable since 2007.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korea_Train_Express#Ridership_evolution

    18. Re:Largest economy? by epine · · Score: 3, Interesting

      China needs to achieve 25% of the American per capita income rates to become the world's largest economy as measured in raw dollars.

      The main evidence that they won't achieve this relatively soon is the amount of equity they presently hold in the American economy. At the rate things are going, they'll soon wish they had invested elsewhere.

      Once China reaches GDP parity with America, it will be a symbolic victory only. China will still be an economy with an agricultural sector resembling America 100 years ago. Their social institutions will take generations to evolve and improve. People underestimate the amount of social equity in an advanced economy.

      The more interesting benchmark is when China achieves resource consumption parity with America for Joe Random strategic resource. That will maybe happen a decade after China reaches GDP parity.

      This will create a bit of a seller's market for primary resources (short of America toppling a Chinese regime). Our foothold in Afghanistan might even pay future dividends.

      As for learning Chinese, I worked with Chinese/Japanese/Korean languages from 1985 until the early 1990s back when these languages were poorly supported. I took several Chinese courses at university, and listened to a lot of Japanese instructional tapes.

      Except for a very small percentage of gifted people, learning a second language *for the first time* as an adult is a hellacious amount of work. I had no trouble with Chinese grammar, because my mind already processes grammar at a higher level of abstraction.

      For instance, most people think of singular and plural. Idiots. It's really singular and non-singular.

      negative one books
      zero books
      one book
      one point five books
      two books

      Fowler made a distinction between "fewer" for counting nouns, and "less" for mass nouns (continuous quantities). This distinction was ruined by the express check-out line. He also distinguished "between" for a party of two, and "among" for a party N>2.

      Most people think of possessive pronouns as a branch of property law. Idiots. "Possessive" is actually used in language to indicated a preferred relationship according to largest eigenvalue in whichever mode of PCA analysis is established within the discourse, e.g. the car I borrowed is "my car" if the person I'm talking to is distressingly car-less, and couldn't give a rat's ass how the car I arrive in was originally procured.

      Grammar devolves into metaphor surprisingly often.

      Even starting from this proficiency with the abstractions of the verbal mind, in the end I could hardly justify the net-present-value of becoming proficient with Chinese to any serviceable level, without actually living in China.

      The the time China passes America on more than a handful of critical economic metrics, software translation will be plenty adequate for 95% of people doing business with China.

      I should add here that learning the Chinese writing system is no small project. Reading is enough of a challenge, writing is pure masochism. The Chinese speech system is surprisingly regular with only four or five challenging consonants (c,x,q,zh in pinyin). You just need to completely rewire your tone perception from the music part of your brain to the linguistic part of your brain. I'm not joking. Sounds the brain perceives as linguistic are suppressed from other forms of scrutiny. TED had a recent video about early language learning. It's very early in the language process that the brain codes which sounds are language and which ones aren't (the other active brain skills are sucking, drooling, and eye contact).

      One thing I will say is that if people had more appreciation for the social equity of an advanced technological society, maybe people wouldn't be so actively trying to tear America apart from within. Some of the anti-government voices out there have no clue about the difference between the baby and the bath water. Time after time I listen to economists talk about the world econom

    19. Re:Largest economy? by rsclient · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The British felt the same way about the American and German "bubbles" in manufacturing and steel, too. But they just knew that eventually the two small upstart countries would slow down, resulting in Britain continuing to have a comfortable lead over all other industrialized countries.

      Sometimes the view in the rear view mirror is true.

      --
      Want a sig like mine? Join ACM's SigSig today!
    20. Re:Largest economy? by artor3 · · Score: 2

      English had the dumb luck to be on top when globalization kicked in. It's entrenched to the point that it will be damn near impossible to replace barring some major, unprecedented upheaval in the world order. And no, the Chinese becoming a leading economy is not a major upheaval.

      Let's say that tomorrow, the entirety of the United States blinked out of existence. A year later, a Chinese businessman meets with an Indian. What language do you think they'll speak? English. Because they've both learned it, because it's a standard. Even if America was dead and gone, people would learn English because English is spoken everywhere, which makes it the most useful language to learn, which makes it spoken everywhere.

      Also, the notion that you need to learn Spanish to reach certain markets is silly. You need to hire Spanish speakers, but you, personally, don't need to know Spanish. If that were true, the CEO of McDonald's would need to be the world's greatest polyglot.

  4. Here's why by wsxyz · · Score: 5

    It's important to learn Chinese so that when you are doing business with Chinese people in English, you can understand what they are saying about you behind your back, cause that's what people do when they speak foreign languages.

    1. Re:Here's why by rastilin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Funny, but often true. It's useful knowing enough to know what your translators are actually telling them you said.

      --
      How do you kill that which has no life?
    2. Re:Here's why by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

      Why would you let them know you know Chinese?

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    3. Re:Here's why by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      [...to know what names they are calling you] That's fine, but if they are aware you speak Mandarin they'll just use their regional language or dialect and once again become unintelligible.

      Like that Louisiana fellow who said I had the "hoppin's of a blue-tailed swamp vermit". I think it was an insult, but who knows.

  5. 1980s all over again by Bloodwine77 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I remember the 1980s when everybody said that you'll need to learn Japanese. In popular culture the Japanese were shown as our future overlords.

    1. Re:1980s all over again by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2

      I remember the 1980s when everybody said that you'll need to learn Japanese. In popular culture the Japanese were shown as our future overlords.

      When in reality, it's only the cafe maids singing "Moe" songs who control us. And don't mind. :)

      Whilst on the topic of things Japanese, I just watched 'Yukikaze" - a very nicely done anime!

    2. Re:1980s all over again by Tumbleweed · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ha, too late!

  6. Joss Whedon (Firefly) disagrees with you by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firefly_(TV_series)

    Firefly takes place in a multi-cultural future, primarily a fusion of Occidental and Chinese cultures, where there is a significant division between the rich and poor. As a result of the Sino-American Alliance, Mandarin Chinese is a common second language; it is used in advertisements, and characters in the show frequently use Chinese words and curses. According to the DVD commentary on the episode "Serenity", this was explained as being the result of China and the United States being the two superpowers that expanded into space.

    Life imitates art, or as is often the case, sci-fi is "Future History".

    1. Re:Joss Whedon (Firefly) disagrees with you by gstoltz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Apropos Scifi. Philip K. Dick`s novels are turned into movies. John Brunners books are turned into reality. (Its a misquote, but heck, it works.) Other than that, i`d say that nothing is closer to truth about the world than old Frederick Pohl/Cyril Kornbluth novels. But i try to be strange. My working strategy is to view scifi as contemporary, not futuristic. Whatever was conceptualizable when the writers wrote it was also happening then, maybe they didn`t notice, yet they did.

    2. Re:Joss Whedon (Firefly) disagrees with you by gstoltz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dreams are synthesis, synthesis is reality, reality is a continual experience of misapprehention on the part of the human species. Outright lies are despicable when propagated against better knowledge. Unfortunately the necessity of belonging usually trumps the quest for truth. And whilst closer approximations to descriptive truth might win in the long term (wishful thinking) knowledge and expression will remain sorely incomplete. Therefore i`ll take my dish of dreams, fantasies and delusions. Whilst sprinkling them with as much consentual truth about the universe as our current expressions are capable of embodying.

    3. Re:Joss Whedon (Firefly) disagrees with you by chill · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ask put in the second panel of this XKCD cartoon...

      For a universe that's supposed to be half-Chinese, Firefly sure doesn't have any Asians.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    4. Re:Joss Whedon (Firefly) disagrees with you by TheTyrannyOfForcedRe · · Score: 2

      For a universe that's supposed to be half-Chinese, Firefly sure doesn't have any Asians.

      So who were the people grilling dog meat under the "hot dogs" sign in the marketplace descended from when Shepherd Book was walking around trying to figure out which ship to take?

      (No, it;s not a myth. Asians eat dog meat. I know two women (chinese parents) who were tricked by their parents into eating it when they went back for a visit.)

      One time a Chinese coworker was sharing favorite recipes. She started into one, stopped, looked disturbed, and said "Sorry! I forgot you Americans don't eat dog!"

      Then there was the time a bbq rib cart was parked outside the office. Being a huge bbq fan I bought a rack for lunch. It was given to me on a big open plate/dish thing without a lid. I left a trail of shocked, gasping, traumatized Indians marking my path from the front door to my desk! One guy covered his mouth and literally ran off.

      --
      "Liechtenstein is the world's largest producer of sausage casings, potassium storage units, and false teeth."
  7. Re:Amen by pudge · · Score: 2

    Absolutely false. The benefit of me learning Chinese, compared to the benefit of using that time to read about math, science, history, and so on ... it's a no-brainer. There's no good reason for me to spend my time learning Chinese, as opposed to doing something else, unless it's something I simply WANT to do.

    I mean honestly ... this guy is smart, and he says it's going to take him more than two years of ALL his free time, and a total of about 5 years, to become fluent. If he wants to do that, great! But for every "maker" (what a stupid term!) to do that, my goodness ... just think of all the things that could be created in those thousands upon thousands of hours.

    It's nonsensical on its face.

    Surely, some people would benefit from it ... but I suspect it would only be those who would already be inclined to want to.

  8. Re:I hope they do what America was too afraid to d by Sicily1918 · · Score: 2

    You're kidding, right? Look up Uighurs if you want one example...

  9. Re:Learn Mandarin and buy Bitcoins by Roachie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yea, I remember this kind talk about the Japanese back in the 1980s( yea I'm old, get off my lawn ). Ooooh, better learn Japanese if you want to succeed in business, Ooooh, they are going to take over the world with their mysterious asian cunning, that us round-eyes will never be able to match.

    Glad I could put it into perspective for you. My work is done here.

    --
    This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
  10. Complete nonsense by sjbe · · Score: 5, Informative

    "MAKE Magazine is making that case that any 'maker' who builds, buys or creates electronics should learn (Mandarin) Chinese.

    MAKE has no idea what they are talking about. I DO manufacture electronics (electronic data harnesses primarily) for a living and fairly little of the parts we make come from China and most of what we buy is commodity parts. (wire, terminals, connectors, etc) Lots of it comes from Japan and much of it is made here in the US. Sure there are some parts from China but it isn't as much as one might think. The manufacture of many of these products is highly automated and China has no cost significant cost advantage.

    Furthermore, virtually all sales of commodity electronic components are done through distributors. You simply are NOT going to buy direct from China unless you are a purchaser for a manufacturing company. Distributors have customer service representatives, most of whom do not speak a word of any Chinese dialect. And even if for some reason you did need to contact someone in China directly, there are a HUGE number of English speakers there. I've been to Shanghai, Hong Kong, Chengdu and other places in China. It is NOT hard to find someone who speaks rather good English.

    source of just about everything we buy in the USA.

    The US has a $3.7 TRILLION manufacturing sector and most of that stuff we make is also sold here in the US. In 2010 the US imported $364 BILLION in goods from China or roughly 10% of what the US makes itself. A big number to be sure, but nowhere close to "just about everything".

    1. Re:Complete nonsense by Biotech9 · · Score: 2

      Is it worth it to save on that?

      I find, as you do, that generally the cost of things made in EU/US are double that of things made in Asia, but I still try and buy Western. It's not a matter of nationalism, or perceived quality, but a conscious decision to ensure things I own are made by people that have the assured quality of life that I would like for myself.

      Yes the cost is double, but then I just buy less. And despite the occasional article (like this one) haranguing the options for buying Western, I have yet to be anything but spoiled for choice when trying to avoid exploitative manufacturing practises. Saving money without considering the moral issue is lazy.

      (Although I would add that I personally find the rise of China to be a wonderful event, dragging millions of people out of poverty, I don't consider my avoidance of their goods to be something that will impede that rise).

  11. Charles V by puppyfox · · Score: 5, Funny

    I speak Spanish to God, Italian to women, French to men, German to my horse, and Mandarin to my electronics.

    --
    The cookie told me to.
  12. Re:Learn Mandarin and buy Bitcoins by Moryath · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Okami: pressed in Taiwanese DVD-fab factory.
    Wii: full of Foxconn components (China slave labor), likely Korean laser diode in the DVD drive.
    Sony TV: Taiwanese or Korean LCD, could be either.
    Toyota minivan: mostly made in the US (probably Knoxville TN).

    What was your point again?

    Taiwan's what we really should wonder about. China's very good at stealing tech from other countries, but crap-all at doing anything else except for destroying the environment and committing acts of barbarism against farmers and monks.

  13. Re:Learn Mandarin and buy Bitcoins by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yea, I remember this kind talk about the Japanese back in the 1980s

    There really isn't a substitute for having lived through something to provide some perspective.

    There are a lot of ways the Chinese Miracle could go bad. I'm old enough to remember when Russia was the main competitor and how they were going to take over the world with their superior genetics and technological blah blah. Hell, there was even a Rocky movie about it. But then Rocky went to Moscow to fight the genetically superior Dolf Lundgren and told the Muscovites, "If I can change, then you can change and we can all change and make some change and hope and change and then we could all walk hand in hand into the bright future on the Moon" (I'm paraphrasing).

    I'm sure there was a time not long ago when the people of England and France were saying "Those Americans...we've got to keep an eye on them or they'll end up being almost as powerful as our Roman Legion and Spanish Armada and then we'll have to deal with them". But of course, the British and French had gay sex and created Canada, and that did something, I'm not sure what, but they sure like their hockey up there. Hell, they fucking riot when they're behind in the second period".

    Anyway, my point is, um, that learning Mandarin because you think it's going to give you some deep advantage in the coming epoch is as dumb as calling yourself a "maker" because your hobby is building steampunk costumes for your chihuahua. If you have to make up a gay name like "maker" then you should visit a tool and die shop in Berwyn, Illinois and talk to someone who actually knows how to make something without giving himself some fruity name just because Cory Doctorow says so. Please. Don't get me started on Cory Doctorow....

    Now please excuse me, I have to go freshen up this drink. Did you know vodka/pineapple is a nice summer pick-me-up? You put in a shot of grenadine and slice of mango. Get a party hat. Hell, two of these and you'll feel like you're wearing a party hat even without the party hat. See? I'm a maker too!

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  14. Re:How much do you EAT? by c6gunner · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why would you need an electric can opener?

    To open electric cans. Duh.

  15. Ya I get real tired of that one by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Informative

    The "Oh the US doesn't make anything!" You see it on Slashdot all the time and it is so amazingly wrong. In fact, prior to the downturn the US manufactured more than it has ever made in the past, and prior to the end of 2010, it made more than China. It is now a close second, manufacturing more than everyone but China.

    I think part of the problem is just people wanting to believe America is doomed and/or crap for some reason but the other part is people don't understand the very global and distributed nature of things these days. They also function by what they happen to notice, which in terms of "made in" stickers is a lot of Chinese things.

    Ok well that doesn't mean anything but that final assembly was done there. The "made in" or "assembled in" mark has to be put on something where it was put together. That has nothing to do with where any of the parts or major part of the work was done.

    As an example: Buy an Intel processor in the US and it'll generally be stamped from Costa Rica, but sometimes Malaysia. Well if you do some research, you discover they have no fabs in those countries. Most of their fabs are in the US (7 of them) 1 in Ireland, 1 is Israel and one still being finished in China. All the high tech ones, the 32nm ones, are in the US so that's where the new CPUs are being made. Why then the labeling? Because it was developed there? No, you find their R&D centers are in the US and Israel. So what then?

    Well the chips are tested and assembled there (also other locations, including one new on in the US). The wafers are shipped off, and the chips are cut off, tested, and packaged, then sent back. However, since that's the final place they are put together, that's what you see stamped on the chip.

    When you do some digging, you find that indeed the US does make plenty of stuff, not all of it finished products though. When the US does make finished products, you discover that their are parts from all over in them. It isn't a situation where many things are built, start to finish, in one country much less one location. Companies all over the world make things, and they buy and sell form each other.

    The US has a big share of that, as I said, second only to China currently.

  16. Re:There are fewer than 50 by David+Jao · · Score: 3
    No, it's not a fact. The "fewer than 50" claim is outrageously false. Wikipedia alone lists dozens of western speakers.

    I personally know three westerners, neither born nor raised in China, who are completely fluent in Chinese (could pass a spoken or written Turing test), and another five who are fluent except for a foreign accent. It's absurd to claim "fewer than 50" when I personally can think of eight firsthand without even trying.

    Having visited foreign consulates in China, a quick estimate indicates that there are likely at least 500 westerners with total fluency in Chinese in the embassies and consulates alone.

  17. Re:There are fewer than 50 by sydneyfong · · Score: 2

    The GP is a nice troll, but he does have his points.

    Chinese is my native and "first language" (though I'd argue English is my preferred language for reading and writing), but I still think that learning Chinese is really fscking difficult, for a lot of reasons that includes his list and more.

    The 50 number is simply wrong, but the others things (even if somewhat rude and racy) aren't that far off from the truth.

    I guess most people that you know who are "fluent" in Chinese (without any cultural or ethnic ties) may be fluent in speaking and listening only. Learning the characters (for reading and writing) takes a painstaking few years, and actually a lot of ethnic Chinese raised in a non-Chinese using place don't even bother to learn it, but they can "fluently" speak the language.

    Japanese is quite a different language (as far as I can tell, I don't speak it), and you can often get by without learning a lot of Kanji. The number of Chinese characters you need to learn is probably at least a few times more than Japanese Kanji before you can use the language meaningfully.

    --
    Don't quote me on this.
  18. Re:There are fewer than 50 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    I personally know more than a dozen blueblooded Americans (born and raised) who speak and write fluent Mandarin. I have intermediate proficiency in the language. Some facts are wrong here. For one thing, knowing about 1,500 characters is enough for basic reading comprehension. Once you get to about 3,000, you can read doctoral theses and literally anything that's published today. The only thing that would require more than 3,000 characters would be reading obscure historical texts from times when characters had not yet evolved to their current state. The pinyin romanization system allows one to read chinese decently well without knowing any characters at all. And Chinese has some things about it that are very easy. A lack of complicated declensions and conjugations, for example. No difficult plurals, no articles, few prepositions, and a general simplicity of expression.

  19. Re:Learn Mandarin and buy Bitcoins by Roachie · · Score: 2

    ScrewMaster said it better than I could. Our dominance of world culture and innovation are carrying over, even during our supposed decline... at least for now. You can spot the winner by whose culture is spreading, China is starting to look like us rather than the opposite.

    Actually, those of us who live in Mexiforniazona would be better served by learning Spanish, at least we will able to speak the native tongue of our future country/contested zone. At present there are more Spanish speaking invaders in my hood than Chinese, despite the fact that I live 5 miles from a major university heavily enrolled with Asians.

    I too suspect that the Chinese are not interested in empire although the whole 'blue water navy' thing makes me suspect. I submit that its probably just a 'me too' thing.

    --
    This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
  20. Re:There are fewer than 50 by Colin+Douglas+Howell · · Score: 2

    The GP is a nice troll, but he does have his points.

    That's because he copied his points from this paper without giving credit. The paper makes much better reading than his post.

  21. Re:Learn Mandarin and buy Bitcoins by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 2

    There are strong opinions that the transition from a manufacturing economy to a service economy is the natural progression, just as agrarian to manufacturing is... I don't know yet how well this theory holds with reality, but all sufficiently advanced economies (well, ones that lasted this long...) do move their manufacturing towards the developing world to keep prices low and resources in play.

    I have been following the "Manufacturing job mantra" from the White House for the last year or so, but I'm on the fence about the whole idea. Things that are made here are done so not because cost doesn't matter, but the advantage of a more skilled workforce (or things like certain defense items which have to be made here in some aspects due to National Security)... However, it is clear that the economy benefits from cheap labor, and as a country expands its wealth and influence, the possibility of having cheap labor dries up domestically. It's the natural outgrowth of more spending power and more influence the working class can have on our form of government and our economy. Through maturity of the laws and power of labor, things shift away from the 12hr days for scrip... (which I don't think anyone argues is a bad thing to have happened...)

    The fun part is when China matures past its "industrial stage" and has to farm out its manufacturing to keep competitive. (I don't know if the oppressive regime there will be able to contain the growth and wealth enjoyed by the prosperity of China's economy forever.) They might try, of course... because unlike the Liberty of the West, China does a good job of keeping their people just enough under the heel of the government's boot to prevent too rapid a rise into a service economy like Europe and the US.

    *shrug* It's probably an interesting subject to dive into, if you can get past the boring theories. :)

    --
    It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.