Slashdot Mirror


$5M In Torrented Files Presented As Art

ideonexus snips thus from Wired: "The Art 404 gallery is currently exhibiting a piece by Manuel Palou called '5 Million Dollars, 1 Terabyte' which is a 'sculpture' consisting of a 1 TB external hard drive containing $5,000,000 worth of illegally downloaded files. The hard drive is displayed on a pedestal at the gallery." Adds ideonexus: "There is a PDF of the files stored on the device with links to the torrents." I'd like this to be an exhibit at every trial in which gigantic money damages are claimed for copyright infringement.

13 of 243 comments (clear)

  1. A PDF? by Hatta · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't know which is stupider, the concept of the art project, or that they are distributing a list of links over the internet with a PDF file.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:A PDF? by ifiwereasculptor · · Score: 4, Funny

      The concept is fine. I'm working on a similar project right now. The stupid part is calling it art.

  2. So it has two songs on it? by mla_anderson · · Score: 4, Funny

    At current RIAA prices isn't that just two MP3s?

    --
    Sig is on vacation
  3. Re:Two questions: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    First, so the harddrive does not contain files, it contains one file with links to torrent files?

    No, the hard-drive contains the actual files in question, the PDF is a separate listing of what files have been downloaded to the drive, and their value IIRC (I can't access the PDF file without my browser crashing as I'm at work and this computer only has Adobe Reader).

    Second, THAT'S ART?!

    Moreso than most things passing as art these days.
    This exhibit actually aims to raise a valid point about piracy.
    By highlighting how trivial it is to cause $5million of "damage" (by certain definitions of that word) and how little effect it actually has, it's supposed to get people questioning the way we deal with infringers.

  4. Uh... art?! by Type44Q · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'll say it again (for the thousandth time - and this is entirely subjective but it's still true): THIS ISN'T FUCKING ART!!! What it is, however, is a coherent political statement that actually says something (unlike the proverbial paint thrown on the wall, feces on a Ritz cracker, etc, etc). Imagine that...

    1. Re:Uh... art?! by maxwell+demon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      THIS ISN'T FUCKING ART!!!

      So you are saying the downloaded files don't include porn?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:Uh... art?! by Tar-Alcarin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So something can be entirely subjective, and at the same time hold some universal truth? That's quite impressive.

      But as for your main point, here's the definition of the concept of art, as quoted from Wikipedia:
      "Art is the product or process of deliberately arranging items (often with symbolic significance) in a way that influences and affects one or more of the senses, emotions, and intellect."

      I'd say; a coherent political statement that says something by means of symbolism, can easily be viewed as art.
      The fact that people are getting quite heated in a discussion about this, I think lends credit to that viewpoint.

  5. This is art by mfh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know a lot of you are going to protest and complain that this isn't art, much like the protest over that sculpture made of raw meat... but in a sense this really is art because of the people downloading, the controversy over copyright, the flagrant copyright violation involved in the artist downloading these files and presenting them as an artistic work. I think it's commendable, and it definitely involves taking a risk and it does make you feel something, so it's art.

    I didn't say it was good art, but it is art, and I think it's interesting.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
  6. Re:Does this classify by maxwell+demon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Didn't you read the summary? It's Art 404. 404 is "not found". Therefore it is not found art.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  7. Re:Two questions: by Abstrackt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Apparently, anything can be called art now.

    That tiny little box sitting on a pedestal is apparently worth $5,000,000. It think it's a poignant statement on copyright.

    --
    They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
  8. Re:Two can play it that game by Tsingi · · Score: 3, Interesting
    If you had a terabyte of music, they would sue for a lot more than $5,000,000.00.

    Interesting system, it's just like conjuring money out of thin air. In the olde daze a pirate was someone who had to work for his money, kill, rape, plunder. Now all he has to do is copy a file. Not even steal it, just make a copy

    Avast ye swabbies!

  9. In other unletated news by houghi · · Score: 4, Funny

    RIAA claims a 5.000.000USD tax reduction because of donations to an arts project.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  10. Re:Two questions: by cHALiTO · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Exactly: We could take another hard drive and copy the first one over to it, then BAM! we've got ourselves 10M bucks. Then another and it's 15M. If we do a couple hundreds, we could actually end world poverty!!

    The concept as I understand it is that the fact that just producing a copy of a disk can instatly create 5M dollars worth of anything is incredibly wrong. From there you can start deconstructing the whole business interpretation of copyright.

    --
    "Luck is my middle name," said Rincewind, indistinctly. "Mind you, my first name is Bad." -- Terry Pratchett