Slashdot Mirror


HP Begins Laying Off WebOS Developers, Potentially Firing CEO

MrCrassic writes "Looks like it might be the beginning of the end for webOS presence at HP, as The Register announced that they laid off 525 webOS developers." From the article: "HP is laying off up to 525 staff from its global webOS hardware biz, according to reports. The tech titan confirmed last month it is shuttering the unit that produced the ill-fated TouchPad and Pre3 devices. 'As communicated on 18 August, HP will discontinue the development of webOS devices within the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011, which ends 31 Oct 2011,' an HP spokesperson told AllThingsD in the US." So far it looks like just the hardware designers are being let go. The HP board happens to be meeting today, possibly to discuss firing the current CEO for failing to improve the company's financial prospects.

37 of 178 comments (clear)

  1. Tech support personnel by Synerg1y · · Score: 2

    Would it be possible to lay those off too and replace them with IT people?

    1. Re:Tech support personnel by ArhcAngel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      WAIT! hp has employees other than management? I thought the entire company was nothing but contract personnel that they laid off one week a year to satisfy the laws about putting contractors in permanent positions. Perhaps they were required to retain the Palm staff as employees for x number of days...

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    2. Re:Tech support personnel by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 2

      OK. Then how about recruiting ones who speak English and shower once a month whether they need it or not?

      It's not them you're smelling when you call tech support.

  2. I've resigned myself to the fact... by Ironchew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...that nothing they do makes any sense.

    1. Re:I've resigned myself to the fact... by pnewhook · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They haven't done anything that made sense since they acquired that pile of crap Compaq.

      I'm wondering if the CEO will actually be fired, or just given another ridiculous golden handshake like was given to Carly Fiorina

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    2. Re:I've resigned myself to the fact... by suomynonAyletamitlU · · Score: 4, Interesting
    3. Re:I've resigned myself to the fact... by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 2

      Things were actually coming together quite nicely under Hurd. I have to say though that the last 6-9 months have been a more fascinating trainwreck than anything Fiorina produced. Quite frankly, I have the strong suspicion that at this point, it's not only the CEO and the executive team that's at fault, but that the board of directors had just as much of a hand in screwing up HP as anybody else. The amount of nonsensical decisions that have come out of Cupertino is just too large to be the product of just one person.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    4. Re:I've resigned myself to the fact... by jd2112 · · Score: 5, Funny

      It makes perfect sense.

      Let's say you were given a year to kill Hewlett-Packard.

      It seems to be a popular game. NetFlix and Mozilla are playing too.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    5. Re:I've resigned myself to the fact... by Jon_S · · Score: 2

      Cupertino, Palo Alto, whatever. It's all the same if you've ever been there.

    6. Re:I've resigned myself to the fact... by mevets · · Score: 2

      On the rumour that Apotheker has been shit-canned, the stock rose almost 7 % -- a market cap increase of about $3B. Imagine if they shot the board and top few levels of mgmt...

      It is a humiliating kick in the crotch to have being firing be the only worthwhile initiative you were involved in. To that end, the BoD was clearly incompetent and he should get a little walkin around money.

  3. Hardware only.. by RedK · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is exactly what they said they would do a month ago. They have been quite clear going forward, they would continue work on webOS itself, just not webOS hardware. So I don't see how this is the "end" of webOS at HP, it's the same thing they've been saying for a month now.

    --
    "Not to mention all the idiots who use words like boxen."
    Anonymous Coward on Monday August 04, @06:49PM
    1. Re:Hardware only.. by digitalsolo · · Score: 2

      Your ideas sound great and incredibly useful.

      We'll have none of that in modern corporate culture, please leave.

      --
      Just another ignorant American.
    2. Re:Hardware only.. by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      i wonder why it required 525 hardware developers to begin with.

      It says "staff from its global webOS hardware biz", not "hardware developers". You have HR, finance, manufacturing, purchasing, janitors, testing, techs, etc... not just hardware engineers. They probably had it set up to be a half-billion dollar or so business, so that number of employees seems pretty reasonable.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    3. Re:Hardware only.. by pavon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      if I remember correctly they stated that they will put it inside cars and other embedded devices

      Yeah, I read that too. Problem is that no-one has made any agreements with them to use the OS. So they are basically just pissing away money in the hope that someone somewhere might want to license the OS, without having any concrete plans for it.

      Oh, and multitouch should be banned from car dashboards. It is the worst possible interface for that situation as requires constant focus on the display for the entire time it is being used, and thus causes far more driver distraction than physical knobs.

    4. Re:Hardware only.. by pnutjam · · Score: 2

      Must be on envelope #2...

  4. Hardware by Tweezak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Note that the article says "hardware staff" not "WebOS Developers." Since HP is discontinuing hardware development for WebOS platforms this is not surprising. I suspect they will continue to own the operating system in hopes of licensing it to other companies.

    1. Re:Hardware by ProppaT · · Score: 2

      Yeah, /. editors have a real knack for reading headlines, ignoring the article, and making up their own headline based on assumptions.

      --
      Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
    2. Re:Hardware by Megaweapon · · Score: 2

      editors

      Inigo-Montoya-that-word.jpg

      --
      I'm sure "SlashdotMedia" will improve on all the wonders that Dice Holdings blessed us all with
  5. Can anyone guess... by Howard+Beale · · Score: 2

    Who s*cked more at their job, but gets a golden parachute?

  6. Fire that NTAC asap and keep the WebOS team by teambpsi · · Score: 2

    Apotheker has to be one of the worst appointments I've seen in 20 years.

    At least Chain-saw Al Dunlap was hired for the express purpose of being a major league a-hole.

    Apotheker showed a shocking poverty of understanding of the empire he was entrusted to run that it makes me seriously question the competency of the people that vetted him?

    --

    Old age and treachery almost always overcome youth and skill.
  7. Re:Does this surprise anyone? by jittles · · Score: 2

    This should not come as a shock to anyone. If I was a WebOS developer working for HP, you can bet your ass I'd have been spending the last couple of months applying elsewhere. As far as the CEO - I'm sure he has a nice, golden parachute. Bend over, stockholders....

    They may not have had months of notice. The HP Touchpad firesale was only about 5 weeks ago. I talked to an HP employee the day before the announcement, and she had no idea this was going on. She dealt exclusively with the Touchpad.

  8. They cant win... by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hp is a sinking ship that cant attract anyone that has any management skills. The current guy has a bad track record, and the possible replacement they are looking at, she's not much better.

    This is what happens when your products suck, your service sucks, and most people say, "HP? that stuff is crap, dont buy it"

    The only way to turn it around is to start "not sucking"....

    Step 1 - Fire every designer in the laptop division. Whoever green lighted the seamless trackpad should be tied up and whipped in front of all the other employees as an example.

    Step 2 - Fire every stylist in the PC division. Sorry but trendy = dumb and that failure of a removable drive bay needs to go. Anyone that says the word "proprietary" or "custom designed" needs to be smacked in the face without hesitation and the word "NO" yelled in their face.

    Step 3 - Fire everyone in the Printer driver division. IF the driver is not a simple small single file then it's garbage. No I dont want to install 160meg of helpers. Nobody does.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:They cant win... by Gazzonyx · · Score: 2

      160MB driver? No, the driver is only 40MB, it's the crap that they bundle that wants to start up with your computer at every boot that takes up the other 120MB. Their corporate printer drivers aren't bad at all, they're basically a single INF file, but their consumer drivers are what crap aspires to be when it grows up.

      --

      If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

    2. Re:They cant win... by kaiser423 · · Score: 2

      Ah, you must never have gotten one of their printers that is flaky as all get out with "just" the 40MB install, and you end up downloading the whole 200MB package just to get the printer to work right...

    3. Re:They cant win... by glassware · · Score: 2

      Where did you find a 160MB driver? The last HP printer driver I downloaded was 534MB. And yet for some reason it wasn't an ISO, it was a single executable file that took 15-20 minutes to install and unpackage.

      They had an alternative 4MB driver that only included the printer definition. However, the 4MB driver didn't include the scanning capability.

      Also, I've noticed that HP printers take about 1 minute to come in or out of standby mode; so printing a single page takes ~2 minutes. On any other modern printer the same page is virtually instantaneous.

      Back in the '90s I refused to buy any printer other than an HP; nowadays I only buy no-name rebadged printers from Dell and high performance network copiers. It's sad how far they've fallen.

    4. Re:They cant win... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Hp is a sinking ship that cant attract anyone that has any management skills.
      "

      Would you work there?

      That is the problem. Your steps just address the symptoms not the problem. The problem is all the good employees quit or were canned. Your steps are examples of cheap and bad employees who couldn't get hired elsewhere. I have a great HP monitor that has amazing color contrast and response time. Part of HP's great engineering of old. Today only the bean counters are compensated well.

      The problem is a company's #1 are its good employees. Notice I did not say employees. I said good employees. They are an asset and not a liability/cost center. If they are then it is best you focus them on flipping burgers as in the I.T. world you need compentent people.

      HP is screwed and no they wont be a IBM/Sap powerhouse with great consultants. A good one would refuse to work at HP and be treated like cattle from some kid with an assocates in accounting pointing a finger about costs etc. If HP can't even manage their own company, why would I hire them to help manage mine?

      They are done and in 5 years they will be out of business

  9. Cut costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have a feeling the bean counters have taken over completely at HP. Engineers are a cost center. Get rid of engineers. Software developers are a cost center. Get rid of software developers. Since no one in the US is willing to work for 7 cents per hour, all manufacturing takes place in China. Sell the buildings that used to contain engineers and software developers. HP will then consist of CXO's on the top floor of one building, with the next floor dedicated to bean counters, and the main floor for overseas operations (bean counters never consider themselves to be a cost center). Its easier to outsource operations, so the overseas operations will be 'rent-a-plant', and since that also includes 'rent-an-engineer', everything but the head office will be overseas. Next to go is the bottom floor. Sell to the overseas manufacturer, give the top two floors a cushy severance, and wind that baby down. Its not like Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard are around anymore. The founding engineers are gone. The glory days of the company were when the founders founded it, and ran it for the first 20 years. The next 20 years saw growth, but not quite so much glory for new hires. The next 20 years saw new managers come in when the founding engineers retired but oversaw things. Things got more corporate. Still an ok company to work for, but not great. The founders die, more management changes (bean counters take over). Bill Hewlett died in 2001, David Packard died in 1996. What Bill and Dave started, Carly and others have done a great job killing. I give them at the outside 10 more years, but something in my head says they will be dead in less than 5. HP joins Sun.

  10. Ah Cringely.... by uzd4ce · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Cringely saw this one coming a long time away... ok, maybe 7 months isn't so long:

    http://www.cringely.com/2011/02/why-leo-apotheker-will-be-fired-from-hewlett-packard/

  11. the only common factor in all of HP's failures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    is the board.

  12. What Slashdot really needs by Jmc23 · · Score: 2
    is a facility to edit submission summaries. This way we can avoid all the posts complaining about the seriously inaccurate summary as well as all of the posts from people who can't be bothered to read the article and so are ranting and raving and opinionating about false information.

    Granted, this would probably leave only a handful of posts.

    --
    Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  13. Oh hell yes. by hellfire · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Does HP really want to give up that long-term cash flow to go chase its dreams?

    In a word, yes. In three words, oh hell yes.

    PC hardware is a commodity market and it's a mess. The upside that anyone can build a PC these days is a double edged sword, because just about anyone can build a PC these days, and the ones that do it the cheapest are the ones who win out. Margins are razor thin. High end desktops are a rare purchase. Mid-range desktops are only sold mostly to businesses when they don't need a laptop. Laptops are losing out to iPads and Macbooks now, which are solid alternatives at comparable prices, AND have better quality on average. HP is not making gobs and gobs of profit on hardware, only Apple, Samsung and HTC seem to be able to do that at the moment. Sure they might bring in $100 million in revenue but it cost like $99 million to make that. The numbers are exaggerated of course but the point is that HP sees that their hardware business is not making as much profit as you think, and it's the profit that's important.

    Look, IBM created the PC and it was their cash cow for years. They then established a business consulting branch to encourage people to buy their machines. Then Compaq came along and ate their lunch, and suddenly their cash cow went away. One day, someone realized "holy shit! Our consultants make more money than our hardware does. All we do is contract out the manufacturing work to some other bozo anyway, let's sell hardware and make consulting our new cash cow, and simply tell them to buy whatever hardware we feel like."

    What's funny is when IBM did this, similar things happened economically then that are happening now. 2001, the dotcom bubble bursts, 3 years later IBM sells it's hardware to work business to business. 2008, housing market crashes and 3 years later, HP gets out of hardware. In both situations, the average household consumer is hit hard and hurting, median middle class wages are practically stagnant and not keeping up with inflation, but corporate profits continue to rise in both instances.

    Follow the money, the money is in businesses paying businesses for business consulting to run their business more. Huge international companies selling to average consumers is folly compared to selling to business these days especially when all the money is in corporations and rich people's pockets (that's not some political slogan, that's just the truth). Sure HP could keep it's hardware, it's probably still profitable over all, but why work so hard at making a little money when you could work half as hard and still make a killing in business consulting?

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    1. Re:Oh hell yes. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2

      Here is the problem. Assuming HP gets a 0% profit margin, the people you buy servers and business consulting contracts are the same people you buy your desktops from. Makes sense to have one standard for the whole company right?

      If HP leaves the desktop market, their customers are going to switch to Dell. Guess which contracts and servers they will buy? Oh, Dell!

      HP gives 40% discounts on their products to business users so I doubt their margins are that thin. Perhaps in retail like BestBuy they are thin, but that retailer choses it to be and puts huge pressure on their sales force to sell $100 Monster powerstrips that are really worth $9.99, and useless anti-virus software to make up for each unit sold.

      IBM overcharged and were selling systems with only 8 megs of ram for the same price as a 32 meg ram system as late as 1997. They really blew and it is no wonder they left that market.

      The CEO wants HP to become SAP, but it is not. IBM had consultants since the 1950s so they are different. To me this sounds no different than hiring the CEO of Bryers to turn HP into an Ice Cream company. Why not? That is a terrible thing to do in business as evident in case studies of dead companies. The problem is HP has no talent left as they were either laid off or quit. They are terrible company to work for and their consultants probably hail from India and can't speak english well or are devry graduates. IBM on the otherhand has great mediocre talent.

      If HP can't even run their own company why would I pay big bucks to consult on how to run mine?

  14. Slash and burn CEOs are destroying HP by hattig · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sure, you can make the figures look good in the short term by slashing R&D and firing everybody, but in the longer run you have no new products coming down the line.

    Bye bye HP. In ten years time you'll be a niche printer ink seller.

  15. Only one thing wrong with that by Kupfernigk · · Score: 2
    IBM make very large, very fast, mainframes. They never got out of that business. And there is only so much consulting.

    An example. Around 25 years ago, where I live, a farmer built a golf course on his land.
    He made quite a lot of money, quite fast.
    A few other farmers thought golf clubs were a good idea, and persuaded people to invest in them
    For some reason, they didn't make much money. But other farmers saw the golf clubs and still thought it looked like easy money.
    They built golf clubs.
    Pretty soon some of the golf clubs were closing, and the early profitable ones didn't make much money any more.
    I wonder why? Oh, it turns out that there is only a certain amount of demand for golf. When everyone can afford to play it, it has no social status any more.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  16. Re:Just adjust your assumptions by cartman · · Score: 2

    Instead look a human nature. The primary sin being vanity... Assume the word "I" in double bold capital letters is the most important word in the universe. Assume it's about personal aggrandisement, power etc... Life will start to make more sense to you.

    I think it's more likely that Apotheker is just incompetent as a CEO, and he made mistakes.

    His incentives are at least somewhat aligned with those of the company. He is paid primarily in options. If HP makes a big profit then his options are worth a lot, he makes tons of money, he is seen as a successful CEO, he continues on in his powerful role, etc.

    How does it help his vanity, or power, or personal aggrandisement, to make these silly decisions and then be fired from HP for failing to increase its profits?

  17. Re:Little detail, but... by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 2

    Eh, the Palo Alto "HQ" is a shell of a building. I was over there a couple of years ago, and in one long-abandoned cubicle area of the building, they hadn't even cleaned up the coffee cup on one guy's desk. Apparently, coffee left on its own for a few years transforms into a kind of glue. You could hold it upside down, and the spoon wouldn't drop out. It was like a freaky episode of the Twilight Zone.

    The buildings that were in heavy use were all in Cupertino.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.