Slashdot Mirror


Building a Better 'Anonymous?'

An anonymous reader writes "A hacktivism panel at the DefCon hacker convention was conspicuously missing its star member Aaron Barr, who dropped out under legal pressure from his former company HBGary Federal, debated how Anonymous could channel its efforts for the greater good. Members of Anon attending the discussion chimed in, too."

16 of 119 comments (clear)

  1. Anonymous is too busy by DoktorSeven · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anonymous won't do anything productive. They're too busy trying to get doubles.

    --
    This is a sig. Deal with it.
  2. Posting anonymously for obvious reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Will try to keep it short to please the tl;dr crowd.

    Whatever they are discussing, it is not Anonymous, the good old "Internet Hating Machine". Wikipedia is defining it as "(...) a group initiating active civil disobedience and spread through the Internet while staying hidden, originating in 2003 on the imageboard 4chan" but it couldn't be farther from the truth.

    Check the origins and the unofficial mottos of Anonymous. "Doing it for the lulz", "Because none of us is as cruel as all of us".

    Trying to pass anonymous a dark side vigilant group, a collective of Batmans fighting for justice in the shadows is part of the mythology some of these misfit teenagers would like to believe. In reality, the only thing the so called "Anonymous" is capable to do on its own volition is to troll camwhores on Omegle and to ruin teenagers lifes.

    All the rest of the stuff that is pinned on them can be divided in two opposite movements:
    1. Highly capable individuals, cloaking themselves in the unwashed masses
    2. Naive and idealist youngsters in need of a banner to follow.

    The first group is responsible for most of the high profile hacks you see, Sony being the most visible example.

    The second group is responsible for all the PR you see going around, and the most likely to go down when it finally hits the fan. They would be on Greenpeace, PETA or any other of these protesting groups but choose Anonymous because it doesn't require socialization.

    tl;dr: there is such thing as Anonymous, but it is not doing what people are pinning on them. There are hackers wreaking havoc and blaming it on them, and there are naive idealists pretending to be internet superheroes. The real original Anonymous is still busy hacking facebook accounts and tracking down camwhores based on the EXIF of their pictures.

    1. Re:Posting anonymously for obvious reasons by schnikies79 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      People that use the word "newfags" are a cancer. The 4chan crowd is a cancer.

      The internet is worse off thanks to "Anonymous".

      --
      Gone!
    2. Re:Posting anonymously for obvious reasons by X0563511 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's like some freak kind of retard-lensing. The area where constructive interference of the Eternal September is at peak value.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  3. I guess I don't belong. by BitwiseX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "If you leave Anonymous because you don't agree with something it did, then you don't belong in Anonymous," Housch says.

    The problem with Anonymous being so unstructured, (which isn't a bad idea) is that anybody can do anything under that brand. As much as I like the thought and the idea of Anonymous, when they attack innocents I can't be associated with them. That's off target. Oh, they don't attack innocents you say? Well you look at those massive password dumps and tell me that all those folks are "wrong doers". I guarantee that MOST of those users are regular Joes (possibly even members of Anon!) who are just trying to make a pay check. Guilty by association doesn't work for entire corporations from top to bottom. Hell, I saw a mySQL dump of passwords for a nudist colony tweeted by Anonymous. Really? A corrupt nudist colony? When you're THAT off target, that's the kind of BS that's going to be used against you. "Chaotic" is the perfect description of Anonymous, and I don't see how it will be anything but. It's unfortunate.

    This is why I don't call myself a member of Anonymous, and don't see myself being a "member" anytime soon. Good messages, poor execution.

    1. Re:I guess I don't belong. by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      well, anonymous is just anonymous.

      it's not like you can blame one anon coward on slashdot for something that another anon coward contributes to the thread.

      but it's essential for how slashdot differs from many tech blogs to have that "post as anonymous" possibility - simply because then you get more possibility for truth that's logical on it's own.

      if you want to put it into context of the old copy-scene.. sure, there were few groups which distributed warez effectively - BUT the majority of (illegal)sw copying happened within the masses of regular computer users, so widely that you couldn't really stop it even if you tried.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:I guess I don't belong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Chaotic" is the perfect description of Anonymous

      The real question then is whether they are chaotic good or chaotic evil

  4. Anon by mfh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Isn't Anonymous kind of synonymous with progressive anarchy? Here are ten things Anonymous could do if they wanted to really be recognized as a positive force for all of humanity:

    1. Develop a manner where a person could support themselves legitimately anywhere in the world. (ie: generate legit income from fair labour)

    2. Develop a manner where a person could know what organizations to support and which to avoid.

    3. Help inform people about what they do that is positive.

    4. Cultivate talent.

    5. Grow numbers.

    6. Maintain their own security.

    7. Shun asshats.

    8. Give and get some lulz that are positive. Remember sometimes the lulz are funny

    9. Create some technologies and give them away to the planet.

    10. Develop a future for Anonymous. What is Anonymous in 20yrs? Is it still an underground group of loosely affiliated people? Is it every human being on the planet? What are the goals of this group? What should the goals be? What shouldn't the goals be?

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Anon by mfh · · Score: 2

      But in all honesty, there are far more notable problems in the world than what these kids are usually making a fuss about, or probably even aware about.

      Like how the fuck we're supposed to stop an asteroid from slamming into our planet when all of our resources are going to global oil wars, diverted away from space exploration and preparation against world-ending events?

      The oil wars are world-ending events themselves. We have the technology now to power cars in a way that won't cost us a dime. We have the technology now to power entire cities without ever having to lift a finger. Solar energy is the way to do it, but you can't operate a solar power station with a bunch of fucking anarchists running around fucking shit up.

      I mean if you look up at the sky and see the vast resources out there, you kinda just have to ask what the fuck we're doing here with this narrow minded anti-purpose.

      What is the balance between Anonymous and the Fascists, and is that perhaps a better solution? Can there be a balance between anarchy and fascism?

      Here is why I like Anonymous. I like the way they can latch onto something and tear it apart, and that 2/3 times the thing they are tearing down is some Fascist organization. The reason Anon attacked Scientology is because they are Fascists, not because of Tom Cruise.

      I think Fascist organizations in general are bad, so I like Anonymous for this purpose, but I don't see anyone contributing to making the world better, I just see that these guys are good at destroying things and destroying people and that's not positive. There aren't many other effective things a group of hackers can do except disrupt the fascist agenda. So when the fascist agenda is tied closely to the American economy, which it is, we see S&P downgrading the US credit score again. This downgrade is a direct result of efforts of the fascists to forcing the US towards a global police state situation. It's exactly what they want.

      I recommend SLC Punk! because it does kind of touch on some of the early ideas about what Anonymous wants to be as a whole, but why it can't be that because it can't be anything if it's not developed as anti-structure and that the whole idea of a structured or purposed Anonymous is one that is Fascist itself.

      --
      The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    2. Re:Anon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Progressive Anarchy? Possibly, but really everything I've seen so far regarding the Anonymous movement seems to indicate that they're the left's equivalent of the Tea Party. Only difference being that the political left has all but been entirely marginalized and shut out of policy discussions while the hardcore right now has a bit of a choke hold on government, as the default fiasco showed.

      Anonymous is supposed to be an idea, a "feeling" and not a centralized movement. It's the crystallized form of the political dissent built up on the left from being progressively shut out of the discussion and debate about the future of the world. More and more government is tending towards the authoritarian, and more and more we have loud cockbacks of frothing fecal matter like Santorum who are trying to turn back the clock and send us into a new dark age of human social interaction.

      Just like piracy is considered an economic metric of complete market failure of pricing in a given area (if people pirate, obviously your goods are too expensive for people to care to buy them) I think this kind of hacktivism is a sign of political failure to address the concerns of the people. When people feel shut out, when people feel violated, and when they feel like they have nothing to lose, they fight back. Sony is a great example of this. There efforts to squelch anyone with the PS3 keys, which each PS3 owner has a right to own seeing as it's embedded in THEIR console.

      Sony is not vulnerable legally, nobody has the cash or the time to take on a giant. Connectix/Bleem showed even if you were more than willing they would drag the case out so as to leave the poor plaintiffs in financial ruin despite winning the case. In this case it finally became too much, and the powerless struck back against Sony, hurting them the only way they knew how, their pocketbooks. Sony has now suffered millions of dollars in damage and possibly more depending on how some of their legal business with insurers fairs.

      They have now seen that they are no longer untouchable, that there is a price to pay for certain actions, and that there are some problems that no amount of money can make go away. I agree very much with the rest of the above though. Right now is always the most important time in history to start changing for the better. Anonymous is all of our collective psyche, a giant ocean of Lulz with which we sail on and we are all but waves upon that ocean. No single wave changes the motion of the ocean, but if enough work together they form a Tsunami, and we all know what those can do in the right places.

      So if Anonymous is simply decentralized social/political/economic rage, it must crystallize into something much more coherent and focused if it is to survive. This can happen if enough people decide to make some very public, high profile actions and set the overall tone of Anonymous in the above manner you describe. It must take a page from the only other type of decentralized mass movement: Standalone Complex.

      We are all individual pieces acting together for the same ideal, find a part to play, or get out of the way.

  5. Members of Anon... by John+Hasler · · Score: 2

    How do you know they were members? Did they produce membership cards?

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  6. Members of anon attending by Culture20 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Did they wear Groucho Marx glasses or Guy Faukes masks?

  7. Re:What he really means by justforgetme · · Score: 3, Interesting

    what's wrong with anti-corporatism when the corporations you rally against the source of your pain?

    --
    -- no sig today
  8. Re:What he really means by somersault · · Score: 2

    Note that I do agree with some of the stuff they have done, and I think it's important for corporations to be more conscientious about data security. But not everything Anonymous does is noble or beneficial to society as a whole.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  9. "Star"?? by sunderland56 · · Score: 3, Informative

    On what basis is Aaron Barr a "star" anywhere, much less a conference about computer security??

    When your (former) company is the poster child for how not to do security, I would think your main reason for showing up at DefCon would be if you wanted to be publicly humiliated.

  10. Re:Dear Anonymous/LulzSec/AntiSec by justforgetme · · Score: 2

    Quite valid points.

    I disagree with all of them :-)

    And no, this is not a joke. The simple fact of the matter is that the glacial speed of evolution in goverments, their agencies and multinational monetary institutions has left them way behind from an administrative point of view. In a state in which they cannot anymore supervise their own mass and activities and because of the internal mechanisms that link them all together they turn to solutions too inefficient from their inception on. These choices that are being made and have been being made since the end of WW1 are leading everyone into the same vicious cycle of approving more and more inefficient countermeasures that end up inflating them even more and perpetuating the problem.

    Nature millenia ago developed a very good mechanism to take care of such mishaps, it's called SPECIATION and surprisingly it is the only one behavior our economic society has to copy from nature.

    So: Sorry but everything you said is irrelevant

    --
    -- no sig today