Slashdot Mirror


Heathkit DIY Kits Are Coming Back

donberryman writes "IEEE Times reports that Heathkit, the fabled electronics kits company, is going back into that business after a two-decade hiatus. The Heathkit website says that they will be releasing Garage Parking Assistant kit (GPA-100) in late September followed by a Wireless Swimming Pool Monitor kit. Amateur radio kits may be coming by the end of the year." I hope for real this time — I never saw for sale the HERO kit they promised a few years ago.

197 comments

  1. Thanks Slashdot by tgd · · Score: 5, Funny

    For reminding me I'm old today.

    (I think its great they're coming back... but gone for 20 years?! Ugh. I made a lot of them when I was young!)

    1. Re:Thanks Slashdot by GregC63 · · Score: 2

      YES! I loved HeatKit! My dad and myself would work on those kits when I was young.

      Glad to see they're making a comeback. Get Kids interested in electronics and a great way for them and their fathers (and possibly mothers) to bond. Something we are sorely missing these days.

    2. Re:Thanks Slashdot by fyngyrz · · Score: 2

      Not only did I make a few of them, I am still using some of them, particularly some of the test equipment -- a transistor/FET checker, a few other things. And I still have a working two-channel digital scope that takes a waveform sample and provides it to a host computer; I bought it, built it, created Amiga drivers for it and used it for quite a while.

      You know what I'd like to see? That new el-cheapo $25/$35 PC board working with some Heathkit designs for measuring house AC power consumption, maybe some water detectors, things like that. Perhaps an alarm system interface. Fun!

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    3. Re:Thanks Slashdot by cayenne8 · · Score: 2
      I hope they start putting out high quality tube amplifier kits again!!!

      They made some old kits that had quite good quality for audio....many still sell on eBay....

      That would be cool..build your own audio or even guitar tube amp!!!!!!!!!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:Thanks Slashdot by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      They're soliciting ideas for new kits. Personally, I want to see the old kits come back, preferably as unchanged as is practical. Maybe it's just nostalgia, but I thought they did a dandy job.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Thanks Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny you should mention that, my dad has both the oscilloscope and waveform generator kits which he built back in the late 70s or early 80s. After a hiatus while he was working in the tech industry, they've since been recommissioned into service as test gear for tube amp repair, which is making him steady if not spectacular income.

    6. Re:Thanks Slashdot by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      I certainly remember Heathkit. I'd go through their
      catalog as others did Sears'.

      I always looked seriously at building a T.V. or an
      oscilloscope but knew it was beyond me or they just
      wouldn't work when finished (too many components).

      I did purchase and assemble a working single
      vacuum tube amplifier.

    7. Re:Thanks Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, do you really want a generation raised on relatively sturdy USB sticks and SD cards to be messing around with 5.25" floppies on the H-80?

    8. Re:Thanks Slashdot by element-o.p. · · Score: 2

      If you want a tube amp kit, you don't have to wait for Heathkit to get around to it. Check out Paia's web site (no, I do not have any association with the company...other than lusting after the FatMan analog synth and a few other kits).

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    9. Re:Thanks Slashdot by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I don't mean the computers so much as the other kits, the simple ones. More selection means more potential interest at each skill level.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Thanks Slashdot by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      For reminding me I'm old today.

      This post made you feel old? Good thing you we're wasting time here a few hours ago:
      http://tech.slashdot.org/story/11/09/08/1510250/1970s-Polaroid-SX-70-Cameras-Make-a-Comeback

      Related? Maybe. Taco and Jobs came and left together...

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    11. Re:Thanks Slashdot by darrylo · · Score: 2

      You know what I'd like to see? That new el-cheapo $25/$35 PC board working with some Heathkit designs for measuring house AC power consumption, maybe some water detectors, things like that. Perhaps an alarm system interface. Fun!

      As much as I loved Heathkit, you don't need Heathkit, as people have already done projects like these (perhaps not as cheaply, though):

      * Whole-house power monitoring: http://openenergymonitor.org/emon/node/43

      * Single-outlet monitoring: http://www.ladyada.net/make/tweetawatt/

      Hacking together a remote water detector should be pretty easy, too, with an xbee (it has built-in ADC and digital inputs).

    12. Re:Thanks Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an OM-3 Oscilloscope in my attic. It still worked when I put it up there but that was 20 years ago, it was my dads and he gave it to me when I was 10 back in 1980. It's in plastic storage bin with a few of my Radio Shack electronic test lab kits, some old Sams Photofact sets, and my old etching stuff. Odd, sitting on my computer desk right now is the "Encyclopedia of Electronics Circuits" Vol 2 and 3 and some old Radio Shack 555 timer chip project books. Wow, I think of all of the cool stuff and time I used to spend with electronics stuff. Even with my old Commodore stuff, TRS-80, and my Sinclair, I still found time for electronics or did things that involved both of them but all of my electronics tinkering stopped dead when I got interested in x86 computers.

    13. Re:Thanks Slashdot by tgd · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I have one of those, too.

    14. Re:Thanks Slashdot by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Audio? I was thinking more like the SB200. Puts out about half a gallon (500w), just enough to get you away from the barefoot blues. Keep it under the desk and your lower register 10 bits keep nice and toasty. Load it up and talk away, or ditty-bop if that's how you swing.

      A pure classic.

      73 de w7com

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    15. Re:Thanks Slashdot by Spugglefink · · Score: 1

      YES! I loved HeatKit! My dad and myself would work on those kits when I was young.

      Back when if something went wrong (soldering an electrolytic cap in backwards, say) you could actually go to Radio Shack and buy useful parts from somebody who knew more than you did about electronics.

      Now get off my lawn!

    16. Re:Thanks Slashdot by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      Audio? I was thinking more like the SB200. Puts out about half a gallon (500w), just enough to get you away from the barefoot blues. Keep it under the desk and your lower register 10 bits keep nice and toasty. Load it up and talk away, or ditty-bop if that's how you swing.

      A pure classic.

      73 de w7com

      I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about, but it sounds cool.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    17. Re:Thanks Slashdot by GregC63 · · Score: 1

      Back when if something went wrong (soldering an electrolytic cap in backwards, say) you could actually go to Radio Shack and buy useful parts from somebody who knew more than you did about electronics.

      Now get off my lawn!

      Radio Shack is another of my favorite things, although the folks that work there now are no where near as knowledgable as in the past. You can get lucky on occasion though.

    18. Re:Thanks Slashdot by AdamThor · · Score: 1

      http://hackaday.com/2011/05/27/speak-your-mind-and-help-radioshack-suck-less/

      Even radioshack dreams about radioshack not sucking...

      --
      -- "Oh. This guy again."
    19. Re:Thanks Slashdot by rhendershot · · Score: 1

      there weren't a lot of them but the Heathkit store was a great thing. I was able to get credit there and see what I was buying and hold/touch/examine it. I really doubt there's much market for online-only DIY kit store aside from what is already available such as so many here have already mentioned.

      Hopefully Heathkit has some other marketing strategy. In my nostalgia I *want* it to succeed. But I'm far too old to want to build a 2M radio....

  2. Wow by tmosley · · Score: 1

    I was too young for these when they went out of business, but now I want some! This would be a great substitute for home chemistry kits which are now "too dangerous" for kids. A great tool for getting kids interested in science.

    1. Re:Wow by wiggles · · Score: 1

      Just wait until people realize how many heavy metals and toxic chemicals are used in electronics components.

    2. Re:Wow by tmosley · · Score: 1

      SHHHHHHHHHHHH.

    3. Re:Wow by cruff · · Score: 2

      And sometimes dangerous voltages too. I put together a Heathkit oscilloscope without any problem, it just took a while. The only problem was that the designers had chosen some transistors with marginal specifications for the high voltage supply (only about 3KV) and the transistors kept failing even though everything was adjusted to the specifications by the Heathkit service center itself!

      They should issue a do it yourself laser-based fusion reactor kit! Plenty of danger in all areas!

    4. Re:Wow by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      Don't worry: They can just update to the "Heathkit: 21st century skills" collection, where you learn the art and science of hiring Chinese subcontractors to assemble the kit, and the CAD skills necessary to design a case with your branding and logo to contain the finished product.

    5. Re:Wow by Dachannien · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was too young for these when they went out of business, but now I want some!

      I was old enough to want them before they stopped making them, but too young to be able to afford them. Now that I have disposable income, look out, shelves! Prepare to be filled with half-finished projects.

    6. Re:Wow by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Those 20 ton stainless steel containment domes are going to be hell on shipping charges. And the DIY route is going to be hard as well. Scavenging every piece of metal in a 10 mile radius and welding it together is going to piss off my neighbors a bit.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    7. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, a Farnsworth fusor? Folks build those all the time.

      http://hackaday.com/2007/03/18/make-your-own-fusion-reactor/

    8. Re:Wow by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Too late they already have. The consumer protection bill from a few years ago that banned lead in children's toys ended up causing all sorts of problems for the youth ATV and dirt bike producers because of the lead acid batteries in them. There was a story in the local paper about this when it went into effect as Minnesota is home to Arctic Cat, and Polaris which made vehicles that were caught by this ban.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    9. Re:Wow by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Did you miss the "laser-based" part? Apparently you did.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    10. Re:Wow by JohnBailey · · Score: 1

      And then shrug, and fire up the soldering iron anyway.

      --
      It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
    11. Re:Wow by geekoid · · Score: 1

      That sounds like an urban myth. I'm sorry, but how many 5 year old are buying ATV and dirt bikes?All sorts of problems? you mean like having them clarify that ATVs sold to 12-15 year old weren't considered children's toys?

      Yeah, that was a really dilly of a pickle.

      A clarification that was made before the first phase of the law was even implemented, I might ad..and did.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:Wow by priceslasher · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the Charlotte,NC hackerspace's feltronics? They have passives sewn into felt circuit symbols that connect to each other magnetically. Less of a choking hazard too!

  3. Heathkit - good quality by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 4, Informative

    I still have a Heathkit multimeter that I built in the late 80's. Still works like a charm. I think I also have an LED clock sitting in a box in a closet somewhere.
    I built a lot of their kits as a kid, from shortwave radios to speakerphones. My dad was a ham radio operator and he got me hooked on them. I'd love to see them make a comeback in this arena.

    1. Re:Heathkit - good quality by oh-dark-thirty · · Score: 1

      Oh, the nostalgia. I also built quite a few kits, including a Dolby ProLogic decoder that's still in use today...

    2. Re:Heathkit - good quality by FudRucker · · Score: 1

      thats what i want to see is a good AM/SSB 100Khz to 30Mhz) superhetrodyne shortwave receiver,

      and a retro style multi-band tube type regenerative receiver (500khz to 10.01Mhz) like the old days http://www.ohio.edu/people/postr/bapix/GR81.htm

      if they do that i will buy one of each.

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    3. Re:Heathkit - good quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it would love more kits on the market.

      Especially nowadays with modern soldering equipment, test equipment, and other tools readily available it's so much easier and your work comes out a lot nicer than the old days.

    4. Re:Heathkit - good quality by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Put together? Hell, I have bought equipment at flea markets that was actually an old heathkit someone put together. In fact, just the other day I was rearranging stuff in my basement and found the old HeathKit capacitance meter that I got at the MIT Flea like 15 years ago. It was probably older than I am now, back when I bought it, but, last time I pulled needed it.... it worked just fine (once it warmed up....ahhh....tubes)

      Actually.... just found one on EBAY.... http://www.ebay.com/itm/Heathkit-IT-22-Antique-Capacitance-Meter-/150647200398

      They call it antique but.. the one I have makes this one look like the new updated model (it probably is)

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    5. Re:Heathkit - good quality by linuxgurugamer · · Score: 1

      LOL. I could have written this message; multimeter works, father was ham radio operator, etc. I built a lot of the kits, wouldn't mind trying them again.

    6. Re:Heathkit - good quality by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      DIY tends to be better quality in general. When you mass produce with robots you can negotiate a 0.004 cent discount on each capacitor by getting the lousiest part you can find, and then trust that it will work fine since you found some other part that is equally lousy in the opposite way so they just happen to work together - until a few years later the capacitor goes out of tolerance and the thing dies, which is a feature since that means the customer will buy another one.

      With Heathkit you actually give the person the parts list and schematics and lousy parts are just going to be obvious, and any EE will spot a poorly designed circuit pretty quickly. The parts probably cost $5 more and the unit lasts for 50 years as a result.

      This isn't like DIY PC builds - buying the $35 motherboard instead of the $15 motherboard goes a long way to making the system last.

  4. I'll get in line by AzariahK · · Score: 1

    This could be great. My first SW radio was their HR-10B ham band receiver. It stayed alive from 1970 through 2008. If they put out a good general communications receiver, I'd be first in line. I don't suppose we'll see any more of the old crinkly green paint finishes, though, alas.

    1. Re:I'll get in line by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Check with a few Heathkit collector sites. Some repro paints are available on Ebay.

      Me lubs Old School industrial paint colors....

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  5. green housing by sribe · · Score: 1

    You know, I think there could be a good emerging market for DIY home control stuff...

    1. Re:green housing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly what I was thinking about. the "green" stuff on their site is of little real value. A home thermostat with WiFi connection, though, would be at the top of my to-buy list. Same for WiFi connected door locks (without the monthly subscription required by Schlage).

    2. Re:green housing by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      It would be nice if they'd get into Zigbee or Zwave... Both these home control protocols seem reasonably mature, but the products that implement it are anything but. I went with Zwave, a closed protocol but has by far the most appliances on the market (locks, switches, thermostats, motion sensors, etc.), though many of those fail functionally in small but infuriating ways. I'd love to see kits for home control stuff, where you just buy components and put them together to work the way you want. Hook up a kit to a simple keypad and solenoid-driven deadbolt instead of using the pricey Schlage stuff.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  6. Just old enough to remember.... by Immostlyharmless · · Score: 1

    I had to go and look at the wikipedia site for Heathkit, as the name sounded familiar but I couldn't place anything. Once I brought the pictures up though, memories of my dads work shop came flooding back to me and I recognized several of the kits that my dad had in there. He was an radio/electronics guy in the Coast Guard and a ham radio operator. If nothing else, thanks for some dredging up some fond memories of my father. :o)

  7. Garage parking assistant? by Deadstick · · Score: 0

    Isn't that the guy who duplicates your house key and passes it to his buddy who burgles your house while you're in the restaurant?

    rj

    1. Re:Garage parking assistant? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      That's why you keep your car keys separate (or detachable).

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  8. There are other great kit/parts companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Have a look for Velleman and Sparkfun if you wish to tinker.

    1. Re:There are other great kit/parts companies by pallmall1 · · Score: 1

      You're right!
      I just got an arduino from Sparkfun delivered today.

      I'm old enough to remember Heathkit kits. They always had a good reputation for quality, but I remember them as being too expensive for me to afford. The Arduino is very affordable and I've found some excellent tutorials about it on YouTube.

      Maybe Heathkit could package some arduino-based kits and not only help gain the interest of a new generation of tinkerers, but also bring back those who got left out when surface-mount parts pushed the DIP package into obscurity.

      --
      3 things about computers: they're alive, they're self-aware, and they hate your guts.
    2. Re:There are other great kit/parts companies by darrylo · · Score: 1

      (Just as a side note: the electronics hobbyist community has gotten used to dealing with surface-mount parts.)

      Also check out:

      Adafruit: https://www.adafruit.com/ (Sells arduino and other microcontrollers, as well as "heathkit-like" solder-it-yourself electronics kits).

      Dangerous Prototypes: http://dangerousprototypes.com/ (Among other things, they were involved with designing a naked-board, 16-channel w/12K sample depth, 100 megasample/sec digital logic analyzer -- for US$50. Then some guy took the firmware and added as many features that he could based upon an HP 16550a timing logic analyzer.)

      Seeedstudio: http://www.seeedstudio.com/ (they're a store that sells cool hardware for arduino and others -- I think they're in China, though)

      Digikey for all sorts of electronic parts: http://www.digikey.com/

      Jameco Electronics for parts and electronic kits: http://www.jameco.com/

  9. Will they have PCs? by Walter+White · · Score: 1

    My first PC was a Heathkit H8. I remember soldering lots and lots of DIP sockets to the boards and putting the case, PSU and terminal together. The terminal, an H/Z-19, had a more powerful processor than the CPU itself. I also remember keying in programs through the front panel to test it out before I attached the floppy drive so I could boot CP/M.

    Are they making kits in Benton Harbor? That town could sure use the help.

    1. Re:Will they have PCs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are they making kits in Benton Harbor? That town could sure use the help.

      It sure could, but I doubt that it'd get any from making radio kits that would end up costing twice what an iPod does.

    2. Re:Will they have PCs? by Pope · · Score: 1

      Heh, I learned AutoCad in the highschool drafting shop on a Heathkit Z80 PC. Later in 19th grade I sourced some superconducting material for a friends' Physics paper. Had no idea they only went OOB in 1991!

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    3. Re:Will they have PCs? by Osgeld · · Score: 0

      how good are you at soldering BGA's?

    4. Re:Will they have PCs? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      well I'll be sheep dipped! I just looked that up and didn't realize there was an AutoCAD 80 for CP/M besides the AutoCAD 86 for the PC. And I was a old hand at AutoCAD in the 80s (IBM AT clone) and in the 90s (on Sun and SGI)

    5. Re:Will they have PCs? by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      how good are you at soldering BGA's?

      I'd be willing to give it a go, set up a simple home reflow station and take a crack at it. Worst that happens is I fail and the parts are destroyed.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
  10. Well it will give the nerds something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to do Friday nights while people with lives are out living it up.

    1. Re:Well it will give the nerds something by Roachie · · Score: 1

      By 'living it up" I presume you mean taking a break from job hunting.

      Or do you mean clocking in at the gas station? .... scooping out the floaters in the fry machine?

      --
      This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
  11. who is their market, any more? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Are there any Americans left who can soldier, or know the difference between a capacitor and their ass, or can tell you the first damn thing about analog circuits? Don't we all just push buttons with our thumbs on cell phones imported from Asia now?

    It seems like the only technically inclined Americans any more are all over 50 or so. The younger crowd knows how to *use* technology, but they don't understand it for shit. This I can tell by talking to young people about their cell phones. They are "magic devices" to them.

    Heathkit - they were a product of the times. Sad to say, I can't really imagine them selling more than a few kits to the geezer/nostalgia crowd these days. The younger folks don't want to *understand*. They just want to blindly buy and use.

    1. Re:who is their market, any more? by Aardpig · · Score: 1

      Get off my lawn!

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    2. Re:who is their market, any more? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Are there any Americans left who can soldier, or know the difference between a capacitor and their ass, or can tell you the first damn thing about analog circuits? Don't we all just push buttons with our thumbs on cell phones imported from Asia now?

      It seems like the only technically inclined Americans any more are all over 50 or so. The younger crowd knows how to *use* technology, but they don't understand it for shit. This I can tell by talking to young people about their cell phones. They are "magic devices" to them.

      Heathkit - they were a product of the times. Sad to say, I can't really imagine them selling more than a few kits to the geezer/nostalgia crowd these days. The younger folks don't want to *understand*. They just want to blindly buy and use.

      Check out any number of hackerspaces across the United States - electronics is not just for the over 50 crowd. Examples:

      Noisebridge
      LVL1
      NY Resist (sp??)

      I belong to LVL1 in Louisville, Kentucky and we have several high school age kids (boys and girls) who are very active in our group.

    3. Re:who is their market, any more? by mewshi_nya · · Score: 1

      I'm 22... I like knowing how things work, too, you know. Was watching a thing on the History Channel last night, tracing from the telegraph to the internet, and I started asking questions (like how twisted pairs of wires reduce interference, things like that).

      However, lots of older people are the same way -- "I only care about the computer at all because I need it" is a common refrain, trust me. Younger people just aren't encouraged to actually investigate any more :\

    4. Re:who is their market, any more? by Jeng · · Score: 1

      It doesn't take understanding to put resister A in hole A. Yes, you have to be able to read resister codes, but otherwise you just need to follow instructions. You only need to understand when things aren't working right, and that is how you end up learning new things.

      Built kits in a class in highschool around 16 years ago, soldering ain't hard.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    5. Re:who is their market, any more? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2

      Are there any Americans left who can soldier...

      Yes, quite a few actually. For the last decade we've been exporting them to the Middle East.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    6. Re:who is their market, any more? by dcavanaugh · · Score: 1

      That's why Heathkit is a good idea. If nothing else, it lets kids learn about electronics via practical examples. There a few other electronic kits out there, but Heathkit was always the gold standard.

    7. Re:who is their market, any more? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe, but if so that is an EXTREME niche. While it's never been everybody, in the 60's it was a much higher percentage of the population who could/would/wanted to do things like this.

    8. Re:who is their market, any more? by djdanlib · · Score: 1

      Yes, we technically minded under-50s are around.

      Perhaps if this stuff didn't get more and more pigeonholed as "geek stuff" and relegated to more and more niche classes for smart kids in middle and high school... You know, because it's not politically correct to teach kids hard stuff that the entire class isn't going to get. None of this stuff is on the (massively flawed in execution) state exams, so it's not going to get the school's attention if they aren't learning it. I'd even like to see more basic electronics and mechanics demos for younger kids!

      You could say the same thing about electronics, mechanics (like car engines), physics, programming, etc... There are all these kids who want to be businesspeople, lawyers, doctors, and teachers... what about scientists and engineers?

      It sure would be great if the elder generations took the initiative to pass it on to the younger generations :)

    9. Re:who is their market, any more? by mla_anderson · · Score: 1

      I'm under 50, maybe only a decade under, but still. I can solder, but pitches less than 0.5mm are rough. Caps are easy to distinguish from my ass, they're usually a whole lot smaller. I've done AM radio transmitters on a bread board, ultrasonic vision systems, audio amplifiers, and antennas and that was just for fun. For work I've done source/measure units (SMU) that can source DC to an accuracy of microvolts and resolution of 100s of picovolts and measure to an accuracy of femtoamps and a resolution of attoamps, I'll bet you've never worried about the DC resistance of solder mask. I've also done analog to 2.1G and digital to 3Gbps (comes out to about 10G edges). Everything I've designed has been wholly built in the US. Much of what I've designed has been exported to Asia, primarily Taiwan and China. (Sorry getting off-topic there)

      My boys want to spend their days pulling things apart to figure out how they work and what they can do with them. My daughter wants to know the why, but could care less what she can do with the knowledge (she's the typical physicist).

      Yes there are a lot of plugged in and tuned out kids (aka anyone younger than me) who have no interest in how things work, but the majority I've interacted with are still truly curious. A lot of twenty-somethings I've talked with are curious about their technological world, even if they don't understand it. We're not sunk yet.

      --
      Sig is on vacation
    10. Re:who is their market, any more? by chronoglass · · Score: 1

      i watched that, pretty interesting, minus the cisco product placement.
      their bit on tesla before that was pretty neat too.

    11. Re:who is their market, any more? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Young people (mostly) didn't know shit about tech back in The Day either, nor did many older folks.

      Don't confuse the masses with techies. They have always been different. People were often able to fix shit which failed often (by playing swaptronics with tubes in the tube tester at the hardware store), but that was more necessity than anything else. If you didn't know how to troubleshoot a points ignition, you got to pay someone to un-fuck your car, lawn mower, etc, on a frequent basis.

      There are plenty of young techies today too. I've met many of them in the Air Force and when I worked vo-tech. The SOCIAL aspect has moved to the internet, which I regard as a vast improvement.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    12. Re:who is their market, any more? by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Younger people are all but actively discouraged from actually investigating any more :\

      FTFY (as much as I hate to "FTFY" someone, sorry).

      I don't know if it's fear of litigation if someone should actually (gasp!) burn their pinky on a soldering iron, fear that if kids learn chemistry and electronics they'll become terrorists, or just a general anti-intellectual snobbishness, but it seems like this country is almost making an effort to prevent kids from learning science and engineering anymore.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    13. Re:who is their market, any more? by lgw · · Score: 3, Funny

      So you learn the basicis of hardware troubleshooting with actual components - that's a good basic engineering skill. You also learn that Violet Gives Willingly.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    14. Re:who is their market, any more? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of the above? My parents encouraged me to play with that stuff. Lots of my friends parents didn't. Interestingly, the ones who did well in school (hey, we all just hit the age to leave college, we haven't hit "life" yet >.>) are the ones whose parents encouraged them to experiment and made efforts to support their kids. Curious :P

    15. Re:who is their market, any more? by hey! · · Score: 1

      Young people (mostly) didn't know shit about tech back in The Day either

      That's because we were busy. HIV hadn't entered the human population and all the STDs you could reasonably expect to catch were cured by standard antibiotics. It was a golden age ... even geeks were getting some.

      Er... You *did* get the memo, didn't you?

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    16. Re:who is their market, any more? by darrylo · · Score: 1

      Sad to say, I can't really imagine them selling more than a few kits to the geezer/nostalgia crowd these days. The younger folks don't want to *understand*. They just want to blindly buy and use.

      Hehe, you need to get out more. Here's one example: http://makezine.com/ (warning: some of the things they do may make oldtimers' hair stand on end).

      Then there's hackaday: http://hackaday.com/

    17. Re:who is their market, any more? by darrylo · · Score: 1

      Then there's Jeri Ellsworth (around 37, according to wikipedia). She fabbed microchips at home, just to show that it could be done.

    18. Re:who is their market, any more? by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      That's why Heathkit is a good idea. If nothing else, it lets kids learn about electronics via practical examples. There a few other electronic kits out there, but Heathkit was always the gold standard.

      The real question (assuming Heathkit really is making a comeback) - is will they continue to be the gold standard, or will they just be riding on name recognition, in the vein of Commodore's "return"?

      Could they come back onto the scene and be a better Sparkfun than Sparkfun, for instance? Are they going to be yet another purveyor of Arduino boards and accessories? Or have they got something more impressive in store - and if so, what are they going to do, and how?

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    19. Re:who is their market, any more? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You also learn that Violet Gives Willingly.

      For gold and silver.

  12. Good stuff by PPH · · Score: 2

    My Heathkit IT-3117 vacuum tube tester still works great. When the tubes in my TV set need checking, I don't have to make a trip to Radio Shack.

    Now get off my lawn, kid!

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Good stuff by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      My Heathkit IT-3117 vacuum tube tester still works great. When the tubes in my TV set need checking, I don't have to make a trip to Radio Shack.

      My TV set is about 1 inch thick... how do they fit the tubes in there?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:Good stuff by ShavedOrangutan · · Score: 1

      I remember seeing vacuum tube testers at the grocery store. They even sold replacement tubes.

      --
      Godaddy is a scam and a ripoff.
    3. Re:Good stuff by batquux · · Score: 1

      That's good. You'd be in for quite a ride if you took your tubes to Radio Shack.

    4. Re:Good stuff by SnarfQuest · · Score: 0

      They own a steam roller. How else would you do it?

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    5. Re:Good stuff by Achra · · Score: 1

      Seriously.

      "Is that some kind of fancy lightbulb, mister? Can I interest you in a cellphone?"
      Actually, the last time I was in radio shack, they had a line of small PIC based kits on the shelves. I think that radioshack might be trying to get in on this whole kit building idea too. I'd love it if they did. I order all of my parts from mouser or digikey, but it sure would be nice to have a place to go to buy a few odds and ends when I needed without having them shipped.

      --
      Each processor would proceed sequentially as if it had been better for them not to rise against Saul.
    6. Re:Good stuff by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      Nanotubes?

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    7. Re:Good stuff by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      My Heathkit IT-3117 vacuum tube tester still works great. When the tubes in my TV set need checking, I don't have to make a trip to Radio Shack.

      You kids and your TV sets. Back in my day, we sat around the radio and had to imagine what the picture looked like in our heads!

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    8. Re:Good stuff by PPH · · Score: 1

      You kids and your TV sets. Back in my day, we sat around the radio and had to imagine what the picture looked like in our heads!

      That's nothing. We had traveling minstrels that visited our village and could only dream of wild inventions like radios.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    9. Re:Good stuff by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      My Heathkit IT-3117 vacuum tube tester still works great. When the tubes in my TV set need checking, I don't have to make a trip to Radio Shack.

      My TV set is about 1 inch thick... how do they fit the tubes in there?

      They stopped using vacuum tubes when practical means of manufacturing and injecting Magic Smoke were developed.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    10. Re:Good stuff by hawk · · Score: 1

      Crush them first, of course! :)

      hawk

  13. Misread as "Healthkit"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And was hoping I could do a DIY tonsillectomy, since I don't have health insurance at my W2 contract McJob.

    1. Re:Misread as "Healthkit"... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      ...since I don't have health insurance at my W2 contract McJob.

      Then, you're doing it wrong.

      I hope you've incorporated yourself first...doing an S Corp is the way I went and I'd recommend it for the great payroll tax savings you can get that way.

      Also, set yourself up a HSA (Health Savings Account) which is a great way to save money for routine care ALL pre-tax. Combine this with a reasonable high deductible health insurance account, only for emergencies (you know, like in the old days when it was all called "major medical")...and you're good to go.

      I had to come off my last gig and take one that is currently W2...I fought and tried for 1099, but they already had too many on the contract and required more to be 'direct' W2's to them, man...I miss the deductions...freedom from having to fucking 'earn' vacation and sick hours.....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Misread as "Healthkit"... by s122604 · · Score: 1

      Unless you've had the audacity to actually have gotten sick from something or have a family

      I'm in my late 30's and on BP meds (and no, I'm not fat, 6'2" 175).
      private health insurance isn't an option at ANY price..

  14. PDP11 by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

    I always wanted to make the PDP11 kit, but could not afford it! Maybe I can now!

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    1. Re:PDP11 by Temkin · · Score: 2

      I got the opportunity to buy one back in the 80's, and couldn't pass it up. But I hate to disappoint you, it was just a linear power supply and a Q-bus backplane kit. The PDP-11/03 board, memory card, and serial interface were all straight from the DEC plant.

      That said... It ate TRS-80 model 1's for breakfast! :)

    2. Re:PDP11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I built the H-11 and had many good years with it. I still have it.

      I have a hard time getting excited about Heathkits today because of the greedy manual Nazis. I should be able to go online and find a schematic for an IB-1103, but all the pages from people that are demanding $19.99 for a Xeroxed copy of the manual puts a bitter spin on it.

      If Heathkit comes back, I hope they kill the aftermarket manual scalpers by posting their kit documentation online.

    3. Re:PDP11 by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      I always wanted to make the PDP11 kit, but could not afford it! Maybe I can now!

      I bet I still have the old Star Trek game on paper tape! Man, that really chewed through the tractor feed paper on those DEC terminals...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:PDP11 by ShavedOrangutan · · Score: 1

      There's a PDP11 emulator on the Android Market for $4.

      --
      Godaddy is a scam and a ripoff.
    5. Re:PDP11 by sconeu · · Score: 1

      I wonder if you can boot Unix on it?

      I still have the "Ancient Unix" from SCO/Caldera -- just before Ransom Love left, and they turned evil.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  15. What Memories! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GREAT memories of my best friend and me wiring a Heathkit Apache TX-1 amateur radio transmitter in the late 1950's. A wonderful experience, and led to me getting my ham licence, which I still hold. (And we wired one of the rectifiers in backwards, so I never WILL forget the smell of burned-out selenium!)

  16. Like the comeback of Commodore 64 & Amiga? by MindPrison · · Score: 2

    ...numerous exploits by various idiot companies that have no or little relation to the time-honored companies of christmas past.

    Wanna bet?

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    1. Re:Like the comeback of Commodore 64 & Amiga? by the_raptor · · Score: 2

      Nope, because even crappy kits would be better then no-kits, whereas the Commodore and Amiga "come backs" didn't fill any gaps. I find it an indictment of Australian culture (and most other Western countries aren't that much different) that the main source of basic kits like crystal radios is dodgy Chinese copies with incomprehensible instructions.

      These kinds of kits is how you get kids interested in engineering, and how you educate others on basic principles of the technology we rely on.

      It is lucky DIY was only mostly dead for twenty years, because the effects if the gap had of been larger would have been the final blow in Western economies competing with Chinese ones.

      --

      ========
      CINC, 4th Penguin Legion
    2. Re:Like the comeback of Commodore 64 & Amiga? by dals_rule · · Score: 1

      Heath never actually went out of business. For the past several years, though, they've been doing educational stuff exclusively. They're getting back into the kit business again, now.

    3. Re:Like the comeback of Commodore 64 & Amiga? by MindPrison · · Score: 1

      If I could Mod you up + for Informative, I'd do it. Thanks for the information!

      --
      What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
  17. 70cm Ham Radio needed by fhknack · · Score: 1

    Sweet! For the two-and-a-half years since I earned my Ham license, I have been singularly unable to find a kit for making a transmitter I could use. I can re-learn to read circuit diagrams, etc., but designing and building a radio from scratch is too far beyond my current skills.

    1. Re:70cm Ham Radio needed by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      You'd have better luck on the MW bands, but that of course requires a General or better ticket. From what I understand, designing transmitters (or receivers) for multi-hundred MHz frequencies is substantially more difficult as the tolerances are much lower than required for anything between 0.1-30MHz.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    2. Re:70cm Ham Radio needed by mla_anderson · · Score: 1

      You'd have better luck on the MW bands, but that of course requires a General or better ticket.

      But a General isn't that hard to get any more. There's no code requirement, so it can be done with memorization.

      --
      Sig is on vacation
    3. Re:70cm Ham Radio needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No General ticket needed. Build a CW rig, learn the code, and you can operate on the lower bands. Or you could build a 10m SSB rig. --... ...--

    4. Re:70cm Ham Radio needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tech has CW privileges on 80,40,15 and 10 M as well as SSB on 10. Has for 4 years now, you guys are a notch behind the times. That said, general is really easy to get now.

    5. Re:70cm Ham Radio needed by mla_anderson · · Score: 1

      CW's a lot harder than electrical theory.

      --
      Sig is on vacation
    6. Re:70cm Ham Radio needed by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      CW's a lot harder than electrical theory.

      What's "CW"? Isn't that a TV network?

      Or do you mean all those people who have intermittent PTT buttons on their radios?

  18. Re:helo by wooferhound · · Score: 1

    I think you should get a TicKit
    to ConnectiKit
    and eat some BrisKit
    then get a joint and SmoKit
    before getting an AIDsKit
    from HeathKit

    --
    We are Dead Stars looking back Up at the Sky
  19. Prepare yourself by RhadamanthosIsChaos · · Score: 1

    I know what the submitter means... I'm holding out for a HERO too.

    --
    +++OUT OF CHEESE ERROR+++ REDO FROM START +++
    1. Re:Prepare yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.heathkit.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=34&Itemid=45

  20. But, will it make Louis happy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PILLS HERE? O:

    After all, Louis needs his pills. (L4D reference)

  21. Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bring back the H8!

  22. Component cost by grimmjeeper · · Score: 1

    TFA talked about the proliferation of cheap components post WWII that really made the kits practical from a cost perspective. With modern manufacturing technology all geared towards surface mount mass production, I wonder how easy it will be to find cheap components to use in the kits. Small surface mount parts are fine for manufacturing but it takes a lot more dexterity to solder them correctly than it does with the old through-hole technology. There's no way I want to even think about attaching a BGA socket on a board by hand.

    Still, I would have a hard time believing that there is no demand for the through-hole components any more. Someone who knows more than I do should be able to tell me whether or not those are still available at a reasonable price these days.

    1. Re:Component cost by fermion · · Score: 1
      With the heathkit stuff, one could build products equal or better to store-bought assembled stuff because so much of retail products were still assembled by humans and the components were manufactured with that assumption. So you would pay a little more for components, but you would save by doing the labor yourself. And it was fun.

      Even when it came to PCB, etching yourself was not a huge problem. Try doing that now. For instance, by the late 80's with surface mount technology, who could do that without machines. Assembling now is pretty much swapping cards. There is no labor savings in that.

      The value now is probably in having firmware that can be customized to specific tasks.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    2. Re:Component cost by Webcommando · · Score: 1

      There's no way I want to even think about attaching a BGA socket on a board by hand.

      Still, I would have a hard time believing that there is no demand for the through-hole components any more.

      Perhaps that is part of the business plan. First kit you need to build is the "Chip Shooter" kit. Next, the "Stencil Solder" kit. Finally, the "Reflow Oven" is added to your list of projects. After that, the rest of the projects are cake!

      --
      I love the sound of distortion in the morning -- webcommando
    3. Re:Component cost by Just+Brew+It! · · Score: 1

      Depends on the component. Passives are still widely available in thru-hole versions. Some semiconductors are as well (e.g. there's still a pretty reasonable selection of transistors, op amps, discrete logic), but obviously anything with a lot of pins is surface-mount only.

      I've recently been playing around with some of Microchip's PIC microcontrollers. Their low pin count (up to 28 pins) 8- and 16-bit devices are still available in through-hole DIP packages, so amazingly enough those old solderless breadboards from the '70s are still good for something!

    4. Re:Component cost by artor3 · · Score: 1

      They are still available. They generally cost 3-5 times as much as the SMT equivalents, but that doesn't make them expensive. Paying 5 cents for an axial resistor versus 1 cent for an 0402, or $3 for a DIP instead of $1 for the same chip in a BGA isn't going to break the bank for a hobbyist. The price differences are actually more significant for the big companies that sell a million widgets, where shaving a dollar of the BOM means a sizable boost to the bottom line.

    5. Re:Component cost by Just+Brew+It! · · Score: 1

      I recently read somewhere (maybe at Sparkfun?) that a $30 hotplate from Target actually works better than a $3,000 reflow oven for small SMT jobs!

    6. Re:Component cost by bws111 · · Score: 1

      Now, why'd you go and say that? I want those kits now!

    7. Re:Component cost by grimmjeeper · · Score: 1

      That sounds entirely reasonable for cost. I last bought a resistor back in 2004 and had a difficult time finding one that wasn't through mail order. The sales monkey at Radio Shack didn't even know what one was. I half expected that no one made them any more. But I suppose they will never completely die out. It's good to hear that they're not prohibitively expensive.

    8. Re:Component cost by grimmjeeper · · Score: 1

      Well, that would make it an interesting project if you had to build the tools first. And that's probably not an unreasonable idea for Heathkit to look into given their target market...

    9. Re:Component cost by epine · · Score: 1

      There's no way I want to even think about attaching a BGA socket on a board by hand.

      Well, times change. The kit everyone is demanding these days is the handy-dandy DIY BGA oven.

      With a bit of ingenuity, Heathkit could come out with an entire DIY benchtop SMT line, with stereoscopic pick-and-place. A low-intensity X-ray laser would be a nice upgrade, if it could image BGA pads in under 15 minutes per pin.

      But then again, they'd probably apply the HP pricing model to the custom DIY BGA oven almost-lead-free solder-paste to the point where it would be cheaper to purchase finished boards from a distant continent.

    10. Re:Component cost by mla_anderson · · Score: 1

      Digikey has 17,000 in stock axial resistors. HSC Electronic Supply probably has some as well, but their website isn't responding. (One of the few things I miss from the Bay Area is HSC.)

      --
      Sig is on vacation
    11. Re:Component cost by artor3 · · Score: 1

      Newark is another good supplier.

    12. Re:Component cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps that is part of the business plan. First kit you need to build is the "Chip Shooter" kit. Next, the "Stencil Solder" kit. Finally, the "Reflow Oven" is added to your list of projects. After that, the rest of the projects are cake!

      Don't forget the all-important soldering iron kit! :)

    13. Re:Component cost by WarlockD · · Score: 1

      It does but be sure to get a good high range tempature guage. The 3,000 ones are normally automated. You set it at what kind of sodlur its using and press a button for warmup. Put the board in and it beeps when its done. Doing one at a time I can take a hot plate from anywhere. The thermoresister is uselly not the most accurate thing in the world but then that's why you can mod it:)

  23. I grew up on these back in the 60s by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Great stuff. Hopefully, they will not be using Chinese parts. I would pay more to get Western parts.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:I grew up on these back in the 60s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good news-bad news.

      Bad news is, they have some Chinese parts.

      Good news is, ex-military parts.

    2. Re:I grew up on these back in the 60s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The western parts are made in China, you pay extra for the Western packaging thats all.

  24. Does this make the old ones valuable? by business_kid · · Score: 1

    My Signal Generator is a Heath Kit. It does 30khz to 100 Mhz with attenuation for testing signal stages of radios/tvs. You can have pure sine wave, or 3khz AM modulation. Pots on everything are still functional.
    I have used it for testing FM stages, and MW stages. It still does 100Mhz, despite the fact that it runs 2 x ECC 83 thermionic valves. Obviously an excellent (if extremely old) design. Will this make it valuable?

  25. Damn kids today... by Just+Brew+It! · · Score: 1

    ...don't even know how to use a soldering iron. What's this world coming to? ;-)

    People used to actually fix failed electronics back in the 60s...

    Heh... I still fix failed electronics today! Just this past weekend I repaired my daughter's failed video card by replacing all of the crummy leaking and exploded electrolytic capacitors in the VRM circuit. I refuse to pitch an otherwise perfectly good card into the landfill just because a half-dozen 50 cent capacitors have decided to commit suicide.

    1. Re:Damn kids today... by artor3 · · Score: 1

      Sadly you can't do much more than that these days. BGAs and COBs are great for making tiny, low cost electronics, but they're almost impossible to tinker with.

    2. Re:Damn kids today... by MadCow42 · · Score: 1

      I hear ya... I was almost embarassed that my son thought I was amazing because I knew how to boost my wife's car. "You can DO that? Wow!"

      (and this from a kid that knows I'm already a Mr. Fixit type guy around the house)

      --
      I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
    3. Re:Damn kids today... by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      I have one of the Dell laptops with Nvidia video that gave Nvidia/Dell/HP and others a black eye a few years ago. My system worked fine up until towards the end of this February, when it coughed up the scrambled video that indicated that it had succomed to the failure that Nvidia was succesfully class-action-suited over. I lucked out as the deadline for filing for the repair/replacement (Dell=repair/HP=replace of the whole laptop) was the middle of March. I filed and got my system (that I'm writing this on) fixed and alls well.. A friend whose Dell/Nvidia laptop was working fine up until a month ago, died with the same squirrely video. Of course, since the
      arbitrary deadline had passed, Nvidia/Dell magically gets to avoid the cost of fixing this (and I bet a LOT of additional) failures. Since the problem is essentially some cold solder joints on the Nvidia graphics chip, we read some discussion online about reflowing the solder on these cold joints, and with the help of a heatgun got the
      system working again normally. Of course there's no way to tell how long this will last, but he was planning on replacing the laptop in the next year or so..

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    4. Re:Damn kids today... by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      I'm impressed. Not because you knew how to fix the caps on a video card, but because you were actually able to remove them cleanly enough to install the new caps. I had a Dell USFF Optiplex fail because three electrolytics had blown and were leaking. I was able to get the old caps out of the board, but I couldn't heat up both sides of the board to remove all the solder, no matter what tools I used. Consequently, I was unable to get the replacement caps in the board (sigh...)

      Fortunately, I had better luck when I had to replace the leaking caps on ECU of my 1G Eagle Talon a few years back, even though the electrolyte had corroded the copper trace on the PCB.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    5. Re:Damn kids today... by mla_anderson · · Score: 1

      BGAs aren't that big of a deal when it comes to tinkering, the worst problem for tinkering is blind and buried vias.

      --
      Sig is on vacation
    6. Re:Damn kids today... by Just+Brew+It! · · Score: 1

      The ground and power planes in a modern multi-layer PCB are quite efficient heat sinks! The key is to use a higher wattage soldering iron than you think you need. I first figured this out about 8 years ago when the capacitor plague hit with a vengeance and I had multiple dead motherboards on my hands. My old Radio Shack 40W (or maybe it is 45W?) iron plus one of those spring loaded solder suckers are the only tools I use for removing the blown caps and clearing the holes. I kept meaning to buy a better (temperature controlled and grounded) iron but somehow never got around to it; I've now recapped numerous motherboards, video cards, network switches, etc. with that crufty old soldering iron.

      I have also read that you can clear the holes with a Dremel tool and an appropriately sized bit if you're really, really careful. I haven't tried this method myself so I can't vouch for it.

      It does seem that removing the old caps and clearing the holes has gotten somewhat more difficult these past couple of years; perhaps this is because I'm starting to encounter more equipment that was assembled with lead-free solder.

    7. Re:Damn kids today... by Just+Brew+It! · · Score: 1

      Forgot to mention, I've also read that heating the pad from one side and jamming the tip of a dental pick through the hole from the other side is pretty effective.

    8. Re:Damn kids today... by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the advice -- I'll keep it in mind if I see another mobo with a blow cap :) IIRC, I tried using a 30W soldering iron with desoldering braid and a spring-loaded solder sucker like you described and another 30W (I think...) soldering iron with a rubber bulb solder sucker attached (Radio Shack used to sell them; don't know if they still do).

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    9. Re:Damn kids today... by Just+Brew+It! · · Score: 1

      Yeah, IIRC a 30W iron didn't quite cut it; the solder never got liquid enough to flow freely, making it nearly impossible to clear the holes. Going to a slightly higher wattage than the one I'm using now would probably make things even easier, but I'm worried about lifting traces.

    10. Re:Damn kids today... by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      I know its not on par with soldering parts on a video card, but I've taken to replacing screens in cell phones. Seems like almost no one these days realizes you can get a 10$ replacement screen, and turn your busted 300$ electric brick back into a phone with 10 minutes work. hell, you can even do iPhones (sure, it voids warranties, but if your doing it, it was probably already out anyways) The DIY/fix it tinkering spirit has largely been replaced with the 'buy a new one' spirit.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    11. Re:Damn kids today... by artor3 · · Score: 1

      BGAs suck because they often accompany blind vias. Buried vias aren't bad because the signal has to surface sometime, but if it surfaces as a blind via to the bottom of a BGA, then you have no way of accessing it.

      I miss packages with actual leads, where you could lift a single pin and blue wire it to something else, while keeping the rest of the chip in place.

    12. Re:Damn kids today... by artor3 · · Score: 1

      I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who calls those things dental picks. I normally get strange stares when I use the term... apparently the real name is "soldering hook".

  26. Cool but, Swimming Pool is huge liability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kits are cool, and welcome back Heatkit, but... to Management

    A kit build safety system is a huge potential liability. Like kill your venture kind liability.

    See Burt Rutan and homebuilt things that occasionally explode or cause fatalities (or failed to prevent)

     

    1. Re:Cool but, Swimming Pool is huge liability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is this (http://www.ondatechnology.org/project-life-bracelet.html) a liability?

    2. Re:Cool but, Swimming Pool is huge liability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is this ( http://www.ondatechnology.org/project-life-bracelet.html ) a liability?

      seems to me that's a good idea that could be a liability but not on the blow things up kind... if customers fail to follow the confidentiality agreements that's when $hit will hit the fan.

  27. Z-19 FTW indeed by alispguru · · Score: 1

    A Z-19 and a US Robotics modem got me through graduate school in the early 1980's. Wrote most of my dissertation at home (in troff, yet).

    I never had to modify the Z-19, but the Z80 processor would have been a piece of cake to hack if necessary.

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
    1. Re:Z-19 FTW indeed by idontgno · · Score: 1

      I played around with a friend's H89 back in the day. (I sort-of had access to another friend's H8/H9 combo, but he was a bit less laid back; he really didn't like it when I opened the case of the H8. So I stopped bothering him.)

      The H89 was a fairly schweet machine; a standard Z19/H19 terminal complete with its own Z-80, and then a second single-board computer embedded in it with a second Z-80. Booted CPM/80 off the internal floppy. Very cool.

      Actually, after I made my big decision in life at the age of 15 ("programming or electronics?"*), I lusted after a H-11. The idea of my very own teensy tiny PDP-11 was intriguing. It was technically a Heathkit, but the "kit" part was mostly gross assembly (if I recall), not so much soldering and stuffing sockets. But it could run most PDP software, which was becoming my speciality. (DECSystem-10, anyone?)

      *I chose software. The choice came down to "$600 for a pre-assembled TRS-80 that I can immediately begin programming, or $1000 for an IMSAI 8080 kit that I can toggle switches and make lights blink." I was cheap and impatient. I still kind of am.)

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    2. Re:Z-19 FTW indeed by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      ... I was cheap and impatient. I still kind of am.)

      At least you admit it. That puts you far above the typical threshold. :)

  28. I really liked them when I was a kid! by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

    Back in the early 50's (Korean war) I built my first kit (crystal set), and more in the following years, AM/FM/SW radio, reel to reel tape recorder, Morse HAM unit, I loved them!

    --
    I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
  29. I did "American Basic Science Club" in the 1960s by peter303 · · Score: 1

    They advertised in the back of comic books. A couple dollars a month got a incremental kit every month for a year. The bulk of it was an electronic subsystem progressing through amplifiers until built a whole ham radio. I remember a dry ice cloud chamber too. Good enough to help me get into M.I.T.

    I am jealous of what kids got today. All the science kits have been dumbed down for safety reasons, I'd be hacking together computers and software. Which I do now.

  30. I'd sure like a good scope. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

    The Heathkit oscilloscopes were of very good quality. These days you can spend a fortune on a digital scope, but many of them are only good for digital signals, and many don't go over a few Mhz.

    1. Re:I'd sure like a good scope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, if you are spending a fortune, then you can get a very good digital scope with bandwidth of 100MHz or more for less than $2k these days. It is true that digital scopes are of limited use for analog, but only if you are concerned about very low noise or very low amplitude measurements, or need very high digitization resolution such as for accurate audio distortion analysis or SMPS switching power loss measurement. But where high BW digital scopes shine is the ability to find intermittent problems in digital circuits, where the "analogness" of the circuitry is actually the matter.
            Scopes with only a few MHz BW are toys and can be had for trivial amounts of $$$. My first personal scope was a 20MHz dual trace analog B&K Precision for about $400.

    2. Re:I'd sure like a good scope. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "No, if you are spending a fortune, then you can get a very good digital scope with bandwidth of 100MHz or more for less than $2k these days."

      But that was my point. As far as I am concerned, $2k is indeed a fortune to spend for a piece of hobbyist equipment. If you are using it professionally, that is another matter.

    3. Re:I'd sure like a good scope. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "But where high BW digital scopes shine is the ability to find intermittent problems in digital circuits, where the "analogness" of the circuitry is actually the matter."

      That is true. What I did not say was that my own use would probably be for lower-frequency, analog signals. I guess really the right combination -- for someone like me -- would be a decent analog scope for my hobbyist stuff, and a high-frequency digital for computer work.

  31. Benton Harbor Lunch Box by whizbang77045 · · Score: 1

    Does anyone (besides me, obviously) remember the Benton Harbor Lunch Box? That's an example of good, efficient design! Not too many parts, and it was adequate to the task.

    1. Re:Benton Harbor Lunch Box by Gim+Tom · · Score: 1

      I still have my Benton Harbor 6 meter Lunch box, and my DX-60B, not to mention the old AR-3 receiver I built when I was about 11 years old. I have one of the tunnel dippers that I got at a ham-fest, but it was somewhat butchered inside and does not work. That is just a partial list, and I would LOVE to see them make a comeback in the kit market.

      I used the 6er with a home made beam of either 3 or 4 elements, I can't remember which, and worked all over the us and into Canada a lot back in the early 1960's. Of course we had more sunspots back then.

  32. I worked at one of the stores! by soloesp · · Score: 1

    Not only did I build quite a few of just about everything, I worked at the store in Omaha until I graduated from high school. What an education! Still have my H89/H77 combination. Booted it up a couple years ago. Still runs. Amazing!

  33. Dear Santa, What I would like to have for Xmas. by LifesABeach · · Score: 2

    A Heathkit Hero Kit.
    A kit for converting Solar DC to the Community Power Grid AC.
    A Heathkit Hero Kit.
    A kit to plug in my electric car to charge up with.
    A Heathkit Hero Kit.
    A Heathkit Hero Kit.

    My P.O. says that I haven't been all that bad this year.

  34. Don't bother with the crystal radio kit by Liambp · · Score: 1

    Big disappointment recently when a young relative put together a crystal radio kit (from Maplin I think). When it didn't work I being the engineer in the family was called in to fix it. I took the scientific approach and calculated the centre to be bang in the middle of the medium wave band. After twiddling with it for some time and getting nothing I finally tried another portable radio with a medium wave band and was amazed to discover that not a single station was still broadcasting on it.

    1. Re:Don't bother with the crystal radio kit by Kaz+Kylheku · · Score: 1

      That's a funny story; thanks for sharing that.

  35. Kits? What's the point? by Kaz+Kylheku · · Score: 1

    Is it to learn what it's like to work in an overseas sweatshop, stuffing components into a PCB? (But in the comfort of your home, and under no pressure?)

    Stuffing requires no knowledge of electronics.

    It takes less skill than, say, knitting (a much better hobby that all kit assemblers should seriously consider).

    If you wanna do electronics, design something, build it and debug it.

    1. Re:Kits? What's the point? by imric · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you'll be much more successful designing stuff then building it without any skills in building stuff in the first place. And craftsmanship has no value, after all, right?

      --
      Paranoia is a Survival Trait!
    2. Re:Kits? What's the point? by rocket+rancher · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you'll be much more successful designing stuff then building it without any skills in building stuff in the first place. And craftsmanship has no value, after all, right?

      The market determines the value of the craftsmanship, not the craftsman. Heathkit is gambling that there are enough people who share your misunderstanding of the value of craftsmanship to make reintroducing the kits profitable for them.

  36. Tentec by vtcodger · · Score: 1

    If you want to order a kit similar to a Heathkit right now this evening, try TenTec http://www.tentec.com/ Their kits are mostly radio related and the manuals aren't quite up to what I remember from Heathkit, but they are pretty good.

    --
    You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  37. Or better yet: Elecraft by dbc · · Score: 1

    http://www.elecraft.com/ The performance of which blows away anything that Heathkit or TenTec ever made.

  38. Fahnestock clips, Anyone ?...Anyone ?... Bueller ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still have the Heathkit Garage door opener in service.
    It works great 30 years later, on a door.

  39. Utilitarian Products! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be tough for them to have commercial success selling only kits for radios, tv, computers and 'as see on TV' gadgets like they're talking about. I'd like to see them take on the crap we're forced to buy at Lowes and Home Depot but that we really do have to get. Electric rechargable drills and leaf blowers and all similar equipment where you can solder your own cells and replace them in 5 years when they go bad! I wouldn't have people wind the coils but pressing in the bearings and soldering the trigger potentiometers and stuff sounds fine. Solder all the components for the chargers, etc. You would build a tool that you'd be proud to own and could fix the rest of your life-made in the U.S.A. by YOU. I remember going to the Heathkit store and seeing all kinds of stuff that we suffer to buy at Walmart and HH Gregg: Microwaves, stereo systems (with tubes!), robotic airplanes that feed your dog and collect their shit! Roomba type stuff! All that shit you can make in a kit and it would be twice as fun. If they're selling I'm buying and I certainly don't care if the parts come from Asia.

  40. tv and microwave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We had a Heathkit console color tv. We also had one of the first microwaves in our neighborhood and it was a heathkit. Dad was an engineer so he was always drawn to the DIY stuff. That microwave lasted 30+ years before we finally upgraded. One on/off button and a timer that would turn it off at 0. 3 small lights for on/open/overheat. Oh the days. Only time I've ever seen food catch fire in one (glazed donut for 60 seconds).

  41. Here's an Idea for Heathkit -- Minecraft! by Commontwist · · Score: 1

    Create a fusion of Heathkit kits and the Minecraft game, devise ways to make it interesting for all ages, and watch 'crafters create project kits online. If Heathkit could actually create kits on demand to allow the makers to build their simulated kit in real life that would be awesome!

    Hey, Minecrafters are already building redstone ALUs and printers--this is just the next step.

  42. Ten-Tec still has amauter radio kits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.tentec.com/?s=kits
    FYI, I have no relationship with the company, not even as a customer...

  43. Old style heathkit? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Will this be a true return with quality kits that actually required you do do something and 1/2 way understand what you were doing? Or more like the later cheapy 'insert chip into this socket here beacuse we told you so' type of kits? ( or worse.. insert card here and pretend you built something.. )

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  44. Heathkit Arduino Projects? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Heathkit made some nice Arduino projects, or some projects using the atmega25, then they wouldn't have to bother trying to sell them, the only problem would be trying to keep them in stock, and not angering suppliers by repeated queries about when the next shipment will occur. Besides /. and 2600, I also visit sites like hack-a-day (ok, yes, lkml too). I did recently install my home-built Gray-Hoverman superantenna for digital tv reception --and it works better than expected, and I was expecting a lot--. There are 7 stations broadcasting locally, shared between 4 towers. I actually have 3 GH antennas pointing in different directions ganged together, then that combined signal is split 3 ways to 3 different TVs. 4 of the 7 have signal strengths of (at least) 100%. One has a signal strength of at least 66%, and one has a signal strength of 50%. I never get MPEG pixellation. The floor level on most of the TVs is between 3 and 4 bars (out of 18). Even in the rain I still get signal (and I couldn't say that with satellite, its a digital signal with forward error correction too, and a heavy rainstorm would kill the satellite downlink). Not so here. Yes its geeky, but I'm the kind to do a Heathkit kit.

  45. HeathKit Career (sort of) by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

    My dad built a Heathkit combined hi-fi amplifier/FM receiver when I was about 9 or 10. I got interested and he let me learn soldering using the soldering practice board that came with the kit (he could solder already). That went OK, so next birthday I got a small portable AM radio kit, Heathkit again. I never got it to work - the small audio power stage was very touchy, and used germanium transistors, so it was extremely easy to blow the transistors when setting it up. Nevertheless I did get interested in electronics despite this setback, and moving on via a Sinclair X-40 kit instruction manual I was given (never could afford the actual kit!), I eventually built stuff successfully from magazines such as Practical Electronics, ETI and Elektor. At 16 I left school and went to work for an electronics company in a R&D capacity - they gave me the job solely on my practical experience with electronics I'd learned as a hobby, not from school results. That company had a similar ethos to Heathkit - extremely high quality components and PCBs, ultra-neat wiring, every transistor sitting on its own "transipad". I felt right at home - I thought that was how all electronics stuff was put together. Opening up consumer stuff built in Japan to fix it for friends was a shock just how shoddily that stuff was thrown together. On one occasion we were trying desperately to solve the problem of microphony on a frequency synthesiser (any vibration of the PCB or unit would modulate the carrier). I discovered (taking my cue from Jap crap) that dumping candle wax over the sensitive oscillator components did the job very effectively, but my boss absolutely refused to allow it as a solution - apart from perhaps being hard to productionise, it just went against the grain of ultra-neatness that the company insisted on. Needless to say they have been history now for a very long time. Rather sad that such ultra-high build quality is a thing of the past - though perhaps in this day of surface mount it's less of an issue than it used to be.

  46. Emulation is not a replacement by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    For the real thing. You cant replace the feel and knowledge that real hardware that you have sweated over and burnt your fingers building.

    And if you can tell me 'its the same difference' sitting down at a modern PC running an emulator and actually holding the real thing in your hands.. you are either lying or a sad excuse for a techie.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  47. PAIA has some awesome electronic DIY kits. by sup4hleet · · Score: 1

    For those musically inclined DIY slashdotters, PAIA has been around for ever. Theremins, tube preamps, effects pedals, analog synths, they could keep you busy for years! They have all sorts of neat kits.
    http://paia.com/

  48. Re:HeathKit Career (sort of) by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

    Gah! Would it really be so hard for Slashdot to convert line breaks into paragraphs? And My title had a '-->' between the two words. Expecting us to write raw HTML is stupid, even if we are geeks.

  49. To meet modern safety regs by russotto · · Score: 2

    The garage parking assistant consists of a tennis ball, a string, and a booklet of warnings about how hanging it should only be done by a skilled professional and to not depend on it as your sole method of parking your car, and you should keep your eyes open at all times while parking, etc.

  50. I bought their stuff last week... by RecycledElectrons · · Score: 1

    I went to http://www.newhamstore.com/ and bought some antennas. They are a great company to deal with.

  51. Yay! by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Great to see this coming back - something that my kids can play with and learn from.

    Now just bring back Capsela and I will be complete.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  52. component-video modulator + demodulator by Miamicanes · · Score: 2

    You know what I want to see from Heathkit? A wideband-FM component video modulator (and companion demodulator) for cheap whole-house HD video distribution. Instead of screwing around with HDCP, or getting tangled up with Hollywood, DRM, and $200 worth of DSP hardware to try and transform 720p60 and 1080i60 into realtime MPEG-2/4, just leave them as analog signals. Take the "Y"(luminance) baseband signal, and modulate it onto a wideband FM carrier somewhere around 200MHz. Then do the same with the "Pb" and "Pr" signals, on wideband FM carriers of their own. Then take the analog stereo input, and run it through a commodity FM stereo modulator chip at something like 88MHz. Feed the signal into a dedicated 75-ohm cable (like the slightly ratty coax buried inside the walls that was put there when the house got built during the 70s or 80s, and hasn't been used since the 90s because it's only RG-59 and falls off rapidly above 500MHz), and use an equally cheap tuner box at each TV throughout the house to tune the modulated wideband FM Y, Pb, and Pr signals back down to component video, tune the FM stereo signal and output analog left and right, and connect it to the TV of interest.

    I'm guessing that a kit project for something like this could profitably sell for around $50 for the transmitter (about $20 worth of parts), and around $40-50 per demodulator box. Not trivially cheap, but if you've ever seen the price of anything intended for transmission of whole-house HD video via HDMI... well, something like this is utterly dirt cheap by comparison.

    It blows my mind that nobody has ever seriously considered making something like this (unless, of course, there's something unusually hard about throwing a ~50MHz baseband signal onto a wideband FM carrier that I'm not aware of). Everybody thinks transmission of uncompressed analog HD video is impossible just because it would take too much bandwidth to do for BROADCAST video. In this case, it's closed circuit, using a dedicated coax cable that's currently buried in the walls doing nothing besides oxidize. It doesn't *matter* if it takes as much bandwidth as the entire broadcast UHF band to send a single channel, because that's all that NEEDS to fit through that one cable.

    There are plenty of expensive ways to distribute HD video to other TVs in the house. There are a few decent ways to do it via cat5 if you can pull new cable. There's basically no way at all to do it cheaply (as HD video) if the only cable that's conveniently at your disposal is an old, abandoned 75-ohm RG59 coax buried inside the walls.

    1. Re:component-video modulator + demodulator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coaxial cable signal speed depends on signal frequency. A 50 MHz bandwidth signal will be distorted by the cable. A long run will be impossible, but maybe inside a house things will work out.

    2. Re:component-video modulator + demodulator by drkoemans · · Score: 1

      While not FM modulated for whole house video, wireless HDMI has become rather cheap recently. Asus makes a kit available on amazon for about $130 for both Rx/Tx that it HDMI input independent; doesn't requires a special chipset like the intel WiDi devices do. Pretty sweet, full motion 1080p video in nearly realtime, too much lag for a video game but great for movies. I don't think multiple receivers can decode it though, but you can send it to different discreet receivers individually. I was impressed because like you, I've balked at the price of digital modulators. Definitely not for the average home AV person.

    3. Re:component-video modulator + demodulator by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      The problem with wireless HDMI is that it's purely line-of-sight, or at best limited to the same room. I looked at a few of them and wondered whether it might be possible to tweak the design to drop the frequency down to UHF and distribute it via RG59 to multiple receivers, but I believe they ALSO require two-way handshaking and other HDCP-centric issues that would still torpedo it for whole-house non-homerun video distribution. You could possibly move the two-way communication out of band and use wi-fi (either piggybacking on the house's existing network, or creating a dedicated adhoc network on a different wifi channel), but ultimately, it's still going to be an expensive bitch to implement... with lots of failure points where things can go wrong and fail to work reliably just by virtue of the way HDCP works.

  53. VTVM by dradler · · Score: 1

    Awesome. I still have my Heathkit Vacuum Tube Voltmeter. I need to dig it out and see if it still works ...

  54. AutoCAD ran on the Z-100 by jabberw0k · · Score: 1

    I believe you will find that AutoCAD 1 ran on the Z-DOS (MS-DOS) side of the Z-100 series computers, not on the 8-bit H/Z-89 or H/Z-90's which had Zilog Z-80 processors. The Z-100 had 640x225 bitmap graphics in monochrome or 8 colors. The 8-bit systems had only VT-52 / VT-100 character block graphics. There are pictures of each on my website here.

  55. parts are cheap, kits are not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    parts may be cheap, but there's a lot more to a kit (esp a Heathkit) than a bag o'parts.
    Someone has to design the widget in the first place, and what you're proposing is probably a 6-12 workmonth effort to come up with a kit-buildable design, do the prototypes, pass the FCC certification tests, etc.
    Then, someone has to write the assembly manual, develop the kitting, etc.

    So, by the time you're done, the $20-30 worth of piece parts is going to be a $200-300 box. As others have pointed out, these days, assembly labor is a tiny fraction of the product cost: you still need all the engineering and design up front, and you have add the substantially greater documentation and support costs.

    Especially so for kits: the volume is small. I've talked to people selling kits into technically sophisticated markets (amateur satellite, etc.), and if you sell 100 kits in a year, you're doing pretty well. If it took only a year of fully burdened engineer time, then the engineering time on the first 5 years production is $500 per unit.

    1. Re:parts are cheap, kits are not by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      You're right about development costs for commercial products, but remember... the bar is much, much lower when you're talking about kits. This particular application of wideband FM might be new, but wideband FM itself is ancient technology. Frankly, if HD happened 20 years earlier, I think it's safe to say that there would be two dozen circuit designs floating around right now to do this same thing. The only thing making it hard NOW is the fact that (statistically) nobody under the age of 60 really understands wideband FM anymore (myself included). If someone could bring this idea to the attention of Wayne Green (the guy who used to publish 73 magazine), he could probably design it HIMSELF as an afternoon hobby project, even if he hasn't personally done anything FM-related in years. Or at least come up with a good, fairly authoritative explanation as to why it's not viable or would cost more to do than it's worth.

      Remember, it's hard to design something like this that's power/spectrum-efficient, cheap, and tolerant of user error. Give it its own 75-ohm RG59, and you don't really have to care about efficiency. You CAN splatter one channel across the entire UHF band, because you've got the cable's entire bandwidth to do it. You don't have to make it user-friendly, because you're dealing with users who by definition MUST have RTFM. That basically leaves a two-sided 2 or 4 layer circuit board made for a buck or so in hundred quantities by a company in China, about $20 worth of parts, a ziploc bag, and a photocopied sheet with the URL of the pdf instruction manual online. You can get away with lots and lots of sins when your target market consists of DIY'ers who can help themselves anyway. This isn't an iPhone ;-)

      The rationale for doing something like this as a kit has less to do with saving labor costs than avoiding FCC regulation (which would add at least $100,000 to the production cost, assuming it even passed). As I understand it, you couldn't sell a finished product like this without FCC approval, but when you sell it as a bag of unsoldered parts and a circuit board, the official responsibility for FCC compliance falls on the buyer (who, of course, will never get it certified).

      As a practical matter a component-video modulator like I described that operates with the typical power of an old RF modulator would be unlikely to have an impact beyond the user's house, even without FCC approval, unless he did something completely idiotic and/or illegal, like try to backfeed the signal into the cable company's cable or jack up the transmission power. If it can be done cheaply, a safety feature to sniff the cable for any hint of QAM (turning on a red error LED and refusing to transmit if it does) would be a nice addition to the design. Beyond that, the potential to interfere is really no better, worse, or different than the potential for someone to do it with an old RF modulator designed for channel 3/4, or even a more expensive "agile" modulator designed for UHF. Just make sure at least the transmitter gets sold with a metal case so the buyer can't try to save a few bucks and run with a bare circuit board hanging behind the TV.

  56. Latter this month, more coming! by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    From the Heathkit web site....

    "Heathkit
    You The kit Builders have Spoken!

    Thank you for your overwhelming response to our announcement that Heathkit is back into the Do-it-Yourself kits business. We received many great suggestions for kits you would like to build.

    We will be releasing Garage Parking Assistant kit (GPA-100) in late September and soon after the Wireless Swimming Pool Monitor kit will be available.

    Based on your input, we are looking at developing amateur radio kits. Our goal is to have kits available by the end of year.

    Please keep your suggestions coming so that we can continue to bring you interesting, unique Heathkit products."

  57. Build, then diagnose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We used to call them "GriefKits" because they so frequently required LOTS of troubleshooting. Of course, my construction skills in those days were not as good as they got later. And after a 20 year hiatus, now my eyesight isn't what it used to be, so they'll be GriefKits all over again...

  58. Electric Organ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got a Heathkit electric organ that my dad put together years ago - still works great! I had to replace some of the frequency dividers a few years back, which was actually possible thanks to the wonderful wiring and timing diagrams, and gave me a chance to put my EE degree to some use.

  59. Heathkit?... try this instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was sadden by Heathkit closing its doors just as I was able to have some "excess" capital for such things. However, Elecraft kits are demonstrably superior in every possible way. I have built a number of their kits, as I was having severe lead withdrawal symptoms;^)
    I am not a spokesman for Elecraft, but if you haven't tried one of their amateur radio kits, you should!