Slashdot Mirror


Google To Shut Down 10 Products

Google announced yesterday that it is closing a number of its current products and merging others into similar services. Many of them will continue to be available in the near future to facilitate the transition. The list of affected services includes Aardvark, Desktop, Fast Flip, Maps API for Flash, Google Pack, Google Web Security, Image Labeler, Notebook, Sidewiki, and Subscriber Links. Google's Alan Eustace wrote. "This will make things much simpler for our users, improving the overall Google experience. It will also mean we can devote more resources to high impact products—the ones that improve the lives of billions of people. All the Googlers working on these projects will be moved over to higher-impact products. As for our users, we’ll communicate directly with them as we make these changes, giving sufficient time to make the transition and enabling them to take their data with them." The link contains brief descriptions of how each service is getting phased out.

114 of 167 comments (clear)

  1. Google is now officially mature company by ge7 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The recent developments within Google and their moving to identity servi.. social networking with demands for ID scans if someone reports you for "fake" name, and other general evil stuff just shows Google has matured as a company and is now just like everyone else. It's not a recent development either, it has been going on for several years, but now everyone else is starting to notice it too. They cut down the amount of geeky stuff like work-on-your-own-projects, they go aggressively into markets and they use every evil marketing tactic in the book.

    That is fine. Every company is like that. But slashdotters should stop giving them free passes because they're "google".

    1. Re:Google is now officially mature company by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Some experiments succeed, some experiments fail. Google tries a lot more of these types of things than anyone else. Hopefully those who use these services will find something else to meet their needs.

    2. Re:Google is now officially mature company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Where have you been that you think Google only just changed? They've been withdrawing from a market at the first sign they won't roll over everyone else for years. Their company mission is to organize (and profit from) the world. That includes you, hoss. Wake up!

    3. Re:Google is now officially mature company by QuasiSteve · · Score: 2

      Note that it isn't necessarily a case of failure either.

      I was surprised to see Google Desktop go away - but it does make sense. Vista+ and Mac both have desktop widgets, and XP+ have a desktop search utility from Microsoft already. I suspect the same applies to Macs. Not to mention that Google sees 'the cloud' as a major strategy, and searching 'the cloud' is more important than a user's desktop.

      So while perhaps Google's offering may have been preferable, there's plenty of alternatives and little incentive for Google to continue its development.

      In fact, the only one that I used and failed, is Sidewiki. Unfortunately, the first result for 'Sidewiki alternatives' yields a piece of SEO scum.

      The idea was sound, but I guess not very liked by webmasters, prone to dickwaddery, and difficult to turn into money.

    4. Re:Google is now officially mature company by hedwards · · Score: 1

      From the list it looks like most of the products have already been largely integrated into other Google services or in the case of notebook will be automatically exported to Google Docs.

      With a small amount of work, one could create a form that does the same thing as notebook for oneself.

    5. Re:Google is now officially mature company by bonch · · Score: 1

      The recent developments within Google and their moving to identity servi.. social networking with demands for ID scans if someone reports you for "fake" name, and other general evil stuff just shows Google has matured as a company and is now just like everyone else.

      They've been just like everyone else since they went public.

    6. Re:Google is now officially mature company by bonch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Microsoft used to get mocked for its constant stream of pointless experiments and go-nowhere products. It seems to be what companies do when they're too big and don't know what to focus on.

    7. Re:Google is now officially mature company by Riceballsan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well the difference here is many of these projects produced some functionality that can be merged into other google products. Just because the projects themselves didn't take off on their own, does not mean they were go-nowhere projects.

    8. Re:Google is now officially mature company by ge7 · · Score: 1

      And why do you think Microsoft didn't either incorporate those into other products or didn't learn something valuable out of them?

    9. Re:Google is now officially mature company by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Try looking for '(public) web annotation'. I remember playing with a Mozilla Suite extension years ago that more or less did what Sidewiki does. Incidentally, there's a Wikimedia project proposal for this, too.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    10. Re:Google is now officially mature company by Dogtanian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But slashdotters should stop giving them free passes because they're "google".

      Said it before and I'll say it again- the idea that most Slashdotters are uncritically in love with Google is out of date. It's undeniably true that up until around the mid-2000s there was a borderline fanboyish attitude of indulgence towards Google. However, that's changed quite noticeably in the past five or so years. While it may be argued that Google still gets cut more slack than they deserve, the era of "Google can do no wrong" being representative of most Slashdotters is now over.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    11. Re:Google is now officially mature company by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      That idea will go away about the same time as people stop referring to "slashdot groupthink".

    12. Re:Google is now officially mature company by QuasiSteve · · Score: 1

      Yes, I used to play with a similar utility - although intended only for personal annotation, not entirely unlike the Highlights addon - a few years back. The main issue is the lack of a large community. 500 people, say, annotating random pages means it's very unlikely that two people within that group ever see the same page + annotations except for possibly major sites.

      That's why I was a bit more enthused with Google's offering - it at least had the potential of reaching many millions of users.

      That said, I'll check for that extension - as well as the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_annotation list.

    13. Re:Google is now officially mature company by igreaterthanu · · Score: 2

      At first I was surprised that Google Desktop was going away too, but then I remembered that the cloud is the future and nobody has any need for a desktop anymore.

      --
      I dream of a nation where a man is not judged by his skin color but by an number assigned by a credit rating agency.
    14. Re:Google is now officially mature company by Riceballsan · · Score: 1

      Most of them because either the concepts behind them were too flawed to be worth carrying anything over from (bob, clippy). Other failures were half way decent ideas rushed out the door with so many problems bugs and annoyances they just hurt everyone who used them, Windows ME/Vista. Some ideas will keep losing spectacular amounts of money while barely gaining enough traction to even be considered profitable, but start to gain a hint of traction due to microsoft continuing to pour 5x more money then they make onto them. (Bing, Xbox, zune, most likely WP7 will fall into this category)

    15. Re:Google is now officially mature company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Google tries a lot more of these types of things than anyone else."

      Bull. Plenty of small companies are out there trying new things every day, and putting their asses on the line because they believe in their products. Google obviously has some employees still coming up with great ideas, but google as a company are killing them more often than not, with their half-assed product backing terrible UI design, lack of concern for customer feedback, etc.

      And yes, now they're evil, censoring web results for one thing.

    16. Re:Google is now officially mature company by ubrgeek · · Score: 1

      Which will be the first Tuesday after people stop using, "FTFY" and "citation needed."

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    17. Re:Google is now officially mature company by cffrost · · Score: 1

      [...] too flawed to be worth carrying anything over from (bob, clippy).

      Bob's my uncle, you insensitive clod! >(

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    18. Re:Google is now officially mature company by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      and people stop using Simpson's quotes and "obligatory xkcd " as substitutes for humor.

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    19. Re:Google is now officially mature company by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Didn't you hear? It's not a social networking service, it's an identity tracking service with social networking features. I am now using it solely to complain about Google's real names policy, and I went back to sharing everything on facebook, or just posting it to my blog.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    20. Re:Google is now officially mature company by swillden · · Score: 1

      They cut down the amount of geeky stuff like work-on-your-own-projects

      I'm a software engineer at Google, and this isn't true. There has been no pushback on 20% projects; and lots of people still have them (I do). Nor, from what I can see, is there any significant limitation on employees' ability to choose what kinds of things they want to spend their 20% time on.

      Rather, I think actions like this are a natural consequence of the freedom given to Googlers to work on what they want to. That freedom means that Google ends up doing a lot of random things. The things that look somewhat promising get more investment and get rolled out to the public. Some work, most don't, and the result is that eventually the projects that aren't panning out get axed. That doesn't mean Googlers can't continue working on them in 20% time if the wish, though it's doubtful that many will want to.

      they use every evil marketing tactic in the book

      I think this is simply untrue, but it's not possible to debate such broad generalizations.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    21. Re:Google is now officially mature company by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      There isn't. On the other hand, has any of the really cool and innovative stuff made at MR ever made it into an actual shipping product?

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    22. Re:Google is now officially mature company by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      >Google has matured as a company and is now just like everyone else
      You mean now actually listens to all its shareholders, instead of just the 2 guys who created it in the first place....as they do not have controlling shares any longer in the company.

    23. Re:Google is now officially mature company by wondafucka · · Score: 1

      The recent developments within Google and their moving to identity servi.. social networking with demands for ID scans if someone reports you for "fake" name, and other general evil stuff just shows Google has matured as a company and is now just like everyone else. It's not a recent development either, it has been going on for several years, but now everyone else is starting to notice it too. They cut down the amount of geeky stuff like work-on-your-own-projects, they go aggressively into markets and they use every evil marketing tactic in the book. That is fine. Every company is like that. But slashdotters should stop giving them free passes because they're "google".

      This actually makes me want to use their products more. Instead of creating anything their engineers feel like, they are focusing on what they can support that is in line with their profit center. Good. No free passes, but at least it seems like all arms of the company are starting to move in lockstep.

    24. Re:Google is now officially mature company by ajs · · Score: 1

      social networking with demands for ID scans if someone reports you for "fake" name...

      Nope, this is simply not true. First off, reports are mixed. There was a widely publicized report of someone who claimed he got accounts blocked be reporting them, but then no one I know of who has tried to repeat this has had any success.

      Further, the whole ID thing is blown out of proportion. IDs are one of several inputs that they'll accept, including links to competing social networking services and blogs where the name you're using (which must have a "first" and "last name") must have been in use prior to the establishment of your Google profile. In other words, you can't use your Google profile to establish a new pseudonym, but as the many authors and performers that use the service can attest, existing pseudonyms are just fine. In fact, some Google execs have pointed out that they use pseudonyms themselves, and have no problem with others doing so.

    25. Re:Google is now officially mature company by ajs · · Score: 1

      Microsoft used to get mocked for its constant stream of pointless experiments and go-nowhere products. It seems to be what companies do when they're too big and don't know what to focus on.

      I thought we mocked Microsoft for the crap it pumped out that didn't make any sense and wasn't creative in the least, like Bob. I never mocked most of the cool things that came out of Microsoft Research.

  2. Translation: by Hartree · · Score: 1

    "It will also mean we can devote more resources to high impact productsâ"the ones that might improve the bottom lines of division VPs and thousands of large portfolio google shareholders."

    There. Fixed that for you.

    1. Re:Translation: by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      Why do I get the impression you say that like it is a bad thing? The purpose of a public equity corporation is to provide a return to the investors first and foremost, lest the shareholders select a better use of their resources. Hint, your retirement is likely tied to corporate performance. If you object to that notion you could try only doing business with non-profits and co-ops but I doubt you will have much luck. Capitalism is sometimes messy but it delivers better than any other system so far devised. It eliminates want and poverty far better than any government program has even aspired to, far better than the not for profit sector and beats the crap out of the other *isms.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    2. Re:Translation: by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1

      I loved this line of specious PR bullshit:

      "Due to the rapidly decreasing demand for downloadable software in favor of web apps, we will discontinue Google Pack today."

      "Rapidly decreasing demand"! What utter nonsense.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
  3. never bet on one horse by e**(i+pi)-1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Shutdown like this remind that it is never good to rely on one service or company. From all the services closed, I liked Google desktop quite a bit on my linux box a couple of years ago. It could slow down the machine too much at some points and it had also not been clear to me how much and I fell back to rely on good old unix tools or beagle.

    1. Re:never bet on one horse by Andtalath · · Score: 1

      One word.
      Gnome-do.

  4. "Software as a Service" fails yet again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    These are 10 more prime examples of the "Software as a Service" concept failing us yet again.

    It makes no sense for any individual or company to use such "services". It's just too damn risky. The only safe and sensible approach is to insist on real software that you can run on your own systems.

    I have clients who still run software originally developed for DOS, back in the 1980s. Even if they don't have the source code, they can run it just fine on much newer hardware, and they don't have to worry about some other company going under or canceling the product and it then being unavailable to them.

    While it's relatively frequent to see normal software being used for decades after it was initially written, it's extremely rare to see any sort of "Software as a Service" lasting even more than a couple of years.

    1. Re:"Software as a Service" fails yet again. by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

      "They couldn't legally treat software as something that could not be resold to another, thus the move to SAAS. "

      That's the theory, but who's going to trust SAAS if the apps are likely to get killed a few years down the road?

      At least with software on your desktop, you can find ways to keep using it even if the vendor stops developing it.

      In order for people to trust their data to SAAS and apps in "the cloud", the apps have to stick around for a *long* time.

      Google should be spending the money to keep these things going, even if it's just a shoestring maintenance budget. Instead, they're driving home to potential SAAS customers just how little control they have over cloud apps.

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
  5. Re:Oh fuck off. by foniksonik · · Score: 1

    3rd party solutions are nice stopgaps for those who can roll their own. It helps prove out the use case without the high investment in R&D and support.

    --
    A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  6. Google Chrome Machine Install? by jeffasselin · · Score: 1

    Google Pack is the only way I know of to install Google Chrome on a computer for every user, instead of only in the local user space. With its discontinuation, this will cause even more problems for installing Chrome in a corporate environment. Anyone knows another method?

    --
    If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
    1. Re:Google Chrome Machine Install? by brianez21 · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you need to set up Chrome in a corporate environment, then you can use the .MSI installer for Chrome ("Chrome for Business"), which is available to download here.

      --
      kernel: lp0 on fire
    2. Re:Google Chrome Machine Install? by odirex · · Score: 1

      Ninite might be what you need. For scripting and corporate use, it isn't free but is pretty cheap.

    3. Re:Google Chrome Machine Install? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      That's a nice link, thanks a lot. Does this also disable Chrome's auto-update?

    4. Re:Google Chrome Machine Install? by jeffasselin · · Score: 1

      Thank you very much, this is exactly what I was looking for.

      --
      If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
  7. WOW by Jello+B. · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Holy shit they're shutting down products I've never heard of and nobody uses. That's fuckin evil.

    1. Re:WOW by esocid · · Score: 1

      fastflip was very useful to me. Problem with some of their small projects is that they never publicize them, then wonder why no one's heard of it, or uses it.

      --
      Absolute power corrupts absolutely. indymedia
    2. Re:WOW by jrr · · Score: 1

      Holy shit they're shutting down products I've never heard of and nobody uses. That's fuckin evil.

      Hey does /. have a +1 for comments?

    3. Re:WOW by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised that you haven't heard of Google Desktop. Back in XP days, it was the way to index all your local documents (since XP's built-in search was very crappy). I've certainly seen a lot of people use that, even if I didn't do so myself.

  8. Awww by phayes · · Score: 1

    Too bad about fast flip, I found a number of interesting stories that I would never have seen otherwise.

    --
    Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    1. Re:Awww by johnny+cashed · · Score: 2

      I won't miss it. I hated the way it interfaced. I'd see something interesting on the google news page within fast flip. I'd click on the article in fast flip to read it. Instead, it opened up into fast flip. I then had to click on the article a second time to read it. Annoying. Granted, maybe if you used fast flip to browse through news, one might like it. I was annoyed at the way it functioned from the google news page, enough so that I removed the whole sidebar. There were other problems I had with the sidebar so it wasn't the only reason for the removal, but fast flip wasn't missed by this user.

    2. Re:Awww by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Too bad about fast flip, I found a number of interesting stories that I would never have seen otherwise.

      Same here - I wonder how it chose which stories to show. I didn't like its interface, and being in Flash was just unnecessary, but an HTML5 equivalent would be handy.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:Awww by jcombel · · Score: 1

      fastflip wasn't in flash.

      anyway, i'll also miss fastflip.

    4. Re:Awww by phayes · · Score: 1

      Clicking on a fastflip opening FF in full page annoyed me too at first. I then discovered that the left/right keys flipped subjects quickly in FP mode. My habit was to read through the main Google news page opening interesting pages in new tabs, then open FF full page, scan quickly through the pages opening the interesting stuff in new tabs again.

      Using it this way I discovered a lot of news that never made the front page without having to open all the section/topic pages to scan them too. With the loss of FF I'll miss out on these subjects as opening & scanning each section/topic page takes too long.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
  9. Re:Oh fuck off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Then who do you rely on? Who provides your cell phone service? Internet Service Provider? Electricity? I'm guessing there are a fair number of coporations listed in the answers to those questions. You will have to rely on corporations for any service that connects you to a larger community. Even if you go off the electrical grid as I have done in the past, you still need batteries, inverters, panels, back up generators, diesel fuel. You have to get those form someone.

  10. Aardvark huh? by netsharc · · Score: 1

    Ouch, I used that service when it was still independent, although I mostly got "I'm too stupid to Google, can you answer this question for me?" kind of questions (for those who don't know Aardvark). So they let Google buy them, and then shut them? That must suck. Or don't the founders care, since they just cashed out?

    --
    What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    1. Re:Aardvark huh? by Konsalik · · Score: 1

      I liked Aardvark, sure there were the "let me Google that for you" questions but all in all it was quite interesting. Unfortunately, within 3 months of Google buying them, nothing was going on, the admins disappeared and nothing new was happening. Looks like Google bought them, stripped the tech they wanted and left it to rot.

  11. Re:Oh fuck off. by ccguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All i can say is it is good that i didnt rely on any of those services. This tells me not to rely on google for any services.

    Well, I guess it's google who would tell you to fuck off them. They offer a number of services, some of them are here to stay, and other are experiments (not necessarily tech experiments, they can be business experiments, too) and if they don't go well, they go off the market - same as every other product.
    Anyway, feel free to ask google for a full refund on whatever you spent on those services.

  12. Not surprising by mkraft · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Pretty much all of those services haven't been updated in ages or aren't even used. For example I used to use Google Desktop, but uninstalled it about 2 years ago because it was buggy, performance hogging and slowed down my machine.

  13. Re:Oh fuck off. by ccguy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Damn right. Single vendor lockin is never a good idea if avoidable.

    It IS avoidable. You can export all your Google stored stuff (pictures, emails, whatever). It's called Google take out.

    http://www.dataliberation.org/

    Of course most people are lazy and won't do it, then complain if something is lost.

  14. Time for everyone to ... by MacTO · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Give me a break.

    Google is a business. They are out to make money. The fact that they have to axe a few products that you probably aren't using (never mind paying for, since a few of those things were freebies) does not mean that they've decided to follow the path of evil. It just means that they have good business sense.

    1. Re:Time for everyone to ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I agree. Unfortunately, Google has also failed to deliver a cohesive roadmap. The Peoples Front for Data Liberation is fairly limited in its tool set. The lesson here is that you should not build sandcastles on Google's beaches.

    2. Re:Time for everyone to ... by Walter+Carver · · Score: 1

      Google is a business. They are out to make money.

      Okey, then we can find another darling.

  15. not to rely on google for any services by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    so you intend on writing all your own stuff then? Since all companies will ditch underperforming offerings, that means you cant use ANY product..

    The lesson is to use paid services, and always have an exit strategy. or just suck it up and expect things to change.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  16. Shutting down Desktop makes a lot of sense. by MrCrassic · · Score: 1

    It was, pretty much, a dead product after Windows 7 came out. Native searching in operating systems are much better now; it doesn't make any sense to have an auxiliary product that isn't as well integrated doing, essentially, the same thing.

    As for the others on the chopping block; did they ever have that many users?

    1. Re:Shutting down Desktop makes a lot of sense. by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      Google Desktop was nice in the way it integrated all of your stuff into their main google search. Being able to look at relevant info from your email, network share and the Internet in one frame was quite helpful when trying to troubleshoot things, find a product manual, etc... Every so often the information I wanted turned out to be on the internal network, and much time (and bandwidth) was saved.

    2. Re:Shutting down Desktop makes a lot of sense. by Spril · · Score: 1

      It was, pretty much, a dead product after Windows 7 came out. Native searching in operating systems are much better now

      You're joking, right? The Windows 7 search functionality forces you to learn an arcane query language, is incredibly limited in functionality, ignores contents of non-Microsoft file formats like PDF, and regularly misses obvious results. Finally, its preview pane locks the file--so in the typical use case of searching for a file to edit, you CAN'T SAVE THE FILE until you close the search window.

      Microsoft seems to intentionally make file searching less functional and more arcane with every OS since Win 2000. The only thing they've done right was to get rid of that stupid cartoon dog.

  17. Shows what can happen in the cloud by MpVpRb · · Score: 1

    If you have a local app, you can run it pretty much forever. It might not get updated, and you might need to run it on old hardware/OS, but you will almost always have access to it.

    In the cloud, things can appear, disappear and change.

    If you depend on a program, or the specific behavior of a particular version, you lose.

  18. Re:Oh fuck off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's the corporations, man! They're, like, out to screw the consumer! Boycott the corporations!

    *I don't get the irony of wearing a Che Guevara shirt bought from the gap*

    -Sent from my iPad, from inside a Starbucks.

  19. What next? by Animats · · Score: 3, Informative

    One wonders what Google will kill next. Likely targets are products which lose money, don't provide opportunities for ad insertion, and don't collect monetizable information about users. Take a look at Google's list of products (which, amusingly, doesn't contain "G+"). Google Docs and Spreadsheets, Picnik (Google's photo editor), Google Voice, Google Talk, and SketchUp may be next.

    Google Health has already been killed. Google has stopped digitizing old newspapers. Knol (Google's answer to Wikipedia) was never very successful. Those are likely targets, too.

    Google is no longer worried about Microsoft, which has failed to compete successfully in online services. Google is worried about Facebook and Apple. So all those Google products which targeted Microsoft's business model, but lost money, can be dumped.

    1. Re:What next? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Picnic will probably go - hasn't gained a whole lot of traction. Sketch will probably stay, if for no other reason than the pro edition has some following among folks who don't need to go whole hog and invest in Autocad (god rot their evil souls, but I digress). The file format is becoming a defacto standard. It's well integrated into Google Earth and Maps and allows them to crowdsource value into both of those products.

      The rest I've never used. I am annoyed that Google Powermeter left - that was a neat product albeit with likely no hope of becoming big enough to matter. Google Health was just an ill advised attempt to chase Microsoft's ill advised attempt to do something in the healthcare arena. Not many people want to key in their medical data. Those that do have already figured out that word processors are useful tools. Dumping raw healthcare provider data into a consumer product was bound to fail - it's way too messy and if you figured out how to do it you would spin the program off and sell it for a small fortune to the health care industry itself.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:What next? by PhrstBrn · · Score: 1

      Google Voice charges for calls outside the US. They could easily monetize Google Voice (cheap cellphone calls over WiFi), especially if they can offer more competitive rates than your cell phone provider. They could make a "Google Phone" which is a cheap IP phone for your home, powered by Google Voice and go after the IP phone market.

      Google Voice has a use for their Google Apps users, and I don't think they're going to piss off their current (paying) userbase. Google Talk is all integrated with the Google Voice, so I don't see that going anywhere. The two products have a lot of overlap. Removing Google Docs/Spreadsheets would also further piss off their Google Apps users. Those products are making money, people pay for Google Apps not for just mail, but because they offer a suite of productivity tools (GMail, GDocs, GChat, GVoice).

      I don't know anything about Picnik and SketchUp, so I can't comment there.

    3. Re:What next? by Roogna · · Score: 1

      Not sure how much money Google Voice makes, but I for one use it regularly to make international calls to family. It's got currently the cheapest prices for calling to the countries I call from any company I've seen, so I'm happy to pay the little I do for it. Granted, I could make the same calls for free if I could get those family members to turn on their computers... but they won't, so oh well.

    4. Re:What next? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Google Docs and Spreadsheets, Picnik (Google's photo editor), Google Voice, Google Talk, and SketchUp may be next.

      There's no way GTalk goes away. It's still the default chat app for all Android phones shipped in the last few years, among other things.

      Google Docs, I don't think so. It's plays a big part in Google's enterprise deployments - wherever a lot of users don't actually need the full power of MSOffice (which is surprisingly often), they use that to sell their Google Apps solution.

      Photo editor they'll likely discontinue as a separately named product, and integrate with G+. They still need something like that for people to easily tweak uploaded photos.

      Google Voice, I don't know. Now that GTalk has got voice & video chat on Android, its only point is to make cheap phone calls, kinda like Skype... except that there's Skype on Android now which does voice/video and phone calls. Not sure if Google is making anything from Voice, but if they do, I'd just merge it with Talk. It doesn't make any sense as a separate app. Either way, I do hope they don't get rid of it entirely, as I like its GMail'y voicemail inbox with speech recognition - though it would be double awesome if it integrated into GMail proper, like chats do.

    5. Re:What next? by pbhj · · Score: 1

      Followed that link, http://www.google.com/intl/en/about/products/, first thing listed after Google search is "Google Directory". So, like wow, they still have a directory?

      Nope, (paraphrasing) 'service closed use DMOZ'.

      They should employ someone to update some of their pages, also flatten this a little, there's plenty of whitespace there to use for a simple 'service closed' symbol.

  20. Re:Oh fuck off. by jmorris42 · · Score: 2

    Exactly right. If you are going to launch a lot of experimental products you have to be willing to put em down almost as fast when they don't succeed lest you get so many going you can't keep launching new ones and get stuck maintaining a bunch of losers forever out of fear that the few people who did like them will scream loudly on Internet fora. For years everyone made jokes about the beta label Google put on everything, well now ya know.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
  21. Re:Oh fuck off. by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

    Yep, and see how far you get getting information out of most of the other cloud based services. I work with someone who had to break down and pay extra for POP access to his email account so he could get his data out. Google makes getting your information out easy. They seem to take the approach that you'll _want_ to use their services.

  22. Re:Oh fuck off. by ByteSlicer · · Score: 1

    Too bad I still can't export my gTalk chat logs (no, it doesn't work with POP/IMAP).

  23. Huh, what? by Smivs · · Score: 1

    Well I've never heard of, or used, any of them, so.......So what!

  24. Talk about timing.... by lbbros · · Score: 1
    I recently set up a wiki on a server of mine to be used to take notes to replace Google Notebook because I was afraid it might shut down, and now I read this.

    Looks my hunch wasn't that wrong, after all.

    --
    A CC-licensed illustrated horror novel
  25. Google Maps Flash API? by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

    in my previous line of work, I was a Maps JS dev. I always wondered who was using the Flash API... I guess now that answer is "no one."

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  26. Re:Ninite Google Pack by jelle · · Score: 1

    That looks pretty helpful, almost like a synaptic for windows. Does it also get rid of the 'I have an update please do another cycle of clicks now' popups that so many windows applications have?

    --
    --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
  27. What about Linux??? by Pausanias · · Score: 1

    Ironically, Google Desktop is the only Desktop search that actually works in Linux (at least on GNOME)! Every thing else is either horribly broken, horribly slow, or lacks basic functionality. Sad to see this go.

  28. gap sells che t-shirts? how much? by decora · · Score: 1

    will they go on sale soon?

    1. Re:gap sells che t-shirts? how much? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      No, but there will be a Groupon offering shortly...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  29. Damn by vleck · · Score: 1

    They better not discontinue Google Voice and Apps (the free version)! Man I just ported my number and domain over. Sigh.

  30. Re:Oh fuck off. by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 1

    Create a filter to apply a label to all in:chats

    then export using IMAP

  31. Re:Oh fuck off. by ByteSlicer · · Score: 1

    Sigh. What did I just say? Unless something changed in the last two weeks or so, this doesn't work. Chat logs don't appear in IMAP folders, even when you label them.

  32. To: Google by AllenNg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So, I suppose all that talk about our notebooks being safe and always available and respecting the time and work we'd invested in their use was just a lie? This, combined with Chrome's increasingly "We're Google--we can do whatever we want" functionality, is edging me closer to abandoning Google completely. I, years ago, was initially hesitant to begin using Google's products. Really, the tipping point was that there weren't many alternatives to the services that Google was providing. THAT IS NO LONGER TRUE, GOOGLE! You would do well to remember that!

    1. Re:To: Google by icebraining · · Score: 1

      The notebooks are still available, you just have to use Google Docs' interface.

    2. Re:To: Google by Mex · · Score: 1

      "This, combined with Chrome's increasingly "We're Google--we can do whatever we want" functionality, is edging me closer to abandoning Google completely."

      Isn't it too late?

      Google is the de-facto search monopoly. If you don't exist in Google, you're irrelevant. Bing? Ha-ha.

      So what will you switch to, if you decide to abandon Google?

      Too late...

    3. Re:To: Google by Kuroji · · Score: 1

      Oh, that's easy. I'll just google a new search engine to use! Yes, this plan has no flaws...

  33. Re:Oh fuck off. by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 1

    ohk..

    Since you hadnt mentioned applying labels to them, or using the "move to inbox" function, I guessed you hadnt tried those

  34. Google pack :( by mystik · · Score: 2

    Google Pack: Due to the rapidly decreasing demand for downloadable software in favor of web apps, we will discontinue Google Pack today. People will still be able to access Googleâ(TM)s and our partnersâ(TM) software quickly and easily through direct links on the Google Pack website.

    Of all these services, this upsets me the most. No where was I able to find a nice installer/packge manager for windows that installed all these packages automatically w/o any cruft or addons, and kept it all up-to-date.

    Also, I seriously dispute their claim of "rapidly decreasing demand for downloadable software in favor of web apps". There are a whole host of benefits that downloadable software give, that web apps do not. (like, when the provider stops supporting the software, you still have access to it .....)

    --
    Why aren't you encrypting your e-mail?
    1. Re:Google pack :( by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      They're trying to make it happen by declaring to have already happened, of course. Sometimes this works ("the floppy is dead," ca. 1998) and sometimes it doesn't. I suspect (and hope!) that this time will fall into the "doesn't" category, but the truth is that if anyone's in a position to make it happen, Google is.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    2. Re:Google pack :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not sure if that answers all your demands but try http://ninite.com/

    3. Re:Google pack :( by odirex · · Score: 1

      Ninite will install everything without addons. If you want automatic updates, it'll cost you; but if you're willing to run it yourself manually once a week or month, it'll update everything just fine.

    4. Re:Google pack :( by jalefkowit · · Score: 1

      Google opened the source of their Windows package manager (under the Apache license) a while back, so presumably you could use it to roll your own Google Pack if you wanted to. No idea how much work that would require, though.

    5. Re:Google pack :( by master811 · · Score: 1

      Have you tried Ninite.com

      It's a pretty good replacement, if not better than Google Pack as it has a lot more apps, and full updates everything as well when you run it.

    6. Re:Google pack :( by mystik · · Score: 1

      I know that they OSSed it, but the value add is chasing all the current versions of software out there, and packaging them into silent installs.

      I was not aware of Ninite, but as numerous replies to this post point out, it looks like it's a pretty nice replacement, with many more options, including software that we frequently used in our system

      --
      Why aren't you encrypting your e-mail?
    7. Re:Google pack :( by Caetel · · Score: 2

      Ninite is a similar product with a wider range of software, although they charge $10 per year for their automatic updater.

    8. Re:Google pack :( by sinan_imam · · Score: 1
    9. Re:Google pack :( by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      Hmm, has anyone suggested you try ninite?

      Personally, I find that Steam carries just about all of the software I usually have to boot into Windows for.

  35. Re:Oh fuck off. by ByteSlicer · · Score: 1

    No problem. What you described actually worked for a while after they introduced IMAP. But for some unknown (technical?) reason they started filtering the chat logs.

    The only ways to export them now seems to be through Gears (which they don't support anymore), or using some kind of scrubber script (which will guaranteed block your account if you download too much).

  36. Maps API for Flash by petsounds · · Score: 1

    This is still a widely-used API by Flash developers, and developers have been trying to get google to add Street View support to the Flash API for a couple years (ironic since google first implemented Street View using Flash) and they always refused. Now I understand why. Unfortunately the things you can do with Maps in Javascript is pretty limited compared to Flash (integration with multimedia content, for example), so I suspect many will seek out competitors. I'm honestly a bit shocked...how many developers does it take to keep the Flash API in parity? Not enough to even register as a blip on their financials. This is a political decision.

    *preparing to get anti-Flash replies from the javascript zealots any second now...*

    1. Re:Maps API for Flash by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Not a JS zealot, although I've grown to strongly dislike Flash. But what exactly is lacking in the JS Maps? Multimedia integration? You can put whatever you want - including HTML5 or Flash videos - in a marker's info popup; I don't see what other integration would one want.

    2. Re:Maps API for Flash by petsounds · · Score: 1

      Sure, you can put custom markers in the JS Maps. But popups that animate in sophisticated ways? Not so much. How about changing the perspective of the map, or customizing the yaw/pitch/roll of the camera to create fly-throughs? Nope, can't do that with the JS API at all. How about mapping the tiles onto a spherical 3D model a la Google Earth, or integrating a google map with a 3D environment to..for example provide altitude display? Can't really do that in JS yet.

      So...you see, there's many ways Flash can interact with a Google Map that just isn't possible in JS yet. But google wants to take its toys and go home.

  37. Re:Oh fuck off. by icebraining · · Score: 1

    It's important to note that at least for Google Notebook, they gave two years between stop accepting new accounts and actual shut down.

    I'd love to have two years of warning for any of the paid services I subscribe to, let alone free ones.

  38. Google desktop search was/is much better by NZheretic · · Score: 1

    Google desktop widgets were an annoyance but the desktop search works very well in a small business environment where the files are stored on NAS or SAMBA servers.

    I really hope that Google could produce a Chrome Local Search Plugin that replicates the search functionality that was in Google Desktop.

    It would be a killer app if Google was also to include two way file merge functionality ( unison or two way rsync ) with removable media, remoter servers, other desktop computers and Google doc accounts

  39. I want them to go back to search. by drunkennewfiemidget · · Score: 2

    Their search results are progressively more useless with every passing day. How about they work on the product that got them big in the first place?

    Also, when I read the list of programs that are being cancelled, I went, "never heard of it" to all of them.

  40. Aww, man!!! by sootman · · Score: 1

    I love fast flip. :-(

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  41. The death of Google by Snaller · · Score: 1

    No longer a place for invention and creativity - now its just about the money. And that spells lack of creativity, and eventually death when you run out of money to buy other companies for.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  42. What I'm really gonna miss... by ClemensW · · Score: 1

    is Google notebook. I still use it every other day and even patched the .xpi to install on newer versions of Firefox. Can anyone recommend a good replacement?

    1. Re:What I'm really gonna miss... by Saganaga · · Score: 1

      I recommend Evernote

  43. Re:Oh fuck off. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    I have just tried it, and it doesn't work. Labelled chat history entries do show up in the label folder in GMail, but if you check that same folder via IMAP, it's empty.

  44. Re:Oh fuck off. by mike4ty4 · · Score: 1

    However, in those cases you can switch to another provider and get essentially the same thing. Not so with software, which is much more variable. I rather would want to be able to _keep_ the software I like as long as I like. Perhaps the person you're responding to sees this in a similar way.

  45. thats awesome.. i'm thinking of opening up a store by decora · · Score: 1

    where i sell che-t-shirts, on ebay. they would be made in china, you can get super cheap labor there... also no fucking unions!

  46. IMO: Google does this too often by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    I rarely feel confident about using any google service, because google axes their new services so frequently.

    I wish google would put more thought into what is worth their while to create. And, once google decides to create something, I wish they would put their full effort into it. and really try to that project a success. Instead, google seem to just throw projects out onto the web, willy-nilly.

  47. Re:Goodbye, Google Desktop Search, we will miss yo by cheeks5965 · · Score: 1

    check out Xobni (probably xobni.com?) it's an outlook plugin that has full text search across all inboxes, threading, etc. etc. i've been using it for a year now.

    --
    -- Flame me and I will happily flame you back. Bring it!
  48. Ninite.com by techvet · · Score: 1

    Just to pile on: ninite.com.