Slashdot Mirror


Google+ Already At 10 Million Users

An anonymous reader writes "I project that Google will easily pass 10 million users tomorrow and could reach 20 million user by this coming weekend if they keep the Invite Button available. As one G+ user put it, it is easy to underestimate the power of exponential growth." I bet if people post in the discussion that they need invites, we can scratch each other's backs here. I've been using Google+ for a few days now (Yes I will put you in a circle ;) and have a lot to love, but unless I can gate twitter and Facebook, the best interface in the world won't help me until I can convince my kids' grandparents to move.

36 of 1,223 comments (clear)

  1. Sure, send me an invite! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    But I value my privacy.

    1. Re:Sure, send me an invite! by AstroMatt · · Score: 2

      I'd appreciate an invite: matt.wood61(gmail)

  2. Post it in your journal instead of the main thread by tomhudson · · Score: 2
    This way, you get people you more or less already know ...

    Don't use your slashdot journal? Philistine!

    Also, not getting your kid's grandparents to use it at this time can be considered a feature. Let the early adopters work out the kinks first, otherwise when they try to move from failbook they'll just move right back.

  3. Better than facebook by Saib0t · · Score: 5, Informative
    This google+ thing is much better than facebook in my opinion.

    It's like going from hotmail to gmail back when it launched.
    It's sleek, doesn't get in the way, lets you do things easily. You manage your "friends" easily.

    Hell, it's one service I wouldn't have any issue adding my boss and co-workers to, unlike facebook.

    As a bonus, I don't get people posting asinine idiocies on my wall. Sure they can get me to eyeball their crap by mentionning me in their posts, but at least it won't bother everyone else who reads the things I write.

    A negative side, not for me but for others, would be the lack of games, but we'll see...

    --

    One shall speak only if what one has to say is more beautiful than silence
    1. Re:Better than facebook by tepples · · Score: 4, Informative

      Who needs Facebook games when there are VirtualNES.com (Java) and Newgrounds (Flash)?

    2. Re:Better than facebook by tomhudson · · Score: 2
      I believe games are coming, but when they do it, they're going to do it better than "the other guy". The basic service should be completely rolled out by the first week of the fall school semester, to "catch the wave".

      The way facebook is blocking exporting contacts, you know they're scared.

    3. Re:Better than facebook by mekkab · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It doesn't let me post pictures from my iPhone easily (unless there is an app I'm missing? seriously, any and all help appreciated, here!). Microblogging with photos is basically what I use Facebook for. Give me that, g+, and I'll start giving in earnest. /haven't "hungout" yet but I hear that's actually kinda cool...

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    4. Re:Better than facebook by SeeSp0tRun · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Facebook games are a big reason I ditched a long time ago. Facebook's privacy was horrible enough without allowing the apps to circumvent what few privacy settings they had. If g+ never has them, I will be one happy camper.

      --
      Something witty.
    5. Re:Better than facebook by Rhaban · · Score: 5, Informative

      iPhone app is pending approval from Apple since day 1 of G+.

    6. Re:Better than facebook by Alarash · · Score: 2

      Lack of games is not a negative for me either. What really is is the lack of Google Reader integration. I'd like to see what people I'm following share from Reader on my G+ Stream, and I also want to see the RSS feeds either integrated or in its own stream.

    7. Re:Better than facebook by dunezone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Who needs Facebook games when there are VirtualNES.com (Java) and Newgrounds (Flash)?

      My parents.

    8. Re:Better than facebook by AngryDeuce · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A negative side, not for me but for others, would be the lack of games, but we'll see...

      Man, that's one of the biggest things I love about it. I know it's futile to expect Zynga and such to stay away from a revenue stream, but the inane games were one of the reasons I quit facebook a few months ago, I got sick of all the spam and having to block apps and people constantly. People would just go around the filters and post crap on my wall about it, "Can you log in quick and give me some horseshoes?" and all that stupidity.

      I suppose we should just enjoy the relative peace and quiet while it lasts. So far I've had a very positive experience...

    9. Re:Better than facebook by arisvega · · Score: 2

      It's like going from hotmail to gmail back when it launched.

      Google did something very, very clever; sit back and wait (develop in the shadows, actually) while people where getting more and more frustrated with Facebook (like they were with Hotmail), and feeling that they got "stuck with it" because of the lack of alternatives. That part was bound to happen.

      You manage your "friends" easily. [..] I wouldn't have any issue adding my boss and co-workers to, unlike facebook.

      In a sense, Google has learned from the mistakes of others; I still cannot fathom why Facebook did not add such functionalities - so many of its users would had welcomed them. Perhaps their coding skills are poor, or they are more busy trying to hire marketing people instead of coders, to figure out how they can sell your information to third parties more efficiently.

      The cynic in me is eager to yell that "they are the same shit, all of them"; though I have to hand it to Google that they played this one very smooth; Facebook has had a hard time making a sensible file out of you; who are your closest friends? Who are the relatives, coworkers, and who are the "people you just know"? With Google+ interface, it is the user is completing this task for Google

      Per the Hotmail/Gmail analogy, Google has the reputation of being more geeky; you want to use Google because you get a sense that you actually do creative stuff, they develop and give new functionalities out and they keep it alive. And it does keep you a notch over the flock, making you feel special - c'mon, you know it does.

      I am absolutely confident that their interface will be getting better and better for decades to come- they will expand and develop and incorporate new technologies. But now, profiling will reach levels never seen before- the fraction of your online time logged with Google will be enormous - let us see how Google will handle that.

      --
      The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
    10. Re:Better than facebook by tepples · · Score: 2

      it automatically uploads any photos & videos to G+ as soon as you take them

      How many megabytes of the carrier's monthly data allowance does that use?

    11. Re:Better than facebook by nahdude812 · · Score: 2, Informative

      As many as you allow it to, it's an option you have to opt-in to. There are options to control when you want to allow it to upload:
      * Only photos via mobile networks
      * Photos & videos via mobile networks
      * Photos & videos via wi-fi only

      Plus there are other options for whether to allow upload when roaming, and whether to wait for the phone to be charging before doing an upload. There is a status message in Settings which tells you, for example, "Paused: waiting for WiFi".

  4. Grandparents follow the pictures by Manfre · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Easy way to get grandparents to switch is to only post pictures of the grandchildren on Google+. They will switch over.

    Also, WTH does "gate twitter and Facebook" mean?

  5. how about people have home pages, and syndicate... by johnjones · · Score: 3, Interesting

    honestly

    I hate how everything is locked down...

    I wish there was a nice way that people could syndicate between things i.e. an open network with a privacy model

    I simply have not seen a nice way to do this any suggestions ?
    (no Diaspora does not even look useful)

    something with OpenID would actually be useful !

    regards

    John Jones

  6. Re:Oh the Humanity! by nschubach · · Score: 2
    --
    Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  7. Why I am not joining Google+ by molo · · Score: 2

    It seems that the invite-only PicasaWeb albums (where only specific google accounts have access) would no longer be invite-only. That alone is reason enough to not join G+. When signing up for G+, they gave the following notice:

    Linking Google+ with Picasa Web Albums
    When you join Google+:

            * [...]
            * Your albums' visibility settings aren’t changed, but people they’re shared with can now share them with others.
            * [...]

    If they could fix this issue, I would sign up. Otherwise, forget it.

    -molo

    --
    Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
    1. Re:Why I am not joining Google+ by doomy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I left Google+ due to their data deletion policies, Google+ would blanket delete your entire Google existence without warnings if you even innocently did something that they did not like on Google+. Which such a policy, I do not feel comfortable having Google+ linked to the rest of my Google data.

      I am a content creator, and I would not like having things on my various accounts deleted cause of a simple policy violation. I figure they still have to iron out the legal issues to do with this, but till they figure it out, I'm out.

      For example: If you change your name 5 times (or just correct it), Google says it would delete all your information. I kid you not. Saw this dialog and felt Google+ was not for me. As a content creator, I already deal with similar issues on YouTube, at least there you can appeal.

      --
      ...free your source and the rest would follow...
    2. Re:Why I am not joining Google+ by doomy · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry, in this case they have already implemented such a policy. In the case of the name scenario. A warning appears that if you do follow with the change to your name, all information in your account would be deleted and account access would be blocked. Test it out on a throw away account. This harsh warning/implementation would probably be changed at a latter time, but right now I do not feel linking my content to a service that can quickly delete it.

      --
      ...free your source and the rest would follow...
    3. Re:Why I am not joining Google+ by Heddahenrik · · Score: 2
      Eh... Google is always changing how they enforce their policies. A Google robot suddenly locked out two of my sites (after 5 years!) from Google Adsense (because of some pages, but I don't know which except one example and neither exactly why. Before they just stopped showing ads on the actual pages that might have "questionable" content (like artistic nudity or a link to a Hentai site)

      Short story: Google will ass-rape you sooner or later, if they can. And Google+ isn't an alternative to Facebook as the US government has access to both.

  8. Best UI? by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 2

    "the best interface in the world "

    Uggg, I hope you don't do UI design in your job. Google+'s UI is horrid.

    It took me three tries before I figured out how to post my profile picture. One would naturally go to Profile... Photos... but that's actually not the way you do it. Even after figuring it out, it still tells me I have no photos of myself. I now have the same photo three times in three different "books" and still can't figure out how three were created.

    I still have no idea how to post on someone else's wall.

    And when I post on my own, I have to choose circles to share it with. Fine. But once it's posted, it doesn't tell me which ones. So if I think I did something wrong and change the sharing, a second post appears.

    That's the first three of dozens of problems.

    It's terrible.

    1. Re:Best UI? by swv3752 · · Score: 2

      Is it hard to figure out that to edit your profile picture you click "edit profile"?

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    2. Re:Best UI? by BlkPanther · · Score: 2

      Your'e funny and simply indoctrinated by Facebook. Changing your profile pic is easy, if you don't follow the Facebook model. It's under Settings > Profile! Whoa hard, right? I think if you use a computer in general, G+ is not only easier on this front, it's *STANDARD*. Jeezus.

      Second, I'm not sure that you can post on other peoples walls. Is that bad? I'm not sure. It's just the way it is there. You can't advertise your crap agenda within other people's spaces. I kinda like that.

      Third, yes it absolutely does tell you who your posts are shared with. Every damn post, from you and every one else, has an indicator on the top line of the post. All mine usually say limited. Click it, it'll tell you EXACTLY who it's shared with.

      Just cuz you can't do it, and aren't willing to *explore* doesn't make it bad.

      *Whine* I don't like it cuz it doesn't copy Facebook.
      *Whine* I don't like it cuz it's not original.

      Can't have it both ways, just judge it on it's own merits.

      No I'm not a Google apologist. I'm just a Facebook hater.

      --


      I find that most often I end up learning from necessity, rather than for enjoyment.
    3. Re:Best UI? by diegocg · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is no "someone's else wall".

    4. Re:Best UI? by sanchom · · Score: 2

      There is no wall! Why did you think there was? You can just choose who your posts are shared with. If you only want to share with one person, just choose that.

      It does tell you who your post is shared with.

      As for changing your profile picture, one would naturally go to Profile, then "Edit Profile", then the "Change Photo" link right underneath your photo.

      That's the first three solutions to your "problems".

      It's not terrible.

    5. Re:Best UI? by BeardedChimp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your post is the equivalent of people who use linux and complain its not identical to windows. Google+!=facebook

    6. Re:Best UI? by f0rdpr3fect42 · · Score: 2

      To address each of the UI problems you listed here...

      The profile photo problem...really? Click edit profile, click the link that says change photo...seems pretty straightforward to me. It was the first place I looked. This raises an interesting UI issue which is that intuitive for one person is clearly not for another. I agree that there can be absolutely atrocious choices for UI (for example, your complaint about circles. I have yet to find a person who is thinks Google+ handles this the right way) but I'm not sure the profile photo problem you had is the best example.

      This wall complaint, though, is absurd. You're making the mistake of thinking Google+ is Facebook. There is no such thing as a wall. You don't post to someone else's wall in Google+. I know people who find this irritating, but this is NOT a UI flaw. This is a fundamental difference between Facebook and Google+.

      Personally, I haven't had many huge problems with the UI. I enjoy the UI more than Facebook's, at least.

  9. As happy as first on Twitter by Kamiza+Ikioi · · Score: 2

    I did the strict "don't mix business with pleasure" on Facebook too. I'd lightened up and added some, but then I got into arguments on Facebook with managers over topics like the mosque project near the Twin Towers (they were actually pretty racist, which I had previously been unaware of), and had to remove them.

    With Google+, I feel the same way. I can finally have a public profile again! My Facebook had eventually been completely private, locked down, and I really didn't even enjoy HAVING to respond if someone messaged me.

    I'm addicted now. I feel with Google+ like I did when I first joined Twitter. I ran to Twitter to just be myself, and damn the consequences. The only problem there, of course, was eventually locking down that account too.

    With both services, it was never really easy to say I want THIS public, I want THIS private, and I want THIS to be a mix. Google+ is both granular and simple. I have no plans to lock anything down again. Circles is what I've been waiting for this whole time.

    I don't give a damn if Google+ is bigger than Facebook or not. It's my new home, and if people want to stay at Facebook, so be it. I've got another circle for people who ignore my invites who I occasionally will say hi to and have Google email them my update.

    --
    I8-D
  10. Re:how about people have home pages, and syndicate by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative

    I wish there was a nice way that people could syndicate between things i.e. an open network with a privacy model

    It's called a website with RSS and security. You could do it with Drupal right now, or probably with Wordpress or what have you. There's an aggregator module that pulls in content from other sites; there's various permissions control systems.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  11. Re:Oh the Humanity! by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You might want to check out G+ hangout. Think "multi-user video chat done right". You create a hangout and invite either individuals or a circle (you'll get the whole "circles thing" after just a few moments) and others come and go as they please.

    That alone will kill facebook for grandma and grandpa. No typing, no chat, just say hi to the kids and see them say hi to you, talk with their cousins, etc.

    And it will be a killer for kids as well. Video Party Line!

    Even business will latch onto it for teleconferences.

    G+ will pass facebook within 2 years, and possibly within 1.

  12. Re:Invite by Pieroxy · · Score: 2

    Congratulations. You just subscribed to shitloads of spam ;-)

  13. Things Google REALLY needs to fix with G+ by brunes69 · · Score: 2

    Before Google Plus is ready for prime time, Google has a few things they really need to fix with the service

    - Make +1 make sense. Currently pages you or others "+1" do not even appear in the stream. They're on a totally different page. This makes the +1 button useless.

    - Either get rid of Buzz, or integrate it. it's currently nonsensical that Google is running both, yet Buzz updates don't go into your G+ stream.

    - Integration with Google Reader. It sure would be nice if things from my Google Reader showed up in my G+ stream, because then you wouldn't have to leave, and it would facilitate simple sharing. This was a big oversight.

    - "Sparks" (AKA Google News) needs to be in your stream. The current implementation is not useful.

    - Gate for twitter. Google already has this with Buzz, why on earth did they release G+ without it, I have no clue. It makes me use G+ less because I now have to update two things.

    Basically - Google needs to get as much into that stream as possible, and allow the user to filter by subsections if they want - NOT force the data into it's own little islands.

  14. how to start a new service? by green1 · · Score: 2

    I have been saying for years that facebook is just a fad, just like myspace was, and ICQ, and geocities, and who knows how many others, all of whom were seen as the place to be in their heyday. And yet facebook seemed to entrench itself well enough in the public mindset that I was starting to second guess my judgment.

    Now google+ seems to be generating quite a bit of buzz of it's own, and amazingly enough, not just among the tech crowd. My girlfriend (a nurse) was commenting yesterday that all her co-workers were talking about it at work the other night, so maybe Google can really pull this off?

    The part that makes this whole launch seems strange though is that what makes a social networking site work properly is the ability to find everyone you know on it, the idea of limiting who can apply seems rather counterproductive. And yet somehow it's working for Google.

    Either way, I'm eager to get in and see how it works. I've been periodically checking to see when they open the floodgates, and I suppose I really wouldn't mind an invite either, after all, I do use google for pretty much everything else, (I have my radio callsign (VE6RAH) as my existing account on gmail if anyone is so inclined)

    The big question though is one that nobody can answer yet with any certainty... will google+ manage to draw enough people away from facebook... will people who already use facebook for everything see a reason to switch... I guess only time will tell.

  15. invite please? by BitwiseX · · Score: 2

    miles.mawyer (at) gmail.com