Slashdot Mirror


Building 2011's Sub-$200 Computer

adeelarshad82 links to PC Magazine's recent account (updating a similar quest detailed last year) "to see if a decent PC could put together for less than $200. Turns out that between some great deals, an AMD processor, and a Linux OS, it can actually be done." They actually come out with a decent-enough system for that money — but omitting an optical drive in a full-size desktop computer build seems something like cheating.

50 of 394 comments (clear)

  1. Don't even have to build it yourself by steevven1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can get an eeePC netbook for $199 RETAIL at Best Buy...Best Buy!!! I know this is talking about desktops, but it just doesn't seem that surprising...

    1. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 3, Informative

      Or you can get a bottom-end eMachines dual core 15.4" laptop for $230. It ain't fancy but, unlike the article's $200 desktop, it includes monitor, optical drive, input devices, and even a UPS. And it comes with an operating system that will have support for or be supported by whatever peripherals or software the user wants to add without having to call their weird nephew for help.

    2. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by Nemyst · · Score: 2

      My experience dates back to second-generation Atoms (I had a first-generation 10" EEE PC) and I'll say they were barely functional. It's certainly able to do most common tasks, just bog slow with it.

      Bear in mind your D410 is a dual-core CPU, whereas I'm fairly certain a $199 EEE PC won't be (looking at Amazon, even $250 doesn't net you that). They did get multithreading in with say the N455, though, which is a step forward I guess.

      My entire point was just to say that even the best Atom gets blown away by the Athlon in the setup presented here.

    3. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by CastrTroy · · Score: 2

      Seriously. I paid $400 for a new laptop last christmas. I got a dual core AMD with 4 GB RAM and 320 HD. Now that It's back to school season I'm just browsing the deals, for that same $400 I can get a 6GB RAM, Intel i3 dual core, and 640 GB hard drive. To get the equivalent of what I have now, I would only have to pay $250-$300. This is why tablets are overpriced. Anything decent is $500, but for $400 you can have a notebook with some pretty amazing specs.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by Pharmboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Browsing isn't what it used to be. For many people, browsing means playing Farmville on Facebook, which will eat up a lot of CPU and memory. And no, Zinga programmers don't really care about efficiency on your computer, only on their servers.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    5. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by RobbieThe1st · · Score: 2

      This is honestly true - an optimized set of applications, and even a real low power chip(like the ARM ones in smartphones) is plenty for browsing and such. However, then we run into things like Flash, which sucks the life out of almost anything.
      Honestly, once we get hardware-accelerated decoding of VP8 available on Linux, and a proper plugin for FF/chrome which allows it to be used with HTML5 video... then that will be less of a problem as *most* youtube videos have webm versions..
      But until then... *sigh*. You either need to run it with a small window, or have a powerful CPU...

    6. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by RobbieThe1st · · Score: 3, Informative

      ...And for $700 you can build a top-of-the-line, amd-based gaming machine off Newegg that will run just about everything you throw at it. But that, like your couple of builds, are *still* way above what was managed with the $200 machine.

    7. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by timeOday · · Score: 2

      If a computer was fast enough in 1990, it should theoretically be fast enough today

      For home users, I see little overlap between what computers were used for in 1990 vs now. Most people who own a home computer now did not even own one then - adoption was about 15% at the time.

      Even since 2000, although Internet was catching on, the main application of the Internet - video - had barely started catching on.

    8. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by faclonX · · Score: 2

      We've needed Gnome lite for years, I remember back in the earlier days of Gnome 2 memory use was deplorable then, and its not gotten any better. Along with the Gnome dev team constantly stuffing their opinions down the user's throats saying "Its for your own good, we're the devs, we know better than you." I remember when they decided it was a good idea to make the default action for Nautilus to be spacial, that pissed EVERY gnome user I knew then, and still know including myself off to high hell. The Gnome team has claimed in the past that they have cleaned up bloat, and made it faster, but I really beg to differ. The only reason I'm using Gnome still is because KDE blows, and my distro of choice hasn't implemented Gnome 3 yet. I know when it does, I'm switching to XFCE, I'm sick of the Gnome team and their shit. The bloat, and assuming they know better than me is getting old, and I can't stand it anymore

      (We also need slashdot lite, I'm sick of this stupid AJAX shit, let me just post)

      --
      It had to be done... It had to be said...
  2. re: optical drive by ZankerH · · Score: 5, Insightful

    but omitting an optical drive in a full-size desktop computer build seems something like cheating.

    It's 2011, dammit, why do people still use optical drives?

  3. no, it's time. by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "omitting an optical drive in a full-size desktop computer build seems something like cheating"

    Optical disks? How quaint! :)

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    1. Re:no, it's time. by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      While I can't imagine installing an optical drive in a computer an external one is handy for software that still ships on optical media as well as ripping the occasional cd or dvd. I use my external drive less and less but I know if I didn't have it I'd have to borrow someone else's sooner or later.

    2. Re:no, it's time. by vux984 · · Score: 2

      Optical disks? How quaint! :)

      You do realize people still buy software, and that it still comes on optical disks.

      Not everyone has a broadband yet.

      Optical discs aren't even close to dead yet.

      Maybe you don't need one, that's just fine, good for you.

    3. Re:no, it's time. by JanneM · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "You do realize people still buy software, and that it still comes on optical disks."

      This is a Linux system they built, though. Shrinkwrapped software is very rare, verging on nonexistent, for that OS.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    4. Re:no, it's time. by walshy007 · · Score: 2

      Doesn't that imply you had software for it? Software you might want to use on the new one? In which case going with linux was a bad move...

      You are assuming the former computer was running windows, some people have been using linux exclusively for well over a decade.

  4. Re:Decent Computer? by suso · · Score: 2

    And it has Linux on it? Crap, at least get Win XP.

    That's right, if you want crap, get Win XP. That was too easy.

  5. Re: optical drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My optical drive broke down about 3 years ago. I've never had to replace it. So I agree, for some, it might not be needed at all.

  6. Re: optical drive by Nos9 · · Score: 3

    Because the people that put out content for the computer ship on them. A cheap 4G mem stick is ~$4, to press 4.7G DVD costs them pennies. Until there is a useful way to allow customers to DL onto their own memory sticks, optical will stick around.

  7. Re: optical drive by DesScorp · · Score: 3

    but omitting an optical drive in a full-size desktop computer build seems something like cheating.

    It's 2011, dammit, why do people still use optical drives?

    Because they want to.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  8. what about a monitor, keyboard, and mouse. by maxwells_deamon · · Score: 2

    Probably more important than an optical drive

  9. Re: optical drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I can unequivocally say no. We sell a lot of little desktop computers without an optical drive. They come with Ubuntu usually and maybe 1/3 of our customer base gets one. They are extra. The minimal configured systems are without keyboard, mouse, monitor or optical drive and run $249. People are not renting DVDs any longer and most have never watched a DVD on the computer in the first place. Some areas have a higher than usual younger user base (Portland) and there is more demand for an optical drive (or at least there was) in these region. Elsewhere though most people do not watch movies on the PC.

  10. Re: optical drive by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Funny

    What is this "Audio CD" you speak of? Is it like an Audi TT?

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  11. Re:Build a desktop? by amiga3D · · Score: 3, Informative

    It is if you want anything with serious horsepower. Sure, a commodity PC will work fine for most things but if you want 8 cores and 64gb of ram with multiple video cards you'll be better off building it yourself.

  12. Re:All recent Computer architectures are dogs. by obarthelemy · · Score: 3, Funny

    your spelling is about as good as your thinking.

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  13. Re: optical drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's 2011, dammit, why do people still use optical drives?

    Possibly because, just because it's 2011 doesn't mean all past cds/dvds are magically converted into usbs.

    Dammit archaeologists, it's 2011! Why are you still reading clay tablets!

  14. They trolled Newegg? by Khyber · · Score: 2

    I built a better system (WITH A VIDEO CARD AND OPTICAL DRIVE, PCMAG) for $189 on Pricewatch.

    AND YOU CAN GAME ON IT.

    But you forget about monitor pricing.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  15. Press F2 to continue... by CaptCanuk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Missing:
      - keyboard
      - mouse
      - network cable
      - monitor?
      - USB key to install from
      - Friend to copy OS onto your USB key
      - taxes (for those lucky to have them)

    I think the real cheat is any budget that involves a mail-in rebate.
    The article starts out about financial difficulties and then provides a price that doesn't reflect the walk home price. 3-6 weeks you might make that money back IF you are lucky that the rebate was honored.

    --
    ---- The geek shall inherit the Earth.
  16. Why I use optical discs by atomicbutterfly · · Score: 2

    I'm currently on a bit of a "get legit" roll when it comes to my media. All my software is acquired legally via the net so that's OK, it's just stuff like movies and music that I still require an optical drive for. Why?

    1. I like my music in FLAC format. There are very few digital music stores which sell in this format. My favourite by far is http://bandcamp.com/ but they don't have much mainstream/big-artist stuff.

    2. Even if I didn't have a preference for FLAC, there aren't any legal digital music stores around which service my needs with at least a high-bitrate MP3. I don't want to use iTunes because I don't want to deal with AAC (I can convert them but I don't want a dependency on iTunes anyway). Amazon still hasn't, for whatever reason, opened an MP3 store here in Australia yet despite promising to open up to the world many years ago.

    3. You can forget about any legit digital movie stores selling non-DRMed stuff either.

    So what do I do? I buy music CDs and rip them to FLAC. I buy DVDs and use HandBrake to convert them, or just play them directly with VLC. Both of these cases require an optical drive, and until such a time occurs that physical sales of media are completely abolished, I will continue to do this. UNLESS... a suitable online store apears in my area which sells non-DRMed music AND video of what I want, in my preferred format. At this rate that's going to take a very long time (if ever), so I do what I can to stave off piracy.

  17. vga only in 2011 and the old GeForce 6100? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    you could of gotten a amd board with a newer ATI chipset with DVI for about $15 more and for like $30 more a AM3+ board.

  18. a brick by pbjones · · Score: 2

    It fails because you need to load an OS from somewhere, from something, so you need to include the cost of the USB stick and time/cost of downloading Linux. I didn't see the cost of HD cable either. CPU Heatsink? Minor stuff but it all adds up. 2 GB of ram? pfft. Why have a HD at all? boot from USB and use Network storage.

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
    1. Re:a brick by iggymanz · · Score: 2

      I've done it that way for fun but usb boot/system disk and internet storage are too dang slow.

      but you don't need to worry about install media, just borrow from your local bsd or linux evangelist. I loan out cd or usb stick, and have done installs for friends and coworkers on their personal machines. wish I had some stickers of dead microsoft colored butterfly men that I could put on case of my laptop every time I kill a windows install. hmmm, that could work as a web page too....

  19. Re:Optical drive? by HJED · · Score: 2

    To instal Windows? To install most versions of Linux? To install a large number of commercial products (E.g. Photoshop)? To boot from a live CD when having boot problems? To install the free stuff that comes with computer Magazines?To play BD movies (I don't live in US and I prefer not to pirate everything)

    --
    null
  20. Re: optical drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > It's 2011, dammit, why do people still use optical drives?

    Because the lightning fast internet connection that (I'm assuming) you have isn't available in every household on the planet.
    It's hard to feel 2011 when you have a 1997 internet connection at home.

  21. Re: optical drive by Darinbob · · Score: 2

    People also have boxes of CDs and DVDs. You don't need a burner but you definitely need a reader.

  22. Re:Optical drive by pz · · Score: 2

    Except when you want an archival copy of something.

    --

    Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
  23. Re: optical drive by colinrichardday · · Score: 2

    With all of the features, each DVD would be 3-4 gigabytes, so 30 would be 90-120 gigabytes. That would be quite a bit of my Linux partition.

  24. Beagle or panda by oki900 · · Score: 2

    Beagleboards are 149.00USD and Pandaboards are 179.00USD you then just need an SD card 4G or better. I run a pandaboard myself for some D-Star ham radio stuff.

  25. Re:Decent Computer? by wagnerrp · · Score: 2

    1) Itunes - sure there are plenty of great media players and what not for linux... but if you have an ios device whether its a new ipod, ipod touch, iphone, or ipad (and literally tens of millions of completely normal people do, they need itunes).

    My dad uses Winamp to sync his iPod. He wants to manage his music the way he wants to do it, and not the way Apple tells him to do it. Now granted, Winamp is Windows software, and while I don't know of or care to find similar software for Linux, saying it requires iTunes is false.

    2) TurboTax etc... yep its just one week a year. But millions of completely ordinary people do their taxes with this type of software.

    TurboTax doesn't do anything particularly funky with respect to Windows. I see no reason why this couldn't run on WINE. You could argue that most people would have no clue how to run an application through WINE. You could also argue that it's trivial to learn to just prepend 'wine' to the command line, and not much more difficult to make an icon in gnome/kde to do so.

    3) Miscellaneous Toys - from the child friendly Barbie photo manipulation software that came with the Barbie camera to setting up your new Logitech universal remote to an AppleTV to programming a Lego Mindstorms creation with LabView.

    Lego RCX units and Harmony remotes can be programmed on Linux using 3rd party software. Technically, Harmony remotes are programmed on the Logitech servers, through a web application, and the only thing the software is used for is to transfer the profile to the device. LabVIEW offers OSX and Linux versions of all but their bottom end interfaces, and what is someone doing worrying about a $200 computer when they're going to use it to interface with IO boards that start at that price and go way way up? The AppleTV is itself a computer, capable of accessing the iTunes store directly. It has no need for interaction with a PC. If you're talking about streaming content to it, well then there are mechanisms for doing that in Linux too.

    4) Video games - Believe it or not, lots of perfectly normal people play everything from World of Warcraft,to Left4Dead, to the copy of Bejeweled or Riven they picked up at Walmart for $7 as an impulse buy.

    A quick check puts some 5000 games and applications on the Platinum and Gold compatibility list for WINE. Yes, people will be afraid of things like WINE, but suck it up and put out a little effort if you want to avoid that $100 Windows OEM license. WOW, L4D, and Bejeweled are all on the Platinum list, meaning it works perfectly out-of-the-box with no special configuration.

    5) Peripherals - Printer fax scanner copier combination devices in particular still suck with linux. Getting printing going is usually relatively straightforward, but anything else is a complicated crapshoot.

    I can't speak to other print companies but HP offers the HPLIP drivers, with support for some 2000 different pieces of hardware. Using it, I had absolutely no trouble getting printing or scanning working on my all-in-one unit.

  26. Re: optical drive by GPLHost-Thomas · · Score: 2

    100 CD + 30 DVD (if they are all full, and all your DVDs are 9 GB, which I both don't think reflects reality) would add up to 340 GB. I really hope that this new computer has an HDD bigger than 340 GB, otherwise, many people will complain about it!

  27. Re:Decent Computer? by RobbieThe1st · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since moving to Linux 2 years ago, both Windows and OS X are crap.

  28. Re: optical drive by RobbieThe1st · · Score: 2

    60mb/sec? I've never gotten over ~20, even in linear-read from a drive I know can do 80.
    Still, even a typical SD card is usually a bit faster than a CD due to less seek time. Which is important for installing or booting.

  29. Re: optical drive by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 2

    Local backup is useful, especially for data you don't care to publish or have anyone overwrite. Fiscal data and GPG keys, for example, can be usefully stored on permanent media.

  30. Re: optical drive by wierd_w · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While you can't put usb sticks in a wallet, you CAN put sdcards in one. Specifically one made for trading cards.

    I would love to see sdcard media get sold in bulk packs like cdrs are. There is a slight problem with capacities not rounding evenly with optical formats... (640-700mb cdr : 1gb sdcard. 4.5gb dvd : 8gb sdcard. 9gb dvd : 12/16gb sdcard) but the form factor is much smaller, you can store waaay more data in a similar sized wallet, and they are less easily destroyed by frequent handling.

    Yes. I KNOW they are more expensive. I also remember when cdrs cost over a dollar a pop. These devices don't have to be blazing fast to replace optical media, and while I know it won't be a popular subject with the demographic here, it WOULD work quite well with software firms, because sdcards have to be able to support special hardware drm features to be spec compliant. (This means that your spiffy boxed 3d game you bought off the shelf can chug slowly on install, use your fast sata drive at runtime, and use the sdcard as a dongle to verify game purchase, all in the same package. I am surprised that no software house has tried it yet.

    The cards themselves don't need to be fast really, so cheap organic semiconductors, like those used in flexible displays that can exceed amorphous silicon speeds could be used to make the bulk pack cheapo ones.

    Like any product, as long as it remains a niche, specialty product it will be expensive, but when it becomes a widespread multi use product, economies of scale drive down the price. I can easily see flash going that way, especially for slow but cheap sdcards.

  31. My $250 system build from Micro Center! by dnorf87 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've done quite a few system builds using this AMD bundle deal that Micro Center has had going on for some time now. Every single system works flawlessly, even the ones with the Powerspec case/power supply (more business if the PSU does fail, and I haven't seen one take a motherboard out yet.)

    Phenom II X2 560 Black edition: http://www.microcenter.com/single_product_results.phtml?product_id=0347369 $87.99
    Biostar A780L3G AM3 760G mATX Motherboard: http://www.microcenter.com/single_product_results.phtml?product_id=0351634 $FREE
    Western Digital Caviar Blue 500gb SATA 6.0gbps: http://www.microcenter.com/single_product_results.phtml?product_id=0352164 $49.99
    Micro Center branded 2x2gb of DDR3 1333: http://www.microcenter.com/single_product_results.phtml?product_id=0353218 $19.99
    PowerSpec TX-381 Micro ATX Computer Case: http://www.microcenter.com/single_product_results.phtml?product_id=0330536 $24.99
    Cooler Master eXtreme Power Plus 500w PSU: http://www.microcenter.com/single_product_results.phtml?product_id=0295037 $37.99
    Samsung 22x SATA DVD-RW drive: http://www.microcenter.com/single_product_results.phtml?product_id=0293049 $21.99
    Grand Total of $255.10 after tax.

    You have an overclockable dual core CPU (I wouldn't push too far with the stock heatsink and with that motherboard, but a little bump to 3.6 GHz shouldn't be an issue.), better graphics than the system in the article, twice as much system memory (4gb vs. 2gb), an optical drive, an actual decent power supply, a case with a handle on it, and I could probably go on, but i'd hope you all get the point. A whole $45 more before tax, not including the lame $8 mail in rebate for the power supply. Definitely worth every penny, and this is all something you could pick up and have together in a couple hours assuming you have a store close to you. Most would likely pay $40+ for the convenience alone. I also didn't shop around too much. Better might be possible.

  32. Re: optical drive by iamhassi · · Score: 2

    My optical drive broke down about 3 years ago. I've never had to replace it. So I agree, for some, it might not be needed at all.

    Then you're not a gamer. Not every game is available on Steam.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  33. Re: optical drive by billstewart · · Score: 2

    Hear hear for your correction of the bogus "here here" - people are really loosing their hold on English grammer.

    But yes, you do need to read CDs or DVDs on a computer, and USB drives are really just fine for that, plus you've probably got one left over from some previous computer by now.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  34. Re: optical drive by GPLHost-Thomas · · Score: 3, Informative

    CD / DVDs aren't at all a reliable media for backups. I wouldn't recommend anyone to do that, especially for financial data. If you need a backup, do it with a USB hard drive for the local one, and also send an off-site backup over the wire. That is, at least 3 copies (if you include the one you are working on).

  35. Re: optical drive by Oidhche · · Score: 2

    If it's not on Steam, it's on Pirate Bay.

  36. Re:Decent Computer? by walshy007 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not this hardware abi driver interface bullshit again, you bring it up all the time.. and it is addressed all the time. ( I think this is the third of fourth time I've replied to you on this topic on /. alone, usually long write-ups but don't have the time today)

    While this is old, it is something you may find interesting. In short, you don't want a fixed abi, what you want, are stable drivers.

  37. Re:Decent Computer? by novar21 · · Score: 2

    Network scanning or just via the USB cable?

    I have both USB and Network scanning (wireless) just fine. No special actions necessary. Just asked Fedora to find the unit.

    What about faxxing?

    yup, not a problem.

    Does the automatic document feeder work? What about duplexing?

    Yes, the automatic document feeder works. Yes, duplexing works.

    When you say you had no trouble getting it working, is that because you like me know what your doing... or could my mom do it too with no trouble?

    My wife and daughters have no problem adding software or hardware to our linux boxes. My wife is not a computer tech, nor are my daughters.

    Now, I dont think anyone is in any position to state that your mom or anyone else can do something without trouble. My Father uses linux. My Mother uses linux. They are in their late 60's early 70's.