Slashdot Mirror


Crowdsourcing Ancient Egyptian Scrolls

An anonymous reader writes "Dons at Oxford University were on the BBC Radio 4 'Today' program this morning asking for help from listeners to transcribe unearthed ancient Egyptian texts and scrolls via their website. Visitors to the site are asked to match-up letters on scanned fragments of papyrus with an on-screen Greek alphabet. By doing so, they can help reveal some of the amazing documents that the ancient Egyptians last read. You too can become a papyrologist!"

25 of 94 comments (clear)

  1. Oh fuck Hellenistic period Egypt! by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Greek? You expect me to help translate Ptolemaic period shit?!?!? Do I *look* like Alexander the Fucking Great to you?

    You want my help, you better throw down some hieroglyphs, bitch!

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Oh fuck Hellenistic period Egypt! by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh my, this has the theoretical potential for a truly epic flame war. I suppose you'd prefer documents out of the 18th dynasty, too? Akhenaten's unspeakable monotheistic heresy and shit like that? Some fries with it, perhaps?

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    2. Re:Oh fuck Hellenistic period Egypt! by DriedClexler · · Score: 2, Funny

      Greek is easier to reed than hieroglyphics.

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    3. Re:Oh fuck Hellenistic period Egypt! by hedwards · · Score: 4, Funny

      Indeed, why don't they just use EMACS, it does have the appropriate function built in.

    4. Re:Oh fuck Hellenistic period Egypt! by cayenne8 · · Score: 2
      Did they find any rolling Papyrus?

      I think Josephus is still looking for some....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  2. Crowdcursed? by kiehlster · · Score: 4, Funny

    No thanks. I hear those Egyptian curses are nasty, and are acquired by simply reading something or breaking a seal.

    1. Re:Crowdcursed? by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Funny

      No thanks. I hear those Egyptian curses are nasty, and are acquired by simply reading something or breaking a seal.

      PHds have always treated grad students as disposable.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Crowdcursed? by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Funny

      That is how you measure success. If everyone in your data center dies, then the translation worked.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  3. smart ! by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 2

    I think this is a great idea, although they would need some peer review and a full board to accept the translations as being the most accurate....but a great way to save money, that's for sure

  4. check out zigzone dot com by FudRucker · · Score: 2

    just think if they setup a website similar to the jigsaw puzzle website jigzone that let anyone download a bunch of fragments and assemble them, and when they find two or more pieces that fit then that info in anonymously uploaded for further inspection and with the millions of internet users having access they might be able to complete this daunting task fairly soon

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:check out zigzone dot com by sgt+scrub · · Score: 3

      But then they would have to allow people to copy/download images. They couldn't have that! FTFA:"Images can not be copied or offloaded...". My answer, "Go fuck yourself. I have better things to do with my time than try to focus on thumbnail sized images on a shitty flash driven website that has moving images on it".

      --
      Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
  5. Try it... by wrfelts · · Score: 2

    It's actually pretty fun. I already transcribed one piece. It's running a bit slow though. When they said "crowd sourcing", I don't think they meant "slashdot crowd sourcing".

  6. Re:I'm disappointed by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You're trying to be silly, but that kind of information would be useful:
    - If I have a bunch of people's shopping lists, I'd be able to tell what sort of things were commonly eaten in that society.
    - Based on how many other people had those foods on the list, I'd likely be able to get an idea as to what's considered rare delicacies versus what's common food (e.g. caviar versus ground beef).
    - Especially combining that information with where the document was found, I'd have a good chance of linking menus to social classes.
    - Once I've got an idea of which social classes have these documents and which don't, I'd know how widespread literacy was in that society, whether there were only professional scribes or amateur writers as well, and maybe some sense of how integrated the scribes were with the rest of the society.

    I mean, imagine you're an archaeologist from the year 3000 trying to figure out why this "pizza" stuff was so wildly popular in ancient New York. Suddenly the nutritional information on the back of a pepperoni wrapper is vitally important.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  7. Somewhat misleading headline. by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 5, Informative

    As a late antique historian, I have to point out (to defend our territory, and, at the same time, avoid offending historians of an earlier period) that these are not "ancient Egyptian" in the sense most people mean. These are very late antique. I am glad to see a project like this, however. It's because of mundane papyrus stashes like these that we know more about daily life in Egypt, and Alexandria in particular, than any other area in late antiquity. For those who might be interested in the subject, I recommend R. Bagnall, Egypt in Late Antiquity (1993), C. Haas, Alexandria in Late Antiquity (1997), and the recent Egypt in the Byzantine World, 300-700, edited by Bagnall (2007), as some great places to start.

    1. Re:Somewhat misleading headline. by rubycodez · · Score: 2

      As a late antique historian

      We are saddened by the passing of yet another antique historian, and offer our sincerest condolences to your next of kin

    2. Re:Somewhat misleading headline. by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm afraid my own fields of study do not extend so far back, so I cannot speak about pre-Ptolemaic Egypt with any expertise. I can say that a standard introductory work in English is Cyril Aldred's The Egyptians (1984) and it receives fairly high marks in the reviews. Even after you finish Grimal, Aldred may prove worth reading as well. The Francophone tradition of scholarship, as represented by Grimal (a work translated from the French), is different in nearly all fields than the Anglophone (which is not to say better or worse). The classic, out of date, but very readable and detailed work is by Maspero. I cannot help but think that Maspero represents the analogue of Gibbon in my own field.

    3. Re:Somewhat misleading headline. by GNious · · Score: 2

      Egypt in Late Antiquity (1993)

      It really doesn't take a lot for something to be considered old and/or antiquated these days.

  8. Re:I'm disappointed by Tr3vin · · Score: 2

    Couldn't they just look it up on Wikipapyrus?

  9. There's your problem... by Comboman · · Score: 3, Funny

    There's your problem. These symbols that you're translating as "Door of Heaven" should be something more like "Star Gate".

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
  10. Made for Crowdsourcing by sycorob · · Score: 2

    I heard about this on RadioLab awhile ago - a trash dump full of fragments of old scrolls. I believe it was the "Detective Stories" episode: http://www.radiolab.org/2007/sep/10/

    They were saying it would take centuries to match up all of the pieces, because they only had a few people working on it, and so many scraps to go through. My immediate thought was that they should scan them all and put them on the Internet, and some bored 17 year old would write a program in Scala that would run in the cloud and match everything up in a weekend. Sounds like somebody else had the same idea ...

  11. I started one by tompaulco · · Score: 2

    I started doing one, but couldn't finish. I got as far as 3.1415926535897 93238462643383 27950288419716 93993751058209 74944592307816 40628620899862 80348253421170 but then I got bored. Meaningless gibberish. I did sneak a peek at the last page though. Turns out the last digit is 8.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  12. This is so cool! by Chitlenz · · Score: 2

    I think this kind of shit gives me hope that the internet isn't just for porn and poker anymore. What a great and smart way to exponentially increase the resources of the project. Stuff like this, and folding@home, and other crowd-sourced projects are an amazing phenomenon. Whoever is in charge knows how to sell it too, with the whole "read it while you translate it" concept, which kind of turns the whole thing into a video game. Nice work by the Oxford folk.

    --
    Imagination is the silver lining of Intelligence.
  13. Re:I'm disappointed by Quince+alPillan · · Score: 4, Funny

    That information failed to meet the notability guidelines and was deleted per the official deletion policy. Backups from that time period were written over a short time later under the assumption that the information would no longer be needed. Later attempts to put the information back were prevented due to the no original research policy and an ill-informed admin with a grudge who wouldn't allow the information, citing the sources being used were unreliable and could not be verified.

  14. Re:I'm disappointed by SnarfQuest · · Score: 2

    I mean, imagine you're an archaeologist from the year 3000 trying to figure out why this "pizza" stuff was so wildly popular in ancient New York. Suddenly the nutritional information on the back of a pepperoni wrapper is vitally important.

    Sodium! They alowed sodium in food products! Barbarians!

    Peparonni? Meat! Theay actually consumed living animals! Bloody Mindless Christians!

    Cheese? Milk! Why don't they just smear dog crap on it?

    They should have eaten what I had for lunch. Palmerized pseudo lichen, just like Mother used to make.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  15. a canticle for Leibowitz by gadget+junkie · · Score: 2

    You're trying to be silly, but that kind of information would be useful: - If I have a bunch of people's shopping lists, I'd be able to tell what sort of things were commonly eaten in that society. - Based on how many other people had those foods on the list, I'd likely be able to get an idea as to what's considered rare delicacies versus what's common food (e.g. caviar versus ground beef). - Especially combining that information with where the document was found, I'd have a good chance of linking menus to social classes. - Once I've got an idea of which social classes have these documents and which don't, I'd know how widespread literacy was in that society, whether there were only professional scribes or amateur writers as well, and maybe some sense of how integrated the scribes were with the rest of the society.

    I mean, imagine you're an archaeologist from the year 3000 trying to figure out why this "pizza" stuff was so wildly popular in ancient New York. Suddenly the nutritional information on the back of a pepperoni wrapper is vitally important.

    the text you are looking for is " A canticle for Leibowitz", by Walter Miller. I distinctly remember that in the story there's a little note attributed to Leibowitz himself, that reads:"Pound pastrami, can kraut, six bagels—bring home for Emma."
    upon this, and other finds, a civilisation is reborn after a nuclear war.

    Couriously enough, I read the book because it was quoted in the novel "Space", by James Michener, when one of the main characters wants to leave a legacy of love for science. Remeber, this is Slashdot!

    --
    "If a boss demands loyalty, give him integrity. But if he demands integrity, give him loyalty." (John Boyd, 1927-1997)