Slashdot Mirror
Android Catching Up In the Tablet Market
TyFoN writes "Year to year, the iPad market share is down from 94.3 percent to 61.3 percent while Android is up about the same, going from 2.9 percent to 30.1 percent in the same period. 'Some 4.6 million Android-based tablets shipped in this year's second quarter as compared with just around 100,000 in the year-ago quarter, according to Strategy Analytics. ...the tablet OS market as a whole grew a whopping 331 percent in the last year and Apple grew right along with it in terms of unit shipments. Tablet makers shipped 3.5 million in the second quarter of 2010, with Apple easily leading the charge with 3.2 million iPads shipped. The number of units shipped exploded to 15.1 million in this past quarter— Apple was a bit behind the pace of that growth, but still managed to ship an impressive 9.3 million iOS-based tablets. Microsoft, meanwhile, had the third largest share of the global tablet OS market at 4.6 percent, with about 700,000 Windows 7-based tablets shipped in the recent quarter.'"
The reported numbers are all shipping share, not market share. The number of Android tablets being sold is pretty dramatically less....
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
I didn't even know there WAS a Windows 7 tablet. I was at Best Buy a couple weeks ago and didn't even see one. Where are they selling these things?
"First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
Are built on cheap hardware and run a version of Android developed for phones, Honeycomb tablets have so far priced themselves out of the market. Here's hoping Google and the manufacturers will pick up on that.
I am curious how they got to those numbers; namely, what do they mean by "shipped". Do they mean produced and sent to stores? Or actually sold to customers?
We know how many iPad's are actually bought by people; but how much of that 30% this analyst is claiming Android has is retail channels filling up but not actually being bought? Where are they getting their numbers?
I'm not saying there aren't plenty of people who may be interested in some of the latest Android offerings, but a 2:1 ratio of iPad's:Android's doesn't at all jive with what I've seen or heard in reality. (Granted, my anecdotal evidence isn't all that more awesomer then your anecdotal evidence)
Strategy Analytics is talking about units shipped. Unit shipments aren't the same as actual sales to customers. Microsoft used that same word-twisting when they tried to convince everyone that Vista was doing well. As John Gruber pointed out yesterday, what Strategy Analytics is calling market share is actually "shipment share." That's not market share in the way most people think of it. If you go by actual sales, the iPad has sold almost 30 million total, while Android tablets have only sold about 1.35 million.
I'm surprised Apple's earnings report didn't make it to Slashdot's front page. Sales of the iPad have tripled since last year, at 9.25 million, and iPhone sales more than doubled. iPad sales have been so successful that retailers reserved inventory space for them at the expense of PCs. PC shipments declined by about 6%, and the PC industry overall declined by 4.2%. I think that's the biggest untold story of all in this--after decades of growth, the PC is in a downward trend because of the iPad.
Because it's percentage-based and can therefore fluctuate based on total size, market share is not as important a figure as it's often made out to be. It can be used to paint a negative picture where there isn't one. It can also be twisted by citing units shipped rather than sold. The iPad is doing better than ever and doesn't seem to be stopping any time soon. I realize that Slashdot is historically pro-Linux and will present Linux-based products as always "catching up" or being on the cusp of taking over, but there's just no evidence of that happening at this point in time.
The key word here is SHIPPED, not sold.
All "tablets" reported from AAPL's quarterly were SOLD, not merely shipped and waiting to be bought.
Whatevers though, small point, and many Android tablets will be sold but the fragmentation will not abate.
IIRC, the Nook doesn't run Honeycomb. My bet is that the vast majority of Android tablets now out there are Nooks, of which only a few have been hacked to be stock Android tablets. The most recent sales figures I can find for the nook imply that 3M were sold as of last March, so the sales of that one tablet dwarf the numbers estimated above
"Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
It may be less, but I doubt it's "dramatically" less.
Stated "shipping share" is an order of magnitude more than the number sold - read the article, it uses Google's own activation numbers and device counts to arrive at that position.
Now granted perhaps a lot of Android tablet owners are collecting them for posterity and never removing them from the box. But somehow I do not think that is the case.
Tablet makers aren't feverishly pushing them out just to lose all their money as they rot on the shelves.
That certainly is not what they HOPE to do. But the market can have other ideas.
Blackberry is shipping a lot of Playbooks but those aren't selling either. Obviously they did not put them out to "rot on shelves" either.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
I'm surprised Apple's earnings report didn't make it to Slashdot's front page.
I'm not; You and I were around when Slashdot was more even tempered than it is today. As soon as I saw that "Shipping Share" article I knew it would be on Slashdot.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Meanwhile when I was looking for an iPad I was essentially told to be waiting at the store first thing in the morning for the truck or order online. They're literally selling them faster than they can ship them at the three Apple stores I went to. In a way I'm happy about that, after more though I paid half as much for Nook, and it's more than adequate for the main use case I was interested in (Web and e-mail capable e-reader).
I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
Considering there are $99 Android 2.1 tablets that you can get in stores like Walgreens or CVS, is it any wonder they're "gaining marketshare"?
They're on the low end of the spectrum, but they do browse the web and can play Angry Birds.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
The ones sold by Walwart, ASDA etc but the truckload. The ones priced at less than $150/£100.
IMHO, the Tablet/fondleslab market should be segmented.
At the top, things like the Playbook, Galaxy Tab and iPad.
etc etc.
Then we might get some more realistic figures especially if the measurements were done by units sold rather than shipped.
If the Galaxy Tab was a bit cheaper I'd buy one.
I'd rather be riding my '63 Triumph T120.
What proportion of users do you think bother "activating" their tablets?
Every one that turns on one, because they contact Google servers to check for updates and other things. Just what did you think "activation" meant in the context of tablets anyway?
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
all the people that bought into g tablet have effectively been abandoned by viewsonic.
viewsonic could not resist the temptation of adding their "special touches" to otherwise generally serviceable 2.2 that rendered the unit utterly unusable (slow, crashes often) and compelled people to either return the unit or root the unit and overwrite the stock rom.
moral of the story - don't buy stuff you expect fw updates from 2 bit companies like viewsonic, because you won't get any.
ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
The iPad came out April 2010 so it's been more than a year calendar wise. For Apple it is the first fiscal year so there is some basis for comparison although it is only a single data point.
Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
Did you even know there was a Windows 7 tablet?
Seems like a good place to make a fanboi plug for my HP TouchPad. I've been waiting for a nice tablet that would let me avoid the walled garden and, so far, I'm very happy with the TouchPad. Three ways to develop your own apps 1) SDK - which is javascript/HTML widgets, 2) PDK - which is C++ and OpenGL, and 3) a hybrid mix of the two. Very easy to create professional-looking applications, Linux-based, multi-tasking WebOS, and pretty good selection of commercial apps so it should be attractive to lots of slashdotters.
That extra competition will do nothing for Android pricing. Right now Android tablets are already facing full competition pressure from the iPad. Android prices aren't high because makers are ignoring the iPad and only pricing against each other. Android prices are high because Apple is buying components they took options on years ago in lots of ten million. Android makers are buying components based on current availability in lots of hundred thousands or even ten thousands.
FWIW, I have a eee Transformer tablet with battery pack / keyboard dock and I love it.
If you'd prefer to have an Android tablet, this one is pretty good IMHO.
It just got updated to 3.1 and likes USB devices. Doesn't work with a USB DVD drive - but mice and hard drives it has no problem with.
HTH
FWIW I won't buy a single Apple product until they stop trying to sue their competition and sometimes suppliers out of business. Even if their market share is up, it's pretty easy to see the greed at work. Once they get complete dominance that greed will be turned towards reduction in product quality.
Most ignorance is vincible ignorance. We don't know because we don't want to know. --Aldous Huxley
As I understand the article on zacks.com, it means that PC shipments were down in the United States but up slightly worldwide: "However, strong upside in PC shipments to Asia, Latin America and Japan offset these declines."
Apple also makes money on the applications for iPads, Android manufactures don't have this additional revenue stream.
You should refrain from purchasing any product whatsoever that is made by a company that is suing one of its competitors.
The first suit I can remember was Polaroid vs. Kodak. Everyone remembers the amazing quality of Polaroid cameras, right? How they are a powerful, innovative player in the instant camera market place of the 21st century?
Most ignorance is vincible ignorance. We don't know because we don't want to know. --Aldous Huxley
Once they get complete dominance that greed will be turned towards reduction in product quality.
And you're basing that one their history of having done so in the iPod market, right? I mean, they continue to have 70% market share in the music player business, and it's obvious that the product quality has really taken a nose dive in the time that they've been on top. All of these new iPod nano and iPod Touch devices have really set the market back by a number of years, rather than driving the innovation and quality forward.
Or maybe you're basing it on what they've done with their 90% market share of the $1000+ PC business? If so, you're definitely on the money, since Macs are known for their shoddy workmanship and poor quality. I can't think of any consumer reports or user satisfaction polls that have spoken favorably of them in a number of years. Once they nailed that market, they just decided to rest on their laurels and stop making decent stuff. Lion is simply the latest iteration in a long line of low-quality operating systems, and I have yet to find a review that speaks well of it. Hell, I'm such a lemming that I installed it already, and I've been self-loathing ever since then. The experience of using it is equitable to pulling teeth.
Apple's strategy all along has been to dominate a market, then release crap periodically, and it's definitely worked for them.
</massive sarcasm>
Or, for the less sarcastic version, Apple has demonstrated that if greed and a love of money is your motivating factor, then putting out high quality products is the best way to satisfy your desires. If they start to put out crap, the iPad will follow the path that the Mac took in the early days, and will quickly be eclipsed by competitors. Apple is at its best when it's competing, and history shows us that when they rest, they fall. But for now, we have no reason for saying that Apple is planning to rest anytime soon, since your examples of greed have yet to generate the effect that you indicate they will produce, despite having been present for a number of years already.
And this is precisely why I don't have either an iPad, or a Xoom. one of my requirements was an SD card slot. And I don't count any feature as existing until it works. I never count on companies to provide "upgrades" to enable functionality, experience has taught me better than that.
It's no wonder that android is starting to really take over the market though, the Ipad2 has about half the features of most of the new android tablets that are coming out now, and the ipad2 is more expensive too... give it some time for a few more android tablets to become available and apple will be relegated back to their usual minority market position.
Yeah, I have yet to pay a single red cent for an Apple product, so I can't exactly say that I know anything about the quality. I won't buy a smartphone without a keyboard, I hate what they've done to the smartphone market to be honest. I've thought the iPods were outrageously priced to begin with, and wouldn't waste my money on such tripe anyway.
Most ignorance is vincible ignorance. We don't know because we don't want to know. --Aldous Huxley
Let's assume that Gruber's wrong(I have no reason to believe he is; I'm a huge Gruber fanboy and his logic's pretty good).
This means that 61% of the tablet market is owned by 1 vendor, and between Moto, HTC, B&N, RIM, Samsung, etc. that's at least 5 with the distinct possibility of way more vendors fighting for 39% of market share.
1 vendor, Apple, owns *atleast* a solid plurality of tablet market share if not an outright majority.
Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
Oh, I didn't have an issue with your personal preferences. To be clear, people who don't like Apple products are fine in my book, and I always advocate getting whatever works best for you (for me it's Macs, for others it's not, but it's all cool). All I took issue with were your claims that they'd suddenly start reducing product quality once they achieved market dominance, which is an idea that's not borne out by fact or history. Even if we go with your stance that their products are already "tripe", clearly you think there's room for sinking lower (else you wouldn't have mentioned reducing product quality), but I'd say that there are no indications that the quality of this tripe has changed at all. Whether you think the current quality is high or low, it still doesn't indicate that they reduce it once they dominate, which goes directly against what you attempted to argue.
B&N in their infite wisdom have not seen fit to sell it into a bigger market that is open to them.
viz Europe.
330Million People.
So your statement should read.
The Nook Color seems to be selling well in the US. Shame that the rest of the world do not get a look it.
I'd rather be riding my '63 Triumph T120.
Am I the only one who couldn't care less about tablets?
giggity
I would say that Apple went south pretty bad in the late 80's, but it looks like they've learned their lesson there. By tripe I mean their consumer grade stuff. They made more expensive MP3 players than were on the market, packed their higher end iPods with notebook hard drives which were destined for premature failure from people being active while using them. I would have considered buying a Mac until they stopped shipping them with Power processors.
Most ignorance is vincible ignorance. We don't know because we don't want to know. --Aldous Huxley
Craig E-Pad CMP738A
7 inch Digital Touch Screen (800 x 480 , 16:9)
Processor Speed 700MHz
Operating System : Powered By Google Android 2.2
4 GB Built-in Flash Memory
Built-in 256MB DDR II RAM
Built-in WIFI (802.11b/g)
Support Video Format : MKV/AVI/RM/RMVB/FLV/WMV/MP4/MPG/VOB (Up to 720p)
Support Audio Format : MP3/WMA/WAV
Support Photo Format : JPEG/BMP/GIF/PNG
Support e-Reader Format : PDF/PDF DRM/TXT/EPUB/EPUB DRM/HTML/FB2
Automatically Rotate Function
Mini HDMI AV Out Jack (720p)
Mini USB to Connect to Computer
USB Host
Landscape to Portrait Screen Function
Built-in Rechargeable Battery
Built-in Speaker & Microphone
Micro SD Card Slot (Support Max. 32GB)
Supports Browser, e-Book Reader, e-Mail, Photos, Maps, Video, YouTube, Facebook, Music, SlideME Marketplace, Clock
3.5mm Stereo Headphone Jack
Can Connect With PC as a Storage Drive
For $99 at CVS, what are you complaining about?
I wasn't a fan of the iPod touch either until I tried my son's first generation iPod touch and found that Apple had snuck a unix work station with an innovative interface onto a hand held device. Yes, you can play your music, watch porn, play games etc. You can also ssh into your server and accomplish useful work, the browser is actually useful and standards compliant and thousands (more?) of developers are applying their ingenuity to creating new tools for your use.
I have a Droid phone with a keypad. If it doesn't have a keypad, then I can't do anything meaningful for work with it. It's amazing how inexpensive used smart phones are on eBay. The thing that I like least about Apple's direction with portable devices is the absence of a keyboard or keypad. I refuse to use a virtual keypad, I've tried it on friends phones. The fact that I didn't own the devices was the only thing that kept me from flushing them.
Most ignorance is vincible ignorance. We don't know because we don't want to know. --Aldous Huxley
Comment removed based on user account deletion
"Once they get complete dominance that greed will be turned towards reduction in product quality". Yeah, the iPod touch is the worst quality iPod ever !!!!!!!!!!!!!
We can see that you are tripe expert.
The fact that Android tablets are taking so long to eat into Apple's market share is down to Google.
About a year ago, Google announced that Froyo was "not optimized for tablets", and that vendors should not sell Android tablets until Honeycomb came out. As a result, device makers and software developers delayed their tablet projects, and customers delayed their tablet purchases. Google made sure that Froyo tablets would not succeed by prohibiting them from accessing Android Market. (The Galaxy Tab was exempted.) This wouldn't have been so bad if the release of Honeycomb had not been several months later than originally expected, and if the first release had not been buggy. It's only in the past couple of weeks that Honeycomb 3.2 came out, giving us a Honeycomb that's truly ready for market.
As it happens, Froyo works pretty well on tablets, so Google's announcement was a disastrous, and I dare say rather stupid, mistake. They shot themselves in the foot, and postponed the development of the Android tablet market by about a year, giving the iPad time to become much more entrenched than it would have been otherwise.
You can not own any phone, tablet, or PC because yo will not find a single manufacturer who has not sued someone.
Many people (including me) felt the same way. Once you take the plunge and use item for about a week, you will wonder why you thought it mattered.
The iPod touch is more a mini-tablet or a phone without being a phone than it is an MP3 player. It was more a market test to determine the viability of a larger device without phone capabilities.
Most ignorance is vincible ignorance. We don't know because we don't want to know. --Aldous Huxley
If a small keyboard is a high priority, your decision is probably made for you. It might be worth mentioning that iOS devices work well with most bluetooth keyboards which come in a variety of shapes and sizes. I do tend to use my iPad rather than iPod because the onscreen keyboard is so much better (almost touch typing in landscape mode). In any case I do appreciate Android users since it keeps Apple from getting even more comfortable.
Years ago, I let our Dell rep talk me into a tablet from Motion PC. Never again....
Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
Recent Android tablets are priced lower than comparable iPad - 16Gb Transformer can be had for less than $400, for example, and 32Gb IdeaPad K1 goes for $500.
$99 sounds cheap, but that thing has less juice than my Motorola Defy, which cost the same (with a contract). My phone's processor speed is faster, it came with more RAM, and it came with a bigger SD card. In addition, my phone is portable, it's ruggedized, it has a camera, has GPS, does 3G data, and has access to the genuine Android Market. My phone even has higher screen resolution (though the physical screen is obviously smaller).
No sale to this guy, but somebody might want one, I guess.
Breakfast served all day!
So you're saying a $600 phone is better than a $99 tablet, well no crap. I'm not buying my kids a smartphone with a one or two year commitment. Hell I'm not going to buy them the same phone as my wife ($150 LG Optimus V from Virgin Mobile, no contract required), but a tablet where they can usefully browse the web AND play their favorite games is in the realm of reasonable.
There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
This is a common myth.
Personally I'm waiting for the Eee pad slider. That has been delayed like 3 times already but it looks like exactly what I want.
With Apple you get one choice. With Android you'll soon have a couple dozen viable choices.
That's what we heard about the iPod. It never happened. That's because people really don't care that much about choice beyond a certain amount. Look at the 20+ consecutive year-over-year quarterly growth of Mac sales, beating out the PC in growth every single time.
In other words, Apple is outpacing the entire industry in PC sales, and has been for years now.
Further, that competition will tend to drive down the price for the Android ecosystem as compared to Apple.
Not for equivalent hardware. The only way Android tablets will be notably cheaper than iPads is by cutting corners. Apple has the best deals on the planet for components. No one can compete with the iPad on price.
This could be the whole PC evolution playing out again in tablets. It is easy to forget that Apple had an early lead in PCs and then Bill Gates ate them alive by licensing DOS to run on a variety of hardware platforms.
Not quite. The Macintosh never had a lead over PCs. DOS already outsold the Mac long before Compaq cloned the IBM PC.
This situation seems almost like a play-by-play rerun. But to make it worse for Apple, this time around the DOS equivalent is "free" for manufacturers.
The only reason the PC beat the Mac in the early days is because the PC was better suited for the market (which at the time was business). That's it. Today, iOS is better suited for the market, which is primarily consumer.
Google has data from devices that accessed Android Market:
http://developer.android.com/resources/dashboard/platform-versions.html
Honeycomb accounts for 0.9% total (3.0 + 3.1).
"Reading that line, you're automagically accepting this EULA"
I got a tablet from Dinodirect for $85. It's now gone up to $91 (AUD).
http://www.dinodirect.com/tablet-pc-7inch-tft-touch-screen-tcc8902-800mhz-ddr2-2gb-wifi-camera-android-imito-im7s-currency-GBP.html?cur=AUD
It's not great but with Aldiko it's now an eBook reader that can check my email and browse the web or do a few other things. I still prefer my Samsung Galaxy S2 any day but that cost 10 times as much, so horses for courses...
Stated "shipping share" is an order of magnitude more than the number sold - read the article, it uses Google's own activation numbers and device counts to arrive at that position
I doubt that every single ultra-cheap no-name Android-based tablet uses officially licensed Android and is detectable through activation.
I think that there's a vast number of devices on which manufacturer slap the free opensource version of Android, and sell it as-is without any activation.
And these device are in a ultra-low price range which makes them attractive on their own, even if they can't compete feature wise with bigger Androids, nor with iPads.
"Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]