Slashdot Mirror


Via Files Suit Against Apple

crookedvulture writes "Add chipmaker Via to the list of companies filing legal suit against Apple. Via owns a number of fundamental technology patents inherited from Centaur, and it's already forced Intel to grant an ongoing x86 license. Via also has a vested interest; CEO Wenchi Chen is married to the head of HTC, which Apple sued for patent infringement last March."

262 comments

  1. Release the Kraken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Surely Apple did not think that they were the only ones in the market with a patent portfolio.

    1. Re:Release the Kraken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Considering they are one of the most frequently sued companies in the tech industry, it's highly unlikely they hadn't noticed others hold patents.

    2. Re:Release the Kraken! by jimpop · · Score: 1

      Apple is late to the IP game. Still, when it's all said and done, the consumer is the loser, and will always be as long as mankind can patent ideas.

    3. Re:Release the Kraken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely you do not believe that every component of the IPhone is made in the good old USA. The IPhone is a half baked, over marketed phone solution.

      Most likely Oracle will fail, but only after Google starts using Python bytecode for their platform instead of Java/Dalvik.

    4. Re:Release the Kraken! by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 0

      It's rather fascinating to see just were arrogance will land you...

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    5. Re:Release the Kraken! by mug+funky · · Score: 4, Insightful

      if they were worried about their IP being stolen, perhaps they should manufacture in their own country... it's not like the USA is in need of more jobs or anything.

      people pay enough for their iToys that it wouldn't hurt apple too much - it'd be slow and steady growth rather than meteoric rise and then sue-town for the next 50 years.

    6. Re:Release the Kraken! by node+3 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Apple did some great marketing with the iphone line, but they just can't keep up with the market anymore.

      Are you kidding? They're the market leader.

      They weren't suing when they had the marketing edge, but now that it is gone, and the rest of the flock has exceeded them technologically, the only thing left to them is sue.

      Except for the fact that they are the market leader. Name *ONE* mobile company doing better than Apple right now.

      They've only sued over things they believe they own, and the courts have agreed with them. They aren't trying to stop HTC or Samsung from making their own products, but they *are* trying to stop them from making products that are too much a clone of Apple's products.

      There are plenty of ways to make a multitouch phone and multitouch tablet. Apple chose their style. It's up to everyone else to choose their own as well.

    7. Re:Release the Kraken! by cababunga · · Score: 2

      ... the consumer is the loser...

      Unless, of course, she is also a lawyer...

    8. Re:Release the Kraken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      First, Via is not Chinese, its Taiwanese.
      Second, their patents come from the acquisition of Centaur Technologies many years ago, which was an American company.
      Where is the IP stealing going on?

    9. Re:Release the Kraken! by jimpop · · Score: 1

      touché

    10. Re:Release the Kraken! by msauve · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Apple is playing a dangerous game. With their very limited range of products, they're much more exposed than most companies. Sue Samsung? Android and tablets are a small fraction of Samsung's business, they'd hardly notice if they were gone - if Apple's iOS were shut down for patent infringement (iPods and iPhones), they'd be screwed. HTC is more dependent on Android, but still has more to fall back on (proportionally) than Apple does.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    11. Re:Release the Kraken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's OK, Americans assume all of Asia is just one big China. They also assume they made everything ever and that anyone non-American claiming to have designed or made something must be a patent troll.

      Oh and Fuck you Apple.

    12. Re:Release the Kraken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      As of Q2 2011 (I wonder what's more recent numbers are) they were market leader with a stunning 1% - it's as much as TEN promilles, I tell you! - leader over Samsung. That's if you look at individual manufacturers - not on the success of the platform.

      As for "clone of Apple's products" - that's bullshit and even courts already know that's bullshit. Only Apple's fanboys still go on about rounded rectangle with bezels and with a grid of icons on display as "Apple chose their style". Look at LG Prada, for a start. Then look at iPhone. Now say, who copied who?

    13. Re:Release the Kraken! by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      First, Via is not Chinese, its Taiwanese.

      Mainland China: People's Republic of China

      Taiwan:Republic of China

      Ask anyone form Taiwan, and they will tell you they are Chinese.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    14. Re:Release the Kraken! by Virtual_Raider · · Score: 2, Insightful

      (...)

      Most likely Oracle will fail, but only after Google starts using Python bytecode for their platform instead of Java/Dalvik.

      OH GOD YES PLEASE MAKE IT SO!

      Damn, few things make yelp like a little girl but this one did :P

      --
      +Raider of the lost BBS
    15. Re:Release the Kraken! by besalope · · Score: 5, Informative

      Except for the fact that they are the market leader. Name *ONE* mobile company doing better than Apple right now.

      They've only sued over things they believe they own, and the courts have agreed with them. They aren't trying to stop HTC or Samsung from making their own products, but they *are* trying to stop them from making products that are too much a clone of Apple's products.

      There are plenty of ways to make a multitouch phone and multitouch tablet. Apple chose their style. It's up to everyone else to choose their own as well.

      Except that at the OS level Android has eclipsed iOS with 2x the marketshare in 1Q11.

      As for phone manufacturers: Nokia (25%), Samsung (16%), and LG (5.6%) are all ahead of Apple (3.9%) in market share.

      As for styling, there's only so much you can do with a rectangular design with rounded corners.

    16. Re:Release the Kraken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Centaur still exists -- Via is its parent company, but is still located in Austin.

    17. Re:Release the Kraken! by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

      How is Apple late to the IP game? Remember Apple suing GEM and all that?

    18. Re:Release the Kraken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      if they were worried about their IP being stolen, perhaps they should manufacture in their own country... it's not like the USA is in need of more jobs or anything.

      Is it sad or funny? Complaining about Apple not manufacturing, when Steve Jobs started Next which did high tech manufacturing in the US, making really, really awesome computers... which people didn't buy because they preferred cheap imported goods and because nobody cared if the DoJ enforced antitrust laws against Microsoft who was breaking the law and undermining competition to prevent innovative companies like Next from being successful. The US had its chance at innovative, US based manufacture and pissed on it. Jobs learned better and went with foreign component suppliers when Next was acquired by Apple.

      Learn your geek history.

    19. Re:Release the Kraken! by Tsingi · · Score: 1, Insightful
      I suppose that is all geek history. Beyond that it is a sad lot of unrelated crap that makes no logical point.

      It certainly has nothing to do with the fact that American companies do not support Americans. But then, they aren't really American companies any more, are they? Except for retail, and steadily shrinking R&D, they don't employ Americans, and they don't pay much in taxes, if anything at all.

      Rats deserting a sinking ship, going to where the pickings are better. Apple is no exception.

    20. Re:Release the Kraken! by Gaygirlie · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Surely Apple did not think that they were the only ones in the market with a patent portfolio.

      That's what I've been wondering about. Apple are suing all kinds of mobile device manufacturers left and right in hopes of being able to bar them from markets and to remain on top themselves. But they MUST have known that once they start suing the other big players they'll start pushing back and not only the ones being sued but also all the others too just to ensure that Apple won't win, otherwise Apple would just come after the rest later on. And well, gee, that's exactly what's happening: companies that haven't yet been sued are taking the initiative and suing first. Offense is the best defense and so on.

      So what's Apple's angle here? They stand to lose quite a lot of money, and if the sh*t really hits the fan their stuff could be barred from the market and a large portion of their patent portfolio could get invalidated. So is there a plan behind this, or was it just simply we've-grown-so-big-we-think-we-can-do-anything - type of brainfart? I personally believe it's more towards the brainfart - situation here and things just got out of hand, but I suppose we'll see how this giant game of chess plays out.

    21. Re:Release the Kraken! by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't think Apple expects to permanently ban them from the market. It just wants to keep competitors wrapped up in court cases until Apple can scoop them with its newest offerings. I'm sure it knows full well most of its suits are sheer garbage that ultimately will fail. But ultimately could mean what? 6 to 24 months? Oh my, look at that, the iPad 3 and the iPhone 5 come out in those kinds of Windows, meanwhile the competition has a product to bring to a market but can't because of what amounts of a strategically placed nuisance suit.

      Of course, if Apple suddenly finds its own products being delayed in the same manner, or worse, but actual hard technology patents, then yes, they could seriously fuck themselves over. But that's fine. If everyone eventually ends this evil little war in a compromise, the consumer will win. I just hope all sides lose massive amounts of money in the process. Unfortunately, the lawyers will get rich(er).

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    22. Re:Release the Kraken! by Tsingi · · Score: 2

      I second that emotion.

    23. Re:Release the Kraken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Apple is late to the IP game. Still, when it's all said and done, the consumer is the loser, and will always be as long as mankind can patent ideas.

      By the gods, you are right! We were so much better under the guild system when the only people who could learn about a new development were people who could be put to death for attempting to share that information with other people outside the guild. Oh, wait...

      Heh, the word verification is "imbecile"!

    24. Re:Release the Kraken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Get outside of Taipei and into "Green" territory, and you might learn that many* Taiwanese consider themselves to be ... wait for it... Taiwanese. They tend to consider the invading Han Chang Kai Shek and Sun Yat Sen (using Wade-Giles, not Hanyu Pinyin) and their followers to be history they would rather not have been involved with.

      * "many" approaches 49% for some definitions of many.

      Word verification is "remorse", how do they pick these words?

    25. Re:Release the Kraken! by jkcity · · Score: 2

      You know its not true not everyone in taiwan thinks they are chinese, some do think of themselves as taiwanese never mind there is abroginal groups there who don't identify with china at all.

      Its like saying all americans think of themselves as european.

    26. Re:Release the Kraken! by cloricus · · Score: 0

      Yes, they should just continue allowing competitors to copy their small range of products verbatim!

      --
      I ate your fish.
    27. Re:Release the Kraken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Except that at the OS level Android has eclipsed iOS with 2x the marketshare in 1Q11

      Only if you exclude iPad and iPod Touch with that report excludes.

    28. Re:Release the Kraken! by QuantumLeaper · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What Black Bezels and round counters, is verbatim?

    29. Re:Release the Kraken! by jyx · · Score: 1

      Yes, they should just continue allowing competitors to copy their small range of products verbatim!

      I do not think this word means what you think it means.

      The the product that you statement is based on, whilst very similar does not: Weigh the exactly the same, have exactly the same dimensions, have exactly the inputs or have exactly the same operating system as the ipad.

      Instead of suing, apple should be using it to their advantage "Look at the crappy imitators, apple original is bestest!!1!"

    30. Re:Release the Kraken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. Though I expect it has everything to do with Apple pushing up on "largest company in the world" status, more than anything else.

      Aim for the deepest pockets, and all that.

    31. Re:Release the Kraken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Patents are fine - if they would be restricted to things that were actual, novel inventions. The problem is that the government allowed the patent system to be abused to heck. One-click checkout is a patent? Using a touch/gesture on a phone to unlock it is a patent? As long as the patent office allows these trivial gimicks to become patents this sort of nonsense will continue. Patents should be restricted to things that are actually new knowledge that people did not have before. For example, figure out an algorithm to solve a problem that was previously unsolvable, or solve a problem far more efficiently, then yes, that is a patent as it is knowledge of how to do something that people did not know how to do before. Putting buttons on a webpage? Unlock a phone by touching the touchscreen? That is not new knowledge.

    32. Re:Release the Kraken! by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

      Not only don't they work the same, they don't even look the same. Apple was caught editing the comparison images for court to make their case.

    33. Re:Release the Kraken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Ask anyone form Taiwan, and they will tell you they are Chinese" - ask the government in China and you'll get the same answer, though in a subtly different sense :-)

    34. Re:Release the Kraken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Okay, so throw in Samsung's excavator sales and your point is? That's what great about statistics, you can pick and choose which ones you throw out there to try to prove your point.

      Phone sales, Apple no
      OS sales, Apple no
      Phone OS sales, Apple no
      Smartphone sales, Apple no
      Smartphone OS, Apple no
      Smartphone and tablet OS, Apple yes

      Bingo, found one. Run with it.

    35. Re:Release the Kraken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Apple makes no technology. For decades, the other technology players in this arena all "share" technology for the benefit of all of them. Each supply each other with parts and assemblies like lcd screens, batteries, memory, manufacturing ability, chips, fab etc.. They manufacture, design, assemble, and sell raw and end user finished products. All Apple is bringing to the table now is some design and marketing and it is not willing to share that back with those same players. What would you expect these companies to do? Still cooperate? For Apple to continue on this path, they will HAVE to secure more assembly lines and be involved with more of the core technology.

    36. Re:Release the Kraken! by fishingmachine · · Score: 2

      Except for the fact that they are the market leader. Name *ONE* mobile company doing better than Apple right now. how about exxon mobil?

    37. Re:Release the Kraken! by Osgeld · · Score: 0

      Apple used to make their shit in the USA, I dont see why they wouldn't now outside of profit margins they help make stupid thin

      and pointing out next? really they were ultra premium workstations with dick for nothing software based on honestly substandard hardware for the time, not even apple fanboi's could support that experiment. (yea I know almighty jobs used unix with a taskbar in the gui, here is your golden coin)

      good luck in your quest of job's approval, the rest of us (including your god steve) live in the real world

    38. Re:Release the Kraken! by erroneus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      China also assumes Asia is one big China, so we're all in agreement on this point right?

    39. Re:Release the Kraken! by erroneus · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Oh please... why did you have to tell people this? For anyone who keeps claiming someone to have copied Apple Computers' stuff, let them point to evidence and THEN show them their evidence is a lie. This helps them get through their stages of grief faster moving from denial into anger and so on.

    40. Re:Release the Kraken! by sjames · · Score: 0

      Why not, they apparently think that they're the only people smart enough to think of a rounded rectangle.

    41. Re:Release the Kraken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is the statement that Android out sells iOS is a false statement.

    42. Re:Release the Kraken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The point is the statement that Android out sells iOS is a false statement.

      [Citation needed]

      Please point me towards statistics showing the opposite is true.

    43. Re:Release the Kraken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get outside of Taipei and into "Green" territory, and you might learn that many* Taiwanese consider themselves to be ... wait for it... Taiwanese. [* "many" approaches 49% for some definitions of many.]

      Citation needed. Since 98% of Taiwan's population is Han, according to Wikipedia, you can understand my skepticism of your 49% figure.

    44. Re:Release the Kraken! by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 1

      And I still won't touch an iPhone with a 10 foot barge pole. They might be decent phones but they are overpriced and just not my thing.

    45. Re:Release the Kraken! by errandum · · Score: 1

      The problem is bigger than that.

      Most of the "job creators" politicians talk about are owners of companies that, much like apple, create jobs overseas. They are rich, have enough money and pull to avoid getting taxed and contribute to the ridiculous unemployment rates the US has now.

      As for the news, it is true that apple has the money to fight these, but you have to understand that it is mostly alone fighting every other single company that produces cell phones. Even if apple has some IPs, they will get burned eventually. They should have focused on keeping their allies (like samsung or google) and not trying to shoot in every direction.

    46. Re:Release the Kraken! by tknd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If everyone eventually ends this evil little war in a compromise, the consumer will win. I just hope all sides lose massive amounts of money in the process. Unfortunately, the lawyers will get rich(er).

      I don't understand how you come to this logic. Previously nobody was actively attacking each other with patent suits, Apple let the cat out of the bag, and now pretty much every player now has an extra line item called lawyer-ing up on their expense sheet as well as all future requirements having an additional risk item called "patent violation risk". Any engineer knows that the more requirements you tag on, the more expensive the product will get. But this one is a double-whammy because not only does the engineering team have to design in attempts to avoid/develop patents, but now the lawyer team gets bigger to defend against patent attacks.

      All this means is delayed products, less freedom for companies to develop products, and more stand-offs between companies. The consumer is never going to benefit. The products will be delayed or put off of the market. The next generation products will be more expensive. All future products will come with their own awkwardness just because of these patent wars.

      Consider this. The top two manufacturers for cameras, Canon and Nikon, don't name their "modes" identically though they should. Canon labels shutter mode "Tv". Nikon labels it "S". Additionally, the exposure bias meters are opposite. Nobody shares lens mounts. Each mfg makes their own. The result? You buy into a set of lenses and if you want to switch you have to sell all of your gear and go buy into a new set of lenses.

      Macs and Windows PCs had the same awkwardness too. ctrl+c for windows. cmd+c (alt key location for PCs) for macs.

      You can see this sort of non-sense going on everywhere in new technology. ebooks: Amazon kindle's only do kindle drm formats and pdfs, everyone else has their own drm format. All of the streaming video content services and random support with tvs and tv boxes (roku, boxee, apple tv, etc).

      It's a giant mess and the consumer definitely isn't winning. The consumer was in an awesome position back when we were still using vhs and cassette tapes. You could take that stupid tape and a gazillion different devices played it from that giant boom box, to the school's cheezy tape player, do your car radio. Same with vhs. These days? Fuck you.

      Apple knows this and they're trying to corner the market while they can. They don't want a race to the bottom but that's exactly what would benefit the consumer the most. While they certainly aren't the only company attempting this (sony and bluray, amazon and kindle, etc) they're certainly one of the most significant (ios apps).

    47. Re:Release the Kraken! by Serious+Callers+Only · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it knows full well most of its suits are sheer garbage that ultimately will fail.

      In the meantime, they lose loyalty from potential customers who notice that they're now more interested in filing lawsuits than producing a good product. There has been a marked increase in Apple's willingness to sue over the last year or so as Jobs was eased out, and I expect that to continue, as the company starts to be run by suits who are interested in squeezing money out of customers, rather than someone who was interested purely in producing something insanely great.

      Shame really as they were the only company with a consistent focus on good design in both hardware and software. They need someone to step in and stop the madness (e.g. suing HTC to try to block their products because they look similar, WTF!), and focus on creating the next generation of products, which their competitors haven't even seen yet - that is where the real money lies, not in chasing after competitors producing knock-offs of last year's hit product. This is not a game Apple can win, but as you say, the lawyers will bleed them dry.

    48. Re:Release the Kraken! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      The problem with NeXT was not that they were made in the USA, it was that, as you said, they were really really awesome computers. They were graphical UNIX workstations, with high resolution displays. They were definitely not consumer products. This is the difference between the NeXT and Apple philosophies: NeXT wanted to make the best computer possible, Apple wants to make computers that aren't as bad as the competition's products.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    49. Re:Release the Kraken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for the fact that they are the market leader. Name *ONE* mobile company doing better than Apple right now. how about exxon mobil?

      Market cap based on 9/22 market close:
      Apple: $372.5 Bn
      Exxon Mobil: $336.7 Bn

    50. Re:Release the Kraken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've only sued over things they believe they own, and the courts have agreed with them. They aren't trying to stop HTC or Samsung from making their own products, but they *are* trying to stop them from making products that are too much a clone of Apple's products.

      There are plenty of ways to make a multitouch phone and multitouch tablet. Apple chose their style. It's up to everyone else to choose their own as well.

      Um. No. I believe Apple tried to patent multitouch.

    51. Re:Release the Kraken! by CapuchinSeven · · Score: 2

      The touch screen probably wouldn't accept input from a 10 foot barge pole.

    52. Re:Release the Kraken! by CapuchinSeven · · Score: 2

      Jessh whatever, like the judge ONLY looked at ONE image supplied by Apple of the products and the the actual physical products (hint, that is actually the case the Judge had access to a number of pictures and the actual physical products).

    53. Re:Release the Kraken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple management is certainly nervous because :
      -A : their next line of products are delayed
      and/or :
      -B : the specifications of the next line of products will not meet the customers' expectation for new features.

      If Apple had a strong line of products coming, they would leak some pictures/specifications in the media, and that hype would stop the progress of the competition marketshares.

    54. Re:Release the Kraken! by dimeglio · · Score: 2

      The only people who will get anything out of this are lawyers. Even if Apple is 100% guilty and infringing, a judge would never issue an injunction if it means the death of Apple. All that can happen is they will have to settle resulting in a "reasonable" amount of money exchanged between the two.

      Don't make things more dramatic than they are.

      --
      Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
    55. Re:Release the Kraken! by CapuchinSeven · · Score: 2

      ..and copy and pasting Apple's icon designs, using Apple's style of packaging, a device that looks very similar to an iPad which Samsung had early access plans to because they helped build it. Why is it so hard for you people to grasp that this has nothing to do with Apple patenting a rectangle, it's a TRADE DRESS CASE, of which a number of issues have been raised, not just one. No one cares if Sony made a white laptop, Apple on the other hand feels that copy and pasting Apples icons, using Apple style packaging all on a device that does look very much like an iPad that Samsung hand access to before anyone else, is a trade dress issue. I don't care which side of the fence people fall on when it comes to Apple vs Samsung but can you people PLEASE try and understand what a trade dress issue is and how "a rounded rectangle" has nothing to do with patents and has to be placed in context with a number of other trade dress issues. This is not just about "a rounded rectangle".

    56. Re:Release the Kraken! by psxndc · · Score: 1

      It's a giant mess and the consumer definitely isn't winning. The consumer was in an awesome position back when we were still using vhs and cassette tapes. You could take that stupid tape and a gazillion different devices played it from that giant boom box, to the school's cheezy tape player, do your car radio. Same with vhs. These days? Fuck you.

      Not true. You couldn't take your VHS tape and put it in a betamax player. And putting a metal cassette tape in a recorder that didn't detect it as metal caused distortion. It's always been like this. Maybe not the patent wars, but every manufacturer wants to lock you in. How many Gillette razor blades will work on a Schick handle and vice versa?

      --

      The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

    57. Re:Release the Kraken! by jo_ham · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, but that's not all that Samsung copied. They made the Galaxy look just like an iPhone 3Gs, right down to the UI and specific colouring and icon style.

      There are myriad ways to make a black bezel, rounded corner phone and not make it look like an iPhone 3G - just look at, oh, any other Android phone.

      When the tech press says of the Galaxy, before any hints of lawsuits were mentioned "it looks great, but it's awfully like an iPhone" you knew it was only matter of time.

      To repeat, it's not one single element that caused the lawsuit - it's all of them combined together.

      Making a phone with a black bezel and rounded corners of a specific radius: ok
      Making a phone with a virtually identical UI to the iPhone: ok
      Making a phone with a black bezel and rounded corners of a specific radius and adding that identical UI: lawsuit.

      The nonsense dismissal by slashdot that this is all about "patenting a rounded rectangle" just makes people look ignorant.

      I personally don;t agree with the lawsuit, since it just seems like a waste of resources, but I can certainly see why they decided to go for it, and why they seem to be making headway.

    58. Re:Release the Kraken! by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm sure the entire case is based on a single distorted image.

    59. Re:Release the Kraken! by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      The touch screen probably wouldn't accept input from a 10 foot barge pole.

      only if it was a certified iPole

    60. Re:Release the Kraken! by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      How are iOS apps different from any other piece of software written for an OS?

      You can't just take them and run them on another OS because that's not how it works. In the same way I can't take the Windows version of Firefox and run it on OS X, or on Linux without using an emulator, or rebuilding it from source for the new platform. In that respect, iOS apps are nothing new, and there are many of them out there that are simply built for different platforms from a common base - dual iOS and Android versions for example.

      It's not "lock in" if your OS happens to work like that, unless it's ok to call all Windows apps "lock in" too, and all Android apps since I can't just take them and run them on any other device running a different OS.

      Where it *really* matters is the data and the content. You need to be able to get your data in and out of the system you are using. On Mac and iOS this is easy - they use open formats for all the major stuff (address book, email, music, calendars, documents etc) so you can say "ok, I'm moving all my data to Android". Contrast this with Windows, where the email and contact stuff is tied up in a .pst format, exclusive to Outlook. Sure there are tools that might be able to get your data out, but it's not like they made it easy to do. Of course it's easy to migrate *into* in Outlook environment, but going the other way is hard work. If you want to leave Apple's ecosystem, your mail is in .mbox, your calendars and address book are built on open source tools in open formats, your music is in AAC format, your documents (if you've been using Apple's software) are in a documented XML format, etc.

      The only stumbling block right now on the Apple front is videos, since these still have DRM, which is why I do not have any video from the iTunes store. Other than that, you ca go in and out of the Apple ecosystem as much as you like - I have a combined OS X/Ubuntu setup, and they work quite happily together.

    61. Re:Release the Kraken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that they are one of the most frequently suing companies in the tech industry, basing their litigation on patents that are patently obvious, it's highly unlikely that they have a fucking clue.

      There - fixed that for you.

    62. Re:Release the Kraken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Previously nobody was actively attacking each other with patent suits, Apple let the cat out of the bag...

      Seriously? Are you delusional?

      Apple has been the target of suits from both patent trolls and real competitors for years. I don't know who exactly "let the cat out of the bag", but it wasn't Apple. Nokia sued Apple first. So did Motorola. Don't let the facts get in the way of your worldview or anything.

    63. Re:Release the Kraken! by Hatta · · Score: 1

      The US had its chance...and pissed on it.

      You could say that about just about anything these days.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    64. Re:Release the Kraken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do they not support Americans? Americans demand lots of cool electronics as cheap as they can be had. And despite the wailing over Apple's pricing, on a feature for feature basis, the cool part above, they are price competitive.

      Directly in line with the poster above you, if Apple manufacured in the US and priced their products accordingly, as Next did, Americans wouldn't buy them and Apple would soon go out of business.

    65. Re:Release the Kraken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's not forget that the Samsung logo was removed by Photoshop and the bezel was re-coloured to match the iPad. Yes, distorted image indeed.

    66. Re:Release the Kraken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Considering they are one of the most frequently suing companies
      FTFY

    67. Re:Release the Kraken! by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 0

      One world - Xerox. Now GTFO.

    68. Re:Release the Kraken! by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      Opposite? Why would he find statistic disproving his point?

      As for proving his point, right here:

      http://www.netmarketshare.com/

      Apple is at 53% of mobile browsing if you include tablets.

    69. Re:Release the Kraken! by JDG1980 · · Score: 1

      "Even if Apple is 100% guilty and infringing, a judge would never issue an injunction if it means the death of Apple."
      Why not? I am not aware of any legal principle that would justify such a refusal. Was Apple declared "too big to fail" at some point and I missed it?

    70. Re:Release the Kraken! by MSG · · Score: 1

      Why? Bytecode isn't what they're being sued for. It's not even clear that a Python runtime wouldn't infringe on the patents in question.

    71. Re:Release the Kraken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://gs.statcounter.com/#mobile_os-ww-monthly-201103-201108 ... Or around 19-20% and about 0.1% behind Android.

      Browser stats are fun, there are so many to choose from!

    72. Re:Release the Kraken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >It's a giant mess and the consumer definitely isn't winning.

      be careful what you wish for. we got rid of that giant mess with ISPs and look what happened to the consumer when we won.

    73. Re:Release the Kraken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Samsung.

    74. Re:Release the Kraken! by deathguppie · · Score: 1

      Why? Bytecode isn't what they're being sued for. It's not even clear that a Python runtime wouldn't infringe on the patents in question.

      True, but wouldn't it be nice to force some of those idiots out there to write human readable code?

      --
      once more into the breach
    75. Re:Release the Kraken! by deathguppie · · Score: 1

      This argument would make sense if Samsung was the only phone make that was sued by Apple. They are not. I don't know how similar the galaxy S is to the Iphone I've never personally compared them (HTC, and Motorola phones are nothing like the Iphone) However I have compared the galaxy tab 10.1 to the Ipad, and I can guarantee you that if you use an Ipad already you will have a difficult time for a few minutes trying to figure out how everything on the galaxy tab works. This is Apple trying to lock down the market place.

      --
      once more into the breach
    76. Re:Release the Kraken! by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      OSX, Thunderbolt, IOS, etc...
      That's just the top of the iceburg. You don't have to share your technology with the world in order to sell it. In fact, in base form Apple hardware is commodity electronics made in a custom pattern to fit the space they wish. Additional technologies were included to create something no one else has done at that time.

      Apple brings to the table uniqueness & design, both of which are hard to make "open".

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    77. Re:Release the Kraken! by jo_ham · · Score: 2

      As in Xerox Parc? As in, the paid-for licence to use their UI and technology?

      There's a difference between paying to use a technology and just copying it to cash in on sales.

      Apple has never made any secret of the fact that Xerox had something - they recognised its usefulness and paid to use it.

      Where am I GTFOing to? Back to my cave of facts?

    78. Re:Release the Kraken! by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Apple are suing other manufacturers over nonsense - the multitouch crap? Other such patents? All nonsense.

      The Samsung lawsuit is about the specific copying of the iPhone 3G as a whole, and is much more substantive (albeit a bit of a waste of time).

      Several reviews of the Galaxy commented specifically and independently that it was a little too close to the iPhone for comfort - and sure enough, Apple sued over it. Slashdot likes to make out that it's all about "rounded corners" or "they're patenting the black rectangle!" but it simply isn;t that simple and never has been. My point is that the lawsuit is over the design as a whole, when all the parts are put together. No single element is something to sue over, but all the things combined are what make a lawsuit valid, and it seems courts are agreeing.

      I don't think it should include the Tab, however, since that really doesn't look substantially like an iPad, but somehow it has all been rolled in together. The original suit was over the Galaxy S.

      Agree or disagree with the suit as a whole, the point is it's about more than just suing because Samsung used rounded corners.

    79. Re:Release the Kraken! by phil_aychio · · Score: 1

      ok, I can either go all 'citation needed' on you, but let me throw in my own assumption: If you're dressed like a communist party official, yeah, they'll tell you they are Chinese...but they let everybody else know they are Taiwanese.

      --
      obvious redundancy is obvious
    80. Re:Release the Kraken! by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      We get it. You own an iPhone and don't care if Apple owns the entire smartphone market -- in fact, you'd prefer for there to be no competition.

      Some of us do care. Apple's "inventions" aren't. We'd like alternatives.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    81. Re:Release the Kraken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> they recognised its usefulness and paid to use it
      "Paid to use" my ass. Xerox sued them in the fucking court, you fucking fanboi.

    82. Re:Release the Kraken! by sjames · · Score: 1

      I've seen the icons in question. Half of which Apple 'ripped off' in the first place (at least to the same degree that Samsung's icons rip off Apple). I've seen the products themselves. They are similar to the extent I would expect given their similar functions and design constraints.

      but can you people PLEASE try and understand what a trade dress issue is and how "a rounded rectangle" has nothing to do with patents and has to be placed in context with a number of other trade dress issues. This is not just about "a rounded rectangle".

      Sorry, I can't do that. I refuse to cut out enough of my brain to allow me to believe that. You'll have to use logic and facts to show me why a design PATENT showing a rectangle with rounded edges and a screen on the front is not, in fact a PATENT on a rounded rectangle.

      It's going to take some amazing logic to convince me Apple should prevail in their claim that Samsung's phone receiver icon infringes on Apple's phone receiver icon which in no way was ripped off from Ma Bell's phone receiver icon.

    83. Re:Release the Kraken! by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      That's a bit of a non sequitur, but if that's what you're going with, sure why not.

      I'm not sure how you get "don't care of Apple owns the whole smartphone market" from my post. I simply cannot see it, especially since I specifically state that I think Apple's lawsuit is a waste of time in my opinion, and that I think they have overreached by including the Tab in the lawsuit.

      Still, whatever makes your totally black and white world fit I guess. Can't really argue against that.

    84. Re:Release the Kraken! by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      The agreement was Xerox was allowed to buy pre-IPI stock from Apple in exchange for use of their UI.

      Many years later they sued, but the lawsuit was dismissed.

      This is not new ground we're treading here. Also, calm down, you'll look less foolish and people are more likely to take you seriously.

    85. Re:Release the Kraken! by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      This assumes Via will succeed which even if they have a valid complaint I wonder what will happen when it's clear they're doing it more because of an employee's relationship than a valid complaint.

    86. Re:Release the Kraken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To bad nobody cares that the consumer is the loser. I mean, who would put up with:
      For 5 years:
      - a crappy notification system (popups have largely been banned on the internet for usability purposes for quite some time now)
      - a monopoly on the software available to a general purpose computing device, thereby censoring *AND* gouging both consumers and developers. (at least consoles make the hardware device cheaper for the consumer, as oppose to charging even more and not lowering prices as manufacturing becomes more efficient)

      For 4 years:
      - not even background services, let alone multitasking
      - below-VGA screen resolution (320x480 or some crap like that?)
      - video chat locked to wifi because the video chat program is too stupid to attempt to save bandwidth by lowering quality or framerate according to network transmissions (what if the wifi AP is congested? Or you're in Mexico on vacation... god the internet is slow down there...)

      For 1.5 years:
      - the usability that comes with holding a tablet with a split keyboard.
      - a tablet optimized UI (I wonder if you'll have to drag their notification area bar from the top of the tablet's screen... you know, where your fingers aren't? That'd be an absolutely horrible usability issue. My hands, when they're holding a mobile device, are typically on the lower-left and/or lower-right) portion of the screen and would hate for me to reach up the better part of 7" just to check what happened.

      Oh wait, that's right...

    87. Re:Release the Kraken! by gubers33 · · Score: 1

      You realize not a single one of the companies is Chinese right? Samsung is South Korean, HTC and Via are both Taiwanese and Motorola and Google are American. Before you post at least make sure what you are posting is legitimate. You really think that Apple is going to win big against Motorola who has been in the Mobile Phone Market about as long as Apple has been around and holds more patents on mobile communication that everyone. Apple is losing their case against Samsung. I don't think you are really paying attention to the Google vs Oracle case either since they are currently trying to work out a settlement and Google is talking about removing J2SE/J2ME code leaving a naked interface so developers can add their own since Samsung and Motorola already have J2SE/J2ME licenses. In which case Google, would only need to pay the settlement from the past damages.

      --
      Just because you are wrong and I called you out on it doesn't mean I am a Troll.
    88. Re:Release the Kraken! by gubers33 · · Score: 1

      I didn't know that iPad and iPod touch were phones.

      --
      Just because you are wrong and I called you out on it doesn't mean I am a Troll.
    89. Re:Release the Kraken! by CapuchinSeven · · Score: 1

      It's going to take some amazing logic to convince me Apple should prevail in their claim that Samsung's phone receiver icon infringes on Apple's phone receiver icon which in no way was ripped off from Ma Bell's phone receiver icon.

      You seem to have read the post, and then totally not been able to grasp the point...

    90. Re:Release the Kraken! by sjames · · Score: 1

      More like you fail to grasp that I find the argument singularly unimpressive and remain utterly unconvinced.They're both rectangles with icons that come in boxes, so what?

    91. Re:Release the Kraken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OSX, Thunderbolt, IOS, etc...
      That was my entire point.
      Your examples are great, what are you going to run them on? Apple branded hardware only right? Where is Apple getting that hardware? What are they giving to those hardware companies in return? Those hardware companies are potentially losing more in their own end user product sales then they are making from selling just the core components to Apple. As Apple moves on, they will find it harder and more expensive to get the required sub assemblies to piece together a complete product.

    92. Re:Release the Kraken! by CapuchinSeven · · Score: 1

      Oh right, I see, so you start with one incorrect point, fail to understand how trade dress works, fail to grasp Samsung had early supplier views to iPad designs which no one else had, change your point and still fail to understand how trade dress works and proclaim that you're unconvinced. Fair enough.

    93. Re:Release the Kraken! by sjames · · Score: 1

      Oh I understand it fine, and I have looked at the "evidence", I just wasn't impressed. I don't care if Samsung saw the future Apple design 30 years ago in a dream, their products don't infringe on Apple's, so it's irrelevant when they might have seen them.

      I'm sorry you're having such trouble coming to grips with the fact that Apple, having gotten some real market traction after decades as the beloved underdog is now nurturing their inner moustache twirling villain and seems to have aspirations to a persian cat.

    94. Re:Release the Kraken! by CapuchinSeven · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry you're having such trouble coming to grips with the fact that Apple, having gotten some real market traction after decades as the beloved underdog is now nurturing their inner moustache twirling villain and seems to have aspirations to a persian cat.

      Oh right okay, so because I understand trade dress and you don't, I'm an Apple fanboy, cool.

    95. Re:Release the Kraken! by sjames · · Score: 1

      Your apparent inability to imagine that someone could understand trade dress perfrectly and still find Apple's claims meritless does suggest that you drank the cool aid, yes;

    96. Re:Release the Kraken! by CapuchinSeven · · Score: 1

      Oooooh I see what you did there, "you're ugly", "no you are".

    97. Re:Release the Kraken! by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      what the hell are you talking about?

    98. Re:Release the Kraken! by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      by that metric, Apple is a dismal failure.

      *rimshot*

    99. Re:Release the Kraken! by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      OSX - so what? What does this have to do with mobile? Do they share it or even license it?
      Thunderbolt - Intel invented it, but also has nothing to do with mobile.
      IOS - They don't share and actively prevent from running on anything else.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  2. Is it just me or has litigation gone crazy lately? by syousef · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It seems during this economic downturn companies have started throwing caution to the wind in an attempt to ravenously feed on each others still warm carcasses. What you'll end up with is a period of heavily suppressed innovation and increasingly locked down and crippled devices, software and services no one will be willing to part with money for. It's all going to shit!

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  3. Anyone got a spreadsheet? by Baloroth · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I think we need a person full time just to make spreadsheets and graphs of who is suing whom at this point. Soon, it'll be easy. Just put: "*".

    --
    "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    1. Re:Anyone got a spreadsheet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even better:

      http://www.bonkersworld.net/images/2011.07.26_who_sues_who.png

    2. Re:Anyone got a spreadsheet? by bahstid · · Score: 1

      Ok, maybe you're right about needing someone to update it full time, but...

      http://freshdigital.info/computer/patent-wars-diagram-who-is-actually-suing-who/

    3. Re:Anyone got a spreadsheet? by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      This graph is inaccurate wrt licensing.

      Microsoft and Apple for certain are cross-licensing.
      Microsoft and Nokia are also for certain cross-licensing.
      Microsoft had a license deal Kodak although I do not know if its ongoing.
      Google is also licensing Microsoft Exchange ActiveSync IP for the Google branded phones.

      I wouldnt be surprised of Microsoft is licensing to everyone on the list that they arent in a lawsuit with at the moment, as well as licensing some IP to a few that they are suing (Motorola?)

      See, it used to be that the companies cross-licensed, exchanged a little bit of money one way or the other, and everyone was happy. It was a rare day when someone filed suit, and half of those were counter-suits (ex: Microsoft's counter-suit against TomTom)

      The problem is that a lot of these companies are new-to-the-game and dont have much IP, so what was once a "little bit of money" is now "a lot of money" because a cross-licensing deal is very one-sided (what can Foxconn offer anyone?) So these new-to-the-game companies say "fuck it" and start pumping out the products and wait for the lawsuit, because its better to be in-the-game with large cash-flow than it is to concede this rapidly growing market.

      Remember that in a rapidly growing market, its common for businesses to run themselves heavily into debt trying to be one of the top 3 in the market when things settle down. They do this because the payoff is high when they succeed. It doesnt matter that they end up billions in debt because if they are one of the top 3 at the end, then they are a market leader and that debt gets paid and its all gravy after that.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
  4. ARM by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Shouldn't they be suing ARM as Apple licensed it from them?

    1. Re:ARM by Rockoon · · Score: 2

      Your line of thinking is the same sort that thinks that Microsoft should be suing Google, the authors of Android, and not HTC/etc .. the manufacturers of Android products that supposedly infringe.

      Its like suing Linus because a software shop wrote a program that runs on Linux/x86 that infringes on a patent.. its stupid. ARM doesnt manufacture anything that infringes.. hell, they dont manufacture anything at all.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    2. Re:ARM by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily, it all depends upon the terms that they were licensed under. It wouldn't surprise me if there was some language in the license that allows VIA to revoke the license to use those patents in cases where the licensee is suing allies for allegedly infringing upon their patents.

      And unlike trademarks, there is no legal requirement that I know of that a party enforces ones patent protections for them to remain available.

    3. Re:ARM by jbeaupre · · Score: 2

      No, patents don't prevent transfer of knowledge (the license from ARM). They allow the patent owner to prevent someone else from using the knowledge.

      35 U.S.C. 271 Infringement of patent.

      (a) Except as otherwise provided in this title, whoever without authority makes, uses, offers to sell, or sells any patented invention, within the United States, or imports into the United States any patented invention during the term of the patent therefor, infringes the patent.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    4. Re:ARM by Albanach · · Score: 1

      I think by this point ARM will also have a decent portfolio of patents that would ensure other chip manufacturers probably don't want to go down that road.

    5. Re:ARM by chrb · · Score: 1

      No, Apple licenses the CPU core from ARM, but Apple then integrates this core into its own SoC platform, has the physical chips manufactured by its foundry partner (Samsung!), and - most importantly - sells the product into the marketplace. It's the same reason that SCO targeted Red Hat customers instead of Red Hat, and the same reason Apple targeted Samsung and HTC instead of Google...

    6. Re:ARM by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      If ARM was to make these chips, they would license the patents necessary, probably through cross-licensing.

      ARM isnt making the infringing chips in question, tho.. Apple is making them and Apple didn't license the patents. Thats why Apple is in some serious trouble this time.

      If Apple could hit back at VIA in order to minimize damages, things wouldn't be so bad. Unfortunately for Apple, they dont. Even Intel couldn't defend themselves, and they have truckloads of relevant patents.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    7. Re:ARM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are suing Apple over things that are obviously in the ARM core they licensed.

      Just because they are in the ARM core and Apple licensed the ARM core doesn't mean the ARM core being used by Apple doesn't infringe upon them.

    8. Re:ARM by mab · · Score: 1

      Doesn't Apple own 55% of ARM Holdings

    9. Re:ARM by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

      ARM was founded as a joint venture between Acorn Computers, Apple and VSLI.

  5. Investors might sue? by INeededALogin · · Score: 1, Troll

    If I was a VIA Investor... I might be a little pissed. These lawsuits cost millions of dollars with no guarantee of victory and often times they can result in your patents being invalidated. CEOs should not make decisions based on their wife's occupation... mainly because it is going to be largely emotional...

    1. Re:Investors might sue? by SpiralSpirit · · Score: 0

      alternately you could be happy since they already forced cash money out of intel, and now they're going to do the same to apple.

    2. Re:Investors might sue? by mywhitewolf · · Score: 1

      CEOs should not make decisions based on their wife's occupation... mainly because it is going to be largely emotional...

      well, IMO yes and no. VIA get the benefits of a reduced chance of being attacked or dragged down by HTC (/ support / insider knowledge), in exchange for getting involved with battles that HTC get themselves into. i doubt the VIA CEO is taking the choice lightly regardless, but improving relations with a client/business partner based on emotion isn't necessarily a bad thing.

      It being emotional decision is largely how the world works anyway and investments / companies aren't any different.

    3. Re:Investors might sue? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, they originally filed suit against Intel in part to counter suits Intel had filed against Via. This happened ten years ago.

      So somehow, rather than cross-license rights, VIA ended up with money. And because of that they certainly should feel confident they can get money out of anyone using their patent, rather than being stuck in a profitless cross-license situation.

      Or maybe they'll get free iPhones for life.

    4. Re:Investors might sue? by SpiralSpirit · · Score: 0

      SO JELUS

    5. Re:Investors might sue? by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      Considering they've been successful with Intel, I don't think losing by having their patents invalidated are really one of their chief concerns.

    6. Re:Investors might sue? by chrb · · Score: 5, Informative

      Wen Chi Chen founded VIA Technologies in 1983, and has run the company for almost 30 years, building it from nothing into a billion dollar company that is now the world's largest independent manufacturer of motherboard chipsets. He is the Taiwanese equivalent of Steve Jobs. Under his stewardship VIA successfully defended a patent attack from Intel that led to 11 different court cases in 5 different countries (sound familiar?). The investors don't care about the family connection - they care about profit. And if VIA's patent portfolio was strong enough to convince Intel to settle, then what makes you think Apple will be any different? Intel holds many, many patents on fundamental CPU technologies; how many do you think Apple holds?

    7. Re:Investors might sue? by rsmith-mac · · Score: 1

      2 things:

      1) VIA's ace in the hole was a patent they picked up from S3 (the guys who made the infamous ViRGE), which was deemed fundamental to Itanium; they've basically kept Intel at the table with only that single patent. That patent will be expiring soon, and it's unclear whether they even still own it or if it went with S3 to HTC earlier this year. The rest of VIA's patent portfolio is not strong and/or untested (which is what makes this specific suit so interesting).

      2) Unfortunately VIA is not doing nearly as well as it used to; there's no real market for 3rd party chipsets anymore, and VIA's CPUs are going nowhere. Business in China keeps them afloat... for now. If Wen is Steve Jobs, then VIA is mid-90s Apple.

  6. Re:Is it just me or has litigation gone crazy late by postmortem · · Score: 1

    or perhaps somebody at /. finds it more interesting than before...

  7. Re:Is it just me or has litigation gone crazy late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Apple stirred a bee's nest. Now everyone's coming out of the woodwork to sting them. I'd like to imagine that these huge companies were enjoying a status quo, like an assured mutual destruction understanding. But Apple had to fucked things up.

  8. Re:Is it just me or has litigation gone crazy late by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    It seems during this economic downturn companies have started throwing caution to the wind in an attempt to ravenously feed on each others still warm carcasses. What you'll end up with is a period of heavily suppressed innovation and increasingly locked down and crippled devices, software and services no one will be willing to part with money for. It's all going to shit!

    Nah, just too many lawyers. Don't make it any more complicated than need be.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  9. VIA doesn't have a vested interest, the CEO does. by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is a difference.

    --
    Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
    The purpose of that site was not known.
  10. Re:VIA doesn't have a vested interest, the CEO doe by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

    Exactly.
    Apple uses mainboards that are nearly vanilla Intel spec... They just make them a bit smaller than other companies. Who is VIA after? Apple doesn't use hardware different from anybody else... And if VIA already has a license with Intel what is there sueing Intel's customer? Unless they're after nVidia?

  11. They are suing Apple over things that are obviously in the ARM core they licensed.

    --
    Fandroids hate facts.
  12. Wow. by blair1q · · Score: 1

    My connection's a little lossy today. I read that as "VIA...patents...Centaur!"

  13. Re:VIA doesn't have a vested interest, the CEO doe by scottbomb · · Score: 1, Troll

    Fine with me. Any lawsuit against Apple is good news, IMO.

  14. Re:Is it just me or has litigation gone crazy late by jonwil · · Score: 0

    What started this mess is Apple and Microsoft wanting to destroy Android & Google.

    Apple hates Android because its the biggest threat to their iOS success and especially to the iPad and wants to stop Android (and especially Samsung, one of the most successful Android vendors and the one that represents the biggest threat to Apple)

    Microsoft hates Android & Google because Google is killing their online offerings (Hotmail vs GMail, Google vs Bing, Google Docs vs Office/Office online etc etc) and because Google (through Chrome OS and Android) is a threat to its traditional desktop OS business (and its attempt to push that desktop OS business into smaller form factor devices)

    Android is also a huge threat to Microsoft's Windows Phone. Plus going after Android allows Microsoft to continue its fight against Linux and open source (since Android uses the Linux kernel)

  15. Re:VIA doesn't have a vested interest, the CEO doe by Stumbles · · Score: 1

    Well ol Daryl Mcbide had a "vested interest" in SCO; oh yeah he was also the CEO. CEO's DO NOT NEED A WIFE to make decisions based on emotions or any flitting human trait, they can fuck up just fine on their own.

    --
    My karma is not a Chameleon.
  16. The Phone Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    In a galaxy far away, large corporate conglomerates wage battle to gain dominance in the vastness of space. The only hope of survival are a small, but pathetic force of Jedi nerds who resist the insidious marketing ploys and legal shenanigans of these dominating legal war mongrels. Will these Jedi nerds prevail? Stay tuned for continuing episodes of the Phone Wars.

    Other quotes:

    "These are not the phones you are looking for"

    "Apple. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy"

    1. Re:The Phone Wars by elashish14 · · Score: 2

      "If you ban my device, it will become far more powerful than you can possibly imagine."

      --
      I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
    2. Re:The Phone Wars by theVarangian · · Score: 1

      In a galaxy far away, large corporate conglomerates wage battle to gain dominance in the vastness of space. The only hope of survival are a small, but pathetic force of Jedi nerds who resist the insidious marketing ploys and legal shenanigans of these dominating legal war mongrels. Will these Jedi nerds prevail? Stay tuned for continuing episodes of the Phone Wars.

      Other quotes:

      "These are not the phones you are looking for"

      "Apple. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy"

      Steve Jobs: Wenchi Chen... I am your father.....

      Wenchi Chen: NO... NO... That's not true, that's impossible... NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO........

    3. Re:The Phone Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I find your lack of open source disturbing"

      And do they have a lawyer named Han that may or may not have fired the first lawsuit off?

    4. Re:The Phone Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You're fulfilling your destiny, Via. Become my apprentice. Learn to use the dark side of the Force".

      HTC to Via

  17. Patent litigation IS out of hand - as expected by sjbe · · Score: 2

    It seems during this economic downturn companies have started throwing caution to the wind in an attempt to ravenously feed on each others still warm carcasses.

    What warm carcasses? Companies have been reporting massive profits, Apple certainly not the least of them. Companies are sitting on gi-normous piles of cash. Unemployment is high but so are profits. There is a lot of uncertainty (economic, consumer demand, political, healthcare, etc) in the economy so companies are keeping their powder dry and waiting for things to settle down a bit.

    All these lawsuits are because we are at a tipping point where PCs are becoming less important and mobile devices are rapidly becoming more important. We're simply seeing companies fighting to establish dominance in this new world. Despite the patent system being rather broken, companies pretty much are forced to use every weapon at their disposal. I don't see this changing anytime soon.

    1. Re:Patent litigation IS out of hand - as expected by sjames · · Score: 1

      All these lawsuits are because we are at a tipping point where PCs are becoming less important and mobile devices are rapidly becoming more important. We're simply seeing companies fighting to establish dominance in this new world. Despite the patent system being rather broken, companies pretty much are forced to use every weapon at their disposal. I don't see this changing anytime soon.

      Some are forced to counterattack, some choose to start things. It *IS* a choice and they will always choose whatever wrings the most pennies out of people even if they have to destroy the world to do it.

      That's why they need to be reigned in HARD.

  18. Toilet paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I need some toilet paper, what to do?- hey I know!! I have these worthless USA patents that no longer have any credibility, I'll just wipe my arse with those, they're of no other use.

  19. Re:Is it just me or has litigation gone crazy late by bky1701 · · Score: 1

    I see this more of a case of people in glass houses throwing stones. Apple cannot be the bully and not expect to eventually have someone stand up to them. Patent trolls will be trolled themselves, it's just how it works out. However, the number of patent and copyright trolls is definitely increasing, with even semi-respectable companies joining the fray.

  20. Apple's going to lose this by blind+biker · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    And by "this" I don't mean this specific instance, but the whole patent war they initiated to destroy Android. Why? Because they partnered with Microsoft in this endeavor. Whoever partners with Microsoft ends up sucking it, hard.

    Already the bullshit lawsuit about rounded corners is starting to turn sour for Apple. Apple doesn't understand how vicious South Korean style of management can be - Samsung execs are not going to forget this easily. Oh no. Add Google acquiring the Motorola patent portfolio, HTC being pissed off and now a little salvo from VIA... yeah, Apple's going to suck it.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:Apple's going to lose this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You get what you give, you know what I mean
      Don't be surprised there's a bug in your eye

  21. Re:Is it just me or has litigation gone crazy late by syousef · · Score: 1

    You left out Oracle.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  22. Re:VIA doesn't have a vested interest, the CEO doe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, because they're a company out trying to make money by selling a product in a free market that you don't like. Not like Google or Microsoft, they're friends.

    What is with the pathetic brand hatred amongst nerds on the internet.

  23. BBBRRRIINNNGGG IITTT OONNN !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like the wheel-chair copy guy in FG !!

  24. Mad by lastx33 · · Score: 2

    The patent business is completely mad. Eventually (not so far in the future methinks), the world will grind to a halt as everyone will be in court fighting patent cases rather than doing anything productive.

    --
    "You can lead a horse to water but a pencil must be lead!" - Stan Laurel
    1. Re:Mad by inglorion_on_the_net · · Score: 1

      Anyone remember the town of Morlaw in the movie Interstate 60?

      I find it more impressive to watch the video, but here are some quotes:

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0165832/quotes?qt0195360

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0165832/quotes?qt0195361

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  25. In this case by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Informative

    It was Apple's mouth writing checks their ass can't cash. Apple is real worried: Android is a real threat to them. Their iDevice market is where their big profits are, they don't have a "what's next" lined up right now and Android is encroaching in a big way. In particular, HTC and Samsung have been since they've smoothed out android's UI and made it even more user friendly (if bloated).

    So Apple went all lawsuit happy. They want to suppress any competition. turns out, the competition isn't so happy about that and is hitting back. Hard. In the case of VIA part of it is the relation with HTC, the other part is I'm sure VIA has an interest in the tablet market. VIA has never done well at the high end and so has stopped trying, but they do low end pretty well. Maybe they want in to the tablet market.

    When you start suing everyone, expect to see the same in return.

    1. Re:In this case by kiwirob · · Score: 0

      I think the facts speak for themselves and in doing so point out you are just plain wrong.



      Apple will have close to $100B in cash in the next few months they can cash a bigger check than any other company in the world, and currently have the largest market capitalization of any company in the world.

      It's not "worried" about either, 1) what's next, or 2) dominating the mobile phone market.

      Apple has for the last few years carved out the high end mobile computing space. They sell top spec'ed devices such as macbook's and macbook air's at higher average prices than their competitors products. They are happy to have the top 10% of the market and let everybody else fight over the remaining 90%. It's been the company way for the last 20 years in the mac world.

      Apple are more than happy for Andriod to operate in the low cost pre-paid end of the market. Though it wants to maintain a 30+% of the high end smart phone market. The fact of the matter is that at the moment they can not find enough production resources to produce any more iPhones or iPads. If they are already making as many iDevices as possible and selling them all then that is all they can hope for.

      The problem for Apple is when companies like Samsung "slavishly copy" the look and feel of Apple products instead of developing their own. Most of the other patent law suits from other OEM have been attacking Apple, to which Apple has had to file counter claims to defend itself.

      Andriod is built on a house of cards. Google, have given OEMs around the world a competitive mobile OS for free but have failed to resolve the patent and copyright issues associated with the OS. They have left their OEM partners out to dry as they have their own substantial problems such as the ongoing dispute with Oracle.

    2. Re:In this case by msevior · · Score: 0

      Did you get paid to write that?

    3. Re:In this case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "The fact of the matter is that at the moment they can not find enough production resources to produce any more iPhones or iPads."

      This is what happens when you sue your own manufacturer. Retards.

      Samsung should tell them to make their own iBricks.

    4. Re:In this case by brokeninside · · Score: 1

      To be fair, Apple has had supply side limits prior to getting law suit happy. Suing Samsung doesn't seem like a good way to expand in a world of limited production capacity, but that's not the root of the problem.

    5. Re:In this case by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      Their iDevice market is where their big profits are, they don't have a "what's next" lined up right now

      I think you nailed it. Apple led the market in pushing laptops. Their laptop sales passed desktop sales about 2 years before the rest of the market caught up. By the time laptops started to become more of a commodity item, they owned the high-end MP3 player market. Before this started to be eaten by cheaper alternatives, they entered the mobile phone market, where they only have about 5% of the total market but something like 60% of the total profit. That's a common position for Apple, but it's precarious because you just need cheap commodity alternatives to become almost as good and your profits shrink a lot. They tried to push tablets, but this is still a really tiny market. Something like 1% of the size of the mobile phone market even after all of the hype, so not a comfortable place to fall back on when the super-expensive phone market starts to shrink.

      Apple's strategy for the past decade has been to enter a market, sell high-end, high-margin products, and then move on by the time the high-end market has shrunk enough to no longer be a major source of revenue. Unfortunately (for Apple shareholders), they don't seem to have a new market lined up.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    6. Re:In this case by torako · · Score: 2

      The big question is: Is Android encroaching? I'm not sure the answer is that easy.

      Have a look at the two graphs in these posts on Asymco: http://www.asymco.com/2011/08/22/nokia-vs-android/ and http://www.asymco.com/2011/08/05/the-competition/ .

      Android is growing tremendously, but it doesn't seem to eat away any of Apple's marketshare. In fact, it looks like a lot of dumbphones are replaced by new Android devices and that Android is eating up Nokia's former share in the smartphone sector.

      Another interesting fact is utilization (don't have a link handy, sorry). If you look at website statistics, WiFi hotspot statistics, the story is usually the same: a big majority of the devices are iOS. It does make sense if you consider that a lot of former feature phone users are now on Android, but continue to use their new Android devices as feature phones.

      As long as Apple continues to sell more and more phones---and right now it still looks like that is the case---they don't have to worry about Android.

    7. Re:In this case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iPhone was still the single most sold Phone model, and responsible for something like 65% of the profits in the smartphone market. The whole bit about how "Android is encroaching" seems kinda off and wishy-washy, iOS isn't a product, it doesn't really matter if they are more Android phones than "iOS phones" because no single model of Android phone comes even close to be being as sold as the iPhone.

      Market share means very little, when push comes to shove, it's about profit - market share is most valuable to high-volume low margin businesse. Apple has historically been quite content to exchange market share for higher margins, look at their desktop products, or their software (Logic, Final Cute, Shake, etc) products, all low-volume, high margin businesses. Also think of it for a moment, Android is fragmented, iPhone is only Apple, it really does not take a genius to figure out that even though Android devices make up the majority of actual devices out there, Apple is making the most profit out of their single model of phone.

      And it's not even a case of Android phone encroaching on Apple's market, Nokia is the one beating eaten alive, and RIM isn't in much better shape, iPhone is as strong as ever in the market. Not to mention that the iPad holds something like 70% of the tablet market, and people call non-Apple portable media players iPods. This slashdot meme that everyone stays up at night, terrified, cursing Linus' name need to die, it's pathetic.

      Always cute though, to see how the slashdot crowd belittles design efforts, as though it's something anyone can do in their sleep. Copy code and it's bloody murder, copy look and feel, and who cares right, the fact the the UI was crap before it magically started looking like Apple's is of no consequence.

    8. Re:In this case by smash · · Score: 1

      iPhone has an 89% re-purchase rate. Mac has been outgoing the PC market in general by a huge percentage every quarter for the past few years. More people are jumping switch from android phones to iPhone than jumping the other way.

      whilst that might seem like fanboyism, it is reality. The problem is that a lot of companies based in Asia are attempting to copy Apple in terms of look and UI, but the underlying technology doesn't stack up.

      I suspect that if apple gets too many problems with either VIA or Samsung, they'll just buy them out. They've got plenty of cash.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    9. Re:In this case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just from a personal anecdotal point of view I have inadvertantly converted several iCrap(Though I'm too polite to call it that in front of them) users to Android devices. The samsung galaxy S2 in particular.

      The Samsung Galaxy S2 is just sweet. The reception is great, almost everything is automatic. (We see you visited ebays mobile site, would you like to install the much more user friendly ebay app from the android market?) Theres built in voice to text that is fucking amazing. I have an odd accent and NO other voice recognition software has worked as well as whats on that phone.

      The S2 is damn near a PC in a phone. Its insane whats built into it from the get-go. I tried using a friends iphone and I had to find and install 3 different apps just to try to poorly do(not apples fault here, the app creators faults, but partially apples fault for not including it) what was built into my Galaxy from the start.

      Actually, given the quality and ease of use my Android phone is actually better than my PC. I bought a roll up extensible keyboard and I use the phone for pretty much everything work-related now. The only thing I need a real PC for anymore is spreadsheets.

      This thing isn't a desktop replacement for me, I still need my desktop, it is however a complete laptop replacement. (at least for my use cases for a laptop)

    10. Re:In this case by BlkPanther · · Score: 1

      Well I'm sure Apple will be looking you up, the next time the CEO position is up for grabs...

      First of all *every* company is *worried* about what's next; any smart company is worried about dominating the market segment they participate in. (Why else would they release an iPhone 4S? To capitalize on the lower-end market. Not to mention Apple is all about selling the hype. Their biggest and most important event every frickin' year is WWDC. I'd say that is Apple, showing that they are *worried* about "what's next".)

      Now: in response to "They sell top spec'ed devices": Yes they can and sometimes do, but that's not their primary market. Neither the Macbook nor the Macbook Air lines are top-spec'ed. Sure you can configure them as such, but the normal machines they are selling are fairly average as far as components go. It's the chassis, the OS and other small details that set them apart and make them great PCs.

      By the way, Apple is not "maintaining" 30% market share. There may be Android devices in the "low cost, pre-paid space", but that is not their primary market. The end. Period.

      Next, the Galaxy Tab didn't copy the iPad any more than than the iPhone copied the LG Prada. All of this bickering between Samsung and Apple misses the basic point: it doesn't help the consumer, and that's what it's truly all about. Apple doesn't need lawyers to sell it's products, they sell themselves for the most part. All of this legal crap is just crass, it tarnishes their name and shows they're worried. If you believe otherwise, considering the evidence to the contrary, you're just a shill.

      As for the legal stability of Android, I'd say Google has it under control. Google's primary point in picking up the HUGE patent portfolio in the past months was primarily to defend itself, Android and it's OEMs from attack. Currently the only credible threat to Android is Oracle, and that mess is just a licensing deal away from being settled anyhow.

      In short: you sir, are a fanboi. I am not. I just wanted to clarify that for you and anyone else who cares to read this.

      Disclosure: I own multiple Apple products and multiple Google products. As a matter of fact: I own a lot of products, produced by a lot of companies and I like them all.

      --


      I find that most often I end up learning from necessity, rather than for enjoyment.
    11. Re:In this case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The big question is: Is Android encroaching? I'm not sure the answer is that easy.

      Actually it is and has been discussed in Android circles for some time now. Android has destroyed RIM to Apple's detriment; as it was Apple's market to take. Apple was primed to do so but Android did it right out from under Apple. While Apple has continued to grow, Android has completely destroyed Apple's anticipated growth. Furthermore, Android has completely leveled the playing field against Apple. The reason why you're not looking at the graphs correctly is because you're expecting to see Apple in decline so as to acknowledge Android is successful. The truth is, Apple need only not grow as quickly for Android to not only be successful, but to prevent Apple from being as successful as otherwise would be.

      While Apple fan boys love to lie and distort reality (not an accusation here), the fact is Apple has been forced to compete for the first time in a long while. Apple's primary competition is Android. Android is Apple's only viable competition which is visible on the field right now. Apple is very scared Android and Google and has been for years now. In fact, Apple was forced to improve the iPhone 3G specifically because they had to answer to Android. There isn't an iPhone 3G and later user who doesn't owe a thank you to Google.

      The fact Apple sees no other option than to sue its competition is seemingly Apple's admission they seem themselves ultimately losing against Android in the years to come so their only hope is to slow adoption via legal FUD (trick right out of Microsoft's dirty bag of tricks) so as to allow Apple to obtain a better market foothold. Translation - they are scared shitless. To me, this says two things. One, Android is far, far better than Apple wants to admit. And two, Apple does not believe it can continue to grow and hold its own against Android in the years to come. Either way, it doesn't speak well for Apple's future or their belief in themselves.

    12. Re:In this case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was Apple's mouth writing checks their ass can't cash.

      I'm pretty sure Apple's ass can cash quite a big check, considering they have enough cash to acquire HTC, Nokia, RIM, LG, Motorola Mobility, and Sony Ericsson instantaneously

    13. Re:In this case by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      Mac has been outgoing the PC market in general by a huge percentage

      That's a nice weasel statistic.

      Of course going from 7% market share to 7.1% market share is a pretty huge growth; that's a 1.4% increase (depending on how you calculate the numbers) compared to the PC market share going from 91% to 90.9%.

      More people are jumping switch from android phones to iPhone

      I'm not going to call BS on your statistic, because a) I don't know for sure and b) it really doesn't matter because Android phones are vastly outselling iPhones, have been for some time, and show no signs of slowing down.

      The problem is that a lot of companies based in Asia are attempting to copy Apple in terms of look and UI, but the underlying technology doesn't stack up.

      Yeah, this is just crap. My Evo looks great, runs great, and had better hardware than its iPhone competitor at the time of launch. It has a few issues here and there, but no more than any of my friends' iPhones. No phone is perfect, and anyone who believes otherwise is delusional.

      I suspect that if apple gets too many problems with either VIA or Samsung, they'll just buy them out. They've got plenty of cash.

      Now you're just exposing your ignorance. VIA? Maybe. Samsung? Do you have *any* clue how fucking big Samsung is?

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    14. Re:In this case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right to call him out for the statistics. They are all bullshit or misrepresentation for the sole purpose of illusion. Contrary to his assertions, Android is winning far more Apple users than Apple likes. Yes, there is traffic both ways but most of it is from Apple to Android and even that really isn't that great; statistically thought to only be a couple of tenths of percent of market share in Android's favor.

      The fact he pushes a lie means he's an obvious fanboy who posts for the sole to lie and deceive. I take that to mean Android has become so good, even the fan boys are scared shitless.

    15. Re:In this case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do tho. Maybe not right now, but I can see it trending downwards. Remember, one of the main reasons why they didn't drop marketshare was gaining the people who were SPECIFICALLY WAITING for an i-device on a cell network asides from AT&T.

      As the market share of Android grows and grows, developers will start to (and some already have) develop for Android *FIRST*, and in some cases, ONLY Android (and sometimes because they can only develop for Android as they're restricted from the store).

      Android users will undoubtedly show off their devices (as you can see in some of the Android Marketplace comments) to potential smartphone consumers. Live wallpaper? Video chat over 3G with reasonable quality (and with face tracking to boot)? Apps like Visidon App Locker (app protection using facial recognition as "password")? Easy information sharing with apps like Thrutu? Check, check, check, check.

      Some of these people will start to wonder: Why should I pay $300 and a 3 year contract for a phone with a reduced feature set, when I can get a $0 - $100 phone that does more?

    16. Re:In this case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's no wonder iPhone is "single most sold", as there's only one iPhone and hundred of Android handsets. Apple's enemy is not some single mobile manufacturer or handset, it's all the Android platform.

      Low volume, high-margin business is good when you're trading elite goods with no competition (like expensive cars or jewelry), but iPhone is now neither elite - smartphones became a commodity since the original iPhone came out - nor it's uncontended - it's features look rather outdated compared to newer Android phones, and there are lots of them.

      And that's exactly the reason for Apple to worry about market share - just think about, they've got about 20% of smartphones market and 65% of profit, which means if single percent of customers moves from iPhone to Android, they'll lose 3.3% of profits at once. And that's why Apple tries to stomp out competition by all means available.

      Saying "Apple's got nothing to worry about and so it doesn't" is just delusional and contrary to what Apple's actions say.

    17. Re:In this case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your data comes from here, which I don't find to be particularly reliable. Just read through several of his pieces with charts with no data and stupid reasoning that "the numbers are too imprecise to provide data." Yeah, whatever bub. Keep "analyzing" business to provide charts that support your predefined position that Apple is dominating Android even while Android holds 45% of the market and climbing.

  26. Re:Is it just me or has litigation gone crazy late by node+3 · · Score: 0

    Yes, Apple was the first ever company to sue someone for infringing upon their patents...

  27. Wenchi Chen? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    Good thing that's a guy - the name almost demands an EEOC complaint all by itself.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  28. Groklaw? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

    Isn't this part of Groklaw's new mandate now that SCO is gone?

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  29. This is music to my ears by gottspeed · · Score: 1

    I am just thrilled that the world of commerce is about to whip the delusions of grandeur out from under Apple. They wanted controversy instead of co-operation because they have a sense of entitlement, and now they have it. They want foes instead of friends, and the universe has provided. I'm even more thrilled that all the Apple fan-boys are going to have to work overtime convincing themselves and their burned out temporal lobes that corporate worship isn't a sub-human enterprise.

  30. Power Couple by hipp5 · · Score: 2

    CEO Wenchi Chen is married to the head of HTC

    Holy fuck they must be rich.

    1. Re:Power Couple by catmistake · · Score: 1

      CEO Wenchi Chen is married to the head of HTC

      Holy fuck they must be rich.

      Not for long if that pig keeps demanding things like: "get me a beer, wench!" Divorce can be brutal on a bank account.

    2. Re:Power Couple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they claim residence in the US, I bet they file taxes separately (opposed to jointly). More specifically, their private accountants file taxes for them.

    3. Re:Power Couple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As if we need more proof that we're returning to a feudal system with royalty and serfs like in the Dark Ages. Today kings, emperors and tyrants are CEOs but they still marry strategically to increase their power. Either you're born into the ruling class or you're doomed to serve ... until heads will roll again. Progress my ass!

    4. Re:Power Couple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "In May 2011, the Forbes ranked her with Wen Chi Chen as the richest person in Taiwan, with a net worth of US$8.8 billion" Source Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cher_Wang

  31. Re:VIA doesn't have a vested interest, the CEO doe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meh.

    Coke/Pepsi
    Christianity/Islam
    Xbox/Playstation
    Star Wars/Star Trek
    Twilight/Good books

    Everyone will always find something retarded to go all tribal over. It keeps things interesting. I just wish I could see what stupid crap the great divide will be over 2,000 years from now :)

  32. First thing that came to mind reading this... by Mistakill · · Score: 3, Funny

    HTC is literally in bed with VIA

  33. Re:VIA doesn't have a vested interest, the CEO doe by geoffrobinson · · Score: 0

    I don't know. I'll ask the pathetic losers on digg.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
  34. FUD by JustOK · · Score: 3, Funny

    Total FUD. Via runs passenger trains in Canada. Their chips are horrible AND expensive.

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
    1. Re:FUD by bruno.fatia · · Score: 2

      I'm sure you'd rather have an iTrain with an iChip. It would be shiny and one hundred times more expensive than anyone else's. And you'd have to buy tickets with iTunes.

    2. Re:FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But apparently their cpu power management technologies are too good for Apple not to blatantly steal

    3. Re:FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't even stock Bacon flavored chips in their trains... What a bummer...
      About VIA, another tech co who turns to patent trolling instead of innovating. The patent system is so fucked up...

  35. Re:Is it just me or has litigation gone crazy late by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    When times are tough you do everything you can to knock the other guy out of the game entirely because you can THEN fight over the still-warm carcass, e.g. the customer base.

    Perhaps we should look at who bought the legislation that created this situation.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  36. When did Apple partner with Microsoft? by kervin · · Score: 1

    Because they partnered with Microsoft in this endeavor.

    When did Apple partner with Microsoft? What did I miss?

    Here is the Web of Mobile Patent Lawsuits. How on earth is Microsoft and Apple partners?

    1. Re:When did Apple partner with Microsoft? by chrb · · Score: 2

      It was a claim made by Google's David Drummond, Senior Vice President and Chief Legal Officer. Basically, Apple and Microsoft banded together with some others to acquire the Nortel patent warchest to use against Android. See TechCrunch: "How Apple Led The High-Stakes Patent Poker Win Against Google, Sealing Ballmer's Promise". Apple and MS also banded together to acquire the CPTN patent pool. Why? Over half a million Android devices are activated every day. Half a million! How many winPhones and iPhones have been sold in total their entire history? Android is a huge threat to both Apple and MS, some would say the biggest threat, so it makes sense for them to work together.

    2. Re:When did Apple partner with Microsoft? by exomondo · · Score: 2

      Because they partnered with Microsoft in this endeavor.

      When did Apple partner with Microsoft? What did I miss?

      Here is the Web of Mobile Patent Lawsuits. How on earth is Microsoft and Apple partners?

      A consortium including both Apple and Microsoft bid against Google for patents from Nortel and Novell, I believe this is what he is referring to, it was very highly publicized.

    3. Re:When did Apple partner with Microsoft? by Telvin_3d · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Everybody but Google banded together. Google was invited to join the same group. The explicit idea was to get them out of the way so no one could use them to sue anyone else. Google is the only one who refused to play along and tried to gain them independently. Shows who is serious about trying to avoid patent fights.

    4. Re:When did Apple partner with Microsoft? by Telvin_3d · · Score: 2

      A consortium of everybody except Google bid on (and won) those patents. And Google was invited. Everybody else just wanted them off the table. Google was the only one who wanted independent rights to them, presumably for use in their own lawsuits.

    5. Re:When did Apple partner with Microsoft? by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Yes that's correct.

    6. Re:When did Apple partner with Microsoft? by Zelucifer · · Score: 1

      Google wanted the patents to protect themselves from Apple et all, by joining them in an alliance, they would be unable to use those patents to protect themselves.

      --
      The corner of a round room
    7. Re:When did Apple partner with Microsoft? by chrb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Google was invited to join the same group.

      The question is, under what terms? If Google had joined, would it have been able to use the patent pool to protect its Android partners from lawsuits? It seems very unlikely that Apple would've agreed to a situation where it has to back down on all of its anti-Android lawsuits, or that Microsoft would agree to a situation where it could no longer sue Android manufacturers. And if the patent pool wouldn't protect Android, then what motivation would Google have to join?

      The explicit idea was to get them out of the way so no one could use them to sue anyone else.

      Since the contractual terms between the Rockstar group members haven't been disclosed, it is impossible to know what the patents will be used for. It's a nice idea that they will only be used defensively, but history has shown that patents are often used otherwise.

    8. Re:When did Apple partner with Microsoft? by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      ..and because Google didnt get the patents, they still cant use them to defend themselves.

      Here is why your reasoning isnt sound:

      Google barely makes any phones at all. Hell, I'm not even certain that they still make phones. Google therefor does not need these patents that badly at all. Google wants other companies to make Android phones (which they are) and its up to those companies to worry about patents (which they should.)

      Its the same with ARM for they don't make CPU's. ARM just designs CPU's and gets others to make them and incorporate them in products. Its up to those product makers to worry about patents, and in this particular case it looks like one of the patents supposedly infringed by Apple was already successful defended by VIA vs Intel, so its not like Apple had no way of knowing that they needed to license the technology. Everyone fucking knew.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
  37. Re:VIA doesn't have a vested interest, the CEO doe by catmistake · · Score: 0

    What is with the pathetic brand hatred amongst nerds on the internet.

    Give him a break; His dog got hit by a hipster texting on his iPhone 4, an iPad2 killed his brother just to watch him die, and an iPod Touch knocked-up his super-model Canadian girlfriend, and he's stuck with trying to avoid paying child support (in Canadian dollars! In this economy!!).

    A few bad Apples can spoil the whole bunch for some people.

  38. Re:Is it just me or has litigation gone crazy late by chrb · · Score: 2

    It's not just you. The fundamental problem is that there is a conflict between global capitalism and the patent regime. The patent regime is hundreds of years old, and developed from the rule of Kings, who could use their power to bestow monopoly rights on their allies in certain areas of production. Think about that - the whole system was based around an exclusive right to manufacture within the boundaries and legal jurisdiction of a single nation. This kind of worked, because the existence of a single legal jurisdiction resolved any conflicts (for better or worse). But with the explosion of globalisation in the 1990s, the whole concept fell apart.

    Why would a foreign court recognise your patent? Patent resolution is far too arbitrary. Why should Chinese companies, who only recently discovered capitalism, accept that they have to give a share of their profits to Western companies for patents that predate the concept of capitalism in their nation? Why would an American court side with a foreign company over an American company? Why would Korean courts side with a Western company against one of their own?

    Global capitalism encourages rabid competition; the patent regime is the complete opposite, and is more akin to the communist states which granted production monopolies to favoured suppliers. Monopolies, in essence, are anti-capitalist, and in this globalised world, lacking a single governmental regime for patent jurisdiction and resolution, it is inevitable that there are going to be huge differences in the way that nations treat different companies and different patents. And these differences are going to become more visible and exposed as more and more companies file for increasing numbers of patents, and courts around the world are filled with the growing industry of global patent lawyering.

  39. Re:Is it just me or has litigation gone crazy late by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    Had I known this 10 years ago when I started going to school to get my degree, I'd have gone into pre-law, and be able to retire in just a couple years after a successful career in software patent litigation...

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  40. No, because Apple is a patent troll. by walterbyrd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Instead of competing in a free market, Apple files frivolous IP lawsuit all the time.

    Apple is scared to death of Android, and Apple is Tonya Harding tactics to compete.

    And Apple has been pulling this sort of crap for decades.

  41. GEM wasn't patent law by tepples · · Score: 1

    That wasn't patent law. The GEM lawsuits were over copyright before it was established in court (in cases such as Lotus v. Borland) that user interface has a thin copyright. Much of it is a method of operation more than it is a pictorial or graphic work, apart from specific graphical elements such as the Aqua buttons. I guess the confusion between copyright and patent is one reason why Richard Stallman of Free Software Foundation rails against the term "intellectual property".

    1. Re:GEM wasn't patent law by Osgeld · · Score: 2

      they sure as fuck tried to patent pull down menus well before that

      ""In September 1985, Apple lawyers warned Bill Gates that Windows infringed on Apple copyrights and patents, and that his corporation had stolen Apple's trade secrets. Windows had similar drop-down menus, tiled windows and mouse support as Apple's operating system. Gates decided to make an offer to license features of Apple's OS. Apple agreed and a contract was drawn up. A couple of years later though Bill Gates will have again copyrights infringement problems with Apple (Apple vs. Microsoft & Hewlett-Packard copyright suit), and then he decided to claim that Apple had taken ideas from the graphical user interface developed by Xerox for Alto and Star computers.""

      even in the 80's people were fighting apples lawyers over patents that already existed ... Apple is the original computer patent troll and may they burn in hell for what they have unleashed (besides 30 years of fucking over their customers with substandard products glossed over in jizz)

  42. Re:Is it just me or has litigation gone crazy late by russotto · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You left out Oracle.

    Oracle hates everyone, but is either leaving Microsoft alone for the same reason a barracuda won't eat a lawyer, or because they're waiting for the best time to stab them in the back.

  43. Re:Is it just me or has litigation gone crazy late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does Oracle wants Android to fall? I thought they only want to bite off some profit for themselves.

  44. Grr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am sick to death of the silly patent lawsuits.

    After 1 year of filing the patent, yes I said filing, to enforce a patent you have to have a current product using the patent or it becomes void PERIOD.

    Once said product is no longer available for purchase to the intended target audience then the patent is open game.

  45. Re:VIA doesn't have a vested interest, the CEO doe by ewieling · · Score: 0

    I feel the same way about Microsoft. Apple may be evil in many ways, but compared to Microsoft, they are a saint.

    --
    I really shouldn't have used someone else's email address for this account.
  46. GDP by microbox · · Score: 1

    It's all going to shit!

    And the cost of litigation is tabulated into the GDP. America is getting richer!

    --

    Like all pain, suffering is a signal that something isn't right
  47. Re:Is it just me or has litigation gone crazy late by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    Just enjoy it, since there's nothing else you can do. Sit back and enjoy the show. Grab some popcorn.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  48. Cut the taxes! by microbox · · Score: 2

    Companies are sitting on gi-normous piles of cash.

    So we need to cut the taxes so that they will start hiring again! Really!!! Anything else will doom America!!!!!

    --

    Like all pain, suffering is a signal that something isn't right
    1. Re:Cut the taxes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think that they will hire one american if they can hire 10chinese + 10indians for the same money? And taking Samsung for example, what a tax cut in america would mean to them?

  49. We loose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever happens, lawyers will have the last laugh. Who is going to pay the legal expenses? Eventually, the legal fees are going to be passed to the product prices of Apple, Via and whoever fights these legal battles.

  50. Re:Is it just me or has litigation gone crazy late by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    Maybe the solution to the economic crisis is a 95% tax on every single nickel every lawyer on the planet makes, with public executions if they so much as try to hide a peso.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  51. Re:Is it just me or has litigation gone crazy late by Tsingi · · Score: 1

    We'll hold court in Georgia.

  52. Re:Is it just me or has litigation gone crazy late by Tsingi · · Score: 1

    +1 Insightful

  53. Re:VIA doesn't have a vested interest, the CEO doe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps compared to 90s Microsoft. Microsoft today is incompetent and stagnating.

  54. You're Nobody Till Somebody Sues You by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 1

    There are two kinds of people in this world -- people who are worth suing and people who aren't. I assume that most SlashDotters fall into the latter category and flame on about it out of jealousy. They should have faith, however, that someday they will hit it big and, YES, get the shit sued out of them. Then they will know that they have arrived . . . in court.

  55. Re:VIA doesn't have a vested interest, the CEO doe by scottbomb · · Score: 1

    Uhh no. I'm all for the free market. The free market is about competition and Apple, with all their patent-trolling, is about as anti-competitive as they come.

  56. Re:OFFTOPIC: faster than neutrino all over the web by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    In TFS?

  57. Schoolyard Bully by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    The best way to deal with a schoolyard bully is to get everybody else together and beat the hell out of him. Just once, but it has to be a concerted effort.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Schoolyard Bully by gubers33 · · Score: 1

      If you are inferring Google is a school yard bully they have not instigated the lawsuits that has been all Apple and Microsoft.

      --
      Just because you are wrong and I called you out on it doesn't mean I am a Troll.
  58. Play with fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and you're gonna get burned!

  59. Re:First post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yay! You won a banana. Here you go.

  60. Re:Is it just me or has litigation gone crazy late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wtf, are you new..?

    This is no different than any other time or place in history, it's just that the public is (somewhat) better at determining when they're being bs'd.

    Or rather how much they're getting bs'd.

  61. Re:Is it just me or has litigation gone crazy late by erroneus · · Score: 1

    Android is not a threat to Oracle.

  62. The Scorched Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You people that suggest that Apple is "worried" about Android are delusional.

    Apple has $76 Billion in cash.

    Let me repeat that for you Android Fanboys.

    $ 76 BILLION. More cash on hand than the US Government.

    The main competition for Apple isn't HTC or Via or Samsung. It's Microsoft. But you don't see them suing microsoft over tablets or anything else for that matter.

    They tried for years and finally agreed to disagree. A lot of lawyers got rich, and all our computer prices went up because of it.

    Apple is suing all these people for the same reason that Microsoft sues people weaker than they are:

    Because they believe in a scorched earth policy of doing business.

    Microsoft, Oracle, IBM, Apple . . . Litigation is just a tool, just like marketing and R&D.

    You beat the other guys any way you can, you don't worry to much about how much of a threat they really pose, you nuke them as soon as you see them on the horizon because that's just how it's done.

    1. Re:The Scorched Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The argument about having lots of cash is moot.

      Because you know what's better than a big heap of money? That's right, a bigger heap of money!

      And Android does make the growth rate of that money heap lower, so they've got every reason to worry about it.

    2. Re:The Scorched Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple nearly bankrupted before

      See how successful Apple was after they got rid of Jobs? See how revenue declined after he came back went up again and declined again?

      Nobody knows anything.

    3. Re:The Scorched Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fap fap fap...
      Now that Steve Jobs is no more there, the time has come for Apple to bite the dust again. Last time Microsoft rescued it, this time it will be Google. LOL.

    4. Re:The Scorched Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er no. Now that Jobs is gone the time has come for Apple to go from strength to strength as it did the last time he left.

  63. I WANT to like Apple by mcrbids · · Score: 0

    As I sit here, typing this on my Fedora 15 laptop, I have a Mac mini playing some Law n Order type show off Hulu. I really WANT to like Apple, the company that made a Unix O/S that appeals to the masses. But sadly, I just can't.

    With all the edicts about telling developers what they can and can't do on iPhones, (no flash) to only including ANCIENT copies of GNU utilities on MacOS, I smell loss of choice any time I give money to Apple. I was about to buy a Macbook Pro when Apple came out with their "no flash" edict... I bought a Dell Precision quad-core i7 that dual-boots Fedora/Windows instead.

    So my phone is a Droid2, my laptop is a Dell running FC 15 instead of a MacBook.

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    1. Re:I WANT to like Apple by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      to only including ANCIENT copies of GNU utilities on MacOS

      Blame the FSF for this. Apple includes the latest GPLv2 versions of utilities. In common with many other companies, they won't touch GPLv3 stuff. They're slowly replacing the old GPLv2 utilities with BSD alternatives, since the FSF decided to change the license for everything.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:I WANT to like Apple by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      only including ANCIENT copies of GNU utilities on MacOS

      Which Gnu utilities? A lot of the command line stuff stems from BSD and you do realise there is nothing to stop you from downloading and installing more recent versions of most of them.

      I was about to buy a Macbook Pro when Apple came out with their "no flash" edict...

      There's no "no Flash" edict applying to Apple's computers, only to their iOS devices.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    3. Re:I WANT to like Apple by CapuchinSeven · · Score: 1

      So my phone is a Droid2, my laptop is a Dell running FC 15 instead of a MacBook.

      And I bet flash runs shit on them both.

    4. Re:I WANT to like Apple by smash · · Score: 1

      no flash on iPhone is for the best. witness the renewed interest in html5 video.

      Recently bought a Quad core i7 2.2ghz macbook pro 15". It runs Windows. it runs OS X. It runs Linux or FreeBSD if i want. The hardware is not made of cheese, and I like OS X.

      GNU utilities are mostly shit anyway, as soon as Apple gets rid of most of the GNU crap from OS X and goes to full BSD user land the better. CLANG is a very good start.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    5. Re:I WANT to like Apple by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Apple simply doesn't ship Flash on their machines by default - in common with other OS makers - like it used to, because it keeps changing, so the customer might as well get the latest version from the outset, since they will likely have to download it anyway (whether to patch or install fresh), but this doesn't mean there is no Flash on OS X.

      They did the same think with the Java VM.

      Also, no flash on iOS has much more to do with performance than "telling people what to do" - Flash is enough of a dog on OS X (for entirely Adobe's reasons - don't believe all the buck-passing claiming it's to do with Apple "blocking" secret APIs and not giving Adobe access to the necessary software - it doesn't seem to affect any other developers who work with the same subsystems). It would be a disaster on iOS (which shares much of the same underlying code as OS X). It has got much better in recent releases - specifically the jump from Flash 10.0 to Flash 10.1 brought some big performance improvements, but it's still too much of a hog to work well on a mobile device that runs iOS (YMMV on different mobile OSes, but from general information, it's been very spotty - it's not a great performer when the device hardware power is limited).

      Regarding GNU tools, that's a GPLv2 vs v3 issue - any GPL software that is shipped is the latest v2 version, but they won't ship any v3. There's also plenty of BSD stuff on there, and of course nothing stopping you downloading anything you like regardless of what is shipped by default. Your argument sounds equivalent to me complaining that Ubuntu doesn't ship with the proprietary drivers for my wireless card and that I have to download them - it's not in Canonical's hands to ship them, but I can get them afterwards.

      Apple are by no means perfect, but your stated reasons for not liking them seem to be... questionable.

    6. Re:I WANT to like Apple by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      to only including ANCIENT copies of GNU utilities on MacOS

      Because something prevents you from downloading the latest code and compiling yourself when you need it? No wait, you can do exactly that, and I have.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    7. Re:I WANT to like Apple by MachineShedFred · · Score: 0

      He's probably one of the people that seem to think that Apple should be the only OS manufacturer that has to bundle Adobe's crapware with their install.

      Hint: no other OS or browser publisher does this either.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    8. Re:I WANT to like Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't understand you. Please take Steve Jobs' balls our of your mouth first. Thank you.

    9. Re:I WANT to like Apple by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      And yet everyone pretty much agrees that Flash is fucking awful on Android and feel free to replace any of those ancient utilities either by yourself or by going to one of the many sites with updated versions or even utilities not originally included.

    10. Re:I WANT to like Apple by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      Chrome does.

  64. Re:Is it just me or has litigation gone crazy late by Evtim · · Score: 1

    Question: what is 10000 lawyers on the bottom of the sea?
    Answer: a good start

  65. Re:Is it just me or has litigation gone crazy late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Android is not a threat to Oracle.

    That's never stopped those mothers from tightening the thumb screws and trying to expect blood from every stone.

  66. I think they did think that by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Americans are born with a great arrogance. Take MS and how certain it was that when it was gracious enough to offer an OS for mobile devices, the phone companies would come knocking at its door... and they didn't... HTC got their big break as a chosen partner (meaning MS payed them a shit load of money) to make for instance the XDA and HTC used that money to become an android phone maker...

    It seems MS at no point was capable of thinking that the entire world was NOT waiting at its feet to release its next bit of software. In fact it seems that MS just never understood, still doesn't, just how much bitter hatred it has generated in the world. Why do you think Nokia was opposed so long to use MS for all its phones? Why do you think the industry first embraced Symbian and now Android? Why do you think several phone makers are involved in Linux research? Because they prefer ANYTHING over dealing with MS exclusively.

    Apple seems to have fallen in the same trap. They believe they own the rectangle (look at a tablet and see how fucking similar it is to ANY monitor screen out there) and can't believe that anybody else might disagree with them. Believing they can own the market and therefor tell the market what to do (don't make tablets in their most logical form) they started to sue... and now they find the entire industry against them. Or do you think MS is going to be happy to have no minimal design tablets for Windows 8 out there? If Samsung can't produce Android tablets, it can't produce Windows 8 tablets either.

    And with so many enemies, one is sooner or later going to find something that sticks and Apple is going to be in deep shit. Because Apple doesn't have any safe cash cows generating money. Kill the iPhone and Apple is dead in the water. And with so many enemies, one of them will perfectly willing to finish it off.

    Unless they got some fiendishly clever plan I really can see the people at Apple going "Oh shit, what the fuck did we get ourselves into". If they weren't arrogant Americans. But they are, so they probably think they are not just going to win but that god is on their side.

    One of the problems Apple might have ignored is that asian companies are closely tied to their governments and each other. They cooperate a LOT more then in the west, even across borders.

    Apple didn't just piss off Samsung, it pissed off Asia.

    My bet is that within half a year, Apple will plead for mercy and offer a deal. Good chance it won't be taken.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  67. Anyone else wonder? by indeterminator · · Score: 1

    There seems to be a lot of patent lawsuits lately. But how do the companies find out someone is infringing their patents? Do they have engineering teams to take apart their competitors' products, and try to match to their patent portfolio? Or do they just look at the product specs and figure that they have patented the only way something could be done, so the other guys must be infringing?

  68. Re:OFFTOPIC: faster than neutrino all over the web by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I jumped the gun. I also mistake "spokesman" for "director".

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  69. One of my kids is an IT lawyer by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1

    I love Apple Computer.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  70. No, too many MBAs by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1

    If it was not for MBAs, there would be little need for corporate lawyers.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  71. Re:Is it just me or has litigation gone crazy late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Georgia is almost as good at killing innocent people as Texas!!!

  72. Re:Is it just me or has litigation gone crazy late by mcvos · · Score: 1

    There's a difference between launching a nuclear bomb to end WW2 and launching one in the middle of the Cuban missile crisis.

  73. Re:VIA doesn't have a vested interest, the CEO doe by mcvos · · Score: 1

    Yeah, they're not as evil as they used to be. Turns out evil was the only thing they were really good at.

  74. Re:Is it just me or has litigation gone crazy late by smash · · Score: 1

    That is just oracle standard operating procedure.

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  75. Legal stalling maneuvers by phorm · · Score: 1

    Indeed. While some people are just dying to buy the next iPhone without even knowing what it'll be, there are still a lot of people who still ask "which is better." I've heard plenty of salespeople expounding the power of the Galaxy S2 vs iPhone 4. Face it, the 4 is older and significantly behind the S2 in terms of most hardware. There's also some neat phones like the evo3d etc (not available here).

    Salespeople are going to gravitate towards pushing the highest-margin item that sells. By having the S2 banned, Apple has time to come up with a new phone that they can then sell as the newest and most expensive. It's no coincidence that the iPhone5 was being hyped up prior to *any* specs coming out, it's a way of trying to prevent people from buying "somebody else's phone" but instead waiting for apple. By killing off other choices using lawsuits - even for awhile - Apple can keep those other phone companies from taking away potential "next gen" iDevice sales...

  76. married CEO's by spidercoz · · Score: 1

    I've heard of corporations being in bed together but this is ridiculous are they dynastic too?

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall, re Voltaire
  77. Check the scoreboard, dumbass by Brannon · · Score: 1

    Apple has been destroying the free market and it isn't because other companies aren't able to release competitive products due to litigation.

  78. Too Funny For Words by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    This is just too funny for words to adequately express. Cluestick to Apple: Live by the patent lawsuit, die by the patent lawsuit.

    For everyone else, I'd rather see you compete by your innovation and pricing, rather than by your lawyers.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  79. Re:Is it just me or has litigation gone crazy late by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

    It seems during this economic downturn companies have started throwing caution to the wind in an attempt to ravenously feed on each others still warm carcasses. What you'll end up with is a period of heavily suppressed innovation and increasingly locked down and crippled devices, software and services no one will be willing to part with money for. It's all going to shit!

    Until a company actually sells something that is truly new and innovative... Then the ravens will be heard with echoing voices saying, "Hellloooooo? Helooooooooooo? Anybody want our awesome innovative products?? Guys? Helloooooooo? We innovated first! Dibs! Heloooooooowwww? ANYONE?"

    /humor... or is it?

  80. Re:VIA doesn't have a vested interest, the CEO doe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Must have enough of an interest for a lawsuit.

  81. Re:VIA doesn't have a vested interest, the CEO doe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The free market is about competition and Apple, with all their patent-trolling, is about as anti-competitive as they come.

    Fine, you have irrational iHate fever. Apple has proven to be the only competitor that can create new tech and markets. It has proven to be the only one the could last with, and now finally get the recognition, for aways outdoing the original copycats: Microsoft.

    But seriously, patent trolling? Do you even know what that means you child?

    A handful of Apple innovations in no particular order:
    - iPad
    - iWork for iPad
    - iPhone (redefined what a phone is -- EVERYONE ELSE IS STILL TRYING TO RIP IT OFF; APPLE IS FIGHTING BACK AGAINST BLATANT SLAVISH COPYING AND TRADING ON ITS GOODWILL)
    - Mac OS X (inc Cocoa, Dev Tools, Core Frameworks -- EVERY DESKTOP OS WISHES IT COULD BE OS X)
    - The Macintosh
    - The iMac
    - iLife
    - The iPod
    - iTunes
    - Mac Mini
    - Newton
    - Powerbook 100
    - The Apple II
    - Got rid of DRM on commercial music downloads

    Apple creates the best software and delivers it on the best hardware within well thought out constraints. Grow up dipshit--you are clearly not a software guy.