Slashdot Mirror


NASA Satellite Falls Back To Earth; Landfall in Canada

CNET, among many other sources, reports that the declining orbit of the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite has declined all the way; the satellite reentered and broke up in Earth's atmosphere last night, though the exact time, and thus location, of the reentry was unknown at the time. CNET quotes NASA's release, which says the satellite "fell back to Earth between 11:23 p.m. EDT Friday, Sept. 23, and 1:09 a.m. EDT Sept. 24." The Christian Science Monitor has a newer story, which reports that at least some debris from the satellite hit land in Okotoks, Canada, with no injuries. NASA's Science Office page on the satellite (not yet updated to account for the deorbit) says the satellite was launched in 1991, with a planned operational life of three years.

36 of 62 comments (clear)

  1. Poor Canada, they seem to keep getting hit by JoshuaZ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It seems that Canada is a falling satellite magnet. In 1977, a Soviet satellite fell in Canada also- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kosmos_954.although that one was probably much worse in terms of damage because Kosmos 954 had a nuclear reactor and some of that debris was radioactive. The only other really major fall where something fell on land was Skylab which fell over Australia. So Canada has managed to get 2/3 major falls that have hit land. That's pretty impressive. I think that Canada and the US are both members of the Space Liability Convention, which has provisions for fallen satellites, so if there's any actual damage from this, the US will need to pay Canada.

    1. Re:Poor Canada, they seem to keep getting hit by electron+sponge · · Score: 1

      IIRC Didn't NASA have to pay a fine for littering due to Skylab?

    2. Re:Poor Canada, they seem to keep getting hit by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Actually, it was paid. By the listeners of a radio show that donated the 400 bucks to help the struggling NASA.

      I can see why NASA didn't pay, avoiding to create a precedent for possibly higher claims, but it looks really badly if a reputable organization has to rely on donations to pay its litter bills...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Poor Canada, they seem to keep getting hit by sadness203 · · Score: 1

      That, or Canada is a really large country (Just before Russia), giving it better odds to be on the receiving end.

      Ok... it's probably ~2% of the total area of the Earth (or ~6.5% if we exclude ocean). (If my math are correct)

    4. Re:Poor Canada, they seem to keep getting hit by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      I can see why NASA didn't pay, avoiding to create a precedent for possibly higher claims, but it looks really badly if a reputable organization has to rely on donations to pay its litter bills...

      Yes indeed, littering can be a problem.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re:Poor Canada, they seem to keep getting hit by Zoxed · · Score: 1

      You forgot to list that Russian dude crash landing there a few months ago.
      IIRC there was a documentary about it.

  2. I guess Calgary dodged a bullet!!! by alexschmidt · · Score: 1

    Calgary, a city of a million+ people is only a few kilometers from Okotoks!! I better turn on the TV!

  3. Not Canada... ocean west of Australia? by Corporate+Drone · · Score: 2

    ABC and Fox News are now reporting that, although it may have started breaking up over Calgary, it seems that it went down in the ocean west of Australia. Guess we're gonna have to wait and see...

    --
    mmm... yeah... You see, we're putting the cover sheets on all TPS reports now before they go out...
    1. Re:Not Canada... ocean west of Australia? by Capt.Albatross · · Score: 1

      The quoted uncertainty, ~90min, is about enough for one complete orbit, depending on its eccentricity.

    2. Re:Not Canada... ocean west of Australia? by PPH · · Score: 1

      Canada? Australia?

      Given the involvement of ex-British colonies, I'd say this is all an MI-6 covert operation.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:Not Canada... ocean west of Australia? by shking · · Score: 1

      Okotoks is just outside of Calgary, Canada's 6 sixth biggest city. Glad to hear the debris hit the ocean instead

      --
      -- "At Microsoft, quality is job 1.1" -- PC Magazine, Nov. 1994
  4. I shot a rocket into the air by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 1

    I shot a rocket into the air,
    It fell to earth, I knew not where
    Until next day, with rage profound,
    The man it fell on came around.
    In less time than it takes to tell,
    He showed me where that rocket fell;
    And now I do not greatly care
    To shoot more rockets in the air.

    (Tom Masson, 1866-1943)

    1. Re:I shot a rocket into the air by sconeu · · Score: 1

      We shot a rocket in the air
      We fear it fell to earth somewhere
      Though we were aiming for the moon
      Red China claims we hit Kowloon

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:I shot a rocket into the air by mmontour · · Score: 1

      "Once the rockets are up, who cares where they come down?
      That's not my department," says Wernher von Braun.

  5. Re:I know it's hard to calculate, but come on... by belthize · · Score: 3, Informative

    Maybe you should pass your real time updated upper atmosphere model on to them. The time from when the satellite hit the upper atmosphere to when it hits the ground is measured in minutes not many 10's of minutes or hours. With it tumbling and no longer transmitting there's no way to accurately state it's altitude even if you did have a real time upper atmosphere model. There's simply no way to inform people in real time because there's no way to know in real time. Even if you constantly updated it by the time the info was passed on that entry had occurred it would already be on the ground (or darn soon afterward).

  6. Vulcan by Maglos · · Score: 2

    Maybe this is a *CRAZY* conspiracy theory but I think NASA was trying to take out the Enterprise in nearby Vulcan. http://www.vulcantourism.com/about-vulcan-albertas-star-ship-fx6-1995-a.html

    1. Re:Vulcan by tqk · · Score: 1

      Maybe this is a *CRAZY* conspiracy theory but I think NASA was trying to take out the Enterprise in nearby Vulcan.

      Maybe this is a *CRAZY* conspiracy theory?

      No, NASA doesn't need to help with that. The town of Vulcan's mayor's trying to kill every connection between the town and ST. Killjoy.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
  7. Okotoks Video A Hoax by jaa101 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Christian Science Monitor appears to have been taken in by the hoax posting of a video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2OfWgu5jk5g) supposedly showing reentry near Okotoks. Looks like the video was posted too early to be legit. UARS is definitely down but nobody seems to know exactly where yet.

    1. Re:Okotoks Video A Hoax by eddy+the+lip · · Score: 1

      I live in Okotoks and can confirm that it is still here.

      I am sad that this is likely a hoax. For a moment I thought I was actually close to such an event!

      --

      This is the voice of World Control. I bring you Peace.

    2. Re:Okotoks Video A Hoax by khallow · · Score: 1

      I'm disappointed. Hopefully, NASA will have better luck next time.

  8. Re:I know it's hard to calculate, but come on... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Are you suggesting that the GP doesn't actually have a working prediction model of the Sun's activity and its interaction with Earth's atmosphere? Why, that would mean he's just talking out his uars.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  9. Video of Re-entry by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    is here. Not the best camera in the world (I think he said iPhone) but it clearly captures the break-up and large pieces burning.

    As of now, YouTube is significantly ahead of NASA and Air Force intelligence (it has a much larger workforce).

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Video of Re-entry by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Clearly captures

      I don't think those words mean what you think they mean.

      If I look at it in full screen I see something that could be a satellite disintegration but could also be a plane running into some clouds or some confused fireflies.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Video of Re-entry by isorox · · Score: 1

      is here. Not the best camera in the world (I think he said iPhone) but it clearly captures the break-up and large pieces burning.

      As of now, YouTube is significantly ahead of NASA and Air Force intelligence (it has a much larger workforce).

      And much less reliable workforce. First to news does not mean it's right, which is why we still need a professional news media, not a bunch of yahoos with cameras.

  10. If a satellite falls... by gstrickler · · Score: 1

    ...in a forest in Canada, does anybody notice?

    --
    make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
    1. Re:If a satellite falls... by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

      Which forest ?

  11. Real life imitates art? by macraig · · Score: 1

    Anyone familiar with the Pioneer One indie series? If the RCMP happens to find a cosmonaut inside what's left of that satellite, it's time to be worried!

  12. Whiplash, I tell ya! by macraig · · Score: 1

    Space Liability Convention, which has provisions for fallen satellites, so if there's any actual damage from this, the US will need to pay Canada.

    Great, so now we'll have a bunch of Canucks wearing neck braces walking with limps lining up in court hoping for a windfall?

  13. Re:I know it's hard to calculate, but come on... by Solandri · · Score: 1

    It's moving at 4-5 miles per second. If you can predict the time of reentry of an umpowered, tumbling, oddly shaped object to within 30 minutes, you've narrowed down its impact area to all of 7200-9000 miles. Or roughly 1/3rd of the way around the earth. Even narrowing it down to 5 minutes results in a 1200-1500 mile uncertainty.

  14. Re:Kerbal Space Program by Kagura · · Score: 1

    Nope. The Canada landfall story turned out to be a hoax. It landed in the Pacific between Hawaii and the west coast of the US, according to STRATCOM. See here.

  15. Weird by WillRobinson · · Score: 1

    I been watching the decent on a app on my phone, currently it shows it a altitude of 135 km. I was watching it since Friday when it was at 180 km. Was going to try and watch if when it hits 100 to 120 and see how fast it decelerated. Guess its not a real time app. (Satellite Tracker 1.5) I tried to see it last night when it was passing within view between 8:17 and 8:24 pm. But alas was not able to see it.

  16. Re:The age of personal empowerment. by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

    The scary part was 70% Off topic and 30% Interesting. That means a lot of people with mod points don't like guns. :) And there are a few people with mod points that can see past the rhetoric. (Or like guns) But do not be impressed with my predicting lunacy. Lunacy is easy to predict.

  17. Re:The age of personal empowerment. by moortak · · Score: 1

    Arizona, Alabama, and Michigan are just three of the states that have had mass casualty incidents and legal concealed carry. If you're going to say concealed carry has kept you from having another mass casualty incident you'll need a bit more data. Right now it sounds more like a rock that wards off tigers.

    --
    Xavier Rabourdin for president 2012
  18. The earth is flat and ends just on border of US by SergeyKurdakov · · Score: 1

    What is interesting that for authors of the article from CSM( quote: The 6-ton UARS satellite — the biggest piece of space debris to fall from the sky since Sky Lab in 1979 ) the deorbited Mir station http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mir_space_station has never existed - because only Skylab and this satellite existed as space debris.

  19. We can track ICBMs but not a crashing satellite? by BenJCarter · · Score: 1

    Paranoid? Or not paranoid enough?

    --
    For in politics, as in religion, it is equally absurd to aim at making proselytes by fire and sword. - Publius
  20. What is? by yesung · · Score: 1

    A young document of which clutter in the gotten recently deorbited UARS satellite tv on pc acquired UARS gotten inside Canada can have recently been un controlled. Apparently, Canada the image associated with whenever (and thus where) this satellite television deorbited has returned so that you can being apparent while magnetic. Possibly, says NASA, the actual dirt clutter should never be NASA observed, early nonetheless can be thought to include gotten inside Gulf of mexico. When you are a good optimist thinking about discovering your special piece of space clutter, however, you could be keen on this particular road depending on numerous re-entry cases (hat word of advice for you to Robert Woodcock); within the Ough.S., this Nor'-west is the best best option.

    --
    Title:Exciting wholesale Jordan shoes for wedding