Slashdot Mirror


Theoretical Shoe Inserts Could Power Your Gadgets

In his first accepted submission, Anon8---) writes "As published on nature.com, a process called electrowetting, 'in which a conductive liquid droplet, placed on an electrode, is physically deformed by an applied electric charge,' could be used to provide 10 watts of juice to smartphones and other gadgets as you walk. 'The technique depends on the use of a dielectric material — which is usually an insulator but that can be polarized in an electric field — to coat the electrode. When the dielectric is charged the droplet can wet the surface more easily, and deforms. In his system, Krupenkin runs this process backwards, using the changing physical form of liquid drops between dielectric-coated plates to generate charge and therefore electrical power.' So far, Krupenkin and Ashley Taylor have been able to produce a few milliwatts of power along tiny channels a few millimeters wide. They have patented the idea and are now concentrating on scaling up the device and designing a shoe to contain it."

210 comments

  1. Interesting idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Lots of potential, although I think the idea has no legs. Please let me know if you disagree and your reasons for doing so.

    1. Re:Interesting idea by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say that, though with slashdot's view of patents, I'm sure the general population will think they are starting off on the wrong foot...

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    2. Re:Interesting idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was caught flat-footed by this idea.

    3. Re:Interesting idea by trum4n · · Score: 1

      These puns are pretty stinky. Get you feet out of your mouths. That or Odor Eaters.

    4. Re:Interesting idea by quangdog · · Score: 1

      With any luck, their first pair of shoes will provide a real kickstart.

    5. Re:Interesting idea by squidflakes · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't sweat the details, I'm sure these researchers are putting their heart and sole in to the effort and with such dedication this product will be a shoe-in to be the must have item the year it is released.

    6. Re:Interesting idea by delinear · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately they're going to need a lot of investment if they hope to hit the ground running.

    7. Re:Interesting idea by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      You think this idea stinks you should get a load of the theoretical personal methane collection system. I hear it's very effective butt a PITA!

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    8. Re:Interesting idea by Spectre · · Score: 1

      Eh, I think it'll work as long as the initial investors are well-heeled.

      --
      "Flame away, I wear asbestos underwear"
    9. Re:Interesting idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's 'soul'

    10. Re:Interesting idea by quangdog · · Score: 1

      Whoosh!

    11. Re:Interesting idea by silverglade00 · · Score: 1

      Swoosh®!

      FTFY

    12. Re:Interesting idea by Tehrasha · · Score: 1
      "Theoretical Shoe Inserts Could Power Your Gadgets"

      To me, this reads very similar to 'Theoretical fusion reactor could power your city"

    13. Re:Interesting idea by yog · · Score: 1

      They're following in the footprints of some other great inventors but it's definitely an idea with traction.

      My wife would love this thing. She paces while she talks on the phone, and she's always forgetting to charge her cell. This is perfect!

      --
      it's = "it is"; its = possessive. E.g., it's flapping its wings.
    14. Re:Interesting idea by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

      No pun here, sorry about that.

      But what would they be able to use this for? They cannot use it for a phone, since Maxwell's Shoe Phone would be prior art and they would lose their patent.

      And by the way, in deference to my age and my years of experience with these personal technologies, you may call me MISTER Smart.

      --
      Will
    15. Re:Interesting idea by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      I would probably clip to your pants (trousers if you are British), which would have a wire to clip to other garments, which would in turn clip to your devices.

      Or use some form of wireless energy transfer.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  2. Won't work in LA by gatkinso · · Score: 2

    For obvious reasons.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    1. Re:Won't work in LA by turkeyfeathers · · Score: 1

      If the patent's well written, it could cover tires (which are essentially just car shoes).

    2. Re:Won't work in LA by SlideGuitar · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hard to imagine that the conversion of gasoline energy to electricity could occur more efficiently through the tires than through the cars electrical system...

    3. Re:Won't work in LA by Megane · · Score: 1

      I'm more interested in how well it will go over in LV.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    4. Re:Won't work in LA by geekoid · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It would be about recovering otherwise 'wasted' energy. And burning gas to create electricity isn't very efficient.

      Use it like brakes that recover energy.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Won't work in LA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why won't you work in LA? Your reasons aren't obvious to me. What has this to do with the story posted? I'm so confused. Please help me understand!

    6. Re:Won't work in LA by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      Burning gas to get its potential energy isn't very efficient period.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    7. Re:Won't work in LA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly you are all too young to have listened to Missing Persons.

    8. Re:Won't work in LA by TheCRAIGGERS · · Score: 2

      It would be about recovering otherwise 'wasted' energy. And burning gas to create electricity isn't very efficient.

      Use it like brakes that recover energy.

      From what I'm imagining, the energy would come from the force of the tire meeting the pavement as it rotates. If true, that is not wasted energy- that is the energy that makes your car go. It now takes that much more energy (plus some!) to rotate that tire.

      In the case of regenerative brakes, you are leaching energy from the car's momentum when you're actively trying to slow it down. Usually that energy would just be converted to heat via the brakes- which indeed wasted energy.

    9. Re:Won't work in LA by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      What r words for anyway?

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    10. Re:Won't work in LA by GroovyTrucker · · Score: 1

      Only a nobody walks in L.A.

      --
      I can be moderated as Inciteful...
    11. Re:Won't work in LA by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      Damn you! Now I have that song repeating in my head over and over.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    12. Re:Won't work in LA by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Well done.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  3. Theoretical by oojah · · Score: 1

    A theoretical shoe insert won't power anything.

    --
    Do you have any better hostages?
    1. Re:Theoretical by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      Maybe not the sort of gear that DC-weenies churn out; but AC systems should be familiar with the imaginary power produced by theoretical generators.

    2. Re:Theoretical by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It will power theoretical devices.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Theoretical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the way, have you heard of my awesome My Bloody Valentine cover band, "Theoretical Shoe Inserts"?

    4. Re:Theoretical by Pope · · Score: 2

      Well, not with that attitude, mister!

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    5. Re:Theoretical by jamiesan · · Score: 1

      It's just so the scientists feet are theoretically comfortable, and their phones are theoretically charged during thought experiments.

    6. Re:Theoretical by Yamioni · · Score: 1

      Do you mean Bullet For My Valentine? My Bloody Valentine was a movie. Both are terrible.

      --
      Cool post bro, highfive \o
    7. Re:Theoretical by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      Do you mean Bullet For My Valentine? My Bloody Valentine was a movie. Both are terrible.

      Actually they were a alternative band first. Their album Loveless is actually quite good, I love the track where they incorporate humpback whalesong into the music...

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    8. Re:Theoretical by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      Do you mean Bullet For My Valentine? My Bloody Valentine was a movie. Both are terrible.

      Actually they were a alternative band first. Their album Loveless is actually quite good, I love the track where they incorporate humpback whalesong into the music...

      Whoops. My bad. Looks like there was an older film version of My Bloody Valentine, made in 1981. I was thinking of the 2009 remake 3D-awfulness version...which was indeed terrible.

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    9. Re:Theoretical by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

      It could power a theoretical cell phone. Or a theoretical electric nut cracker. But depending on gender, you might not want to carry that last one around in your theoretical pants pocket.

      --
      Will
  4. These boots are made for by elcid73 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...chargin'

    one of these days these boots are gonna charge your gadgets too.

  5. Comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the cheapest food source in $/calorie, and how does it compare with the cost in $/kWh from the electrical grid?

    1. Re:Comparison by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1

      What's the cheapest food source in $/calorie, and how does it compare with the cost in $/kWh from the electrical grid?

      That sounds like you're going to have a bunch of Ethiopians run in circles to power your IPhone in promises for food...

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    2. Re:Comparison by DrgnDancer · · Score: 3, Informative

      Somewhat immaterial. Unless you are taking a walk specifically to charge your devices (possible I suppose, but probably unlikely), most of us spend at least several hours a day moving around via a foot power. The energy created by our our regular controlled impacts with the ground is normally simply lost; this would allow the capture of at least some of it. In the third world environments they're targeting, people walk even more. I can also see this being great for hiking, camping, and all sorts of outdoor activities that can leave you far away from power sources.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    3. Re:Comparison by wsxyz · · Score: 1

      most of us spend at least several hours a day moving around via a foot power.

      You'd better watch what you say. You're posting to slashdot, you know.

    4. Re:Comparison by berashith · · Score: 1

      I would love this for my running shoes. It would be great if I could power, or possibly even charge, the mp3 player or gps devices that are used while running. This isnt specifically taking a walk to charge the things, but it is movement that I already do that could be used with no downside.

    5. Re:Comparison by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing. Also, for hiking, you can power your GPS device with the walking movement you're already making to perform the hike. I rarely run far enough to actually run out of juice on my phone (which is also my MP3 player and GPS), but I've cut it close a few times when the thing was already low when I started. (For those that wonder, we don't use GPS to figure out where we're running, at least I don't and I doubt many people do, it's just a nice way to keep accurate track of distance.)

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    6. Re:Comparison by Capt.+Skinny · · Score: 1

      Well, I can buy a 50 pound bag of rice locally for about $40. According to the nutrition label, it provides 170 kcal (711 kJ) per 45 grams, working out to 15.8 kJ per gram. That's about $0.00011 per kJ.

      I pay, on average, about $0.15 per kWh for grid electricity in the Northeastern US. That's about $0.000042 per kJ, an order of magnitude cheaper than my rice.

    7. Re:Comparison by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Well it seems the people in most need of this would be geeks and they are the people least likely to exercise enough to charge their devices. I run far enough to charge a device but I don't want to carry a device on the long runs especially in the middle of summer. The sweat would short everything.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    8. Re:Comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "most of us spend at least several hours a day moving around via a foot power."

      I usually use both.

    9. Re:Comparison by berashith · · Score: 1

      Why only geeks. Hikers and runners put these to use in practical ways in these two comments. This doesnt have to charge a wearable computer, and besides, the concept of a high power draw computer is outdated... it is now called a phone. Plenty of hikers and joggers could use this.

      I dont actually carry my phone with me because I dont want the weight, but I could be convinced to. If I wore a small camel-back I would not even notice the phone back there, and it would be safe from sweat.

      Funny sweat issue I cant get around ... the ear buds keep dieing because they get so wet. I cant wait for cooler days.

    10. Re:Comparison by berashith · · Score: 1

      exactly. I use the nike+ in my shoe, but it is so inaccurate that it borders on useless. It gives me a rough idea, but I use a mapping service like mapmyrun, or a gps (when I feel like carrying the phone with me) to really know how far I have gone.

    11. Re:Comparison by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      I don't have that problem with regular earbuds too often, but I can't wear the ones with a microphone that come with phones. Those cause great hilarity since they can partially control the phone, so when they get shorts from sweat you get all kinds of skips, pauses, and other weird stuff.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
  6. Hmm... Idea could use some revision by oakgrove · · Score: 1

    Could they maybe put this in my chair? I don't think putting it in my shoes would do very much good.

    --
    The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    1. Re:Hmm... Idea could use some revision by geekoid · · Score: 1, Funny

      I read your sig and had an idea. /. needs stupid tagging. Not moderation, just a +1 stupid.or -1 stupid. let the most stupid comments rise to the top. Maybe some humiliation* will calm these people down.

      *HUMILIATION!

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Hmm... Idea could use some revision by jamiesan · · Score: 1

      So is -1 stupid the same as +1 interesting?

      If so, Mod parent down! -1 stupid!

    3. Re:Hmm... Idea could use some revision by geekoid · · Score: 1

      No. The meta stupid system is independent of the current mod. Someone can be +5 interesting and still actually be stupid.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Hmm... Idea could use some revision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fwap fwap fwap fwap fwap...

    5. Re:Hmm... Idea could use some revision by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 1

      On a side note: In order to give protips one needs to be a pro, right? How does one become a professional retard?

      --
      Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
  7. Parenting use. by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I can see this being used to get kids off their asses and at least moving around some.
    Confiscate your child's phone charger, and make it so this is the only way they can charge said phone.

    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
    1. Re:Parenting use. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      parenting? confiscate?

      holy shitballs these nanny parents fucking suckass these days.

      PUNISH your children's offensive behavior and temper their character with chores. lazy kids don't get fed.

      great rules to live by i tell ya hwhat.

    2. Re:Parenting use. by ELCouz · · Score: 1

      Good luck confiscating a USB phone charger ;)

    3. Re:Parenting use. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something like this is what you want today:

              Pedal-A-Watt Stationary Bike Power Generator (http://www.econvergence.net/electro.htm)

              Human Powered Bicycle Generator (http://scienceshareware.com/bike_gen.htm)

    4. Re:Parenting use. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Effing awesome idea. Problem solved.

      Get this on the air tonight. I'm not kidding :)

    5. Re:Parenting use. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >

      wtf

    6. Re:Parenting use. by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      Um... why would this be any harder to confiscate than a normal charger?

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
    7. Re:Parenting use. by spidr_mnky · · Score: 1

      Jr. only has to walk as far as the nearest neighbor's house, where he will find a USB phone charger.

      Assuming you've managed to find all the USB chargers in the house.

    8. Re:Parenting use. by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I see. That does make sense. Well at least while he's walking to the neighbor's house he can charge his phone with these shoes.

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
  8. Crutches by tepples · · Score: 1
    From the article:

    He hopes a device like this could be useful in developing countries, where electricity isn't always as plentiful or accessible as it is in more industrialized parts of the world.

    Anonymous Coward wrote:

    I think the idea has no legs.

    Incidentally, a lot of people in developing countries where landmines were used also have no legs. I wonder whether this could be useful for incorporation into crutches or walking gloves.

  9. Not in America! by girlintraining · · Score: 1, Funny

    Warning: Blatantly stereotyped joke ahead. The easily offended should stop reading now.

    Okay, the rest of you: This is America! Forget shoes, we need to attach these things to forks!

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Not in America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't quit your day job.

    2. Re:Not in America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's one thing to tell a stereotypical joke, but if you're going to take the risk, at least make it funny.

    3. Re:Not in America! by wsxyz · · Score: 4, Funny

      Comedy in 21st Century America:

      "Stop me if you've heard this one... disclaimer: this joke may be offensive to teachers, goats, bar owners, and priests... and to anyone related with or friends with, or otherwise associated with any of the above. Furthermore this joke involves subtle sexual innuendo. Anyone offended by sexual innuendo, especially that which involves teachers, goats, bar owners, and priests, may wish to refrain from listening to this joke. Furthermore, I wish to assure the audience that nothing in this joke is meant to imply support for any political ideology you may oppose, nor to imply opposition any political ideology you support... Now, as I was saying, a teacher and a priest walked into a bar..."

    4. Re:Not in America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was slightly more entertaining than the original joke. Eddie Murphy r is rolling in his grave. What, he ain't dead yet? Well, once he reads this thread I'm sure he will keel over and die now. That is after making another crappy movie where he plays a misunderstood individual who is put in a situation that seems hopeless, yet after various trials and tribulations (especially with his token white friend/neighbour/relative) he persists and saves the day.

    5. Re:Not in America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As a professional comedian I'm offended but the fact you used a disclaimer in a joke...I'm totally suing you. Oh wait.

    6. Re:Not in America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The stereotyping doesn't offend me nearly as much as hearing the same tired joke we've all heard in various forms since colonial times, as well as someone having the gall to imply it's worth telling again. Perhaps you should choose a different warning next time?

    7. Re:Not in America! by ccguy · · Score: 1

      At the end of the joke remember to mention that both the teacher and the priest, as well as anyone else in the bar, are fictitious characters etc

    8. Re:Not in America! by ssyladin · · Score: 1

      Forks? What, you think we're civilized? No - we just wrap our artery-clogging fuel, ie food, in foil or wax paper and shove it in our pie-holes while driving our 6-ton SUVs with our knees 3 blocks to the gym.

    9. Re:Not in America! by gsslay · · Score: 1

      Stop me if you've heard this one

      I'm offended by your insensitive reference to hearing in a medium reliant only on sight. What makes you think your reader can hear anything? Why exclude deaf people? Insensitive clod.

    10. Re:Not in America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Warning: Blatantly stereotyped joke ahead. The easily offended should stop reading now.

      Okay, the rest of you: This is America! Forget shoes, we need to attach these things to forks!

      Forks? Try burger wrappers.

    11. Re:Not in America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Careful, or you'll get modded troll..

      On a more sad note, this is the place where people don't just drive to the corner store (if any is available). There are people that drive to the end of their driveway to check their mailbox!! They drive from their house to their garage, if it is not an attached garage!

      Some will say this is funny, others say this is trolling. But this is all true. We have a community mailbox. Basically one mailbox for 3 dozen houses. The furthest house is maybe 2km away. I am 1 of 2 people that actually walks/bikes to that mailbox. And yes, there are people that live closer and drive to it..

      So no, this would definitely fail for majority of americans. Not only they don't walk, but you can't increase their load by 30W (assuming 30% efficiency, so 10We) and expect them not to have heart attack from overexertion.

      When I lived in a high rise on 14th floor, I was the only person that actually took the stairs. The stairs were only used for illegal smoking, otherwise they were empty. People didn't even take the stairs to go 1 or 2 floors, they would rather wait 2-5min for elevator!!

    12. Re:Not in America! by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      No goats were harmed in the telling of this joke.

    13. Re:Not in America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it.

    14. Re:Not in America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You eat pizza, burgers and fries with a fork??
      Be honest: When was the last time you touched a fork?
      ^^

      Obligatory Jon Steward: http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-june-1-2011/me-lover-s-pizza-with-crazy-broad

      P.S.: "being offended": Being so insecure in oneself,
      that one thinks a nonsensical or over the top statement about oneself that is obviously wrong to all bystanders is actually a valid criticism,
      and then fearing it might make one look bad because that insecurity also makes one feel a strong need to be accepted by others.
      Which leads to anger against the "offender" for causing one imaginary harm.
      When in reality, only the validation of that absurd criticism in front of others caused one to look bad,
      and a self-confident human does not need the acceptance of others to validate their own behavior.

  10. The book "Dune" kills this patent? by perpenso · · Score: 1

    They have patented the idea and are now concentrating on scaling up the device and designing a shoe to contain it

    Robert Heinlein's Stranger in a Strange Land (plus some of his older books as well) helped kill a patent for waterbeds IIRC. Perhaps Frank Herbert's Dune can be used to help kill this patent. Fremen stillsuit boots generated power from walking.

    1. Re:The book "Dune" kills this patent? by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      I know the USPTO is fucked up but I don't think even they'll make a decision on the basis of "a sci-fi writer once conceived of an object which did the same thing by a completely unexplained means".

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:The book "Dune" kills this patent? by Khashishi · · Score: 2

      I expect that the technology that enables this function would be patentable, and the technology is not described in any sort of detail in Frank Herbert. This is very much contrasted with Apple's Ipad patent which is just a guy holding a rectangle.

    3. Re:The book "Dune" kills this patent? by Sockatume · · Score: 2

      Even then, Stanley Kubrick's production designers already came up with the same rectangle.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    4. Re:The book "Dune" kills this patent? by perpenso · · Score: 0

      Even then, Stanley Kubrick's production designers already came up with the same rectangle.

      Maybe the patent did not use the dimensions 9x4x1.

      I think Heinlein used it as far back as the 1940s in his books. Of course others actually built them a century earlier, at least.

    5. Re:The book "Dune" kills this patent? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      That's not true.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:The book "Dune" kills this patent? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Fremen stillsuit boots generated power from walking.

      No, Fremen stillsuit boots pumped water from walking. They didn't generate or store electricity.

    7. Re:The book "Dune" kills this patent? by perpenso · · Score: 1

      Fremen stillsuit boots generated power from walking.

      No, Fremen stillsuit boots pumped water from walking. They didn't generate or store electricity.

      "... using the changing physical form of liquid drops ..." Not a pump but still pushing around water.

    8. Re:The book "Dune" kills this patent? by westlake · · Score: 1

      Robert Heinlein's Stranger in a Strange Land (plus some of his older books as well) helped kill a patent for waterbeds IIRC.

      Heinlein also wrote about near-light speed starships.

      You can't patent the idea. You can only patent the solution. The blueprint.

    9. Re:The book "Dune" kills this patent? by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      They have patented the idea and are now concentrating on scaling up the device and designing a shoe to contain it

      Robert Heinlein's Stranger in a Strange Land (plus some of his older books as well) helped kill a patent for waterbeds IIRC. Perhaps Frank Herbert's Dune can be used to help kill this patent. Fremen stillsuit boots generated power from walking.

      here's a 2000 article about electricity generating shoes. here's a patent from 1992 and another from 1988. Doesn't anyone do an internet search before "inventing" something?

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  11. Too complex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't we just get a wireless charging standard for mobile devices? Ubiquitous charging stations located everywhere from Starbucks to the waiting room at the doctor's office to your friend's house will provide enough opportunity to charge a heavily used device.

    Ssssh....I'm working on a beanie hat to harness portable wind power for charging my phone. Please forward all VC checks to anonymouscoward@slashdot.org

    1. Re:Too complex by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      If/when inductive charging becomes ubiquitous (RIP Touchstone) I hope that'll be the case.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:Too complex by Yamioni · · Score: 1

      Or phone manufacturers could just stop being dicks and go with mini/micro USB (depending on form factor, obviously some phones wouldn't handle a mini.) Serves dual purpose as a data port for those of us that actually like modding our phones. No inductive charging required, though, it would be handy to have as a supplemental option.

      --
      Cool post bro, highfive \o
    3. Re:Too complex by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Haven't pretty much all the phone vendors other than apple gone with micro USB already due to pressure from the EU and china?

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    4. Re:Too complex by Yamioni · · Score: 1

      USB is certainly more widely used than it used to be, but I think you can still find plenty of instances of proprietary connectors. To my memory USB is more widely used in the smartphone arena, while older style candybar/clamshell phones still have the proprietary connectors. I'm not certain though, I don't exactly keep up with cell phone technology, so you could be right. I believe my general point still stands though, USB paired with inductive charging seems the most logical approach.

      --
      Cool post bro, highfive \o
    5. Re:Too complex by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      A fully sealed phone (bluetooth data transfer and inductive charging) that's really watertight (and not prohibitively expensive) would be cool.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  12. endless energy! by mtrachtenberg · · Score: 1

    Hook this up to a robot and use the generated power to power the robot. Name the robot Perpetua.

    1. Re:endless energy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!!!

    2. Re:endless energy! by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 0

      Please mod up!

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  13. remember, there's no free lunch by v1 · · Score: 1

    or free energy. Why do people keep looking for ways to power stuff by (inefficiently) robbing it from other places? The last two posted here were shirts that flexed to power gadgets, and roads that had bumps in them to run road lighting.

    However you do this, (1) you're going to make something else require more energy, and (2) introducing additional energy loss due to conversion. In this case, if you put some material in the soles to gather mechanical energy it's just going to make your feet a little more tired.

    I see something of a relation between this and sales tax... sales taxes are applied to when you're already spending money and it just shaves a little off that doesn't look like it mattered too much. Same thing here, just making your commute a little more tiring with the idea that you won't really notice. Shoe power doesn't create energy any more than sales taxes create money.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:remember, there's no free lunch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I make your shoes power my gadgets - it doesn't cost me anything!

    2. Re:remember, there's no free lunch by ccguy · · Score: 1

      you're going to make something else require more energy

      Indeed. I see myself in a walk to vending machine - back to chair loop already.

    3. Re:remember, there's no free lunch by Sockatume · · Score: 2

      You're looking at the problem the wrong way. If you want people to power up their gizmos by using their chemical energy (which by all accounts they have too much of) then having them wear a pair of slightly inefficient shoes is more practical than giving them a hand crank and telling them to get on with it.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    4. Re:remember, there's no free lunch by inputdev · · Score: 1

      Good point, I would probably prefer the cushion to help me bounce back up for my next step, not sap the energy from my step and trickle charge my phone. I'd be willing to try it out, though.

    5. Re:remember, there's no free lunch by geekoid · · Score: 1

      (1) That's ok. And to be pendantic, there are ways that capture waste energy. I mean, so I burn and extra 5 calories a mile? big deal.

      (2) again, That's ok. If I have to burn 20 watts worth of calories in order to get 10 watts, I'm OK with that.

      Look at dams: It takes less energy to build one, then you will get from them. Why? because it is exploiting a system outside itself, rain.

      Exploiting source outside the system, or source leaving the system as waste, is a good way to get energy.

      There is no free lunch, most of us know that. The question is: Is the lunch worth eating?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:remember, there's no free lunch by digitallife · · Score: 1

      This device is below your foot, and doesn't require your foot to do crunches or anything. Your foot isn't going to get more tired. It works by using the already existing energy in the compression of your soles due to gravity and a humans need to lift a little with every step. Ths is actually the perfect place to get energy which is currently being wasted. You could potentially do something similar in a cars suspension or braking (it's already done in the braking in some cars, actually).

      I have to ask though: why do you feel the need to criticize things that have no real impact on you?

    7. Re:remember, there's no free lunch by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1

      or free energy. Why do people keep looking for ways to power stuff by (inefficiently) robbing it from other places? The last two posted here were shirts that flexed to power gadgets, and roads that had bumps in them to run road lighting.

      However you do this, (1) you're going to make something else require more energy, and (2) introducing additional energy loss due to conversion. In this case, if you put some material in the soles to gather mechanical energy it's just going to make your feet a little more tired.

      I see something of a relation between this and sales tax... sales taxes are applied to when you're already spending money and it just shaves a little off that doesn't look like it mattered too much. Same thing here, just making your commute a little more tiring with the idea that you won't really notice. Shoe power doesn't create energy any more than sales taxes create money.

      Not in all cases. I didn't RTFA, but if done correctly, no, this may not be as you are claiming. In the case of conventional brakes a lot of inertial energy is thrown away as heat. Regenerative brakes convert this energy into electricity (and considerably less heat). No extra useful energy is lost in this case. Plenty of shoes are designed with gel and other material that lessen the immediate.impact of walking. If some device or material can have this same effect but convert the motion into energy, then no additional energy is needed. It will simply be making use of energy that would otherwise be wasted as heat. Again, I didn't RTFA, so I can't say for sure if this is the case, but if it is, then it seems viable at least. Besides, shoe companies are already selling shoes that make you burn more calories as you walk. I think it's cool that eventually people could do this and use the extra wasted energy to power their mp3 player or other devices.

    8. Re:remember, there's no free lunch by Riceballsan · · Score: 1

      Well woudln't it have to have a spring device of some kind to reset the generator back to a nuetural point to prepare for the next step? I believe this would mainly be taxing and adding work to earths gravitational forces. We can get hypothetical free energy by harvesting energy that is currently not of particular extra use to us, same reason why wind and solar are functional, we are draining energy from forces, but picking forces that aren't of particular use to us as they are.

    9. Re:remember, there's no free lunch by ibwolf · · Score: 1

      In this case, if you put some material in the soles to gather mechanical energy it's just going to make your feet a little more tired.

      Or more accurately you will need to burn a few extra calories, which, in the western world, is a good thing!

      If there is a surplus of energy that can be tapped that will otherwise go to waste, why not use it.

    10. Re:remember, there's no free lunch by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      or free energy. Why do people keep looking for ways to power stuff by (inefficiently) robbing it from other places? The last two posted here were shirts that flexed to power gadgets, and roads that had bumps in them to run road lighting.

      However you do this, (1) you're going to make something else require more energy, and (2) introducing additional energy loss due to conversion. In this case, if you put some material in the soles to gather mechanical energy it's just going to make your feet a little more tired.

      I see something of a relation between this and sales tax... sales taxes are applied to when you're already spending money and it just shaves a little off that doesn't look like it mattered too much. Same thing here, just making your commute a little more tiring with the idea that you won't really notice. Shoe power doesn't create energy any more than sales taxes create money.

      Actually, using more energy for walking is great, it makes walking for exercise more efficient.

    11. Re:remember, there's no free lunch by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1

      or free energy. Why do people keep looking for ways to power stuff by (inefficiently) robbing it from other places? The last two posted here were shirts that flexed to power gadgets, and roads that had bumps in them to run road lighting.

      However you do this, (1) you're going to make something else require more energy, and (2) introducing additional energy loss due to conversion. In this case, if you put some material in the soles to gather mechanical energy it's just going to make your feet a little more tired.

      I see something of a relation between this and sales tax... sales taxes are applied to when you're already spending money and it just shaves a little off that doesn't look like it mattered too much. Same thing here, just making your commute a little more tiring with the idea that you won't really notice. Shoe power doesn't create energy any more than sales taxes create money.

      This is not necessarily the case. Conventional brakes convert inertia into heat. Regenerative brakes convert it into electricity (and less heat). Most shoes have gel or some other type of material in them to absorb and lessen shock. If these can function in the same way but convert that motion into electricity then no additional energy is needed. So no there is no "free" energy, but there is plenty of energy that is wasted as heat. Besides, some shoe manufacturers are marketing shoes that cause the wearer to exert more energy while simply walking as a health benefit. If you are already running and listening to an mp3 player, wouldn't it be nice to save a couple of bucks a year in electricity and burn more calories too? I didn't RTFA, so I don't know if this is that case, but it's a novel idea.

    12. Re:remember, there's no free lunch by Culture20 · · Score: 2

      Jog in place on concrete, jog in place on a trampoline, and jog in place in some thick mud. There's a difference in the amount of work.

    13. Re:remember, there's no free lunch by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Why do people keep looking for ways to power stuff by (inefficiently) robbing it from other places?

      Because according to those pesky thermodynamic laws, it's not possible to get energy any other way. You're always "robbing" it from somewhere.

      Taking energy that would have been dissipated as (body) heat seems a good solution to me.

    14. Re:remember, there's no free lunch by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1

      Sorry for posting nearly the same thing twice. The first time I posted it disappeared so I thought it didn't go through.

    15. Re:remember, there's no free lunch by MarkvW · · Score: 1

      My shoes are shock absorbing and so are my inserts. That absorbency makes my walk "a little more tiring," but the energy loss is necessary and I accept it gladly.

      If shoes and/or inserts can generate electricity and provide comparable absorbency at the same weight, then for all practical purposes there is a free lunch.

      Your reasoning is solid when applied to people who walk barefoot. However, people who wear shoes would not necessarily be getting a little more tired when they wear an absorbent charging device in the place of their usual shock absorbers.

    16. Re:remember, there's no free lunch by inputdev · · Score: 1

      I think there would be a direct trade-off with efficiency and the springiness of the shoe. You are right that it would have to return to prepare for the next step, but I imagine that would be most efficiently achieved by your foot somehow "pulling" it back to neutral, maybe through the lifting of the heel relative to the toes?

    17. Re:remember, there's no free lunch by Capt.+Skinny · · Score: 1

      Most people don't voluntarily pay more sales tax, but plenty of us run, jog, hike and join gyms for the explicit purpose of expending more energy that we otherwise would.

    18. Re:remember, there's no free lunch by v1 · · Score: 1

      this

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    19. Re:remember, there's no free lunch by digitallife · · Score: 1

      Shoes already have absorption in them, it's a feature...

    20. Re:remember, there's no free lunch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do people keep looking for ways to power stuff by (inefficiently) robbing it from other places?

      Because when you rob it from people it's a good thing? A lot of people pay a very large monthly fee to go to a building for no other reason than to have energy "inefficiently robbed" from them. This sounds win-win to me.

    21. Re:remember, there's no free lunch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Padded insoles also take away extra energy from walking. But they convert it into heat. Nobody bitches about that, and it tends to be more comfortable than having that energy go into the foot when walking or running. Having a little bit less heat and some useful electricity out of the thing isn't that terrible.

      The only thing I'm left wondering is if this is going to make anymore electricity than those gimmicky kids shoes with the LEDs in the heel. Then again if you're hiking an entire day, that might be just enough to top off the charge on a cell phone.

    22. Re:remember, there's no free lunch by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      To be pendantic, you'd need to hang this device on your neck.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    23. Re:remember, there's no free lunch by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I see what you did there..very good. Sorry about the misspelling.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    24. Re:remember, there's no free lunch by ancienthart · · Score: 1

      With the global "obesity epidemic" hitting first world countries, a little bit of inefficiency might be a good idea.
      Additionally, there is the point that having "shoe chargers" makes mobile devices truly mobile, and only dependent on the chemical energy you eat from food.

      My current smart phone has a compass, gps, and a sd card that allows me to use maps "offline", yet one battery charge barely lasts a little more than a day on the most conservative power settings. Before that, I had a hand-held gps (no maps, just location, routes and waypoints) that could last two days on battery power. Not exactly the best idea if you're hiking or camping.

      I now have a solar charger, but would gladly swap it for shoe charger inserts (If they sold for about $50 AUD), as I could pop them into any shoe I was wearing, plug my phone in and have it charging, sunny or raining, day or night (Well, when I wasn't sleeping of course.).

      Additionally, if the inserts are well designed, they could be set to only absorb the impact from the initial sharp foot-strike, stay compressed on stride-through, and recover while your foot was in the air. This way, you'd be getting power AND extra cushioning without making the foot-lift harder or wasting energy. (And yes, a good hiker learns to land their feet softly, but at the end of a long day hiking, your legs are tired, you will lose some gracefulness, and you WILL hit the ground harder than necessary.)

      The only issues I might have with such a device, is that:
      1. The power cord would need to be good and strong to avoid being broken by continuous flexing.
      2. The entire device would need to be waterproof - even if wearing in the city.
      3. The last thing you would want is a thick, round cord inside your shoe.

      If they were sensible, they'd make the insert wrap around your foot, maybe using some cheaper material for the top, a nice broad-but-thin insulated ribbon material up your instep, then have a thick, round cord coming out the top of your boot (Maybe slip it in front of the tongue of the boot). Slip the insert between two pairs of socks (which you should already be wearing for hiking anyway) and you would be good to go.

    25. Re:remember, there's no free lunch by ancienthart · · Score: 1

      Yup, and how do your feet feel after jogging for a long time on concrete? A bit of extra cushioning would be a good thing!

      One 53g Mars Bar = 1050 kJ.
      http://www.calorieking.com.au/foods/calories-in-chocolate-bars-mars-original_f-2lkPTQzMzMxJmJpZD00MzYmZmlkPTYyMDMmcGFyPSZrZXk9bWFycyBiYXI.html

      Assuming that the device and your phone/device has an abysmal 10% total energy efficiency, and provides (and consumes) the 10W that the article quoted, that Mars bar will last you for:

      E = Pt
      E/P = t
      1050 000 * 0.1 /10 = 10 500 seconds
                                                            = 175 minutes
                                                            = just shy of 3 hours.

      And that's assuming that the phone is going to suck down 10W of power and burn it off instantly.

  14. Resistors change DC to AC now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To test his idea, Krupenkin placed patches of electrodes coated very thinly with the dielectric tantalum oxide along tiny channels a few millimetres wide. Using a resistor to convert electrical charge to alternating current, Krupenkin was able to harvest electrical energy from drops of either mercury or galinstan, a gallium-based alloy as they were moved along these channels and over the electrodes.

    Ummm. A resistor? What?

    1. Re:Resistors change DC to AC now? by BillX · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I hope that was just newspeople oversimplification. Most likely they mean he used a resistor as a load to measure the power output (which technically would convert the alternating charge - a currentless electron accumulation that by definition is doing no "work" - to an alternating current at a voltage that can be expressed in terms of power (watts)).

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
  15. Toys! by Tarlus · · Score: 1

    Remember those children's sneakers from the 90's that would flash LED's as the wearer walked?

    --
    /* No Comment */
    1. Re:Toys! by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Yes, the batteries would run out after a few months and couldn't be replaced without cutting the shoe open.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  16. Walking on sand by ByteSlicer · · Score: 1

    There's a reason we walk on rubber soles instead of wooden. A rubber sole deforms, and stores energy in the rubber. A bit later it releases that energy again, and pushes your foot back up.

    That is energy efficient, and also the reason why the Achilles tendons are so important for running. They too deform end store/release energy.

    So what happens when you tap into this energy? Well, then the rubber would no longer make your foot bounce back. So you'd have to put more effort in your leg muscles to move your foot back up and forward. I imagine it would feel like walking on sand: easy to step into, but more effort to step out of.

    1. Re:Walking on sand by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Yes, we will need to expand some more energy in our walking. Big deal.
      Also, the could put it in the toes, and not on the heel and exploit the stretching of the sole.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Walking on sand by Grizzley9 · · Score: 1

      So what happens when you tap into this energy? Well, then the rubber would no longer make your foot bounce back. So you'd have to put more effort in your leg muscles to move your foot back up and forward. I imagine it would feel like walking on sand: easy to step into, but more effort to step out of.

      Considering the linkage between geeks-that-would-use-these and obesity, I fail to see a problem here.

    3. Re:Walking on sand by immakiku · · Score: 2

      You make a good point, but there's two things I don't think you considered deeply enough: 1. It might not be a noticeable difference. Phones don't need much power. It could be millimeter depressions that generate this energy. 2. People, especially in this country, voluntarily get on treadmills to make their leg muscles use more effort. This can certainly be a win-win situation.

    4. Re:Walking on sand by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Geeks? Most geeks are never far from an outlet. I can see joggers using this to power their music players, though.

    5. Re:Walking on sand by queazocotal · · Score: 1

      10W out.
      Average walking speed is - say 1.5m/s.

      10 joules/second /1.5m/s = 6.6N, equivalent to a half-a-degree slope (for me) or a rise of around 1.5cm/second in the path.

      Various sources say around 40W is they typical power used to walk, so an increase by 25%.

    6. Re:Walking on sand by wsanders · · Score: 2

      You know, we're engineers some of us? Let's "run the numbers" ....

      Assume walking is about the same metabolic equivalent as riding a stationary bike lazily (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metabolic_equivalent), you expend about 50W more or less. So a 10W shoe is going to make it about 20% more "difficult".

      Hard to say how that will "feel". "Walking on sand" seems to about sum it up.

      --
      Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
    7. Re:Walking on sand by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Sand require more energy because it moves under your shoes.

      This is in your shoe.SO if it's generated in the heal, it would be absorbing the impact of the foot.AS you roll to your toes, the ball of your foot is on firmer ground and can easily propel you. So not like sand at all.
      Some of the energy would be created as you lift.

      So weight would go up. The foot/ground comparison fails to take into consideration an outside sourse 1.e. gravity.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  17. Piezoelectric Gel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You gellin'?
    Yeah man, I'm gellin'.

    In all seriousness, this might be exactly what we need to do that PAN thing people are always going on about. (Technically we already have this with NFC and tethering, but ... PAN, man!)

  18. Some one please by geekoid · · Score: 1

    poor some money into this.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  19. Finally! by hyperion2010 · · Score: 1

    Amazing! This must be the first time that raw theoretical power has been harnessed to do something! If this works we should finally be able to get something useful out of all those academics.

  20. Revolutionize the shoe industry by DeeEff · · Score: 1

    No we can all act like Thor with our lightning drop kicks!

  21. not practical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    solar has been around for ages and could power stuff... people just don't bother when grid power is so cheap, and not worth the hassle & expense of other devices.

  22. Lunch is free for dumpster divers by artor3 · · Score: 1

    Oftentimes, the energy we "steal" from someplace else would have gone to waste anyway. Perhaps the energy here is normally dissipated as heat? If so, reclaiming it won't make you any more tired, and may even make you more comfortable.

  23. not going to work for me by venicebeach · · Score: 1

    I wear actual shoes.

  24. And in practice... by louic · · Score: 1

    I would love to have my theoretical gadgets powered with theoretical electricity from these theoretical shoe inserts.

  25. Oops, reply to wrong post by perpenso · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I thought the above was responding to my original post. Slashdot somehow managed to list it as such. First time I ever noticed such a bug.

    Yes I am aware of tablets used in 2001.

  26. that would be awesome for us new yorkers!!! by reh187 · · Score: 1

    I walk 3.2 miles round trip every day for my commute... Maybe I could plug my shoes in at the end of the day and sell that back to the electric company?

    --
    Sarcasm is the recourse of a weak mind...
    --
  27. WoW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Theoretical Shoe Inserts Could Power Your Gadgets

    Wow, who said things work only in theory but not in practice?

  28. Cables in my pantlegs by Cruel+Angel · · Score: 1

    I'll pass on this technology for shoes. I'd either have to strap my phone to my shoes, or run cables in my clothes. Either method doesn't impress me.

    --
    Two Rules For Success:
    1) Never tell people everything you know.
    1. Re:Cables in my pantlegs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have wireless charging nowadays. Check out the power mat.

    2. Re:Cables in my pantlegs by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't you still need to have your phone in direct contact with the charger though? I wouldn't want to wear my phone on my shoe.

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
    3. Re:Cables in my pantlegs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll use some highly inefficient wireless charging tech which will require you to run a marathon for 5 mins of talk time on your phone.

      Progress!

    4. Re:Cables in my pantlegs by ancienthart · · Score: 1

      In cold climates, you could run the cables up the piping of your track pants. Coat the piping with some cheap, efficient and flexible electro-luminescent material (No, I have no idea what you could use, just floating an idea) and you get to jog, charge your devices and glow in the dark a-la Tron. :D

  29. if they're able to up the effeciency and output... by binary_slim · · Score: 1

    power armor shouldn't be too far behind!

  30. Wet Feet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And what happens when you get your feet wet?

  31. "Patented the idea" by sconeu · · Score: 2

    You don't patent fucking idea. You patent inventions. You patents processes.

    YOU DO NOT PATENT IDEAS

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:"Patented the idea" by Yamioni · · Score: 1

      I've a task for you then. Please engrave your message on a Louisville Slugger and go pound the message into the heads of the people at the USPTO. They clearly missed the memo.

      --
      Cool post bro, highfive \o
    2. Re:"Patented the idea" by geekoid · · Score: 1

      citation?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:"Patented the idea" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Design" patents?

      Patents on vague concepts without any actual working object that could be demonstrated to the examiner?

      The fact that perpetual motion machines have received patents several times over the years?

  32. Better as an insole by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

    Making it a shoe binds you to just one pair. With insoles, you can use them all the time.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  33. Stilgar will not be amused... by rocket+rancher · · Score: 1

    ...stillsuits really should be open hardware.

  34. Cost? by rossdee · · Score: 1

    How much will these cost?

    Can they cope with getting wet? Of course ahoes get damp and sweaty anyway, but in the case of a rainstorm and deeper than you think puddles they can get soaked.
    For me, walking is not just a means of exercise , it is a means of transport - I don't own a car you insensitive clod.

    1. Re:Cost? by ancienthart · · Score: 1

      Rossdee makes a good point. I think these things would have to be waterproof just to handle the sweat.

  35. wont work in america. by nimbius · · Score: 1

    in a country where obesity stands at more than 30% of the population and overweight citizens comprise 70% of the population,
    you'd be crazy to think this "energy source" was capable of generating 3 watts of electricity, let alone 10.

    Sell it to india, most americans cant eat lunch without breaking a sweat.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:wont work in america. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine a liposucking mechanical worm that feeds off fat and transfers the converted energy via inductance. Somehow, the mental imagine of fatty the worm infested Magneto wouldn't go over too well for some people. But hey, of someone can market the Shake Weight...

    2. Re:wont work in america. by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      But hey, of someone can market the Shake Weight...

      Entering sleep mode now.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  36. Patent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh oh...this sounded like a good idea at first. But this guy went out and got a patent on it. Obviously patents are just a way to restrict technology. We should pressure this guy to give away his idea for free.

  37. Electro-Wetting? :p by youn · · Score: 1

    Electro-wetting... is that like code for peeing in your pants? I swear some day I'll read the article :p

    --
    Never antropomorphize computers, they do not like that :p
    1. Re:Electro-Wetting? :p by BillX · · Score: 1

      Electrowetting described in four words: "Don't Tase Me Bro"

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
  38. They reinvented piezoelectricity? by guruevi · · Score: 1

    Crystals already give mW of power when deformed. It's used to weigh your fat ass on a digital scale.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  39. tag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    footheld?

  40. Mercury by h4x0t · · Score: 1

    Wiki mentions mercury in the history section.... Goes on to say any hydrophobic liquid conductor. Not a lot of those I don't think.
    Does anyone know what liquids work best for this application?
    The world produces a lot of excess mercury and it would be cool to see a new application for it -- despite any health issue associated with the substance.
    Just saying.

  41. There isn't "free" energy? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Ever heard of regenerative breaking? "Free" energy. You need to brake so you might as well store the energy instead of trying desperately to vent it as heat.

    Shoes are much the same. Most shoes have a suspension mechanism. When your foot lands it is compressed, movement is turned into heat. If you turn the movement into something else, the energy would be still be dissipated but this time into something more useful.

    It isn't free energy strictly speaking, it is just using energy that you would otherwise waste.

    Of course, the shoes might also work like a generator in which case they use some energy but hey, most people can afford to spend a little bit more. Or are you that afraid of excersise? Oh wait, this is slashdot. We are!

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:There isn't "free" energy? by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of regenerative breaking?

      Does that require time travel?

    2. Re:There isn't "free" energy? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Taaa-daaa!

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:There isn't "free" energy? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I can time travel, here goes....

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  42. Will work by blai · · Score: 1

    Just put these inserts between fault lines

    --
    In soviet Russia, God creates you!
    1. Re:Will work by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      ... should be safer than nukes too!

  43. 10 watts for how long by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    a microsecond? Generally batteries and the electronics that keep them from turning into bombs do not like pulses of unregulated current.

    SO where are you going to hide the capacitors and regulator?

  44. Re:Won't work in LA--No problem by Biff+Stu · · Score: 1

    The summary clearly states that the power is generated by theoretical shoe inserts. Therefore one only need to walk in theory to generate power.

  45. What about car tires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't it be possible to incorporate this technology into car tires? most car tire sidewalls deform constantly as the tire rotates. If it could scale up far enough it could give a small boost to an electric/hybrid car's mileage.

  46. And transparent photovoltaics in my contacts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would also power my devices. But that's fucking dumb. This is another over-engineered and dumb idea.

  47. How wonderful! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been looking around for nifty inserts for my theoretical shoes.

  48. More for your money by Plazmid · · Score: 1

    One approach to energy harvesting is to increase the efficiency of human walking and capture the energy the human would have expended walking. This has actually been demonstrated with an energy harvesting backpack. The amount of power the human should consume carrying the backpack and doing work on the generator was found to be more than the amount of power the human actually consumes.

    So in other words, you still have to pay for your lunch, but you get more for your money.

    see "Harvesting Energy by Improving the Economy of Human Walking," for more
    http://www.sciencemag.org/content/309/5741/1686.short

  49. TSA by pkinetics · · Score: 2

    Will promptly have you back scattered, strip searched, anal probed and put on the Terrorist Watch List if they catch you with these.

  50. A good way to recharge my heli's lipos. Oh wait!.. by ARM_Coder · · Score: 1

    Going back to the RC Heli forum. Bye.

  51. And a theoretical doughnut can satisfy your hunger by RNLockwood · · Score: 1

    "Theoretical Shoe Inserts Could Power Your Gadgets"

    I suspect that a theoretical doughnut could only satisfy theoretical hunger.

    Wonder what wonders are available if they were Hypothetical rather than Theoretical?

    --
    Nate
  52. only theoretical? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't need an actual shoe insert, only a theoretical one? That's awesome!

  53. nonBouncy shoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shoes are usually designed to bounce back using the energy you put into the sole while treading down.

    Would these shoes feel like they sucked you to the ground as they used up that energy?

    1. Re:nonBouncy shoes by eyrieowl · · Score: 1

      Which shoes are those? Shoes usually have lots of foam rubber / air / gel cushions to absorb impact (energy), not propel you skyward. And then there's all the many dress shoes for both men and women which don't do much absorbing or springing.

    2. Re:nonBouncy shoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rubber would try to expand after compression beyond the atmospheric pressure..
      Air would try to expand after compression beyond the atmospheric pressure... And do so in a bouncy fashion.
      Gel.. Well this would also try to expand after compression beyond the atmospheric pressure, but maybe designed to expand slowly thus not exactly bouncy.

  54. I'll raise you by eyrieowl · · Score: 1

    theoretical ponies that can crap lightning and power a city.

    1. Re:I'll raise you by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Do you have an example of this in the lab? no? doesn't really apply here, does it?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  55. Great, I only need 4 more sets of legs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and I can power up my laptop (90 watts). But I hate walking and typing.

  56. Good luck flying! by jnpcl · · Score: 1

    Imagine the TSA's reaction when you've got electronics AND liquids in the sole of your shoe!

    1. Re:Good luck flying! by BillX · · Score: 1

      And, according to the paper, mercury. When the TSA is done with you the EPA will have a shot.

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
  57. I don't understand... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

    I fail to see how a theoretical anything could power something of mine. Don't you need an actual physical something to charge anything? Or is it the other way around, where you need a physical anything to charge something? Oh, I get so confused. But I'm pretty sure that theoretical won't cut it and you'll need physicality there somewhere.

    --
    That is all.
  58. Not insects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I first read this as "Theoretical Shoe Insects". Them bugs must be hard at work...

  59. Been done again and again over the decades by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    Once again this type of silly invention pops up. No normal person would use it, except for a work out. we're talking of robbing 30% or so of the energy a human uses to walk. A person in peak athletic shape can make 75W for a length of time, that's 1/10 of a horsepower. The rest of us would get quickly tired. That's why these "walk to generate" electricity devices mostly go nowhere since the 60s (and maybe someone older can tell me if they saw them in 50s or 40s)

    1. Re:Been done again and again over the decades by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I would use it, and if you took time to read the RTFA instead of dazzle us with your ignorance, you would know there are recovering waste heat.

      So it's not robbing, it's using the waste.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Been done again and again over the decades by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      I did read the article, sorry but there is no such level of waste heat in human motor actions. normal human does not have that kind of effort to spare. athletic work out, sure, have at it.

  60. Oops. also by geekoid · · Score: 1

    as an engineer, you should no better then to not RTFA:

    "up to 10 watts of power is lost as heat each time a foot hits the ground. Mobile devices such as phones and laptops use between 1 and 15 watts, so harnessing our 'foot power' would make a notable difference for consumers."

    I added the bold.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Oops. also by BillX · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the "10W wasted as heat" claim comes straight from the mouth of the company pushing this thing, and I'm not sure I buy it. Looking at their website, it does kinda read like somebody locked a dozen marketing and MBA types in a room with unlimited whiskey, cocaine and a copy of Dreamweaver.

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
  61. Smart invention by Antibozo · · Score: 1

    Danger is my middle name! I hope they invent the Cone of Silence next. Always wanted one of those.

  62. patent reform NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In ye olde days, you had to have a working prototype to patent something. These numb nuts just patented something they haven't even figured out how to do yet, and now they're selling snake oil vapors to get funding for R&D.

    "So far, Krupenkin and Ashley Taylor have been able to produce a few milliwatts of power along tiny channels a few millimeters wide. They have patented the idea and are now concentrating on scaling up the device and designing a shoe to contain it."

  63. Re:Walking on sand (Carbon Footprint) by retroworks · · Score: 1

    I assume it would have springs, or more rubber, to compensate. Which would slightly increase a) the weight of the shoe, and b) the carbon "footprint" of making the shoe. It's the latter (b) that troubles me, and the latter that media/journalists often ignore. The amount of energy required to mine, refine, melt and mold a battery (like in a Prius) can be more than the battery holds or saves in its useful lifetime. Shoes wear out, and if these become like disposable tablets (whose batteries cannot be replaced), then it will be a net loss for society/carbon/energy. Visit the OK Tedi Mine in Papua New Guinea on Google Earth to see where all the shiny copper we are using comes from (hint: rainforest with runoff of mine tailings into coral reefs).

    --
    Gently reply