Slashdot Mirror


Can a Playground Be Too Safe?

Hugh Pickens writes "John Tierney writes that the old 10-foot-high jungle gyms and slides disappeared from most American playgrounds across the country in recent decades because of parental concerns, federal guidelines, new safety standards set by manufacturers and — the most frequently cited factor — fear of lawsuits. But today some researchers question the value of safety-first playgrounds. Even if children do suffer fewer physical injuries — and the evidence for that is debatable — critics say that these playgrounds may stunt emotional development, leaving children with anxieties and fears that are ultimately worse than a broken bone. 'Climbing equipment needs to be high enough, or else it will be too boring in the long run,' says professor Ellen Sandseter. 'Children approach thrills and risks in a progressive manner, and very few children would try to climb to the highest point for the first time they climb. The best thing is to let children encounter these challenges from an early age, and they will then progressively learn to master them through their play over the years.' After observing children on playgrounds in Norway, England and Australia, Dr. Sandseter identified six categories of risky play, although fear of litigation led New York City officials to remove seesaws, merry-go-rounds and the ropes that young Tarzans used to swing from one platform to another."

43 of 493 comments (clear)

  1. This "safety net problem" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    is far broader than our playgrounds.

    1. Re:This "safety net problem" by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The "safety net problem" is far bigger than that, indeed. Mostly, it's due to parents who would love to pack their kids in cotton boxes 'til they turn 18. Oddly, the same parents then kick their kids out as soon as they're 18, unprepared and unfit to survive in a world they have never seen.

      Parents, your job is to prepare your kids for the life when they're fully responsible for their actions. It doesn't say anything about them not having had a single cut or bruised knee in their time 'til then. Bones heal. Scars heal. And you'd be surprised what damage children can sustain, where you witness it and you're sure they have to be dead, only to notice the child is wiggling his limbs, dusts himself off and climbs back onto the tree. Kids have tremendous healing ability, unparalleled any time later in their life. In other words, childhood is the perfect time to learn what is possible with your body and what is not. Your chances to survive stupid stunts will never be higher.

      The problem is also a psychological one. If you keep your kids locked away 'til they are 18, you not only limit their development and their ability to judge their own abilities, you also prepare them for a life of missed chances. They will look back at their childhood and realize that they "lost" 18 years of their life. Also, their social development will suffer. They will not be able to interact sensibly with peers, and they will not be prepared for the dealings of social life and interactions. In short, they will be the tool in whatever company they will work in.

      That's called bad parenting. Not having a child that has a skinned knee every now and then. Bad parenting is simply not preparing your child for the life after you're no longer responsible for them.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:This "safety net problem" by Pope · · Score: 3, Informative

      The "safety net problem" is far bigger than that, indeed. Mostly, it's due to parents who would love to pack their kids in cotton boxes 'til they turn 18. Oddly, the same parents then kick their kids out as soon as they're 18, unprepared and unfit to survive in a world they have never seen.

      Nope, it's worse: they still don't let them go, accompanying them to job interviews and trying to make sure their university profs are assigning them homework. Do a search on "helicopter parents" to read the true horror of what these morons are doing to their poor kids.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    3. Re:This "safety net problem" by Renraku · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'd vote this up if I had mod points. Anyway, 'controlled risk' is the key word. All the playgrounds I've ever been on in my entire life have been controlled risk environments and decently safe. Compared to the other places children can find to play, playgrounds are a fucking safe haven.

      Playgrounds aren't supposed to have no risk. No place is supposed to have no risk, because that's impossible. You cannot construct a place where people can't find a way to injure themselves. Even padded rooms can cause injury if someone wants to ram their heads into the walls at full speed. Playgrounds are supposed to have LESS risk than other choices. As a kid, I often had to choose between cool places like construction sites, abandoned buildings, and playgrounds. A lot of kids played in the others, and a lot of them got seriously injured. Making playgrounds shitty and devoid of cool things to climb on will just lead to more kids getting hurt.

      It's basically shifting the blame. The city can now say, sorry folks, we can't make flat ground any safer, and we aren't responsible for your kids that went to play in an abandoned building and died when the roof collapsed. They do this by necessity, because so many people feel like they're owed something for nothing. My kid sprained his ankle, I want a hundred grand for medical bills and pain/suffering. Which won't go to the kid even if they win, it'll be used to buy things for the parents anyway.

      I guess what I'm getting at is that there's a level where you can't make playgrounds any safer without just removing them. Kids need to learn that the ground is hard and to watch where the hell they're going or they'll never learn. Running full speed into a metal post when they're a kid is less damaging than doing it as an adult.

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    4. Re:This "safety net problem" by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Some books related to your excellent points:

      "In defense of childhood: protecting kids' inner wildness"
      http://www.chrismercogliano.com/childhood.htm
      "As codirector of the Albany Free School, Chris Mercogliano has had remarkable success in helping a diverse population of youngsters find their way in the world. He regrets, however, that most kids' lives are subject to some form of control from dawn until dusk. Lamenting risk-averse parents, overstructured school days, and a lack of playtime and solitude, Mercogliano argues that we are robbing our young people of "that precious, irreplaceable period in their lives that nature has set aside for exploration and innocent discovery," leaving them ill-equipped to face adulthood. The "domestication of childhood" squeezes the adventure out of kids' lives and threatens to smother the spark that animates each child with talents, dreams, and inclinations."

      "Last Child in the Woods"
      http://richardlouv.com/books/last-child/
      "In this influential work about the staggering divide between children and the outdoors, child advocacy expert Richard Louv directly links the lack of nature in the lives of today's wired generation--he calls it nature-deficit--to some of the most disturbing childhood trends, such as the rises in obesity, attention disorders, and depression."

      "Underground History of American Education"
      http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/chapters/16a.htm
      "A huge price had to be paid for business and government efficiency, a price we still pay in the quality of our existence. Part of what kids gave up was the prospect of being able to read very well, a historic part of the American genius. Instead, school had to train them for their role in the new overarching social system. But spare yourself the agony of thinking of this as a conspiracy. It was and is a fully rational transaction, the very epitome of rationalization engendered by a group of honorable men, all honorable men -- but with decisive help from ordinary citizens, from almost all of us as we gradually lost touch with the fact that being followers instead of leaders, becoming consumers in place of producers, rendered us incompletely human. It was a naturally occurring conspiracy, one which required no criminal genius. The real conspirators were ourselves. When we sold our liberty for the promise of automatic security, we became like children in a conspiracy against growing up, sad children who conspire against their own children, consigning them over and over to the denaturing vats of compulsory state factory schooling."

      And a TED Talk:
      "Gever Tulley on 5 dangerous things you should let your kids do"
      http://www.ted.com/talks/gever_tulley_on_5_dangerous_things_for_kids.html

      We've taught our kid early on to use a sharp knife to cut up vegetables and fruits, in part because US emergency medicine to deal with knife injuries is far better than US medicine to deal with chronic health problems that come from not eating enough vegetables and fruits. Related:
      http://www.drfuhrman.com/children/default.aspx
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffJAePZFg90

      Unfortunately, we listened to advice from doctors to "protect" our kid (and ourselves) from the sun and ended up with vitamin D deficiency and related health issues.
      http://www.vitamindcouncil.org/health-conditions//kids_fall_short_on_vitamin_D.aspx

      We're slowly learning. There is a l

      --
      A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
    5. Re:This "safety net problem" by davester666 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why phone when you could just yell up the stairs...

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  2. I don't understand the perceived problem by idontgno · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mom's basement is perfectly safe, and I grew up JUST FINE.

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  3. risk/reward by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The whole risk=reward philosophy is just a way for people who are comfortable and have never needed to take any risks to push others to do so, so they can leech off them. Tell people that something will make them a man and they'll run into the middle of a battlefield.

    A society's advance is measured by risk reduction, so stuff can be achieved without a large proportion of people being harmed in the process.

    1. Re:risk/reward by g0bshiTe · · Score: 5, Funny
      so stuff can be achieved without a large proportion of people being harmed in the process.

      You obviously don't work in Aperture Labs do you?

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    2. Re:risk/reward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A society's advance is measured by risk reduction, so stuff can be achieved without a large proportion of people being harmed in the process.

      Says who?

      By removing the risk of physical injury in these cases, you add the risk of psychological "injuries". A child locked in an empty padded cell is perfectly safe but the adult resulting from such an upbringing will be a broken mess.

      Granted, that's an extreme. However, to some degree w're already seeing this in today's society: people ruled by abstract fears, nobody taking responsiblity, everybody blaming/sueing somebody else and so on.

  4. Re:Learning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Fear of lawsuits isn't stupid. It's quite sensible.
    Lawsuits are stupid.

  5. In other words by FrkyD · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Generations are being deprived of the chance to learn to deal with the process of overcoming their fears?
    In a society whose political and media culture centers around obscuring debate by preying on fear?
    Whodathunk?

  6. No evidence by goodmanj · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Like most of Tierney's articles, this one is iconoclastic but has no evidence to back it up. The "study" he cites is just one psychologist's opinion, with no actual data behind it.

    Speaking for myself, I do think I'm more well-adjusted psychologically as a result of all the dangerous stuff I did as a little kid, but given the medical bills and the permanent scars, I can't honestly say it was worth it overall.

  7. Yes they can by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 4, Interesting

    At the park nearest my house they recently put in a new playground. Thankfully it still has some "unsafe" equipment. My oldest (almost 3) wanted to swing on the big swings a couple of weeks ago. So I put him on and started pushing him. Eventually he wanted me to get on the swing next to him. When we were both swinging he fell of and did a nice face plant from falling forward off the swing. He had a few little scrapes and a mouth full of sand, he cried a bit but I told him he was ok. He then went and got right back on the swing. He has also fallen off slides and rope things (a cargo net like structure) and still goes back. There is an older "safe" playground at this park but he never want to go there.

    --
    Time to offend someone
    1. Re:Yes they can by clong83 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I took my one year old nephew to a playground in my neighborhood, and as soon as I set him down he crawled up to the very top of the biggest slide and flung himself down it headfirst. Nobody was there to catch him and he did a nice faceplant in the sand at the bottom. He was fine. Cried for a minute, had a bunch of sand in his nose, but then calmed down and crawled back up and did it again (with me waiting to catch him this time). From then on, he was a little bit more cautious and wouldn't go down unless I was there waiting.

  8. How to Land Your Kid in Therapy by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Interesting

    On a similar note, the Atlantic recently ran this article about how
    coddling children robs them of an important part of childhood.

    When a parent says something like that they want their child to "just be a kid for one more year," that's just selfishness on their part. It isn't about letting the kid enjoy childhood, its about the parent holding their child's development back in order for the parent to take pleasure in the kid's innocence.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    1. Re:How to Land Your Kid in Therapy by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

      Could someone hand that guy a "dammit, couldn't you have told my parents 30 years ago" insightful mod?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:How to Land Your Kid in Therapy by stephathome · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Too true. This is why I liked my college professor who describes parenthood as raising future adults, not children. I want my kids to keep growing up. They get better as they get more mature. Sure, babies, toddlers and on down the line are fun, but seeing kids grow up is much more fun than treating them as younger than they are. They're people, not my personal toys.

    3. Re:How to Land Your Kid in Therapy by need4mospd · · Score: 3, Funny
      You know if you visited home more often you wouldn't think like that.

      -Dad

      P.S. Don't forget to call your mother this weekend. You know how she gets when you forget her birthday.

  9. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  10. When parents complain about bruises ... by MacTO · · Score: 4, Informative

    I work with children, and sometimes they get sent home with bruises and scraped knees just because they were playing so vigorously. Most of the children I've seen will cry for a little bit, accept a bandage, then will be eager to do the same thing again.

    Parents though, well, some of them will assume that the supervisors were negligent or abusive. Not all of them, not even many of them, since they tend to know how their kids play. But it is the ones that wrap their child in a protective coccoon that you have to be petrified of. Even those parents aren't so bad once they get to know you, to trust you, but a lot of them don't even bother.

    The unfortunate truth is that those overly protective parents count for a lot because the consequences are many. Lawsuits is the often cited one, but losing your job or your license is an even bigger and more real concern. So all of the children suffer.

  11. Re:Umm...yeah no shit. I could have told you this. by MozeeToby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Common sense goes out the window when there's a gallon of hormones flooding your system telling you that this child in particular is the single most important thing in the universe. Everything from over childproofing to being against a public healthcare options to over prescribing antibiotics to giving up freedoms for perceived safety can be traced back to the psychological changes that occur when people become parents.

    As a new parent myself I can feel the invasion of these lines of thinking, and it is only through conscious, concerned effort that I maintain my pre-parent sense of right and wrong.

  12. Re:Think of the children! by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sure I'm not saying let kids play in a forest alone or something

    Why not?

  13. In Canada by Rev.+DeFiLEZ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My 3.5 year old broke her arm at the playground, and I was very proud of her. We made the whole thing, including the hospital trip all part of the fun.

    It does seem that the playgrounds are becoming less fun, but I let my kid do all sorts of stupid things, so the way I see it, as an adult she'll be at an advantage over her peers.

  14. Interesting presentation on TED re: Child Safety by dr_canak · · Score: 3, Informative

    Came across this TED presentation last year:

    http://www.ted.com/talks/gever_tulley_on_5_dangerous_things_for_kids.html

    Definitely an interesting take on this whole issue of child safety regulations. The book (written by the presenter in the video above, Gever Tully) entitled "50 Dangerous Things (You should let your kids do)" is a really nice read.

    jeff

  15. Stop pussyfying our youth by pak9rabid · · Score: 4, Funny

    Treating kids like pussies turns them into pussies.

    1. Re:Stop pussyfying our youth by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 3, Informative

      The word "pussy" describes someone that acts like a scared cat and can be used as a word for female genitals. The "scared-y cat" connotation, however, does not derive from the reference to female genitals. The two connotations share the same origin but for different reasons.

  16. Talk about risky behavior.... by pyneiii · · Score: 3, Funny

    "After observing children on playgrounds in Norway, England and Australia..." Did anyone else picture a weird guy in a lab coat with a clipboard standing around a jungle gym?

  17. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  18. Re:Think of the children! by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I take it you were never were in Boy Scouts. When I was young there was nothing better then chasing each other through the forest, often with big sticks, climbing pine trees and dropping stuff on others. Truth is kids are probably less likely to get hurt in a forest than in an urban landscape since forests tend to be squish compared to concrete and asphalt.

    --
    Time to offend someone
  19. Re:Umm...yeah no shit. I could have told you this. by 2names · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Far *greater* than half of the world's population are below average intelligence. If you do not understand the previous sentence, then I say to you - albeit very slowly - you are in the lower portion.

    --
    "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
  20. Re:It's not just playgrounds. by SethJohnson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How can we encourage children to be active if anything "active" thay they would think about doing (running, playing tag, climbing trees, skateboarding, etc...) is seen in a negative light?

    I just Google+ friended you for that statement. There are so many activities, such as the great examples you gave, that the author could rewrite this study substituting for the word 'playground.' One of the bees in my bonnet these days is how diving boards are being phased out at public swimming pools.

    It started with phasing out high-dives. Now low-dives are also an endangered animal. New public pools are built shallow with water slides instead of diving boards. From the first to the 10,000th time a kid slides down a waterslide, they've developed exactly zero skills at doing anything. It's passive entertainment. There's no sense of performance or challenge. With a diving board, there are a whole host of dynamics a child can attempt to master. Our society is taking that structure away from children in so many areas.

    If you watched the 2008 Beijing Olympics, you might have seen the Chinese divers dominate in all categories. American children might have seen that and said, "Mommy, I want to become a diver and win a gold medal at the Olympics." To which an honest parent would have to say, "Unfortunately, you live in America and aren't permitted to engage in that activity. Perhaps if we move to a dangerous country like China you'll have that option in life."

    Seth

  21. Adventure Playground by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Informative

    "C. Th. SÃrensen, a Danish landscape architect, noticed that children preferred to play everywhere but in the playgrounds that he built. In 1931, he imagined "A junk playground in which children could create and shape, dream and imagine a reality." Why not give children in the city the same chances for play as those in the country? His initial ideas started the adventure playground movement.

    The first adventure playground opened in Emdrup, Denmark in 1943, during World War II. In 1946, Lady Allen of Hurtwood visited Emdrup from England and was impressed with "junk playgrounds." She brought the idea to London. These "junk playgrounds" became known as "adventure playgrounds." "
    http://adventureplaygrounds.hampshire.edu/history.html

    "The Adventure Playground at the Berkeley Marina was opened 31 years ago in 1979. It is a wonderfully unique outdoor facility where staff encourage children to play and build creatively. Come climb on the many unusual kid designed and built forts, boats, and towers. Ride the zip line or hammer, saw, and paint. By providing these low risk activities Adventure Playground creates opportunities for children to learn cooperation, meet physical challenges and gain self confidence. Pictures of a fort building project. The concept for Adventure Playgrounds originated in Europe after World War II, where a playground designer studied children playing in the "normal" asphalt and cement playgrounds. He found that they preferred playing in dirt and lumber from the post war rubble. He realized that children had the most fun designing and building their own equipment and manipulating their environment. The formula for Adventure Playgrounds includes Earth, fire, water, and lots of creative materials."
    http://www.ci.berkeley.ca.us/contentdisplay.aspx?id=8656

    And here's a song:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQtwb3lQ_c0

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  22. One thing I learned from kids ... by MacTO · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was on the swings one day with a bunch of children, then noticed that they were all swinging higher a few of them were flipping their heads back for the thrill of it. So I decided to try it, and it was scary. Especially the vertigo from flipping my head back.

    It made me realise how safe I, as an adult tend to act and how it takes all of the thrills out of life.

  23. Case in point - City Museum by turtle+graphics · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The City Museum in St. Louis is a crazy, dangerous, and incredibly fun "playground" in an old industrial building. Most people who go there think it's incredibly fun. Some people who go there get seriously injured (often by exhibiting stupidity they should have learned to avoid on the playground).

    The musem's founder, Bob Cassilly, says that $1 of every $12 admission ticket goes to pay insurance, and he has posted a 'wall of shame' listing all the lawyers who have sued the museum.

    There's an excellent and relevant article in the WSJ about it: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304159304575183463721620890.html?KEYWORDS=city+museum

  24. At our park.. by roc97007 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Our homeowner's association has a park across the street from my house. Some time back they pulled out the swing set and monkey bars and put in an attractive looking rubberized steel play structure with several platforms but kind of low to the ground and really nothing to climb on or hang from. The kids ignore it and climb the trees instead.

    Life finds a way.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  25. Re:Each generation coddles the next by Shark · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What bothers me most is that if I want to raise my kid like that and let them have a real childhood with all the bumps and bruises and scares it entails, I'll be the evil parent and CPS will come take him/her away.

    --
    Mind the frickin' laser...
  26. Not being overprotective by Animats · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a horse owner, I see how various parents approach risk. Some parents hover, constantly watching their kids ride. (One barn in Silicon Valley caters to those parents. They have bleachers where the parents watch the kids take lessons.) The kids whose parents just drop them off do better with the horses. Kids do fall off, but it's better if they have their falls when they're 10 or 12 and on a pony.

    An old friend of mine is the complete opposite of the overprotective mom. Her kids (one son, one daughter) grew up riding, and by their early teens, were competent to go off alone on horseback into the mountains. By their late teens, the kids were taking road trips of hundreds of miles on bicycles. Both kids are in their 20s now. The son is still in school, taking a year off for a startup right now. The daughter has graduated, and took a trip around the world alone, bicycling across whole countries, riding in a cattle roundup, surfing, kayaking, and coming home cheerful, uninjured, with hundreds of pictures. She works as a lifeguard (ocean rescue/climbing/EMT).

    Interestingly, these kids are cautious. When encountering something new, they tend to hang back, carefully watch others, see how it's done and what goes wrong, then do it. They don't charge in blindly. It's not about being bold. It's about being competent.

  27. Re:Learning by RussR42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I believe it is a reference to the double standard. Guys are championed for their sexual prowess while girls are considered sluts when they get around.

    Perhaps it's a reflection of the effort it takes for most guys to get laid compared to most women who can just stand up and say "Next!".

  28. Children of acrobats by MobyDisk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Last weekend I went to a local art festival and they had a giant picnic table that you could climb on. Perhaps 20 feet high? You needed a ladder to get up on it. It was installed on a grass median and had no fence. As I was on top with my 2 year old, an 8-year old kid ran by me, jumped off, and vanished over the side as he went down. For a moment I thought the kid was crazy! But shortly thereafter, 2 more boys joined in, only they flipped off of the top. It was quite impressive.

    It turns out that they were 3 brothers with their dad. The father was a martial arts instructor and he was coaching his middle boy to use his ankles to cushion his landing, and telling his youngest how to roll if he falls too hard. They weren't crazy - they just saw this stuff growing up and learned to do it safely. The dad told the youngest one that he was only allowed to flip off if he could do one from a standing position. It isn't that they had no rules, they just weren't overly afraid. They had a coach, and they knew their own limitations and followed instructions.

    Amazing what a trusting, confident parent can teach an 8-year old kid. I want to know what they are like in 15 years.

  29. Remembering old times by Chicken_Kickers · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I grew up in a traditional village in Malaysia during the early 80's. I know this is going to sound like one of those get off my lawn stories but my experiences while growing up there was very beneficial. At that time, my playground was the snake-infested semi-jungle around the village, the monitor lizard infested nearby river and the limestone quarry lake where they were blasting rocks with explosives. We kids will form roaming bands of 10 or more and play soldiers and communists (it was only 1 year after the communist insurgents surrendered), make our own "hand grenades" (got scars to prove it) out of firecracker fillings and spark plugs as detonators, even our own bamboo cannon filled with carbide. We will climb trees, slingshot monkeys, take a swim in the river and fish for tilapia and catfish in the quarry lake all the while explosives were going off nearby. On Eid days and the Chinese New Year, we will go to war with the kids from the neighbouring village, launching firecracker raids and ambushing the counterattack which will sometimes end up as fist fights. Looking back, I couldn't believe I lived that life now that I am living in a modern suburb where everything is gated and sanitised. Firecrackers are now banned in Malaysia. I look at my own two kids and see them playing video games, and the only time they can play outside is when I am supervising them out of fear of speeding cars or kidnappers (this is a real problem).

    Now, everything revolves around the nuclear family. I could do all those risky things in the village because all the adults in the village will keep an eye on you, regardless if you are their kid or not. All adults may scold or cane any child in the village if they cross the line. Complaining about this to your parents will result in another round of caning. You could drop in on your friends house and their parents will serve you food and treat you like you are their own. Now get off my lawn.

  30. It's not just the lawyers... by thejuiceisloose · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My son (23 months) loves the "big kid" playgrounds. He is a cautious child, and he definitely follows the progressive learning model in how high he climbs. However, he is adopted, and we have to worry about social workers disapproving of how we raise him, and we could get in big trouble if he got hurt, so I am one of those mothers who tends to hover around her child on the playground. It's not because I am overprotective, but because society has gotten to the point that the state will take away your child if he cuts his finger, practically. In a civilization's progress, I think sometimes we start to go overboard, and that's when society becomes corrupt and a new, younger society takes over. Look at the cycle of civilization. Ancient powerhouses are no longer around. We don't just get more civilized, we go back and forth.