Slashdot Mirror


1 in 8 Take Fake Phone Calls to Avoid Talking to Others

A survey conducted by the Pew Internet & American Life Project found that people are lying 13% of the time when they say they have to take a cell phone call around you. That number jumps to an inconsiderate 30% in the 18- to 29-year-old age group. The survey also found that 42% of the 18-to-29 group "have had trouble doing something because they did not have their phone nearby." More than a quarter of survey respondents...sorry, I have to take this call.

160 comments

  1. First post by kimvette · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd post something worthwhile but I need to take this call. . .

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    1. Re:First post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. *calls kimvette*
      2. *kimvette's phone rings while it's at (let's be honest:) his ear*.
      3. *kimvette now has a tinnitus and looks like an idiot*
      4. ...
      5. LOL

    2. Re:First post by laejoh · · Score: 1

      I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of the statement that 1 in 8 Take Fake Phone Calls to Avoid Talking to Others, which this comment is too narrow to contain!

  2. Quick Question by h4x0t · · Score: 0

    Are we talking business majors here, or like... regular people?

  3. Statistics fail by spazdor · · Score: 5, Informative

    "People are lying 13% of the time?" C'mon.

    From RTFA, the real stat was that 13% of adults admitted to doing this ever. I think we can be generous and assume that that 13% aren't doing this 100% of the time.

    --
    DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    1. Re:Statistics fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      13% of people lacked the confidence to say fuck off, and/or goodbye.

    2. Re:Statistics fail by jovius · · Score: 1

      But how do we know if people are lying or not?

      I'm wondering whether I should yell YOU FUCKING LIAR for every eight sudden call taker around me or carry a D8 dice on me and let it roll.

    3. Re:Statistics fail by Duradin · · Score: 1

      Are their lips moving (or fingers in the case of typing)?

    4. Re:Statistics fail by Dthief · · Score: 1

      100% of the time, I do this 13% of the time.

      --
      www.RacquetUp.org - Helping Detroit Youth
    5. Re:Statistics fail by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      And only 13% of their test group.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    6. Re:Statistics fail by rust627 · · Score: 1

      There are three types of lies

        1, Lies
        2, Damned Lies
        3, Statistics

      --
      da da da dum indeed.
  4. We have a system at work like this by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    we will IM others to call us just so we have an excuse to hang up on someone else, it is even good for getting rid of people who come to your desk and won't leave.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:We have a system at work like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or you could grow a pair and just, y'know, tell people to fuck off

    2. Re:We have a system at work like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being a timid, scared little man is the path of least resistance.

    3. Re:We have a system at work like this by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      ...or you could grow a pair and just, y'know, tell people to fuck off

      ...sez the Anonymous Coward

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    4. Re:We have a system at work like this by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Brilliant, and avoids hurting the feelings of people who may be useful.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    5. Re:We have a system at work like this by Sta7ic · · Score: 1

      Another good way to dissuade coworkers from hanging around is to pull out a camera. It's the shotgun of office politics ~ there's no mistaking the sounds of the lens covers coming off, or the click of the shutter. Point'n'shoots, with that whirrr-whir as it extends the lens, also gets people's attention. Just some exposed glass has been enough to clear some of my coworkers out of the 4-plex, from time to time. Every now and then I even turn the camera on and get some random pictures. 55-200 lens get REALLY CLOSE UP from 10'.

    6. Re:We have a system at work like this by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Interesting comment from an anonymous coward.

      Anyway, telling people at your workplace to "fuck off" will likely lead to a talk with your boss or HR, disciplinary action, or termination. Workplaces don't like employees who "aren't good team players". Of course, they never do anything about the obnoxious loudmouth who keeps interrupting people who are doing real work so he can make himself look important.

      I'd say the fake phone call is a good workaround for this problem.

    7. Re:We have a system at work like this by vlueboy · · Score: 1

      It's funny, but let's explorer this before considering even joking with that. 1/8 random fakers AND 1/8 random dice rolls coinciding takes a (( 1/8 ) ^ 2) probability.

      If all your friends, daily events, calls and rolls were perfectly random in some ideal world (who trusts truly "random people"? ), we would be statistically right 1.6% of the time your "friend" gets on the phone. it's not worth the drama of the other 98% failures. :)
      Don't you wish the stats were skewed hugely in favor of lying for once?

    8. Re:We have a system at work like this by trytoguess · · Score: 1

      Why not politely tell someone to fuck off then? Something like: I'm sorry, but I've a lot of work to do. Perhaps we can talk some other time?

    9. Re:We have a system at work like this by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Because most jabbermouths just keep on blabbing anyway?

    10. Re:We have a system at work like this by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Because that's more confrontational, and a lot of people don't like confrontation. Basically, by saying the above, you're saying "what you're telling me isn't important to me and I want you to go away". With the ringing phone, you can blame it on the person on the phone (who doesn't actually exist).

      How many people want to hear "I don't care about what you have to say to me"? This will hurt the coworker's little feelings, and then he'll become your enemy and try to cause problems for you and stab you in the back at any chance he gets.

    11. Re:We have a system at work like this by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      It is possible to tell people politely that you're too busy to talk to them right now, without resorting to this kind of passive-aggressive behaviour. Unless they're really irritating people, and then 'fuck off' is the socially acceptable method of ending a conversation

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    12. Re:We have a system at work like this by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Depends on the workplace. Never underestimate the level of dysfunction at the typical office in America.

    13. Re:We have a system at work like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and then he'll become your enemy and try to cause problems for you and stab you in the back at any chance he gets.

      He's a co-worker. He's going to do that anyway.

      Most co-workers will just as quickly stab you in the back as wish you good luck on your chance of promotion (knowing that he's scuppered your chances with a few private ill words to the boss in order to better his own).

    14. Re:We have a system at work like this by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Is that a co-worker, or a cow-orker?

  5. App idea by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    It's a bit hard to convincingly fake taking a phone call when your phone is not ringing.

    Maybe someone should make a smartphone application that could react to some kind of surreptitious gesture and make the phone ring. After a short delay to avoid making it obvious.

    1. Re:App idea by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 2

      How about a bluetooth sensor? You could tell it to randomly call you in 2min stddev 1min whenever that jerks phone is in range. Doesn't completely ignore the jerk but at least will put a limit to how much of your time they can waste.

    2. Re:App idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A friend of mine has this on his phone (samsung ...). You have a sort of alarm app which fakes a phone call at a specific time!

    3. Re:App idea by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      It's a bit hard to convincingly fake taking a phone call when your phone is not ringing.

      "It's on vibrate."

    4. Re:App idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My partner's decidedly not smart Motorola is supposed to have this feature. It is in the manual. There is a setting in the phone, how long the wait should be (5, 10, 20, 30, 60 seconds) between when you press the buttons, and it rings.

      The trouble, it doesn't work. The buttons don't make the phone "fake ring" no matter how you press them, or what order you press them in.

      I would be all for taking the phone back as defective, if we lived in a country with strong consumer protection laws. But, as far as I know, we don't.

      Apparently other's have this problem too, as a quick web search will reveal.

    5. Re:App idea by stms · · Score: 1

      There's already an app for that that.

    6. Re:App idea by sjames · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more literally, put a bluetooth enabled strain gauge in a filling so that when you get annoyed enough to clench your jaw, the phone fakes an urgent call.

    7. Re:App idea by ks9208661 · · Score: 2

      I have this on my HTC Android phone too. It's a widget called Fake Call. You select a person in your phone book who will fake-call you, then the number of minutes of delay (from 0 to 10 minutes) before you get the call. It would be nice if this could be scheduled at a specific time.

    8. Re:App idea by the_leander · · Score: 2

      The Samsung Tocco Lite has a fake call feature, just press and hold the volume button for a couple of seconds and it's good to go. A few moments later and you get what looks to be an incoming call from someone withholding their number.

      Very useful for getting out of a situation where you don't want to talk but at the same time don't wish to be rude.

      --
      regards, the_leander
    9. Re:App idea by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      My broadband RF scanner has a directional antenna and picks up 2.4GHz. I actually found someone who had the pressure-activated tooth filling you described! The RF scanner cost me $590 but the ability it gave me to safely call that girl a lying bitch in public when she did it was PRICELESS! :>

      Hey.. It sounded good.

    10. Re:App idea by houghi · · Score: 1

      It's a bit hard to convincingly fake taking a phone call when your phone is not ringing.

      My phone has a fake phone function. It rings and I can hang up again when I want.

      People tend to do these white lies all the time. When she asks if she looks fat in whatever she wears, your ass is toast if you tell the truth. OK, wrong example, you are dead anyway.

      When people ask 'how are you'? They do not want to hear the truth. People expect to hear "Fine, how are you?"

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    11. Re:App idea by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's a bit hard to convincingly fake taking a phone call when your phone is not ringing.

      But more effective in the long term if you do it right...

      Them: Blah blah blah
      Me: Oh, that's my cell phone, gotta take this
      Them: But I didn't hear it ring...
      Me: [reaches into pocket, draws out nothing, looks into empty hand] It's the president!
      Them: You don't even have a cell phone...
      Me: [thumb to ear and pinkie in front of mouth] Yes Mr. President! TERRIBLY fucking boring! Ugly too!
      Them: [never talks to me again]

    12. Re:App idea by dr.+chuck+bunsen · · Score: 1

      Already exists. At least for Android.

    13. Re:App idea by Unkyjar · · Score: 1

      It amuses me greatly when I use that app on my iPod.

    14. Re:App idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure someone can tell us how to use the Tasker App in conjunction with Fake Call to do just that - ring at a specific time.

    15. Re:App idea by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      just change "Them to "Everybody" if you've ever done that.

    16. Re:App idea by Bobakitoo · · Score: 1

      Very useful for getting out of a situation where you don't want to talk but at the same time don't wish to be rude.

      Taking a call while been with peoples use to be rude. Usually the person receiving a call ask to be excused, leave and then take the call. Maybe i am old-fashioned but i think you can do just that without a noisy gadget.

    17. Re:App idea by the_leander · · Score: 1

      Exactly - "Sorry, I've been waiting for this call, excuse me".

      There is little the other person can say or do to stop it without themselves being rude, either way, you have your out.

      --
      regards, the_leander
    18. Re:App idea by Captain+Spam · · Score: 1

      It's a bit hard to convincingly fake taking a phone call when your phone is not ringing.

      "It's on vibrate."

      "But I didn't hear it vibrate."
      "I've got the vibrator off, since it makes too much noise in the theater."
      "Then how did you know it was vibrating?"
      "Look, I've got this call to take."

      --
      Demanding constant attention will only lead to attention.
    19. Re:App idea by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      "But I didn't hear it vibrate."

      Vibrate is noisy on a lot of phones, but on other phones, you can't really hear it from a few feet away...which is, after all, the point of vibrate.

    20. Re:App idea by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      You mean you don't keep a panic button taped to the underside of your desk, where you can surreptitiously bump it with a knee?

    21. Re:App idea by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Depends on where you are. Some people have mentioned doing this in an office setting, where some obnoxious coworker is talking your ear off about some drivel you don't care about, but you're too polite to tell him to fuck off (plus, if you did, you'd probably face disciplinary measures for "not being a team player").

      When someone calls you on an office phone, leaving to take the call isn't an option. Moreover, if you're in YOUR cubicle, why should you leave to take the call, even if it's on your cellphone?

    22. Re:App idea by eedwardsjr · · Score: 1

      Or like mentioned above. Snag the Bluetooth ID for the person you do not like and have the phone ring (play an file) when they are around. Make sure you have states for not being on the phone or the phone is already ringing. Hmmm. I may need to go visit my boss and get his ID. Then have it vibrate/flash the LED. Nice warning system.

    23. Re:App idea by kwark · · Score: 1

      So who has bluetooth enabled all the time and at the same time has his device discoverable? Sounds like a serious battery drain.

    24. Re:App idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh, the alarm function?

    25. Re:App idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually... most of the time anyone responds to that question with "fine" it seems to mean exactly the opposite...

    26. Re:App idea by dbIII · · Score: 1

      If they can feel that your phone in your pocket isn't vibrating then they are too close.

  6. obligatory by spazdor · · Score: 1

    (Go on somebody, make the Sex Panther joke.)

    --
    DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    1. Re:obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      13 percent of the time, Ron Burgundy jokes are predictable every time

    2. Re:obligatory by Tsar · · Score: 1

      Yep, the OP was made with bits of real statistics, so you know it's good.

    3. Re:obligatory by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Nice reference, where'd you get it? The REFERENCE store?

    4. Re:obligatory by codeAlDente · · Score: 1

      The only real statistics are bits. Also, 70% of statistics are made-up.

      --
      He once inserted random mutations into his code, just so he could have the experience of debugging.
    5. Re:obligatory by spazdor · · Score: 1

      I'm all out of references... could you give me a few pointers?

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    6. Re:obligatory by Lieutenant_Dan · · Score: 1

      interkin3tic, I've been meaning to talk to you about that. You should find yourself a safehouse or a relative close by, maybe lay low for awhile because you're probably wanted for using a cliched reference on /..

      --
      Wearing pants should always be optional.
    7. Re:obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well the jerk store called and there running out of YOU!

  7. Never done it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I usually just walk away if I want to walk away, I don't need a damn reason.

    1. Re:Never done it. by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I think the interesting thing here is that people seem to think that it's OK to answer a phone while they're talking to somebody else. It's understandable if one is a receptionist that needs to answer the phone, but for most people it's rude regardless of whether or not there's somebody on the line.

      Same goes for call waiting. There are a limited number of times during which it is acceptable to use call waiting most of the time you're showing a decided lack of respect for the person that's one the line.

    2. Re:Never done it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a reason for doing that. The person calling you doesn't know what you're doing, but the one you're talking to does know that you're taking a call. It is therefore less rude to take the call than to leave the caller in the dark. The right thing to do is to apologize, take the call, inform the caller that you'll call back, end the call quickly and return to your conversation.

      Another option is to reject the call. Unfortunately many callers don't get it and immediately call again, so this is only an option if most of your friends understand that ringing followed by the busy signal means you noticed the call but can't talk right now.

    3. Re:Never done it. by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      immediately walk away from someone if they answer the phone mid-conversation. if they raise their finger, raise them your middle finger and walk away. they'll catch on.

    4. Re:Never done it. by hedwards · · Score: 2

      There is no etiquette rule that dictates that you must answer the phone in a situation like that. The person on the line will just assume that you're indisposed at the moment, which you are, and either leave a message or call back.

      The sort of self entitled thinking that demands that people answer the phone even when the callee is indisposed is really not something which should be allowed to continue. Manners are getting uncommon enough as it is.

    5. Re:Never done it. by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      The person on the line will just assume that you're indisposed at the moment, which you are, and either leave a message or call back.

      All the while the 'phone is ringing and ringing and ringing. Depending on your job function the call could be orders of magnitude more important than whatever the hapless bore is banging on about.

      Oh hi boss, just returning your call regarding the serve....
      Right, no..I got the messages you le...
      Well...no...I agree it is very urgen...
      I was at my desk!
      I just couldn't take the ca...
      Well, I don't know if it'll seem more important now, bu...
      Bob was telling me about his fishing trip with the kids at the weekend. Did you know he caught 3 cod and 2 snapper? Hello? Hello? Boss?

    6. Re:Never done it. by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Nice strawman you've got there.

      If you're at work then there will be guidelines about that. It's still not required by etiquette that you conduct yourself like a jackass though.

    7. Re:Never done it. by errhuman · · Score: 1

      ...or maybe social etiquette is just changing.

  8. I don't believe it... by trunicated · · Score: 0

    All the 18-29 year olds that I know will sit there and text and facebook and whatnot while they're talking to you. I don't think they would be polite enough to fake a phone call to not want to talk to me... I'd think they would just get up and leave.

    Then again, maybe I'm just a lot of fun to talk to

    --
    There's a reason there is no "Disagree" mod...
    1. Re:I don't believe it... by Ngarrang · · Score: 1

      All the 18-29 year olds that I know will sit there and text and facebook and whatnot while they're talking to you. I don't think they would be polite enough to fake a phone call to not want to talk to me... I'd think they would just get up and leave.

      Then again, maybe I'm just a lot of fun to talk to

      Huh? Oh, are you still here? I was doing something else. What were you talking about? Oh, wait, I have this important text message to read, hold that thought.

      --
      Bearded Dragon
    2. Re:I don't believe it... by DigiTechGuy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I see this crap all the time and find it tremendously disrespectful. I fall in that 18-29 age group, though at the upper end. I have a few friends at the lower end of that spectrum and they're worse than my older friends. I generally don't call those younger "kids" very often. Why would I want to invite someone to be a guest in my home who is going to eat my food, drink my beer, and ignore me? Then when they can tell you're getting irritated, typically after you point it out at face value several times, they might engage in conversation for a minute or two. Though when they do, you can tell they're not really involved in the conversation, but just waiting to talk. I don't need those types of people in my life. They're always looking for the next big party or next best thing instead of enjoying the company they're with.

      So that being said, it's no surprise 3 of my best friends are in their 50s, and a couple others in their 30s and 40s. I'm by far the youngest in my normal social circle.

  9. Well, in my opinion by anomnomnomymous · · Score: 0

    In my opinion this clearly shows that...

    Oh, sorry: Got to take this call.

    --
    When you shoot a mime, do you use a silencer?
    1. Re:Well, in my opinion by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      When someone "takes a call" within about ten feet of me, the FlameWar App(tm)(sm)(r)(c) automagically finds their contact info and haunts them for a month.

      Take that, you hot girl that thought I wasn't stupid enough to be cool......

      Oh, wait. Uh.. sorry I can't finish this, I have a conference call.

  10. I'll be the first to say by cosm · · Score: 2

    that I have done this before--not to avoid contact with people, but to make it look like I'm making contact with people.

    Signed,
    Forever Alone lolololol

    --
    'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    1. Re:I'll be the first to say by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      I was actually going to say the same thing. I tend to pull out my cell and flip though the menus/old texts when I'm in one of those awkward situations where I'm waiting in uncomfortable places for uncomfortable lengths of time. I pull my phone out more because that's just what people do than I do because I'm actually using it. And I'm supposed to be part of the generation that does this crap all the time.

      Can't say I've ever done it to avoid someone though. My phone is so old nobody would believe that -- anyone who was actually using their phone more than a couple times a week would have one that wasn't nearing a decade old.

    2. Re:I'll be the first to say by Idbar · · Score: 1

      Same thing here. If something, I pull the little box to read the RSS feeds or check on messages (and even send some messages) when I'm by myself in a place and haven't had the chance of meeting anyone.

      It must be the utter social ineptitude part from the knack.

  11. I've absolutely done this. by ultraexactzz · · Score: 1

    Speed dial #2 on my cell goes to my office phone - makes checking voicemail easy. And when the guy in the next office comes over to tell me about some damn facebook game he's playing now, I can fidget with my phone, hold down the number 2, and boom - my phone rings. "Oh sorry man, I need to get that."

    Of course, if he ever notices that it's always the same number...

    And as a bonus, I change the name from "Work" to "Santa" during christmastime. Scares the hell out of a kid throwing a tantrum when I threaten them with a long distance call to the North Pole.

    --
    Never underestimate the potential of Human stupidity. -Heinlein
    1. Re:I've absolutely done this. by Seumas · · Score: 2

      An alternative to faking cell calls is to fake listening to your iPod. I know plenty of people (myself included) who will have our headphones on, even if they're not actually listening to anything. Hell, I know people who don't even carry their ipod with them. They just have their headphones on and the other end goes into their pocket. It's especially useful when on Tri-Met or any other public transportation or public situation. If you just want to be left alone and not hassled or bothered, it's a fantastic way to achieve it and you don't have to go through the motions of pretending to talk to anyone on a phone.

    2. Re:I've absolutely done this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A glare works better.

    3. Re:I've absolutely done this. by Unkyjar · · Score: 1

      You are obviously not a New Yorker if you think glares will stop the subway preachers.

    4. Re:I've absolutely done this. by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      fake listening to your iPod

      Yah, guilty there.

      Another advantage is that it decreases traffic noise by X decibels (for my buds, I estimate about 12 db's). Considering that each 3 db drop will halve the sound level, it's a reasonable decrease, yet still allows audio situational awareness.

      sr

      "There is no distinctly American criminal class except Congress." -- Mark Twain

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    5. Re:I've absolutely done this. by neo8750 · · Score: 1
      I just look at the person bothering me on public transpo and say "that's very interesting now i have a question for you have you accepted our lord and savior jesus Christ?" usually will get the to shut up and if by chance they are religious i progress follow up with "I'm just fucking with ya buddy i don't believe that hokus pokus I actually have a brain"

      But hey we all handle things differntly

    6. Re:I've absolutely done this. by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      I often leave my headphones in even when not playing, just because it's a pain to keep taking them out and putting them in. I usually listen to podcasts when walking around or waiting for something.

    7. Re:I've absolutely done this. by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      And as a bonus, I change the name from "Work" to "Santa" during christmastime. Scares the hell out of a kid throwing a tantrum when I threaten them with a long distance call to the North Pole.

      Why? Does he pay the bill?

    8. Re:I've absolutely done this. by Seumas · · Score: 1

      The thing is, it's also a good way to just stop the casual conversationalist. Sometimes you just want to be left alone, even if you're in the middle of a sea of people. Just an extra fifteen or so minutes of mental solitude before you walk into the office and have to really start the day off. Faking this preoccupation and unawareness gives you that, without having to fend off people repeatedly or having to seem like a jerk to someone who just wants to ask you what time it is or have some jovial morning banter.

  12. Nobody fakes by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

    Like Meg Ryan in "When Harry Met Sally"
    Memorable post performance line: "I'll have what she's having" delivered by director Reiner's mother.

    --
    There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  13. busted by Krau+Ming · · Score: 1

    I saw one of the TV announcers for the Toronto Raptors chatting on his cell phone when it loudly rang in his ear. guess he was one of the 13%.

    1. Re:busted by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      I saw one of the TV announcers for the Toronto Raptors chatting on his cell phone when it loudly rang in his ear. guess he was one of the 13%.

      Since most phones will alert you in some way if you have another call while already on a call, that could just be a misconfiguration so the alert was too loud.

  14. 18-29 year olds are disrespectful by quintin3265 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The most interesting fact from this article is that 18-to-29 year-olds are much more likely to use cell phones as an excuse to not talk to someone. This jives with my experience in real life. Finally, now it is possible to agree with our grandparents that young people are more inconsiderate than old people.

    People in that age group seem to think that they are entitled to do anything they like, as if their feelings are more important than everyone else's. Instead of treating people with respect, many young people seem to think that it's acceptable to ignore the person making the request. This happens in dating, where childish women give out fake numbers; in friendships, where some idiots have decided it's acceptable to commit to something and then not show up; and in family life, where you invite people to a party and they can't take five seconds from their self-centered lives to apologize and inform you that they will not be able to attend. A year after I graduated college, a co-worker and I scheduled a bowling outing for about 30 people; despite being the organizer, she decided not to show up and was unreachable on her cell phone because "someone from Pittsburgh suddenly showed up at my house and I had to give her a place to stay."

    When people pull stuff like that on me, I tell them to get lost - but they keep doing it because others are willing to put up with this crap. It's bad enough that people cut short in-person conversations to take cell calls. But it says something about how low our society's expectations are for our youth that we accept one third of that age group being so self-centered that they can't be bothered to talk to you even when they don't have anything else to do.

    1. Re:18-29 year olds are disrespectful by sdguero · · Score: 0

      Ever heard of an old person acting like they can't hear something when they really just don't want to hear something?
      What about someone from another country saying no habla anglais?

      The cell phone thing is just a newish tool to eject from an encounter. Whether the motive is based on passive-aggressive/non-confrontational/disrespectful/whatever-the situation-is behavior, its one way that some people deal with others. I'd expect young people to use this one more as cell phones are a relatively new technology and young people tend to adopt new technologies more quickly that oldies. Is it rude? Yes. Are their rude people in every generation? Yes. Does this stat mean that young people are ruder than old? Not necessarily.

      Since you are going to jump to conclusions about generation-Y based on a correlation you have perceived from that article, I think I have the right to jump to conclusions about you based on correlations I perceive from your post:

      I'm guessing that you are over 30, don't have stellar social skills, and are confrontational...

    2. Re:18-29 year olds are disrespectful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many of your examples boil down to lying (especially giving a fake phone number). Friendships have to be based on trust, or it's not a friendship, just some person you hang out with sometimes. If they are lying to you, they aren't your friend. And if they just casually lie to people, they won't ever be my friend.

    3. Re:18-29 year olds are disrespectful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got some excellent points, but could you hold that thought while I take this call?

    4. Re:18-29 year olds are disrespectful by Trillan · · Score: 2

      I'm 35. I have older and younger friends who fall on both sides of that. Age is a part of it, sure, but 29 is by no means the cap and it isn't the only part. Some people were simply raised to think of dishonesty (in all its forms) as a tool they can use, and some were raised to avoid it at all costs.

    5. Re:18-29 year olds are disrespectful by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      I think there's a bigger picture here and that's changing perceptions with age.

      You don't see the world the same at 20 as you do at 50, we are constantly evolving socially (if only to catch up to our perception of others). At 50 sdguero may not be making the same post and at 20 quintin might not have made his.

      My point being 50 year olds will always look down at 20 year olds and 20 year olds will always look down on 50 year olds.

      This is however isolated to Western society, both posts would easily be considered trolling on say a Chinese forum based on those generational standards.

      I can only give one piece of advise here: Don't take things personally, people have reasons for doing what they do and 99% of the time the insult from a missed social appointment is not personally directed at you, focus in on patterns rather than single incidents, maybe somebody had a damn good reason for falsely picking up their cell phone and not talking to you, such as a personal tragedy, or PMS.

      Ask yourself "why did i get stood up?," (gender independent) if you can't come up with an answer, it's exactly that, there's something else at play you don't know about.. that's 99%. 1% is because the other person is so self-centered they are putting themselves on a pedestal, you don't want to know this person (guess what another piece of advise), maybe I do though (the females tend to be kinda hot), that just means you haven't broken through yet though.

      Know when to throw in the towel , I believe all human relationships can be achieved with the right chemistry, some are just not worth the emotional and time commitments though.

      Might sound like the above applies to women only, but trust me it applies to both sexes with just slightly different wording (I think how I think).

    6. Re:18-29 year olds are disrespectful by quintin3265 · · Score: 2

      I am 28, but my age is irrelevant to the discussion.

      I can only speak from my own experience, but I've never had this problem with people who are older than 30. I've volunteered at carnivals where we crushed one ton of potatoes over six days, for years, and the 50-year-old ladies never failed. The work was brutal - imagine peeling and chopping into tiny pieces 200 pounds of onions manually. They showed up with colds, bad backs, hung over, and even drunk, but despite doing this for 120 days over two decades, there was only one time that one of them failed to show up, and she called to say why.

      Yet, in my dealings with people my "own age," I encountered the incident described above, another instance where I gave someone a $75 ticket for a concert over another friend and he decided not to show up, a friend I provided $2500 of videography for in exchange for a place to stay, and she didn't pay the $160 hotel bill, 200 hours of work put into an organization at the president's request when the president didn't even bother to look at what I had produced, and the list goes on and on.

      You can blame poor social skills or whatever you would like, but the fact remains that any reasonable person would believe this behavior is abhorrent. I never lied, cheated, assaulted, or bad-mouthed any of these people in any way. No matter how poor one's social skills are, nonviolent people deserve the simple respect of being told the truth, or simply the offer of an apology and an acknowledgement of having done something wrong. Kind, respectful people would think just the opposite - that someone with poor social skills could benefit from some extra help. Consider that you don't often see poor social skills develop in the first place in people who are treated respectfully as children or young adults.

      Criticizing the "victim's" personality is not an excuse for the poor behavior of self-centered people who care nothing for others.

    7. Re:18-29 year olds are disrespectful by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      Good answer. It reminds me of something Plato wrote about "how this generation has no respect". Apparently screeds like this can be plugged into any era.

      sr

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    8. Re:18-29 year olds are disrespectful by couchslug · · Score: 1

      I'm old but (usually) considerate. I get rid of annoying people whose fucking babble I don't want to hear in the politest practical manner.

      I don't give a shit what age they are. If they want to babble they can take that shit elsewhere. My friends don't babble so we don't have a problem. That leaves non-friends in the "babble" group, to be dealt with in whatever manner is useful.

      As to organizers who don't show up, chew that ass in public and humiliate them. Life is too short to be nice to those who don't deserve it.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    9. Re:18-29 year olds are disrespectful by dev.null.matt · · Score: 1

      The most interesting fact from this article is that 18-to-29 year-olds are much more likely to use cell phones as an excuse to not talk to someone. This jives with my experience in real life. Finally, now it is possible to agree with our grandparents that young people are more inconsiderate than old people.

      I couldn't agree more! Now get off my lawn!

    10. Re:18-29 year olds are disrespectful by Vyse+of+Arcadia · · Score: 1

      Fun fact! "Respect" is arbitrary.

      Yeah, people not showing up for things is a dick move. But if anything, faking a phone call is actually a more respectful way to duck out of a conversation. Let's review the alternatives. 1) Wait around for the other person to wrap it up when you have better things to do. 2) Tell them to their face that you have better things to do. (Disclaimer: I have never faked a phone call, because I can't lie worth a crap. But I can understand why people would do it.)

      When you start generalizing and blaming "young people" for things, you have finally lost all perspective but your own. Also, you can have your lawn back; I'm going to go do fun things somewhere else.

    11. Re:18-29 year olds are disrespectful by quintin3265 · · Score: 1

      One sentence that is completely true is that the more attractive a woman is, the more likely she is to exhibit this kind of disrespectful behavior. It sounds sexist, and it certainly doesn't apply to every woman, but in general it is entirely true. It is so true that I have to consciously fight against this stereotype when dealing with young women outside of a business atmosphere.

      Many attractive women have been so coddled by men that they have come to feel entitled to everything the world has to offer. They come to see it as an entitlement that they can walking into bars and reject guy after guy, and get boyfriends to pay for lavish gifts for them. If you still are skeptical, look at the prices escorts charge compared to those doctors charge. A neurosurgeon with 24 total years of schooling can make $300/hr, a ridiculous fortune by any means, but a prostitute with a high-school education can make $500/hr - and a select few can make over $1000.

      Therefore, society values attractive young women more highly than doctors who can save your life. The market speaks for itself. Since many attractive women are between 18 and 29, it would be a fair assumption to propose that a significant proportion of the rudeness can be explained by this effect alone.

    12. Re:18-29 year olds are disrespectful by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      People in that age group seem to think that they are entitled to do anything they like, as if their feelings are more important than everyone else's. ... and in family life, where you invite people to a party and they can't take five seconds from their self-centered lives to apologize and inform you that they will not be able to attend.

      This isn't restricted to that age group (though it might very well be worse within that age group). My wife's father is in his early 70s, and he couldn't even give her an answer as to whether he would attend her (our) wedding, because his stupid lawyer job kept him busy and was apparently more important. She uninvited him, and they haven't spoken in years.

    13. Re:18-29 year olds are disrespectful by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I am 28, but my age is irrelevant to the discussion.
      I can only speak from my own experience, but I've never had this problem with people who are older than 30.

      [anecdotes of horrible ways 30-year-old people have treated him]

      While I can't say if this behavior is more prevalent in the sub-30 age group or not, I can say you're lucky that you weren't born into (or adopted into) a dysfunctional family, because your complaints remind me of things my own family members have done to me, and things my wife's family members have done to her. All these people, of course, are over 30. How about my wife's father, who when his wife died early at 35 and the kids got Social Security payments until they were 18, kept all this money to himself so he could spend it on himself, and then refused to give her any money to go to college? And then she wasn't able to finish college because she had no money, but wasn't able to get any financial assistance because her father made too much money, even though he wasn't sharing it with her? This is all from a man who can't even hold a normal conversation; any time he talks to someone, he rambles on and on about stupid things he did decades ago when he was in his 20s, and doesn't care at all about hearing anyone else's life stories. I have a hard time thinking of anyone more self-centered than this man, but he's in his 80s now.

      I think you may be a little biased in that you're only 28, and people tend to hang around others from the same age group for various reasons--they graduate school at the same time, they're at similar career positions, etc. Except for relatives, how many positions are you put into where you're dealing with people several decades older than you? Also, you mentioned volunteering at carnivals and the heroics of 50+ women. The kind of people who volunteer for anything are generally not the kind of people we'd call "flaky"; people who have interpersonal problems I would imagine generally avoid such activities. After all, if they're self-centered, why would they want to volunteer their time for anything?

    14. Re:18-29 year olds are disrespectful by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yep, I've heard many guys say they intentionally avoid highly attractive women when dating, because they assume they'll be too high-maintenance and have a bad personality, so they look for the "second tier", women that are pretty enough but not too pretty. They've probably been burned a few too many times by the hot ones.

    15. Re:18-29 year olds are disrespectful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TL;DR

    16. Re:18-29 year olds are disrespectful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop inviting me to every single event your going to, and maybe I'll respond sometime.
      I have better things to do than to check all your spam.
      Also if I don't respond you can just assume I'm not interested and am not showing up.

      I take fake calls every time I see one of those people trying to get you to donate to some aids/Africa/food/clothes for the poor things.
      I don't want to donate, and they don't shut up when I tell them so.

    17. Re:18-29 year olds are disrespectful by sdguero · · Score: 1

      I am 28, but my age is irrelevant to the discussion... I've volunteered at carnivals where we crushed one ton of potatoes over six days, for years, and the 50-year-old ladies never failed.

      Hehe, well I guess I was only right about 2 of the 3. But I think your age is certainly relevant. While you might only be 28, you seem to think, act, and befriend people like someone who is much older.

      another instance where I gave someone a $75 ticket for a concert over another friend and he decided not to show up, a friend I provided $2500 of videography for in exchange for a place to stay, and she didn't pay the $160 hotel bill, 200 hours of work put into an organization at the president's request when the president didn't even bother to look at what I had produced, and the list goes on and on

      Dude, have you noticed a recurring theme here? I.e. YOU. Sounds like your are one of those guys that most people see as a semi-creepy nerd who does things expecting to be reciprocated with money/favors/friends/sex or whatever it is you really want, but you never have the huevos to tell anyone what those things are. Therefore your peers (not best friends mind you) assume it is the creepiest thing they can think of and they do everything they can to get away after you do your part. And so, you get burned, bury your feelings in real life, then let them burst out on the internets with confrontational posts that stereotype things according to your own paradigm. Try to step out of your own shoes once and a while and understand other peoples' world view, which is obviously much different from your own (hence the disconnect between your expectations and reality). I'm not saying some of those people aren't bad peeps, but I am saying that trying to understand where they are coming from, wherever that is, will help you mitigate those kinds of situations. That is a big part of being successful in social situations...

      Criticizing the "victim's" personality is not an excuse for the poor behavior of self-centered people who care nothing for others.

      Aaaaah, I think we may have arrived at a source of your frustrations here... Victimization. You are a victim of a what??? Social structure that isn't perfectly shaped to fit the way you were brought up? The real world isn't fair, and you are not perfect my friend. Accept that and you will be able to move on, befriend younger folks, and grow. ;)

      OK, Dr. SDGuero is gonna call this case closed for now. I highly recommend checking out some of the literature/classes out there to help understand your own paradigm:

      I took an MBTI course and it was really interesting. Best of all my employer paid for it...:)
      http://www.capt.org/training-workshops/training-schedules.htm
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myers-Briggs_Type_Indicator

      Also, I highly recommend The Game by Neill Strauss. He does a great job analyzing male/female interactions in our generation..
      http://www.amazon.com/Game-Penetrating-Secret-Society-Artists/dp/0060554738

      Good luck out there dude!

    18. Re:18-29 year olds are disrespectful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Upbringing and culture is indeed a huge part of how often and well you lie, and find lies by others acceptable.

      I know this the hard way -- having moved to China from Sweden...

    19. Re:18-29 year olds are disrespectful by Eivind · · Score: 1

      Atleast the old has, at all times, been of the opinion that they young are rude and ill-behaved.

      A white lie, is sometimes *less* rude than the truth though. What the hell am I supposed to say: "I'm sorry, but you're boring me, see you later !" ?

    20. Re:18-29 year olds are disrespectful by quintin3265 · · Score: 1

      I read "The Game," and tried some of the methods described in the book despite feeling like scum. Fortunately, I found that "pickup artistry" is a scam that is designed to make money. I've posted requests on reddit to ask people to come forward who don't own a pickup business and who have actually changed their lives from being unwanted by women to being studs, and strangely not one person has responded. I still have yet to meet anyone who has benefited from the "pickup" lifestyle advocated in "The Game." As to the rest, we'll have to agree to disagree. I do have friends who are in their 30s, and they are generally respectful and honor their commitments.

    21. Re:18-29 year olds are disrespectful by quintin3265 · · Score: 1

      Or, perhaps he said it because it is true. It may be true that people between 18 and 29 were always disrespectful; they just always get old and become more respectful with age, as this study seems to indicate. People change over time.

    22. Re:18-29 year olds are disrespectful by quintin3265 · · Score: 1

      Good for her!

    23. Re:18-29 year olds are disrespectful by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      While I agree with most of your post, about "The Game" all I can do is link to xkcd: http://xkcd.com/800/

      As a better reference I'd recommend the "On Being a Man" series by David D'Angelo, which is roughly the same idea, but less sleazy.

  15. I do it only to avoid bums by cod3r_ · · Score: 1

    When a bum comes up to me and asks for something I take a phone call and they leave me alone. Some sort of bum code of conduct I guess.

  16. Double standard questions by KnownIssues · · Score: 1

    The verbage for all respondants is much more positive than the verbage for young adults. For example, "help prevent unwanted personal interactions" sounds (to me at least) much less anti-social than "avoid interacting with people around them" and "important tool in an emergency" gives an entirely different sense than "have had trouble doing something because they did not have their phone nearby", yet that appears to be how they align.

    This might be entirely unintended but it looks to me as if a subconscious bias has been exposed.

  17. Please learn the difference between... by J'raxis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Please learn the difference between "13% of people lie" ("1 in 8 Take Fake Phone Calls") and "people are lying 13% of the time" before posting any more articles about statistics.

    1. Re:Please learn the difference between... by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

      You didn't complete the quote: "people are lying 13% of the time when they say they have to take a cell phone call around you."

      I.e. You are the cause of 13% of people faking phone calls.

      --
      Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
  18. It looks normal. by Borg+Bucolic · · Score: 1

    Now it is possible to talk, in public, to someone that isn't there, and that is normal. This has been a real boon to the schizophrenic population. Thank you blue tooth fairy

    1. Re:It looks normal. by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      Now it is possible to talk, in public, to someone that isn't there, and that is normal. This has been a real boon to the schizophrenic population. Thank you blue tooth fairy

      Yep, I've thought that many times. Didn't know who to give thanks to, though, so mark it +1 Informative.

      sr

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
  19. 18- to 29-year-old are liars by formfeed · · Score: 0

    A study looking at fake phone calls found that it is more than twice as likely that one of these 18- to 29-year-olds will be lying to you than a normal hardworking American, who still believes in God and the values that made this country great. Members of the Greatest Generation were found to be more than 15 times more honest than those ungrateful kids: "Only 2% of the oldest (65 and older) respondents reported using cell phones to avoid dealing with others." (Study also included some immigrants)

    Besides refusing to get off the lawn, those 18- to 29-year-olds also seem to be the worst liars in generations. Unfortunately, the study did not look at any of the reasons, that caused the massive decline in values we all experience with those 18- to 29-year-olds.

    1. Re:18- to 29-year-old are liars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This study doesn't mean that 18-29 year olds are worse liars. It just means they use this *specific* lie more often. There are plenty of other lies to get out of conversations which are more common in the older age brackets.

    2. Re:18- to 29-year-old are liars by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Of course, if you want to assign blame, then the blame lies with the "Greatest Generation", as they were the ones who were the parents for the generation after them, and they in turn for the generation after them, etc.

      If you look at the state of this country, it seems like the Baby Boomers really did the most to screw it up directly, when they were in positions of power in the government and industry. However, who raised the Baby Boomers? That's right, the "Greatest Generation" that's so revered. Looks like they weren't so great at parenting, and should have focused on raising their kids better instead of having so many of them.

  20. I have never done this.... by mat+catastrophe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    but I have made certain that someone would call me at a certain time in order to extricate me from a situation.

    --
    sig not found
    1. Re:I have never done this.... by quintin3265 · · Score: 1

      And that is still wrong.

      Everyone deserves respect. If you don't want to talk to someone, then you kindly but firmly state that you are busy and aren't available to talk right now. Or, if the person keeps pestering you, you firmly state that you don't want to talk to the person again, and then ignore him or her on future occasions.

      Faking or arranging a cell phone call helps nobody. The person who is talking to you might not even know that you don't want to associate with him or her and would never learn otherwise. (S)he eventually ends up confused and feeling bad. Meanwhile, you keep wasting your time as the person continues to contact you about whatever problem you're putting off with these fake or arranged calls. It's just a sign of disrespect that you won't look the person in the eye and tell the truth.

    2. Re:I have never done this.... by turtledawn · · Score: 1

      And an awful lot of these people are coworkers, typically the ones to whom you already sent the piece of information they are asking about three days ago and which they could find easily if they ever bothered to read their email or attend department meetings. Good luck telling them to get lost and still keeping your job (in the interests of disclosure, I do not own a mobile and am a month shy of 30).

      On the other hand, those dimwits still have their jobs, so maybe I can get away with being ruder than I have previously tried.

      --
      Uh, "if it looks roughly mouse-shaped according to my infra-red sensitive pit, eat it"? --Chris Burke 09-08-10
    3. Re:I have never done this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have obviously never had to work with the simple minded. You can't tell them you're busy - you can't tell them not to speak with you. That'd be "mean" and will get you in trouble with management. It's your job to get your work done AND be respectful and courteous of other peoples needs.

    4. Re:I have never done this.... by mat+catastrophe · · Score: 1

      And that is still wrong.

      Everyone deserves respect. If you don't want to talk to someone, then you kindly but firmly state that you are busy and aren't available to talk right now. Or, if the person keeps pestering you, you firmly state that you don't want to talk to the person again, and then ignore him or her on future occasions.

      Faking or arranging a cell phone call helps nobody. The person who is talking to you might not even know that you don't want to associate with him or her and would never learn otherwise. (S)he eventually ends up confused and feeling bad. Meanwhile, you keep wasting your time as the person continues to contact you about whatever problem you're putting off with these fake or arranged calls. It's just a sign of disrespect that you won't look the person in the eye and tell the truth.

      Lighten up, Francis.

      --
      sig not found
    5. Re:I have never done this.... by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Everyone deserves respect

      No they don't. You have to earn respect.

    6. Re:I have never done this.... by quintin3265 · · Score: 1

      If everyone had to earn respect, then we would walk down the street spitting on people, stealing their wallets, and running them down with cars. A society with complete disrespect is unlivable. I prefer to assume good faith and great ability in everyone I meet until proven otherwise. I believe that people deserve the benefit of the doubt. Of course, if a person decides to abuse that respect, then I'm quick to withdraw it.

  21. Different social situations? by TriezGamer · · Score: 1

    I didn't RTFA, but isn't there perhaps other explanations than 'young adults are less respectful'? That age group is also the most likely to have young children, and many are also in a transitional phase where they're moving on from high school and college lifestyles into the adult world -- part of doing that frequently includes shedding of old acquaintances (and even friends), and might necessitate termination of a social encounter.

    Furthermore, what is "I need to take a call" replacing? It's very possible that taking a fake call is replacing some previous behavior people would use to avoid a social encounter.

    It also seems to me that there are far more socially inept individuals in the young adult demographic. This may be because, as a member of that group, I am exposed to them more often, but I don't think so. The number of people who I met in college who could not take the hint that they were annoying or that people would prefer them to not be around was staggering, and many people probably feel that 'taking a fake call' is preferable to saying 'go away, nobody likes you'.

    In short, I don't agree with the assessment that young adults are necessarily less respectful based on this study. It still may be true, but this study doesn't really consider enough factors to be useful at all in that regard.

  22. Doesn't mean 18 to 29 year olds are disrespectful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People in *all* age groups make excuses to get out of conversations or not talk to people. The only difference is the method used, with the younger crowd more acclimated to cell phones. The older age groups have their own ways of doing the same.

  23. I take fake phone calls in public by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 1

    As a socially acceptable way to talk to the voices in my head.

  24. Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  25. 18-29 year olds... by RJFerret · · Score: 1

    ...haven't learned about voicemail.

    1. Re:18-29 year olds... by bledri · · Score: 1

      ...haven't learned about voicemail.

      This is actually my experience. Many of my younger acquaintances won't leave a voicemail and expect you to always call back. How hard is it?

      --
      Some privacy policy Slashdot.
    2. Re:18-29 year olds... by coolmadsi · · Score: 1

      ...haven't learned about voicemail.

      This is actually my experience. Many of my younger acquaintances won't leave a voicemail and expect you to always call back. How hard is it?

      I've had voicemail turned off on my phone for years, originally from when I was a teenager and it cost me money (well, phone credit on pay as you go) to listen to the message, and of the messages I listened to before turning it off, most were just the inside of someones pocket.

      If I'm calling someone, it is usually because I need to have a conversation with them, something that requires interaction with the person being called, that you don't get with a voicemail. If I call someone and they don't answer, I usually send them a text message to say why I called (but I'm from the UK where sending texts is commonplace as it doesn't cost anything to recieve them), and will often call back later if it is important enough. If I just wanted to give them a message without interaction I would just sent a text message (or email etc.) instead of calling them.

  26. FTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a part of I feel inclined to agree that members of are much then my superior . And I think that they should get .

  27. Re:Doesn't mean 18 to 29 year olds are disrespectf by couchslug · · Score: 1

    "The older age groups have their own ways of doing the same."

    Both have good reasons for wanting to ditch some conversations in a non-confrontational manner.

    Hint to the clue-resistant:
    If YOU get put off often, YOU might be the problem.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  28. What I also have observed... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    The same age group act's like they are having Crack withdrawals when they do not have a phone at all for a 48 hour period. My daughter lost her phone on vacation in the woods and was acting like she was going to cut one of us if she did not get her fix... " I need to check my messages, give me your DAMN PHONE OR I WILL CUT YOU!"

    people need to unplug more and learn how to not be a slave to the tech.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  29. In an unrelated study by bearflash · · Score: 1

    1 in 8 people found to be incredibly boring to converse with

  30. I'm sorry I missed the first posts by BetaDays · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry I missed the first posts, I was on the phone.

    --
    Paul: Father... father, the sleeper has awakened! - Dune
  31. I would comment on this thread... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but I have to answer my phone.

  32. Frustrating. by screwzloos · · Score: 1

    Why do people do that? What started this trend?

    I'm right in the middle of that age group and I see it all the time. More often than that, though, is taking out a phone to play games or update Facebook right in the middle of a conversation or lunch meeting. Then all of the sudden I'm the obtuse one for getting up and walking away when the rest of my peer group is sitting around tapping away on their phones at one another. Why even go out if you're just going to fiddle with your phone the whole time?

    The worst part is, I see it at all levels. This isn't just something the lower class is doing. It might be the way I was raised, but I find the whole thing impossibly rude. If I took out a Gameboy during dinner while I was growing up, it would've been slapped out of my hands into the trash can. I'll be doing the same favor for my kid, if I ever have one. Too bad there's nobody worth my time to procreate with in this day and age.

    I'm not even old, but get off my lawn anyways.

  33. What is with that? by khasim · · Score: 1

    And when the guy in the next office comes over to tell me about some damn facebook game he's playing now, ...

    What is with that at work? Why do people want to tell me about Mafia Wars or their latest WoW raid? Why do they think I have any interest in that at all?

    Even Red Dwarf mocked this 20+ years ago.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5TxzDY_sEk

  34. Sorry, I gotta go, REALLY! by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

    My mothers calling!
    My water is boiling!
    I gotta piss!
    Somebody's at the door!
    I think dinners burning!
    I'm being kidnapped by aliens!
     

    --
    I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
  35. FTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a part of (older generation) I feel inclined to agree that members of (younger generation) are much (hairier / louder / more disrespectful / ugly) then my superior (older generation). And I think they should get (a job / a haircut / off my lawn).

  36. I have it easy! by cmv1087 · · Score: 1

    All I have to do is pretend my hearing aid battery just died or just go "What?" enough times. Few random people have the patience to deal with someone with a hearing loss. Failing that, I've long ago mastered the art of listening while not hearing a word they've said and I have an out if they ask me if I've been listening afterwards. :D

  37. 1 in 8 Read Slashdot to Avoid Working by Psykopat · · Score: 1

    ...so what ?

  38. %%TOKEN%% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is that?

  39. Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the real stat was that 13% of adults admitted to doing this ever

    Wrong, they admitted doing this "In the past 30 days", which is quite a different thing.

  40. It gets worse for me by xyourfacekillerx · · Score: 1

    While I am at work, and talking to someone I prefer not to talk to, I reach into my pocket and speed dial my direct extension, the speed dial begins with the "block ID" code. I then answer professionally and say something like, "I suppose I can look into it for you. Oh, you need it now? This could take some time".

    I do this once a week at least. *shamed*

    and like mat catastrophe I have also had people call me to get out of a situation. Or I've rang myself with another phone while on the line, so they could hear the call waiting blips, knowing that when I say "I have another call" and switch over, I'm not just muting the phone.

    I'm a computer programmer. I'm NOT people person.... only thing is I am not rude to anyone's face at any time (unless justifiably aggravated, i.e. by a girlfriend's conniving, interfering family member...) so people generally like me and THINK I'm not socially retarded. What they don't know is that I prefer to have very few people in my life.

  41. Irony? by formfeed · · Score: 1

    Can you spot a irony marker in my post? (Extra points for finding a movie quote and cookie-cutter racism).

    And that goes double for the idiot who marked it troll. Mod points should not be given to people who can't pass a reading test!

    Aargh *@#!

  42. Now it is possible to talk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now it is possible to talk, in public, to someone that isn't there, and that is normal. This has been a real boon to the schizophrenic population. Thank you blue tooth fairy

  43. Samsung Provides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Samsung E2370 actually provides the functionality to fake a call. By pressing on the down button 4 times in quick succession it'll initiate a fake incoming call after a 10-ish second pause. You can also pre-record messages to make it sound like you've actually got someone on the other side of the line. I've personally never had an oportunity to use it. Actually found it strange they included something like this, seeing as it'd cost a bit in R&D and deliver no additional functionality to, according to this artical, 87% of it's users.

  44. i have trouble... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    I do have trouble when i don't have my iphone nearby....
    only because i think i forgot it somewhere, and thinking of it being lost, and what will i do if i cant find it...i better go find it....
    i got to find it right now..... ..... ......