Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Laptop + DSLR Backpacks

I typically travel with a laptop and camera, but usually with a bag for each: a backpack for the laptop and a lowepro top loader for the camera. I'd really prefer a single backpack for both a 17" macbook and a DSLR with a larger 24-70mm or 70-200mm lens attached, as well as perhaps a few spare lenses and accessories. I've seen options from Case Logic (the SLRC-206), Kata (the DR-467), the Streetwalker Hard Drive, and LowePro (the CompuDay Photo 250, the CompuPrimus AW), but I'm not seeing a clear winner. I'm guessing a few of you have opinions on this subject, so share them so I don't buy a piece of garbage.

282 comments

  1. Mountain Smith packs rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    http://www.mountainsmith.com/products.asp?productId=275&categoryId=13&subCategoryId=14&subCategory2Id=0

    1. Re:Mountain Smith packs rock by capnkr · · Score: 1

      Seconded, for the quality of the gear. I don't need the camera capability, so I use the Explore pack, bought from Sierra Trading Post for about 1/2 retail. Extremely pleased with the fit and function, after having tried probably 15+ other packs in the past ten years.

      --
      "...there are some things that can beat smartness and foresight. Awkwardness and stupidity can." ~ Mark Twain
  2. Re:Don't go cheap! by Flyerman · · Score: 1

    oh come on! The article is about a backup and all we get a few lines? You can do better Dr. Bob!

  3. LowePro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use a LowePro ProTrekker 300 AW. It fits the description you provided, but it might be a bit large for you.

    1. Re:Lowepro by lordholm · · Score: 1

      I had one for a 17 inch MBP, but it really was too small for the Mac (it did fit in, but just barely and it was very cramped). I also tried to fit in a D7000 with a 18-105 lens. I cannot recommend you to do in the CompuDayPack for a MBP 17 with DSLR.

      I sent the rucksack back to the seller and got a CompuRover AW as replacement. It is quite large, but will fit the D7000 and a 17 inch MBP fine. A warning though, the laptop compartment of the CompuRover is on the side (the Daypack has the opening on the top), meaning that if you forget to close it your laptop will fall out of the CompuRover. I ruined my screen this way and had to get a new laptop (though my employer paid for that), I can guarantee that I will never forget to close it again though. Even though this accident happened, I am in general very happy with the CompuRover AW and highly recommend it, unless you are a forgetful person that tend to forget closing zippers often. Honestly, I cannot say wether a 200 mm lens will fit as I don't have one, the pockets for storing lenses and cameras are 200 mm deep, so assuming it is a zoom lens, it will probably be OK. Whether the camera fits depends on the model, so I highly recommend that you try it out (if you can only find one online, you can always return the backpack if it doesn't fit).

      --
      "Civis Europaeus sum!"
    2. Re:Lowepro by crath · · Score: 1

      I recently used a Lowepro Pro Runner 450 AW DSLR Backpack (http://www.amazon.com/Lowepro-Pro-Runner-450-Black/dp/B0036B67B6/ref=sr_1_24?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1313425697&sr=1-24) on a two week holiday trip through India. It did a great job carrying my laptop, camera, accessories. To lighten the bag, I would often leave the AC adapters for the laptop and camera in the hotel room; but, I always carried the laptop, camera, and lenses (that is, the expensive items).

      The Lowepro 450 does not provide a convenient way to get the camera in and out of the pack; but, I haven't even found a camera-only bag/pack that offers my large DSLR easy access.

    3. Re:Lowepro by geogob · · Score: 1

      You seem to have the wrong backpack for your setup and needs. If you only have a single lens to carry around, you would be much better served with a normal laptop fitting backpack and a shouldered top loader for the camera. Considering your equipment, my feeling is that would be more probably more adequate for your likely use of the camera (which I can only guess).

      Camera backpack fitting laptops are often too large to be useful if you have a single camera or a single lens. Plus, their second compartment is usually too small.

      If you want to stick to backpacks, maybe something like the Lowepro CompuDay woule be better in your case. I would definitely avoid dedicated multiple camera or multiple objective compartment packs (like most camera backpack have).

      Go get one and keep your FastPack for your future needs. Personally, I think you'd be better off with a combo top loader and normal backpack. A good top loader is always fun to have. I use it alone or in combination with the FastPack for quick access to a second camera.

  4. Think Tank by ScentCone · · Score: 2

    If you haven't checked out the bags from Think Tank , then you're missing out on the good stuff. They do it right, and charge accordingly. Several flavors of bags/packs well suited to the sort of mix you're talking about. Their ShapeShifter is worth some study, as are some of the Urban Disguise models. I use lots of their products in one way or another, and swear by them.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    1. Re:Think Tank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He already mentioned the Streetwalker HardDrive. I think it's safe to say he's looked there, too.

    2. Re:Think Tank by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Here's a better idea. Get a cheap airline ticket to New York City. Go to B&H Photo / Video, wander around the acre of backpacks and such and find the one that works best for you.

      Then slowly back away from everything else, otherwise you may find yourself needing 2 backpacks and a Pelican case.

      Really, it's such a personal decision and there are so many choices. NYC is really nice this time of year....

      (Personally, I use a LowePro DryZone 200 (It's completely waterproof) and ditch the Lapzilla for a 13 inch MacBook which works fine for tagging, organizing, storage and other road trip type things. Should be able to pick up one of them for a song these days).

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:Think Tank by etnoy · · Score: 1

      +1 for Think Tank products. I use several of their products, including the aforementioned Streetwalker Harddrive. Like you, I lug around some serious SLR gear (plus laptop, accessories and heavy tripod) and this bag has performed well and has got very good build quality. Of course, it's quite pricey, but so is your gear.

      --
      Quantum hacker.
    4. Re:Think Tank by hedwards · · Score: 1

      For a thousand dollars and several days off work, one can afford to buy the wrong back pack and even after buying a couple others still come out somewhat ahead financially.

    5. Re:Think Tank by JazzLad · · Score: 1

      WTF do you live that it will cost $1000 & take several days to do a simple NYC round-trip?

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    6. Re:Think Tank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hawaii. :\

      Besides, taking a day off of work can equal a few hundreds of dollars off lost income. Absurd to think a NYC trip can be so simple.

    7. Re:Think Tank by acmwallace · · Score: 1

      I agree about the ThinkTank bags - I have 3 different ones for different circumstances, but they are extremely well-made bags. Very solid. Thom Hogan has an article on bags (http://bythom.com/bags.htm) which is quite good. But sticking with ThinkTank, LowePro, Kata, Tenba... you won't get a piece of garbage. You might not get the perfect bag for your purposes, but it won't be garbage.

    8. Re:Think Tank by dunng808 · · Score: 1

      In Hawaii people don't carry cameras in bags because A) it makes them look like tourists, B) it ruins our tan line, and C) those 1,000MM lenses used for surf shots and bikini watching don't fit.

      --

      Gary Dunn
      Open Slate Project

    9. Re:Think Tank by hedwards · · Score: 1

      The lowest price for airfare I can find is $600 round trip and most of the fares were closer to $800 without taxes. Then throw in the cost of food and lodging and you definitely get pretty close to $1k.

      You know a lot of folks don't live on the East Coast.

    10. Re:Think Tank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh, I eat anyway, so I discount food. Lodging? Ever consider a daytrip? Fly out in the AL & back in the PM? Maybe you don't live in/near a sufficiently large city for same-day, but I have flown out (a couple years ago) to the (other) coast for a day in the sun. Just 1 day missed work to spend a day at the beach ... worth it (and closer to $300, but I realize travel costs keep going up).

    11. Re:Think Tank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally: Winnipeg Manitoba Canada.

      Round trip airfare, Saturday September 10'th (assuming a standard M-F schedule via one of the cheaper providers, (westjet in this case) would be $1198.90 CAD alone.

      If you do it over four days, (tuesday - friday) you can get it as low as $700 in airfare, but then food/lodging alone will put you WELL over $1000.

  5. I gave up on DSLRs when traveling by mholve · · Score: 0

    After dragging my 25lbs. backpack of Canon DSLR gear around for 10 hours in Amsterdam one time (too many) I changed gears (literally) and went with a rangefinder system. So much easier to deal with, and there's no need to drag around a huge back anymore. Read more about it;

    La Vida Leica - http://lavidaleica.com

  6. Shadow Conspiracy. by pecosdave · · Score: 1

    Nice backpack for lots of stuff. Lots of body hugging stuff too. /flame on!

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  7. Naneu Pro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The folks over at Naneu make some great bags. I carry a briefcase style one that came with SLR/DSLR inserts, and it is fantastic. Based on your criteria and my experience with their other products, I expect that the U220 would be an excellent choice. http://www.naneubags.com/products-by-series/urban-gear/u220n . It's $300, so that's the other side of it. IMO, you get what you pay for in this sort of thing.

  8. Tamrac- Great for Traveling by erfunath · · Score: 2

    I've traveled all over the place carrying all that gear (that's actually my exact list of typical stuff) and I've used a Tamrac "Aero Speed Pack". I actually have the older version (unfortunately orange), but the newer one has a side zipper to get that camera out of there faster. I've never had to complain really. And ditching the laptop is hardly a possibility sometimes. Sometimes you just need all that stuff.

    1. Re:Tamrac- Great for Traveling by elrick_the_brave · · Score: 1

      I second using Tamrac. Had mine for three or four years now. I've put small and large laptops in as well as magazines and iPads. It holds my lenses plus binocs, power cables, etc.

      It does get weighty though. It's a good traveling backpack if you have a decent back. If you are not planning to take "everything" where you go, go with a nice small roller for plane trips (holds your laptop and other accessories) and a small shoulder pack for your body and a couple lenses. It really depends how you are going to look at your whole trip.

      --
      (1st sig) If this were a snappy sig, you'd be reading it right now. (2nd sig) I'm a karma whore. >Insert FUD here
    2. Re:Tamrac- Great for Traveling by naroom · · Score: 1

      Thirding the orange Tamrac Aero. I've had mine for three years and carry my 17" laptop in it daily. DSLR + 4 lenses fits in the camera section when I'm hiking or vacationing. Even has a spare pocket for sandwiches! Very sturdy and reliable.

    3. Re:Tamrac- Great for Traveling by PortHaven · · Score: 1
    4. Re:Tamrac- Great for Traveling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that the Tamrac Aero Speed Packs are a good choice. I've got the 85 model. You can strap a tripod - or another, light bag - underneath and it'll gladly hold my Nikon D200 with battery grip and large-ish lens attached, plus two additional lenses and other kit in the bottom half.
      My only real beef with it is that only two of the internal dividers fold, so you can't create "freeform" sub-compartments inside.

    5. Re:Tamrac- Great for Traveling by chundo · · Score: 1

      Tamrac is great. I've used this one for about 5 years now, fits all my expensive electronics in one carry-on bag for traveling. http://www.amazon.com/Tamrac-3380-Photo-Laptop-Backpack/dp/B000XXBMCY

  9. LowePro Vertex AW 200 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best photo related investment. Never looked back. They say it's only for 15in laptop, but my MacBook Pro 17" fits perfectly.

  10. Stick with two bags by KeithH · · Score: 2

    Honestly, I can't see the argument for a single bag. I travel with similar equipment and the last thing I want to do is add the weight of a laptop when I'm out photographing. The laptop stays in the hotel or car. What I do carry with the camera is a small USB drive which holds one of my three backups (in case my laptop is stolen.)

    Keep in mind that the laptop requires a power adaptor and, internationally, a plug adaptor. If you're like me, you might even include a mouse and other USB cables to charge phones and MP3 players. In other words, you might as well have a dedicated bag.

    For bag advice, I strongly recommend that you go to a dedicated site such as dpreview. I've received excellent advice for people there.

    Regards,
    Keith

    1. Re:Stick with two bags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, I can't see the argument for a single bag.

      You've obviously never flown Easyjet

    2. Re:Stick with two bags by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I can't see the argument for a single bag

      You only have two hands. I could add to this argument, but it really comes down to this. Sometimes you need to have your bag in your hand plus have one hand free.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    3. Re:Stick with two bags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then put the 2nd one on your shoulder(s)??

    4. Re:Stick with two bags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if you don't actually take the full pack with you when you're out photographing, the OP's request is still valid. I have two camera cases: one with all my travel equipment such as a battery charger, and one with just the camera and whatever accessories that I'll need when I'm out photographing. But the nice thing is that the smaller case fits inside the larger, so during travel I have just one case.

      Perhaps the OP is asking for something similar: a larger bag that he can use as a carry-on on the plane as well as to/from the hotel, into which he can fit his smaller camera case for when he's out and about, and still have room for his laptop.

      That said, I would personally go a completely different route: Get a netbook, and then any backpack should have plenty of room for the camera.

    5. Re:Stick with two bags by crath · · Score: 1

      You definitely want one bag: leaving your laptop in your hotel room is a bad idea unless you can be certain that you can robustly secureit while you're out sight-seeing. Some will argue that keeping everything in one bag is less secure because everything can be stolen in one "grab"; but, I manage that by simply wearing my camera plus laptop backpack at all times (unless I'm in the car). If I do have to put the bag down (like sitting in a restaurant) then I put one of my legs through a shoulder strap.

      As a final precaution, I carry two backup hard drives and each night do two backups. One of the HDs goes in my wife's day-pack, and the other I either lock in the hotel safe or leave unsecured in the room (if I have no other option). When we fly, my wife carries one HD, and the second HD goes in a checked bag,

    6. Re:Stick with two bags by Suferick · · Score: 1

      I agree with the advice to ditch the heavy laptop but sometimes you want to see what a shot really looks like. This is one of the rare times when a netbook is the best tool - and the new dual core jobs will even cope with a certain amount of image editing

    7. Re:Stick with two bags by __aaitqo8496 · · Score: 1

      Just because you can't see the argument for a single bag doesn't mean that there isn't one. For example, when I recently traveled to Peru, I rarely let my backpack out of sight—I didn't random hostels enough to leave thousands of dollars of equipment there, nor did I have a vehicle. That said, I did very well with a single piece of luggage, the Calumet BP1500 Large Backpack. It fit my 13" Macbook Air (with plenty of room for a larger laptop), my DSLR with a couple lenses and requisite accessories, in addition to clothes and whatever else I needed to survive for 10 days. All with enough space to bring back souvenirs.

      The simplicity of a single bag was a boon when cramming myself into a taxi colectivo for 2 hours with a dozen strangers. Honestly, I'm not sure there would have been room for extra luggage.

      As for the author's request, most details can be found on the product page, but in my opinion, the best part of that bag was having a hip belt to take the admittedly heavy load off my shoulders while hiking.

    8. Re:Stick with two bags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A) Don't take the laptop in the first place OR leave it on your back in the backpack
      B) the "toploader" style of camera bag is ordinarily slung over your shoulder

      You now have 2 hands free. If carrying your backpack in-hand, you still have one free.

      I don't usually take my laptop with me, but whether I do or not I have both hands free to use with the camera because the camera bag is over my shoulder. With some of the places I've clambered around, having both hands free is essential.

      Like the previous post, I don't understand what the problem is or why you would want to change from a toploader +- backpack. Having things in two separate bags means you can leave the laptop behind where you know it will be secure and only take the much smaller camera bag. In my toploader there's plenty of room for some memory cards, a usb flash drive, and I even keep my iPod in there. I only use one lens when traveling -- a 28-105mm lens with a faux-macro closeup setting. It's not as much magnification as a 200mm+ lens, but on the other hand I can just move closer to the subject (105mm to 200mm isn't *that* much difference -- only ~2x -- and the light performance is going to be worse with long lenses unless they're huge and heavy) and it means I don't have to swap lenses all the time or carry a lot of bulk. My goal has always been to travel as light as possible. If I know I have to do long-lens work or need to review pictures, then I put a bigger lens in the backpack and take it with me, but the camera still goes in the toploader over the shoulder for easy access.

      The point is, two separate bags gives you more options and more flexibility than one when you go out for the day. I'd go nuts if I had to take my entire backpack off or swing it around every time I wanted to retrieve the camera to take a photo. I don't understand why the submitter's preference is for one bag unless they're prone to losing things.

    9. Re:Stick with two bags by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Two words: Gaffers Tape

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    10. Re:Stick with two bags by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I can't see the argument for a single bag. I travel with similar equipment and the last thing I want to do is add the weight of a laptop when I'm out photographing. The laptop stays in the hotel or car.

      But first you have to get the laptop *to* the hotel...
       
      It also depends on shooting conditions - if you're headed out for a dedicated shooting expedition, leaving the laptop behind and/or having two bags sometimes makes sense. But a single bag does make sense if it's "daily use/daily carry" bag, where everything goes into one bag because you don't know what the day will bring. (That being said, I found that an iPhone replaces 90% of what I used to use a laptop for.) I wouldn't carry a laptop out in the wild, but I certainly would in the city.

      For bag advice, I strongly recommend that you go to a dedicated site such as dpreview. I've received excellent advice for people there.

      I find the best bag review site to be cambags.com because it features user reviews and pictures of the bag packed/in use, sorted both by bag type, and by camera model. The Flickr group for a given camera is generally also a valuable source.

    11. Re:Stick with two bags by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      That just doesn't work for me. When I'm at conventions, I don't have ready access to a car or hotel room. Free time happens in spurts during the day, between events, and that's when I need the laptop. And I might need the camera at any time.

      I really liked this bag when I saw it at the SXSW trade show this year:
      http://www.amazon.com/National-Geographic-NG-2475-Explorer/dp/B000FJ2OTG
      It would hold two camera bodies and a few lenses along with a 15" laptop, but it wouldn't hold a 17" MacBook Pro.

      Does anyone know of a similar-looking bag that could hold a slightly larger laptop?

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    12. Re:Stick with two bags by pz · · Score: 1

      You don't travel internationally much by air, I'm guessing. There are much stricter limits on carry-on bags in Europe than in the US (although the US has recently started to get a little stricter). You are not able, for example, to carry a briefcase for your laptop, a camera bag for your camera, *and* a roll-aboard. You would need to have at least one fewer pieces with you, sometimes two, depending on how strict the enforcement is, and how big your camera bag and briefcase are.

      Having one bag for laptop and camera would be important, especially if that one bag would be about the same size as a briefcase.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    13. Re:Stick with two bags by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I can't see the argument for a single bag. I travel with similar equipment and the last thing I want to do is add the weight of a laptop when I'm out photographing.

      You put too much faith in hotel staff and even hotel safes.

      Also, keep in mind many DSLR users carry three or more lenses since ultrazooms are a compromise at best; not good at landscape shots, not good at telephoto, and not good at macro. So, even if you choose quality zoom lenses, figure on one wide zoom for landscape shots, one zoom telephoto, and one to cover the middle range. I have a very good camera bag which can handle three lenses, lens and sensor cleaning tools, remote shutter release/intervalometer, spare batteries, polarizing filters, an organizer for CF cards, plus a flash or two along with a small diffuser. I made the mistake of hiking up a small mountain with all the gear in that shoulder bag and I was hurting for days!

      I've been checking out local stores for backpacks for a while; Calumet Boston had a relatively small selection (I have not been there since they moved to new space) and all of the smaller botique stores (Ritz, mom & pops, etc) and big box stores (Worst Buy, Sprawl*Mart, etc) have pretty crappy selections as well, intended more for the folks who have one ultrazoom lens, or a bridge camera. So, I'm going to be reading this thread pretty thoroughly since I am also looking for backpack suggestions. :)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    14. Re:Stick with two bags by KeithH · · Score: 1

      You put too much faith in hotel staff and even hotel safes.

      No, I do not put too much faith in the hotel staff; that's why I include one of my backup disks *with* my camera bag.

      The simple fact is that if I had to carry my laptop in addition to all my camera gear when I'm hiking up a mountain side, I simply wouldn't be able to cover as much ground. I'm not a professional so I can't afford a sherpa to help carry all the gear.

      I'm prepared to lose my laptop. I'm not prepared to lose my photos.

  11. How thoughtful... by haus · · Score: 0

    ... for you to place all of this valuable gear into a single, easy to handle package for someone else to walk of with.

    1. Re:How thoughtful... by xMrFishx · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I'd find one bag easier to keep track of than three.

    2. Re:How thoughtful... by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      One bag is just easier to keep up with than two. I'm not going to think "well, even though it's easier for someone to steal one of my bags, at least they'll only get $2500 worth of equipment from me instead of $5000". I'm going to keep track of my stuff and make damn sure they get none of it.

      I shoot Q&As and celebrity events at film conventions. Free time occurs in spurts between movies, not at the end of the day, so leaving my laptop in my car or in a hotel room just doesn't work. And there's simply not room for me to hold two larger bags in a theater seat; one I can put behind my legs as the film starts and whip it out when the credits end.

      I really liked this bag when I saw it at the SXSW trade show this year:
      http://www.amazon.com/National-Geographic-NG-2475-Explorer/dp/B000FJ2OTG

      It would hold two camera bodies and a few lenses along with a 15" laptop, but it wouldn't hold a 17" MacBook Pro. I haven't found a similar one that would hold a slightly larger laptop.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  12. Lowepro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a Lowepro Compudaypack (http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000EY5R8C/). I bought it in a sort of emergency need situation (I had doubts about an old bag holding up) for use in international travel.

    I love it.

    This bag gets extremely heavy (two DSLRs with 4-5 lenses, 17" XPS, my wife's netbook; along with extra batteries and a complement of chargers for everything) and has held up extremely well. Best pack I've owned, if you shop around some of the Ritz/Wolf camera places will sell it for under $60 from time to time.

  13. Re:Obligatory apple slam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm guessing a few of you have opinions on this subject, so share them so I don't buy a piece of garbage.

    Bad idea. By the time you're done listening to everyone's opinions on Slashdot, you'll be fully convinced absolutely everything on planet earth and beyond is a piece of garbage.

  14. StreetWalker® HardDrive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the winner would be StreetWalker® HardDrive, based on the specifications and photos I see it looks like that is the perfect job for your needs and most of photographers which get their camera equipment and the laptop. A problem might be that you asked to fit your 17" laptop and StreetWalker® HardDrive is only for 15" I think.

    -Gent

  15. Lowepro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just tried the Lowepro Fastpack 350. Online, it looked perfect, but the top compartment is rather small, while the bottom (camera) compartment was way too big for me. You didn't mention what DSLR you have. I have the Nikon d7000, middle-of-the range, about 700g + lens (18-105) attached. I intend to own a 50mm lense (rather small) and an ultrawide once I can afford it. Anyway, after much hesitation and research, I gave up finding a good backpack. Instead, I choose the Lowepro Inverse 200 AW - rain cover, tick materials, and comfortable to use. A bit big for your waist, and fully loaded perhaps a bit heavy, but it does have a shoulder strap. I'm kinda worried about safety - there are thieves riding fast motorbikes that can grab your camera - so I use both. It's on my waist while I have the shoulder strap across my body (that relieves some of the weight from my waist) - it's more comfortable than you'd think. I'm rather happy with this set up, for I have really fast access to my camera. This bag holds a DSLR like mine with a 70-200 attached + one lens, or a smaller lens attached and two other lenses. That's enough for me, I don't need quick access to more lenses. If I go out to shoot landscapes, I'd attach the wide lens, and I'd put a more generic lense in the bag. Same with portraits. I'd keep the third lense safely in my backpack. This, waistbelt + a small, comfortable backpack provides the best mobility/safety combo. For me, at least.

  16. Lowepro Computrekker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out the Computrekkers from Lowepro. I have had the AW version for a little over 7 years. I've taken it all the way thru the rain forests of Costa Rica and across Europe without any problems.

    1. Re:Lowepro Computrekker by terjeber · · Score: 1

      The CompuTrekkers are good, particularly if you have a bit of equipment. Depending on where you go and what you do I would not give up the fast access to camera I get from the FastPack 350 however.

  17. Re:50 pound backpack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about you, but have you ever tried to take a tablet + DSLR with you for more then a week?

    One day, tablet's will be available for power users. right now, you might as well just dump/edit photos on the camera itself. it'll provide you little for functionality.

  18. Go generic by TrumpetPower! · · Score: 2

    Go to your favorite store that sells knapsacks for hikers and students. REI is great if you don't mind the price premium.

    Bring all your gear.

    Load all your gear into each and every pack they have, and put the pack on your back. Include the packs which you're sure wouldn't work.

    You should be able to find something that comfortably fits everything and which doesn't scream, "Mug me! I'm carrying around thousands of dollars of easily-fencable equipment!" Instead, you're going after the "I'm a poor student lugging around waaay too many textbooks" look.

    If you don't have cases for the individual items, you can get padded cloths with velcro to wrap them in; your local pro camera shop should have some. Winter socks also work great for lenses. The goal here is just something that'll keep stuff from scratching as it rubs against each other plus a very little bit of shock protection. No backpack will provide more than that, so there's no point in pretending. If that's what you really need, get a Pelican case and a custom foam insert -- and forget about carrying it on your back.

    Cheers,

    b&

    --
    All but God can prove this sentence true.
    1. Re:Go generic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why, they make exactly what he's after? I have one, even has room for tripod. I just don't help lazy people with macs...

    2. Re:Go generic by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      I agree. There's an almost universal pattern - backpacks that are "camera-oriented" have vastly inferior frames and suspensions to good hiking backpacks. There are a few exceptions but they are rare.

      I strongly recommend a frontloader pack and not a toploader - unfortunately in larger sizes this is rare. The Kelty Redwing is one of the exceptions. It's an excellent frontloader that is VERY comfortable.

      Put your padded cases inside, or possibly go "all out" and convert it to a dedicated camera backpack by adding your own foam dividers.

      The sides are great for holding a tripod and monopod - stick 2 feet of a tripod into the water bottle pocket and strap the tripod to the pack (there are straps for this).

      If you go to Kinesis Photo Gear, you can get straps/harnesses that let you clip your camera to the shoulder straps of the pack - FAR more comfortable than a neckstrap!

      You may want to consider a modified Redwing from photobackpacker.com - the modified ones have a "squared up" top (more room) and a zipper extended all the way to the bottom of the pack (easier loading/unloading). I kind of regret buying a standard Redwing instead of one of the PBP modified ones. Unfortunately, PBP's inserts for the pack are oriented towards LF cameras, but the pack itself is a great base.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    3. Re:Go generic by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      I think about the cost of the typical L-series Canon lens, and I cringe at the thought of carrying it in a "winter sock."

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    4. Re:Go generic by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      I think about the cost of the typical L-series Canon lens, and I cringe at the thought of taking it out of the original box.

      Fixed that for you.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    5. Re:Go generic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should be able to find something that comfortably fits everything and which doesn't scream, "Mug me! I'm carrying around thousands of dollars of easily-fencable equipment!" Instead, you're going after the "I'm a poor student lugging around waaay too many textbooks" look.

      Thanks to Amazon's textbook buyback program, textbooks are easily fencable, too!

    6. Re:Go generic by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      I have L-series lenses including the ~$1000 24-105mm f/4L. I sometimes travel with them unprotected - not even with socks - in a jumble at the bottom of a small shoulder bag (I do usually keep them in bags with foam dividers, just not always).

      These things are built to last - you'd never be able to tell how much abuse they've taken; they look brand new (and no mechanical issues either). On the other hand, many (though not all) less expensive lenses *do* get very beat-up looking, and fast. But even then, it's worth it to me to have quick access. Yeah I could resell these things for more money later if I kept them pristine, but then, I wouldn't have gotten much use out of them if they were still pristine.

      I'm an amateur photographer, and my expensive collection of equipment is uninsured, and I couldn't afford to replace any of it right now. But I don't baby it because I care about the photographs I make, not the equipment.

    7. Re:Go generic by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Go to your favorite store that sells knapsacks for hikers and students. REI is great if you don't mind the price premium.

      I have to disagree - those stores are wonderful if you're hiker, student, or someone who needs a backpack for use on the trail or for daily use and who incidentally wants to carry a camera along. They're much less useful for the photographer who wants to carry a camera and incidentally some other stuff.
       
      Visit REI or some other serious backpacker/hiker/student type store *first* in order to learn how to fit a backpack and how a properly fitted one feels... Then go to a pro camera shop to get advice, try on different bags, and to actually select and buy your bag.
       

      Load all your gear into each and every pack they have, and put the pack on your back. Include the packs which you're sure wouldn't work.

      I concur 100% - you'll never know if a bag is going to work unless you load it and try it out.
       

      You should be able to find something that comfortably fits everything and which doesn't scream, "Mug me! I'm carrying around thousands of dollars of easily-fencable equipment!" Instead, you're going after the "I'm a poor student lugging around waaay too many textbooks" look.

      I tried that route, and ended up with a backpack designed for poor students and too many textbooks - but which absolutely sucked for carrying a camera. The bad part is that I spent too long convincing myself the bag would work if I just kept trying and ended up keeping it too long to be able to return it. Even worse - said student bag ended up costing just as much than the camera bag I eventually bought. (Sturdy and comfortable bags aren't cheap.) I ended up going with a bag that wasn't quite so stealthy but which actually worked as a camera bag.
       

      The goal here is just something that'll keep stuff from scratching as it rubs against each other plus a very little bit of shock protection. No backpack will provide more than that, so there's no point in pretending.

      With a daily use camera bag, you're not so much worried about large shock loads on your gear as you are about the wear and tear caused by bouncing around and banging against each other as you go about your daily business - and a proper dedicated camera bag excels at that, while your solution provides little-to-no protection. (It takes a hell of a lot more than a bit of padded cloth or a winter sock to protect a lens as large as those described by the OP.) When you've spent a couple grand on a decent DSLR and lenses, you're stupid to not protect that investment by spending a couple of hundred on a proper bag. If you're a dedicated photographer (rather than someone who just carries a backpack and happens to carry a camera), a proper bag also offers something a half-ass solution doesn't - organization. Places for extra cards, for extra lenses, for filters, for your cleaning kit...
       
      A proper bag pays for itself a hundred times over. Spend the time and money to do it right, and you'll never regret a penny.

    8. Re:Go generic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree on the Pelican case. It isn't easy to carry, and it is heavy. But your camera will be safe.

    9. Re:Go generic by Meski · · Score: 1

      The 'poor student' look has to go deeper than just the pack, it's clothes, hair, etc as well. Or the muggers will be unconvinced.

  19. Crumpler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recommend something from Crumpler (http://www.crumpler.com/US/). I use one of their backpacks and its pretty nice and is fairly stealth compared to Tamrac/Lowepro.

    1. Re:Crumpler by RDW · · Score: 1

      Yes, Crumpler has a very nice range of these things:

      http://www.crumpler.com/us/Camera-Bags/Camera-Backpacks.html

      Tough fabric, nice designs and less boxy than much of the competition (though this means that clearances can be tight, so make sure your gear will actually fit). Some are designed so that the main compartment can only be accessed when the pack is removed, which makes things more difficult for pickpockets.

  20. Re:Don't go cheap! by Mister+Fright · · Score: 2

    I've also noticed a lot of the "show me evidence" science-cultists, too. They can't argue Chiropractic's merits so they attack me.

    Asking for evidence isn't an attack, it's called being rational. I think you're the one that can't argue Chiropractic's merits, no one from from Big Whatever-a cares.

  21. Burton Photo Packs by VooDoo999 · · Score: 1

    The Resolution has a laptop compartment.
    They just released their 2012 gear this weekend. Definitely check them out in person.
    Haven't used their photo packs, but I've had good luck with lots of their other packs over the years.

  22. You'll probably wind up with more than 1 bag by tonywong · · Score: 2

    I've got LowePro, Kata and Clik Elite bags and I'll probably wind up getting more.

    None are perfect but they all are pretty good, depending on your needs.

    LowePro: quality construction, high price, thick padding. Photo Trekker AW has water resistant zippers. Bag (not me!) survived a tumble out of a minivan on the Kalahari desert when the hatch wasn't latched properly. Only damage was a slightly decentered 50-500 OS lens, 1DIV, 5D2, Sigma 12-24 and TCs flash guns unscathed. Bag didn't flinch with 42 pounds of gear. Bag is on it's way out with plastic stiffener bits coming out after 8 years of heavy weight use. No tears or rips in the fabric and looks perfect externally though.

    Kata: lighter weight, innovative design. Love their sling bag 3N1-20. Just doesn't hold enough for me. Also evaluating Bumblee-222 and front pack but probably not the one I should have tried (220). Front harness system looks less functional than the Clik Elite, but the frame ventilation system seems the most comfortable and coolest (but takes up valuable space). Padding seems adequate but choosing the lightweight series makes me question the protection.

    Clik Elite: lower pricing than LowePro, less padding, slightly lighter weight. Average fit and finish. Clean and innovative design. Pro Express bag not wide enough (center row lens hood gets squeezed with lenses in the outside lanes) compared to LowePro design but guaranteed for airline compatibility. Front harness system integrates well to pack.

    I'm going to look at the Tenba shootouts as well, and the newer LowePro replacement for my older Photo Trekker, the 400AW (pricey, especially in Canada).

    I carry around an iPad and a 13" MacBook Air so I don't need a 17" laptop carrier.

    1. Re:You'll probably wind up with more than 1 bag by tonywong · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, forgot I have ThinkTank gear as well, pretty darn good stuff. Don't forget to try Andy Bigg's Kiboko bag too, it's very highly regarded among travelling pros, don't think it handles a laptop though. Never seen a photographer with Case Logic stuff but photogear queers are usually brand snobs as well.

    2. Re:You'll probably wind up with more than 1 bag by ethan0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Bag (not me!) survived a tumble out of a minivan

      Sorry to hear about your death. I hope you feel better soon.

    3. Re:You'll probably wind up with more than 1 bag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've also got a LowePro camera/laptop bag, and it's solid. Good ergonomics (for me, at least), excellent padding, no worries. Isn't too big to be legitimate carry-on luggage, either. Survived a couple of bumps and drops, with no problems.

  23. Lowepro Fastpack 350 by geogob · · Score: 2

    I have a Fullframe DSLR (implying large large and heavy lenses) and a MBP 17". Fits perfectly in the FP 350. I really like the good and quick access to the camera, that can be taken out without fully removing the backpack.

    Negative point is that only slim laptops fit in it. Don't expect to put anything thicker than a macbook.

    I've had almost 15 kg of gear in it, and was still comfortable. Fitted nicely, MBP 17, Western Digital mybook (one 3.5 HDD format), 1 extra tele lens, 1 extra fixed focal lense (small) , flash and various accessories (power supplies, cables, etc). The bag is still compact for all that content. The compartments are well organized and optimized.

    Largest drawback is that you can't nicely strap a tripod or monopod to it. I miss that a lot.

    http://products.lowepro.com/product/Fastpack-350,2087,14.htm

    1. Re:Lowepro Fastpack 350 by vondo · · Score: 1

      Similarly, I have a Slingshot 300 that I love. I can stick a DSLR with either 24-105 or 70-200 lens in the "holster" part, put a few more lenses and flash in if I want. They make a 350 which is about the same size but with a laptop pocket as well. Should be good for traveling and then when you are out shooting, leave the laptop behind to save on weight.

      These bags are really nice because they sit well and keep the camera in the bag, but you can have the camera out of the bag and ready to shoot in just a few seconds.

    2. Re:Lowepro Fastpack 350 by HFShadow · · Score: 1

      Similar here. I have a 15" dell that's a little thick that fits in (it's tight) with a 7d and lenses / misc gear quite well. Works well as a carry on bag, but I find it too big for a day pack. Day pack, I use separate bags.

    3. Re:Lowepro Fastpack 350 by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      Second the vote for the Fastpack 350.

      We were looking for something for travel, and this did just what we were looking for. My husband's 17" ACER laptop even fit in there, albeit it was a snug fit (i.e., we tore the flimsy zipper extender tag off while zipping it up...but it fit, and it wasn't going anywhere!). Lots of room for a couple of lenses, external flash and cables, even with the bulky battery extender/grip installed on the Canon Rebel. What I liked best is that we could stow the camera with a long-ish lens attached (our longest is 200mm and there was plenty of room to spare), and it was all well supported and cushioned. Interior partitions are adjustable to allow you to fit your gear. Quick access to both camera and laptop compartments for airport security too ;)

      As for the tripod/monopod - we got an extra slim/short version and stuck it in the laptop area for day trips. It stuck out the top a bit and looked kinda goofy, and wouldn't have been good to hike with (the tripod would dig into your back if you were wearing it as a proper backpack, instead of just over one shoulder), but it was a workaround that we found useful. It would be nice if they added some tripod straps, tho...

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    4. Re:Lowepro Fastpack 350 by Rifter13 · · Score: 1

      I'm going to pile on here. I have a 15" HP laptop that fits in it, plus my Canon XSI, plus 4 lenses, plus flash, plus filters and other crap. I took it to Washington DC on a plane, fits in the over-head bin. This is my main photography pack. (I also have a much smaller sling bag from Lowepro). My pack has worked GREAT for me, for about 3 years now. It has fallen out of a car, more than once, and kept things safe. I really, REALLY can't recommend this bag enough.

      Oh, and with their sling design, it is easy to get the camera out of, without putting the backpack down. Two things I wish it had. A waterproof cover, and a place to tie on a tripod. Oh, I will point out, I had this in a flooded vehicle as well, and it dried out easily, and has not shown any adverse effects of being half submerged in water. The one lens that WAS submerged with it... not so happy ending. :-(

    5. Re:Lowepro Fastpack 350 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed.

      I use the Fastpack 250 (smaller laptop), this series of packs is fantastic. I've done overnights that include cosmetics, a change of clothes, laptop, and DSLR with lenses in the pack. I have found that the very comfortable straps allow me to carry a relatively heavy load in primarily pedestrian city like Boston or NYC. I feel like my gear is safe and properly segregated.

    6. Re:Lowepro Fastpack 350 by johnmat · · Score: 1

      I'll second this also. I can get a 15" Macbook (17" would probably fit), Canon 50D, 17-55 f2.8, 70-300, big flash, chargers, compact camera, mini tripod, and a bunch of other junk in. It is small enough to carry-on and put under the seat in front of you as your "personal item", at least in the US. I love it!

  24. SLRC-206 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.caselogic.com/slr_camera_laptop_backpack/product_detail/index.cfm?modelid=138052

    This case is wonderful. Its modular and allows me to carry my laptop, charger, and camera all in the same bag.

    A little spendy though.

  25. Too much to ask for one bag by chaostangent · · Score: 1

    The short version is that a good mix between the two doesn't exist if you want to use the backpack effectively for either item. So if you want a backpack that you can pull your camera out of quickly but still have easy access to your laptop you'll be hard pressed to find one that fits a 17" laptop. I've searched myself for such a backpack before (looked at the CompuDayPack before - a companion to the CompuDay Photo - stay well clear) and the my conclusion is that how you use a laptop and how you use a camera are too disparate for one bag. The best you can hope for is a storage bag (basically luggage) that stores both. To solve this issue I usually go for a laptop backpack big enough to hold a smaller camera bag that I can take out when needed. As others will point out, the weight will be a serious issue if you're doing a day's travel so your mileage may vary.

    --
    -- More squirrels than sense
  26. Crumpler Bags by jlbooker · · Score: 0

    I've enjoyed my Crumpler "Karachi Outpost (M)". They're pricey, but quality built. There's plenty of room for a DSLR, a couple of lenses, and my 15" MacBook Pro. See: http://www.crumpler.com/us/Camera-Bags/Camera-Backpacks.html?LanguageCode=EN

  27. Re:50 pound backpack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why dont you focus on the original, SPECIFIC question instead of offering useless off topic answers. he lugs around 17 inch mbp for a reason. probably because it's the best tool for the job. christ you people

  28. Kata 467 is the bomb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I carry the Kata 467 with a Sony a500 (I know, I know...), nifty 50, 100mm 2.8 macro, 18-55mm kit lens, external flash and a bunch of light modifiers. The bag is awesome, and has kept all of my stuff safe for the last year and a half.

  29. Check out Crumpler bags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you want to pack that much though, expect to have a BIG bag.

  30. Reconsider your pack by G-News.ch · · Score: 0

    A 17" MBP and a big DSLR just happen to be a bad choice for travelling. Go for a 11" MBA and a Panasonic or Olympus MFT camera instead. Almost the same capability at a fraction of the weight and bulk, and less expensive to boot. You can easily half your pack's weight this way.

    1. Re:Reconsider your pack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OP: "I already own XXXX and YYYY and am considering a $50 to $250 pack to put them in for travel, opinions?"

      You: "Replace all your gear with a $fuckton mac and another $expensive other brand of camera, then buy a pack"

      I don't think this is viable for anyone but lotto winners. But in the name of science, I'll take your advice. Please send me $5k so I can switch all my gear out and then buy a $200 pack. I'll let you know how it works!

    2. Re:Reconsider your pack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is really the best solution. Throw out your lenses and move to a new platform to save a pound and MAYBE get close to the same capability. Also, spend a grand to move to a computer that will chug if you throw heavy graphics editing at it.

    3. Re:Reconsider your pack by G-News.ch · · Score: 1

      Spare the irony. For traveling, the outlined equipment is quite adequate, I know from my own experience (i.e. less than 2kg of equipment, which can be easily carried around even for hiking trips without tiring the back). If the OP was a professional fotographer, he would probably just resort to a hardened roller case with ample space for both the computer and the camera(s) with lens(es) and a tripod to boot. As for the financial aspect: If both the DSLR and the MBP are fairly up to date, their resale value is probably higher than the new price for the "light kit". Since the OP was asking for a solution and not for a bargain, the reasoning is sound.

  31. Crumpler all the way by Splab · · Score: 2

    Their backpacks are designed for this exact combo. Got my laptop, filters, lenses and body in one backpack.

    Look for the "c list celebrity"

    1. Re:Crumpler all the way by Balial · · Score: 1

      Yup, I also use Crumpler. They're very handy for travel and well padded. I don't know if they're still made waterproof, but mine survived 10hrs in the rain without any moisture on the inside..

    2. Re:Crumpler all the way by Splab · · Score: 1

      They come with a "raincoat" these days, but they are water repellant, but I use the additional protection for heavy rain.

    3. Re:Crumpler all the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      goddam, that's a $400 bag

    4. Re:Crumpler all the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, you were being serious. I figured this was a scam.

    5. Re:Crumpler all the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had your exact needs - a laptop plus a nikon D200 - with 70-200 lens.

      I got the crumpler (not the C-List Celebrity - but the Sinking barge) and love it. They look like standard (maybe a bit fancy) backpacks - and dont have any of the issues.. like people recognizing it for a camera bag etc.

      http://www.crumpler.com/us/Camera-Bags/Camera-Laptop-Bags.html?LanguageCode=EN

      Bags are not cheap - but are fabulous.

    6. Re:Crumpler all the way by Splab · · Score: 1

      As someone else said, who cares about $400 bag when you are carrying $5-6000 worth of equipment (or if you are a pro, probably $10-20.000).

      I love my crumpler, I love the fact that even if it gets recognized as a camera bag, they still need to get it off your shoulders to steal the hardware.

    7. Re:Crumpler all the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      check out karachi outpost and the sinking/customary barge bags too.
      http://www.crumpler.com/us/Camera-Bags/Camera-Backpacks.html?LanguageCode=EN

  32. Crumpler... by Zaediex · · Score: 2

    I think you're looking for something like this:

    http://www.crumpler.com/us/Camera-Bags/Camera-Backpacks/C-List-Celebrity-L.html?LanguageCode=EN&SKU=CLC001-B00170

    You can go smaller too, but that should carry everything you could possibly want and then some.

    1. Re:Crumpler... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're looking for something like this:

      http://www.crumpler.com/us/Camera-Bags/Camera-Backpacks/C-List-Celebrity-L.html?LanguageCode=EN&SKU=CLC001-B00170

      You can go smaller too, but that should carry everything you could possibly want and then some.

      $500 for a camera bag that's made in a sweatshop in Vietnam? Uhh, no thanks. I'll stick with a Caselogic for 1/10th the cost.

    2. Re:Crumpler... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with the Crumpler recommendation. If you prefer messenger format, you might like this one http://www.crumpler.com/us/Camera-Bags/Camera-Laptop-Bags/Brazillion-Dollar-Home.html?LanguageCode=EN&SKU=BDH001-B00150.

      I've never had an all-in-one bag, but my girlfriend is a professional photographer in A2 who carries her *llion dollar home bag and likes it. I carry their laptop-only bag and have been very satisfied. They're expensive, but my bag has been my constant companion for seven years and only shows a tiny bit of wear.

    3. Re:Crumpler... by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

      I have one of the Karachi Outpost bags which I find very good. I can't compare it to other brands but the bag has a lot of nice touches that make it clear that thought has been put into it. I particularly like who the whole camera compartment can be removed and put back in one leaving you with a nice big general backpack without needing to re-configure all the subcompartments. The rearward opening is nice too. It can't really be opened when it's on your back so you have to worry less about light fingers.

      --
      Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  33. Manfrotto by fermion · · Score: 1

    Manfrotto had a numer of very good bags. They not only carry a laptop and DSLR, but also can carry the short Manfrotto tripod.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  34. Tamrac by erotic_pie · · Score: 0

    I love Tamrac bags, they have a great build quality for the cost.

    I have had the Adventure 9 and am currently using the Expedition 7x and they are great bags.

    I would highly reccomend any of these bags:
    http://www.tamrac.com/5587.htm
    http://www.tamrac.com/5588.htm
    http://www.tamrac.com/5549.htm
    http://www.tamrac.com/5550.htm

  35. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really?? You can't even buy a backpack without trying to turn it into rocket science?

  36. Try Crumpler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.crumpler.com/AU/Camera-Bags/Camera-Backpacks/Karachi-Outpost-L.html?LanguageCode=EN&SKU=KOT001-X00170

    I have one, its heavy but does what you want.

  37. Tenba Messenger by sglewis100 · · Score: 1

    Try the Tenba Messenger series. Great bags. And I own a lot of bags, so I speak from quite a bit of experience. I actually own the "Mini" size, which holds my iPad or MB Air (actually both if I try), and can fit my Canon 7D without grip, plus a couple of lenses and a flash pretty easily. That's the mini... there's a small, and a large also. It will hold your gear. You can check this thread to see how it will work with a 70-200 attached (hood reverse, obviously).

    1. Re:Tenba Messenger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This thread was posted right as I was preparing for an overseas trip, and reminded me that my current sub-par laptop & slr solution needed to be updated since it was falling apart (couple years of college, two trips to Japan, one to Europe, one to Jamaica, and one or two domestic trips for the past few years....all out of a Targus laptop bakpack). I was just packing my camera around soft items in my targus since my dedicated "hold all your gear" camera/laptop bag was just too huge to take anywhere.

      I read through the thread, checked out the options I wasn't familiar with, ordered a Kata, DaKine, and Crumpler off Amazon with the belief that one of them would work. In the end, I ended up running to The Local Camera store during lunch+ and bought a Tenba Messenger backpack. The Kata 467i was a close 2nd place (although I was really looking for an r-103).

      Enough room for my camera, some accessories, and an extra smaller lens in the padded camera part, with enough room in the other compartment for other random things (like a 70-200 L series in its pouch). Should be able to fit under an airplane seat as well.

  38. Crumpler bags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Crumpler makes great bags for that kind of thing. They aren't cheap, but I've had my backpack for 5 years and it still looks pretty good. www.crumpler.com

  39. Lowepro Fastpack by no_opinion · · Score: 2

    I have & like the Lowepro Fastpack 350, and I think it will meet your needs. There's a full sized laptop sleeve along the back. The bottom part of the compartment will hold a DSLR+lens and 4 other lenses or 2 lenses+flashes. The camera compartment can be opened from the side, so you can get your camera out without taking the backpack off. There's a side pouch that can be used to carry a tripod (be careful with the mesh) if you add a strap at the top, or you can strap it to the bottom/back. The top compartment is large enough to hold a light jacket + other random stuff (MP3 player, chargers, mouse, grad filters, cleaning gear, filters, etc). Take a look at the pictures on Amazon to get a better sense of the layout.

    I visited a local photo store to check out options before ordering this one, which met my needs and was reasonably priced relative to the alternatives.

    1. Re:Lowepro Fastpack by erice · · Score: 1

      The Fastpack 350 is a good pack. I used it on a six month trip to India and a four month trip of mostly Madagascar. It does, however, have some significant issues:

      1) Like virtually every other camera pack, security is a non-thought. Before I left on the first trip with it, I had a luggage repair shop replace all the zippers with metal lockable kinds.

      2) The waist pack is a great, in theory, but it is not adjustable. Unless *you* are just the right size, all weight will be on your back rather than on your hips. With heavy gear and a laptop, this is important. My solution was to wear a large water bottle carying waist pack under the Fastpack 350. With just a little filling to puff it out, it acted as a detachable and adjustable waist pack for the camera bag. For me it was the difference between having to to put the pack down after less than an and hiking through the woods all day.

      I'm actually thinking a better solution might be to reverse the arrangement. Carry a good photo waist pack topped by a general purpose day pack. But I haven't actually tested this theory. That's the problem, there seems to be no fully functional solution. Anything you choose will have issues and you won't know what they all are until you actually buy it and use it for a substantial trip.

  40. LowePro Fastpack 250/350 by terjeber · · Score: 1

    This is the first photo backpack I have been satisfied with after using for an extended period of time. All the others I found something to dislike after a while.

    My recommendation is to not get one of those sling-shot-thingies, they are going to get uncomfortable if you are out walking for a while. Get a proper backpack. The LowePro FastPacks combine the one advantage the sling-thingies have, namely fast access to your camera, with comfortable carrying. It was on my back more or less constantly for a week in Ireland, and the camera was never more than a quick move away. The ability to grab the camera without taking the back-pack off is going to pay off again and again.

    It does of course depend a little on what you are hauling, I have a (rather largish) Canon 7D and a selection of lenses. If you are only carrying a single lens in addition to the one mounted on the cam, the camera compartment may be a little big. My experience is that you can never get enough space in the camera compartment though. I have a few lenses, a charger, an extra battery, some filters, a remote, some cleaning stuff etc in there. Fits beautifully.

    My only point against it would be the lack of a place to hook your tripod, but you can attach it to the back of the bag if it is not too big and heavy.

    I can not overstate the value of having easy access to the camera without taking the pack off your back. Both for speed, and also for convenience. You don't want to set the pack down on a wet/dirty ground or somewhere else nasty.

    1. Re:LowePro Fastpack 250/350 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only problem I have with my Fast Pack 350 is with lens selection in storage. I have one of the f/2.8 medium telephoto zooms (in my case, a 50-200mm, but the same applies to the 70-200's from C or N). If I want to bring that lens with me, the ONLY way I can comfortably store it is if that lens is attached to the body. If I want to keep my normal-zoom on the body, I can't put it in the backpack and keep the 50-200 in there at the same time. If I'm just shooting tele, it works great, but as a "walk around" it's problematic.

  41. Compurover AW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a compurover AW and it's awesome. Holds my DSLR w/ 4 lenses & Flash, laptop, then has a massive storage compartment above the camera for all your other goodies & a change of clothes or your lunch. Also has a built in holster thing for strapping on a tripod. Top it off, if the weather turns, it's got a rain cover.

  42. I gave up by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

    I gave up on the idea of carrying both in one bag myself. I went back to a backpack for my dslr, which also includes tripod straps and a regular laptop bag with shoulder strap for the laptop. Leaves me with plenty of miscellaneous storage space, everything is easier to reach, and when I need to travel a little lighter I just leave the laptop bag in the room/car/whatever. Most of the time when I'm out on a shoot I don't use the laptop anyway (exceptions would be something like outdoor portraits).

    I don't think it's all that relevant but I use an HP elitebook rather than a macbook pro.

  43. Re:Don't go cheap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about you you show me before/after x-rays of subluxations. Then we can talk about chiropractic's merits.

    Oh wait, you can't. Subluxations don't exist.

    Have fun peddling your quackery. Your profession is giving one of my friends (a physical therapist) TONS of business repairing the damage you quacks inflict on people.

  44. Re:Obligatory apple slam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about that, overpriced: yes. funky: sure.

    but "garbage": I don't think so. they may not be the most ROBUST laptops in the world, but they'll take a beating. and for internals, it's hard to find a laptop with real components in it these days.

  45. Tamrac Evolution Series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tamrac has the Evolution Series which can carry a multitude of equipment including a laptop in the 8 and 9 models. Nicely padded, quick and easy access to the camera (maybe a little too easy if you have it on your back and a thief comes walking up behind you), and it can carry a tripod.

    The bottom section has movable velcro walls to allow you to position your gear as needed.

    It also can be used as a sling bag or as a backpack. I bought the 8 model for myself and it has worked great for me.

    http://www.tamrac.com/f_evolution.htm

    1. Re:Tamrac Evolution Series by Adair · · Score: 1

      Agreed, I just bought the Tamrac Evolution 9 bag and I'm very happy with it. Holds my Canon DSLR with battery pack/grip plus abut 7 lenses with a little room to spare. Yes, all that plus a laptop gets heavy. However, if you're going out from your base point to shoot, just load up what you need and leave the laptop out.

      But having the room for everything is perfect for traveling so you can fit your laptop + camera gear into one bag that will fit in the overhead compartment of any airplane except maybe the small commuter jets. That frees you up for another carry-on or to just have one.

      The zippered side panels are great for quick access to camera or lenses. And I've been very pleased with the options of wearing it like a backpack or with a single shoulder strap by reconfiguring the straps on the back.

      The storage area at the top of the bag is great for everything else that won't go in the camera/lens compartment like lens hoods, batteries, power adapters, a mouse, etc. And the laptop fits nicely in the sleeve underneath it all.

  46. Get the Caselogic by Phexro · · Score: 1

    I picked one of these up a couple months back, and it's been great so far. I don't have a ton of gear, but that means that I have quite a bit of flexibility in deciding what goes where. I have three main configurations:

    Light. This is mostly for around town.
      Canon 450D w/ Sigma 50mm 1.4
      Canon PowerShot S90
      18-55mm kit lens in case I want a wider angle
      Luma Loop
      iPad in the laptop pouch
      MiFi
    Cables, adapters, etc in the various pockets

    Heavy, for when I leave town. All of the above, plus:
      15" MacBook Pro, charger, camera battery chargers, and the MiFi charger.
      500gb portable disk
      Shure earbuds

    Diaper. I'm a dad, and this backpack is big enough to hold the light configuration, plus a second iPad, diapers, wipes, a change of clothes, bag of snacks, and a couple books and toys. I sometimes leave the kit lens at home, since the S90 covers most of the same range and it's easier to pull out than swap lenses anyway. I can actually (barely) stuff the laptop, charger, and disk into there, too, but I don't usually need to.

    Even loaded to the gills, it's not terribly uncomfortable. My only complaint is that the tripod straps on the side are kind of lame. They'll hold my tripod fine, but it becomes impossible to set the bag down and the balance is totally whacked. Some have a center read-mounted tripod setup, and that would be much preferable — but at the expense of easy access to the contents. The one other thing is that it's hard to use the last couple inches in the bottom because of how the flap opens. I don't mind, I just put the larger / less frequently used stuff down there.

    Otherwise, it's been great. I love that it sits upright when I put it down instead of falling over, and I feel much better about having the camera up at the top of the pack instead of on the bottom.

  47. Tenba Messenger daypack by ShortyR19 · · Score: 1

    http://www.tenba.com/products/Messenger--Photo-Laptop-Daypack.aspx This bag has enough room for a laptop, body, 2-3 lenses, and still has a compartment up top for miscellaneous items. Plus, it still fits under most airline seats, saving the overhead compartment for your luggage.

    --
    -Ryan
  48. Re:Seriously? by JustOK · · Score: 3, Funny

    That would be a good Ask Slashdot question.

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
  49. Re:50 pound backpack by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    That reason might have been made moot by the advent of different and more interesting tablet options.

    I will be dumping my netbook for an Android tablet very soon because of this.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  50. Think Tank Photo by kochsr · · Score: 1

    They make a variety of bags that look and don't look like camera bags. I use the urban disguisel line myself.

  51. Re:Obligatory apple slam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything but Linux!
    Because M$ and Bill Gate$ are the source of all evil.

  52. A few options... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You haven't said how you use your camera gear. Do you want quick access to it while walking around which would require side access? I do. To use these bags you swing them around like a sling off of one arm to get to the side access. I also want the ability to keep a 70-200 2.8 mounted on a body of considerable girth (7D/5D).

    These are the bags I am considering that have those requirements.
    The Tamrac Evolution 8 and soon to come out Evolution 9 have Laptop sleeves and side access. The 8 does fit a 70-200 2.8 Mk II mounted but it is awfully tight to put anything else in there easily and switch stuff on the go.

    The Kata 3n1 33 has a laptop sleeve but is more expensive than the better made Tamracs.

    Another bag to look into is the Vanguard Uprise series. These also include side access.

    The Tamrac appears to be the best option for me, I'm going to wait and see an Evolution 9 in person to see how big it really is.

  53. Tamrac Expedition 8x by 1gkn1ght · · Score: 1

    I'm a big fan of my Tamrac Expedition 8x. Feels good on, holds my camera, flash, 150-500mm, 6 lenses, with room to spare. Holds a tripod on the outside, and has the M.A.S. and S.A.S. system too so you can add external attachments. I also have a little pack for my camera and lenses from them that fit the M.A.S. system too.

    Downsides I have found with it, the camera equipment is against your back, not the laptop like in most packs, no room (without loosing room for camera equipment) for laptop accessories, and I have found it does not fit in all overhead compartments with the laptop in it.

    It does however fit my 17" laptop and Xoom in the same pocket without issues.

    --

    "Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they AREN'T after you."
  54. Wenger Swiss Gear ftw by Pax681 · · Score: 1

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/SWISSGEAR-IBEX-NOTEBOOK-RUCKSACK-17/dp/B000VSFLCI

    this has room for my laptop and my DJ decks and external hard drive and associated accessories. nicely padded and protective from a solid reliable brand

  55. Re:Seriously? by TermV · · Score: 1

    Clearly you fall outside the target demographic that is able to answer, or even appreciate the question. This is a topic that generates a lot of debate even among professional photographers. Camera bags are specialized pieces of equipment that that must protect potentially tens of thousands of dollars worth of fragile and oddly shaped gear and provide efficient access for somebody who might be billing thousands of dollars for a job.

  56. I use a Kata by rkitts · · Score: 1

    I've got the Kata DR-467 you mention. In it I put my 17" MBP, a Nikon D5k and two (kit) lenses. Comfortably it holds as well both chargers (camera, computer) extra camera batteries, a fold up reflector, moleskin notebook, Slik Sprint Pro tripod (not always, but when I want it it fits well), a full size mouse, an iPad (not terribly well but you can squeeze it in with the MBP), and some other misc stuff. There is room left over in the top compartment for, easily, a jacket and, say, some food.

    I used to carry this with me everyday everywhere for about 6 months (have your camera with you all the time). The bag is entirely fine. YMMV. I stopped carrying it because, as others have pointed out, it's pretty heavy. I never cared enough to weigh it but it is heavy enough that I just stopped wanting to deal with it.

    tl;dr Kata bag holds a ton of shit. Mine held up well to everyday use for 6 months.

  57. Go mil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get yourself a military backpack. Since you're going through a lot of airports with expensive equipment, put "Explosives" in large lettering on the outside so nobody will steal it. (Cough.)

    1. Re:Go mil by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      All I can think about is the years I carried my Nikon F to plenty of far-flung places in an army bag that I got for $5 at a surplus store. I still use a webbing strap from that kit as the shoulder strap for my Canon 20D. I've always believed that looking old and crappy and cheap gave as good security as anything else. And I'm damn sure not going anywhere with a strap that has "CANON EOS DIGITAL" emblazoned on it in bright red letters.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:Go mil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got a small holster-type bag just large enough for the camera and attached lens when I want to go low-profile, or don't feel like lugging the whole kit around. Sometimes, being more agile makes up for a smaller lens choice. My favorite lens for this mode: 18-105 (Nikon).

  58. timbuk2 by memoman.inc · · Score: 1

    I was in a Timbuk2 store the other day looking for the same kind of bag and even though pricey their snoop camera bag looks and feels nice. I actually tried my camera with a slightly smaller lens that you mentioned and feels comfortable while carrying. you can check from this link .They have various sizes. http://www.timbuk2.com/tb2/products/search-results/snoop-camera-messenger

  59. Targus XL by bhengh · · Score: 1

    I just ordered a Targus XL for a 17" laptop + some large tools (multimeter, hand tools). I haven't received it yet, so I can't speak firsthand, but from what I've seen online it may be big enough for you. You might want to look into it further.

    1. Re:Targus XL by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      The XL is a great laptop bag for carrying from one place to another, but it's a poor camera bag. The main deficiency is lack of a good way to strap a tripod to the side.

      I own an XL for my laptop. I have never put my camera into it. That's what my Kelty Redwing is for.

      I have put my laptop into the Redwing using a neoprene sleeve though.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    2. Re:Targus XL by Wingfat · · Score: 1

      I have the Targus XL.. It actually fits my Toshiba Qosimo 18.5'' prefectly! i did a ton of research on all of them out there that hold 17+ Lap Tops. The thing i love about this is being able to hold my giant "Laptop" as well as the 5lb power supply, all the cords needed. My Sony PSP in a large metal case, My Nikon CoolPix 50x zoom camera with case, my 6 Cup "The Rock" Thermos (rather large one if you know Thermos's). As well as a pack of CDRs, DVD-Rs, pens. business cards, soda/water holder on the outside (which works great for holding my work badge when not at work) a zipper pouch on the side with Ear Bugs hole for putting your MP3 player in the side of it. All this and it sits well and feels nice on the back even with out using the extra waist strap. This is a very highly recommened bag for a Gamer, or someone that has a larger Lap Top that also needs extra spots for much needed day to day items. Also Amazon is the way to go! free shipping no sales tax and i am a happy IT Guy/ Gamer

  60. Re:50 pound backpack by AngryDeuce · · Score: 1

    You gonna be doing photo editing in the field with a tablet? Come on...

    Nowadays, a computer capable of storing the enormous amounts of data generated by shooting in RAW at 20MP, as well as running CS5, Lightroom, and a host of other photo apps is pretty much a necessity for any serious photographer. My mother generates between 80-100 GB of data a day on a typical shoot. Granted, she's a professional photographer, so she's probably at the higher end of the spectrum, but still, once you get into the SLRs you've moved beyond the typical needs of someone taking pictures with their phone and crap.

    For the hobbyist a tablet is probably fine, but this person doesn't seem like a hobbyist.

  61. Think Tank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll second Think Tank...they're built better than any of the other brands, don't look like camera bags, and several of the backpack models have a laptop sleeve that slides into the bag, but can be removed when you're out shooting. I've dragged mine all over the world for several years and they basically look the same as the day I bought them.

  62. Why do people buy manufacturer's bags? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    I notice that probably 90% of laptops are carried in bags made by the manufacturer (I see lots of Dell backpacks) or companies who focus on laptop bags (caselogic as an excellent example). When you're carrying such a bag that is clearly designed for carrying a laptop, you are pretty well advertising to potential thieves that you are carrying a laptop.

    Maybe you live in a utopian world where laptops are never stolen, and you have nothing to worry about - if so, congratulations. I would otherwise suggest you find something that might get you slightly more cover when you set it down.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Why do people buy manufacturer's bags? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if you get the premium lether package you get a bag that's build to last.

      I got this 10 years ago http://cgi.ebay.com/Dell-Leather-Computer-Laptop-Bag-Messenger-Case-/280723010280

      It was plenty of space then and only quadrupled the weight of the computer alone,
      now I think I can get 10 ipads into it and it still not notice it being any heavier, bless that

  63. Back Pack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use a backpack, so much easier to carry. You can buy backpacks made for laptops with additional storage, Targus makes some nice laptop backpacks.

  64. I have a Kata... by cepler · · Score: 1

    I have a Kata backpack that is my main 'case' to carry stuff. I generally cram in a 5D, 70-200 f/2.8L IS, 85mm f/1.2, 24-70 f/2.8 L, 100mm f/2.8 macro, a flash, blow bulb, all hoods, lenspens, batteries, chargers, 1.4x tele converter and maybe a few other odds and ends... This is NOT light. I originally got it thinking I'd put a 15" laptop in there but the space they give you for the laptop feels VERY VERY tight and I wasn't comfortable doing that.

    Again, a backpack of this size is NOT going to be light, you will NOT want to carry it very much and you WILL have a sore back/neck afterwards.

    I don't recall the model Kata I have, it was quite a few years ago and probably not a current model. Construction on their bags appears to be great though so I wouldn't hesitate recommending them as a brand to consider. I would suggest that you bring what you are considering packing into it to a store and trying it for size/weight/fit first.

    1. Re:I have a Kata... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      "Again, a backpack of this size is NOT going to be light, you will NOT want to carry it very much and you WILL have a sore back/neck afterwards."

      Wrong. A properly made backpack can allow you to carry a LOT of weight without getting sore.

      Unfortunately, 95%+ of backpacks from the camera bag manufacturers are not designed well in terms of how they are worn on the back. There are some exceptions but they're rare.

      Look at Kelty, North Face, Osprey, and their brethren, not Kata, Lowepro, Tamrac, etc.

      It's a lot easier to make a hiking backpack suitable for a laptop/photo gear (add dividers) than to fix the fundamental comfort deficiencies of a camera backpack.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    2. Re:I have a Kata... by cepler · · Score: 1

      Sorry, didn't realize those manufacturers have found a way to defeat gravity, I'll check'em out!

    3. Re:I have a Kata... by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      A good backpack distributes the weight into your hips and shoulders where you can bear it without getting a sore back/neck. Humans can carry weight more easily in some places than others. If just carrying weight made your neck sore, the 70% of Americans with beer bellies would be aching daily.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    4. Re:I have a Kata... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      As another poster said - It's not about defeating gravity, it's about how the weight and pressure are distributed. Bad backpacks put most of the weight onto the shoulders in such a way as to cause a sore back/neck. Nearly all photo backpacks are in this category. Good backpacks put a lot of weight onto the hips.

      There's a reason military personnel can carry 40-60 pounds of gear - it's not just about the shape they're in, it's the design of the packs. An external frame backpack can allow a human to carry a LOT of weight comfortably, far more than you might expect. Internal-frame packs like the Kelty work very well too. Many photo backpacks have no frame at all.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  65. kata bag by sammy+baby · · Score: 1

    If Taco is like me (and in this respect I expect that he is), he intends to do some editing during his downtime while on vacation. At present, that's just not something that a semi-serious photographer is going to be able to take on using a tablet.

    CmdrTaco, consider something from Kata, maybe the R-106. I'll vouch for the feel of the thing - I have a 105, and the weight distribution when loaded is pretty good.

  66. Re:Don't go cheap! by jhoegl · · Score: 2

    You know... I seem to remember a group of people taking the "martyrdom" approach when defending their point of view as well.
    We, in the scientific community, call this a charade and dismiss it.

    Crack doctors are laughable, a trolling crack doctor... hilarious.

  67. Re:Seriously? by jdkramar · · Score: 1

    Did you completely miss who asked this question?

    --
    "One can not truly appreciate Shakespeare until you have heard it in it's original Klingon" -Star Trek
  68. I too shoot tethered on location and travel. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lowepro is my bag of choice. IMO. Perhaps now that tablets can tether to my camera, I too will be looking for a small, lighter bag, with more room for flashes and pocketwizard space not to mention more lens. I try to hold it down to carry on weight, but have to put on my superman face because when I hoist that bugger in the overhead, the 50lbs + almost throws out my back.

  69. Billingham camera bags are great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As is the classic Domke FX.

  70. Love mt Kata backpack by Unholy_Kingfish · · Score: 1

    I have an R-103 and it is about ... 6 years old now. Been hiking with it in Hawaii, honeymoon in Jamaica and countless other places and is in perfect shape. The bag itself is pretty light for the padding and construction. What I travel/keep in there most of the time. Canon Rebel XT (yes it is old but invested in my lenses), battery grip, 17-85f4, 50mm 1.4, 70-200 f4 IS, 580ex flash, plus spare batteries. All that is just in the inside compartment. There is still the oustide and inside zipper compartment. I tend to use those for my iPod, phone and small point and shoot. With everything in there it is tight, but manageable. I usually will take some things out of the bag if I am taking somewhere where I know I won't need that equipment. Laptop - I don't use it much but when I do I have a Powerbook 12" I put in there. I just have many CF cards. I have found the key is don't bring stuff you won't use, and if you do leave some in the hotel room and travel light. For example I didn't need my 70-200 IS on a nature hike so I locked it in the safe.

    --
    Fear Is the Only God
  71. Are you stuck in the stone age? by cvtan · · Score: 1

    Just get an iPhone! You are not supposed to carry a giant laptop and a huge camera anymore. Take crappy photos on a cell phone and send them to the cloud!

    --
    Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
  72. Re:50 pound backpack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, the 50 pound backpack is mine (LowePro CompuTrekker) with a small laptop (13" is sufficient for basic photo and video editing), DSLR, 6 lenses, teleconverter, hot shoe flash, videocamera, wideangle lens, external mic, and various accessories, cleaning supplies, batteries, snacks, maybe a change of clothes, etc. The amount of gear in the question is probably about 20 pounds.

    The problem here is that "travel" is a vague term that can have many different meanings. On a typical trip, I will usually have three different configurations. For transit to/from my destination, only the expensive/irreplaceable components (and lithium batteries) are placed in a lightweight laptop bag to keep the weight down to about what is required by international air carriers (though usually slightly over). For basic sightseeing or small events where I need high mobility, I'll go with either a belt system or a cheap old beat up backpack (with everything inside in padded cases). And for when I need to have everything with me, I load up the heavy duty camera bag, sometimes with a tripod hand carried or in a separate bag. The camera bag also doubles as a padded interior for a Pelican case, which in turn functions as on-site storage for everything I'm not using (and sometimes as furniture). All of this is easily manageable for me and is a great theft deterrent - try to lift my fully-loaded bag too quickly and you'll be in need of medical assistance.

  73. Lowepro website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No idea about whether any of these would be appropriate, but here are the Lowepro backpacks that are designed to fit both cameras and laptops (they have dedicated padded sections for naked cameras):
    http://products.lowepro.com/catalog/Notebook-Camera,16.htm

  74. More feminine by RJFerret · · Score: 1

    Others have recommended plenty of non-cute backpacks, so here are some more fashionable alternatives....

    At Targét, this gal found the perfect solution for her laptop, camera and a few lenses, and for only $20!

    Trey chic, this cotton bag with pink lace design Techie Diva found doesn't offer as much padding, but squee, cuteness!

    Here are several other options Lynette compiled for us, not just purses, but messenger bag style as well, which would be easier to carry over the long haul.

    For the future, just check with your favorite bloggers, if you don't like to shop as much as the next gal! ;-)

  75. Re:Don't go cheap! by spire3661 · · Score: 4, Informative

    When my GF suggested I see a chiropractor, the very first thing the doctor did was try to convince me he wasnt a quack. Now mind you I hadnt asked and merely was explaining my issue and he goes on and on about how its a respected field and they have more training then regular doctors. After reviewing the history of chiropractic care I am literally STUNNED that we as society allow you to practice your charade. The foundations of your practice are mired in the supernatural and have no scientific merit. You are as viable as a Phrenologist, sir

    --
    Good-bye
  76. Quantaray != cheap by Radworker · · Score: 1

    You might want to look at the Quantaray Pro line before you purchase. I use an U-100 to carry my Nikon D300 with 80-200 f2.8 plus lenses and flash. I don't usually carry a laptop when I shoot but the pack has a compartment large enough for your laptop. It was less expensive than the other contendors here. Food for thought.

  77. Re:50 pound backpack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This happens with every Ask Slashdot. People who don't have anything to contribute in the way of an on-topic answer are still compelled to chime in, so they start arguing about whether or not the question is valid, changing the specifics of the question, etc.

    And so you get, "Why ask for a $100 backpack solution when you could just buy a $600 tablet?"

    The answer is, "Nevermind why he wants to carry his laptop. Answer the question or don't."

  78. National Geographic Earth Explorer by chocomilko · · Score: 1

    National Geographic sells the Earth Explorer series. Durable hemp canvas and plenty of padding; sew a patch over the National Geographic logo for stealth (or don't; looking like an NG photographer may be a pro or a con depending on where you're traveling).

    I've got the medium, and use it extensively for traveling (albeit not with camera gear), and I'm more than impressed with the quality. I've visited three different continents with it as my only pack, and would buy it again in a heartbeat.

    Keep in mind that NG apparently measures laptops differently than everyone else; it would be wise to try fitting your laptop into the bag before purchasing.

    1. Re:National Geographic Earth Explorer by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      I think the NG logo actually says "wannabe" more than anything, though depending on where you travel with it I suppose you may be able to pretend that you're a NG photographer :)

      I don't think their bags are bad, in fact quite the opposite - a friend has one and it seems quite nice, and she likes it a lot - but yeah, definitely cover or remove the logo.

  79. Domke by empath · · Score: 1

    They have a variety of hand bags and backpacks. Just don't forget to either remove the red label, or cover it with something else.

    http://www.tiffen.com/results.html?search_type_no=455&tablename=domke

    The canvas finish is durable and timeless.

    --
    "Please don't sigh like that, maam"
  80. Tamrac by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    Has several nice camera back packs that have laptop areas. Best of all, they're compatible with Tamrac's modular component system. So you can buy additional lens and accessories pouches and mount them on the back pack for expansion.

    http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/544650-REG/Tamrac_558701_5587_Expedition_7x_Backpack.html

  81. National Geographic Explorer pack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used this bag on a three week trip to Euope last winter.
    http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/428388-REG/National_Geographic_NG_5162_NG_5162_Earth_Explorer_Medium.html

    It held my DSLR, Two lenses, notebook, Rain gear, has many pockets. I used it as my carry-on and as a daypack. They also have larger and smaller packs available.
     

    1. Re:National Geographic Explorer pack by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      That only holds a 15" laptop. I would love a NG-style bag that could hold a 17" but haven't seen one.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  82. Tamrac bag by kb_one · · Score: 1

    I carry a Nikon D7000 and a 15" MBP every day in this: http://www.tamrac.com/3447.htm

    The bag does well protecting its contents and also has enough storage for camera and computer stuff. I like this bag and I am glad I got it.

    1. Re:Tamrac bag by kb_one · · Score: 1

      And I FAIL at reading comprehension. My suggestion is neither a backpack nor will it fit a 17" MBP. Sorry Internets for wasting your tubes. Sorry Slashdotters for this post and the previous one!

  83. CompuRover AW works for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have exactly the setup mentioned in the post, and I use a Lowepro CompuRover AW. I'll put in the bag a Canon 7D with 24-70mm f/2.8L attached (with the giant lens hood loose in the upper compartment), a 70-200mm f.28L, a 580EX, a 50mm f/1.8, and accessories in the top compartment. I also put a Macbook Pro 17" in the laptop slot. It all fits. It's heavy. I fly with this arrangement as a carry on (no airline has asked me to check it yet, and it's smaller than many people's carry on suitcases). Still have some room for water/food/nook. I have fit another camera body and lens in the camera compartment for a wedding before.

    The other packs listed look smaller than the CompuRover AW to me. I like having the flexibility of a larger bag so I can fill it up when necessary.

  84. Seconded by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1

    The solution that I have is to use a regular laptop backpack and a camera shoulder bag that will fit inside the backpack. That way, when I want just one I can get just one.

    1. Re:Seconded by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Ditto. I've got a LowePro Toploader that carries my light travel camera gear plus some form of backpack to carry all the rest of the stuff, including a notebook if necessary. The camera bag can go in the backpack if necessary (but it hardly ever is).

  85. Tamrac CyberPack 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use a Tamrac Cyberpack 8. It will hold all this and more.

    Sigma 50-500 Lens
    Nikon D300 w/ 18-200 and Grip
    Nikon GPS
    Remote Control for D300
    Nikon P5100
    P5100 Underwater Case
    Battery Chargers for both D300 and P5100
    Pack of 10 Filters.
    SB600 Flash

    17" Dell XPS M1710
    External Mouse
    Laptop Charger
    Blank DVD's

    You can strap a Monopod and/or Tripod to the sides of the pack

    1. Re:Tamrac CyberPack 8 by wmelnick · · Score: 1

      I have the Cyberpack 9 and it does all of this plus more as well. I traveled through the middle east with 2 Nikon camera bodies, 4 lenses, external flash, a Tascam audio recorder, an olympus voice recorder, a full size Maha battery charger, 2 nikon battery chargers, a dozen chargable AA batteries in holders, a Dell 15" notebook and its charger, with a tripod and a monopod attached to the sides. Definitely consider a CyberPack.

  86. $400 is a drop in the bucket by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but it's got no less than $8000 of gear in it, even if he's a cheapskate when it comes to glass; maybe $20k if he's OEM all the way. $400 seems trivial in that light.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  87. You just keep shooting your Kodachrome old timer by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    ...oh, right - you can't. Sorry 'bout that!

    (FWIW, I have a D3 and an F4s. It's hard to justify the cost of shooting film these days.)

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  88. National Geographic bag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://shop.nationalgeographic.com/ngs/product/gear-%26-gadgets/cameras-and-photography-gear/national-geographic-walkabout-rucksack

    Has served me well so far!

  89. FStop Recommendation from Semi-Pro by Evolv3 · · Score: 1

    As a semi-professional I can highly recommend any bag made by FStop. I have the older version of this bag. I don't however carry a 17" laptop....I have instead the 15" Dell XPS with B+RG screen and it fits perfectly. http://fstopgear.com/en/mountain/tilopa Bonus - It fits (with a bit of help) into any overhead bin compartment...this way my gear never leaves my side. The Satori is what you want if you carry a 17" http://fstopgear.com/en/mountain/satori Not sure if it fits into a bin. Hope that helps! The best

  90. If you're like me, 1 bag rules. by jampola · · Score: 1

    I fly a lot with my Macbook and a DSLR and my worst nightmare is leaving one of these bags someone that isn't on my back. I know this also has something to do with my general ability to remember stuff but when you're 30 mins past check-in for an international flight (which happens to me several times since I live in Bangkok, i.e. worse traffic than NYC), memory tends to come second. I second the Think tank bag choice, I have the one with the security cable attached to it and it's worth it's weight in gold (no pun intended)

  91. Tenba Shootout Large by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Greetings:

    I use a Tenba Shootout large backpack to carry a 17" ASUS laptop, 2 Nikon bodies, 4 or 5 lenses, and all the chargers, cabling, etc. Walked it up mountains and down into the Grand Canyon without anything bad to say. Small enough to go onto planes as a carry-on. Have carried it weekly for over a year without any problems.

    -Scott

  92. Re:50 pound backpack by CrashandDie · · Score: 1

    As a biker (motorised or not) who needed to lug around a lot of gear, I have to say that a 15" courier-style bag has served me very well. In it, I can fit a lot of different combos, depending on what kind of thing I intend to shoot:

    - 40D + 200mm zoom lens, 40D + 50mm lens and 13" macbook pro for candid/street photography.
    - same photo gear, but instead of the 13" mbp, a manfroto tripod (for night street photography).
    - 80mm zoom + tripod for timelapses.

    The handy part of a courier bag, is that I can switch between the 50mm and 200mm in less than a couple of seconds. The 200mm + 40D body fits perfectly in the 15" bag. Just get a bit of cushioning fabric so it fits nicely, and you're off. Also, the good point about the courier bag is that you don't necessarily look like a photog, and you can just put the bag on your hip/back when shooting. Because of the nice strap, it's also handy to just attach to the bike when parked and loading/moving stuff from the bike's cases/storage. It does burn in your shoulders a bit, especially with configuration 1, but sometimes you do need the lot when shooting interesting stuff that needs to be sent out immediately (I'm still waiting for a 3G capable card that emails specific shots to a pre-defined address).

    I've had a number of occasions where I just put the bike in neutral, whipped out the 200mm and got a grand candid shot, and was gone before the subject ever even saw me.

    I think you're completely wrong with the tablet idea. No tablet provides great connectivity/applications for photo editing/retouching on the field. This being said, the 17" mbp is a mistake. Get a smaller one.

  93. Re:50 pound backpack by hedwards · · Score: 1

    In the field, just about any computer will do. The main thing you're wanting is something that's going to allow you to take a look at the composition in full and get a fair amount of the composition at the pixel level. Also, you're not going to be performing a proper back up in the field, so all you're going to get to do is copy the cards to the laptop and keep the originals still on the card until you get home.

    The other thing is taking notes, and you're probably going to be better off taking notes on a write in the rain notepad anyways than trying to enter everything into the computer.

  94. iPad Backpack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about something to carry your iPad: http://ibackflip.com

  95. Naneu pro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somebody mentioned Naneu pro sahara already?
    http://www.naneubags.com/component/tienda/products/view/35?controller=products

  96. Already did.. by Bearded+Frog · · Score: 1

    "I'm guessing a few of you have opinions on this subject, so share them so I don't buy a piece of garbage." You already did. You bought a mac. .....Sorry I had to XD

  97. Re:50 pound backpack by Krojack · · Score: 2

    I'm not so sure about that..

    My iPad + iPad Camera Connection Kit + Filterstorm Pro & Brushes have worked nicely for me.

    If you're out hiking there is no need perfectly touch-up a photo. You can do all this when you return home on your powerful desktop or laptop. When you're out in the field you just take the photos and save them to an external storage device so you can free up space on your memory cards.

  98. Lowepro whatever by Carik · · Score: 1

    I've got three Lowepro bags, for different situations.

    1) An old holster-type bag, with a shoulder strap. Similar to the Toploader Zoom 50, but much older. I use it for day trips to the fair, things like that -- it'll take my SLR (with or without grip) with an 18-125 lens, and I can fit a 50mm in the outside pocket with a few extra memory cards and a spare battery.

    2) A slingshot 200. This is my tool for all-day walks. I spent a few weeks walking all over Italy with it, I take it for day hikes, and I carry it pretty much everywhere on a daily basis. It will hold the gripped SLR with any lens I own, up to the 70-300 VC attached, with my other two main lenses (the 50mm and the 18-125OS) and a flash also in the main compartment. The front pocket holds my remote shutter release, a couple of batteries, a notebook and pens. The top pocket holds a Nook perfectly, and still has space for either lunch or a few other travel necessities -- glasses, contact lens stuff, and an address book, for instance.

    3) A Fastpack 250, I think. It may be the 350. With all of my lenses, the gripped SLR, a 15.6" laptop, spare batteries, remote trigger, memory cards, tripod, windbreaker, lunch, ebook, notebook, and all the chargers for everything I'm carrying in it it weighs a ton. But it IS a convenient (more or less) way to move everything at once, and make sure it all makes it through airport security. I usually stick one of the other two bags in my checked luggage if I'm going to bring this along, because it's just too big for daily use.

  99. Tamrac Evolution 8 works for me by kybosch · · Score: 1

    I have been pleased so far with Tamrac's Evolution 8, otherwise known as Model 5788. It's got enough room for a 17" MacBook Pro, DSLR and a few lenses as well as an additional compartment for charger and accesories. It converts from a backpack to a sling bag, has a tripod pocket and strap to carry a tripod, and contains its own rain cover. The literature says it will carry a DSLR with a lens up to eight inches long attached.

    I carry my MBP 15", 7D, 50 mm f/1.4, 100 mm macro, 17-55 f/2.8, 45 mm TS/E, 18-55 kit lens, 2x580EX flashes, extra batteries, charger, flash diffuser, MacBook charger, and wallet all at once. None of those lenses are quite as big as the 70-200, though some of the others are comparable in size to the 24-70 you mentioned. I wear my equipment somewhat hard and this bag had held up very well for me so far. I would recommend you take a look.

    I do feel a little concerned that the MacBook lies against my back when I wear it as a backpack, but I know of no other way to carry all my equipment so conveniently.

    Good luck in your search.

  100. Ground good. Lowepro (CompuDaypack) bad. by evilninja · · Score: 1

    Lowepro CompuDaypack does not have enough pockets for stuff. It's also phenomenally uncomfortable to wear. I feel like they designed it to suck a lot just so they could put a bigger price tag on their nicer bags.

    I also have a Ground Bass Pack (http://www.groundwear.com/showprod.php?idnum=30000205255) which is pretty awesome as a backpack/laptop bag. But it doesn't have the DSLR pockets. It is, however, big enough that you can buy a small camera back and nest it inside.

  101. Re:50 pound backpack by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

    That reason might have been made moot by the advent of different and more interesting tablet options.

    I will be dumping my netbook for an Android tablet very soon because of this.

    So which tablet has the 1920x1200 screen, like my 8-year-old laptop (Sony VAIO VGN-A117S)? Which ones also have a mouse and keyboard for effective interaction/editing at the pixel level? When you're dealing with pictures from a DSLR, you don't want to go below this sort of resolution. Image quality can reach the individual pixel level using a DSLR with 14Mpixels and a good lens, with data at 12-14 bits per pixel in the raw image. It's not some crappy phone camera with a miniscule detector and tiny lens, where pixel count is just a marketing number.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  102. What's your scenario? by Paninaro · · Score: 1

    You don't mention whether you're looking for a fast-loading bag to walk around with and have quick access to all your camera gear, or just something that can comfortably hold everything to travel with on a plane. I wanted that latter - I frequently travel with a laptop, tablet, a couple of camera bodies and 3-4 lenses - and I ended up settling on a Think Tank Shapeshifter bag, which expands easily and has neoprene pockets to hold lenses, etc. It's not really set up to be a fast-loader; but when I'm out shooting, I usually have the camera on a strap, or I have a lightweight bag I throw in checked baggage. I don't usually want to lug the laptop along when I'm out shooting, but I need to carry all the expensive stuff on when I get on the plane. Crumpler has a good name, and I really liked the construction, but it didn't have enough internal pockets (for cables, writing utensils, etc.) for my traveling tastes.

  103. Timbuk2 Snoop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just picked up a Snoop, easily holds my MB Air, 60D and a few large prime lenses w/o any issues.

  104. Quantaray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a a giant quantaray backpack. It holds a 17-inch macbook pro and a freak ton of camera. You can get from wolf/ritz camera. I put a clipboard in the back between me and the mackbook for just a little added rigidity. It works fine but it's way too heavy a setup.

    If you want to focus on taking pictures take one camera one lens and maybe a filter or two. The more stuff you take the more time your are futzing with tech.

    The big backpack is for the airplane trips so I can take everything but the light setup and not have to check it. On a shoot I do not take the full backpack. I take just what I need.

  105. Cinebags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I personally have a bag from cinebags: http://www.cinebags.com/

    It's a great, bombproof, well thought out bag. I use it on location all the time.

    But it's really really heavy when it's loaded with 2 Camera bodies, 4-5 lenses, chargers, batteries and a laptop. Personally I'd ditch the 17" Macbook Pro and travel with a Macbook Air and shave four pounds. Also consider travelling with a couple of primes instead of those zooms. Those are seriously heavy lenses. I try not to travel with my Canon 24-70L/2.8 or 70-200L/2.8. They're just so darn heavy. I'd rather have a 21mm, 50mm and 85mm prime. And if I really need the reach of the 200 bring a 135mm and a 7D body.

  106. Travel and DSLR by David_Hart · · Score: 1

    I also used to travel with all of my camera gear. I've since learned that having too many gadgets with me eats up too much time. Between charging, cleaning, packing for side trips, editing, etc. I always felt rushed.

    I've sinced pared my travel kit down to two cameras, Canon 40D and S95, one lens, 17-40 f4L, and a light 4.5lbs HP DM4T 13" widescreen laptop. I leave all of the rest of my gear at home. The Canon S95, which gives me DSLR like results and which has HD video, is pocketable and is great for taking to the bar or restaurant.

    I find that most of my travel photos are either of scenes, which can be captured by multiple images and then stitched, or people. Very rarely am I taking pictures of animals or objects in the distance where a long zoom would be required. Then again, I like getting close to scenes, people, objects, etc. when I am on vacation. I also have time to do so.

    David

  107. love the "customary barge" from Crumpler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i have an old crumpler, it is an australian brand. Can fit a laptop and a slr, no problem, top quality, on the expensive side.

    http://www.crumpler.com

    does not look like a "steal me - fill with expensive toys bag", great for long travel.

  108. 17" is a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I travel with a 13"macbook and a sony dslr with a vertical grip including the "Bigma" which is a huge lens. Plus chargers, extra lenses, flash units, etc. For that I use QANTARRAY PRO backpack that has the added benefit of not looking like it is filled with thousands of dollars worth of electronics. And the camera portion of the bag can be removed, which has proven incredibly useful sometimes.

    see link: http://freelance-zone.com/blog/gear/quantaray-pro-photolaptop-backpack/

    I also bought a cart for 9.99 at some airport and it is great combination.

    similar to this: http://www.industry-nb.com/products/Foldable-baggage-cart-546401.html

    unfortunately, your 17" requirement renders my advise useless

  109. Thinktank Streetwalker HardDrive by nimrod108 · · Score: 1

    http://www.thinktankphoto.com/products/streetwalker-harddrive-backpack.aspx These guys make really good bags. I have heard many pro-photo bloggers raving about them.

    --
    $2.50 for a decade.
  110. Any bags like this? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

    I really liked this bag when I saw it at the SXSW trade show this year:
    http://www.amazon.com/National-Geographic-NG-2475-Explorer/dp/B000FJ2OTG
    It would hold two camera bodies and a few lenses along with a 15" laptop, but it wouldn't hold a 17" MacBook Pro.

    Does anyone know of a similar-looking bag that could hold a slightly larger laptop?

    --
    It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  111. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, I noticed it was posted by Rob "Micropeen" Malda.

  112. Crumpler Karachi Outpost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have the Crumpler Karachi Outpost, and love it ... if you don't mind a pretty heavy backback. It'll hold a 17" laptop, DSLR, and quite a few lenses/flashes/filters.

  113. Tamrac 3380 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I currently carry a Tamrac 3380, when fully loaded it holds two laptops (Dell Latitude E6500 and XT2) along with a Nikon D700 with the extra grip and 3 lenses. And all other accessories. It is pretty heavy but i can comfortably put it under a seat in an airplane. The bag is going on 2 years old and has held up well for all the travel I do and protects the camera and laptop well.

  114. ThinkTank Urban Disguise + harness by jddj · · Score: 1

    Love my ThinkTank Urban Disguise: http://www.thinktankphoto.com/search.aspx?find=Urban+Disguise. This is a briefcase-look bag, which you wouldn't think held camera gear. Can get a harness for backpack use. Word to the wise: this is a LOT of gear to be hauling. My bag weighs a ton without ANY laptop, and my 15" MacBook Pro makes it a strain on a shoulder. Travel lighter than me, please.

  115. Re:50 pound backpack by SydShamino · · Score: 1

    I've thought about getting a 15" laptop just to fit in a field bag with my camera, but honestly I prefer the 17" screens and I'd rather just use the same laptop on short- and long-distance events.

    --
    It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  116. National Geographic by rdtreefrog · · Score: 1

    Last year I picked up a national geographic laptop/camera bag for the same reason. I will say that the name brand bumped up the price a lot.. and the ergonomics are not great. But! It is a great looking bag with lots of room and pockets, and it gets the job done. Of course, now I have more stuff, so I carry a Swiss army laptop back pack to carry up to 2 laptops, the ntl geo camera bag for dslr, and a manfrotto messenger bag for camcorder. Looking back on it, I think the extra money and loss of room for a laptop bag was a waste. You add the word laptop to a camera bag and it taks on $100 min, and takes away space that you could have used for field gadgets..

  117. Re:50 pound backpack by dorre · · Score: 1

    I see several scenarios for this guy and they all change what kind of bags he need. Personally I do work mostly with people and urban scenery, which is my perspective.

    Anyway, according to his story has experience of traveling, which means that he knows about the hazzle of carrying equipment. But I agree, travelling with a 17" does not seem wise if a netbook would do (which it would in most circumstances).

    If the guy is doing professional work and he needs to send pics during work, I certainly understand his request for this kind of bag.

    Otherwise I would just recommend getting a big bag for clothes accessories and laptop + small bag for day trips. Carrying less equipment improves your pictures a lot! Unless of course you are doing nature photography, when you are better of with a mule to carry the 50 pound tripod needed for shooting panther's in the dark with your 200mm f2 (possible with 2x extender).

  118. Try Timbuk2 Photo messenger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I carry a camera body, three lenses and a iPad in a Timbuk2 Photo Messenger bag without a problem. The laptop compartment has plenty of space for a laptop, and there is plenty of storage for accessories. Also, it doesn't look like a photo bag, which has advantages at times, too. I find the messenger bag format to be quite comfortable for hauling a bunch of gear.

  119. Thinktank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a look at Thinktank brand bags... they have exactly what you're looking for, they're designed for pro photographers, and are used by pro photographers around the world.

    I own a couple of their bags and belt systems, great quality, great features.

    -Jeff

  120. burton-f-stop-pack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://uncrate.com/stuff/burton-f-stop-pack/

  121. Re:Don't go cheap! by ganjadude · · Score: 1

    ive never been myself, but my best friend, a world rated gymnist, he had major back problems. he went to a chiropractor for a few years 2 times a week and he cant stop talking about how great it was for him even 7 years later.

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  122. Lowe Pro Stealth AW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy a stealth AW bag. Big enough for all the gear you mentioned, plus laptop. I use 24-70, 12-24, 70-200, teleconverters, macro lens, flashes, pocket wizards, hard drive backup unit, cleaning stuff, spare crap, cards, etc... Top access is there for getting to your stuff fast and will accomodate 70-200 w/body and hood reversed on it. Backbacks suck. You cannot get to your stuff fast enough and have to put it on ground, etc... Shoulder bags work much better for photography. I've had them all and will not have another backpack. I put my stuff in a pelican case to transport it and bring the stealth with me full of clothes, etc... Then when I get to where I am going, I switch the stuff around (clothes in pelican, gear in stealth). Seems to work pretty good so far. If you are taking short trip and don't need much clothes, just mail them to yourself at the destination point.

  123. Re:50 pound backpack by ganjadude · · Score: 1

    external storage??? ipad??? you sure??

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  124. dakine sequence or reload by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Built tough and able to withstand constant back country use if desire. Its the bag of choice for most mountain bike photographers I know.

    http://www.amazon.com/Dakine-8100-460-29-DAKINE-Sequence-Photo/dp/B002G7JA7E

    http://www.zappos.com/dakine-reload-26l-camera-pack

  125. you really should just go to a store... by bloosqr · · Score: 1

    You need to take your stuff to a proper store and figure this out.. I have gone through a ton of bags before being reasonably satisfied w/ the lowepro 250 (which is fine with the 70-200/f4 and the 17" macbook pro), which is my day trip and airplane travel bag. Even with this I also use an old velocity 7 for wandering around with because it is lighter and I can leave my laptop @ the hotel / home. For international 3rd world travel / hiking I use the velocity bag as an insert to a normal camping bag. This gives you the proper framing that camping bags have and also doesn't scream out rob me and is also not easily unzipped from the back.

  126. Just use an insert by Solandri · · Score: 1

    Tenba sells inserts. Other manufacturers might too. The problem I had with specialized camera + laptop bags was that sometimes I didn't want to bring the camera or the laptop. That resulted me in buying two bags - one for when I want just the laptop, another for when I want the camera+lenses (with or without laptop). The photo-centric design of many bags meant they frequently can't take a laptop, necessitating a third bag for camera+lenses with the laptop.

    The insert lets me do it with just one bag. If I want the camera + lenses, I put in the insert. If I don't want them I remove the insert. Having my photo gear in the insert also makes it easy to switch between these two modes without having to move all my lenses one by one between bags. The size of the insert won't work for a pro, but I find it's enough to carry a 70-200, 28-70, one body, and a flash. If the bag I was using were bigger, I could probably squeeze in an extra big lens (put the flash outside but to the side of the insert - like I do the power adapter and cord for the laptop).

    The insert also has the advantage of being extraordinarily cheap ($15-$30) compared to dedicated photo bags ($100+, for some reason when you put the word "photo" on something it triples or quadruples in price). And it gives you the flexibility to use whatever bag you like as long as it's big enough, instead of being limited to the dedicated laptop + photo bags that scream "valuable stuff inside!" to thieves.

  127. Re:50 pound backpack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not ipad. For sure.

  128. Re:50 pound backpack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How well does that setup handle HD video? And who said anything about hiking or home being nearby? "In the field" can mean spending several weeks thousands of miles from home.

  129. Buy a regular *huge* hiking backpack by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
    Then get a "laptop sleeve" for your laptop.
    When hiking around, stick both laptop (in sleeve), and camera (in its small camera bag) into your backpack.

    Added bonus: there's also space for your lunch box, an extra set of clothes, water bottle, or whatever else you might need on a hike. And when you reach a scenic stretch of trail, take your camera out of the backpack, and put it around your neck (or on belt), so it's easily accessible without having to stop every 20m to take your camera... And when you reach a more boring stretch, back it goes into the backpack where it's easier to carry.

  130. Tamrac 5788 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had the same requirements and ended up with the Tamrac 5788. You can find it here: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003D5MZUW

    It's a great pack with an excellent laptop compartment and it has the slingshot capability from either side and the ability to use it as a pack or just a sling over. Carried it for 10 days during travels and Russia this spring and it was awesome!

  131. Amazon Basics by cjb-nc · · Score: 1

    http://www.amazon.com/dp/B002VPE1WK/ - AmazonBasics Backpack for SLR camera is my standard airplane travel bag. Holds my D90 with two or three spare lenses, gps, backup usb harddrive, and a 10inch netbook with power cables. Still has room for travel docs and a snack.

  132. Re:50 pound backpack by Yamioni · · Score: 1

    Of course. Trashcans are great external storage devices.~

    --
    Cool post bro, highfive \o
  133. Will one do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One bag will not fit all situations but when I am flying or can only take one bag and want a laptop and DSLR I use my Lowe Pro 250, the 350 would suit a larger laptop, the 250 suits my tablet or 12 inch laptop.

  134. I have a Kata DR-467 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a Kata DR-467, which I bought instead of a LowePro (forgot the name) which had some kind side opening system... wellwell.

    The Kata DR-467 has a good price and looks good, but the camera compartment is not speedy to get to if you looking for that. So it's more of a carrying bag than a photographing bag, which was what I looked for. It also comes with a nice weather cover which fits the bag very well. The laptop compartment is also nice and carries a 15 incher pretty easily (but if you have a smaller computer maybe the 465 or whatsitname may be better, as the top compartment doesn't do that much good anyway).

    Oh, and make sure you get the i-model if it isn't too much more expensive. I miss the extra tripod-strap sometimes and would love to be able to remove the wall between the camera and top compartments.

  135. +1 for Kata by sbraab · · Score: 1

    I've been using a Kata R-103 for about 5 years now. The bag is bulletproof. It's been all over the world from urban travels in europe to camping trips in the US. I load it up with my 1D and lots of L glass. While the pocket layout isn't perfect, the bag has protected my gear even when the cabbie knocked out of his cab and when I've abused it in the woods. Try as I might to abuse it, the bag still looks brand new. Honestly, I wish it would get a bit dirty. I feel like a poser (ok, a bigger poser than I am) it looks so new. I took the bag with me in to Haiti after the earthquake last year and everything else I took came back smelling horrible. I couldn't wash the "funk" out of some of my clothes, but that bag didn't pick it up. I'm really starting to think it has some magical properties that keep it clean.

    I do have a few complaints. First of all the easy access camera section in the front isn't idiot proof. Twice now I have left it open only to have my camera fall out when I pick the bag up later. I shouldn't expect them to fix stupid. The other real problem I have is with their "system." I got the W-92 waist pack to hold my second body. Sadly it took some modification to make the system work. The bags just didn't attach to each other well enough to become one. I also made some minor modifications to the W-92 to make it work as a shoulder bag.

    I've had bags from a bunch of other manufactures like crumpler (stylish, but don't protect well) LowePro (just not as good) and Tamrac (not as sturdy) and I have replaced them all with kata bags.

    Oh and don't listen to the folks who tell you to get a regular pack. The velcro-in mesh lens bags and dividers do a good job keeping you glass from getting banged around all the time. I used to put my 10d in my Spire laptop bag (if you need a laptop only bag they are great,) but it took too much abuse and collected too much dust and dirt.

  136. Try the Theft Magnet packs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're great!

  137. Re:50 pound backpack by steveg · · Score: 1

    Which laptop can you buy now that has a 1920x1200 screen?

    Since HDTV has taken over the monitor market, Hi-res displays have become almost impossible to find, especially in laptops.

    We have the odd situation that older laptops are actually better than newer ones, at least as far as their displays go.

    --
    Ignorance killed the cat. Curiosity was framed.
  138. Random bag + an insert or two.... by alanh · · Score: 1

    My solution to this was to use a generic looking messenger bag that had a padded computer insert, and add an inexpensive camera/lens insert for around $20-25.

    For example:

    http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/509016-REG/Tenba_638_251_Pro_Digital_2_0_Photo.html

    That way, I can customize the bag for whatever I need to carry and save weight when needed. Let's say I'm going to a conference for work and sightseeing a few days afterwards. For the trip out, I put both inserts in the bag. When I'm at the conference, I take the camera insert out and keep the computer insert in. When I'm sightseeing, I do the reverse (camera in, computer out).

    You could probably do this with a backpack instead of a messenger bag too. Plus, having a non-dedicated bag won't advertise "I have an expensive computer" or "I'm carrying an expensive camera" as much as dedicated bag would.

    --
    - AlanH
  139. Lowepro Fastpack 350 or ThinkTank by ejoe_mac · · Score: 1

    Most bags are great, the big deal will be if you're doing a pro body (or standard body + grip) or a standard body. Lots of options that will depend on if you're hiking or hitting airports. I had to go the Lowepro route due to the pro body - and it'll fit a 70-200/2.8 and 3-4 lenses.

  140. Re:50 pound backpack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not going to be performing a proper backup in the field? I have a pair of 500GB external hard drives that would beg to differ. Unless you have a big stack of cards or shoot everything in the lowest resolution setting, you're going to need to wipe the cards at least a couple of times a week (or day in the case cited by the previous poster).

  141. Lowepro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    everything you need in one bag, they have something for everyone. I love their bags, they can withstand tropical downpours if you get an all weather one.
    I speak from experience.

  142. Two bags - sort of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have this same issue and after trying various solutions I went back to 2 bags with a bit of a twist.

    I don't want to have to take a big bag and/or my laptop out with me when shooting and I did not want to have to have a laptop bag and a camera bag as part of my carry on bags when flying so I ended up with a bag inside a bag solution. I got a Lowepro Slingshot bag (I have the 220) that is big enough for me to have my camera a few lenses, filters, etc when I am shooting without being the size of a full pack, and it fits inside a Wegner backpack that also holds my laptop, chargers, kindle etc, so I have a single bag with all my electronics/valuables for a carry-on on the airplane, and then when I am at my destination I can pull out the camera bag for going out taking photos - the laptop and all the accessories are all still together in the backpack and should I decide I need all of it for some reason I just put the camera back back inside the backpack.

    It is not ideal, but better than having two separate bags, and better than having just one that is big enough for the laptop as well.

  143. PJ major here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a Dakine Mission Photo I bought after my brother gave me his old Dakine bag that had been through hell and proved to be quite durable. It has a removable "photo block" with padding to separate components, rain fly and a board/tripod strap. The removable part is great because if i'm going out of town I can use the main bag to carry clothes and toiletries and throw the camera block on a sling and not have to check any luggage. The backpack is my carry on and the personal is the photo block. My laptop fits in the same compartment the photo block is in, nicely padded. What I usually carry is my Nikon D700, two SB-800 strobes, an 18-105, 50 prime, charger, audio recorder, mini tripod(table top dealy), cords, lens kit, filters, etc. along with my macbook. Big tripod stays home if it can.

    One advantage I see to this bag is it doesn't mark you as a photog, Dakine bags are hugely popular among students, skaters, snowboarders, etc. so you blend in well. Crumpler and Lowepro are nice, but everyone knows WTF you are carrying. Also there is a lifetime warranty should anything break. Also since the block is removable you can throw it into any other bag, I toss it in my REI backback when I go camping, if you wanted to be really incognito you could toss it in a cheap jansport school bag. Dakine doesn't sell the photo blocks separate anymore sadly, but I'm sure there is a company that sells something similar.

  144. I've got the CaseLogic bag... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I've been reasonably happy with it. As you can probably guess, all of these bags are compromises. You can carry your laptop, and your DSLR, but you aren't going to carry much more. I've got my Canon 350D (with my "go-to" lens, the standard Canon 27-135 IS lens) mounted on it in the top spot in the camera area, then another 5 lenses (ranging from a Sigma 75-300 to a Canon 50 mm prime), along with a Sigma shoe flash stashed in camera area. I still have enough room for my 17" MacBook Pro and power adapter (the laptop has a dedicated, zippered pouch that fits like it was made for it). That's ALL you have room for, though.

    You won't have room for much more than a thin paperback (I had JUST enough room to stick my Nook in the front pocket where the wall wart/mouse/extra stuff goes).

    So the verdict: it does what you need it to do, and does it well (it even has a pretty nice system for carrying a tripod along). Just don't expect to carry much more than the camera and laptop.

  145. I've got the CaseLogic bag. by ValentineMSmith · · Score: 1

    Sorry: forgot to log in and posted this anonymously a few minutes ago.

    And I've been reasonably happy with it. As you can probably guess, all of these bags are compromises. You can carry your laptop, and your DSLR, but you aren't going to carry much more. I've got my Canon 350D (with my "go-to" lens, the standard Canon 27-135 IS lens) mounted on it in the top spot in the camera area, then another 5 lenses (ranging from a Sigma 75-300 to a Canon 50 mm prime), along with a Sigma shoe flash stashed in camera area. I still have enough room for my 17" MacBook Pro and power adapter (the laptop has a dedicated, zippered pouch that fits like it was made for it). That's ALL you have room for, though.

    You won't have room for much more than a thin paperback (I had JUST enough room to stick my Nook in the front pocket where the wall wart/mouse/extra stuff goes).

    So the verdict: it does what you need it to do, and does it well (it even has a pretty nice system for carrying a tripod along). Just don't expect to carry much more than the camera and laptop.

    --
    Karma: Chameleon - mostly influenced by bad '80s New Wave music
  146. Lowepro Pro Roller x100 by pez · · Score: 1

    Not the cheapest option, but this rollaboard is also a backpack -- it's basically a backpack inside of a rollaboard, so you get the best of both worlds, plus a bonus that if you buy a bunch of stuff while traveling, your one bag turns into two. I recently purchased it for business travel, and couldn't be happier.
    http://www.amazon.com/Lowepro-Pro-Roller-x100-Camera/dp/B0027JM3B6/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1313439687&sr=8-2

  147. Re:Don't go cheap! by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

    Hair products count as heavy items? If they're using that much product, they might have other health issues...

  148. So I don't go buy a piece of grabage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you said you own a MacBook, you already have a large piece of garbage.

  149. Re:50 pound backpack by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

    Price of the SD card reader: $30
    Price of a 32 gb ipad: ~$600
    Carrying around ipad: er... bulky and potential for damage/theft.
    Price of another 32gb sd card to use when you've filled up the first one that you can then manipulate on your home computer with a mouse: ~$30.
    Not having to carry an ipad with you when you're taking pictures: priceless

  150. Eye-fi card if you don't -need- the laptop by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

    On the off chance that the laptop is only there to move the pictures, I thought I'd mention the eye fi cards. I haven't bought one yet, but I'm thinking they might be interesting to use with a smartphone, send pictures from the camera to the phone to an online storage site.

    Anyone know if there's some way one could automate cloud storage via such a system? I take a picture with my DSLR, it automatically sends it to the phone, and the phone automatically uploads it to flickr? Seems like there could be some interesting uses there, real-time photostreaming, making sure your documentation of police brutality or other crime couldn't be taken easily, etc.

    I'd be lying to myself if I said I would probably ever be in an interesting situation where that would be useful though...

    1. Re:Eye-fi card if you don't -need- the laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes - the eye-fi cards do allow auto upload to iPhone, iPad, droid using the app which you need to install on device. My assumption is that the app will upload some cloud services and I would think that the app will be updated to include iCloud in the next 1-2 months.

  151. Ads as a guide` by hsmyers · · Score: 1

    Check out the advertisements in Digital Photo Pro and similar. There are usually a number of ads for backpack style bags----some of which are designed for laptops as well. I'd tell you what I use, but I don't haul around my photo-laptop so my setup wouldn't work for you. A smallish bag is good for my Nikon and my best guess regards needed lens(s) of the day. I know I've see adds, sorry can't remember specifics....

  152. Tatonka and Tasmanian Tiger by yerktoader · · Score: 1

    I am exceptionally happy with my Tasmanian Tiger Mission Pack MC. They're made by Tatonka, a German manufacturer of quality outdoor/camping gear. The pack is comfortable, spacious and each storage area differs from the rest so as to be flexible and practical.

    I bought my Mission Pack MC at a military gear-specific post exchange at the Kandahar Air Field and paid $200 US for it, which is about 52 dollars less than what it goes for from the manufacturer. I've had it for about three months here at my base and I use it every day, with only the slightest amount of wear showing even after a few trips back and forth to KAF and amongst the Afghan dust that permeates everything.

    You'd need to pad all of your gear, and maybe the bottom of the pack for extra security, but I'm expecting my new 17" laptop will fit with ease once it arrives. My only regret is I did not have enough money for one of the slightly more modular systems that have detachable bags, an adjustable back panel with aluminum braces for varying loads and even better padding and materials. Check them out, you won't be disappointed.

    My pack: http://intranet.tatonka.com/infosys/infocgi/artintt9.dll?7836_TT_Mission_Pack_MC&0
    Main Tasmanian Tiger website: http://www.tasmaniantiger.info/EN/TasmanianTiger/tasmanian-tiger.htm
    Parent company: http://www.tatonka.com/en/

  153. Why do you want a camera backpack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are you putting all this in a backpack? To travel to/from the bus/airport? Or to walk around when you're wherever you want to be?

    If someone is looking for stuff to sell quickly and cheaply, they'll know what makes/brands of bags to look out for ... IMHO, bags such as this do nothing to make yourself less of a target and they lack certain ergnomics (see below) that make them a useful backpack.

    When I'm travelling, I pack my camera bag into a carry-on bag with wheels and carry my laptop in a laptop bag. For anyone that sees me at the airport, there's *zero* indication that I'm carrying expensive camera equipment. I just look like another ordinary traveller.

    When I'm walking around wherever it is that I want to be to take photographs, I have a camera bag and camera over my shoulders because I can keep both within easy reach of my hands. Nothing is flung over my back where I can't see it and/or is easy pray for someone approaching me from behind.

    When I'm hiking, I use a backpack for hiking and the camera bag stays in the car. In circumstances such as this, I would love to use a camera-laptop backpack but they're nothing special for hiking, so why pay a premium for it? Now if my camera-backpack could double as a camel-back backpack when the laptop isn't in it, *that* would be a useful backpack to own. Let me put a couple of litres of water in there somewhere and I'm sold.

    So considering that the only useful purpose of a camera-backpack is really between accommodation and your means of transport, aren't there better ways to solve that problem?

    Oh, and as for camera backpacks being good for taking your stuff around with - if you see something really cool (lets pretend it is a bear at Yosemite or similar), do you think that the bear will stay where it is long enough for you to unmount your bag, unzip and get your camera out? Not likely. You may have a bit more luck in metropolitan/suburban areas where the subject is usually a bit more static.

  154. try this by DeanOh · · Score: 1

    Been using this for 2 years...holds lots, decent ergonomics, great for consolidating a DSLR, laptop and all the accompanying stuff:
    Lowepro CompuTrekker Plus AW Camera Backpack
    ($165 on amazon)

    1. Re:try this by Builder · · Score: 1

      I've had two of these. The first one was stolen with all of my gear in it.

      After extensive research, I ended up just buying another one.

      This weekend, I carried it around Edinburgh for hours on end with no discomfort.

  155. Crumpler Karachi Outpost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I spent all of last month trying to figure out the best backpack for similar needs except a 15.4" laptop. The two finalists were the Kata Bug 205 PL and the Crumpler Karachi Outpost (L). I ended up going with the Crumpler KO since I like the fact that the zipper is behind the backstraps so it keeps curious fingers at bay when traveling. Crumpler has amazing reviews and if you are looking for more info, they have different names for the same product in different markets.

    US Name -> European/Asian Name
    Karachi Outpost (L) -> Karachi Outpost
    Karachi Outpost (M) -> Whickey and Cox
    Karachi Outpost (S) -> The Keystone

    they have a few more names for some south east asian countries, but just search for Karachi Outpost or Whickey and Cox for the reviews.

  156. Re:Don't go cheap! by dgatwood · · Score: 1

    Look for a backback with good padding that will spread the load across a large portion of your shoulders. If it feels like it's pulling back on your shoulders while using the contact spot on your spine as a fulcrum, don't get it.

    Well, that's probably good advice in spite of the rest of the message.... However, I don't think it goes nearly far enough. My advice would be to not use a backpack at all except for carrying the laptop. If you're carrying around a bunch of lenses in a bag on your back, you're going to be throwing your balance way off, and that's just plain not good for your back.

    Instead, invest in a large fanny pack and wear it in front of you. Wear the backpack on your back with the laptop, and put your DSLR camera, flash, a couple of spare batteries, some disposable lens wipes, and two or three of your most commonly used lenses into the fanny pack. Leave everything else at the hotel or at home. This is how I travel when I'm shooting (minus the laptop—I leave that at the hotel, too). It's easier to deal with than a shoulder bag, but without the problems of having all that extra weight so far from your center of gravity.

    Alternatively, use a rolling backpack and get all the weight off your back.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  157. Tom Bihn Brainbag by gessel · · Score: 1

    I carry a Tom Bihn Brainbag with their sleeves in it for laptops since 2007. I carried two laptops with it (T60+Dell M40) for a long time, now a W500+Sony NX5+acc and a crap load of other goodies. It has been on about 500 (?) maybe 600 flights with me, well over 1,000,000 air miles, was strapped to a pallet in a CJ in Afghanistan (and offloaded at the wrong fob where it spent the night and finally got back to me awfully dusty), bounced around Iraq, and accompanied me to to other difficult, sometimes less than gracious environments without any failures. The zippers are tight and with an occasional NikWax have kept the contents dust-free and dry.

    My only complaint is that the Freudian Slip doesn't organize enough stuff - I wanted to make a rigid MOLLE style insert for the front pocket to strap sacks of cables and crap to and keep organized, and still keep an eye out for semi-rigid containers for delicate things, but so far nothing has been smashed inside, the straps and zippers work like new, no real fraying. The waist strap on mine has been a vestigial annoyance, but newer models have removable ones.

    The only system failures are that the sternum straps disappeared one by one, but my GF has a later edition of the same bag and gave me hers since they interfere with her anatomy and the updated ones work better, no problems since. She's had hers for almost as long and almost as many miles and pretty much the same difficult travel schedule with no problems at all.

    If it ever fails, I'll get another. It would be really cool if they had a ballistic spectra option and it would be very cool if there was an easy option to lock the zippers.

  158. CRUMPLER BACKPACKS by nikkolascc · · Score: 1

    I myself was like you and I picked up a crumpler back pack. Take a look they are pricey but they do the job. Click the link below http://www.crumpler.com/CA/Laptop-Bags/Laptop-Backpacks/C-List-Celebrity-M.html?LanguageCode=EN&SKU=CLC001-B00150 hope that helps NCC

  159. Naneu Alpha L by lysine · · Score: 1

    I was searching for a bag such as this as well and eventually ended up with. http://www.naneubags.com/products-by-series/military-ops/alpha-l

  160. Re:50 pound backpack by Krojack · · Score: 1

    Who said his DSLR supported HD video let alone any video. Mine doesn't so my setup works for me.

  161. Crumpler Big Cheese All the Way! by tpconcannon · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, it is a Euro-only bag, but I was lucky enough to have my ship pull into Amsterdaam and bought one there. It is a bit pricey, but worth it!

    --
    I found the "Any" key.
  162. Tamrac 3385 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're real happy with our Tamrac 3385: http://www.tamrac.com/3385.htm
    It fits the laptop nicely, and our DSLR with about any lens that a normal person is going to put on it. We store two extra lenses (70 - 300, and 50mm) and keep the 18 - 135 on the camera usually. Also in the lower camera-section of the bag is the external flash, hood, and other small odds and ends.
    Above the camera-section is a nice sized compartment that easily fits the power adapter, and plenty of other stuff that you might need.
    The camera is quickly accessible from the side zipper or from the back, so it's easy to quickly get to.

    We recently took it on a two week trip to Uganda, and it was comfortable and easy to travel with and took good care of our equipment. It travels as a "personal item" so you can still take a carry-on bag for your clothes and whatnot.

    1. Re:Tamrac 3385 by dingram17 · · Score: 1

      I use this bag too and it is a good piece of gear. The laptop section handles a 17" laptop, and since I have a 13" laptop that leaves me some room at the top. The camera area is very spacious (more than I need now). The best feature was the price - around A$150. The Crumpler looked really nice but was over twice the price

      .

      I travelled around Norway with the Tamrac, and I use it here in Australia. I really like the fact that it doesn't scream 'expensive laptop and camera inside' -- it just looks like a largish backpack. When I have the laptop (1.5kg), the camera and lenses, a charger or two, umbrella etc the weight gets up near 8kg which is pushing the friendship for air travel. the bag doesn't fit under a seat that has the entertainment system box down there, and the side compartments of an A330/A340 are too small. The centre overheads or 747 overhead lockers are fine with this bag.

  163. Booq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will hold an SLR and medium sized lens, http://www.booqbags.com/All-Products/Boa-laptop-bags/Boa-flow-XL-laptop-backpack I carry a Canon T2i with 24-105 lens for travelling and it fits perfectly.

  164. my pick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pre-face: Just finishing up a year-long trip around the world... 30+ countries, almost 100 flights etc.

    I store-tested everything, even bought a few and got rid of them before settling on my fav setup. Happened to be both Lowepro.

    Pro Runner x350 AW: if you carry anything anywhere for an extended amount of time, or fly, the rolling backpack is ABSOLUTELY necessary. The convenience factor of not having to lug stuff on your back UNLESS you absolutely have to, is a godsent. It has space for a computer, 1 big lens, 1 big body + lens + a ton of other accessories.

    Classified 160 AW: The key to carrying a camera everywhere while travelling for a year, is to be able to lug it comfortably and to be discrete about it when you want to. This bag offers just that. Most people don't even know it's a camera bag. The shoulder strap and everything is made well and durable. includes a weather cover, which is necessary when you get caught in a downpour somewhere.

  165. Cheap backpack padded with socks and underwear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use a cheap backpack (£20) and pad the cameras with my socks and underwear. Yes, the dirty ones are in plastic bags.

    Works great, inconspicuous, no extra weight to lug through airports.

  166. Crumpler Sinking Barge by kurowski · · Score: 1

    It's big enough to carry everything you've mentioned, but no bigger than necessary. It comfortably distributes the weight when fully loaded, and is unbelievably durable. I've used mine on a daily basis for four years, including several cross-country and international trips, and it still looks new. Worth every penny. Highly recommended.

  167. Kata Bubblebee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got a Kata bubblebee, very light and well designed.
    I took backpacking in vietnam and it held my 7D (with grip) and a 24-70 L with no dramas, had room for 3 other lens and 2 flashes, + cleaning kit.

    I was also able to slot 2 cardreader/HDD's and a few days of clothes, passports etc into the laptop section. (only use the laptop side when i am travelling for work, otherwise its clothes storage when I am hiking)
    It was heavy but only because i crammed so much stuff it in, when its empty it almost floats away its that light!
    Has a rain and sun cover and heaps of points to get a carabena hooked on to.

    Only gripe that since the camera part is well built it does take a bit of time to unzip everything to get at the camera, that said, when walking along somewhere i know nothing is going to fall out or shake loose.
    Plus it was great to be able to put a lock or a carabena on to the zips and attach it to the bag, so it stops pick pocketers.

  168. Crumpler rocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I run my Nikon D90 and laptop around in Crumpler's Whikey&Cox backback. Absolutely the best compromise for carrying both I've ever seen.

    It zips in the rear so there's no way for someone to get into your gear while you're carrying it.
    Great padding. Comfortable straps and webbing - important when you're hauling so much gear. Even has a loop for a tripod as well.
    Laptop pouch is removable to make it camera only, or you can pull the camera/lenses/pockets section as a complete unit to make a big laptop bag.

    Can't find this model on their site any more (mine's like 10 years old now) but the "Karachi Outpost" looks like it http://www.crumpler.com/AU/Camera-Bags/Camera-Backpacks/Karachi-Outpost-M.html?LanguageCode=EN&SKU=KOT001-X00150)

  169. Booq BOA by whatever3003 · · Score: 1

    The Booq Boa could be what you are looking for: Booq Boa Flow XL Digital SLR/17" Laptop Backpack I have a regular laptop bag made by Booq and it's perhaps the nicest thing I own. I was blown away by the quality of it when it arrived. I also paid through the nose for it, but it was worth every penny. Rushfaster, the site I just linked to, also have an excellent website and excellent customer service. Not a shill, just a regular, satisfied customer :) Hope it helps.

    --
    "Those who do not want to imitate anything, produce nothing." -- Salvador Dali
  170. Some backpack suggestions by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

    In answer to the original question, I'm assuming that only the camera gear (DSLR, lenses, flash, etc.), laptop, and related accessories are to be carried in the backpack. I have used a few of the larger Tamrac bags, and have never been let down by them. However, I don't carry a laptop to shoots. Here are some suggestions which might be good choices:

    Tamrac Expedition 8x 17" laptop and a lot of photo gear, including 2 DSLRs with lenses attached.
    Tamrac Cyberpack 7 17" laptop and a lot of photo gear, but not quite as much as the Expedition 8x.
    Tamrac LP8 17" laptop and similar amount of photo gear to the Cyberpack 7.

    The LP8 is also convertible between backpack and rolling bag, and might be the best bet as an airline carry-on, if that's a factor (not stated in original question). Of course, if you're hoping to carry your raincoat, food, toothbrush, spare socks, etc. in the same backpack, these models are not the best choice. There are backpacks available which will do this, but they necessarily compromise on the space for photo gear.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  171. Lowepro CompuDayPack by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

    Probably not the dog's bollocks of bags, but this thing does me just dandy. I was out with it last week with a 15.6" notebook, a 10.1" netbook, power packs for both, DV camcorder, four spare tapes, one spare battery, Kodak compact DC, two litres of Lucozade and a complete change of clothes.

    Hardly even noticed I was carrying it.

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  172. Re:50 pound backpack by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

    Which laptop can you buy now that has a 1920x1200 screen?

    Not many, and probably no consumer models. They've all gone for the shortscreen 1920x1080 instead. To get a proper 1920x1200, you'll have to shop for one of the few business models where it's an option, such as Dell's m6500, and pay a premium for the extra 120 vertical pixels. Alas, Sony and HP no longer make any 1920x1200 laptops, not even for business customers.

    This is one of the reasons we have not replaced our old laptop. Its processor power and RAM are adequate, and its 17" 1920x1200 display is unsurpassed. In fact, its display is a lot nicer than the 15.6" 1920x1200 on my Dell m4400 at work. I fully expect that the next laptop I get at work will be a shortscreen model.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  173. Commercial?? by Occams · · Score: 1

    Is this a commercial?

    --
    Heavy is the head that wears the tinfoil hat.
  174. Best Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the best solution for your problem is to give away either your camera or your macbook! :)

  175. Re:50 pound backpack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This happens pretty much in any place with a community. Since they opened the Internets to everyone, that's it.

  176. Crumpler C-List Celebrity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holds all my 7D and various other bits and pieces, as well as the 17" macbook pro in a comfortable backpack style. Be warned, they aren't cheap, but will outlive your camera and laptop easily.

  177. Case Logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SLRC-206
    Awesome case for my Canon 550D and MBP, waterproof base that makes it stand upright, tripod straps, quick access to camera, my 70-200mm lens only takes up one of the 8 compartments inside, extra pockets for small accessories too, I also carry my magic mouse, filter sets, battery pack, etc,

  178. Think Tank Shape Shifter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think Tank Shape Shifter

    I have used a number of packs, including lowepro, but for small cameras such as 35mm slrs the Think Tank is the way to go.

  179. Re:The gadget-guy photographer movement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, if it was intended for an SLR, it would need to be much bigger than it would for a DSLR.

    Why? Because 1,000 frames worth of film takes up a LOT of room in that bag. My 32GB card fits very neatly inside the camera, not taking up any more room in the bag.

  180. love my fastpack 350 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a lowepro fastpack 350 and love it. It fits my macbook pro, my nikon dslr, and a few lenses with room to spare.

  181. Crumpler's Customary Barge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've travelled around Mexico and Central America many times with a Customary Barge (http://www.crumpler.com/AU/Camera-Bags/Camera-Backpacks/Customary-Barge-Deluxe.html?LanguageCode=EN&SKU=CBE001-T01170) bought some six years ago. It holds perfectly both my 15" laptop and my camera with lenses and flash, with plenty of room for even taking along some beers. I would consider buying the same one next time, but so long it has not even a scratch, and if you travel to less than 'safe' places as I have it has the plus side that it does not seem as a "Laptop + DSLR bag".

  182. Burton Resolution Camera Backpack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I went with the Burton Resolution Camera Backpack. Holds my 15" MBP, and most of the camera gear I bring on trips. Also doubles as a great non-camera pack when you don't need that gear by taking out the removable camera pack. The camera pack has a strap on it, so if you want to just carry your camera gear on its own without the rest of the pack, you can sling the strap over your shoulder. It's the best solution I've found to the exact problem you describe.