Slashdot Mirror


Lucasfilm Unveils "Sandcrawler" Singapore Office

An anonymous reader writes "The massive, slow moving Sandcrawlers from George Lucas' Star Wars films inspired the form of Lucasfilm's new regional headquarters in Singapore. Designed by Aedas, the Sandcrawler Building will house a 100 seat theater, Lucasfilm Singapore offices, a public podium and other employee spaces. Neither rusty nor slow moving in this case, the glassy and streamlined building will combine a high performance facade with lush gardens and foliage that spills over terraces, resulting in a highly efficient commercial space. With construction already underway, we can look forward to this real life Star Wars manifestation sometime in 2012."

159 comments

  1. Asia by ge7 · · Score: 0

    Asia is in general much nicer looking than western world. They put a lot of thought on how things look, even to the finest detail, and have done so for centuries. This is visible in the old temples and buildings, but also in modern view - like Marina Bay Sands in Singapore. As someone who likes to travel and live there I can say it's much nicer than being around the concrete blocks western world has. We have really let ourselves go and forget what's nice in life, and just have shit like wal-marts.

    1. Re:Asia by iluvcapra · · Score: 0

      I seem to recall that in Singapore the official penalty for chewing gum on the subway is a police-administered beating. Keeping things looking nice is easy when you can flog people with truncheons for messing it up.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    2. Re:Asia by ge7 · · Score: 0

      It's a fine, not beating. Gum is illegal according to laws anyway (and don't start about it. Their country, their laws).

    3. Re:Asia by vbraga · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity, why gum is illegal there?

      --
      English is not my first language. Corrections and suggestions are welcome.
    4. Re:Asia by Oxford_Comma_Lover · · Score: 2

      Comparing the most expensive hotel in the world to a local Walmart may tend to distort the "nicer looking" scale. =)

      --
      -- IANAL, this isn't legal advice, and definitely isn't legal advice for you. Also, Squee!
    5. Re:Asia by hedwards · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's not really true. Had you been around thousands of years ago to see what are now Greek ruins they would have been quite the sight. Unfortunately, due to whether and deterioration you don't get to see the bright colors that were original.

      The main difference is that the temples in SE Asia relied more upon detail carved into the rock than treatments applied to the building materials.

    6. Re:Asia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I guess you've never been to downtown Paris. Or Prague. Or Antwerp. Or Stockholm. Or lots of other places in Europe.

      Furthermore, "Asia" covers a lot of ground. Pick a random city in Vietnam or Pakistan or China and you'll find plenty of the usual hellish concrete boxes. Cherrypicking Singapore is a bit silly.

    7. Re:Asia by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Because it's a small country and they need to keep it clean. They don't administer canings for possession of gum though, but the penalty for sticking gum anywhere other than in a trash can is pretty harsh.

      I wish we could get a lot more strict about that here, because it's nasty coming across somebody's ABC gum because they were too lazy to throw it away.

    8. Re:Asia by Hartree · · Score: 2

      There's a whole wikipedia article on it.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chewing_gum_ban_in_Singapore

    9. Re:Asia by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Informative

      Meh. In Asia, but also in Europe, public spaces tend to look a lot better than in the USA, where they mostly look rather shabby. But moderns buildings in Asia are just as crap as in Europe and the USA, whereas in old buildings on all continents you will find attention to beauty and detail. I did not find buildings in Asia to be all that nicer.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    10. Re:Asia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds as if your comparing Kansas to Singapore, not exactly fair when most of south east Asia still lives in a hut.

      Yes they have nice buildings but New York tears down nicer things than they build. Have you looked at the new freedom tower being built? There was a nice Discovery special on it this weekend describing it, I can see it from my building now and it is beautiful, well thought out and unique, so trust me we're not behind.

      That said, yeah we tend to be a bit more practical and less thoughtful with most of our building, which I happen to find more beautiful and natural in many ways.
       

    11. Re:Asia by PNutts · · Score: 1

      Comparing the most expensive hotel in the world to a local Walmart may tend to distort the "nicer looking" scale. =)

      Agreed. I couldn't afford a pair of socks from that hotel.

    12. Re:Asia by gl4ss · · Score: 0

      because this way the cops only have to keep gum with them if they want to randomly punish someone.

      why the fuck does lucasfilm need a singapore office though? and what kind of a creative person would want to live in singapore?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    13. Re:Asia by Flyerman · · Score: 0

      If chewing gum is outlawed, then only outlaws will chew gum.

    14. Re:Asia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why the fuck does lucasfilm need a singapore office though? and what kind of a creative person would want to live in singapore?

      if you can afford the plane ticket, fly here for a look. it'll be really obvious.

    15. Re:Asia by Forrest+Kyle · · Score: 1

      Probably a creative person who is a native of Singapore?

    16. Re:Asia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The should have built this in the desert.

    17. Re:Asia by MightyMartian · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia gum chews you!

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    18. Re:Asia by icebike · · Score: 1

      Asia is in general much nicer looking than western world. They put a lot of thought on how things look, even to the finest detail, and have done so for centuries.

      Actually, the reason they look nice is because they are simply NEW. The west is is still using 100 year old infrastructure. But a much larger percentage of some Asian cities are the result of rapid growth, with most of the large buildings being built post 1960s.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    19. Re:Asia by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      dont like it, then dont go there

      why are you getting all up in arms about something that doesnt effect you? and if it does effect you why are you pissing and moaning here, get off your ass and do something about it

    20. Re:Asia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Asia nice looking? That hasn't been my experience. The only nice looking areas of Asia seemed to be due to European influence.
      Come to think of it, the dirties areas of western cities tend to be the asian areas. Maybe I've developed a bias:

        In China I got an idea how old a building was by the amount of grime it had collected. At night these same buildings had amazing light shows... a residential apartment tower with computer coordinated light bars on the balconies.. looked amazing... until the sun came up.

      In Calgary, Alberta, a super clean city by any standard, you walk by the large asian T&T grocery store on 16thNE and they've let the bird crap pile up along the main entrance! They'll eventually get fined... but really... are the health inspectors the only one's concerned about this? Go to _your_ local asian-run restaurant and look around.

      Malaysia was dirty too... and it took them 3 months to repair an incredibly dangerous broken drain cover across the street from "Times Square" - their fanciest shopping complex roller-coaster and all. I put a frick'n dead tree in the hole to warn others.

      Thailand - they know how to do it right... brightly painted and overall clean place!

      Indonesia... other than the brightly painted taxi's you don't get a clean place with any pride until you get west to Yogyakarta.

      then of course there's India. Look down for the garbage dump. If you want clean your only option is Gandhi's neighborhood or the Taj Mahal.

      There was the Buddhist Monk throwing the chip bag out the bus window in the middle of nowhere in Laos. Of course... they used to use leaves to wrap food in and haven't quite adapted yet.

      I have to admit though that Singapore is very clean in general. After all I've seen though I'm sorry, I have to attribute that more to the British influence, and the super-strict laws to keep the population from messing it up.

      Don't get me wrong... these are all amazing places in one way or another.. some just don't have cleanliness as a priority.
      Also, it's much different when you consider personal spaces.

    21. Re:Asia by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      Clearly you haven't traveled much in the West.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    22. Re:Asia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " (and don't start about it. Their country, their laws)"

      Fuck you and fuck this sentiment.

      Believe it or not, many people are perfectly willing, even happy, to give up certain 'personal freedoms' in exchange for security (or the illusion thereof), peace of mind, harmony (or the appearance thereof), or a number of other social benefits. You can't sit outside the culture and judge them according to your own norms: their country, their laws. Neither you nor the United States gets to define right and wrong across the planet. Hell, even within the US, you can't agree on right and wrong - all the different states have their own laws, cities have their own laws.

      That's what "sovereign" means: to be an independent authority. You don't get to invade countries just because you don't like their internal policies. You don't get to assassinate dictators just because they're assholes. Regardless of how many times the US and other Imperial Powers have done so in the past. Countries in which you don't live are not backwards children in need of babysitting.

    23. Re:Asia by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 0

      I was thinking exactly the same thing. The hundred seat theatre is probably sized for the number of people who still think a Lucas film is worth watching after the last batch of star wars consumer rip off movies he made. Pure drek.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    24. Re:Asia by Sulphur · · Score: 0

      If chewing gum is outlawed, then only outlaws will chew gum.

      If gums are outlawed, then only outlaws will have gums.

      FTFY

    25. Re:Asia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (and don't start about it. Their country, their laws).

      Well, if there were more upstanding people like you, South Africa would still be the shining diamond (pun intended) of the continent. ...and to use a ge7: (and don't anyone suddenly start whining that you "can't compare" the two situations - one should have put a more nuanced/qualified statement in the first place).

    26. Re:Asia by lennier · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall that in Singapore the official penalty for chewing gum on the subway is a police-administered beating. Keeping things looking nice is easy when you can flog people with truncheons for messing it up.

      What's the penalty for bleeding on the sidewalk? Two beatings?

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    27. Re:Asia by lennier · · Score: 1

      If chewing gum is outlawed, then only outlaws will chew gum.

      Well, at least they won't be able to walk at the same time.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    28. Re:Asia by okooolo · · Score: 1

      well seems to me in Singapure they give up some personal freedoms and get clean streets. In US they give up some personal freedoms and get... (definitely not clean streets)

    29. Re:Asia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Neither you nor the United States gets to define right and wrong across the planet."

      We absolutely do. I'm sick of this morals are relative nonsense. There are absolute rights and absolute wrongs in this world. For example it is wrong to kill an unarmed and innocent man, woman or child and no sovereign authority on this Earth will change that. No religion can say otherwise. It is wrong. Perhaps we can afford a little leeway to gum, but don't you dare say that we can't judge other countries or groups for their internal policies. We can and in some instances (ex: Somalia), we should.

    30. Re:Asia by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 1

      It's a fine, not beating. Gum is illegal according to laws anyway (and don't start about it. Their country, their laws).

      Gee, I thought gun-control laws were contentious enough... now gum-control laws?

      --
      "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."
    31. Re:Asia by mikael · · Score: 1

      Singapore is basically a city state. They are an island on the end of the Malaysian peninsula. Due to the high costs of living, a lot of the population commutes in and out from Malaysia. Imagine somewhere like Manhattan existing as it's own internationally recognized country.

      From experience after World War II, the Singaporeans know that things can do downhill fast if they don't keep a tight grip on living standards - last time they let them slip, the place became a den for drugs and crime. They only recovered by allowing the army to take over law and order. As a result, they have all these rules, regulations and punishments.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    32. Re:Asia by creat3d · · Score: 1

      But it would have nothing to do with Lucasfilm or their new office.

      Yet, somehow, there's no fine for discussing whatever the hell we want.

      --
      Grammar nazis are to this community what excrements are to gold.
    33. Re:Asia by outsider007 · · Score: 1

      If you don't like it, start your own country and make chopsticks illegal.

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    34. Re:Asia by outsider007 · · Score: 1

      Singapore is a corporate tax haven and has the least corrupt government on earth.

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    35. Re:Asia by X.25 · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall that in Singapore the official penalty for chewing gum on the subway is a police-administered beating. Keeping things looking nice is easy when you can flog people with truncheons for messing it up.

      Yes. And if they didn't have the law for chewing gums on the subway (and penalty is not the beating, of course), Singapore would look like Dhaka. Right?

      Maybe you should get a passport and get out of whatever shithole you live in. There is a whole world out there, and it's not working according to your misconceptions...

    36. Re:Asia by tragedy · · Score: 1

      If killing an "unarmed and innocent man, woman or child" is an absolute wrong, I'm curious how you feel about any military operation that may have civilian casualties. If it's truly an "absolute wrong", then there is no justification in taking any action that will lead to it happening. So, how do you feel about, for example, the war in Iraq?

    37. Re:Asia by endymion.nz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Singapore is a beautiful place, I went there earlier in the year and my basis for comparison is New Zealand. They aren't really a 'democracy' but the country runs like clockwork and puts the West to shame.

      --
      mediocrity rules, man
    38. Re:Asia by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Last time I was working in Singapore I went out for the evening and without thinking bought a doughnut to eat on the train going home. Bad idea. Two police officers with automatic weapons approached me on the train station platform and told me in no uncertain terms to put the doughnut away. I did as I was told.

      I like to compare Singapore with Penang. Both are Malayian islands with a lot of industry. In Penang pretty much anything goes which might be good for business but there is little public transport and hardly any footpaths so most people get around by bike or car. I like many places in Malaysia but I can't stand Penang. Singapore is boring but have to say that it is the place to look for a job.

    39. Re:Asia by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      because this way the cops only have to keep gum with them if they want to randomly punish someone.

      Um no. If the Singapore cops wanted to randomly punish someone (and from experience I don't believe they do) then they would just fucking do it. No mucking around with entrapment. The real, direct deal. Its kind of the way business is done there. One day at work a co-worker interviewed an engineer. He was hoping the guy would leave his current job and start with us in the same week.

    40. Re:Asia by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia gum chews you!

      Quite true.

    41. Re:Asia by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Malaysia was dirty too... and it took them 3 months to repair an incredibly dangerous broken drain cover across the street from "Times Square" - their fanciest shopping complex roller-coaster and all. I put a frick'n dead tree in the hole to warn others.

      Three months? Thats bloody fast for Malaysia. I could believe thirty years.

    42. Re:Asia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those two statements just don't seem to go together at all.

    43. Re:Asia by nobodie · · Score: 1

      I have to agree, the absolute worst, however, is when money is poured into "renovation" which involves using modern workers (painters, carpenters, other tradespeople) and modern materials (particle board, mdf, paint and plywood, and especially concrete/ mortar). the results are garish, heinous and shocking. Modern renovations of Chinese temples are a travesty.

      A close friend, a Chinese Taoist abbot, has taken the temple where he lives and done very little to it. He works on it himself, in his free time, with almost nothing in funds he uses what was used originally, local materials. The result is organic, original and a true presentation of what a working temple was and should be today. It is really lovely and almost empty of visitors, which was one of his goals. It is a temple after all, not a tourist attraction.

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
    44. Re:Asia by GameboyRMH · · Score: 0

      The punishment is a massive fine IIRC.

      Still, I consider it a shithole on par with North Korea due to its laws and political system (do they still have a "benevolent dictator?" That's fine for open source projects but not for countries that I can't fork my way out of), even if it looks like a nice place. I have a relative who works at LucasArts and I don't know how he lived there for so many years, I'd have a perpetual case of the creeps.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    45. Re:Asia by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      They get a few very rich and powerful people.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    46. Re:Asia by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      What's the old joke about trains running on time again?

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    47. Re:Asia by endymion.nz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's a joke about New York.

      --
      mediocrity rules, man
  2. Looks like a toaster by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    Or some random chome chunk form a 1950's buick

    either way, grats just what the world needs, another monstrosity of an ugly building

    1. Re:Looks like a toaster by newcastlejon · · Score: 2

      You want to see a monstrosity? There aren't any near me, but this comes pretty close.

      We call it the slug.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    2. Re:Looks like a toaster by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      gah! Its like a disco ball laid out a turd

    3. Re:Looks like a toaster by Hartree · · Score: 1

      If you're a tomato plant, be afraid. Be very afraid.

      (And carry an oversize salt shaker.)

    4. Re:Looks like a toaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mechamothra!

      Mechamothra was in a Godzilla script but never made it to the screen, BTW.

    5. Re:Looks like a toaster by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Or some random chome chunk form a 1950's buick

      You're thinking of a taillight surround, maybe this one?

      http://www.motorbase.com/uploads/pictures.ubh/2007/03/15/fs_1954_Buick_Skylark_taillight__ruggles_.jpg

      There's another '50s car that has almost an exact match, can't find it now though...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    6. Re:Looks like a toaster by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      I was just going to say it looks like a shiny chrome mould of the inside of a rectum.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  3. Very lovely, but for me it misses the point by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

    The sand crawler we all know so well was dirty, weather-worn and perhaps extemporised. In the circumstances methinks they should have gone with a shiny Naboo-inspired design.

    --
    If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    1. Re:Very lovely, but for me it misses the point by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      it also wasn't curved

    2. Re:Very lovely, but for me it misses the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sand crawler we all know so well was dirty, weather-worn and perhaps extemporised.

      That was sooo 1977. I guess you haven't seen the enhancements in the new Blu-Ray version.

    3. Re:Very lovely, but for me it misses the point by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      I guess you haven't seen the enhancements in the new Blu-Ray version.

      Your point? If anything it would have been worse, being able to see every pock mark, burn and blemish in glorious (TM) high-definition.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    4. Re:Very lovely, but for me it misses the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You talking about Mark Hamill's face or the Sand Crawler?

    5. Re:Very lovely, but for me it misses the point by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      You talking about Mark Hamill's face or the Sand Crawler?

      Yes.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    6. Re:Very lovely, but for me it misses the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chirrp-clickety-whirr-whirr-bonk

      (Note - that was originally posted as "whoosh" before GL got his hands on it.)

  4. hahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL I hate netfirms.

  5. Re:what the flook ? by Osgeld · · Score: 2

    it says right there in the article, he needs a theater for his ego, its not as strong in the east

  6. How Appropriate... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If memory serves, the sandcrawlers were the mobile headquarters for the Jawas, a smelly little species known for their skill in picking over and/or stealing the detritus of more advanced civilizations, bodging it up just enough to get it moving off the sales lot under its own power, and then skipping town.

    This seems like an eminently appropriate architectural allusion for the 'late-Lucas' period of Lucasfilms' work...

    1. Re:How Appropriate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Phew, okay, thought you were gonna somewhere else entirely with that one...

    2. Re:How Appropriate... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Something that has long bothered me about the Jawas was the idea that Tatooine was littered with serviceable escaped droids just waiting to be picked up and resold. It really is a stupid idea. Wouldn't it have made more sense for the the droids to have crashed the escape pod into Uncle Owen's back yard?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:How Appropriate... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If I remember correctly, the rationalization(most likely a retcon) was that Tatooine was originally a much more ambitious mining colony that, for some sort of convenient plot-related reasons, failed to pan out. The investors said "fuck it" and abandoned all the equipment not worth pulling back out of the gravity well, along with the assorted scum and yokels who were hanging around to either take advantage of the distant location or scratch out a feeble living. That was supposed to explain how they had sandcrawlers in the first place, those being rather above their tech level, and how a lifestyle based on nomadic scrounging and tinkering could possibly make sense...

    4. Re:How Appropriate... by EdIII · · Score: 2

      You guys are cracking me up... lol. Seriously....

      George Lucas wrote the movie and filmed it in the 70's. Rational explanations? How about how much drugs were done in the 70's? Trust me, there was some rationalization about a lot of things in the movie, but the kind you only understand when you are really really fucked up.

      I heard the guy that played Chewbacca was stoned half the time during the film. It's the only way he could pull off those sounds.

    5. Re:How Appropriate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It took me until the end of your comment, to realize that we are not talking about Microsoft. ^^

    6. Re:How Appropriate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't quite get your point... are you saying that Tatooine has significant reserves of something akin to Spice, like planet Arrakis? Besides, what is a drug to a human wouldn't necessarily affect a Wookiee in the same way, they have a different biochemistry.

    7. Re:How Appropriate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard the guy that played Chewbacca was stoned half the time during the film. It's the only way he could pull off those sounds.

      If you think Chewbacca's voice in the movie is the sound of a human actor maybe you are the one who's on drugs. And no whooosh please, it's not a joke if it's not clever or funny.

  7. Special edition? by Baloroth · · Score: 1

    So, how long till a special edition Star Wars re-release has sandcrawlers that look like that?

    --
    "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    1. Re:Special edition? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      maybe that's why they're locating that office in singapore.

      you know, if bart & lisa try to go to smack some sense to the guys there, they'll get death.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  8. Sweet building! by RobinEggs · · Score: 1

    I just hope they return to making movies that look half as good as the building.

    Although, what I really mean is writing and acting half as good as the building looks. But that wouldn't have been as smooth an opening line.

    1. Re:Sweet building! by hedwards · · Score: 1

      That would be Episode II.

  9. Not the first sandcrawler corporate HQ. by davebooth · · Score: 3, Funny

    Exercise a little google-fu and check out the Best Buy corporate HQ near the Minneapolis/St Paul airport... When they built that it seemed so appropriate and in line with their corporate attitude that they'd be headquartered in a bunch of sandcrawlers. We try to avoid buying from them but if we're running out of options, somebody in the family will always say "well, in the last resort we could go look what the Jawas have got... "

    --
    I had a .sig once. It got boring.
  10. Non Entity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess Lucas would rather spend the money on the building that on better writers or a series of lawyers that prevent him from killing his own creations. Oh well. It's not my money. Lucas has ceased to be anything. Enjoy the building.

    If it was Peter Jackson putting up a building... I can understand. But not Lucas.

  11. Re:Not the first sandcrawler corporate HQ. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    Thank you. I'll be stealing that.

  12. Re:Why are there so many sour grapes in the commen by Alter_3d · · Score: 1

    While I agree with most of your post, IMHO what really bothers most Star Wars fans is not the prequels, but the crap he pulled with the release of the "Special Edition" and the DVDs. He took great movies and filled them with CGI nonsense. Come on. An extended dance sequence in Episode VI with a freaking toad stripper? WTF Lucas??

  13. Re:Not the first sandcrawler corporate HQ. by Flyerman · · Score: 1

    hahaha! oh man, they really do look like a bunch of sandcrawlers.

  14. And these weld points by senorpoco · · Score: 1

    Too accurate for Chinese people, only imperial storm troopers are so precise.

    1. Re:And these weld points by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

      Well played.

      Except when you're watching/being shot at, then they can't hit the broad side of a barn.

    2. Re:And these weld points by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Well, in the first movie at least, they didn't actually want to hit anyone, because they were going to use the falcon to lead them to the rebel base. Vader probably hatched the plan the moment he sensed Obi Wan, so in a sense, the jedi religion did give him the clairvoyance to find the rebel base...

      They seemed to be pretty accurate mowing down rebels on Hoth in the second film, though.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  15. Re:Why are there so many sour grapes in the commen by mrsurb · · Score: 1

    If your wife cooks you an amazing steak and gives you an amazing blow job, appreciate that she did that. Don't hate her because she didn't give you steak and lobster and a threesome the night after that.

    No, but if the night after she promises to give you steak and lobster but instead serves you a turd sandwich, and the threesome is you and two big burly guys (and you're not into that) then you will complain.

  16. googling 'china pollution' by decora · · Score: 1

    i have to agree. their people, dying of cancer, take it so much more gracefully. they dont shout in the streets like those people in syria or tunisia. they just shut up and die, so admirable.

  17. Re:Why are there so many sour grapes in the commen by aekafan · · Score: 1

    I completely agree with this. The SW eps. 1-3 were clearly made for children. Unfortunately, all we have heard about them around here is the child-like whining of the Star Wars fanboy losers. They hit their target clearly, and Lucas is laughing all the way to the bank, because even the fanboy rage is still publicity for him

  18. Re:Why are there so many sour grapes in the commen by apt142 · · Score: 1

    The problem isn't that he didn't make another great movie.

    The problem is he took that great movie and manipulated it again and again.

    To use your analogy, he cooked us dinner and took us around the block. And now he's retelling us that same story night after night with new fabrications such as changing the steak to salmon and making us believe that we blew him instead.

    Living on past accomplishments is one thing. Dwelling on them and reminding us frequently how great it was that ONE time. Not so great.

  19. What retarded PR by sgage · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Neither rusty nor slow moving in this case, the glassy and streamlined building will combine a high performance facade with lush gardens and foliage that spills over terraces, resulting in a highly efficient commercial space. "

    WTF is a high performance facade?

    1. Re:What retarded PR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF is a high performance facade?

      I'm guessing the glass is insulated, high efficiency, low emission (especially with the mirroring), so there is little solar gain and lower cooling costs.

    2. Re:What retarded PR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too retarded to use Google to find out for yourself? Here, I'll spoon feed you:

      Building facades - external exposed surfaces, including windows - have a dramatic effect on the quality and performance of the internal space. Low performance facades degrade internal living quality (for example, by trapping heat, letting in noise); high performance facades avoid these problems, or better still, channel them as improvements. Your heat problem is now a solar power source. Your wind problem is now an air circulation system. These baffles move to optimise light levels as the seasons progress but also reduce noise.

      There, that was hard, wasn't it?

    3. Re:What retarded PR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF is a high performance facade?

      Ugh, slashdot's fallen far. This reply and children is akin to a tailor mocking Intel for saying 'thread-safe'.

      There's no insight in ignorance or not recognizing jargon.

    4. Re:What retarded PR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF is a high performance facade?

      A performance facade that is up high. I guess they forgot the hyphen.

    5. Re:What retarded PR by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

      A "high performance facade" is something that looks shiny and cool, but underneath is a pile of crap. You know, like a kit car that looks really cool but is really built on a VW beetle frame. Or a movie with lots of flash and SFX but no real substance.

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    6. Re:What retarded PR by Landshark17 · · Score: 1

      Yeah that sounds pretty dumb. But also weird: They're talking about lush gardens and foliage on a building that was inspired by something that existed on a dessert planet with no vegetation... Are they going for aesthetics, or is this the harbinger of a drastic ret-conning of Tatooine's landscape for the next media release? With Lucas, you can never be sure.

      --
      This sig is false.
  20. Re:Not the first sandcrawler corporate HQ. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The new library in Canada Water, London is a sandcrawler-like building - www.canadawater.org

  21. Larry Ellison by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Larry Ellison is following suit by making his headquarters shaped like the Death Star. Coincidentally, it's aimed at Google.

    1. Re:Larry Ellison by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

      AT&T has been using the Death Star as their logo since the 80's. Seems oddly appropriate.

  22. Of course... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    ...everyone has to walk single-file in and around the building...to hide their numbers.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Of course... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I don't want to know how newly hired staff are, um, inducted into the building.

  23. Another in Virginia by Nkwe · · Score: 1

    Right next to the Dulles airport in Virginia there is the CIT Building that has a similar look. Address is 2214 Rock Hill Road, Herndon, VA 20170.

    1. Re:Another in Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right next to the Dulles airport in Virginia there is the CIT Building that has a similar look. Address is 2214 Rock Hill Road, Herndon, VA 20170.

      No, that's the "upside down" building.

      Ask someone here how to get to the "sandcrawler building" and you'll probably get a blank stare. But EVERYONE knows what the "upside down" building is.

    2. Re:Another in Virginia by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Looks silly, but I bet the offices have killer views from those windows.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  24. 'Bird Shit Architecture' in Brasilia and Beyond by ipv6_128_lgwb · · Score: 3, Informative

    Great talk about this type of Architecture http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnq1SvmZUYU

    1. Re:'Bird Shit Architecture' in Brasilia and Beyond by wonderboss · · Score: 1

      Where are my mod points when I need them.

      Best reference ever on /.

      For an alternative way see "The Timeless Way of Building" by Christopher Alexander.

      --
      more cowbell
    2. Re:'Bird Shit Architecture' in Brasilia and Beyond by BaldingByMicrosoft · · Score: 1

      Ended up watching his entire presentation. Very thought-provoking. Thank you very much for the reference!

  25. Sandcrawler from unreleased StarWars by tokul · · Score: 1

    Sandcrawler was rusty box on tracks. Building is horseshoe shaped and sits on poles. If building looks like sandcrawler to journalist, he/she should stop smoking that stuff or pass it to others. Two or three ground floors missing. Public podium available 24/7 for bombing and you don't have to dig anything to put explosives under the building. Interesting design. I hope they don't have earthquakes or terrorists in Singapore.

    1. Re:Sandcrawler from unreleased StarWars by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that somebody at LA or the architecture firm told them that it's inspired by a sandcrawler. Or possibly the same person that confuses an iPad for a Galaxy Tab

  26. Re:Why are there so many sour grapes in the commen by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    "Living on past accomplishments is one thing. Dwelling on them and reminding us frequently how great it was that ONE time. Not so great."

    Yeah I agree. But that's what fanboys are doing to themselves, not what Lucas is doing to them.

    Appreciate what you get in life. Raising your standards to ridiculous heights and flogging a dead horse is the fanboy's problem, not Lucas's

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  27. It might be slow moving by theillien · · Score: 1

    If you consider the glass-as-slow-moving-fluid concept.

  28. Re:Why are there so many sour grapes in the commen by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    My kids were bored by them. They weren't made for kids. They were made for chumps... and seeing as I went to the theater and watched them and own them now, I guess I'm one of those chumps.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  29. Re:Why are there so many sour grapes in the commen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your wife cooks you an amazing steak and gives you an amazing blow job, appreciate that she did that. Don't hate her because she didn't give you steak and lobster and a threesome the night after that.

    If you and your wife aren't happy today, it really doesn't matter at all that you were happy together years ago. You should still get a divorce.

  30. only white people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently, Lucas' designers expect that only white people will inhabit this building in Singapore. Look at the slide show.

    1. Re:only white people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry about that, Jar Jar.

  31. Re:Not the first sandcrawler corporate HQ. by proverbialcow · · Score: 1

    I know exactly the buildings you're thinking of - just off 494/Penn in Richfield.

    Weirdly enough, I was thinking of another Twin Cities building that my friends had dubbed 'The Sandcrawler': McNamara Alumni Center at University of Minnesota.

    --
    The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
  32. Trite tripe by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    They're bullshit artists, they get turds polished up real nice. I guess PR are the Jawas of the corporate world.

  33. Re:Why are there so many sour grapes in the commen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The guy made a great movie."

    I love it when manchildren try to throw around the "fanboi" epithet. Uh, you're gushing over a movie for children, not grown adults. We have nostalgia on our side for Star Wars, the prequels, which we can see with fresher eyes were fucking retarded.

  34. Re:Why are there so many sour grapes in the commen by circletimessquare · · Score: 0

    right

    but then you are dealing with people with serious issues about the ability to appreciate what they have, and therefore people who will never truly be happy, and therefore miserable people you should stop considering as valid examples of anything

    there are pitiable creatures you should recoil from and never ever want to be near, as they are merely toxic influences in the lives of everyone they touch, because they simply can't ever be happy and content with modest things

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  35. Re:Why are there so many sour grapes in the commen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Appreciate what you get in life. Raising your standards to ridiculous heights and flogging a dead horse is the fanboy's problem, not Lucas's"

    Perhaps we've grown up, but you haven't. Raising your standards is something that all should attain.

  36. Why do they need a Singapore office? by __aarimw2106 · · Score: 1

    Let alone a whole building? Managing the cheap labor for their merchandizing?

  37. Re:Why are there so many sour grapes in the commen by circletimessquare · · Score: 0

    no. wisdom is the difference between raising your standards too high and not raising them at all. it shows you don't know what you are talking about when you think just raising standards is the only issue here, and it doesn't speak very highly of your communication skills that my words represent something to you that i didn't even say

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  38. Re:Why are there so many sour grapes in the commen by vux984 · · Score: 0

    I completely agree with this. The SW eps. 1-3 were clearly made for children.

    Turmoil has engulfed the Galactic Republic. The taxation of trade routes to outlaying star systems is in dispute. Hoping to resolve the matter with a blockade of deadly battleships, the greedy Trade Federation has stopped all shipping to the small planet of Naboo.

    Yep... way to engage the young'uns. The movie doesn't even have a main character.

    My kids don't enjoy it at all, and if we throw it on they wander in and out paying attention to only the major fight scenes. These are kids who will watch The 10th Kingdom from start to finish in one sitting.

    The problem with Star Wars I to III is that they are bad movies. Full stop. They don't satisfy anyone and they are chock full of bad decisions, bad acting, bad scripting, bad direction, they're just bad. And they are stuffed with CGI to the point of distraction.

    And the CGI additions to the later episodes do nothing to make them better, they extend the movie and add nothing, except distraction. If they'd been in the original movie, they should have been cut out by a good editor.

  39. Han shot first!!!! by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

    And I have the video to prove it.

    1. Re:Han shot first!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I have the video to prove it.

      Now, why was my first thought "Rickroll'd" when you mentioned that?

  40. Re:Why are there so many sour grapes in the commen by RazorSharp · · Score: 0

    The movie doesn't even have a main character.

    The main characters in all six Star Wars films are R2D2 and C3P0. Kasdan tried to get away from it in Empire Strikes Back, which is everyone's favorite, so it's understandable why this fact is so conveniently overlooked.

    I love how everyone becomes an expert film critic when bashing Star Wars episodes 1-3. The fact of the matter is, if the prequels would have lived up to contemporary critical standards they would have felt out of place next to episodes 4-6. The same goofiness we hate about Jar-Jar Binks was central to C3P0. We just have fond childhood memories of C3P0 which blind us to how annoying he really was.

    I'm sure you would have been just ecstatic if Michael Bay made episodes 1-3. They would do everything 'right' and by doing so fail to actually hold all six movies together as a single cinematic experience. The point of the CGI enhancements to the older ones was an obvious means to this end. They came out before the prequels and Lucas wanted to make them fit together cinematically.

    People seem to really forget that Star Wars is a series of adventure films. They get into some dark territory when they climax (episodes III/VI), but they build up to these climaxes with stories of adventure and fun. It's obvious that many filmgoers such as yourself wanted the prequels to be like Batman Begins compared to the Tim Burton films. But Lucas wasn't trying to redefine what Star Wars was -- he was just finishing a project he started a long time ago.

    Hayden Christensen may have been a wholly mediocre actor, but so was Mark Hamill. Wouldn't it have felt weird for 1-3 to have stellar acting/writing and then move on to the ridiculousness in 4-6? I say keep it ridiculous the whole way through, which is just what Lucas did.

    Personally, I think Star Wars as a whole series is the greatest work of cinematic art ever created. Yeah, I said it. Citizen Kane doesn't have shit on Star Wars.

    --
    "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
  41. Hey Look! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Outsourcing is cool when you build a geeky office building.

  42. Looks nothing like a sandcrawler. by flimflammer · · Score: 1

    This looks like the antithesis to a sandcrawler.

  43. Signapore canings... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the same place that caned the American more than a decade ago and a Swiss national just last year:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caning_in_Singapore
    They apparently cane you regularly there in prison and school even.
    I suppose all of our corporations opening offices there, including Lucasfilm, condone this or they wouldn't be there.
    Food for thought.

    1. Re:Signapore canings... by initialE · · Score: 1

      Consider this:
      A caning followed by a short stay in jail may be among the more reasonable forms of punishment that actually has the ability to prevent people from committing future offenses. It leaves scars that are visible in your underwear or speedos, does not physically impede you from living your life, does not dump you inside crime academy to learn the ropes and find contacts within the underworld. Or maybe you have some better suggestion of what to do with minor offenders?

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    2. Re:Signapore canings... by seeker_1us · · Score: 1

      The American who was caned willfully violated their laws. Nobody forced him to vandalize buildings.

    3. Re:Signapore canings... by Datamonstar · · Score: 1

      I'd so much rather be caned then spend even 1 night inside a incarceration institution of any sort in the US.

      --
      The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
  44. Re:Why are there so many sour grapes in the commen by vux984 · · Score: 0

    The main characters in all six Star Wars films are R2D2 and C3P0. Kasdan tried to get away from it in Empire Strikes Back, which is everyone's favorite, so it's understandable why this fact is so conveniently overlooked.

    Neither had any real part in episode one. They were not the main characters. Its absurd on its face to suggest that they were.

    And even in later episodes, they were not the main characters, they were the comic relief. Luke Skywalker and Han Solo were the main characters... they had conflict and character development. The two droids... not so much.

    I love how everyone becomes an expert film critic when bashing Star Wars episodes 1-3.

    Including you?

    The fact of the matter is, if the prequels would have lived up to contemporary critical standards they would have felt out of place next to episodes 4-6.

    They still feel out of place.

    The same goofiness we hate about Jar-Jar Binks was central to C3P0. We just have fond childhood memories of C3P0 which blind us to how annoying he really was.

    JarJar just stands out in the prequels as a focal point for what is wrong with them. JarJar as "C3P0 2.0" is just fine, albeit unfortunate. But the movies failings go far beyond the pointless annoyance of JarJar. C3P0 actually had some good lines.

    I'm sure you would have been just ecstatic if Michael Bay made episodes 1-3. They would do everything 'right' and by doing so fail to actually hold all six movies together as a single cinematic experience.

    I hate Michael Bay movies.

    But Lucas wasn't trying to redefine what Star Wars was -- he was just finishing a project he started a long time ago.

    Then make a good movie. eps 1 to 3 sucked.

    You mentioned Batman... good example. The original with Keaton and Nicholson was perfectly fine.

    While many people would have liked Batman Begin's style re-envisioning of the series.

    Continuing it in the same style doesn't mean its going to be terrible though.

    Lucas could have made eps1-3 in the style of the originals without making them suck.

    Batman Returns was awful. But Batman II with Walken and DeVito was just fine. I'd have been fine with a Batman Begin's prequels... I'd have been fine with a Batman II style prequel... but we got Batman Returns... no... what we got was even worse.

    Hayden Christensen may have been a wholly mediocre actor, but so was Mark Hamill. Wouldn't it have felt weird for 1-3 to have stellar acting/writing and then move on to the ridiculousness in 4-6? I say keep it ridiculous the whole way through, which is just what Lucas did.

    Yes Hamill wasn't the best actor. But Christensen's problem wasn't his acting, it was his script and direction. It was Batman Returns not Batman II.

    It didn't continue the sillyness... it was just bad.

  45. Heat by blair1q · · Score: 1

    From TFA: "the space, which will be overgrown with foliage, will be a respite from the heat and the sun and cooler than surrounding areas."

    Which will be warmer because of the heat and the sun reflected from the shiny building...

  46. Re:Why are there so many sour grapes in the commen by vux984 · · Score: 0

    -sigh-

    Batman II is Batman Returns and is fine.
    I meant Batman and Robin as the turd sandwich.

    Sorry for the confusion.

  47. Re:what the flook ? by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

    I just assumed this office was in charge of ways to further fuck up future releases of the original trilogy.

    --
    "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
  48. Re:Why are there so many sour grapes in the commen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe you could make a movie about wise zombies. That would be great.

  49. Re:Why are there so many sour grapes in the commen by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    Even Hamill could invoke gravitas without behaving like a spoiled adolescent. Ponder the final confrontation between Luke and Vader in RotJ, and then look at Christensen's sheer lack of chops in Anakin's final battle against Obiwan. Hamill was no Shakespearean actor, I'll grant you, but he was a helluva lot better than Christensen. Even with good dialogue, Christensen would have sucked. Hamill, at least, was watchable even with stuck with some of Lucas's infamously badly written lines.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  50. Aliens crashing in the backyard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the previous two decades, I'm sure this had been seen often enough. A middle man allowed them to hide this redundancy.

  51. I've got just one thing to say: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OO-TEE-DEE!!

  52. Re:Why are there so many sour grapes in the commen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yeah right, kids moives (Proceeds to drone on about trade disputes) ...

    You really need to see the RLM review to get THAT BS talking point bitchslapped to oblvion

  53. So George Lucas hates Americans. Outsourced again. by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

    So George is following the trend of fucking over American workers, so he can hire overseas slaves.

    Thanks George. American Graffiti... fucko

  54. Looks like ILM USA is about to get fired. by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

    George Lucas is joining the walmart trend of fucking over American workers.

  55. Re:Why are there so many sour grapes in the commen by Trogre · · Score: 0

    One of the problems is that it's getting harder to actually see this great movie he made. The closest we have at present is fan-edited preservations.

    I don't know if you have seen anything from this supposed leaked copy of Blu-Ray release, but check YouTube if you haven't and come back here with comments.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  56. Re:Singpore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a friend of mine remarked in regard to Singapore, "You know you're in a Police State when you are walking along some nondescript part of town and are greeted by a giant sign declaring 'THANK YOU FOR YOUR CO-OPERATION'."

  57. What! by transami · · Score: 1

    No Wheels?

    --
    :T:R:A:N:S:
  58. Re:what the flook ? by initialE · · Score: 1

    My guess is that it will be a renderfarm, datacenter and graphic design office. Singapore is targeting to be the new go to place for CG drones and game development.

    --
    Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
  59. oh FUCK you Lucas by seeker_1us · · Score: 1

    Can't you do anything original anymore? Are you such a living dead zombie that you have to base EVERYTHING you do on a nearly fourty year old movie that effectively ended your career?

  60. 35-year-old non-Lucas ideas by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    This seems like an eminently appropriate architectural allusion for the 'late-Lucas' period of Lucasfilms' work...

    It's telling that the inspiration for this building is an idea over 35 years old. And it came from the mind of Ralph McQuarrie, not Lucas.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  61. Re:Why are there so many sour grapes in the commen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem is, extending your metaphor, she promised steak again the second night but instead served up cat vomit. And the constant tinkering with the originals is the equivalent of telling us later that she dug the steak out of the trash.

  62. Knights of the Old Republic explains this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lucas probably does not even know about it, but the awesome RPG KotoR explains it very well.

    Tatooine is world that features some minerals and ores that look very awesome to any prospector and companies, so they start mining operations that then turn due to the wild nature and danger of the planet turn into massive operations of mining and mercenarying. The ores are not as awesome as they seemed, so the effort does not pay and the companies abandon the planet after a couple of years or decades.
    Settlements that were started fall apart and vanish in the dust and sand.

    As Tatooine is far, far out in the rim of the galaxy, that is not generally remembered and the process repeats countless times (over thousands of years).

    As explanations go, that is a rather good one. It does not appear in the original movies but it's a pretty decent background for the location in the game.

  63. Re:Not the first sandcrawler corporate HQ. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not even the first sandcrawler building. The Hotel du Lac in Tunis (http://theswca.com/travel/tunisia/tunis/tunis.html) was standing prior to Lucas arriving in Tunisia in 1976. Potentially the building was the inspiration for the vehicle in the first place.